ML18064A427
| ML18064A427 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palisades  |
| Issue date: | 06/30/1993 |
| From: | Ratcliff M, Wisner C AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18064A426 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9410260106 | |
| Download: ML18064A427 (260) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:I i, WIND TUNNEL PREDICTIONS OF CONTROL ROOM INTAKE I CONCENTRATIONS -FROM THREE SOURCES OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS I _, AT THE I PALISADES NUCLEAR POWER PL,ANT Covert, Michigan
,Tjf *~ i i I CPP Project 93-0907
_, I**
-~ ~
1-I Prepared for: I SARGENT & LUNDY
-I 55 East Monroe Street Chicago, Illinois (i0603 -
i'
- ~
Prepared by: Quality Assurance Review by: I
-I Michael A. Ratcliff, Ph.D., P. Chester E. Wisner 1* .1 Project Manager
-CERMAK PETERKA PETERSEN, INC.
Project Director Wind Engineering Consultants I 1415 Blue Spruce Drive Fort Collins, Colorado 80524 _, -I
.'~ June 1993 CPP~
I
~-----....
I
- i d
1 J
,-1
- ,~:
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
***~ This report describes a wind tunnel study to predict air concentrations at the emergency and normal control room air intakes due to potential accidental radioactive releases at the
- ,] Palisades Nuclear Power Plant. The plant is located near Covert, Michigan, on the eastern shore
-:,~
of Lake Michigan. Wind tunnel modeling* was used to provide accurate predictions of dispersion around building complexes. The present predictions will be compared to the Nuclear
- ~
-:\
j *Regulatory Commission (NRC) model predictions which are generic in nature and most likely conservative.
*-1 *c The three sources of emissions studied were: l) leakage through the walls of the
_J
~*::1 *Containment Building, 2) the Ventilation Stack, and 3) the Safety Injection Refueling Water (SIRW) Tank Vent. The maximum concentrations (normalized by the emission rate) from the three sources at the emergency c~ntrol room intake were: 378, 319, and 577 µg/m 3 per g/s (x/Q values of 3.78 x 10-4, 3.19 x 10-4, and 5.77 x 10-4 s/m3) for the Containment Building, Ventilation Stack, and SIRW Tank Vent sources, respectively. Concentrations at the normal control room intake were higher for the Containm_ent Building, Ventilation Stack and SIRW
*Tank Vent sources: 643, 313 and 13212 µg/m 3 per g/s (x/Q = 6.43 x 10-4, 3.13 x 10-4 and 1.32 x 10-2 slm\ respectively. Alternate focations for the emergency control room intake on the east and north sides of the Service Building were also evaluated and had higher concentrations
- ~-.;
than the present intake location for the Containment Building source.
.:;j.
~
The enhanced turbulence due to exhausts from two diesel-powered emergency generators appeared to lower emergency intake concentrations by about 20 percent. for the Containment Building and Ventilation Stack sources. The future expansion of the Service Building also resulted in lower concentrations by about 30 percent for the Containment Building and Ventilation Stack sources. Emergency intake concentrations from the SIRW Tank Vent were not affected by the generator exhausts or the Service Building expansion. The future expansion of the Support Center had a smaller effect on the plumes from the three sources in the testing. ii CPP~
.- 1 This report contains atmospheric dispersion results in the form of concentrations normalized by the emission rate. Actual radioactive emission rates, health effects, and " !
allowable HV AC in-leakages are not discussed. 1; l J'.\'. I~ I I
- ._ I I
J I I I I iii CPP~ I
TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii LIST OF APPENDICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v LIST OF FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _. . . . . . . . . . . . . vi LIST OF TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . viii LIST OF SYMBOLS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -. . . . . . ix
1.0 INTRODUCTION
......... -. -... : ............ ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2.0_ DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE AND THE SCOPE OF WORK ......... . 3 2.1 Description of the Site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.2 Exhausts and Intakes Studied . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3.0 METHODOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -...... . 7 3.1 Establishment of the Wind Tunnel Modeling Similarity Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . *. . . . .. 7 3.2 Establishment of the Approach Boundary Layer . . . -. . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.3 Model Construction and Installation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 3.4 Flow Visualization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 3.5 Data Collection ..................................... . 13 3.6 Data Reduction . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 3.7 Quality Assurance . . . . .- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 4.0 RESULTS-._- ............... -.............. : ........ : ......- . 17 4.1 Initial Tests- ............ -............................ . 17 4.2 Containment Building Emissions ......................... . 18 4.3 Ventilation Stack Emissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 4.4 SIRW Tank Vent Emissions ..............................- 20 4.5 Effect of Diesel Emergency Generators . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . _. . . . 20 4.6 Effect of the Support Center Expansion .................... . 21 4.7-. Effect of the Service Building Expansion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 5 .0 CONCLUSIONS .......... -. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 6.0 - REFERENCES ....- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *........................... 27 TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 iv CPP~
LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Experimental Methods A-1 Appendix B CPP Facilities and Instrumentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-1 Appendix C Concentration Data Tabulations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-1 Appendix D Quality Assurance Documentation * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D-1 v CPP~
LIST OF FIGURES (Continued)
- 16. Ventilation Stack concentrations versus wind direction at the normal control room intakes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
- 17. Flow visualization of the Ventilation Stack release (wind direction = 205 degrees) . . . '. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
- 18. SIRW Tank Vent concentration versus wind direction at the emergency control room intake .. ; ........... ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
- 19. SIRW Tank Vent concentration versus wind direction at the normal control room int8.ke ................. ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
- 20. Effect of diesel exhausts on dispersion of Containment Building em1ss1ons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ; ....... , . . . . . . . . . . . _. *. . . . 50
- 21. Effect of diesel exhausts on dispersion of Ventilation Stack emissions . . . . . . . .* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *. . . . . . . . . . . . 51
- 22.
23. Effect of diesel exhausts on dispersion of SIRW Tank Vent
. emissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _. . . . . . . . . .
Effect of t~e Support Center expansion on dispersion of Containment Building emissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ; . . . . . . . . . . 52 53
- 24. Effect of the Support Center expansion on dispersion of Ventilation Stack emissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
'. 25. Effect of the Support Center expansion on dispersion of SIRW Tank Vent emissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ; . . . . . . 55
- 26. Effect of the Service Building expansion on dispersion of Containment Building emissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . 56
- 27. Effect of the Service Building expansion on dispersion of Ventilation Stack emissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _. . . . . 57
- 28. Effect of the Service Building expansion on dispersion of SIRW Tank Vent emissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 vii CPP~
LIST OF FIGURES
- l. Typical air flow patterns _past a single building structure .............. . 29
- 2. Plan view of overall physical _model including terrain within an 1800 ft radius . . . . . . . . .. -. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -. . . . . . . . . . . 30
- 3.
- Closeup plan view of Palisades Nuclear Power Plant .................. - 31
- 4. Photographs of the physical model installed in the wind tunnel:
a) view from the north,. including tunnel test section; b) view - from the south, including tunnel fan; c) view from the east; d) view from the west; e) view from the north; f) view from the southwest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _. . . . . . 32
- 5. Plan view showing future expansions of the Service Building and the Support Center ....................... ; ......... : .... -. . . . . . . 35
- 6. Sources of radioactive materials modeled in the wind tunnel . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
- 7. Measurement locations used in the wind tunnel modeling (excluding S.ervice Building expansion) ........ -. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
- 8. Measurement locations at the Service Building expansion ..... : . . . . . . . . 38
- 9. Vertical profiles of mean wind speed and turbulence intensity for a) the water approach (wind directions 206-024 degrees); and b) the land approach (wind directions 025-205 degrees) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
- 10. Reynolds number independence test results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *40
- 11. _ Containment Building flow rate independence test results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
- 12. _Containment Building concentrations versus wind direction at the emergency and normal control room intakes .................... : . . . 42
- 13. Flow visualization of the- Containment Building release (wind direction .= 205 degrees) ...................... -~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
- 14. Maximum Containment Building concentrations at alternative emergency intake locations on the north and east sides of the Service Building .............. ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
- 15. Ventilation Stack concentrations versus wind direction at the emergency control room intake *. . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 vi CPP~--
LIST OF TABLES
- 1. Radioactive Source Parameters . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *. . 61
- 2. Concentration Test Plan 62 .
viii CPP~
LIST OF SYMBOLS (Continued) Symbol Definition Units n Calibration Constant, Power Law Exponent (dimensionless) Q Emission Rate (g/s) p Density of Air (kg/m3) Pa Density of Ambient Air (kg/m3) Ps
- Density of Stack Gas Effiuent (kg/m3)
R Velocity Ratio (dimensionless) Rgas Gas Constant (Nm/kg K) Ri Richardson Number (dimensionless) Reh Building Reynolds Number (dimensionless) Rek Roughness Reynolds Number (dimensionless) Re5 Stack Reynolds Number (dimensionless) T Mean Temperature (K) Ta Ambient Temperature (K) Ts Stack Gas T~mperature (K) v Kinematic Viscosity (m2/s) u Wind Speed at Stack Height (mis) ua Wind Speed at Anemometer , (m/s) uh Wind Speed at Building Height (m/s) Ur Wind Speed at Reference Height Location (mis) u 00 Free Stream Wind Velocity (m/s)
- u. Friction Velocity * (m/s)
- u Mean Velocity x
(m/s) CPP~
Symbol Definition LIST OF SYMBOLS Units A Calibration Constant (dimensionless) B Calibration Constant (dimensionless) Bo Buoyancy Ratio (dimensionless) c Concentration (ppm or µg/m 3) co Tracer Gas Source Strength (ppm or µg/m 3) ~ Difference Operator (dimensionless) ~e Potential Temperature Difference (K) 0 Boundary-layer Height (m) d Stack Diameter (m) E Voltage Output (v) Fr Froude Number (dimensionless) g Acceleration Due to Gravity (m/s 2) H Stack Height (m) Hb Building Height (m) Is Gas Chromatograph Response to Calibration Gas (v) Jbg Gas Chromatograph Response to Background (v) K Non-dimensional Concentration (dimensionless) k von Karmans Constant (dimensionless) A. Density Ratio (dimensionless) L Length Scale (m) Im Momentum Length Scale (m) Mo Momentum Ratio ix (dimensionless) CPP~
LIST OF SYMBOLS (Continued) Symbol Definition Units u Longitudinal Root-Mean-Square Velocity (mis) W' Vertical Root-Mean-Square Velocity (mis) v Volume Flow Rate (m31s) Ve Exhaust Velocity (mis) z Height Above Local Ground Level (m) za Anemometer Height (m) zo -Surface Roughness Factor (m)
. Zr Reference Height" (m) .
Zoo Free Stream Height - 600 m above ground level (m)
- Subscripts m pertaining to model f pertaining to full scale
- xi CPP.:t!!P
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 1 CPP Project 93-0907 *
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report describes wind tunnel modeling predictions of air concentrations of radioactive materials due to potential accidental releases at the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant located in Covert, Michigan. The results of the wind tunnel modeling may be used later for evaluating control room habitability and to determine allowable unfiltered in-leakage of the control room air handling (HV AC) system. The present work was contracted through the firm . of Sargent & Ltµidy for the plant operator, Consumers Power Company. Radioactivity brought in through the control room air intakes combined with radioactivity brought in through HVAC system in-leakage will impact habitability of the plant control room during emergency conditions. To date, the air intake concentrations have been estimated with numerical procedures of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) which most likely produce conservative estimates of air intake concentration. The _calculated higher air intake concentration reduces the allowable unfiltered in-leakage, which may necessitate expensive modifications to the
- control room HVAC system. Wind tunnel modeling is presented in this report as a more accurate technique for estimation of air intake concentrations. Lower intake concentration estimates would permit a higher allowable in-leakage value and would minimize HVAC system modifications.
Predicting pollutant concentrations at outdoor locations within building complexes is one of the challenges facing the air pollution modeling community. Current preferred, refined
- dispersion models listed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are based on
*measurements in flat, Unobstructed terrain, and the EPA preferred models which treat building
. effects do not report* predictions within three building heights of a release at a building (EPA, 1987). An EPA screening model (EPA, 1991) does perform a simple approximation of average concentration within the downwind wake of a building for a stack located on the building roof. The EPA screening model assumes complete mixing of the plume within the building wake. The NRC model (e.g., Ramsdell, 1990) is also based on models originally developed for unobstructed terrain. CPP~-
Cermolc Peterka Petersen, Inc. 2 CPP Project 93-0907 Examining typical flow patterns around a building, as shown in Figure l, illustrates some of the difficulties encountered. Approaching winds travel over and around the building and separate from the building surfaces because of the inability to negotiate the sharp turns at building edges. Zones of reCirculating flow appear on the roof near the windward edge of the building and near the building sides, especially in the wake cavity on the leeward, downwind side. Pollution released in the wake cavity can experience rapid initial dispersion such that the plume lateral and vertical dimensions are approximately equal in size to the building cross-section. For a building complex, even more complications arise. The recirculation and turbulence zones from individual structures merge together in complicated ways, and the air flow can be accelerated and channeled through gaps between buildings. Hasker (1984) presents a review of air flow and diffusion around building obstacles. In contrast to current numerical dispersion models, wind tunnel modeling directly simulates the air flow patterns in the building complex through the use of scaling relations derived from the governing equations of motion. Measurements are made in the wind tunnel in much the same manner as a field tracer study. Tracer gases are released from the model sources and are measured at the locations of interest. Using the scaling laws, the source and tunnel conditions are established, and the full-scale (real-world) concentration results are computed from the measurements. With this *approach, the complexities of the air flow patterns within building complexes are accounted for. The specific goals of this study are to predict air concentrations from three sources: the Containment Building, the Ventilation Stack, and the Safety Injection Refueling Water (SIRW) Tank Vent. Concentrations are predicted at the control room emergency air intake, the control room normal air intakes, and approximately 40 other locations. The concentrations reported are normalized by the radioactive material emission rate. Actual radioactive emission rates, resulting health effects and ;illowable HYAC in:-leakages are not discussed in this report. Chapter 2 describes the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant site, the sources modeled, and measurement locations used. The wind tunnel modeling methodology is discussed in Chapter 3. Chapter 4 describes the wind tunnel modeling results. Conclusions are presented in Chapter 5. CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 3 CPP Project 93-0907
2.0 DESCRIPTION
OF THE SITE AND THE SCOPE OF WORK This chapter provides an overview of the project site and describe:; the exhaust sources and receptors evaluated in this study. 2.1 Description of the Site The Palisades Nuclear Power Plant is located on the eastern shore of Lake Michigan near Covert, Michigan. Large sand dunes with heights of up to 150 ft above the lake level are located. near the lake shore and surround the r>lant site. Figure 2 shows the terrain modeled for the
- present study. The radius of the area represente9 by the physical model is approximately 1800 ft.
