ML20094H490
| ML20094H490 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 05/14/1982 |
| From: | CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20094H471 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-91-187 M01-601-2, M1-601-2, NUDOCS 9203100306 | |
| Download: ML20094H490 (43) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:- ._ . -. . - _ . - _ - .
. - - _ - . . . . _. . ~. --
~* '
e PROJECTS. ENolNEERWo
, taa== .4 AUDIT REPORT ^~o =~a==o~ -
ouAuTV ASSURANCE DEPAQTWENT t
# Q Pcwer Campany .
a n.1 DATr or ISscAncri 5/14/82 Pact _L cr s__ DISTRISfRION: RCAsh HPLeonard ALAB-2 F01-601-2 URBird BWMarguglio rn.E so J$Brunner RBMcCarley DECalkins DBMiller m or ne JWCook JARutgers LEDavis MSkates 4/19/82 through 4/22/82
- oncAxIEATIon AupITED:
MADietrich DATaggart ' GSKeeley RAWells The Zack Company, Chicago
'a -
SZO CFAUDyEAMI.EADER/DATE: APPROVED . PLANT & PE0 JECT: deidhe//4_ fdt'd Z- "
// M # / g// 82, Midland Unit 1 and 2 i
/ /
I. SCOPE AND OBJECTIVE The objective of this audit was to verif) The Zack Company's compliance with program requirements as defined in the Zack Quality Assurance Manual, Plant Quality Control . Proccdures and Weld Procedure Specifications. The audit scope encompassed those activities related to the implementation of the following procedures: a) Zack Quality Assurance Manual (all sections as applicable to PQCP's) b) PQCP-1, Rev. 2 " Receiving Inspection" c) PQCP-3, Rev. 1 " Plant Fabrication" d) PQCP-6, Rev. 3 " Weld Filler Metal Control" e) PQCP-7, Rev. 5 " Document Control" . f) PQCP-8, Rev. 1 "NCR"
- g) PQCP-10, Rev. 1 " Calibration"
, h) PQCP-11, Rev. 1 " Training, certification and Evaluation of QCI"' i 1) PQCP-14, Rev. 1 " Hold" j) PQCP-15, Rev. 2 " Procurement" k) PQCP-16, Rev. 1 "On-going Training"
- 1) PQCP-17, Rev. 1 " Training, Certification and Evaluation of QA Auditors" m) PQCP-20, Rev. O " Trend Analysis"
- n) WPS-1, Rev. 11 " Gas Metal ARC Welding of Zine Coated Structural and Sheet Steel" o) WPS-2, Rev. 7 " Shielded Metal ARC Welding of Zine Coated Sheet and Structural Steel" p) WFS-3, Rev. O " Gas Metal ARC Velding of Stainlesa Sheet and ' Structorsil Steels" I=
q) WPS-4, Rev. 0 " Shielded Metal ARC Welding of Stainless- Sheet and Structural Steels" - r) WPS-6, Rev. 2 " Braze Welding Zine Coated , Sheet and Str,uctural- Steels' Using l Carbon ARC" j s) WPS-7, Rev.- 8 " Qualification / Certification of Welders Using GMAW, SMAW, CAW [ Processes" t) .WPS-8, Rev. 1 " Preheat /Interpass Temperature Control" Follow-up verification of completed corrective action on the following Audit Findings was also included in the scope of this audit. All of these items were deemed " ready for closure" by The Zack Company. - a) AFR M01-35-1-01 ,' b) AFR Mol-35-1-02 c) AFR Mol-35-1-08 '- d) AFR M01-35-1-10 I'
% (
./ s 9203100306 910827 :
PDR FOIA ZACK91-187 PDR- -- -,
l ,' Con!UmH1
). . --
m J PROJECTS, ENGINE E RING AND CONSTRUCTION-QUAu?Y ASSURANCE DEPAQtMENT ! l POWit v - Comptry
,,,n ,,,
QA2! 4-0 n w 1 y ,J>_ l t e) AFR M01-35-1-11 s l f) AFR M01-35-1-14 g) AFR M01-35-1-15 h) URI M01-35-1-01 II. IDENTIFICATION OF AUDITORS, The audit was performed by the following personnel: SBandla - Audit Team Leader (MPQAD-HVAC QA) GParker - Auditur-in-Training (MPQAD-HVAC QA) i JZimmerman - Audit Team Member (MPQAD-HVAC QA) III. PERSONS CONTACTED DURING THE AUDIT Audit Audit Name Organization Title Entrance Audit Exit C Zack DeZutel Zack President X X
- J DeZutel Zack Exec. Vice President X X D Calkins Zack Project Manager X X D Malzahn Zack Vice President X
- M Skates Zack QA Manager X X X
! R Basiaga Zack Lead QA Engineer X X X l D Allbritten Zack QA Engineer X X X A Howard Zack Document Control Supv. X X A Wanniger Zack Staff Engineer X i G Kollaritsch Zack Detailer X l S Drozdz Zack Detailing Supervisor X l T Delafosse Zack Staff Engineer X B Prim Zack General Foreman X ) N Rosa Zack Shop Supervisor X C Richards Zack QC Inspector X S Bandla MPQA Audit Team Leader X X X C Parker MPQA Auditor-in-Training X X X J Zimmerman MPQA Audit Team Member X X X l IV. AUD;
SUMMARY
A) A pre-audit entrance meeting was held on 4/19/81 with personnel in attendance as noted in paragraph III. The audit scope , plan , tentative 'achedule and audit finding procedure were discussed. Contacts for the various phases of the audit were identified. B) Checklists for this audit were developed from the Zack procedures noted in para-graph I. Specific sectione audited are as noted on the completed checklists. Data was collected by proceeding through the checklists for each procedure audited. All checklists employed during the course of the audit are attarhed to the file copy of this report. C) The audit resulted in nine (9) findings which are attached to this report.
/
~
PQoJECTS, ENGINEERING
-m --
ANo CoNSTRUC?loN-
, C0ASUmt3 -
J oVAU7YASSURANCE oEPAQTMENT Powtf v - Cor.pany qAph.0 '"*"8" m1ei D) The following observations were made as a result of this audit: ,,
- 1. The Evaluation of Performance Form (ZQF-37) is required by PQCP-17, Rev. 1 to be initiated to document the observation of an acting auditor (paragraph 6.3.1.2) or acting lead auditor (paragraph 6,3.2.2) and , also to document the annual 3 valuation of Auditors and Lead Auditors (paragraph 6.5.1). The initiator of the ZQF-37 form is not required to indicate which type of evaluation is being documented and this is not always evident from the completed form. It is recommended that the initiator of the ZQF-37 form briefly describe the type of evaluation being documented. No response to this observation is required.
- 2. PQCP-17, paragraph 7.7 requires the use of the QA Audit Checklist (ZQF-86).
The audit checklists used in the recent vendor audits are different from the ZQF-86 form listed in Exhibit F as a " sample. " It is recommended that, in the next revision of PQCP-17, Exhibit F (ZQF-86) be labeled SAMPLE with the associated statement that the form may vary in format but not in content. No response is required to this observation. 3 PQCP-17, Rev. 1, paragraph 6.3.2.2 requires that a minimum of one audit be performed by the candidate af ter he meets the requirements of paragraph 6.2.1 and 6.3.2. The audit is conducted with the candidate performing as acting lead auditor under the observation of a lead auditor. An evaluation is documented on a ZQF-37 form. Two lead auditor files were reviewed. Both had ZQF-37 forms that indicated audits performed to meet the requirements of paragraph 6.3.2.2. A detailed review of the qualification audits (internal audits ZC-LS-001 and ZC-LS-002) for E Sadley showed the following: l Z C-LS-001 ZC-LS-002 l a) No written audit plan (as a) No written audit plan (as required by paragraph 7.3) required by paragraph 7 3) b) Checklist different than b) Checklist different than ZQF-86 form (as required by ZQF-86 form (as require'd by paragraph 7.7) paragraph 7.7) c) No indication of exit meeting c) Drafted ' audit report not (as required by paragraph 7.10) issued in 30 days (as required by paragraph 7.11) The ZQF-37 form used to evaluate Mr Bodley indicated that he was a certifiable
- candidate for audit team leader. In view of the discrepancies noted above, l the auditing requirements in paragraph 7.0 of PQCP-17 were not met by the I candidate in performing his qualification audits. There were no indications l in the comment section of the ZQF-37 form discussing the situation or any l mitigating circumstance that may have warranted this apparent lack of compliance l to the crocedure requirements by the candidate. It is understood that the audits used to certify E Bodley were performed at LaSalle County Nuclear Station. However, there is no equivalent LaSalle procedure that addresses audit plans, use of checklist ZQF-86 or exit meetings.
/
/I PROJECTS, ENGINEERING i
COAHR10ft - ANo CONSTRUCTION-POWtf v - oVAUTY ASSUQANCE DEPARTMENT
. CO#@Ry
, QA21HO * * *
- auen noi m1&A
' It appears the The Zack Company auditors / lead auditors may be evaluated for-audits performed at the LaSalle, Clinton or Midland sites to qualify as an auditor / lead auditor. However, as noted above, audits performed at other Zack Company sites do not meet the requirements of PQCP-17, Rev. 1. Once qualified, '
the auditor / lead auditor may perform audits at all sites. Some method must be provided to assure that audits performed of Midland related activities are done so in accordance with PQCP-17, Rev. I to preclude the discrrpancies noted in AFR H01-601-2-04. A response to this observation is requeste1 on or before 6/3/82. (AI: S-1511, Priority 5, DCUMOO) 4 ZQAM, Section 6 requires that " procedures shall define the methons and systems used to control the preparation , review, approval, distribution and control-of instructions , procedures and drawings. " Since the Field Procedures implemented by The Zack Co. site personnel are no longer under the control of the Chicago based QA Section, the methods used to control- these procedures need to be incorporated into a Field Procedure. A response to this observation is requested on or before 6/3/82.- (AI: S-1512, Priority 6, DCUM00)
- 5. PQCP-7, Rev. 5,. paragraph 6.3.4.4 states that BPCo drawings are received at the Zack Company's Chicago Plant for "Information Only." These drawings are now received marked CONTROLLED. It was observed that, although these drawings are currently being logged , the FCN's/FCR 's/DCN's associated with them are not. .
l These changes are not being recorded on the: face of the drawings although they. are attached to the -back of the ' drawing.- The procedure should be upgraded to require the logging and posting of drawing changes (similar to requirements l in FP-7 ). A response to this observation is requested on or before 6/3/82. (AI: S-1513, Priority 6. DCUMOO) 6. l PQCP-7, Rev. 5, paragraph 7.2 requires .that " follow-up action. . .be initiated. . l ir acknowledgement s (of transmittals) is not returned within 15 days." Of the 120' transmittals logged sending current revisions of PQCP's , WPS 's and the - ZQAM,21 were not receipt acknowledged. Follow-up-is accomplished by phone , so there is no documentation that followed. It is recommended that some documentation the procedure requirements'are being cHF the follow-up be implemented, ie. telecon, notation in transmittal' log, etc. ~No response is required to this observation. - --
- 7. a) PQCP-3. Rev. 1, paragraph 5.14 requires the QCI to document inspection I
l resu.'ts by stamping the appropriate block (acceptfreject). Contrary to this , the QCI is initialling the block (accept / reject /NA). This discre-pancy was brought to The Zack Company's attention-during the November audit performed by BPCo Materials and Quality Services- Department. A draft of PQCP-3, Rev. 2, was prepared to allow the QCI to indicate .the ' inspection appropriate. results by checking or initalling the. accept / reject' block as This revision was submitted to BPCo 'for approval on 2/23/82. As of the date of this audit, BPCo had not returned this procedure to The" Zack Company. Although MPQAD agrees that the requirement stated in -paragraph 5.14 warrants revision , however , BPCo approval is required prior to implemen-- ! tation of a revised procedure.
