ML19329E866
| ML19329E866 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 09/30/1975 |
| From: | CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19329E863 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8006180684 | |
| Download: ML19329E866 (51) | |
Text
, y ._ y
- u. $$N.; h q#'-
C g ,,
NONCONFORMANCE - REPOR'T LOG & STATUS BOOK REPORT DATE D
. m . . .u
' E 2"W s(
)
PAGE COMPL.
b O.C. ENG. SIGN
- 1. PROJECT NO. 7220
~ STAWS NONCONFORMAIJCE NCR NO.
' ORIG.
DATE PREPARED BY DESCRIPTION / REMARKS 8-route #'x$TE S cloSeo CLOSED BY 232 1-21 T. Haswood C-111. Damaged edge of Dmn Iinor Plato Field No J 1-25 1-21 ~ -74
-74 RD-9-6 1.109 . 4 2- 2-14 L. R. Albert 233 . 1-21 L. Johnson C-230. Concrete tenneratJre out of snec Field- 11 74 -75
-74 A(593)a 1.205 :- 1-21-i 4 13=75 2-13 ?-14 L. R. Albert 234 . 1 P. Carpenter C-208. Cure Ta n k Temnora t.:rrn nut nf ennr F4 eld 12 -75 -75 74 1.105/1.205' 1 1-22-; 4 -74 2-13 2-13 L. R. Albert:
235 11-22 P. Carpenter 0-230. Batch Plant wate u eter out of Field 12 -75 -75
-74 tolerance 1.105/1.205 3 1-22-i 4- -74 236 11 Nate Shawl 0-38. Structural Columns ont of sonarn Field No 12-11 12-20 R. A. Moray
-74 =144D4.7 et al 1.201 1 1-22-7 4 74 237 11-22 it . Shawl C -38.
~
Structural Columns out of souaro F6 eld flo 12-11 12-20 R. A. Moray
-74 1.201 1 1-22*-7 4 -74 -74
-111. Fire damane to liner nlates. lin i t Field 12-0-7 41-14 1=15 L.R.Albe 238 11 L. R. Albert (
-75
-74 #2 1.109 3 1-25-7 4- 75
-110. Fire danane to liner plate coat- Field 12-9-7 4 12-23. .
239 11-25 E. flanning C g
-74 ings, Unit #2 1.109 -3 1-25-7 4 ] 74 2-12 2-1 L. R. ATherGl 240 11 L. Johnson C-231. Failure to start watnr rnen Field 12-5 -5 after form stripped, 1.205 1 1-27-7 4 -74 -75 e
-74' 1 9=P=F4 9
?41 12 R. A. Moray C-233. G-3210 Form not filled nronnriv Field = rio 1-17 1-27 R.A.Mo06Y 74 1.101 f t . S .1 75 -75 -75 11 - 1 . Marking on vessel does not match B&U tio 12-4 12-5 II . D. Foster 1 242 12-2 J. Aldridge
-74 tiumber on Cert of Confc rmAS11E 4.029 12-2-74 -74 -74
-Field 12-19 1 9-10 A.L.Boulden 243 12 H. Shawl C-38. Beam 134B12 Bent connector -75
-74 1.201 -122-74 -74 -75
C 3
/,. , .. .
NONCONFORMANCE - REPORT LOG & STATUS BOOK u *'""'
~',,
No$[odTE I-YM1Nh-bP i PAGE COMPL.
J, Q.C. ENG. SIGN
- 1. PROJECT NO. 7 .
STAWS NCR ' ORIG. NONCONFORMANCE DATE PREPARED BY DESCRIPTION /REf4 ARKS 8*
CLOSED BY NO. ROUTE XMTD CLOSED 12-19 1-14 L. Shively 256 12-19 A. Boos 1-231. Aux elon Robar imnronerlv cut rield il -74 -75
-74 Juring bending 1.203 L2 19- 74 257 12-19 R.A. Moray IFMC-1. InnroperMill Test Report on sield 1 1-14 1-15 R.A. Moray
-74 E.6010 llel d Rod Varies t 1-R0-74 -75 -75 -75
- -38. Beam 21981C Fabri ated fron '40 Y ;ield 12-31 3-12 L. R. Albert 258 12-23 J. Aldridge N14- -75
-74 210 matl, not 30 X 190 1.201 1 1-84-74 =74; 259 12-23 J. Aldridge 1-115. Spools not marked per Spec M-201_sield 1-3 1-28 4-18 R. A. Moray
-75
-74 Jocuments not Shop Insp2cted ASt1E4.124 ba 14 75 1-15 260 12-24 A. Doos 1_2_31. Rebars omijted from Aux Bdin 14 eld 12-3' -75
-74 f a l.l s 1.203 1 1-24-7 4 -74 261 L2-30 R. A. Moray Lt-104A. Markinq and G-3210 Forms. Pine MS fio 1 4-18 R. A. Moray
-74 iize ASi1E 4.104 + L2=31= ?4 -75 -75 3-d-262 l-8-75 R.C.Boothe M-1. Iluni d i t v indicator on Steam Gen. B ?dl -75 4-18 R. L. Bowren 19-El-2012-55-12 ASf1E 4.021 L-8-75 rio -75 263 L-9-75 R.A. Moray L1- 104 A . Pi ne nia rki ng , n3t released. no MS fio 1 4-13 R. A. Moray
-75 X-Ray Films ASME 4.111,4.134. +J 7f 75 264 l-9-75 J. Aldridge '1 - 1. Prntnctivo enatinn nn stnan con B Pll a
3 9-22 R.A. Moray 2SG1B ASME 4.021 1-13-7 3 fl0 75 -75 265 .-10 J.C.Aldridge C -?33A. Drawinns not availahin. wennEIEL D /M . S . 1 1-21 P.A. Moray 1- 10-75 Ho 75
-75 FMR flumber 1.101 75 266 .-14-74 C.F. Clark C-111. Liner Plato damage dun tn fi rn Uttel 1 1 1-31 L.R. Albert 1.109 i 76 75 75 -75
~
- 267 1-15-75 R.A.itoray !!FMr 1 F A01n weld rne certificatiep p$e)d 1-22 l 75 =75 .
m u) .o h . 2P
- - y q _
y y .
/ NONCONFORMANCE -itEPORT LOG & STATUS BOOK 12' N ~
We%A,'$1lg5[Fi?E-15i{d1 d PAGE CoMPL.
~
'I I'
. o.C. ENG. SIGP
- 1. PROJECT NO. 7220 g "NCR ORIG.
STATUS PREPARED BY NONCONFORMANCE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION / REMARKS 6-nouTE xs TD E CLOSED CLOSED BY 268 1-17 2- 7-30 J.C.Aldridge :-33. Bean connectors damaged, shionent sie44 1-30 R. A.ilo ray
-75 .-14 1.201 E-17-71 -75
-75 4-10 269 l-20 A.L.Boulden :-111. Liner Plate X-l!av of reoair not ideld 1-29 75 4-10 A. L. Bould
-75 ivailable 1.109 L-20-26 -75 -75 270 ,t-21 2-13 J.C.Aldridge :-38. Damaned beams. nine each. shio- ;ield 2 -75
.A.M ray
-75 nent C-15 1.201 L Ti 75 -75 271 L C.F. Clark l
- -111.1leiding procedcres P1-F( A-CO ,) Field 1-22 4-10 5-7-7 i A.L.Bould
-75 1.109 4 4 4-76 75 272 L t.C.F. Clark I:- 111. Leak noted at 1.nuckle Plate, I ield flo .-22 1-29 2.Lussier
-75 lamination 1.109 .-21-75 -75= -75 273 .-21 R.A. Moray Bul k fla terial . b " 7. 5/8" Round hars. l'ield fl0 1-24 5-29 R.A. Moray
-75 7220-F-11452 .-22-70 -75 -75 11 . 5 274 1-22 J.C.Aldridae 4:-33. It'a t e ri a l s hiped wi thout release IWl d' flo 1 1 R.A. Moray
-75 1.201 70 75 -75 275 1-27 R.A. Moray :1-201. M-104A ITT-Grir.ne'1 1 markinn of EJ:nLi 2 f528- 9 R.A. Moray
-75 J -Rayed joints nor per fi-201 AS!!E 4.192 J -f-9 -=i 4 75 -75 276 1-28 J.P.Betts :-39. Rebars cut off.do not match Own <=i =e=bJ 1-29 2 2-10 L.R. Albert
-75 C-324 Rev 10. 1.103 1 -e53 --7:5= - 7 5 -75 -75 277 1-29 R.A.Noray 1 1044- innennor r, u o rnrn Il0 2 4- R. A. Moray 4,13S 3
-75== AS?t E ,4.104 1-30-1 5 475 _
278 1-29 R.A. Moray 4- R. A. Moray 1-10AA. Imoroner G-32iD. X-Ravs innrnn 1. S N0 4-
-75 er, Code Da ta flane Plate. AS'1E ,4.124 1-30-1 5 279 1-30 C.F. Clark do. n t. .:-6.y L.-Q,p;n]
C-111. Liner Plate radius out of tol- Eveld 1-31 2-7-78
-75 erance after concreting, 1.109 4 74 -75 .
t; 3 0-103099 P# 26 oc.c o -
M
/} 12. , _.
J' s i
NONCONFORMANCE - REPC R LOG & STATUS BOOK REPORT DATE+M *
' W 9-3 75
/
PAGE COMPL. -.
, 't j .C. EN G. Sl 7220
- 1. PROJECT NO _
~ ,
STATUS NCR ORIG. NONCONFORMAhCE ~
bLOSED CLOSED DY PREPARED BY ' ROUTE XMTD DATE DESCRIPTION / REMARKS NO. -
7 7. -J!y-f; 2-an n :r P ca.u.o :,ct
-711. Structural CacEfill fla t ' 1.004 l out 7 1c!d-31G 3-30 L. R. Albert ; 30-7;- 7 7E 7-31-? 5J.P.Connolly
-75 ) f Gradation.
flo 7 8-14 R.A. Moray
.t . Shawl :-38. Damaged Beam, Ship 11ent C-26 r i el d -75 317 6-30 -
-75 1.201 7-1-75 7-15 8-13 8-14 R.A. Moray 318 7-10 R. A. floray '1-904- Sandvik nA Mannal nnt annrnuna - M -75 -75 -75
' hSME
-75 -24 ~1~
7-17 R.A. Moray C-38. Beams made from w ao_pn size matl E i.e-l.d _75 75 319 1.201 C-29 7 =17=75
-75 f1 11 c; Excess fla t ' l not shon insnnctod_ 3-7-75 Field No 10-6 320 3-1-7! R.A. Moray 4.134 ASTIE -75 no G-321D.
- -239. Concrete Temperature -c i.e.l_d. 9-11 321 3 L.R. Albert 1.10.5 L . L .7.5 -75
-75 C(622.25.)a'
-tt&d- 9-11 LR Albert : - 2 O . c oncrete Air Content 1.105 ,H -7+ -75 322 8 <
-75 C(622.25)a' 8-28
-75 9-12 R.A. Moray 323 8-5 R.A.floray 't-92. Storaon F-1-10'1 ?R tin t n r nnt S.,i e l d flo -75 4.001 7-
-75 rotated per schedule.
Tc*/c + 8-1]-75 L.. A 6 L C G B.T~
8 /-//- 75 3-6 C l a Plant Arna Fill mnisturn hoinu Ed:.3 d 324 L. R. Albert reqis i remen t s . 1.032 SE7E75 -75 E 75 8 75 L.R. Albert
-75 ,
L. R. Albert c ?qn. cnnerato c yl i n '! e r r nnt cured E ic 1.d 9-11 325 3-7 1.205 7-75 -75
- 7 a, per spec., tenperature. U-lb ra w x
-75 v z-75 9-5 L.R. Albert J.P.Connolly C-?31. Rehars O tini t #? Pino Tunnpl -Af=e=1=d
-75 326 8-11 3-4-75 1.203 B=:12= =75
-75 not bundled.
C-38. Fabricated Beam ' engths Fi el d No 8-25 327 8-14 R. A. Moray 1.201 E-15-75 -75
-7'
, ~
Pa0e30 Q OC.G31 3
4AO-103 09/74 0- ;
]
1 iw v
) )
NONCONFORMANCE - REPORT LOG & STATUS BOOK u.
)
~~
REPORT DATE f'I'M #2" PAGE COMPL.
O.C. ENG. StGN
- 1. PROJECT NO __ 7220 ,
8A NCR ORIG. NONCONFORMANCE **
DATE PREPARED BY DESCRIPTION /REMA RKS ROUTE
~
XMTD T CLOSED CLOSED BY l NO.
9-30 to - I-C-38. Shear Studs missing frnm enlumn Field 8-15 L.R. A t-EGET 328 8-14 A. Boos -75
-75 Pour A(614.5)b' 1.201 :8=14=F 5=-75 329 8-20 J.P.Connolly C-230. Air and Slumn tests. Pour -
-F 4-e-1 d 9-11
-75 A(613.25)a' . 1.205 2-1--7-6 -75 330 8 J.P.Connolly C-230. Air tact at and nf numnline F4 eld 9-10
-75 Pour A(612.5)a' 1.205 8- 21-76 -75 331 8 7 L.R.A5bert C-230. FlyAsh content. Pp_ur #8. Fiold 9-11 75 A(611.75)a' 1.205 8- 21=75 -75 332 8-21 L. R. Al bert C-230. Air Test Results. Pour # Field 9-10
-75 A(612.75)a' * . 1.205 8t 22-75 -75 333 8-29 L.R. Albert C-230. Air Test results. Pnur# Fe gg 9-11 8-
~
-75 A(613.25).c' 1.205 2 -75
- r. i r Test re s u ! t s ,_p_our Eield 334 9-3 L.R. Albert r 92n_ -
1.205 3-76
-75 A(614)a' .
335 9 L.R. Albert 0 230. Air content, Pour #9, EdeJd 9-11 75 A(612.75)b' 1.205 F _% '7.5 -75 336- 9 L.R. Albert C-230. Slumn tnst resultc; pnnr -- Fteld 9-11 75 A(612.75)b' 1.205 WS25 -75 337 9-19 R.A. Moray C-233A. F-3043. FMR CA-2051. Docomont; hydh
-75 tion missing, AE0- 1.202 5 7E 338 9-22 L. R. Albert C-230. Cement used withcut accentance Fi-trid 9-30 9-30 L.R. Albert
-75 test. 1.105,1.205 -2-2-7d -,5 -75 -75 339 9-22 L. R. Albert C-230. Cement weight less than requirec Field
-75 Pour A(608.67)a' _
1.205 9-22-7 5 _
mmmc i. .- Page 31 "_)
CI - - - _ - - - - _ - _ - . _ - - _ - - _ . .
