ML19329F019
| ML19329F019 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 10/31/1975 |
| From: | CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19329F013 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8006190805 | |
| Download: ML19329F019 (51) | |
Text
&
D
~
7 c. 4.W'7 $ =
[.[].f.7 \.,_]'y.g
~ '
b-NONCONFORMANCE - REPORT LOG & STATUS BOOK n REPORT DATE '" *E REACTOR FACILITIES BRANCil PAGE COMPL. M -/ f* M 722Q O.C. ENG. StGN M ~/ 'Y'- '
- 1. PROJECT NO= FILE COPY g ,
lR' ORIG. NONCONFORMANCli ^
- 0. DATE &REPARED BY DESCRIPTION / REMARKS ** ~
ROUTE XMTD C OSED CLOSED BY 34 3-26-7 1 R. C. Boothe F1- 1. B&H Documentation missing for 1 &W .0 74 3-33-2012-50-1 ASflE 4.028
- 9-26-74 .lo 10-16-74 H. D. Foster 15 1-26-7 1 H. D. Foster c-110.' Liner Platn cucfaca dafactc; rield flo .0-1-76 M. Ilo p fen s pi f i4-1-0-2 & S3-1-U-2 ,
1.109 9-27-74 '
. 0 74 16 1-27-7 1 H. D. Foster c-11n.-tiner n' late surfaco dofactc ; cield flo .0-1-74 M. Hopfenspi
- 52-15-U-2 & SI-2-U-1 -
1.109 9-27-74 .0 74 17 9-27-7 1 H. D. Fo::ter C-110. Liner Plate surface defects. Field flo .0-1-7^ M. Hopfenspi
- i2-13-U-2 & S1-14-U-2 1.109 9-27-74 .2 74 18 9-27-74 H. D. Foster C-110. Liner Plate surface defects. Field flo .0-1-7^ li . !!o p f e n s ni -
- i2-12-U-2 & S1-13-U-2 ,
1.109 9-27-70 0 74 l9 9-27-74 H. D. Foster C-110. Liner Plate surface defects. Field flo .0-1-72. ft. Hoofenspi-
- i2 14-U-2.& S1-1-U-1 1.109 "-27-7L 1 0-18-74 O .0-1-74 R. A. flo ray - f1- 115. X-Ray reports not !loned ASME by Fie3d No : 0-14-14 R. A. flo ray Shop Inspector, 2-6CB-010-5613-4.4.314 .0-1-71 : 0-15 74 e
~T 1 ,0-1-74 R. A. floray C-2. Lack of correlation between Doc. & f1. S . flo '
0-23-T4 R. A. Moray
't flase Plate Assys. 1.107 .0-1-7/. : 0-28-74 o
2 .0-3-74 B. F. Price C-110. Liner Plate s u r f a c'o doforte; Irield flo ] 0-7-7/ M. Hopfenspic C S2-15-U;1 & S1-12-U-1 1.109 . 0-3-7/. 1 2-10-74 ~ 80
$ .0-4-76 R. A. iioray C-66. Beams of'not aonroved material F ield No 0-18-2 J 1 R. A. Moray 1.201 m 0-8-7/ J 1-7-7d 4 0-7-7^ 11 . Hopfensprger C-110. Liner Plate surface defects. flo 10-1f Field ] 0-8-7/ H.D. Foster linit #2 1.109 . 0-8 -75 5L0-9-77 L. R. Albert C-231. Crack in Concrete. Az 2430 to l ield rio 1 0-18-2 4 2 L.R. Albert
. 253 , Unit #1 1.205 '. 0-9-7/ -75 f
)
x.) ' , ' '
- . NONCONFORMANCE . REPORT LOG & STATUS BOOK u'
/
- 'e'fof'fMFi3[:-r n -t482 E PAGE COMPL. O'I 7
- W Q.C. ENG. St Gre
" ** N I
- 1. PROJECT NO-- 7220 ' <
STATUS ICR ORIG. NONCONFORMANCE A NO. DATE PREPARED BY DESCRIPTION / REMARKS nouTE xuTE
- ' N
- CLOSED CLOSED BY
!80 1-31 G.G. Butler -173. Hyd ro wa te r fo r 2 CC l-72" no t usi th -Ri=eit4 1-31 2-13 4-10 R. L. Bowrer-in limits of letter BEBC538.ASHE,4.353 1 1=- 79 75-I- -75
~
l -75 ei s FT618 2-10 2-10 R.A.Morav G1 - 2 J.C.Aldridge ' 11187. Bulk Material criteria, no
- flo L 973 Lertiticatenot conformance ,
2 75 -75 -75 NO 3 4-18 R. A. Morav 202 2-5 R. A.!!a ray fi- 1. Coft of Conformanca nnt red fnr rigg 75 -75
-75 list of Items. ASME' 4.029 H-5-75 l
" - . A. M ray 283 2-7 J.C.Aldridge :-66. Documentation for F-10366. AEO-49 3 H.S. _7f l -75 1 1-321-0 Form 1.101/1.201 2 75 UU 3-13 4 R. A. 11o ra y h84 2-7 J.C. Al dridge :-66. Oncunontation 'for F-10166. AFO 441 M S. .
-75 l -75 :ert of Conformance I1TR ' 1.101/1.201 2 75 -75 M-204. Ileat Codes , !! arkin 1, Sizes on Fi el d No 2-18 4-10 R. A. :1oray 285 2-7-70 R.A. Moray -
-75 Fittings,F-10577. ASf!E 2 75 l86 2 2 10 J. Fitzgerald' ' :- 2 31. Curing of pour CC(E93.5)e 7=i eJ d 2-11 2-20 2-20 L. R. Albert
-75 1.205 Edd-20 75 -75 r j e'j g rio 2-10 2-18 A. L. Boul de-27 2 A. L. Coulden C-111. Nelds on 1iner n1 ate to hnld -75 -75
-75 nice restraints 1.102 2 75 l
23A 2 L. R. Albert C-39. Reba r KE-2041 Failed usor t=<t = M:eM 2-18 5 4-11 L. R. ilbert 75 for over-shipment 1.103 9-13-75 -75 -75 2-21 3-10 8-14 R.A. Moray 289 2-18 R. A. Moray C-38. Shinnent C-17. two tnams dananad - i e.l d
-75 -75 -
-75 -
1.201 2 -L4-15 -75
!90 2-21 R. Revereza C-39. Aux Bldo Finne clah_nnura
- Field 4o ; 3-p g. , gLgg)g
-75 vertical dowels for contruction openina 2-21-2 5 75 =
77 -
flo 2-28 10-27 R. A. Moray 291' 2-25 R.A. Moray C-38. Documentation not Rc.d for Nuts / _4 -27,,75 S1 S
-75 -75
-75 Bolts / Washers 3.101/1.201 r- PaDe 27 a.to3 0ern c '
" C>.k, s '.
-- 1 3. _ _ - - - - _ _ - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _( L. - ___ _____ _
v , .
-- y n j
..- i NONCONFORMANCE - R EPORT LOG & STATUS BOOK 12.
w , v.s.n . . .
~
REPORT DATE 8'?"7'- ' ~~~j PAGE COMPL.
7" O.C. ENG. SIGN ' ~'dM "
- 1. PROJECT NO. 799n y
1 A 5" 2"NCR - ORIG. NONCONFORf/.ANCE STATUS NO. DATE PREPARED BY 8-DESCRIPTION /Ri! MARKS ROUTE XMT CLOSED CLOSED BY -
304 4-7 R. A. Moray ,1-104A. Spool martiinq differs from rt. S . flo 4-11 5-12 R. 6 'f o ray
-75 reader. sheet markings ASME 4.114 4-3-75 -75 -75 305 4 R. L. Bouren ?!PGh.StoraneonSteanGenerator ed No 10-20 10-27 H.D. Foster
- -75 2E-51A. AS!!E 4.021 4-9-75 -75 -75 i
'305 4 b.R. Albert :-211. Con-creto tennnraturn. A Hino b ' 5-1C 5-19 L.R. Albert riald 4 -75 -75
~
-75 -
1' ."- 2 0 5 d-9-76 -75 307 4 R. A. Moray 11-204. Fittinos.F-10577. AE0-9?R. tia rl i ng M.S. II0 4" 8 8- 7 " R.A. Moray
-75 and Documentation. ASME ( 7E
-75 308 4-17 R. A. Moray 4-2 5 2 R. A. Norav 11- 104 A - R o a rlo r chnat hae inenrrnet ennn' M,$,
-75 numbers. AS!!E4. '114 4-21-7 5 309 4-23 L. R.. Albert C-230. Datch P1 ant nualificatinn nast si:ehd 5 7 l7-3 J.F.Connolic;
-75 due. 1.105,1.205 c M 75 75 -75 315 4 R. A. Moray c-3?. Damaned beam. Shinnent C ?^ ideld 5-1-75 5-1[ 7-30 R. A.ilo ray
-7'"$' 1.201 6-gg-n -7a _75 41 4-30 R. A. Morav C-1n. naan : shinnnd. nnt nn chinninn it . S .
il 5 5-12 R. A. itorav
~
-75 List 1.201 5-1-75 76 -75 312 4-30 R. A. floray e -3n Dandnnd Rnans. shinront r 94 Gi=rikd 5 5-27 8-14 R. A.fio ray
-75 1.201 ;- F- 3 5 -75 -75 -75 313 5-2-7 3 J.ll. Miller C-38. Beam material tensile strenoth W el d 5 5-27 5-29 L.R. Albert over ASTM A-36 limit 1.201 d-R-78 75 = -75 -75 314 5-29 R. A.llo ray C-38. Beams, Shioment C-27 without F ield rio 6-16 6-17 R. A.!!o ray
-75 ueight or orienta tion na rk ing 1.201 H-30-75 -75 .5 315 5 -29 R. A.fioray
-75 C-38. Damaaed Beans, Shionent C 96 4W GSM 6 -75 8-14 R.A. Moray
-75 1.201 { -2^-7:
AO 103 09/74 0 _ ..
page 2g
- OC.G31
_- v J. #J
< N
(
NONCONFORMANCE - REPORT LOG & STATUS BOOK u.
REPORT DATE $'I'M V ';' "' l'* V S PAGE COMPL.
.C. ENG. SIGN j ,
- 1. PROJECT NO. 7220
~ STAWS OR 'OR IG. NONCONFORMANCE PREPARED BY DESCRIPTION /REMAR (S ' ROUTE X T C OSED Ct.OSED BY
- 10. DATE ,
9-30 10 g,g, p g,ggg r 328 8-14 C-38. Shear Studs missing _fenm enlumn
~
Pfeld 8-15
-75 A. Boos Pour A(614.5)b' 1.201 :8=44=U 5=-75 -75 3i 8-20 J .P.Connolly, C-230. Air and Slumn test!. Pour -
-F-i.e-14 9-11
-75 A(613.25)a' 1.205 4-1---7 5 -75 330 8 J .P.Connolly C-230_ Aie tnet at n n d 'n f nnmn14ne F4 eld 9-10
-75 Pour A(612.5)a' 1.205 8 21-75 -75 331 8-21-7 L.R. Albert C-230. F1vAsh content. Poer #8. E.i el d 9-11 '
75 A(611.75)a' 1.205 8= E1=75 -75 Ig' .3.g &>-7) 1>.L. o v a o R N 332 8 21 L. R. Al bert C-230. Air Test Results. Pourd Field 9-10
--75 A(612.75)a' 1.205 Br22-75 -75
~
333 8-29 L.R. Albert C-230. Air Test results- fnnr8 Field4 9-11 1.205 8 -75
-75 A(613.25)c
Eield- 9-10 03d 9-3 L.R. Albert c nn Air Test results. P.aur -75 1.205 3-76 t -75 A(614)a' Dag'
' ' g /P3-75 ~b . 6 . u., N VJ 335 9 L.R. Albert 0:230. Air content, Pour F9. E.i e.14 g-11 75 A(612.75)b' 1.205. 94T -75 p.c o w w .
q,g,, n325 336 9 L . R . A1.b e rt C-230. slumn test ensulte .pnnr - Eield 9-11 75 A(612.75)b' 1.205 p.c 25 -75 337 9-19 R.A. Moray C-233A. F- 304.3 . FMRCA-20kl. Docomonta hh llo 10-10 10-10
-75 -75 R.A. Moray
-75 tion missing, AEO N -
1.292 5 7E 338 9-22 L. R. Albert C-230. Cement used withou : acceotance Fiehl 9-30 9-30 L.R. Albert test. 1.105,,1.205 ~2-2-7&"*l , 5 3 -75 -75 339 9-22 L. R. Albert C-230. Cement weight less than requirec Field 10-28
-75
^
-75 I Pour A(608.67)a' 1.205 9-22-7 5 L ==. < ,
N "!" [
- _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____ _ __ flV- Page 31 *YN
NONCONFORMANCE - REPORT 1.OG & STATUS BOOK u.
REPORT DATE #" # ##4"'
f- PAGE COMPL.
.co ENG. SIGN
- 1. PROJECT NO. 7220 _,
3- A 5- STATUS ORIG. NONCONFORMANCE 8.DATE 9.DATE 10.
PREPARED BY 6. 7. D ATE DATE DESCRIPTION / REMARK!.. ROUTE XMTD RETD CLOSED CLOSED BY 9-29 R. A. Moray
~
!!-104A. Rain Splashed dirt on receiot Field no 10-6 10-27 H.D. Foster
-75 of LS 9030 & LS 9031 ASME 4.104 9-30-15 -75
~" -
r10-15 J i ud-2 A.L.Boulden C-111. Discontinuitv in liner plata fie4d= 10-6 10-28
-75 Unit #1 130 1.109 = 40=E=i'6 73 No 10-29 10-8 H.D. Foster M-204_ Cadwald sniattar nn 7cen 77 1 1 Field
-75
-75 Reactor Cavity Drain Line A5ME 4.343 ] 0-8-7E 10-9 L.R. Albert 00230. Concrete Mixing Water Ph higher fi-e-1 /*
- 75 - N 10-29 L. R. Albert .
-75 than allowed. 1.105,1.205 4 0 0 75 10_7g8 _73 m-:5.
10-g4 R. A. Moray F 42 - Mo't o r na ta Sheets not incaivind F-i-e-hi 7 for RB Crane-Motors 4.001 10 75 10-20 L.R. Albert 0-211. Structural Backfill materbl fniina Piel d
-75 Gradations. 1.002 10-20-73
-20 L. R. Albert C-230. F1vash content high. pour cc(670)a' -F-1-e-16 10-29 .
-/5 1.105 e4-20 7: -75 10-20 L. R. Albert C-230. Slumn t8 hinh at end of ntnnlino.
nnnv Ficla- 10-29
' 75 -75 A(613 25)a 1.205 c-2c-7; 10-20 H. D. Foster 0-111. Liner Plate aaap imperfections _S2. & U 1 Pield No 10-2h- 10-30 H. D. Foster
-75 /s1-11i-u-1 1.169 10-20-75: -75 -75 10-20 H. D. Foster 0 111. Liner Plate laminatinna n11 tan 99-19 U1 Pield
~
No 10-27 10-30 H. D. Foster
-75 /s1-15-u-1 1.109 u0-20-75' -75 -75 10-27 H. A. Moray M-1. Damare unon reciept of 141-?O13-50-1 B&W
-75 Reactor Coolant Pipe. ASME h.018 10-27-75 10-29 R . Moray B-1-R. Certifinatinn fnv Rf1+1 Pistamra nnt M.S. No 11 -
&75 received with shipment N/A 10-29-75 75 _
Page 32 11. P G31 Loom oc (3 _ _ _ _i __ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ __ _ _ _ _____ ____ ___ _ _j{v
llllll 1lll i i Y
B D
E S
O L
C 5
7 i
N' D E .
N E T L G I S A P O D MO GS. S b t
T R C N U O E E. T P G C. A E A R P Q T .
S u
T M
"X 5
E d7 d5 T l - l7 K U O
e9 i2 e-O O 8 R F -
0
~
iF h. i B 1 S
U a
_1 1
,9 T a 1 0 g0 A a 1 1_ 1 T m 1
S n 3 1 1
& a 1_
n G a
_ n O. _ a e 1 S +
Y K n a R E CR i
r a .