/
PR3JECTS, ENGINEE RING j l i-- -N -- AND CoNSTAUCTioN
- Consumm
- s ouAuTy AssunANcE oEnaruENT
. POW 2f v --
Company unn n,
*** 8" nm c; or _6_
1 QA24-0 ..- --- . b) PQCP-3, Rev.1, paragraph 5.14 and 5.15 refer to a paragraph 5 13 Th e. - current revision of procedure PQCP-3 does Cot have a paragraph 5.12 or 5.13 i NOTE: PQCP-3, Rev. 2 was received approved (level = C) from BPCo on 5/6/82. Included in the BPCo comments is a esserence to section (b) of this observation. No response to this observation is required.
- 8. PQCP-11, Rev. 11, requires that specific items be completed and documented prior to certification of the Quality Control Inspector. However, the criteria to maintain certification or to re-certif7.an individual at his current level is not addressed. Those specific iteme 1.sted in~PQCP-11 are new requiremento not previously listed or required at tha time of C Richard!s certification (level II). It is recommended that PQCP-11 be revised to ir.carporate requirements for maintenance of certification or re-certification upon completion of the initial 3 year period. It is further recommended that the specific itets listed in PQCP-11-be adhered to upon re, certification or maintenance of cwetification for C Richards. A response to this item is ,
requested by 6/3/82. (AI: S-1514, Priority 9, DCUM00) E) Follow-up verification on the seven (7) previous audit findings and one (1) unresolved item listed in paragraph I'was conducted during this audit. The results were as follows:
- 1. AFR M01-35-1-01: A further response is required from The Zack Company describing how they intend to meet the-ANSI N45.2.9 requirements for quality records storage.
(
- 2. AFR M01-35-1-02: This finding remains open pending the approval and issuance of PQCP-8, Rev. 1.
3 AFR M01-35-1-08: .This finding remains open pending a-resolution to the
-inconsistencies noted in the completien of Hold Reports (blank 12).
- 4. AFR M01-35-1-10: Corrective action was verified and this item was closed on 5/12/82. .
- 5. AFR M01-35-11: This finding remains open pending the approval and issuance of PQCP-15,-Rev.'3
- 6. AFR M01-35-1-14: - Corrective action was verified and- this finding was closed on 5/12/82. .
- 7. AFR M01-35-1-15: . Corrective action was verified and this finding was closed -
L on 5/12/82.
- 8. URI M01-35-1-01: This question has been resolved and was closed on-5/12/82.
F) The post-audit exit meeting was held on April 22, 1982 with those in attendance as noted in paragraph III. At that time , ten (10 ) draft audit findings , one (1) . unresolved item and (11) observations were presented and discussed. As a result - of this discussion, the unresolved-item concerning, The Zack Company's role in the - site Trend Analysis program was resolved. This item does not- appear in this repor-y- .-' - y y a.-,.a. , , - . my y g-- a. y-m,y = d-q
- 4. p s -
g9-i.3g. 9-4.isvee..m.ier*
-. . . ~ . - . - - - - - - - . . ~ . .. . . - - . . . - - . . , . . ..- ~.- - .- -
E A PROJECTS, ENGINEERING 3
' ANo CONSTRUCTION- ,
COR$C8f3 OVALITY ASSURANCE oEPARTMEhY Porer V - C0mpany may m qA24-0 1 ' " * " *
- nr 6 e, 6
. Since the exit meeting, the ten (10) draft audit findings and eleven (11) 's observations were combined where possible and appear-in this report as.eight (8) findings, and eight (8) observations. One (1) draft observation concerning out of date procedures has been escalated to an audit' finding (see M01-601-2-09).
Commitment dates .*or all items requiring responses were discussed. G) Responses to the audit findings and observations are to be forwarded to MPQAD. V. EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS This full-scope audit of twenty (20) Zack Procedures relative to the 011cago Plant operation resulted in nine (9) audit findings. When this is compared to-the previous audit (M01-35-1, 8/10/81- through 8/13/81) which resulted in fifteen (15)-findings after a review of eleven (11) Zack Procedures , it would appear that some improvement has been made in the past eight months. However, a review of the nine (9) audit findings attached to- this report shows that five (5) of the findings were recurrences of the same types of problems identified - during the M01-35-1 audit. In fact, three of the findings are identical to those-from the M01-35-1 audit (ie, M01-601-2-Ol4, 07 and 08). For this reason, it must be stated once again that The Zack Company's implementation of the Quality Assurance Program is judged to be Nrginal. Discrepancies resulting from lack of attentian to details and inadequate 4derstanding of procedures is still very much in evidence. It was suggested to The Zack Company that ,,when responding to the findings and observations resulting from this audit, they identify methods of corrective actions which are inventive and provide lasting resolutions to the types of problems noted. 1
/
,9 .. .
. - . , _ . - - , , . . . .. . . , - . . . _ , , . , -,m.,,_ ,,,#, ~.a e . . ,,...m ~., m.,,,
..*' ,g -
, PRIORITY: 9 TREND: N6 SUS: DCUMOO AT: S-1515 4
. JECTS. "NolNEE;UNG ANo CoNSTRUCTl4N -
Consumers na Quo-1 AU JI.. -
\ M\ G E. '01.. ouiuTY ASSUIANCE DETA as as" cursaros uma.s as muaunsc / as m:n cosantos utn azroncza; an saa en The following discrepancies were noted in the implementation of these we K)1 -601 01 auonso .
pr6cedures: Zack Chicago /r*1dland la batt of issuAJocts A) PQCP-14, Rev. 1 - Procedure for Hold S/14/82 -i FIM stsette
- 1) Paragraph 7.6 - requires that the PS (Plant Superintendent) 18.4.7 retain a copy of the ZQF 40A form after signing blank 10.
- 2) Paragraph 7 7 - requires the the QCM maintains a file of aggart open ZQF-40A forms for reference.
- B Thirteen (13) Hold Reports were reviewed. Contrary to the above , DGrar y
copier, of open Hold Reports M-182 and Q-184 were not in the QCM files. A copy of open Hold Report M-188 was not in the PS file. MADietrich g3g,,y,y B. PQCP-7, Rev. 1 - Procedure for Document Control "* 7 go
- 1) Paragraph 7.3 1 - requires that documents which are voided.
canceled , or superseded shall be destroyed or ma.-ked VOID DB and placed in a void file, JARutgers g3 , (continued on back)
. -~an ~~-,m acuoe, Part Corrective Action:
- 1) Provide copies of Hold Reports M-182 and Q-184 for QCM file. *
- 2) Provide a ccpy of Hold Report M-188 for the PF, file. (continued on back) h=ma wrsc= cu cssfr
- 1) Cepies of M-182 and Q-184 will be provided for the QCM file.
- 2) A copy of M-188 will be provided for the PS file.
- 3) Void and superseded revisions of PQCP's and WPS's will be marked " VOID."
l (continued on back) or or ma ec eurre : 7//J/81 me ans, ran cia rasos mum c,4 ccmmerri un or c/4 smenmess: 7//3/8 2.- The Zack Company M Skates t siETiece of VERZricATIDE:
- 1) Copies of open Hold Reports were provided- for the QCM and PS file. Ve ified on 4/20/82 by GEParker.
! 2) Void and superseded revisions of PQCP's and WPS's were marked VOID during the audit and verified-on 4/22/82 by SEBandla. (continued on tack) u a w asu m 9.m.h , u ns . mn or zoast to nei a na , zm or anm to me, sr tas , nue er sne arrzes,6 to == nea-ini N/A rr rs ,vuo masamari N/A N/A an asci va s sicuamuoars, st.nmsonjypn E hA N/ri - AA ($/N22W / Sb4l82
' muzcAtzos natt
/
c/a v)mtrIi tzca a :asatuass'
~ A fhsha
.y yw-- e- y.--. --
gey -g r+w-wg p'y pcM-g 7 p y-ydy-u g 9
consumers pgygg All ("\ U l" l Il1\l ll1/ O V
)\.I 3IlU T'"OdecTs. ENo4NEEQtNG ANo CONS?QUCTioW
\ OVALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT COMM corrtsuams ami as z connwa vusus '44 arvar connai wm smaw:u (cmmum Contrary to the above , void or superseded copies of PQCP'a ar,d Wi'S's are retained in a
history files but are not marked VOID. M&wdJGG Jh7DE Aulas(COer!NJs
- 3) Review " history" file for PQCP's and WPS's. Mark " VOID" all those revisions that are void or superseded per the requirements of PQCP-7, Rev. 5.
For ' ith PQCP-7 and 14, train cognizant personnel and forward documentation of this training to MPQAD. l cauurrtn ac=cs exw:Irmn Training will be conducted and doc mented. A response to this item is requested by 6/3/82. l METHOD OF VERIFICATION (continued) l
- 3) Training reports showing that a review of PQCP-14 and PQCP-7 were conducted, have been received (M151-C/B-628, dated 7/13/82) reviewed and are attached to the file copy of M01-601-2-01 and M01-601-2-05.
Items 1), 2) and 3) above complete the part and process corrective actioe. for this report.
. PRIORITY: 6 TRNbD\ NE. SUS: DCUMOO AI: S-1510 y ( ,
JEcTS ENGINEERING AND CoNbfRUCTioN - TMENT Consumers .. _ s& A0,] -
\ ll NG E_ 01.. ovauty Assu:tANce DUA: ,
QA50-1 an sa mi
'as ts cccmos msus as amusv ras sme ecs:mos em acrosscus PQCP-16, Rev. 1 - On-going Training m1-601-2 02 Par.J/psPt auDtTID:
aco/ Midland 1 k;
- 1) Paragraph 7.1 requires a monthly training session by the QCM f*") , g, for the QC and Fabrication Plant personnel, Training tol address q,gfg The Zack Company quality program in the ZQAM, PQCP's and WPS's. ,ga - ,
18.4.7
"* S*"
- 2) Paragraph 7.2 requires a monthly training session by the PM (Production Manager) for the QC and Fabrication Plant personnel, RCAsh Training to address The Zack Company contract requirements as WRBird DATaggart detailed in the project technical specifications and those JEBrunner RAWells project drawings designated as safety related drawings. DECalkins ALAB-2 JWCook Five (5) personnel files were audited. Contrary to the above , LEDavis there are no on-going training records in any of the five QC, QA MADietrich and Fabrication Plant personnel files between January 1982 and GSKeeleY April 19, 1982. The QCM was questioned regarding any other HPLeenard training records or files. None were available. Any training BWMarguglio records are kept in each individual's file. BBMcCarley DBMiller JARutgers MSkates um.oesa cunasew acr=,
l Part Corrective Action: None I Processcorrectiveketion: Establish a training schedule and submit for information to f MPQAD. Implement schedule and train on a monthly basis. Document training and forward to i MPQAD. Documented training records should be-provided to MPQAD for three successive months, cCSRsGTIY3 AcTICE CDstL'TMLJIT & A response to this item is requented by 6/3/82, un or e/a coesurroni an sse a ciai rasos mum cia cu masare un or c/4 amtzmassi *Ihe Zack Company M Skates msTNOD GP mI,ICATIDS: 1 m ., m_ ,. . ,, . . . . . .s .. . . . , _ . - 1, m .,,-o,s . . . .s..s. -.,m m . . - . a .s . vno mos amouri N/A _ N/A-m arcturu s sicumciani swaytses- :sz ,, m ::
//
/ > $44 A _UW . / O m m., ~ . .
