Text

Nonconformance Rept for June 1976.Rept Consists of Bechtel Nonconformance Repts,Nonconformance Rept Log & Status Book, QA Discrepancy Repts,Quality Audit Findings & Mgt Corrective Action Repts Written or Closed During Month
	ML19329E915
Person / Time
Site:	Midland
Issue date:	06/30/1976
From:	; CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
To:	;
Shared Package
ML19329E912	List: ML19329E911; ML19329E915;
References
	NUDOCS 8006180767
	Download: ML19329E915 (163)
	v • d • e

{{#Wiki_filter:..,. NONCONFORM ANCE - REPOR.1' LOG & STATUS BOOK it ,k REPORT DATE UN ' ~ ~ - ' PAGE COMPL. ~ #'O:~'Y *

1. PROJECT NO.

7220 G.C. ENG. Sl 3. 4. 5. STATUS '4CR ORIG. NONCONFORMANCE PREPARED BY NO. DATE DESCRIPTION / REMARKS 6.

7. DATE 8.DATE

9. D A TE 10.

ROUTE XMTD RETO CLOSED CLOSED BY l 376 2-4 D.L.Osborn 1 2nR. v1yn =h Tn ce vennunnry, m e n + 1,, " Vibid 2-19 5/7/7( 5/28/76 E. R. Mbert -76 100 tons received w/o user test 1.105,1.205 = -+ -76 -76 377 2-5 E. Dutto n C-208. Concrete test frequency exceeded, .Fic1x1: 2-19 h-9-7( h-13-1 6 -76 Pour A(633. 25)a' 1.205 ?e-A-=71) -76 I). L. Osborn 378 2-5-70 R. A. Moray C-233A. F-3043 R elensn #12-Nol nnn Rtud e nr Field No 2-5-76 3-31 R. A. Moray Back-Up Plates have defective welds 1.202 2-5-76 -76 379 2-6 D. Martin M-1. Purification neminernli er onennd. icn B&W No 3 h-27-76 P. M. Pitts -76 found inside ASME 4.038 2-9-76 -76 2-12 2-25 E L. R. Albe rt 380 2-6 E. Dutton ~ 2 31 nnnn entn nn ving +cmpe r atur-c, pours PicRF -76 -76 -76 -76 A(633.25)a' & TT(606)a 1.205 =3=9=76 381 2-9 G. Depew C-50A. Liner Plate heat number discreDancy Field No 2-17 3 R. G. Lus sier f -76 1.109 2-9-76 -76 -76 5., 382 2-11 D.' L. Osborn C 111. T. inn r Pin en t ni n en n n n finir #1 vi a - Field No 2-17 2-27 D.L.Osborn h -76 -76 -76 65086" to 65186" 1.109 3-11-7( AN 383 2-11-N D. L. Osborn C-230. Half vard of hich slumn concr'ete- ' Fidrd 2'19 h nour -76 A (6 3 0. 75)a' 1.205 =C:12=70 -76 76 h-2g wt n.,5 e m-* 384 2-11 H. Boleen u in4A_ Pipe snools with shipninn anmngo Field.. 76 4 6-1-76 6-2-76 R. A. Moray (" -76 snd improper painting ASME 4.164,4.1 74 2.} C -cFcid 2 1" 385 2-13 R. A. Moray WFMC-1. Weld rod heat treatment temperatu[e 76 O -76, b-3029. ASME hl:3.,7f -76 -76 go = No 3 iS6 3-19 R. A. Moray M i n 6 tTane n c e rocnica withnut c /R nintos Fiel d 3-26 R.A. Moray E-20-76 76 -76 -76 welded on. ASME 4.131 54 387 Z-26 D. L. Osbo rn C-111. Penetration toleranen. Tinit #7 Pl o v. =rcicid 76 5-10 3-10 L. R. Albert -76 635'6". 1.109 T ~Bii36 T T 11 OC.G31 o.103 03/7 J Page 35 g

b ] b'^' ^ NONCONFORMANCE - REPORT LOG & STATUS BOOK n. REPORT DATE 'Y # Y" D 7 PAGE COMPL.

1. PROJECT NO'.

7220 o.C. ENG. SIGN STAWS NCR ORIG. NONCONFORMANCE PREPARED BY 8- ^ ^ nouTE "XMTu YE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION / REMARKS CLOSED CLOSED DY 388 2-26 G. Depew F c;n A Liner Plate heat number discrepancy Field No 3-4 3.-31 R. G. Lu s sie r 7g -76 -76 S8-1-U1 1.109 2-26-76 389 2-26 H. Boleen sM-1. CR nM sn evien st runturn cyH ndor anmno No 3-26-76 -76 ed @ off-loading N/A 390 2-27 H. Boleen M-104 A - Pipe snools with naintine and weld y elyl. 4 6-1-76 6-9-76 n. A. Moray -76 end prep discrepancies ASME[,i f[ 2.h76 76 l Field No 3-12 6 391 3-2 P. M. Pitts M-104A. Code Data Form and other document s 76 76 P. M. Pitts -76 for one spool ASME 4.164 3-3-76 3-16 9~ - f T 392 3-8 T. LIEB C-230. 'linetv dnv c on c ent n stronohte-I" -id- =26 -76 70 3-22 L.n. Albert _7g -76 A(599)m', A(612.5)d' l.205 3-8-76 D 4-6 R. G. Lu s sie r C-304. Embed C-6 not loc ated per DCN #2 F-t e,lg

193, 3 P. Neiswander C-287.

1.201 3-8 -76 -76 394 3-15 C-230. Flyash content. ticket 075072. Pou r Wid-- 3 ~ 'l 28-4-28 L. R. Albe rt E. Dutton -76 A '630. 7 5)b' l.205 4--J-5 W- -76 -76 395 3-22 R.A. Moray L1-10hA. Pipe snools with loose end closures Field No 3 -2-% n.,. Mmy -76 ASME h.164,h.174 3-22-76 76 s. 3-25 396 3-22 W.. Faulkner C 931. hhnm nmi ttpd. Any m dg 'A' linn unl1==hqh) 3-23 -76 h -76 pour. 1.203 h2M4 -76 74 7L 7_ g qsnm

d t, r; Lj -f.,b t' '

1 S 397 3-22 '6 E. Dutton C-231. Curinst temperture. Pour C(62h)a' FM h-2-76 h D. L. Osborn 1.205 a,etu-s 76 1-25 398 3-23 R. Revereza C-2 31. R ebar om7tted. Aux R1dn ' J ' Fi ' K 8 - Field- ~3-23-7 -76 -76 line walls 1.203 I-23-70 76 3-26 L.n. Albert C-231. Prenlaceme. t FIP signed-off for nour Field No 3-25 399 3-23 L. R. Albert n -76 A (63 0. 75)c', rescoped down to A(624)a' l.203 3-24-76 -76 -76 \\ page 36 H. PA oC-Gal AAo 103 0994 oCG" e 9

NONCONFORMANCE - REPOR LOG & STATUS BOOK u. REPORT DATE 7 PAG E COMPL. .C. ENG. SIGN

1. PROJECT NO.

7220 STA WS CR ORIG. NONCONFORMANCE PREPARED BY N O. DATE DESCRIPTION / REMARKS "'n ouTE xdro" 'ONb No^sEo CLOSED BY 3-3I 400 3-31 H. Boleen C-233A. Fabrications with imoroner welding Field No 4 A. L. Boulden -76 76 -76 1.201 3-31-70 h01 h-1-76 H. Boleen M 117. T.i nting nr vn1vnn vi+h vnn+. nn+na nn Field No h h receipt incpection ASMS Varie3 4-1-76 76 76 P. M. Pitts 4 R. G. Lu s sie r 402 4-2-76 R. Lus sie r r 1R. st ructn r,1 %,m 2 3 3 B3. c rack (d a nale Field no g_g_ clip. 1.201 4-2-76 76 tyy. 403 h-1-76 T. Lieb C-230.-Quality Verification Documents 73FC j-11-h; 9 -l ' 6 4-7/s L. R. Albert Submitted without G321D. Varies 6-3-70 No 4 4-16 D.L.Osborn 404 4 J. P. Betts 1-52. Cadweld rieeve nnnears to hnve been Field 76 -76 -76 c ut off. 1.104 4-6-76 h05 ' h-8 R. Hsndricks %92. Weldinc inck or fhnien. Ciranr C 1. Field -76 ~ ~ h.001 h-12-7(i Jnit #1 h06 h-13-76 L. P. Wehner C-10h. column it 3 31 & Py mininentna nt

vieht

5-7-76 6 617-0. 1.201 h43 '/6 76 h07 4-19-76 H. Boleen M-106. Unnyr Pnb chantn npprovna invol h 32L2 E n SuW 6-1-76 h.112 u h08 4-21-76 W. Pardee C-40A Dome T,iner Pinto Feat Number T)increpanc rField No 5-6-76 1.109 h-21-7t; 409 h-21-7ti R. Bennett C-110 Den mumn in T,inor pi n to ennt. Ai __',22-75 No 4-29 4-30 P. Dica rio . tela -76 -76 1.109 d10 4-21 N. S h.- w l C-2 33. Anchor b3lts without ASTM A-325 nuts 7.Tc321 5-3-76 -76 1.202 fr-96 74 Field No 6 h11 h-g-P 177 &-M-17A Imp-np n y, pipn spon1n coverines-4-26-76 ASME h.018 & h 028 l76 P. Pitts iAO.103 09/74 oc i) page 37

11. PA*

OC.G3-1 0-O O

-5 .) 'h NONCONFORMANCE - REPOR f LOG & STATUS BOOK 37 ' ' ^ ' HEPORT DATE FACE COMPL. 7220 0.C. ENG. SIGN

1. PROJECT NO.

f[NCR 3. 4 5 STATUS ORIG. OMMCE PREPARED BY NO. DATE DESCRIPTION / REMARKS g, 7,g,7, ,,g,7, ,,g,7, i n, ROUTE XMTO RETD CLOSED CLOSED BY 412 4-26 T. R. Lieb C -2 3 0. Flvash finenes s. User Test F:ield 4-29 .76 1.105, 1.205 4=27=76 -76 DEX 413 4-26 T. R. Lieb C-230. Batch Plant Cement Senins b rn1-n F:ipid 4-29 4-30-76 4-30-76 durinn enlibratinn 1_106-1.206 4 7L76 7A LM 7A cL7@ r a _A t h e,.* 414 4-29 R. A. Moray M 104 A. Documentntion and Cndo natn Field b 6 76 -76 Plate 2ea nipe spools. ASM F 4_13 6 3 4 24.7( 76 415 '4-29 H. Boleen M-106. Hangers fabricated and shipped w/o F:ield 5 -76 sketches being approved ASME 4.102. 4.1E 4"Z97L 76 6 416 4-30 A. L. Boulden ASME Section IIL Field Weld. Unit //2 Sumn. Eield '~ 76 -76 X-ray requirements violated ASME 4.134 4:3076 417 5-4-76 A. L. Boulden C -111. Unit lit Sump. weld in need of repair __ Field No 6 f after pressure test 4.128 3-4-76 76 F:ield 418 5-4-7C R. A'. Moray M-104 A. Documentation and Code Data 5 - 2 0 -70 6 4.192 h M6 Plate on pip.c_.apool s ASM F 4.164_ 4 _ 17 4,_, ~ 5-5-76 -76 . 419 5-4-76 H. Boleen C-233A. A nchor Rolt s rii m nn ei nnnd chn re MS No 5 - 2 4-76 1.102 5-5-76 FiI 420 5 76 H. Boleen M - 12 0. Valve taegine varies from document d No ~ ^ 7 marking on MO Valves ASME Va rie s 5-11-76 76 6-22 6 421 5 7( C. H. Nelson C-210. Ramn north of Auv R1dS m ni a tu r.' Field 5-21-7 i -76 '76 L. R. Alberts enntnnt hin,h _ 1 n n e. 6-12-76 422 5-10-76 P. W. Ratter M - 10 6. T.in n n r in d i e n ti n n e t-r.i n g a v- "' elds Field No 6 nn 4.102 76 c;_i a - ~ ' ' 6 6 423 5 7f P. M. Pitts M-104 Pipe Snonis Air quen,ho % t 76 76 P. M. Pitts @ivid 5-28 Water Quenched. 4.144 ASME E2 tt-74 7 /, ) tao.103 0904 Oc

11. par'c OC.G31

) page 38 s

NONCONFORMANCE - REPORT LOG & STATUS BOOK 12 REPORT DATE [ PACE COMPL. .. ENG. StCN

1. PROJECT NO 7220

/ 3. 4 5. STATUS [NCR ORIG. NONCONFORMANCE PREPARED BY NO. DATE DESCRIPTION / REMARKS 'nouTE d[o' NE ^ ctoseo cLosto av 424 5 P. M. Pitts M-104 : Pipe Snools Air Ouenched. not Water 12ivlx] 5 76 Quenched 4.104, 4.114, 4.134 54 % 76 76' 0-70 425 5 B. A. Moray F"C 16, Deeny Heat Rc=cv 1 h t-h hance perce I y 5 Nd76 76 precsure out of reg'ments ASts 4.101, 4.111 426 3-24-76 P. W. Ratter 10-lFCB-35-H3, Incorrect Fillet Weld 6 6-22 6 7A*1d -76 76 P. W. Ratter 4.102 5-2h-76 76 in d 1 427 5-25-76 L. R. Alberts C 07.5y--Robar--Heshc, E17. 65?'^ " "x-.--Pl'? c. 5-27-76 6-10 76 6 - 1.203 5-95-V6 76 L. R. Alberts & 6-18 428 6-2-76 P. M. Pitta 4106F ' F'ncer thteri ni carti f'i ention - Field -76 6-4-76 Amr vo r< e, h29 6-3-76 W. Faulkner C-231. Reinforcing Steel Slab Dovels 62h'0" Field 6 Broken 1.201 6-1-76 No h30 6-8-76 R. Hendricks M-10hA, Pine Spool tarming, crool misidentifier Eicad 6 76 Asta 1.114 6s8=74 431 6-10-7 5 P. M. Pitts M-10hA. Pipe snool Documentation without MS 6-10-76 shon trnveler ASfE h.16h 6. h32 6 c-pal c,avel a nnl i c A Tw < nc m la L. R. Albert b 76 76 1.10h and 1.20h 433 6-11-73 M. E. Foote C-231 Dovels exceedinn ' accented tolerancec E h l:d 6 76 c. 4 9. r.h o Ach'n" , on,

my h3h 6 M. E. Foote C-231.

Incorrect rmacinre of devels. Aux. Blde F4c-11 6-23-76 5.6 line vnll e 62h'0" 1.201 E55Tf field 435 6 M. E. Foote C-211. Incorrect spacinr of dovels. Aux. Bldg 6 11 76 go 6 23-IS ' n ' u n<> uM 1 e 61h 'O 1.203 76 g =AO-103 09/74 QC

11. P e OC.G3-1 g.

g rese 39

NONCONFORMANCE - REPORT LOG & STATUS BOOK 12. ,/ REPORT DATE _g./ PAGE CoMPL.

1. PROJECT NO.

7P23 O.C. ENG. StGN 3. 4 5 ~ .NCR O R IG. NONCON FORT.1ANCE STATUS NO. DATE PREPARED BY DESCRIPTION / REMARKS EMTo No ' bo^s'$o' ' ' CLOSED BY ^ route C 7 436 6-11-- Ic 3. yoote c21 ._,3,Dow ls do not match to slab, Aux. Bldg. Field No 76 76 'G' Line vall F 632'6" 1.203 p.g 6-29 7 437 6 11. Boleen " leh. 0-301-9 mt recar~1 ritw P ELL'- 6-14-7c No -76 76 H. Boleen 76 ASME 4.185 438 6-14 R. S. Mo r r ow W 104A_ incorrnet info on ende antan1nte [ igd No 7 -76 76 6 _ for pipe spool IHBC-17A-S'Y,.(a ASME' 4.164 76 M-104 A. Pipe spool delivered w/o venturi h-[5 ld 439 76 R. S. Morrow assembly lHBC-123-S616-B-2 ASME.164 76 l 440 A W. M. Pardee r_mna Heat Number discrepencies on Field Ilo 6 16 Slabh8 HT# 81989 --76 1.109 76 441 6 II. Boleen M - 12 0. Incorrect PO Item # on Valves [_iNd 7-2 _q 9 76 H. Boleen 76 ASME c:N i;2n A ni 1 17 2 nci 5206 01-1-13 442 6-15 H. Boleen M - 12 9. G-321-D not traceable to 83 MS -76 valves ASME 6-17-76 443 ( L. R. Albert C-231. Missing Dowels. Aux. Blde. at Wall Field 7 -h-6 53 & Kc Line. El. 623'3" & (PA'3" 1.203 No 76 C-231 444 6 L. R. Albert Lack of Reinforcine Diac. Bars on 76 Figid-Wall 53, 'H' Line wall, El. 630. 75 ' 1.203 76 445 6-16 R. S. Morrow M-106. Hangers fabricated to not-approved Pg~ -76 Drawing s. ASME 4.112,4.lc 76 446 6-17 II. Boleen M-104 A. No documentation for 26" wrapped MS No 6-29 -76 & coated, piping 20' Inths ASME 4.192 6-17-7( -76 Field -104A. No documentntinn* cap $6, E,4 192 447 6-17 H. Boleen. M ic l.mgm 6-18 nd coating for 24"&26"Fittingo -76 176 ) \\o.103 00/74 11.P O C.G3-1 T pa~n h1 I

J ) NONCONFORMANCE. REPORT LOG & STATUS BOOK it REPORT DATE Y' PAGE COMPL. ' O.C. ENG. SIGN

1. PROJECT NO=

7220 NCR 'O R IG. NO. DATE PREPARED BY NONCONFORMANCE STATUS DESCRIPTION / REMARKS 6- $^[" "' NIf, I s^=. '~ nnis er 8 t 9 ' '* / 448 6-21 P. M. Pitt s M-104A. Documentation for IHBC-133-S616-6 Field -76 7-6 misidentified ASME 4.164 76 6 Ff-106. Incorrect Deh'. sent with llanner 449 76 R. S. Morrow 12-1CCB-25-Ill4 ASME 4.102 76 Dug. Field 450 6 M-106. Tncorrnet R n v. nna nocheni Ancrovn1 76 R. S. Morrow level 4 sent w/ Ilangers ASME 4.102,4.112, f"- ~ D' 4.162 451 6 __F-10hA. Vanturi i noH m fmm nmn1 76 H. Boleen 2HBC-123-S617-8 AS?5 4.17t 76 i 452 6 M-lo6AC. PipeHanger 18-lHBC-133-H6 rabricatet Field 6-28-7 i 76 R. S. Morrow to a Bechtel level 4 sketch ASIS 4.162 453 6 'M-lo6AC. Incorrect Dug. Rev. cent with 6Nf6 I 76 R. S. Morrow ASME I:I 1h' II:1 h 4.2 41 m 454 6 $1-204. Incorrect stamping of 26" yard {,"24_ d J. R. Behres No 7 7 76 J. R. Behres 76 piping.. ASME 4.192 76 76 455 6-24 U.M. Pardee C-lll. Heat Kumber rliserepancy on Domo T,i nar-Field -76 Plate ascemblies 1.10 9 6-24-76 456 6 C-Ill. Shop Assembly Untraceable to Field 76 W. M. Pardee Documentation Htl/21302 Slabl/10

1. 10 9 6,-g 457 6-28 W. M. Pardee M 120. T.inea r indientions fannd on 16" Vnive Field

-76 S/N 3 N-64'l 'ASME 4.164 6-28-76 458 7 I ld M - 10 6 A C. Wrong Dwg. Revs. on Hangers 7, y", 76 R. S. Morrow fab, to level 4 dwp.s. ASME 44.102'44. 112 177

191 76 Field 459 7 M-10 4 A. G-321-D not submitted. swnnnn1nt, 76 H. Boleen not capped.

ASME 4.192' 7-6-76 %AO-103 0944 oc g Page 41

11. P/

OC.G3-1 y c

,\\.- NONCONFORMANCE REPORT .s ,, 4 f or 7 38h da

2. O N A ws NG /PA R T No.

F. PR OJECT No. I R f v. e t. R E Po RT E D.Y l' D ATE 7/////. 7220-M-201- !6 7220 //,ndhts.:t. --_/

25. DisPoseTION CONCuM NE NCE

-- - ' -l "M - '~~- A I' -"7' l -~ >.rc = ocsco.Pr o I' ..., = to e. v.o M ...v',, in., i o.v > ~ ...h..o.p_E,.n.b.r.ic a te d P i p e_S pn a 1 = Q(' Hald Aran S .I 'b E'.N N.....Pa...'.P..... ul.,.d W I' G < u .......P......No. ............ q... --s See Blo k No. 19 N/A N/A .. Pu nco...c 'l2@dQ,,, j",(6 y) f -f - g., onoca No. ...ocrieto.NsPacv.oMPo.N o. , T, ... acroa ccur r se niat No. 7220-M-104A-AC Rev. 2 M-104 A-R-19 Rev. O M/A L[,,L'1["* ""*M" '~A'-""/_Q""* ~1 !. .. con, n acro nitoc ar.o M G ves ..souncc p, ITT Grinnell/Kernersville, S.C. gaouve to recto cNameca.No ~ Supplier ,, c o O No ... ocu r. G ms,.uc r.o Ns, o aouve ro marea.. suP nv o. 9 9. NaNCoNFoNMING CoNDIT oN r FlM C-5 Rev. O Para. 3.3.4/a/3 - States in'part: " Preliminary Inspection: This inspection s;.:'l be to ascertain freedom from the followinn: 3) Environmental damane water or oil marks, damp conditions. _ dirty areas. or salt film (indicating expose to sea water or winter road salt chemicals). 4) Tie down failure __ Shif ted, broken, loose or twisted shipping ties, and worn material under ties, indicating improper blocking and tie down durinn shipment." 9 Continued on Page No. 2 30. Q FtELD OfSPostTtoN Ov'r'a arco ="cao^r'oa/aour. 'o raceccr cac'atra'aa a' r'c'o o'5Pos'rica arsut.75: 'M al d racerxacndr "I'sc An-Is" r.ontamination of.-pipe hy_ucather_.and ulator vnnd r nn. ditions was on the pipe coating and has been washed off by recent heavy rains. Loos ( tie dowsm rubhed the shon coatine and did not nenetrate the mill coatinn. Pines witj loone.-caps-and-f4anpe-covern-h#.ve4een-openedr inspected,--socurod-and-acaled.-- The snools identified as "Not Painted" were painted over 95% of their surface area. (pant 3) 2 2. 8 NG.NC t' RING DISPoStiloM Bechtel Shop __I_nspect; ion verifics each load has been properly 2 2. ENGINE E RING Ds5POSITBoN RE $ubTS: tied down for shipment prior to release. Loose tie downs, flange covers, and ,, /g,p,,gjj{[n.7/,/,7, .,f n. / end caps,_resulting _Crom sh.ipment_do_no.t;...affe_ct_ acceptability _of this material. /YN'/I?J.5/&Nuhw,'.duee/$'n.4%#d<} _. Engineering concura with field disposit_ ion of all items. bMr N h /f /;G/,-8 n.hw ~~ n) kaL&na 4 a p

24. IS DESIGN CHANGC ptEoulMCD 2.. REJECTED M AT ERt A L DISPoSITIoM

O **"**'* "A"

27.O P [sh O....,,.. o. 4.. p 3 SPEC. R E V. A D O. _.e 5 009B 9 White Copy - Originator GC-G a 2 Corsery Copy - Field Erigineer ' Pink Copy - POAE Goldenrod Copy - OC er e 9

NONCONFORMANCE REPORT (CONTD) .. ra c c.2_o,,_,3 3L ....c '

Blb'ditllo_._19_ Continued.

Z220-K-201_lQ1_Pav_,_6_Eara _fuh l_S_ub__Se_c._b_._ States in part.1 "A merni cha11 be_placed over_back_ opening-enn and sealed to the R pe with at least 3_ passes of sealing rape." Para,_fb_6,_3 - S.tatts_in_part:.. " Carbon _ steal i flanges shall be scaled with metal or non-metallig.Ji.sA_holted_t.o_the_ flange." Para._6..II 6 - States in pare- "All external surf aces _of_. carbon steel p_ip_ing_a.sAemb. lies _except_nachined_ surfaces._shall he_giaten one shop c of priner af ter the ends have been scaled. GILnne.ll_ Spec,lS _12.36-4._lUl_5 - S_tarcs_in_part: "The_ s urface_shall_b e_ grit _ hlas ted_to_ncar_ white __methiraducing a surface free of all oil,_ grease, dirt,_ visible mil _1__ scaleu _usty_corto.sion_ products._ oxides p aint_or_.any_ foreign r matter." Contrary to the above the following was found: F_ILM G 5]_0 vTu c-5/n FIM c-5/0 M-2.0_lf2 M_201/2 M-20U2 crinna11 spar-3.3.4/a/3 3.3.4/a/4 %.L 4ht/.4 6.6d/n 6.6 3/n 6.It.6 9%1236-4/_III/5 Contamination Loose _Tip Worn _ liar. Loose Toose Fi g- 'Nor flo.t_Blas_ted nowns Under Tigs c ps cavnrs Pninte.d a 2-IIBC-131-S_6_17-9-2 X X X Y 1_.@C-135-S_617-6-1 X X X X_, X 2-HBC-135-S617-6-2 X X X X X 2-IIBC-12 3-S 617-6--4 X X X X X X 2-IIBC-135-S617-8-3 X X X X 0-IIBC-50-S617-7-2 X X-X X y X 0-IIBC-50-S 617-7-3 X X X X 2-IlB_C--131.S6.17-2-3 ___X ~X X__ X Y x 2-IIBC-131-S617-7-4 X X X X l-IIBC-131-$616-9-1 X X X X X l-IIB C-131-S616-7-2 X X X X X ,' 1-ilBC-12.3-S61.6--6-6_ x

x x

v X l-IIBC-135-S616-6-4 X ~ X X X X Noted duripjg _recc.ivinQspecti.on., Unit #1, ' 2 & Common. 13__QQJ!old_Tagsupp_ lied._ "0" Ho 4.164 4.174 f eces a /j ym c.n.,v copy - Fi.io onein, Whit. Copy - Orig lnator p[e Pink Copy - PQAE y eo,..n.c.c... - oc er e 9

r 2 48 o.c 3 t 'r

c 1 o

u t n s f n r e a-t i u d c o s o a ~ n o c ) T. p. ' e g t e s r d s a d i e e e u v r t q o a r e r e r p e l p r,* h g/- a t a T o n n n ' 3' e o f-c s i i ' s. e b. e s k o i c s d v 9G 3 u a e mb h h R c 9 t r i g t r e h r. MS M o i w t s p l n p p 0 e I G u p 0 m[H I s u 5 e R S 1 r O e i uS h x u g t . o q [8 ) n l e D h o a r t i r T i s r t N w o e s wf r f a O t r l C c o h b ( d'N a c t T t i t R n f w i O A o o r c d g P e e E n c t e R i n a h e o t E s d c C a i e N w v p t e o a ) A e h n M p o s i g i n m R p e i O s r l F e i a e N h t e s o O r l t C e e o N r h o 6 O e t p 3 h S 2 N-w d 1 n s a S i e ~- g r P d n u e i t t t u c n a f e i o p a c e s p h l t d t l e o i n s n m i iv a y d e e b e r r t ~ a d n s ~ e i a e t a h 6 h c p 7 T e l t y l 5 o l e r e n 3 d p t n e e i n o u e l r o n r p C i a m g t o n n d c i o e n r c t e o e n r i e 0 i a t n b2 a a i g p s r g )f. k l a n c p o p e o o o e f .l h p r y B s s p b g i I ll1llll11 1

( NONCONFORMANCE REPORT ' "^ 2 E i

u. N CR NO.

OF _ _) 2 D R A V.G G/PA R T NO. I R C V.

7. PR OJ ECT NO.

I 2. R CPO R T E D Y. DATC 2 5. DISPOSsTION CONCUR RE NCE _.3220-lPal !6 7220 M ds !'?// N "~" j "y "

3. BTE M O E SCRIPT SON 0, IT E M LOC ATION f 3(val,40A TED BY. -

IbATE . Rhnn_F.ahricate? Pipe _Spnols OQ_Xold_Arqa F4 ~UOb M +...JRI AL NUMBER UI

9. ST ARTUP SYSTEM NO.

f 15S. IPL ACEM E NT PA t' R E V. T NO. emb e ct e n.Le * *=c e ,g.cy4'* =m, _ Gee Block No_._.19 H/A yA

a T Et

_ g n. 7a IJ. PU RC H A S E O R D E R N O.

l 9 0. Q C FIELO INSPECTION Pt.A N NO. _-o IG. REPLACEMENT 3ERI AL NO. A-AC. g {g. [fe-/ a _.7220-E-10h, LOC ATiONRav-1 M-10hA-E-21 Rev. O N/A " y*_ _ _ a 7,g,,, } ""f?" ( "{,"y -

e. CONTR A CTOR g YES ir.SOunCE si.ASuE y

,_JT'LGrinnpllm Kep).ersv111_e. I! orth Carolina erEu O NO Supp,1ier 9 8. ROUTING INST R UCTION S: 110 UT E TO FlE LD ENG tH EE RING C ROUTE TO M ATErtI AL SUPERVISOR 8 0. N'i NCO N FO R MING CO NDITION: vTM c c' Rov. O Pnra 34h /a/3 - State _s in part: " Preliminary inspection: This' inspection chall hn +n n.nnytnin freednm from the follow _ing;__h)__ Tie Down Failuro - Shifted, broken, loose or twisted chipping ties, and unrn nntnvini under_tica._.indisatfpse impr_oper blocking and tie down during shipment." 7220-M-201-Q,Rev. 6 Para 6.6.3 - --States-in-.partdarbon_ateel ri n_ngnn nhn11 hn with mntn1 or non-metnllic disc bolted to the flange." Para 6.6.6 - States _ __ i n 7,v+. "All nytornni nurfnnnn nf carbon steel DipiDg_ Assemblies except machined surfaces shall be given one chon o --A nc nwiP,nv.,rtov nnan hnve been sealed." Continued on Page No. 2 Zw. ] F E LO'OlSPOSITION QFIELD RECOMMEND ATION/ ROUTE TO PROJECT ENQINEERING

21. FIELD DISPOSITION RESULTS t Fiald recorECDds "Une nm is".

T.nnse rio anuns vnhhna rho shon onnrino nna did nne nanetrate rho mill ennrino. Thn rinnon nnunr h,c kann npened,. 49enec gg,na found s ' ticfactory,-socur <d e _ and sealnd. T'nine nn nnd nron fc,ccumnd rn ha._denynl umin s en. Fnninnoring 42 rnnucatnA to evaluate Crinnell's end nren continn and. if acceptable, revise specifications to include co, tinn. Tr enntino is nnt acceptable notify Crinnell to discontinue its use and conform (continued p.3)

22. EMCs N E E RING DISPOSIT TON Bechtel Shop _ Inspection _verifles each load _has_been_ properly _ tied _down_for_sbipment_.pri_or to 2 3. ENGINEERING Ot5 POSIT 10N H ESU LTS:

_rfel_e_a se. Worn coatings and' loose flanne covers resulting from shipment do not affect M.m en],1],y.%/ w 1. f J d~ J __accep.tability_.of this._ material Engineering _concurn with fieldl isposition_for_. cad _pr_ep rnu p.ksh I M4(. d 8/c p. 4 1- ._ ds.viations. Surface _preplatio_n requirements for application of Ferralox 1500 has been hfg//w/[r(, fjffj,p/r M. [-e. r resolved as noted. Engineering concurs with use of deoxaluminate application to end preps. [7p /f-/2gr, jjsJhd_d _ and will revise M-201 accordingly. 'Nk-A f k.8,,r. /II#[h[/N

29. 83 DESIGN CH ANGE REQUIRED ' ]

2%. R EJECTED M ATERI AL. DSSPOStTSON O a nwaa'o =ve*'asa Ted l**

27. O Y ES. SEE ATT ACHEDI

,g / f DRAWING REV. DCN DLw ~ %PEC. R E V. - - 8 ORIGINATOR

~ NONCONFORMANCE REPORT (CONT'D) .. nc e_2 _o r 3_ ,,,,c,,' u o, OM -Block-Nov-19-Continued. _ Span-799n-N-47_3dev _lt Tno chnrt nn page 8 of_9_shown_that_ standard wall _ thickness will use_ Type 2 373 bevel yna pmparation.__End_ preparations _.do__no3_ hay _o_3he_ require _a_1/16" 1.and. _QIinn. ell _. Spec. PS-1_236-h III_l$ - States in part: "The curface shall be grit blasted to near white metal _, producing surface _.fr.e_e._o.f_all_ oil _,_gre_ase, dirt, vi.sible_ mill scale, rusty corrosion products, oxides, paint or any foreign a ..mntier " C ontrary_t o _the_ahove_the._foll oxing_nondition a_M cIe_.JQ1tntis vm n-5/0 M-201/6 crinnell Spec-MG3/4 M201/6 13dL/_n/h 6d,_3/_a PS-1M6-h/III/$ Pg. 8 of 9 6.6.6 (Contingn)._Hom %ti T.none F1g Not_.111 antea Wela Pna Pnint on ITndor Pics Cover Prep. End Pren. __lrEC-131-S616-7-3 x X X 8 __1.--HD C-131--S616-l! x X X 1 -m l h1 -3616-8-3 Y x X 1-HBC-12-3-S616-8-1 X Y Y Y __.1-EC-12hrE616-6-1 X X X 1 -BBC-1 PIr-3616.It-P X X X. 3-MC-126S.616-6 1 X X __2--HBC-136-S617-6-1 x x 9-HBC-l?.1-8617-6-1A X X 2-HB.C-12h-S.612-6-1 X X X 6 _ 2-HBC 1).1-S617--8-3 x X X X _0 HBC-50-.S617-7-h Y Y Y Y Hoica dnving_ receipt innpcclion,_Vni.t_l,_2.,_.and comcton. l1 QCJ old Tags Applied. "Q" No. h.1_6h,_hd]h g8>e. 4 h /

W W

ORIGINAL

_e 3 _3Y' G 0 C. ' 9 5 - J 3_ o. n , n y e_ e r n e. d ~ a f s r d 7 s u e e s v ( c o - e a r8 n r p f p f n n Y i n o n v o 1 l 6 i ne P s / 9 r a n i n n v j s-d e e c n 't t o 8m a e c c e r p t u L s h n A n c e 6 N i i m b e I e u r G u#J b i I R 0 l 0 q O .P l 9 e i 1 r w ) D r t s n s 'T ? p i a N e n l O y r b J> n r C o t ( d P i T n r. R e h a O t f i e P o w t E d R p d n p n i E

i. e m

C t n i N he n lc A y o_ M c p O I. ir h R d_ 0 1 c F o c. N n s t 4 i O fi v C n e N p r 'f O N 6 P ne (2 e g_l 6 n s a i a r d h_ a 1 c n 6 (* 3 6 2 d 1 n .y n 9 e 6 P. p D 7 u 1 5 Q r c e 2 i c. '4 f p s n f n o n l t l 3. e e e n n n f i n r . T d_ t. f e e r e u e C n nh i t g it n n t n a n e_ c o v_ 0 nt i h i t 2 e n '1 c r i J k o a c r p o n t e d I n r n 2 J-e n e 8 9 = 0 0 1 j

- 1,, NONCONFORMANCE REPORT ' " ^ * '

2. D S" aeM-f" ^ ^ ^: 2 sRCV.

7. PR OJ E cT NO.

Or 9 391 I 2. R E POR ED sv 3 __E Jf. 7220-M-10hA !4 N/.*b DATE

25. oISPOsITION CONCUR RENCE 1220 n *,f.

-W

3. TEu otscR PTiON

" " ' " l ~ " _y. rpgycfgbef S. iTEu loc 4 TION pl* ,o.,v '.D4 T E D.y i __ Fabricated Spool -QNIcAd-Areer D TC ^ h/# de. I[.~ !5 2 N# [b s. -?' r ' ".

c. (EReau NunaCR

.. sT ant uP s ysTEu NO. jREv. .....c,.... %. .s: nEPeacEuCNT P4R 1-HBC-135-S616-6-4 N/A Y N/A' NO on

c. Pu;.cN asE OR DE N NO.

s o. Oc r EtD.NsPEcTiON Pt.N NO. 1 7 l'(* y' )"."(lg y.<-[U % is. REPoacEuENT sER 46. NO. 7220-M-10hA-A0 N/A N/A .'- > = = ' ' = = = = " - * - "*

e. cONrRacTORicOc^" "ITT Grinnell Industrial 6Ii.^.... f.h-

d. '*

Piping Inc., Kernersville, North Carolina "^5"", D "5 coo .T E u O No Supplier B S. R$ UTf MG INSTRUCTIONS hRO UT E TO F8E LD E NGIN EERIN G O aOuTE TO M^TERia'suPEavisOa t s. N s NCON FORMING cONDITfDNt Form C-321-D BlhCk Ph (Ref. P. Q._7220dI-10hA-AC) ntaten " Thin fnm nna tho onnlity verrientinn T)ocumnn t n vnferenced horeon hnve been recalynd nna thniv vnlatinnnhip in ihn hnraunra itomo vnvicina_n nnntrnvy +n +hn __.. nhnvn tho fnll owing. Onnl i tyJeri ficn_ti nn T)ncumenta unro nnt ihrninhnd by TTP Qvinnn11 Tn ann tvi ni Diping Tnn. fnv pipn_gpogi __No. 1-HBC-144-S616-6-h: 6 2.. Og tcLD Dispos T io" OFIELD RECOMMENDATION / ROUTE TO PROJECT ENGINEERING f'ontinund nn pn ren 9.

21. FIELD DISPOSITION RESULTS:

Route to Field Pr_om r_Cnent S.upervisor, Field Procurement Supervisor to obtain documentation from ITT Grinnell referred to in Block 19 above. .%cm.eeA//_.s- /2/McA g ggg Y' efx M./ A lb Acc C M A4~ ar&1.s eaw

22. MNGIN EE RING D85PostTION

23. ENGINEERING OtSPOSITION RESULTS:

n 4L / (se etet CW4* d ff of A 27,.a 4 n .c.w a.t,,- uu i } $o /d le o fr 2 f - 7 6.. m,n.ntan,%2)., /' ,. % o @ f 2.d.<fr/ & c 1 w % Cf.f 4 4 k /

24. o oEs,GN cN*NGE REOuinc ONO

"^"'^'"'5" 5' U""#"'*""" O.vEs. SCC 4TracNCo. "' pg'yEggj g'_ ypfg g DR P. WING REV. DCN _ lQt.v% f f, fPEC.

{

REV. A D O.

l 1 9 3 4 o a c a i 2_ r a een f r i 2 r taE ogn a n E g id e igl A e r iOC t OFPQ a C_ y t p n b' o y C yp e A] poyd m d' 1._ oCpo 8.30 r /E C o u n yCe er c 7 3 / 0 it nk lo e d )D o 1 1 1 h ein D '/, WCPG T L s I-7k NO 1 C 1 s 2 u/ ( l_ 3 T o_ fl-R C O l P I E R Q" E CN A d M g R i O l_ F pp NO A_ C g N a O T N d_ s l_ t n r U ) o I p 1 e f aR P t R_ r n_ w o o e mpi i r a t v o R a e F c t i B_ E n f n I n t ei o o S i A T_ r i e t d t ( l X_ a e a a t u t t i l n n n rro e i e o e r m t m i t t n u e hn c o c R_ d C_ D_ o n C o L D_ ad t e d c 5 1 a i o n b_ if R_ i r o e t d u n i rl l D_ o e e d + c C W d e o l )' 1 l ) o 3 J a h c_ H_ -es o o g

a. ~8' NONCONFORMANCE REPORT ' ' " ^ * ' s Or ___? 395 ~2. n un.1 ra Gl.r.4J2.LJLD. H E V.

7. PR O J E C T N O.

lDATE I 2. R E p T A'

25. DesPOSIT EON CONCU H RENCE Seec. 7220-M-201 6

7220 A f I5/@'

3. sTEu oEsCRiPT GN

. T[D p S. IT EM LOC AT4ON I A'L _I D TE / ^ ..sTaRTUP.T,rc NO. W (b_ A V7A $.'t Y' Y w s m "f~HUS

c. < E s.

N e -- RPi e_.Sooolc QQJIa1LA a r TE <,.. E P. &,_ N T P A T N O. p. .............g... See Block 19 N/A N/A I O. PURCH ASE ORDER NO.

10. QC FlCLD $NSPECTION PL AN NO.

3 4. REPL AC EMENT SE Ro AL NO. (q. g

[ ~/.

7210-E-lQWL-AG Eqv._3 M-LOhA-R-23 "ter._0 M/A {'", "",'{Q'" 4;,yh. :- J*

. C NT R ACTO RfLOC47.ON q vEs i T. s6URCE ii.asuE 17.7 SdNNllaleJMIDXillt. JkIth CMoli_nn O N_O

nnpplin,

.T E u I 8. GOUTING SNST R UCTIONSe { ROU'*E TO FIE LD ENGIN EERIN G O ROUTE TO mat ERial supervisor

19. NONCO N FO*tMING CO NDtT ION :

Speci ficettinn ?ppo-M 201 Rov-6 pnrngrnph AJA_1 stnton in pnv+. na ma+n1 nnp ehn11 bo-placed over each openin!! and sealed to the pipe vi_th_At_least 3 pagacy of sealirig_ tape." Parncraph_6 1 3 staton in pnetr " Carbon steel flanges shall be sealed with metal or non-metallic diska bolted to the flange." Contrary to the_nbov3 the foll.cWing_. pipe-. spools hna InoncJapn nr l onnn finngn nnynrne Continunr1 nn Pnfo 9 er. C, e IE LO DeSPOS8710 N, QFIELD RECOMMENDAT&ON/ROUTC TO PROJECT ENGINEERING

21. FlELD OtSPOSITtON R ESULTS:

Subject spool. cud caps and flanne covera vill be inst ?cted. If the neal in annne.nd en d M Aj_$ UAYT f ,'s? >r l'-L'uc the e:: tent to allou forcinn natcrial to enter the interior of the nine. the ennn nr ' Ulv VlU tM /-1-2 /- or covers vill be renoved. cl e snool vill be insnceletLand cl onnrdbN#l'n

J/

T MtA '0 ' ' 9~6 x ,%v a nr i covern replaced in accordance uith specificatinn 7 ? 9(1-!r-701 unu r, n,v n prn,,h n rA 1 ud /'AU/ YdA'7" A d #M 6. {,. 3. Il the covers are loonc but the r. cal has not. heen viola [ed,'the caba or covers - / / //ve//'f'.,- saall bo secured an reonfreI by the abow. cuor i fi cn ei.n. e 4 /

22. ENGiNEcRiNG oisPOs T EON n

/ j.'

23. ENGINEERING DI5POdtTION HESULTS:

' s_s;s~ Yu- ') f/ff/~23 7/- M -2.T -7 5 ~ f ./

24. o oEsiGN CNaNGc REOusRE O NO

@ l(7 " ~~ 21 M c.% [^d N px.g O v Es. sE E 4T14CN Eo,. DRAWING

EV.

