IR 05000440/1982006

IE Insp Repts 50-440/82-06 & 50-441/82-06 on 820611.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Containment Radiographic Review,Suppression Pool Weld Repair & Polar Crane Box Girder Weld Repair

ML20055B037
Person / Time
Site:	Perry
Issue date:	07/01/1982
From:	Danielson D, Nightingale E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20055B033	List: IR 05000440/1982006 ML20055B032
References
50-440-82-06, 50-440-82-6, 50-441-82-06, 50-441-82-6, NUDOCS 8207200287
Download: ML20055B037 (3)

Text

. . .. . _ . - . - . . . ,

o

.

i

.

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i

i

REGION III

i i

Reports No. 50-440/82-06(DETP); 50-441/82-06(DETP)

Docket Nos. 50-440; 50-441 Licenses No. CPPR-148; CPPR-149 i

Licensee: Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Post Office Box 5000 i Cleveland, OH 44101

Facility Name: Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 Inspection At: Perry Site, Ferry, OH i

Inspection Conducted: June 11, 1982 W # k Inspector: y.H.Niphtingale ,

'

W

, M/o.. dV

! Approved By: D. H. Danielson, Chief 7/![V Materials and Processes Section Inspection Summary Inspection on June 11, 1982 (Reports No. 50-440/82-06(DETP); 50-441/82-06(DETP))

Areas Inspected: Containment radiographic review; suppression pool weld repair; polar crane box girder weld repair. This inspection envolved a total of eight

.

(8) inspector-hours onsite by.one (1) NRC inspector.

! Results: No items of noncompliance or_ deviations were identified.

I

!

)

<

l

!

l t

-

8207200287 820702 i PDR ADOCK 05000440

G PDR

'

_ ___ _ . _ _ , . _ . . . . _ . _ . _ _ . . . -_ ,, - , _ _ - . , - _ _ , . . , . . . _ , . _ - - . ,

.

.

DETAILS Persons Contacted Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company

• Carl Hubbuch, Gilbert Associates

• A. L. Bradshaw, TAS/NDE - Level III

• Jchn Bowser, TAS/NDE - Level III Hudson Walls, CEI, Senior NDE Administrator

• Denotes those present at exit meeting on June 11, 1982.

Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings (0 pen) Noncompliance (440/82-03-03): Lead location markers were in the area of interest, a repair area was not correctly identified by location markers, and lack of fusion, excessive slag, and a crack were found in varioau weld See Paragraph 1 of this repor (0 pen) Open Item (4.0/82-03-01): Possible linear indication in assembly No. OM-61-17X, weld No. D, area E-F-G on the radiograp Reference Inspection Reports No. 50-440/82-02; 50-441/82-02. GE has issued an FDR to ITT Grinnell for repair. This item will remain open until weld repair has been completed and reinspecte (Closed) Open Item (440/81-17-01): Box beam girder welds in Unit 2 polar "

crane. Reference CEICo Final Report on Unit 2 Polar Crane Girder Weld Deficiencies (RDC 39 (81)) dated February 26, 1982, as supplemented by letter dated April 23, 1982. The repair process for these box girders has been completed. The inspector reviewed site documentation and the licensee's reports and has no further questions at this tim Functional of Program Areas Inspected Containment Radiographic Review The review of the shell plate radiographs for Unit 1 is now complete The first four (4) courses had approximately a 35% weld rejection rate, while the remaining courses had only a 3% reject rate. The total film reviewed on Unit 2 shell plate consisted of 7,910 film, which encompasses 418 welds. -There are 2,910 film involved with the dome, which encompasses 266 welds. The dome radiographs are presently being reviewed; as are the penetration weld It is expected that the review of Unit 2 containment radiographs will begin the week of June 21, 198 ~

. Possible Weld Defects in Unit 1 Suppression Pool Floor Reference Inspection Reports No. 50-440/81-17; 50-441/81-17 and CEICo Final Report on Unit 1 Suppression Pool Clad Floor Plate Installation Activities (RDC-40(81)) dated March 31, 1982. The weld repair of two (2) areas has been completed. Tha epair process is progressing slower than anticipate . Polar Crane Box Girder Repair - Unit 1 The informational U.T. examination of Unit 1 polar crane girders (Reference Inspection Reports No. 50-441/81-02; 50-441/82-02.) has been performed on a random basis to determine if defects similar to those identified in Unit 2 exist. The results indicate that similar defects do not exist in the welds for the Unit 1 girders. The inspector icviewed site documentation and has no further questions at this tim Exit Interview The inspector met with site representatives (denoted in Persons Contacted paragraph) at the conclusion of the inspection. The inspector summarized the scope and findings of the inspection noted in this repor