c,.mzm.7.s..,_,
<*k,w.,,- .,,ru_ ,, yg-,n,wg,,,,y., ,ygy.y ,,, , , . ._,. ,, ,p, , , _ _ ,,. ,,, ,
(
\{
EE ll U
~
jl. D
~)
)[PCoJECTS, ENGINEERING ONo CoNSTGtJCTlob
\1 OVALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT campany co ,zy ,n, m ,
"c8 Ja* CogDIT105 vndus ~AS 82Q'"J4D ' CTAfD{TIVE WITH R]7GDIC14 (COgiM @ g
,the review signature blank. ,
NOTE: AFR W1-35-1-08 previously identified incomplete inspection reports and NCR's. Zack had coma. tted to reviewing their inspection report and NCR files to resolve these problems as corrective action to close the finding. r w.c war.1 atwmn and properly complete blanks that are not up to current status; 2) Rsview inspection reports and complete as necessary; 3) Provide documented evidence of training in the areas of responsibility for PQCP-8 and PQCP-3 for all cognizant personnel. Y $ NY l&$ h$ 1 l
-l 1
l 1 l
PRIORITY: 6 TREND: '% SUS: DCUMOO AI S-1516
;,g "
JECTs, ENoiNeto No cNo cowsToucTtoN - AUD F : O l \ G E,. 01.. ouduTY ASSUQANCE otPARTME
@CA$Umtf3 l
mL QA50-1 na u~ = atma man a snac ra swa ceamsu w:n suaaca. An m \c, M01 601-2-04 Four (4) vendor / supplier files were reviewed; one N stamp (title on ,, ..gro, flie), one survey and two (2) audits. The following discrepancies Zack Chicaro/Midlan'd* 1 L were noted in the implementation of PQCP-17, Rev. 1: un or usurs. 5/14/82
- 1) Paragraph 7.3 " Auditors / Lead Auditors prepare a written audit enaiueni plan identifying activity, organization to be audited, etc." ,,h8 11. 7 ,
Contrary to the above , there are no audit plans in the audit RCAsh files for the following Vendor audits: WRBird DATaggar . a) Hobart North Welding Supply D #f B2 b) Air Monitor Corporation JWCook
- 2) Paragraph 7.6 LEDavis "A Pre-audi+. conference is conducted." Contrary to this there is no documentation in the audit files of a pre-MADietrich g3g,,y,y audit conference being conducted for the following Vendor files:
HPLeonard BWMarguglio a) Hobart North Welding Supply RBMcCarley b) Air Monitor Corporation DBMiller
- 3) Paragraph 7.10 " "
"A Post-aud' t confi rence is held. " Contrary to this requirement , there is no documentation in the (continued) ascomaco maamtm Acmai
- 1) Amend the noted discrepant audit files to indicate the subsequent addition of the required information or the addition of documentation identifying and rationalizing Provide documentation for MPQAD verification.
l the lack'of required information. l
- 2) Retrain and provide documented evidence of training for cognizant personnel.
- GGIUETIVd AGmA ComITPE YT 4 A response to this item is requested by 6/3/82.
NTE of C/A ITurt2 Tics: 03G. Rear FUB C/A rGa:4f st4EDE CIA 461 urs er c/4 .,mm.-asi The Zack Company M Skates _ er:m er muze.,msi l u At samuu ru w.m.u u rxs , urs or num so ocn N,A a r s . ros or som to ines a rza , nAns or me emeur, to vmm snwo, e m , vno ses nam: N/A N/A cri ema. ru s sicurweiunj st.rcavt ysca- _H m /
. E A a-- - LJA s (S)YA7AM J Y/$&Z C/A IW si:nA!'R$3 m175GATIDW MT14 8 f i
-.-- ....,_,__%..w- _.-my .,n.y----,- __r . , . , . , , , . - - , , --,.'s'1
+
c=== ' *"- ' " * " - ' " - * """ - " ppg Capany AUDF :N31f(1 P. 0 W o"VAUTY ASSURANCE DEP as constms vaam 'as anuaza coacmon wm nrnacts (ac:nus audit files to show that a post-audit cc."ference was held for the following Vendor audit a) Hobart North Welding Supply , NOTE: Previous audit finding Mol-35-1-07 identified that Audit Plans were not being maintained in the audit files, umcw - ---,r.t us(wet.3,
"" "*f D'E AL".19d (COCIET.D h I
1 e
- ~ . ,,c-.. , . - . - - e . - - , . 7 9 - y. -m , -
, - - - , ~ . . , .,, -, -e ,--
PDTODTTY- o- TREND: N6, SUS: DCUMOO . A1: b- 15 i 7 [ JECTS. ENGINEEQiNG ANo CoNSTQt>CTioN - 00f!Sumt3 ,. , OVA 6
- AS$URANCE DCC'ACTMENT
% QA30-1 AUDI -
NDi \ G Y0 \.\ as is* conmes mra as am.uos / as m:c: contrIon vm apuw.m an so so: In conducting the audit, several instances of incomplete documents f01 601-2-03 wer.e noted. These discrepancies are as follows: *d/om asimi Zack Chicaro/ Midland 1 & A. PQCP-8, Rev. 1: Nonconformance Reports 5/14/ 2 Fx1s rsexes
- 1) Paragraph 7.2.8 requires sis;n/ stamp and date in blank 9 18.4.7 Twelve (12) NCR"s were audited. Contrary to the above , otmaams NCR 's S108, Q-173 and 0-111 were not dated. RCtsh WREird DATaggart
- 2) Paragraph 7.2.5 and 7.2.6 require that in blank 6 (owner furn- JEBrunner RAWells ished material / equipment) and blank 7 (Q listed) the "yes" DECalkins ALAB-2 or "no" boxes be audited. Twelve (12) NCR's were audited. JWCook Contrary to the above , NCR Q-111 did not have the boxes LEDavis checked in either blank 6 or 7; NCR S188 had blank 7 marked tuDietrich "No" for a Q listed iten. GSKeeley HPLeonard B. PQCP-3, Rev. 1, paragraph 5.14.1 requires that if the inspections BWthrguglio were performed by a Level II/III, the review signature blank RBMcCarley of the inspection report is marked N/A. DBMiller JARutgers Contrary to the above , the QCI Level II is not completing MSkates I
amm eno ccemrm acrzo , Part Corrective Action: 1) Date and sign blank 9 on NCR 's S108, Q-173 and Q-111; 2) Mark ,
"yes" or "no" boxes in blank 6 and 7 on NCR Q-111; 3) change the "no" to "yes" for blank 7 on NCR S188.
l . Process Corrective Action: 1) Review all Midland related , Zack Chicago generated NCR's l (continued on back) _ c:.arcrm acrma comme.vr a l
- 1) Date blank 9 of NCR's S108, Q-173 and Q-111.
- 2) Indicate "yes" or "no" in blanks 6 and 7 on NCR Q-111.
- 3) Indicate correct Q listing for blank 7 on NCR M-188.
A re3ponse to this item is requested by 6/3/82. DATE Cr C/a COMF!ATY% ,
; agic. agsp FCE C/as Frasos s&DG C/a CMITIC1fra l em er C/4 mm:rma ssi The Zack Company M Skates ME3CD OF TDirl:ATICE:
Blanks on NCR's S108, 0 173, Q-111 and M-188 are completed. Verified by GEParker on 4/22/82. ts ci anmuu in u.m.n u nc, .=r or anm to me. a nc, re cr anm a nues a rze, use or me ortzetas, to == anms:n N!O a r r. into met ancer: N/A N/A QT1t omic1 EAT *$ 51C3ArUtt/DATE: CUP U YISOR'S S- /DATE' / Y 7 *1L s t ?AK /$,A%l Sh} l h fl mIrmarms u m / c/a nantcajrtos staurws, /
- '" r'W
'T V
PRIORITY: 10 TREND: N6 . SUS: DCUM00 A1: S ,1519 ( dECTS, ENGINEEQiNG ANo CoNSTGUCVION
- S00$umtf1 ..
E QA50-1 AUD _101
\ G E. 01.. ouAuty AssOQANCE oEPCRTCEN as 1
- conomon maus a maaumr / 4s smsr cornn:oa virm aupacui an sa e PQCP.i , Rev. 2, paragraph 4.2 states " Quality Assurance Engineer M01-601-2-05 (QAE), has the responsibility of verifying that items conform t the requirements of the purchase order." PO #1683-1 specified that Z VO diand 1 't P ano,,,,W.
actual chemicals and physicals be provided for stainless steel bare S/14/82 weld wire. rtu sum 18.4.7 Contrary to the above, receipt inspection was performed on 3 each 25 pound spools of stainless steel bare weld wire for PO #1683-1 and
*Q"'"" h WRBird DATaggart accepted as conforming to the requirements of the purchase order' however, the physical certs are not available. JEBrunner RAWells DECalkins ALAB-2 NOTE: This weld wire was immediately tagged and recoved from JWCook DGrar yg the controlled rod issue cabinet. All material oncered and MADietrich received has been accounted for as of 4/21/82. g3g,,y,y HPLeonard BWMarguglio "lBMcCarley DBMiller JARutgers MSkates recao ccan:rm acrzoni a) Provide documented evidence of '.rair.in6 jr t'he area of responsibilities for all cognizant personnel.
ceama:rm acres co,.eur e A response to this item is requested on or before 6/3/82.
- erces w ta: 7,/i3[ff t cas. asse im en mace paazm cia Comrrers
*^" /* * *"***'
~7// 3/91 The Zack Company M Skates III"JtCD OF TritHICATEst Tr,"ning of cognizant personnel was performed on 4/23/82 (M151-C/B.628', 7/13/82). This documentation is attached to the file copy of this report.
a ci aamruu m w.m.n tr n r , n n or sn ar n ac: 3 "TE ", TDs CF EIP3tT to MCs 2 *rE3*, 8AM CF SC 61Als N N N1 N/A a rzr, wo mes amar: air .u.4m;s stenmsiars, swahrs,,s;.m.ap ::: e 5/N/Pz , Msxe / c//dn cyyrun sw , muu-w. nu, i i
.}An ok ? d Gl 50 l -
, , _ . ,, ~ - . , , , -.--,,,-,m--,- - - - - - ~ , r , -~ -- - -vs s ~ ~ - - - r
7
)/
Cangymtt! power ll v l~~ i [ l
\l1vh )\ .[ )b U
[l MoJECTS, ENGINEERfMG AND CoNSTRUCTioF
\l ouAuTy ASSURANCE CCPARTMENT
. COIrFDPDTIOt SKrt?:
"As I5' CONDITION VDSJB 'A4 athuDC ' CONLITics a(TM RDU34LJ (CrN Om a ucumi n w u Acua(Cuaraw.;,, ,
c) Develop a system by which dates for re-evaluation and re-certification are brought to the attention of the appropriate party to ensure similar reviews are not overlooked in the future.
$N A4M hE k@@ @M jj
-AH a
T r
, - - . ,. ,, , , . - - , . . . , , , - , +
PH10HITY: 5 TN t N *> : N") dud: ULUrivu su : s- i s e v
'JECTS, ENoNEEKfNo AND CoNSTRUCitoN a CCfl$Uffitf5
; im AU JI_, ,, O l N G E01. OVALITY ASSU3ANCE oE QA50-1 as n' ownma vom as as,uan ras nunc cwntra vm umamm ar, sa m, M01-601-2-06 The qualifications file for C Richards indicates that his certifica- m/om auoma tion for Quality Control Inspector Level II expired on April 15, 1982 Zack Co. / Midland 1' & 2 Level II inspection had been performed during the period of April 19 areerzm m through 21, by C Richards. 5/14/82 NOTE: Audit Finding M01-35-1-12 (8/12/81) identified that the
- E d.7 annual re-evaluation for C Richard had not been performed as required by PQCP-11. RCAsh It was recommended that The Zack Company develop a system by which dates for re-evaluation and re-certification are WRBird DATaggart brought to the attention of the appropriate party so that a review JEBrunner RAWells ;
of the qualifications can be performed and action can be taken to DECalkins ALAB-2 gg g ensure compliance to the procedure. A tickler system was developed for tracking these items and was verified to be in existence on MMb 9/22/81, by MPQAD personnel. On 4/21/82, it was determined that this MADietrich tickler system was no longer in use. CSKeeley HPLeonard BWMarguslio RBMcCarley DBM111er JARutgers MSkates na m w o cowzenys scr u i
- 1) Evaluate the qualifications for C Richards and if acceptable , re-certify candidate per requirements of PQPC-11. valuate all other personnel performing inspections for the Zack Co. Chicago and ensure certification to PQCP-11.