Figure 3 is a closeup plan view of the plant complex showing the principal plant structures, including:
- the cylindrical Containment Building,
- the Turbine Building,
- the Auxiliary Building, and
- the Service Building.
The Containment Building is the tallest structure at 197 ft above grade. The Turbine Building, Auxiliary Building, and Service Building are 95, 110, and 50 ft high, respectively. The grade elevation for these buildings is approximately 590 ft above mean sea level. The Lake Michigan surface elevation is 578 ft above mean sea level. A number of smaller structures exist including the Support Center near the parking lot. The Support Center is located at a higher grade level of 625 ft above mean sea level. Two banks of mechamcal draft cooling towers are located to the south of the plant as shown in Figure 2. Figures 4a to 4f show photographs of the physical model installed in the wind tunnel. Two building projects at the plant site are likely to occur in the future which may have an effect on radioactive material dispersion. The Support Center is scheduled for expansion CPP~
l Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 4 CPP Project 93-0907 eastward into the parking lot, doubling the size of the building, as shown in Figure 5. The height of the Support Center expansion will be the same as the present height. The Service Building expansion to the west is also shown in Figure 5. The height of the expansion is the same height as the current Service Building. 2.2 Exhausts and Intakes Studied Three sources of radioactive material were investigated in the present study:
- 1) leakage from the sides of the Containment Building,
- 2) _ emissions from the Ventilation Stack, and
- 3) emissions from the vent for the SIRW (Safety Injection Refueling Water) Tank.
Figure 6 shows the location of the three sources. The Ventilation Stack is adjacent to the Containment Building and extends to a height equal to the peak height of the Containment Building. The SIRW Tank is located on the lowrise roof between the Turbine- and Auxiliary Buildings. Two diesel powered emergency generators could be operating during the design basis accident. The generators are located below the Mechanical Equipment Room (MER) north of the SIRW Tank, each exhausting at 25,800 cfm. The MER is located on the top floor of the Diesel Generator Building and houses the control room HVAC equipment. The normal control _room outside air intakes are located on the roof of the MER. The diesel exhausts may enhance turbulence in the building wakes and influence the radioactive plume behavior. The effects on the air flow and dispersion were studied for each of the three radioactive sources .. The volume flow rates and exit velocities from the three radioactive sources are expected to be small with no exit momentum. Table 1 lists the source release parameters. The leakage on the Containment Building acts as an area source of uniform, minute emissions through cracks in the concrete wall up to the lower edge of the roof at a height of 163 ft. During emergency conditions, the fans to the Ventilation Stack may not be operating, so the flow rate from this source is also expected to be small, caused only by temperature differences between the interior of the Auxiliary Building and outdoors. The SIRW Tank vent will have emissions during filling of the tank with an exit air volume flow *rate estimated to be only a few cubic feet per minute. CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 5 CPP Project 93-0907 Figure 7 shows the measurement locations used in the wind tunnel modeling for most of the testing, without the Service Building Expansion in place. The locations include the control room emergency air intake on the north end of the Service Building (pt. 5), the control room normal air intakes (pts. 27 and 29) located on the roof of the MER, six Service Building air intakes (pts. 1-4, 21, and 22) and33 other locations. The additional locations were used for characterizing the behavior of the exhaust plumes and for possible relocation of the emergency and normal control room intake locations. Three measurement locations were added to the Service Building Expansion (pts. 43-45) representing future air intake locations, as shown in Figure 8. Four more locations (pts. 46-49) were added to evaluate intake locations at the center and south end of the expansion roof.
- . I I
- CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 6 CPP Project 93-0907
. (This page intentionally left blank.)
CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 7 CPP Project 93-0907 3.0 METHODOLOGY In this study, concentrations of radioactive materials at outdoor locations were predicted with wind tunnel (physical) modeling. Wind tunnel modeling is well-suited for predicting the air flow patterns around complex building configrirations such as found at the Palisades site. Wind tunnel modeling is much like conducting a field experiment where concentrations due to tracer ga5es relea8ed from the sources are measured at the points of interest. The only difference is that the concentrations are measured over a scale model of the facility in a wind tunnel that simulates the wind flow over buildings: The wind tunnel modeling methodology is described in this chapter. The methodology incorporates the following steps: similarity aiialysis, establishment of the approach boundary layer, model construction and installation, flow visualization, data collection, and data analysis. Throughout the modeling process, a quality assurance plan which was reviewed and accepted by Sargent & Lundy was in place to ensure reliable results. 3 .1 Establishment of the Wind Tunnel Modeling Similarity Criteria An accurate simulation of the boundary-layer winds and source emissions is-an essential prerequisite to any wind tunnel study of diffusion. The similarity requirements can be obtained from dimensional arguments derived from the .equations governing fluid* motion;* A detailed *
*discussion on these requirements is given in the Environmental Protection Agency fluid modeling guideline (EPA, 198la) and in Cermak (1975).
Based on past experience with stack height studies (Petersen, 1985a, 1985b; Greenway et al., 1981; Halitsky et al., 1986) and the appropriate requirements in the EPA fluid modeling guidelines (EPA, 198la, 1981b), the criteria that were used for conducting the wind tunnel . simulation were:
- match (equal in *model and full scale) the ratio of source exit momentum to approach wind momentum, M0 CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 8 CPP Project 93-0907
- match the ratio of exit air density to ambient air density,
- ensure a fully turbulent source gas flow - Reynolds number based on source
. diameter (Res = dV/v) greater than 2000, or in-stack trip, or visual demonstration of turbulent exit flow;
- ensure a fully turbulent building wake flow - Reynolds number based on the height of the building (Reh = Utflblv) greater than 11,000, or demonstration of Reynolds number independence;
- similar geometric dimensions with no distortion of the horizontal scale relative to the vertical scale;
- equivalent atmospheric stability - Richardson number [Ri = (gA()Hb)l(T Ub2)]
in model equal to that in full scale, equal to zero for neutral stratification; and
- equality of dimensionless boundary and approach flow conditions; where Ve = stack gas exit velocity (mis),
ub d Pa
. A8
=
=
=
=
ambient velocity at building top (mis), stack diameter (m), ambient air density (kg/m3), potential temperature difference between Ht and the ground (°K), T = mean temperature (°K), Ps = stack gas density (kg/m3),
.,, = kinematic viscosity (m2/s),
Hb = building height (m), g = gravitational acceleration (9.8 mls 2).
*Reynolds number independence is an important feature of turbulent flows which allows wind tunnel modeling to be used. The Reynolds number describes the relative importance of inertial forces to viscous forces in a flow situation. Atmospheric wind flows around buildings are characterized by high Reynolds numbers ( > 106) and turbulence. Matching high Reynolds numbers in the wind tunnel for the 1:300 length scale reduction of this study would require tunnel speeds 300 times typical outdoor wind speeds, an impossibility because of equipment limitations and since such speeds would introduce compressible flow (supersonic) effects. Beginning with CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 9 CPP Project 93-0907 Townsend (1956), researchers have found that in the absence of thermal and Coriolis (earth rotation) forces, the turbulent flow characteristics are independent of Reynolds number provided the Reynolds number is high enough. EPA ( 1981) specifies a Reynolds number criteria of about . 11,000 for sharp-edged building complexes. This criteria is stated above. Also, it is recoµunended to perform tests over a range of Reynolds numbers to verify independence. Four such independence tests are performed for the Containment Building release, and the results are discussed in Chapter 4. All testing has been performed with neutral stability (Ri = 0). Hosker (1984) cites a
- Colorado State University report (Meroney and Yang, 1970) which determined that the effect of atmospheric stability on dispersion within five building heights of a building complex is relatively small due to the dominance of mechanical turbulence generated within the building complex compared to stability effects on turbulence.
The matching of Ross by number (pertaining to the earth's rotational effects) is a simjlarity criteria that is not met in the wind tunnel. However, its effect is insignificant over the small horizontal distance scales modeled (Cermak, 1975). EPA (1981) specifies a*horizontal scale liinit I of about 5 kilometers, within which Rossby number matching can be neglected. The physical model used .in this study extends only to a distance of 1800 ft (0.55 kilometers) from the plant. For the low momentum sources examined in this study, the criteria for matching of ~*. momentum ratio does not apply. The result is that concentration predictions from a wind tunnel
- run can be adjusted mathematically to represent any desired wind speed down to a lower wind speed limit. The calculation method is further described in Section 3 .5. The criteria for sufficient stack flow rate for a fully turbulent exhaust also does not apply for low momentum sources which do not experience plume rise.
3.2 Establishment of theApproach Boundary Layer An important similarity criteria discussed in Section 3 .1 is the similarity of approaching wind conditions, particularly the variation of mean wind speed and turbulence intensity with height. In order to document the wind characteristics approaching the model, profiles of mean velocity and longitudinal turbulence intensity were obtained upwind of the model test area. CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 10 CPP Project 93-0907 The profiles were collected using hot-film anemometers mounted on a vertical traverse . device. The hot-film anemometer is first calibrated against a pitot-static probe velocity standard. The hot-film responds to velocity, U, by sensing heat loss from the heated thin film-covered wire. The voltage output response, E, is nonlinear and follows the power law: E 2 =A.+ B un where A, B, and n are calibration constants. The exponent n has a typical value of 0.4. The calibration constants were determined with a least squares fit to the calibration data. Figure 9a shows the mean velocity and longitudinal turbulence intensity profiles that were collected upwind of the turntable model for wind directions ~pproaching the site over water (wind directions 206 .*to 024 degrees). Figure 9b depicts the profiles for the land approach directions (025 to 205 degrees). An analysis of the profiles was conducted to determine whether the shape was characteristic of that expected in the atmosphere, based on equations which are commonly used to predict the vertical distribution of wind and turbulence in the atmospheric boundary layer. The most coinmon equation for the mean wind speed, which has a theoretical basis, is referred to as the "log-law" and is given by u u.
= .!. In k
(3..) zo (2) where U is the velocity at height z, z is elevation above ground-level, z0 is the surface roughness factor, U. is the friction velocity, and k is von Karmans constant (which is approximately equal to 0.4). CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 11 CPP Project 93-0907 Another equation which is commonly used to characterize the mean wind profile is referred to as the "power-law" and is given by U (z )n (3) Ur = Zr where Zr is some reference height, Ur is the wind speed at the reference height, and n is the "power-law" exponent. Figures 9a and 9b show the computed n, U* and z0 values obtained from an analysis of i
'I the mean velocity profiles. The analysis was undertaken using a least-squares technique to find I I
I then, U* and z0 values which gave .the least error to the above equations. For the land approach, the "power-law" exponent is 0.21, and the surface roughness factor is 70 cm full scale. The 70 cm value is reasonable for the forested area surrounding the site (EPA; 1981a). On the water approach, the "power-law" exponent is 0.09, and the surface roughness factor is 0.02 cm full scale, reasonable values for open water (EPA, 1981a).
. Counihan (1975) presents a method for computing the "power-law" ~Xponent from the surface roughness factor z0
- He gives the following equation:
n = 0.24 + 0.096 log 1oZo + 0.016 (log 1oZJ2 (4) with length units of meters. Substituting a z0 of 0. 70 m for the land approach gives an expected "power-law" exponent of 0.226 as compared with the 0.21 exponent observed in the wind tunnel, providing good agreement with expectation. Similarly, a z0 of 0.0002 m for the water approach gives an expected "power-law" exponent of 0.124 compared with the 0.09 exponent observed in the wind tunnel.
- CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 12 CPP Project 93-0907 The variation of longitudinal turbulence intensity with height has_ been quantified by EPA ( 198 la), which gives the following equation for predicting the variation of longitudinal turbulence intensity in the surface layer:
- U' =nm(~) (5) u hi(~)
- where all heights are in meters full-scale. This equation is only applicable between 5 and 100 m - (16 and 330 ft). Above 100 m, the turbulence intensity is assumed to decrease linearly to a value -*of 0.01- at 600 m (2000 ft) above ground level. Figures 9a and 9b show that the observed turbulence intensity profiles compare reasonably well with that estimated using Equation (5).
In summary, the mean velocity and turbulence intensity profiles established in the wind tunnel are representative of those expected for the Palisades site, and the profiles meet the approach similarity requirements for wind tunnel modeling. 3.3 Model Construction and Installation The Palisades Nuclear Power Plant structures and nearby terrain within a radius of approximately 1800 ft was constructed at a 1:300 scale ratio, which is equivalent to 1 model inch equaling 25 ft. The physical model plan view is depicted in Figure 1, and photographs are shown in Figures 4a to 4f. The main buildings were constructed from plexiglass, and the smaller surrounding structures were made from styrofoam. Structures which are scheduled for removal within the next two years were excluded. Models of. the Service Building and Support Center expansions were also constructed and used in some of the runs.
. _The physical model was installed onto a rotating turntable used -to facilitate changes of wind direction. The approach conditions were established with appropriate roughness elements and flow trips in the approach test section of the wind tunnel. The tracer gas release sources and measurement locations were then installed onto the model.
i-CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 13 CPP Project 93-0907 The measurement locations on the physical
- model were connected to a SO-syringe sampling system located outside of the tunnel. Two sampling tubes measured background tracer gas . concentrations in the wind tunnel test section upstream of the physical model. After installation of the tubing, the tubing arrangements were checked by forcing compressed air through each tube (one at a time) out of the physical model. A data technician in the tunnel ensured that air was flowing out of the correct measurement locations during the check.