NA t
O a n P AM m n E E n R MR i t n
- R/ n E ON -
n n
C FO ra i t
N NIT e n A 0 OP CI l
n c kr e
M 2 2 NR a
r r o R e w 7 OC S B p O NE t a
n m g F i n N .
D i n t i
pt i
O O n a e a C N e c n o _
i i . _
N 'T c f D c _
O C i . g N E 5 n
- t 1 n J 1 i '
O 0 e 1 r _
9 d - u R " - I C d P R 1
Y
. B D y r e
E a t R r s A o o P M F E .
R A D P
R H GET 9 5 I
25 RA 0 7- I-t. 7-OD -
1 .
i1 .
- ; 3
' , t 2 3 1llll
rw.qc
__I7i ~~# / '"-
"^ * ***""
NONCONFORMANCE REPORT -
~_,
J. t AWIN 2/PAtiT NO. C E V. 7. PJiUJ ECT N O.
f M r__u A / "'
cr '- 291 12 jf( DATE 25. D8SPatIT83N CaNCU.JK ENC 3
...... ....c, ...... noe snoninnotinn n 1R i < 07990 t. A. Mneny , 9,j94,j7<
- 3. OTEM C ESCRIPTION 8. BTEM LOCA TION , j; A . TED SY I DATE '
Nuts, Bolts & Washers QC Hold Area '
- 4. LE RI AL N UMBER
_ !2. - 2 E-7I 9, STARTUP SYSTEM NO. MLACEMENT PART N LV. emosscv ras 6a ensansen o4rs {
Sen Block 19 N/A N/A I -
J. PUK CN ASE ORDE R NO. 3 0. QC F8ELO INSPECTION PLAN NC. 9 6. REPLACEMENT SER8 AL NO. -
/ 2 -YY-d 7220-C-38 See Block 19 N/A **'"
- 6. CJ NT&J ACTOR / LOC ATtON ll.ASME C YES 3 7. SO U R CE
'g * * "' * * ""* ""[ _
Ingalls Iron Works /Verona Pa. ,'r E M K) No Vendor
' 4. C3 UTING INSTR UCT80NSs Q ROUTC TO F sELD ENGINEERING h ROUTE TO M ATER8AL buPCRVISOR
. NCrNrORMiNG CONDiT. "'
Specificati'on 0-38 Rev. 5 requires vendor to furnish a completed Form G-321-D and Certificates of Co--liance for bolts certifying that the bolts conform to the applicable specifications.
~
Contrary to the above,G-321-D's and CL. tificates of Compliance have not been received for 'the following shipments of ASTM A-326 bolts. nuts, and washers:
Continued on Page 2 .
- h. IELD DISPOSITION OF8 ELD RECOMMENDATION /MOUTE TO PROJECT ENGINEERING 21. FIELD DISPOSITaON RESULT $a f9/da /4$2?..$, dEd
%au Gwcomoa re anw mm /2-a m/ 6L wAnt & M S $ ft $. I 5't ff'
+
- (Mb-zr /,M 70' ip.
- 22. EN B8N E E RING DISPO$tTION 23. ENGINEERING DISPOSITION RESULTSs
- "'"^""5" S "
U"",',"""'**""
a 2'gM/f6%j, g o.>r
,,,,,,,, e ,,,,,,,, < ,,,,
D;2 AWIN E REV. DCN auvenomesso susescrom enes WEC. . REV. A D O.
~, ORIGINATO
~
t c
' ' ~~ s.rea_d or 2 34. nca na 291 NONCONFORMANCE REPORT (CONT'D) iock 19 Continued.
OTY SIZE MATERIAL PACKING SLIP # -
NRR 4 TEPECTTONRTaf
/ AEO-733 0-38-R-21 Rev.
100 7/8" ( 6" Bolts /w/ nuts V863-R$2
,C '48-R-2h Revi-100 7/8" X 6" Bolts /w/ nuts V665-R53 / . AEO-73h V863-R78 AEO-707 C-38-R-30 Rev.
h5 7/8" X h 3/h" Bolts /w/ nuts i Bolts /whiuts V66h-R55 AEO-707 C-18 R 10 h r_
125 7/8" X h 3/h" /
175 7/8" X 31" Bolts /w/ nuts V66h-376 / AEO-707 C-18-R-30 Rev.
v 125- 7/8" X h4" Bolts /w/ nuts V665-R96 / AEO-707 c-38-R-3n rov:
V863-B15 /," AE0-707 - C-38-R-30 Rev.
60 7/8" X 3 " Bolts /w/ nuts' Bolts /w/ nuts V863-B15 l AEO-707 C-18-R-10 Rev.
50 7/8" X 3 3/h"
' C-18-R ~40 Rev.
Bolts /w/ nuts V863-B16 AEO-707 55 7/8" X hA" __
Bolts /w/ nuts V863-B15 : AEO-707 C-38-R-30 Rev.
5 7/8" X 5" ~
Washers V863-G231':
- ~
AEO-709 C-38-R-31 Rev.
3990 7/8" ..
15 7/8" X 2" Bolts /w/ nuts . V863-G231 '- AEO-709 C-38-R-31 h v.
Washers V1016-B12 ' AEO-709 C-38-R-11-Rev.
2220 7/8" Bolts /w/ nuts V1016-B12 s AEO-709 C-38-R-11 Rev.
80 7/8" X 2" Bolts /w/ nuts V1016-B12\ AEO-709 C ~48-R-11 Rev.
30 7/8" X 31" Washers V66h-G118 / AEO-710 0-18-R-12 Rev.
/
3000 7/8" washers V665-G119 / AEO-710 0-18-R-12 Rev. 4 3000 7/8" Bolts /w/ nuts V1016-K56 / AEO-7h9 C-38-R--33 Rev.
200 7/8" X 2 3/h" h00 7/8" X 2 3/h" Bolts /w/ nuts V665-X57 r AEO-7h9 , C-38-R-33Rev.f 600 7/8" X 2 3/h" Bolts /w/ nuts V863-K58 ?
AEC-?h9 C-18-R-33 Rev.
Bolts /w/ nuts V66h-G88 -
AEO-7h8 C-18-R-lh Reve N 175 7/8" X 3h" 175 7/8" X 31" Bolts /w/ nuts. V66(Pol -
AEO-7h7 C-38 R-35 h v.
150 7/8" X 3 3/h" Bolts /w/ nuts V665-R91 / APO 7h7 c-3R R--35 h v:
Bolts /w/ nuts 'V863-R192 AEO-752 0-18-R-16Rev.k 700 7/8" X 3" Nonconformance noted durina receiot inspection. O Numbers 1.101 A 1.201 lin i t e 1 A 9 j d
E S -Hold Tags applied.
' QC-G
,7 D _
v ORIGINATOR 9J
m, , -
'~ *
' }' -W DM @.
NONCONFORMANCE REPORT ' " ^ * "
. c. u s.wsNaje n T Ns.
E v. 7. PassacT Ns.
g ,, i- "l"*[0[
ia. r.E>OnTEs av Field Procedure C-4 ! 6 07220 lOATE as. OssrossraON cONcuanENcs *
- 3. tTEM DEsCRIPTsON ,
- 8. STEM LOCATtON R. L. Eowren 14/0/75 * " * ' " ~""' " ' " "
' y "*
<'"s . JQhDATED sv I OATE Steam Cenerator Unit #2 Storage Yard Area "G" fhy,.
7 !h-i-7I ,Jdhrfd 4 '
m E..ALNuM.E /
.. TA.Tu, SYSTEM NO.
...J ' /M 7!
2E.51A
- s. PuRCH AsE ORDEN NO.
N/A p/ N/A, AcCM EN !/ T ,..Tp. ; .E..
......... p ... ....
M-1.6 10.QC FeELO GNsPECTsON PLAN NO.
9 4. R EPLACEMENT sEk BAl. NO.
I
. py.g h M.(i Q1'~
- e. cONTn AcTOn/ Loc ATsON N/A N/A *
,y f
_ N/A i s.cOoc AsME $ vEs 7.souncE Long Term
[%.[$,*) -- g7ffg
~~4m..
ITEM O NO ....
s a. nOureNG sNsra.,craOMsi p ROUTE TO PsELO ENGsNEERING Cons truc tion Storane O aourE vo = Av=a:A' 5urravisoa t.. MONCONFORM6MG CONDITBONs E Long Term Storace Procedure b*-1-62 Rev. 5 Section 5 nara.
- 5.2 s tates as follows . " Maintain nrassures between 4 oz. pain and 1 lb. nsin." . In order to maintain
_Contrnry to the nbove, on 4/8/75_it uns noted a nitro.nen nurne.
ti at the_pressorn onnge nn noennrfnry nirin nf the nnhjner imie fn41nd l
to indicace that a positive cressure existed.' (minimum _prensure.
inch) . indication obtainable on gauge is 2 oz. per sq.
Further investination revealed that pressure was below minimum required for less than two hours . -
as. Monconformance O r.Ei.o ois Os Tio" was detected durinn walk thru of stornne area on 4/8/75. "O" No. 4.021. One Hold tan attached. .
Orit'o acco"acaoavaoa/aours To raodscr raciacca'ac 2' P'r'o u'5eo5oa ac5u'v5'
.M w mn n 9 X-5' rn u A 0Nu,mn dYAu 22'0/2.A/htKR WNH-BA hcocA' flA,*/ (?ox_ _
O
, lxnk Gdm s => R T ' w /mssf A).Ss -)S b 9 l7~A SS-f
. aa. a:NGINEE R6NG OlsPos4TaOM 7YR/td 9 b-7
- c/A0.$rsWfj-
- 23. ENGINEE#1NG DSSPGstTION REsul.Tsa as.as oEsaGN cNANGc aEauenE ONo **"'"^a'^'*'5" 5"' a O"'.*.*"***'""
O e- cc s' c O TEs. sCE ATTAcNEO. 2'oMc C #[Q 8 1)
ER AW8NG REV. OCN g,, .
J)~-
t pEc.
R E v. ADO.
[i.i die i O N ~) 7 I*
~
White Copy - Othnerot o
Canary Copy ec-Ga a
- Flaid Engineer
! Pink Copy - PGAE Goldenrod Copy - CC s
9 ~
j
- . .A . . 'l E BABC0CK & WILCOX COMPANY - Kk.
iER'GENERAT10N GROUP
?
~ .'VN. ASGAONKAR , B&W MIDLAND SI' E REPREStaiTATIVE nd ,
CEM #233 sos us.s C. E. MAHANEY, PROJECT MANAGER, NPGD, LYNCHBURG (2665) st.
~
o , 12E55/12ST NSS-12/13 T3 55 CPCO . .,
Date .
- 6) . SEPTEMBER 11, 1975 STEAM GENERATOR STORAGE ,.
. .g ,
l s u . i .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . w ... . .i r. _
e td.5.udi.'l.s's -ic 4. ;$. ~/. . . S_P 6
.. ..i.. Wd.;v.- . >. m : :-
With reference to NCR #305 dated April 15, 1975 letter to E. F. Walder, as well as Ed Walder's informal note dated May 2,1975 confirming that there are no adverse effects resulting from the lack of nitrogen purge gas pressure for 'about 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> on April 8,1975, I wish to formally confirm that B&W is aware of this incident, but that there should be no physical damage to the generators resulting from a 2-hour loss of the minimum r: commended nitrogen gas pressure.
Wa recommend however that the gas pressure controls and monitoring procedures g (It is my understanding be revised to avoid reoccurrence of this incident.
O3hr.t correcti're measures have already been instituted to remendy this (N V eituation.)
/
CDI:1p cc: E. F. Walder R. F. Quinlan M. J. Bell D. L. Howell A. ii. Lazar D. K. Frerichs V.N.K.
C hh SEP 15 '75 ' . .
U f.
U .
% e l
, Inttroffica Memorandum O O J.' P. Connolly. osis April 9, 1975 Q) .
. {: '
- ILong Term Storage' Control : 1*" R. L. Bowren'
- Field Procedure F-1-62 *
. QCFM-680 ,
or Quality Control copieeio .
u Midland, Mic'higan .
QC Files' Job No. 07220
._ On '4/8/75; as a' result of.a " walk thru" of storage area "G" by representatives of the NRC, CPCo. ' QA, Bechtel QA and Bechtel QC it was reported that .thh pres-sure Eauge on the secondary side of the Unit #2 NSSS Steam Generator No. 2E-51A' failed to indicate that a positive pressure existed. .
Further investia ? ion of this condition revealed the following: Subject pro-cedure requires ; ,pressure of 4 oz. per sq. inch to 1 psig to be maintained on
. this vessel. .
. Checked with CPCo QA Eng. R. Whitaker who advised that pressure gauge was in-i dicating a pressure within the prescribed limits when he had checked the vessel
. in the AM on 4/8/75. ,
O s A check w1LL B&W 31Le Repte=euiative 'i. Assuaakar tuvealed i.he same cunditiun - -
-A as noted by Whitaker existed when he checked the vessel at 11:30 AM on the same k day.
A check.with the long term storage and control Engineer, Dale Martin who is
- responsible for compliance with the procedure, revealed that pressure was y acceptable when he checked the unit early in the PM of the same date. Hartin further stated that when .he conducted his review that he noted that the l nitrogen supply tank was low and that he had made arrangements to have t.he tank i replaced upon his return to the fielo effice. He further advised that the
. time-lapse _between his inspection was less than two hours as he had conducted i ,. - his inspection at 1:00 PM and the tank was replaced and the vessel re- .
, pressurized by 2:40 PM. Martin also stated that a positive pressure, although j* lower than required by procedure, had been maintained throughout' this period of
, time as he had detected a discharge back flow of pressure from the steam gen-erator as the new nitrog<en tank was connected. ,
'It should be noted at this time that the pressure gauge being used indicates
. or " pegs" at a pressure reading of 2 oz. per sq. inch rather than indicating or
. " pegging" at zero pressure. Therefore, it is possible for a positive pressure -
to exist without a deflection of the gauge dial in.dicator. -
s ,
. As a result of the above. investigation NCR No. 305 was issued, to document the p y deviation from the long term storage procedure. **
- c -
q .
'D R. L. Bowren -
l' . ,
.~
seu tenktB/jstw -
" . m
.BecliteFPowerCorporation
. -) ,
Intaroffica M::morandum X
I'8 J. P. Connolly Date October 20,'1975
\j , .
Job 7220 Itidland Project From T. C. Valenzano
( , subi.ci NCR-305 - Final Disposition O-985 - Quality Related og Construction
" liidland, Michigan
Ilowever, I do co with reservation since I believe this condition not to have bgen truly non-conforming.
I am attempting to approach B&W to give us a time limit far lack of purge or lowering of purge pressure. This should be the ca'sc since they allow entry to the vessel for inspections.which requires elimina' tion of the nitrogen atmosphere for as much as 8 to 10 hours1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br />.
Later on during erection the purge will be impossible to maintain.
- .It is readily evident that some allowance must be made~, however, it may take a good deal of time to obtain concurrence on this.
I believe the condition not to have been non-conforming because the Os p B&W manual recognizes that inspectiorG will be made in a normal
( a Luoyhete and uvi. uli.tugen. Thus, the logic that applies to that
- {'~)
l' should surely apply to the accidental loss of nitrogen purge pressure.
~ n . .
=bQC 07220 $ I
__ ! PFQC3 -
3 JGG T. C. Valen t. o
~
A. ??RC3 V ,
TCV/sw _ CIVIL i i
ELECT. ~
~
_ _ _ PIPING MECH.
[ WELDIt!G ~
"M OC.
I RECEIVIt:G orEn oe O YES 'O CCT 2 0 1975 DIGE-QUALITY CONTROL B2CHT*' JO 7220
$1GMAtutt _f I. -
'{}
p) q
( --
5424 (10 72) .
1
. -)
~
' ?tQi.m cz NONCONFORMANCE REPORT ' raw i i s. N Ca N e,
- 2. ca AWiMG/FAWT No. e W" 3 V. F. PaOJICT N1b.