DCN M Q b .u veeomus p s.ses c woe l o.,'a SI E C. REV= A D D- .m... ORIGINATOR

59 3_ m I /t o o '? a ) ; a Wr cu u. 1 z , p g I g e f,' w, 9 d r a o h 2 n q a [p-t r t o n n f" )p, - n m n f t _f d lo H_ )D 'TN O C ( TR O P E R .h E 'f C 1 n s s s n s s s o N r r r r r r r r i A e e e e e e e t J M v v v v v v v d c 6 o o o_ o o o o n e R C C d C C C n p O C_. s F e e e e e e e h n g g gnhng g c 6 i N s n n n n_ n 1 d O p p a a a n a a n i t. C a al l l 1 l l 1 C F F F F F F F p N C_ J i O e c e e e a e e e n e N s s s s s r p s s o c o c o o o o g o o II e o a o o o o g o o r L L L L L L L L L O g_ 9 n i n v n n m d n a d c h 2 1 3 2 7 1 4 i 1 d o 6 8 8 6 8 - 7 8 8 n n 2_ n 7_ 7 7 7 7 76 6 e 1 1 1 1 1 7 1 1 1 n 6 6 6 6 6 1 6 6 6 2 n

W

) S S-S S S 6 E S S 8 a 9 r 3: - m 1_ h 51 h 1 1 l l I k 1 11 1 1 5 1 l I %i 2 35 2 5 0 3 h i o 1 c. o C C-n C C Q C C Q. C n o l B BB G G_ BB E RG t C B H H E-I- n on 1 I I I i ( 2 9 2 2 2 0 2 1 1 T F I I de un i tn o C ~ ~,, 1 ec nP ,i .P

N9( d ,... h s.' NONCONFORMANCE REPORT

~ " " * * *

'*"*""'3 Is0 Or ?

2. OR A Wis.G /P A RT NO.

i ME V,

7. PR O.c C T 9.O.

.2 REPORTEDev DATE

25. D6SPO5.T EON Co seCQ A RE NC E S,.pe c. 72 2 0- C-2 3 0 l6 7220

'Shw M !'?d'1

3..v - o sc o..

0,. l""' l "~' f'1"M

1. - tO c. r.O.,

...v vo.,coe,d I 'j h.,c-/ - 7C O */2f/4.,,s.we " l-/#//'//, i -,vy.g4 Quality Verification Documents N/A O % '. Q g., u .. sc a.at Nuwee n .. staavue sysvau NO. . n..a rta c c us,. r... r No. i '...n l nsv. , W P.f... 4 u. N/A N/_A / _N/A o/ o -.. //. w v*2/ % 1 .eu c.se O oc a O. ,[7,,yyg Wg ,f pg. ej ... Oc r.c to.Nserev.O rt. No. ..u.c ..N1. No. N.. j.A 1-a c r o a,60c a v.O N N/A N/A ' - ~ ~ * * " * ' ' " ' * ' ' ~ cO ...a5"= 0 v** " souacc Champion Inc. Midland, MI .r.' O No Subcontractor ... n o ur...Nsrn ucr.O.. g Ouv e to reci.o cNG, cco,*a O aou's to **a'= a'ai Suacav'5aa .9. NOP.cO N F ORMI*dG coNDtT eon Specification 72_20-C-230 Appendix D states in part, "G-321-D is_a multi-nurpose form to be used by Buyer / Contractor to spec _ifically id._entify documents required of the supplier to satisfy specification _ _r_e_q. uirements and i_s to be used by the Supplier as a cover sheet for Quality Verification Documents when snhmitting_them to_the._ Buy _erl_. Contract.or " Contrary to_the_above-prior to Mar _ch._H. 1976. Champion Inc. has not used this form ga_a__c_over shs_et when submitting.Applicabic_d_peuments to Bechtel. It should be noted that all Ouality Verification Documents recuired by Snecification 7220-C-230 have been submitted by Chamuion 2.. O c'o o'5eas'no" d r'c'o a r co="caoa vio~iaou'r va eao sec' r ac"* *

a'~$

n'. r'r'o o'5 aos"'oa a c5ui 's-n i .i _f.icJd_rS.co_mmend_s "uSS _as_.is" to_date and re. commends _deletine. form G-321-D f r om_7 [j "'. 9 <^ c %C material with exteryfive g1 ' y [4tlkiosdbhtMggg nG'Mor W}yt.4ying--+- w / _spectrirnrinn 7??n-r 93n. rn r, r 3?i n, 4: nnro n ents. Only form G-321-D should_br deleted. the rf. Yn 'u_submir nill carriffeneinne nnd testa esults-shal1 t.ema4n-tfr 5ffec~ificat10n 7220-C-230[,/ f}tj,_,1.; 4 - 7( 22 E NG OP. L HING o'SPOStTeO N Rec _p_I_of 7 fnr Engineerf ng Disposition '&, w 0,2) 2 3. cDeG tNc E R.NG Ot% POSIT tO N ME SutT S: ..f b'd., #,./[' Q =

24..s DessGN CH ANGC REOutRc0 g

26.RMWDMMMWNWM IE M O ves. s= c avvacNcD. ), / ..,r, :.... - - - + oR AW9NG RcV. oCN atet...eaese.e,essee SPEC. R E v. ADO. .0098-9 White Copy - Orig 6pe.o# ecG22 Cenery Copy - Fletd Engineer Pink Copy - POAE Goldenrod Copy - OC E e 9

s NONCONFORMANCE REPORT (CONTD) .... c _2_o r_2 w:Lc ' o._l#3 E _ Block 19) and reviewed, signed, dated and properly filed by Bechtel. No Hold Tags Applied. Nonconfo rrnance .was_noted_during a review __oLSpeciftcation 72hC-2_10mRez. 6. ..q.. No._variec Jlloch _20-Revised)____l'icid_ recommends._ compliance _with_ specification _l220_C-230._11cvision 6 requircnents pending disposition of 0F-93 (Same subject) by Project Engineering. Block 22: Engineer'ing concurs with field recommendation of compliance llay_(_[q) JL s-s-7G pc - f ..p,j,7 with Specification 7220-C-230, Revision 6 with modification U / per SCN C-230-6002. Reference is made to memo dated 5/27/76 from R. L. Castleberry to J. Connolly, for the disposition of QF-93 by Project Engineering. This item has no safety implication. ,_L_. s.zs-74 _f. $^ E' Ih' - nis 'J h-u a ww. co, o,i,io..., ac+ 8 -* c ,v copy ri.id caeio, es,* c., _ come Gold.oeod copy - OC s oc e 9-

~ NONCONFORMANCE REPORT '"^***

a. a.Le.u.s.r[uYa.o-2 420 or Spec.

j "E V- '""*'EC'"*- 'snsegnusogy jo.va as. usseoses son coNcuaatNcs 1220-r,-120

9 7220

-MsM," TiW.v.[/r&....Sf#'h.,-6-76 85 ""- ' "'I - h"" ~ "" " " I ;/ "-(, ' '^1 ,a u nesco. o~ .1totocaroNg-c; m d,. f,:$%~.c I ,o - pv i 12" o te_v r ..s... a u_..a.te, . d-76 -i A...... G I L % ~ E a. N~ h 1' .......u......No . c'. 2H-620 & 2N-622 N/A N/A ..,,y..U... = ~t'.'.

1. '

N f S. PURCN.st oRDE R No. 3 0.ee.s.Eske.ese6* Ween m a -e o e s. REPL.CEMEN Y sE RI

t. No.

p(4g/g y /.',' *f V-120A0 Rev. 5 QCIR Uo. R-1.OO-60 N/A V he*/ * /4 9'M'y[,jQ" * " " * -* D"- .-4 g, @ l .. con ra.c r o mtoc atioN ..... c (g vas ...sou cc [ _ Anchor Darling Valve Codiayyja3 d,_CA ' O No ... a o u r.N o.N., a u c t.oN Surplisr i "'-- L * b b48 i, e u g aourc io eisto.NG to.No o nou,e,o -.v s...t succ.wmo. 99 NoteCoNF.HMs G C.NorfloN4 Spec. No. 7220-M-120 Para 13 1 states in._part. "The folloving infor~'-' tion nhn11 he nhnui on each tag: -(a) Purchase Order Humber and Item number. (b) Valve IdentRip_a_t. ion _Rumber_as_ indicated in the _Valyc_htrchase_Ordern.__(' rho en n numhav ehall nppone nn any innen nv acccccory-packago-shipped-vith-the-valver)" Contrary to the above, two 12" Gate ValveslSNJ PN-62O_&_2h622) identity __tacn from Anchor /nnr11ng n nvrinv dia_not match _the_valven documentation _pnnknga-e numb _pr 5206-10 3 Continued on nage 2 re--.nge to o.scos.v.oM O"c'o asco""c'* oar'oaraoure to enosect rNo Nera.NG - ' w.

. rimto oiseaser oM nesutvs.

Route _this]D_ErocurfJnent, Ff_ eld Procurement Sup_e_rvisor' to obtain cor_r_e.qt J4.dAgEk&MP G-321D__ and_ documentation.frDalvem-laufacturer. Tags attached to valves are 1J.od :2. c m us '- n . correct. -WIMIV &#7-7e ona.L- , -~ .p/ f j; < .-v 7p, Turn to nace 2 for Revis'ed Block 20. -~ -6 l-

22. E NG.N C E R BNG Uls Po st T f oN 2 3. ENGtNEE RING otsro IT.o.e entsuLT.

24. Is oCstGN CH ANGc REQu1HEo ONo

* * * " ' " ^ ' ' * ^ ' " " " * * "

@ [7 " ~~" ",,a,..*.*.7' 4c{ ggg g-O ves.ses arracNeo, op WINc p r v. oCN h k f%,, r k s P E C. e a o s e-s R E V. . o o. Whit. Copy - Orig 6nator Q G -<. 3-3 Canary Copy - Field E risin r Pink Copy - PQAE Goks.need Copy. QC oc e

e [ 0_ J. 5. 2 Y-i 4 / d v E n e e d ~ / R_ 4 v i i o 4 n 3 a L, c 0 = [ e 2 9 c ,f r _M i j , / d /* N g e / g 9 i 1 l t 2 / p 7_ p y A t o 'l ~ i t l s t e 2_ g n 4 - A ' /u r r a n 7 e o_ T d / en "?. ,6g i 2 2_ d ,n 1 / ,E R R l d / i,o E a P T-R d o e s A 3_ c i,6eOC H s ac B 1 i ~ oFPO 3 d 1 3 v e i 6 6 e t 5 'y 7 6 r a 7.W- , oyd p J 1 1 8 d_ o y h C yp D D c m C. C p o 1-1 a u o 2 2 t d orn yCe n_ T-T A a sn e t n nk ld ic )D a an o g G G - r wCPG T' n o O 'r B B N m ? B m e 6 e n H t 7 C m_ i y a / ( T l n 7 e n 2 i 2 s R y 1 D m / a O r 5 h P e c E t d r R e e u E d t p C n a N-i d o t A r n r-R- M e o e e b i m t f O R E u i e F P P_ n s R_ N o O A / i "Q p C n 1 1 s N o 6 6 i t i 7 6 d c O t 1 J_ e N a o d r t o 0 G n l r nl o e o 1 e 2 l i i c_ mg t f u a T T-c s c T_ G G e e i. e p d e. B B s e n D_ g B B n s o ea H H i r i vk e t l c "M t p a a a 2 p u t vP 1 i s n e e c o m e t u r c s o g i D n i g r n u i r 9 d d w o 1_ e o d d s l n h e i l e c t v o V_ o o e f lB n R m e o y h r g c T f. n n 0 i a 2 u p 8 n e K i r C -r t c O a n s L a c s i B o C D c i i-[ s E

k-i .\\ M (. V ,r ' NONCONFORMANCE REPORT f', '" A "1"

2. e st easeese p s* 9* ee p 4

gg R E v.

7. PROJE C T NO.

g2 R E Po se T E D B Y ~ ~7 PPG C-23/)_ l 18 '7220 6:N'b ben 's/sh.x. m -;--- j -

--- 1 s DATE: 21. D8SPOSef tops CONCURREPeCE g),p; 3. 4 T E he DESCRIPTaON p

8 STE M LOC Af TON e-4 DATEDWW. Pi I )[Q[fQ'h.[f h W PhrS11 OP 'M UnvWh nr Aun P1ae DATE t_ ?' -

h Y

4 SE RI A L NUMWE R C ffbs o f2l7C

9. ST A fI T UP S YS T E M req.

rs p'5. R E PL A C E ME N T P A R T NO S. PpN.*t A SE OR DE R NO. 4G D'pCLD ONSPECTtON PLAN 960upPL ACEMEN T SE RI AL NC'. a, c o! R E V. l I sE te e m.e e'O C .../.1 =6 96. u ...... + 6 8 _uh,.TRACTOn,EOCAT.ON _n/s n/1 8 5. R (**g s *,, j ..,(/, w,._ ..[. )4. .. CO -' - - ~ - ' ~~ ~ n .. aS=E. O vEs 'T Source Canonig_ Cons.tr.uction pp,,,,_Sou.t. h_JJay_en,_ME urM __ G No Subcontractor ... ROUT a.N S T RUC T.ONS: g ROUT E TO P.uo ENo.uC E R,No o ROUT E 7 0. Y ER. A SUPE R,,50 R SS. NON 'ONFORMING CONDITtON: c'pecification_7220-C-210,_. Hen _l,_Ihra, IP.C 1 staten in nnet i , "N__3:at eT-content au-<ng no,nnntinn... nhn11 n ot_he_rore_than_2_perc entace_.poin ta_nhorc_optimtt:LuoistMrd_ content _A_._."- cnntrary +n +wn nhove, a,,ving thn en11 nr 1975 n, nn -tT,1ctt.nn acennn vn= m n enn tvurtea ovn-ire,teiini vhich exce.eded thc_mointure_ content _rcquirementa of_. Specification 3-21Q. .lontIQl. were aware that,_the_ pa_terial_cuecded moisture when placed._._The_ field _ forces,_ including Bechiel_.Ra e & d / W / VC. /. CD 2'- Tlb he,,, i~ ; < - A v. o, e n $ $ / 'd When the material vasa la_ce_d_it was

== O -(E'oo'5Posn'oN sy E'a REcoM=ENoa v=NmourE vo PR=EET enc'~EEa'Na enn+<n,,na nn % e-o o a' P'E'o o'5Pos'rioN aESAm Recomend " accept asjs,".. subject to Project EnJ neerino review and qvaluatiom i Backfill malefial las__b_ccB_compaclei_to not less _tlEU1_!L53_of maxinum_ density in accordance wi th Specification C-210.f uksw s/n/71. 46., p,a

22. E NGIN E E N tNG 08SPOSt f BON 2 3. E NG SNE E R0NG OsSPOSsTsON RESULTS:

. Discussion of the ba_cl; ground to this.c.ondition with Einid personnel indi~tted _(1)& the' ramp;was. installed as a temporary,mean.s for aceess into adjacent work t _arcaa_and-not as_ permanent _back_fi_ll; and (2);. that the Field now vishes to, use the ramp as part of the_ permanent backfill, We understand that._should_the r..,- i 7 amp _ pot _be su_i_ tab _le_f s

24. lS DESIGN CH ANGC RCQUIRED,N'N O

26. REJECTED M ATERI AL DISPOSIT6ON O--wa=*==******

O v ES. SEE ATT ACHED. o.....

27. f* e'M

. sf - g /z yj.yg CE OR A Wt NG - REV. DCN , u,= q SPE C. - RE V. ADO. awwa.o.3.,e....,,, I 098 9 White copy - Oriennetor G Ga 2 Cansey Copy . Flead E nginewr Penk Copy . PQAE Goldenrod Copy - OC e 9

,i / NONCONFORMANCE REPORT (CONTD) ..eac e_2_ori ... =,, ~o.__4 2 1 Block 19 Continued - considered temporary fill for construction access. The field now wishes to leave this material in place. L'ith the exception of the noisture content requirement, the material meets all requirements of Specification C-210. The~ testiny, frequency was naintained and the compaction test results are as shown on the following list: ~ Block 22 Continued: . permanent backfill iLean_.readily_be-removedMIcnce._ Engineering _ submits _that._A noJL_ conforming _t.ondition does not_ _enigt_s_in_ce the ramp _is_s_till a temporary facility. _ Engineering _ suggests that if the Field wisk ' to use the ramp as part of permanent _ backfill, they request _ Engineer _ing_a.ppr_qval._ vin nn FCR-Q).g _7G 3 l t .o..... ~ ww. con, - o, i......,

c..,,co.,

- ei.weoco, Pink Copy - POAE Gold.nrod Copy - OC e e 9

( '. n 7 -t'ONCONFORMANCE REPORT (CONTD) ipac As e d Nb ... = c.i n o f _ Block _19_ continued __- tbisture Optinua % Abbve FeTcEnt _ Test.Do.__Date._.___Iacation Elev. content (%) Winturn npti min _. cogne< on .lO-490* 10-31 75__356 cont _yl,_76_' ner un11 ft31 ' 14.8 1; 4.2 95 3:D-492* 10-31-75__356 contJ1,_79'_ ort._ van 631' 12.9 10.6_ 23 96 3:D-519 11-13-75___45 contJ2,_95 '__off_vall __610' ___ R.2-- 9.6 h.. h o8 JOJ-13 11-13_75 28 contJ2,_.100' off_xan 615' 13 5 9.8 37 08 _MD_-514" 11-13-75 _356_contJ1, 76'_off_ van 631' 12.6 10.6 2.0 loa _ _MD-524 11-27-JS__25'_L_4.55_line,J0'Jf. "A"line_630' &.4 9,8 4.6 97 fa-595 11-17-J5 75' n. "A" linn O 63 line 6978 13,9 _9f 5.h 48 2m-526-11-17-75 85' N. "A" line_(?_.8.7_.linc 624' 16.h 9.0 6.6 43 l!D-27 11-17-75 28 cont //2 110' orr vall 619' 14.7 9.8 4.9 97 3 1 MD-530 11-18 7s 36s coni fl. 115'_orr vall 63 3' 13._9 9.8 h.1 96 _ER:531 11.18-75 11' E._4 55_11ne,_88'J!, "A" linef>32' li.3 9.8 4.5 98 t 30-532 u 18-15.__108' n,_"A" line_E_I,_8_11ne 628' 16_._6 - 13J _2_. 9 96 l_% 533 11-18-75___87'_A "A" lineJL8.L11no 624' 11h5 o._8 47 96 lh534 11_18__75_._68'.JL_ "A" H ne_E_8.Lline 62h' 16.9 13 7 1.2 99 20-535, 11-18-J5__25 _ cont _!2,_91Lort_Vn11 620' 14.8 o.8 50 o8 ma 536* 11-18_-35 45 cont _f2,_95' off vall 615' 15_.1 9.8 53 94 Js_537 11-l 8-75-_93 cont _f2,_85' nrr va11 610' 14 9 9.B 5_.1 95 lh539 11_19-75._45 cont _52,_.97' nre vn11 615' 11 9 9._8 2.1 47 _fotes-

Thi _ arfA_ICEoIKed_and_ratcJ.ttda__SAe test No. _ MD_' ilk S
- Niqt.ure ani C_otggs_t_i_on tasa;_e_lears MD h90 and MD 492 M* Thi n nrca_rcVorhed n_nd vntested:_.See_ tent _Ro.JD-533_for_pasning_compactim N Thin

~ nrcR rCWQrked and retected:_See_testJia._MD_-539_for_pansing_ compaction ____Sen_ pace =,3Jor=lo. cation.cketch._ __. i0 9s 2 _gg7 White Copy - Oelsin. tor C.nasy Copy - Fleid Engin..e %kCopy - PQAE 'd,24ldenrod Copy - OC

Di., p.. .; *

v t.s.

v i r. I; 5 ) tis,*,tr.',f l 3Y 8' f . h A I I.*. c'.3 # :..I' f. l

ljy U.8 8 i, f*T r *.1 s

4 (O j' r*T [d ' , _,I]C8_jf. 4 2 I,PDCC XMbf.4_ I 5 ,._. '.. 30 J NO _5_.e..... _..* O I ._... _.s l.o i .s _...l.. s.. p-i. _r..,. e ..oe ;, t,,,,..,ry.. t .g

r.

y i,,. r 9.... .\\ e4 n t. ..... k.. 1 ' ' i / .ri =--....,) r 5 / f ~ ' .t/ l l El.. s. ;3 L \\ ,\\.,. \\.-- ~ - <. ,/ >t ,l. i i ./ - f- :.,... ,\\, ../ .. ~t. \\...s *1 { s i ( ~ .......-.........l g-l \\ .c - ,.<t \\. .s \\- \\ \\..,,. ' _,f s ^ u t f.. p\\. ~ t T e', \\ \\ \\:.. \\ .g a. :..:, : 3, s,. c { s s ... / g/.'\\~ \\~:S 'd;'i /. a. y. G:.). G. f*%/ \\/ I. .~ '. A 'i \\ ,)\\ \\ ./ / %. \\ s / / N t I s,. ,/ \\..\\ 1. /; t., N \\ - s t / t \\ 1 -},, } [ 4./ J. ___ _ _.._ ;.. ...- 4 't. - \\ I- \\ - s .P s \\ \\. / \\ / ( *.....#, y e c~ 7. e. n. z j c., r. r..:,; ,/ s' ~: =- T \\ / \\ e s / ~~. s~ /,z,. /\\ N OF /?/\\t.:/' /,re ti ~ P./. s. 3ss' terit. l A.n t nr. re

9. *: L;,, e IE' c:s T. 2

'lo* C.:ro ?; 2 W'E . -- 6.21. 6 e i.; l l,___i / .?. s .i,< / i /,./ ~ ~. G >. s. ./ / '<.~ - ~ /,i,,..

/

> j.../.. f-T~o t' U r C XI.: l Rh M P / ,/ / h / ' /,/ ! /} ~/ / s - - / j / / / / ' /'/,- V,',,,;,,~. . m, w Aff'l:2.. L ita'l ~.S 0 1' 70 it..S m/ j '/ ' / / j' /,- i / /,, M tst.$7 UKl- (t.t:1: tri ~ Y WITH lt ! 6.

t */ / /

s' s' s~ ,/ c ue,. e,, l, ! n./ -'/ / './ /,i.- ~,/, * //.ym. .. /

/

r., s -'L.../ / .t ~4 ..y i ~ '. ';, an - s 3 I 8 & 0 9.t' ' l'l!Q T I L F O lt (? (s (e' I) /,1:'- it \\ !!. T. $. (*,,

'3 ~ 3 jt NONCONFORMANCE REPORT or _.1_ b'? ^t

a. onaw.nGiraar ao.

i n s v.

v. enoacc, no.

.. n cronycp[,EeY//[ b _.- ' t'-h: j "" l~"**l""J'"l"" 'o.vc as o.scoser.on concunnewcc __7220-M-61h Sht. 7 !'1/_F_17220

i..,eu ocscairnou Embedded

]MW' 7' ^ "" "'O

' '7e Nl " * ,,',,,

N[,,,,,"' nn-on ...c en..t_c, ooling-System s P .-. s.iAi.n.a<,F,,u,a,l, Pool-Area N-c. f * ' / ^' ~ N' ,. ;g,,,,,,,, ~ See Block 19 N/A // N/A '#Y y *,' p */*," M '? _ [.," ' J'g, ~ s ruacuase onoca no, ... oc r ic uo insrec r.o= roa m no. ....r et c cuc ~r se n.. / 222a-n.cron,u-se u-2au-2 s tu ne aer n 1o .r.spunce 't1;; 3 y:c- ,3 4 u ir 2 ..conva 6ocanow ...as-c g vcs ITT Grinnell, Kernersville, UC/ , ',, ' o. Engineering .. =oun~ .~sva ucnons' 0 "a a ' * ' * "' 'a < " * '" " a 'a G O aoun 'o wa'caia'sure avisoa 9 9. NoNCopeFoRMING CONotTsoN Ren #7 tn npnn_ M-pol nnv_ A Pnrn 6_p 1-d ntnton in p"t - - "All nnetonitin etninlon-nteel mntori n1 chn11 he i n thn nnlution_hent trnatna untor nnonchna onnai+ inn 'rh n Onl l nvi ng pipe._npnnl.- _rere fabrient.ca utili-ing nn nir cuenching procenn_prinv in the i nnnepnrnti nn in thn prnnnro,nnt npnn. g.1-20M nf ' the vnter quench requirement (ECL/f( tn U-pol). nnenrenen tn TOM nRne-lon1 netnnhna_ Continued-on-Pago-2 s 2.. O neto o.scos.non gncto.cco.ucso.nou, ourc 1. eno,ccv cuc.uce,~. n. n eto o.s os,1,...csou,s, _ Ronte_.10_ Pro.iert_Enstocerina for disposition. Contrary to Block 19 note 1, spools OHCC-15-S614-7-4 and OHCC-12-S614-7-3 are installed but not embedd.ed. .e / Y b e b 8 P ]Y-7/ W k A 'Ib- S-Z A -76 23 c NGINec RING ogsroStTtoN Mnenrin1 an ins _t.alled _is_ac_ceptable based on the following: J. This piping is embedded in Q-listed concrete so a failure by cracking would r:ot prevent the functioning of the system. hn. Eenifafailureisassulbemoa8 versa plant [. to res it in c Ect on caelete loss of function of t e uel ol ool_ing SystemTinespentfuegeremoupool is seruced by redun ant connectgafe.ogege Q ly te, __ t e tion t e ons t .seigmicallyqualif.iegtue,{1ceWage{ngepool.Thes_econnectionswillassureproper er-S tem coo ing o any spen store g 2.. Is ocsIGN CH ANGc McQUIRco

2. RcJcCTc'dM AYefilAL otsrosITIoM

, O * *'#** se ev reus e 2 b.OC NCfg No O ves.sec arv curo, 8Y7 eI ~" / oRAWING R c V. oC Pt ( aervse= esse emeessven sec C. RcV. A o o. . 00 9.. ^ white Copy - oris6netor o c-G a a Canary Copy - Field EnSineer Pink Copy - POAE Goldenrod Copy - OC

5 3E n f k. o o i o. t n c o a e i a p t c s a n g = I i t d s l e e v i n F i e c d e i S r r e ( n o l e ,io e e g n t

i. e r

e a i.osE - wA o. r i,. O C c g orPO e n n o i c r y u po n d y C ,p i ,oyd g .cpo

c., o,

d n v n n.Ce e i D d r eiak ld ) n o d e wciPG T' e e N b n O m i C e g ( n T d E n R a t O c P d e E. e j R t o n a r l E l P a C u i

N s

y r O A n b e M i t R d n e m ~ O F d t e r l N t o e O s p e C e e t N t r n O d n N__ d n s w e a e l l l d n a e i )0_ t r n 6 s e t n v n r a o i_ 1-9 3_ 4 1 2_ 4 e n c a ~ e B_ 4_ s n 77 77 7 7_ 7 r 1 i h e pd c ~ 4 1 4 h44 k v?4As C p n 1 1 1 1 1 11 l e 66 6666 n S - - a u 3-sS S S l h ~ S R 1 sw q o 1 g 5 5 5 5 2 2 2 o 6 L an r_ 1 1-l_ 1 1 1 1_ 1 p - _ T o i h "~ s 2 s i_ n C C C c c C. C i_ ld t_ C C C cC 0 C e h i r H M H u H1 H p O r od o_ 1 O n O n O 0 O i 2 e H n p b o e e_ U-m% d c s e a Q u_ u H_ s n s n e a ei e it h . vh h n m 0 T T T_ t o c_ 1 9 3 h 91 w o t K N k n c e e l o a B n e oc ~ i

_y Bechtel Associates Professional Corporatiori Infor-office Memorandum O To J. F. Newgen caie liay 13, 1976, subect Midland, Plant - Units 1 & 2 rrom R. L. Castleberry Job 7220 Air-Quenched Stainless Steel Piping Engineering g, File: 0274, 0545 w/a copies to Ai -Ann Arbor J. Connolly w/a L. Sokol W0c "7 T. VanVick w/a f' It has come to our attention that 23 AS11E stainless steel pipe spools which have been shipped to the site were fabricated using methods. contrary to current revised specification require- ,i The spools are listed on the attached draft NCR's. menta. Should you 'or the PFQCE feel an NCR(s) is appropriate to document the situation and assure control of the spools, Engineering requests that the attached draf ts be used. (j~ ; We are actively pursuing this catter with Grinnell,although \\ we do not as yet have a schedule for resolution. Should there S. be any questions, please contact Mike Rothwell. g-4.., Z.~l$5:* r-- Rv-L ""t}eberry 5 E JLH/ld -yQC 07220 g JPFQCE I1 attachment ~ A.PFOCF{ CIVIL ~ ELECT. ~ 0 Zhrina - Nil tMECH. ~ llWEl. DING ~ [9cC. RECEIVI3 M ). I OPE;f LO g RECEV.53 a" u) t.: t MAY 171976' ~ L) \\e QU ALITY CONTROL BECHI. C 7220 SIGHATUU L

/x S G ' Z-

I

'q l c. ~'-._h[ t p-M / E jW>.5 .[a, g ' C o n l S c Q i r w T L 6 a U t' r g s E h S 0 m i E C " d n S R N 7 d l b N d l u O R ~ I W A R /( v-l S I T u - e 2 E O j" t n d 0 R S C O i n N l N P O I 4 ? .g,- i d S C g r a h TB D ~ N O v I G C v S ( o c O Nt / 2 O e I Y g~ ri P T ~ 2 p - B E P S R T s IS .M,e 4 p r-O O .o E e e D N s r P e - Wl q S

r m

h L I

/

a e e gm e G A e D. E n + t n PI N t ri f og 5 b . N n E r J 9. E O~ 2 v n i i 3 v toe 7 2 2 d a R-o e Q igl A 2 eiOC r t e OFPO Ed E n 4 1 i Th "^ 1 .l 1 g g A A y n n p '"k Ds 7 'y m i o e" u R y C yp O h poyd !'c r'd S t + n oCpo

b O

i n r C or l N v y n R a d erCe t nk ld i t nu c L s j i a f E m '~

/

s A h eino P t w 0 WCPG R R c 4 oS e p h / A E 61N~ 6 M A 4 5 9n L P S i n c A T t. n n a V N cR o h t D) x,. L /n E E D c M uE c 'r t rT e G e nM E E A /r 's o 'E / / 7 C E tM h N T _R e' N C R A A s c e I / O 0 R L A L O hU n3 i i c E e "b r/ wD ITp / d ^' E/ E P P O ht h g n E ~F R v R N R f . n S. v e N S r n/ T 6 7 u m r G O S. 9 O d n e N F P 2 f I 9 S 8 ~- ~O o // T^ L R l t f E D e i e T 7 A s / O v F C k M.O I A A?- E S q E W / A T J R V e ,r O E R P w h ,o l, R / T P 0 O9 O P t r', O 0 A l M G E 1 O f n_ T 7 N EE b-N MD" o E 7 o C n [/ D R h T SO AC"' N. c 1 t O 1 e / T A u E 6" w C L C l E s. R O n i R P O / J N N E / P v G E t A o 0 ga 9 m E y a f N R .N b l o t C e O )- .e T M S 8 C G o T 2 R r M. 1 E N n v e A / b n $ N E D N N A S I a O n P S a o - d o 2-e F O. N S N n o i t o T n+ g nt t. n i M E '7 ? i c 1 s M D Y E D - O T C P L x .JO C C O " g g1 O /_ n r n <v I m T e f 2 E E T p 4 ) C D E N 6 e m / M e F J E O O 7 s_,A A C M R E cE n ( / d A R C F e / O. e dT i o D N P T. i. w M W AT N O. L! l c oU t e t. N L e O. l n u 4 T C D E v A D A F a 1 t M A V u 7 C E n / E ti V n -r C n ~ s S. R i o e 7 S e. w E y / T n 1 7 . G s O a 'v r d a o i n 7 4 i N v n d i t D W c / V O o I i d e E V x_ r. I n l N I Y T N R n l i E C S O 7 I R R D a N N u ,n O O u p O l G A N T Q I S 3 . e t L C O n p T Jr I O C n 2 4 E O T O. n. N H N sA R +- C E e / C 1v G ^ S P .e R C P I R r. A O S r-O. 5 s O. c I ) 1 N G w / n,R E T R 3 D C 4 N S 3_ 3 M 1 h f T D P R, E. R R R aS R G G x A n B O - O i.N O P T_ O s N 4 A H A_ L R d t A E 0 o f D i C rC u C E T ro F / o 7 G S I ,n .n. F N S - C G.. o e l E L N I a I G. e n c I G r N E O s A vl A n G C C 1 g F N %T o R H W 4

x. A.

x S 4 r E_ Q G J u N T M o C C I 8 N ,p D A l R P 0 N

o ui l 7

O T.. O o e w o R1. Ma u - R D N U O W N 1 P C fl s E S C. r L A 0 E 9 5 0 7 4 2 S 6 9 2

y 2

2 D S 0 1

1

.m.- ,if}ls. ,k, .' ; '..%. f ',:.', \\ Q ..-. '.%.t:t.- -,

n%;..;. fliR...

3 N.l.T f ':).,(.?c.,:,.-. a,,. Q;>.s. : 4,. v.... - 7 .n. i U.g-7.." $. p ~,g's., -)g ..y:;s,. ,. m... t,,y.,.. g,,,, m; y, 9 - W:..o.... .\\.s.," :qc, Q' y %.y. X.,. c. .A. ,. 7.% . :. m >A., . :/.t .s.r, g. >

c..

W w $.w@F /) 4-h..,/ ..t n.t AJ.. % ;h.4 :..p"A ?d,,;.p!" '/4 ,ic'c )yN h %(. mph.TfM;'t.,.{M:.y;{M,vqi Q'v.> - s

r W

...e,th d,;.@;', ?,)p'.m. : :<(l.M g .. s v ~ !:' . W: k*.w i h:..;.r.w w' ?? t %,8?E F.:n.H4 T.;;i.x...v:s.,,L..i?!;l .t.1c: [- t" . J. t s

1. 9

.n '..

x to 9:

~ g s Ay 4.V.v.s 3.",y?.',?....W. c. %s...'i > 43: W-n M g Q M.; c 't

:r 4:..; ;", -Y.

p 4-y . m. =. ' -. z u m w '. 9,.. g5 ...e t. p: 4 Q,y,,..., =. f. -.:.M.

s.,

lt;.M c

d

~ 'h 'z %9 h.'r : e? L

'%, :...-W..y. e ':'M vh *.

, m % ) i... s JW:WWM6.O. @,%.Q G.y Q s: T U.,%, %aY$,,... - @* 'Y @' + '..? h?+:.'..#. %: ?ki y. -['WH.. m.: 5 L: A l,';:.WM.M.:J,;. Si a &. y&o.,... y.:... y. v .v~ .tr. g'..,yi a.;,w,:....: f5f,f...; q\\.~.,4..w ..?.Q:: ~ . ' :. w' t: :.

C ' S % O' % ".. ? r l k.

ne

- ni . y ;;n... y.m..;..n m.. w.;;o:c. 7+..,.l .-..: x, c. s.. . ;,, c ..;F;.,%.c. M... y% Qs.;n.y;.f. ' q..q .,%,%-. :W.1 .s, 2. :.

s.T

> 16. 4;>. Q'. U.

s un,d.,,

n,,.'.. ' '. :: .o 'e i t e -r .) p se.3. p 4. ? d E'.iy 7 " % )'!y

c.,.p.'f.< Q ' M >:.. Q,..

,,,f),*4e,

y..

) j 'p ..,p 3*W D.,,y... n.....; 79, r. Q 6 s 4 3 ....,eu c. 4 &.s. ' ' l. .,.... g. _ .) . El ' ?.'. ':.;;:h::.3 '.!%y& &c h,c - "' %,."..n. ..a; ?:gm .,,./.W. ww

h. y y

.u;.%i.:,g %.* v m,, t.. q! ~ t 4,

s. - ~t ay M.i:.;

4:. : s:s$:t... ::,',...- m.:.F:Wd. p., y7 M. S@;fN h.p. ',i ~.u..y,, n,.s.,y.

: I w > >'.v...w; d.P.H %,.c ""j" 'N(.'

.r s r >..+....>. s l'. . - ('p ' [. (;. ., ' - ('"." ~ ** @s.*t;.A'**

rp -

4 'vic.i..l'*sp

9 J..

c,*,h[' .St .s .,i.)." ;b, I?,

b '

.ll [ Y.r. 1 J i j f. F5' Yi' , C5f. \\. .b 'b?> :., ..N. ., -) ', i i ], ( ~ .. l. f h- .s L.

g.. v.j,.t..

r .,,, c c,..v(. -c.c..d.'.Nw' m 4, v, i:.1 ... y. . i..v,, ,,m.(s.. ct7v ?,,p &..,1,,h, %, y ~f.s.,. 3 s '- 9 <. pa -sg..:, 7 . ;tO.

f. *..

ys,*.. Q a~.C-13 .s t h :::>. r. l.';: }. f. '..

b l$ f p' k k E k '! ?. h D. h....-h.'/l;?k'Y,, f.?Q. ; &: m-?:. ydd 8

y Y ' 'f ' i .h.,sh.f6v.@n$..'b. b. n?Q.., iM..w.

., hyyg.y.,gy%.m.op,.y,d. if.,Q

, e.n.r c . 4@. n. ?p4.g..m.q.?& y ^ J.. $.... ~.. d f. 9 .,w t.fgeli%1 erg..eec h w.coorda.wt s N; l

.x

@ :aosign6da n F.64 1 v 7 "?',;$+$

s...

, bf3N1.M.'e,p D' U. M..N.... fi b 1,gi@Redtire ia'T& 101 mm.@om,G.h' ' y Ys)3 9 b.e _g, ir f i! L h N h.hkkbbkhN y M g f g p & ~g g @ $yw A ~ a m q at.u n 7: 9.ra,.;u. m &.g.a g n $h % " 1 : e a e n w b i' N N.Qg,c.ny@dli:l::h4k QWy9 .i.., hj K cf.3T '~C 6 Nk.ggg . Ifh ddd N ,i %n u s n:.. g g @y f n ~ i @W }.> s W 8 i i l hn dpnf w $ittw pW Mw i M _ $ $ % d_ b M _S % a _W,: 6 1

V s NONCONFORMANCE REPORT $. o R a weNGira M r No. ""' Q * "'" Q ' iREv. F.eRosEcr No. 7220-C-275 3 7220 [/ /7 //c./ i s. R e co R y s o a v loavE

29. oesPostT ton CoMCUMME NCE 7

/

5"zg9: " --- l "f"' j -">

j ~ " s erru ocsCRerrioN e erru Locar oM Jeinforcina.Dars Aux. Bldo. Elev. 632'6" d.o a v E o e v '.. S W oavt (gwd69- ,5-2670. j/ / []w-v ~ _f </. ? (., i

4. ss Rea L NUwea R f

s. svaRrUr stsv Eu No.

ys/RacLacEucNr capr No. ' Re v. ,J, 4 gg g i-.4<,..nri-. n ~ W # w,=M4(< s pu RcNasE opoc M No. ijfg v i s e G"*...,,6~ L so. oc vi Lo sNs-EcreoN ri a N No, l is RacLacrucNT ssRent No, , f..q..r,e q ..- w.... _ '. . ;UA

!/A f4,,g j,M 4 _ y s

6.fv 70

e. CoNrMacroR/LecarioN I!/A

~' - ~ - -" g i s. AsuE O Tes s r. soUacE J/A 6 '. " O No Cons truction S t. ROUTING SNsrRUCetoks. GoWYE ro FIE LD ENGtN EE RING O aou o aa v ERia'sWPEav'so R 99 NONCONFORMING EoNot T8oN; e r _ standard hooks oriented down into the wall below the construction joint at Eley. 629' +. Field Construction elected to install these bars with standard hooks extendina uninto the slab above. CPCo nA has identified this condition as nonconforming in their !!CR OF-100. The identification of this condition as nonconformina was reiterated by CPCo'sleply to Bechtel's initial response to 0F-100. All reference correspondence is attached. Four Hold Taas aonlied. "0" Lis t t!o. l.203. 20-Q FsE Lo oIsPosIYeoN QFsELo MECoMMENDavaoN/RoWTE To PRoJECr ENGINEERfNG

29. FsE Lo otsPostraoM REsULTs?

_By_no.te_f5_on DrawinLLC-140s Project Engineering has established that detailing & _ fabrication of. reinforcing _iteel shall be according to the current ACl Manual of Standard Practice. The ACl 315 Manual for Detailing-clearly provides that a 900 bend hook indicated without dimensions on the design drawing is a standard hook per ACl 318 sect 7.1. The purpose of these hooks is understood by field civil b.on td) 21 ENGINE EM6NG Dl5PostT eon 2 3. ENGtNEER ANG otsPosfT eoM REsWLrst lsr_the f Il._and # 8 rebars_ described in th ? c:_.NCL tha book nrinnenefnn en af ther_ i __ extend m ards or down into the wall satisfies the design requirements of Section _ _.D. E and L of Drawing C-275, Revision 3. This disposition is consistent with the desinn intent shown in Standard Concrete Detail 2. Drawing C-140 ( vhich is similar .s _'.to ACI ~115--74. ficure 2-9) wherein alternate hook end orientations are shown ( contc )

24. 8 A otsIGN CN ANGC REQUIREo o

26. REJECTEo M A ER94L oisPosITIoM O-*T**-''"8"

-3 O v Es..EE arracNEo, S t. OC AC PT w=.-

((... CR a WING ~ RCV. oCM f,s,

- .*o*ees a s..m e.e c eem Whste Copy

- Originator S cia 3-i Cenery Copy - Field Engineer Pink Copy - PQAE Goldenrod Copy - OC e 9 8

/ ~ / NONCONFORM ANCE REPORT (CONT *D) 2 427 i c.a c.__o r ..... c o Block 20: _ engineers _to_devalop_the_s.trengib_of_eacb_rcinforcing bar which_re. quires them. For_s_ome _qgn ffguratio_ns.,_the f design _ engineer may__ require slecific orien_tation or special lengths for hooks; however, ACl 315_ requires that these special conditions be shown on the design drawings. To assure that design __is complying with__ACl 315 and to confirm the field engineering _ interpretation, a telepl_ Lone call from Field to Project Engineering was made 4/29/76.- ._LSee_ aj;tached_ memo). Project Engineering stated that special_ cases have been indicated _by_ dimensions or notes on __the_ design _ drawings. _The_.f_ie.ld_ Engineering __ interpretation _of the design drawings and decision to orient the hooks to facilitate con-struction did not violate existing design requirements, and was not an extension of Field Engineering responsi-bility beyond c *ablish_ed guidelines. __lberefo.re.,_this is__no_t_a__no. acon formiDg_c.o_ndi tion, ./ -/ .f pj.s - / ,4: '/ %./ 7 <i.= V L/ 3 . Elocl_22:_ _ Engineering _ Disposition __.LContd d _as__ acceptable _ To_resolyc_any_ doubts _as_tb_ thia _deaign_ intent. DCN 9 to Drawing _C-140. Revis_i_o_n _8 was recen_tl_y issued adding _ notes 17 and 19 to Drawing _C-140. Engineering holds _that the_ described installation is not non-conforming cnd h'ence has no deleterious impact on_ plant safety._ _ 4-h ...(fiynfr84 e 4 "Y m a.c., - o,6,io.,, Uc'..v"" $I["#"**' caso.n..a copy - oc e e

yj$ 3 M /F.. Bechtel Power Corporation Post Offico Box 2167 Midland Michigan 48640 Ifay 10, 1976 Consumers Power Company P. O. Box 1963 Midland,111chigan 48640 Attention: J. L. Corley Re f : CPCo NCR No. QF-100 Dated: 5/4/76 FQCL-070

Dear Mr. Corley:

The Midland. Construction Quality Control program for controlling noncon-forming items in accordance with criteria XV of 10CFR50, Appendix B is' de-scribed in FIM Procedure G-3. This procedure defines a nonconformance as: g . (d "A deficiency in characteristic, documentation or procedure which b renders the quality of an item unacceptable or indeterminate". 'llie ' condition noted in Block 12 of the activity / task 2.60 on FIP C-231-2-858 is not nonconforming in accordance with the above definition. It is an ex-planatory note pointing out the option was exercised of installing the bars in the subsequent slab pour rather than in the wall placements below other words, it was decided the dowels would be installed with the tails up In rather than down. This was a conscious decision made with knowledge before-hand by the responsible field engineer and concurred with by the responsible -QC engineer as perr.itted by paragraph 3.3(a) of FIM Procedure G-1 whicli ' states in part: " Field engineers'. . have the following responsibilities: Interpretation and clarification of drawings and project spec-a. ifications through liaison with discipline design engineers " The Project' response to Regulatory Guide 1.55 and associated MRC question 130 5 clearly indicates the propriety of the manner in which Field Engineering hand-led the rebar in question. situation and agrees that At my request Procjet Engineering has reviewed this the field made a proper interpretation of the denign drawing. Further, to prevent future controversy, Project Engineering has re-vised Drawing C-140 to note that standard hooks may be oriented at the Field's discretion unless 6therwise noted. ./ M .../.