Os b
Y B
D E
) .
S O
L C
' O
- D E .
N E .
b l
T R C J f
O P G E E .
E A C. ^ 65 R P Q 7 0 -
2 1 1
65 T
7 M 0 -
X n 1 5 6' 1 =i E d - d= 2 T l0 4E 3 K U O
e3 e=
O *R i - i0 e g
O 6 F9 f4 B = a S P U t T n4 a 9 A i 0 t 0 T e 1 a 1 S c . l .
& e 4 P 1 G
r r
O n a L S o E' n h.T K M i
.R E CR t S, l N A -
O P AM i r/
n U E E d i R MR R/ d 1 v' ON E e 3 t C FO h 0 i 0 NIT s 9 u N n A 2 2
OP CI l a
S i M 7 NR p L t R OC S n O S & o0 F NE n c0 .
N ;
D i 0 s 3 O O a 3 i 1 C R 0 D N 9 1 N T . . #
O C A S 1 N E 4 L 1 t J 0 1 i O 1 f - n R ' - o C U P l l
1 Y y n B
a e D r d E o l R M u A o P . B E A .
R L P . .
R A
)/ '
GET I
95 25 0 27 - 7 RA - - 0 -
4 7
. /
9 1 9
~
0
. 3 0
j R C O 0
4 1
4 1
O N N
- 3 3 A 1
CS - .-
bONCONFORMANCE REPO% f ' g~ ~ "^"*' **""~
N#f#iffarn). i x E v. 1. exOsECT N o. " ia .REeORTEo.=v 'oATE er 9 2A S as. osseos TinN CuNCun. NCE
__Speciffencinn 7770-c_'1R
- 3. STGM D25CRIPT 50N 1 7??n
- 8. ITEM LOC ATIO f1 y k, 1
.V
- [-2#l-7M DATE
" ~ " " ~ "
"i p t DhTED ev r
Struetural Steel Beam C. L E'41
. ALNUMBER A:"'- s _',m LI:
1, OL/ A M/A' Y s f/2'2' 7' flMaw / - 3'7 1
RhPLACEMENT PART . 3 REV5 Paos Far sma sa cave N/A
- s. cure.N AsE ORoER NO.
N/A 8 N/A I
I C
..r ,
Ec sM 12-29 ~l so. OC reEto iNsrECTiON etAN NO. -
s e. RErt ACEMENT sERi Ac NO. 2 ,,. . . . . ..v
/-p g.
7?l0-C-38-AC C-38-R-15 Rev. O N/A T" * * * " ' ' "
,. CONTR ACTO R/ LOC ATIO N I1.A$ME C vES I7, SOURCE
_ Ingalls Iron Works Co.. Verona, Pa. iT E M G NO I Vendor 8 8. RJUTING INSTR UCTIONS:
QROUTE TO FIELD ENGINEERING ] ROUTE TO M ATERI AL SUPERVISOR '
- 90. N7NCCNrORMING CONoITION:
Beam 134B12 (Vendors Shipnent No. C7) has end connections . . . I F' I i bent as shawn on Page 2. Nonconfor mance noted during h
field engineers inspection. "O" nt mber 1. 201. O gggg3 BECHTEL POWER map JC3 m n 7220 a r.
A l O &HoL/3 7~44 /)AAMEA griEco oiseOseTiON
- - EW Eco RECOMMENoATiON/ ROUTE To rRO2E::T ENGINEERING mi. riEco oiseOsiTiON REsuurs.
R:ptir by straightening bent end-connections of subject beam in accordance with ;1---r-'-
- AISC Specification S-50. Section 1.23.1.
-Expected-implementet-fon tlate:-12 30 =74 8 A n
- 22. ENGINEE R tNG ol5 POSITION
((. N'h{t>/ I z - I g cy' 2 3. ENGlN EE RING DOSPOSITION R ESULTS4 Engineering concurs with Field recommendation to repair by straightening bent . _
e ffgc// /3rf/5 fr/N/dfg#EO /A end connections in accordance with AISC Specification, Section 1.23.1.
N h2kk A M B // # r! 4 n "t r # u f d l
0.$h.]- /W2Y14 rfenzz/ t. z 1. / Mittri'MM Expected implementation date: 1/24/75 k y,[f / @ -
n
_.# f[A 33,83 DEtsGN CN ANGE REQUIRED m ,9@ge, h jf/,- K-f $ gg.
r NNO 6. J ATERis A ol5 POSITION O a-N w -ma 2 7. O c A TA(CE, f' O vEs. sEE 4TT4CNEo. Oocuse ,W. PjNJ A f="/O '/*) -
0% A WIN 3 REV. DCN _
?P2C. Aufwonease ansPecten ears REV. A D D. ,-
~
aa. ->.
... ORIGINATOR _
s U J
1! \ ) l lii ,
j\1, Jl I {
q\l\
b N
I o
34 n r " ),
a c
n eR P' O
gg 2.
3 C 5
' 7 0
[' 9 R c2
' _ u 1 2 7 4 0OPO N
W2 d R 2 -
- A OP2 O T
r- J LJE A o I H N
? LC E a I
G
- m. JB r I
R u.
s O
)
D T
N O
C
(
T-R O
P 9 E 1 R H 4
1 E
)gv.
C l h ^
A .
M R
O F
N O
C -
N -
O N
.[- =
=
" _ ,}
4
/ d n
u n
i e
n n
c L
'- [' -
+
- -~ NONCONFORMANCE REPORT ' ' ' ' " '
gg "" " '8 4
. . m . . . A 1 ,. .
B&W Spec. FS-III-2 g..
- O
- 1. m e,3C1 7220
,.o.
/
[7o" Al.dr'i ge _
. uA1E i 1/9/75 n o.
t.1,oN Cx,.Cu mENCE
,y ""- ** " "
- 3. ITEM DESCR8PTsoN G. ITEM loc ATIoN #
e 3.
DATEDe #
3 OATE ' 3 y
.S.t.eam
. . . _Ge_n.e.r.ator
. 2SclB .. .. ANS N,SS_S.lo.
uP . rage No.
_ Area h I. ,EPACE E . PA No. b f'.7 d b't u
f...7 7! "
- . E.. ... g .
69-El-2021-55-12 N/A N/A i -
- 5. PuRCH ASE ORDER No. , ... ....
5 9. QC PtELD INSPECTeoM PL AN No. 9 6. REPLACEME NT SE RG AL No.
A 3 (*
.N/oN1 AC1o.,coC ArioN TGT-31 by, 1 * *
...A.
E a_, E, . . .N/A ou CE ",[]"((*[
4 [{*..g~
Babcock & Wilcox, Lynchburg, Va. rE= O No Vendor
- i. aour.NG .Nsv uCr.oNs>
Oa "" To "o "a5'a r c a sac 0 aouv a 'o "aT ra'ai SuP5 a v "
... NoMCo N ro -.NG Co o.r. "'
X Babcox & Wilcox es d h M h h he h Me WM Mm the spraylat coating and the vessel shell. This is in conflict with B&W Specification IG-III-2-12 & 13 Section III
_ Ear _agr_aph 1.2.1.1. 1 "Q" No. is h.021. Honconfonnance noted durine receipt inspection.
One tag applied.
20.
Q PIELD DeSPostTaoM OPac'o acco===aparioaiaourE vo Pao,i Cr ENGiNEE=iNG Ii. P.Eco oisPosir oM nEsutvs.
/ , .
Cover affected areas with Griffolyn 75 poly tarp and secure in place with tapex Nh,y ;f b
/S/ C. M. Fletcher m.v.. upon ons h /h'- M #77 ( M2 hI'.",/ r )E ,I .v4 7
Proval by C. Mah.mey, Proj. Mgr.1/30/75 Q [M/f
~
cnNnsmn nM RHFFT ? fs;fA,_f r
- 0. , Y/ ')" " /;. z i
- 22. ENGINEE R8NG DISPoSITIoM 2 3. ENGINEEMONG DISPOSBTsoN RE$uLTS:
f
- 14. 85 DESIGN CN ANGE REQulRE -
ONo "^"""'"$'*"
O YES,5EE ATTACHED
@((""" Jh(cpJ[c#g,*y ~ gj f yf gc# o!.'e se s ' .
DR AWONG R E v. OCN /^ .,,,
SPE C. RE V. ADD.
=r..... . ...R !S
.,.. M..,.).
e cos s-s White Copy - Originator e C 43 2-2 Canary Copy - Field Engineer Pinit copy - POAE Goldenrod Copy - QC
. m o ..
/ . .
'" "'" [6 4 NONCONFORMANCE REPORT l "'i 1 . .A-
., gRawsNG/PA RT NO. 7.E V. 7. P MitJEC T N J. F' ft 'DATE 2 5. D 65PallT 6 7 N C"J NCulb E NC3 BW Spec. IS-III-2 l0 7220 / i Aldr'i ge i 1/9/75 " - * " " ' " ' ""~ " ' " " **'
S. ITEM LOCATeON # 93. 'DATEDSV E DA
- 3. STEM DESCRsPTION
/ 'I bE7F
.Stean_ Generator 2SG1B 6.OZRI AL NUMBER NSSS_ Storage Area
b 2[ ' ' '
pgEPLA CEMENT PAN N O. REV. **ese ct res te s.es.e e n sava 69-El-2021-56-12 N/A N/A l . . . . . . , . , , , , , , , , ..,,
S. PURCH ASE ORDE R NO. S t. QC P 4 ELD SN5PECTION PLAN NO. 16. REPL ACEMENT SERI A L NO.
- ~ - - - " - --
.NjO n MTR ACTOR / LOC AT SON wn v "
ver. n n/n
- 6. St. SME QVES 8 7. $OU R C E -
Babcock _& Wilcox _
a Lynchburg, Va. .T E M O NO Vendor _
s e. RouveNG aNsTRuCTiONs O aou's To P'r'o c a* *cca'aa O aourc vo aa'ta'ai SuPaav'5 " X Babcox & Wilcox es. MONCONrORMiNG CONDif eons The spraylat coating applied on the vessel is not intact. There is water trapped between the spraylat coating and the vessel shell. This is in osnflict with B&W Specification FS-III-2-12 & 13 Section III Paranrath 1.2.1.h. "O." No. in h,021. Nonconformance noted during receipt inspaption.
One tag applied.
2 ). 29. PIE LD DISPOSITsON RESULTSe Q F8 ELD DISPOSITION QP6 ELD RECOMMENDAT40N/ ROUTE TO PROJEC* ENGINEERtNG Cn oALf9 cm- J$ (1.~ $ L A m 7.S~ p+0~r ha ' & /w a Am LbML hi.a! U .
( .?n, -f.LL&CL VNA ((c^ , il!PGI) tR C 5 2 3. ENG 4NE ERING 045PO54TeON R ESULT$a
- 22. E NGtN EE RING De5 POSITION
[ r- ,. , ,
.n..-- .
O f h r l &
i p .g p u i W 2 7. QC ACCEPT ANC E ss. ss DESIGN CH ANGE REQUlHED 2a. REJECTED M ATE RI A . DISPOSITION O NO O D ". e"a a ."" " """ "
O TES, sEE arraCNED. .. .... ........., ,,,,
ER A WING REV. DCN aut.soesaaee.s.este. ..,,
REv- aoo-j r PE C.
i o s e.. whii. Copy - on.ein. .r GC-Ga a a Cenery Copy - Field Engin.or g
Pink Copy - POAE
,i Goldenrod Copy - OC
- v 0 -
f l j l l l flll ll l
,fl1I lll' C
G 4
6 2
r u "
a ;
c n
- c. I n
A 1 h R n
e x i n
t l O
2 e r o F n l T r- w ob n i
u A
o t e
f n h e N
7 w
b s
s e
s d o
i d n
a M f r n n r h
t i n
r a W' I
G I
R p ne t o u p n.
n e r i C M e F e lo O ul P r r -
i m p t C 2 n e _
e c o u n p " y, B r i e n s: l R e g a t n l e o t w = t n a n
h mi oi t s t e nr n
) i o i b - a i s o t D'
T N
w e
c c d r o o c n t n
e a c W
- o t i
d d
A A
n f t s O
C a y h e mO e
e ai ly tt d
ONG
( r .
r l t g a e 0- A T o n a R c o d n
s r t p o n O c t a l S r o P
E a
n s
. d i
e d
a m e t
- p n 1 R
E i n t
e l
p t p s e
f r
o J ha "n i t r s
. n n o g C
N A
g o p c f_
t_
n o
a n
i i
l i h
t Et S o t I h a
- i n
g s
.u M n c "Q i t o R o c e d
n w , - c n_
y O h a t e
4 r
- c s h F t t o c N a g n n h d i g O l f n a c nh n v o i s r u t C a t i d a - i N r e a r M- de tis r p c o m o a O s n c te c t I r h n N a c C e t c f r e i a - v f o a v s n l o s c c i o s s p
i t i i t n
a p c h s h M n n c e t i C - o a_ t c t i i r o e n a t e a e r r W n i n lh f
e t p f
o .
B a
n s op s
i n .
e a e e n n n t.
c c r c y y v e n b .
n l e c n t o h a e e d a f a n T m t v P n m re
- f h r u o C a ro h a n s o o b te i o i
e
. f n d e
a t
n l a
f W
t_
r u
d a t m g o d e
u f
e p e a c l d n6 t r - l d n aB u c l n e n e g
n I_. t e i o t o p e r m_ e n i.
d h s s n s m i nh i t
n ce a f o t d n
o i
h d a n n i n e a_ B t n o s o t ,
e C a t i a c a m e p E . o t c 0 V d r t n i l n i i d .
2 0 n e i s et a f t e q m v s s o h i y k e u e n i p h c s a e S-r s c W l L peh ie q_ C w a o o r 9 i e l r P D B R S t d
, B o C H t 1 2-8 9
0 0
' 1 llI ll lf \Ill lfl ll'
3 . .
pn ty -
.h
't . h ' " ~
O
- 2. D3 A W SN GiPA D T M$.
A E V.
