ML20081G101
| ML20081G101 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 06/08/1983 |
| From: | TERA CORP. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20081G099 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-83-451 NUDOCS 8311040119 | |
| Download: ML20081G101 (24) | |
Text
t
,t' . v.
t E FOF9 69-336 l
. OVERVIEW OF MIDLAND INDEPENDENT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM PRESENTED TO: Paul Keshishion, NRC George Gower, NRC JUNE 8,1983 l
~
,,,4S g P D
% mi IERA CORPORATION 4
O 6 l
PHILOSOPHY OF REVIEW e SELECT A REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE OF ENGINEERED SYSTEMS, COMPONENTS, AND STRUCTURES WHICH WILL FACILITATE:
- AN INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT OF IMPORTANT PARA-METERS AFFECTING THE FUNCTIONAL CAPABILITY OF THE THREE SYSTEMS AND THE ABILITY TO EXTRAPOLATE FINDINGS TO SIMI-LARLY DESIGNED FEATURES WITH A HIGH DEGREE OF CONFIDENCE o CONSIDER POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE FINDINGS WHICH WILL ALLOW A BALANCED VIEW OF OVERALL QUALITY e ASSESS ROOT CAUSE AND EXTENT OF IDENTIFIED FINDINGS e REVIEW CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN TO ADDRESS FINDINGS I
O l
I
- m
e' 6 INTER-RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MIDLAND DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PROCESS AND THE MIDLAbD IDCV PROGRAM l 40 CFR 50, ADPEtOIX A]
e SR, e Reg Guides FSAR A*O OTER REVIEW Or DESIGN e tr*stry L UTILITY CRITERIA APO 5teoards COr.MIT MENT 5 CoveITMENT5 e N555 Criterio 1f l DESiCN INDUT5 l 3y
REVIE A Or A-E, N555 VEtDOR lvDLE VENTING ENGINEERING - IMDLE w!NTING DOCUMENTS ST A*C ARDS, DocvwrNTS
<i 4.
PROCEDURE 5 DESIGN PROCE55 e Des'r Cetrol - e Egereerig -
e GA/GC E volvet.ma CHCK Or CO*FIRMATORY e Colculaties CALCULATIONS A.C
- C ALCUL ATIONS OR EVALUATONS EVALUATONS 1I l DES:GN CHANCES l 1r IDV ' "
DE5IGN OUTPUTS
CTCK Or e Dro.ings DRAwINC5 A*C e Specificot.ons ,
, SPECiriCATONS d
I 1P U
1P CWCK Or FABR!CATON ghfE5 b ICV 5UPPLIER DOCUMENTATION I i 1f i, SITE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES e Comtreson
- N "'
- e Control 3 [,7 REVIEW 0 STORACE REVIEW Or CONSTRUCT #ON/
- O*'OC e Erectim,lestol- APO M ANTENA*CE ^T' on, etc. DOCUMENTATION TAT 1P
' l FIELD CHANCES l 1P ii ii d'
VERIFIC ATON/ INST ALLED STRUCTURIS, k OVER INSPECTION D SYSTEMS Ato VERIFIC ATION Or ACT!VITIES COMPO*ENTS Pt4YSICAL COPTICURATION 1y g REVIEW Or VERIFICATION TURtOVER FOR ACflVITIES 3 FUNCTIONAL TEST NG If
?! ODE R ATO*6 l
~
DESIGN NO CONSTRUCTION PROCESS MIDLAND IDCV PROGRAM FIGURE 1.2-1
/ /
INITIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR THE AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM I
MIDLAND INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM SCOPE OF REVIEW F
// a m k y
C g i N
e h 5 *$m U$
U
$5 E
DE51GN AREA s
- Kg c- l r 88 E~! 8 o
2 +2 8
g9;89 e
' ss2 Es w u l g e O
AFW SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REQUIREVENTS 3.11 SYSTEM OPERATING LIMITS X X X
!.2-1 ACCIDENT ANALYSIS CONSIDERATIONS X
- 1.3-1 SINGLE FAILURE X X X e 1.4-1 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS X X l.5-1 SYSTEM ALIGNMENT /5WITCHOVER X X
!.6-1 REMOTE OPERATION AND SHUTDOWN X I.7-l SYSTEM 150LATION/ INTERLOCK 5 X X l.8-1 OVERPRESSURE PROTECTION X e e e 1.9-1 COMPONENT FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS X X X X l.10-1 SYSTEM HYDRAULIC DESIGN X X X e 1.11-1 SYSTEM HEAT REMOVAL CAPASILITY X X X e
!.12-1 COOLING REQUIREMENTS X I.13-1 WATER SUPPLIES X X g.[4 3 PRESERVICE TEST!NG/ CAPABILITY FOR OPERATIONAL TESTING X e e
- 1. I 5-1 POWER SUPPLIES X X e I.16-1 ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS / X e e 1.17-1 PROTECTIVE DEVICES / SETTINGS / X X X l.l B-1 INSTRUMENTATION / X X X X
!.19-1 CONTROL 5YSTEMS / X X X e 1.20-1 ACTUATION 5YSTEMS V X e 1.21-1 TOE COMMITMENTS / X e .
