ML20065P533
| ML20065P533 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinch River |
| Issue date: | 10/21/1982 |
| From: | Longenecker J ENERGY, DEPT. OF |
| To: | Check P Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| HQ:S:82:114, NUDOCS 8210260168 | |
| Download: ML20065P533 (38) | |
Text
-
Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20545 Docket No. 50-537 HQ:S:82:ll4 OCT 211982 Mr. Paul S. Check, Director CRBR Program Office Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555
Dear Mr. Check:
CONTROL ROOM PHILOSOPHY EXCHANGE MEETING, OCTOBER 19, 1982 On October 19, 1982, the Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant (CRBRP) project met with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to describe the CRBRP control room design philosophy and approach. Enclosure 1 to this letter is a list of attendees, Enclosure 2 is a copy of all the handouts from the meeting, and Enclosure 3 is the action items resulting from the meeting. If there are any questions, please call A. Meller (FTS 626-6355) of the CRBRP Project Office.
Si cerely,
/
John R. Longenecker vv i
Acting Director, Of ice of the l Clinch River Breeder Reactor l Plant Project Office of Nuclear Energy Enclost es l cc: Service List
! Standard Distribution Licensing Distribution
\
I QO0
~ ~'
8210260168 821021 PDR ADOCK 05000537 h PDR
. ENCLOSURE 1 CRBR CONTROL ROOM WORKING MEETING OCTOBER 19,1982 LIST OF ATTENDEES Richard Stark NRR CRBRPO Robert J. Schemel NRR HFEB S. H. Weiss NRR HFEB Mark Greenberg NRR HFEB Lisamarie Lazo NRR HFEB Neil W. Brown GE(WLLCO)
Peter J. Gross DOE CRBRP-P0 Joel J. Kramer NRR DHFS Dave Elias CRBRP-PO C. H. Fox CRBRPO George Clare Westinghouse-Oak Ridge Bob Rosecky CRBRP-PO Al Meller CRBRP-PO Don Florek CRBRP-PO
.Tohn Longenecker DOE Voss Moore HFEB/ Chief l
l 1
l l
l i
- ~
CRBRP CONTROL ROOM ,
e
=
! BRIEFING FOR -
I NUCLEAR REGULATORY l COMMISSION .
CRBRP PROGRAM OFFICE l
4 OCTOBER 19,1982 90 02 1333 34
,j i
BRIEFING ON.
CBRRP CONTROL ROOM DESIGN i
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i CRBRP PROGRAM OFFICE BETHESDA, MARYLAND
!- OCTOBER 19,1982 i AGENDA
- INTRODUCTION C. FOX ,
- CONTROL ROOM DESIGN-AN OVERVIEW P. PLANCHON
- CONTROL ROOM DESIGN P. PLANCHON
- OPERATOR RESPONSE TINiE J.COX
- ALARM LOGIC '
- SYMPTOMATIC PROCEDURE DARK PANELS
- CONTROL ROOM ACCESS
- DISCUSSIONS P. PLANCHON
- NUREG 0718 ITEMS
- FUTURE MEETINGS
. , m _. , p
j .
INTRODUCTION ,L i .
l OBJECTIVES ,
- PRESENT CRBRP CONTROL ROOM DESIGN BASIS AND PHILOSOPHY j
- O.BTAIN NRC ENDORSEMENT OF CRBRP APPROACH
! ~ l TOWARDS CONTROL ROOM DESIGN
- dBTAIN PROMPT IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION ,
<. OF ANY MAJOR ISSUES ~ CONCERNING CONTROL '
ROOM DESIGN .
! - IMPACT ON MAIN CONTROL' ROOM PANEL I
PROCUREMENT
- IMPACT ON SIMULATOR DESIGN AND PROCUREMENT
- SIGNIFICANT CHANGES MAY PLACE THE DESIGN OF THE MAIN CONTROL PANEL ON THE CRITICAL PATH .
- IDENTIFY ADDITIONAL MEETINGS WITH STAFF REGARDING CRBRP CONTROL ROOM
- CONTROL ROOM MOCK-UP, OAK RIDGE I .. ., _ ,
~
CRBRP CONTROL ' ROOM
! DESIGN-OVERVIEW BRIEFING FOR M NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l
CRBRP PROGRAM OFFICE l PRESENTED BY .