Bechtel PowerCorporation Aq{1.5cf& 4/g /g/(1'[ 76 h27 ( ) x,,,,/ O Mr. J. L. Corley May 10. 1976 Pago No. 2 In view of the abo've, the conditions described in QF-100 do not constitute a nonconforming condition and therefore the recommended corrective action of issuing a NCR is not applicable. We will continue to schedule periodic train-ing sessions covering the itnplementation of FIM Procedure C-3 as appropriate, just as we have iri the past. Sincer ly, 1 J. P. Connolly ( FQCC JPC/juu cc: T. C. Cooke L bec: J. Newgen C.RichardsonQ)/2$lI3 'h R. Hermeston P. Martinez R. Castleberry W. Holub D. Johnson e 4 b. /'% x _./ h \\ \\

j *. ,_/ u) c <f r S 'ff i a tt .nt A Route To 'D11s Copy For /' s., File 16.3.6 FilSoutiworch S ti!Iow.s L1 [ Issue Date %. 4. 10/4 I CQilills CSKeeley \\,, a / Projec t-tiidland 1 & 2 IIWSlager TCCooke 3 JFillandin COM',sers F0W8f UFilolub File Title NCR's on r>ec:'tel GLRichardson Nonconformance Quality Contral ZGTucker Report No QF-100 This Nonconfor=ance Report is Issued To: Prepared ByjeN dM//date 509'-7(. ~ ~ Appr ved,B d[ .Date S 4 J.. P. Coitnolly. Dechtel PFQCE. Written Reply RequestydfBy Date Sh/r0 Corrective Action Req $ested By Date 6/4/76 tho is responsible for corrective action. Uonconformance Description and Supporting Details: See Attachment A. O p r, 'I/ T. } N L. b MAY 0 41976 QU ALITY ' CON TROL BEC L J B 7220 51sNATURE No @ See Procedure 9 (For Nuclear Project only)' ,em. AEC Reportable Yes ( ) Stop Work Hecessary Yes O no > see Procedure 16 - stop Work no 3 Recc:: ended Corrective Action: -n H ~ O T4 See Attachment A. h QWOn20 g PFQCE R A. PFQCEl/* Corrective Action Taken: CIVII. CLECT-1 P(PI!C _3,_ CCl!. WEI.DIIC DCC. Ei CP.IV) r:C i Verification of Corrective Action Required Yes C Ho L g- ~ lethod of Verification: O DATE V bronconfomance Closure Confirmed By ( j Date ' To be co=pleted at time of closure by Consumers Power QA Services, Pqe l of 2 )

YEtq). ~~[Qk).", s '. Act, Q_hn File 16.3.6 Issue Date Itay 4, 1976 Project Midland 1 & 2 File Title I;CR's on Bechtel q _,/ Q'ality Control u

)

Attachment A to Report No Q -100 Nonconformance Description and Supporting Details: CriterionkV'of1DCFRIO(B) states: Measure's shall be' established to control 'i materials, parts, or components which do not conform to requirements in order '.to prevent their'insdvertent use or ins'tallation. These measures shall include, as appropria'r;, procedures for identification doccmen"* Pion, segregation, disposi-tion, and nctification to affected organizations. Noncon' forming items shall be rev,iewed and accepted, rejected, repaired, or reworked in accordance with docu-mented procedures"6 Contrary to these requirements, a nonconforming condition was noted in Block 12 of Activity / Task 2.60 on Field Inspection Plan C-231-2-858 with no nonconformance report written. Fur,thermore, this cond'ition'was not " reviewed and accepted in accordance with documented procedures". Recommended Corrective'6ction: 1. Write a nonconformanc.e report to cover the nonconforming condition in the referenced inspection plan. I i .\\-/ 2. "h Receive disposition from Project Engineering including engineering rationale for use as is if that is the disposition received. 3. Review all completed Field Inspection Plans for. exceptions which have not resulted in NCR's and, if any are f.ound, proceed as in items #1 and #2 above'. 4. Instruct all QCE's in the requirements'of Criterion XV and the necessity of following it. l-t Page 2 of 2 u

( & fMg - ^ ' ~ " U ..nm s C00SumBf3 .] h p0WBr }.~ C0mpany N" Midland Project: P.o. Boa 1953, Midland, Michigen 49540. Aree Code S17 631 0951 May 17, 1976 Mr. J.' P. Connolly Bechtel Power Co.rp. P.O. Box 2167 Midland, MI 48640 MIDLAND PROJECT - UCR QF-100 File: 16.3.6 Serial: 52FQA76 . Contrary to your l'tter FQCL-070 dated May 10, 1976, the condition noted in block e 12 of Activity / Task 2.60 in Field Inspection Plan C-231-2-858 does represent a nonconforming condition in that the' drawings were not followed. Also while the Field Engineer-does have the authority to interpret or clarify drawings, he does not have the authority to change them. It should be no.ted that Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary, copyright 1973, defines interpret as "to explain or deter-(i G 'j mine the meaning of" and defines clarify as "to make clear; to free of confusion; to make understandable". What was done by the Field, Engineer in this case did g 'not me'et the definition of either clarify or interpret. It should be noted, how- / cver, that with the change you reference which was made by Project Engineering to drawing C-140, he would now be allowed to make such a decision within the frame-work of FIM Procedure G-1. While we are not saying that the book bars in question could not have been turned, wg re saying that the manner in which you proceeded with respect to them did i 'lQC07220vir.. tid action remains unchanged. te Criterion xv of 10CFR50, Appendix B. Therefore, our position on corree- ' PFQCE elf A PFQCE[)p i anw fficially stated your position on this NCR and we have, by this J CIVIL y e,. rejected it. We feel it is now hir e to get on with the corrective action ^. c - ELECT. vdi tned in our NCR. It appears that you still have sufficient time to implement recommended corrective action. However, if you do not, please let us know pgpygg u u at we may grant you a time extension if warranted. HECH. a m WELDIEG t ooc-RECEIVJtCT AlftworD" r ~ 0 Corley ims.(u3hl 3 _ty Assura Superintendent Fq C ~ y V ", U GG TCCooke ~ GSKeeley HUSlager MAY 171976 FMSouthworth GLRicharcson ~ QUALiT ZGTucker C ON TROT BECHT B 7220 sioNAnne _ s W b

~ ~ - " " g -h f bf?- .-Q.f$$5-).f*?['N' ~ .,+t tw h'...,l 4..,; ,..>.,%..s-.:. cx w.. 'flDN, !$5:Y,..

$'kI E

N.\\!5 '?bY ~ pj)n - ph4, Y Y . Y ? Osaa ~ T. oil A% e, " docAom %~ P J. b R. e, . ;,,,f M ~ i.~'2.9 ,, r//t \\4 L& m ._ l, M % Q a c A b L,,,,, ' l L A r % ' ).. ~.. <1d" 0 ~ .... ;, p.. x

.9 t

I.;.,.c, t:sv O M $mo- , M.'i. 1 'M 1 D s og b.enf. % %e . a,W '3 r. ' [. W A, 3.nb $. $.$h Y b, fu 0 $sc w h.y ~s % (60. [s y

s.

~. t n - 5., j i usS ' w,- sf N'olq, r .i. at ** O. e 4 e 8 b N_,) e I \\^ 'l

),: v 0* / g f h T' y/,Q l-f-7& AV$VW75 NONCONFORMANCE REPORT ' ' ' " ' " " * ~

3. DR A WIPsGhA R T NO.

4 RE V.

7. PROJECT NO.

3 2. ftE PO R T E D B Y b' 'D A T ETW " ~ ~~ l "'"' l ~ l "" " ' l "" 2 3. DISPO5si SON CO.eCU R R E NC E DNN.v e> E.ne_R1 o.c_k_11 02720 Fasteners for s.siEu otsCR.PfiOR Various Storage =.'v== 'vcar'ON i s. .O Arr s oATE N M mms,_.S. guts,_&Estrats___&Inslallation Locations / el2~.-.- -j5/T[~2d YNbN..,l 5u7%. [r bg w See Block 19 N/A N/A l RE V.#4 4 '-7#)-.- 4 N7

a. kE ses AL NuwsE R

s. ST ARvur s TsT EM NO.

is.NEPLA'CEwENTPARTNO. .,e e e r..l.. =..=e s.= / b.es ',, f 3 E*N S. PuRCH ASE OftDER NO. t e. OC F 0 ELD ON SPECT BON PL AN NO. O S. RE PLAC EMENT SERI AL NO. 7220-M-106AC See Block I'9 N/A [ /p *== .] p .......-.~..-,y 4, CONTR ACTOR /LOh A TION 03.ASME @ VES 9 7 SOURCE 1TT Grinnell Corp., Warren, Ohio OO 8"PPII"# coor "EW"f N d'E'*0 k 1

10. STOUT ING GNST R UC T GONS:

ROUT E TO FfE LD ENGtNEE R4NG Q ROU T E TO M AT E RSAL SUPERwtSON I s NC$ NCONFO R MING CON D11 TON' ASM.E Section III 1974. Para. NA 3767.4(referenced through Specification 7220-M-209 and ASI *E Section III, Para. NF 2130 and NF 4121.1) states in part... A Material Manufacturers Certificate of _ Compliance with the material specification, grade, cla s s, and heat treated condition, as applicable, may be _pr_ovided in lieu of a Certified Majerials Test Report for... bolting 1 inch _ diameter and less. Material identification icluding any marking code shall be described in the Certified Materials Test Report or Certificates of Compliance as applicable. " ( Continued on Page 2) g.ELo n.sPOs T.ON gr.E Lo RE CO-=E No A T.oN, ROUTE T O PRO,ECT E NG.N E E R.NG ..,,E Lo o.sPos.T.ON R E.vLTs. _!_tRR_L F i dd_ Ilis p ositi on:___Th i s_i. tem _i s_n o t_a_nonconforman ce _Cotaca so-1651Md_ article _HF 4121 app _ lips which enunrs 'enrtificatos nf enmnliance furnished by compn- .nellt Support manufacturer. ITT Grinnell has_ furnished certificates of compliance in accordance witn code case 1651 f. NF 4121. continued on cane 3

22. E NGINE E R SPeG D85PO SIT aO N T ersm 7 ThTS_ itcm_.in nnt n t s. ENGINEERING 085POssT SON Mr5 ULT 5r n onenn formance. The fact thnt the_ nuts nrn unmnrked does not constitute a nonconformance. ITT Grinnell's QA-program assures that the h e d D m A. n nuts conform to those specified by ITT Grinnell engineering department's design.

/h /g fg, __I.n_t_he case in_queslion, ITT Grinnell'_s_ engineering elected _to use an SA-307 _Ak _s.'e.-eff/gs s. 7 s / grade A or B carbon steel nut with an SA_193 B7 (Alloy Steel) stud because of the /-fg/' [M 7 %;?( principal shear loading conditions. (Continued 'on attached sheet) 3,9/gg

24. IS DESIGN CH ANGE REOutHED O

24. R EJECT E D M ATE R I A L DISPO$tT IO.e O a. waa

m*6.*
cgC A, pC O vEs. sEE aTT ACHEo.

,.g..g g...- - {~ R A WtNG REV. DCN ~ b. ft s f PE C. REV-ADD. . e. a s e-s White Copy - Or*04nsto' GG435 Canary Copy - Fisid E ngineer Pink Copy - PQAE Goldenrod Copy - OC e e

/; m.:. ~ cY ' W ,s /kW NONCONFORMANCE REPORT (CONT'D) ?-}- W [ A r(M. $. e race _.lorg*p2'_.,p,r-b20 ... aca ao .ock_l-9-Continued. 6_-_The_.followingronditinns_c.onttary_to_the_ahore_cxist on_alLassemblicsl,?q, g, /dr76 d'e a'enisheito date_undor-Purchase-f' '., Order 1220-hL-106ACs a )__ M ate r ial-Ce rt ifi ca t e s-of-C ompli a n c e-d o-n ot-s pe c i fy-m a t e ri a l-s peci fi c ati t ypes_ us ed_in. fabric ation. - onsrgradesrclasses-b4 4)--JdateriaLCertificates_oLCompliance_do_not specify the 1ncans oL th c_ marking-c ode _ utilized, 2aat crialid entification_includin g 2 Hex nuts _furnishecLwitit stud-bolts _ marked 'TL.7L(ASME_SA-193) arn notidentifi d SA-193 para.J 3,1-and-ASME SA-194-para._.13a_and_13b, e _as_requirc.d_by_.ASTiE L-No-material _ identification marking ne description _is_pr.avided_for thn following additional t material n - _ ypes of fastener m at--D L_-G , 'C'-, ew- /.ltjQNfAdd.ib/-d*- d$lW-$ch W ~ 7L y b)-Hex head _ bolts-and-nuts _for-pipe-clamp = c) Miscellaneous hcx nuts l' age.1, Blo.cks.2,_4,_ansl_10 Hanger Field-Inspect' ion-Plan IQ.lE.C B-35-H3 Location M-204-2-CH-610 6 10- 1_F C_B-3 5-H 5 Fina_LLocation 1B-lGCIL 33-H6 M-lG4._2-GH _610-3 12.-2G CB,25-H11 M-204-2-EH-611-5 18-2GCB-J3 H3-FinaLLocation llL-Z_G.C D _ 1 3.z l B 18-2GCH _31-HA Comtinuc_d_.o2 age 3 o -_-~_--=-~=~s:-~t. e es e e-a ..-.s- _.---~m,s.__._u---- White Copy - orig,nator Canary Copy - FlowEneines' Pink Copy - PC AE . Goldenrod Copy - OC

.t - A y 3 gy f NONCONFORMANCE REPORT (CONT' .= __ ~ f.31ocid9_Cantinued,. Page_l,_Blochs_2,__4, and 10 aca=o.__ 500 e c or / 6-1FCB-20-H1 M - 204 G H - 610 -4 Final Location _10-1EC B -A3_-H3 _10_ lECB _43-H2 10_-lEGB.43-H1 Note:_Other-nonconforming hangcr_ assemblies _ located _in_ storage _ warehouse.4O *M/_//4& 3M d//J 5 5~h~ [.. d f M _ W W l $ f ? ? ! M -C. T-NSN$~-T 7" g]J[/ ' Q //'~. h ? _N onconform an ce_no t ed_d urin g_in s t a l l tinn in npection.__Q_ list _numbr r - Hr-Vt: sn e-va rinn = 1 - r ~ 7 Hold "rng e Applied. HLOCK 20_ continued from nage_1 /O_~I f/] W L__$ {-7Y Item #2 a 3 - Route to Pro, ject Engineering. 4StT-HI d'ar r "^- 27% E-e(,tec(,qqg qJc'mu-e w -n 40 4-v ~- / n-. -n <a cta 1 m ilcr Sc:2 !!:c cr = :=iM ^ for " "" it--!ct: '"'"4" ta-ad -":ts ? " ng, diamet __ - ... a- ~ "" direci '""--ne^ d ne t S c ~ ' "~ , m:c?r ' - T-O f_O'p i rCQ' 'hc '".O ri2 7 CycI #i " 4 ^"A Material specification ASME II Part A. _on _t tte__h e a d_01__b_olts__an d__LCERWS_ Dad _ortone_ cad __of_s_t uds_a Material Spe_cification ASME 11 Part A. SA-194 states (a)"all nuts shall bear the manufacturer's ide marking".._(b)._ nuts shall be Icg_f bl n ca_ tion i Lstamped to indicate grade and pr.ocess of manufacturer per table V._. field _ Recommendation - Proiect Engineering to notify _Itt Grinnell to ship rep _lacement n reguiring_ nuts and bolts which have been s;iipned to date and that all future shipment and bolts. Field requests that replacement nuts and_ bolts be packaged in a kit form with each kit iden e nuts _the._appropr_iate_ hanger mari_ number _ Fi el d reoucitS_a._co_adi tio na]_rcle.Asg. lot._ ins _tal l a t i on o f nn aco n f_qnn i n Aanners -- Eased-.on-rephcc::cnt n# y the hakinn mtor_ial -ftar receipt at the,inhsi tn (EI'1 't naracra$ '; _'1) AO tw^t. FseA~nirex 77-v'~M Prf k-4 b -/:/ d h A-se -/C 7EELE'1St* &n /GMAMr. kh ~~ A- ' YNG pt Ams"AtCl../c'S N Lt5YW g felt 6 - t u ~7 (> pg. _g. ______n- _ (A.:i~:.) w m.ce,y o,wo.,o,

" * ~
c.a., c..y rw r Peak Copy

- PO AE Gold.a,od Copy - OC e 9 N

/ Q'y .,4 . ' i' d' F /'///,f'hi Q Q Q-)~-C NONCONFORMANCE REPORT (CONT *D) cac$ Y25 _= T.2. Engi.neering Disposition - Cont'd = ... a c a o k'hile SA-193 studs require marking, SA-307 nuts do not require marking by Code or specification.- Item 3: There is no evidence that this item is a nonconformance. The fact that the items gonstitute a nonconformance. No nonconformance with the Code or the hanger specification exist:.. ITT Gr_innell's QA-program assures that engin_ccring department's design. the_ items conforn to those specified by ITT Grinnell's A more detailed clarification is set forth in ITT Grinnell's response to NCR 428 of 6/18/76 which is attached. f,f,(bfh l s i j i y 1 's A 2 3 b b ed,r q mrs se W. .( Jsec, 4 7, .,,. c q, g p, 4gg a n_p,p Qc_,,_g,,,,,,.(,( .g C.- ~ e _ a cx S % + % V W d eL,\\c_,Av G r w e % tIcrl. v4 m t(g bik.),b d 1 9 l[1 hL- ..a.-, ~~ ^ whai. copy . o,w n.,o,

EE c.n.ry copy

- ri.=s c,,in P6nk Copy - POAE Coed.nrod Copy - OC

T a (lh M.E M..O I: ^ t "_.4. !.M 4 4 A k/557EA. ~ ~2Af/$Nb_._ s-y's-7g wuALCk 9'M F "'.%f4_. 4PPL /cA l'soiJ R'e<:.ciO g,v, a a, ? awn 7.-s//.y-// - .,.,.6,,.,., . c <<. .N .-/ 0

M*".yy fU: / V...N/ ?.... Y'/) l (- f -

V - h Io // j j ) . y_,-( (. p q. jj,y, s ') YO - VC 8.'/3 ///' _. Eb ? 'I %-de-3-7

q Q ;_ t,t_,,y-4 // :

p. -6// A s*

37 = 2 H' E -T - H.S _,,( g y yy ~

2. -dit 9 3.

% - 6*N-C 1.'L' /5'

Rc8-t - H (?

q <j)

y j.g.<;e- ? yg

, -, 7y. - 3 '),_?_-2/28-2.0 - /// ~ / 2_ f A / -6/s - V - A J y

- &n

. ~9 x-gy, _3 y )4.J?8.2.C_:'-/....

7).W.Lllf 0 -L ~ ll 2 5b l2

'Mc C - 1 C -Htc ~ /-6f.) -V 7 .:. -6//- Cr-3 t /.s;so. 3 - g ' 5). ]9.- /f60 'l? * // 'k. --./ A..! $ 0 ~ Y ? f !. 3 _.. _ J7] i 'I-iE?9 -a -/ 7 ~ Q), jy.,7,(g ,3 _.3 pj 3 )..? .] - A.fc!? 20 -//tt. y /-6/<>. 4 / /-6e ,- g,/. c- . > - ca - r - =- 7 - d u t,<.3 2. - f L) {f-)))r & / -j-f/3 , t 'c + ? .,- g,, p. w L-)D A GG G - 2 5-////...?o).3 - T C - i 7-H4 f_y) ty. t e;c; B - 3 3 -f/t/

7. - c s - s -i.e x-6 n.3 -2 7

.x..g,,-3. g f j\\ (L Ley fz 7.7 ,,,5 h -l. Ed* 9 0 ~ 5 ~'!I.?/ 12-A6C.C - 7 C-ff d i cz.-6//-ca 27 / i'- 2 a c. 6-3 3,vc .? p} l ), - zi c e-2 s-//g n-c//..s-/ p 4ve -y./ y. $ / 0' '~Lcj-34:..A'E... D} 5 - 7 T&B Hz hh .4 t c;/'s -s -.::./?^ N-b'c8-3 E //S.'. .:y) /V -/ //c /1 - /- Wi3 9 / -srs-d 3 K ~ svi. 1 2.y }s !) io -t Fce-s c -i/3 .)-Q iz g,.g xg.y s-- dio - S 3o ' g g,,. 3 So

,- c a 3 - 7,$. 7

'9 ,l ' b _/ 8.-Mc;G _n - Hf -. 3 f} t 2s - 1cice zy.y 3 - GN 3 S,l 2 I !h2.k~.2.0k-(iz ... -.. R /.7 7.p.B ///

t

/ 6/s -y-z 'E 3.7. /SE /M_.. 'l!) t 7 2..cs,-y.;y -- P 4c G '. : m's .: -x n 2 /

z. s,,- g. /,

U*) if- ?.A C 8.-3_L-/5. 3 9) < ?- R + E-z - Ht/ 3 w m rS,,,.. x-ei,. g - s N cusc a ,/./- M- ? Ild?:. l.!/.~5 b'./.r'/.h<. 5'N - 7. k<B - A-iM R 2.- u. r-m

2.,s //- s,, -

Y [V .U. /l( 0 - /. '" /ld_ . l/ / M - ).//(,f5 / '/j.? R-dN-S'- r.3 . x - c,v sg !9. 7-Y ~. $llCA:/ l'!E_. 'ls) ? '/ -X //&C -L-f/q' N Q a -co-:s -w 2.- <co.3 ;< .Y-2. Hc G-7 -N/' ' t// 't y wcE M// ',\\q n-2-sa-e-n 2.s,,-e-g . !.J'- ), ffc.G - / - M ll [V)s Q$,h t () ? i ;h /^ T -- //2 .a-da-a-a-n - r,,- n.u 3 &,12^-7f/cS-i.'.H/0

P-e-< r T - ) /0 - ? t=ca 3r -i

.2. ..Y-( v y up !-//Gc - ! +>-Ht- </ s) Oc wow sa A /eccnu,i.v; unc y9 .m -p i c g - 3 y -// g . - ~

f...yf!1.I t

M K M ofM M 9_t & ! ,,,.//Z)i4-s&,, JPliWldw n. u.a. - -. - - - = f.')9/ 'l?$ a'.-- ,,c, .......ox,..--- .-.--..-..-.--.---.-..w = .-. ~. Ald, W 69f,. A&s... ...-....-......w. ~ d*-/d-YS ... 2 n. ....$6 Y'b! k kfr'Al' .N.dhM ' d b O -<A-y? O )f, Ae. Z $r f / %.c'w g - .....- Zle&<*<-Sk W.. -. - -...... .S'$........-. /'d - 3lEEY -$b?'S'..... --....--.. 6AAf?I/.-. - -.-- - O f& . 34Nr .. -.. -. Stt)4 f/ [ 7 8 6 7 ~. ,-c,1o ~,:io S*7 {_ 7 9- / Mcd-/-y.7 0 641Ai/..._-. f Sai w d , g,, c. -3. v StuA (; [1~Citf.. . v. ...... }. ..f ?. M - /./kB /- /-ld. Lt amp. [ _.......---.1 .. / ? .. A A/4~..... -. .SidAV. ff?2tif . _ _ _ g_- 6'! / /-/4 C8,/O-s -/6... pc - ? X * /~l-T..... . C S A /21 h -..--.. -... - - --... - w A% ..-. 5AAlf 2 - G 11 -6.I c:, .. -. ..-.......:.5h.)AV...57~t0itl~. dF / b ' 0 .;t. /~eA,2. 2. - /g / '?. - 2 - g,, (, y-64Am$ }.' 6 // /0 - ?-FCA,,_3..s'- t-/,h- ) .... C l A p t /... O t5 /0 - 7.R0- 2n - U-/3 ....-..--.g-h f. 5272 T.. ~% 2.rcit-6,-/o / 5tJA t 9 dd /u -X/~c8. 2 x.--//-t.? stost,s'Tsa f.,.--)N f'5h

4 - %)=~d/.S - /k - N, /...

&LArnp ~ u z.-c,y - y-ea. 6f. _. _. /0 - 2 i=~c8 ~% L-W6 . -...... %. 3 StJAt7.s ?7? tr 7' ..... y k .c -6 :! :5 v- . S?.... / 0 ~ 5 N $ ? L.' l ! S.. y 5 (O A y' S l~A'// f.....- N.' ../ 2 - / Scd, c-fo i7

L 3 A. - W

- && A /H f .P ..,,_,,.,/. /t- /t;co - 7 x - // 2 z. G i l 7.? '-. f,.vg y. g 7fe v7 ]- 12. t o - X Fc B - 7.x - H & f-cao - s z.' clamp - %y 73 / 2- /N'a - 2' /N /.. cLiim p. _.. ..... Q. -.{ 4 7 y t tr-t NEW~V!'M cum

~ d.r? MEMORANDUM e 10_,,,. _ _, .. V O I ? I -. = * * - - ' - - - * - * ' V 8% 9, o Nk - ~ * * - - * ~ ~ " ~ - ' * ' ~ '

* * * * ~ ~

. ;-p:- 9 l%, ... _ _.e u.... '7.5~... IP- / Hcd-l-W //... .- ?lA AiA ~ ~ 5A!" 14- -. - - E. W'%' M A- - - - 7.7..- 'A. l - az - c,,i-c, - n f 6 c B,~ ^#- 77.. /o - 2 R-B ~9 S~ ;M,N / --. #2 dd / -- -- --- .,. m. 3 - 5' ... M M/572af--.. 79 sA.p.,,,E,o : 2 .... 44 A m A -- rn 20 2 R - /H&B-2 -t/S' .. C L A m P...

- c,, ( 0

f

'J. L ./ 7 - / M c s,/ - H M aAm P. f _ c,, c, - e /O-2 i'cB 35 // f .... 4*LA m 0. i 23..... s'A M E .5LU/1 V. SThat .....k- ~ Ec?b.e ~ '].3 s A m E-Ec E Boll ~ 4 C.CEM &Vy.. . --.. h' '7 ~, f_ 4 / 0 -.3 ' J./$ -/ 068-2 'N 3 C41M9 s-tN -k /g-/-Y6Y~f/-//2- .. 9 'h.' f h SYOAlj. 5 7X'it T~ 9d SAME 64 A/H f. 2 -con-c

> t.7 97_

/O -2.fc8 - 2. x -/H 7 & LAMP ' c, r 9 /?. l~!^82f 'I' i ' e . s@x -m

T ga.bO}

-m ( / . _4 .M.E..M O.. R.A..N._.D...U M I8). ( *.4 ATf' M. 0 69t.1. .......DAIC ..-...I9-- ... e ~... ; .. ~ s.... .. _.., _ pg,, _ g 1."* 7 9. .M] -H4B - l - N.s...--- . c &A n;P...-.. _.._... _....-....._.. . _. /. 0 0..... S A D 1 E. .. _.._.. _ GO.) A <./. _. S. TR.. U. T.._. _ ___.. _ .-_.. /. 0. /...../i--/44 8-J.S*- 4/8 .... K<.g A y,c7X. a. /. _.].O. .. r2. --/4 c B.-2.C -H/. [......... &.4. 4.N..1 ..J23 /O. -/&&/ ?' -0X .... 3 dA y..sTMl.......... _.. .!!)V. . / &&&&/2-#.2-O,a..r. .... 446!@.P.. .. j7 /&&S--33 -1.:. ~/ ..... _S..a.M. _. t..c..re. aT... i- . /04 /2.-McB-33 -//k. -... 6?dm A..._.... -.. _... _.... -.... x( .../27... /.2 -/4KBMHd.....- cM-da?! D' ~ S Y ............_.._._....._._..._._h._.k f ........ _ _. __.-_........_......._..,4 .A 3 \\ ._.... _.. __K g 9 \\3 w% Yy...<) -N cc i y._..

k 5 1 'h$- I f O N \\.z ~ ( i ~ g-j uj g) l S-i wgi _, C, - . \\\\ ' $ $ e' s. \\ t.< j D 'i f-- (NK: p: w$ s!,) ',1,y e,

y y

s c s e = \\. D s NA l ,l t ( 'N )5 l 1 N

a

,d .i ' ) N s Ig s el y I e s! q'; B: l F V i)c s e s k 9 \\h b = s ( s e., e.- ~ t

x s

E, > s ). ( cu s o . x-j s fN ) k l 5' o J %',4 k k i E O l t,. - N 'i 3 N V [ d b u 4 n 2 o e t h rf, I b ) ] w .e. s y c -f l 1, i g g p s o q _y v y = ( o( w OZ 1; i-M- E R x LL. t I b S 5 ,c q1 1 c( t ',,l, \\., w g

y. (,

g, !'- ), 7-Q p, g vi e n e on y, g,2 g n to ta n s. g ~g $ t R n o e 3' -[ 1 Q \\ I 5 O i D k I tJ k I M M O M 'e I', ^ s t c i4 ! N z e g i i 3 'e 'S R R D 2 S 'l n $ X i l

.R t 'h R S R 9

Q k $ d i T, ? Y j '$ - ) i 'f i 9 i i h h k y Q C' i c s h c. e, t1 t: e, - ~ = q.' c< c' c e< c( c,. x e ss .J a, M i p. n Q L w h I k )i } ;i 6 C E % T 0? a te 09 q ta ~ 1ag 't i I 't 2 2 y : y 9] '$ ej e t g eJ d e s a i m l' i c t .c 1 k 3 $ k $ 5 .E h $ 5 * .= = z, ~ d-t . fi 's 'Q.(' k h h h th b,,' h_ s! c, s s o t: .s a, r er e i h,e [e e: e e c:. 1 e c am. 1 n t i h bb 2 '"h 3 'j' $ U ?H tl s e y e'i clU h h h t}2 SJg q,' ?t s c.g y g g 3g g s.1 7 y s N ( N e Q Q, M d Q t'l C,'ilt{- O 6 Q,Q i Q] y QJ y, ( q3 ~

~ l ' q, xp.=v:' ~ mny.pa.gu,y..: s.+;.,..,f - ~~~~m.r.R 4 --.wcrrow, _ ...,y yyp. 4 r, m 'L ITTGrinnellCorporation &,.~ s? 5 ~1 Dans & Paige Avenue N.E. G Telephora (216)399 7566 s 5%rren. Ohio 44401. y Jtme 18,1976 l 1 4 0, Bn #1000 h chtel. Associates Professicnal Cbrporation m.; 43 Sm th State Road sit 63diryi"t* n Artsor, Michitrm 310106 Eid ef' tention: Mr. R.1 Castleberry -H i Pn> ject Dgineer .)j jhject: Cunstr.cru Pbwer Ctrpany Hidland Pleavt - Job 7??D lp 4m ~ P.O. f 7270-M-105-AC y V C126.169 nt.lemen: 2SH R mm j Wednenday, Jtme 16, 397G,11ws resickmt Dechtel Ire.pector, D. IfcMillin, 3 wa:Ced a cqrf of Ncn-0.xttc,rnance Report 042B to ITT Grinre11 personr.e1. copy of this Ncxt-Cbnforcance Ecport. in attached. Mr. M115133n stated ( g w mtil this problem ws recoJved, there couad be no furtix r thi xmnts g 6 1 7.aterial for the subject project. p4 l G e fol3cwing is ITI Crinrell's respmsc -to the three (3) Ncn-Otinfttruances - p' g '[h7 it.ted on Page "2" of the hQmformance Reprt- {:l &ji, 5 ,s T isechte3 3*m-Cortformmen: 7he followina conditions emimy to the atxwe exist on all asse-blien N u furnished to date under nrrchase Older 7220-M-10 fat.C; 4 hi:. a) thterial Certificates of Coq >15ance &> not specily noterial \\q specificaticus, grudes, c3 noses or types usei in Iabrication. b3 "Ihterial Cert.ificates of Ccr(311ance do rot specify the reans 1 e.,, of material identification inc1w33ng the unrking coda utilized. A,h ~ q .'y .q n9 l5-8?:h? t F h ;;I ,,7,' / u d.+: . 3 6. j n=

ce=f w m une n

2.. =

u -~ o-e - - - - ~ ~

4;;:.4 = [ )f)i { (_ ' h; 1 }at i I 1 70s Mr. R.1.. Castleberry - B chtel e i ' SUfUIX!r: (bnsamm Pruer Oanpany - Midland Plant - Job 7220 T@ PAGC 2 in h' X; ~ i 1 x. 3)' ITT Grirmell's respmr.e: [_@ h' Approxirste)y one year ago, ITT Grd2csell detected a conflict in the' 3 ivqttirencrrts of HA 370D versus the requixemnts of Dsd6ection Mr. l An it applies to shi;xents to ITT Ctdnnell's esmtes:els, our interpre-5 i tation of he certificarica requirecerrts, is that the ntles dei $r.ed y in Sub At t.iole NP M21 chould apply for an noteidals em:pt those h used is, Class "1" nort-standard stggorts and thme supports requivire impact testing. It in also our op. inion that the requircrents c,1

l0 NA 3700 alv) /u' tic]c hT 2000 rqiply both within Ceiraren's neufacturirm h

faci.11ty and on noterial supplied by ITT Crinnen's vendotu. J ' Dais hrsd been vertally discussed with Ecchtel-Ann /etur perocecc1 car)y in g 197G and agreed upon. e A Ih certificates of Cbrpliance snhrni n tted in the sa-pie data package, hf giwn a code "1" appiuval by Ek datel-Ann Artre on Jctrwuy 76, 1976, b rvDect ITI Grinnen's yeaition. provided with the material shipped 7he actual Certifleates of Corpliance 3 '. are virtually identical with the $l 9(package.sapple Oertificate of Oxpliance included in the Bechte.1 opproved data .d I Jn order to reso]ve this matter on a fcuTm1 Insis, ITT Grdrmen riotwited M $5 M

t. hat a Co$e Crise be cenerated to elisninate any poterstial quentions that adr.ht arise.

ntis 0:rje Case, (1728,ws appioved by AE2tE in Rrm.W, Q $1 1975. It has received fornal approval,01 the U.S. Nuclehr Ecculatory 4 p$ Cbrmiceim, and is ir.cluded in Regulatory Guide 1.8h, Revisicn "6", g"1Y dated May.1976. W I \\ On Decesnber 27, 3975 ITF Grinnell :mquested Ikchtel approval of thin f R Code Case for use on the Midland pruject.. Altivxigh ITT cringe 11 has fonowed up cm this matter, we have had no response frua Ihchtel as of i s \\g T@ this date. '. l Ihe Dechtel YeSident inspector has continually ve ied that Tr Grinnell - Pipe Hanger Divisiran is Ionowing the 2equirencnts c,f HA 3700, HA 40D0, hh d and Subsection Nr dring the manufacturing phase at the Warren, Ohio N \\ g-facility. The Ormg system utilim! by JTI G:irciell in do_u ented in Vdy B{q% Quality Oantrol Pzu::edure 0?A009. A copy of the Ocde 1.isting for various 5.' crinnen materials, as defined by this qrlity contrei Procedure..in k y attached. p La d3f requested, ITI Grinmu will be pleased to sube:it a oc}rf of this Quality % 7 5 corrtzul hoce&ue to Bechtel on a fortal basis. $-} 4 d q n;.S ~ ~ - - - . - -. -. -.. - - - - - - - jg{li - ~

l T A. N .0 + he. R. L. Cantleberry - D2chtui. ? o ~ SU1LTECT: Cbewuners ib.wse OcvTxany - 113dland P.lant - Jcb 7220 I .PAGE 3 7 J h. i ?

2) ITP Cninnell's Respon+e (Ccnt8d. ):

m It Ney le noted that the materials used in cerTenent cupports for the I;i culdect project, are defined citMe en ITT Grittrell amscir.gs (for T c%a,ent stardard supports) w on Bechtel opproved hanger cketchec. i Verification of material usage fw ccrponent stalard supp:>rts nust t te acconplished at tJe Warren Plant. [j .F ~1) &chtel Non-Cbnformmee: j In }hx nuts furnished with sitd-lolta narked 'B-7' (IGE Sbl93) ar r identified as required ly. ASIE Ste-193 partt. o e not 9 13.1 ard N2E EA.194 paru. 3 23a and 13b. ITT Grinnell'a Response: _puy The Dv,ineering Depertncnts within. TIT Crinnell'r: JSpe H j M grs. In ccco designs, cuch as the rigure #200 hytiruolic shock and W scne bolting naterial am prinvarily chear loatis. sway suppresse and tie rigu e E 12ve of the bolting uaterbin used as pins in tk M11 bushingc on the'lhin in particular 5 arcmrentioned two (?) pIulucts. stub in accordance with SA 193. Ik cordirgly, they Mve. cpecified alloy 3 A-307, Grude "B".the nuto used with tkoe otwis are spectified as A-307, Grade "#' eSince there are very Icw tensile 1 cads, x-it "Ilete are no narking requirvrents ferr A 307 nuts. k $ Divisiori Engineering Departr.ents."The Warun Plant has net the requirecen g 3 behtel Inspector. 'lhis has been ve.rified by the resident g qy s M

3) Bedstel Neo-conforunnee:

p: ) .a e b No mxterial ichntificarico parkirg w descriptico is provided for the 4 N w follming additicnal types of fastener materials. - g3, b) Hex head bolts and rarts fe pipe.cla::p.t. g'W c) Miscenanceus hex nuts. h.Pg

hl l'IT Grinnell's I:esponce:

JY $i 'Q- $. Article NP-71SD, states, in piet., "caterirG fce r-n'ai ites:n shall be arv identifiable an acceptable trateriais at all tiees". controlled durir \\[h ? l! W (%y i 3 l

7 RgqhpM5'5?lQ.'%!?%%@ W.:f;'.i;i. * ^, y , ; i,49 :ay. - -.e-

s..

-e.. p c..;. ;..t . o 50:' Mr. R. L. Castleberry - Becirtel [. SUR70UT: h_rs Ibser Cbcpany - Mid1hnd P1hnt - Job 7220 PAGC 4 a

ffC-p

}l.3) ITT Ceinnellt a Response (Cbntid. h In: 3npimnting this zuguirunent, 2TT Crinnell did wler locik to NA 376S 6 for a definition. Acconliigly bolts and nuts 1" Tmiral directer and estaller are not Ocded in accor,duw:e with the wqttirecras defined in Qaality Ctotrtil Procedute #02A003. ITr Ce.inne31's pcmition las been revie $<ith the local Dechtel Isopector and hic ecomeme received. If Deditel feels that ITI Crimell shee.nd nark the shipping cocetainus with a tstatenent statina that scme of the f asteners incitdod, caply with the requirmints of A-307, etc., t.his can le accxzipliche<3 drwings and/ac custarer ageoved hanger sketches, de Jh>ever, ~ 9 c. rygtn.recents. 3t is ITT Gninne33's opinion that no action is required. ng W feel that this response should eJahle you to C10GC Cut Non-CDnfLN hepcen R428. trew-e will be given to any questions yco my have. 1 Very truly youru, e n D. M. Sewell b Division Qa21ity A~;umnec & nager ) .I h; DG/jb Enc. l \\ cc:, P. Milman - Providence J. Boyd - Psov:idence

n. Decrictofaru - Pnwidence N

D. HaMillin - Bechtel R. Malcahey - Providence 4 M. P3ur Aett '- Pr*.svidence h A. Rczvin - Warw ', N)

r. smni.n -

n .Jp n. str. y - war m, i, ) 4.==% e ~ e ,,*==a-..- ~

5?' ,I6jf..,.l'hij - ?,1 '~ ~ ' ~ '~ 4...

x. : -

j."hh'.. r ATTACFDfDfT I l '{"

D2AODP,

'l..' NATDtIAI. LETTER CODE '.f. : ?J f-SA-36 yyic' * - SA-53 Cr. A A TQ l- ,SA-53 Cr. 3 H ?

SA-106 Cr. A TF i

'SA-106 Cr..B K SA-382 F-22 a TR~ ~! SA-193 cc. B7 E I SA-194 Cr. 2R f,I Y SA-194 Cr, 7 SA-216 Cr.:WCA E TB SA-236 Cr. WCB TA SA-240 Type 304 TE SA-240 Type 316 Yr SA-266 Cle1 N k< SA-266 Cle-2 P SA-265 Cle-3 {' SA-306 Cr. 50 .-Q )

B SA-306 cr. SS D

SA-306 Cr. 60 C V EA-306 cr. 65 SA-306 Cr. 20 H U . 8A-307 cr. A x St.-307 'Cr. B L SA-312 Type 304 l T3 SA-312 Type 316 Ti a SA-376 *I9pe 304 Dt 4 Tc SA-376 Type -316 g TV SA-387 Cr. 22 CL-1 ~TC

d

.i SA-3S7 Cr. 22 CIr-2 TD' 9 SA-479 Type 304 Tu ' - ,%i SA-479 Type 316 TR ,73.: A500 Cr. B ( YW ','4 A500 Cr. C 5 A501 TI ] Tz SA-315 ar. 65

i V

A-668 C~ C n.. A-66B C.. D S A-668 Cz.. F \\ T .N ,1013 y 2020 K AISI 4140 g ? TL A AISI 411A0 TH k SA306 cr. 75 k O' > m aas xA w4 cr ac mp y, wm p on ac c ./13% P 7 t. ~ w XE h kh Y

NONCONFORMANCE REPORT '**'.2 , o n A WING /Pa a r No, n E V.

v. enoJECr No, or -

hpo it nE arE 'oarE 7223-A pFA

4 7993

/- 3 9. o ssPo b/h "*" ser tom Co NCu n R E NC C a aveu oesenseriou -c6 p > g o(ttr/h', V3'k.'f-M l"", f ' l*"**"l **' - t

a. irru tocarsom Beinforctnn Steel as.oarao e Aux. B1de

'C' Line / rA']$(&.),,: 4,10.7 L .s 26; ..sen.atmuuman .. st a nrue s ysr e u no. 1/n jjs. acetacrurur cant wo. j ncV. ...in n ..c..-.i-sJeunenase onora no. 4/A UjA k d**. / I ... oc resto susrecreou etan no. U/A is. ne ctaccucur sen.at no. C, h.......,.urj ( l.jf./A (.e -f f - 7,;; .... ~ C-231-2-904 Rev. O U/A e cournacron,6cca reon y#" ""'* *'"~$' i s. a sur. O v=s " souacE b/b ftwo non itmetM nn si.~nourenG insinucreons:. gnourc vo resto sacearsnimo O aou'< 'o "a' casa' sue = aviso a stru .. ~ouco~,onu ~oconoiriou, Four 16 slab devels at the intersection of 'C' line vall and roof slab at Elev. 624'0" vere h c m n ce n + +hn cono ne tho in' linn un11 anving enrm vennvaL Rvnken anunin rit thtbotton of the ninb nye located 21"_t_o 40" cast of 7.h line vall. Top dovel broken off 20" east of 7.4 line vall. Pnnegnonymn.n nn+na anv$r On Rurveillante Tnnpentinn. O TM nt !L203 One tna,_appH ed. na (Jricto oiscostrion I Rlock'20 RPviSciofL agerecto e couurnoarsoninourz vo enosecr enGiureninG mi. riri.o oiscosition n asui.rs. Reworks as,follousV6 rill 1 J/2" Diam Jol(s, fill holcrdith nbo-slirink 'ghou,t/ N [Maco$3M 1dlLshhedssinAtdorfets.*doutin'o'of bars)shall he ikaccbid_ance t wNhthe \\ fakturerls insAructAns. Emb_e&[t lengthsihall be in\\codformank ma with thelrescr'ibed thble-66\\Dwg. 'Q-211,\\Rev.\\4. typecjpd it'nplernen'tatihn date on or about 6/11/h6. \\ /dbCN/M D '4Y6 N #1/ N )wre / 6-4-$

22. ENGINEC n4NG otsrose fioN

/ b '

23. ENGINEEnlNG ossPostraoM REsul.rst N

- m

24. 8. OEssCH CH ANGc RCoUff4 Eo C No O res.secavr4cnao.