- 12. REPORTED EV er _1 328 GAT 8 2 5. C 81 PO 18'. eO N C a N C U 4M N C E C-238 (Q)_, 6 7770 A, Ticon " ~ * " ""~
- 2. eTEM DESCRiPYsON Aug. Blda d truttural Steel S. lTEM LOCATBON 83 u A/ED ay 6 A /1/2 / 75 gg _
"f" "*("
1 1 ROLACEMENT PART H N
- R E V.
h Pe .J. C. P e. h . ses rur<O .e
_ . 9:b -
!I /A v.
N/A DM S. PURCN ASE ORDER NQ
- 48. GC F8E,LD 8MSPECT80M PLAN NO.
N/A '
y
' hM. .7 v, ... <
2['
ns t 4. R EPLACEMENT SERI AL NO. '
w o_c 2, Ag h *.. .. r2) e 7)-
C. CO N T R A CTO R/ LOC AT40N ll.ASME Q YEt. 17. SOUNCE y....,.u . . .-y . ....
N/A a ,eO i s. ROuvina insTRuCTiOMs.
,,,M Construction gMOuTE TO riELD ENGsNEER NG O aouTs To =^Teasa'suPsavisoa 4 9. NONCONFORMING CONDIT80Ns Detail G on drnuing C-218 (0) en11n for_30 - 3/4"d v 6" shone ntnan en be nroviand by thn fi n1 d n, eninem c/6 A nhnva tac cl. 603'-0" splice.
This nortion of the column uns_ embedded in concrete _ placement A(614. 'ilh' wi thout thn stude in n.ince.__ o Non enn fo rmn en nornd rinr. inn Fin 1d Fnoinnerine innuection. O #1.201.
2o.
c.g g4 4 6 d . % Q g g i n ' m O ris'o o'saas'T'oM
% 4 g 6 ,.flwlf g Tags applQed.
0n<'o acco==='apaTioniaouva To PaoJs c7 <NosNEraiNG li. ciELD DesPOS T.ON REsubTs.
Project EnEincaring to evalunte non-conformine condition.
- 22. ENG4N EERaNG DISPO 54 TION S b .J t f e
/
- 23. ENGINEERING DISPOSITION RESULTS:
There are three ils $nch stiffeners attached to the colnnn in auestion. These stiffeners' are adequate to transfer the load to the column from the wall without the 30-3/4"6_x 6" shear studs. Engineerine recom:nends _'!Use-as-is".
J. CL v0 (ct 2%. 3S OESIGN CH ANGE RCQUIRED
- g 9 / O Et /.7 s*
- 28. R EJECTED MATERI.sL D45 POSITION C"*"*"'**"'**
- 27. QCpC T C .y 0 v Es. sEE ATT ACHED. .. ....
D9 A WBNG R E v. DCN .. ,,6.....
i,,g, EPEC. R E W. ADO. mesvn.een.eemee..v.e e.,,
twas s Wtsite Copy . - Originator Canary Copy eC-Ga a
- Field Engineer Pink Copy - PQAE
, Go:Warod Copy - OC m{
-___L___ _ _ - _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - _ _ _ - - -. _ _ _ . _ _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ - - - - _ _ __ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _
~
e
' NONCONFCWANCE REPORT **"*"' "'"' " '
< __Tys d y7 cF >
337
_ : f.v(oR
- 3. tm.wsN ;tema T NO. s wiv. v. enOnCT NO.
j jeaTE .rs.nasPoseT oN CaNCu mLNEz DNC F-7220-C-233A-IR-62 l 2 s.eT,EM DEsCRarTsON 07220 '
//[f/
f ffff y #MM 7----
P- ~~-
! -" " " *gf-
. e. ETEM LOCATION * /s . V A ,.tD A T E Ods Y / I DATC
- ~" '
_ Cable Pit & Valve Pft Angle 'P h *N
~
- c. sE R.. N uM.E R 4 Fram.es OC_llald
.. sT RTue sT. TEM NO. Area jft
., s.FR E,... C E M E N T ,,R yyO.
'O
/' >
/A -.v.
-so 7 [ o 62A & 6215 j REv. .............-..,9 /
N/A N/A L/ i
- o. euaCMasE OROER NO. ... OC r.Ei.O n.srEC T.ON rL.N NO. ... R E eb.CEME NY .E RimL NO. . Cf(('-E',%h/,,, ~~Ei./i~ -
__2220-F ')0/3_fMR-CA-2051 t
. O. (;ON T R ACT ON/ LOC A 7 80N C-2 33A-R-2 5 N/A Ot.ASMC C YE. 0 7. SOURC E y*"," ~ "'" " ~ "'(*f " **",
Iniand Ry,crson/Southfield, Michigan ,'TEM ' 10 ,.O Vendor f A ROUT 8NG $NSTRUCTIONS; Q ROUTC TO F8ELO ENGsNEERtNG ' C ROUTE TO M ATE R$ AL 5UPERwaSOR 0). NONCONFORMtNG CONOsTIOtes Purchase Order 7220-F-3043FMR-2051 raquires all material to be furnished in accordance with h Spec.ification 7220-C-233A, Form G-321-D and ASTM A-36. Form C-321-D requires Certified Material Tesc Reports and Inspection Verification Reports.
- 1. Einht (8) f rames Mark #62A were f abricat.ed as shown on Drawing F-7220-C-233A-IR62 Rev. 2, but the inspection record doesn't show that the frames include the 1" X 5/16" flat bar as shown on the drawine, and documentatica '
package doesn' t include any certifications for 1" X 5/16" flat bar. Continued.
3% $ F8ELO Oe5PO$aTSON QFICLO RECOMMENDATsON/ route TO PROJECT ENG8NECRBNG 18. FIELO 045PostTION REsubT5:
- 1. Detail (1) on Drawing C-114 is typical for the angle frames refered to in / / 4- -<
A/* < Pc7 / . na t. * ;.m
?f.'7
!['i m 0 W / /J ~ k,k
./ put s/K /
Block 19 It states " Bars" (refering to 1" x y/16" or 1" A 3/lo"> "ma.u. oe -
/// . .' 'M.{ .g carbon steel with no mill test reports required". -J
',.(('/,/.d 7
Continuce [P '
- 33. ENG8MEER4NG OBSPOSITION
- 23. ENG 8NEERING OISPO5sT60N Rg5ukT5s f
Ud*,'"'"**" 'r' $#,Mbd *+'Ectfy.
as, as DEsaGN CN ANGE REGusREO Oreo **"'"^""'5' 5'" "
a v E .- -11 CNEO. g g-pf
.. .... - y.
genwsNe RE v. OCN awvese.sa,e.=.e.sv..
f 7 e...
e..,
EP:ft R E Y. ADO.
s e a-s
- White Copy - Originator e C <. 3-a
, Canery Copy - F eld Engineer Pink Copy - POAE Cotdenrod Copy - CC
( -u v
v v
- i
, s . ,c.u_2_.- ,_.2.
_NONCONFORMANCE REPORT (CONTD)
_ _ _ 337__
.:..c2-2.
_ Block No. 19 Continued. *
- 2. Eight (8) angle frames Mark #62B were fabricated as shown on Drawing F-7220-C-233A-IR62 Rev. 2. 'Ihe -
ins _p.ection record shows ASTif-A36 material with Jt.Cosic_/No. JC/DS10"c'._used, howevar ' the Certified Ifaterial Test Report for th_is (1" X 3/8" flat bar) has n at been included in tPc documen'tation packane.
Aux. Bldg., "Q" No. 1.202, '8 hold tags applied. Monconforr.an:.a noted during receipt inspection.
/
_BlockJo,_2Q_C_ontinugd.
- 2. A1.though 1" X 1/8" bars are not refered to in 15:-1%, it is the intent that the bars be 1/16" thicker than the checker _ plate _ cover._ _Dc_ tail _E_on_C-22k_shov;_a valve uit with a_5/_1_6" checker _ plate cover _[ indicating /
thnt 1" X 3/8" bars should- be used) and refers tc.1/C-1% for the angle frame. Therefore, mill test repor'ts are not reqttirad for 1" X 1/8" bars.
/)
/V Y -
.in,4,/ c f .
- b. ,
White Copy - Orginator " " '#
Canary Copy - Field Engineer
- Pink Copt - POAE Coldenrod Copy - oc f# -
. U V) d.,.)
1 g
4 \n s 3 n a t
.- i w s t u a t r c i
, i e
, d ,
c
, n 1 a i 3 r
, ( 0 r 9 u ,.
m s l d i n n .
f a i n g
o t 0 i l 3 n t 2 a 0 i c r e
s 9 t e e n
, l p ti ag
, r s u s t n o t s n eE n E 2 e e i id gl A e r ieGC ru r i s h t OFPC a S s p e e i - - -
- r. r g p e y s p a n i c o i p e yp y
C y d r poyd t a e oCpo r o h g C yo nr i L t n erCe d t e d i inkl h ein o
) l o r WCPG D ,
l t u T s e g d
N n n o . n n d O i " i i e C t r r t
( i . G e o T d h n R n . T d o T a e O c .
'I c P t n E o ) n r a R n s o i m E a l d _
r o
C d a d
- e d f N , i t e n A s m s h o M k e i s . c R r h l a 0 0 1 1 1 n O a c l 3 3 3 3 3 o m s p 0 0 0 0 0 N F d l s . 9 9 9 9 9 N l a o s O i o o n l S S S S S .
C o r p i o L L L L L 2 N s a o O r r r p d N o e e S n t p d a r n i a e e i p h p 1 t w i 1 n r s P 1 2 1 9 1 s U r o l - - - - - t o f o S 6 4 6 6 3 i
- o / - - - - - n r n p S 2 0 3 3 3 U D e e e e o s 1 1 1 1 1 n t i e 6 6 6 6 6 a a t e s S S S S S .
n w c p e - - - - - 4
- a e i h 9 6 3 9 0 3 D a p p t 1 2 4 1 2 1 .
e s - - - - - . d l s n g f R B B n B 4 e a i n o C C C C C i t o i 1 1 F 1 1
1 1 H d l
. n t y w r 1 1 2 2 2 n p d e r o o a p e m e a l i a u n r n l r 4 n o u i o e 2 s n
i . r s m f t 1 t i o i x . a n . v n l e e 4 t o n :: e h C .
E e r t e '
3 3 0 ,
d l
p i
?
' 3 1 3 1 4 9 t t - - - - - 0 o 1 s a 3 8 3 3 6 1 h i h n 6 7 6 6 6 .
. h t o - - - - - 4 o . . t P T PM MR R .
_ N 2 3 d m M t M .
g e r o
~
+
k c
o i
n r
i c
t f
o N 5 2 s
l- u o o "0 e 5 E D n t "
( ,.
N i
., _? , ".'" *
( f, [
. NONCONFORMANCE REPORT 8 DMWeN1/P2WT NO. R E V,
- 7. P tOJE CT NO.
"*'* Yr 3
"'U 3 '
I 2 RE POf8TED of e
- 21. DISPOsti SON CONCOR M ENCE
__sp ;c.__c-111 3- 4T EM C;4 SCRIPT 80N .
l9 07220
- 8. 4 TEM LOC ATION 4.@jadde.
8 3. V A E' M D ATE- - " " ' ', [ W
^
\c" Cont. Liner Plate
.I ^
l Unit 01 Cont.
O.Q3we1LNUMsER DATED h hSY),.l D ATE 10 2 '75 } 'M(,$ $. i .y;,as '7. % '
9.STARTUPSYSTEM NO.
,v7 e.se t[. hPLACEMENT PART O enesec, eerse e =o a.s.m C-111-48 S3-1-U2 N/A D PuaCN A5E ORDER NO. 99. OC PaELD INSPECTION PLA'N NO.
/ H/A
!' R E V.~ ' # U L
- T*
O
- W
._ C--5 0 - A c-111-91a
' CINT GACTOR/ LOC ATION d.
_SLut;hern_ Boiler, Memphis, Tenn.
$9,A&ME
_ _ . _ _O vEs MLA iv souact ""'""*""'d e...
S t. (MUTING 8MST R UCT80NS
. TEM Of NO i Vendor Q ROUTE TO PIELD ENG8HEERING O aourf 'O MavEaia'suPEavisoa
- 49. M kNCAMPORM4NG CONDIT BON .
__( Thro.ugLthirkneas_lcalderected in k" lin_cr plate durinn air pressure test of 130 Mau_t;h-vertical seam weld leak chase at elevation 633'3". Further investigation by NDE revealed a linear disc.ontinuity in tha plate on a horizontal plane approximately 5" long t'o the lef t from 130 Azmuth scam weld.
"T' No. 1.109. __
n-~
aw w;) M# i~c W y PsELo DisPosef SON 3 $.~..'ff "'
et 1 tag applied. -
O RECOMMEND A TION / ROUTE T O PROJECT ENGINE ERING 2 5. P8 ELD Ot$POSsTION RE5uLTS:
5
- I. *) ryk cll Is. C *L h =:<< ' 4 ' .f y fo.).' '- s TIE'1Itinpf_rcromacuds_.five inch _arca_.bc_cxcavated_as-shown_on_attaghad-* c wand-insert a_Jancred b xcavate aren_on emir n d_fr~ 1002 rio in en beam and liner plate. On opposite-errd o . hackup should lie k" fillet welded Mr .100LFrcavae+rrir~dfo~ild$n uni, fed ff rar nn== u M-h m3afn _uith_/!E201 1
'f ve
- 23. E NGeNCERING DesrossTOONinches of existine leak chane on vert. 1100 should bn voranved fnr r it _
- 23. ENGeNEERING Da$POS4TeON RESULTSe T
Proiect Engine _ering concurs with the Field Recommendation to repair the leak in the 1/4" liner plate, as follows:
- 1. Excavate the area to be repaired. .
- 2. Deform the beam flange to bring it in_ contact with the liner plate.
- 3. Portion of renair extendinn beyond beam will have a backup plate attached an.u cCmN CH ANGE REOuiREo gN.
as. REJEC.TEo M ATER A' OisPo sn ION a e we- we - 6ae 3,.OC ACCE ,TANC O vES. SEE 4TT4CNEo. n.....
@l2 A W8N 3 es aneemsee N E v. OCN , ..,.
avvmen,ase e'aseestas SPEC. R E V- ADO. e ,,
b 00 0 0-3
- White Copy - Originator Oc<.3 3 Canary Copy - Pleid Engineer
- a Pink Copy - PQAE
- e Goldenrod Copy - OC cO= cg r) > -
- yy n
NONCONFOf MANCE REPORT (CONT'D)
-.-._ - _ ~
s . cr.c2_2 e ,_3_.__
- _.,_ n __ n _ . _ . . - - . _
. .. c2 3, 331_____
__. BLOCK 20- Excavatq_afffet_ed five (5)_ ingh area and tie-in area (vertical) in accordance with Appendix B Specificatio_n C-111_, Rev. 9 (see diagr.im) . Repair veld shall be made in accordance with' repair
__ procedure Pl-AC-Lil utilizing tapered b.ick-up with k." fillet weld for 100% penetration (see attached diagram). Follow with NDE_ procedures lit-Y-1, 2, Rev. l_ and LT-VB-1, 2 for integrity of repair area.
//<c1 ' a.t.l RTACK 20- Cont.--AltgJnate method: Press liner plate to beam and utilize beam as backup. (Measurements indicate _ppegif_i_ca_ tion __ tolerance for distortion will be maintained). Portion of repair and e to the beam __e_dge.
excavation extending _beyond_ beam _will_h we_a._ backup _p1_aio_a_t_t. ached Re_ pair veld procedure will be P1-AC-LH utilizing ba:kup as stated with t" fillet veld for 100% penetration.
Pn11nw with ITDE procedures as stated' ab3ve. All welds will be full penetration.
lYtob x. N.p BLOCK 22- '3. Cont. - to the beam edge _yith a full _p_cncIInt. ion butt veld.
- 4. Repair the excavated area by full penetration butt veld, followed by__NDE in accordance with Specification C-lll. '
- 5. Add leak chase channel over the repaired area.
- 6. Show the location of repair and new leak c.hase channel on the as-built drawinns.
f,).ff> N-M~.3$_.
g/J'_ /A h i / "F f*
q
/!. !! ,, ,* * .* , ...,.