NONCONFORMANCE REPORT
- 7. PkOJ3CT NO.
j ,
'[^ 2
, ' '2"b" "
t
[g RTp j g ATE 25. D BSPOSITION CONCUR R ENCE ,e
_ Spec M-201 h 07220 c. 1. 'Norpy fil/2h/76 " - * " ""'
Q
is v . g .T 8 DA E -
//~M[h1o. f.b a
_1_0_P_ipe_ Spools QC Hold Area di. S E R G A L N U M D E R 9. ST ARTUP SYST EM NO. 3 3(
.h EPLACE MENT PART NO. tu a** **
Z '2.R.'M 9*'*
I' 'R E V. o" *'r<.......
o c'h' rs w See Block 19 'N/A N/A I o W:k:/7f
. 3, . j S. PURCH ASE OR DE R NO. 9 0. QC FsELD INSPECTION PL AN NO. S S. REPLACEME NT SERI AL NO. [ *..; 1 =7 M-10hA ~ M-10hA-R-3 Rev. O N/A
- t Wf*g ']*
ITT Grinnell/Kernersville, IJ.C. .'T E M" O NO Vendor S S. ROU T 0NG INSTRUCT 60N S: OUTE TO FIELD ENGINEER 4NG O aQu'E To MaTEa'A'surzavisoa .
8 9. NONCONFORMING CONDIT40N Spe_c Mi_qation 7220-M-201 Rev. ltaragraph 9. 'ib states in part. "Ea_qh_radionraphic film _rhall be identified through the use of lead numbers and lett ars to show the following as a part of the radiographic image..
- 1. Bechtel Order Number.
- 2. Piping system and weld identification...".
Contrary to the above radiographs received for welds 'on pipe spools received on loading sheet numbers 6121 and 6123 do not show the Bechtel order number or the piping system. Units 1 & 2. Continued on Page 2.
- 20. O FIELO Dl5PO587 TON FIELD RECOMMENOATSON/ ROUTE TO PROJE CT ENGSNEER NG 2 3. F8 ELD DISPOSITaON RESULTS Item #1: The Bechtel order number is not on the film.yhowever, the film does have the Gridell Register no. Engineering to determine if the register number is trace-able to this iob. and if so to revise paragraph 9.3 accordingly b and indicate "use as is". Item 7 #2: By use of the Grinnell reninter nt mber, (Continued on Page 2)
- 22. E NGIN EE MING DB5PO58 TION
- 23. ENG 8M EE RING OISPO58T10N RE SULTS,
.No_cngincoring_dispositinn mde _suggcat_ return of noncanforming documentation to .
supplier for revision to provide information required br the specification. Please 1,/r .ff ff/g g/ Erg efeff.E,M4 note that Grinnell RT procedure also requires order numser. Processing of /g,,/[yg/% //[,f'/jf-ff/M l supplier deviation disposition request (SDDR) may be required in this case, f77'[4,,./[ g,%[,, g, ,J- J
+. n /k L 2. 4dh . ' o MM 's-2pch9 , /4(tf/4 t99*-'*
O yE., SEE ATTACNEO. g 2 -y P
.. .. . .7 n ..i..
DR AWeNG REV. DCM , .... . , _ ,
M O ~
~ 3 SPEC. R E V. ADD.
t wo s e-s White Copy - Originator G C-G3 2 Canary Copy - Field Engineer Pink Copy - POAE ,
Goldenrod Copy - OC Os '. . = '
~
G.>
Q' G 9:._3
l ,
~
5 I 7
2 # ~ -
ce /' *
~
a c
a.
b Nl f
s m
s a
u e
Y. l ~
s i
- f b c -
~
i M h b
2 r
N o r
e 9 3
r o i t o 2
~ida s h p
t a
lis r :
i g a in ig E
A C
r e
A l fo s
w e
r rg O r
Q c.
o a - -
l l r
$w s y l o a p e o r o C
f J, y Ni vr e s t
n p o
yd po o 4 c o r Y r e. c t e Cen
. i k t
u g e g v h n ld o
)
D n r n e W iG s, i a i R T bl r w N - u s a ,
O d h p
r1 C
( ) d e r a
D 0 2
T m g l -
R nr t e M O o o t P r n i h y d C c b E
R u ce a o
. e J n re B d
E N B B B B e e r
- a. r
.w C d , .
h i N_Ibl A
M f o u i
q W l
e 1
1 1
- 1. 1 1 1 1
1 1 1_
h e u
q R
O F
hc k
n e o r c
n h g r u
q s t a c,-
N s nh o c h O N i t m -
C N
O
/( h w
l e
l i
f a N h3 b 32 a c gi d61 g h lr='h d n d
t a p rar -
7
.$r na n a n o D
Dh 0 1
2 i i d
aB l
f 1 n a e%
1 6 . o r s
1 0 6 6 3 i
t e f
- 1 9 1 2 7 7 T
l h_ ,e t k 7
- 5 5
5 5
6 6
6 7
h
- ah c t .
ff e r i kh l
a 9
1 2 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
3 f n 1 d
asg e M 6 S6 1
S 1
6 S
6 1
S 1
6 S
1 6
S 1
6 S
1 6
S 1
6 3
1 6
S d i o t
a s "
4 h_,i n c 1 - - - - - - - - - e ci -
e 0 0 55 9 9 9 2 1 u d s 2d 9 a i
P 181 -
2 2 2 2
2 2
2 2
- i n i n
o i_
o tl C B B D E B B D B B mis n
o al B C HH C
H C C G G C
F E E E C H
t n
o e t t a a_
h_e o n - - - - - - - - - -
C_
S c e s
C_l0 9 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 0
y i_
u 1
l s
- 2- n_
g t if "
- o ' . n n e U
n mo l p N o i e r p d o .
r
+ N_
os
" p e
k c
o
- i p
n i
d l e f
e r a w
6, i l h e h
$ m Q" P E
- t_ H_ T_
0 0
/ ,
k .:.. ; 4 . d . .:.: ..L '
Post Offica 0o: 1000 g 3621 South Stata Road , ,
Ann Arbor. Michigan 48106 ..
0
[N .
~
j
.t . .
August 22, 1975
~
ITT Grinnell Industrial Piping Inc. ;
P.O. Box 566 '
l Kernersville, North Carolina 27284 ,
l Attention: Mr. D. Formisani . .
. t
} h > ject: Con.uners Power Company O , Midland Plant - Job 7220
' ' - ~ ~
ds P.O. 7 220-M-104 A 6 B 1 AUG 2 91973 Grinnell Jobs 70?l-7094 ) File: M-194A, U-104B
..- BECHTEL- POWER CORP. BG - 27 '
- - JOB 7220 ~
1 Gentlemen: PER .
.. l
. This is a complete rerponse to your letter (GD-52) dated August 7, A, 1975 regarding Deviation Request f3. 1
[/} s. ' Please be advised that on all future requests of this nature a Grinnell Quality Assurance end Quality Control Deviation Report should be submitted to Dechtcl. This form r. ore readify facilitates control of these deviations and provides Pechtel Shop Inspection . an official authori stion from Ecchtel Engineering,as part of the . docur.entation package, for pipe shipment r lease. .
~
'Bechtel accepts your request for the. spools referenced in your letter ~ ;
.and understands that all piping fabricated since May 1975 that , l requires radiography, includes the Bechtel purchass order number as j
. part of the radiographic film. -
i Very truly yours,
. - , ., \
[J }R.~ .hCastleberry W bd' . .
~
I ##**b# ,
,, Pr ect Engineer -
"sGenut,n ,jf
+ t o u
yM r \> >
, \
din ll [7 u g1W
""~
~w @ w rIl ljl
! 8 "f r l l l 4 -];; p
~1, "
.. ) ! L
,n3 n - i. . 9 e
=
o .- 3 3
. e. .
[A. a
.g
. kJ ho f,{ f f f f f $, jj c)- *r i,! i
=.,sV- - = 1 3 .< : 8 .,
i o u u ~
}5 < .a I
l
~ % L.1 t 5: K
~
f<~
.w ms. ua c..- .a.-- . I i ! . I
.m -
wp .. . v,.;. ,. ., G
- s. wl l J s.1
'. /f ./Y,. > ..MU! .h
. s
.J r
' }p q k hUi,it!k@b y SEP M1975 ITTGu,nnell [v) i,n l
! tr
' '~ ~ '
~3 AUG 12137.5"9 ~5i = ::"nm: ,T2 p'o. ca'oIno'ustn.a l Apm.g, Inc.
h) ga.ng A.A. 7220 r{ Nbd x 3
.\
. /= c P. O. B.ox E65 ...
- ..n I'\ KemdsviHa,.N,.C 27224
- . . .y I
Ausust 7, 1975 (S;S)l.99Z483 f
-. . b__.._
GB-5 =,.:a r.r. III
$.f W- '
Bechte' Power Corporation ..,.,.:.. A i :!fg el P. o. Box 1000 .
. ca. ! # ,'3 . 7/g Ann Arbor, ,Mir M snn ' I8106 r .
em. l .:(-~
,4 c: n l Attention: It . R. L. Castic~ce q , .
ca < l - Project W W er . -
..- P.c. l
. ,4 . .; 3
. Subjeet: Midland Units 1 aed 2 'u e
- C1 '
Consu=ars, Power Copazry . I P.O. 7220-M ,to. M
.~ '..
c$'"i I ' s
*... O Eh. % l P.O.Grinnell ITT 7220-M-io4-A0i Iro, 7C91-9 ;.. -2 ,
c .cx , l
- a. *
.o * '
1 3 - Deviation Request. #.g. .
.,.s..
g
.g-Gentle =en: - '
?
mtno. p.iq~qo U.- M f , ((g) In answer to yetu-let+gi of 4/28/75 resaidins radiosraphs sent to the fic1d withcut thc Ecchty!. purchase: bid =r der appearitys on stich. h v We respectively request that the radiographs received on the pieces '
\
listed belcw be' accepted as reeeeived by the' field, without your purchase
- i.
order n*ere Sta"4 in May suur purchase . order nu=ber beca=e an ' p,.
~
intergalpartoftheradiogph,
,.(
- s. ..
. Register Nu=bers: Te-21-13,14,16,18,19, Ie-63-o'5,07,24, Fa'-66-28, Ie-78-55, 3 59,74,75,76,94,96,105, da-13-6, Ia-21-1,12,13,14,19,20,26,28,1a-63-23,25 .
' 28, Ie-66-4 28,32,12-67-.1,2,3,4,5;6, da-78-14,63,71,94, Ic-o6-23,25,26,27, . - s 29,30,31, 16-21 -02,03,04,05,c 6, o7,08, og ,10,1 1,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,21,22,23, !<
25,26,27,29,30,31,32, Ic-57-02,04,05,06,07,08,09,10,11,12,13,16, Is-67-1,2, 4,5,6;7,- Ic-o6-2; rc.o6-57 6;,- Ie:2t-4,7, Ier63-x,3,4;8,9;1o;19y21 22;23 3o, , --C
- 32,33,29,31, M"-66-13,15,16,32,24, Ie-78-10,11,12,14,22,30,32,56,61,89, .
Ie-78-92,93,99,101,102, Ia-13-1,2,4,5,7,8,9, Fa-21-51,70, la-63-2,3,4,5,7,8, -
. 9,10,19,21,22,24,27, Is-66-1 ,23, la-78-19,20,21,58,59,98, Ic-6-24,28,1e-21 (
24 and IG-67-3 l ., , .. . ;
- i. .
d *
, , ,. 'l ,
Very truly yours,
- IET GRDINELL INDUSTRIAL P$- PIN
. . . . . . .. ..a... ., ,- l
,' DCF/ DAD /eb - -
. . '. 3 .
dy [ jZ~ ~ .% David C. Fro::isani t .* s( Enclosures . g ,-.. 3 . , , .q. 9. . . . . . . N.J '
.. .'.~.'.. ..
..~- .
xc: Mr. R. T. Kingsley .* . - Mr. S. Cartwrisht . 4 t
~ .
9 ^^
T> m. m g. NONCONFORMANCE REPORT ' ' ' ' ' ' '
- 2. RJ#,eNG/P AR T N2 g{ , 1
"' "'h" 3
- 7. PAC 4JIC T N M.
t i E V. B REa Off Ep CV ///' E l GATE 25. Dl% POUT 81N CbNCU MIN} g, g __L22EM-92
- 3. SIGM DESCR4PT80N .
l 5 07220
- 4. eTEM LOC ATION 9 it. A. Moray 8 3.y AL D AT ED BY i8/5/75 I TE j~g " ~ ' -
2 Reactor Building Crane Mo : ors C. Ul ~ 0 A L N UM B E R WilSE
- 9. ST A R T UP S YSTE M NO.
)I ) l, T h,g b,,g,, M p pg$L/47[ #
,e .f EPLACEMENT PART ', ,
5 g g y, es[e s me * **'S 1-R-S1 N1A
- N/A l j ^1y,W ......dl g,. $d2? 73
.. ,U R EN A sE OROE R NO. u.e ,
... OC r.E LO .NsPEC T.ON PL A N NO. -
.. R E PL ACEME NT .E R. A L NO. 7 J22J)-M-92 N/A N/A *"*
- e. CO N T R A CT O R< LOC A T.ON ...A.ME o vEs - n. SOURCE *l " ' ** ** " -* *-'lff CODE , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , _ , , , ,,,,
__nfa .TE M 0: NO _ Construction 9 8. M* U T SNG $N ST R UC T 40N S. ROUT E TO FIELD ENG0NEERaNG Q ROUTE TO M ATER6AL SUPERVe50R 8 3, NONCO MP O R M tN G COND8 TION: Storage Requirements Form F-1-193 Re'r. O requires shaft of motors to be rotated every ninety (90) days. Contrary: to the above the motor shafts on the two Reactor Building Crane Motors were not rotated after ninety (90) days, but were rotated af ter one hundred twenty.(120) days. Unit #1. "Q" No. 4.001. Nonconformance
' ~
noted during maintenance inspection of motors. f fg,[ [],,a f(g), j ~
~~'
g~ //~ \ 2a Q F4 ELD DeSPOSIT EON QFaELO RECOMMEND AT SON / ROUTE TO PROJECT E *eG4N CERING 2 3. FIE LO DISPOSITsON RESULTS: Storage. instruction F-1-193,_Rev. O was_prenarAd._pr.ig._3 receipt of vendor storane . h /a* l'ha ,m.,.. Ir. E?r / requirement inntruc.tions which states that motors have be2n prepared for long term fc. v [ [ /-) f // I r / M /7~. nna an nor require _ shaft rotatinn. F-1-193 will be revis2d to delete this require- ofpylow_ [ ,Ib .h/jf AM4y
~, n w Gum G.Tv% 1 / !. a #"I w y<'~
~
2 2. E NGIN E C M pMG DISPO SIT ION { e 2. , 7 r 2 3. ENGINEE RING D8SPOSIT40N RESULTS:
- 23. 93 DESIGN CN ANGE REQUIRED 0 24. REJECTED M ATE RI AL D SPOS87 SON O = = v v a **
- e * * * * * * * = 27 O C gw
**O**"' /
D A AWING REV. DCN e s /s =e sas s a / ,,,, awyeseessa s amees C*ee pave f4 E C. R g y, ADD. ul Whne Copy - Or'Oinator GC-G 3 2 Canary Copy - F eeld E ngineer Pink Copy - PoAE Goksenrod Copy - oC ce 9
~
Ce s
~
' ' " ^ " ' '#'"*""'
NONCONFQRMANCE REPORT cF 1 326
- 2. D R A W I N G #u%P&5.++9y 8 EE V. 7. PR OJE CT N 3. p pds tpb CY 'DATE 23. DI3PQZlT13N CONCUH RENCE MA Y p
C-280 ~"
- 3. 8 TEM D CSCRIPTION l1 & 2 7220'
- 4. ITEM t.OCATIO N t i TED BY F-//-71 p
"~~ ~"
^
'~
y" 1 Reinforcing Steel C. 5EMI AL NUMBER Aux.'B1do. "Hk" Line Wall
- 9. 5T A6 TUP SYSTEM NO.
vi
. AEPLACEMENT PART Nd.
