ML17208A671

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Safety Evaluation Re Containment Overpressurization Potential Due to Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Runout Flow Following Main Steam Line Break.Peak Containment Pressure Will Remain Below Design Value
ML17208A671
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Saint Lucie
Issue date: 05/15/1980
From:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Shared Package
ML093450149 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-80-515, FOIA-80-555 NUDOCS 8006020593
Download: ML17208A671 (2)


Text

~

~

ST.

LUCI E NUCLFAR POL JER PLANT, UNIT 1

.SER Supplement Docke,t J,'o, 50-,335.

COHTAINMEJ'JT OVERPRESSURIZATION POTENTIAL DUE TO AUXILIARY FEEDlrJATER PUMP RUJ'J-OUT FLOW FOLLOWING A MAIN STEAM LINE BREAK By letter dated December 21, 1979, the staff requested the Florida Power 5 Light Company (FP8L), the licensee for the St. L'ucie Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 to provide certain additional information.

Specifically, the licensee was to assess the potential for containment overpressurization due,to the anticipated continuous ad-dition, at pump's run-out flow, of auxiliary feedwater to the affected steam gener-ator following a postulated main steam line break (MSLB) accident.

The staff's interest in this issue resulted from the recommendation of the Three Mile Island, Unit 2 (TMI-2) Lessons Learned Task Force to automate initiation of the auxiliary feedwater systems.

Automating the auxiliary feedwater system would cause an increase in energy released to containment after a MSLB; thereby, increas-inq the containment pressure response to a HSLB.

. In a letter dated January 24,

1980, the licensee responded to the staff's letter Y

cited above.

In the original J<SLB analysis by FP8L, no consideration was given to auxiliary feed-water pump run-out; The licensee has since performed an analysis that demonstrates that the addition of auxi'liary feedwater at the run-out flow condition (2600 gpm) will not cause containment pressure to rise above the initial blowdown peak.

The auxiliary feedwater pump run-out flow was based on a backpressure of one atmosphere.

The staff concurs with the licensee's conclusion that the peak containment pressure will remain below the containment design pressure even with the addition of auxili-ary feedwater at the run-out flow rate.

806pg() Eg '3

'I h 1