= 0 e... p a a WING n g v. oCN ..v. SPEC. R t v. A po. i no s s-i .av. Whi-

Co iy

- Origm. tor ec Ga-a Cena y rapy - Field Engloeer Pinir t.,,y - PQAE Goldenrod Copy - OC

NONCONFORMANCE REPORT (CONT'D) 2.__o,1 429 .. race BLOCK 30._Rev.isjon ReNork_aS_folloWSl__ Drill I l/2" diam._A0les fill holes with non-shrink arout (Embeco 636) and set a _the missing.lsottom_ dowels. For_tbe_s_inglelt.op_ bat._ drill 2_1/2" diam, hole, set the dowel through - the wall _and_filLthe__ hole _with Fmheco_636_by_ funneling _through_a_ tube._at_the_same_ time _providing adequate _ vent..lo_ensureJropet_ grouting.__ Grouting _of_hars _sball be in accordance with the manufac-t_urer's instructions._ Embedment lengths shall be in conf' rmance with the p.rescribed table on o Ihtg.3:211._ReL_1._Izper,_ted imp _Lementation date on or about 6/11/76. ((Qu. trac f c, 'y. n r .A., (-rA / V i s e M V 9 L ~ wha. copy - o,i in.,o' r ~ co"Is'"**' nm copy Gold.nrod Copy - OC s tx

NONCONFORMANCE REPORT oW A WDNG/PA M 7 No, or 1 430 e R E V. ,, PR oJECT No. See Block 19 7220 W -1.: d Mx I 2. R E POR, CD Si oAYg

25. o 65 POSIT 3.N LoNC uNNE NCE 3., c - o n C..P r.o,.

o= ~. i. ~u""*"2 FCB-35-5611_-6-7___ hux _Blfig._El_184 F &__6.9 lirte_R d. ",6 a b i.s O; [7g' I " " '! " " I ^. ...d coC A ..N -,, v A t.o n e ir s l r 2ipe_SpAols 'h~-E-74 ' " a a ' u' 5 '" = ~ a o-n a=P'ac==ca "aa'ao-2ECB-35:5611-6-8 i ac v. ~ > " ' " " - - - " - 5 PuFtC H A SE onDE se No. fla _RA i g o. oC P IE Lo INSPLC, #oN Pt A N No. e.e,.......

16. R E PL A CE ML N Y SE RI AL No.

7220 M-104A-AC Rav._2 NA . C o ~ r. A C ro,coC41. flA " " * " " - ~ ' - ' - " - .,,.A,.. a... ...,ou Ce ITT Grinnell, KernersvilLe, florth Carolino - ',$.' O ~o _ _ _ S_upplier .... o o,,,u., ~,,. u C.... g. u, t, o... t o c,.G, u o,~. ,o. u,.vo-A,...AusuP....so. M '(1T Ae "."'TiWW-480fRev. 2 show the By-oass line around the decay hea't removal heat exchancer i'-611-6 Rev. 5._ shows the itnociated pipe srcols to he 2ECG37 S611-te-7_anLZECE-32-5611-6-8. Contrary to the above, the code name plates identify the subject sp_ools to be 2FCB-35-5611-6-7 and 2FCB _Ronc.onformance discovered during drawing / hardware review (Q number 4.114). Two QC hold tags applied, s 2o y rit ou oisPos...on gr.c to neto-c No A vioninour c to Pnost C1 c uc.u t e n.no ,,,,, c o o.s,o s,,,o, o r s um, s.

ield r_ecommends that project engineerino revise M-411 Rev 3 M-480 Rev 2, and M-611-6 Rev 5 to correspond to existing pipe spool code name plates.

Spools are in perman_ent location (not welded) and documentation is on site., bc#&v/-/i/!/ /-- ?-M N b.J N 6k 74 22 [ h G tN E E R ING D4LPoSIT 60 N 2 3. E reg eN C L MIP.G o 0LPo& f,8o N M C $u L T $: 24.15 DESIGN CH ANGL RLoulHCo Ono U."..""***'" - ' ^ * * ' ' ' ^ " ' " O vr s. a e A r14Csco, o.e os A weeen RE V. oCM SPEC R E V.

Aoo,

.womo.sase.. esc,o- ~~ c.*a sues Wriste Copy - Ot egenator. o G-G 3-2 Ceners Copy - F 6eid E no.neer Go denrod Copy - C

? NOfJCONFORMANCE REPORT " h 4"j"i --s. oR Aw,NG,,A R T NO iA s-Butgt ) l. RE v. 1.Ro2ECT N O. .. R E,O RTEo E T 7220-M-616 !'<o A T E<.,65 2 I220 M/// 2n .. O.,0..T f0 N CO N Cv R R E NC E ' - " ' - " " " " ' ~ l " "' i I I

3. 8 TEM oE SCR8FT f 08+=

. 1, o1 - ri.a-c 3

0. 4T E M LOC AT tO N 0 3. V A LtD A TE D E Y I

DATE . rn rhan Stec1 ine % no1 .s N 1 Lach 14 ,.,en. 1,svsTEM NO. - J. e r 'r : V . : n -, 7t' .. sER. A L Nuum ER AuTU ... R E rL A C E M E N T, A R T. N O. l HBC-13 3-S616 7 N/A N/A 'REv ...,.....n....o. ..a I

s. PURCN Ast ORDE R NO.

19. OC F tE LD tN SPEC TION PL A N NO.

16. RE PL A CE ME N T SE RI A L NO.

_72ZD-V lf3A C N/A N/A

6. CONT R ACTORfLOC ATION It.ASME

{] VES 9 7. 50U RCE ITT Grinnell, Kernersville, NC ,',E,' o NO Supplier S S. ROUT tNG INSTRUCTIONS Q ROUTE TO FaELO ENGtNEERING ROUTE TO M ATERI AL SUPER vlSON t o. NONCONFOR46NG CONDITION: Snegification 7220-M-201. referenced by PO 7220-M-104AC._ states in part IParaFraDh 9.1) nrh rop- -w,ii emhit s,na m, int,in syrtam for_thn enntrni nr nuniity anving (3hr;entinn n na hinn;ng a mwich_will_ assure th,* nit m, t a rial e inalnding pu rebn e ad n nd cubcont rn etael item c. ennrorm en thene unncirientions. Thin n y_cto n-chn11 he organi: ed in cuch n manner thaLit_will_h.c._notaible to relate every comnonent of the finir.hed soool to its fabrication history. " Contrary to the above. the data furnished with eine snoot IHBC-13 i-S616-7-7 (PO 7220-M-104AC, VR-64-51, p 20. O "o 'o'seo5'T'oa Or'<'o arcoa"rao^r'o* /aoure vo -ao'ecr =NGINE ERfMG mi. riELo o.srostT.ON REsULTs, 2 3. E NGIN E E R ING D eSPOSIT ION 2 3. ENGINEE RING ot%POslTION RESULT 5e e

14. GS DCSIGN CN ANGE REQUIRE ONO

"*'**""^"'"'$" 5 O vEs. sEE ArvACNED, D ***".*"'*'"'*" - a r. OC ACCE,7 ANCE o.... DR AWING REV. OCN SPEC. REV. Aoo. ..t.o..as e. e. ses c. e.,, s co e s-s White Copy - Orig 6nator QG%aa Canary Copy - Fleid Engineer Pink Copy - POAE Goldenrod Copy - OC

5 a I I. 4 y f ?; 1 c 3 o 1 m fado r .c n eF s od i i ,s t v re uo l r o e pv o a e r s s T l u J. a n d e o er r nr e h n o_ e a S taE ri og n 2,_ e fa n E r h t_ igl A id o t

r. f r

4 ieQC a oo OFPO r rep e m i y f R r p i o t o y C yp nt f poyd s e oCpo e e C o r d n yCe T h er i e d ) t it n l k h n D h l i o 6 T' c a n WCPG i ii N hr d O v e e C s t v a d ( i T a M v R d o O n h r P cp i E i R e h n n E w e e-e C r r b N i A r o + f M n s w R s t O m e w t n o i e F e v y l N m e t O d r i n p l C i i n a h N h n s s ON a' i r t s a c e u t n b o n e m i e f v u e m a n r u a t p c d a o n e h d_ i t h i c g w n n l i a i I r i r s u n e a a a d_ t h ) a l e d d l r m x e e i d r n A t P ) i t n o r e ) e n e a i u 4 r g l m G r4 c a \\ e n " l i i t f ( a o6 n 1 n 1 d a d B t 1 o n h S rm c t a c 4 l U r r 9 u 4 e r el S n no h a N pf 1 o i t a m k c i r E t s o T ais c. c a e s ' o t fon cI a O o l B n. a. m L O_ T J 2 i ? ( r I 8 _ 9 e __ 0 _ 0 . 8 e e c 1 i I

F e, p p -m l<- e NONCONFORMANCE REPORT 2 432 2 DR AWsNG/PA R T NO. e R E V. T. PR OJ E CT NO. O,

13. R E PO RT E D S V

} > r.pt i / h'DATE/gfs.- - - -- l - ~' j j - j ~ Spec. 7220- C-231 j6 7220

25. D15POSI T 80N CO NC UR R E NC E

3. E T E M OE SC RIPT f 0 N S. ST E M LOC AT tot 9 93

_ g p O/t[- " 4EM DAYd eDATEDSv di __ Mechanical Splices Aux B1dg F RB #2 lL -/?% e.stR.ALNU-.ER .. s T A R Tu.Tsu NO. ... E LACE-ENT,A NO. i N/A N/A 8'N/A ( l RE v. ....u.............. o i

5. Pu pCre A 50 O R DC R NO.

10. Q C F IE LD tw SPE C TION PL A N PeO, IS. 84 E PLACE M E N T SE RI AL NO.

N/A N/A N/A ~ = * " ' ' ~ " * - " - " -

6. CO NT R A C TO R/ LOC A T eO N tt.AS-E O ves

5ouaCe N/A .T r -. f3 NO Construction 8 0 ROUTING $N ST R UC T IO**S: ROUT E TO FIE LD EN GINE E RING O aou'r 'o = av raia' 5UPEa visOa ...NONCON,OR-.

GCONoiT,

"'Section 10.13.4 of Specification 7220 C 231 R v 6 states in part.that."If production and e sister splices are tested the sarnple frequency shall be one_p_ro_d_u_q_ tion _ splice of the first ten productiori splicew. " Contrary to the above. 42 #11 splices have been made with the use of two sister splig.es for testint. R eview of_. "As' Built" sketches indicates that all of the above splices were made in areas of extreme congestion or too ' close to construction joints to obtain a product' ion splice of sufficient length for tensile testing It is the intent 3 _to obtain two production splices within the first 100 splices as required in above referenced section 10.13 4 as e ,.. a r.E i.o o.5,0 s, T.O N ar.EtO R ECO-= E,.o AT.O N, Ou T E T O eRc,E CT E NG.N E E R G .. r.E t c. o.s,0. 7,o M R :s u L T., The above situag presented problems similar to those encountered when using curved rebar N@h"' series cadwelds (both ca ;es test only sister splices). He have #11 rebar to be cadwelded in the near future where production splices can -be taken. It is recommended that two production splices be taken within the first 100 splices (plus one additional sis ter splice) to insure adequate testing.g,,,-r 2 2. E NGIN E E N 6 peg DISPOSIT ION f* g gr 2 3. ENGINEE RING 08SPOSIT EON RE SULTS y q p.p ' i v v 6

24. SS DES 8GN CH %NGE REQutRED O NO

* " * c' ' " " * ' t a ' a ' " ' ' 'o ' 'n o "

0--''-a = >. OC 4 CCEeT A N CE O T Es..EE 4Tr4Cu to, U*** OR A wiMc R E,,. oCN .e =.eese.emeesc..e SPEC. REV. . A D O. 90000 3 Whate Copy - Or @neror Q C 4, a-a Cenery Copy - Field E ngineer

Pink Copy -

POAE g g Goldented Copy - OC g

I y

g 9

o. de c._. i s l pp a_ nga l 1 d l r o o l E ,n .i. q .o .c e E n E c iwA e.OC n i,. e i orPO 4 y 0_ p o y X, C ro uoyd o po C. C,C.n l. or ). D.- d. .. o T' w c. k n wn n,no sPC a_ O r 4_ C 0 ( 1 R_ T 1 L_ O P t E s R iL E N.- Q C 9 A M-R s O A F-r N-o_ O-c_ C e N R_ O N-CQ fo e w d e a i c_. y m r_ er g a n s r i. e u c d_ i d lp e ) d s t e o l u a n. n n t t c m. i o e i n 'n t o i a c d / d m 9 a r. T 1 o s f / k a n c o. r o n c_ l o t n_ B o q s i b_ ( o c / e

y I oj _..-. - _ _.e.. -f._. NONCONFORMANCE REPORT 433 c' 3 On a vytNG/P A RT NO e RE W. 7.Ph03ECTPeO 92 McPON 'O E6 ' > DATL 2 %. o t%PCs e I aON CO NCUR f*E NC E 8 I Drawing 7220-c-288 (Q) 4 7220 o t_ i4/M6 ---gl- -- ! " " j " "- l -" " ' ' ". _ s esem osscniPreon m e errantocArion e a rrro av r.cg *J o A r c Reinforcing Steel Auxiliary Bailding , dhg( J l6W-7f 4, sc M c A L FeUM f8E R

9. sf A N T up s vs T E M No N/A N/A N/A l' N c V.

t s, N EPL A C E M c N T P A ft 1 NO ews.at c e * *t s e e mmene.m O.% s PUHc M A %E Ost DE *. NO 9 4. Oc F EL LO INSPCC T*ON PL A N No 04 RcPL ActME NT s[RI AL NO

/A N/A N/A R IW ~ ~ * - ~ ' -

~ Ni;A c i s-56G o,7 - ~ ' - ~ ~ ' ~ - ~ "--" - i C nic - [f 7Ei- ~ ~ '.,. so o,. c a N/A ,,. ' E;, o .......... m... Construction .. ao u r.~<, i~si a va ous. g nour, io r.c Lo c uo.uc c a.~o o ourc v o ~Av e .AL svPenvison o~cO~.o

u. ucono..on. Drawing 7220-C-140 (Q), Rev. 8 general note 16 states in part, in no case shall the tolerance o'n cover exceed cinun one-third of the clear cover stipulated on the design drpving or in the

.<-7-4.u a.-.u w - - specification." Contrary to the above bottom slab dowels along 5.6 line'between C and D li'ne,_ top of concrete Elev. 624'-0", exceed the allowable tolerance, see Page 2 for existing location. Nonconformance noted during routine QC surveillance. Q-List #1.203. 2 Hold Tags applied. m ~ i 9 2glyntLo oisPosei.on K. cLo nccouucnoArionfaourc vo Puost c, racincrueur. e. s,-.s., g 2. s ic Lo cisPos.1,ou nesvLis: ' is - - - -. -. a _e..all dov:e.ls in_~o.ues.t.i.o..n._ by bendino to reet th.e. required' clear cover. 2" to 3" ___o f con crete. 2 ro un d_.ca c!L.doncLsh a il_bc_ chiDAcient_to_a lloy_p r_one r ben d i no. Bend-o - ina_shall_.be in_.accordance_with_Sec.. P 3D_of. Spec c C-231_ Rex _9 _. Imnlementation Date -- July 16, 1976. e,- /.b.. 4 <. /. _ _u n W./ .'; : co ~ 22 L N b t N L L fe l 4 G O t".PO b 8 T bOI4 2 3. c hGINL C RING & 4 POs T ION pt suLis: 6 6 o 2.. is otsian cn Ancc utause.s o Ono ...'....,""^"'^'""5"' U".<.'.". ' " ~ ' ' ' ' O O vcs. sec 411 Acueo. DR A v/INr. Rev. OcN '~ sw eaoes a s e,.= s*e a e r,. l sPF C RFV. ADO. g... 7

.m.-,=--

a..., _ _ _arw --- =-

==w-- = - -==.- g CanaevCcpy - F.ekt Enomeer Penk Copy - POAE Goksenrod Copy. OC

e% d i 9 3 i n i 3 ! I I I 1 : I I l i I i i l h I I i l k. e i all l i i i l i i J if i i 1 @'1i]-][ l 1 2 yp 1.! Nk5 j q i b'

)V

( o.. l I w i v h 1 i w i l.:a .m F i Dl 1 I i k i ng l [ s i i I g s* 523 5,5 i PI 1 i i i i~. t .)l 1 s i 4 -i.;' i i . m o. Q ' 'i ' l' N W is [ f, el-D'i I le ii y s i 1 e l .! 1 w %y dq 81 .x l jj j N l(is td l1 i .,i s S esl

(i.

y Ni I l. .. c. g i ', ;o 'g .a z i jy I ~s o u ,N + i oa O } } i i z d,i 19., l 4,' 'l s .l. j r w I 1 N i s lM i! j . y;- I I !G wR l i m i i3o i ds Yr i $.l e i i t o Q; I j i l l l l ,II l Ni l i i I (N .. _I { i f i l l. _..._L._. j i i t i,; i a-v i i. I l 't i i I i l i l P il i l 5 i i i a I

s A P' 3 NONCONFORMANCE REPORT l'**'. --... sums I Or 434 2 DN A WlNG /PA R T N O. s RE V. F, PR OJC CT NQ. b' D A T E,M 74 j "'"' j ~ ~ l -" "

92 RLPORTE BV Dwg. 72 20-C-2 88_(Q)

!4 7220 7J[y 2 5. D aSPO5 f1 SO N CO fvC UN h E N C E 3 S P E *4 DE SC R ePT TON

3. tT E M LOC A T tO N t,/O A T v

d I3 w i3 ATE Reinforcing Stecl Auxiliary Buildinsr ', d( h // 2

4. E E R I A L N U M es t R

9. ST A R T UP S Y ST E M N O.

15 N E f*L A C E M k N Y P A R T NO ngE e.eas s e e n t o. =e s=s e e een N/A N/A _p/A 1 5 PURCN ASE ORDE R NO 9 0. QC F tE LD IN 5PE C T ION PL A N NO. 3 6 REPL ACEME NT SERI A L NO. N/A N/A N/A CONT R A CT OR. LOC Af TON 09.ASME O vEs 8 2. 50uac c /A J,. RO U T.N c..N sT R UCi.ON S.

__m_,

IT N _ _ Construction t IT E M g; ROU r E T O r.E LO E NG N E E R.NG O t OuTE TO M A TE a'a' supe av'50a et h0NCON 8 OR M tNG CONOtT ION. Drawing 7220-C-202 _Rev. 5 Gene ra.1_No_t_e_fl5__s ta tes_ " Slab _doucls_ tom tch_ slab _re. info rH ng_nnless 2 otherwise noted." Drawing 7220-C-288 (Q), Rev. 4, indicates 12" spacing for slab reinforcing. Contrary to the_above, the first' top and bottom dowels are located 34" from the face of the wall. See Page_2_f.o.r_slet.ch_nf_cnis11nc douel location. Nonconformance noted durin u o_ urine _Qg_sm y_e1 Hance.. Q-Lis.t #1.203. One_ Uni d Tag _ap,n14 red - 5 20. 'tE LD Os5POSITOON @ r4CLD RE COMM E ND A TION / ROUT E TO PNOJEC T [NGINE E RtNG 29 F4E LD D85PO5tTION R ESUL15: NEEJubo'.ONIs: Dtij l l!;" diam, holes, fill holes with non-shrink arout (Enbeco 636) and set the following bars: a) 2-#6 bottom bars and b) 3-f5 top bars at 9" 0.C. in lieu o_f_2-#6 bars at 12" 0.C. Enbednent lengths and lap splices of bars shall be in accordance with the prescribed table on Dug. C-211, Rev. 4. Manufacturer's in-structions on aroutino shall be followed. Expected implementation,date-7/16/76. 22 i NGIN E E R ahG USSPO50Y EON ~ / 23 ENG 0NE ER SNG D*SPO5tT 00N R E SULT S-g44-1 YC

f f'lj A
t 'e' s

W 24.15 DEstGN CN A r#G E RE QUIHC D ]g 24, RCJECTED M ATERI A L DISPOSITION O**'.*.**'*****6"' 2 7-QC ACCEPT ANCE O v E5. 5E E ATT AcNEDt O.< = e,........ DR AWBNG R E V* DCN av e===.9.e ea s e e v en SPEC REV. A DD. e.,, eaose e White Cop - Ortsenator Q L 4. J 2 i Canary Copy - Field E ngineer - . ty. Pink Copy - POAE 6 Goldenrod Copy - OC f I g

.e

4. ss 3a Y

4-n J.si G k c e .e s a ~ s e r_ r f ig e o e h.w n 4__ n C E r w E b.o,_ ld A D-Cpo iOC e f FPO y p 7 .o y c p 5' oyo E ra y nr o D ( W ai Ce ) nkte f no T' CPC Y

\\iI\\

-g N O -, k ( l-C S l T m e R A O U f~ ~ P E 6 R 4 1k E ~& W l C N r A e R A) 0 'd M O r O__ _ F / s l N / O b ~ C N 1 l 0-ON / / w N C N \\ I \\ A s m m. ~

s w

3 o f

) *. NONCONFORMANCE REPORT ' " ^ * ' ' {, D R A WsNG/PA R T NO. y- ' * "'" "13 5 I RE V. T. PROJECT NO. f t. R E Y T l'6 //74 m. De5PolaTION CONCUR RE NCE prauing 7220-C-288 (4) ih 7220 DATE 25 - i '~ "-' ~ ppkc]"(N, >.TE u DE sCR P T.O N S. B T EM t.OC A TIO N O TAL A TED as . DATE i l Reinforcing' Steel Auxiliary Eldr' C4Y 'M i6-//-7/ axe" 6-J4-h ... E R. A L N u.. K., ...T.R. uP...T E. N O. n/A n/A n/A l R EV.*...................x.. ... N E PL A m.E r.T P A R T N. S PuRCN ASE OR DE R NO. 0 9. OC F 8E LD eN EPE C TION PL A N NO. II/A U/A N/A IG. REPLACEMEN T SERI AL NO.

* " ' = ' - * * * - * - " -

~' .. CO ~ T R ACTO Rn.OC AT.ON ...As E o vEs

o. source E/A g_,.O Construction

,T Ku ... ROvuM G inst R uCT.ON.: qRo uT E TO P.E LD ENG.N EE N.NG o RO u T E 10 = A T E,n A L s uPE R v..O R 99 NONCONFORMING CONDIT 60N: Dravinn 7220-C-202 (Q) Rev 5. neneral note _ states- " Slab dovels to rntch slab reinfniciprr unless othervise noted.", and drawing _7220-C-288 (Q) Rev h indicates 12" snacinn for slab reinforcinrr. Contra y_._ to the above, the firct clab dovels' top and bottem are located 18" from the face of the support See pace 2 for chetch of e::icting dovels. Non conformance noted during - Qv^-- QC. ~nsPwe r' l: = ce.Y p A ~Q lict number 1.20'4. One i Cw holc ' tag applied. I 20 % PIELD DISPOSIT00N , P4 ELD RECOMMEND ATION/ ROUTE T.O PROJECT ENGtNE ERING

21. PIELD DISPOSITION RESuLTS:

curved rebaM5eriesThe-ahave 51uatinrtpresented-problems 's.imi-Ight.hosebn6chte 1 cadEelds ny nave #1I rebar t{,be captgl,de;d31 'fj;b(hd ktda*,MdMsister-spHce ' t l R-b iep_Qture where production splices can 9 be taken. It idkcgi end d_that twn_ production hn-teke hin.-the-f-i rst ..___100dpTices (plus one additional sis ter snlicoi en insure adoqua4e-testin. 2 2. E N GIN E E RING OISPO SITIO N 2 3. E NGIN EERING OI5 POSITION RE5ukT S:

24. es DEseGra CN AraGE REOusNC O No

' ' ~ " " * " " ^ ' ' * ' " " ' * " ~~"~~ O vEs. sEE ArvACHED. D ec.a. OR A WINC REV. DCM e.,, ans t.no.es.. eas e.s.se. SPE C. REV. A DD. e.,, secte o White Copy - Originator QC-Ga 2 Canary Copy - Fs.ed Eneineer Pina Copy - PQAE Goldenrod Copy - OC

F ,f l 1 w ,G '"i ls b I E e I IQ q. t ,1 i si

W I

y $a v ? ! 1 5lT 2 EU Q' %

h i,,7

\\p! N % fM'N- .o N W n$ s % ,e s j d y 'Stj! N f y !=[3 4 s D s id L s .a 4 4 S O 2 S t. 8 h. s e 9 . q g o f h G, e i o s g o 2. .),j e l d E ) $i II i. I I,. - W 1 s 1 , _i ,__] + l / 8i / f a 2 l O f( iY I e fl fl. I Nv \\ j \\,\\ / N &a 2- ,c s 's D I ,1 i / I i 1 I w .2 \\.

\\ f NONCONFORMANCE REPORT (CONT'D) orb .35 ....cc ...c,... ~ EL_0_CX._20 REllSEp ~ - ~ ~ Reuork asfollows: For the sinnie bottop_bar, drill 14" dian hole, fill hole wjth non-shrin.k nrou_t_(fanc.co _ G361._a nd_;.e t_tlle_ mis s i n a b_ar. For_ tite _sincle top _b.at._IlrilL2'i' diatl _llole thru the wall,_. set the har thru 'the wall,_a_rg! fill the hole uith Enheco 636 Liv funnelina thru a tube at the___same time providins_3de_qu_alg_.yent_ to ensure _py_oper aroutino, Groutino of bars shall be in accordance' with the_m_.antLfa_ciur_ef's_lDS_trucli_ons-u En5fe_d ent_ lengths _nad_ Jap _sp_llces_of__ bars _s_ hall confora__to_tt10 :p1_eic lhed_tahle_ art _JL'G. C-211, Rev. 4. P Fvne cted_icp i nnn n tati on_da_te_.._.146/76 : 7 ". b5*"0 b 2 3 75 fA /~-; s- ^ Gft i b u t, ,/ v h s s _.--r mc.ss_w .. _ _ _ m=mrw sse_. --. -...= ar m e.+w=wouurast: - ' : a-ase-- - -- -- -- - - --' - ~ ~ ~ - g,yy icosa a white copy - origin tor cea.cycopy - r6.id anoin r Penk Copy - PO AE Gold.nrod Copy - OC

NONCONFORMANCE REPORT e

a. o n a N,NGir.a r EV.

i. eno,Ecr No.

or et 436 y' j osvE ,....cos.v.o coNeu..ENcE ....E r _D.r.auing_72.1,oN.20-C-PJ_4_IQ)!3_ 7220 4'M < j""" j " ~ j "" '"' j ~ E-oEsc. ..r c-to c.,lo,. gqo.,E t,. E o., Reinforcing Steel Aux. Bldg. /t 4 ' <.; M A/A'& j; M 4 Tift,m. d..6v& ...E...uNu~.E. e. r., u,. s v E -..

...E,a cE.E,1...,..
,,s.

,r H,IA.c..f o ot. No. fl/A fUA I .u .. a........ .o. oc r,E co.~s,E crioN eu.N No. ....E rt. cc-E N v sE...u No. qfn f,p.fM.j ',7-&-p p N/A N/A N/A

y. 6,-. - -. - ~, -

-~

s. coNin.c r on/ Loc.v ion

1

^5=E O vEs 'v SouaCE N/A , ',, - di No Construction 9 0. ROUTING INSTHUCTIoNS2 Q MouTE To F RELo E,eGeNEE RING O aouva to =avEa.a'su Eavesoa S t. NoNcoNFo RMING CoNoITION: Drawino 7220-C-202Jev. 5 gneral note _5_sDtes " Slab dowels to match _sla_b reinforcino unless otherwise noted." And drawing 7220-C-214 (0) Rev. 3 indicates 12" spacing for slab reinforcing. Contrary to the above, slab doucls do not ratch slab reinforcing in three (3) areas along G-line between 5.6 line and,,7,.4,g.g line at El. 632'6". See page 2 for sketch of existing dowel locations. Nonconformance noted during -rcutis'~QC -sur-veilhacu "Q" list number 1.203. Two hold tags applied. is w e-n g.e gjzy m I 20. QF BE LO oesposaT son. CFIELo RECoMMENDATsoN/ route To PROJECT ENGINEERING tt. FRELo otSPoSSTloM RESULTSt Hework as follous: Drill lh" dian. holes, fill holes with non-shrink arout (Embeco 636) and set the alssino 7-#8 hori:'ontal douels. Groutino of bars shall be in accordanc.e with the arout manufacturer's instructions. Embedment lengths and lap splices of bars shall conform to the prescribed table on Dug. C-211. Jtev. 4. Exnected innlerentation date: 7/16)76. $3 #fWfNs', d1 76.

22. E N G IN E E F#4N G o tSPo S17 ton

[

13. ENGtNE ERING oISPoSIT IoM RESULTS:

s/.;

24. 85 oEstG N CN A t4G C FIE UIR E D - CNo O v Es.. s,cr arv.cNEo, DR AWING REV.

oCN SPEC. RCV. .oo. seess s Whito copy - Orig 6nstor QM Canary Copy - Fleid Engineer i Pink Copy - POAE Goldenrod Copy - OC

Y 4\\ 'ys 3 d e \\u m Y \\ 0 45 *) 0 0 N Mk e I 4 r e oJ'

f

.I 3 ,,Q, gi-(N i c L_l s<. -6 c tn ? 8'28 g h. sisi z m 3 f a 3 IhN D; l l~ $?!! st 9 V ~;!!! s u z T

s V

ry C* N. g k O o s l4 w c-t W e i j U h, z 9 a <C y ,a 9 4 2 7 0 z l 3 i n z f \\,, O }^l z, e 2 k'./ ' n a y< y ,s = 3 4 e 1 6 . i \\ i. 4 1 D i, l \\6 t 4 l l i i 6 ( x { sts )' '[ j l L.

L

~ ~ - NONCONFORMANCE REPORT "' " *y ' i:6s.. NG,,aNTNO. g ge j RE v. ,.,RO,EC T NO. j 4 p ,O R T E D R s 7223-M-201

6 7220
D.TE

... D..,O s,T.ON C O NC u R R E NC E 3 IT EM DESCRIPT TOR &//.76 - - - ~ i- " > ~ - ' - - ~ ~ ' - _

8. RTEM LOC ATION

.+.. D,1 r I I IA ih-26" 90 LR ELLS CI/.SS "A" VHSE 9 3. V A 90 TEDR 6 ,oEu.eEME %, (2-<3D ATE (t9/ / /[*.L,me d-J ?- g ...E..,.M.E .'//-7 r !E# ... T. T... T., E O. YiT33 U/A U/A T.. T NO. ..........y.. . runCN sE ORDE. NO. ... O C r.E Lo. .E C T,0 N,L. N O. ......).-..,,,....-3 2 p 4.g } -L ~ ... R E,L.C E M E N r s E R.. L NO. R23-li10h AC IR-D-1.00-109 U/A r;gj,,, .. CON T R.CTOR, LOC.T ON ,777 '*'- Q';*;;- _I'I'T Grinnell Kernersville, NC. ,gg,,,,,, g*',*/ g a vE. .Y..OuRCE i.. ME .T E M O NO Supplier g,, - 9 4. HOUTING INSTRUCTfCN$s Q ROUTE TO FIELD ENGINEERING , % ROuYE TO M A T E ns AL SUPCR Wp50R

9. NO NCONF ORMING CO NDtT f 0N s j

Patgrial Reauisition 7220-M-10hA Rev._5,_.famar;trh Documentation sub:.,ittal sub Paracranh 9 n'c.aten in nart " Form G-321-D shall be used and cubmitted" Contrary to the cbove docitmentation for 14-26" 93 LR ELL Code //YU3B Heat //U32851 did not contain the G-321-D forms. Hoted during receipt inspection. "Q" Uo h.185 14 Hold tags applied a 20. FIELD D!SPOStTION QFlELD RECOMMEND A f TON / ROUT E TO PROJECT ENGINEE R,0NG

29. FIE LD OfSPOSIT SON RESULT 5e d4,a / De 7e. 4 %., A -., A A w d d.

., chk (W J a.n.t wAL-he... k k ( = l$ '){. ~

22. E N GIN E E R ING D15,OSIT80N 2 3. E NG IN E E R ING DeSPOSITION R ESU LTS s 4

24. IS DE SIGN CN ANGE REQUIRED NO ts. R EJECTED M ATERI AL DISPOSITtON O TEs. sEE 4TT4CNE D.

O. "..= = *.. * *s e e. Yl2m A.s..,C aCCEpTagCe ?-L-?4 o.... j* ,,,,,7-OR A WgNG R E'y. OCN _ u QV 4=. J8 ...c... g g.,,- S E C. R E Y. A DO. Es e-. White Copy - Oregonator G C-G s-a Canary Copy - F eeld E rsgineer Pir.k Copy - POAE Coldenrod copy - OC tog,. en s

O s ~ NONCONFORMANCE REPORT. '^ * ' g "'" " ' 4 3 8 2.na a miess/mA m. nee. SpcC. j RE v. 7 PROJECT NO. e4 7E 'O R Eo g j onJE j 2s. oeseOsn EON cONcuRREs.CE _ZaaQ-M- 2_0_1 6 7220 /# f I #76Mf4/16//4'/ 76 "y j "y'".' l ""~ j -" " " l *", a.T E M oE sCRerTioN e ITEM LOC TiqN is vauonyo g joATE E-(.f..L.itMaf..TO.i V.% $~. &/V-7/ %/ h G v. w n,<a" & G -Y ~ M, i e_S 0 R.Ep.a NUM 01 QG_JIold Area 9 ER ... T. R T U.,.. T E M NO.

, E..- -

,,...e............ f

s. ruRCN ast O roe N.6.O.lHBC-124 S 1A A 4 N/

n o. O C e.A N/A I M k,,,....q,4,(f p -y (,.- 7 v, ELo eNsrECriON eLa N NO. is. REeLaC EMENT sERiA NO. _Ai-10 4A g/ LOC A T SON Tit /_R _.lm00 - 87 NLA ,(K'"Q{* *['f7 g y '* g y

6. CO N1 st a C T O 9 9. ASME Q VES O F. 50URCE Coot

" ' - - - - ~ ' - TT T Gr.innell; Ke r n e r n v111 n, N. a nEM O NO s pp1 Ley u

18. ROU T jN G SNST R UC T IO N S-ROUT E T O FIE Lo ENGlN E E RIP.G Q ROUTE TO M AT E R$ AL SUPE RVISOR 9 9. NONCONFORMcNG CONDIT DON:

Specification _.IRRD _Ai-10_1. Rev. 6. Pa ra,_6 _2_,_2 s ta't e s in pa rt: "All materials shall be marked with the_information requirrd by th_e_applisable._ manufacturing specifications and the Nuclear Power Plant C.omponenta_C_ ode, Paugsph NB-2150. Certification of materials by the manufacturers in accordance .3yith the Nuclear Power Plant Componenta Code, Paragraph NB-2130 is required. " Contrary to the above pipe spool 1HBC-124-S616-6-4 was delivered to the jobsite with the code dataplate marked lHRC-124-5616-6-4. _ (Sc.e,, attached rubbing). Continued on page 2 hlE Lo DISPO5stsON OFtE LD RECOMMEND ATION/ ROUT E TO PROJECT ENGINEERING ' 20. 3 3. FIELO Ot$ POSITION RESULT $t tiaterial Supervisor to contact ITT Grinnell and obtain written field instructions f_or:chanoinn rpcol mark number on code data plate and arrance for ITT Grinnell author 170d insanctnr to_3tltness re-stampino of code data olate at the iobsite. Field will c-ha na a-code-<f ata_pla te-spookma rk-n umbe ,S6W6 4 tn lilBC_124-iS164-4_ af ter receivino the above instructions @rgrop-iRC.p /,m j d./-Je-h;9f'# 4-2806 J 2 2. E NGIN E E se BNG DeSPO SITIO N [ 2 3. ENG SNEE RING DISPOStisON RESULTSr

24. 31 DE SIG P* CH At47.C R F O UgR ED NO O TEs. sEE avrACNEo, Osc...

DRAWING R E Y. OCN awe. ..as. ...s... SPE C. REV. ADO. 8Does s White Copy - Orig 6nator M-G s a Canary C py - Fiesd E ngineer 9 Pink Copy - POAE Goldenrod Copy - OC ~ 's

I 8 ~ 3 4_ o.. = c. de e i lpp a sg d aT r re o. e d n .ig 2 l .eE n o e n E s H id gl A i, i O c e ac oFPO / ypo y C yp poyd oCpo c or y n erCe ) t a ink ld D h n aio T' 4

wCPG N

6 1 O C 4 ( T s R i O r P e E R b m E C u N n A M 'O s R O F N n O o C i t N c O e N p s t r i_ t O p isc 3_ r_ gn iruM =

== d e-t o d n e = u c. n c i n t a n m o c. r o 9 f 1 n k o c c = o n e = l o a B_ N_ m . o s - s e .. s

\\ i h. m 's nW" m = n, co ,M c:og ~% .,:Dw~ f

.QWhng '.

- u . lW$fhQm% 3.s:~, !n I% N%. h n%TDl,s.i: \\ (.., Q t g }h N f3 y ,b .m I n 6 ~~ y,x'x-. - b$ss.p: ' y ) ,. _.w. ,4., q . uv.c, .o L. . p.;,m a vg +.; % > l Cb'.% ' k v.q:4g',k.. S,,,c 6.g" D l 4 )' h* .h. Y b.:,?.?') Yhk -l , cL. ' 'Q'l' "J'5-l l .. K.; i n..,m -N ?'s3)$ J.O.. l hh I 4 s.n w $ D .9 e% g@i.i.h,bJu-. ;- igf. f-i g., t

As%

S 's, ;. ~, .p .1 i s$Y'$:ax!:..., y.., \\ 'l G'M*,%..y.v,.su1.-c, M.g, *h 2 't.. it'0, i;. ? \\:;a;; 9.,

y. v..<

yg.,*-ru.s.f ,T; [').hh, -l i:.:C.Y : -,f:N j- !y i $,. t...id: \\.. 'n iAl Wii,.. %a, @a.yM,$' v,'j.wp w]e;.,. y. -,. 2 l ,,s.. %. c. m i .q.,., L. h:,C B M ' 4 4, ')i. cu 4 % " 321, - 9,..,,' x L , - )(4-A,$XQ: P, V' . s, %. 3 l .A 172. y . g.,. t s t.. q%g. I . d% :'.iI - ( b.')*..:W w. v.. .s(.h s.,N.s'i'e :'N s..J.a \\. 'l+ . N?.,.,W g*. ' ? .. ' i LW.1**.5 e .\\ ps .',L M w, g .sm;:;.T)a.c.:pp \\ \\ i s s. e k

2. _

s s se. NONCONFORMANCE REPORT l ','"* * ' 2 " ~ ~ " ~ r=... M.,P. 439 ..E. .. P..E C, N O. v O, =.,,0N _. EN.E ...E -(12 0 /Md', O., fl.A / M$~0, i 6 ' "-"- l -* '* " f*"-- l ~" " ' { " " _l7.2hhi _2.0_1 '! 6 3 S T E w DE SC #f PT 60N 8 ST EM LOC ATION e s..a t e ATE av Q 04TE 3 _ Pine _ Spool OC Hol_d Area [f* # f, .,...<lN !6 -& 7) ... E e... u E,. ...T yup.v.T E m NO. ....t PL. C C M E Ny..T O. __lHBr_-32AS jE. s Puf.CM A SE ONOCf. 616 2 N/A ' N/A I NO. 9 9. O C F tE LO sN SP8t CT 90N PL A N P.O. 9 6. REPL AC EMENT SE RI AL MO. _.113D-hi _1_0_4Ac ntin - 1. Oo-10.B . N/A & Cold 1 R ACTOM/ LOC A T SON tt;ASME Qvts sp.souMCE LT1.Gr.inaclL_%.cJ.pe r n ville E. .00E .T E - 0 NO q,, nr. T. i s nouTsNG eNara uC rioNs. g=OuT E TO F f E LO E NGIN E E RING O acu'E = a T E a'ai supe = visDa It esONc O*er OMMING CONOf f EON: Specification 721_0-M-20L_R.ev. 6,_P_ar_a._8. 7 states _in parti "r.inmciric line_dr. awing s will be furnished by the Buyer and will show overall dimensions of each line, branch connections, flannes, valve orientation, bypass.es, instrument points, vents, drains, and connections to equipment./ / " Contrary to the above, he pipe spool IHBC-123-S616-6-2 was delivered without the venturi assembiv>noted on the applicable drawine. .45 awr-t rt tc. _t Nonconformance noted during receip_t_inApection. 'O' number is_4d64. / Hold tags applied (See Attached Drawinc.1 QPIELO RECOMMEND A T80N/ ROUTE TO PROJECT E NGENEC ptING 10. O FtELO OtSPO5sTtON 21 FsELD DISPoseTION REsuLTS:

22. E NG 9NE E peNG DeSPO5of SON

33. ENGINE ERING OlsPosef SON M ESuLTS.

e a t. rs OE ser.re CNarec t nE OusnCO OO ' ' " ' ' ' ' ' ' " " ^ ' * " ' ' ' " ' ' ' ' " ' " ' " * " " * ~ ~ ~ ' ' " e O v Es. sEE aTT4CNEO. Dee... g n a w s N f: REV. OCN .......s...=.*ecve. f PE C. R E V. A DO. e,.e e-o White Copy - Or.gmator O c-G 3-2 e Ceneev Copy - F leid E.egineer P6mk Copy - POAE Gosdenroe Copy - OC

,. p r. -... (v v-n r. n >._ ~723 L I[0:du:E.w,',I.1.co:l,pgl. u c e r-- 1 -c" coo:. vie:27 ;/rk onw "-

. *^h'LV 'd n l' mil eawa..o.a 0 tMOL't0,.mcman.