- 3. 4 Flow Visualization
.Smoke generated with !itanium tetrachloride was emitted from each source and was used to visualize the emissions to gain a qualitative sense of the release plume behavior. Four visitors were present during the initial flow visualization: Mr. Mike King, Mr. Paul Harden, and Ms~ Lynda Holmquist of the Consumers Power Company, and Mr~ Gerald P. Lahti of Sargent * & Lundy. After the concentration tests were performed, flow visualization of representative cases *were photographed and videotaped. A copy of the videotape was delivered to Sargent & Lundy.
- 3. 5 Data Collection
- The quantitative c~ncentration data was collected in a series of wind tunnel runs, each of which modeled dispersion for a given wind direction, wind speed, and source configuration for up to three sources. Each source was operated with a separate tracer gas.
Prior to each run, the operator confirmed several setup items:
- the correct tubing arrangement,
- the appropriate test section setup (i.e., water approach versus land approach),
- the ramping of terrain features to the approach setup,*
** the source gas connections to the appropriate sources,*
- the correct flow metering device, and .
- the correct turntable wind direction setting ...
The run procedure w~ guided by CPP's data ~ollecti~ri computer program and was comprised of the following steps: CPP~.
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 14 CPP Project 93-0907
- The tunnel was turned on and the tunnel reference speed was set to the desired*
speed within +/-0. l mis. The tunnel reference speed and reference height were specified in the detailed test plan discussed in Chapter 4.
- The tracer source gases were emitted by opening valves to the compressed gas bottles and metering to reach the specified flow settings. The flow rates were specified in the test plan. The tracer gases used were methane and ethane, hydrocarbon gases which are readily detected with standard gas chromatography.
- The 50 syringe sampler was then engaged. First, a high speed flush of the syringes was done with the SO\lrce gases operating. A slower speed filling of the syringes then took place over a 200 second time period. . The 200 second time period approximates a 15 minute to 1-hour steady state time span in the full scale setting (real world).
After the air samples were extracted from the physical model, they were analyzed with the gas chromatograph. The gas analysis consisted of the following steps:
* . A single-point calibration of the gas chromatograph, using certified tracer gas mixtures, was performed following each run. The data collection program recorded the GC readings. A strip chart recorder was used as a backup recorder .
- The 50 syringes were injected into the gas chromatograph two syringes at a time .
The gas chromatograph has two channels and can process two injections at a time. The data collection program recorded the gas chromatograph output with the strip chart recorder serving as a backup. The gas chromatograph output range was selected to measure the highest concentrations while obtaining reasonable accuracy for the lower readings. If a maximum concentration was missed (i.e.,if the voltage output exceeds lOV, the limit of the computer) due to an improper choice of range, the test was rerun and reanalyzed to obtain the missing readings.
- 3. 6 Data. Reduction The collected data was reduced to -
produce full scale (real-world) concentration values. The data reduction calculations consist of two steps:. 1) computation of the tunnel tracer gas concentrations, and_ 2) scaling the model concentrations to full scale values. The concentrations measured in the model were converted to full-scale concentrations by equating the non-dimensional concentration, *K = CUL21Q, in both model and full scale. The following equation results: CPP.l!P
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 15 CPP Project 93-0907 (6) where cf = full-scale concentration for pollutant of concern (µg/m 3), (Co)m = tracer gas initial concentration at the source in model (ppm), L = model (m) and full-scale (t) length scales, Ur = model (m) and full-scale (t) reference wind speeds (mis), Qf = full-scale emission rate (g/s), set equal to 1 g/s, v = model (m) volume flow rates (~3 /s), and (l)m = tracer gas concentration less background* in model (ppm). The full scale. concentrations as determined from Equation (6) above represent 15 minute to 1 hour average concentrations in the full scale. The model gas concentration Cm is computed using the following equation which involves no scaling parameters:
. where- Cca1 is the calibration gas concentration,* Vm is the sample voltage reading, Yca1 is the voltage reading for the calibration gas sample, and Vbg is the background concentration voltage reading. The voltage readings are normalized to the same gas chromatograph range if collected on differing ranges.
The concentration is calculated for a standard 1 g/s mass emission rate, thus the concentrations reported in Appendix Care in the form CtQ: To obtain actual concentrations, the reported concentrations should be multiplied by the actual emission rate expressed in g/s. The C/Q normalized concentrations listed in Appendix C have units of µg/m 3 per g/s. These units can be converted to s/m3 by dividing by 106 , in which case the concentrations are denoted by xi Q in this report. CPP.IJP
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 16 CPP Project 93-0907 For the low-momentum radioactive releases, the model non-dimensional concentration applies to a wide range of full scale wind speeds because there is no plume rise influence. Thus, a tunnel run for a given direction can be applied to any full scale wind speed by equating CUIQ for the two conditions. Equating CUIQ cannot be extrapolated to zero wind speed because that would yield an infinite concentration. At low wind speeds, meandering of the wind direction becomes inore important, making the wind tunnel measurements conservatively high (Kothari et al., 1981). EPA (1987) uses a lower limit of 1 mis (about 2.2 mph) for monitoring purposes. A lower limit of 2 mph is thus recommended for this study. The results presented in Appendix C for the radioactive releases were evaluated for a full scale wind speed of 2 mph.
- 3. 7 Quality Assurance Prior to testing, CPP submitted a quality assurance project plan to Sargent & Lundy for approval. The plan and completed forms are enclosed in Appendix D.
The plan describes the instrumentation used, calibration procedures, and traceability to NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) standards. NIST traceability was provided for tracer gas concentrations, DC voltage readings, tunnel wind speed, and volume flow rate for the sources. Other aspects of the QA plan include personnel training and qualifications, report review, engineering calculations, exception reports, and checklists. CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 17 CPP Project 93-0907 4.0 RESULTS This chapter presents the results of the wind tunnel study of atmospheric dispersion of potential accidental radioactive releases at the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant. The sources of radioactive materials are described in Chapter 2: leakage from the sides of the Containment Building, emissions from the Ventilation Stack, and emissions from the SIRW Tank Vent. Chapter 3 describes the methodology used in the wind tunnel.modeling. This chapter describes the detailed test plan, results of initial characterization tests, and dispersion test results for the three sources. The detailed test plan is shown in Table 2. Each line consists of one run or test for a given source and wind direction. The first series of runs (lOOs) consists of the initial runs to establish Reynolds number independence and flow rate independence for the Containment Building. The next series (200s) pertains to the Containment Building source. The Ventilation Stack and SIRW Tank Vent sources are the subject of the 300 series runs. Two types of tracer gases were used simultaneously to distinguish between emissions from the Ventilation Stack and the SIRW Tank Vent. Included in the 200 and 300 series were tests for estimating the effects of diesel exhausts, expansion of the Support Center, and expansion of the Service Building. Concentrations reported in this chapter are real-world (full scale) values normalized by emission rate and are in units of µ.g/m3 per g/s. Dividing by 106 converts these values to x!Q with the conventional units of s/m3 . This study describes atmospheric dispersion rates and does not include actual radioactive material emission rates, health effects, or allowable HVAC in-leakage rates. 4.1 Initial Tests Initial tests were performed to establish Reynolds number independence and independence of tracer gas flow rate for the Containment Building source. Reynolds number independence is described as an important similarity requirement in Section 3.1. In Runs 101 to 104, modet Reynolds numbers ranging from 6242 to 15605 were CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 18 CPP Project 93-0907 used in otherwise identical conditions. The length scale used in the Reynolds number definition is 100 ft, a typical building height and also about half the height of the Containment Building. The velocity scale was set to the approach model tunnel speed at the typical height. Figure 10 shows the variation of concentrations with model Reynolds numbers. The average, standard deviations, and maximums of the 42 measurement points are shown as well as the emergency control room and normal control room intake locations. The figure shows some deviations at the lowest Reynolds number of 6242 and nearly constant results above 11000, the criteria value quoted in EPA (1981). For the remainder of the testing, a building Reynolds number of 12484 was used. Leakage from the Containment Building is an area source which was modeled as a collection of small point releases distributed over the surface, as shown in Figure 6. In the model, tracer gases were pumped into the Containment Building and were emitted through holes drilled into the model. If the flow rate is too large, the tracer gases may have too large of an exit velocity which would artificially expand the plume outwards from the Containment Building. On the other hand, a minimum flow rate is necessary to achieve uniform emissions against the varying wind pressure exerted on the building surface. A series of tests (Runs 105-108) was performed at four different source flow rates for the Containment Building (10, 20, 30, and 40 eels) to demonstrate that the_ concentration was -relatively invariant with flow rate. Figure 11 shows the resulting mean, standard deviation, and maximum concentrations for the 42 measurement locations and the concentrations at the emergency and normal intakes. The figure shows about 10 to 20 percent higher concentrations at the low flow rate of 10 eels compared to the 30 and 40 eels values. The higher concentrations at low flow rates could be attributed to the preferential emi&sion from the downwind (low pressure) side of the Containment Building which is closer to the measurei;nent points. A flow
- rate of 30 eels was used for the remainder of the testing. Flow rates of 30 eels or_ 40 eels yielded similar results, and either flow rate would have been acceptable.
4.2 Containment Building Emissions Concentrations due to the Containment Building area source emissions were measured for seven wind directions aimed toward the emergency control room intakes~ The concentrations are reported for a worst-case 2 mph wind speed in Appendix C. Figure 12 shows the worst-case CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc.* 19 CPP Project 93-0907 concentrations at the emergency and the normal control room intakes. The concentrations at the normal intake represent the maximum of the two intake measurement locations (pts. 27 and 29). The maximum concentration for the emergency intake is 378 µg!m3 per g/s (or 3. 78 x 104 s/m3 , Run 201A, 205 degrees). For the normal intake, the largest measured maximum was 643 µg/m3 per g/s (6.43 x 104 s/m3 , Run 207B, 180 degrees). The normal intake is closer to the ContainmentBuilding compared to the emergency intake resulting in the higher concentrations. Figure 13 shows flow.visualization of the Containment Building plume traveling over the building complex. The top of the plume can be seen to be approximately the same height as the Containment Building. A number of alternative emergency intake locations were examined along the.north and east sides of the Service Building roof. Figure 14 shows that these alternative locations all received higher concentrations than at the existing emergency intake location. The east side of the Service Building is closer to. the Containment Building, accounting for most of the variation . .4.3 Ventilation Stack Emissions Concentrations from Ventilation Stack emissions were measured for 16 wind directions
***I with Rilns 301-316. The worst-case 2 mph wind speed results are listed in Appendix C.
Figure 15 shows the maximum concentration measured at the emergency intake is 319 µgfm.3 per g/s (3.19 x 104 s/m3, Run 308A, 215 degrees). Flow visualization of the maximum concentration detected at the norm.al control room intakes, seen in Figure 16, was 313 µg!m3 per g/s (3.13 x 104 s/m3 , Run 313A, 250 degrees). For most directions, the norm.al intake concentration was lower than at the emergency intake. The elevated release of the Ventilation Stack emissions allow them to pass over the closer norm.al intake.
- The norm.al intake*
concentration of 313 µg/m3 per g/s for a wind direction 250 degrees appears to be an anomaly in Figure 16, but similar concentrations were seen at ,nearby measurement points for that wind direction (see Run 313A, Appendix C). Flow visualization of the Ventilation Stack release is shown in Figure 17. The plume centerline is seen to be tilted downward due to the influence of the Containment Building. CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 20 CPP Project 93-0907
- 4. 4 SIRW Tank Vent Emissions Concentrations from the SIRW Tank Vent emissions were measured for 16 wind directions, and the worst-case 2 mph wind speed results are listed in Appendix C under Runs 301-316. i:t the emergency intake location, the maximum concentration was 577 µ.g/m 3 per g/s (5.77 x 104 s/m3 , Run 309A, 220 degrees) as shown in Figure 18. Figure 19 indicates that the normal intake maximum concentration was a larger 13212 µ.g/m 3 per g/s (132.12 x 104 s/m3 ,
Run 31 lA, 230 degrees) due to the proximity of the normal intakes to the SIRW Tank. 4.5 Effect of Diesel Emergency Generators Two diesel powered emergency generators are located beneath the control room and exhaust at a flow rate of 25,800 cfm each in a horizontal direction toward the north. The generators* tnay be operating during the release conditions studied, so. limited testing was performed to examine the effect of the diesel exhausts on plume dispersion from the three radioactive sourc~s ... Both diesel generators were operating during these sensitivity tests. Figure 2-0' shows the ._effect of diesel generator exhausts on dispersion of the Containment Building release for a wind direction of 205 degrees. The figure indicates that many locations on the Service Building incl~ding the emergency control room intake have lower concentrations by 10 to 30 percent compared to concentrations without the generators operating. In contrast, concentrations near the normal control room intakes increased by 10 to 20 percent. Concentrations on the higher Auxiliary Building and Turbine Building roofs changed by less than 10 percent. The repeatability of wind tunnel tests is approximately 10 percent, so changes of more than 10 percent are probably due to the diesel exhausts. This trend would probably be similar for other wind directions close to 205 degrees, such as the direction of 180 degrees which was the maximum for the normal control room intake. The effect of diesel generator exhausts on dispersion of _the Ventilation Stack relea8e is shown in Figure 21. Concentrations on the Service Building again decreased by 10 to 20 percent, while concentrations on the Auxiliary Building roof increased by about 30 percent. The concentrations at the normal intake remained very low with the diesel generators operating . CPP.;;;tt
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 21 CPP Project 93-0907
- Figure 22 shows the effect of the diesel generator exhausts on the SIRW Tank Vent plume. On the whole, the changes were less than the 10 percent expected from repeatability, indicating that the diesel exhausts had no appreciable influence on the SIRW Tank Vent plume.
In summary, the diesel exhausts appeared to have lowered concentrations from the Containment Building and Ventilation Stack releases at the emergency control room intake location by about 20 percent. This decrease could be explained l?Y the entraining of "clean" air from the west side of the plant into the area west of the Service Building. The maximum concentrations at the emergency air intake discussed in Sections 4.2 and 4.3 above may be conservative estimates since they do not include the effect of the diesel generator exhausts.