$/ - /t"M~~/r e
e a-a White Copy - Originesor Cenery Copy - Field Engineer Pink Copy - POAE Caldenrod Copy - OC e.m ea e.w
+
. .. . .s.. -
CALCULATION SHEET
.@h/
J DATr ~ - t s M DATr /6-Y.7[ CHECKED DY 4N BY .
. SHEET NO , y Q' PROJECT 'OB NO _
dU2 JECT - OAI M* U O 8. Fil E NO a t n ; h.. l
-l-p . .,
Ext'S 7'sNr) ik_ C }}, * . , 1 % 't?
.c I -
i **
, f .
\
l !
, N l r EMBEDED. '. & \
l
. /J - A FA >w -
1 l
=
. .g g .
i .. [ s > l - 1 ( ~
\
\ Y a l
~ l /?8FAl P5 $ l
" 1.t er in. n o n k 1
.s -t c -
(' ) $
.cr ,ri ,e- :.v: / -x , . .f). , 'N '- N _2
- sit k Le +.; NR eb MoQ Ke w -
* ~ '. '
(. -
.l .
=
70 ft/'/// r
,. ,.. l
' Y I ,e' -l I t
.s *
.. l 8. - * .
s'. n.w. .y _- 9.,3 , , , ggg'p et ';
,,----s-.-. . .---e--.-~~--+-~~---- e-----
n , _ ;-.-- . .-.,.,----.=----._.er------r----.- l.
'f . *ij .
.. { .
.,[,
.. I .71 :
e I 8 ( ! I T i m ' *
--. . . 3. ,
3y ..l.,........,n._ . . . . . . ........s..-- >.a.._ .. , ll l g 1s-- s
,1 g... )
% . 8
, . .- _ . . - - _.-- . ._ l' -
% , s a
,3 _./my/. . s 3 3
- C ** . ~ ,~ .
- g I .
c
~
s-v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I i - i ( - l d 'sw - g.--- - s . ., . .n s........ .
- s. . .. .
.. . f ;
t vt . *
\
[za*y.kis ... .
. x..y
- - .. .' t; I
=
*** f. ' , . ;. '
l']^,j][ ylg,
# - NONCONFORMANCE REPORT 2,. DISPOStT IO N C 2NCu .LNOE SY 'CATE "*
- 3. Dm AwsMG/ PAR T No.
$ Ld V. 7..l.oJ1c7 NO.
3 2. R d [EPOM, MM l//. S'- 7e* ~ ~' ',"gg " " FSK-MPC2-CCB-72-1-1 l2 07220 'V ATED .T I DATE d b d/ s h /C . .-M T
!.!/>-8'.. ,'.. U
- s. ITEM LOCAYnON
- 3. eTEM DESCRIPTaoM s ___ NA - .........-.... .-
nrnin TAe .. .T coAT .n e . #2; R1. 592'0" o.
. .m ,<. E . E ,. T . A .
l.E J _Re.a..c.t.or u..E. envity
. o. .Y., EM i
...E .
N/A . N/A
'. .. .E,6 A cE us uf sEn. Ac no. Q7E."1Mg, . /T&75'~ -
N/A ... oc r.E tD ins,E cTion ei. Aw no. , f"/ ""** '* * * "" *'j'
. i. ,vacu AsE o.DE. no.
N/A N/A { _ ,_ ,,_ 5 7. 50u RCE _N/A 0..A5ME @ TES Construction s cocer m ACTon/LO. A f ton , ' , *, . O ,o Midland Jobsite, Midland, Michigan - O aouTE To M^vEa A' su PE a v isa a t s. aou r.no inse nCcTious. g nouTE To riEto EnciuEEneno 3 states in pac , Para. 5.2.1, " Care shall be taken in handling and in-( . . . o-co u , o-- . o c o -D.T .o ,. , Spec. M-204 Rev. 11ation of piping to prevent surface damage." h bject pipe (see __s t : Contrary to the above, molten cadweld' material was splashed on and is tightly adhered "Q" No. is 4.343 Unit 2. Onetohold t e su Nonconformance noted during surveillance inspection. attached sketch). tan attached. an. r ELD Deseos: Tion aEsu6Ts. . gr:Eto nEcomutuoATsoninouTE To enoJEc7 EncinEEnino no. g riELD DiseosirioN Contrary to the above, care was taken in handling and the installation of theHo _ subject piping. - molten cadweld ma.terial contacted the pipe. The following steps.shall be followed to remove the defect: 23 ENGINEERehG OtSPO5tTION NE5 ULT 5 Continued on sheet 2.
- 32. ENGtP4EE R tNG DISPossTION
{ O*"""" av oc mEnAncE 2 6. R EJECT E D M,=TE R S A &. DISPo$W SON O.e...
- 34. 85 DES 8CM CH A NGE REQulHED O NO O Y Es..EE art acned. . . . . . . '
...e attvos.. es . . ese o.. .v..
REV. - DCN DR AWING ec-Ga 2 REV* ADO. - Originato, White Copy SPE C. - Field Engineer Canary Copy
- teess t 7;nk Copy - POAE e Guenrod e,sy - OC
. h
%]
^
y
' pat..wg.2.
f' - s - / ''
,, ( NONCONFORMANCE REPORT - "'" ~
. A. LJ A W4N T /PAuf N G. 8 2,3 V. 7. PACJECT ND.
2 34b" tF 1T tiATE 25. 4442 PO5tTBoM C3NCu AVlNC3 Snec. 7220-M-201 !6 7220 5!2.//f)[Eo f)e:7/ f-8/[ Xlm "-"- -""' ""* ' l"'""
- 3. tTEM oEsCairfiON .. 8. 87EM LOCATION /
/C h erd [ ,IHATE /G 'IdV. (MM, ,,,, f y g4 4 ~
. 5 S/S Pipe Spools Locked Area #1 #AONATED[V C.<E..A NUM.E. .. .T . T.. . . .T E. N O. -
y .E.L. ENT ,A,eTy . ; .EV. ..... .. ... . .g.; - ....
=CN)sE okoE. NO. '
. .. e 7220-M-104A
.e.O ELo Ns,ECT.ON ELAN NO.
H-104A-R-12 Rev. O
. . . . f,hCEMENrsEn.ALNO.
N/A Ch" ,4[" /C*G'-7 8'
. C, CONTR ACTO R/ LOC ATsO N ll.AEME C YES 17. SO U R C E p'er
.. .~. .g ="-
/
CooE ---*a'a='"*='** *"= ITT GrinnellMemersville, N. C. .T E M O No Vendor 9 8. ROUTING INSTAuCTeoN54 Q RoGT4 TO FeELo ENG8MEEWSNG Q route To MATEnsAL SUPERV85on
- 83. NONCONFORMING CoNDIT80N.
Field Insoection Procedure C-3 paragraoh 3.3.4a states in part: -
- n. Preliminary Inspection:
A prol f-innry insnection shall be performed by the ACR at the time of unloadine to identify the damane that may have occurred during loading or shipmeist. This inspection shall be to ascertain freedom from the following:
- 1. ...
- m. O resi.o ois,Os Tion Continued.
OriE'o aECo==ENoAvioNeaouTE TO caoeECT ENGiNEEa No l 2i. riEi.o oiseOs Tion aEsui.Ts, All epnnle vn f n v enen,I in n 1 n c1- 14,chn11 kn c1 n n n nel in n ccorrinn en ufth Rp o ci ff 'en einn J a'."e! #A '
,'-[
M-204 If required for construction expediency, the spools may be moved to the #fM; .ad h'h Combinntion Shon for cleanine. However. " Hold Tans" must remain ittached. After b lh' g. c om i n ti on of clonnfnc nnd insnection nctivities the snools shall be returned to )
/*
lonc tern stornce in the laydo m area.
- 22. ENG4NCERING oISPOS4TsON 4/ F. Fm OP lo-s-7s- '
s 2$. a5 OEElGN CN ANGE aEQu&AE O= * * " ' ' ' ' ' ' " " ^ ' ' " ' ^ ' ' ' ' ' '"' " ** en A,W Na a E v. O vEs. sEE ArrACNEo. oCN U n '.'.'"'* *'~", '
.. . ~.4 6 -
~
[2kh - aJ K g-1..). 0G d& I o..' 1 % _ TPEC. REV. ADD.
.--.. ...., .-.:.1 9 244 e=3 e
- White Copy - Originator Q C-G 3-3 Canary Copy - Fletd Engineer P1nis Copy - PQAE Goldenrod Copy - QC (s. ,.
_ - _. _____________a
(3 .
/].
.. . .s . .m;;,.
*d
. g'..
> c .
+
.:s, n o .
. .s r . .. , . c. , *
', . ,,' . : ;2 m ,
.i s j\ r .#. * - *
~
s'ss. ','! .. s ) N y.. ..
.s
-'s.Te.
j j,: ' i Tel caN lll.. e.51.
,,. f ..
8%M ' Rourc Mb . , C o,peb //,Q Q g g ,
- i q*L.__
' f/'A EA-QY L. . - ,.
/d/ D /2/9/N/'M. '$i '. ,
Or .
- d. -
- q.. . ', .M
. D Af r O6 b [M ,, [ ,
+-
4fp. .~. * ' '? ; CUBJECT b - .i d, .
~
id d)]//$0s:t .Au lR/uZ,e/ ph,,g p ,, . 7 .; . 0 $0 /YK g ,eg ,_ $_
. B W e f & L d .c d5y s & & s n .-l- l
~
2'C00 N /h3 /?ue. <pa.S en p q 50
- ... .' . ~ l YO' AG/aZ' '
f #' " W *dbe/ bc4 rre.m.eu.d &og s,.;a, e/o iv<w m .p pg ..
- p;, ag %
m
- ., f4c':. .
5
- e
.~%
.*O l' _ * ,~o
, E.E
., 4e
. s+
y . .i *
, .h A*
9 e 44* ir(f
* . . g.. ,
....?'1.'.'.*J,.-
3 '
. , ,'. ;. ' M '. 4 , / ,,-
'. i, .' ,1
- c ')s. ;~ ,'
- ^ . . , ,, ; #
, ,,':, a * . t'.h..k' p; :,' ' * . :. . . c; i
l , , ;* 'b. '; .:
' *4* ,
- C.; . *% ,* i
*n j. . 1. ,.' ,b, .N
' '
- e , $,
e , e "a*
,. , P
'\. .,)
' s' ' ' .
.' ' b. \ l,:
.i '
*~", , ,.((
( .
- *i,lt -
e.
.q.
7
.v.*.e
~~
e * .
. w=l '
- **i. , ,
J '#. s.ermlxrN
~
/ so, aca ao._3:
NONCONFORMANCE REPORT (CONTD)
~
- 1) The elimination and repair of the defect shall be in accordance with specification M-204, rev. 4 F.ield Fabricatii and Installation of Piping and Instrumentation for Nuclear Service, paragraph 5.2.1.
- 2) Measure and record the minimum pipe wall thickness at existing pipe end utilizing' calibrated equipment.
- 3) Measure and record the' minimum pipe 0.D. adjacent to the defect.
[ 4) ' Remove the defect with a medium grit aluminum oxide or silicon-carbide grinding wheel, flapper or disc. Care shall be taken to remove' only the amount of pipe side wall to eliminate the defect. The surrounding area shall' be blended uniformerly to eliminate sharo discontinuties.
- 5) After eliminatio'n of the defect, examine the area by the liquid penetrant e rethod in accordance with Form 84 I
(attachment to G-27Q) for 2" and under piping, class CCB and paragraph NB-2500 of the Nuclear Power Plant Com-par.enets ponents code for the applicable product form. __, 6) Afterthedefecthasbeenremovedortheindicabonreducedtoanacceptablesize,measureandrecordthe minimum pipe 0.0. at the point of grinding. i
- 7) Deduct the_ amount removeLin_ grinding ff from the minimum measured _ttall thigkagsLde.lermined in Slep_2_ dove.
If the remaining pipe side wall is equal to or greater than 87.5 percent of the nominal wall thickness, the recai shall be complete and accepted. However, if the remaining pipa side wall is less than 87.5 nercent of the nomina wall thickness, the repair shall be rejected. Should rejection occur, the isometric will be rcvised to indicne replacement of the affected section of the pipe in accordance with M-204. The repair shall be comolete and ac-cepted upon installation of new pipe. fy.( f
,M]M 1 a .-2 9. 15- _
i x ...: 3 ,- Ws
- i '
a ORIGINATOR a
-O e W
. ' .ri,,E.,
'T;.
/ i,
~ ff.
jf
' I ATT ACIIHsff[- 70 ' ,
, , ., / s .,.s.
\/
a .5/3 . ,
- an l 2 U G 1 -l . 4; a
g - g
- fr4 Coaa.ew 12 " i.
N3 . ; 1. ' I ,
.a'.. g
.p - , ,g t 7 '"
.h$ ,,,
"Yj j ' '
'.h
,6 .
, ~,
) .,'
- 5
- t. ,s
~ htfE (t:cTcQ ,
.t.
44
/. .
y
/ ,
Ky ( r.e. er .
?omot Curt f WAe . ,
e tq,
'l'i
.7D
~~- dkNh6,D h g'{- ~- - ...
O..SM. e*q - 7Gc
..~.._..... .. .
.. {.
+
.O e ~
y
- j. I pe + .
jT _ ..)l . m
.{
b- '
NONCONFORMANCE FtEPORT '
- a. an wAwsNs/PAar Ns. jwV. 7.r m ECTNo.
'[^[' { "#'yj
- s 2. R PoaTEo av jcATE 2s. OssPoinfiON CvNC ,w;NC:s
_ Spec C-230
/f Q /#
! 5 7220 t/0/v/;c- -- - ' ~ " ~~" -~-
- 3. 87EM DESCR8PTsON .. .8 ITEM LOCATION . - - . 3 %. V CO SY ,
IDATE# [/d/ I dIra-.,A-g im.,.n e, Reactor Bldg. #1 & 2 & Aux. lldg. ~ .
- c. s E R iEC riu m e E R s, sTARTue system NO. !/ M 7J ,
//7 P7.Grs ' .
es. R ~PUACEMENT PAR' 'REV. ** *** ev e s o' e e.e - M/A N/A e a} ' eave # D. PURCM A5E ORDER NO, A L ! I
'I#07 M # ~ '# '7 Io. QC F8ELO $NEPECT80N Pt.AM NO. 9 6. REPLACEMENT SERl AL NO.
_.N / A N/A
/0 Yf-71~
N/A **"
- e. CoNTR ACTOR /LOCAT4ON
_ champion Inc. ll.ASME Q vEs 37.50URCE [/d" ** 'f""
$ $. ROUTING IN ETRUCTIONSs
.T E M (9 NO Subcontractor y ROUTE TO FsELO ENGtNEER4NG C ROUTE TO MATER 6AL SUPERVISQR is.NONCONrORuiNG CONo T.ON, Spec 7220-C-230 Rev. 5 Section 7.3 states in part that water for mixing concrete shall have a
_ PH range within 6.0 to 8.0.
,{~~'
' Contrary to the above, mi>:ing water sampled during Users Test No. 24 on Sept. 9, 1975
_ had a PH of 8.8 and 8.4. The preceding Users Test No. 23 sampled on July 7,1975 had a PH of 7.3. Quality of concrete produced subsequent to July 7,197.5 is inde' terminate. Nonconformance noted during routine Users Testing.
. "O" List No. 1.205 and 1.105.