H. P. PLANCHON MANAGER, PLANT SYSTEMS AND SAFETY-RELATED DESIGNS
, WESTINGHOUSE-OR CRBRP PROJECT
- J.J.COX COGNIZANT ENGINEER .
PLANT CONTROL SYSTEM WESTINGHOUSE-OR ' '
CRBRP PROJECT
'"~~~
-. ~
OVERVIEW .
- DESIGN PHILOSOPHY COMMAND AND CONTROL i 'OF OPERATIONS RELIABILITY
- PROGRESSIVE DESIGN PROCESS
- CONTROL ROOM REVIEW l
- STATUS /
SUMMARY
/ CONCLUSIONS l
1 10 82 3033 33
~
CRBRP CONTROL ROOM PHILOSOPHY
- COMMAND AND CONTROL OF OPERATIONS
- COMMAND, SUPERVISOR
- CONTROL, UNIT OPERATOR
- MAXIMUM RELIABILITY OF SAFETY CONTROLS AND l INDICATIONS
- SAFETY FUNCTIONS - AUTOMATIC
- OPERATOR ACTIONS - MONITORS PERFORMANCE, CARRIES OUT CONTINGENCY ACTIONS 4
~
COMMAND AND CONTROL OF OPERATIONS .
- PROVIDE THE CONTROL ROOM SUPERVISOR WITH INFORMATION THAT WILL SUPPORT COGNITIVE BEHAVIOR
- PROVIDE CONTROL ROOM OPERATORS WITH INFORMATION AND CONTROLS THAT WILL SUPPORT RULE AND SKILL BASED BEHAVIOR l _
- TO ACHIEVE THE ABOVE PROVIDE A STATE-OF-THE-ART COMPUTER SYSTEM TO ENHANCE COGNITIVE FUNCTIONS OF THE SUPERVISOR PROVIDE CONTROL ROOM AND CONTROL PANELS LAYOUT WHICH EMPHASIZES MAN-
- MACHINE INTERFACE CONSIDERATIONS .
10 82 3036 4
RELIABILITY .
- PLANT PROTECTION SYSTEM ,
HIGHLY RELIABLE DESIGN EXTENSIVE HARDWARE TEST PROGRAM .
- ACCIDENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION CATEGORY 1 INSTRUMENTS ARE REDUNDANT, CLASS 1E, SEISMIC, ENVIRONMENTALLY QUA.LIFIED, INTEGRATED INTO THE VIEWING AREA OF THE OPERATOR
- OTHER CONTROL SYSTEMS UTILIZE MODERN EQUIPMENT PROVEN IN COMMERCIAL APPLICATION 10 02 1336 S
,, MAIN SHIFT M M ENGINEERS o0 OFFICE 4 E .
=
(hg -
- 0<
LIMITED $
ACCESS SUPERVISORS DOOR l
_b,:,,_
COMMAND STATION f m E3 >
H o m ~~ m.
Ho E gj ,
- !! 55 I i i B8 m -
I' z
i "E
<a ~
5:2 o za I E
$ ELECTRICAL PANELS
@O
~E h\\\1 COMPUTER OUTPUT TERMINAL 10 82 30M 3
i l
1 l
l e
. 9 h
c
~
l m,...-
J . L. # 1 c
,, ., 7- g gi;;.!4 4 ; G "."{.
~ja l
,, ..h :
f _.f{w. ,'. '
., t. ..
a
$5;' ' DT:'
.- 3.~.
.4- -
,,.~ -
C
A DELIBERATE AND PROGRESSIVE DESIGN .