[![DATF //'D 8
9/(fl p40an ct res' [_la f Iada< M /
- 9. (- 7 ou y lREV. e.g&s e
//2s/ef N/A S. PU RCH ASE OR DE R NO.
N/A ft/A 9 6. REPL ACEMENT SERI AL NO. I y.xb}[
.[
N/A 80.
-C 221QC2 Ff381ELD hv.INSPECTION 1 /y6 N/A PLAN NO. M A " ' ' " ' ' " * " " " ' ' " '
U. CINT3 ACTOR / LOC ATIO N 11.ASME Q YES* 9 7. SOU R CE [ N/A ,'T E s No Construction la. RCUTING INGTR UCTION$a ROUTE TO F6 ELD ENG4NEERING Q ROUTE TO M ATERI Al. SUPERVISO R 5 9. NU NCO NFO R M8NG CO NDaTIO N s Drawing C-280 Detail l calls for bundles of 1 #6 ties 0 6" cround the pipe tunnel. Contrary tai the above, the pipe tunnel between the 7.8 and the 8.6 lines was embedded in concrete with single ties on 6" centers. A total of (42) ties were left out. Nonconformance noted during QC preplacement inspection of the similar placement between 5.3 & 4.6 lines. Q Number 1.203 2 Hold '.ags Applied.
- 20. O FIELD Di$ POSIT 40N @ FIELD RECOMMEND AT40N/ ROUTE TO PROJE*:T ENGINEEHING 21. FIELD DISPOSITION R ESULTS:
Fiol d requinnen el at..Prnjece Enginnnving nunlivnen enndi t-ina _ nna na visn Fin 1A_Em- o9 l any enrrocrinne requii rnd en rhn un11 in niin n ti nn _ M // M A
'/' BA s/?5~ '
/
- 22. EN G tH EERING DISPOSIT40N
- 23. ENGINEERING DISPOSITsON RESULTsa A revicu of the "as-built conditions found:
- 1. The existinn tic reinforcinn (one #6 @ 6") is adeqt_utLq, .
- 2. The norr.al slab reinforcing in the area of the opening provides the required rein-
.p [
forcing _and_therefo.re t$ie missing"Use As;~#6 tlc'd_a not t t p_ rn eL The AuxilkaryBu d sinn eYSdSnn calculatlntiatinkd 1 ation substa ons fou in clie s is kng);nund c ntair. dthn_og.cning_are ineerkna ti$es.n i eJ V 12f,$n/L JIsue,h?/df SNj
- 23. 88 DEstGN CH ANGC REQUIRCD
@ NO
- _ f ' .* * '
j !j-O vEs.sEE ATTACHED. ,,_,. - 7 . ..r.. ... - - < go, DR A WING REV. ; . DCN.. (PEC. REV,
... .::. %, t : , :.:
A D D. 4 _
~ ~ ~ ~ - - --
NONCONFORMANCE REPORT
- 2. (A ,1W s N j /#C; T N O. e W V. 7. Pi;UJlC T N D.
']}^"' j, "' "h *5 I 2. E E POR T E D 3 Y
/ ' O.173 2 5. il t 5P.:4 4 T G ;N CO NC U .:G f*Cl
--.succ_ c-71n
- 3. RT f M DESCRsPTsON
!s 07220
- 3. B T EM LOC A T IO N .
!M[82 LlDATED 3
9dds-DATE
'~ ~ " ' ' " ' *~ " * " " "" '__ Concrete Aux. Bldg. Uall A(612. 75)h' *L ! Q -94'- ..sERiaLNUM.ER .. sT.R T ur s vsTEu NO. fij E P . C E M E N Tg R T N O. ...............e... .u.
j REV. . N/A N/A / N/A V l ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,
- s. PURCNasE ORDER NO. ... OC riE LD .N sPE CT.O N eL* N N'O. . .. R E PL4 C EM E N T sE R..L NO.
,fa c-211 - 3 .56 7 _N1A " * ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' * * * ' ' * ' ' " ' """
.. Cw N T R .C T O R, LOC . T .O N
. . . gM,E a o, ....OURCE Chamoton Inc. . Midland,1!ichigan iTEu D ,u._ _ _
Subcontractor
$ $. ROU TING ONSTR UCT TONS 4 QROUTE TO FtELD ENGINEER 6NG h ROUTE TO M ATERI AL SUPERV850R
- 89. NONCONPORMING CONDITeON:
Spec. 7220-C-230 Rev. 5 requires in part that the total air content of the concrete as measured at the point of olacemeat shall be between three per cent and six percent of the concrete by volume. Contrary to the above, an air content of 2.5 per cent was measured at the end of the pump line on con' crete repre-
-_sented by Ticke t No. 06081 placed in Aux. Bldg. wall Pour No. A(612.75)b' on 9/5/75. Nonconformance noted during routine OC insnection. "Q" Lis t No. 1. 2 0'5 .
One tan aonlied. 20 Q PIELD De5PO5e) TON QPeE LD RECOMME red A TION / ROUTE TO PRO CCT ENG4NEER4NG 28. FIELD 045POS6TSON RESULTS. Field recommends "use as is". Total quantity in placement was 101 c.y. Placement _ involved is an_ interior _ wall an'd as such will not be adversely affected by 8 c.y. of concrete havinn an air content of 2:5%. [ [ ',[fe,-] / [ <> M i 'l//U? c'
/ /
22 E NGINE E RING Ol5PO54TaOH 2 3. ENGINE E RING 085 POSIT EON R ESuLTS. e
- 24. f 5 DESIGN CH ANGE REQutHED NO 6. R EJECTED M ATE 5te AL DISPOSITION O=.rwa=** .w'* 6.. a 2, OC ACCEPTANCE O vEs. sEE avT CNEO, O.ca..
ORAWSNG REV. DCN
*w*meesseacases. tee ,,,g SPEC. R E V. ADD-9 009 8-B Wh.se Copy - Orig.nator ec G3-2 Canary Copy - F eeld Engineet Pink Copy - PGAE Coldenrod Copy - OC v _
NONCONFORMANCE REPORT ' ' [' ' ' y 2.( JAWIM2(P.hTNJ s G3 V. F. P2O JE C T NU. 3 3N~
- 12. R E PO R T E D SV 04TE 25 titsPotsT tsee C3NCu u C NCl
_sacm
- 3. 0TE M emC2ePT8iN
-2 C 30 !5 07220 8 # 6 4 8:. I !?//W ~ - ' ' - ' ' " ' ' ' " ' " " ***
S BTEM LOC ATsON 8h7MT
. 4 LiO A T E'D a y I DATE Concrete Aux. Bldg. wall A(612. 75) )' .
$4#-
- 4. 5E R G A L N UM BE R 9. 5T AR T UP 5 v5 TEM NO. 3 3 5. ht EPL AC EM E N T A TNO. REV. ***secfressesmesaaem e.,e .
N/A IUA */ N/A S. PURCe4 A SE ORDE R NO ...... ,, ..... e... 9 0. QC P 4ELO BN SPE CT80N PL A N NO. 3 6. R E PL ACEM E N T SER $ A L NO. N/A C-231-3-567 N/A E*""'"*""'***"" *"*
.. CO N T R A C T O ,,,LO C A T.O N
...A.ME CODE am5 n. SOURCE
=
Marnica Inc __ Midland. JIiclLigan trE M DE __ . Suhcontrac t or t 5. ROUT 4NG INST RUCT aONS. _ QRO UT C TO FtELD ENGIN E E RING Q ROUTE TO M ATERs As SUPERVISOR 5 9. NONCON FO R MING CO N D$ 7 TON: Spec. 7220-C-2 30 Rev. 5 in Table 9.1 states in part that the rejection limit for slump of D-2 concrete mix is 4h". Co n ta_rv to the a_b_oyea a s:.umn of 51s" was measured at the end of the pumoline on D-2 concreta mix represented by Ticket No. 06092 placed :.n Aux. Bldg. wall Pour A(612. 75)b' on 9/5/ 75. Noncon formance noted during routine QC testing of concrete. "Q" List No. 1.205. One tag applied. 20 Q FIELD Dt5POS4TeON @FIE LO R ECOMMEND A TIONf ROU T E TO PetO. ECT ENGINEERING 2 8, FIE LD Os5 POSITION R E5ubT52 Field recommends "use as is". Total quantity of concrete in placement was 97 c.y. _Duc_.to_the net hosLoLpla_camen t . i.e.: pump, the 8 c.y. of 51"3 slump was distributed _avar t'h a e n ti re_s u rf a c e_a rc a_o f_theJ ;i c am e n t . Therefere the concrete in question will not adversely affect the overall compressive strength of the total placement.
~
- 22. E NG4 NEE R SNG D45PO5aTsON (Yr*Nlll/h 9////7 5~ ' #
f 2 3. E NG 4N E E R lN G D e5PO5 sT IO *4 R E 5u bT5. s e 2e. as DEssGN CH AfeGE REQUIHED 24 N EJECTED M ATE NI AL D45PO5tTION Oa*'w==**==**6*a O NO 2 OC ACCEPT ANCE O v C 5. 5E E .TT ACNE O, o..... DR A WING REV. DCN ave =osess e eases swee e.,. SPEC R E V. AOD. M, s -e White Copy - O rsg anator Q C-Ga . Canary Copy - F ield E ngineer Penk Cops - FOAE Goldenrod Copy - oC m . o
=w _
- y? .
NONCONFORMANCE REPORT ^ " ' " ' " ' " " ' e a.Of.4WINggPART NU.
/-_ _s eF -, 337 Mv. T. P & O J E C T Pe l, s2 ' PQ4T lOATE 2J. DaiPOSITION C3 NCUelE NCE DwC F-7220-C-233A-IR-62 ; 2
- s. TEM OEsCRiPTsON 07220
- s. T E.4 .OCa T eO M
/f[//g5 tow [y//g.pf r IN/77 " - - "~ -- - - " ' " **
. (/r ~O a T = O4. v s O ,
rnblo Pit _&_.Vniva Pi t Angle Framcq OC_}{old Area . 9 .,,,9 -p,_ t
- 4. sE R sai. N uM E R .. sT 4 R T uP s ysT E M NO.
/ sfREPL4 CEMENT PaRgo. '
' R E v.
.a..........-..-ea aa'=
- 62A & 62B N/A N/A L/ i S PURCN ASE ORDE R NO. ........ ..... ....
0 8. OC FsELO INSPECY60N PLAN NO. 16. R E PL AC E M E N T SE RI AL NO.
._2220-F-304,
..CONTR.CTOR 3_
LOC.HIPm051 c-233A-n-25 NLA " * * " ' " " ' " " " " ' ' * " **" 70 .....ME o u, u..Co CE Inland Ryerson/Southfield, Michigan * ' ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,, EM Kj ,,0 Vendor le. ROUT 4NG $NSTRUCTsON S; Q ROUT E TO F4ELO ENG4NEER$NG Q ROUTE TO M ATERI A L SUPE RVISOR
- 19. MONCO N FOR MING CO NO ST 40N a Purchase Order 7220-F-3043FMR-2051 requires all material to be furnisned in accordance with Specification 7220-C-233A, Form C-321-D and ASTM A-36. Form C-321-D requires Certified Material Test Reports and Inspection Verification Reports.
- 1. Eight (8) frames Mark #62A were fabricated as shown on Drawing F-7220-C-233A-IR62 Rev. 2, but the inspection record doesn't show that the frames include the 1" X 5/16" flat bar as shown on the drawing and documentation package doesn' t include any certifications for :." X 5/16" flat bar.