1.22-1 MATERIALS SELECTION X X I.23 1 FAILURE MODO AND EFFECTS e e
- KEY NOTE X -INITIAL SCOPE OF REVIEW l. INITIAL S AMPLE DOCUMENTED IN REV. O AND 1 OF THIS PLAN HAS BEEN MODIFIED EFFECTIVE h- DELETED SCOPE OF REVIEW 4/13/83
- - ADDED SCOPE OF REVIEW FIGURE I.2-2a
b n
/
INITIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR THE AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM MIDLAND INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM (CONTINUED)I SCOPE OF REVIEW i C s s O Y 1g v 85 5 $$ 08 DESIGN AREA E E g9[s s a ga 5 gb $b'g* az b8 5~8 g E 2
y p! l y e uf ! f l' lbba o
AFW SYSTEM PROTECTION FEATURES X
!!.l-l SEISMIC DESIGN X X X X X 11.2 - 1 e PRESSURE BOUNDARY X X X X X l1.3-1 e PIPE /EGUIPMENT SUPPORT e EQUlPMENT GUALIFICATION X X X X 11.4-1
- 11. 5 1 HIGH ENERGY LINE BREAK ACCDENTS X e P!PE WHIP X X X X
- 11. 6 - 1
- 11. 7 1 e JET IV.PINGEMENT X 11.B.1 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION X e ENVIRONMENTAL ENVELOPES X X X X X
- 11. 9 - 1 11.10-1 e EQUIPMENT GUALIFICATION X X X X
!!.11-1 e HVAC DESIGN X
!!.12-1 FIRE PROTECTION X X X II.13-1 MISSILE PROTECTION X II.14-1 SYSTEM 51NTERACTION X X X STRUCTURES THAT HOUSE THE AFW SYSTEM lli.I-I SEISMIC DESIGN / INPUT TO EQUIPMENT X X X X lli.2-1 WIND & TORNADO DESIGN / MISSILE PROTECTION X 111. 3 - 1 FLOOD PROTECTION X I!!.4-1 HELBA LOADS X Ill.5-1 CIVIL / STRUCTURAL DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS X 111. 6 - 1 e FOUtOATIONS X X X 111. 7 - 1 e CONCRETE / STEEL DESIGN X X X X 111. 8 - 1 e TAtKS @ @ @
KEY _
NOTE X - INITIAL SCOPE OF REVIEW l. INITIAL SAMPLE DOCUMENTED IN REV. O AND l OF THIS PLAN HAS BEEN MODIFIED EFFECTIVE
@- DELETED SCOPE OF REVIEW 4/1 /83
- - ADDED SCOPE OF REVIEW FIGURE I.2-2b . _ - .