- 4. 6 Effect of the Support Center Expansion Several tests were performed to evaluate the potential* effect of the
- future eastward*
expansion of the Support Center shown in Figure 5. It was not anticipated to see major effects since the Support Center is a relatively small building and is not upwind of the emergency control room intakes on the Service Building. Figure 23 indicates that concentrations due to -the . Containment Building release decreased about 10 percent on the Service Building, about the maximum change expected from repeating a test. Concentrations. on the MER roof near the normal control room* intake increased by about 20 percent, larger than the normal repeatability variations of 10 percent. Similarly in Figure 24, concentrations due to the Ventilation Stack release decreased on the Service Building by about 15 percent. Figure 25 for the SIRW Tank Vent release shows no appreciable differences with the Support Center expansion.
- 4. 7 Effect of the Service Building Expansion An effect of the Service Building Expansion on the radioactive plumes is expected since the emergency control* room intake is nearby. The effect of the expansion was investigated for four wind directions for each of the three sources.
For the Containment Building release, Figure 26 indicates that the emergency control room intake concentration decreased with the expansion added by about 20 to 30 percent for all four wind directions tested. The overall maximum concentration decreased from 378 µg/m 3 per
- g/s to 256 µg/m 3 per g/s (3. 78 x 104 to 2.56 x 104 s/m3 , Run 210A, 205 degrees), a 32 percent CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 22 CPP Project 93-0907 change. For the normal control room intake, Figure 26 shows increases of lesser magnitude for three of the four directions tested, but the overall maximum remained the same. Figure 27 shows that for the Ventilation Stack release, the emergency intake concentrations again decreased by 20 to 40 percent for three of the four directions tested. The overall maximum decreased from 319 µg/m 3 per g/s to 239 µg/m3 per g/s (3.19 x 104 to 2.39 x 104 s/m3, Run 333A, 215 degrees), a 25 percent decrease. For the SIRW Tank Vent release, Figure 28 shows that the emergency intake concentration did not change appredably due to the Service Building expansion. Some decreases are seen in the nearby normal control room intake concentrations, possibly due to repeatability variations since the Service Building is far downwind of the normal control room intake. This decrease* is opposite of the increased normal intake concentrations seen .for the Containment Building sotirce. The differences in trends may be due to .subtle variations in air flow patterns
- affecting the larger Containment Building source plume differently from the narrow SIRW vent plume.-
CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 23 CPP Project 93-0907
5.0 CONCLUSION
S This report describes a wind tunnel study used to predict air concentrations at the emergency and normal control room intakes due to potential accidental radioactive releases at the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant. Actual radioactive emission rates, health effects, and allowable HVAC in-leakages are not discussed. The three sources of emissions studied were: 1) the walls of the Containment Building, 2) the Ventilation Stack, and 3) the SIRW (Safety Injection Refueling Water) Tank Vent. The maximum concentrations from the three sources at the emergency control room intake were: 378, 319, and 577 µg/in.3 per g/s (3.78 x 104 , 3.19 x 104 , and 5.77 x 104 s/m3) for the Containment Building, Ventilation Stack, and SIRW Tank Vent sources, respectively. Maximum concentrations at the normal control room intake were generally higher: 643, 313 and 13212 µg/m3 per g/s (6.43 x 104 , 3.13 x 104 , and 132.12x 10'4 s/m3) for the Containment Building, Ventilation Stack, and SIRW Tank Vent sources, respectively .. These concentrations correspond to a 2 mph minimum wind speed. Alternate locations for the emergency control room intake on the east and north sides of the Service Building had higher concentrations than the present emergency intake location for the Containment Building source. The exhausts from two diesel-powered emergency generators appeared to lower emergency intake concentrations by about 20 percent for the Containment Building and
- Ventilation Stack sources. The future expansion of the. Service Building also resulted in lower emergency intake concentrations by about 30 percent for the Contaimilent Building and Ventilation Stack sources. Therefore, the maximum emergency intake concentrations stated above for the Containment Building and Ventilation Stack sources are probably conservative overestimates. The. expansion of the Support Center had a smaller effect on the plumes from the three sources. It is likely that changes in smaller support structures such as trailers would not
- have a significant impact on these concentration predictions regardless of position of the trailers. Larger future modifications (especially within the main block of buildings) could cause significant changes in the. above results. Estimation of the direction and magnitude of these. potential changes from larger modifications would require further wind tunnel testing. CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 24 . CPP Project 93-0907 (This page intentioiially left blank.) CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 25 CPP Project 93-0907
6.0 REFERENCES
Cermak, J.E., "Applications of Fluid Mechanics to Wind Engineering," Journal of Fluids Engineering, Vol. 97, p. 9, 1975. Counihan, J., "Adiabatic Atmospheric Boundary Layers. A Review and Analysis of Data from the Period 1880-1972," Atmospheric Environment, September 1975. EPA, SCREEN Model User's Guide, USEPA OAQPS, November 1991. EPA, Industrial Source Complex (ISC) Dispersion Model User's Guide - Secorid Edition (Revised), USEPA OAQPS, EPA-450/4-88-002a, December 1987. EPA, "Guideline for Use of Fluid Modeling of Atmospheric Diffusion," EPA Office of Air Quality, Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC, EPA-600/8-81-009, April 1981a. EPA; "Guideline for Use of Fluid Modeling to Determine Good Engineering Practice Stack Height," US EPA, EPA-450/4-81-003, 198lb;
- Greenway, A.R., Cermak, J.E., Petersen, R.L., and McCullough, H.C., "Physical Modeling Studies for GEP Stack Height Determinations," 74th Amiual Meeting of the APCA, Paper No. 81-20.3, CEP80-81, JAP-JEC333, Philadelphia, PA, June 21-26, 1981.
Halitsky, J., Petersen, R.L., Taylor, S.D., and Lantz, R.B., "Nearby Terrain Effects in a Good Engineering Practice Stack Height Demonstration," 79th Annual APCA Meeting, Minneapolis, MN, June 22-27, 1986.
- Hosker, R.P. Jr. "Flow and Diffusion Near Obstacles," Atmospheric Science and Power Production, U.S~ Dept. of Energy, D. Randerson, ed., 1984.
Petersen, R.L., "Dispersion Comparability of the Wind Tunnel and Atmosphere for Adiabatic Boundary Layer with Uniform Roughness," Society Symposium on Turbulence and Diffusion, American Meteorological Society, Boulder, CO, November 12-15, 1985a. Petersen, R.L., "Kennecott GEP Stack Height Evaluation," prepared for Kennecott, Salt Lake City, UT, by Cermak/Peterka and Associates, Inc., CP/A Report No. 85-0279, 1985b. Ramsdell,.J.V. Jr., "Diffusion in Building Wakes for Ground-level Leakages,"- Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 24B, p. 377, 1990. CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 26 CPP Project 93-0907 (This page intentionally left blank.) CPP.sP
highly - approach turbulent
=:~~--
wind speed profile rooftop recirculation zone wake frontal cavity vortex zone Figure 1. Typical air flow patterns past a single building structure.
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 30 CPP Project 93-0907 90" 180' a* 500" 1000* e ,. 'I Om 100m 200m JOOm Nofe: For clarity, terrain interval shown is 20 ft.; model constructed with terrain intervals of 5ft. Figure 2. Plan view of overall physical model including terrain within an 1800 ft radius. CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 31 CPP Project 93-0907
.... *F*--~ ..
.. ****** G 0
************** i*** 1. \ . . *.*.
o* Note: Heights indicated are roof heights above grade Om 100m in full scale feet A-Containment Building E-MER with Control Room B-Turbine Building F-Service Building C-Auxialiary Building G-Support Center D-SIRW Tank H-Demineralization Facility
- Figure 3. Closeup plan view of Palisades Nuclear Power Plant.
CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 32 CPP Project 93-0907 a) -- .... ____ ;j b)
- Figure 4. Photographs of the physical model installed in the wind tunnel: a) view from the north, including tunnel test section; b) view from the south, including tunnel fan; CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 33 CPP Project 93-0907 c) d)
- Figure 4. Photographs of the physical model installed in the wind tunnel: c) view from the east; d) view from the west; CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 34 CPP Project 93-0907 e) f)
- Figure 4. Photographs of the physical model installed in the wind tunnel: e) view from the north; f) view from the southwest.
CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 35 CPP Project 93-0907
- ,_ D
~~
I mDD
. . .i
. . -~
.l
~
- CJ c:::::J 0
'\
. ". r 0
~
- . D '[
~~
~
~
~LAK£ MICH/GANE, D ~ _j-7
'Cl 0
0 n _J ('
~
LJ r-----..
.Q -- 1-J
~
=
-~-
r
---- ~i I
~
n D I CO' oD o* Om 100'
- A-Service Building Expansion 8-Support Center Expansion 50m 200' JOO' 100m Note: Heights of expansions some as original buildings (54' for Service Building; 25' for Support Center.)
Figure 5. Plan view showing future expansions of the Service Building and the Support Center. CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 36 CPP Project 93-0907 D I D
\\
\
Diesel Generator r-_._;;:::=:::==:;F==t-----, \
. . . - - - - . exhausts
\
\
SIRW Tank Vent uniform leakage) from Containment Bldg. walls (release heiqhts: . 25,50, 75, 100, 125, 150 ft.; at. up to 18 pts. per height.) o* ~* 100'
\ 2~
10m 20m JOm
~
Om Note; Diesel generator exhausts modeled only for effect. on dispersion of radioactive releases. Figure 6. Sources of radioactive materials modeled in the wind tunnel.
-----~-~--- ----- __________________________,
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 37 CPP Project 93-0907
\
5 s7a
.' I I 10 11 D 3
-20 12 4 2 13 14 D
17
*23
*31 *32
*34 *35 *35.
*37 *3a *39 8
*40 *41 O' 50' 100' -Points 1 and .2 located at el. 58'
-Point 3 located at el. 15' Om 10m 20m JOm -Points 4 and 22 located at el. 20'
-Points 7,
- 20 and* 21 located at el. 28'
-Points 5; 6, 8-19 located ot el 51'
-All others at roof heights Note: Location 5 is emergency control room intake; Locations 27 and 29 ore normal control room intakes.
Figure 7. Measurement locations used in the wind tunnel modeling (excluding Service Building expansion). CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 38 CPP Project 93-0907 LJ 44 49 43 5 678 9 45 10 Service Building 11 0 Expansion -20 12 46 * *48 13 2 14
- 47. D 17 o* 50' 100"
-Points 1 and 2 located at el. 58'
-Point .3 located at el. 15' Om 10m 20m JOm -Points 4 and 22 located at el. 20'
-Points 7, 20 and 21 located at el. 28'
-Points 5, 6, 8-19 located at el 51'
-Points 43-45, 49 located at el 49'
-All others at roof heights Note: Location 5 is emergency control room intake; Locations 27 and 29 are normal control room intakes.
Figure 8. Measurement locations at the Service Building expansion. CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 39 CPP Project 93-0907 MEAN PROFILE PLOT TURBULENCE PROFILE PLOT 1.2
~
I Approacn Flow WO range: 206 25 i r- *q' fun scale m: 0-JO 0 a Water 1 i.O~- ... full scote m: 300 1~ I model cm: 100.0 0 ---< a J [ I
-Power law. n: 09
""""Log Law. tJ"/Uo: .0278
*o' full scale m: .0002 D
1f a a)
.8 -- a *-- a N
C<:
--....._ of l a l
J N
~
.6 a; i D
°'
'iii '
I a a a D A --- ---o D - ---- Snyder's 0 (]pproximotion a ( 1981) I a
~~ r ~
,.,I D a
a i I 1 0.0'--"--'-........'--~--'=**~--~--=*-=--*~*=---=i_._...L,_....___.__._...L,_._.....J.......J 0.0 .2 .4 .6 .8 1.0 1.2 0 iO 20 30 Meon Velocity, U/UR Local Turbulence Intensity, U,.,;,/U, r. MEAN PROFILE PLOT TURBULENCE PROFILE PLOT Approach Flow Z0 , full scale m: 600
- z. , full scale m: 300 j
1.0 -Z., model cm: 100.0 _ .
-Power law. n: . 2 1
"*-Log Law, U"/Uo: .0651 Zo, full scale m: . 70 I ~ b)
C<: J N N
.4 j Snyder's
- poroximation
( 1981) 0 10 20 30 Mean Velocity, U/UR Local Turbulence Intensity, Urms/U, r. Figure 9. Vertical profiles of mean wind speed and turbulence intensity for a) the water approach (wind directions 206-024 degrees); and b) the land approach (wind directions 025-205 degrees). CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 40 CPP Project 93-0907 Reynolds Number Independence 1000 900
-- 800 ""'""
UJ O>
........ 700 C ')
E 600 O>
- J c: 500 0
- *~
co 400
....c: -
lo... CD 0 300 c: 0 (..) 200 100 0 I I I I I I I I I 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Building Reynolds Number (Thousands)
~ Avg of 42 pnts ~ Std Dev of 42 pnts """'*- Maximum of 42 pts
---Emergency Intake ~Normal Intake (avg)*
- Figure 10. Reynolds number independence test results.
*CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 41 CPP Project 93-0907 I Containment Bldg Flow Rate Independence 1000 900
~ --en 800 -- O>
C ') E 700 600 O;
- :l c
0 500 Go--_
~
400
---"l cQ) "'
0 300 c 0 C.) 200 100 0 I I I I I I I I I
- o. 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Model Volume Flow Rate (cc/s)
--- Avg of 42 pnts -+- Std Dev of 42 pnts ---:'f- Maximum of 42 pts Emergency Intake ""*- Normal lntake.(avg)
Figure 11. Containment Building flow rate independence test results. CPP.l!P
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 42 CPP Project 93-0907 Containment Bldg Concentrations Emergency; Normal Intakes (2 mph)
- _.... 6004-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--t CJ)
- 0) C") 5004-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--t E - g1 400+-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~----j o~~~--~~--.---~~--~~---~~~....-~~-r-~~--1 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Wind Direction (deg)
.1--- Emergency Intake* -+- Normal Intake (max)
Figure 12. Containment Building concentrations versus wind direction at the emergency and normal control room intakes. CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 43 CPP Project 93-0907 Figure 13. Flow visualization of the Containment Building release (wind direction = 205 degrees). CPP~*
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 44 CPP Project 93-0907 Containment Building Concentrations Alternate Emergency Intake Locations en 600
--E O'>
( ") 500 O'>
- l 400 c:
0 1a
-~
c: CJ> 0 c: 300 mergency CR Max Cone 0 (.) .200 East Side of
( ;t) E 300 250 O>
- l c: 200 o*
~
c: Q) 0 c:
.150 0 100 u
50 0 160 180 200 22o 240 260 280 Wind Direction Figure 15. Ventilation Stack concentrations versus wind direction at the emergency control room intake.