BEFORE TMI AFTER TMl FUTURE PLANS
- WESTINGHOUSE R&D AND
- EXTENSIVE CONTROL
- MAINTAIN HUMAN CORPORATE DESIGN ROOM REVIEW FACTORS CONTROL HUMAN FACTOR . ENGINEERED CONTROL OVER ALL CHANGES TO FERSONNEL INVOLVED ROOM LAYOUT TO THE CONTROL ROOM
- ORNL HUMAN FACTORS SUPPORT SUPERVISOR
- USE CONTROL ROOOM -
PERSONNEL INVOLVED AND OPERATOR MOCKUP AND FUNCTIONS WORKING MODEL OF
- INTERACTION WITH EPRI COMPUTER FOR ON MAIN CONTROL PANEL
- OPTIMlZED MAIN CONTROL PANEL HUMAN FACTORS DESIGN EVALUATIONS
- HALF SCALE MODEL BUILT ARRANGEMENT FROM A HUMAN FACTORS
- UTILIZE SIMULATOR AS -
- FULL SCALE MODEL BUILT VIEWPOINT IT PROGRESSES
- ITEMS OF SIGNIFICANCE
- ENHANCED COMPUTER
- OVERVIEW SHAPE OF ABILITY TO ASSIST ORMERATOR SUPPORTS SUP RVISOR AND OPERATOR FUNCTIONS
- VERTICAL "K-FRAME,,
- UTILIZED LATEST NRC GUIDANCE (PRIOR TO .
PANELS
- ENERGY FLOW LAYOUTS
- MODERN HARDWARE UTILIZED
- PROVIDE PLANT COMPUTER
! A DELIBERATE AND PROGRESSIVC DESIGN CONCLUSIONS
- CRBRP CONTROL ROOM PRIOR TO TMI INCORPORATED "MANY HUMAN FACTORS i CONSIDERATIONS
- FOLLOWING TMI EXTENSIVE DETAILED
- ANALYSIS ON THE CONTROL ROOM WAS ~
PERFORMED RESULTING IN FURTHER ENHANCING OF THE MAN-MACHINE INTERFACE
'
- FUTURE DESIGN CHANGES IN THE CONTROL ROOM WILL BE REVIEWED WITH RESPECT I TO HUMAN FACTORS CONSIDERATIONS
l -
CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW ~
LSTARTED OCTOBER 1979, ENDED JUNE,1980? .
I l
- TOP PROJECT MANAGEMENT ESTABLISHED CHARTER I
- REVIEW TEAM SELECTED FROM WIDE RANGE OF l BACKGROUNDS (23 MEMBERS, 6-9 MONTHS) l COMMERCIALLY LICENSED OPERATORS OF LIGHT l WATER PLANTS ~
OPERATORS WITH SODIUM PLANT EXPERIENCE PERSONNEL EXPERIENCED IN NUCLEAR PLANT DESIGN / ANALYSIS, OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE, TESTING, TRAINING PERSONNEL WITH HUMAN FACTORS, BACKGROUNDS
- INSIDE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY-DRS. LEW HANES, DAVE WOODS, WESTINGHOUSE DR. SHARON ECKERT, EPRI REPORT -
OU i S!DE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY-DRS. JOHN SNIDER, JOHN HUNGERFORD, UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE
CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW (CONT.) -
- METHODOLOGY ESTABLISHED TEAM MEMBERS RECEIVED SPECIAL HUMAN FACTORS TRAINING .
l ,
UTILIZED TVA SIMULATORS UP-FRONT ANALYSIS OTHER KEY SYSTEM REVIEW RESULTS RELATED TO CONTROL ROOM DESIGN WERE REVIEWED CONDUCTED EVALUATIONS IN FULL SCALE MOCKUP RECOMMENDATIONS ASSESSED AND IMPLEMENTED
- DESIGN MODIFIED AS REQUIRED i
STATUS /
SUMMARY
/ CONCLUSIONS ~
~
STATUS OF CONTROL ROOM l
AND RELATED SYSTEMS
- SIMULATOR
- MAIN CONTROL PANEL
- COMPUTER i
SUMMARY
OF CONTROL ROOM -
l
- DESIGNED TO COMMAND AND CONTROL OPERATIONS IN A RELIABLE WAY CONCLUSION .