- 2) Revise PQCP-11 to incorporate requirements for maintenance of certification or re-certi-fication upon r]mgg of the initial 3 year oeriod.
cQaaErIV: AcrIDn. cue 9@tJfr & (continued on back) Part Corrective Action: Effective April 22, 1982, C Richards ' certification as a Quality l Control Inspector Level II was extended for a period of one year. A response to this finding is requested on or before 6/3/82. uts or c/a coeevrai _ ma. ase a c/ai msw mano cea co*Irmwr.
~ ~
ursoret.,,. - > The ZaEk Smpany M Skates omaa or mmurus a l l a as auwrasu ra x.ni.h a w , nars or anwr to nei a rrs . Tra er maar to me a rsa . uw or me crixezas to vuosi expourro N/A
" " ~ ' " " " ' "
N/A N/A AF 08 &Arun'$ $1CHArWE/oArts GurERYtsca's 5:w Dart;
')
W .WH A 0 mmmm - ex? / 4 /4 lAl c g um ,m -, .
/ i
-w -- rm. y , - --or 1-w13-+++ -
'ye- - y v- - *-
PRIORTTY: 9 TREND: N6 SUS: ocuMuu u: . .>- o c .
- JECTs, ENGINEEQiNG AND CoNSTRUCVION *
( - OVALITY ASSU2ANCE DEDACTMENT C0ftSumtf5 ,.
, ; agr. AU JI.,. -
\ )l iG Pe. 30 l l .
QA50-1 ara so m>: as as' ccama mais as assmn* ras rzzcco cmcmca um r.smocus ' PQCP.10, Rev. 1, paragraph 7.5.3 requires t' hat "upon receipt or H01 601-2 07
'*'8"d*'*'
measuring and test equipment returned from an outside test facility t he QC shall. . . (ar. tach) a new ZQF-61 to acceptable items." ,, g d"d ' 4'? i
- s/14/A>
~~
Contrary to this , the GAGE BLOCKS, which hrd oeen calibrated on g, . 3/9/82, did not have a ZQF-61 attached. T. . sticker from the out- 18.4 7 8Im a= > side facility was attached to the GAGE BLOCKS. R f'a c h NOTE: This same problem wcs documented on M01-35-1-13 during the WRBird DATaggart August 1981 audit of the Zack Co. , Chicago. JEBrunner RAWells DECalkins ALAB-2 JWCook LEDavis - BJCole MADietrich KFriayes GSKeeley ESmith HPLeonard RWSoderhoJ m BWMarguglio TKSubramar i RMBcCarley DBMiller JARutgers MSkates come.ecco maasctm aerzoni
- 1) Comply with procedure requirement or revise the procedure.
- 2) Provide and document training for all cognizant personnel. Forward _ this documentation
. to MPQAD.*
I . commrm acrzcs coma.eurr a A response to this finding is requested on or before 6/3/82. x= or era ecw.stront _ coo. ans, rm cia, rosas mano esa scanam nau or e/a smerzmzas The Zack Company M Skites I aTHoc or mmCatzow ZQF-61 was attached to the GAGE BLOCKS during the audit. Training for cognizant personnel was conducted on 4/23/82. Documentation of this training
- was received from Zack Co. on 7/13/82 and is attached to the file copy of this report.
u cr urceram m w.m.n zr rza ,carser - :o me: l , , Iy w", FD6 Or AIrcrr 10 sci IF *TEs's pam or Imc Or7IClab TO WHose agrty?ID: l N/A tr w . wwo mes ancar: N/A. N/A cT1 CalClip>Tua's sicNaftt)q/Darte GlJPEltviscR*S sp'.T",'1 3
. /O@ i 'k lY S .
/ f$2/& / .h $ $
mlrICATIEMTE / -/ , M C/o mIrI9& TION SIGNA 8T',A 7//s-/st - l
--. .. . . . . . . . . ~ . - - . . . . . . . . . . . ~ -. -.. . .. _ _ . . .. .
_ppIOPTTr o TREND: N6 SUS DCUMUU A1:--s-1522 SJECVS ENolNEEQlNO AND CoNSVQUC? TON-f0fl$Umtf1 ..
. , & QA30-1 AU ) ,,, Gil\ G E01.. oOAUTY OSSUQANCE DEETMENT A5IS'CONLMVSvpFA A4 R5#J313' /"a3 IIII.DQ' CMCITICS WITM llETDUCla n Art SIR NQi M01 601-2-08 PQCP-15. Rev. 2, paragraph 7.1.1.2 requires that " Purchase Orders twfurf uonu in61ude... identification as Safety Related or Non-Safety Related." Zack Co. / Midland 1'~& 2 Furthermore , paragraph 7 1 3 requires that the "PM signs / dates the nat* or imm' Purchase Orders. " 5/10/8E rzu meani 18,4.7 Contrary to the above , twenty-four (24) out of twenty-four (24) umzmira:
Purchase Orders reviewed were not signed and dated by the PM (six RCAsh (6) were initialed by the PM) and only eight (8) of the twenty-four WRBird DATaggart (24) Purchase Orders indicated whether the items. were Safety Related JEBrunner RAWells or Non-Safety Related. DECalkins ALAB-2 JWCook NOTE: AFR MD1-35-1-11 (8/12/81) documented that the PM did not LEDav b sign /date the Purchase Orders reviewed during that audit. Zack Co. MADietrich has deleted this requirement from PQCP-15, Rev. 3 This procedure 33g,,3,7 is currently in the review / approval cycle. HPleonard BWMarguglio RBMcCarley DBM111er JARutgers MSkates anL*mun Ccamm.7m agues, , 1) Review the requirements of PQCP-15 and comply to requirements or' revise the procedure accordingly.
- 2) Train cognizant personnel on the above requirements and provide documentation of this training to MPQAD.
COSAICTIVE ACTION COr9dTMJf? 4 A response to this finding is requested on or before 6/3/82. HTE Cr C/A C08f3TI% _ _ cac, age em g;,% rason piam Csa CceeCTMDrf s uf or e/4 armarf. mass, The Zack Company M Skates -' eTTMOD CF VIIIrICATEs 1 Is C# REFT #rASM FU N.3)ien Ir "IE8*, DATE Or SEPvaT TO ACs v res , Tas or saw? To ime, xr Ts , mis or ime orrtew. To una= ammui N/A
- r rzr, mio == naouri N/A ,
N/A ara c:n safva's s Cu skioart, wruvtsca s s~ p s, C,.m -. n n,-, lox db7--
-zrnw. an.
- 9 km / s/n/nz
./ i.
ai- , .. u- --e -- - - , 9.,,---,- ..--..,.,-,-----.-f .--,=s- . - *w,,,,-9-s .-%.,--y-g-e v-w+v-*-v= **-v'**"r 9**-'e v v<-F"c-- sr
( EE A1l h'" sip 3 J r) '>Traosects. eacineraino Awo consrauction
,M U D l1 -- ~
13 )\ liNV \". U \l ouAttiv ASSURANCE oePARTMENT Campany
, e tta m cs ts conatos vasas as asevan conazon win suauess (mrrmur e - ,.
l l i l l w us cum ~m.<mnmo,, --
"ccascrm ces (cent METCHD OF VERIFICATION: (continued) l l 7/13/82 M151-c/B-628).
- 3) Training on PQCP-7, Rev. 5 was conducted on 21/23/82. Documentation of this training was received by MPQAD on 7/13/72 and is attached to the file copy of this report.
*** *%ee r
l t
- r I
, .~, .
46oo W.12TH PLACE o CHICAGO (CICf.7,0)ILL Cd65o
- 312/242 3434 *
.'44o1 VESTERN e FLINT MICHIGAN 485o3
- 313/73D 2odo r
,- -' n ,
8 the 2/A@% 1eo. , CUSTOM METAL FABRICATION April 29, 1982-To: CHRISTINE DeZUTEL ' From: TERRY HOWARD . Re: CAR 20 (see attached)
..Some comments on Item 17 of subject CAR:-
- 1. Records are insufficient to verify necessary training of all personnel connected with 'O' (Quality) materi..ls that are used by The Zack Company in Nuclear related contract-ing. ,
t
- 2. All personnel includes th'ose'who have f a part in the Quality Assurance functions of the company.
- 3. Document Control Departmant extends to those same individ-uals.
i 4. Compressed time schedules are.certainly germane to the_ ' forgoing'three. , I In keeping with the recommendation and direction of yourself and Mr. Skates, may I aubmit the following corrective accion proposal outline to be,thes subject of a subsequent Corrective Action Request (CAR): . . I The Zack Company Quality Assurance Training Program.... A._ Formal, Documented and Published. y B. Identification or personnel directly engaged in 0,uality Assurance Functions. - Identification .of personnel indirectly engaged in Qualitiy
. C.
Assurance activities..
- II. The Zack Company Quality Assurance Training Prejram - Sub' ject Items: / . -
A. Priority Studies -
. 1. Client Contract Specificatioris -
Federal Regulatiot.s 10CFR50 (Appx. S), etc. 2.
, _( cont'd)- !
$(bbr 4 -;
f/Lb : Z'
- FOUNDED TO SOLVE THE UNIQUE METAL FABRICATION NEEDS CF INDUSTRY *
- DEOtCATED TO CLEANING AND CUSTOMlZlNG THE AIR 08'THE WORLD * *
-'r--e y-y w -,--'y g-g _d-= gy*,a- r +-vp$- .e wy9 y- y y-
,'v .t*
i 8 4* To Christino DaZutol
. 4l'- From: Terr'y Howard Ret CAR 20 April 29, 1982
- 3. Applicable nationally recognized codes:
f (i.e.) ANSI, ASME, AISI, AWS, etc. *
- 4. Zack Company QAM's.
B. Procedural Priority Studies
- l. QAI'- 3 ) -
- 2. QAI - 4 l (Suggested updating) l,. 3. PQCP-7, Rev. S(Do'chment' Control) -
Midland
' "' ~ ~
- 4. PQCP-7', Rev'. ' 8' (Plant Document ContFol) . - Cilntoh C. ... '
Required Reading ~ ' '
- 1. All published material listed in A & B p
- 2. Any aasigned reading by qualified instructors ew; aged in the performance of carrying out the Zack Company Quality Assurance Training Program.
III. Zack C6mpany Committment j . . . . . . . .. A. Incorporate ia official company policy.
. . . . . ... .... .a .
~r Monetary. impact.
.~
. D .' ' ,
'C. ' Compensated' release-timb'Ior' participants. '
~' ' "'
IV. Empl'yee o Committment ' A. Adopt formalized training as a neces ary step in contin-ued employment. - ' B. i Follow through with morS efficient and effective work habits. ' The foregoing is an outline that merely encompassed what, I believe, are necessary actions. Such actions will, without any doubt or question, update the verification issue of all personnel engaged in'the Quality Assurance functions <of the Zack Company. It is my intention to dise,uss this same' recommended direction'with you. s . Th/lt CC: M. Skates f4\. Terry,Howard QA File t .
- h 9 d A %W- l r
- r-=-- -
-e v "-m-- - -
-"w++ ~'
, . ts .
.. h.
.; : '?he 8&@DKco.