B9
,~ . l
)
INITIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR THE AUXILIARY I FEEDWA MIDLAND INDEPENDENT CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGR SCOPE OF REVIEW 2 2 8 g8 y e ,9s as of kr 2
2 er w% y%
d SYSTEM / COMPONENT e ~8 $a b6 25 by ls l ls f
"" N,l,l ele $lBf ~ :
M.ECHANIC AL_
X X X X X
l.1-Ic e EQUIPMENT X X X X
l.2-le o PIPING X X X X l.3-Ic e PIPE SUPPORTS ELECTRICAL X X X X X 11.1-le e EQUIPMENT e o X X
II.2-lc e TRAYS Ato SUPPORTS X e . X ll.3-Ic e CONDUIT AND SUPPORTS X X X X X ll.4-lc e CABLE INSTRUMENTATION Ato CONTROL X X X X X
lli.1-lc e INSTRUMENTS X x
lli.2-le e PAPING/ TUBING e o X X
Ill.3-Ic e CABLE HVAC X X X X X
IV.1-Ic e EQUIPMENT X .
X IV.2-Ic e DUCTS APO SUPPORTS STRUCTURAL X X V.1-I c e FOUNDATIONS x X X V.2-Ic e CONCRETE X X X V.3-Ic e STRUCTURAL STEEL e
VI.1-Ic NDE/MATERI AL TESTING PROGRAM f NOTE KEY l l. INITIAL SAMPLE DOCUMENTED IN REV. O AtO I X -INITIAL SCOPE OF REVIEW OF TH:5 PLAN HAS BEEN MODIFIED EFFECTIVE
@. DELETED SCOPE OF REVIEW 'II3IO3
- . ADDED SCOPE OF REVIEW N
l l
/ / l INITIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR TI-E STANDBY ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM MIDLAND INDEPENDENT .- DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM SCOPE OF REVIEW ie e s eeY' ,L !
ls
- u DES!CN AREA g; 8 e n! 23 la 36 68 !e I kz a
y k C
< 3
~
U k
U f l ST ANDBY ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM PERrORMANCE REQUIREVFNTS X X X 1.1-2 SYSTEM OPERATING LIMITS - DC X X l.2-2 ACCIDENT ANALYSIS CONSIDERATIONS ,
- DG, AC, DC SINGLE FAILURE - DC, PDS, AC, DC X X X Xe 1.3-2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS - DC, DC X X 1.4-2 LOCAL OPERATION -DG X l.6-2 SYSTEM INTERLOCKS - DC X X l.7-2 X X X X I9-2 COMPONENT FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS
- DC, PDS, AC, DC X X X 1.12-2 COOLING /HLATING REQUIREMENTS - DG X X X X l.14-2 PRESERVICE TESTING / CAPABILITY FOR OPERATIONAL TESTING - DG X X X X l.I 6-2 ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS-DC, PDS, AC, DC PROTECTIVE DEVICES / SETTINGS- DC,PDS X X X 1.17-2 X INSTRUMENTATION - DC, AC, DC X X X l.lB-2 X X CONTROL SYSTEMS - DG X X 1.19-2 X X X X l.20-2 ACTUATION SYSTEMS - DG X X X
l.23-2 FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS - DC, PDS, AC, DC X X X Xe 1.24-2 ELECTRICAL LOAD CAPACITY -DG, PDS, AC,DC ELECTRIC AL LOADS SEQUENCING - DC, PDS X X X X 1.25-2 ELECTRICAL LOAD SHEDDING - DC, PDS X X X l.26-2 X X X l.27-2 FUEL OIL SYSTEM - DG
/ !.28-2 LUBE OIL SYSTEM - DG X X
X X X X l.29-2 STARTING MECHANISM AND AIR SUPPLY SYSTEM - DG X X X 1.30-2 COMBUSTION AIR SUPPLY-DG X X X l.31-2 INDEPENDENCE - DC, PDS, AC, DC X X Xe X X
l.32-2 CABLE SIZING / ROUTING / SEPARATION- PDS m
KEY DG - . DIESEL CENERATOR DGB - DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING PDS - POWER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AC - PREFERRED 120V AC POWER SYSTEM SERVICING AFW SYSTEM DC - 125V DC POWER SYSTEM SERVICING AFW SYSTEM FIGURE I.2-Aa
l .
l 1 / /
l INITIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR THE STANDBY ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM MIDLAND INDEPENDENT DES'GN VERIFICATION PROGRAM (CONTINUED)
SCOPE OF REVIEW i a1 ! !
DESIGN AREA 2.of.