- CONTROL ROOM DESIGN IS -
FELT TO BE APPROPRIATE FOR CRBRP
J CRBRP CONTROL ROOM ~
DESIGN '
l BRIEFING FOR emus -
i NUCLEAR REGULATORY -
l COMMISSION CRBRP PROGRAM OFFICE PRESENTED BY H.P.PLANCHON MANAGER, PLANT SYSTEMS AND SAFETY-RELATED DESIGNS WESTINGHOUSE-OR CRBRP PROJECT J. J. COX COGNIZANT ENGINEER PLANT CONTROL SYSTEM WESTINGHOUSE-OR CRBRP PROJECT 10 82 0336 38
. CRBRP CONTROL ROOM .
e i
- CONTROL ROOM DESIGN '
! MODERNIZATION! HUMAN FACTORS l
'
- OPERATOR RESPONSE
- HALO
- SYMPTOM VERSUS EVENT LOGIC i
- DARK PANELS l
- CASHIER'S WINDOW 4
1002 1936 9
~
i RECENT ENHANCEMENT OF CONTROL i
ROOM CAPABILITY (COMPUTER RELATED)
~
- ACCIDENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTS FUNCTION BASED RELIABILITY j
COMPUTER FUNCTIONS
- SAFETY PARAMETER DISPLAY SYSTEM WILL PROVIDE SAFETY STATUS OF PLANT ~
DETECT ABNORMAL CONDITIONS PROVIDED BY PLANT COMPUTER SYSTEM
- INOPERABLE SYSTEMS MONITORING ,
INDICATION OF BYPASS OR INOPERABLE STATUS AUTOMATIC PROVIDED BY PLANT COMPUTER
- EMERGENCY REPONSE DA.TA SYSTEM PROVIDED BY PLANT COMPlJTER SYSTEM CONSISTENT WITH ACCIDENT MONITORING DATA SET to02I336to
PLANT COMPUTER CHARACTERISTICS ,
'l
- FUNCTIONS {
DATA RECORDING
- TREND
- HISTORICAL
- ALARMING
- OUT-OF-LIMIT
- INTER-CHANNEL COMPARISON
- VALIDITY ~
- PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS INFORMATION DISPLAY
- LINE PRINTERS
- TYPERS
- PLOTTER
- SIGNIFICANT HARDWARE FEATURES ,
- > SK INPUTS EXPANDABILITY 4
FLEXIBILITY
- DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING -
- REDUNDANT HARDWARE FEATURES
- STATUS-ON ORDER, PARTS BEING DELIVERED 10 82 3036 11
EMPHASIS ON MAN-MACHINE INTERFACE i
CONTROL ROOM LAYOUT
- SUPERVISOR HAS OVERVIEW OF OPERATING AREA
- LAYOUT IS IN ENERGY FLOW SEQUENCE
- SAFETY FUNCTIONS ARE CLUSTERED
- GROUPING OF ENVIRONMENTAL TYPE PANELS
- GROUPING OF ELECTRICAL PANELS
- LIMITED ACCESS l
l I 10 02 ID36 6
l MAIN CONTROL PANEL ENERGY FLOW '
SEQUENCE .
HEAT FUNCTION GENERATION HEAT REMOVAL INDICATION REACTOR PRIMARY INTERMEDIATE HEAT SINK LOOP LOOP FLUX FLOW FLOW STEAM DRUM LEVEL ROD TEMPERATURES TEMPERATUr.2S PRESSURE POSITION AFW FLOW I
to 02 0236 23
O O
CLUSTERING OF SAFETY FUNCTIONS
~
PRIMARY STEAM REACTOR AND GENERATOR CONTAINMENT SHUTDOWN INTERMEDIATE AUXILIARY ISOLATION SYSTEM COOLING HEAT LOOPS REMOVAL i
e 10 82 3333 30
- n w -
.- --r ..
- .u --
3 $;Kk ,$ .. T- m WG :Sg,. y' ~. ,.q.:a . 4, . L Q ~ j m_
,. ~ '
kt =
~
.%a 8.b,L ia
- , n. &. .*o*g
> :. ,: ,;.+=
., .m Js+
4 e, v ; .=55 , 4 1... .,,.
j- ,
,. , :C, . _
x ., -.h.f- .
<> i
- k. .--.
, +_:
W y.
s.
,7.4. %,,%
. ;s -
. , .k i
g.
s y.-- gi..s+ .
- * ;,g . ,
.V '7 AD*D W.* f4.- -=5: r*
e ,
y .. ... "'f. .? <.q-,
~
.g...., .
I
.h*r* .
^' - .I,. ah 4 h ,. $ ,', l $'y' R h .(l' f k; Y. . z, 4;
,=l .. ,& ,
. ,; Si, == ; M
$!y,:; ..m:., .:5,-,u $. % g. 'C t ' i:n: ..~ -., _~ :i :: ==
'c, ffhc
- v ,.
i , . . , * . =. .
ji . , . . . _ '==j n.,
.r.