CORRECTIVE ACTION PEOUEST (CAR)
\-n. .
1, CAR NUMRER: 20, 7. D ATc: April 28, 1982 3 PROJECT: Chicago Document Control 4. LOCATION Zack Chicago ' 1 l
- 5. ACTION ASSIGNEE: T. IlOWARD G. SCHEDOLED COMPLETION DATE: April 30, 1982 D.C. Supervisor 1, DESCRIPTION: In the opinion of managgpe,.pt , the verlflabin Frnining rncardn
, .of the Chicago Document Control Department are insufficient. \
.Notet Management nnten and apnrocinton the enmnrannna tims. erhnanin committed tn by Mr. Hnwned. ,
B. RECOMMENDED / DIRECTED CORRECTIVE ACTIONIS): Formulate n trnining n1an fnr &hn department. It is to include (1) recuired reading 14ntn_ (91Tdan&4rina&4nn of procedures upon which training is tn hn cnnanntad innina4ng; kno En* i limited to, critical areas esoecin11v rnuninne &n &ha anrumnnt ann &eni
% $% . *k e28 =8L 9.W4 5)=1T=$( *
- 9. O.A. MANAGER /DATE 10. PRESHWNT/DM
- 11. ACTION TAKEN: Inil.iated pI_oposal to correct discrepancy linted in 87 ;
above to Christipe De2ntel. Zack Cemrj,ny President on April 29. 1982. - in letter _of tha t came date (see copy in OA film .
- i Ah 4 Y*dY~ $s=
/12. ACTION ASSIGNEE /DA(E 9
- 13. VERIFICATION:
M
- 14. ACCEPTED / REJECTED
- 15. O.A. MANAGER /DATE 16. PRESl0ENT/DATE IUs" _ _
y :->g.q- ** -y+* 9 =r r* -rW4Tw*'W'" '-'Ct""---?*"N7-B*4
- F P'e-' 'M'* 'T'- 'T TT
A s)'
, 4 COO W,12TH PLACE
- CNICAG[ bCEROIILL 60630
- 312/242 3434 4401
- WESTERN
- FLINT MICHIGAN 480o3
- 313//36 2o40 e j.
the ZACK co. .* CUSTOM METAL FABRICATION April 29, 1982 To: CHRISTINE DeZUTEL Prom: TERRY llOWARD Re CAR 20 (see attached) Some comments on Item #7 or subject CAR:
- 1. Records are insufficient to verify necessary training of all personnel connected with 'O' (Quality) materials that are used by The Zack Company in Nuclear related contract-ing.
- 2. All personnel includes those who have a ps.c c in the Quality Assurance functions of the company.
- 3. Document Control Department extends to those same individ-uals.
- 4. Compressed time schedules arc certainly germane to the forgoing three.
In keeping with the recommendation and direction of yourself and Mr. Skates, may I submit the following corrective action proposal outline to be the subject of a subsequent Corrective Action Request (CAR):
- 1. The Zack Company Quality Assurance Training Program....
A. Formal, Documented and Published. B. Identification of personnel directly engaged in Quality Assurance Functions. C. Identification of personnel indirectly engaged in Quality Assurance activities. II. The Zack Company Quality Assurance Training Progran - Subject Items: A. Priority Studies -
- 1. blient Contract Specifications
- 2. Federal Regulat' ions 10CFL50 (Appx. B), etc.
(cont'd)
- FOUNDED TO SOLVE THE UNIQUE METAL FABRICATION NEEDS Cf INDUSTRY '
- DEDICATED TO CLEANING AND CUSTOM 121NG THE AIR OF THE WORLD * *
(l A6
, To : Christir e t>Zutel From: Terry F w rd
,l, Ret CAR i APIII 29' 1992
- 3. Applicable nationally recognized codes:
(i.e.) ANSI, ASME, AISI, AWS, etc.
- 4. Zack Company QAM's.
B. Procedural Priority Studies
- 1. QAI - 3 )
- 2. QAI - 4 l(Suggestedupdating)
- 3. PQCP-7, Rev. 5 (Dacument Control) ~
Midland
- 4. POCP-7, Rev. 8 (Plant Document Control) - Clinton C. Required Reading
- 1. All published material listed in A & B
- 2. Any assigned reading by qualified instructors engaged in the performance of carrying out the Zack Company Quality Assurance Training Program.
III. Zack Company Committment A. Incorporate in official company policy.
. B. Monetary impact.
i C. ' Compensated releasa-time for participants, IV. Employee Committment A. Adopt formalized training as a necessary step in contin-ued employment. B. Follow through with more efficient and effective work habits. The foregoing is an outline that merely encompasses what, I believe, are necessary, actions. Such actions will, without any doubt or question, update the verification issue of all personnel engaged in the Quality Assurance functions of the Zack Company. It is my intention to discuss this same' recommended direction'with you. uy d TH/lf CC: M. Skates f A. Tetry Howard QA File G
l p.< " QUALITY ASSURANCE TRAINING REPORT i x - 3 (i g. f
- i PROJECT No. ADDM- 27. IM2 t.OATE THE DELOW LISTED INQiVIDUAlls) RECEIVED OUALITY AS$UR ANCE TRAINING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZACK COMPANY OUALITY ASSURANCE TRAINING PROGRAM NAME gQlg
- PO$lTION 2 ft 111hv4& ton b oar M. clone ft/SswAk.7
, 3. m Doc. Control 1,- A
- 4. P. Mnward dub
- Doc. Control Eueer.
/ E' F_ t' r m n t- TER*W it.
e f5m r= . f'o n t e n 1 -F 9 - '- -- f & ,,, , A _ Wanninear _- Plant Ene(neer
- 7.
- g /*
g .' *
- gg i a e
11. 1 DESCRIPTION OF TRAINING SES$10N CONDUCTED t
- 12. vnAnr+v4nm*4mn in +k. penp
- c^nu nr Amriim.nen&4nn (CMTR. C of C. P.O.. RIR. Receivine checklist. Hold. NCR) and individual renconsibilities.
es-
'l '
/
- 13. I M > A.D LOAE Q.A.TRAI G INSTRUCTOR G
CC: ELA. M ANAGER ,.. ,
.. i FILE SITE.OC DEPARTMENT '
1 IQF-23 i e 4 J 9
.m ..
% { '
.12TH PLACE
- CHICAGO (CICERO)ILL GO650
- 312/242 3431 F. STERN FLINT MICHIG AN 405c6
- 310,730 2040 w
' ~
$/
me M @iTOco. /
" CUSTOM METAL FABRICATlON April 16, 1982 To:
All Zack Personnel From: Christine Zack DeZutel Ref: , Document Control Records ErrECTIVE IMMEDIATELY ! allegations have been made to Consumers Power CorpIt ha i 1 questions Records. the integrity of The Zack Quality Assurance . that { l j The Zack Company has now and always ruth! e ind the will stand b hLet me i t integrity of its products; both metal and pape r, The Zack Company has notified Consumers Powe
- it thewill Zackcooperate and assist in overyway po r Corp, that Company name. ssible to clear 4
- to the Investigating Team thatesnothing ourselves and its present changIn order to provide
- condition in provisions now the Document Control area apply
- ,
the following special
~
- 1. A.
Wanninger has been appointed Overseer of the R ecords Depa.rtment until the completion of the investig a ti t in this capacity he will be the watchdog of upper on. management to verify no unauthorized personnel hasacces from the present condition, A. except as stated below:
'3 No packages will be taken from tht center.
Document Control be run by the document eference persennel control they will only u dIf copies are n the authorization of Mr. Wanninger. THERE ARE g EXCEPTIONS! n er < Continued e-7
. FOUNDED To SOLVE THE UNtCUE METAL FABR! CATION NEEDS
- DED!CATED TO CLEAN 1NG AND CUSTOMl2iNG THE AIR OF THE W jbob
'vw
',' 4400 W.12TH PLACE
- CHICAGOICICEColILL CO650
- 312/242 3434 p * - ' !On'vF. STERN
- FLINT MICH GAN 40*06
- 313/7J6 2000 ,
g -
'f / ~.s\
the D\ Wh@lT[. co. CUSTC,;.1 METAL FABRICATION -
/
April 16, 1982 To: All Zack Personnel . From Christine Zack Detutel Ref: Document Control Records EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY,1 It has been brought to Managements attention thne certain allegations have been made to Consumers Power Cc p. that' questions the integrity of The Zack Quality Assurance Records. Let me assure you that nothing is farther from the truth! The Zack Company has now and always will stand behind the integrity of its products; both metal and paper. The 7ack Company has notified Consumers Power Corp. that it will cooperate and assist in etaryway possible to clear the 2ack Company name. In order to provice the greatest assurance to ourselves and to the Investigating Team that nothing changes its present condition in the Document control area, the following special provisions now apply:
- 1. A. Wanninger has been appointed Overseer of the Records Department until the completion of the investigation.
In this capacity he will be the watchdog of upper management to verify no unauthorized personnel has access to the records or that the recordsiare changed from the present condition, except as stated belew A. No packages will be taken from the Document Control ceinter. If copies are needed for reference they will be run by the document control personnal only under < the authorization of Mr. Wanninger. THERE ARE NO, EXCEPTIONS! -
- Continued
- FOUNDED TO SOLVE THE UN1QUE METAL FABRl0AllON NEEDS OF INDUSTRY *
. DECICATED TO CLEANING AND CUSTOMlZING THE AIR OF THE WoRLD *
{
i t' s a d April 16, 1982 Hemo to Zack Personnel Page 2 '* B) NOTIIING will be removed from the existing document packages. New material received will be reviewed and stamped in accordance with present practice. Old material will be left in the folder and stamped void and initialed and dated. C) All changes to packages are to be verified and author-Azed by Mr. Wanninger. D) All keys to the Document Control Room and cabinets will be turned over to Mr. Wannirer immediately. No other persons will have access to those files. E) The Document Control Department will function only according to the following schedula 8:00 AM - Mr. Wanninger will unlock oom & cabinets. Work may begin.
) '
12:00 Noon - All files will be rattrned and cabinets locked. . 12':30 PM - Mr. Wanninger will unlock files - work may resume. 4:30 PM - All files will be returned and cabinets locked. 2 The above rules will stay in affect until the investi-gation is complete. l Your cooperation and adherence to these rules,is expected and any violations could result in dismissal. (%n ?h?1o
' Christine Zac D Zutel President - ]
CZDZ/nw \ l
.O:.t0 . .w.6.u C w . rwn==
r
" a
'C
$D h t pV h \- 7 -. A E CO*
. ; /* CUSTOM METAL FABRICATION NJ' Harch 1, 1982 0 .
Commenwealth Edison company R.R #1 Box 240 Marseilles, IL 62341
. Attn Mr. J. Dierbeck Re: NCR's Related to Reportable Defect Evaluation Report Mr. Dierbeck, o
Attached are 99 NCR's that have been generated to close out items that, are currently included on the reportable defect evaluation list. Items covered by these NCR's are items purchased soley for the LaSalle Prcject and Atems purchas-ed for stock and used at LaSalle. 4 of the 99 reports, 30 have been closed internally by The Zack Ccmpany. Closure of-these reports was accomplished through project management review and the surfac-ing.of documents and information made available by project management. On these grounds we determined that it was within the authority of the The Zack Company to close these reports. Xerox copies of the closed reports are included for infor-mation. Any comments or additinnal information you may have concerning the affect-ed items would, of course, be welcome. The'69 open NCP's are submitted for an accept as is disposition in all cases. These
, are items for which, at this point in time, it seems unlikely that necessary documentation to-correct- deficiencies can be obtaineds Also in this group are Atcms that are correctly documented but are not included in the LaSalle Tech. Spec.