*cpp~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 46 CPP Project 93-0907
. Ventilation Stack Concentrations Normal CR Intake (2 mph) 313 (ug/m3)/(g/s)
~ 300-1-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_,...---1r-~~~~--1 -E 0) ~* 2so-1-~~~~---~~~~~~~--.,.~~~-+--+-~~~~--1 0)
- J c 2001+-~~~~-1-~~~~~~~~----~~-t----r~~~~---1 ra
~ 0 cQ) 0
§ 1501-1-~~~~---4-~~~~~~~~~~~f--~t--~~~~
1001 +-~~~~~~4-~~~~~~~~-+~~-+-~~~---1 u o-i-~~~..-~~~....-~~~1--1.-:11:=~;..-~~~.----t1----f 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 Wind Direction (deg) Figure 16. Ventilation Stack concentrations versus wind direction at the normal control room intakes. CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 47 CPP Project 93-0907 Figure 17. Flow visualization of the Ventilation Stack release (wind direction 205 degrees). CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 48 CPP Project 93-0907 SIRW Tank Vent Concentration Emergency CR Intake (2 mph) 700 60*0 577 (ug/m3)/(g/s) . rn
--Q)
('I') 500 E Q) 400
- J c:
0
- 300
. al c:
Q) 0 200 c: 0 (.) 100 0-1-~~~~~~~.......-~~~--~~~--~~---,,...-~~~ 160 180 200 .220 240 . 260 280 Wind Direction (deg) Figure 18. SIRW Tank Vent concentration versus wind .direction at the emergency control room intake. CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 49 CPP Project 93-0907 SIRW Tank Vent Concentration Max Normal CR Intake (2 mph)
.14 12 I 13212 (ug/m3)/(g/s) r-Ui' -9 10 M'
- E Cl 2.
"ii)
'O c
B c: 0 a"'"'
~ E. 6 cQI 0 4 c
0 0 2 a 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 Wind Direction (deg) Figure 19. SIRW Tank Vent concentration versus wind direction at the normal control
. room intake.
CPP~
Effect of Diesel Exhaust Containment Bldg Emissions WD=205, 6mph 350 I
' UJ 300 I
Aux Bldg Roof
---... ~
O> Service Building
~
E 250 I I I r¥1r MER Roof l I Pts 27,29 - Normal Intake O> Pt 5 - Emerg.lntaka
- :J c:
0 200 150 *-
~ Turbine Roof I
~
c: Q) 0 c: 100 - **- r I I> I I 0 50 (.) 0 I I I I I' . I. I 'I I 'I I I' I I
. ~-
I I I I I "I II I , I 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 3,1 33 35 37 39 41 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 Measurement Location j ~ w/o diesels - with diesels Figure 20. Effect of diesel exhailsts on - i o n of Contain_ment Building emissions.
Effect of Diesel Exhaust
.Ventilation Stack, WD=205, 6mph 300 I ~ I
( /) Aux Bldg Roof C> c t) 250 200 I Service Biuldlng \ E Pt.5 - Emerg. Intake
\ -C>
- J c
0 150 I I Pts27,29 - Normal Intake I MER roof II
~ ....c 100 I Turbine Bldg roof I
Q) J
'J.
0 c: 0 50 -* - - (.) I II I 0 I I i~I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
** .I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 3 5 7 9 . 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 Measurement Location j., w/o diesels - with diesels Figure 21. Effect of diesel exhausts on dispersion of Venti~ation Stack emissions.
':.**. -; ,,*'. ~~*: ' ~ '
Effect of Diesel Exhaust SIRW Tank Vent, WD=205, 6mph
- UJ 2soo--~~~~~~~~~~~--1 C> Aux Bldg roof MER Roof C ') Pts 27,29 - Normal Intake E
C>
- J 2000-+----------------..----*
c: Service Biulding 0
~'-
c Q) 0 c Pt5 - Emerg. Intake 10001 --~~~~~~~~~_...,~~~~~~---- 0 (.) 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 Measurement Location I~ w/o diesels
- with diesels
. Figure 22. Effect of diesel exhausts on
- ersion of SIRW Tank Vent emissions.
E:ffect of Support Center Expansion Containment Building, WD=205, 6mph 1000 l ( /) 900 Service Bldg I """' -J I Aux Bldg Roof I C> C ') 800
. Pt5 - Emerg Intake \
\ £~MER roof I r
700 ' E
...._ I I Pts27,29 - Normal Intake C> 600 - ::J c
0 500,- ' -* -* ... 1- - *
-- -* Vl w* ~ .....c L-400,_' - - - ) Turbine Bldg Roof I
300 -- CD 0 I I c: 200 -- 0 u 100 *- .. - 0 I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ii I I 1J I I I
.Jj __.
I I I I 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 Measurement Location I~ w/o expansion - with expansion Figure 23. Effect of the Support Center expansion on dispersion of Containment Building emissions.
Effect of Support Center Expansion Ventilation Stack, WD=205, 2 mph 600
-1\.
- I
~
Service Bldg ( /) Aux Bldg Roof II C> c t) 500 Pt 5
- Eme<g. Intake ~
I E
-.. 400 -
C>
- J I
- I Pnts 27,29 - Normal Intake c - -*
I MER Roof I 300 0 I I
~
c 200 - .. - I Turbine Bldg Roof I Cl> 0 5 100 -- I 11 I I I (.) I I
.. 1.t ..... _ * - I I * .I
- 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 2 4 6 6 10 12 14 16 16 20 22 24 26 26 30 32 34 36 36 40 42 Measurement Location j ~ w/o expansion - with expansion Figure 24. Effect of the Support Center exp on dispersion of Ventilation Stack emissions.
_J
Effect of Support Center Expansion SIRW Tank Vent, WD=205, 2mph 10000 ( /) O> C ') 9000 8000 7000 Aux Bldg Roof Pts 27,29 - Normal Intake Service Bldg E
-O>
- J c:
0 6000 5000
~ 4000 _ _ __. Turbine Bldg Roof cu c: 3000 Q) 0 c: 2000 0
(.) 1000 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 Measurement Location I~ w/o expansion - with expansion Figure 25. Effect of the Support Center expansion on dispersion ()f SIRW Tank Vent emissions .
.. -~ ;
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 56 CPP Project 93-0907 Effect of Service Bldg Expansion Containment Bldg Release (2 mph) 600 CJ) O>
-... . 500
( 'I) E O> 400
- J c:
0
~ 300 ca
.....c:
Cl> 0 200 c: 0 u 100 o+-~-.-~--...~~-r--~-.-~---.~~....-~-.-~---.,...--~-.-~--1 180 185 190 195 200 205 210 215 220 225 230 Wind Direction (deg)
--- Emerg w/o Expan -+- Emerg with Expa -;.+E- Nc;irmal w/o Expa -& Normal with Ex!?a Figure 26. Effect of the Service Building expansion on dispersion of Containment Building emissions.
CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen,_ Inc. 57 CPP Project 93-0907 Effect of Service Bldg Expansion Ventilation Stack Release (2 mph} UJ
---E Cl
( 'I)
-- Cl
- J c: .
0
~
c: Q) 0 c:. 0 (.) oj_~~~~---=:::::~==::::::==!=:::::::::;==,.,_.___,_~_j 185 190 195 200 205 210 215 220 225 230 235 Wind Direction (deg) Emerg w/o Expans. -+-: Emerg with Expans. --*""" Aux Roof w/o Expans Aux Roof with Expan -*- Normal w/o Expans~ __._. Normal with Expans. Figure 27. Effect of the Service Building expansion on dispersion of Ventilation Stack emissions. CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. 58 CPP Project 93-0907 Effect of Service Bldg Expansion SIRW Tank Vent (2 mph)
--( /) -- O ')
C ') E O ')
~ a-t-~~~~===---=:::;e:~__;==-.........:::::::::;7-~~--:::::==--~~~-----1
- J c
<ti CJl c: ::J 0
0 E.. e---~~~--'--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~---1
~
Lo. c: (l) 0 c: 0 (.) o..--~-.-~--..~~..--~-.-~-.-~~..--~-.--~_...~__,~__, 185 190 195 200 205 210 215 220 225 230 235 Wind Direction *(deg)
---* Emerg w/o Expans. --+- Emerg with Expans. --*'- Aux Roof w/o Expans
-a- Aux Roof with Expan ~ Normal w/o Expans. + Normal with Expans.
Figure 28. Effect of the Service Building expansion on dispersion of SIRW Tank Vent emissions. CPPJFP
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc . 61 CPP Project 93-0907
- TABLE 1 Radioactive Source Parameters Palisades Nuclear Power Plant Full Scale Full Scale Full Scale Release Exit Diameter Flow Rate Height Source (ft) (cfm) (ft)
Containment Building Area of Negligible Q'.:164' Containment Building Ventilation Stack 6.4' Fans not 197' operating; Negligible SIRW Tank Vent 0.33' Negligible 0.5' above tank roof CPP~
TABLE 2 Concentration Test Plan g Palisades Nuclear Power Plant 300 Scale Typ Model Model Model Typ Stack i
~
Anem Anem Site Typ Bldg Full Model Model Typ Pitot Bldg Model Land ~ Wind Direction Wind BL Anem Anem Speed Ht n BL BL Ht Speed Ht Site Bldg n Ht Wind Ref Stack Speed Speed Flow BL Ht Ref Ht Bldg Ref Wind Flow Model Ht Speed Speed Rate Bldg or Water fr Run (deg) Source mph (m) (ft) (m/s) (m) (ft) (m/s) (m/s) (cfm) (m) (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (cc/s) Re Approach ~
~
Reynolds Number Independence Tests: ;::i
Purpose:
To verify that concentration results are Independent of model Reynolds number (I.e. model wind tunnel speed). To accomplish this
~
the wind tunnel Is operated at several model speeds for the same full scale S'
~
situation and the full *cale concentration results 11hould be constant. 101 205
- Cont.Bldg. 2 600 0.213 32.8 2.14 600 0.213 100 1.13 1.85 NA 2 0.102 1.50 0.92 30 6242 Land 102 205 2 600 0.213 32.8 2.14 600 0.213 100 1.13 1.85 NA 2 0.102 2.25 1.38 30 9363 Land 103 205 2 600 0.213 32.8 2.14 600 0.213 100 1.13 1.85 NA 2 0.102 3.00 1.84 30 12484 Land 104 205 2 600 0.213 32.8 2.14 600 0.213 100 1.13 1.85 NA 2 0.102 3.75 2.30 30 15605 Land Model Flow Rate Independence Tests: 0\
N
Purpose:
To verify that concentration results for the containment building are not dependent on the model emission flow rate. 105 205 Cont.Bldg. 2 600 0.213 32.8 2.14 600 0.213 100 1.13 1.85 NA 2 0.102 3.00 1.84 10 12484 Land 106 205 2 600 0.213 32.8 2.14 600 0.213 100 1.13 1.85 NA 2 0.102 3.00 1.84 20 12484 Land 107 205 2 600 0.213 32.8 2.14 600 0.213 100 1.13 1.85 NA 2 0.102 3.00 1.84 30 12484 Land 108 205 2 600 0.213 32.8 2.14 600 0.213 100 1.13 1.85 NA 2 0.102 3.00 1.84 40 12484 Land
TABLE 2 (Continued) Concentration Test Plan Q Palisades Nuclear Power Plant 300 Scale Model i
~
Typ Model Model Typ Stack Anem Anem Site Typ Bldg* . Full Model Model Typ Pitot Bldg Model Land
~
Wind Wind BL Anem Anem BL BL site Bldg Wind Rel Stack BL Rel Bldg Rel Wind Flow Model or Direction Speed Ht n Ht Speed Ht n Ht Speed Speed Flow *Ht Ht Ht Speed Speed Rate Bldg Water Run (deg) Source mph (m) (It) (m/s) (m) (rt) (m/s) (m/s) (elm) (m) (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (cc/s) Re Approach "'ti
~
~
~
Containment Building Concentration Tests
Purpose:
To determine maximum C/Q for the Containment Bulldlng.
~
s
~
201 205 cont.Bldg. 2 600 0.213 32.8 2.14 600 0,213 100 1.13 1.85 NA 2 0.102 3.00 1.84 30 12484 Land 202 200 2 600 0.213 32.8 2.14 600 0.213 100 1.13 1.85 NA 2 0.102 3.00 1.84 30 12484 Land 203 190 2 600 0.213 32.8 2.14 600 0.213 100 1.13 1.85 NA 2 0.102 3.00 1.84 30 12484 Land 204 210 2 600 0.213 ,32.8 2.14 600 0.088 100 1.65 2.01 NA 2 0.102 3.00 2.45 30 16615 Water 205 220 2 600 0.213 32.8 2.14 600 0.088 100 1.65 2.01 NA 2 0.102 3.00 2.45 30 16615 Water 206 230 2 600 0.213 32.8 2.14 600 0.088 100 1.65 2.01 NA 2 0.102 3.00 2.45 30 16615 Water 207 180 2 600 0.213 32.8 2.14 600 0.213 100 1.13 1.85 NA 2 0.102 3.00 1.84 30 12484 Land Effect of Diesel Exhaust on Containment Building Plume Dispersion: 0\ w
Purpose:
to see If diesel exhaust plume11 Influence air flow and dispersion of Containment Bulldlng plume. Note: diesel exhaust model flow rates to be set to 151.5 cc/s 208 205 Cont.Bldg. 6 600 0.213 32.8 6.42 600 0.213 100 3.40 5;54 .NA 2 0.102 3.00 1.84 30 12484 Land Effect of Support Center Expanaion Tests.
Purpose:
to 111ee If expansion of Support Center will have discernible effects on plume dispersion from the Containment Bulldlng. 209 205 Cont.Bldg. 2 600 0.213 32.8 2.14 600 0.213 100 1.13 1.85 NA 2 0.102 3.00 1.84 30 12484 Land
~
Effect of Service Building Expansion Tests.
Purpose:
to see If expansion of Service Building will have discernible effects on plume dispersion from the Vent Stack and SIRW tank.