!s in aR aw an
'l o,g" Oy
- a h n
$w ,a-.
fU U 88" E! bu f
I E'2
+
si ylof 52 [s Ek
- g' 9s 8 e ,
~
STANDE3Y ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM PROTECTION FE ATURES
!!.I-2 SEISMIC DES!GN X 11.2 - 2 e PRESSURE BOUPCARY - DG X X X 11.3 - 2 o PIDE/EOUIPMENT SUPPORT - DC, PDS X- X* X* X t' X-11.4-2 s EQUlPMErfi OUAllFICATION - DC, PDS X X X -
X
- 11. 5 - 2 HIGH ENERGY LINE BREAK ACCIDENTS X
!!.9-2 e ENVIRONMENTAL ENVELOPES - DG, PDS j X 11.1 0 - 2 e EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION - DC, PDS / X X X y_,.
- 11. 1 2 - 2 FIRE PROTECTION - DG X X X
- 11. 1 3 - 2 MISSILE PROTECTION - DG X
- 11. 1 4 - 2 SYSTEMS INTERACTION - DC, PDS, AC, DC X X STRUCTURES THAT HOUSE THE STAPOBY ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM ll1.1-2 SEISMIC DESIGN / INPUT TO EOUiPMENT - DGB X X X . X 111.2 - 2 WIND & TORNADO DESIGN /MISS!LE PROTECTION X X X X
- DGB 111.3-2 FLOOD PROTECTION - DGB - X X X .
III.4-2 HELBA LOADS - DGB X d
111. 5 - 2 CIVIL / STRUCTURAL DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS Ill.6-2 e FOUtOATIONS - DGB X X X 111.7 - 2 e CONCRETE / STEEL DESIGN - DGB X X X X 111. 8 - 2 + TAtKS X X X X4 X XEY DG - DIESEL GENERATOR DGB - DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING PDS - POWER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AC - PREFERRED 120V AC POWER SYSTEM SERVICING AFW SYSTEM DC - 12SV DC POWER SYSTEM SERVICING AFW SYSTEM FIGURE I.2-4b
INITIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR TE STANDBY ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM MIDLAND INDEPENDENT CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM f SCOPE OF REVIEW f4
!s b 99a g
8 SYSTEM /COMPOtENT la i e 8-
/
81 5 lEsf 111/
R5lE I MECHANICAL X X X 1.1 2c e EQUIPMENT - DG X /
l.2 2e e PIPING - DC X X X l.3 2c e PIPE SUPPORTS - DG X X X ELECTRICAL 8SE II.l-2c e EQUIPMENT - DC, PDS, AC, DC X X X X X -
II.2-2c e TRAYS AND SUPPORTS-PDS X X X X
!!.3-2c e CONDUIT AND SUPPORTS-PDS X X X X -
II.4-2c e CABLE - PDS X X X X X INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL lil.1-2c e INSTRUMENTS - DG X X X X X lil.2-2c e PIPING / TUBING - DG X X X lli.3-2c e CABLE - DC, PDS X X X X X HVAC IV.1-2c e EQUIPMENT - DG X X IV.2-2c e DUCTS AND SUPPORTS-DG X X STRUCTURAL V.1-2e e FOUNDATIONS - DG X X V.2-2c e CONCRETE - DG X X V.3-2c e STRUCTURAL STEEL - DC . X X KEY DG - DIESEL GENERATOR DGB - DIESEL GEPERATOR BUILDING PDS - POWER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AC - PREFERRED 120V AC POWER SYSTEM SERVICING AFW SYSTEM DC - 125V DC POWER SYSTEM SERVICNG AFW SYSTEM fit (dRFfTl351.-M j
l
' l INITIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR THE CONTROL ROOM HVAC SYSTEM MIDLAND INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION- PROGRAM SCOPE OF REVIEW s i e E $ w w 8 n m'c" ^" 6:f 5P Msll~5ci %
g:Eg fg 5 ff d 8 of j s eb by E"
$? c! u$? j5[
o -