Closure of the above referenced'NCR's will reduce the number of open items on the list to 35. These items are of a clerical nature and we are reasonably certain that necessary documentation can be obtained to correct the deficiencies. NCR ' 's - were not written on these remaining items based on this belief.- Although a time frame for completion o't all items on the: list.cannot he establish-ed._ closure of the enclosed NCR's and continuing effort on.the remaining items will certainly bring this matter to a close in a timely manner. Very truly yours, . The tack Company .
. a l.t v'<- e .
.v.g, p ;
- P:.y. y.d J. 5.asin s}_.,epfy :)} 'D)
~
Q.A. Engincor f,, Zack Senior L ment FCUNCED TO sot.VE T'HE UNIQUE METAL. FABRICATION NEEDS OF INDUSTRY ' '
. OED:CAIED TO CLE/.NING AND CUSTCMitNG THE AIR CF Tl4 WCal.D *
- p .
__ u ._ _ ;- -- - --
. - .. ..- . . - .. . . .. . , .w
.a uv u ou * .sie/ 4 4 2 34 34
. . 4401 WESTERN e FLINT MICHIGAN 40503
- 313/733 204o '
~
(c / D tbe W( Jh@N ca. CUSTOM MCTAL FABRICATION , March 18, 1982
\
/
. . l To: Detailing / Drafting Dept. l Nourly Non-Manual Parsonnel l I l Prom: C.L.Eichstaedt, Jr.
Re Time Cards / Time Clock Effective Monday March 22, 1982 a new time clock will be installed in the main first floor office for use of all hourly, non-manual Zack employees. The timo cards will be weekly in lieu of dai3y.
- This clock will be used for initial "Chee!t-In", final l " Check-out" as well as Lunch, personal time, school, l
etc. Company errands will still be 'on a sign-in/out sheet of Steve Drdzdz. This is company policy and there , will be no deviations. . Each person will be responsible for punching their own " time card. Being caught punching someo'e n elses card, - will be ou for dismissal. _ nt /0 oc N A
~
b '
- Carl L. Eichstaedt, J Std.ve Drozdz [ [
/
Concurred: h k_ h rs:s ti Y A k Ov .D'~R ~._. . Joseph C. DeZutel ^
' FOUNDED TO SDL/E THE A%b UNIDJE MiT/ L /AERL/sTIO n
' DEDICATED TO CLEANING AND CUSTOMlZING THE AIR OF THE WORLD * )
m >
q-
- s I wi on a itu 7 ira u.ai..,,o u.ce., . : uuo
. ( ,
&(
flovernber 24, 19111 C The Zack Company - 4600 W.12th Placu Chicago (Cicero), IL. 60650 Attention: R. Greune . Job 7220 flidland Project Subcontract 7220-H-151
- Hueting tiotes H-151 -B-1391
Dear !!r. Groune:
Attached for your information and files, plcese find one copy of meeting notes for the jobsite taeeting held on llovember 3,1981 at Midland. If you do not concur with these notes, please advise us within ten (10) days of receipt. , p. . Very truly yours, ,
'. , hk. L-L. E. Davis
. Site Manai;er
- LED /RCA/EE/ck ,
Attachment:
Heeting Notes , hs<afd4 &t's ~ del &d //'I?
' / ~,8 7 - 43/ - sizf c u
M Yt o .
. W l .
e
. j *
. \
- s . ,
-i,
\; _
,kW ,
}
w W- =w +wia- ## w l
T lberla.: Hinu t c. o.. , . H-lb) , UATE: I overnher 3,1981 ' TIP.E :
- 9. 00 a .ni. * -
Pl. ACE: Jobsith Conforence Itoum - PLRPOSE: To discuss the Zack report on 10 Crit 50-65 potentially reportable - issues on CllTR's; to provid:e l'ro.iect Engineering with additional
~
details and to expedite resolution of th:: disposition. ' ATTEllDEESy Dick Soderholm nechtel Powr Corporation Clark Ash
. r tochtel Power Corporation
)
" ., Ed Entrekin llochtel Powr Corporation *
., Georie Ritter .
Bechtel Power Corporation ' s Tom Baldwig Buchtel Powr Corporation __D3 nnis A,p,pel . Dech te}, _P,og Q_o.raorat.1on ' M nson Consu,mrs Power Company e Ga Niin ry(Te'onTTci 6 111111Vhd~ PT6jicr Omrrrty Assurance Dapt. Bill 0010 liidland Project Quality Assurance Dept. Howa rd McGrove ( Mc9m,e-) liidland Projecte-Quality Assurance Dept.
"Russ McCarley
~
The 2ack.Cempany .
, Dave Calkins
'The Zack Company
. : *l ,. .
A meting was held at the liidlo'nd Jobsite Conference Room on Hovember 3,1981 be-tween Bechtel Field, Dechtel Project Enginaaring, Consurrers Power. Hidland Project Quality Assurance, Department, and Zack Quality Assurance to discuss the 2ack 10 CFR - 50-55 report on' potentially reportable CHIR issues. Zack was asked to elaborate 'on the position taken by the tuo other utilities simi-larly involved and particularly if related to the Midland site. It was detenni; .ed that one other site had determined the issue to be' reportabic and the other one was indetenninate, since llovember 2,1981 was the deadline date. lloweve r, it was agreed that the disstollarity in criteria and circumstances betnen the three sites precluded drawing any conclusions fro.n the other evaluations. - It was pointed out to Zack 'that mny of the columns in the report stateri a need for
. engineering resolution ~but that it was not clear what Zack was looking for. 2ack elaborated that at the tim of issue, many additional items of docuinentation are still being located; that at a given point all data available was collected and in-corporated. It was also stated that Zack was asking for engineering concurrence on proposed resolutions. - -
it was agreed to discuss the issues by category and the following' discussions took place: ,
+
~
f h5 *
. _ = &~
g w- -
.-_.__s--..n__.---._,- _ - a
. . $1.eot anil Coil - It u.u. putated out that 1.h. di:. :repant. vanlititen was listed in '
i s. most ca:;es as'lcss than 3G 101. In view of the recent llCH accept.loff 30 KSI, Zack 4 was asked tn datermino hoy cinch less than 3G KSt. 7ack respuntled that in all cases where CilfR's wru availablo, the yield strungth was tireater than 31 KSI. , 2ack niso explained that the reason for having 1.h? Cllilt's that they do have is in con.1 unction with a requireent on another sito wheinhy they cannot purchase material with physicar propiirties certified. In all caset; th.:y have tests per- ~ formed af ter delivery and in 100 parcent of the cases tested, the material hr.s fl een greater than the 30 KS1 required., . Zack feels that the probability of accepta'nce 'of.all material now in question is quite high. Total disposition appears to be 1:lantification of the af fected travelers and establishing a testinD program to substantiate the physical proper-
. ties.
. Huts. Bolts, ifashers - In all cases it was determined that a C. of C. was available.
Ilowever, there is some question as to what constitutes an acceptable C. of C. Engi-neering agreed to provide criteria. Also, Engineering was asked if the spiscifi ' cation required a CitTR. Engineering conceded that the specification was not clear and thst they would research and provide an interpretation. Primarily they felt that it should not be required on accessory items but probably should be re- . quired on structural armhers. . .,
. [2ack uas advised that an SDDR had baer$ returned authoriz$fg use of the non-marked A- lbolts in, question and they were advised to submit an $D071 an the nuts and washers.
Action items'from the meeting are as follows: ' y . . 2ack to provide an add 3hdum to the report by Friday, November 6,1981, stating that, all items.with CilTR listed as "below 36 KSI" are greater than 31 KSI.
. J. Zack is to prepare a list of all suspect material purchase orders and update to the Field weekly ,as dispo,sitions art obtained.
tM. Zack to' address the " Approved Vendors List". sit 0ation by Friday, !!ovember 6,1981.
- 4. MPQ?.D to determine and advise the _date of the follow-up meeting with CPCo management regarding this and other outstanding quality issues. ,
5 , Zack is to try'to' get the material certified to federal specification ,
, rccertified to ASTil or issue an 50DR against this, order.
(/6. Zacktosub[* tan DR against ,MCf._1138 by next -Tuesday-l.Hovember 1
~ _ _ , , ,, p BPCo Engineering to issue a specification change nntice for ve.ntglas material. M-
'O8 BPCo Engineering is to provide an interpretation of the specification as to uhen CMTR's are required. -
p Mnt , - p& - 9 BPCo Engineering it to provido clarification as to what constitutes an acceptable - C. of C. by November 18, 1981. go .
/{f v .
n t . . 9.- . f
- p
,_ _ . .w - . - . . -- - .-- ~ .. - -..
, ,_A due e op g.y me.n e, *
.e_ g -- --= *:per a.
P - w'-'-g-- eW-m- -fm-in-ty gr, T "P +-7P7-+1 W't7C'*W" M"N"Y'W'*' *#'TP 't4' j
,10. Zack to is::ue an EDDR on nuts anel !tra:;h.trs. ? pk Ary""I -
. ' 11. Zack. to update and resubdjt the report in th ty ( 30 ) d ay s . .M d ~q.. .(/*
7,12. BPCo Engineering t.o pe r.f.osu tlia sa f ety c.alua tion by Friday , llovoinbe r 6,1981. 1 In summary. it was agreed that in virtually all casos, outerial is acceptabic or util .ba deemed acceptable. There is no special raaterial involved and the na.ior i issue is certif,1 cation and/or proof. In the trorst casos, additional testing may be required. ,, . (. 'i,s -
. H 6 Dhb 14&t hecting flotes Prepared 17 Date
- I" E. Entrekin
/
eknowledge: .
. .Ra.y Greunc .
Date
- 5,;.'
.i . . .
. . . .., c- - *-* '
s .. Concurrence:'. I .
.'... Date *
,. 4 ,, . .
, 3, .. .
,,,,~
\ ..
. *, 4.g .. . .
W
- 6 l
l . . I ./ . , l
. . e r
- S e
e en shee a e>e-
, .+ ..,n,.,.
---,--e- - +. ~.rr.,- . , - - - p , ,r- - . . - -,r- ,,.g..g.,.,._e. --,,,-r,--. y .ne, - ._ e a ,- n , , - - - -
_ m
... .r c o); g;.PLoonardd
.....Ia DDM111er
,y
- OCR-0006
,'*' C@ntymL4 Peo.it.Cis. E NGINI t esNG
( P0ntf AND CONSTRUCTION
- s comm ORAL COMMUNICATIONS RECORD CUALITY ASSURANCE D(PART8Af NT c m .rna no 2.15
% -0 ,w
_ c,_g__ et v ca ,cnce-n ,_ 8/25/81 u.a n,3m ,unemnw WRaird. HPLeonard-MPOAD
- ce er cmv:: mum 1:15-1!30 PM _ cma runW naron n _ HPLeonar
- rwen Wea stwin usevuu Mid1and Proiect - Zack Company - HVAC - Issues itenardinn Certi fied Materi al Test Reports (CMTRs) wm :r cexcmuu Mr. Leonard called Mr. Bird to fblate the following:
1) MPOAD-HVAC OA had been reviewinn ca.TRs recei /ed f rom Zack-Chicaqo. The new OA Manaaer at Zack-Chicaco (Dave Calkins) had begun a similar review. 2) on 8/25/81 Mr. Calkinn visited the Midland site and mado Mr. Leonard aware of aeneral conce' rny renulting from these reviews. Potential problems may be tentatively categorized as follows: a) Incomplete CMTRs b) Material properties which are not in accordance with the governing specification c) Certifications whose ~~alidity is in question.
- 3) Mr.
Calkins intends to define the issues better -issoe a Corrective Action Renort to record and track the concerns
- and nropose an action ~
plan to resolve individual discrepancies. Inherent to the plan is a complete review of all CMTRn.
- 4) Mr.