-;~; ,9. #.
c x'%y =k===
- 5.s,4 -
. ;q:jK
'. .--- 1
')
==
5,(p%y,[, :y],r, m .
. T.O y,' i
?j.'f =
_.' . . ,C
...n,Q.n .y, ..w
. '= _,[
.!.fg' -
- ~:*...: .4:. .a.~.9.;G .: .s
.~c =- - .. - - ,
w.. OD --
DOE i ~
. ,3 .
e
': G -:;.v = 0EE ' .. ' 9.w
.B "i.' DEE .N h.w;'i'f:jlY i 2 i _
ts -.
- ,y,e .
_~ CEoao .
ew ~
QY"$ DEEDo . ~ $1 .
f.y y3 : .
000Do -
KID (f . _._ q -
.j .
- i ' .
.f . .
A;h.3 p
,, ,, i ::= t .
. .; " .e
... .e L
.; Q. 2}?,
g
~
- 9. e ? 8 .k; x:r}4
.%ti
..s J.V#.
_~ s.rw.u.,,. w., ,
- m. ..A ' Li g M...
m
.o s
' ' .. m. a u .g a% ,a , ,I dg y 5 x\
, /,j. g #r }C- . '
j
== d g,/. .
e- a geo
- h
'ga t yx g%: l 5.g p'0 i pY
^
j .
, 4 .
x% . , a w,-----
1 1
-l
- 1~
[M~~~ _ >.lj/,.-a l , 1 t'! - i:-
- t. ,
i -s - . -
; y =Q i - .1 l t
.,Qlg- l
'~- * - k. m "W qa f - , y~," i-}'..' -'_ ,
l
,7 .' .~M.
_)_ .,t, (Ni%.' . i l s.<.' ) i li,] { O
- ~ r,_ :-- - l j 1
sp -
-- ,7 eg i, _ ,
.i -
,1 .___.N,.=--- { . _- . -
[ , l *
',h .;: .,
1.V,, * - ~ -i
'tSfF.? ',.. ' % g- p ~~_. .. _ . . , , -l .
)
-Q:u a ,
_ =- q -- n _ t ,
' cf}Q Ii s'. s t EM,a- l,f =
J l
.. .;. ' V.
.'=
- , _ a _-
.<: 'p?.y Q{= g jh)=; ' -
4' O,n =
. . . v 1 s n v' . . c' . _
;i k.
J .
- ~"_. A.'
--_ g[b_ h.g ' ,._
el. .. _ _
- . . 3
. 2. .- ; u = -
3 -
. .; .. , , :t, u..
_m g
~
.g'i T1J 5
, i .. .
~
. I
-j
- +
, ;Q,,
' ~'
l . m
,9_
[. ) . 'U- 5j d 3 .m.i _ __ k '
~{
. ,f.'. , ' : , J s 4, a: a a . O $M, ('.Q .,.
, ,a.a,as '
l t% ty;. ., , ; , - s ,
- . c;,
,r a, ,
' 5'
. l -fk
;4
$. 5..fj. i,l = ,
< . 7 ., _rM,'(.' -
. h. , ;
- r. -*
- l. --
- ' .= ' a g;,,, ,%3 l
-_ ' ~ ' -
. , . 3,
.. jt.y.v ..
i
. 3 i (. ': -
gg[go5 1 :s: . .g ....
= , L's
- c_ =1 w (. , -t. ..
= , 4
~
# i' I L
%, k th . e. -; 9 .
L .22 c. , %c m
,h ,_% MN i4 cs - $ $5,..g.
g-. c . a tg.. _ y 3 m ie .
. l
{ , 4 r. l i.*%. 1
.-::g
m
>. ;.f:' e M l i
.' . .:tW 2
' '~ J 1t ,p> ...t e.s ? t' - [>d I ! .: .sT. - *k;-
I
,, ?. $s g ):,
Q %*.
.l< I- .
.O}$
* - , - .c k.1'?x${Af[.
by. .:n. W .b Jr- l = .