CONTROL ROOM HVAC SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REQUAEMENTS l.1-3 SYSTEM OPERATING LIMITS X X X l.2-3 ACCIDENT ANALYSIS CONSIDERATIONS X X l.3-3 SINOLE FAILURE X X X
!.4-3 TECFtJ1 CAL SPECIFICATIONS X X l.5-3 SYSTEM AllCNMENT/SWITCHOVER X X l.7-3 SYSTEM ISOLATION / INTERLOCKS X X X X l.9-3 COMPONENT FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS X X X X
!.10-3 SYSTEM PNEUMATIC DESIGN X X X X X l.12-3 COOLING / HEATING REQUIREMENTS X X X I.14-3 PRESERVICE TESTING / CAPABILITY FOR X X OPERATIONAL TESTING 1.15-3 POWER SUPPLIES X X l.18-3 INSTRUMENTATION / DETECTION X X X X l.19-3 CONTROL SYSTEMS X X X l.20 3 ACTUATION SYSTEMS X X X X l.21-3 NDE COMMITMENTS X X X l.22-3 MATERIALS SELECTION X X X X l.23-3 FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS X X X l.33-3 FILTRATION X X X! X l.34-3 PRESSURIZATION X X X X l.35-3 VENTILATION X X X X X FIGURE I.2-6a
~
/ /
INITIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR THE CONTROL ROOM HVAC SYSTEM MIDLAND INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM (CONTINUED) f SCOPE OF REVIEW i 2 e!!
DESIGN AREA El n V f B *EC E
~g~~g T *-
U f [I8 l"lN 1:$ q f
CONTROL ROOM HVAC SYSTEM PROTECTION
/! i l'{ l' _
FEATURES 11.1 - 3 SEISMIC DESIGN X 11.2-3 e PRESSURE BOUtOARY X X X 11.3-3 e DUCT /P!PE/ EQUIPMENT SUPPORT X X X X l'.43 e EQUIPMENT GUALIFICATION X X X X 11.5-3 HIGH EtERGY LINE BREAK ACCIDENTS X 11.6-3 e PIPE WHIP X 11.7-3 e JET IMPlNCEMEPR X 11.8-3 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION X 11.9 - 3 e ENVIRONMENTAL ENVELOPES X X X X X
!!.10-3 e EQUIPMEPR QUALIFICATION X X X X 11.1 2 - 3 FIRE PROTECTION X X 11.1 3 - 3 MISSILE PROTECTION X
!!.14-3 SYSTEMS INTERACTIONS X STRUCTURES THAT HOUSE THE CONTROL ROOM HVAC SYSTEM l 111.1 - 3 SEISMIC DESIGN /lNPUT TO EQUIPMENT X X X -
, Ill.5-3 CIVIL /STRUCTUR AL DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS X
! 111. 7 - 3 e CONCRETE / STEEL DESIGN X X
! ll1.9-3 o LEAK TICHTNESS X X X l
l FIGURE I.2-6b
STEM INITIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR TFE CO MIDLAND INDEPENDENT CONSTRUCTION VER f SCOPE OF REVIEW q
92
<3 as gE fB 2 g
E SYSTEM /COMPOfENT ss b~8 EE 88 ej A"8[5 f
I o hyf &s
/
jabl DE es E E
~
MECHANICAL X X X X X EQUIPMENT X X 1.1-3c e X e PIPING X X l.2-3c X l.3-3e e PIPE SUPPORTS ELECTRICAL X X X X
EQUIPMEtR X X ll.1-3e e X e TRAYS AtO SUPPORTS X X
!!.2-3c X X
ll.3-3c e COtOUlT Ato SUPPORTS X X ll.4-3c e CABLE INSTRUMEtRATION APO CONTROL X X X X X INSTRUMEtRS/ DETECTORS X X
!!!l-3c e X X X lit.2-3c e PIPING / TUBING X lil.3-3c e CABLE X X X X IV.2-3c e DUCTS APO SUPPORTS '
STRUCTURAL X X X
X X V.2-3c e CONCRETE X V.3-3c e STRUCTURAL STEEL X
[
VI.1- 3c NDE/ MATERIALS TESTING PROGRAM j
FIGURE I.2-7
/ /
SCOPE OF DESIGN VERIFICATION REVIEW e REVIEW OF DESIGN CRITERIA AND COMMITMENTS
- REGULATIONS AND LICENSING COMMITMENTS
- ADEQUACY, CONSISTENCY, AND ACCURACY e REVIEW OF IMPLEMENTING DOCUMENTS
- EXISTENCE OF IMPLEMENTING DOCUMENT (E.G., DISCIPLINE DESIGN INSTRUCTIONS, STANDARD DESIGN PRACTICES, INTER-FACE DOCUMENTS BETWEEN NSSS AND A-E, ETC.)