28 Con t in ue d. O F3ELO OsSPO5eTeON QFsE LE. "#ECOMMENO A TgON/ route TO PR 3 JECT ENG4NEERING 2 9. PIELO Ot5POSITeON RESULT 52
- 22. E NGtN E E R ING 045PO SIT eO N
- 21. ENG4N EE H4MG Ol5POSITaON RESULT 5 as as DESIGN CMaraGE REOuinE **"'"^"'^5" "
ONO 5 U"'*."~"'" - *^^"*" O TE . sEE .TT CNEO, O* - e,,, OR AWING REV. OCN aw*=*=ess..=e. .... .,,, SPEC. REV. AOO. Wti.te Copy - Originator G C<. 3 7 Cenery Copy - Feeld Engineer Pink Copy - PQAE Coldenrod Copy - QC 0 3 - e 3 @ m o
7 l 3 a i r 3_ t e
,. e a n 2 h I
! o
' i
- c. d t e c
- x. . i e 2 f p i . s
. t e n v r a i e e a R C k t c p 2 e a i 2 6 h p e ,r R t c e e
. I n e n o - r o r r i tog A e i aE E n
2 3 v t g n 3 e a n olde A c 2 w t i r iOC a - o n r OFPO a C h e u ---- s - m d y 0 u p 2 , c d y o 2 d o e yp C 7 e d t poyd cCpa o
- s C orn F u e n .
y terCo a o h
) g 1 t e ih nk ai nlo D n 5 c WCPG T i 0 n n N w 1 i a a S m O r D d r C D / e o
( G d f . T n J u n R o l o O . c c P n o n n E w N i o R o / H h e n E s d e C o e N s b d a C. e A t t i M d H o l F e r [ O t h p F a t s a N c i a i w h s O r g C b l ) a N a a r t O f i a N r b d e e l r t t o e a a h w m l f B 6
? 3 e 6 A "8 k
r T S
/[
3 X a A M " s 1 .
- s. w (
e o , m h s 2 a s i 0
- r ' h 2 d f d t e r 1 u e o r n l c o .
i g e f o t n r N n a t o_ n r C ) o o "Q 8 i p 9 1 ( t c R e ", t e g hg p t o s s d N i n e l E i T B
- " k c .
o x a s l . u o
, B 2 A c
[..[ ' -
r- . NONCONFORMANCE REPORT ' " ' " ' " " ' 2,OAAW4NG/Pt.MTtoD. 4 Ws V. T. PRO A iCT N D. _ Oi 2 338 I 2. i;E POR T E D Gv D 25. Os5Polef TON CVNCURNE PeCE Spec. C-230
- 3. ST E M DE SCRtPTION l5 07220
- 4. IT E M LOC A T IO N
? ' /',Qi ((, /5e -
l' r; ATE /.- ./g
- - - . . . . " - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ _
43? 3NTED sy _CClaCnt I dATC . ;-/](y= . 7 f
- 4. SE RI AL NUMsE R luL BI dm _&_Renctor Bldgj 9'. ST A RT UP S YSTEM N O.
@ 7*D *1 _ C. bA " m-# N I LACEMENT PART REV. *mee...r,.g..
N/A l'/A e,ogEs .es. buRCN A SE ORDER NO. N/A V i - IG. GC FIELO IN5PECTeON PLA N NO. 5 4. REPLACEME NT EF RI AL NO. ~
, / . e. CONTR ACTORtLOC ATsON yf3 is.AsME O v E:-
yf3
.50uacE j."...............g ....
Champ 1011 luc . III'11nn ri. MIchigap iTE M D NO Subcontractor S t. ROUTlNG INST RUCTION S: QROUTE TO FIE LO ENGBPe1E RING O aourr to MaTEa A'surEavssoa 3 9. NONCONFORMsNG CONDITsON: Section l'2.2.1 of Spec. 7220-C-23) Rev. 5 states in part that no cement shall be used until notice has been given by the contractor that the acce3tance t;ests required by Section 6.1.1 of Technical Spec. 7220-C-208 Rev. 5 are acceptabic. Con t ra ry to the above, cement delivered and used subsequent to 9/8/75 has not been subjected to the required acceptance tes:ing. Nonconformance noted by Subcontractor QC.
"O" I,Ist No's. 1.105 and 1.205.
- 30. FaELO De5 POSITION QFICLD RECOMME'NDA TSON/ROU TE TO PROJs:CT ENGtNEERING 2 8. FsELO OISPO5af SON R ESULTS:
Cement referenced in Block 19 was sampled at the mill on 9-18-75. Acceptance Acceptance test results have tests required by Section 6.1.1 of Specification 722C-C-208 Rev. 5 will be performed on the sample. Further_progessing gf adjacent placements may proceed been received and meet the up to point of embedment. uirements of ASTM C150-72.
'/ g f,,// f ] o g reg /[.lfg>// //f2f7 9/,?*1/7 C
- 23. ENGIN EE R tNG DISPOSITION # /
l 9b C 3 3. ENG4NEER f G OISP/5tTaON R ESULT S: e
- 24. 83 DEssGN CH ANGE REQUINE O NO **""'"^"-"'"
O vES.SEE ATTACNEO. .. .. .
@ [7 " ~~" y pjQ",'Q[ g-[q/[ig cRAwgNG 5........
REV. OCN e . . ,,, (PEC. R E V- ADO. aw.m.aes..enees.... ..,, i..... - White Copy - Originator CC-Ga a Cenery Copy - Field Engineer Pink Copy - PGAE
, Goldenrod Copy - oc
=
v _ _ __ _____________ __
8 3 - 3 5 ~ 7
- 9
- 1 a
c a. s i 8 1 u t p e S o t r e L_r 5 7 e n ri a 9 o ne 1 taE E n 2 idgl A i r e. G C w 8 ) OFPQ a c. t
. 'a - - -
y s ) p y c 0 0 o yp y C S 6 poyd ( oCpo m A C y o nr o er Ce t a r . inkld h aino
) f WCPG D 'a T d o
)
0 N i 0 O r 6 C ( e ( p C T C R e O h t P E 'a R n ' ) n b 3 E i ) 0 ,. C r 5 6 . N A t u 2 ( _ C _ 4 M e 0 C ( . m R d 6 . O a ( . F m A ' 'a N e )
'a
'c ,
b
)
)
2
'c
)
O r 5 ) ' 5 9 3 C e 7 0 h 2 3 N w . ) . 2 . O 0 4 9 0 6 3 N s 1 1 9 1 e (6 9 e e t 6 6 5 6 n 5 n n n( ( ( ( o C ( o o e A A A A N C A N N m e c a l p e
- t e
r c n o c 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 d d 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 e e/ / / / [/ / / / u t 8 9. 0 1 2 5 6 7 8 n s 0 y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i i / / / / / / / / / t L 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 n o 0 C t s 9 n 1 i w
- o o l N l o ,
k f e c e a-l H h
'I s
e c e s p
NONCONFORMANCE REPORT
- 3. C A W GN >f /MiT N J $RXV.
' '[' ' ' i
, 339 F. P AOJECT NO. II. N EPO N TED OY 8 C#a T E 25. DISPO5tilaN CU NCum ANCE Snec. C-230
- 3. STEM DESCRIPT80N
~
!5 7220
- 8. BTE M LOC ATsON (3._ ON !9/2/77 " - * " "'"'
j
" ~ ~
l "" " "
'LBO A TE D B V 3dATE" . -
- rnncreen A. h E RI A L N UM BE R Pour No. A M08.67)a'
- 9. ST ARTur SYSTE M NO. '
.g5 s m c-<
REPI' ACEMEN T PART N .
% b-D # REV. **S8S C T
- sste e seceses s e e4Te N/A 5.PURCNASEORDERNO, N/A
- 30. QC FIELO $N5PECTaON PLAN NO.
I N/A I
/ ' 3 4. REPLACEMENT SEMB AL NO.
I , . . , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .... M/A c-70R-1-11n Nf3 * * * **" (A CONT R ACTOR / LOC ATION Chanofon Inc.. Midland. Michigan ts.ASME erE M O vEs O NO
**.souaCs Subcon trac tor
_"***"_"'_'* _ _"'""' .m 9 0. RouTSNG INSTRUCTION $a { ROUTE TO FIELO ENGINEERING Q fion.tTE TO M ATERG AL SUPERVISOR - 9 3. NONCONFORMSNG CONDITION: Section 9.2.1 of Specification C-230 states that the measuring of all concrete shall conform to AST>I C-94-72. ASTM C-94-72 states in part for batches smaller than 30% of the full capacity of the scale. the
~
_ quantity of cement shall not be less than the required amount. Contrary to the above, Batch Ticket No. 06043 re-presenting the concrete in Pour # A(608.67)a' poured on September 3,1975 shows the cement content below the specified batch weight. "Q" Lis t No. 1.205. Nonconformarice noted during QC review of batch tickets.
- 23. Q PtELD DISPO5tTaON OFeELO RECOMMENDATION / ROUTE TO PROJECT 8:NGINEER4NG 19. F4 ELD DtSPOSITION RE1uLTSa
- 22. ENGIN EER4NG DSSPO 58 TION 23. ENGINEERING OISPossTION RESULTg a 2 3. SS DESIGN CH ANGE HEQutHED O NO 8 * " "' ' c ' * " " * ' ' " ' ^ ' ' ' ' 5 "o 5 n ' o M 0-**-*-**** 2 r OC ACCEPT ANCE O vEs. .EE ATT ACuED, U""
g* R ;.W l N G REV. DCN avveseaease emeesstem ..,. SPAC. REV. ADO. S u 8-5 Whale Copy - Originator G C<a a-2 Canary Copy - Field Engineet t PMk Copy - PQAE Goldenrod Copy - CC
. .j
_ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I
.., .. "o .
f M L'A h% d NONCONFORMANCE REPC'RT " j "^'* '2 34b" ' e 2. L;G A wsNG /P A W T N J, g r.E V. 7. PJ irJE CT No. 32 ' t ro R T E o 77 oATE 2 5. fa a5PC 5s f ooN C3 NCu .a ENCJ Socc. 7220-!!-201
- 3. IT E M oESCRIPT 0oN ..
!6 7220
.. ITEM loc A TaoN
, /(/I w l'fW/I 4* - " ' "'"' "~' " ' ' " ' ' " * -
~
V 5 S/S Pipe Spools LIO'ATEo[M, [I[ ATE 24 71-fY(/]dd./m,,d /O-6 7f" Locked Area #1 h' .Qg9
.. .E .A N u- . E R . . ., A R , u . . , - M N . .
y R E. A.E.EN, . AR,y. ; RE . ...-
..... . . ... .. ... 7 3;
..euRcM sE ... o c 7220-:1-104 A oE R No. E to .N s,Ec Tion ei.A N No.
}I-104 A-R-12 Rev. O_
M/A
'A c E = E N T s E R . A i. N o. ] 'f p M [ g r*lc"- 7 [
. .. con TR A cT oR, oc A T.oM ~ ' * * ** * * * -* -"g-)
si.AsuE [] vEs . ,. sou R c E . ITT Grinnell/Kernersville, N. C. .T E M []No Vendor s o. RouraNG $NSTRUCTeoN5. _- Q route TD FIELo ENGtNCE RsNG Q route To M ATERa AL SUPERVe50R i.. No coNroR=.NG coNo. Tion Field Inspection Procedure C-5 paranraoh 3.3.4a states in part:
- a. Prellainary Inspection:
A prolininary insnection shall be performe<1_1 y._Gle bC" at the time of unloadine to identi fy the damane that may have occurred during. loading or s1 *n t. This inspection shall be to accertain f reedom from the following:
- 1. . . .
Continued. 2.. e c.E to o.sros.T.oM o,.E co REco. ENo A T.oN, route To ,E c 7 C N G.N E E R ,NG 2,. ,,Eto o.s,o.,7,o,,RC ,vi.T ; All cpoole referenced-.f .i_Blo,ct- 14 r-hn 11 he_ cleaned _1.1_accordance_uith_Spe ci f f en r i nn__ ff-204. If required for construction expediency, the spools may be moved to the Combinatinn_ Shop for cleaning. Ilowever. " Hold Tans" must renain attached. After C.onpletion of c1 caning _and insprctinn activities clie._snoo,)q_sjtal1 be returrLed to
]onc tern storace in the laydown area.
22 ENGINEE R 4NG oa5PoseTsoM WF! 4. IN lo-s zr 2 3. E NGINEER ANG oaSPossTaON RE5ukTS. e
- 24. g$ o[ SIGN CH AP4GE N EautHEo g 2., R EJECTEo M A TE RI AL oISPoS4TIoM O a * *wa a * * ****wa a 2 7. oC ACCEPT A NCE O vEs. sEE ATTAcHCo. O .e...
oR AWsNG .. ........ .... RE V* OEM
$PCC
.w .a ea sa. . e. ..e . v e. ..,e REV. ,
Aoo, 8 098-0 Wh te Copy - Ori0sator ec G3 2 Canary Copy - F kad E ngineer Pink Cos=y - PQAE Goldenrod Copy - OC ea a e9 m e e
* /
y' NONCONFORM/sNCE REPORT (CONT D) 2 s . c a r-_.o r_2 s o. aca ao--- 3 4 0- _ Block N~. 19 Continued.
- 2. . . .
- 3. Environmental Damane - Water or oil marks, damp conditions, dirty areas, or salt film (indicating ,
e;;posure to sea water or winter road chemicals) " During this prelittinary inspection for pipe ; pools listed on ITT Crinnell Loading Sheets 9030 and 9031, it was noticed that the followin1 pipe spools had rain splash 2d dirt adhering to the pipes resulting in surface rust to form on the exterior of these S/S Pipe Spools. IIP-63-27 11Lcr,-19-S612-6-ll LS 9030 MP-73-33 1FC3-26-S610-4-2 LS 9030 MP-ti 3-19 21iC3-43-S613-6-1 LS 9031 MR-6 3-30 211Cn-19-S613-6-9 LS 9031 HR-66-1 2ilCB-20-S613-3-1 LS 9031 "0" No. 4.104, 4.124 and 4.134. Units 1 and 2. Noncoiforma'ce noted during receipt inspection. 8 hold tans apolied. 6 secta a White Copy - Originator Canary Copy - Fieu Engineer Penn Copy - PQAE Gowented Copy - OC
# f *>
. 9
~
f e # o
' s 9 m ' ' '
. ' g, i0 ,-
.g
- w. .
Tel call ,.< R...
. J:y.s!f RouTc b6 N dMa .
.a.u,a c. ea . -
4 , u Lw Gaesa> .,4 w,n,a,nias. .
- .i.- '
- 9 ' *
. D Af t_A6I d IM i, 7 pug .g.,
~
SUBJECT "
.los No. ' l
.P. ,
- s. ,
s
,:w
[ 2 .e x dod 722o AGzses' g,,, gg- D n e fe e id p c,.4sp.: .'4 %.'.
.- +5, ,i /Eccon /c /Ai_S pu,. , pag e,g pgg 8l/O< ,NE fuOr.;r AG,eegg .
t. y 5 #'W DE SU d dau f Aic,e e/6 ,ute, ,v u .f. 73,p.g ;.,[ , 7 7 . 6 A 1 , d u <. < l & o f 3 ,. ( g >
- . ..l> ,
, .* L..,. '..
e Av. . '
. g.*
i . ,..,. . .
,i '. M.o e *
- p *.
...'t,/
. : . N'c'A
. -' *'i.. .
* * ' . ,l.,',yj' ,')j
.. y,' .,
, f , .,q'.;
- u..q ]
3
; , .:;y
.t . .\ ; \
. . , * '.,' Oli
, :, ?j
. ' , . . '.E.,%..