One tag applied at Batch Plant. E@, Q FeELD OasPOSITaON QF8 ELD RECOMMEND ATION/ ROUTE TO PROJE( T ENG 8MEERfMG s El. FlELD Ol5POStTlore RESULTSs Field recommends "use as is". Existing 7 and 28 day ~cHpi essive strengths indicate that alloftheconcreteplacedduringthelimeperiodou,elinchinBlock19will ment rhn vennirnd 90 day s tren c ths . / N [ // A- [- [Ii b - Ny ' < WiCW
- 22. ENGIN EERGNG Ds5 POSIT 40N Based upon the results of the water user's test for the 9/9/75 sample, and 23. ENGINEER 4NG OISPO$& TION RESULT 3s Field evaluation of the 7 and 28 day compressive strengths of the concrete 5 cu - c . 2.30 - S o o / A'ecf2 A cylinders it has been determined that the concrete oroduced during the. period f>,sn ,,m,, o m . , , f __ l outlined in Block 19._ meets the intent of Spec. C-230. SCN C-230-5001 has Y[256#
been issued to eliminate pH as an acceptance criteria for concrete mixing 1 water. Engineering concurs with Field recommendation to use as is.' swifM . 2% sa '4~~ 34,83 DCSIGN CM ANGE REQueRED g ,,g 24. REJECTED M ATERI A . 01SPO$3710N / O a=aaav=****6.== E E YES. SEE ATTACMEOs 27.OjA
,,,,,,,,, "7
,g,,,,,,,,,
D15 A WIN G .REV. DCN f ,,,j pg / M*a R gy. ADD. 8s498 5 .-
, White Copy - Originator e c-G 3-2 Canary Copy - Fleid Engineer
\ Pink Copy
, i - PQAE Goldenrod Copy - oC O
,f p.
pih t sm
~
Q. lad A W8M O/Ph T MO. S F E V. NONCONFORMANCE REPOF T
- 7. PAOJ ICT M 9,
-s 12 EPQ T
-a DATE
']' 3 "'"3 E
' spec. 7220-M-92 25. MeUC5s tsON CONCURNE $eCE
//d///)E 5 7220 Sy s eTEu OEsCR PT ON . .. a. eTEu LOC ATeON
#~rJ'2J "-*" j " * " " " ~ ' " " " " "*
/* '
f a ,V A4,[O d TC5 "'" AR/B-.Cr
- 4. sE R AL NuM.a.ne_.Motore E WHSF b , d'vd */'
b
.. .TANTuP svsTCu No. i i. E .ACEMENT ,AR O j REv. ......... ... .-... .~.
See Block 19 N/A 'V N/A S. PURCH ASE ORDER NO, I .,.... ... lo. OC F4ELO 8N5PECTION PLAN NO. IG. REPLACEMENT SER8AL NO. 7220-M-92 M-92-R-4 N/A "**"'"*'***~~~"* ****
- 6. CO N TR ACTon/ LOC A T 80N St.ASME C r,E S ET.5OURCE HarnischFeger__ Corp. / Milwaukee , Wis. .T E u Il 30 s s. RouTeNG N sT R uC TsO N E. _
Ven d_o r_ Q ROUTE To r$ELO ENGSNEERING hROUTE TO M ATERI AL SUPERVISOR
- 19. NONCONF ORMING COe+0a TeON s r Specification 7220-M-92 Rev. 5 raragraph 9.2 states, "The Seller shall submit all electrical
( motor data called for in Specification 7220-E-10." Specification 7220-E-10 paragraph 10.1 states, " Motor data sheet velltims, ' supplied by the Buyer, shall be completed by the Seller, including all applicable data, and returned to the Buyer." Contrary to the above Motor Data sheet vellums
' (Form MDS-182) have not been received on jobsite for the following Reactor Building Crane Motors:
- 20. O rsE'O DisposON Or'E'O aECO==ENDATiONeaOuTs TO pre >>ECT ENG NEEaiNo Continued.
- 2i. riELO DesPOs.T.ON aE subTsi
- 22. ENGSNEE RING GeSPOSITION r 2 3. ENG4N E ER ONG DeSPO3ITION RE SULTS-e 24.15 DESIGN CH ANGC REOueRED O NO 26, R EJECTED M ATE teal 045P056T 0 O -.'a = a *~~6 a 2 r. OC ACCEPTANCE O vEs.sEE4YTACNEO. - o.....
OR A W4NG REV. OCN ... ..... .... SPEC R E V. ADO. awen..ea..e.s .cv** .av. 30004-s "
. WNte Copy - Orie astor QC132 2 Canary Copy - Fald EnCineet Pink Copy - POAE Goldenroe Copy - OC e,/ M e3- 9. 9
v lill
~
*~
4 4
- 3_
o. 2 c. d f i a n t p m p n r 1,. d l o o ,i osn a h 2 _ i. a e E m i,s id.QCiA a oPPO c - 1 - y p o
. yp y C poyd
_ o n; c. vcor np o n i.C. a
) i h ao D
' 0 0 e
c aw PG e
- c. k ld T - 7 0 7 e N o 1 7 0 p -
O 1 6 1 s C N_ AA A n ( l - - - i T a3 0 7 R i2 3 4 t O r - - - p e4 2 5 i P S 1 1 0 e . E 10 0 c R 5 5 5 e E 11 1 S C 2_ 2 2 r_ g N n _ A i M r R u . d O _ F d N xA A A a O o4 7 9 t C B o N n O e
~
N c n n m a f n o _ r c o n t o . r r o N o o M t t . ao e . l l M v l t t i r o d
. s i i s D J 4
e o o y b H H e . n l o i n . l t n i a u x or N_ o l F A T "Q C " 9 1 . 1 o . . S N o N 8 k . c e o i a .
., l n e B f
/
- i
=
e s
// . .
' rl . ,Y
W NONCONFOflMANCE REPORT
' ' OP
'^ " '1
- 3. L A1 WIN 3/P.'.WT NO. a RE v. 7. PR OJE CT NO.
314 5 t 3. R ORTED DV 8 Spec. C-211
- 3. ITEM DESCRIPTsON
!2 07220
/IMd[ 'DAT yD /7/'<.'
- 35. DaSPOS4 TION CONCURRENCE
" ' ~ ~ - "'"* "*~ '" ' **
. . . 8. STEM LOC ATsON 1 V Structural Backfill Sand I DATE ,
. Stockpile \ l 4h'iDATED ST',pci/*l/g.zo * / 78' '
O. SERBAL NuaggER
- g. ST ARTuP SY STEM NO. e s p. 'REPL ACEMEN T PA R TI NO. *REV e.eas e, cease e.es.es. eave N/A C. PURCN ASE 08 TOE R NO.
N/A
- 18. QC P8 ELD $NSPECTION PLAN NO.
7 N/A h t 5. REPLACEMENT SERBAL NO. N/A N/A N/A --**==v- = ~ = ~ -=== *=
- 6. CONT R ACTO R/ LOC ATION 85.ASME Q YES 97. SOURCE
_ Hub sche r es. RouTsNG sNSTRuCTsONS: ITE M (21 NO Subcontractor g ROUTE TO PaELD ENoaNEEnsNG
. O aou'E TO =avEa'aL SUPE Rv.SOR sa NONCONrORMsNG CONostsoN:
r i' Material requirements for structurrl backfill are specified in Section 5.1.1 of Spec. 7220-C-211. Material sampled in accordance with Section 5.6.2 of Spec. 7220-C-211 Rev. 2 on 10/17/75 did not meet the gradation requirements and has been incorporated into structural backfill stockpile. Nonconformance noted during routine testina of material. "0" List No. 1.002. Two tags applied. '
- 28. Q PSELD OfSPOSITsON QPaELO RECOMMENO AT80N/ ROUTE TO PROJECT ENG4NEERaNG 3 9. PIELO DaSPOSITaON RESULT &s 3 j. ENGINEE RING DeSPOSsTION r
- 33. ENGtNE EReMG DeSPOSIT80M
- R ESubTS:
( ,
- 34. aS DCSaGN CN ANGE REQutRED O NO ** "' " ^ ' ' " ' ^ ' * * ' ' ' '"' "' *^**^"*'
O vES. SEE ATTACNED.. U"'.'.".*~'*'"**'"' an OR A WlNG se E v. . . ... OCN .... av esse.sa.e ease.e s,** SP3C. REv. ADO. emse White Copy - Oris*nator Q C G 3-3 Canary Copy - F4eed Engineer Pina Copy - POAE Goldenrod Copy - QC
n
#1 #
/
NOMCONFORMANCE REPOR'.~ "^ " '
~
"
- 3 " *'
. I (
- z. .tRt.wsN Jtew ? N 3. iREV. v. rROscCT NO.
er 1 " '3 14 o s a. R roRTEo8v 4 Spec. C-230
- 3. ITEM DEsCNePT80N ..
l5 07220
.8. ITEM LOCAT4CN INM ~
h' o ATEMI77 as.ossros 7 ON CONCuRREMCc
" - * " " ' * " "~~ " " " " * " -
=
! 3 dAT'E Concrete RB # 2 Placement No. CC(570) ahVlte,/ ApepyATED sY
- 4. sERS Ab NUMBER s. sT ARTUP sVSTEne NO.
!/O147J_. -
35 REPLACEMENTP EMNO. REV. **.ses, reese emo.ne se seem S. PUNTN AsE ORDER NO.
/ ! eseese, em.eenee. e.,e IS. QC F8ELG INSPECTION PLAN NO. 8 6. R EPLACEM EN T\' ERB AL N O.
- N/A C-208-1-113 N/A "***""***""**'"* * * "
CO NTR ACTO RitOC A ..ON n.AsuE O vEs it. source Champion Inc., Midland, Michigan * ', TE. g AO Subcontractor 9 5. ROUTING INsTRUCTIONsa Q ROUTE TO FIELD ENGSNEERING Q ROUTE TO M ATEMIAL sWPERVesOR S t. NONCON FORMsNG CONDITION: f* Section 9.2.1. of Spec. C-230 Rev. 5 requires that all concrete materials be measured in L. accordance with " ASTM C-94-72 states in part that povilared admixtures weighing accuracy shall be within 3% of the required weight. Contrary to the above Batch Ticket No's. 06346 and 06374 representing concrete placed in Pour No. CC(670)a' on 10/7/75 show the flyash con::ent to be 39 lbs. and 34 lbs. respectively over the maximum allowable weight. Nonconformance noted during revictr of Batch Tickets.
"Q" List No. 1.105.
One tag applied. - ae. O '* E'o o'5*O5' TION a:ELo aECOMMENo ATiONiRouTE TO rRc eECT ENoiMEERiNG an. riEto ois Os T.ON R EsubTs.
, Field recomends to "use nn'in". Although the flynsh_qunntity repnrtori in n1n cie
#19 exceedeL n11nunble enlerancen. it'n effect in n Invering of the tinter enenne ratio with an acconnanvinn increase in strennth.
in fines was not sinnificant enounh to affect niacement. Water dy/h pe Mh to the increase. O M~ ' aa. ENGSN EC R 4MG OtsPoseTeON
. f / 0 fE'? h
/ [ 23. ENG 8NEERING OtsPCs0 TION REsWLTst s.
ne.as DEssGN CNANGC REQUtREO O NO
- O vEs. sEE AtracNEo. O.<=..
es .ee,
"'** "" .ee eee ...e
*" ^ }"* ..,...........,
sPE C. " R EV* ADO. * ..,. 4 e a s s-a ~ White Copy - Originetor Q CT.3 3 Cenery Copy - Field Ecstaaer
* . PMk Copy - PQAE i 0 Goldenrod Copy - QC
y '~ k t.,,48- __ i NONCONFORMANCE REPORT '"' " ' ' ' ' ' ~
- 2. i. wscwsNJ/ A L T No, I R 3V. F. PR4J1C T N A
_ - - . - _ o, 1 .h7 l5 Sp*c. C-230 32 ' 07220 'oATE 2 5. b.SPGSsT8aN Cu recut 4 RE PeCJ
. 3. STEM oE SCstsPf poM
..$ 8. 4 TEM loc A TsoM 8'LEPo2TEo oY/8 C(.c'[ Vpfd.f - - - - - " " "" ~ " * " " *~
Concrete
- t 3. V A yo
- 3
- e. SE RI AL NUMoER Aux. Bldg. - Cask Pit 1.(613. 25)aQhE3up.j,qdb.(~ lc.20-7f' , oATE
~
- 3. ST AR TUP S YST EM NO.
_ N/A BS.RE dCEMENT PAR o, st E V. _
- 5. PuRCM ASE oRoE N No. N/A V N/A
.*eedte. esse S=* ewe.e
**'t 1
IG. GC FaELo .NSPECTaoM PLAN No. N/A e,.o ._,....
- 14. REPL ACEMENT SERIAL No. g
' e...
i CoNrR ACToRetoCA r.oM C-231-3-631 N/A
- .t.AS=E o vES n.SouRcc
~~"*"'"*"~""' * * "
Champion Inc., Midland. Michigan
~ *
,'T E . (3 ,,o ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
T.. Rou r.No .N STGCT.o $. ggRourE To r E o ENo EEN. o Subcontractor ,,,,
.S.NoNCoNrom.. oCoNo.r.o :
O au's To "a'saiai suecav'5aa _
- g. of D-1 concrete mix isSpec. 5". 7220-C-230 Rev. 5 in Table 9.1 states in part that the rejection limit for sluso L Contrary to the above,.1 slump of Sb" was measured at the end of the pu=pline on D-1 concrete mix represented by Ticket No. 06390 pl. iced in the Aux. Bldg . -
Nonconformance noted during rou;ine QC testing of concrete. Cask Pit Pour A(613.25)a on 10/14/75.
"Q" List No. 1.205.
One tag anolied. 2.. O r.Eco o.ScoS.T.oM g,.E Lo R E Co..E N o A T,o N,Ro o,E y o ,, o,EC , E,,,,, E,,,,,o
,,,,,,,,, -o,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, '
_ Field evlinder set #649 was taken at the end of the pumpline from the nonconfor-turf ming _lofid identified in Block 19. 28 ar.d 90 day breaks will be reported.
*> R day hront- ' nre due 11/12/75: and._yJll be forwarded to-Project'iEngineering, bEb/?S l
- 23. ENG8MEE fg8NG oaSPoS47.oM / mr W?r
[ / / 2 3. ENGENEE'3aNG o8SPoSaTIoM e.E SukTS. I
- 24. $$ oESIGN CM A'NG C RLGuaREo O= **"'"^a'^'- "
'5" 5 U oR AwaNG -
O vES. SEc ATraCNEo. o.".'.'..**~~" *c^*c'"c" REV. OCM e,._,.... e.to SPEC. R E v. _ Aoo. _ awe .saseenseesee. 90098 8 WNteCopy - Orse.aator Cenery Copy - Feead Engineer
- G C f. 62 PMECopy - PQAE '
Goadented Copy - OC
. \g
Pt;EN@d f r- # NONCONFORMANCE REPORT *
- 3. u. a c. win w aar N;. ie
-- ' [^, " ' i "$*U " ' ~
C-lll- So,e. !9 V. F. ease 2cr No. y////oahp og, ._f sa.ns gr as. wisewrioN c.NcuacNcs
. orcu ossenserioN .
07220
... iram coc4 riom .-
Svamoarro dy o4(z
/w "- - [ "K g -" " " "'
/ ,
- Ranc.ene R1do. T.inor P1irn c.tca 46 Nuuman -
('on e . 7 F1. 621' A7. 1M O
.. staaru, sysrs= No.
A/# M VCD' 8/ -m fM-? 'M" . [ij. ncru4cau Nr e4=7yo. j a:V. .... ..
.ya. ..=
N/A N/A / N/A ~ (/ l -
- c. evacNase onoca No.
H /A no.ac ricto m3PCCyloM PLAN No. C-110-13-a/d Rev. FC-5
- 14. REPLACCuENr EERIA4. No.
N/A Q ?{ W [) *^ . * * "
~
- c. coNra ncro =foocarioN si.asus Q vzs ir.sounce ((#'"~'***"***""(( _
N/A .'v e u* I] M. Construction I a. enouranG aN51RUCraoNs4 Q RourE ro rtELo ENGtNEER ANG G aours To Marcasa'5u'<avi5 >a o.NoNeoNronu NG coNomo"' Spec. C-lll Rev. 9 Appendix B para. 3.4 states in part, " Deep imperfections shall be removed". NOTE: Deep imperfections are defined in Spec. C-lll Re'r. 9 Appendix B para. 2.4 as greater than .06". [ Contrary to the above Liner Plate C-lll-13 (S2-7-U-1), (S1-14-U-1), in Cont. #2, Elev. 621', AZ 180 degrees has ene (1) deep pit. 1/8" dia. X .075" deep. Nonconfoimar.cc noted during coating inspection. "Q" No. 1.109. Unit #2 One HOLD TAG attached. NOTE: Pit has been conted with Carbo Zine 11. - an. M practo oiscosir.oM griEYo accou=cNo.r.oN, ours to ,no,cci NG,N c.,N. 2, . ,,e to ..,o mom . ..u r ., - Repair in accordance with Spe_cification C-lll, Rev. 9, Appendix D, para. 3IR
~
[gh,pg / fgg Aridg&[ flit &I 3.4 Cr ,/- G t k.. .. i ,~ ~ z. t - 7.; ( d't'f--if S,f)_ c 6 ( t I ();: v Q TMs in an annroved standard repair procedure. Wor 1. may proceed. Implemen- 19dM,cJ m 'R' DildA . R V- . - ention ernected nrior to November 30. 1975. /M8/hE-t_. - /d- > 7- 75 9Ib T-T/3 ('ll I-R h 0,r t/ O.
