ML19275E727

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Suppl to Safety Evaluation Supporting Licensee 800125 Response.Peak Containment Pressure Will Remain Below Design Pressure Even W/Addition of Auxiliary Feedwater at run-out Flow
ML19275E727
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Millstone
Issue date: 05/09/1980
From:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Shared Package
ML093450149 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-80-515, FOIA-80-555 TAC-42410, NUDOCS 8005300393
Download: ML19275E727 (1)


Text

-

MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 2 SER Supplement Docket No. 50-336 CONTAINMENT OVERPRESSURIZATION POTENTIAL DUE TO AUXILIARY FEEDWATER PUMP RUN-0UT FLOW FOLLOWING A MAIN STEAM LINE BREAK By letter dated December 21, 1979, the staff requested Northeast Utilities, the licensee for the Millstone Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 to provide certain additional information.

Specifically, the licensee was to assess the potential for contain-ment overpressurization due to the anticipated continuous additon, at pump run-out flow, of auxiliary feedwater to the.affected steam generator following a postulated main steam line break (MSLB) accident.

The staff's interest in this issue resulted from the recommendation of the Three Mile Island, Unit 2 (TMI-2) Lessons Learned Task Force to automat'esinitiation of the auxiliary feedwater systems. Automating the auxiliary feedwater system would cause an increase in energy released to containment after a MSLB; thereby, increasina the containm/ent pressure response to a MS' B.

~

By letter dated January 25, 1980, Northeast Utilities responded to the staff's letter cited above.

In the orf pinal MSLB analysis by Northeast Utilities, no consideration was given to auxiliary feedwater pump run-out. The licensee has since performed an analy-sis that demonstrates that the addition of auxiliary feedwater at the run-out flow condition (2000 gpm) will not cause containment pressure to rise above the initial blowdov4 peak. The auxiliary feedwater pump run-out flow was conserva-tively based on a backpressure of one atmosphere.

The staff concurs with the licensee's conclusion that the peak containment pres-sure will remain below the containment design pressure with the addition of auxiliary feedwater at the run-out flow rate.

8005300 7

.