-Q '
. , , .I
,h . j== g ~
xx=w. . m: ~
, a
>. :.3'l l .8.A
.l, U8 3p / p .'inf 's.' .;e.' .
p '{ i .[*,,"!?. 4.' , e
' '~- "a ,j . s. ,1 ' 'p)= ~hg ' j;)s ;.
t.'!*'. .t
~.
ca; .;
,k ' ;'
- i .-fj ." , ,. ,
. ~.. Jp.fy8./M* p .: . 7.-
'h
*T.r3 W
.., h'L. t ' ': = 'l
= .+.t..'
- ;e::.
.MwQs. .c,,v;,.g, "4
'.fp,
- d. 93 f ..-
J
.h;i.,.'M y ep?. . w !.3 ..?-g
.P.'.3 J';t h . .
i
.A E$'..*.- * - ,e e : ;,.,t.g ,, . .y'3, <
*g . . . l ., .
,* n :,. %; 4. -;;,
j .l, g, . ~ C '.'. ,;.. i.: =:...p ::.b' .
,;f .y. * -
~ %. . 4.. ,
'..;. 3 V.Us. '.'
t i
.L ?.;-':l..;7*. /q n l .: -
l Y
* .';i
*'a ::. s*:. ',.
I , ..[
- u.
. " : , * ' r ,.
*.. . N
.~
f;;i ' *l:!.*.;,hl*;i. $s i.. a;
'*r
.g.
?.' .. ';,.'g'. .' i;~ ;; ,:*... ':,: &
y.,, . , '
.,;;._a
. , '_ . . c .,,. . .. '.':y: ,.
'{. . l,1 y .
,*r ,_
}':g. j' y;.M ...'.._ :
.,,s . . ,
. ~ .-:.y-:. ....?n u.y
..+>;
) Q. . .. . . .
- i :s? .; .4;;:7. s .
; _. .,ed:- .isa
\
;; .;q%.g::,a .p r .o)
, . ..: ., 4:
- w. ' 7.." .
,'
- i<-8k.S
- r. . . f.
t ..-i. .
* ., .r '
.<.' < l,y;.,. .
...l
j :t. ' : W..']' e $ M:': %%
.%m..:.ln.M.?g~. n :y .
.w
[ -
- '.;.,: hW' ' . :: ,-
. . c MNp
{;,..i$.a.:a.w.p
~
- I .
O.i,Q. 1,. - ll.,~- --
=. .
#. u w y e,:. a
==
. .u. .
,R.;.7 ,
- c w- ya,,..:.w,n .a.t w-
= .
.+
y - o s . n; a,>.y
- v :. ,
~
. ;M.....t. n.m:g .3. ,'w. y .w-ei- .
e a =. i;;?.c,.;u u r.:.. . r< ,:: , .
.=
'.:cau
_.- . . g.a:gg. .a g:,e. ., .. . } j..;Q@../..Q. . .?p?.{ v
. a. . . ,.
. ..n " .;~ t
= .
.f,p,.,j: *
.rA.r[...y.M.3..
P.8 . tr
. . i*G...
n'
*/f bh, ,t' [1l :e
.$. t.r.- gU. +M 8
,vi 4
.N ,.
/. ,., &
g ,' - n p*
@ /
- _H" :
i ).:4:tm%[&: v c, . A
.it$.. n' Wg. .g,i,
?s' i. y .W a: . .c~ .
[el[s .. 4.u.v..yi.b
'. :' h. . -
- m .. . ..
,u : -(.w p_ n i:q' uru p.1.M.:.n%.
.r' =
,.. = .R . I u e a ru - ..+< . a .4 . . .wb v.- .
e a .
' n.7 . , ..
N. p ry.;-p: . g ,/
,' .'i '% 4 .2.%?.:2 ~.
m. M - .o 1 , 7 ".; ;i -- as L- &' .g 3 I&.~ikQ ys.;g;.w k
% L.; . 8
't - t, 9 f* y N(n
' 4
+
x.. ,.
.t
.T
- t ..
.k.:.i.q:o
. w:. ;g p .
h p.x R y .
. hla . ,r %
~.g.