- 23. ENGINEE R$NG os1PoSerioN c/l10i?nt 'Vn/79
- 23. ENG8MEERING oeSPoStraoM RESULvSa
.r .
I o
- 23. 85 oE54GN CN ANGE REQuaN Eo ygg 26. RCJECTEo M#.rERIAL oISPosirioM D a = w a = '. ** ** *'*
- ar. oc a e Nec CG A WIN G R E V.
Ovss.scs arracN o. oCN a = =aa a ' " , .-.
.G4... d N>" .# W. R5 anetweees.e ease.svem sa,,
SPEC _ _ R E V- Aoo. S u s-a White Copy - Originator ec<.3 2 Canary Copy - Fleid Engineer PMk Copy - POAE Goldenrod Copy - CC
fA v'1d NONCONFORMANCE REPORT ' *e3
- is NCa NO.
- 3. L L AW4N 4/PA T NO. t ,' Ai V. 7. PR $JXCT N'$.
OP 1 314 9 ___ Spec. C-111
- 3. 87EM DESCRIFT80M
!9 07220 t3.REPO p[,
10 GY
, [a
' CAT 3 w->e -7s 2;% eISPOSITsOJ CANCU NENCE
"' ~
"r'"'M*5~
. . . . .8. STEM LOC ATIO N -
Reactor Bldg. Liner Plate q TEDSY 'OAYE . Cont. #2, Ele 628' AZ 155- 7D/ / /' jff_/[,,,,, ,,,) . /g ;'ge
, '.', /peO-7F
' e
- 4. SERGAL NUMBER s
- 9. S T A RTUP S V5TE M NO.,
ftEPLACEMENT PAR N/A N/A R E V. *.eaecs a.M e desemas "~"' eaf9 8, PURCH ASE ORDER NO. N/A - - N/A S. CONTR ACTOR / LOC ATION
- 19. QC FtELO INSPECTION PLAN NO.
C-110-10 a/d FC-5 3 6. REPLACEMENT SERIAL NO. N/A u
["~' &
[ W *7&", 33.ASM Q yg,3 g y. SOURCE - = =~ g-N/A _ n-- 3 8. ROUT 8NG INSTRUCTION 5a Q ROUTE TO FsELO ENGee(EER8NG
.TE M G Nei Construction Q ROUTE TO M ATERI AL SUPERVISOR
$ 9. NONCONFORMtNG CONO4TIONa
( c Liner Plate C-111-10 S2-12-U-l. Sl-15-U-1. Elev. 628' AZ. 155 degrees has apparent lamination in the surface of the liner plate approx. 21s" wide. Lamination has not been ground out and the depth has not been measured. Nonconformance noted during coating inspection. "Q" List No. is 1.109. Unit #2. NOTE: Defective area has been coated.with Carbo Zine 11. One Hold Tag attached. 30 Q FIELO OtSPOSITION OF8ELO RECOMMEMO ATION/ ROUTE TO PRO.ECT ENC 8HEERING S t. FIELO DISPOSITION RESULTS: Renair in accordance with Snecification 7220-c-111. Annendi-- B. unrnernnh 1.1. // A* ) /W////) S!M Thic is an approved standard repair nrocedure. Renai prior to nafntine. Uoric r C, nny nroceed. T /7'e 'n / A ' %'- n 7 Tnnlononenrinn nynnernr1 nrinr en Mnvnnh3r ~10. 1975. e YN/'(/4tr/ fr?M// ##4 t'- e / t /ht t.-
$,W. 0 AWys- R /b/?// ?. ~4. hl FZ~P 0 ///-/Ab
- 23. E NG8M EE R ONG OBSPO5tTION kt! 6. Wl/ M -'
$fil7f C 3 3. ENG8NEERING DaSPOSITION R ESULTS:
o
- 34. es OES8CN CH ANGC REQUIREO O NO "*c "^"^'"'5" 5'" " *********
O vE5. SEE ATvACNEO, 2' a ^c '"a "~ ct O ."c = a - O R A wing R E V. DCN
.. .... _ . 3.
,; ,,,,,,,, r,La o sy /f - R t* ~ ~/Q avvenee*sseses.asvea e,,e seesa a White Copy - Origanotor Canary Copy C C< a-a
- Field Engineer
. Pink Copy - POAE Goldenrod Copy - OC
YAU'W NONCONFORMANOE REPORT _ -_/ i OP 1 73* 5
- a. DR AwiNGiPAR r NO. eREV. v. PROJECT NO. . REPORTED ay / 'O zS. DiseOS T.ON CONCuRRENCF BUT Spcc. FS-III-3
- 3. TEM OESCR PT ON l3 07220
- e. TEM LOCATsON
[,4/['f ;.9,
'/ VA [DAT$Dev (,
,hATEi'/pr
'DATE
- - - - ~ " -- a"- *~
..-k N nctor Coolant Pine "F" Laydown Aron 9.ST ARTur Sv5 TEM NO.
L/[/4W eA/ h') 2N) fIREPLACEMENT PART N[ *-**e s' *.ete a meeme s e enge e.SERIALNUMOER E41-2013-50-1 N/A !/g ?f/A [/ l' R E W. S. PuRCN A SE OR DE R NO. te.QC FIELO SNSPECT80N PLAN NO. 3 4. RE PL AC EMENT SE R e A'L NO. wJ MRI-M-46 _ N/A
.. CON TN ACTO RiLOC ATiON si.ASME I] vs S er. SOURCE ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,
EM?/Jo'anite .T E M O N., Vendor 4 8. RouTBNG INSTR UCY80NSt Q ROUTE TO M ATERI AL SUPERVBSOR X == U(s';/ - job 31CC Q route TO FIELD ENGINEERING
... NONCO N rO R M NG CO ND.T. "'
B C Specification FS-III-3 Para 2.2 states, " Verify that the shim ent has not sustalnad physical danar;c or surface deterioration.d Contrary to the above Reactor Coclant Pipe Spool 341-2313-50-1 was noted to have a one foot long scratch approx.1/32 inch in depth on the elbou near the stainless steel end.
"Q" Ho. is 4.018. Nonconformance noted during rocciIt 1 inspection. / Hold Tags applied.
- 29. FSELG OeSPOStTBON RESULTS:
- 30. O FeELD DaSPOS8TsON OFtELD RECOMMEND AT40N/ ROUTE TO PRC JECT ENGINE E RING
- 22. ENGSNEERlNG DISPOSaT40N 21. ENGINEERING DeSPOSITBON RE SULTS4
(
+
'*"'""^"'^5' 5 " U****' *"'** 2' c^"^"
ae. sS DESsGN CH ANGE REQUIRED O NO o..... O vES. SEE 4TT ACNED. .. . .. es..e....e ,,,, OR AW4NG R E V. DCN avv ee.ase ans.e swee ..,, SPEC. REV. A DO. - Beete 4 White Copy - Or6g6netor G C<= 8-2 e Cenery Copy - F told Engineer Pink Copy - POA.1 Goldenrod Copy - OC
- - a
~r G , #, .
~-
NONCONFORMANCE REPORT do p . A
'"'l or _
"M ~ '
- a. DN A WING /PA R 7 NO. I 8t E V. F. PR OJECT NO. ,25. D 4SPOSIT TON CO NCUR R ENCE BEBC-491 07220 p,//y';ff'
~
l0 2. tqLPORTED ,/ /. ST 'f /p ;g [' O ATE'W8 ...... . . . . . . . . - - . . . . . . y
'yg>8
' ~~~
~ 'YlYd~ti4II[s'it Anchors
~ ' ~~ '
..S...A .M.ER
'"f@'i*oTT1rea S. STAR ,..STSYE ..
%. [M1 JUK% g. g
- ,, .E.
. A C.M E N, ..R Y N . . R . V. . . . . . - . . - . . . ....
M/A N/A (/ N/A : I
.
- T2'"E"F-Hf4"7" ' "'"$-T-Y-TE'[lN" "Y " " ' "' "' E[1'" '"" * " " ' '
S. CoNTR ACTOR / LOC ^TsOPe St.ASME S Hilti Inc. ,/P.O. Bo:c 538, .3 tanford, . Conn. COoE . 3 7. 50TJWCEendor . ------a-- "- ITEM Nel .. 9 8. ROUTING GNSTRUCTtONS; Q ROUTE TO F8ELO ENG4NEERIPeG O aou'E TO =aTEa'a'suPEavisoa g' . .S.NONCOMPORMi G CONo.T.0,.Gulk Items List iESC-491 requires that concrete expansion boita have a Certiticate or Contor-mance and a Certificate of Cqap11ance. Fill G-5 paragraph 3.3.6 requires docu: entation to be traceaMe to caterini received. Contrary to the above,a Certificate of Conformance is not available for flush anchors received anc the Certificate ot compliance ic not tracenole to riush aschors received. 1000 - O and 10aa - *s" Ilusn ancnors on PO 7220-F-12347 were received with Packing Slip 619152 on AEO-1001. Nonconformance noted during receipt inspection, "Q*yo. is not available. 3 llold tags 2pplied. .
- 20. QFIELO DaSPO$aTION OFIELD RECOMMEND ATSON/ ROUTE TO PRO 8ECT ENGINEERtNG S t. FIELD OsSPOSsTION R E5ubTSs
/ *N W$4ft,nl ff . k, Y) '<d' fw )V
,. . . ff.** /d.* ,04.s Cf*) , ,
. fo't.'N , $A4 ' . 47.,s L// Ntl 4* (. J.*kCff(Afd*.Cc (Zji/' s'& h,0!/g*
0? U , $ff*- E af: *P
- g'7%.- eG' . .f d}c4ft*3%.*' , h*.h' * <.A' '*?.'l's'd'4 -
ci i k ed .cks : 'O1. ,74; 72 u /* - 72sv 7 , , ,
- 22. E NG6 NEE RING DeSPOStTION 80 ,.' 8 '*'*' 9 /9i 35 2 3. ENGINEERING DeSPOSITION SEE SULTS6 e
a4. 8$ DES 4GN CN ANGE REQUsHED O NO * * " ' ' ' ' ' ' " " ^ ' ' " ' ^ ' - ' 5 '* 5 ' " **^**^"*' O VES. SEE ATTACHEDs U O .c".'.*."' " ** ""
. . an . . . e e.. ... .a..
DR A W4MG REV, DCN awr ...a.. ..c... ..,, SPEC. R E V. ADD- _ us,a : White Copy - oreeinator Oc<.a a Canary Copy - Field Engineer Pink Copy - PQAE Goldenrod Copy - OC
- 2 ,-
ffi ( A. T: NONCONFORMANCE REPORT
- 2. .-
.-a wsNGs m r Mr
* ; j g;d v. 7. Pros 3Cr N a ._..f__- -
l ' ** * ') OP
._Sp;c . 7220-E-205 s..
~
EPORT Eq ev/f - I 392 l6 7220 gDATE
- 3. 873 he 'OE SCR&PTsO*e ..
- a. eTE M LOCATeON /s/sf8 .hr t/d 2A';
23 DesPosereON CONcuRmE NCE
~"---- " " '
j " ~ 34 Circuit Breakers kf I ' ' " " l ~ - _ .A .-...R Terr.p. Receiving Area
.....R........N..
N/jf _D ATED gy,y M / p > 'C7 h.T g, '~h S a Block 19 S. Pu i. CN A SE OROE 8d NO. N/A .
- r. . N/A A E . ... _v , ,.
I . . .. .............-... .... 9 0. OC PsELO IN$PECTsON PL AN NO. f
. __]220-E-205 E-205-R-1 l e . R E PL ACEME N T SE R G A L O. '
- u. CONTR ACv0RftoC A rsON N/A ***'"""~'~**"*
as.AsME O '<5 i-50uRcc **** ITE Inoerial/Southfield, Michigan es duraNi, sNsrRocreONs. -
., E M O N2 . . . . . . . . . . , _
O ROurE To PsELO ENGaNsEReeiG _-
- 12. N INCON8 0RMf M4h CONOef SON:
O aOv'< 'O = ^' < R'^i. ruPE R visO a fr e Rioek 4 1A05-
- i. 1 A0!i
"-A-1-8-R F-R-5-8-B 2A05 2A06 E-R-2-8-B E-8-6-8-B F-R-1-E-n F-8-5-A-B Xk. h 5,b L-8-5-8-C n g_i_o_A F-8-2-8-B F 6-1 -B L-8-2-8-C u_a_s_o_A E-8-3-8-B E-8-7-8-B L-8-6-8-C M-8-2-9-A F- 8 8 -B F-8-7-E-B M-8-6-9-A
~
E- 8 8-B L-8-3-8-C L-8-7-8-C M-8-3-9-A M 7-9-A E-8-8-8-B F-8-4-8 B F- 8 E-B E-8-9-8-B L-8-4-8-C L-8-8-8-C. M-8-4-9-A G1 Q PtELP DeSPO5ef SON L-8-9-8-C M-8-8-9-A. QPsCLO RECOMMENDATION /MOL YE TO PROJECT ENG NEENsNG Continued. 3g. PsELO OfSPO537 SON RESULT 54 s-
- 12. ,G N T BN E E RING OsSPO5t T40N k _
2 3. ENGf ME LrespeG Os$POS4TsON RE5ubT 5 2 3. I3 0173GN CN ANGC REQusHCD O NO **"c""^"'^' '5"
. 5'" "
@3) A WIN S O vEs. sE E ArrACNEO.
, .. ..., U**'."."""
n ... a c ^ cc '* *c 5 REV. OCN e,.,,, SPT C. R E v. A D O. .w.as ese . o.oes s v.. 8 u-s e.,. Whete Copy - Originator Canary Copy - Field Engineer OC-Ga a Pi% Copy - PQAE Goldenrod Copy - OC (. s c.
/' *
' . . ear.2 2 , ,_2__ . .. ~ c, a o. 35 2____
NONCONFORp1ANCE REFORT (CONT *D) Block No. 19 Continued. -
- 1. Instructions for preparing C-321-D Block 20 states:
" Enter _idcDtiliAatiQn number (s}_ traceable to th_e_ unit (s) b_e_ing_rgleJ1g_c,5!agpigment_Ecr.ial_DWher. hga_E__,_
nuQ er of major component, cable reel number or c ther unique designator". - The " unique designator" for these circuit treak'ers would be their serial number as shown on the circuit breaker nameplace.
; contrary _ro_the._above_a " Unique._Dninnator" (atdaLnn_mberLis__no_t_sho_wn_in Alack 20 of the (4) G-321-D's received for 34 circuit breakers. Block 20 now teads, "See attached Cert. Sheets".
2a. Specification 7220-E-205 paragraph 6.10.1 states, " Engraved lamicoi'd nameplates, black face to white core, shall be provided for each device and each switchgear cubicle in accordance with a naceplate list to be furnished after award. The nameplates shall be as shown on Drawing 7220-E-49 except that the thickness shall be 1/16 inch." . Contrary to thq_ab_ove. lamicoid nameplates have not been provided for the 34 circuit breaker devices. 2b. Specific _ation 7220-C-1 paragraph 5.0 states in ,psrt:
"Each piece of equipment shall be identified witi- a securely fastened metal tag, bearing the purchase _ _
order number and the appropriate equipment number as specified . . .". Contrary to the above, metal tags were not provided with the 34 circuit breakers.