0 nev.02VI /l-O1l75 enwa_GJff 7 . & ncs.396 gt/7& cae'0 p>m l-)r-A gsy, S4cu 2/GILcWcs /M.B @M.WD 1/dx ci!e'b es- ..w c t.. o e s (o - l u ~ --) .C.g_._ gn -(3 _qiD

..n: ;.

i u 2 _/ . t.. w _. w: f,. ' gz.,tj; x 1 s.n s ~c 1a _ __p__ _. x. i. . m.. r. .N-I .~ .~ 4 m m

..,y

..e. y o.. . o ... NOTE : SHIP DIRECTL.y To ..:'f ws y. . ~, ... -. usc coov spec Pam l l. El.6l.l.R l M A NU FAC T uRER -s t .i. r.w;y h_ S' 2.Q-2C 9 ~ ( 37 BEVEL ENO2-Qs (%L PlVEl 5T0, WG S A-141$ ASME COOC.. APPROVED .I* ~ CARDON STEI. 4 i M.S..* C-b

8.t N C S F'C C.

\\ b A F P. C O o *4

l;$

N.'.', ~.f40. f tCO. - ,al O C H A P H i-gn til i , st.EC. AL M AnKiNG PetCHEAr l 'C ETi r, c e CO M PL e A N C CI >L. rnwr ir r. , - - -si rciat clunis.- ocu:.u r.i n r.srracar u.m.t n orn:"o."rs i E' miu rine. cooc or.oir l Iomr2 n,.ron t r,eW p. C' c, c. s.- i w c-., W.',p,,m, 7,,,cc,._g.c. sc tp..-=.. e. - M. M - v:9 .aem - e lit W g*, 'N o._ "" b I 'b NT* -Q ,(re,g,,f M ( p l.\\ P - cc o. -60 [ii.w'.e.i,.>.. e., -;yY.h;* D.3. g --" h. L U G - W r. 5 ' D ^ " ' #'

1 re - NONCONFORMANCE REPORT Ij """440 sr.m

a. onawesGjra ar No.

- incv.

a. rn o,c c v No.

or FSK-C-34 A (R ollout) !1 7220

. necongto av

oave

% f),., w d/<& l/f-ty.76 as, o.spo,arioN coNcun.ec cc 3.nco orsca.,1. " 1/4" Dome j"~" j"s-j" ""h ' " ' " ' *^" "U nit # 1 Dome 8fS' "'""'W! b k"^'N-3' .L..i.n..c.tr_Pl.a.tc Assembly ...E..r.n o.ti.o..n.J. i.!L ec L D-3-6 .... <,. c ci, c ,4. N/A S PURCHASEonoERNo N/A i 8 0. QC F tEbo #N$PECTsoM PL A N No. 7220-C-50A f.. RE PL AC E ME N f 5 era AL No. T p',,,~... , j *, g /[ *,6 4 M[' [.; J IR C-Il 1-15W N/A e _h g .. coNv a acientoca r.

p < ' "-

- -~ - " Southern Boiler & Tank " t "o', O ns " souace W nr h,... M n m p ... o ur.NG.N,r a uc.h..i.s.,:Tenneuce Q.~o Vendor- "r" q=ouis vo ricko e No Nr.. G o noursvo..rsmai.svernv,.. t 9. NoNCoNrORMING CoNotTs N A dis _crep_ancy exLsts_bativ_qcn_Olill sla_b_numhntdacyme.ntation ansLthe vendor transfcrrrd stamp number. Do cumer - tion slab number is HT# 81989 Slab #8, the vendo;- transferred stamp is HT# 81982-Slab #8. Discrepancy detected during QC field review. O List '# 1.109. d Hold Tag ap6ied. i ae. g re t to osspos " Or'c'o accow'* No AvioNeaourc io racerc< a NG.Nce a.NG ..,, c L o......,,o N o.,,,, _llte field vill contact vendor and verify correct heat and slab number. Documenta-tion.uill then be corrected. !!ork'may proceed. / / f f .m,4-...,c G/nii" ./ U g

22. ENGINCE retNG of 5PostTioN

23. ENGINE ERING otSPoSIT foN RESULT $s

24. es otssGN CH ANGC RCQUIREo hNo O ves. cr avracNeo.

D.e... OR A WING R E V. oCN SPEC. R E V. A c o. I 99 3 4+3 Whose Copy - Oelg6netor Sc 6 Cenery Copy - Fseed Engineer Pink Copy - POAE Coadeaeod Copy - OC

= NONCONFORMANCE REPORT 3 lOATE 441 Or OR AwsNG/ PAR T NO. g ec,

.e E v.

T. PROsECT NO. p

,a yCPORTr av as. DeSPOs,T EON CO NC UR R E NC E JPP%?.b197 3

7993 J+-.-- l[*/ b '""'"l"~~ " ~ * * " ' " * " t_

3. 0 f E M OE SC R IPT TON 9 w r$ @#0 F cdALsO A

74) r

. ' DATE68-p ST M O A T eo f-p (.~ /(. 'g 3 V -~Co sv ) I ^ 16" nsc-cK-z valves W~~ M.7fC.j...

7. / - 7c

- = .m AL,.u p, MIN. f .. ST.R Y UP.T.T E M No w,, E PL A C E M E N T P A. .,0. jb8:di:I> .n S. PU RC H A SE O RDE R NO. n/A n/A l RE v. S,.'>.."..- ~ i- ~~... ,4 2 r -.1 9 0, QC F eELO INSPECTION PL AN NO. 9 6. R E PL A CE ME N T SE s0 0 A L NO. {f"g g % #h: . * # f *f _7222-y-12nc rnja.too_n ~ { vES g y, fouRct v/j -, ~ - ~ ~~.g

6. CO N T R A C T OR/ LOC A T SON

^f-8, - ( - ff- _ gg.ASME CODE -.4... b P. Anchcr/Jhrlina.141Vh navvard.C/- iTE M O__N O

b. k y" pk '

en mgt,,,,,,,,,, . g t._ 5 0. RO U T f N G 6N 57 R UC TION S. ROUT C TO F tELO E NGINE E R6MG C ROU T E 10 M AT Ens A L auPERvesOR 9 9. NONCO NF O st M eseG CON DIT SON : 'Phe Purchace Or:ler Item nu"1 Der on the mnufar turer'< vnive identif ice tinn t n re anne T-ngree with the Purchase Order Item nucbe'r an shown on the Code Data Betorts for the folloviner valver-(1) 'rhe mnufacturer's valve identiff entinn tag for the 16" U m-cr-2 yni ve ui t.h knay_ccrint pn_ c:9%_m__1 17 a.,,- n _Bitchgae__Drder Iten_L2. 'Phe cnh;. Data Report for the 16" Mnc-cK-Z v lye wi th nnvini vn. 59M.n1.1_17 ewnu,. a Purchase Order Item 2.1. Continued on Page 2 20. MF SE LO OISPOSIT tO N OFtE LO RECOMMCNO ATIONfROUTE TO PROJECT E NGSNEERING gg. FtELO OtSPOstTsON s*ESULTSs Rou'te this uu, Lv "r - " = -f,t-m Procurement Supervisor to Obtain cted . (,,,g. ty. _, t u ). _ code da r s from valve nanufacturer. ..h m; p.4k '*/.. T4 i h,1Yet$'e4X sc 6LA w c, % Pace 2 for Block 20 revised 2 2. E NG E N E E R ING OfSPO5tT f 0N 2 3. E NG IN E E RING OISPOSlT 80N RE SULT $. v. e 2a. as DE$eGN CH ANGE REQUIR' O N* """"~~' "lieJ"Y:".k' e -

)'*/,*

O vEs..EE AvvACNEO. Os.... !4 k Q OR AWING BR C v. OCN b _#~ Y i....i ] o 7 SPE C. R E V. A D D-s oo t a-s w, tite Copy + Orio6nstor QG-e n a Cana,y Copy - Field Engineer Platt Oopy - FQAE g. Goldenrod Copy - OC

NONCONFORMANCE REPORT (CONT'D)

s. Pace-2 or 3-

... co o 441 eP1n k 10 cont._- _12)_The_manufa.cluyer';;_yalve ide_ntifir ation tag for the 16" HEC-CK-Z Valve with body serial Ho. 52^>6-Ol-1-yf15 tbf d.i -shovs-Purchasc-Order-Item-2.L_._Th" c~1a n,+a Report f'nv tha 16" HPc-cK-Z dalve uith knay ri n 1' 77c.Jpo6-01 u n ch,u Pu-chn te_ order _Iten_2 2 EnCnf0NnC1_natc_d_dur.1DR Recei_p'_t__ Inspection. Q_ List No. is indeterminate,- Hold Tags applied. 2 Block 70 revised: f_ield to inslallcarrect valve identifica.tlan_lans_ supplied _bLvendor_(sec_. attached letter from Anchor Darlinc .daied 6-25-7M - TastaLlation-to be tdtnessed_by DCEAI-,-and Eicid-encincer moved--tags-sha44-be-destroye d. ?,,, y,acau& n /+ Y, ik Ma-7 - I ~7 5 ? White Copy Des ineter s Canary Copy - Faew Fnginee, Pack Copy - PQAE Condeaeod Copy - 00

O) \\t, O DARLING O ~ ~ ANCHOR /DARUNG VALVE COMPANY NU CuMER ROAD

HAW /ARD. CAUFORMA H545 W 5U85-NM CABLE: ANCORCO
TELEX: 335451 June 25, 1976 i

BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION PO Box 2167 Midland, Michigan. 48640 Attention: Quality Control Engineer

Subject:

Bechtel PO 7220-M-120-AC Bechtel Itesm 2.1 and 2.2 Gentlemen: p Enclosed please find new Anchor / Darling nameplates to replace incorrect plates shipped on the two valves. Sincerely, ANCHOR / DARLING VALVE COMPANY [ A QC 07220 M.A. Solyan/se ^n.] Project Engineer- ',"f p encl /a'ck CIVIL N [ ELT.CT. ~ M.L. Acker, Bechtel Expediter ~ fC. cc J.P. Punch WELDING , _ '.Sj $ @ t. Bechtel 3 DOC. y g ten * - - 9 . AlEECEIVING AE-A a-3 OPL.. m [jfM(W J'IFl '2 81976 O f BECHTb. JO7220 e wwuu \\t a .::.3

3 NONCONFORMANCE REPORT "'"'"" 442 .g ,,..Muns,s

a. u R A w s N GfP A Mi NO.

cPw* i R E V.

p. PROJEC Y NO.

s a. R E PO R TE D a y.. 'DATE as. ossPCsIT60N CONCURRENCE 7220-M-12 9A j2 7220 /;23 e $ w.,__ i, c., s, c 1-.-

w... 1

.~ 9 3. V ALaD A kE D o g. ',e4f. /M.* M. 3 l I I I 3 IT E M DESCRtPTION

s. lT E M LOC AT tote DATE Valves CC Hold Area e

4. $E RI A L N UMoE R

9. ST A R T UP 5 Y ST EM NO.

See pt'. 2,3, L 4 of 4 N/A N/A l' REV. t 5. RE PL ACE ME N T PA R T NO.

- - - e ce peste s me e=s e-

..es 5 PURCN A$E ORDER NO. t e. QC F s ELO GN5PE CT60N PLA N NO. 9 6. REPL A CE ME N T 5E RI A L NO. 7220-M - 129A AC IR / R -1. 00-I l2 N/A -a---<--- ~ Pittsburgh, PA

6. CONTR AC TOR / LOC ATION

".AsME O vEs " SOURCE Ke_r_otect Manufacturing Corp. .', E M O N_O Supplie r e s. ROUT ehs eNsTRUCT eons' D ao u's ' a "o ""S '"' * "'"a 4 "a u '* " a a 'a ' 5v'5 " v '5a " T.. NONCONrORM No CONo.T.ON. Specification 7220-M-129A, Rev. 2, Appendix A 3, Instructions for preparing G-321-D, Para. 'G', item 20, states: " Enter identification number (s) traceable to the unit (s) being released, e.g. serict no., heat no. of major component, cable reel no., or other unicue designator. " Contrary to the above, __ he G-321-D is not traceable to the followinrT 83 valves: See pg. 2, 3, f.c 4 of 4. Nonconformance noted during receipt insocction. 'O' number is indeterminate. Il T.',$.uHold Tags applied. 20. O PIELD DeSPOSITION QFIELD RECOMMEND ATeON/MOUTE TO PROJECT ENGINE ERONG

39. FRELD D8SPOSOT80N RESULTSt s

22. E N GIN EE RING OfSPOSIT IO N 2 3. ENGSNEERING OfSPOSITSON RESULTSt e

t

34. ss DEssGN CN A NG E REQUIRED ONO

26. REJECTED M ATERSAL pl5POSf7 ION O"."."*"******

a r. oC ACCEPTANCE De O vEs. sEE ATT ACNED.' DR AWINC RFV. DCN avre... se, esoce sso. SPE C. R E V. S oD-scoes s _J-Whhe Copy - Orig 6nator GC u s-a cenaev Copy - Fleid Engineer Pink Copy - PQAE Goldenrod copy - OC t [ ~

L MATERIAL. Rkbl /IhG REP. ORT (- _._,..,y.- O' C-DISTRIB_UT'lON } . _ m u w. 3 , P. O. NO. 7 2 2 0-M-12 0A-AC F?B NO. 7220 spec. No. 7 MRR NO. A.E0 - 15 21 Da!E 6/_R/ 7 6 vg40oR r Kc.rqte,q.t;_Jia032facluting_C.orp.ota. tion. REF. OWG. SHIPPED BY Vcadqr p l SHIPP!NG POINT 'PittGb_urdh, PA

SERVICE

( ' ( ?. lT E M NO. Q U ANTI TY

1. N O.

l RECEIVED Page 1 of 3 COMPLETE DESCRIPTION L3.1 1, J 3 2" Globe valve ECC-YGB-R 600# .S.S. s/n TEC 1-1, 1-3, 1-2 6 2" Globe valve ECC-YGB-RD 600# S.S. s/n TEB 1-11, 1-4 1-7 1-6, 1-2, 1-5 L3,6 2 21' Globe valve ECC-YGB-R 600# S.S. s/n TEC 1 u._l-5 L3 9 4 _2" Globe valve ECC-YGB-RD 600# S.S. c/n TP B-lL_.J E B_l-12.,_. 27,1 1-12,a 1-13 4 2" Globe valve ECC-YGB RD 600# S.S. s/n TE B 1-2 5 _,1.- 21., 3 1-24, 1-23' 13 2" Glo_be valve ECC-YGB 600# S.S. s/n TEC 1-L63_l-11, 1-7.,__ 1-17, 1-6, 1--11. 1-10, 1-14, 1-8, 1-13, 1-12, 1-L__1_18 4 2" Globe valve ECC-YGB-R 600# S.S. s/n TEC_l-21._l-19. 1 - 2 '/ 1-20 7.1 2 2" Globe _xalve _ EC_C-YGB-R__6.0_03 S,L___s /.n._ 'tEC_.1-- 21,A23 SHOP INSPECTION HELEASE REC'O QC RECOROS HECElvtD YES l ) NR.l l NO l l NON CONFORMANCE ( ) YES ( ) N R. l ) NO TAG NO. l l rICTION PRCCC.SS S CoheWENT/INSTauCTION e e

ECTE* ;' y p g] py, APPROvF.D er

^ ML'FLD ENO 04ft M t./QC i OATE ',I) Zs .vc-No GLX A 15-224099 Cea r e. NC. Cam NO 6/4/76 5000# M [j ,,,,,,, (.X c,,,,,,_ 3 cc,,,,, g

a i; [ Lf P NO __

s es A R TI A L f f COMPLETE f f OSO NO De Lavt REO TO/LOCA TsON _ _ to-da Bechtel Power Corp., agents foTdonsumers Power Co. <*. o a couNern av ... v om a r an... _v. i

z ~....~. - MATERIA!. RECE!VING REPORT z =- ~ Q. C. m m...m. DISTRIBUTION P. O. NO. 7220-M-129A-AC JOB NO. 7220 SPEC. NO. MRR NO. AE0 - 1521 DgE 6/8/76 I VENDOR Kerotest Manufa0turing Corporation . REF. DWG. SHIPPED BY Vendor SHIPPING POINT Pittsburgh, PA SERVICE N.)."

SS$0Io Page 2 of 3 countTc otscmoN to.1 I i

'S 2" Globe valve CCB-YGB-R 1500# S.S. sh MC-11.6, 11-2, 11-11, 11'5, 11-10 1.1, 2 3 2" Globe valve CCC-YGB-R 1500# S.S. s/n MC-ll-14, 11-7, 9 Jd 4-25 '. i ~5 1 2" Globe' valve-CCC-YGB-R 1500# S.S. .s/n MC-11-20 tl.3 2 2" Globe' valve ECB-YGB-R 600# S.S. s/n TEE l-21, 1-22 . 0.__0 1 2" Globe valve CCB-YGB-R 1500# S.S. s/n MC-11-21, 11-23, 11-24 L 2

2. 3 -

2" Globe valve ECB-YGB-R 600# S.S. s/n MC 9-18 6-1 'l-2" Globe valve ECB-YGB-R 600# S.S. s/n TEE 1-9 11 3 2' Globe valve ECB-YGB-R 600# 'S.'. s/n TEE l-12. 1-11. 1 '17 S 1.6 25 3/4" Glob'e valve ECB-YGB-PR 6008 S.S. s/n SXE 3-22. OW 22-5 2_2-11, 22-15, 22-23. 22-10n_22-19. 22-12.,_22-6. 2 2-l_3_2_2__ 3. __2 5 Hop INSP,ECTION RELEASE REC'O QC RECOROS RECENEO NON CONFCRMANCE ( ) Y ES l l N.R l l NO l ') YES l ). N R. ( ) NO T AG NO. l ) .E ECTION N OCE.5$ (3. COMW_ NT/ INST AUCriON

ECTEDCY APPROVED SY MS/FLO ENG DATE PFE/bC OATE
d

.Zs t e,No / .5. N

8 F.E. NO.

CA R NO W EIG *4 T CHARCES-Pi te a tD l h COLLECT f l

- - sGELey No.

panying ( ) CoadP L E T E l l 050 No. W 'l DEttVE4tD TO/toCATeON - P., Bechtel Power Corp., Ogents for Consumers Power Cr. A u em,,,,y,y,n,,

- MATERIAL. RECEIVING REPORT _ O. c. Im.mj m.m.m. _ - DISTRIBUTION P. O. NO. 72?O-M-129A-AC JOB NO. 7220 l SPEC.NO. MRR N_O. AE0 - 1521 ogE 6/8/76 C, '~' Kerotest Manufacturing Coroopgligp _ ! REF. O WG. VENDOR sHrPPED BY Yendor 4 i i SHIPPING POINr Pittsburgh, PA LSERVICE MEM NO. QUANTGY *

c. uO.
REctivEo Page 3 of 3 COMPLETE DES PTION: 71. 6 ii 22-18, 22-25, 22-21, 22-22. 22-1L ??-7

??-n. 997u, ? ?-? ts. 22-16, 22-4, 22-7, 22-17 ...1.. e r h SHOP DNSPECTION RELEASE REC'O - QC RECOROS RECEIVED YE2 f l N R. ( ) NO ( ) NON CONFORMANCE ( ) YES ( ) N R. ( )' NO TAG Nd l ) PECTrog imCCESS G Coa *=e:NT/tNSTRUCTION EECTEDTY APPROvtD'er Z MS/FLO ENG DATE PFE/DC DATE e-A = ev E nemo A / FJ f F 8. NO. CA R NO. WEIG H T CHAaGES pnEPAIO f ) COLLECT ( ) t I*eG ( Led NO. PARTtAL ( ) COMPL E TE l ) 050 NO. O [ i DELivtRED TO/LOCA?80N A-Bechtel Power Corp., agents for Consumers Power Co. C-O, Cnuutto ne ea6 = .. v.a = m * ~

./ NONCONFORMANCE REPORT o, P - 443

a. caaweNGiam ar No.

intV.

1. Paoicc v No.

i s. n a ro n r a p a v k' c arc.)g/)--! j -* ~ - " - = l cm C-204/4,C-282/6,C-284f3 7220 as.oeseoser oM coNcunacNcr fffj((Ef 1 -.* o a erzu omscnierioN

e. nru cocavioN e s.% 4 uoavMa o,..n h f;;{oire 4

Reinforcing _ Steel Auxiliary Building f8, ) f s,M_.3,f"h'~dihy, (d.**f$. i

a. s a n ea s, N uw ee n e svan tur svsvzu No.

Ts. a c PL4 C EME N T P A R T No, d:/_A N/A N/A REV. f b

- * *W e *
ee s e t ee tme. m uncNasc onorm No.

s o.oc recto NsracreoM roan No. a coNrnacropstoca son ",,['[ 7[h"td Qf.,/ is. arroac cur N r sa n eat No. '/ *(' d. _17/A N/A N/A - a - - - - -{f-s e asus O vas . sovace 'i,_,._,,,. _, /f'/) .'v r u _' (2 ~o Construction t g. aouTING fNST uC T eo N s. Q Rout E To r RE Lo E NGtNEE?q tNG O aour t to =a tza'a' 5uetav'soa .. NaNeoNron-.NG c " "' "' Drawing 7220-C-282, Revision 6 requires that Wall 53 be reinforced with horizontal #6 bars at 12". spacing. Contrary to the above two #6 dowels are missing at Elev. 623'-3" & 624'-3" at intersection of Wall 53 with Ke Line. See Sections & Plan on attached Drilling Permit for exact location. "Q" List No. 1.203. One _Hol.d_ Tag _applic_d. I ao. Qr seto oesposereoN Oric'o asco=== Noav'oNiaourr 10 creoeter cNGiNaca.NG

r. coo o,sros,,,oM et csutvs, T.cwork as follous:

Drill l!" diam. holes, fill holes with non-shrink grout (Embeco 3 636) and set the nissing 2-#6 horizontal bars. Grouting of bars shall be in ~ accordance with the arout manufacturer's instructions. Embednent lengths and lap _ splices of douels shall conform to the prescribed, table of Dwg. C-211, Rev. 4 Expected innlementation date: 7/16/76. d, din'rt/M4 @ M76 4/.jh'h 22 a;NGINEE RING ogsPosIT BoM . / a3 E NGINEE RING oesPosIT EON RESULT S-e e ae.as otseGN CNaNGc HEculHtD hNo O vcs. sac avracNro. Der... ...e.... om a WINP. RCV. oCN es e e,s,=c e e avemenetaeon..ec.** s PE c. REV. a D o. eata Whees Copy - Orismeesw QM Cenery copy - Field E nemeer Pink Copy - PQAE Goldenrod Copy - OC

i _ CONCRETE ORILLIllG PERiitT '] .. ). ' ' gl[' , ll k q; ' Project 722d Permi t' fio. 3 Prepared By: (5. e t. r, e i._. Discipline: Cies u Date: 3-i'L A C C. (DI(., Unit ' B1dg. A u.v. Area El e.J. 62.b'-3 / (da'.r'-3 - ~ ~ W k k .i. o.- ( .c --u l', ;. \\ l l e. / T-C V3 Vg (. (, - S' .....{.._......-- 2. "Pt. A,0 'I - l Q- ,( -, [ 70:. M oT 9...To 5. % / ? 7.'. 4 3 -- :s 1 t m c. ::u -q u, i j.,wg i.7o P. l cu c1d-D /. m.O c.z uc. Ar-f c.. sw, sim v. s m.e c,ttu-ga4( 4' % 62.l-C+ --- C 2q e z.u-4 ' ~ ' ' P, C N tr b N % r>oh o .t , 'O 10' EF l.ac.. of / 3 dYtllit!If l[t U h' lr- ~ ( %W-O' i c s. . (- S Ec.X A - A.' S sc__7

Q -. 6 Dri ! 2. 01d [cy (muhoI5 T- @ ~0M P P4" W. of E.i Specific Instructions:

f . Pir.9 o r N oit h 5 fd r e G3 Dc'tutLs e, Loc _cd ioJt: 5 hov.m ca. See.:l 'f5 6 Reference Drawings C 7C4/4' C,- 982 h 'y C. -294 -3 ', M-2 tt/2 s,4r 1 / i, Approved By: Z NY-L'AN. bib Civ11 Date Elect 'd8'4 1, C, Date 4-z2 74 h Mech. # 5. " d A d Date 4'- z6 -7 6 i y ~ Piping 2E d Date 4-26 /6 f Instru 44 Da te__ ?, y.- u \\..

s J NONCONFORMANCE REPORT

i. o Ra..~o..Rr No.

__2 444 E V. ,.,Ro,Ecr No. o, J.r-3 p, C-14o/s, C-2s2 ,,. R E,o R v E o., o mo ,j w,,e p.,Ef.,,, .. o.. .1..N c o,.c U R R E Nc E t tu oEsc,ievio ...rf u LocarioN Rcinforcing Steci Au: ciliary lldilding ?///(/.E.~. f,....y M.,E,fe/y ... v. L,o., E o., i o .. ER..LNUu.ER .... R r W. s v. r E... is/A ti/A ....Eri,cE ENr,.R, S.,U.3CH A SE oRoE R No.

i/A prey;

.;/A 9 0. oc,s E Lo INS,E CT eon,L A.6 No. i

t/A

14. R E PL A C EME Nr SE RI A L No.

M/A .. con,Ra c r op,Loca r.oM ..... E o vE. o.soWRcE _/.

coo,

,1, o O. Construction 0 8..vouTtNG GN57 R UcTeoNSt s QRouTE To,tE LD ENGONEERING Q route To M ATERI AL SUPERV35 R ... o co ~ roR = ~a coNoir.oN' Drawing C-2S4, nevision 3 shows openings in :iorth Ends of 1:alle 52, 53, & 54 of South l' ace of "11" Line Wall. one foot soutu The openings in Valla 52 & 54 are provided for unter tight doors. Revision 6 shows typical detail for reinforcing around water tight door openings indicating diagonal bar Drawing C-232, required on each side at the top of the opening. Contrary to the above, "li" Line Wall and the north one foot of ~ s are Wallu 52 & 34 bave been placed to Elev. 630.75' without providing diagonal bars above the north side of th The opening in the north end of Hall 53 requires reinforcing to be provided in accordance ultit Detail 7 of D e opening. O r'c'o o'S*oSoa 20. Oric'o asco**c anar'oataourc 'o rao'<ct rac'ar t a'ac raving 2'. ns'o o'5rosoa ac5u'v$' 2 2. ENGINEE RdNG of $.953 710N 2 3. ENGINEE RING oesPo$1 Tion RESULTge e t

24. SS oEssGN CH ANGE NEQUIREo ONo

' ' " " * " " " ^ " " " " ' ' * * " " U ~ ~ " ~~ O vE3. sEE avracNEo. Q..... **^c*'"^"** o R' A WI N a R E V. oCN 4.'..a....e.s*..... 10000-3 White Copy - Orlgheter q {.d Canary Copy - Fleid Erigineer Pink Copy - POAE Coldenrod Copy - OC '=~3., [g. f. . 'i. t' ./ - ' ' h,. ..,,f,.., .,g

A ~ I. o t g I N d n e i c r a u l d p d c, n e s e t e o b n e e v c a n p h a e m 3 r 5 o f A 2_ l n r e a l o e a c n. r W n ogn 2 o taE n s e f G ida oi c o r k LC a l O7PO sc. t o g o n y f i p o n y C e e yp poyd n p oCpo o o C or y n er Ce ) t e lo = d ink 0 D h e h n ei t h WCPG T' r t N o O n f C o e ( h e TR t d i O d s d P n e E a h h R t c l r a E l o t C a n t N U A A e M e h s n t g R i a O L e T F v N "I o d O b l I C "_<a o N H e s O v r e N o a e b b r a h l T e a e h n I t o e g 3 b o a 0 l t i 2 d y 1 r g a n r i o t d y n i o v t c o s r i p L 8 t "Q nu o o ih s t ki yw n e o R '5 i m7 tc O e 0 p 1 3 s 6 n C I s 0 v 7 e C. 2 ~ 2 l a 7 E 0 ts 0 1 } O 9

/ ~ NONCONFORM ANCE REPORT ' ' ^ " ' '

2. DR AwlNGiP A R T NO.

i R E V,

7. PROJE CT NO.

or 445

12. R TPORT E D S T.

7p p t w n 3 7223 - If I h U.V ib'DAT>W ""*~~

25. D85PostT40N CONCURRENCE c-.

arete 4 LEscNacTecM j"" j "~ j"*"'l""

s. eTEu loc A T,0*s s i. w.

v4 YEb er 3 DATE y ...iy Ettmnns+ Q"L}}Q3.d 'I /C V~M'2' o.. A NUM.E R ...T A R Y UP.T. T E N O. ... R EPLA CE MEN T, AR T NO. _sce_nas 3o n/A n/A lRE. ~.......... S. PURCN A SE ORDE R MO.

80. GC F 8 ELD INSPECTION PLAN NO.

t e. REPL ACEMENT SERI AL NO. p m 1g fe ;:,-_ o n.1.co-58 F/A

e. CONT R ACTOsyLOC ATION es.AsME D vEs

.T. source Co E wvn r *,.n17 U.a + c.n. I s. ROUTSNG INSTRU' TeONS4 ' OMo .T E = 0 NO Supplier C Q ROU1E 10 FIELD ENGmEERING Q ROUTE TO M A TERI A L SUPE R VISO R 8 9. NONCONFOR MING CONDITIONS yp n-nhn, n neaar__p?a-4106AC. Rev,__2, Documentation Cubmittal, Para. 2 ctates in part: n_3 ,,.,,q.,-..:,,-4.,-- a,r.,-n t,- r-m-koa in en112:n_S_nf Form G-321-D nuct be cubnitted for Dayer approved. Thoce ..e -enginccring-a' ' ~ d e mekad Yen f n colungt 85 recuire npproval prior to correncement of fabrication." Contrary +n +hn nhorn, the o nitty Documentation for the hangers chov that they were fabricated to chetches that had a u _Bechtcl._npprnved level h "rtofteppmyed-Cor_ rect and recubmit." 1 8 2 0.- Q r8 ELD De$PostTeON QrtELD RECOMMEND AT40N/ ROUTE TO PROJECT ENG eN EERING Cont. w 2

29. FIELD Ot5 POSITION RESULTSr

22. E NGIN E L RING DISPO 53 TION

23. ENGINEERING OtSPOSIT EON RESULT Sr e

~ e

24. IS DE5aG N CNANG E REQUIR E ONO

'*"'""^"'^5' 5"' O YEs. sEE arv4CNED.. U "'.'*.*"'* ~ ""'"

27. OC ACCEPT ANCE D.e DR A WING R E V.

DCN SPEC. R E v, ADO. .u t...e a s. e. e...... - seese s Whate copy - Originator Canary Copy - Field Engineer ,- QC4 3 - Pink Copy - POAE w Coldenrod Copy - OC %. A.; 3 s ~ s) l ' ', a ? ' - ~ ~

NONCONFORMANCE REPORT (CONT *D) N ar_I. 445 _ s.cace is. ma ao Cont. Block 19 Hyger_MG Draving Shop Order 13-1FCD-22-H18 1-610-6-21 E-If d 7 (2) Purchace order 7220-M-106AC Rev. 2 Item A ctates in part: "Perto lists reSuired cbn11 centnin the name and. m-kar er every g,rt 4%,- tho aquipmant nna ite-nm'iliarlen including denvingn in nutricient detn11 to inento ang identify _cach_ par.t." Contrary __to_tlic_nbme __the G-321-D for this chipment references the vackinn lict ac the a f,reccable dpeu :ent. The packing _J. int does not ccree with the drawings cent-vith the shipment on the following jisted hanr:er pipe nupport assemblics. Eg.chipen Ii.st Dens Referenced Duns Sent Ulth Shipment Henger No. Hanger Shippint: Order t 2-611-6-10 Rev.1 Rev. 2 10-2FCB-35-H10 E-F.B-004 P-611-f2 97 n,c3-y _ nm_r _ o 5 in-PPcn-op n17 P 511 6-96 Rev. 1 Rev. 9 lO-2FCB-h2-H1 2 611 6-3A ncy. 1 nev. 9-2 1/2-2ccB-28-U3 1.610.3-3 nov_ n nev. 1 ph-lHCR-2-H3 F-FE-J2h 2 610,-3-s_Ecv. n n v. 1 24-1HCB-2-Hs e l-610-3-6 Rey. O (Did nnt cen:1 dvg or hanger __DCScI:LDly) 1-610-3_18 Rev. 1 Rev. 2 18_lGCB_._32_In 1-610-a-16 nov_ n Rev. 1 18-lGCB-32-H4 1-610_5-11 Rev. O Rev. 1 24-lHCB-1-H3 E-IC-Oh7 1-610-5-22 Rev. O Rev. 2 18-lHCD-1-Hlh . e,, Hondonformance noted during receipt inspection. 'Q' Humber in 1.102 nna h.112 11 N Hold Tags applied 1 a 9 eooss t ---u, Wh! e Copy - celginesor Cenery Copy - Field Engineer . Pink Copy - PGAE Condenrod Copy - OC ~ e, d_;.. I

g *jy *, ;

.f'g*c, " i,, *

l; '. l-

'T ' ' ?l,? . 'l }' ?h ?{ .NY 0 ;' k :YY'

NONCONFORMANCE REPORT or p 446

2. D R A W SNG,, A R T No.

t RE V. T..R o AE C T N o. ! 9 2. R E,o R T E o.Y !' D A T E.[c/626 m-'" l "'"' " '" j "" " l '"" Snee. 7220-M-231 !6 7220 /MDNMr

25. DIS,oS67 ton Co NCU R R A.sCE

3. ITEM DESCRIPf tom

5. 97E M LoCA ffoN 3

\\$)VALIDAf/ znD Y~-/7-]b $ $ lb l c,,c C-E9-76 t3 Fo py oATt _.2E.Au o-.ER6" cnM.'rapptd Pive Sasse Road 8,/ ...? A R T o. T TE No. ,. ;, E,< A. E. E N Y. A R T,..

,,E v.

.,vRc 6726-63-i thru es n/A II/A ma I A E oRoE R No. ..y,,Pp,,,,,,,,,,qu( /.v. j.. y ;.,r... .e. oc r.E6D.Ns,EcT oN,po ... R E,o A c E -E T.E R A No. g.-fgm. -{..- . 7220-M104A-AC IR -Q-/,4 e-l Z 2 6-1Y k N/A g g. .. con T R Ac To R, toc A T.oM I"'? Grinnell, Kernersville,.g' c g/75

g TE.

.T.. ounce ut t (, fey,g SC .T E. O. Supplier RoWitNG INSTRUCTeoNS: Rout E To efE LD ENGEN E ERING R ouT E To - AT E RI AL.u,E RV SSo m .> - w w T. ... No co roR= G eo.. Tion, P hM A preliminary inspection shall be treformed by the OCE at the time of unloading to identify dnmnge that may have occurred during loading or M pnent " (2) M/R 7220-M10hA. Rev. 5. Para. 3 states in part: " Form G-321-D shall be used and submitted in - 3rdnee with items C and D given on the form. Specification paragraphs references on Form G-321-D are to __npecification _7220-M-201 unless otherwise noted." Cont. Vg 2 I n. g rit tD o.scos.Tioa Or'<'o Mrco"am anav'oataouT E To,RaiEc7 ENGtNEERING a. c E tD o...ostT.o R Esui.T., Itco 1 - Coating a wrapping damace vill be repaired and tested in the field in accordance with Spec. 7220-G-8 at the time of installation. [L-a)# n+* ~ MM*s' I_ ten 2 - Material >se'eer-v vmn will secure required documentation. -91

22. E NGINEE RtNG O t5,oSST BoM 3 3. E NG tN f E R.NC Of%,oS0T 8aN RESULT S-

/ ),* )vL/' ,7 \\ f . 9 1 7 # 6 :. & y - N i-2.y-7% T \\ Af /IUTP 6-2 u u N /

24. SS DEStGN CH ANGC REQUIR ED No I' O #

O V ES..EE ATTACHEDs D e... e, e.g..,,,, DR AWING REVe DCM mw, men.s e e.=e.a ctem 5,E C. REV. AoO. 10098 5 WttiteCopy - Or.ginator QC%ia CanaevCopy - Fleid Engineer Pir* Copy - POAE Goldenrod Copy - OC

I 6 d 4 s e 4_ l i o o l o y p p ac s a g s n g i a w t o l d l l 2 8 1 o o 3 1 1 2 f H 2.- 1 1 1 1 e 3 3 3 3 h r-6 6 6 6 t o io 6 6 6 6 r ~ o 2 0 0 n 7_ 5 0 o .r 7 7 f E e

d. G C c

6 6_ 6 f E iA a 0 0 n0 e QrPO ,i r 1 T_ D D 1 g F P e a T T T k y c p N a 2 o / p 9 C G yd 1

c. e p o n

oen ,vC. o h i, d ) i n

l D

s t ,o w c. 6PG T l a o o t N N o n O p e C s m "Q ( u T g c R n o i d O u n P o A o E l i R l r t E o o c C f e N D p ~ e s A h 1 n M t 2 i L R 3 O n F o G p i N g a e O n c O i d e !h p e r O p v N a i g r e n w c i e r d r u n d a t o d 6 n e n t i e q t v n n a L o h c 2 e e v u h t t e h v t_ ~ o o t b l d_ ~e 0 a -1 e t h 6 o t n 6 o 2 n t 7 t a 6 n v y 0 e r 1 aF c c E r T 0 a gE 1 ma p_ / g k D s c ~ o ) [2 R 1 n 1 I ( s. (

.' / s. NONCONFORMANCE REPORT * "45 '/ - O, _2 2 oi=~6 N07A = Y NO. i aE v.

7. Pa O4E C T NO.

a t 0 = T E o.7 ToATE 92 Spec. 7220-M-201 !6 7220 as. oeSPOSiT EON CONC M jJ id"-/7-/c', - -- - l - " " l ~ u.e a E NC E~ j." " " t 3 ' 4 T E M OE SC se tPY 10N m. e GTEM LOC Af TON t.3 VALtOATC 'OATE Pipe F_ittings Sasse Road if 'gg'/ [/,,, -f,6 h'77-7,4

a. S E. A L N uM.E.

. ST A Tu, sT uM O. . S..E ca C E M E, P A,8 7 O i WO 3344 N/A N/A l Ev. S. PuRCH ASC ORDE N NO-

99. OC F.E LD ONSPE CT aON PL A N NO.

15. R E PL A C E ME NT SE RI A L NO 7220-M-104A - A C IR /R - 1.00- 120 N/A 6 CONT R ACTOse LOC Af TON r

S t. ASME hvES 4 7. SOu8tCE ITT Grinnell, Kernersville, NC O NO Supplier ee =OuT NG.NST=ucT.0 S. p =OuTE TO recLo ENGtNEEneNG O a Q u ' E ' O M a ' E a'a' Su E a w 'SO = 99 ** ONCO N F O R M8 peg LONDIT SON: fil_Jorm C - 3 21 - D r eqe r e o yunHty dvcurnentuuuu iu Lc zuLuducu i v_ ib e iubrit c. Cwn' - T to-the-aboverthe-documentation-peekeve-ha s act becn-receivedid-M D th Nb (7. ) . Specification 7220-M-201, Rev. 6 Pa ra. 6.6.1, Section b, states: "A metal cap shall be placed over each opening and _ sealed to the pipe with at'least 3 passes of sealing tape. " _Cp_ntyayv to the sbove. lea 26" 45 ELL did 'not have a cap on 'either end. s (3) Snecification 7220-M-201, R ev. 6, para. 6.6.3 states in part:" Carbon steel flange.s shall be sealed with 20. Q r #L LD OtSPOSsTION QFsE LD MECOMMEND A Y TON / ROUT E TO PROJECT ENGINE E ReNG 39 F tELD OtSPOSIT 80N RESULT &:

22. E ngl *d E E 8's IN G DISPO set SON 2 3. E reg eseE E RING D8SPOSf f eOce st L$uLTS.

24.15 DESIGN CH ANGC R E OuBR E ONO

- "c""^""'5'**'"

D '**"'****'" ac ^cc r^ ~ c e O Y ES. SEE ATT ACHEDs Dm A wtNG R E Y. DCN 898'..-*W..e....c... g,g4 , g 9, 8 DO S 8-s White Copy . Oregonator g C.G a-2 Cenery copy - F iese E ngin.,, * + Pink Copy - PQAC Gehsensed Copy - OC

) I 7_ _ 4 sr e d o. e n e i l v p a o c i e c n s .e e l g e n n e e t e a d s b e lf i n e l e o v p h b a p t r h a 2_ d a n c s n r e t o_ a f n a d g es 2_ o a r3 s e T o0 tsE a e s a C r ese A g e i d c e ieQC n c l e 4 t o OFPC a af H_ l f a f r e u r y p G_. oCpe h s e o y C m yp t l poyd o a i 2 C or ) t n r r a d ee Ce O r p 5 a e d e 6t ak M T e f t 8 a e o WCPC e t o a N t x o O l C o e t c a b ( l o n 2 T l t c e S R_ o A e J. O_ n " p b P o 4 L_ E e h e s R r e s v t e E t a s C w a e h i t n l-N s s o s A r 'L Q M e 6 n R v e L 6 v v_- O E_ n o i c 6 F g o N e i O e e 5 t g g a b 4 c C n n r e N a a a l p O l l Pa 6 N f l s f 2 h n e s a i_ h 4 6 t e t 2 s 0 p o e i c *2 e t e v h e d a e c t R f h e e r r_ f t l o . u t f s g o 1_ o n b 2 02_ d e 1 i c - e r l. n u n s Mi o l d h n d_ i a -0 c d c , e e 2 a e t i m v o o l v 2 l o 7_ t o n. da b t b e e a n ya s u o e e nm e ,i c e c t i - h n a x h n t t e = nn c e t a n o o k i n t of s o nr i t r r e rl f r 4 r y ci b o o r el pb n 1 a l a m r o c_ S l l k r a a t e t c -r t n s n n i oe o r_. ) s o n i R m C a_. 4 a C N ( 2 8 9 0 0 t o e e j

/ e NONCONFORMANCE REPORT "^**' "'"*""A . on aN.NofPa=T No, Nts Ihilt): .a.E Po = T E q./, i nE v,

1. Pa o,ECT No.

or e MG 72po-M.416 ch MP '/Ox N'o.YE 2 m . o.sPos T.0,. C o N eu. E NC E

3. STEM oEsCRsPTeoM

.' -h ' * - - j - ' ' j -' '"- l -'7~ ' Sh e ITEM LOCATeoM e.~u m os on,op Fabrfcated 3 3..V A lad A7 to SV 3

v. c.nv1 gen n1 n~k 1 o Lf,4,ud oATE i's4., /A_% w-l/-h,-

L .. st -i n i; Nuw eE n

e. sTa=Tue svsTE M No.