Leonard and Mr. Calkins had discussed the requirements of 10CFR21 and 10CFR50.55(e). Mr. Calkins is aware of Zack's obligations in this area and of the need to solicit Bechtel participation to determine whether any " Deviation" is, - fact, a " Defect" as described in 10CFR21. 4 a JC ldAAw
' ~
' ~
- f ,, . n, OCR-0006 4'#*:,* *' . Censumtfl enostCTs. tncantinono AND CONSTRUCTION *
*b.OEL ORAL COMMUNICATIONS RECORD ems.ruz m 2.15
%5-0 n s ? er ? .
- s v cen.ncmm 8/25/81 a.ruc necc:u, tuncudas WRBird. HPLeonard-MPOAD as e.r cue.xm. 1:15-1:30 PM oma run(s) urun n HPLeonard I
I nuc=s m/ca sesm-s ascesu Midland Project - Zack Company - HVAC - Issues Regarding - ! Certified Material Test Reports (CMTRs) l .
- em ar comunes Mr. Bird and Mr. Leonard agryed that no apparent safety concern meeting reportability conditions is e rident at this time, recognizing:
- 1) Historically, most CMTR problems are found to be administrativo over-sight, not technical inadequacies.
- 2) Some deviation from soecified material procerties can be accomodated by design conservatism.
l
- 3) Recent documentation from material vendors tends to support the technical adequacy of the material, even thouah earlier CMTRs may be in question.
1) The material properties which could be most problematic if they were out of specification a2:e in fact verified by the success of t'J Welding, forming, and similar operations to which the materials are subject.
n wac ro,,n m 811 m> ALLEGATI.O.N.n,mTA imn,ci. ,- D A, w. FORM u s. uucttAn arcut Ato::V couuissioN RECEIVING OFFICE
- 1. Facility (les! Involved: INe,nel Docket Number lif applicable) in me,. ih.n 3. o, a e.n.ne.-,a.ctwinici
$ (D64 AJ D I o(o_ o e 3 '& 9 a o so a o 33 o
- 2. Functional Arestal involved: ~
tcheck app,op,*ie boilent i operations onsite health and safety construction _._ offsite health and safety
. safeguards emergency preparedness
_ other tspec.ity) 3.
Description:
it m.i to no ch.... .,.i [PIEJTI(I4Wl Icl#1AWldlsI_Mf.lslflNloloIrif I leloj g g ; g; g ;g; gyg; g,gg ;, g l_I IIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII I I I III I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~l I l
- 4. Source of Allegation: ~
ICheck app,opnete bohl ControClor employee _ Security guard _ licensee employee tiews media NRC employee , private citizen _._. orgenlaation tcpecifyl
- MMMMUN
, other tspectfyt
. MM 00 vy
- 5. Date Allegt non Received:
7p p g y y
- 6. Name of Individual tries two initi i. end i..: n m.: F' C. N4WK!A5 Receiving' Allegation:
- 7. Of fice:
g 7 ACTION OFFICE
- 8. Action Office
Contact:
IFi,si iwo inicole end I.. nemel M __
- 9. FTS Telephone Number:
jg . gig g g
- 10. Stett.s: Ec (Check onel Open,if followup actions are pending or in progress Closed,if followup actions are comp!sted
- 11. Date Closed: I
*"'**: l)3 n n., io so che,.ci.,,, I t i I l'l l I i l IIIIIIIIIl l IIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIl
- 13. Allegation Number: *** ***' ""*"
R1 s s 8 2 -A o o r's, \// -
&v t>O3{8.3 .
_ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ ___-__._.u.-.m._ .
i RUN DATE 04/03/84 H-1246110 T R ACK !NG $Y5 TEM i A LLEGA T 10N - v DAT A HASE REVTEW/ UPDATE SHEET 1-t DATA AS Of THE END OF MARCH 1984
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ - -----------.--- r ALLEGATION NUMAER:
Rl!!-83-4-0096 ' 05000329 MIDLAND 1 05000330 : FACIL!TY/DOCKETt MIDL ANL) ? CONSTducT10N FUNCT10NAL AREA DESCRIPTION: DESIGN CHANGF METHODSI CONTROL ROOM HVAC HEDESIGN. SOURCEl ORG - GAP l OATE RECE!VEDI 10/05/83 t FC HAWKINS PERSON RECE!VINGt R3 OFFICE RECEIVING ACTION OFFICE CONTACT JJ HARR! SON 388-5635 '
+
FksPHONENUMBERt ' STATUSl CLOSED DATE CLOSED: 03/07/84 .. CLOSED By REPORT 50-329/83-088 50-330/83-10. WEMARKS: . Y l' CHANGES TO OATA? .._Y E S __ ._NO 'I
.DATE REVIEWED .. _ / _ ..../ _-_.
l 0FFICE C00RDINATOR'S INITIALS _______. e
** g =~ w .,
, ,,~.pm,. w_,,,, ,-,_.-,,,m,..-,., ,c-.y-,y , . - , - _ . . . , ,-e. p u~.,,,- ,y ,-,,*.e,...,-~,.,4 .
e-. w w y-
s #{- I I
)
)
lJ . 10 710 . l 6mdosce N. su c4Wes $N A %je9 ch S d OWD nuc0 pk bd, dEQ s[, )0d'AD$$ t 04 a ub an&gcd9AA 6gtu LL cugintJfawi. Atooc>{4Ium-{61mp(M(eu aa M6to i Mitto eWw hee opp)k thk uAAC cawAiaisoJchct$ts b n d k k %Y1cuOt 0 4 0 d b'n1 dIU m h da j a c, A ge s& A $J.4mA "p4 b y pil"ow , [ bD ga 4 &,,4,134A> ' 4 NM 4 %b04 saktm,wdgw&*ag'htMk 1r s A@. Abc shal eMy
'
- Y" P"
- hw b) ;c f I 6kpeaa bA& 4$ P y ' o b st 3 $ 4 k y y D.
QL %CL'u n Pm GO - i ri),-e D0'NOT DI'SC
,Containential conf entity of source k'Y/f/ * /~
~
'* L Q. e
,s . , . . . - - , . , _ . . - .,4.-.. ,,----m_m... , , , , - . . . _ , .
....,m-.. s
- Fa'm W ALLE2AT10N DATA FORM u s. wuctsAn maoutAtoaY couuissow -
IU inettuctor$ On f$vette 6ide RECEIVING OFFICE Docket Number (if applicable)
- 1. Facility (les) Involved: (Nemel in mo,e th n s. ot d 9.weg, write GENERICI hl bdA/d (lAf /r M/ O 5 0 .o o .5 J 9 n nd L Ad) ti >> > 1- 4 2.- O ci!o o o a 3 c) -
~~~
- 2. Functional Atee(s) Involved:
(chect approproie boat o i _ operations onsite health end safety h construction ~ offsite health and safety _, safeguards _ emergency preparedness other tspeelfyl 3.
Description:
It;Io Id ic Ic.lR.lv I s I 1Rie I&l A IRill i lhl& I le I A It ik I I I (ta i. a ch. .ei.'" Icle 14161r I Alu lc lT li lolkl, IWlo.lt ilis Inl61. Iblo it.l. I I t.lo la frIRiollI I AlillAl Jalul AILI,IfIVI II I III It.lo lvivl Alo lLI Il II/IslPlelc l-flolA.lsl. l I I I I I I
- 4. Source of Allegation:
Icheen appropet.te boi) contractor employee security guard licensee employee news medle NRC employee I private citizen organization tspecifvl- P FNAm MM ? MD. _ othertspecityl b N 1$ U 9 0 v's i 7-MM DD YY
- 5. Date Allegation Received:
g
- 8. Name of IndivlNual triret iwe inki i. .nd i.. n.mel I* IT - NC IIUCb' '
Receiving Allegation:
- 7. Office:
g ACTION OFFICE
- 8. Action Office
Contact:
trie i twe init..i .nd I..i nem.) I. C dklN
- 9. FTS Telephone Number:
3 % 3 - 5 5 8 5
- 10. Status:
scheck onet 7 - Open,if followup ections are pending or in progress Closed,if followup actions are completed MM DD YY f j
- 11. Date Closed: .
l
- 12. Remarks: lg-l3 l7lylgjg j.y lC lDI lCloIMlP ll. It'171210INI IDIP fr ItI it- io w ch.<.ci.,.i IGI- 121ol- 19141, I I I I I I I l- I l- 1 I I I I I I l
- 13. Allegation Number:
R 1 r 1 t 3 -A' O 3 S t
.ac w awot/M r sw n H1 '/tr/tr c- w for ~~~ m a - v w w .
t 4 ', / 1 AU6 2 9 683 . Docket No. 50-329; 50-330 Docket No., 50-461; 50-462 Ms. Billie P. Carde, Director Citizens for Accountable Covernment l Covernment Accountability Project Institute for Policy Studica 1901 Que Street Washington, DC 20009 Daar Ms. Carder I want to again thank you for your assistance in arranging for the deposi-tions of Individuals C and H. Your ef forts in that regard are appreciated. On August 18, 1983, we transmitted the transcripts of both_ depositions to you for your review. Members of my staff have reviewed both of these transcripts to identify unresolved issues khleh require further action on our part. To that end, our review of Individual H's deposition has identi-fled two matters involving you. Specifically, you stated on page 55 (lines 9-14) that it would be to our benefit to discuss CAP's knowledge of the Zack issues with you or a member of your staff and you stated on page 64 (lines 7-19) your concerns regarding the inadvertent or careless ordering af materials by Zack and the supply of those materials to utilities. We recognize that your knowledge regarding the Zack issues is of value M-our effort and we welcome the opportunity to share your insight into them.
~
Accordingly, and in keeping with our intent to conduct a complete inspection of this matter we would lika to interview you _ to acquire any information j which you believe could adversely affect installed HYAC systems or components at either the Midland or Clinton facilities. You may bring other members of CAP to the interview who you believe can contribute to ont s9ecial inspec-tion. In order to have a record of your coessents, we plan to have the interview transcribed by a court reporter. Additionally, as agreed between you and members of my staff _ during the deposition of Individual B, we are in need of legible copies of the 44-attach ==ts to Individual B's original affidavit. These copies are necessary-to assure that we are fully cognizant of all items of concern. l
]3 d DY[ 7 l 7 .I .
' "o k... ...... . .... ............i."".."..o - " " -
" " "l " " " " " " " " " " " " d"/ - "*" ""
l
'u*> .. .. ..'. ..
.......q.............. -"""""- .h ~~."" " g """""" "? " " " * "
""f....,
.. ... .............. [ ." 3 .' ..' ~ c ~ 3 ' " " " ' :: " " " " L1 " '. '. . ;.' ' '.' ' *i ' *: ' "." " * .
,ac e eau ais oo-soi ~acu oTao OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
7 '.
; i
*f' .
.. /
e ,,/ Hs. Billie P. Carde g p g y,,g . Please contact me or Mr. Dun.no Danielson of my staff as soon as possible to arrange a date for your interview. I Sincerely - l "Origie cl fi:..H by P.. L, SptuarW'
- .R. L. Spessard, Director Division of Engineering ces T. Rains, EDO l Mr. W. C. Constner )
1111nois Power Co. Philip L. Willman, Esq. Assistant Attorney General i Environuental Control Div. Reed Newcan, Esq., Assistant Attorney General Cary N. Wright, Manager Nuclear Facility Safety Jean 707, Frairie Alliance Mr. James W. Cook Consumere Power Co. The Honorable Charles Bechheefer, ASLB The Honorable Jerry Barbour, ASLB The Honorable Frederick P. Cowan, AELB-The Bonarable Ralph S. Decker, ASLB William Faton, ILD - Michael Miller * - .
