ML20128R016

Expresses Thanks for 840222 Review of Site Redress Planning. Concurs W/Conceptual Approach & 1-yr Period for Development of Final Site Redress Plan & Investigation of Potential Use of Site.Ml Lacy Encl

ML20128R016
Person / Time
Site:	Clinch River
Issue date:	02/29/1984
From:	Zeller H ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
To:	Gross P ENERGY, DEPT. OF
Shared Package
ML20127B595	List: ML20127B592 ML20127C294 ML20128R000 ML20128R016
References
FOIA-85-362 NUDOCS 8507270097
Download: ML20128R016 (4)

Text

--

A.

ty' 3 l ~s. 76 To m Mh 3 JHRe RAA,/ rn:+n -+7+P

• h s~ , tonp p

,: m-7My I hi -

l g .3 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

%# . REGION IV ses countuwe evneer Aruwra.oronsm asses

- FEB 2 91984 4PM-EA/SNM Mr. Peter J. Gross Assistant Director for Public Safety U.S. Department of Energy Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant P.O. Box U

, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830

Dear Mr. Gross:

Thank you for coming to Atlanta, Georgia, February 22, 1984, and reviewing your site redress planning with us. We concur with your conceptual approach and agree that one year is a reasonable time to develop a final site redress plan, and to investigate potential use for the site. We commend your desire .to secure input from TVA, NRC, the State of Tennessee, -

and local government. We are willing to assist you in any way that we can in reaching an environmentally acceptable solution.

Sincerely yo'urs, Roward D. 2 ller l Assistant gional Administrator for Policy and Management l .

4 f

8507270097 850606 PDR FDIA BELL 85-362 PDR g

j fb g....y..g 2 _ j-STATE OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF HEAL.TH AND ENVIRONMENT RAST TENNESSEE REGIONAL OFFICE atsu s. sewe6er messo=AL ns4Ltw centse saan cwanoass tnut amouvua,te==essas mee February 27, 1984 4

Mr. Jerry Wing Olinch River Breedcr P.eactor Prejset

7. C. Box 'J Cak Ridge, T:: 37830

Dear :

'.r. Wing:

Thank you for reviewing our staf f en the site redrest p;&ns for the terminated Clinch River Breeder Reactor Prcjoct. As was discussed at the February 24, 1984 meeting, our main concern with the site redress proposal is to insur e that erodable materials and cther potential contaminants for the abandoned site do not enter surface waters of the area. Since all the erosion control measures and sediment ponds are to remain functioning and in place we have no objectic..s to leaving the site undisturbed until May 1955, as long as the following conditions are met:

1) All surf ace run-off is to be directed through the sedimer.t pond systems as presently established c..

the site.

2) All discharges from the sediment ponds must not exceed NPDES pern.it conditions as presently established.

3) All erosion control measures must be maintained to prevent erodable materials frcan entering surface streams from roadways on the project site.

If no suitable use is found for the project site by !4ay 1985, and the final redress plan is implemented, we feel that your proposed site stabilization plan is adequate to protect the surface waters of the area pMided that the seeding of the area is successful. We request that the Tennessee Division of Water Management be notified prior to 9019-9E9 Sid 30018 Muo du853 IWD et t98 090ewte

l-l r'

tr. Jerry Uing Page Wo Tsbruary 27, 1984 dismantling of erosion control :neasures so that we :nay make a final inspection. Thank you for your cooperation in keeping us informed on your plans to close out the Clinch River 3 reader Reactor Project.

site.

sincere ,

.6 McKinney, Manage \r d A D Knoxville S& sin Of fico Division of Water Management ADM:DLM:bp e

G 4,-

c . _ _ _ . _ , -.___....:___._. _

..x.-_ . . _ _ _ . . __

l l =

NW ~ Y$ "UY J - W/ l O K[D 1

, pp7 Pbm M O "#ME"~IO TENNESSEE CITY OF OAK RIDGE M UNiCIP AL BulLDING PC$t c'8 r#CE SCs t 37838400t Tci.crecN E. te 153 as3 5671 March 6, 1984 Mr. Peter Cross Assistent Director for Public Safety CRER Project Office P. O. Box U oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831

Dear Mr. Gross:

Thank you for your presentation to City Council on February 21, 1984 of the CRBRP preliminary plans and schedule for site redress. We certainly agree that time should be taken to ' fully evaluate possi.ble future uses for the CRBRP site, and feel that your proposed schedule provides suf fi-

. cient time for that evaluation. If no specifi'c use for the site is identified during this evaluation period, then the general approach to site redress, which you uutlined and which results in Icvel land uses for future industrial development, appears reasonable.

We look forverd to working with you in the future to develop the details of the site redress design.

Sincerely yours, H. Lylc Lacy, III city Manager im l

. . . . . ,