1TiW'-1 Tt cA16-7-6 N/A .... n.E et. a C E M E N T Pa = T. 9 I' n E v. -.-.....s...-... b. /A / .. * = U ~ S. PURCN ASE OR oE R NO.' t e. oC F8ELo INsPECreON PLAN 8eo. 1 rnn-n-twe 3 5. REPL A C E M ENT sE R A L NM I' con T= CTonitoC.T.oM uh nh ~ ~ ~ - - ~ ~ t...asME g vEs .,.sou CE ITT' GwiqujdJ. ICernersville. NC Coot .T E M O No Supplier e s. nouveNo ensTRuCTsoras: nouTE 7o rsELo ENGeNE EmeNG Q route To M ATERa AL suPERvtsom

19. NONCoN F o R M ONG CO No0 TsON, speciate,+4ne 7sl.5.m1, vnf evon-na hy_PO__7m-M-1 %4 ntaten in pa-t (Pn-ng eph 4.1)

~~ - p i,,- ,w i t,. +,,wi<-w o,,a,a y,,4m ,e n .,.yctgm r,,,+w, ant"n1 nf' c'm1f ty th?ving_ fabrication rnd_rhippinc rhfah vf17 n -nyn that n11 aaterin1" inclua t ng purr hnced cal _cubeentrneted items conforn to thece specifientionc. 'rbf-yrter cha11 be nv.ennf red in nudtn tvumer thnLit vill be pocsible t finished coool to its fabrication history." o relate every coreanent of the i Q F4ELo oesPOsiTfoN S 2e. Or><'o at co===ao AT'oa/aours 20 eaoercv =ao'a< ea'~o Cont. M 2 n' n<'o o'5Posa*oa ac5u'v5' 5

22. ENGINEERING otsPCssT40N as. E NGtNFE ntNG otsPoi isON RE suLTs, e

1 2.. es otssGN CH ANG E NEQutREo O No 2

a =><cvEo

. yen.L o,,Pos,7,0N o............. O TEs. SEE arr.CNEo, D-- D R A WING N E V. oCN ,,, c. ,,,y,

a.-...

n es s e-White Copy - Ocaginerer e C<,E Canary C.py - Fl.sd Engin e Pine Copy - PCAE Goederired Copf - OC r, 8 } / **. . su ,'v. <g ' S IA (

[ 3, S ~ )'7 h t d i a w o_ c ~ I d e c i 0 f z, 5 i t 0 a I 6 c s d iJ i 1 t, y l L C t A c 4 e d e v e 0 r e n o ,i 1 r i og L r n t-o l eE c u n E* { I id ge A e n p imGC o 0 i n oFPQ f' r 2 /*, 2 s g 7 a a y w t p IE o o y C P h d yp ( c l poyd 3 oCpo i o Cy o rn 6 h H .e r C e D 7 e ai ld a w ~ i nk ) h n o s n wCPG T 6 l O N 1 a O 6 i c r C @E e 1' e h ( 3 t T 3 h 1, ~ R 1 t i L O P C r J_ E B e R H l a 1 l { E i J_ C l T t. N o n A o d i M p n L_ s a R q_ Y, O e e F p s N i a e O p B y C c N h g i t n y j, O i i e N w t R n d i n e l o ^- h i s d t i r n n o t r c n A '4 u e a f R m k n 'y-a c e t l, 6 b n c - i i 7 d_ r - g

e e1 n

h t 6 t S a-t_ F_ 1 u 3 a a e q 3 1 v 1 a od n b e C t_ B n a_ duH n el - 9 h c1 n ' f. 1 t_ r n, n i o e n 9 a, e: b t_ ) n n a y6 u m

r. d n t

e e n i rt e t t. t e n n -a h' n. n o n e oh e o m c e r p I e C C. e s . s k".

NONCONFORMANCE r.EPORT 449 I. OR AWINO[PA R T NO. OP ^ e Rf V. T. PR OJECT NO. II. R E PO R T E D W Y.

DATE -

25. DeSPOSaf TON CONC UR R E NCE 1DO f*.

)-S$ NO

3. tT E M D ESCRiff f 0N e, tT E M LOCATION 8 3, w A lad A T ED AY 5

h. ATE-2/1 D

Pipe Supports QC Hold. ' d'.<DY c M 4 /

e. SERs AL NuM.ER

s. ST AR tup SiET EM NO.

i s. R EPL ACEM E N T P A R T70.j RcV. -..... =. Fen Finck 10 U/A 'N/A I S. PuRCNa SE ORDE R' NO. S o. QC F 8ELO SN SPE CTION PL A N NO. t 6. R'E PLAC EM E N T SE RR AL NO. _7m -n. nsac rev. 2 in/n-1.oa-12h n/A - - - ~ - ~ ~ ~ -

s. CONTRaCTORsLOC AveON si.ASME 13 vES iT. SOURCE T"I' Gvf nnn11 Va - n.

Ohin O NO Supni 0",ua'a""*'"<<""** Q "au 'a "hr iT E M

13. ROUT aNG tNSTRuCT TONS:

^ ' ' "' a ' Su a v '5a " s 9 9. NONCONFORM4NG CONDtTeON: Purchnne Onle" 7Pp3-M-106ACJev. 2 Itettf eteten in part: " Parts 11ste recuired shall c'ontain the name and number of cycry Vert for the coulpent and its nuxilinries including drawingt in sufficient detail to loccte and identify each part." Contrary to the above, the G-321-D for this shipment references the _pn el-i ng l i nt n n the tracenble dnetiment. 'I'he packinc list.@es not cpree With the drawinn cent with the chinnent on hantter 12-lGCE-2'i-H14. I Cont. pg 2 20. O FIELD DeSPOStTeON QFIELD RECOMMEND ATIONtROUTE TO PROJECT ENGINEERlNG

39. PsELD DISPOSitsON RESULT $e A

22. E N G tN E E RING DISPOSITION 2 3. ENGINEER 0NG DISPOStTION RESu(TSL i

34. sS des GN CN ANGE e EOu RED ONO

* " ' ' ' ' ' ' " " ^ ' * " ' ' ' " ' " ' ' ' ' "

" ~ " ~ ~ " **^***'"** O v ES. SE E A' T A CNE D. D.e... T DRhWING REV. OCN SPEC. REV- ^ D D-acess e WnsteCopy - Origenetor GUGE Cenery Copy - Fleid Eng6neet Flak Copy - FOAE Goksenrod Copy - OC [' j' l l r

m n I o 4 J. .c m =. - s '(,, de i ih. lp r p e a d 2 r c r O 6 ..'.tY o_ c c t a r 2 n oc 4. o nr r c t_ d of' h a g c p l tewOC A .gi p o l, ,. 5 i H orPO .] h_ f f 0 s .- fj 8 Y .h r 0 p r' e I e E-C }. g yo poyd n ccpo o T n v orn E E / ,Ce ) T h wcio h.4te D c a h r PC N .,n. f*t /<n O y C ( .* b' T n 2 R s 0 O s 1 a P l E l 4 ' f'lj r l R I E b

5. k-

?

e o C m R N N u lI. D t A C c M r C i R e L ..,5 O c l F n e Q ,,,'.I,, N n P O H 1 J. C

.<[

n N o

t.. i O

i N t t c n e O p

c s

u.2 ';- Q n I;, i D t p i t e ..f i c y e r t ~ n g e 2 n c_ i r g r u h e d R d e t o 1 n

'f-o e

l v e n t e p M s R n .\\ i n L_ r 5 W r i o n g 5 f .. a n n t 0 o t a 1 c n 6 n n n o 8 e P 1 H 5 /

fl.

(. i NONCONFORMANCE REPORT

2. c4fWiedotPanW is6. gE'.

C 3 450 e n t v.

p. rmoJtcT No.

or 7220-M-209 ,I 3 7220 es.ntronf ro er} ' / / ;/A joATE as oeSposeTeoN '///i '.- i '/. '/ ' " "- -- ' " >"' co Nc un wa nc t

3. BTEM oESCR8PtsoN P_ine 9mno

.. ITE M LOC A Tso.4

13. w ALao ATro av I

l 1 "~ I " " " 'I ~- .. s c...L M u...c.r t s OC Hold dd '4A [ kN oATE ...T A.T ue s,.T s M No. See T11ock 19 ....e,L A c c. T,4. T No. N/A ~ N/A d l cv. S. PuRCNASC ORDER No. te. oC reELo INSPECTeopf PLAN No, _72 2 0- M-1R6A.T.oM IR /R - I. 00-81 N/A C e s. nrPLAcEMENT SE R8AL No. .. cont. Acto n.oc ITT Grinnell,_ Warren, Ohio ... A s = ", O * Sau"c= ,oo .T r M Oo Sunplier .....-uT.N..NST.ocT.o S' 0 "a u' " ' a n ' 'a = a 5 ' ' " '" 5 R"* u 'a " a "' a '

u a v '5* "

g.. NoNCoNroRMsNG CoNoITeoNo Purchase Qrder 7220-M-106 AC. R ev. 2 "All ent ineerint documents marked i Documentatio'n Submittal. Para. 2. states in oart: n column 5 of Form G-321-D must be submitted for Buyer approval. ~ engineering documents marked Yes in column 5 require approval prior to commencement of fabrication " Those Contrary to the above, the Quality Documentation for the hangers show that they were fabricated to that had a Bechtel approval level 4 "Not approved - Correct a d sketches n resubmit. " I m e. O rarLo o.Scos.T.*" Oro accoMMc NoaTio**/=ouT= To eaoereT rNo N== = a Cont. on Pg. 2 ...,,, t o..., T,o,,,,,, u L,,,

32. ENG tNE E R tNG otSPollT ton

23. ENGeN EER3NG otSPOSITeoM RESULTSt 1.. 5 o e N c N A N o e n eo u'"'

Oo ' ' " ' ' ' ' ' ' " ^ " " ' ' ' " ' ' ' ' " ' ' ' O Trs. ser avTache o. o.".'.'.".'*****~** ' ' * *

c c ' ^ " c '

o iw.No arv. och r ce c. o c v. - Aoo. . Wttet. C.tv - Origin. tor eCW5 C n.ryCopy - Fi.id E #* gin e Pink Copy - PQAE ) ( ; '* .g.

NONCONFORMANCE REPORT (CONT'O) ..nce 2 ar_1-i.. aca o L50 - lock-1-9-Continue d _Hanec r_MKs nrawine Shop Order . lS-1HDC-131-H1 1 416-7 " Rev-1 E-ME-061 _.12 _lliB_G-316_El 1-616-7-10 R ev. 1 E-ME-06 t 1 A-11U1C-f 23-H9 1 416-6 A nev 1 F-ME-D36 B) Pu r ch_a_s_e_Onl e r__7_23 0 - M_- 106 A C,_R_cy,_2,_It e m_A_s t a t e s_in_na r t : " Paris lichrgquired shall contain the _ Dame _.aninumbe_r._of_e.very_partfor_tbe equipment _and_its_4uxilistrics._ including _dntwingsin_anificient 11ctail _tn_locrteand_ identify _each_p tri. " Cont.tr.ry_to the above. the G-321-D for this shioment references the nackinn list as the traceable document. The 7,nking 1;-t daa r nnt_agrec_with the_drnwinge-. sent wit}tthe r.hipment nn the rn11nwing 11=ted hange_r_pipa support assemblies. . I Packing _ List Dwas_sent with Hanger Num_ber Hanner .]wes Referenced Shipment Numbe r Shiopine Order _.2 - 611 3L R e v. i Rev. 2 3-2FCIl _E S-H3 E-M F- 0 3 6 _1 - 610 _ft-ln R n v_ n n ov. 1 in1rrn u mn r_ME (14 9 I-610-6-2 0 Rev. O Rev.I 10_-1FC B-22-H17 _.1-610.-1-2 6_Rc v._0 R ev. I 10-lECR _41-lil 1-61 0 6 Rev. O R c_r, 1 10-IFCB-34-H6 - E-ME-056 1 - 610 11__R_c v. _ 0 R ev. I 10-IFCB-34-1111 _1-610.-1-14_Re.v 0 Mav 1 6 1ren _3ft _F2 1-610-4 -2 2 Rev. O Rev.I 10-1FCB-19-H14 1-616 1 Rev.O Rev.I 18-1HBC-133-H1 E-M E-061 2 611-4-6 R ev. 2 Rev. 3 10-2FC B-34-H 6 E-M E- 06 5 2 - 611 2 P ev. 3 Rev. 2 (Sheet 2) 10 -2 FCB-35-H2 E-ME-090 lee s s-a White Copy - OeWns Sr - ' Canary Copy - F6.ed Fegineer Pink Copy - PQAE Gold.neod Copy - OC 6 'O g [ _ 1 . ' [ 4 [. .W [ I d A ~

t'

~ 'J D ~~~ I. i 0 c 5 -c 4 e .c s 2 )_ 6 r_. 1 a w a 4 r 1 tos n c eE t e n E id ge A a ir6 eOC c 2 OFPU ) 1 1 y 4 po g y C o yp 2 poyd oCpo 0 C or y n 1_ erCe ) t a D L Mnkld n ai o T .WCPG N e O r C a 3 ( s T r R e O b 9 P m ER u e E M CN 'O A M R O F n 9g N o i O t C c N e O p N sn itp i e c e r c nd F I e ri ul d p Lp 1 A e t s o a de

n. a n

e. I_

t iz nd i f; ul ~ tn o o n U_ ~ C ro 9 fo@ n 1 f k c f_ c j:,' n o o lB N _ 1 -s s s eo t J

'2' NONCONFORMANCE REPO.9T ~

2. DN A Wf MG/PA RT NO.

OP 1 R E V. T. PROJE CT NO. 33,REPORTEDSV lOATE 2 5. OrSPOStTION CONCURR E NC E Spec. 7223-14201

G 7220

.Ga V-P G l " " l "" ~ l "' " ' l "

3. 0 TEM DE SCRIPT BON

.,,/ _ Pipe Spoci S. ST E M LOC A'. IO N 03 V A LID A T E D B Y I DATE " Umi.MU / h2&% QC Hold

4. SE R. A L N uM.E R

.. Sv A R tup STsTEM NO. i $. R E,L ACE MEN T PAR T NO. j REw. _PHDa-32L S617-8-4 M/A 7 U/A I

3. PURCN A SE Of1DE R NO.

9 0. OC FIELD $NSPE CT OON PL A N NO. t o. RE PLAC EM E N T SE RG AL NO. 7220-M-104A-AC In/n-1.03-133 n/A - - ~. - - - - " - - - -

6. CONT M ACTOR / LOCATION IS.ASME O 'E'

'TSouRcE ITT Grinnell, Kernernville, PC Oy Sgp,Qer .YEM i s. Rout NG NST R uCT.ON S. O route 70 riELD ENGINEERING O aou'E vo Ma'E a'ai. SuPERv,SOR e 9. NONCONFORM8NG CONDeTaON: M Crinnc11.cpprovedJ, pool rJ:ctch-2HEO-123-S617-8-h-rc-cpires-that-a-ventwi--Le i.stt11 J __in the cnnol niece. contrarv tn the nbove there im nnt n vcabn f fn thn epani pior a. .- c Konconfor:mnte noted _durin5t reccint incDection. 'Q' Number in 4.17h_ __(f '[irn1d tyn rmni ted. I 30. O FIELD DISPOSeTION OFIELD RECOMMENDATION / ROUTE TO PROJECT ENG'NEERtNG

39. PIELD OtSPOSIT90N RESuLTS:

t II. E NGIN E E RING OtSPOS# TION

23. ENGINE ERING DeSPOStTeON RESULTS e

34.8S DEStGN CH ANGC REOutRED NO O TES.SEE avT ACNED. O. e... DR k WlNG R C v, DCN SPEC. R E V.

s D O.

awesee..a.eease.s,** e.v. '"8

~

White Copy - Or6 ineter GCiB ~ 0 Canary Copy - Fiese Erigineer Pkt Copy - PGAE . ;,* g - Goldenrod Copy - OC + 4 n !.' l :

NONCONFORMANCE REPORT ' ~ " ^ * * *

2. O R A WIN G/PA RT 6 0, O,

o 452 t R E V. F. PROJECT NO. 3 2. R E PO R T E D e v ./ - /. 'DATE

23. Ot$POE87s08. CO NCU R RE NC E

-, f ',,<,g# /e 'h. _nw w._72.PT.ON2,-m200 ... E oESCR 3._ __pE eo ,,,......,.m I l I l LOC A T.O N ,, v a 0, TE o., .. oATE ,J.'E R, A N uM.E Ripe Supporjtc CC Hold EIl[/'VAwdb]L 7,,M ...T A R T oP.T.T E. O. ... EPL A c E M E,. T P A,,, O./ E.. i lfi /f - can na n,tP to t+h i

5. PU RCH A5T ORDE R'NO.

s e. Q C F 8 ELD INSPE C TION PL A N O. 9 6. R EPL A C E ME N T SE RG AL NO. _'f220-4106AC Pev. 2 IR/R-1.03-53 I?/A

6. CONT R ACTOS

AOC AYsON

~- " " *'- " ~*~ " ~'- ' SB.ASME C VE5 e 7. SOUR CE _I'PI' Grinnell, Vntren, Ohio Coot -'---"-~"a ~~ OO Supplier .T E - ... R Ou T G.N s T R uC T.ON, g route To P.E o E,.G N E E R. G g,ROvTE T O - AY E R, A L supe Rv..O R 8 9. NO NCONFOR M eNG CONDITION: Purchase Order 7229-M-106AC Re'.. 2. Documntation Pub ~. ittnL Pgq31gr_nJ>h 2 ctatec in p':ra f,31 onginaowing rinnu v ntn r-nnker1 in enlum ri nr Pnm (:-3P1-D mt be nuluitted rnr Ibyer npproval. OmW _engineerinrr documents marked _Yes in column 5 require npuroval prior to commencement of fabriention. Contrarv _to the above, the Quality Docucentation for Hanger 18-lHEC-133-H6 shows that it vas fabrf cated to cketchc= that had a Eechtel approved Level I4 " Hot approved-correct and recubmit." s Cont. M 2 29. C FIELO OtSPOSIT BOM CFIELD RECOMMEND ATION/ ROUTE TO PROJECT ENG8MEE RING S t. FIELD 045PO54780N RR' SULTsa 2 2. E NGir4 EE R tNG D85PO 58T ION 2 3. Ep.GeNEERING Ol5PO3ef TOM R ESULYSs e 1

24. IS DESIGN CH ANGE REQUIREO ONO

- -""""" ^ * * " " " "

~~ O vEs. sEE 4YY ACNEo. n.<..."~~" DR A' WING R E v, DCN .........o SPEC. p E v. ADO. s ea s s-s ++ Whrte Copy ___,=-. Orl 3ae#88 0 ec4 3-a Caneer Copy - F wid E ngineer PMk Copy - PGAE ,. e Coteenrod Copy - OC 's ,.F* 9

~ l. s 4 o o ~ a aca N i de ilp p c 2_ r s o_ g a a o. ri 2_ t

t. os c

n E i d. O C c d giA iri a l OrPO sr. oH yp o y c yp poyd / C. C p o o or y n ) t,Ce .k h n ld i n. i D o T' WCPG N O 2 C r 6 o e ( 1 T d 5 R r 3_ 8 4 o_ o O t n p c-P i E o f E R i 'r h r E C E e C be I. N r A un M R 'n O 'Q F N 1 O C n N v o ), O e i N n t c e 1 p c g 9 n n i d 61 t u 6 p n i D 1 ecer gn ir J u d de ton 9 G e 1 I I e n k 3 n c 9 e o W ) r i e t t D r E f n e S o A t c c n n n o a 8 8 o C_ I_ 1_ l 8 H 9 0 86 _ 9 0 i l g , /

NONCONFORMANCE REPORT ' " ^ OP o h57

2. DR AW4NG/PA R T NO.

IREV. T. PR OJECT NO.

12. R E POR TE D a y

'OATE

25. De5PO5tTtON CONCURRENCE m.

vo?a-4 2% !9 7g20 U, M 2 YI " "* * " l " '* " l " " '" l "' " " l * *l-c

2. If EM DESCFIIPTION S. ET E M LOC A1 TON 8 3. V ALID ATED BY

/

3 Pipe Supportc QC IIold Phif/-t g,ppbM;/ b33-As DATE

4. SE RI A L NUMBE R

9. ST A R T UP S YST E M NO.

IS. REPL ACE MENT PAR T N/O l' RE V.

- - - - '**Le****"88*

_see mock 19 1r/A ' / N/A l .. PURCH A sE O R DE R NO. s o. QC P. ELD.NSPECTION PLAN NO. g i s. REeLAC E ME N T SE R A L NO. __7pm-M-1061,c. nev,_2 H-1.00-121 U/A .. CON r R ACTO itOC A T.Ou ...AsME E)vES '7souaCE ITT Grinnell Ucrren, Ohio ,', E M O NO __ Supplier F 9 0. ROUTING SNST R U C T GON Sa g ROU T E TO PIELP TNGINEERtNG QROUTE TO M AT E Rf AL SUPERVISOM 9 9. NON CO N F'O R MIN G CO NDIT IO N: 7220-!!-106/.C Rev. 2 Item A ctates in part: " Parte lict required chcIl Purchase Order enntMn the nnr:e and number of every part for the equip.acnt and its nuxiJinrics including drawingc in sufficient _ __de.triti to lonttp_f.nd identify ench part." Contrary to the above the G-321-D for this chipment refercngec the pe];inlict ac the traceable' document. The packing 1.ict doec not agree with the drnvings sent with th? chipment g on the followinrr listed !ange_r_ pipe cupport acccmblies. L Cont. pg 2 20. O riE'o oisrOsiTio" OFICLD RECOMMEND ATION/ROUTJ TO PROJECT ENGINEERING 2 5. FIEL'O DISPOSITION RESULTS: f'

==

22. E NGIN E E N ING O f 5PO$tT40 N 2 3. ENGINEE RING DISPOSITION RESULTS:

24. 8S DEstG N CH ANGE REQuaRE ONO

' ' " ' ' ' ' ' ' " " ^ ' ' " ' ^ ' " ' ' " ' " O YES. SEE ATTACNEDs U.'.'."*" ' ' * * ^ * ' ' ' ' ^ " *

D.c DR AWtNG REV* -

OCN e,. SPEC. REV. A D D. s oes s.: White Copy - Originator oC-s a 2 Canary Copy - F 6.id Engin.or Pink Copy - POAE ~ coldenrod Copy - OC ~ ~ =.,,

v e 1 s ., i e I NONCdNFORMANCE REPORT (CONT'D) .. r o r 2 o r__R ' .e. c= no --Thakine -T, tnt _Deg - DvCSlent_llith Hanger _Ho. IIanger Shinpin-Onler _R.eferenced rhipryint 1-634.-J-19 Rev. 1 Rev 2 8-UInc-23-II2 E-!D:-018 ' 634-3-16..Rev._1 Rev. 2 (Cheet 3) 8-111DC-23-H6 E-!E-019 o-61o-7-12 Rev. 1 Rev. 2 26-onnc-20-H12 E-!c-oh2 / _o-619-7-24 Rev. 1 Rev. 2 lo-1HDC-lol-H4 E-2c-042 1-610-3-9 Rev. O Rev. 1 18-UIBC-2-H9 E-!E-055 1_610-3.lIL_.Jhr._o Rev. 1 18-UIEc-2-H12 _1-610-3-13_11cy, O Rev. 1 18'UIBO-2-H13 -.1 610 3-2R _ Rey. O Rey. 1 12-1CCB-25-H7 1-616-8-2 Rev. 1 Fev. 2 16-UIEC-150-H2 E-1G-068 _1. 616-2 A fir v. 1 ne i. 2 '16-lRDC-135_H3 1-616-8-12 Rev. O Rev. 1 16-OHBC-51-H2 1 616 8-lh nev. O Rev. 1 16-1.HBC-123-H5 i 1-616-0-19 Rev. 1 Rev. 2 12-1 HEC-141-H3 ~ _.2-617 6-10 Rav'. O Rev. 1 16-2H30-323-H2 E-1E-110 Nonconfor=ance noted during receipt inspection. 'Q' Ilumbers are 4.102, 4.162, 4.172, 4.191, and 4 341. _1 ___ Rold toco ripplied. t i e ~ ' ' 1000e 2 White Copy - Originator Canary Copy - Flead Engineer Pink Copy - PQAE Co'< seared Copy - OC g l$hg:t'.' ~ '], f j {k f'lV. ;'?,<Y'h ',k .r.. 'i ..I ^ I,, a f-l < < * *:

~ s [8 4 NONCONFORMANCE REPORT ' ' '. 'Y -9 7" L OR a w.NG, = R T NO.

RE v.: 1. eR O,EC r O.

Or,c o 454 /f. r,ORTjosj k'. .h.g3 7f - x--- u - u p ~ - l ~ 2 7220-M-16 6 /F1 7220 'o.TE 2. o.S O S.T.O. cO Nc uR RE NcE /j, f 1 i ..T.M..S.R.,..N .... M -. T.. N 26" Coated Pipe (Yard) Combination Shop 'm/h,' j f.. w ('d y k..,. %. ....TE...

[-- d'$dh, (;-M 74 N

O

4. SC RI A L N UM.E R

9. S T A R TUP S Y ST E M NO.

S S, R E PL'A C E M E N T P A R T J. OHBC-15_8, OHBC-16 N/A '/ N/A (. 3 l REV, .-e as c e e' * ** E * ** # [

- 8 S ruRcN.SEORoER O.

... o c r E Lo. S.E cT,$N L. N,.O. 7220-M-104 A - A C ... R E L. c E M E N T S E R. O. M-204-2-16 Rev. O N/A hw.. w,,,7.;,.,. 4......f y 7.f. j ( .. CON T R cT O,fitoc.T.O N h'y,,',,;,,),,,..f' 4 -- %,f,I N' ... SME g TES ...SouRet N/A EM O NO Constru ction 4 3. ROUT 8NG 4NSTRUCTIONS: OUT E TO FIELD E NG tNE ERING Q ROUTE TO M AT E RI AL SUPERVISOR 9 9. NC NCO N FO8tM st.G CO ND 4T f 0 N : Marking e anAtranshv M Heat Numbare n nd identifientinn. mar _kir c halLhn a c e nmpli sh ed using a steel indentation stamp with a round nose or interrupted dot die, reference Specincation 7220-M-204, .E_a_r._a_g raph__4_,.).3. C nn t r ary__t o_the_ab ove,__during_ fahr.icAti.on_a nd_.cntling__o.f_t_hc.J_6 " va ralpiping,_s_t_a mp s ot h e r th a n th e r e qui r round nose or interrupted dot dies were used and noted after fabrication and QC acceptance. 0-List #4.192. Nine QC Hold Tags applied. 3 20 QFIELD DeSPOSITION QFIE LD RECOMMENDA TeON/ ROUTE TO PROJECT ENG9NEER0NG 2 3. FIELD Ot$ POSITION RESULT S: bece LJLJ1 umbers shall be imprinted 6" or more laterally from nonconformina inprint Se cury c/y[. o. Round nose or interrupted dies shall be used. Non-conformina impressions then to be "emoved A P Y- /> Co-Phe & tiy orindina. Minimum wall thickD_ess of.375 inch shall be maintsined. Com'oleted W4 A a._ cenund citrfarne c h a ]_1 hn dyp checknd fnr any crackinr1 from rpmnved impressions-u-. 2 ' 7 C k $ $ 4i,-t-2fr-Y N k h 6-2 9 '76 /'

22. E NG IN EE RING, DISPOSITION i

2 3. E NGIN EE RtNG OfSPOSITtON RESULTS: 24, tS OEllGN CH A NGE RE QutRED ONO

- "cc

" ^ ' ' " ' ^ ' o ' 5 'o 5 ' o " D"-*'******'- 1. c accE Tenc YES, SEC ATTACHEDs DR A W6NG

REV, DCN 7

~

k .... L.......... g SPEC. REV. ADD. soess-e White Copy - Originator o c< 3-2 Canary Copy - F sold E rigineer Pank Copy -- POAE Goldenrod Copy - OC

O 9

3. RECORD CONTROL'

,1-FIELD INSPECTION REPORT

..a '/' CONTROL NO. FILE NO. [ ' 'M-b !c l /

1. PROJECT NO.

2. D ATE PAGE OF-a.sreu sNSeecrEO C94. # W//ft? 14% /talcano Pi>>;

Wigo) Me e a% (3H BG ~ I L ~ l., 9.') .TQrtino MGL utAu THilIL/JE85 ot}bh 13~'7 411 '/04 A n n f-1 f.~ 3. A 9 i,'. w ' u in o _,<j c ? , a,-d tij"_L _bju3r-I L, l/ 4t h ' ~ 1,Lu/'.

yn j' !Jr 5 ljo 8' OHRt*~ l L~ 7 ack.41)

Si%l5 .if10.4of . ito r. ab'?A'..:M? AQt A59 9J IDt. -43(i of), es o y f)H Ae_-1_T-2 O XiSU~ is~ 2 a.5_Q - s!Q');3?.Qqtsi .JfE)UfEfjD! n n &=M-+'.-.aIAQ 20 10D, - 44i /

5. LOCATION

{f,%0-w 3)($. c--- Y[f>A u/, 6 TYPE OF INSPECTION ~ { )_.._.._____.___ .__=_m.

7. }S ANDARD / CODE / PHOCEDURE / DRAWING / SPECIFICATICN I(f

//_.$'// [g, /// r[f*A/' Of ' l' > ]) st M-2 ey e f._L_dm4hs* fc)flSq f}-)/. l n-l' O _/77.1/Ibl.S v hj_jO_.,

8. INSPECTION EQUIPMENT USED O ~/

t eb DG M~s??9 L/2a /I (?n /.b. h-L - 7 L, ~ ~ [L( n, A ' / ~ (, d7 /

9. RESULTS OF JNSPECTION:

SAriSF ACTORY b UNSATISFACTORY [.)

10. ACTION TAKEN IF UNSATISFACTORY n

P S N O ra,wi eon. White - GC Files g" ~ g s)g,i,y,, f yQ'j ,9 Cm, y - 0,.#,mo, W 3 3, cya,y e en, _ j_ yf, ni. nan f oc.u i. i s.-

~ \\ n:.. c Number (w) N NONDESTRUCTIVE EfAMINATION REPORT s ^ Job No. and Project Location t Date g i,.

,.7220 Midland, Michigan 7i

~7 - (o. 7A Surface Condition Time of Examination AFT 6lf GID5/Af 51G- ' *8 "" *' \\ H A /h 8mnoT{ Before P,VHT. VGPAiC. Af ter PWHT M I b fo O//:~~/ Type of Examination Type and Temp of Material' NDE Procedure No. r PT IN MT( ' ) UT( ) Other ( ) @((~ h.qp-l,1 kgd / Specification Standard Acceptar.ce Standard W - S P - 1i E W e,.t). I PT-Ri?-1) Z 9mg I ./ Defset Code,

C':1 0,$'IN c.

6.. ~ C-Cracks P-Porosity NF-Nonfusion S-Stag R-Rounded L-LINEAR Other-Specify

_.,., Part or Weld Number ACC R EJ. D ect Remarks % y (%ATeel 11A 2cl ~ I ~ {1 010 }NC6'If kUck .; w. /u t= w k B - l(o u s -71 % L n~< . *.,. a, a fGMd 4L r1 F % co Luce Kra4 Yelegeves L1cRS 4g4 ..e,'; N 4 .. ) D . v.- 4 10TES: / Enclosure Adit d: Yes ( ) No ( g A-TV ll-L$ ~ 7Q g pyr j Ex.' liner Witnessed by ' 3.' d,.g.. '.* i i ' t .~ - sac. e ;' I

/ as.rasim NONCONFORMANCE REPORT ' ' " ^ ' ' ' k hh

2. DR A WING /PA RT NO.

OP i e RE W. T. PR OJECT NO. I 2. R E PO RT E D B V DATE

25. DISPOSITION CONCUR RE NCE ljE--0_- 2h.L(rollent)

!1 7220 [N/aur~/// ctJ<'d '/-2 M "-"- l "" *' j "' - l " " l -C

3. B TE M DE SC RIPTIO N g.II My.

S. OT E M LOC ATIO N (g[f j $ 3. V ALID ATED R V 3 OATE liinor P1nta_f_cannbly C-.111 122 Tw n PT neth Ti Jin-ATd dd.%r a-@,, /-, I O/d

4. SE R I A L N UM B E R

9. ST A R TUP 5 Y ET EM NO.

S S. REPLACEMENT PART NO. !' R E V. pe.se ev reeSe e =.swe en oave N9-16 and_b10-16 N[A N/A

g. PuRCH ASE ORoER NO.

ES. QC P8 ELD INSPECTf 0N PLA N NO, IG. REPLACEMENT SERI AL NO. _7220- c 50A,i.OC AT.ON IB/C-111-18y R/JL c " - " - ' " ' ~ - " .. CONTRACTOR gg313, eymag ...A ME o vEs ...OURCE Jagthediler & Tp@ Vorl;n 'T m 8 NO Ycndpx s o. ROUTING INST R UCTIONS: ROUTE TO FIE LD E NGINEE RING O aOuTE TO M ATER AL suPERWisOR 3 9. NONCON FORMtNG COneDITtON: A diacrepancy erio_ts between_mi_ll plab numbarJommentation_nnd the vnnanr trannfn Tnd stamo rnunber on two chon fabri_cated_nqn. enbliem___Incw;;cntation_for_D-9-16 nhown IPNjd13Q9 n1 ih //Jge tho vnnah-transferred ot=p in HT!/81982 nlab (h7, N10-16 doctunentation showslTf'81989 slab /228;_ the_Ycndor transferred stamp in HT681989 nlab //26._ Nonconfomance noted durins 0.0. Review. 'O' Nienber is 1.1QL__ _/ _ Hold tn y cpplied. 1 20. Q P4E LD DISPOStTf0N QPIELD RECOMMENDA T40N/ ROUT E TO PROJECT ENGtNEERING

21. FIELD DISPOSITION * ' ULT $r 3 2. E N INEE RING OBSPOSITION

23. ENGINE ERING OfSPOSIT SON RESULTS:

e e e

24. es DESicN CH ANGE REQUIRE O NO U~~"~~

O v Es. sEE aTT ACuto. D e... DRE WINf3 RE W, DCN avres.nesse esses crom SPEC. REV_ ADO. scopa White Copy - Originator G C-ia Canary Copy - F 3.id E ncin**r Pink Copy - FOAE Goldenrod Copy, QC

'T

l.: ' '

S ~ \\

i l l , NONCONFORMANCE REPORT ' ' " ^ "'

2. D R AWING /PA R T NO.

c,r - 1 456 e R E v. F. PF# 0JE CT NO. 6 2. R E PORT E D a v FSK - C 'i42.{B o, nut) !h .7220 N(Oh.MH /R !'(D A T E 2 9. DISPOSIT ION CONC UR R E NC E -$A%

* * * " l * * '* " l * """ l " " " " l '"'"

y4 tner A

a. ST E M LOC A TIO N UniL #1 UOme t ITEM DEsCRerTION

.... A LID A T ED., i Plate Amy C.I11.I30 Facct_Loffic 4 M L '>' M 5% !s ' M OATE

a. SERI A L NUMGER

9. 57 A R TUP S YSTEM No.

D-4-7 N/A \\. N/A J 9 5. R E PL ACE M EN T P A R T NOf ' R E W. '"*8..T68'"**

s. PuRCH AsE onDEn NO.

t s o. OC FIELD INSPECTtON PLAN NO. e 6. REPL ACEME NT SERIAL NO. 7220-C-50A IR/ C-I11-30W N/A

s. CoNTR ACTOpe/LOCATIO~Southe r n B ot ter

-.....P.. a==E O vEs ".=Ouact - and Tanl hxhs Vemahis J.cnn. COoE ' REM D NO Vendar

18. ROUTING $NETRUCTIONS:

ROUT E TO FIELD ENGINEE STING Q ROUTE TO M ATERI AL 5UPE RVISOR 9 9. NONCONFORMING CONDaTION: Shop Assembly D-4-7 has a shop a.nstalled hanger pad welded over the heat and slab stamping that obliterates all but two numbers makinn the material untraceable to the documentation. The documentation __ shows the numbers should be Heat #21302 Slab #10. N' nconformance noted during OC surveillance. O List #1.109e One Hold Tag applied. o .t I 8 Q Ff ELD Ot5PO$tTION, QFIELO RECOMMENDATION / ROUTE TO PROJECT ENGINEERING 20.

21. FIELD DISPOCITION RESULTS:

22. E N GIN E E RIN G DISPO EITION 2 3. ENGINEE RING DISPOSITION RESULTS

=summmm.no e e t

24. OS DESIC N CH ANGE RCQUlftE ONO O vEs, sEE ArrACuEDI U "..e"

" ~ ~ ' ' ' " ^ * " ' ' " ' D se DR AWING REV. DCN SPFC. REV. A O D. Aw.m..es.. eer e e. t..se ~ seces-s whits Copy - Orloinster Q G-G 3 Canary Copy - Fi.Id Engineer Pir.k Copy - POAE Goldenrod Copy - OC

/, Y, l

e t .y ,N ;'{f1 ,.y

e e s. S NONCONFORMANCE REPORT "[15 7 ~ 2[D R A vvsNG/P A R T NO. OP sREV. T. PROJE CT NO. 8 2. R E PO R T E D B Y l' D A T E

25. D.SPOSITION CONCU R R E NCE M 616 Sheet 8 (c)

!5/F1 7220 ',)..,'//.,, <r/ b, n f_ t/ f e /c. j "" j""** l "* " j "*-

3. ITE M DESCRIPT f 0N

4. ITEM LOC A TsON 9 3. V A L.ID A..T E.D D V i

3 OATE shn <her+ yatve en nbinatian Rhon '^ I * *L M M A i I v *Z ' A-4.SERiALHuMeER e, ST ART ur SYSTEM NO. is. REPLACEuCN T rART NO/ I' R zw. e = =,s e v *.e t e = =*.-= = =

- - e 16 -lu1C.Cl< - 7 9N 3N 641 N/A N/A I

a

5. PURCN ASE ORDER NO, 5 0. OC F tELD IN SPE C TION PL A N HO, 3 6. R E PL A C E M E NT SE RI A L NO.

1??n-X 1 ?O A C ,5 $ h.? W. ~ /// ? 5' b.' l A t

8. CON T R AC Toft / LOC A T IO N 38.ASME C YES 3 7, SOURCE

^ CODE _,n, b o r / N v1 T mv Vn hrr. E n_ Mrv _wnrel C/ .TE M O NO Ve nde r 9 8. ROUTING l'NSTRUCTIONS ROUTE TO FtE LD ENGtN EE RING O aouTE To Ma T Ea'a' SUPE Rv'Soa 9 9. NONCONFORMING CONDtTION: During a Quality Control rer:uired Magnetic Particle inspection of M-613, Sheet 8, Field Weld !/8, linear indications were found in the valve body adjacent to the field weld. R efe rence Nondestructive . Fxarr.inntion P er> ort #1662, attached for locations. 'O' number 4.164. One Hold Tat ant 311ed 4 e 1 8 20. O Ff ELD DISPOSITION OFIELD RECOMMEND ATION/ ROUTE TO PROJECT ENGINEER 4NG 2 9. FIELD DISPOSITION RESULTSt 2 2. E N GINE E R ING DISPOSITION 2 3. ENGINEERING DISPOSITION RESULTS: e 4

24. ss DES GN CN ANGE REQUIRE ONO

- "*c

" ^ ' ' " ' ^ ' o ' 5"o = ' no N D**'.*.*"'*****" af. OC ACCEPTANCE O YES. SEE ATTACNEDr D c. E R'A WING R E V. DCN awvmee.neeenseast.e SPEC.

REV, A DD.

s oe s s.: WMte Copy - Originator Q C-G a-2 Canary Copy - Field Engineer Pink Copy - POAE Goldenrod Copy - OC

r-Numhe __ .b. N ~Pnge \\ c s x. NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION REPORT ~ Job Nr. and Proicct Location Date 7220 Midland, Micliigan -,[l[-[h 'urfaca Condition Time of Examination /~/A//f L iso /Dwg Number C gg Octore PWHT jf/// Af ter PWHT //f)/ l'% Gw ' 7-30 ~Z4 Type and Temp. of Material h/} - g yg g gg

i ype tf Examination pFC-lh -f8/

NDE Pieceduce No, ('1

T l ) MT h UT (

{ d yyj h ) [ !/ / 9 - p(f) y ) Other ( ') / pecificati n Standard Ac'ceptance Slandard m -16 % k l i - ]) 1 i2eo_ _t.Asin e l-fcct Codo s.ali I C-Cracks P-Pot osity "N F-Nonf usion S-Stag R-Rounded L-LINE AR Part or Weld Number Other-Specif y ACC' REJ Defcet Remarks l., A - Pldqk'O L. / leTeer 70e To LuliEA R 'T'M IF C /4T I O N S in TMF VA L\\/E CASTO% [ 5ee A~iiAcaf3_QXh l IS: Enclosure Added: Yes M No ( l ] [ (1ir? / -<f I. Ad Examiner / dUC1 // Witnessed by o ~4ST /)/(f/t ,[],. u v' m

NDE REPOltI CNCLOSURE,d om u, ~ . PROJECT Midland, ' Michi,qan JOB NO. 0722_0_.___ EET NDE REPORT NO. _k.b.I..b-OF JOMMENTS N D 3 lg-s el.- g to _y M .N "'1 9 \\d }

I 7

h 'h lh! / / -~\\ ~ l 9 I 4 $_. __ p._ 'N 0 o P ~ <j 3-7-7 g-_- y w. I \\_ L n N 70 0 4 ) 1-g e ss o i -l6.. O g. O_- \\\\ / / o. _. Q g j ~~~ 0 -(, p h ----- ( l O s -~ t' f / F .[ _k.f f R'N\\ _dn T t c m w 3 \\ b l .e s.- n ,g_ _ h 3 ~ ' U o'LP 4_ 4 )) 6-5 k_ s.i 8 k_. _Q - - A). _. v \\ l 4 1, ,/ r-2 x. I 0 /\\ y__ j ea I j O s __!X,~ i_ ~ g t i i aCD Psienven a, sne., moot ano, us.

7bh 3,p.,,3,.y w--e QiBUTl AU0lT E10!M bl.3F;-2) ~ e '.. Anell !4 1976 nra J$ g N /.\\ {.. m,.'......M42!!"." *- ~~ ""~y.7,7. ~.2,,, g.,,,, 7.,..,...

' land 1 & 2 Job Ho. 1220 Construction l~.l> -'u I..

T. Stojkov 25-3-P-2 9.3 Ehampion, Inc. Office Files K. Italman _ Champion. Inc. QMI, Rev. 11, Article XIII m _. n.... o } Champion QM4, Article XIII states inpart: " Champion, Inc. Quality Control Procedure provide fcr the calibration cf measuring equipnent.used in production of concrete. 'Ihis includes scales, meters, admix dispensers. Ths ccales and meterd are calibrated. nur cu of Standards." . with traceability to the standards of the National T 311bration records for adnix dispenser No. to calibrate to the' National. Bureau of Standards.I do not provide traceability of the standard, , u. i NOTE: Admix dispensers are calibrated by US Testing on site. '~p.<.......4, Recommenced. 1. Establish traceability of calibration standard used to calibrate admix dispensers to the National Bureau of Standards. 2. ' Remind' cognizant Champion, Inc. personnel of the requirement for documented traceabili of calibration standards. t_.. _ m.. ......s.................... L.. ...y 14, 1976 Ma PFQCE l. Champion Inc purchased a Volumetric Flask (Champion Equipnent (1o.1). U.S. Testing calibrated it using flationally Recognized Standards, U.S. Tesing recalibrated all admix vials. -2. ~ "hampion Inc. was reminded of the requiremenk for documenting traceability of calibration

tandards. (I.F.b64GS) (6W68 C/z.

,.. ;r....g C 2M 76 W6x,ryck.w.:,rPr&E t 2. n - _G S._(, '~ - 'q > + _M

7 00AUTY AUDIT FikDING ??.V 5-1-2) r. 04/12/76

g...., d me N/A

....w,x.......,,..u.. p......... g,,,,, F land 1 & 2 Job 7220 Construction O.-.. -

n. T. stojkov m.