~
Ronald'Callen, Michigan . Publie Service Commission Myron B. Cherry l Barbara Stamiria , Mary Sinclair Wanda11 Marald1 ' Colonel Steve J. Cadler (P.E.) Howard Levin (TERA) Lynne Bernahei, Government Accountability Project DHB/ Document Contrel Deok (RIDS) eU-Rasident Inspector, 1 III- p'
- Clinton/ Midland .. -
W h. yn y'.A k f .- l
"' . . , R, ,1, g ,,R III , ,
,R ,
,j ' , , , ,,,,j,,, ,I , , , , , , f, , ,R I T , ,,
R I1 n'
"'* > Hawkins/lc . '.I. . D'a on. .l. . Lit 41e . . . . '.i. . }{a , ,i spn, esso '
, , , , , , , ,L y, ,s , , s cut > 8/26/83 1 .... g ....'.....
...e.d.....M,,,
r... .. ....... .r. ..... ..L 1 .. ..:f .L. .% f. 3 :, . . .
=Te% A v u. ,,n..n v.cu nun . - c . r- r e r e a e n r. e c. n n e , n u
' ~
( R-1246110 RUN DATEt 04/03/84 ALLEGA T ION TR ACK 1 N G' SY STEM OATA HASE REVIEW / UPDATE SHEET DATA AS or THE END OF MARCH 1984
-- - -.-------.- . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ - - - .--
ALLEGATION NUMBERI R111-83-A-0135 FACILITY /00CKETt M10LANil 1 05000329 MIOLAND P 05000330 FUNCTIONAL AREA: CONSTRUCTION DESCRIPTION: CONCERNS REGARDING ZACK CONSTRUCT!0Ne WELDING,-DOC.-CONTROL,-AND QUALITY _ CONTROL-INSPECTORS. .
-SOURCEI ORG - 6AP AFFIDAVIT DATED T/15/82-DATE RECEIVED 0T/15/82 PERSON RECElv!NGt JG KEPPLFR OFFICE RECEIVIN31 R3 ACTION OFFICE CONTACT JJ HARR190N FTSPHONkNUMBER 388-5635 ,
STATUSt CLOSED DATE CLOSED: 03/07/84 REMARKSt CLOSED IN REPORT-5(P329/83-081 50-330/83-08 i CHANGES TO DATA 7 _--__YES _-_-_NO DATE REVIEWED __ _-/_ -__ /__-____. OFFICE C00RDINATOR'S INITIALS ___--___ : 4
- i
)i i .
M' -- W'< e e-+ *4.,,,y, .,.,,, , , ,
ametemar A ,m FORM u.s. NUCLUA AEGUMTO1Y COMMIS$10h tim) ALLEGATICN in.iroci.ons on D,sv.TA RECElVING OFFICE Docket Nurnber (if applicable)
- 1. Facilitylles) involved: (Nom.l -
ov - .is.n geners, wrn.t GEN . d(RIC) MLAd 4dir #/ 0 5 0 0 0 3L1 9 M ALMA M<r o 0 5 0 0 0 3 S O , l -
- 2. Functional Areals) Involved:
Icheck .ppropri.ie boite.i s operations onsite health and safety construciton offsite health and safety
- _ safeguards d emergency preparedness other (specifyl 3.
Description:
itmi io im en.e.ci.,. Ic. lo l#le Ic.lf. In is l IAle I&lA lAIA II In Irrl I AI I I I I I If IRlelVI floldI lk'lklcl I/ IdlsIfle kIrl; loin l I1 Il!OIPlo lRlfl lo l#l 12lf Ic.lkl.1 I I I l- 1 I I l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l1l l l l l- l IIIIIl l
"""~ """
- 4. Source of Allegation:
(Check .ppropri.t. be.: _ contractor emp!oyee security guard l _ licensee employee _ news media j - NRC employee I private citizen l organization tspecifyl CAP / rhr/t2 Aromuzd, . . .. other 16pecityl ifnT "M/f"T MM DD YY
- 5. Date Allegation Received:
- 8. Name of Individual triest two iniiial. .nd i.it nom ) _ ' - SO _
Receiving Allegation:
- 7. Office:
l ACTION OFFICE l
- 8. Action Office
Contact:
int : two tnaties. .nd i..i n.m.i b, O. M Mld
- 9. FTS Telephone Number: '
3 3 - 5 5 8 5
- 10. F 6tus:
tc .,ct one Open,if followup actions are pending or in progress Closed, if followup actions are completed MM- DO YY
- 11. cat. Cios.d:
l l itE*o'"Ees.,.ci.,,, IElSlfltlhlA 17l(lol IclolnlPlt lelvlfl lol 10la lTlE l IC l Islol-Iflfl. I- 1 I l 1 I -l I I I I I I I I l--l l Office Year Number 1'3. Allegation Number: R $ I r -13
- o / 3 7 19c Rmarno d//$f .%r re, #f f/4/M -n n g arfe sg.,aquo aywagw,s,,
, . - ~ . . . - . . - . . ~ . _ , , .. ~ , _ . , . , , , , - . . ~ , , , , , , , _ ~ . . . - - - . , _ , . , . . - - - - - . ~ - -
, ,,- .- .-#,. . , . ~ ,
- r l 4 . . %
p t*3 has ogetgO sfATES Attechmsnt A A ,oi '
.,, NUCLE A9 RtGULA10RY COMMi$$10N I? e Mioso*d 111 l),e '
I 769 Poost vt L1 MoAo oLew a ttyw,ILLiwoes sots?
.dVL 2 61983 l l
l Docket No. 50-329 Docket No. 50-330 1 l Ms. Billie P. Garde, Director _ Citizens for Accountable Government Government Accountability Project Institute for Policy Studies 1901 Que Street : Washington, DC 20009 Dear Ms. Garde in the interest of providing a fresh und independent assessment of the adequacy of the Zack Company's construction activities at Midland, the Region III Administrator directed the Region's Division of Engineering 6 to conduct a thorough inspection of site HVAC construction activities
- including the concerns brought to our attention by former ecployees.
Accordingly, vd have begun the onsite inspection of Zack's activities and the detailed review of the pertinent affidavits which were provided to us by CA7 so that an onsite inspection of these concerns can be con-ducted where appropriate. One of the affidavits we are reviewing is a response to an investigation conducted by Region III personnel which is documented in Report No. 50-329/80-10; 50-330/80-11. The affidavit was filed with us prior to the issuance of. Report No. 50-329/82-15; 50-330/82-15. This report documents the results of the follow-up of open items from Report No. 50-329/80-10; 50-330/80-11. W believe that Report No. 50-329/82-15; 50-330/82-15 addresses the substantive technical issues expressed by the affiant, and are enelosinE a copy of this inspection report with the request that you cake it available to him for review. If after reviewing this report the affiant still has unresolved issues, then.ve would like to meet with hic to discuss his specific concerns. 1 f h 9 u nowo 3' '
R,
, o, ,
.'~ -
y
, i Hs. Billie P. Carde - 2-6 d
Plasse advise Mr. Duane Danielson of this office at (312)932-26101.f you ' are unable to contact the affiant er if yet, have any questions regarding this letter. We appreciate your cooperation in this anatter, j . Sincerely, . 04rlLIDd LIS UCd bY b
- L' $ N IIF
. R. L. Spessard, Director Division of Engineering Enclosures Report Nos.
- 50-329/82-15 50-330/82-15 ..
cc w/o ancle Consurars Power Company A2TN Mr. James W. Cook . DMB/ Document Control Desk (RIDS) Resident inspector, RIII The Bonorable Charles Rechboefer ASLB t ne Honorable Jerry Barbour, ASLB The Honorable Erederick F. cowen, ASLB The Bonorable Ralph E. Decker, ASLB Willias: Patony ELD Michael Miller Ronald calien, Michigan Public Service Commission Myron H. Cherry , Barbara Stamiria Mary sinclair Wendell Marshall Colonel Steve J. Cadlar (P.E.) Bovard 14rin (TERA) Lynne Bernabai, Government Accountability Project t O
-- - .-+n--e- ,,,,,4 q ,.w--meemm - mg.m-,e-9 -1,g p. .my 9 ey -p -s y ,,m- --w,,, y p-,- y ,- m -y -p- g -- ---w-+4 4 4
r-H-1246110 RUN DATE 04/03/84-ALLEGA T ION T R A CK ING SYST EM DATA DASE REVIEW / UPDATE SHEET DATA AS OF THE END OF MARCH 19H4 ALLEGATION NUMBERI RIII-83-A-0138 FACILITY /DOCKETt M!OLAND 1 05000329 MIDLAND P 050003301 FUNCTIONAL AREAt CONSTRUCTION DESCRIPTION: CONCERNS REGARDING A PREVIOUS NRC INSPECTION REPORT ON ZACK, SOURCE: ORG - GAP (7/15/R2 A'FFIDAVIT) DATE RECE1VED: 07/1b/82 PERSON RECEIVING: JG KEPPLER 0FFICE RECE!VINGt R3 r ACTION OFFICE CONTAcit JJ HAtRISON i FTS PHONE NUMBER - - 388-5635 . , STATUSt CLOSED DATE CLOSED: 03/07/84 REMARKS CLOSED IN REPORT- 50-329/83-088 50-330/83-08 i CHANGES TO DATA 7 ____ YES _____NO DATE_ REVIEWED __ / _ _ ./ - -
- OFFICE C00RDINATOReS INITIALS ________ -
l-4 b
=
-ww 3-
P hac rum m . s s. NutttAn atoutAtonY COMWS$10N W'82) ALLE2ATl3N Ir::truct vns onDATA F.ORM
#2rette 660 RECEIVING OFFICE Dt. ket Number (if applicable)
- 1. Facility (ses) Involved:
of ma.e tv n t u a e.n.,.c. - ,i. c u m ..ci (Nem.)j
//, lap] A (/M i f n' / 0 5 0 0 0 3 e2. 9 N / $ lifAl$ UAl i r #.2- .
p_ 5_ Q. O O 3 3 0
'~""
- 2. Functional Ares (s) Involved: I onsite health and safety (Check opproprote t,oitest ) operations _
construction offsite health and safety _ safegur22 emergency preparedness other tspeelfy) 3.
Description:
I tlo IdlL lt lait \ls l IRIEl6l A l 4Lld I I In l(el 12 l Alc Ik l l I n- i. a che,.et.,.' IMIMIdNILI , R lulRicl A14 is le I lol Aldle la is I ,I lalM leW.lo krl AIMIf l Inir/111 1(da lal Al/lolc.I III If lelRIG lo ldl Allelt.l lelul Al bl ilFI f lel Alrl / l olA/lsic l
- 4. Source of Allegation:
tcheck sporopriate boni J . contractor employee security guard _ licensee employee _ news media
- NRC employee private citizen organisa tion (speci,,, 6SP (7//S/937 Are:mourr)
_ other (specity) /T [t [ ,i,* 'r #~ 'v6 v i i MM DD YY
- 5. Date Allegation Received:
g ,
- 6. Name of Individual triest two inittels and is.: nemet bbSN Receiving Allegation:
- 7. Office:
ACTION OFFICE
- 8. Action Office
Contact:
(nr.: two initisi and ie. nom.: .b. b' ki N
- 9. FTS Telephone Number:
g g g , gg g g
- 10. Status:
tcheck onei
%. Open. If followup actions are pending or in progress Closed,if followup actions are completed MM DD YY
- 11. Date Closed:
- 12. R l l
; g;, ;7 ;,;y;, ; ,, ,,, ; ;c j,,,; g;,, ,, ;7;,;,9,; ;g ,, y ,7 ;
}) l
)
C,rk n,,,,,,,,, IGI-Islol-Irlfl. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- 13. Allegation Number:
R1 1 r ~
? 3 'A' O I y 0 zee n .. . //s h D , n do //s/M w.rwr. daz- w ma-uv .<.rme. ,,_ _ _ . - . . . . _ . . .
. . , . --w.. e . . - - ,}}