"'ti
~
210 205 Cont.Bldg. 2 600 0.213 32.8 2.14 600 0.213 100 1.13 1.85. NA 2 0.102 3.00 1.84 30 12484 Land .Q_
~
211 200 Cont.Bldg. 2 600 0.213 32.8 2.14 600 0.213 100 1.13 1.85 NA 2 0.102 3.00 1.84 30 12484 Land ~ 212 190 Cont.Bldg. 2 600 0.213 32.8 2.14 600 0.213 100 1.13 1.85 NA 2 0.102 3.00 1.84 30 12484 Land 213 220 Cont.Bldg. 2 600 0.213 32.8 2.14 600 0.088 100 1.65 2.01 NA 2 0.102 3.00 2.45 30 16615 Water ~I cIO l) c ~ ~
TABLE 2 (Continued) Concentration Test Plan Pallsade1 Nuclear Power Plant 300 Scale Modal Typ Modal Model Typ Stack Anem Anem Site Typ Bldg Full Modal Model Typ Pitot Bldg . Model Land Wind . Wind BL .Anem Anem BL BL Sita Bldg Wind Ref Stack BL Ref Bldg Raf Wind Flow Model or Direction Speed Ht n Ht Speed Ht n Ht Speed Speed Flow Ht Ht Ht Speed Spead Rate Bldg Water Run (deg) Source mph (m) (ft) (m/*) (m) (ft) (m/*) (ml*) (cfm) (m) (m) (m) * (m/a) (m/e) (cc/e) Re Approach Ventilation Stack and SIRW Teets Purpo1~: To determine maximum C/Q for the Vent Stack and SIRW Tank Vent. 301 205 Vent Stack;SI 2 600 0.213 32.8 2.14 600 0.213 100 1.13 1.85 5000 2 1 0.102 3.00 1.84 12 12484 Land 302 200 Vent Stack;SI 2 600 0.213 32.11 2.14 600 0.213 100 1.13 1.115 5000 2 1 0.102 3.00 1.114 12 12484 Land 303 195 Vent Stack;SI 2 600 0.213 32.11 2.14 . 600 0.213 100 1.13 1.115 5000 2 0.102 . 3.00 1.84 12 12484 Land 304 190 Vent Stack;SI 2 600 0.213 32.11 . 2.14 600 0.213 100 1.13 1.85 5000 2 0.102 3.00 1.84 12 12484 Land 305* 1115 Vent Stack;SI 2 600 . 0.213 32.11 2.14 600 0.213 100 1.13 1.115 5000 2 0.102 3.00 1.114
- 12 12484 Land 306 180 Vent Stack;SI 2 600 0.213 32.11 2.14 600 0.213 100 1.13 1.85 5000 2 0.102 3.00 1.84 12 12484 Land 307 210 Vent Stack;SI 2 600 0.213 32.11 2.14 600 0.088 100 1.65 2.01 5000 2 0.102 3.00 2.45 12 16615 Water 3011 215 Vent Stack;SI 2 600 0.213 32.11 2.14 600 0.0811 100 1.65 2.01 5000 2 0.102 3.00 . 2.45 12 16615 Water 309 220 Vent Stack;SI 2 600 0.213 32.11 2.14 600 0.088 100 1.65 2.01 5000 2 . 0.102 3.00 2.45 12 16615 Water 310 225 Vent Stack;SI 2 600 0.213 32.11 2.14 600 0.0118 100 1.65 2.01 5000 2 0.102 3.00 2.45 12 16615 Water 311 230 Vent Stack;SI 2 .600 0.213 32.11 2.14 .600 0.0118 100 1.65 2.01 5000 2 0.102 3.00 2.45 12 16615 Water 312 240 Vent Stack;SI 2 600 0.213 32.11 2.14 600 0.088 100 . 1.65 2.01 5000 2 0.102 3.00 2.45 12 16615 Water 313 250 Vent Stack;SI 2 600 0.213 32.11 2.14 600 0.0811 100 1.65 2.01 5000 2 0.102 3.00 2.45 12 16615 Water 314 170 Vent Stack;SI 2 600 0.213 32.11 2.14 600 0.213 100 1.13 1.85 5000 2 0.102 3.00 1.84 12 12484 Land 315 260 Vent Stack;SI 2 600 0.213 32.11 2.14 600 0.0118 100 1.65 2.01 5000 2 0.102 3.00 . 2.45 12 16615 Water 316 270 Vent Stack;SI 2 600 0.213 32.11 2.14 600 0.0811 100. 1.65 2.01 5000 2 0.102 3.00 2.45 12 16615 Water Effect of Die.eel Exhaust on Vant;SIRW Plume Dispersion:
Purpoee: to eee If dleeel exhau1t plume11 lnfluehce air flow and dispersion of Vent Stack; SIRW vent plumes. Note: dleeel exhaust model flow rates will be set to 151.5 cc/a. 329 205 Vent Stack;SI 6 600 0.213 32.8 6.42 600 0.213 100 3.40 5.54 5000 2 0.102 3.00 1.84 12 12484 Land Effect of Support Center Expansion Teets. 215 Vent Stack;SI 2 600 0.213 32.8 2.14 600 0.213 100 1.13 1.85 5000 2 0.102 3.00 1.84 12 12484 Water Effect of Service Building Expansion Teets. 331 205 Vent Stack;SI 2 600 0.213 32.8 2.14 600 0.213 100 1.13 1.85 5000 2 0.102 3.00 1.84 12 12484 Land 332 195 Vent Stack;SI 2 600 0.213 32.8 2.14 600 0.213 100 1.13 1.115 5000 2 0.102 3.00 1.114 12 12464 Land 333 215 Vent Stack;SI 2 600 0.213 32.8 2.14 600 0.0811 100 1.65 2.01 5000 2 0.102 3.00 2.45 12 16615 Water* 334 225 Vent Stack;S! 2 600 0.213 32.11 2.14 600 0.088 100 1.65 2.01 5000 2 0.102 3.00 2.45 12 16615 Water
TABLE 2 (Continued) Concentration Test Plan Palisades Nuclear Power Plant 300 Scale Model Typ Model Model Typ Stack Anem Anem Site Typ Bldg Full Model Model Typ Pitot Bldg Model Land Wind Wind BL Anem Anem BL BL Site Bldg Wind Ref Stack BL Ref Bldg Ref Wind Flow Model or Direction Spead Ht n Ht sp-d Ht n Ht Speed Speed Flow Ht Ht Ht Speed Speed . Rate Bldg Water Run (deg) Source mph (m) (ft) (m/a) (m) (ft). (m/*) (m/11) (cfm) (m) (m) (m) (m/*) (m/a) (cc/a) Re Approach Table 2 Abbreviations: Anem Anemometer BL Boundary Layer Ht Height h Wind profile exponent Typ Typical Bldg Building Ref Reference Height Re Reynolds number
LICENSING CORRESPONDENCE\COMMITMENT TRACKING RECORD
SUMMARY
.DATE: October 17, 1994 DOCKET 50-255 LICENSE DPR PALISADES PLANT WIND TUNNEL TESTING TO DETERMINE SPECIFIC CONTROL ROOM INTAKE CONCENTRATIONS
SUMMARY
- Provides for NRC review a copy of the wind tunnel tests used to determine site specific atmospheric dispersion factors for the plant.
Previous Previous NRC Letters Dated: CPCo Letters Dated: LC _ _ __ 4-29-92 LC 502701 LC _ _ __ 7-28-92 LC 502931 LC _ _ __ 5-17-93 LC 503681 UFI NO: 950-02214 Oath &Affirmation Required:(y/n) ~N~ Individuals Originator: Concurrences: Initials: Concurrences: Initials: Providing Info: WLRoberts KMHaas KPPe*,~el"s TCDuffy RAVincent RJGerling ~ MDKing TCDuf fy -1c.1S"" . Special Distribution: None PSE LOG Information Copy PRC MTG AMDavis (RS only) NPAD LOG COMMITMENT TRACKING COMMITMENTS MADE: None Assigned Individual: Initial: ---- Target Date/Due Date Related CA Document No: CTS Commitment No: Commitment To Be Made Resident? Resident Document: COMMITMENTS CLOSED: Verbal commitment made during our October 6, 1994 conference call to send the Wind tunnel test report to the NRC. Related CA Document No: CTS Commitment No: Additional Information Needed for CTS Entry: System Code: . . , VA"""'S,___ __ Suggested Keywords: control room HVAC MHA analysis wind tunnel testing atmospher~ dispersion
APPENDIX A EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
- CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. A-1 CPP Project 93-0907
- LIST OF FIGURES APPENDIX A Figure Description ~
A-1 Flame Ionization Ga5 Chromatograph (FIGC) Linearity Check A-9 A-2 Hot-Wire Calibration Curve ............................... . A-10 A-3 Flow-Meter Calibration Curve for Buoyant Mixture ............. . A-11 CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. A-2 CPP Project 93-0907 (This page intentionally left blank.) CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. A-3 CPP Project 93-0907 APPENDIX A EXPERIMENT AL METHODS A. l Concentration Measurements A.1.1 Test Procedure After the desired atmospheric condition is established in the wind tunnel, a mixture of inert gas and a tracer (ethane, methane and/or propane) of predetermined concentration is released from the stacks at the required rate to simulate prototype plume rise. Samples of gas are withdrawn from the sampling points and analyzed. The flow rate of the gas mixture is controlled by a pressure regulator at the supply cylinder outlet and monitored by a precision flow meter. The test procedure consists of: 1) setting the proper tunnel wind speed; 2) releasing a metered mixture of source gas of the required density from the stacks; 3) withdrawing samples of air from the tunnel at designated locations and 4) analyzing the samples with a flame ionization gas chromatograph (FIGC). The samples are collected simultaneously over a 200 s (approximate) time using CPP's sampling systeni and consecutively injected into a FIGC. The
- .sampling system is tested periodically to insure all gas syringes and tubing connections are operating properly. The linearity of the FIGC is also checked periodically. The results of a linearity check are shown in Figure A-l.
A.1.2 Analysis Procedure T4e procedure for analyzing the air samples from the tunnel is as follows: 1) the 30 cc sample voiume drawn from the wind tunnel is introduced into a 2 cc gas sampling loop; 2) the ice sample is injected into the FIGC column; 3) the flame-ionization detector (FID) indicates the presence and measures the amount of components in the column effluent; 4) the voltage output from the FID is captured by a computer-based analog-to-digital converter; 5) the digitized signal is analyzed for the peak height which is proportional to the amount of
- hydrocarbon present in the sample; 6) the peak heights and pertinent run information are stored in a computer file; and 7) a data reduction program converts peak voltages to full scale concentrations.
CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. A-4 CPP Project 93-0907 A.1.3 Calculation of Full-Scale Concentrations The FIGC responses (peak heights) are converted to full-scale concentrations using the follpwing equation as presented in Snyder (I 981 ): (A.l) which can be rewritten as follows since the ambient temperature and temperature of the exhaust gas are equal in the model: (A.2) where Cr . - full scale pollutant concentration (µg/m3), Q = pollutant emission rate (µg/s) and is equal to CO times V times a mass to volume conversion factor,
- I = peak height for tracer (volts),
/bg = peak height of background sample (volts),
/B = peak height of GC calibration (volts),
cs = calibration gas concentration (ppm), com = tracer gas source concentration in (ppm) which equals (/-/bg)C9 / / 9 and equals the mass concentration when multiplied by the same conversion factor for model conditions as discussed under Q above, Urm = . model reference wind speed (m/s), Ur = full...:scale reference wind speed (m/s), r vm = volume flow rate in model (m3 /s), and SF - scale factor of model to full-scale and is equal to Lr/ Lm. A sample calculation of full-scale concentrations is provided using the following values for I, /bg* / 9 , C9 , Com* Ur V m* Q and Ur: -1.21 volts, -0.32 volts, -9 ..8 volts, 101 ppm, 100,000 m r . ppm, 3.5 m/s, 0.0001214 m3 /s, 1.6168£09 µg/s and 12.0 m/s respectively. CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. A-5 CPP Project 93-0907 The full scale concentration value is then
-(-L21 + 0.32) (10lx3.5xl.6168E09)
/(-9.Sxl 00,000xO.OOO 121x6002 xl2.0) (A.3)
= 993 µg/m 3
_ A.2 Velocity Measurements A.2.1 General Split-film (dual hot-film sensor) and hot-film or hot-wire (single sensor) probes are used to measure velocities. The dual sensor probe is used to measure mean velocity, U', W' and u. while the single sensor probe was used to measure mean velocity and U'. The theory of operation for split-film and hot-film sensors is based ori the physical -principle that heat transferred from a sensor equals heat supplied to-that sensor by an anemometer. This physical - principle can be represented by the following equations: E 2 =A +Bun * (A.4) *..l for the hot-film, and (i}(f )=[A+ B (U)"] (A.5) and ( EK112 l-( lEK212 = (a + bUn) (6 0 :-- 6) +_ c (A.6) for the split-film, where
= output voltage from a sensor (A.7)
= RHi (RHi - Rei)
= the velocity sensed A, B, n, a, b, c
- constants determined by calibration
(} = angle formed by plane of sensor splits and the velocity vector change in(} CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. A-6 CPP Project 93-0907 A.2.2 Calibration Sensor calibrations are accomplished immediately prior to each velocity measurement activity . utilizing a Thermo-Systems, Inc. calibration nozzle and a Hastings Mass Flowmeter to provide the metered air flow. The constants A, B, n (or A, B, n, a, b, c and 00 ) are obtained by calibrating the sensors over a range of known velocities (or velocities and angles) and determined by a least squares analysis utilizing the appropriate previously referenced
- equations. A representative calibration curve of sensor output voltage versus sensed velocity is included as Figure A-2.