? % .* ..
* >l .*.t
','f. ;
%9 p}J
- s.i ., .,- g 4
+ %. 'g,'j V .
. e, v
. e.- l
.\'
s .
.a 03/06/75 L .
. m , - ......,...... N/A -
........... g . ,, , . ....... !!i_dland 1 & 2, Job No. 07220 Construction 0 .. .
- c. Dichardson
(, 8 QC Files
~u..~............................ J. Connolly Fitt G-5. Rev. 0 Para. 3.3.3
~
" Purchased items which do not require release by Bechtel PID may re-
- quire quality verification documents . . . . .
' Die documentation re-
' quirements will be designated in the P.O. and shall be itemized on the Field Receiving Inspection Plan. Documents received shall be reviewed for . . . . compliance with the requirements of the technical specifications and procurement documents."
C ntrcry to the abova the. Ficid' Inspection Plan C-66-R for receiving materials to Sp;c. 7220-C-66 does not itemize the required material test reports and there is no evidence of review of complainee by a QCE. The same condition was also noted for FIP C-233A-R-1 which is used to receive materials purchased to, Spec. ,7220-C-233. f 'p pa,kaCa checked: # iiiGTE . Spec. 7ezu-Sbe () C--66, HRR AE0 636 s' no longer in ' C-233, MRR AE0 316 use at this site.' Therefore re-
- vision of the FIP is not necessary.
m .... ..... B.
, For C-66 materials review all . material tes t reports for compliance. '
- 8. For C-233 review MRR AE0 316 for compliance and revise the FIP or utilize FIP B-1-R to receive non shop inspected materials from this P.O. as these materials also appear on the bulk items list.
I).
' Assure that this condition has not occurred elsewhere by reviewing FIP's used to receive otimr non shon inspected items.
.. l 06/06/75 PFQCE l b .u m........,
- 1. All material purchased by C-66 has been reviewed for compliance and documented on the i Receiving Field Inspection Plans.
- 2. All C-233 material that was not shop inspected has been reviewed for compliance add doc-umented on the Receiving Field Inspection Plans.
?.
( AllFM-723 non-shoprequests inspected f rom the ClC-38,iicf Field Quality Co tC-232, and C-255, material ha n rol Engineer revisions to applicable O 1d Ins.ie ri.cn ans to conn _1v with C-5 para. 3.3.3. fm.G 75 .w. . .b. . . . . . . . . .. .PF&CE.
.. _ . . ...... 7 u y ....
p =====
~ .m.~.
,1 my24-2-n QEUTY AEIT FillD13 i I 9
. ,. lrn .u/24 / 75 s
7 4 l N/A ( v' .
. . . . . . . . . . , g...,. .......
p .m., m ... ...,...... Construction D. ~ . c. nicharason 1 and 2
,....d Hid l,a 7..q...V51en:ano J. Connolly M/A 167 OC Records / Aux. Blda. ........
p....................................... !!/A Spec. 7220-11-204 Rev. 3 5/16/75
" Spec. 7220-11-204 para. 6.5 .
Cicaning of Field f abricated piping. Para. 6.5.1 After Final sub-assembly cleaning shall include a demineralized water flush and rinse. rinsing, sub-assemblies shall be tilted as necessary to inst,sre complete drainage and lef t to " drip dry". . Sp:c. 7220-M-204 parat 4.2 Field ben'd ing. Piping 2 inches and smaller may be cold bent; 'using hydraulic or mechanical bending t,'ols. o Uending shoes which are the standard size 'for' the bender shall be used to Be'nds shall be smooth and produce a bend of approximately 5 nominal pipe diameter radius. wrinkle f'rce. No bending shall be performed at metal temp. less th'an 70 F.
- rnn e n.m a .
1.. . g,.
- 1. The domineralized water and rinse was not accomplished for the piping sub-assemblics
'Ihese sub-assemblics are currently partially embedding in listed on the attached These shecc. spools are part of the Spent Tuel Pool 3/4" Leak'T.hase Piping. '
. Bdig, walls.
The Master Inspection, Plan (M-204-2 (a-b),.Rev. FC-1 (10/12/74) 5.ece does not include taskstc,to t:ch: :.cre .ct adac.d {( ar field bending and cleanine of field fnbricated pipian. the FIP's that cover the sub-assemblies described on the attached sheet. Piping Spools Audited: OllCC-118-f 011CC-119-1 OllCC-120-1 OllCC-121-1
. Continued.
n..<,sv#w+.s uecoTwiiaeo.
" 1. Perform the deminerallred water flush and rinse required by the technical specification o.
ths installed piping sub-assemblics or revise specificat*on in this area.
- 2. Add additional tasks to the FIP's that cover the subject piping sub-assemblics to include verification of pipe bending and cleaning and perform these activities where still possible.
(at least one bend is still visible on each assembly)
- 3. Obtain revisions to the _ Master inspection Plan to cover the two above items.
.. ..... ........... J. Connolly
" 1. J. Newgen 2, 3 "10/24/75 p .......,;.......
{ ,p- _.)
- 3. . . .. .
a ~- .... ,
,( 372 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .
a u ~~e .=e-. . ~ ~ .
, m ., e w. .*w
( Block No.10 Continued FIM C-6, Rev. 6, 6/7/74; para. 4.1:
'.' Master Inspection Plans include the minimum inspection activities and .
tasks necessary to determine that the performance of the work or quality of materials meets the Project Engineering requirements. Block No.11 Continued Piping Spool's Audited 011CC-122-1 011CC-123-1 . OllCC-124-1 011CC-125-1 - OllCC-126-1 OllCC-127-1 OIICC-128-1 011CC-129-1 - OllCC-130-1 nn ec_ , > , , ( OiiEE-iii-i e 9 C -
, --w 4 .-%,, 3--,-.r--,,,---,y,.y.#-,-c- w., n-+w,w- ,'w--
# 7 e r.: ,.. I
' ~ ~ ~
l., vn'.n Com! ror I . File l6.3
. /
JS3ue fr:Le A n 9 n ca 91 1474 l C. S. K:aley S. H. How211 f - 1 froject _ Midland 1 & 2 l C. Q. Hills . W. E. Kessler (1) s I W. Slager , W. F. Holub I hm ;.M File Title l ' (last) ! File ! NCR's on Bechtel l
!.one nfomance No .QF-21 ,
l
.--.c.r. .--:- m .
a-k.=-====,-- l
'2 hit; nonconformance firpurt ib Isaued ED: Prepared by MM D' ate 8]
Mr. R. C. Sommerfeld Reviewed B' Date M & FQCS Written Reply Regtji ed 3y Date Ann Arbor, Mich. Action Required By Date 9-18_74 l _ ho w 1 resocasible for correction action. l tionconformance Description and Supporting Detad,la: The ASME Code,1971 Edition, Section II, Part C, Material Specifications, SFA-5.1, paragraph 20 entitled " Chemical Analysis" states, " Chemical analysis samples for the deposited weld metal shall be obtained for 5/32" and 1/4" sizes of electrodes specified in table 2, using the types of current shown for that classification and siz'e in table 8." Table 2 lists the chemical requirements l of E7018 electrode. I It violation of the above paragraph of the code, UFMC-1, Rev. O Table I
- I entitled " Weld Material Certification Requirements" states that E7018 electrode
!requiresN0chemicaltestsandanalyses. There is currently 350# of.5/32" E7018 rod in stock.
fi.C heportaal2 Yes O Iio @ S2e Procedure 9 - Reporting of Deficiancias to Id l AEC do:ified on P.y Pethod ((V fi :'.;c:mr.cnd::' C rrectit: ?.: tion (!f ?.p. Orc.Orirt:): i 1. Provide assurance that chemical analyses are available for all 5/32" & j 1/4" E7018 weld rod received and used on site to date.
- 2. Provide assurance that outstanding purchase orders require chemical analyses.
! 3. Revit,e WFMC-1, Rev. O, Table I to correctly address the ASME Code.
l 4. Review WFMC-1, Rev. O for. statements that violc.te ASME Code and make necessary l, cdxrections. uorracwn Acticn To _a s Tsen:
! 1) Bechtel Quality Control will review records to assure that the chemical analysis j reports are available for all E7018 electrodes.
l2) Review outstanding purchase orders to verify that chemical analysis has been requested for all E7018 electrodes. i 3) Revise WFMC-1, Rev. O, Table I to include requirements for chemical tests j , for E7018 weld rod.
' Underl /ing Caus= of lion:onfo:~*'ce:
I No longer required by Procedure 8. t 1 (Cortet ha I.e . ion leplemented and Nonconformance Closed) Confirmed By l Date 9 7.T )
,/ 'a' l 1
- l. 70 Pe Protid-d by Addressae.
l 9/15/7h -
~
7- / /RGacECn3A
. Rout 7 To Thia Copy For s, Filo 16.3.6
-j ICsu3 Dat3 June 23, 1975 GSKeeley SHHowell Project Midland 1 6 2 x CQHills WEKessler (2) i HWSlager TCCooke CC mBf5 FD'# K File Title NCR's on Bechtel L2 Quality Control (last) WFHolub Nonconfomance CLRichardson Report No QF-51 This Nonconfomance Report is Issued 'Ib: Prepared By [ [ e M Date (/2 4/S+
Approved By N _ j 'dI [ [ Date 4/3 sh J. P. Connolly Bechtel PFQCE Written R d Request [ Date 7/23/7' Corrective Action Requested By Date 7/23/ who is responsible for corrective action. Nonconfomance Description and Supporting Details: See teachment A AEC Reportable Yes No @ See Procedure 9 (For Nuclear Projects Only) [ Step Wrk Eece"e2",/ Ya* C Nn { See Procedure 16 - Stop Work Ko (A/) . Recommended Corrective Action: - See Attachment B l Corrective Action Taken: See Attachment C l Verification of Corrective Action Required Yes No kiethodofVerification: See Attachment D bionconfomance Closure Confimed By ((~x Date p-y ;S // Q,) 1 To be completed at time of closure by Constmers Power QA Services. Page 1 of 4 e - . .
,7-Issun Date: June 23, 1975
. Pr,oj ect : ' Midland 1 & 2-File
Title:
NCR's on Brchtel
- Quality Control
{ Attachment A to NCR QF-51 Specification C-lli-(Q), " Technical Specification for the Erection of the Reactor Building Liner Plate" contains Nondestructive Examination require-ments for the liner place under Section 9.0 which references Appendix C, Section, 1X-3300 for radiographic examination techniques.
- Section IX-3334.3 " Number of Penetrameters To Be Used," requires that film density through the diagnostic area be from -15% to plus 30% of the density through the penetrameter which is normal to the radiation beam. However, if the density varies by more than these requirements,' an additional penetrameter is required for the exceptional area and .the density of the diagnostic area may be checked using the density of the second penetrameter. The additional penetra-meter does not need to be normal to the radiation beam.
One hundred radiographic films of liner plate welds were reviewed for compliance with the above requirement. The density check was performed on a Macbeth Quanta Log Densitometer using calibrated film strip BPC 465 (Certified on 5-15-75, due for recertification on 5-15-76) to calibrate the densitometer. It was found that fif teen films did not meet the requirements of Section IX-3334.3 of Appendix C to the specification. The films reviewed and the results are Ifsted below: Dens ~ity Through Density Through Liner Plate Film Lightest Weld __ Assembly Identification Location Penetrameter Actual / Allowable on No. Belt C-lll-22 734' 2" 6' w d 2.94 2.25/2.49 11-12 2.30/2.49 0-1 l 736' 3" '4' e6 2.75 2.09/2.33 11-12 736' 11" ~6' ed R1 2.45 1.90/2.08 11-12 C-111-31 731' 6" 73" wg, 2.89 2.26/2.45 0-1 C-111-44 603' 6" R8R 2.54 2.0/2.15 0-2
-C-111-48 648.' 0" R2 2.70 2.15/2.29 11-12 655' 0" 2.48 2.0/2.11 11-12
-643' 0" T-2.60 2.0/2.21 8
-- 640' 0" 2.82 2.25/2.40 11-12 658' 0" 2.44 #
11-12 1.95/2. % t 636' 0" R1 2.63 1.82/2.23- 0-1 Page 2 of 4 j
'Filos. '16.3.6 Icaue Dates .Junn 23, 1975
, Project: ' Midland 1 & 2 File
Title:
NCR's on Bechtel. Quality Control c0 Attachment A to NCR QF-51 (Contd) Density Through Density Through Liner Plate Film Lightest Weld Location Assembly Identification Penetrameter Actual /Allevable on No. Belt
. 2.07/2.23 1-2 ,
. 2.08/2.23 2-3 pg 637' 0" 2.68 2.03/2.27 0-2
~
2.20/2.27 11-12 659' 0" , 2.28 1.85/2.0 0-2
, 1.90/2.0 11-12
- 639' 0" 2.22 1.36/2.0 0-2 1.90/2.0 11-12
, ({ c-111-107 see A 15' s of c. P.1 2.25 1.85/2.0 11-12 e e e
F
/*
Page 3 of 4
~~ -
FfRos 16.3.6 Issus Dsto: Juna 23, 1975 Project: Midland 1 & 2 File
Title:
NCR's on Bachtal Quality Control
- ( Attachment B to NCR QF-51 ,
Recommended Corrective Action:
- 1. Review all acceptable radiographs 100% for proper density. Review is to apply to 100% of Q-list, field weldment radiographs.
- 2. Provide a justified disposition for each veld represented by a radiograph with unacceptable density.,
- 3. Determine if the radiographs of liner plate welds have fulfilled their purpose as is stated in Volume II, Section 5.1.4.1.1 c. of the Midland Plant PSAR.
~
- 4. , Determine underlying cause of. improper densities and .take corrective action to preclude recurrence.
.l 1
l
- - n- ~
-Page 4 of 4
Project: Hidland 1 & 2 File
Title:
NCR'c cn B:chtal Quslity Control .
~'
f[ Attachment C to NCR QF-51 \ C'; , Corrective Action Taken: ; 1
- 1) Acceptable radiographs have been reviewed 100% for proper density. The review was conducted by two Bechtel interpreters certified.to SNT-TC-1A. -
H
- 2) A demonstration radiograph was shot which established that radiographs with I densities down to 1.54 have the sensitivity required for proper interpretation.
The radiograph was shot under the supervisi.on of MF6QCS personnel. The test radiograph provides a justified disposition for each film with an improper density. There were no films with densities less than 1.54.