- .~ %f v
k* ki;-g
." k,. ,.~.am..-
c;
- 6:in,a
EMPHASIS ON MAN-MACHINE INTERFACE ~ (CONT.) ~ CONTROL PANELS I
- NORMAL AND EMERGENCY OPERATIONS ARE PERFORMED FROM SAME LOCATION
- IMPORTANT PARAMETERS ARE LOCATED AT EYE LEVEL
- LAYOUT IS IN ENERGY FLOW SEQUENCE
- PROCESS CONTROLS ARE LOGICALLY CLUSTERED
- HUMAN FACTORS CONSIDERATIONS ARE INCORPORATED AUDITORY TACTILE ,
VISUAL
- SHAPES
- COLORS
- MIMICS CONSISTENT NOMENCLATURE to02 3016 7
ADVANCED CONTROL ROOMS PANEL o SUPERVISORS $ A COMMAND l STATION d ( I m ho _ N 8 d I ENVIRONMENTAL PANELS l I I I III i 1
.ul W w OVERVIEW TYPE STANDBY AUXILIARY
-lNFORMATION -CONTROL MET CONSOLE ELECTRICAL PANEL PANEL PANEL if BALANCE OF PLANT PANEL if SUPER.
DESK MONIT. PANEL - -* i I DG , REACTOR CORE N I COOLING BENCH BOARD COCKPIT TYPE 1
,a em u n ,s
ASSESSMENT OF OVERVIEW TYPE . CONTROL ROOM .
- SUPPORT FOR SUPERVISOR
- ENGINEERED IN _
IN COGNITIVE MODE
- SUPPORT FOR OPERATOR IN
- ENGINEERED IN RULE AND SKILL BASED MODE
- OPERATION OF SAFETY OPERATED IN SAME MANNER SYSTEMS AS DURING NORMAL OPERATION
- RELIABILITY
- ENGINEERED INTO NORMAL OPERATING PANELS AS PART OF DESIGN
- MODERN E'QUIPMENT IS USED WHICH HAS LARGE OPERATIONS OR TEST HISTORY
= DENSITY OF CONTROLS MEETS IEEE 384 BY INCORPORATING THE SEPARATION INTO NORMAL OPERATING PANELS
...,m.,,
~
ASSESSMENT OF OVERVIEW TYPE CONTROL ROOM (CONT.)
~
l
- INTEGRATED SPDS AND ERF TOTALLY INCORPORATED
+ FLEXIBILITY i (INCORPORATE NEW OPERATING SCHEMES)
- - INFORMATION a COMPUTER SYSTEM HAS -
ADD ON CAPABILITY FOR HARDWARE, AND PROGRAM
- FLEXIBIL!TY FOR SOFTWARE
- CONTROLS
- PLACEMENT OF SAFETY
! CONTROLS ON PANEL COULD AFFECT DESIGN
- DIVERSITY IN TASKS
- REQUIRES PHYSICAL WHOLE BODY MOVEMENTS
- VIEWING TARGETS ARE OF DIFFERENT MAGNITUDE, COLOR, SHAPE 10 02 ID3610
SCHEDULE .
- FINALIZE CONTROL PANEL SPECIFICATION 6 YRS BEFORE CRITICALITY SUPPORTS TESTS AND OPERATIONS SUPPORTS SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT AND l DESIGN TVA IS IN PROCESS OF INITIATING SIMULATOR _
DEVELOPMENT l
- COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND GRAPHICS MUST START 6. YRS. BEFORE CRITICALITY SUPPORT TESTS AND OPERATIONS SUPPORT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT
- SIMULATOR PROCURED 5 YRS BEFORE CRITICALITY SUPPORT OPERATOR TRAINING
...m,...
s i e OPERATOR RESPONSE . SAFETY. FUNCTION ARE AUTb'MATIC r: R ;t; N,0 OP'EBATOR ACTUATION OR CONTROL IS NECESSARY OPERATOR. FUNCTION IS TO , ,s
"'~ v
- VERIFFYvSAFETY FUNCTIONS ARE BEING .
l PERFO'RMED OF SAFETY SYSTEM ; y ,l !'. s . VERIFY PROPER OPERATIO ,h /- EQUIPMENT '
'c SAFETY SYSTEMS DESIGNED;TO, PERFORM SAFETY , -
' ~
- 7. FUNCTIONS IN THE-EVENTEF EQUIPMENT FAILURE 1 .-
~" '
- REDUNDANT REAUTOR Si40TDOWN SYSTEM
( REDUNDANT DECAY HEAT REMOVAL!;STSTEMS l3 '
< MULTIPLE FAILURES-DESIGN SUPPORTS OPERATOR :
- c. IN DEALING WITH BEYOND DESlGN BASE FAILUFsE .