DESIGN CRITERIA ADEQUATELY DEFINED AND INTERPRETABLE e CHECK OF CALCULATIONS AND EVALUATIONS
- SAMPLING CHECK OF ORIGINAL ANALYSES, CALCULATIONS OR EVALUATIONS; REVIEW OF
- DESIGN INPUTS (INCORPORATION OF DESIGN CRITERIA, CONFORMANCE WITH COMMITMENTS, TRANSFER OF INFORMATION)
- ASSUMPTIONS
- METHODOLOGY (INCLUDING ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES, EVALUATION PROCEDURES)
- VALIDATION AND USE OF COMPUTER CODES
- REVIEW OF OUTPUTS
- COMPLIANCE WITH CODES, STANDARDS, NRC GUIDANCE I
l .
i l e } !
SCOPE OF DESIGN VERIFICATION REVIEW (continued) e CONFIRMATORY CALCULATIONS OR EVALUATIONS
" BLIND" INDEPENDENT RE-ANALYSIS OR RE-EVALUATION FOR SELECTED DESIGN AREAS _
- INDEPENDENT RE-ANALYSIS OR RE-EVALUATION FOR DESIGN AREA THAT MAY BE SUSPECT ON BASIS OF A REVIEW OF ORIGINAL CALCULATIONS OR EVALUATIONS
- ALTERNATIVE TECHNIQUES, SIMPLE BOUNDING EVALUATIONS OR DETAILED ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES MAY BE EMPLOYED e CHECK OF DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS
- VERIFICATION THAT THE DRAWING OR SPECIFICATION REFLECTS DESIGN REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED IN THE DESIGN CALCULATIONS OR EVALUATIONS l
s SCOPE OF CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION REVIEW e REVIEW OF SUPPLIER DOCUMENTATION
- SAMPLING CHECK AGAINST DESIGN SPECS AND DRAWING 5; REVIEW OF
- DRAWINGS TEST REPORTS CERTIFIED MATERIAL PROPERTY REPORTS
- STORACE AND INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS e REVIEW OF STORAGE AND MAINTENANCE DOCUMENTATION RECEIPT INSPECTION DOCUMENTATION
- STORAGE, INCLUDING IN-STORAGE AND IN-PLACE MAINTE-NANCE REQUIREMENTS INCLUDING PARAMETERS SUCH AS TEM-PERATURE, HUMIDITY, CLEANLINESS, LUBRICATION, ENERGlZATION, ETC.
- OBSERVATION OF ON-GOING ACTIVITIES e REVIEW OF CONSTRUCTION / INSTALLATION DOCUMENTATION
- lMPLEMENTATION OF PROPER REQUIREMENTS SUCH AS EREC-TION SPECIFICATIONS, INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS, CON-STRUCTION PROCEDURES, CODES AND STANDARDS, ETC. !
1
- REVIEW OF DESIGN CHANGES, FIELD MODIFI' CATIONS, ETC.-
EVALUATION OF DOCUMENTATION FOR ITEMS SUCH AS CON-CRETE, WELDING, BOLTING ACTIVITIES, ETC. l
% 1
SCOPE OF CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION REVIEW (continued)
OBSERVATION OF ON-GOING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES e REVIEW OF SELECTED VERIFICATION ACTIVITIES
- CABLE SEPARATION, PIPE SUPPORT, AND BOLTING OVER-INSPECTION PROGRAM 5, ETC.