- 3) Bechtel Proj ect Engineering has evaluated the MF6QCS review and evaluation l and concurs that the. radiographs are interpretable and, therefore, meet the requirements of the PSAR.
- 4) The underlying cause of the improper densities was a technique problem, probably I caused by not centering the film beneath the source. The films were accepted based on the interpreters judgement that localized areas of low density were interpretable. The following corrective action has been taken to preclude !
recurrence: ( ,,-~s a. The NDR niihenntractor han commit ted rn more carefully centering the X-Ray.. '('- ) source; affixing a sticker to each radiograph showing the measured film densities at the penetrameters and in the veld areas; and placing a minimum of three penetrameters per each radiograph to cover the various weld buildup and backing bar thickness when an X-Ray source is used on liner plate radiographs.
- b. The NDE Report prepared by Bechtel covering the interpretation of each radiograph has been changed and now requires that the measured film densities be recorded.
- c. All Bechtel Level II Interpreters employed at this site will be made aware of QF-51 and this response prior to their acceptance of any radiographs.
It should be noted that all future radiographs will be accepted in accordance with specification requirements. The determination of interpretability of radiographs with low density applies only to the radiographs identified in the review necessitated by Nonconformance QF-51. G 9F5]
, File: 16.3.6 Iccus Date: Juna 23, 1975
- Project: Midland 1 & 2 File
Title:
NCR's on Bachtel Quality Control
~O (V Attachment D to NCR QF-51 Method of Verification:
Verification of corrective action consisted of the following:
- 1) The documentation of the Bechtel review was reviewed for completeness.
- 2) The qualifications of the Bechtel personnel (A. L. Boulden, W. C. Koepke) conducting the review were reviewed ,to verify cotopliance with SNT-TC-1A.
- 3) Thirty (30) films were interpreted for density by CPCo QA to verify that Bechtel's review provided accurate density readings.
- 4) The demonstration radiograph was reviewed. The sensitivity indic'ator (~slit) was visible on a number 7 penetrameter through which the density' measured 1.54 on a calibrated MacBeth Densitometer. The film I.D. is C-lll-ll4, Seam A, 24" South of C. .
- 5) The Project Engineering evaluation was reviewed. (10M telecopy, R. L. Castleberry to J. P. Connolly dated July 14, 1975)
T 6) Peabody Testins: letter from R. L. ilyard (Vice-President Operations) dated' kfd July 9,1975 was reviewed. Letter commits to more care in centering the X-ray tube over the weld and the use of three penetrameters on each shot. Also, a t'ag with film densities recorded on it will be affixed to the film.
- 7) Reviewed the revised Bechtel NDE report form on which all film densities will ,
be recorded. l l
- 8) Verified that the Bechtel Level II RT interpreter's training file documented awareness of NCR QF-51.
- 9) All commitments contained in the corrective action have been observed to be implemented during subsequent radiograph reviews conducted by CPCo QA.
(
/ \
1
Route To Thic Copy For , Filo 16.3 4 tMSouthworth SHHow211 ~
. I:sua Data Aueust 13. 1975 WSlcger GSKe: ley (2) n e Projtet Midland 1 & 2 CQHills TCCooke CODSumM3 power File Title NCR's on Bechtel JMilandin 3 WFHolub Cogtruction bm/
GLRichardson Report No 0F-54 This Nonconfomance Report is Issued 'Ib: Prepared By ?%jld MLv Date 9-15~ Mr. J. F. Newgen Approved By f M d $ / . 7 Date 6')I/pr Bechtel Project Superintendent Written Re h RequestcI By Date 8 Corrective Action Requested By Date 8 who is responsibic for corrective action. Nonconfomance Description and Supporting Details: ' Project Special Prcvisions Notice SF/ PSP #4, Rev. 1 section 5.la in the Quality Control Notices Manual states in part
' hat "Upon receipt of revised drawings, the Document Controller is responsible for t
removing and replacing superceded prints on the office sticks". Contrary to this requirement, Field Sketch FSK CA-6, Rev. 3 was approved on July 17, 1975 and has not been placed on the office sticks. Because of the work activity in the area of the field sketch, the repJ acement of the superceded print with the revised print should have been done in a timely manner, but was not. IIC Reportable Yes No @ See Procedure 9 (For Nuclear Projects Only) Stop Work Necessary Yes No See Procedure 16 - Stop Work No ( ) Reco= mended Corrective Action: (1) Replace the superceded prints with FSK CA-6,- Rev. 3 (2) Review all recently approved drawings for similar problems and correct the problems if applicable (3) Take corrective action to preclude repetition. 1 Corrective Action Taken: (1) FSK CA-6, Rev. 3 has been placed on the proper office print stick. (2) The Document Control Department conducted a total review of all approved drawings for conformance with the card file records and corrected the problems where applicable. (3) One person has been added to the Document Control Department to help prevent i further untimely distribution of prints. Verification of Corrective Action Required Yes X No 1 Method of Verification: On September 26, 1975 100 approved drawings were reviewed for confomance with the card file records. All drawings were found acceptable. The reason for the late closure of this NCR was due to the rejection of part of the initial corrective action taken by Bechtel. konconfomance Closure' Confirmed By ;%v-M N /dfu g Date % ? 6 J :- y s V 1 To be completed at tir.e of closure by Consumers Power QA Services. Page 1 of 1 i
__ _ m-Rauta To This Cooy For j,p g - File 16-3 4 l FMSouthworth SHHowell. Issue Date September 4. 1975 i HWSlager GSKeeley , .' Project Midland 1 & 2 CQHills TCCooke Q JMilandin C0f!Sumer3 PF#8f File Title NCR's on Bechtel 1 Q Construction WFHolub Nonconfomance - i GLRichardson Report No QF-55, ; This Nonconformance Report is Issued To: Prepared By Y M d / f N ate 9 e/"-) Mr. J. F. Newgen Approved By M? . [, ., Date # 4 b-j Bechtel Project Superintendent Writiten Reply Requested'By Date 10-l Corrective Action Requested By Date 10-j who is resnonsible for corrective action. Nonconfomance Description and Supporting Details: kaceway Installation Procedure Documentation FPE-1 Rev. O, page 3 section 3.4.3 s' tates in part, " Draws out raceway paper cards by filing out raceway paper card form (See Exhibit B)". And, page 7 states in part, "The punch card then is transmitted to engineering, form as shown i on attached Exhibit C shall be used for punch card transmittal". Contrary to this procedure, requisition form Eichibit B in the Procedures and transmittal fom Exhibit in the Procedures are not being used in the field but superseded forms 47711 and 676) were being used. AEC Reportable Yes No @ See Procedure 9 (For Nuclear Projects Only) . Stop Work Necessary Yes No X Eae Procedure 16 - Stop Work No Recommended Corrective Action:1) Revise the procedure FPE-1 to include and note superc seded forms now being used in the field. 2) Take corrective action to preclude repeti, tion. 1 Corrective Action Taken: On October 3, 1975 Field Procedure FPE-1 Rev. O has been rewritten implementing forms 47711 and 67611. In addition, the scope of this procedul
~
was redefined to exclude the procedure as a Quality Verification Document. Verification of Corrective Action Required Yes X No O Method of Verification: . Field Procedure FPE-1 Rev. I was reviewed for implementatio9 i of forms 47711 and 67611. In addition, the scope was reviewed to assure that the action taken was defined in FPE-1 Rev. 1. 1 Nonconformance Closure Confirmed By','y Date /,n.. s - 7 y 1 To be completed at time of closure by Consumers Power QA Services. e Page.1 of 1 1
~
~ Rout? To This Copy For /<e g - Filo 16.3.4 FMStuthworth 3IIII ""11 IN I '"u Dat9 * * " " - '" -
' 7%
cSgc31cy Project CQililla \u .- Midland 1 6 2 HWSlager COUSUmW3 PDW2f
, File Title NC R ' <: on ne ch en1 rn ,
r3 WFilolub " " " Honconfomance ( ) . GLRichardson
-a . ,,-a,-
Report no ov-s6 mis Honconfomank:e Report is Issued To: Prepared By [Ma % 7 Date .9-/S-J Approved By h d M d d . Date f'M-N Mr. J. F. Newgen UrittenRe[IyRequeste[ByDate Bechtel Project Superintendent ' ma_ Corrective Action Requested By Date 9 who is responsible for corrective action. Monconfomance Description and Supporting Details: .: FPG--3, Rev. 3 and FPG-6, R3v. 1, Procedures for Storage and Storage Maintenance of Q and Non-Q listed material respectively, set certain requirements for storage of Leve] D items. The following items were observed to violate Level D storage requirements E the requirements of associated F-1 forms: l
- 1) Level D storage requires items to be stored on cribbing or , equivalent. Non-q stafnless steel pipe was observed 'to be in contact with the ground in approxi mately 16 locations in storage area F. Q-list stainless steel (spray header )
piping)was observed to be in contact with the ground in 2 locations in storag area G. AEC Reportable Yes no @ See Procedure 9 (For Nuclear Projects Only) . Stop Work Hecessary Yes- No @ See Procedure 16 - Stop Work No { (/~'s) ., ncc Vu d caad c u, t,01Ac uAvc nuuAviG Correct storage to comply with procedures FPG-3 and FPG-6' as applicable. 1 Corrective Action Taken: l
- 1) Stainless steel pipe in storage areas F and G has been replaced on dunnage.
- 2) The damaged pipe cap was repaired.
- 3) The reactor building crane ladder cage has been tipped and no longer traps water. The dome dollar plate has been tipped to drain and covered. i 1
Verification of Corrective Action Required Yes X Ho 1 1 Method of Verification: ' Correction of storage discrepancies verified by observation. l bonconfomance Closure Confimed By *
- Date 9 -2 9 - 7.s- / <
' 1 ib be completed at time of closure by Consumers Power QA Services.
~
Page 1 of 2 l
-- . l
e e - File
Title:
NCR's on Bachtel~ Coristruction Attachment A Report No. QF-56 (Contd) n .m .- , Nonconformance Description and Supporting Details:
- 2) F-1 forms associated with stainless steel pipe require that all closures and tapes must be intact. A damaged cap was observed on a 10" stainless steel spool piece in the fenced laydown area.
4 3) ' Level D storage requires that items be stored in a manner to avoid trapping
. water. A reactor building crane ladder ca*ge stored east of the crane gird-
- ers is trapping water. Additionally; the dome dollar plate (liner plate) l for Unit 2 is stored on the dome fabrication slab in a manner that traps water. ,
i' The above storage discrepancies were not corrected within the five days Bechtel requires to correct storage and the NCR was issued as required by Midland Project i QA Procedure M-2 " Surveillance of Material During Prolonged Storage at the Midland Site." t k e e e i 4 . i 4 4 O . 2 of 2 -
'****-~-=-***.-...:.,,,,,,,, ,
. . , . . . - . , - . _ .- . . _ _ _ . _ . . _ , _ _ , . . _ - _ _ . _ . . _ _ . _ . . _ , m
.1 , m. , . ,. g
~
s Routa To 'Ihis Cony For -
, Fils 16.7 CQHills SHHowall ] Istua Data w a h 15_ 1m ojee Midland 1 & 2 HWSlager CSKeeley s,j FM3outhworth p TCCooke C318UfHf3 P!P#W RLTeuteberg File Title NCPJs On MiSCDil3D*C
{ Subject File Honconformance vendorx Report No 0F-57 This Nonconfomance Report is Issued To: Prepared Byffk8 Mate 9-/C Approved By Y/J 8e d'., Date /V/#[ Dr. L. C. Meyers - EG&G Corporation Written Re[ly Request /By Date' 9-2f 9025 East Kenyon Ave
- Corrective Action Requested By Date 10-10 Denver, CO 80237 who is responsible for corrective action.
Nonconfomance Description and Supporting Details: 10CFR50 Appendix B, Quality Assura Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and' Fuel Processing' Plants Criteria 6 Document Cost states in part, " Measures shall be established to control the issuance of documents,' such as instructions, procedures, and drawings including changes thereto, which pres. all activities affecting quality". Contrary to this requirement, there was no appro or issuance dates on the Midland Nuclear Power Plant Site Meteorological Data Acquisa tion System Calibration Procedure 91.5 meter station. l AEC Reportable Yes @ No @ See Procedure 9 (For Nuclear Projects Only) . Ctcp "cru Neccccc:/- Yee C Ne @ Eee Preced"re 16 - Step Herk Ne Recomended Corrective Action: - I A.- The Procedure shall be approved and issuance dated. B. - Take action to preclude reoccurrences. 1 Corrective Action Taken: 1 Verification of Corrective Action Required Yes O no b/,ethod of Verification: l l l (Id m \ bonconformance Closure Confimed By Date
~
1 To be completed at time of closure by Consumers Power QA Services. Page 1 of 1 e e -
Rout 7 To 'Ihis Copy For Filo 16.7 CQllillo sillfowall g Iccue D;ta Septeaber 15. 1975 HWSicgcr FMSouthworth GSK;: lay TCCooke (s - Projtet Midland 1 & 2 RLTeuteberg CWMM EUWW File Title NCR's on Miscellanec f j Subject File Nonconformance Report No OF-58 l Tnis Nonconformance Report is Issued 'Ib: Prepared By NMate 9:-/S~d Dr. L. C. Meyers Approved By d b % M eq / Date M/d EG6G Corporation Written Beh Requested ByI Date. 9-2( 9025 East Kenyon Ave. v Denver, CO 80237 Corrective Action Requested By Date 10-1C who is responsible for corrective action. Nonconformance Description and Supporting Details: EG&G QA Plan for liidland Nuclear Plant, Section 14 states in part, "Ca).ibration of analog signal conditioner circuits : will be performed by EG&G using test equipment with traceability to the National Bureau of Standards. Calibration certificates for each individual signal conditione ( circuit will be furnished". Contrary to this requirement, a wind conditioner card used on the 91.5 meter equipment was found.to have no calibration data documentation' and was in service. ; AEC Reportable Yes No @ See Procedure 9 (For Nuclear Projects Only) g, Stop Work Necessary Yes O No X See Procedure 16 - Stop Work No V 1 -
'v' Recor: mended Corrective Action:
A. The wind conditioner card shall be replaced. B. An evaluation shall be made on the card that was placed in service without calibration to determine if the circuitry was within tolerance. C. Training required to preclude repetition. 1 Corrective Action Taken: 1 Verification of Corrective Action Required Yes No Method of Verification: I Nonconfomance Cl:;sure Confirmed By {'f3 Date
' s' t
l'Ib be co:::pleted at time of closure by Consumers Power QA Services. Page 1 of 1 e
. W
Attach:nant A R:uta 'Ib his Copy For # , FilG 16.7 CQllills S1111owell ] Itsua Dat2 Sentenber 15. 1975 IIWSlager GSKeeley Project Midland 1 6 2 g' '
/' FMSouthworth TCCooke C m Poww File Title NCR's on Miscellaneet h) RLTeuteberg Subject File Nonconfomance Vendorn Report No OF-59 This Nonconformance Report in Issued To: Prepared Byg[/djMDate 9-/f-Dr. L. C. Heyers Approved By MN, Date NM EG6G Corporation Written Rep d Requeste4 p Date 9-26
, 9025 East Kenyon Ave. Corrective Action Requested By Date 10-lC Denver, CO 80237 who is responsible fer corrective action.