A.2.3 Data Collection After calibration, the appropriate probe is placed in the wind tunnel at a specified location and reference height. A hot-film probe (TSI Model No. 121020) is used to measure and set tunnel speed at reference locations and to measure lateral velocity distributions. A split-film probe (TSI Model No. 1287) is used to measure the vertical profiles of mean velocity (U and W) arid turbulence (U', W', and U.) when required. The lateral velocity profiles are obtained by moving the probe to selected positions across the tunnel while the vertical profiles are obtained by affixing the probe to a vertically traversing carriage which related height (z) to voltage output and could be operated from outside the tunnel. All data are obtained by sampling the probe output 20 times per second for 20 to 30 second intervals at each location. The data is then reduced by real-time computer action and stored in files for later analysis. A.3 Volume Flow Measurements The volume flow rate of tracer gas from the model stack is an important variable in this study. Various volume flow rates are calculated prior to testing to simulate multiple wind speeds or so.urce flow rates. Ball-type flow raters and mass flow meters are calibrated using a soap bubble technique to determine the settings necessary to obtain the calculated volume flows at stack exit. The gases used for the calibration are the same as those used in the study tests. Figure A-3 contains a typical flow meter calibration. A.4 Quality Control To ensure that the data collected is accurate and reliable, certain quality control steps, most of which were discussed earlier, are taken. To summarize, these include: CPP~
f:ermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. A-7 CPP Project 93-0907
- use of certified gas mixture for source gases (See Figure-A-4 );
- multipoint calibration of hydrocarbon analyzer using certified standard gases;
- calibration of flow measuring devices with a soap bubble meter;
- adjustment of _tunnel roof so that blockage effects (i.e., reduction of cross-sectional area) are less than 5%.
A.5 Error Analysis The full-scale concentration results presented have certain experimental errors associated with them. To estimate the experimental error, referred to as uncertainty interval, the technique outlined by Kline and McClintock (1953) will be used, which results in the following error equation: (A.8) where
+/- 0.15 for low concentrations
= +/- 0.02 for high concentrations
= +/- 0.02
= +/- 0.02 Substituting the above uncertainty estimates into Equation A. 7 gives the following uncertainty for the full-scale concentrations:
(AC/C)r = +/- 0.15 for low concentrations ( ~ 10 µg/m 3 )
= +/- 0.03 for high concentrations ( ~ 100 µg/m 3 ) .
- CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. A-8 CPP Project 93-0907 (This page intentionally left blank.) CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. A-9 CPP Project 93-0907 5;000
- Methane
* *Ethane 1,000 G
c 100 50
.,,0 Q.
G a: u CJ 10 5 Concentration (ppm) (NBS traceable primary standards)
- Figure A-1. Flame ionization gas chromatograph (FIGC) linearity check.
CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. A-10 CPP Project 93-0907 4.2 4.1 4.0 3.9 v 3.8 MV u 3.7 3.6 3.5689 3.7760 3.9367 4.0846 145.7 226.95 309.14 396.0 4.1969 474.44 3.5 100 200 300 400 500 u (cm/s) Figure A-2. Hot-wire calibration curve. CPP.tP
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. A-11 CPP Project 93-0907 Meter 3 Cal in 0.9 Air Mix 15.0 (.9 z ~ 10.0 w Cf) 5.0 o~~~~..._~~~..i....~~~._~~~ .......~~~--~~~- o 20.0 3 40.0 60.0 FLOW (CM /S) O Lower setting + Upper setting Figure A-3. Flow-meter calibration curve for buoyant mixture. CPP~
APPENDIXB CPP FACILITIES AND INSTRUMENTATION CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. B-1 CPP Project 93-0907 CPP~
'NIN
~A~~RGINEERING ATORY A -- Ooseci-arcuit undary-lay~r win~d Open -circuit boboundary-laver wi B Data reduction tunnel c Computer tunnel D In room E strumentati F Model techn. ~n room G Office iaans J
H I Machine sho Conference Lounge r oom K Reception area W L orkarea CPP~ .......
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. B-2 CPP Project 93-0907 PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CLOSED-CIRCUIT WIND TUNNEL
- 1. Dimensions Test-Section Length 70 ft Test-Section Width 10 ft Contraction Ratio 2.7:1
- 2.
- Wind-Tunnel Drive Total Power 75 hp
- Type of Drive 6 blade axial fan, single-speed motor Speed Control Variable-pitch fan
- 3. Velocities Mean Velocities Approximately 0 to 50 _fps Boundary-Layer Thickness ... Up to 60 inches Turbulence Level About 2 percent at entrance
- 4. Longitudinal Pressure Gradient Zeroed by ceiling adjustment Function of boundary roughness and thickening devices at test-section entrance n.7' 47 7' 1jl ~,,,.,;
I 'r'r,, u I ---~ i
- Jl!.~ *
~~-I '-----*,.------------~---"'o_*or__ I.~-~
r, 75 ho r, ...!J:/.'._;_ _ _ _ ........ t ,,-~ - -
~.. ..- '--~-----------------'---,----~
-* II -. . . . . .-.c** r\\._ .......
Tl.J'l\IODI* i I 7~ST SECTION ~AIRFLOW
':'rio
__,';:::la-
=-
- ,;..&-~~it'll 111~
_;,._ .:*':. :.11.:. :....... Pion View I Extu6or wall-
"'1 -s
- ta 9 ,- a**
, l ~ " __________
- AAdtullatl&e ceill'"I *
]_"°_~_::L*~ floor ~I..................~** mI
_2, _____, ____ r---ITTr=---r~--;-----1~--r--*--:=>~ *~
.,~ r I I ii Elewtion View CLOSED-CIRCUIT BOUNDARY-LAYER WIND TUNNEL CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. B-3 CPP Project 93-0907 PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE OPEN-CIRCUIT WIND TUNNEL
- 1. Dimensions Test-Section Length 74.5 ft .
Test-Section *width 12 ft Contraction Ratio Variable from 6.5 to 8.5 ft
- 2. Wind-Tunnel Drive Total Power 20hp Type of Drive 8 blade axial .fan, single-speed motor Speed Control: Coarse 900/600 rpm, 2-speed motor Speed Control: Fine Pitch control
- 3. Temperature Ambient Air Not controlled Surface -50to120 ° F
- 4. Velocities
- 5.
Mean Velocities Boundary-Layer Thickness Streamwise Press.ure Gradient
~I u*
0 to30 fps Up to 6 ft Zeroed by ceiling adjustment
*..,..iv**_.*:,_o.;..o!.,,_v'-"')""'o:._..*m':; .;. o. ._,;:. * ~v*;:. :.* :,.; ;a;_:; ,;,; ,: _>>.;. .>u,:. .',.:. ;:":_.~. . . ,*u. .,.:.:.4"-!.;. .,~.;.;*.;.-,*.'-'. ,* *-. i:" '_. .v; _*-:*=-~ *. : *~_.*0-.:.1*,_*_* ___J
* .a.."
- 5
~AIRFLOW 7E ST SECTION YO lot Pion View NOTE' ALL DIMENSIONS GIVEN IN FEET
~--*J.o'
- OPEN-CIRCUIT Elevation View BOUNDARY- LAYER WIND TUNNEL CPPJ1$'
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. B-4 CPP Project 93-0907 DATA ACQUISITION AND ANALYSIS SYSTEM The CPP data acquisition and analysis system utilizes a system of microcomputers. The system presently includes the following hardware:
- i 16 bit, 512-640 KB RAM
- i 20-30 MB hard disks
- i 8-12 MHz clock speeds
- i 160 cps dot matrix printers
- i 1 color, 2 monochrome high resolution graphics monitors
- i 16-channel 35 KHz 12 bit A/D converters
- i 2-channel 12 bit DIA output. 4 channel digital input/output
*::i 32-channel digital input/output
- i Fast Fourier Transform card 5 IBM PC-AT microcom:puter based data analysis svstems *
- J 16 bit, 512-640 KB RAM
- J 20-30 MB hard disks
- J 8-20 MHz clock speeds
- l HP Laser/et Series II laser printers
- J 3 color, 1. monochrome high resolution graphics monitors
- J 6 pen plotter
- J 9 track, 1600 cpi digital magnetic tape drive
- l Cassette tape back-up system
- J Microsoft Mouse Telecommunications interface for communication with client com:puter facilities or commercial timesharing services.
- CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. B-5 CPP Project 93-0907 AEROELASTIC BALANCE The aeroelastic balance is of a universal type on which various models can be easily mounted. Stiffness of the balance can be adjusted over a wide range to match the natural fequencies of the prototype. The balance is designed to model two fundamental rocking modes of motion and twisting motion about the vertical axis. Damping of the balance is adjustable over a range of expected. prototype values. Strain gage bridges yield outputs for the data processing system which gives mean, rms and peak values of base moments and building-top deflections. Placement of accelerometers on the building enables direct measurement of rms and peak accelerations. ALUMINUM__.._ _._i 1 SASE PLATE STEEL._..!.-/ BA!?E RING TOP VIEW BUILDING M O D E L U SENDING SPRING-'-----
- LAMPS BASE -....-.;::.....,....;.... COVER PLATE PLATE.
RING
- CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. B-6 CPP Project 93-0907 HIGH-FREQUENCY BASE BALANCE The high-natural-frequency balance is used to measure overail fluctuating wind loads at the base or a model structure. The balance has fundamental natural frequencies of about 500 Hz. and can accommodate a model of nearly any size building at scales from 1:200 to 1:500. with resulting natural frequencies of about 80 Hz to 200 Hz. Together with associated instrumentation and computer software, this system can measure the power spectral density of the external dynamic wind load over a bandwidth from 0 Hz to 1/2 of the model's natural frequency. Additional computer software allows the dynamic response of the structure to be easily computed for a wide range of values for mass, stiffness and damping.
~----=,..----d LO' 16.25".
~eacrion with 10.0 Ring SQ. Cut-out 1 -------0.5 SQ. Cross Beam with 0.15 x 0.25 x 1.25 Strain Section
- - - - -.......... 0.25 Sprung Plate
' I I '
u n - S t e m -Aluminum Tube
. Building Model Plate Strain Gauges to sense Base Moment
- Thermal !2 Air Flow Barriers All Dimensions given in inches.
CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. B-7
- CPP Project 93-0907 HYDROCARBON GAS TRACER SYSTEM The Hydrocarbon Gas Tracer System consists of a Flame Ioniza-tion Gas Chromatograph and a CPP-designed gas-sampling sys-tem. The dual column gas chro-matograph 1s equipped with:
0 Flame-ionization detector 0 Automatic linear tempera-ture programmer digital sensor pane (checks opera-ting parameters) 0 Automatic 2 cc sampling loops The gas chromatograph has the capability of operating four detectors simultaneously. These detectors are: 0 Flame ionization 0 Flame photometric
- i Electron capture 0 Thermal conductivity Also in use at CPP is a High Frequency Response flame ionization detector which combines an accurate method of real time hydrocarbon measurement with the ability to track varying concentra-tions with an averaging time of less than 0.01 s. This equipment has two independent FID systems which can be used to determine concentration time series at two locations simuitaneouslv.
The gas-sampling system is a state-of-the-art system. It features isokinetic withdrawal of up to fifty samples simultaneously. Its non-contaminating design and isothermal temperature control assure stable performance, resulting in reproducible samples with excellent accuracy over a wide range of sample concentrations. The sample reproducibility is +/-0.9 percent for 100 ppm and +/-0.4 percent for 1,000 ppm ethane in He. The contamination in the torm ot hydrocarbons (Cl through CS) is less than 0.001 ppm. Both the gas chromatograph and the gas sampling systems are interfaced with the CPP data acquisition and analysis system. Real-time data analysis is thus provided. All gas mixtures used in testing are commercially certified. Further verification is provided by our scientific staff with our own chromatograph, which is calibrated using certified primary standards. The linearity of the chromatograph is verified using a wide concentration range of certified primary standards .
- CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. B-8 CPP Project 93-0907 PRESSURE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM The Pressure Measurement System is designed to interface with software developed for the Data Acquisition and Analyzer System. The following hardware is presently available for pressure measurements: Pressure Transducers type: 15 differential pressure transducers range: . between +/-0.1 psi and +/-0.18 psi d~fferential accuracy: 0.25 percent of full-scale natural resonant frequency: > 5000 Hz Pressure-Tap Scannin~ Valve For pressure measurements, the data acquisition and analysis system software is capable of sampling and analyzing pressure data simultaneously at a rate of 5000 Hz. The Data Acquisition and Analyzer System also controls the positioning of the scanner which allows pressures to be sampled at sequential locations with a single transducer. Presently, 8 scanning valve systems are utilized, each allowing 48 pressures to be measured sequentially by one transducer. CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. B-9 CPP Project 93-0907 VELOCITY I TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT AND CALIBRATION SYSTEM Complete instrumentation is available for the measurement of lateral, longitudinal, and vertical mean velocity and turbulence intensity, Reynolds stress, mean temperature, and turbulent tempera-ture fluctuations. Prior to any measurement program, a detailed calibration of the velocity or temperature sensor is performed. The components of the system include:
- J Five TSI model 1053B utility anemometers.
- J Five TSI model 1056 variable decade modules
- J Five channel monitor and -power supply
~ Temperature switching module - TSI model 1125
- J Model 1125 TSI velocity calibrator
- J Model 1210 hot-film velocity sensors
- J Model 1287 split-film two-component velocity sensors
- J Model 1211 hot-film velocity sensor
- CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. B-10 CPP Project 93-0907 MISCELLANEOUS INSTRUMENTATION 0 Chart Recorders 0 Digital Multimeters 0 Oscilloscopes 0 Function Generators
- l Positive-Displacement Flow Meters 0 Digital Mass-Flow Meters 0 Linear Flow Meters 0 Power 5 upplies 0 Still Photography and Movie Camera Equipment 0 Video Recording System CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. B-11 CPP Project 93-0907 g CJ ol~3 BRISTLE CON~ ID D RED
- 4---CPP
~
CERMAK, PETERKA, PETERSEN, INC. u.i 0 D CEDAR
~
c:=:::: c:=:::: 1415 Blue Spruce Drive Fort Col lin1, Colorado 80524 ct CJ C::J C::J (303) 221-3371. CONIFER ,,., N I
. MULBERRY (HWY.14)
University Pork Holiday Inn PROSPECT Fort Collins
~
MorrioO I HORSETOOTH RD.