- 3. Specification 7220-E-205 paragraph 12.1 states in part:
"'Ihe method of preparation for shipment shall adequately protect the switchgear and all accessories against corrosion. dampness, breakage or vibration iniury that might be encountered in transp_o_rtation and_ handling".
Conrrary to tin. above two_(2) circuit breakers (Serial No. F-8-3-8-B and L-8-8-8-C) sustained damaze around the area of the hinges of the arc chutes (see attached photos) . Apparent damage was caused by circuit breakers shif ting to the rear on the shipping skid. NOTE: Wooden block on the front of skid is bolted down, while block on the rear of skid is only nailed down. The rear wooden block gave uay in each case.
- 4. Manual Close Lever on Circuit Breaker E-8-4-8-B does not spring back to original position when lever is pulled. -
.Nonconformances.noted.dur.ingmreceipt.dnspectionMQ" 7. int =No 3,_101 UnitJ1 W2 N--Ealdaags=apg.gd.
smos a white Copy - originator canary Copy - Field Engineer e Pink Copy - co AE Goldenrod Copy - OC e J . t~ J rf (-
N7 UUAlliI <- HUWl titMllb .
....l'r ..." ^ ^>
*~' -
6/9/75 NA U .n i g.'..... ...i.. ... l' ~'idland - 7220
........... g).,,,. ~ . . .
' construction g..
G. Richardson 1 3&4 Q,'. Accords
- J. Connolly
- FIM-G-4, Rev. 6
- SF/ PSP #13, Rev. 0 i 3.2.1 "Calabration and aces..acy verification of measuring and testing equipment shall be in accordance with the accuracy tolerances established by the equipment manufacturer."
. ~
During a review of the M/T equipment list (QC-G4-1) it was noted that entries made in blocks 10 are: Examples and 14 are not in 'accordance with the manufacturers data for some thermometers. No. 269: The entry is 10.5 min. scale division (10F). Manufacturer i established + 2.0% of total scale (50F). ~
, No. 2006: The entry 1[i 0.5 min, scale division (!s F). Manufacturer ~
( - estchliched i 2.0% of total ac. ale (3"F). ,, NOTE: The records for instrument No. 269 indicate the thermometer is not within the ~ l tolerances specified on the equipment list but is within the requirements ~of the manufacturer. . Instrument No. 2006 is not within the tolerances established by the l j equipment list or the manufacturer. QC has removed this instrument from service. l l 1
,y............
As a minimum review the equipment list for all thermometers and assure the verifica-tion requirements are consis. tant with those established by the manufacturer. It is recommended that this be accomplished for other types of equipment as well. 1 l l7,.._.m.....,...... ............ . . . . . . . . , . . S/8/7s PFQCE l go.m.............. . The Measuring and Testing Equipment List has been reviewed and revised in its entirety to assure the verification requirements are consistent with those estab-lished by the Manufacturer. *
*i 1
.(0 ' ,........... . . . . . .
~
1 [ 09/16/75 u.-w.m............... f(.g( '"" mob m2 .. _ .1,d:.w .. ..
".-,._,_ .. . . _ _ . . . . . _/ 7 M.
........ I
-[3.,,s -
.WEi/ AUM FEMiG
.....p2-1-o 6
v} , . . .. - 7/10/75 l t ) \~ ;
.:.==.wa., . l '
y: Midland 1 & 2 .. .......= m . .. .. ....... Construction O .. . .. . c. Richardson gW.r. . . . . p.......... ....... .. 1 ..m..Vilen2ano Project Files
- r. J. . . m .. . .. . . . . . . .......... . . . . . . . . . . .1 - J. Connolly Spec. 7220-H-204. Rev. 3, ......
5/6/75 t Appendix Al.'l " Suppliers Quality Assur. - Programs", "Cencral requirements for Supplier Quality Assurance Programs Specification 7220-C-23 shall apply". Spec. 7220-G-23 para. ,
"Within thirty days af ter award of cor*ract and prior to starting any activities relating to the applicable" arial requisition, the Supplier
...". Upon shall submit .a controlled copy of his Quality Assurance Program 1 Bechtel's approval, activities.may procede.
I
. l
\
i The suppliers QA program has not been approved "by Midland Project Engineering for material purchased to Specification 7220-M- 204. 'Ihe P.O. Numers and Suppliers are':- l D- - F-10393 r.d F-10575 issuad tu 39 :idvik Steel inc. ' F-10577 issued to Capitol Pipe and Steel. , Note: Material is ASME and both manufacturers are on the ASME approved manufacturers list issued in accordance with the BQCM-ASME-III Section III. i
- 7................
1. Identify the materials received on these P.O. 's as nonconforming. 2. Obtain QA program approval for these Suppliers prior to their performing further activities relating to these or future P.O.'s. ; 3. _ Revise the Field Procurement Procedure or develope an alternative met. hod to assure that QA P.O. programs are approved prior to allowing Supplier activities relating to the to procede.
. ~..... ...........
1: ~ 7/11/75 2.3: 9/12/75
- 1. PFOCE 2.3. Project Superintendent 7
.. 1 1.
The Sandvik S' teel Inc. material har been identified on NCR 318. The Capitol Pipe and Steel material was rejected on NCR.307. 4
- { x[ n)
!%%. . . . . . . - . f......... .......
- f. ...h.....ll ~~75 h W V-~
- 0" .................V.
Jb 1G / vMAd.xW /MS- .... 7AshR
n n i 7/10/75
,g. . . , .
g'7;Tq l. = m m . .. ..
. . . . .;"". ; pp.,. ,s . ..
land 1 & 2 Construction O * .. = G. Richardson !
..q:..Qilon zano .l 1 1 Project Files J. Connolly I r.
u... .... .......................... ........ Sp::c. 7220-M-204. Rev. 3 5/6/75
.3 .
. i
^ e ,
App::ndix A1.1 " Suppliers Quality Assurance Programs", " General requirements for Supplier ) Quality Assurance Programs Specification 7220-G-23 shall apply". ]
"Shc. 7220- G-23 para. , "Within thirty days af ter award of centract 'and prior to starting any activities relating to the applicable' material requisition, the Supplier shall submit .a controlled copy of his Quality Assurance Program
...". Upon Bechtel's approval, activities.may procede.
. s -
Tha cuppliers QA program has not been approved bygidland ' Project Engineering for material purchased to Specification 7220-M-204. 'Ihe P.O. NuYa'NYdad Suppliers are :- F-10383 and F-10576 issued to Sandvik Steel Inc. _ . F-10577 issued to Capitol Pipe and Steel ([ r i da Material is ASME and both manufacturers are on the ASME approved manufacturers list issued in accordance with the BQCM-ASME-III Section III. C. .#,"L' . . . ..
- 1. Identify the materials received on these P.O. 's as nonconforming.
- 2. Obtain QA program approval for these Suppliers prior to their performing further activities relating to these or future P.O.'s.
- 3. Revise the Field Procurement Procedure or develope an alternative' method to assure that QA programs are approved prior to allowing Supplier activities relating to the P.O. to procede. .
.. ~. ... ...........
_1 ; 7/11/75 2.3: 9/12/75 1. PFOCE 2,3. Proiect Superintendent Itzm 1 & 2 have been addressed by 0-977 (see memo). Item 3 has been addressed by 0-977. In rddition, Field' Procurement shall make para. 3.6 and/or 3.1 of Spec. 7220-G-23 conditional to cubjnct purchase orders, a' s applicable, to ensure compliance and prevent repetition. Condi-ticnal contract statement shall assure t' hat QA supplier programs are approved prior to allowing cupplier activities relating to the Purchase Order to proceed. G,. j=.. ,
~
............. .. .u . D .
- 7. w.s . . s . ... .
M/ O-b n _n v a fi, 7 ,
, VI- 5 Attachment A It
y - m- , 7.n.. - m --
..- ( O .
0.8 15 7/5
. /
m.
;i m ,...... . w .'.T... -- N/A dland - 0 7220 -
fj;,,,, p.G.
. . . ... . , .r.Tra Construction O .. . .. . C. L. Richardson !
1 .. QC Records
....u.u................................. . . . . . . .
L. Albert - C. DeGeer Canonic Cons't. Co. , QA/QC }!anual Supplement dated 07/26/73 gu..s S:ction 16-A1: " Lift thickness control - Figure 2. The QA/QC Engineer will determine the lift thickness achieved. He will prepare a report from informat' ion listing . . . lift thickness".
., ,. m . 2 The lift thickness report (Figure 2) is not being used properly. Le form is'being used to record days placement rather than individual lift thicknesses which results in lift thicknesses recorded that are in exccas of specification limits. We daily report kept by the QA/QC Engineer indicates acceptable limits. Examples are report g _.]er7/25/75,8/1/75,8/8/75and8/11/75. This condition exists for 1975 records.
3 . L/ - y............
- 1. Request the subcontractor QA/QC Engineer to utilize available logs and data and correct the lift thickness reports for 1975 showing actual lif t thicknesses where measured.
- 2. Assure the subcontractor's QA/QC Engineer utilizes this form properly in the future. '
.. m.,m .. . .... ....
7r;m. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . 09/12/75 "- 'CE ,,~ .a..,.... ..... All lif t thickness reports submitted by Canonie QA/QC Engineer have been reviewed, all deficiencies .have been discussed with and corrected by. Canonie QA/QC. All re-submitted reports have been reviewed and found acceptable. Canonie QA/QC Engineer is now submitting reports in accordance with Canonie QA 11anual as evidenced by subsequent review covering period from 08/15/75 to 10/01/75. e-w-- 4g- g .3 47-
~
__ s
- y- -
2* _ t _
K63 T ., .. Ji enauutrLrhtTlFlflRPf0h m - . . . _ .
, e, f I i 8/14/75 n
p a ,..........,..u.. N/A lidland - 07220 g ,,, ,,, .......
- i. ... ,.... Construction D .- G. L. Richardson ,
(~' m... 1 4 QC Records
]. ... .. ..... u....................
L. Albert C. DeGeci - Canonic Cons't. Co. QA/QC Manual Supplement dated 0 7/26/73 Ssetion 16-A4 "When notified by a Bechtel reprensentative that a deficiency exists the QA/QC Engineer will note the time,date, feature, location . ficiency (i.e. failing test). . . of de-or his representative and corrective action will be determined and plemented. and the results noted.In the case of a failing tcst a view test (s) will be performed a standard form." The above information . . . will be recorded.on Tha standard form " Deficiency Corrective Action Report" is not being utili rection of failing tests. , zed for cor-of fail' ng i tests are 'lo's. Testing records indicate retests have been taken. Examples dition exists for 1975 records.206, 212, 217, .2M r 218 f rom the 'lant fill area This con-
/Wwy .
hM pm e kl -
~ G'i
{.w ... . . . ... .
- 1. Request the subcontractor's QA/QC Engineer to utilize, available logs reports and data .ta prepare Deficiency Corrective Action Reports for failing tests ,
fo and assure proper retesting of all failing tests. r 1975 2. Assure proper use of this form in the future. ,,. . . m .......... .... g.............................. 09/12/75 ,. _.... u ......... _ _ PFQCE Submittal of "Deficien :y Corrective Action Report" was discussed with C Engineer followed by a review of records identifying all deficiencies anonic QA/QC . . Deficiency able by Bechtel Quality Control. Corrective Action Reports were undsubmitted accept- by / ..
....T.................. .
i .s .-...,2............. p=
^--
_..__N /W/?]. .-
- e. .
' ' .'c l/.
I tb h f b.bb Th b11O lr~U'.b.9 lsmr/24 .. / 75 (} .
,M C..'ff. E IC.'G* " ' - " - - ~ - ' " ~ - - ~
l ti/A t- ;) . , , , ,, .
..!!ldland I and p...... . . . .2. . . . . . . . Construetion [l"""
. . . . . . . . , . . G. Etqharison l II/,A l.7 , 7. . < 7. .. g.g,, n o
,............,.......,................... OC Recordn1 Aux. Hida. .I. Conn o ll y Spec. 7.' 20-11 .'0!. F.e v . 1 ,
, , , , , 5/16/75 II/ A~
.. = . . . .
Spec. 7220-!!-2 ) para. 6.5 < Cleaning of Fit .d fabricated piping. - Para. 6.5.1 Final sub-assembly cleaning shall include a domineralized water finnh and rinseAfter .
,' to rinsing,
" d rip dsub-assemblies ry" . '
shall be tilted as necessary to insure complete drainage a . Spac. 7220-M-204 pa ra. 4.2 Field Benuing. . bindint; to'ols. Piping 2 inches and smaller may be cold bent, 'uaing hydraulicor mechanica
, produce wrinkle l'ree.
a bend.of approximately 5 nominal pipe diameter radius,Uending
'No bending shall be performed at metal temp. lle'nds shall be smooth and less thhn 70 F.
rhn H mr.a 1. listed on the attached sheet."the demineralized water and rinse was not accomplished - emblics
. Aux, ndig. walls. These sub-assemblics are currently partially embedding in' k- The Itaster Inspection plan (M-204-2 (a-b)"Ihese spools are part of t,he Spent F .
er field 1,c...dlur, und e teaning of field fabricated Rev. FC-1 piping. (10/1'!/ 7/:) decs r.01. Include tasns n FIP's that cover the sub-assemblics described on the attached sheet.'lhe
'k Piping Spools Audited:
- l. (/ '
- OllCC-118-I
.u.
" OllCC-119-1 OllCC-120-1 -
OllCC-121-1 -
~ m JM. Continued.
" 1. - -
,thn 2. installed piping sub-assemblics or revise specification .
c cationin thion Add additional tasks to the FIP's that cover the subject piping sub-assemblics t o include varification (at least one bend of pipe is stillbending visible and on each cleaning and perform these activities where e.still assembly)
}3.
- c. . Obtain revisions to the Master Inspection Plan to cover the two above items - .
s
'"10/24/75 :...............................
"L. J. Ilcwgen 2, 3 J. Connolly p e ..............
1. Demineralized water flush and rinse waived on subject pipe spools. Ref: FCR M-42. Field bending on subject pipe spools inspected and documentated on FIR dated ({ MIP M-204 AB F.C.2 incorporates pipe cleaning and bendir:n inspections . 10/16/75 .
/
-,_....r.- .r m 10 7p_(29),75 ... . .w. .w.e .f.. .,._-.wm=.mn=.....&
- r'Al ' 5A $ npy- f g} S ~~
- - . e. j& 7)y -
q .... , ,
\ '
AGtachment A Rout 7 To Thia Col . For s F. .: 16 3.4 FHS;uthworth SHil well , Iccua Date September 4,1975 HWSlager GSKeeley , Project Midland 1 & 2
, .CQHills TCCooke
(, ,) JMilandin C0!!Sumef3 POW *f File Title NCR's on Bechtel [^d s WFHolub GLRichardson Nonconformance Report No QF-55 Construction This Honconformance Report is Issued To: Prepared Byj[Md IM' ate D C/-S/-? Mr. J. F. Newgen App oved By M',. I. -. Date ',N,k Beghtel Projeci. Superintendent . WrittenRep~lyRequeste,[ByDate 10-t Corrective Action Requested By Date 104 who is responsible for corrective action. Nonconfomance Description and Supporting Details: Raceway Installation Procedure Documentation FPE-1 Rev. O', page 3 section 3.4,3 states in part, " Draws out raceway paper cards by filing out raceway paper card form (See Exhibit B)". And, page 7 states in part, "The punch card then is transmitted to engineering, fom as shown on attached Exhibit C shall be used for punch card transmittal". Contrary to this. Procedure, r.equisition form Exhibit B in the Procedures and transmittal fom Exhibit in the Procedures are not being used in the field but superseded forms 47711 and 676] vere being used. AEC Reportable Yes O No O .See Procedure 9 (For Nuclear Projects Only) . {w Stop Work Necessary Yes O No O See Procedure 16 - Stop Work No Recomended Corrective Action:1) Revise the prodedure FPE-1 [to include and note s6per-seded forms now being used in the field. 2) Take corrective action to preclude repeti, tion. 1 Corrective Action Taken: On October 3,1975 Field Procedure FPE-1 Rev. O has been rewritten implementing forms 47711 and 67611. In addition, the scope of this procedur was redefined to exclude tihe procedure as a Quality Verification Document. l Verification of Corrective Action Required Yes X No O Method of Verification: Field Procedure FPE-1 Rev. I was reviewed for implementation of forms 47711 and 67611. In addition, the scope was reviewed to assure that the action taken was defined in FPE-1 Rev.1. bonconformance Closure Confimed By,,,' fD(,\ . Date As e e, - 7 , , 1 To be completed at time of closure by Consumers Power QA Services. l PMe l of l i
.- .,-.,n....,.....
g.,. . , m
,i h Atte hant A File 16.7
[D Route To Shis Copy For q Issue Da% - sentember 15. 1975 SHHowell { ( U ' CQHills
'- HWSlager GSKeeley d " '
FMSouthworth TCCooke DEsWDets Pl W NCR's 9n MiRCCllAncQ RLTeuteberg File Title - vendora Subject File Honconformance Repod No QF-57 l This Nonconformance Report is Issued To: Prepared By [ . ate 9- /M p4d
~
- Approved By h / /N h ., Date ///S/f Dr. L. C. Meyerpr p /
9-21 I Written Reply Request 9s By Date EG6G Corporation 9025 East Kenyon Ave. Corrective Action Requested By Date 10-1( Denver, CO 80237 j who is responsible for corrective action. Nonconformance Description and Supporting Details: 10CFR50 Appendix B, Quality As Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel Processing Plants Criteria 6 Document Con states in part, " Measures shall be established to control the issuance of documents, such as ' instructions, procedures, and drawings including changes thereto, which pren all activities af fecting quality". Contrary to this requirement, therewasnoapprf or issuance dates on the Midland Nuclear Power Plant S4.te Meteorological Data Acquio I tion System Calibration Procedure 91.5 meter station.