Nonconformance Description and Supporting Details: EG&G's QA Plan for Midland Nuclea2 Plant, Section 14 states in part, "The. operating status of the system is checked dai: by onsite technologists by checking conputer printout, and strip chart records and keeping daily operating logs". Contrary to this, no site logs for operational statui checks were found for dates 8-27-75, 8-28-75, and 9-2-75. AEC Reportable Yes No @ See Procedure 9 (For Nuclear Projects Only) e f% (v) Ctop Ucrh Nccccc= / Yec O Ne ] Sec Preced= 16 - Step Work 2 - Recommended Corrective Action: - A. Review operational procedure 'and operation history on site to evaluate deficiene: in daily checks. , B. Evaluate data recovery with 90% recovery requirement by Reg. guide 1.23. 1 Corrective Action Taken: l Verification of Corrective Action Required Yes C No C Method of Verification: ( C'; 1 Nonconformance Closure Confimed By
)
Date 1 To be completed at time of closure by Consumers Power QA Services. Page 1 of 1 e
M2 Attacn:nent A
- Rout, 'Ib '1his Copy For -s Fil3 16.7
. FMSouthworth SHHow211 " "' -
.s -
Project Midland 1 & 2 l CQHills GSKeeley A, p)# HWSlager TCCooke RLTeuteberg CCC3UmW3 PS'#W File Title NCR ' s o n M1 n e al l w el vendorn
, Subject File Nonconfomance Report No OF-60 , ,
This Nonconfomance Report is Issued To: Prepared B d [ ,[ Date $P-. / r i Dr. L. C. Meyers Approved By /M3u Date fM.5.d EG&G Corporation Written Reply Reques By Date 9-2d 9025 East Kenyon Ave. I Denver, CO 80237 Corrective Action Requested By Date l0-10 _ who is responsible for corrective acH on. I Nonconfomance Description and Support:.ng Details: EG&G'sQAPlanforMidlandNuclearj Plant, Section 14, states in part, "0; erating QA and calibration record chart vill be maintained on site and located in the instrument shelter. This chart will indicate current status of routine maintenance checks and site calibration or operational chec Operating Procedures for Hidland Nuclear Power Plant Meteorological Program and Parameter Logs states in part,'"An individual folder is kept for each data parameter. The calibration sheet for the sensor and signal conditioner card is filed in this folder". Contrary to these requirements, QA records were found to have sporatic inspection frequency and incomplete calibration records. (Contd)
, AEC Reportable Yes No See Procedure 9 (For Nuclear Projects Only)
Stop Work Necessary Yes O no see Proceaure 16 - stoP work no {a .. . Recor: mended Corrective Action: A. Four files were reviewed during the audit and four files were found to have the above findings. Therefore, the onsite file s'. ail be reviewed for compliance in accordance with the EG&G's QA Plan and take necessary action to correct deficiencies to update file. B. Training to preclude reoccurrence. Corrective Action Taken: 1 Verification of Corrective Action Required Yes No Method of Verification: Nonconformance Closure Confimed By 2 '4- Date
)
1 To be co:::pleted at time of closure by Consumers Power QA Services. Page 1 of 2
~ c - - - - . . .v.
'~'
Uile 16.7 Ingus Date Ssptembsr 15, 1975 Project Midland 1 & 2 File Title NCR's on Miccellaneouc Vendors
/~')
((,/ Nonconformance Report No QF-60 (Contd) , Nonconformance Description and Supporting Details: (Contd) A. 60 meter level wind speed and wind direction conditioner card - metrology laboratory data sheet was found with wrong due date and the QA records frequency found not weekly but from 3-10-75 to 3-28-75 to 4-16-75 to 5-23-75 to 6-10-75 and to 7-9-75. B. 60 meter wind direction transuitter - metrology *: laboratory data sheet was found to be incomplete with no due,date and the QA. records the same as A with'the same frequency. C. 91.5 meter level wind direction transmitter metrology laboratory data sheet was found to have no next due date and QA record frequency'from installed date 5-13-75 and checks made from 5-23-75 to 6-10-75 to 7-9-75.
. D.
The south satellite wind direction-metrology laboratory data sheet was found to have no calibration date and QA records with same frequency as A and B. s c' (d
~Page 2 of 2 e '
,_ , .- ' ' ~
o . Attacb=ent A Routo 'Ib This Copy For - Fila 16.7 CQHills SHHowell . Issue Date Seotember 15, 1975 HWSlager GSKeeley s,, .< Project Midland 1 6 2 ( CC m F0W3r File Title 1C o n W s e al 1 '"< RL e eterg Subject File Nonconformance Report No QF-61
'1his Nonconformance Report is Issued 'lb: Prepared By.f((/dM Date f-/5 <
Dr. L. C. Meyers Approved By YfM/'< 3 Date M/ M 7 EGLG Corporation Written Re d Reques Date 9-2f 9025 East Kenyon Ave. Denver, CO 80237 Corrective Action Requested By Date 10-1C who is responsible _for corrective action. Nonconfomance Description and Supporting Details: Midland Nuclear Power Plant Site Met'eorological Data Acquisition System Calibration Irocedure - Appendix C List of Forms. A. Consumers Power 100 meter tower device allocation sheet is incorrect for 100 meter level. B. Consumers Power meteorological data acquisition system onsite summary checklist fom 'ALD-CP-101 is incorrect for 300 meter level and approvq CPQA. C. Consumers Power onsite summary checklist for 10 meter station fom ALD-CP-is incorrect because no approval by CPQA can be implemented. AEC Reportable Yes No @ See Procedure 9 (For Nuclear Projects Only) e 73 k ,) stop worx neces::ary res y no [gj see l>roceaure .Lb - Stop Work No Recomended Corrective Action: A. Above - Revise form to correct 100 meter to 91.5 meter on title and chart. B. Above - Correct form from 300 meter.to 91.5 meter and delete approval by CPQA. C. Above - Correct form by deleting approval by CPQA. 1 Corrective Action Taken: Verification of Corrective Action Required Yes No Method of Verification: l 1 -[3 Nonconfomance Closure Confimed By () Date 1 To be co=pleted at time of closure by Consumers Power QA Services. Page 1 of 1 e 9
9 . Attachment A Route Ib This copy For . File ' 16.7 CQHills SilHowell .H Issun Data g nn , orwr 19, lo7M I HWSlager CSKeeley s.
.' Project Midland 1 &'2 FMSouthworth TCCooke (C RLTeuteberg Subject File C3ftSH8f3 POWN Nonconformance File Title Men's on wf ca n1'
- a=j Report No OF-62 ,
this Nonconformance Report is Issued To: Prepared Byf M . M Date 9- /5 -J Dr. L. C. Meyers EC&G Corporation
- Approved By [M/b Date fM M '
WrittenReplyRequest[ByDate 9-26 . 9025 East Kenyon Ave. Denver, CO 80237 Corrective Action Requested By Date 10-10<l who is rermonsible for corrective action. l l Nonconfomance Description and Supporting Details: Midland Nuclear Power Plant Site , Meteorologica'l Data Acquisition System Calibration Procedure, Appendix E, " Required test equipment for six month calibration at CP in Midland". Contrary to the list, a tektronix oscilloscope model 422 was found at the site instead of a model 454 and ' the tektronix model 422 was found to be out of calibration (last calibration date 7-74 and expiration date January 1975) with no calibration record on file. AEC Reportable les No { See Procedure 9 (For Nuclear- Projects Only) Ctcp 'Tod Ucccccc:/ Yec C Ne{ Sec Prc:.ct:re 16 - Step Herk No . Recommended Corrective Action: A. Change Appendix E to state tektronix model 422 oscilloscope which is on site. B. Calibrate instrument. . C. Review and evaluate the equipment that was calibrated by the oscilloscope. D. Training required to preclude reoccurrence. 1 Corrective Action Taken: Verification of Corrective Action Required Yes No hthodofVerification: I Nonconformance Closure Confirmed By Date l ib be completed at time of closure by Consumers Power QA Services. Page 1 of 1 l e
' ' IXM29E503G iS Routa To 'D11s Copy Far_ / ,
Filo 16.7 ( l= ua Data sne -,hnr 1 s _ 1 c7 s - FMSouthworth SHHowell Project Midland 1 4 2 GSKeeley ( ' ,jN ,/ _ CQHills [h HWSlager TCCooke CCfMmef3 F0W9f File Title NCR's on Miscellane: ( RLTeuteberg Vendorn Subject File Nonconfomance Report No OF-63 This Nonconfomance Report is Issued To: Prepared ByMMMI/Date 9-/f-Approved By 5pdN[N/N. .- Date 9/ds
~
Dr. L. C. Meyers EG&G Corporation / WrittenRe[lyRequestefByDate 0-2 < 9025 East Kenyon Ave. Denver, CO 80237 Corrective Action Requested By Date 10-11 who is resnonsible for corrective action. Nonconfomance Description and Supporting Details: 10CFR50 Appendix B Criteria 2 states in pa-t, "The program shall provide for indoctrination and training of personi performing activities affecting quality as necessary to assure that suitable pro-ficiency is achieved and maintained". Contrary to this requirement, no training documentation was found in the onsite file. AEC Reportable Yes No @ See Procedure 9 (For Nuclear Projects Only) Ston Work Necessarv Yes R No fil S'ee Procedure 16 - Stop Work No (( G J') ~ ~ ~ Reco=:nended Corrective Action: A. Document training of site technologist and place in shelter file. Corrective Action Taken: 1 Verification of Corrective Action Required Yes No b4ethod of Verification: bionconformance Closure Confimed By ((~3\ ? Date v 1 To be co=pleted at time of closure by Consu:ners Power QA Services. Page 1 of1 e m
liout, 'Ib This Copy For Filo 16.3 6 FMSouthworth Silltowell j'(Q;
, ., , e Ic.sua Data September 16, 1975 Project Midland 16 2 I
flWSicg:r CSKe:1cy ' I CQllills TCCooke con 3'Julers PDwei I JM11andin File Title NCR's on Bechtel I
/ WFilolub Quality Control I U neonfomance (V CLRichardson Report No 0F-64 Subiect File ,
This Nonconformance Report is Issued To: Prepared ByhMS.@W Date 9-IC ~7d Mr. J. P. Connolly Approved By # # (<) M u Date 9// c/7 Bechtel Project Field Quality 1 Control Engineer Written Reply Requested By Date 10-17 Corrective Action Requested By Late 10-17 who is resnonsible for corrective action. Nonconfomance Description and Supporting Details: . Specification C-231 Revisions 1 through 7, Section 14.1 states in part', " Newly placed concrete shall be kept wet by the continuous presence of water with.a nezzle, soakers, or wet burlap for the first seven days after the concrete has been placed". Contrary to this requirement, the Concrete Postplacement Reports (QC-C5 forms) for concrete pours A(597.25)b', A(597.75)a' and CC(601.92)a' show curing only lasted six days after the concrete had been placed.
~
AEC Reportable Yes Ho @ See Procedure 9 (For Nuclear Projects Only)
,p Stop Work necessary Yes No @ See Procedure 16 - Stop Work No _
("l j T Recommended Corrective Action: (1) Review all pour packages for similar curing. deficiencies (2) Receive a Project Engineering evaluation on the acceptability of the concrete in place, based on the curing deficiencies above and any curing deficiencies found in the review and/or nondestructive examination of the concrete (3)
~
in place Take corrective action to preclude these occurrences. The written reply to these items is requested with the Project l'ngineering evaluation and/or pondestructive examination of the concrete in place. Corrective Action Taken: Verification of Corrective Action Required Yes C Ho b 1 Method of Verification: bonconfomance Closure Confimed By ( ,, . Date ( I To be completed et time of closure by Consumers Power QA Services. Page 1 of 1
itauta To This Copy For [s Filo - 16. 3. 6 & 1 A . ~4 . 4 FMS::uthu:;rth Silliowell , Inu Data Scotch 30. N>
~
IIWSlager CQFlills CSKccley TCCooke (' ggasum pDW J "' "" " File Titic NCR's on Bechtel OC UFilolub h' _j; NCR's on Bechtel Construction CLRichardson Nonconfomance JMilandin Report Ilo OF-65 ' This Honconfomance Report is Issued To: Prepared By I f/jifX((,./. bate ? Jo
- 1. Approved By J~~d df M 7/Ilate MM J. P. Ccnnolly, Bechtel PFQCE p- /
- 2. J, F. Newgen, Bechtel Project Supt. Written Reply Requested [By Date 10-Corrective Action Requested By Date 10-frho is responsible for corrective action.
ITonconfomance Description and Supporting Details:"[Bechtel Field Inspection Procedur G-3, Section 4.4.2 states, "The tag ,shall remain on .the item until disposition has been implemented and the reinspection accepted by a QC Engineer". Contrary to this requirement, a QC hold tag (NCR 82) was found buried and attached to duct bank secti CC-CC (E-547, Rev. 7) south of Turbine Building. AEC Reportable Yes No @ Sae Procedure 9 (For Nuclear Projects Only)
,. Stop Work necessary Yes no @ See Procedure 16 - Stop Work No' kI's>
Recomended Corrective Action: '~
- 1. 'Reinstruction of QC Hold Tag removal. ,
- 2. Reinstruct personnel to abide by QC Hold Tags.
Corrective Action Taken: i 1 Verification of Corrective Action Required Yes no l Method of Verification: 1 l l l uonconfomance Closure Oonfimed By h'-'
)
Date l l w.- l To be completed at time of closure by Cons :mers Power QA Sc-vices, i Pace 1 of 1 l
.}}