25-1-P-1 2.3 Subcontracotr's Offica Files C. M. Willlams Peabody QA Program Requirements, Rev. 3, Paragraph 1. '5.1 Peregraph 1.5.1 states in part: "The purpose of the Quality Assurance [ndoctrination Program is to familiarize the new or transferred' employee with the Quality Assurance Program requirc-ment. stressing the importance an'd meaning of Quality Assurance / Quality Control as it applies ts.the employee's position". ~ t Nsither of th.e subcontractor's personnel currently at the site have received Quality Assurance etination. l ........n....** neCommended .a Provide Quality Assurance indoctrination for all currently acting site personnel. Retain rscords of this indoctination on the site. Based on the number of discrepancies uncovered, indoctrination should emphasize program implementat' ion.

m.. u............

Tuce 28,1976 PFQCE c.).. ~,........ 1... e m \\ '[ \\.. g.._..... 7......................., j,...,._...................

b, p.

'"; '.,.. !.. ~ - -- -- =.

I,j I / M iiW [D',n itjOJ A J Jr b :\\ g e Q .,J.,{'s_( *> 3 -1. 2 ) (u..r..., C 's/ j 2 / pr. r.r 76 .. Mf;T ffdT=,;;3==. =---- --==.== =- - -. m _m_.,._m..,,._ __ [p, M/A i

=,.

Midisad ?. 5 2 Job Mo-n ')0 b3 g,... a.,,,,, -,'..C. Con s t ruc t 2.on p.,',,'", ..-...,4.

3. T. Stojkov_

_2 5 - !.-P-1 lItum 1

....,.u..... =...,...,,..,3, 3 Subcont ~. or's Offite F.I1es

. ~ ' " '"'~ p,, g gfn Fea.)ody QA Program Requirh: ents, Rav. 3, Paragraph 16[2 1 3 Paragraph 16.2.1.3 states *n par *- "A L ba 6a tained for each project'or facili y. ' Ports and their sta:us shall j..... No Log of lionconformances is bains maintained. ,-l i.

r j.. ~,....,.. Escommenceu Pr: pare and riaintain a Los of Nonconfo:::ances.

uhere necessary information is available. Include Previously

issued nonconformances L. _..............,.

BR ....................6,...... 14 Mav 28. 1976 ....s:............. PFOCE o Requ:sted responsible, action by X-Ray Engineering Co t3 X-Ray Engineering Co. nonconformances have been issued to date. Project ifanagere Memo to J. N main tained, When nonconformances are issued, a log will be No i %..,...u.*.. .c.- ,v. p r ..e,,.... EK.7,' -~- - - - - ~ *' a.. ~,,..........., w }$ }& Y/ ' ' ~ - ^ " - - -- -~ h_- hf?ll7b f**'"""**-- =

i ? hh b Ident.: Project Quality Assurance liidland Units l' 5 2 - 7220 _ Verification of Corrective Action fe hod: 1. Verify action of respons'e as impice.cnted. 2. Review of documentation or attachrents to resolve finding. 3. Requirement removed or finding withdrawn. 4. Other: </ Items Checked: \\[h@\\@@ Ayny C3d 7t@JAj3,Q(h MD i k Tldb SCT~{0 b M ST'~Ldk / b X-hkY (5DcDd /WA%cv mRm GA 0FRW Pi trl L) 1 e e s s' closeout Documentation (list or attach) Verifica a Not verifiedtexplain)' ~* ' TesG' auw ~ __ QAE N 'Date ) O k ( ) s e e

h ,1.b:l - ~ E.".-::?. '.W,7~" '~- ~ ( m kfg 001.G AU0ii FLTING O g" qw.S./.m>m Ii 04/12/76 a T. nr u ll lI/A F...,,n...,....,., m ,..,..t' bJ' ". Midle.ad 1 & 2 Job No. 7220 Cons truc t i.on 0-- .m.,m.,.. ... 3.- e.., n.,., 23-1-P-1 Item 15.0 ..o.. Sebcontractor's 0*fice Piles. ... m.........,....,............ c_ rr uit1<,,, Peabody QA Progra:t R2quirc:aats. P.av. 3, Para,:raoh 11.5.3 ~. Paragraph 18.3.3 states in part: 'shall be distributed to the Client (or designated representati"A uritten report yill be .. Tita report Peabody Testing, the chief executive office of the orgaainational unit audited and th ve), the presideat of manage'r' of the project or facility audited. e 7,. ,' m audit report of the internal audit performed on October 29 )t signed by Peabody Director of Quality Assurance) or distributed., 1976 was not complac p

1. Complete and distribute the report of the internal audit'perfo ed on October 29, 1975'.

2. Reinstruct internal auditors on required audit reporting procedures

%.. w.-.......... , = = - - * ' - ' ' " - * - * * * * * " * * * * " *

l&

Mity 28, 1976 C...n,. 2 : PFOCE n.,...,.... 9 Requested responsible action by X-Ray Engineering Co. tachment to X-Ray Engineering Co. A response was transmitted as at- . Int:rnal audit report has been submitted and filed. Project flanager memo to t. flewqen PBT-206-3 dated 5/20/76 made 5/24/76 by A. L. Boulden. QC v'erification of X-Ray Engineering u... s-24-24 Q......................PMg ...................!z.., 4,9f f4,5,;$ A x=: = -

Ident.: i Project Quality Assurance Indiand Units 1 & 2 - 7220 f _ Verification of Corrective Action- - Me hod: ~ 1. Verify action of response as' icplemented. .~, 2. Review of documentation or attachtents to resolve finding. 3. Requirement rc=oved or finding' withdrawn. 'e 4. Other: .,, " Items Checked:_ IChb h.)D fY dW 9kdC ( D!N1 '7 ~ ' 43m/h %\\CrMO ?$ %Y OiMGDY 6L &. LAC V - D?.1Co3rAMD - fi. J 969fMONomdr 410.DLL E WNied@ DCE/W. II T 10DirAWh GabiT'C490.Fv T hr.ElAiTSD 'la YKed R . ~$,. ' Vih R.M. v3itu/NAS WrP-- 73 d. IJ&dCM 5/7 d7e n y::. -. 3,. i.;". (~\\ U s. is..

s',_s.

r t

1.

l,'. closecut Locumentation~ h or attach) [ Verified c3. Not Verified (explain) L O,k. bM1 A-M R t T(?- TO 9

<t.md co 'xlwh e

~ Nj'h),S G/J/m ?F .2, G.&. Esaf59Y' LTV-so V .X.2... h.vk um a r/rhc L ! p. w s-D w m.c c.paro &,y P.7n. f.~4.,f _ M M.v. -\\ s

YI .Ja n::1.'... QbAUTY AUDIT RMDING M 1 '. 3) - ^ ~ ' April 27 '10. 1976 ,.~.,........,,,.... N/A dland 1 & 2 g,,_ 0....... B. T. Stojkov_ c..........- th.1-P-2 12 Quality Control Storage Reco'rds ...m................................. D, Martin, H. BoleeE PG-3, Rev. 4, Paragraphs 5.2 & 7.0;'SF/ PSP G-5.1, Rev.' 1 Paragraph 4.2 'PG-3, 5.2 says in part: responsibility ~of the MSS. The maintenance require;"The perfomance of the stor ' Me, - tis representative..." .sts are perfomed by the MSS or, Gy[: E f f.- 7 'PG-3, 7.~o says in part: i'orvarded to'the PFQCE for vault storage.""Upon task completion, the issued F-2 Fom 2.i.. .;. f IF/ PSP. G-3 1, 4.2 st,s in part: ~ ' '. - ~ :7j:.

t. hat... required maintenance activities are perfomed in accorda'"(The resp b

tnd storage maintenarice requirements..." nce with the storage C',fjf f.g

n...

~~.e e. ,.s

1-203, Rev.1 for "B" series Ca'dveld Sleeves requires stora6e d:aintenance activit O day intervals.

y at.. - %: : Dates on successive foms F-2-1277 and F-2-2211 vere 1 espectively. :It was confimed with the Assistant' Material-Supervisor for' naterial Co ? ,pTt no unreported storage maintenance' activity had occurred in the approxim ( ?rval.. Fom F-2-2211 was reviewed and signed by the responsible Quality Con '3 ,; y,i ); T .x e s. it'ly completion of the required storage maintenance activities -Re e y for Reinstruct the responsib'le Quality Control Engineer's~t' ..2.4 ompletion of required storage maintenance activities. o check F-2 Form for timely g. 1 I, .A..2 June h. 1976 __1 - Pmj_ect Sunerintendent. 2'- PFCC_E. has been re-emphasized to the responsible Quality Con .c v es. l j .....,62 "m O./ ..g........, Cf .e...;...........m. w.. N_.w A. g N i ~ - ~ .m

b. _<

Ib y_

N~ QUAUTY AUDIT RNDDiG 'o8 d ^ 3) (']} '/ 5/19/76-6/1/76 s v ..... s ee n/A g.,.,. Midland 1 & 2 Construction O... -

n. T. Stojkov 7,..g.DJhres 9-2-P-1 7

Document Centrol/ Field A. Boos ......u.................................

SF/ PSP $lt, Rev. 1, Para 3.2.2.l'& S.0

.3 Para. 3 2.2.1 states: " Prints of new Engineering Drawings and. revisions shall be distributed in accordance with the Drawing Distribution List. Old drawings vill be destroyed br marked void in accordance with Paragraph 5 0." Para. 5.0 states in part: ---the Document Controller is responsible for removing and replacing superseded prints on the office sticks." r The following drawings were found in the f,ield on.the sticks listed, but distribution to (' ();osestickswasnotnotedontheDrawingControlCards. Continued on Page 2 ~ 1. Revise /updatetheMasterDistributionList 2. Perform review of Drawing Control Cards and drawing sticks, and bring them into agreement. 3 Remove superseded drawings from the field or mark them void. m....m............. "8/31/76 Pro. ject Superintendent g~..n...... i i,, 3 'N = u,........ gn n 8....-..................... .o*

r. (9-2-3) ~~ 19/76 - 6/1/76~ T. Stojkoir ock 11 Continued . Drawing Stick 7220-C-94, Rev. 1 Office #2, Survey, Resident Engineer 7220-C-184, Rev. 0 Office #2 7220-C-245, Rev. 4 Office #1, Office #2, Survey, Aux. gl t 7220-E-527, Rev. 2 Aux.#1 i 7220-E-539, Rev. 6 Survey, QC, Aux, fl, Aux #3 7220-E-651, Rev. 1 Office #2, QC 7220-M-613 Sht 3, Rev. 4 Office fl, Office #2 7220-M-619 Sht 1, Rev.1 Office #1, Office #2 7220-M-656 Sht 24, Rev. 2 Office #1 The following drawings were marked on their Drawing Control Card as being distributed to the sticks listed, but were not found on these sticks. 4 Drawing Stick 7220-C-164, Rev. O Resident Engineer 7220-C-320, Rev. 4 Boilermakers 7220-E-527, Rev. 6 Electrical Shack p- 'The following superseded drawings vere found on the sticks listed, but were not \\j marked void. Drawing Stick-7220-C-94, Rev. O qc 7220-E-527, Rev. 1 Office #2 1 y a

M @AUTY AUDliRNDING 929- -" ^ ...... 5/19/76-6/1/76 m ,,n..........,,...... g,,.. 'dland 1 & 2 Job 7220 Construction O.- -

n. m. stoakov

...y..y,..Fehre s 9-2-P-1 8 Docunent Control A. Boos SP/ PSP M. Rev.1 Paragranh '4.2.2.2 , ~...... .3 Para 3 2.2.2 states: "A controlled copy shall be placed at a designated area for a period of three working days'for review by designated engineers and superintendents who ackndvledge review by signing the Rev Drawing Sign-Off Sheet." e,... Engineers 'and Superintendents who' review drawings at the review table are not signing the New Drawing Sign-Off Sheet. (;e : In ac.cordance vith paragraph 3 2.2 3 another copy of the New Drawing Sign-Off Sheet is ~ (, lng routed to, designated Engineers and Superintendents with an additional print ' f the 6 o craving. This copy is being signed. Remove the redundant requirement of Engineer and Superintendent sign-off of'the New Drawing Sign-Off Sheet at the review table.

g. _...............

7/16/76 PFQ"E / 7-4 / ~ La.,ca. 4.... ...*.....k. .....,9 g .2 ........T O h s.,... u w e v...... =. v.......,... o g

h QUAllTY AUDIT RNDmG

N

^ 9lio/76 6ft/76 .(m)

P "

N/A t.;. z.......,,...... m..... ' iland 1 & 2 Job 7220 Construction O.

n. m. sto3kov

-.s.... . 9,...y h res ..._-P-1 10 Document' Control A. hos 92 u......... SP/ PSP R. Rev. 1. Paracrauh 6.1:& 6.2 o w Paragraph 6.1 states in part: "The Document Controller shall check the Field Draving Log egainst the Drawing Coritrol Register to assure that the latest drawings have been received, and inform the Project Field Engineer of any omissions or discrepancies." Paragraph 6.2 states: "The Project Field Engineer shall resolve discrepancies with Project Engineering." The Document Controller is noti int'orming the Project Field Engineer of omisssions or discrepancies. Any discrepancies occuring are being resolved by the Document Controller. /% ( \\ Q,f s Have Project Field Engineer make formal delegation of responsibility for Field Drawing' Log / Drawing Control Register discrepancies to Document Controller. y. 6/18/76 Project Superintendent .,s. ~ / s~ o ~./ cie.. 6.,..

u a

8._~,.....,......-........ .on

g......... M w QUAUTY AUDIT FiNDlllB lli(b-1-1) .... - ~ 'i 6/3-14 8 15/76 (,) N/A gg...,. 11dland 1 & 2 Construction O =- G. A. Waldrop

7.......

24-1-P-0 6 t!alMnn nonartmnnt D. Mathews. A. Boos ..m................................

Specification 7220-M-204(Q)Rev.0

~ Paragraph 5.1.4. states: "A detailed written report'of major weld repairs shall be made and a copy furnished to the Project Engineer in accordance with the procedures described in the Nuclear Quality Assurance. Manual. This' report shall state the nature and location of the defect, how repaired, subsequent heat treatment and include copies of all examination re- . cords". Reports of major weld repairs are made weekly on Bechtel Fom'WR-9 to the distribution stated in the BQAM Appendix 3 Paragraph 11.1. The Project Engineer is not on distribution for the report nor does he receive copies of all examination r'ecords. ~ v 4 .,............- Ke comenoe a Bring actual Field practice and the provisions of Specification 7220-M-204'(Q) Rev. O, Paragraph 5.1.1 into agreement. m.... " July 15,1976 ' roject Superintendent e = / A _j g,., ~...... i g -.......................

a. um s u r. m. u u.

p G n80 Rav. 1 yf - QUALITY..'5URANCE DISCREPANCY REPORT' .,.,p

4. ISSUE DATE r

( )3 5/11/76 A

1. PROJECT /OEPT./ CONTRACTOR :

2. POINT OF ORIGiti

@ FIELD

5. OAD PREPARED BY:

y.r. gg,31and 1 & 2 O OFFICE B. T. Stojkov' A.,y ',',.

6. WOllK PLAN DATE

7. CHECKLIST ITEt.1

8. WHERE FOUND

9. DISCUSSED WITH J. Voris A

.i ~1/27/76 - h/o/76 c.2 Document Control D. Palmer

10. CONTROLLING' DOCUMENT. SECTION, PARAGR APH, ETC.

Z, ' SF/ PSP Mh,' Rev.1, 8/1/74, Section 3 2 3 & 51 k,, } - ,11. QUOTATION W ;. ', Pn -r>. ?_9 3 1.9- "Dintributinn (nf d*nvine s) shall be individually deter $,; ed by the 1 4.' Proiect Field Engineer. Drawings may be included on the drawing distributi'on list for !E,', his instructions." Para 3.2 3.2.3i " Distribution of those drawings (reviewed dir-YgT.!." ectly from _surplier)'shd11_ be'in accordance with 3 2 3 1.'!. Para. 5.1.b". i .. any superseded drawingsmust be c&rked " VOID"'and destroyed,' or ii' required by the Lead lq Engineers, drawing's vill be carked "*JOID" and an apprcpriate reason for retention .v added...". ' *(1.-

12. DISCr EPANCY OESCRIPTION *

(e). ni eAvi V.nti nn nbnvn en th'e nenving control cards does not match the Drawing Distribution N.T T.f et e

the fnlinving Vendor Drawings:

n I .1.e.

'1*.

!.1*i -

.l.h' 7220-C-2-24 Q. C. Stick added to Drawing-Control Card

f. !R,.7 1,. ;,

7220-C-2-34' I I;a. .7220-C-2-106

_3.-

1 3l..: ?. - \\ 7220-C-2-122~

.7

.. : f(..,,i. 8 J > I: Cent,inued )h '

13. RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION

.].k'r 1_- m.5 n r. nvnvtng nf ntributinn T.4 nt. nnvinn enntrn1 cardn and Drnvfn& Dintvfbution s., a.:g:7.,.v. . 7 i. 4m+n o,., nn +_ _ .s;..- ' }. l}l}fi .,2, pp-vn vnf a annvingn Mm Sf eld. r,* p ' ; - 14.. SCHEDULED COMPLETION

15. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION

,'s..I .. DATE 6/4/76 M Pro.iect Surerintendent E,* 1G. CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN ) ") 3,

NN O'TT M

/ .(.,. t 1

i

17. DATE COMPLETED

10. SUDMITTED DY RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITY

10. CORRECTIVE ACTION VERIFIED DY OAE T

]lI>ll.i,9.AAO-86 .' P t.. e

20. DATE icLeu L

(of(o/76 9/17/.74 V q

9 BOtel PowerCorporation ~ Block No. 12 Continu2d..QADR No. 089 Rev. 1 7220-C-2-147 Q. C. stick added to Draving Control Card 7220-C-38-4 Q. C. stick omitted from Drawing Control Card 7220-C-38-56 7220-C-38-14 Aux. #2, Aux. #3 and Ironvorkers sticks omitted frcm Drawin'g Control Card l 7220-C-38-159 Office #2 and Q. C. sticks omitted from Drawing Control Card 7220-M-73 Office f2 stick omitted from Control Card 7220-M-73-13 7220-M-73-14 2. Actual Drawing Distribution does not match the Draving Control Card for the following Vendor Dravings: 7220-C-38-4 Distribution made to Q, C. stick 7220-C-38-32 7220-C-38-56. 7220-C-38-159 7220-C-38-lW Distribution made to Aux. #2 stick ("~'S 3 Obsolete Vendor.Draving not unrked " VOID" found in the field: 7220-C-38-lu Rev. 9 found on Aux. #2 and Ironvorkers sticks f r"Q

l.y yy) O, oJ Bechtel PowerCorporation Interoffice Memorandum [ G. L. Richardson June 2, 1976 r. u, se Job 7220 Midland Project ne. J. F. Newgen 0.A. Discrepancy Report No. 089 Rev.1 Drawing Control o' Construction 0-1097 ) cesio A Midland, Michigan In response to subject QADR, Rev.1, dated 5-11-76 the following clarification of corrective action is submitted: Block 12 - Discrepancy

Description:

Vendor Drawings 7220-C-2-24, C-2-34, C-2-106 and C-2-122 (0.C. stick added to control card:) The Specification Register. indicated these drawings as being both "Q and Non-Q". Drawings falling within this area in the register with Non-Q indication shown on actual drawing are not placed on automatic controlled distribution but are handled on a request basis from Q.C. For these drawings the Master Distribution Book has been corrected to indicate distribution to Q.C. of these. and all future revisions. The /7 control cards, Master Distribution Book and Q.C. Stick are in agreement. J ' Vendor Drawings: 7220-C-2-147 (Q.C. Stick added to control card) 7220-C-38-4 (Q.C. Stick omitted from control card) 7220-C-38-56 (Q.C. Stick omitted from control card) 7220-C-38-144 (Aux. 3 and Ironworker sticks omitted s from control card) g, ' a The above discrepancies were corrected during a Document Control In-house Audit held on 4-30-76. The Master Distribution Book, Control Cards, and sticks are in agreement. ~ ' Vendor Drawing 7220-C-38-159 (office #2 and 0.C. Sticks omitted from ' drawing control card): The Q.C. Stick was updated' and logged on control card during the D.C. Audit of 4-30-76. The office #2 stick location was not initiated until Jan.1976 (. the original date of receipt at site and distribution of this drawing was . c. ' Sept.1975). This drawing has been added to the Master Distribution Book indicating' office #2 placement, logged on control cards and placed on the appropriate stick. Vendor Drawinas 7220-M-73-10, 7220-M-73-l', 7220-M-73-14 (office #2 omitted 3 from control card): 74 These drawings were received on site and distributed in May 1975. (Therewere ( )' no office #2 sticks until Jan.1976). A " hold" was placed on 'all Bechtel / Mechanical and Vendor Mechanical Drawings in March 1976 for placement on A/ office #2 sticks in order for a study to be conducted on what actually wculc' be required on office #2 sticks as a complete set of sticks are available 4024 (10-72)

.-s.. n. O BOtel PowerCorporation G. L. Richardson June 2, 1976 Page 2 ff in office #1. This particular drawing (Liquid Waste Receiver Tank) will only be located on office #1 stick. Office #2 has been deleted from the fbster Distribution Book. 2. Vendor Drawinas 7220-C-38-4, 7220-C-38-32, 7220-C-38-56, 7220-C-38-159 l and 7220-C-38-144 The discrepancies noted regarding these drawings were corrected during the D.C. Audit of 4-30-76. The Master Distribution Book, Control Cards, and Sticks are in agreement. 3. Vendor Drawino 7220-C-38-144, Rev. 9: (Obsolete drawing not marked " Void" found in the field on Aux. #2 and Ironworker Sticks). These discrepancies were corrected during(D.C. Audit of 4-30-76. Master distribution book, Control Cards,- indicating latest revision) and sticks (with latest revision) are in agreement. \\. / . F.'fR,Alc f't w_n l JFfl/TJB/sw I l O ~ JUN081976 C0Clik. 'OWER CORP. '03 ??.20 FIR. I) ~ t 75

^ p

( .+ n. ,j; ; kkSI. b?kh ram:..

~ He lol2 ~

3. CAD IDENY.~NO.

D /03 ', ' " QUALITY ASSURANCE DISCREl'ANCY REPORT

i

4. ISSUE DATE 5-13-76

1. PROJECT / DEPT./ CONTRACTOR

2. POINT OF ORIGIN

@ FIELD

5. OAD PREPARED BY:

Midland finits 1

7. 2 O OFFICE G. Richardson

6. WORK PLAN DATE

7. CHECKLISTITEM

8. WHERE FOUND h.?..'-

9. DISCUSSED WITH I

f,,

?!/ A N/A 0C Dorneds ( tir0 's i

10. CONTROLLING DOCUMENT.SECTION. PARAGRAPH, ETC.

.,g. Snec. 7220-M-201. Rav. 5 (P 0. 7220-M-104 A-AC) i E [A

1. OUOTATION

,.f.; 4. paracranh 6.2.2a. "All materials shall be marked with the information required by g.

i jy.',;

the applicable manufacturing specification, and the Nuclear Power Plant Components t Code, paragraph NB-21SD. ,$l5* .,;.~-

f..

Dl

12. DISCREPANCY DESCRIPTION ^

.f

Q.

r. ;;.'

Contrary to the above Bechtel NCR's 263, 278, 418 identify code data name plates '. M% I.'. % :. a% incorrectly marked with a "5" instead of an "S" and Bechtel flCR's 304 and 308 ,, y g.;:IL . identify verification reports witi1 a 5 instead of an S. try;g.

A 7.'.

.; y a 4 P,... f.'. NOTE:~ All of these NCR's except No. 418 were identified to C Buhl in W. Holubs ,4,{,, i ikdk; letter dated 4/15/76. ,h

13. RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION

,yfi ' l. Tdentify this recurrino oroblem to ITT Grinnell and assure affective enernctiva actinn hv their nroani7atinn. ..t s ! ![!,iv.

U-2.

Based on this findino and the oroblems' identified hv W. Holohs lottar tn r. Ruhl g

3

14. SCHEDULED COMPLETION

15. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION

}*;pfl ', DATE 6 /4 76 (continued page.2)' Dntteier

i.

16. CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN

'.Ai. 356-k.,9. dot 642.GR. T.o.M. 90 C l.. DCld4EO soQ 49tO ZSGr. t@s.o sud 1. tqw4

f. k

'h-10St.hv T o K Tb t W PoTitR26R Dwso RN zci iq % ~p

17. DATE COMPLETEC

18. SUBMITTED BY RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITY

19. CORRECTIVE ACTION VERIFIED BY O -

20. OATE

.D ES k 2 7b ~~ Rg'. AAO-86. 9/17/74

J $ ),it. x I"*3C S 77:g) 2 MJ / Bechtel Power Corporation Inter-office Memorandum To C. L. Richardson Date June 7, 1976 Subject QADR 103 for 7220-M-104A-AC Frorn K. R. Dotterer PD 285-76 Of Inspection Copies to W. Holub w/a At Ann Arbor, Mich. R. Castleberry w/a P. Martinez w/a ) J. Milandin w/a J. Newgen.w/a J. Connolly w/a ' LT Sokol' w/a ~ Tha^ subject QADR addressed only NCRs that pertain to incorrect identification on name plates and accompanying verification reports. ~ Attached is a consolidated su= mary and review of fourteen NCRs which includes (7,'the subject QADR. The review and corrective action reco= mended and taken by the () assigned inspector is adequate. Additional training for the responsible inspector

is not necessary or appropriate. Contract requirements are for random or selected inspection. ' Bechtel inspection exceeds tha type, however, all material is not j

100% inspected. The only positive solution s to provide enough coverage to inspect each and every piece of mate 1. at type of inspection coverage would' require additional inspectors and a significant increase of man hours. $&65fD o fdSY$L&'W Ke& W K. R. Dotterer Attachment e b 0 -8 CECHTEL ' POWER CORP' f7220 o 10 w a y 6

.,.a . g.n. c., (e- ..w a F.. Bechte! P6wer Corporation r'? Inter-office Memorandum 7/ I . [,8 0 dam K. R. Dotterer May 27, 1976 / From Subi:ct 7220-M-104A-AC R. H. Tinsley Of Inspection At Central Region C: pies to .I The following is my response to the 14 NCR's listed in G. L. Richardson's letter da'ted March 18, 1976 as requested by your letter dated May 6, 1976. I will not take time to restate each NCR but will instead focus my com=ents on the five (5) questions posed in your above mentioned letter. In answering these five questions, I will list each NCR in numerical order and explain how it occurred. After cover-ing all 14 NCR's in this manner, I will then describe what Grinnell and Bechtel inspection can and are doing to prevent re-occurrence, what trends, if any, the NCR's indicate, and then give my comments or suggestions as applicable. In doing this, I will note which state =ents are applicable to which NCR's making sure that all 14 NCR's are covered in each topic of discussion. NCR #261 Item #1 - field in error, no response necessary. i Item #2 & #3 occurred due to poor legibility of piece mark numbers on shop detail ( V sketches, extremely close resemblance of hand written 5's and s's (note), and a lack of general knowledge by sh'op personnel that the letter S always prec : des the isometric drawing number on all piece = ark numbers on the assign =ent. Item #4 & #5 "a" and "c" were typographical errors and "b" was caused by a lack of knowledge by the supplier on how to complete the G--321-D form in order to meet the job's ' requirements. NCR #263 Item #0 occurred bdcause the supplier did not list the five spools on loading sheets. Loading sheets are the means by which Bechtel Inspection verifies which spools are being released for shipment and are the ceans by uhich Grinnell's Q.C. knows to send docu=entation. The incorrect piece mark nu=ber on the code plates occurred due to the poor legibility of piece mark numbers on shop detail sketches, extremely close resemblance of hand. written 5'.s and s's and a lack of ' general knowledge by shop personnel that the letter S always precedes the isometric drawing number on all piece mark numbers on this assign =ent. Item #1 was an error made by Bechtel Inspection when filling out the BPI-361 form. Item #2 A-1 was caused by a lack of' knowledge by the supplier on how to complete the G-321-D form in order to meet the job's requirements. Item #2 A-2 was a typographical error. Item #2 E There is no weld A on spool tagged 2EC3-21-S613-6-4; Field in error, no response necessary. Item #2 B-2 The radiographer who shot this weld was not familiar at the time with the requiremot of having the Bechtel' order nu=ber on the film. Bechtel m (

Inspection failed to pick this up on this spool during the review of the rad'iograph.

s' Item #2 B-2 Bechtel Engineering stated that use of Grinnell's register number is satisfactory for the piping system; no response necessary. \\ i t

Mi y ,:5?. , y' t. P.ay 27, 1976 .l / /.dR #263 (cont.) Item #2 C-1 occurred due to typographical errors arising from poor legibility of /', piece mark numbers on shop detail sketches as previously described. Item #2 B-1 cince Rev. I has a code 1 approval and Rev. 2 was only cos= etic. This is per Bechtel Engineer R. L. Castleberry's TWX dated 12/6/74; Field in error, no response necessary. FCR #275 Radiographer who shot this weld was not familiar with the requirement of having the Bechtel order nu=ber on the film.- Bechtel Inspection failed to pick this up on spool during the review of the radiograph. NCR #277 Items #1 A and #2 A - Caused by a lack of knowledge by the supplier on how to complete the G-321-D form in order to meet the job requirements. Items #2 B and '#1 B - Typographical errors. NCR #278_ Item #1 A - Lack of knowledge by the ' supplier on how to complete the G-321-D form in order to meet the job's requirements. Item #1 B - Typographical errors. Item #2 - Due to poor legibility of piece mark numbers on shop detail sketches as previously described. ,s ( ) Item #3 - Radiographic verification reports were numbered incorrectly and this was 'v' missed by both Grinnell and Bechtel inspection. Item #4 - Crinnell radiographed the welds in error. However, since the radiographs were satisfactory, Grinnell decided to document them. The writer saw no probica with this since Grinnell did not bill for performing or documenting the radiographs. NCR 6297

Grinnell Engineering incorrectly identified Register Number MR-66-23 as 2CCE 5613-4-1 on theh spool detail sheet. This spool detail sheet was approved by Bechtel Enginee.iing (Code #1) with the incorrect piece mark number and was, therefore, not caught by Bechtel Iuspection as being incorrectly identified.

NCR #303 Revisions'1 and 2 made to spool 2HCB-21-S613-i-4 af ter Revision 0 dateil 8/23/74 were cosmetic and editorial and, therefore, according to the TWX dated 12/6/74 from Bechtel Engineer R. L. Castleberry, the sp;ol could be released using the code 1 spproval on Revision 0 dated 8/23/74; Field in error, no response necessary. NCR #304 Occurred due to poor legibility of piece mark numbers on shop detail sketches as previously described. NCR #308 - Occurred due to poor' legibility of piece mark numbers on shop detail sketches as j previously described. / NCR #340 This NCR occurred due to a difference in the requirements of the field's inspection procedures and Bechtel specification 7220-M-201Q, the difference being that Bechtel specification 7220-M-201Q cakes no requirements for protection of stainless steel spools against environmental damage on the O.D. during shipment. Also, Grinnell

gy? v- [, 3. May 27, 1976 ,/ NCR 0340 (cont.) was not required to submit any shipping procedures to Bechtel Engineering for approval. I NCR #367 Spool tagged 1 REC-18-S610-3-4 was prepared for shipment on 2nd shift when they were out of rubber gaskets. This fact was missed during inspection of the load prior to release for shipment. Trucks are tied down for shipment by the driver whenjhe picks up the load. Since this is done at any time day or night seven days a week, it is impossible for either Grinnell or Bechtel to assure a proper tic ~ down. Also, with the bulk and configuration of the spools being shipped, it would be a near impossibility to eliminate all of the type " damages" listed in this NCR. See also Inspection Report 051 on this assign =ent. (Note that piece mark nu=ber given for the stainless steel spc.i is lE3C-18-S610-3-4, which would be a carbon steel spool. Piece mark number should read lHCB-18-S610-3-4.) NCR #384 Contamination - Due to difference in field inspection procedures and Bechtel specification 7220-M-201Q which makes no require =ents for protection of carbon steel spools against environ = ental damage on the 0.D. during shipment. Loose Tie Down & Worn Material under Ties - Tie down done by driver of load any time day or night seven days a week; impossible for either Grinnell or Bechtel to assure a proper tie down. (

loose Caps & Flange' Covers - Caps and covers were not loose upon inspection of,

~' (,) loads prior to shipment; this must have occurred during shipping. Not Painted - Spools identified as not painted were painted with the exception of small areas where the spool rested on bucks during painting and inspection. Not Blasted - The requirement for blasting the 0.D. in specification PS-1236-4 was put in by error and is not a required surface preparation for Ferralox 1500 paint. Due to these facts, neither the shop personnel nor the Bechtel inspectors were inspecting for this type of surface preparation (See Insp,ection Report 658). UCR #390 Worn Material under Ties, Loose Flange Cover, Not Blahted - Same,as NCR 0384 above. Veld End Preparation - 1/16" land.is either filed or ground on the end preparation after the pipe is cut. This must not have been performed on these spools. Paint on End Preparations - The paint on the end preparation is veldaluminite as ' required by Grinnell's approved code 1 procedure SS-KU19-8 Section VII 43, Paragragh -6.6.6 of specification 7220-M-201Q states that machined end surf aces shall not 'be ' painted with primer; it does not state that the ends shall not be painted with weldaluminite. . NCR #391' The quality verification docu=ents for spool.1HBC-135-5616-6-4 were reviewed by Bechtel inspection, zeroxed for shipment to the field, reinspected by Bechtel for completeness and legibility, and then boxed for shipment. Due to thesa facts, I do not know how this NCR occurred unless the documentation was somehow lef t out ~ of the box and overlooked by both Grinnell and Bechtel inspection, or somehow lost x in the field when the documentation was unpackaged (See Inspection Report #61). ,7 e ~ The following measures have been taken by both Crinnell'and Bechtel inspection in an ef fort to alleviate the problems indicated by the NCR's listed in this me=orandum. Both partics are making a special effort to ensure that the piece cark number of ~ each spool is legible and correct on all documentation, on the spool itself, and on \\ i

,/.' ( ~D { / [ May 27, 1976 'ie code plates (the third party inspection agency, ' Hartford,' has also been made [ ware of the problen of substituting 5's. for the required S's and is checking [ferthisproblem) This will help prevent the reoccurrence of NCR's '#261, 278, y 304 and 308. The purchase order number on the G-321-D form has been corrected and -..the supplier has been instructed on the proper technique for filling it out - this will help prevent the reoccurrence of NCR's #261, 263, 277,' 278. Loads are being ';l inspected more closely by both Crinnell and Bechtel to ensure the correct number .,; cf pieces are being shipped, that they are completely painted, and that, the ends ' cod flanges are properly. protected; this will help prevent the reoccurrence of

'i.J.NCR'n' #263, '367, 384, 390. All radiographers have been cada aware of and are

[(fellowing the requirement for putting the purchase order number on all radiographs; this will help preve'nt the reoccurrence of NCR's #263, 275. Grinnell engineering irSrised procedure PS-1236-4 eliminating the ' surface preparation by grit blasting ' 1 h e.nd the revised procedure PS-1236-5 was approved by Bechtel Project Engineer, .JR.L.Castleberryon2/26/76-thiswillpreventthereoccurrenceofNCR's#384 .[end'#390..Grinnell and Bechtel inspection review the completed zeroxod documentation J.l packages im=ediately, prior to packaging for ship =ent to the field to ensure co=plet-This will help prevent the reoccurrence of NCR #391. Bechtel inspection is f<..furss. >.ptrforming a randem check of piece mark numbers shova on. sketches used for inspection (';with those shown on the isometric drawing to verify their correctness. Also, ..g G'rinnell engineering. is performing a check between piece mark nu=bers on sketches ' V end'on isometrics. This will hsip prevent the reoccurrence of NCR #297. No (-S preventative action has been taken for NCR #303 since the writer's research found it. ( 'to'be written in error. No preventative action' can be taken on NCR #340 and VCR #384 (contaminatic n) until sither Bechtel's specification 7220-M-201Q is t.rrvised to incorporate protection against environmental da= age on the 0.D. dur'ing.

. chipment or Grinnell is requested to have a shipping procedure covering this

..;; rcquirement. submitted and approved. .A. ~. .f. ?The writer.does not feel, af ter researching the cause of the 14 NCR's and af ter .,','. initiating and monitoring the preventative measures to climinate the nonconformances, y, that a " trend" of poor quality or lack of quality is developin'g at Grinnell. "f./What does appear to the writer from these 14 NCR's is the image of a new job ' brginning with its inherent problems, misunderstandings and unintentionally over-looked requirements, without an efficient line of co=munication between the jobsite cud the supplier, other than through NCR's to try to correct the problems. .) :. The writer suggests that if possible both Bechtel inspection and the supplier, iTI -g,;Grinnell, should be put on the distribution lists for NCR's; at the:present time, ~ @ the writer only receives NCR's sporadically and the supplier's only source of UCR's 1'., :is from the writer. This immediate distribution of the NCR to those at the source rU, pef the co=medity would help to bring fast preventative measures to that particular f. problem and perhaps uncover other potential areas prior to fabrication or release. C 'The writer vould.niso suggest that Grinnell be requested to subnit for approval .* h 'c ' shipping pro'cedure so that Grinnell, Bechtel inspection and the jobsito will 3( know hc1r loaded spools are to be protected from the various types' of damage 3,;.receivam.e.during shipment. Also, the writer would like to suggest that someone ymvithin tue Bechtel organization review and compare Bechtel's specifications,. 3 frinnell's procedures'and the Field's inspection procedures for any' potential f.,$ conflicts in requirements (if supplied with the field's inspection procedures, the }',{.. writer would be villing and happy to do this). .hi .p .] .-W g..: s. t

j/ (d 4 3. May 27, 1976 f / ',/ ?In conclusion, the writer would like to point out several things: /

1) The spool listed in Table I of G. L. Richardson's letter to U. F. Holub dated 1brch 8,1976 as having a configuration inconsistent with the drawings was not fabricated with an incorrect configuration, but was tagged incorrectly l

due to an Engineering error'(See NCR #297).

2) The 2 spools listed in Table II of G. L. Richardson's letter to W. F. Holub

{ . dated tiarch 8, 1976 as not having been approved by Project Engineering were Iapproved and acceptable for release for shipnent in accordance with the TWX f dated 12/6/74 from Bechtel Project Engineer, R. L. Castleberry. 3)' Af ter research by the writer, NCR's #261 (ite.m 1), NCR #263 (item 2 B-1 2 B-1 Rev. 1), and NCR #303 vere found to be in error. If I can be of further assistance in answering thes~e NCR's, please call ce. R. H. Tinsley !, (-~- - cc: D. Moore ~ ,\\ Attach =ents: IOM from K. R. Dotterer April 20/1976 w/a IOM from K. R. Dotterer Iby,6,1976 NCR's #261, 263, 275, 277, 278, 297, 303, 304, 308, 340, 367,' 384, 390 and 391. j NOTE-This me=orandum was typelby Ann Arbor Procurenent Inspection Department from R. H. Tinsley's handwritten nemorandum. \\ / \\ % -) 4 i 9

h@ G.? , f*.b1 [ [,- .. d,.e 105 r.hv. '. QUALITY ASSURANCE DISCR{PANCY REPORT

4. issut DATE s

5-21-76 >/ 1.' FRO 'ECT/ DEPT /CONTR ACTOR

2. POINT OF OnlGIN

{}} FIELD

5. OAD PREPARED BY:

Midland 1 & 2 O OFFICE-G. A. Waldrop 8/ G. WOl1K PLAri DATE

7. CHECKLIST ITEM B. WHERE FOUND

9. OlS_ CUSSED Wi1H A. Ecos fi/A ti/A Auxiliary Building

'J. P, Connolly

10. CONTROLLING DOCUMENT.SECTION, PARAGRAPH, ETC.

Field Instruction FlW-1, Rev. O "Ecchtel Welder Guidelines"

11. OUOTATION FIV-1 Page k. Item 8.

"DO IKTP veld or burn unless all exposed m terial is adeauntely trotected. Particular atte' ntion chall be provided in the area

belov vour veld."

I. TTV-1 Pnge 4. Then O. "g nrr,tect facility equipment from sparks or slog by covering I ' -o-nving it hornrn cutting nr veldine." n.- i V. l 1

12. DISCREPANCY DESCRIPTION

,s-( Contrary to the foregoing, velding operations for p'ipe wg hanger installation vere obse'rved in-process in the Auxiliary Building above Decay wn+_ p.-nern 1 Wnt Webnger 1r 60A vith no trotective cover used to trotect the enuipment f'en starks and slag. I I'

13. RECOMMEtJDED CORRECTIVE ACTION -

See Attached Sheet y-14, 3CHEDULED COMPLETION DATE

15. RESPONS10lLITY FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION June '4.1976 1 ? 3: PFOCE 2: Profect Superintendent.

1G. CORREOTIVE ACTION TAKEN i See Attached Sheet

17. DATE COMPT {^ED

,n

k. SVGl.11TTED QY[jjij'O' 1

(r210 GLE AUTHORITY - N/ / }// l/ M*c4 if (;T2pt 5.I% 3 Ylrtritn e JXEH2-) l 10.COR VE 4CTI ,pMRI IED BY OAE (./ / Ii l~ p

20. DATE

( /, ,p e l AAd-46 9/lh(/74 - ffD-fg [/ a.

/ ' ' o 2 1 G. A. Waldrop Block //13 1. M - Inspect.lE-60A to determine.if damage or cont, amination has occurred. Document this inspection and initiate' remedial action as required. 2. Project Suterintendent - Reinstruct Field Personnel and Welders in the requirements of the procedure. ' 3 M.- Detemine why procedure was not enforced by QO. Take appropriate training action ~ to ensure QC Engine'ers are familiar with the required ' protective practices.

n...

(g!.. e. ~-. 4 9 ) A ~ s

i 106

/

.t ' +.. n" "( OUALITY. AS. ANCE DISCREPANCY REPORT

4. ISSUE DATE

,,g.- v.ay 21, 1976

1. PROJEC1/ DEPT./ CONTRACTOR

2. POlfJT OF ORIGifJ

5. GAD PREPARED BY:

Q FIELD Midland 1 & 2 Job 7220 0 OFFICE B. T. Stojkov ~ G. WORK PLAN DATE

7. CHECKLIST ITEM D. WHERE FOUND O. DISCUSSED WITH 5/15/76-5/28/76 n/A Auxiliary' Building J. Miller

10. CONTROLLING OOCUMENT, SECTION, PARAGRAPH, ETC.

FPG-16, Rev. O, Paragraphs 5 3 and 8.0

11..O UOTATION

'l cnyn in vart- "The verformance of the raintenance Pnvnnynnh 9.7 g vnnnivn-entn (nn airected nn tha F-10 form) in the recronsibility of the WS." P vngvnph A A myn in pn-t- "Tc n aariciency occurs. the tes shall obtain technical 44* von +4nn n nr1 nnnrnprinte n n,-va r t i va ti.-a li,,its from the MME." '. j -

12. DISCREPANCY DESCRIPTION

{' NOR h25 describes the nonconforming condition of the nitregen purge pressures en Decay Nj Heat Removal Heat Exchangers lE-60A, lE-60B, 2E-60A and 2E-60B being out of specified _ range on nine out of ten consecutive days fro: 5/10/76to5/20/76. A subsequent check on 5/21/76 shoved the purge pressures still out of the specified range (below 2 psig). k .,i,.

13. RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Attached Sheet

."I 'n '

14. SCHEDULED COMPLETION

15. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION

y DATE 6/11/76 Pmject Surerintehdent 1G. CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN See attached letter 0-1100 dated June 3,1.976.