~
'(O AEC Reportable Ye= 0 no O .see Procedure 9 (For nuclear Pro 3ecta 6 air) Stop Work Necessary Yes No @ See Procedule 16 - Ston Work No Recommended Corrective Action: A. The Procedure shall be approved and issuance dated. B. Take action to preclude reoccurrences. 1 Corrective Action Taken: l A. Meteorological Data Acquisition Calibration Procedure 91.5 meter station was l issued, approved and dated. Meteorological Program Site Operational Procedures for Midland Nuclear Power Plant was issued, approved and dated. B. EG&G reviewed all on-site procedures and Manual for signature and date. 1 Verification of Corrective Action Required Yes @ No O hthodofVerification: All procedures and manuals were reviewed and visually verified on 10/29/75 in the presence of Dr. Meyer in the meteorological tower shelter. (w\ f INonconfomance Closure Confimed By Date k * '
/O. 30- >f ITo be completed at time of closure by Consumers Power QA Services.
. I <- O.., ,
"i '
Attachment A Route Tb 'Dtis Coph For File 16.7 -
, CQllills SHHowell l Issue Date September 15. 197 5 C HWSlager .
CSKeeley Project Midland 1 & 2 :I (4' . *FMSouthworth TCCooke RLTeuteberg File Title NCR's on Mfarell - t1 Subject' File Nonconformance Report No QF-61 This Nonconfomance Report is Issued 'Ib: Prepared By.f g Date 9-/5 -% Dr. L'. C. Meyer . APProved By $ Y d N " DSM EC&G Corporation Written Re d Request Date 9-255
^" Corrective Action Requested By Dato 10-10J De ver CO 8 237 who is responsible for corrective action. I Nonconfomance Description and Supporting Details: Midland Nuclear Power Plant Site Meteorological Data Acquisition System Calibration Procedura - Appendix C List of Forms. A. Consumers Power 100 meter tower device allocation sheet is ' incorrect for 100 meter level. B. Consumers Power meteorological data acquisition system onsite summary checklist form ALD-CP-101 is incorrect for 300 meter level and approva[
CPQA. C. Consumers Power onsite summary checklist for 10 meter station form ALD-CP-1 is incorrect because no approval by CPQA can be implemented.
- ([ AEC Reportable Yes C No @ See Procedure 9 (For Nuclear Projects OnAY.)
Stop Work Necessary Yes No @ See Procedure,16 - Stop Work No , 1 Recommended Corrective Action: A. Above - Revise form to correct 100 meter to 91.5 meter on title and chart. B. Above - Correct form from 300 meter to 91.5 meter and delete approval by CPQA. ( C. Above - Correct form by deleting approval by CPQA. 1 Corrective Action Taken: A. Device Allocation Sheet incorporated correction from 100 meter to 91.5 meter on title and chart. s B. Form ALD-CP-101 was corrected from 300 meter to 91.5 meter and deletion of approval by CP-QA. C. ALD-CP-102 was corrected by deleting approval by CP-QA. l Verification of Corrective Action Required Yes X No Method of Verification: Reviewed the Midland Nuclear Power Plant Site Meteorological Data Acquisition System Calibration Procedure for adequacy for above deficiencies. 1 Nonconformance Closure Confi med By w - Date M . 3 o 7 5~~ 1 Tc be completed at time of closure by Consumers Power QA Services. Page 1 of 1
Attachment A / _ Rout 7 Yb This Copy /or Fia.- ' 16.3.6 FMS::uthworth SIIHow211 l Icsu2 Dat9 Srptember 16, 1975 HWSlager CSKeeley Project Midland 1 & 2 CQHills TCCooke (m) JMilandin ConstJmers Power File Title NCR's on Bechtel WFHolub Quality Control I C.V - CLRichardson Nonconfomance Report No OF-64 Subiect File This Nonconformance Repor is Issued To: Prepared ByM f.%% Date 9-IC '7fl Mr. J. P. Connolly Approved By #8 (dMEb Date 9// 6/7N Bechtel Project Field Quality ~ Control Engineer Written ' Reply Requested. By Date 10-17-l
, Corrective Action Requested By Date 10 who'is responsible for corrective action.
Nonconformance Description and Supporting Details: Specification C-231 Revisions 1 through 7, Section 14.1 states in part,." Newly placed concrete shall be kept wet by the continuous presence of water with 'a nozzle, soakers, or wet burlap for the first seven days after the concrete has been placed". Contrary to this requirement, the Concrete Postplacement Reports (QC-C5 forms) for concrete pours A(597.25)b', A(597.75)a' and CC(601.92)a' show curing only lasted six days af ter the concrete had-been placed. , 1 1 AEC Reportable Yes No @ See Procedure 9 (For Nuclear Projects Only) l {p 'G Stop Work Necessary Yes No @ See Procedure ld - Stop Work No Recomnended Corrective Action: (1) Review allspour packages for similar curing - deficiencies (2) Receive a Project Engineering evaluation on the acceptability of the concrete in place, based on the curing deficiencies above and any curing deficiencies found in the review and/or nondestructive examination of the concrete in place (3) Take corrective action to preclude these occurrences. The written reply to these items is requested with the Project Engineering e.aiuation and/or pondestructive examination of the concrete in place. Corrective Action Taken: (1) Bechtel Quality Control reviewed all pour packages for similar discrepancies in curing documentation and had discussions with personnel who completed some of the discrepant forms. The discussions confirmed that the QC-C5 Forms in no way controlled the actual length of cure, but only documented the fact that a cure was in effect on t day noted. (2) To preclude repetition of this discrepancy, all Quality Control personnel involved with concrete curing have bee rein ructed in the proper use of t[b Verification of Corrective Action Required Yes- X No QC-C5 Form. Method of Verifications Reviewed QC-C5 Forms completed after this NCR. The QC-C5 forms reviewed documented seven days of curing. 1 Nonconformance Closure Confimed By hMd f.b _ Date to- 7.l *75* , l ib be completed at' time of closure by Consumers Power QA Services.
. Page 1 of 1
?. ^
Attachment A Route To 'Ihis Copy For - Fil9 15.3.1 FHSouthworth Sill!owell (( Issue Date October 10. 1975 IIWSlager GSKeeley . ( / Project Midland 1 & 2
.G/.
CQIlills TCCooke JMilandin NE File Title NCR's on Bechtel ( - Project Engineerine WFilolub Nonconfomance GLRichardson Report No QF-66 9tth i nc t- File
'1his Nonconfomance Report is Issued To: Prepared By b'e ,,M@!d.w Date 10-10.-7 Mr. R. L. Castleberry Approved By. [ [ M 2 A - Date N.Xe d Midland Project Engineer ,y j Bechtel Power Corporation Written Reply Requer,te)d By Date 10-2/
Ann Arbor, MI 48106 Corrective Action Requested By Date 10-2/ who is responsible for corrective action. Nonconfomance Description and Supporting Details: In the response to DRf Question 5.1.11 in the PSAR, it states in part that " Soils above Elevation 605 will be cohesive soils in an engineered backfill". Contrary to this_ statement, Spec. C-211 Rev. 2 Section 5.1.l' states in part that "The materials .used for structural backfill within three feet of the exterior wall of any plant crea structure, shall b'e cohesionless and free-draining". AEC Reportable Yes No @ See Procedure 9 (For Nuclear Projects Only) (( ' i Stop Work Necessary Yes No @ Sec Procedure 16 - Stop Work No Recomended Corrective Action: (1) Per the Bechtel's Engineering Department Procedure Instruction 4.1.1 Section 3.4, an SAR change notice would be applicable. (2) Also per the Bechtel EDPI 4.1.1 Secticn '3.4, " Fabrication or' construction of items differing in design or quality from the SAR shall not commence until the SAR change is approved by Consumers Power Company". This statement should be evaluated to determine whether work should b'e stopped in the field until the SAR phange is approved by Consumers Power Company. Cor ective Action Tanen:
. :r - ,
kerificationofCorrectiveActionRequired Yes- No Method of Verification: ' I ( (' Nonconfomance Closure Confimed By -
~
Date - 1 To be completed at time of closure by Consumers Power QA Services. Page 1 of 1
My+ Attachment A
..e r 211'1 Copy I'ur Filo c
16.34&163.6 Route 'Ib SHH:w;11 IOzu3 Date October 13, 1975 FMS:uthworth 1' Project Midland 1 & 2 WSlager GSKeeley m CQlfills TCCooke f
- t. ) JMilandia C0!!sumers power File Title NCR's on Bechtel Construction and Quality Control
(. WFHolub Nonconformance '
" Report No OF-67
*hf This Nonconformance Report is Issued To: Prepared Byhd f,4fe% _ Date 10-13 '7 6 J. P. Connolly Approved By MMe Date NJ >Ar#-
Bec e roject Field Quality Control WrittenRokRequest[ByDate 11-11-7 J. F. Newgen Corrective Action Requested By Date ll-ll-7f Dhi"s1rM!iElbf}]pfyygpfggive action. Nonconformance Description and Supporting Details: PSAR section 5.1.3.3.la states in part that "In addition to the tests required of the cement manufacturers, the following user tests are performed:... ASTM C-ll5 Fineness of Portland Cement". Spec. C-208 Rev. section 6.1.1 states in part that (1) " Prior to commencing of any concrete work cemen3 from the s.ource selected.by the concrete supplier shall be given an initial Acceptance ; Test consisting of a complete c.hemical and physical analysis by~ the Subcontractor in' i l accordance with Paragraph 7 of ASTM C150 with the fineness to be determined by
. ASTM C115." (2) "In addition, for each subsequent grind the subcontractor shall f perform an Acceptance Test ' consisting of a complete chemical and physical analysis..."
(Contd3 AEC Reportable Yes No X See Procedure 9-(For Nuclear Projects'Only) Stnp um* Nenesnarv Yes O No @ See Procedure 16 - Stop Work No [a) Recommended Corrective Action: ('l) Review tlie sinitial Acceptance Test, Acceptance Tests and User Tests for similar deficiencies (2) Receive a Project Engineering evaluation on the acceptability of the cement tested by the alternative method (3) Notify U.S. Testing of this nonconformance and take corrective action to preclude these occurrences (4) Instruct QC personnel on the proper test method for determining the fineness of Portland Cement. The written reply to these items is pequested with the Project Engineering evaluation. Corrective Acticn Taken: Verification of Corrective Action Required Yes NoO 1 Method of Verification: 1Nonconformance Closure Confirmed By . ~ Date
~'
} _
1 Tb be completed at time of closure by Consumers Power QA Services.
- Pqe l of 2
D . Iccua Dato ^ October 13, 1975
, I Proj ect s ' Midicnd 1 & 2
' File Titist NCR'o en Bechtel C nstruction cud Quality Contral Nonconformance Report No QF-67 (Contd) b' Nonconformance Description and Supporting Details: (Contd)
(3) "Also, for every 5000 cubic yards of concrete produced...a User's Test con-sisting of a complete chemical and physical analysis" is made. , Contrary to the requirements above, the -fineness for User Tests 20 (Report 66), 21 (Report 67) and 23 (Report 74) and Acceptance Tests for Silo 20 (Report 41)', Silo 18 (Report 58), Silo 12 (Report 62), Silo 20 (Report 69) and Silo 17 (Report 76) was determined by ASTM C204, Test for Fineness of Portland Cement by Air Permeability Apparatus instead of by ASTM C115, Test for Fineness of Portland Cement by the Turbidimeter.
.(~. '
o N l I Page 2 of 2-c
-,. . - - - ,- r -w-. ,, , - ,--g-,...-nen,m-- ,-,,,,e, ,,.a ,. , a-- p m.- - -,w----
.. pr
("' f i' Attachment A
- Route To 'Ihis Copy For Fil'3 16 3.6 FMSouthworth SHHowell Issue Date October 17. 1975 UWSlager CSKeeley Project Midland 16 2
<-~3
( l CQHills TCCooke , L JMilandin CortstimCf3 POW 8r File Title UCR's on Bechtel WFHolub Ouality control Nonconfomance MMYhyn Report No OF-68 This Nonconformance Report is Issued 'Ib: Prepared Dyb0Jf.b Date lo-r7 ~75 J. P. Connolly Approved By j bA v Data'-3//% Bechtel Project Field Quality Control Written Reply Request Date 11-17-1 Engineer Corrective Action Requested By Date 11 who is responsible for corrective action. I Nonconformance Description and Supporting Details: Specification C-210 Revision 4 section 13.7 states in part "All backfill in the plant area and the berm shall be compacted to not less than 95 percent of maximum density as determined by modified
. Proctor method..." Contrary to this requirement, the compaction test MD142 taken in the West Plant Dike had been calculated using the wrong maximum laboratory dry density for Bechtel Modified Proctor, resulting in a 96% compaction which is passing. Using the correct maximum laboratory dry density results in 92% compac-tion which is failing.
AEC Reportable Yes O No see Proceaure 9 (For. Nuclear Pro 3ects only) ~ m
- $%op Work Necessary les ho h 6ee trocedure 16 = 6i,0p Work ho Recommended Corrective Action: 1 -
S
# See Attachment A.
1 Corrective Action Taken: l Verification of Corrective Action Required Yes, No b4ethod of Verification: ,
~
bionconfomance Closure Confirmed By ( ). Date ' 1 To be completed at time of closure by Consumers Power QA Services.
. Pages 1 of z
.y "
L4Plo 16.3.6 -
*' Octchcr 17, 1975
-(- ' Projset Iccue- Dr") Midland 1 & 2.
File Title NCR'o en B:chtal. Quality Control - f,' Attachment A ~ Nonconformance Report No QF-68 Recommended Corrective Action: (1)* Review all Bechtel Modified Proctors (BMP) and Field Work Sheets used by
- U.S. Testing to assure the maximum laboratory dry densities and optimum moisture
. contents on the BMP's agree with the Field Work Sheets.
(2)' If there is a discrepancy between the maximum laboracory dry densities and/or the optimum moisture contents, review all compacted Fill Density Test Reports that used the maximum laborato.ry dry densities and/or optimum moisture contents in error. - * (3) Resubmit all test reports that used the maximum laboratory dry densities and/or optimum moisture contents in error. (4) Receive a Project Engineering evaluation on the acceptability of the failing test MD142 and any failing tests that are found during the review. (5) Take corrective action to preclude these occurrences. The written reply to these it ems is requested with the Project Engineering evaluation. O ,
=4 8 l i 2 v ~
, Page 2 of 2
.}}