OBSERVATION OF VARIOUS WALKDOWN ACTIVITIES (E.G.,
SYSTEMS INTERACTION - SEISMIC ll/l)
COLD HYDROS COMPONENT AND SYSTEM FUNCTIONAL TESTING PROGRAMS CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION PROGRAM e VERIFICATON OF PHYSICAL CONFIGURATION INSTALLATION OF SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH PIPING AND INSTRUMENTATION DI AGRAMS INSTALLATION OF COMPONENTS AND PIPING IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARRANGEMENT DRAWINGS AND ISOMETRICS (APPROXI-MATE LOCATION AND ORIENTATION)
INSPECTION OF SELECTED FEATURES FOR COMPLIANCE WITH DESIGN DETAILS (APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS)
VERIFICATION OF IDENTITY (EOUIPMENT PART NUMBERS, ETC.)
IN ACCORDNACE WITH DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, OR SCHE-MATICS QUALITY OF WORKMANSHIP
BASES FOR SAMPLE SELECTION e SIMILAR TO SYSTEM SELECTION CRITERIA
- IMPORTANCE TO SAFETY INCLUSION OF DESIGN / CONSTRUCTION INTERFACES ABILITY TO EXTRAPOLATE RESULTS
- DIVERSE IN CONTENT SENSITIVE TO PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE ABILITY TO TEST AS-BUILT INSTALLATION e STRONG RELIANCE UPON ENGINEERING JUDGMENT e POTENTIAL USE OF STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES TO ESTABLISH SAMPLE SIZE FOR REPETITIVE PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES (E.G., CON-CRETE AND STEEL PROPERTIES, WELDING RECORDS, ETC.)
e INDUSTRY DESIGN / CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE e INDUSTRY OPERATING EXPERIENCE e PROJECT DESIGN / CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE AREAS EXPERIENCING REPEATED PROBLEMS AREAS WHICH MAY NOT HAVE RECEIVED EXTENSIVE PRIOR ;
REVIEW e AREAS WHERE FINDINGS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED )
l Q
TERA CORPORATION _
o ,
. e A
TE ~*oe'C A.
PiviE m B e REwit n TE Av 1P
- E m8 RE5OLVED cg,g5 g o,;
OY LI b+ [ /-
POTE NTI AL CPEt4 ITE M # / /t + W e {
v 3 ,
[ W 1P F17 OltJC REPORT REviEn &
NEff CL A55510 ATION y BY LTR 5. v 1 r ir
- # DISPOS: TION l
OPEN ITE v
/
1r j 1r 1r 1 r FLATHER REviEn M ONTH;.Y BY REVIE* TE AM PREPA T ON BY '
R
- CPCO/ORICINAL DESIGN ORCAN12ATION q y CL ASI U A 3ON ffE ^: ,'4o=,;.,
y "' W ,0R S 1 P v 1 F CorfIRWED ITE M C r yo, CLA55 CAION q r v
[ PM M M tt.Y 1p 1 r STATUS DISPO$1 TION REPORT ** BY PIC
- pg y oggg. r cac J r
,, v r v 1 ,
/
a
- h. b PREPARATION Or RESPONSE BY /
1 r CPC /ORICP44.