5 N, - _^ 17. E COMPLETED

10. SUDMITTEpJ '

NSIBLE AUTHORITY 6-y( g,s s

19. CORRECTIVE ACTION VERIFIED BYrOA '

1 e 1

20. D A E LCM.

1i btS J. -i AAO-66, 9/17/74 Q 4. A

k t t- \\. & '?' p-QAD$106 A say'al, 1976 B. T. Stojkov ( Block $13 l., ) 1. Determine,the cause of the' continued failure to comply with the Decay Heat Removal Heat Exhangers maintenance requirements as stated (on the F-10 form). 2. Develop a plan of action to prevent the recurrence of the failure. to comply with maintenance requirements.for equipment not in the storage pro 5 ram. 4 e 4 e a4 e a 4 O e i 4 4 7" s 4 9 e S .1 I s i s. q [ s 9 -e S / 4 e ** e 3 t e W O j G -#....1-,,,,,, ~,r,r ,m,,-,.e.......,,m,..,..-m....,,%-.., -.......- e,.. ..w-~.r, --- -,4.r ey we, -, -

s M.h 2 O, ,) Bechtel Power' Corporation interoffice Memorandum to G. L. Richardsori om. June 3, 1976 Job 7220 Midland Project suo.c r. J. F. flewgen r Response to 0ADR ?!o.106 0-1100 of Construction i ce**= ^' Midland, Michigan The nonconfomance outlined in the subject QADR was an indirect result of the present strike. Failure to comply with maintenance requirements per the F-10 form was due to the unavailability of pipe fitters and laborers that normally replace nitrogen cylinders when they are empty. A temporary solution has been accomplished by placing a nitrogen cylinder outside the building and hooking up with a rubber hose. Except for one day, this has resulted in a confonning condition for the week ending 5/27/76. This arrangement will provide conformance until a permanent r~ C)T - rolution can be accomplished. ~ / .gG .F en JFil/JV/sw JUN081976 DECHTE R CORP. JB7 o

s. )

nt /./ t i ./ e s memo

..j 3, QAD'ID' N T. NO. E

yi
QUALITY ASSURANCE DISCREPANCY REPORT 107 s.-

4. issue DATE

.d

1. PROJECT / DEPT./CONTR ACTOR 6/1/76

2. POINT OF ORIGIN

. - @ FIELD

5. OAD PREPARED BY:

7* Midland 1 & 2 O OFFICE . f., '.

6. WORK PLAN DATE

7. CHECKLisTITEM

8. WHERE FOUND G. Richardson

9. DISCUSSED WITH.

^h' '"? ' tt/^ tt/A OC/0h Records J. Connolly '.,..,;. - lo. CONTROLLING DOCUMENT, SECTION, PARAGR APH, ETC. w-

.r..,,, -

RT-XG-1, Rev. I and RT-XGu2, Rev.1

i.,'i -

11[ QUOTATION ..s c.: ' Para'3.9.3 or,27*.*. *.. "The Bechtel Level II individual shall'interp. ret and accept all rad' io ,',ik,.. graphs ^. '..,".

- \\ th. ' '

.q:s+ .a.L **T :*: Y: lt.+

12. DISCREPANCY DESCRIPTION O

The following qulaity-findings describe. instances when Level 'll Bechtel Ouality Con-V.1 i 3... trol Engineers have. accepted radiographs that did not meet the ' technique requirem '.17: . f the above referenced procedures. These appear to be recurring problems' as in- ..y,';;<f o .,n..

f3T;.

di.Cated by the following' dates: H*K,g,t. - I f,ff,'.' CPCo llCR'QF-51 Dated 6/23/76 . Bechtel QAF-088 dated 3/25/76 ,- es:. ,. /.',1,b. '.. .Bechtel QAF-086 Dated 3/25/76. CPCo itCR.QA-97-dated 5/24/76 .v M8 g.g)h l: Bechtel QAF-087 Dated 3/25/76 'l

13. RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION Develop a training module that will describe past problems and emphasize technique Ih),Y' requirements. Present this to-onsite Level II RT p'ersonnel. Also, retain. this 4

a.r;. - i d,'. training module 'for' presentation to.all future Level II RT perso'nnel that are assig 4 j,,@~..) s

14. SCHEDULED COMPLETION

15. RE P UStBILITY FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION 1.,.

.'l DATE 7/30/76 _m " -**"~*"* PQt l

*?.*,y: 16. ' CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN w:.

l .} j f. ' h 'r

17. DATE COMPLETED

18. SUBMITIED BY RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITY

,i<.: -

19. CORRECTIVE ACT10N VERIFIED BY OAE

rp..

20.DATE ,.ik. AAO-86 9/17/74

'!.(.',

3. GAD IDENT. NO..

M //J., v, q ' ;p, . QUALITY ASSURANCE DISCREPANCY REPORT

4. ISSUE DATE

\\ June 16, 1976

1. PROJECT / DEPT./ CONTRACTOR

2. POINT OF ORIGIN

Midland 1 & 2

, @ FIELD 5. O PREPARED BY .,.n. = O OFFICE G. A. tlaldrop

6. WORK Pl.AN DATE

7. CHECKLisTITEM

8. WHERE FOUND

.4. i ;,. " '. 9, DISCUSSED WITH j' N/A N/A - Aux'. Bldg. A. Boos [ ;,{.

10. CONTROLLING OOCUMENT, SECTION, PARAGRAPH, ETC.

D. Mathews , ;p,,j , Specification 7220-M-204 Rev. O Paragraph 6.3.3d i. f.. St. QUOTATION . I .iv. *.... " digs, fixtures and lifting devices used in contact with surfaces of stainless 'f**, d,v. - steel shall be. stainless ~ steel, aluminum or approved non-metallic material. 1 ', = - ' gl.(pr . l! .u. ..lla ty. ~

g.i i'

M'h' 12, DISCREPANCY DESCRIPTION The gounding fixture observed in use on pipe spool 1GCB-25-5-6 consisted of a

i

,,.7 '

welding ground cable with the insulating enSboot pulled back and the brass counlino i.Wi. .'..p'; - held in surface contact with the stainless steel pipe using adhesive backed tane. re.. 's: ti.: WfM: { U. ;.C - .c-1 1.+ ' '. t uB* f.'.). ; - lU.k$N. i};f[C-e .J

13. RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION

-Qq 1. Remove grounding fixture and inspect contact noint' on nice surfaca

k:3 % :' *

. t ::,

ott arc striking. fnv avidanca i 2.p;' Issue instructions to Field ~for nroner methof of croundinn t s Take ret.edial action if regi, ired. . 'l,$i., components. ,.i t:.y 3. Indoctrinate weldinn personnel in correct aroundino methods. , 'e3)p.(n.

14. SCHEOULED COMPLETION

15. RESPONSIBILITY FOR C.)RRECTIVE ACTION DATE duly 15, 1976 Project Suot.

g:*,h.

16. CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN t-a

- ) g.

j.p.;,. s i t - A j. . i9}:7i -

17. DATE COMPLETED

18. SUBMITTED BY RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITY

19. CORRECTIVE ACTION VERIFIED DY OAE

, k..

20. DATE

i;j}i,{

, AAO-86 9/17/74

., -,. m c u. a v. 113 QUALITY ASSURANCE DISQREPANCY REPORT

4. issue DATE 6/24/76 i

1. PROJECT / DEPT./ CONTRACTOR

2. POINT OF ORIGIN

@ FIELD AD PREPARED BY: Midland 1 & 2 O OFFICE [A.Waldrop

6. WORK PLAN DATE

7. CHECKLISTITEM

8. WHERE FOUND

9. DISCUSSED WITH N/A tt/A Fabrication Shop R. Dougherty

10. CONTROLLING DOCUMENT, SECTION, PARAGRAPH, ETC.

Specification 7220-M-204 (Q) Rev. 4 and ASME Section III,1971 1 114 OUOTATION i ,/ Specification 7220-M-204 (Q) Paragraph.4.1.3 states: '1- " Steel indentatio stamping shall be done with'a round nose or interrupted dot die". n ASME Section III, 1971, Daragraph NB-2151.1 states: )I " Stamping, when used, shall be done with blunt-nosed-continuous or blunt-nosed-interruped-dot. die stamps". y

12. DISCREPANCY DESCRIPTION 1.

/atb 1. The millerfalls No. 1500-05-and 1550-05 1/4 inch dies being used to identify , kl i .th'e shop fabricated 26 inch OHCB. Piping,(ASME III, Class 3) are not round-nose or - blunt-nose dies, but appear to be standard sharp nose dies. The vendor has verified through field procurement that the'se' dies are not low stress dies.

(

13. RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION See attached sheet

14. GCHEDULED COMPLETION

15. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION DATE 7/23/76

1. Proj. Suot.

2&4. Quality Control.

3. Proi. Suot & Ouality I

16. CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN Control m

/

17. DATE COMPLE'TED

18. SUBMITTED BY RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITY h

19. CORRECTIVE ACTION VERIFIED BY OAE 20.DATE t

AAD-86 9/17/74 i. e -m e _m ---m_ e .,,-,7 --r.---,---

[ Attachment A Route ib This Cony For File 1 n _ t _ ri FUSouthworth SHHowell Issue Date /\\ CQHills GSKecley Project giain,sa'1

r. ?

..,a o 1on HUSlager TCCooke JM11andin Cor.SumW POWtf File Title wio re ~, n ~ w 1 WFHolub C"*" Nonconfor=ance GLRichardson Report No or_go rit. ' mis Nonconfomance Report is Issued '1b: Prepared By [/[be-Date 3 75 Approved By Q $ $ h Date W Y W Mr. J. F. Newgen Written Re k Requestq [Iy Date 3-17-76 Project Superintendent Corrective Act. ion Requested By Date 3-31

who is responsible for corrective action.

Nonconformance Description rmd Supporting Details: WFMC-1, Rev.1, " Welding Filler Material Control Procedure. Specification" controls weld rod on liner plate (per Section 7.4 of Specification C-111) and ASME Section III piping per the Bechtel Quality' Assurance Manuar (BQAM). Section 6.3 of WFMC-1 states that, "The,LFWE is responsible for designating the, correct filler materials to be used for each* weld or group of welds through the use of WR-5 and WR.6 Forms. Bechter Standard Procedure WD-1 covers the use of both forms in detail.'.' Bechtel Welding Standard WD-1, Rev. 3, " Quality Centrol and Documentation Procedure for Welding and Nondestructive Examination for ASME Code, (Contd on Attachme AEC' Reportable Yes O no O see Proceaure 9 (For Nuclear rro3ects on2y) No hold tags applied.yl O no x Stop Work Necessary Tys see Procedure 16 - stor work No Recce= rended Corrective Action:

1) Provide assurance that Revision 3 of Form WR-6 addresses the requirements of Revisions 0 and 8.

i , 2) Use the revisions of the form that are required by the procedures or, if Revision 3 of the procedure is acceptable for use, amend the procedures contained in the BQAM to allow'use of the form. 1Corrective Action Taken: See Attachment. 1 . Verification of' Corrective Action Required Yes @ No O Method of Verification: Sse Attachment, Nonconformance Closure Confirmed By ,,1 Date G -2 ;-7G ITo be co=pleted at time of losure by Consumers Fower QA Services. Page 1 of 2

a

j*

File 16.3.4 Issue Date March 3,1976 6 Project Midland 1 & 2 File Title NCR's on Bechtel Construction l Attachment to Report No QP-82 i Nonconformance Description and Supporting Details: (Contd) Section III, Division 1 Applications, " covers the use of the WR-6 " Filler Material Withdrawal Authorization", under Section 9.0. Section 9.2 of WD-1 states in part that, "Two versions of Form WR-6 are approved for use. These are specifically: WR-6, Revision 0 (for' manual data input); and WR-6, Revision 8 (for manual or com-puter data input)." Revision 0 is dated May,1973 and Revision 8 is not dated. 3 Contrary to the above, WR-6, Revision #20 dated April 1,1971 is in use for liner -G-plate and ASME Section III welding. 1 Corrective etion Taken:

1) Ecchtel has compared revision 3 of the WR-6 to Rev, O of the WR-6 and concluded

~ that the two revisions of the form are equivalent,

2) Bechtel has determined that a co=parison of revision 3 and revision 8 is not appropriate as revision 8 is used for computer data input and is not in use at ex.

Midland, i

G

3) Bechtel has ordered and received the proper revision (revision 0) of form WR-6.

As Bechtel had detersined that revisions 0 and 3 are equivalent, revision 3 was used in the interim until the proper revision was received. 1Method of Verification:-

1) Revisions 0 and 3 of form WR-6 were compared and found to be equivalent.

~

2) CPCo QA concurred that a comparison of revisions 3 and 8 is not appropriate.

3) Verified that the proper revision (revision 0) of WR-6 has been received and distributed to the point of use.

1 ',/ ' Page 2 of 2

_. _ ~ ~ h h-1 Attach:nent A Route To 7his copy For [ File 16.3.4 g FMSouthworth SHHowell N Issue Date ga,.ch ?L 1976

HWSlager, CSKeeley Project uf ati, a 1 & 7 CQHills TCCooke CLRichardson M ENE File Title NCR's on Bechtel 4-JMilandin Nonconformance '

"*E"""I glub Report No 0F-88 This Nonconfomance Report is Issued To: Prepared By 7886) Mate 3/AJ/74 s' J. F. Newgen Approved DatecN-3/W. s Bechtel Project Superintendent Written R Requeste By Date >f/M/74/! l Corrective Action Requested By Date id/k I who is responsible for corrective action. Nonconfomance Description and Supporting Details: On March 10g 1976, tendon sheathing was found open back of the condenser storage' area and near the paint and sandblast building. The Material Storage Supervisor was ^ i notified at that time of the problem. On 3/17/76 during the NRC visit the problem was again identified. At that time the MSE was contacted and he said he would have the sheathing covered by 3/18/76. A portion of the open ends were covered, but some of them are still open'. 4 l AEC Reportable .Yes O' wo a see Procedure 9 (For nuclear Prosect= mir) )" Stop Work Necessary Yes No @ See Procedure 16 - Stop Work No j .No hold tags applied. Recommended Corrective Action: 1 1. Inspect, clean if necessary and document all of the sheathing that is now open. 2. Recap or cover all of the sheathing that is now open. 3. Instruct personnel,with storage responsibilities in proper techniques for storage maintenance to preclude repetition of this or similar problems. 1Corrective Action Taken: SCN C-2-6001 was issued April 19, 1976 eliminating the requirement to keep semirigid sheathing capped or covered and adding the requirement to thoroughly clean the interior of the sheathing just prior to installation. The storage requirement forn F-1-199 was changed to reflect the change in the specification. 1 Verification of Corrective Action Required Yes @ No. O Method of Verification: The revised form F-1-199 and SCN C-2-6001 were reviewed. Mac.er Inspection Plan l C-2-1 Rev. FC-2 uhich picks up the inspection of the cleaning of the semirigid . sheathing was reviewed. { - J. % i Nonconfor:sance Closure Confimed By [d) d Date 6 /'7 / 76; To belcompleted at 't e of closure by Consu:sers Power QA Services. Page 1-of 1

.,l s ! ' ' j' ') .) y Attachm:nt A Route To 'Ihis Copy For x File 16.3.4 FMSouthworth SHHoweli Issue Date April 6, 19/6 v HWSlager GSKeeley Project Midland 1 & 2 CQHills TCCooke GLRichardson CCn311 METS F0WEI File Title NCR's on Bechtel JMilandin Nonconfomance 1,f" Report No 07-89 'Ihis Nonconfomance Report is Issued To: Prepared By #84823:td f._ Date 4'/4/74 EE J. F. Newgen j Bechtel Project Superintendent Written Et:p Reques):6d By Date 4/20/7f ~ Corrective Action Requested By Date 5/04/7t who is responsible for corrective action. Nonconfomance Description and Supporting Details: At the present time a tag with the following information is attached to the upper internals, shipping container. '"D0 NOT REMOVE THIS TAG, Refer to FPG-3, F-1-207, F-2-1872 Dated 1/8/76 and letter from Babcock and Wilcox to Bechtel dated 3/19/76..." There is not a provision in FPG-3 for tagging material until a problem is corrected. The only existing procedure for tagging an item to identify a problem that needs correcting is FIM G-3 for nonconfoming items. AEC Reportable,Yes O No O See Procedure 9 (For Nuclear Prosects only) Stop Work Necessary Yes No See Procedure 16 - Stop Work No _ One Hold Tag applied. Recommended Corrective Action: 1. Issue a nonconfomance report to document the problem that exists in the uppe.r

internals shipping container.

2. " Hold a training session to inform the appropriate personnel how to handle situa-tions that do not conform to specified requirements.

1Corrective Action.Taken: See Attachment. berification of~ Correctivs action Required Yes @ No O hhthod of Verification: The form E-1-207 Rev. 3 was reviewed and the removal of the tag was visually confimed. The notes and charts from the training sessicn were reviewed. Wp 1Nonconformance Closure Confimed By 7(([< db Dete G/2p /-) g 1To be cor:pleted at time of closure by Consumers Power QA Services. Page 1 of 2

t ~ {'-)T Filo M. 16.3.4 Issue Wie April 6, 1976 Proj ect Midland 1 & 2 File Title NCR's on Bechtel Construction ^ Attach =ent to QF-89 1 Corrective Action Taken: 1. The F-1-207 form has been changed to require restoration of the internals cannister to its original condition (replace belts in cannister) by Septem-ber 1, 1976. The improper tag has been removed from the upper internals' ship-ping container, 2. Field Procedure FPG-3 has been revised (Rev, 5) to clarffy the. procedure to be used when a storage deficiency occurs. Training sessions were held on April 26 and 27, 1976 to explain the revisions to FPC-3, 6,16 and 17 which covers the entire range of material storage both Q and non-Q. This training included what to do if a problem occurs. (1-. i 'x.J I l / S 4 i 'G' Pase 2 of 2 t

Attach =ent A RoutJ To This Copy For [- Pilo 16.3.6 FMSouthworth SIIHove L L ( Iscue Date April 30. 1976 []' CQ!Iills GSKeeley (> Prohcb Mic11and 1 & 2 V ilVSlager TCCooke PAMartinez C33Ml!f3 FDMr File 11tle NCR's nn Bachtal JMilandin WFHolub Nonconformanco ' .ardson Report No 0F-95 This Nonconformance Report is Issued Tb: Prepared By Date Approved By MM Date 4/s/76 3 J. P. Connolly Bechtel PFQCE Written Reph Reques By Date 5 / 4 /76 Corrective Action Requested By Date 4/i/M who is responsible for corrective action. Nonconformance Description and Supporting Details: A copy of Field Inspection' Plan C-231-2-827 obtained on or about 3/27/76 has only a signature and date of 3/2/76 at the bottom of Block 12 for Activity 2.60.

However, a copy 'of the same plan obtained 4/29/76 has a. lengthy exception added with no date, signature, nor initials.

Obviously, an inspection record has been changed. This is unacceptable to Consumers Power Company without a controlling mechanism. 2 AEC Reportable Yes no @ See Procedure 9 (For Nuclear Projects Only) Stop Work Mecessary Yes No X See Procedure 16 - Stop Work No ~ Reco== ended Corrective Action: / 1. Develop a mechanism for changing and controlling the changes to completed inspection plans. or 2. Decide that such changes will not be nade. 3. Train all QC personnel in the alternative chosen. lCorrective Action Taken: 1. PSP G-7.1 was revised to include a mechanism for changing quality records and controlling those changes. 2. Training on the revised PSP was given on 6/8/76. kerificationofCorrectiveActionRequired Yes No 1Method of Verification: 1. Revision 1 to PSP G-7.1 was reviewed for content. 2. Reviewed QCFM 2068 which was written to document that training. NonconformanchClosureConfirmedByh I g ) ,Dite 64thA / v 1To be co=pleted at time of closure by Consumers Power QA Services. Page 1 of 1

/

Attach:nent A / Route 2 'Ihis Cory For File 16.3.6 [ ) FMSouthworth SHHowell =f ~ Issue Date May "4 1976 U' CQHills GSKeeley ( Project m a l.,,,a 1 r, ? ) HWSlager TCCooke r z CCCUmCis PM2f File Title NCR's on Bochtel WFHolub Nonconfomance GLRichardson ZCTucker Report No 0F-96 'Ihis Nonconfomance Report is Issued To: Prepared By C# L/~~~f'/7; Date d /'6 ^EE# ** I "~ Written RepY[ Requestedk Date J. P. Connolly Bechtel PFQCE 5/07/ Corrective Action Requested By Date 5/17/ who is restonsible for corrective cetion. Nonconfomance Description and Supporting Details: Field Inspection Plans C-231-2-827 and C-231-2-858 hav'e notes in Block 12 of Activity Ta'sk 2.60 which, in essence, are exceptions to'the QCE's acceptance. However, Block 5.10 is signed off indicating that there are no exceptions open. Also, the exceptions on these plans indicate a total of twenty bars left out (fourtee in the first and six in the latter) when actually fifty-two bars were left out (twent six in each case). The second of these was af ter the additional corrective action va started 'in response to FSW-7. [ AEC Reportable Yes No @ See Procedure 9 (For Nuclear Projects Only) y Stop Work Necessary Yes O no O See Procedure 16 - Stop Work No J Consumers Po9er Company will continue' inspections of all rebar placement. Reco=:nended Corrective Action: 1. Reinstruct QCE's in completion of Field Inspection Plans. 2. Correct the referenced plans. 3. Since the additional corrective action af ter FSW-7 still did not result in all missing bars being accounted for, develop additional corrective action in this area. 1Corrective Action Taken: i See Attachment. 1Verification of Corrective Action Required Yes No 0 1Hethod of Verification: See Attachment, i... - 1Nonconformance Closure Confimed By M ) Date t - !s-W. 12 be co=pleted at ti2ne of closure by Consu:ners Power QA Servicca. Page 1 of 2

r Fil's 16.3.6 7 Iccum Data May 3, 1976 / Project Midland 1 & 2 File Title NCR's on Bechtel Quality Control I Attachment to Report No QF-96 1Corrective Action Taken: 1. A response letter from J. P. Connolly stated that the Lead Quality Control Engineers were instructed in the method of changing completed inspection plans and later were instructed on Section 3.5 of PSP G-7.1 which was issued for ,' portion of the corrective action of QF-95. 2. Bechtel NCR-427 was issued and an Engineering disposition stated that, "The Field installation satisfies the design requirements and was acceptable". In addition, a DCN No 9 to Drawing C-140 was recently issued allowing for rebar . hooks to be turned in any direction to facilitate construction and all Field Inspection Plans were reviewed, evaluated and review results documented by a letter from L. R. Albert to the QC file which indicated that the Leed QCE -reviewed and evaluated the entries made in Block No 9 not pertaining to NCR's which was related to this NCR. 3. There.vas no additional corrective action after Field Stop Work-7 reluired since Bechtel's letter of response stated in part that, "The problem then was not that Bechtel QC was unaware of requirements for these bars but rather 9' in question should have been changed'to the scope of the inspection plan rather that the omitted bars were improperly documented. The reference to the bars-than an exception to activity 2.60. The decision not to include the bars in the subject placements was a change to the secpe of the placement rather than an exception or nonconformance to the placement". 1Method of Verification: 1. The response letter from Bechtel QC was reviewed and accepted. 2. Bechtel NCR-427 and the Engineering disposition was reviewed and found acceptable. Also, DCN 9 to Drawing C-140 was reviewed for content. 3. The response letter from Bechtel QC was reviewed for content. /. Page 2 of 2

Attach =ent A ~~ Reute To This Cony For File 16.3.4 [ T FMSouthworth SHHowell Issue Date May 4 1976 C CQHills GSKeeley a / Project Mialnna 1 r. 7 HWSlager TCCooke E U3 ECWU File Title NCR's nn Bechtal JMilandin WFHolub Nonconformance g ehardson Report Ito 0F-99 This Nonconformance Report is Issued To: Prepared By 8 [ [ M Date S - f-7S APP # V*d II J. F. Newgen Bechtel Project Superintendent WrittenReplyRequeste[ByDate 5-18-7 Corrective Action Requested By Date 6-01-7 who is responsible for corrective action. Nonconfor=ance Description and Supporting Details: Bagwell procedure 3232 BCPDlB " Application Procedure Phenoline 305 Finish" requires in section,III D that for airless application, a Graco 30:1 Bulldog pu=p and Graco Golden Gun with a.015 rip be used. Contrary to the above, Bagwell has used a Speed Flo pump and H gun for the application of the intermediate co'at of Phenoline 305. ~'s ~~ AEC Reportable ,Ye= 0 no B See r=ocedure 9 (For nuclear Pro 3ect= on17) (O Stop Work Necessary Yes N 3 See Procedure 16 Stop Work No No hold tags applied. Recc= mended Corrective Action:

1) Assure that the'use of'the different equipment has not affected the quality of.

the coating.

2) Comply with the procedure or revise the procedure to allow the use of alternate equipment.

1 ~ Corrective Action Taken: See Attachment. Verification of Corrective Action Required Yes No thod of Verification: The manufacturer's (Carboline) latest written recomendation for Phenoline 305 application was reviewed and it was verified that the equipment used met the manufacturer's recomendation. Wr I ( ) Wonconformance Closure Confirmed By -y Date 4 is-7& / To be co=pleted at tkne of closure by Consu=ers Power QA Services. 1 Page 1 of 2

~--.. - ~ Fils 16.3.4 Isaus Data May 4, 1976 Project Midland 1 & 2 File Title NCR's on Bechtel g Construction Attachment to Report No QF-99 1Corrective Action Taken: Specification C-110 "Recoating Work of the Containment Building Lider Plat,e" governs over the Bagwell QA Manual per a statement in the QA Manual. The specification requires that the " Application shall be in accordance with the manufar:turer's latest written recommendations governing..., airless or air spray equipment;..." The equipment used was in accord with the manufacturer's recommendation and thus the liner plate was coated in accordance with the specification and meets.the required qualiry. As it is stat'd that the specification governs, a revision of the procedure e is not considered mandatory. 1 l t I i \\ / ::: 'f\\ Q) Page 2 of 2

/ Attach::2 eat A Route To T11s Cony For File 16.3.6 9~FMSouthworth IQ~ ' Issue Date _yny 4. lo76 SilHowell Project Midland 1 & 2 CQHills CSKeeley s. TCCooke HWSlager JMilandin CCrJUmtf3 Fay;ct File Title NCR's on Bechtel L rdson Nonconformance ZGTucker Report I!o QF-100 This Nonconfor=ance Report is Issued To: Prepared Byf[M dd/date #9-74 Appr ved db Date MM J. P. Connolly Bechtel PFQCE Written Peply Requested'h Date S/r/t. Corrective Action Req 5 tested By Date t///v6 who is recnon::ibic for corrective action. Nonconfor=ance Description and Supporting Details:' See Attach 5ent A. ,s ( ) AEC Reportable Yes C No @ See Procedure 9 (For Nuclear Projects Only) Stop Work Necessaiy Yes No See Procedure 16 - Stop Work No Recc::::nended Corrective Action: See Attachment A. 1Corrective Action Taken: See' Attachment A. berificationofCorrectiveActionRequired Yes No hthodofVerification: See Attachment A. / * :;- ,a k'onconfon::ance Closure Confirmed Byj/ / a Date G- /9.-76 1To be co=pleted at time of closure by Consu=ers Power QA Services. Pesc 1 of 3

[ / Fila 16.3.6 [, / Issue Date May 4, 1976 Project Midland 1 & 2 File Titic NCR's on Bechtel Quality Control

(h Attachment A to Report No QF-100 Nonconfomance Description and Supporting Details:

Criterion XV of 10CFR50(B) states: " Measures shall be established to control materials, parts, or components which do not confom to requirements in order to prevent their inadvertent use or installation. These measures shall include, as, appropriate, procedures for identification documentation, segregation, disposi-tion, and notification to affected organi=ations. Nonconfoming items shall be reviewed and accepted, rejected, repaired, or reworked in accordance with docu-mented procedures". Contrary to these requirements, a nonconfoming condition was noted in Block 12 of Activity / Task 2.60 on Field Inspection Plan C-231-2-858 with no nonconformance report written. Furthermore, this condition was not " reviewed and accepted in accordance with documented procedures". Reco= mended Corrective Action: 1. Write a nonconformance report to cover the nonconforming condition in the referenced inspection plan. c,. k/ 2. U Receive disposition from Project Engineering including engineering rationale for use as is if that is the disposition received. 3. Review all completed Field Inspection Plans for exceptions which have not resulted in NCR's and, if any are found, proceed as in items #1 and #2 above. '4. Instruct all QCE's in the requirements of Criterion XV and the necessity of-following it. 3 ' Corrective Action Taken: 1. Bechtel NCR 427 was issued stating that the design drawings showed certain No 11 and No 8 reinforcing bars standard hooks oriented down into the wall at elevation 629' and that the Field construction elected to install these bars.vith standard hooks extending up into the slab instead. 2. Project Engineering disposition was received and indicated' that the Field decision was acceptable and, therefore, the installation was not a nonconform-ing condition. 3. All Field Inspection Plans were reviewed and evaluated for entries made in Block No 9 not, pertaining to NCR's and the review results were documented by the Lead Disciplide Engineers in a 1,etter from L. R. Albert to the QC file. 4. Quality Control Engineers and QC pernonnel reviewed all field inspection plans b as a result of this NCR QF-100 as well as other NCR's and deficiencies. A training session was conducted by Bechtel QC on the overall results of the field inspection plan revicw. This training session was documented in the letter from L. R. Alber t on June 10, 1976 to the QC files.

// j Filo 16.3.6 / Iecus D:te May 4, 1976 / Project Midland 1 & 2 File Title NCR's on Bechtel Quality Control $N' Attach =ent A to Repor*. No QF-100 (Contd) 1 Method of Verification: l. Bechtel NCR 427 was reviewed for content and found acceptable for closure of NCR's QF-96 and 100. 2. The engineering disposition for NCR 427 was reviewed and found ac'ceptable for closure of QF-96 and 100. 3. The cover letter from L. R. Albert to the QC file written on June 10, 1976 was reviewed 'for the specific items pertaining to QF-100 that were reviewed by . Bechtel QC. 4. Reviewed letter from L. R. Albert on June 10, 1976 which indicated that a training session was presented. 9 e** r /. Page 3 of 3

( Attach =ent A Route ib 'D1is Copy For Filo 16.3.6 FMSoutnworth Shhowe11 7g [] CQHills GSKeeley g/, Issue Date May 17. 1976 Project Midinnd 1 62 'u./ HWSlager TCCooke JMilandin C."JWr3 Pmf File Title NCR's on Eechtel UFHolub Nonconfor=ance GLRichardson Report Uo _OF-102 vf1n This Nonconformance Report is Issued To: Prepared By ((MM Date S-/7-74 Mr. J. P. Connolly Approved MdMb Date M/M;M Bechtel Project Field Quality Control Writtec# ly Requ By Date 6-1-76 Engineer Corrective Action equested By Date 6-1-76 who is responsible for corrective action. Uonconfor=ance Description and Supporting Details: Bechtel Field Inspection Plan (FIP) C-110-b-64, "Recoating Work of the Reactor Building Liner Plate," contains an inspecti point under. Act/ Task No. 3.00 which requires that the liner plate be inspected far dee pits and gouges prior to coating. The inspection on liner plate assembly C-111-64 failed to identify a deep gouge. The gouge was subsequently identified by Bechtel during the hold point for liner plate requalification and documented on Bechtel NCR 409..NCR 409 states that the gouge was prime coated indicating that the gouge did not occur during handling subsequent to the prime coating. The gouge has been repaired in accordance with the disposition on NCR 409 and.the coating repair has been addressed through corrective action on Bechtel Quality Assurance Discrepancv report 099 and there is to further hardware repair requi. AEC Reportable .Yes No @ See Procedure 9 (For Nuclear Projects Only) /' b Stop Work Necessary Yes No See Procedure 16 - Stop Work No No hold tags applied. Rec a ded Corrective Action:

1) Instruct personnel in proper requirements for surface inspection of the reactor' building liner plate.

.e 1 Corrective Action Taken:- Cognizant personnel received instruction on liner. plate surface h.g Ection. Verification of Corrective Action Required Yes X No O Method of Verification: Reviewed documentation of the instruction that was given (letter QCFM-1065). The instruction was given prior to the issuance of this NCR in response to NCR QF-91. All liner plate will be reinspected for surface defects under the C-lll-4 inspection plan. Nonconfor=ance Closure Confirmed By _ - - 7, (q l Datd 6-fo.76 / l ib be co=pleted at time of closure by Consu=ers Power QA Services. Page 1 of 1

(. } (r Att chm:nt A I Route To his Cony For File 16.3.6 s FMSouthworth SHHowell-Issue Date May 25. 1976 ( 'CQHills GSKeeley / Project Midinnd 1 & 2 HUSlager TCCooke JMilandin . C0nSumtf5 PDWer File Title NCR's on Bechtel WFHolub Nonconfomance Y hRJ . Report No 0F-104 n Sis Nonconfomance Report is Issued To: Prepared ByMkMMate 5 ,79"-> J. P. Connolly. App mved By G # M s Date Md i Bechtel Project Field Quality Control Written Esply Requested'By Date _ 6-15-7, Engineer ~ Corrective Action Requested By Date 6-30-7 ~ vho is responsible for corrective action. Wonconfo:w.nce Description and Supporting Details: Project Special Provisions notice SF/ PSP #16, Rev. 0, section 3.1 states in part, "The Lead Field Quality Control Engineers (LFQCE) shall submit written requests to the Fielt-Inspectilon' Planning Coordinator for the preparation of the required Field Inspection Plans". ~ Contrary to the above, only one of four Field Inspection Plan Request forms asked for was presented. The one presented did not show documented evidence of submittal by LFQCE. i g AEC Reportable Yes No @ See Procedure 9 (For Nuclear Project's Only) Stop Work Necessary Yes No See Procedure 16 - Stop Work No Recommended Corrective Action: ~ 1. Revise procedure to conform to field practice. 2. Provide a system for control of written request forms or specifically state these forms are not to be retained. If the written requests are not retained, the FQCE who submitted the request should have the persods name and date of request appear in Block No. 5 of QC-G6-1A form.' 3 1 Train QC personnel on revised procedure. Corrective Action Taken: See Attachment, + herificationofCorrectiveActionRequired Yes No Method of Verification: j See Attachment- + - 1 l ,/.- / Nonconformance Closure Confirmed By /' ~~ Date g-pp-7 1 lb be completed at. tine of closure by Consumers Power QA Services. Page-1 of 2 F 7 w -y ,,_pv.+, ,_w.v.,.n.-,y-.. r w.--,.9-_--yy,---- --,,4,-_r e, y,,,,- _.,ww..g --,y,,, -..., *,, ,..,y---y, 9 m.

} () File g.. 16.3.6 Issue m e May 25, 1976 Project Midland 1 & 2 File Title NCR's on Bechtel Quality Control l Attachment to QF-104 W \\ 1Corrective Action Taken:

1. & 2.

The Project Special Provisions Notices (PSP) No.16 was canceled which supplemented the FIM G-6. Now the Quality Control Engineer with responsi-bility for preparing the Field Inspection Plan _ is required to make an entry in block #5 of the QC G-6 1A form and sign and date it. IMethod of Verification: 1. Review the Project Special Provision Notices table of contents which indicated that the PSP No. 16 supplemental requirement was dele'ted. 0* .V t ,r x Page 2 of 2

Attachment A Route To This Cony For File 16.3.6 (} FMSouthworth SHHowell Issue Date May 25. 1976 j CQHills GSKeeley \\.y. Project Midland 1 & 9 (7 HWSlager TCCooke C#E'T POWER File Title NCR's on Bechtel JMilandin WFHolub Nonconformance hRon Report No 0y-105 n This Nonconformance Report is Issued To: Prepared Byf[/[M Date & J;79 -' Approved By [, d Date Mr->NA J. P. Connolly Bechtel Project Field Quality Control Written Reply Request d'fBy Date 6-22-7 Engineer Corrective Action Ref uested By Date 6-22-7 l who is resnonsible for corrective action. Nonconfomance Description and Supporting Details:. FIM G-6, Block No. 6 states, "The Lead Discipline Quality Control Engineer shall revie the plan for content, adherence to this procedure and completeness and shall signify approval by entering his signature and the date before the plan.is utilized for inspec tion by the Quality Control Engine ~er". Contrary to the above, two ' inspection plans C-231-4-632, Rev. O and C-231-3-631, Rev. were found with documentation missing in Block No. 6. (No approval signature and date AEC Reportable Yes O No 8 see Procedure 9 (For Nuclear Projects on17) ~ See Procedure 16 - Stop Work No ) Stop Work Necessary Yes No y Reco=:lended Corrective Action: 1. Review all inspection plans from September of 1975*to present for entry informatio in required blocks. 2. Document this review and' evaluate. 3. Based on results, state in written reply the corrective action taken to preclude repetition. 1Corrective Action Taken: See Attachment. 1Verification of Corrective Action Required Yes v No I Method of Verification: See dttachment.. k*onconformanceClosureConfirmedBy[ s,- Date G,- y /-. ? c, - lib be co=pleted' at time of closure by Consumers Power QA Services. Pcge 1 of 2

Time of increase in construction activities.

Filo 16.3.6 Iz:us Date May 25, 1976 Project Midland 1 & 2 File Title NCR's on Bechtel Quality Control j 6 t-Attachment To Report No QF-105 Corrective Action Taken: 1. Bechtel QC reviewed and evaluated all Field Inspection Plans for signatures and dates relating to the implementation a'nd close out of Field Inspection Plans. ~ 4

2.

The review of the results were documented by cover letter on June 10, 1976 (attached to NCR in file) which outlines the items reviewed and documented by Lead QCE's. The cover letter and review package are filed in the QC vault at Midland.

(Audit file No 206.) 3.2 A written reply letter fr,m Bechtel (FQCL-051) describing the corrective action taken to preclude repetition was received. Training class was held on June'8, 1976 on the new change to hechtel Procedure G-7.1, Section 5.3 that requires the file ' clerk to review newly received records for completeness. In addition, the PFQCE has instructed the Assitant PFQCE to review all newly completed Field Inspection Plans and IR's for completeness until further notice.' 1Method of Verification: t. 1. Reviewed Bechtel QC FIP review cover letter for the review package to assure for legibility and completeness. 2. Reviewed Bechtel FIP review cover letter and response letter (FQCL-081) for content and applicability. 3. Reviewed -letter (FQCL-081) and FIP review letter outlining review requirements of the package and for signature of the Lead Discipline QCE's concurrence. /.

Page 2 of 2

Attachm;nt A Route To ' Ibis Cony For File 16.3.4 FMSouthworth SHHowell Issue Date June 1. 1976 g HWSlager GSKeeley' Project Midland 1 & 2 CQHills TCCooke JMilandin Consumas POW 8f File Title NCR's on Bechtel WFHolub Nonconformance chardson Report No oy_107 This Nonconformance Report is Issued Tb: Prepared By 8 'r_dd;.Date k/.-74 Appmed ByMMJate MNd Mr. J. F. Newgen Bechtel Project Superintendent WrittenSephequested Date 6-15-76 Corrective Action Re ested By Date 6-29-76 who-is responsible for corrective action. Nonconfomance Description and Supporting Details: WFMC-1, Rev. 1, " Welding Filler Material. Control Procedure Specification" requires under section 6.4 7) that, "Where physically possible, low hydrogen type electrodes shall be used directly from the rod warmer". l Contrary to the above, an ironworker welder in the Auxiliary Building was observed i to be drawing low hydrogen weld rod (E7018) from a stub bucket where it was physically possible for him to be using directly from the rod warmer. Discrepancy was observed on May 26, 1976. NCR's QF-78, QF-81, and QF-86, issued relative to weld rod control, will be held open i until this NCR is cl ed. No @ See Procedure 9 (For Nuclear Projects Only) AEC Reportable -Yes ~ ^ Stop Work Necessary Yes No See Procedure 16 - Stop Work No No hold tage applied. I Recommended Corrective Action:-

1) Revise General Specification G-27 to incorporate WFMC-1, Rev. 2 and issue for use.. Rev. 1 will currently' remain in effect'for ASME Section III work.

2) Instruct cognizant personnel of new requirements and document the instruction. 1Corrective Action Taken: 1 1 Verification of Corrective Action Required Yes O no Method of Verification: 1 Nonconformance Closure Confirmed By j Date [ ITb be completed at time of closure by Consumers Power QA Sers-ices. Page 1 of 1

- \\ s ~, Attachent A Route To This Copy For File 16.3.4 ('-s 's_ h EM.soutnuortn Panowell Issue Date June 21, 1976 / INSlager GSKeeley Project Midland 1 & 2 CQHills TCCooke JMilandin CCDSURIBf3 POW 8f File Title NCR's on Bechtel WFHolub ' construction Non.codomea GLRichardson File Report No OF-108 This Nonconformance Report is Issued To: Prepared By 8[bT~/ Date 8 -2 /-76 Mr. J. F. Newgen Approved By Yds (If Date /[//[7/- Bechtel Project Superintendent WrittenReplyRequestehyDate 7-06-7(. Corrective Action Requested By Date 7-19-7f I who is restonsible for corrective action. Nonconformance Description and Supporting Details: See Attachment. j G]' ' AEC Reportable.Yes - No @ See Procedure 9 (For Nuclear Projects Only) [ Stop Work Necessary Yes No @ See Procedure 16 - Stop Work No No hold tags applied. Rec e ended Corrective Action: See Attachment. Corrective Action Taken: kerificationofCorrectiveActionRequired Yes No heathodofVerification: / ( ) fonconfor:::ance Closure Confirmed By Date 1To be co=pleted at time of closure by Consumers Power QA Services. Page 1 of 2

~, p ,p File 16.3.4 Issue Date June 21, 1976 (3 Project Midland 1 & 2 File Titl'e NCR's on Bechtel Construction i Attachment to Report No QF-108 Nonconformance Description and Supporting Details: 10CFR50(B), Criterion XIII, " Handling, Storage and Shipping," states that " Measures shall be established to control the handling, storage, shipping, cleaning, and preservation of material in accordance with work and inspection instructions to t damage or deterioration". Criterion V, " Instructions, Procedures and Draw-prevp' requires that activities affecting quality be prescribed by d ings ocumented instructions, - procedures, or drawings. Contrary to those requirements, maintenance of Reactor Building liner plate was not covered by procedure between'the time it was released from storage and the time it was erected. There is no mechanism to assure that items requiring post storage maintenance are covered under the maintenance procedure (FPG-16). The folloiting was observed on the liner plate:

1) Unit 1, second lift liner plates C-111-55, 58, 59, 60, 61, 63, 65, 66, 69, 70, 71, and 72 had open leak chase nipples.

3

2) Dome liner plate sections D-9-18 and D-7-17 were in contact with the ground.

Recommended Corrective Action:

1) The leak chase nipples have been plugged and dome section D-7-17 has been moved onto the jig. Further hardware correction requires that dome section D-9-18 be lifted from contact with the ground. Required material evaluation will be done under liner plate requalification.

D-9-18 is located east of the dome jig buildings.

2) Issue an F-10 form on liner plate in accordance with procedure FPG-16,

3) Institute a method to assure that items that require FPG-16 maintenance coverage do obtain the coverage.

I /.. g]? t i \\ / J Page 2 of 2 -}}

ML19329E915

Contents

Text

vieht

Dear Mr. Corley:

Subject:

=,.

Description:

Navigation menu

ML19329E915

Text

vieht

Dear Mr. Corley:

Subject:

=,.

Description:

Navigation menu

Search