-
- FUNCTION BASED ACCIDENT MONITORING IS , c BEING ACCOMPLISHED
- INDICATES THAT SAFETY FUNCTION IS1BEING ACCOMRLISHED ,
INDICATES THAT SAFETY EQUIPMENT IS FONCTIONAL 10 82 I336 40
i 1 . l HALO - 1
- HANDLING OF ALARMS USING LOGIC (HALO?
!
- SUPPRESS ALARMS NOT SIGNIFICANT FOR A
! SPECIFIC OF'ERATING CONDITION ..
- FRENCH HAVE SUPPRESSION USING A MANUAL MODE SELECTOR
- CONCEPT IS BEING CONSIDERED IN U.S. .
- CRBRP CRTF ADDRESSED SUBJECT SUPPRESSION NOT RECOMMENDED FOR ANNUNCIATOR PLANT COMPUTER SUPPORT OF ALARMS RECOMMENDED i l
- _ _ _ _ , , _ _ _ - - -- - - - - . . - - _ _ _ ._ _ _ _ _ _ _\
i SYMPTOM VERSUS EVENT LOGIC . b t
- PROCEDURES
- SYMPTOM BASED - DEAL WITH LOSS OR THREAT TO SAFETY FUNCTION -
~
- EVENT BASED - DEAL WITH RESPONSE -
TO IDENTIFIED EVENT
- CRBRP COMMITMENT IN PSAR APPENDIX H
- CONSIDER INPO WORK RELATIVE TO DEVELOPMENT OF PLANT PRO.CEDURES .
- UTILIZE STATE-OF-THE-ART PROCEDURE FORMAT AT TIME OF CRBRP PROCEDURE WRITING ...
- - TVA WILL ULTIMATELY WRITE THE SYMPTOMATIC BASED PROCEDURES *
- CRBRP INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SYMPTOM BASED OPERATOR ACTION
- ACCIDENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTS
- SAFETY PARAMETER DISPLAY SYSTEM 0 82 EDM 20
DARK PANELS L
- NO SAFETY PANEL LIGHTS ARE ILLUMINATED WHEN THE PLANT IS IN THE NORMAL CONDITION
- CRBRP CRTF ADDRESSED THIS SUBJECT RESULTS
- LIGHT MODULES WHICH REFLECT SAFETY FUNCTION STATUS REMAIN DARK UNTIL ~
SAFETY FUNCTION IS INITIATED i i to 82 CD36 21
i
- CASHIER'S WINDOW .
- PROVIDE A CASHIER'S WINDOW IN CONTROL I ROOM TO FACILITATE HANDING SMALL ITEMS INTO CONTROL ROOM
- SHIFT ENGINEERS OFFICE IS ADJACENT TO CONTROL ROOM FOR MANAGEMENT OF ROUTINE ACTIVITIES POSITIVE METHODS OF CONTROLLING ACCESS ARE PROVIDED BY A CARD KEY AND CIPHER PAD SYSTEM
- PLANT SECURITY CONTROLS LEVELS OF PERSONNEL IN CONTROL ROOM ,
10 32 I336 15
-~
ENCLOSURE 3 CONTROL ROOM PHILOSOPHY EXCHANGE MEETING OCTOBER 19, 1982 ACTION ITEMS
- 1) NRC will review the Sun: mary Report on the Conduct of the CRBRP Key Systems Reviews, submitted February 19, 1982, Longenecker to Check.
- 2) P0 will review the FNP PSAR Amendment 28 July 15, 1981, pages C222 on and assess the need to revise the CRBRP PSAR accord-ingly.
l 3) A meeting will be scheduled in the next 2 - 3 weeks hopefully at the CRBRP Control Room Mock-up in Oak Ridge, to discuss the results of the above and to permit NRC Staff to review the Control Room Mock-up.
i AllACHMENT l 1 l 4
- \
- - - , - . . . , . - - - - . - - - - - - , -}}