ORCA 2ATION > Y PIC 5 T 4f 9 r RESPONSE INTERIM TE CHJ1C AL REPORT OR y FINAL REPORT **
v 1 P A
KEY: PM . PROECT M ANAGER LTR - LE AD TECttJIC AL REVIEWER Plc . FRINCIPAL.IN. CHARGE SRT . SENOR REVltW TE AU NOTL
- DISTR!BUTED TO IDCV servi LIST FIGURE 5.2-1 REPORT FLOW CHART MIDLAND INDEPENDENT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM
j l
PROTOCOL FOR REPORTING AND COMMUNICATIONS MIDLAND IDCV PROGRAM e INTERPRETATION OF NRC PROTOCOL GOVERNING COMMUNICATIONS e ALL CONTACTS AND INFORMATION EXCHANGE ARE RECORDED AND AUDITABLE e PROPRIETARY MATERIAL WILL BE AUDITABLE, BUT EXCLUDED FROM SUBMITTALS e PRIOR NOTICE OF MEETINGS TO DISCUSS " SUBSTANTIVE MATTERS" e AT FINDING STAGE, NOT DURING SOLICITATION OF INFORMATION e SPECIAL CASES -
CONFIRMATORY CALCULATIONS, PROGRAM CHANGES, SIGNIFICANT SAFETY ISSUE IDENTIFICATION e REPORTING e PERIODIC STATUS REPORTS e TRACKING SYSTEM
SUMMARY
FOR OCR ITEMS, FINDING REPORTS AND FINDING RESOLUTION REPORTS e PROGRESS
SUMMARY
AND CHANGES TO REVIEW SCOPE TERA CORPORATION
~
i
. .. l PROTOCOL FOR REPORTING AND COMMUNICATIONS MIDLAND IDCV PROGRAM (Continued) e REPORTING (CONTINUED) e FOR FINDING REPORTS, IDENTIFICATION OF SIGNIFICANT SAFETY ISSUES e CURRENT CONFIRMED ITEMS, FINDING REPORTS AND FINDING RESOLUTION REPORTS e INTERIM AND FINAL REPORTS e TOPICAL INTERIM REPORTS AS COMPLETED FOR EACH SYSTEM e FINAL REPORT e DOCUMENTATION e TERA RECORDS LOCATED IN BETHESDA, MARYLAND AND AVAILABLE FOR NRC AUDIT e INTERNAL QA AUDIT RESULTS AVAILABLE - FOR NRC INSPECTION TERA CORPORATION
. l 1
NUCLEAR REGULATORY CONSUMEP,5 POWER COMMISSION COMPANY I I I I I I a _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .a l
I I SENIOR REVIEW TEAM
~ ~
IPE[PRJECT DIRE T PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE Donald Dovis, Chrm.
...... PROJECT o A iMPL EVENT ATIOt4 John Beck William Hall IA N (ItOEPEtOEt4T Robert Wilson yR E )
PROJECT QA PROJECT MANAGER Chuck Lemon Howard Levin STRUCTURAL REVIEW SYSTEMS REVIEW ELECTRICAL REVIEW Howard Levin, Acting Richard Snaider Lionel Bates CONSTRUCTION MECHANICAL REVIEW VERIFICATION Frank Dougherty Donald Tulodieski SITE ACTIVITIES Martin Jones FIGURE I PROJECT ORGANIZATION MIDLAND INDEPENDENT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION
I AIM L I MIDt. Ati!) IDCV IHOGitAM l'INANCI AL IHOEC TIONS ILitA IHO1CT 3201 Inception Thru liein April h .h ne M A mjost Sept. M iksv. Dec. Totals So nreiary Prof ssional Mon-Lomling (Man-Months) 38 12 15 18 18 18 15 7 4 145 Expenditures by Month ($K)
Cuniulative Lxpernfitures ($K)
Expenditure Details fly System ($ x 1000)
Al W Monthly At W Cumulative SEl2 Monthly 5t.13 Cumulative CI(-HVAC Monthly Cit-HVAC Cu nulative Prof essional Monpower Details lly Systern (Mon-Months)
Af W Mon-Loading 31 2 8 7 5 3 2 l 1 60 SLl* Man-Loading 3.5 5 4 6 8 9 6 3 2 46.5 Cit-tlVAC Man-Loading 3.5 5 3 5 5 6 7 3 f 38.5 4
9 G b "
e e, .
I *
- FIGURE I !
i PROJECT FINANCIAL
SUMMARY
MIDLAND IDCV PROGRAM TERA PROJECT NO. 3201 ORIGINAL CUPRENT EXPENDED i TO DATE CURRENT STATUS REFLECTS
($) ALL CHANGES THROUGH SCR-3201-H AL-001 ESTIMATED TO COMPLETE IbI PERCENT OF ESTIMATED TOTAL WORK TOT AL JOB COMPLETE COST 20 %
($)
_ PLANNED TOTAL
. _ _ __ ACT UAL M
m -
t b
O O _
E E
x -
C -
5 _
AFW b -
e _
SEP ku. _
CR-HVAC
~, I , I , I i I , I , I , I , 1 5/1/83 6/l 7/l 8/l 9/l 10/1 II/I 12/l 1/1/84 CALENDAR DATE i