* ** PRIMARY ROUTE *
*H ALTERNATE ROUTE Stapleton Airport T*nuaiv.1989 CPP~
APPENDIX C CONCENTRATION DATA TABULATIONS CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-i CPP Project 93-0907
- APPENDIX C PROLOGUE Appendix C contains full scale concentrations for each run. The letter A, B, C, etc.,
following the run number stands for reruns (letter A is for the original run). The C/Q results are in the column labeled Cf with units labeled µg/m 3 . Since the so1:1rce strength Qf if 1.0 g/s for all runs; the Cf is effectively the C/Q value in µg/m 3 per g/s. The wind direction and speed are given by wind dir and Uaf, the anemometer full scale speed, respectively. Other abbreviations: Urf reference wind speed, full scale Urm reference wind speed, model Zref reference height, full scale Zan em anemometer height, full scale Zrefa reference height at anemometer, full scale n@anem boundary layer exponent at anemometer Cs calibration gas concentration Is calibration gas voltage response Atn
- Attenuation scale Chg background concentration CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-ii CPP Project 93-0907 (This page intentionally left blank.) CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc.
- C-1 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE. CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant
========================================================================
Run No. 101A Gas Parameters: Gas 1 llind dir 205.0 Cs (ppm) 502.0
- Urf (m/s) 1.85 Column 1 Is Cv> -3.92 Urm Cm/s) 1.50 Column. 1 Cbg (ppm) 4.74 Zref (m) 300 Column 1 Atn (-) 11 Uaf(m/s) .90 Column 2 Is (v) -3. 76 Zanem Cm> 3.05 ColUllfl 2 Cbg (ppm) 4.27 Zrefa Cm) 183 Column 2 Atn (-) 11 n @ anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 30.00.
Tracer cone (%) 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000 Buildings In Source name CONT BLDG Project 907 # sources operating 1 Date 05-10-93 Stack* height (ft) 3.3
--------~-------------------------------~-------------------------------
Location X Y Z I Descrip Cf (1)
<m> (m) <m> (µg/m3) 1 Service Bldg Int. 406.2 2 Service Bldg Int. 519.1 3 service Bldg Int. 131.6 4 Service Bldg Int. 141.5 5 Emergency CR Int. 379.3 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 403.7 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 403.9 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 436.2 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 447.4 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 551.6 11 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 571.6 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 582.9 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 591.2 14
- Alt Emerg. CR Int. 605.7 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 617.8 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 607.3 17 . Alt Emerg. CR Int. 605.8 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 598.9 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 581.2 20 Service Building 581.7 21 Service Bldg Int. 593.2 22 Service Bldg Int. . 560.4 23 Aux Building Roof 493.5 24 Aux Building Roof 883.5 25 Aux B.ui lding Roof 842.4 26 Alt Normal CR Int. 265.4 27 Normal CR intake 476.2 28 Smoke purge duct 541.2 29 Normal CR intake 512.8 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 475.0 31 Turbine Bldg Roof 3.8 32 Turbine Bldg Roof 13.6 33 Turbine Bldg Roof . 126.2 34 *Turbine Bldg Roof .o 35 Turbine Bldg Roof 5.8 36 Turbine Bldg Roof 63.3 37 Turbine Bldg Roof .o 38 Turbine Bldg Roof .8 39 Turbine Bldg Roof 53.1 40 Turbine Bldg Roof 2.8 41 Turbine Bldg Roof .o 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf 319.5 Maximums: 883.5 CPP1i!P
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-2 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant
========================================================================
Run No. 102A Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Wind dir 205.0
- Cs (ppm) 502.0 Urf Cm/s) 1.85 Column 1 Is Cv> -3.91 Urm Cm/s) 2.25 Coluin 1 Cbg (ppm) 8.85 Zref Cm> 300 Column 1 Atn (-) 11 Uaf(m/s) .90 Column 2 Is (v) -3.76 Zanem Cm> 3.05 Column 2 Cbg (ppm) 4.41 Zrefa Cm) 183 Column 2 Atn (-) 11 n @ anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 30.00 Tracer cone (%) 10.0 scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000 Buildings In Source name CONT BLDG Project 907 # sources operating 1 Date 05-10-93 Stack height Cft) 3.3 Location X Y Z I Descrip Cf (1)
Cm> Cm> Cm) (µg/m3>
---------------------------------------*-~-------------------------------
1 Service Bldg Int. 372.2 2 Service Bldg Int. 494.3 3 Service Bldg Int. 100.0 4 Service Bldg Int. 134.9 5 Emergency CR Int. 372.8 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 390.7 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 384.9 8 Alt Enierg. CR Int. 419.6 9 Alt Emerg. CR Ir:it. 401. 7 10 Alt Emerg. CR . Int. 546.1 11 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 541.0 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 566.5 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 550.2 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 574.9 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 574.5 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 596.6 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 584.3 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 597.2 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int; 583.7 20 Service Building 559.9 21 Service Bldg Int. 547.9 22 Service Bldg Int. 512.3 23 Aux Building Roof 440.4 24 Aux Building Roof 816.4 25 Aux Building Roof 798.7 26 Alt Normal CR Int. 270.3 27 Normal CR intake 412.1 28 Smoke purge duct 466.6 29 Normal CR intake 403.4. 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 407.0 31 Turbine Bldg Roof .o 32 Turbine Bldg Roof 16.3 33 Turbine Bldg Roof 120.8 34 Turbine Bldg Roof .o 35 Turbine Bldg Roof .6 36 Turbine Bldg Roof 72.8 37 Turbine Bldg Roof .o 38 Turbine Bldg Roof 1.2 39 Turbine Bldg Roof 36.4 40 Turbine Bldg Roof 4.8 41 Turbine Bldg Roof .o 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf 188.4 Maxi1111.111S:. 816.4 CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-3 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant
========================================================================
Run No. 103A Gas Parameters: Gas 1
\.lind dir 205.0 Cs (ppm) 502.0 Urf Cm/s) 1.85 Column 1 Is (v) -3.91 Urm (m/s) 3.00 Column 1 Cbg (ppm) 3.24 Zref (m) 300 Column 1 Atn (-) 11 Uaf(m/s) .90 Column 2 Is (v) -3.74 Zanem Cm> 3.05 Column 2 Cbg (ppm) 2.62 Zrefa (m) 183 Collllln 2 Atn (-) 11 n @ anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 30.00 Tracer cone (%) 10.0 Scale 300 Qf Cg/s) 1.000 Buildings In Source name CONT BLDG Project 907 # sources operating 1.
Date 05-10-93 Stack height (ft) 3.3 Location X Y Z I Descrip Cf (1) Cm> Cm> Cm) (µg/m3) 1 Service Bldg* Int. 388.8 2 Service Bldg Int. 491.4 3 Service Bldg Int. 115.2 4 Service Bldg Int. 127. 1 5 Emergency CR Int. 346.6 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 382.5 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 373.8 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 402.8 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 400.7 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 532.2 11 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 524. 1 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 548.3 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 538.1 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 562.7 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 556.7 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 582.4 17 AL t Emerg. CR Int. 564.6 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 581.5 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 535.8 20 Service Building 532.4 21 service Bldg Int. 533.0 22 Service Bldg Int. 480.5 23 Aux Building Roof 463.1 24 Aux Building Roof 824.6 25 Aux Building Roof 837.8 26 Alt Normal CR Int. 271.5 27 Normal CR intake 358.8 28 Smoke purge duct 420.2 29 Normal CR intake 390.8 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 385.2 31 Turbine Bldg Roof 1.9 32 Turbine Bldg Roof 27.5 33 Turbine Bldg Roof 153.8 34 Turbine Bldg Roof 1.0 35 Turbine Bldg Roof 15.3 36 Turbine Bldg Roof 88.1 37 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 38 Turbine Bldg Roof 6.5 39 Turbine Bldg Roof 57 .1 40 Turbine Bldg Roof 1.7 41 Turbine Bldg Roof .9 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf 137.7 Maximums: 837.8 CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-4 CPP Project 93-0907 . FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant
========================================================================
Run No. 104A Gas Parameters: Gas 1 IJind dir 205.0 Cs (ppm) 502.0 Urf Cm/s) 1.85 Column 1 Is Cv> -3.91 Urm Cm/s) 3.75 Column 1 Cbg (ppm) 3.46 Zref Cm) 300 Column 1 Atn (-) 11 Uaf(m/s) .90 Column 2 Is (V) -3.73 Zanem Cm) 3.05 Column 2 Cbg Cppm) 2.95 Zrefa Cm) 183 Collm'l 2 Atn (-) 11 n @. anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 30.00 Tracer cone (%) 10.0 Scale 300 Qf Cg/s) 1.000 Buildings In Source name CONT BLDG Project 907 # sources operating 1 Date 05-10-93 Stack height Cft) 3.3
---------------------*--------------------------~------------------------
Location X Y Z I Descrip Cf (1) Cm) (m) Cm> (µg/m3>
----.----------------------------------~---------------------------------
1 Service Bldg Int. 386.0
*2 Service Bldg Int *. 500.0 3 Service Bldg Int. 103.5 4 Service Bldg Int. 106.5 5 Emergency CR Int. 349.9 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 392.6
.7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 401.0 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 416.0 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int.- 421.4 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 562.4 11 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 549.6 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 572.7 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 559.9 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 586.6 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 574.1 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int; 594.4 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 584.6 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 593.6.
19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 551.2 20 Service Building 560.7 21 Service Bldg.Int. 550.0 22 Service Bldg Int. 469.9 23 Aux Building Roof 478.5 24 Aux Building Roof 863.3 25 Aux Building Roof 858.2 26 Alt Normal CR Int. 257.4 27 Normal CR intake 333.5 28 Smoke purge duct 380.5 29 Normal CR intake 383.9 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 377.9 31 Turbine Bldg Roof 1.6 32 Turbine Bldg Roof 23.9' 33 Turbine Bldg.Roof 146.0 34
- Turbine Bldg Roof .0 35 Turbine Bldg Roof 15.5 36 Turbine Bldg Roof 83.8 37 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 38 Turbine Bldg Roof 3.0 39 Turbine Bldg Roof 49.9 40 Turbine Bldg Roof .0.
41 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 42 . Lower Aux Bldg Rf 113.9 Maximums: 863.3 CPPl!!9
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-5 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant
============~===========================================================
Run No. 105A Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Wind dir 205.0 Cs (ppm) 502.0 Urf (m/s) 1.85. Column 1 Is (V) -3.90 Urm Cm/s) 3.00 Coli.ann 1 Cbg (ppm) 3.50 Zref (m) 300 Coli.ann 1 Atn (-) 11 Uaf(m/s) .90 Column 2 Is (v) -3.72 Zanem Cm> 3.05 Column 2 Cbg (ppm) 3.13 Zrefa Cm> 183 Coli.ann 2 Atn (-) 11 n iii anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 10.00 Tracer cone (%) 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000 Buildings In Source name- CONT BLDG Project 907 # sources operating 1
* *Date 05-10-93 Stacie height (ft) 3.3 Location X Y . Z I Descrip Cf <j)
(m) (m) (m) (µg/m ) .
---------------------------------~--------------------------------------
1 Service Bldg Int. 465.2 2 Service Bldg Int. 597.2 3 Service Bldg Int. 153.3 4 Service Bldg Int. 161.7 5 Emergency CR Int, . 431.6-6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 474.2 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 473.8 8' Alt Emerg. CR Int. 499.0 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 505.1 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int *. 670.4 11 Alt Emerg.* CR Int. 667.2 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 691.1 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 679.0 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 711.3 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 705.4 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 722.2 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 714.7 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 719.3 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 682.0 20 Service Building 686.3 21 Service Bldg Int. . 679.7 22 Service Bldg* Int. 614.8 23 Aux Building Roof 524.1
. 24 Aux Building Roof 988.3 25 Aux Building Roof . 969.3 26 Alt Normal CR Int. 277.7 27 Normal' CR intake 387.3 28 Smoke purge duct 459.6 29 Normal CR intake 451.0 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 442.6 31 Turbine Bldg Roof .2 32 Turbine Bldg Roof 23.3 33 Turbine Bldg Roof 169.3 34 Turbine Bldg Roof .0.
35 Turbine Bldg Roof 11.1 36 Turbine Bldg Roof 99.5 37 Turbine Bldg Roof 9.0 38 Turbine Bldg Roof 3.2 39 Turbine Bldg Roof 62.6 40 Turbine Bldg Roof .o 41 Turbine Bldg Roof* .o 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf 86.1
-------------------------~--------------~-----------------------~-------
Maximums: 988.3 CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-6 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESUtTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant
========================================================================
Run No. 106A Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Wind dir 205.0 Cs (ppm) 502.0 Urf Cm/s) 1.85 Column 1 Is (v) -3.90 Urm Cm/s) 3.00 Column 1 Cbg (ppm) 3.98 Zref Cm) 300 Column 1 Atn (-) 11 Uaf(m/s) .90 Colunn 2 Is (v) -3.72
*zanem Cm) 3.05 ColUTn 2 Cbg (ppm) 3.24 Zrefa Cm) 183 ColUIV'l 2 Atn (-) 11 n @ anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 20.00 Tracer cone (%) 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000 Buildings In Source name CONT BLDG Project 907 # sources operating 1 Date 05-10-93 Stack height (ft) 3.3 Location X Y Z I Descrip Cf (1)
(m) Cm) (m) (µg/m3> 1 Service Bldg Int. 484.7 2 Service Bldg Int. 587.4 3 .Service Bldg Int. 141. 7 4 Service Bldg Int. 153. 1 5 Emergency CR Int. 394~2 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. . 432.2 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 428.7 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 452.7. 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 452. 1 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 597.2 11 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 587.9 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 616. 1 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 604.4 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 635.0 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 620.6 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 651 .4 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 630.9 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 640.9 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 583.3 20 Service Building 589.3 21 Service Bldg Int. 589.0 22 Service Bldg Int. 520.7 23 Aux Building Roof 492.7 24 Aux Building Roof 919.4 25 Aux Building Roof 907.4 26 Alt Normal CR Int. 230.0 27 Normal CR intake 329.0 28 Smoke purge duct 433.2 29 Normal CR intake 486.3 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 490.4 31 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 32 Turbine Bldg Roof 21 .9 33 Turbine Bldg Roof 139.6 34 Turbine Bldg Roof 1.3 35 Turbine Bldg Roof 12.7 36 Turbine Bldg Roof 77.5 37 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 38 Turbine Bldg Roof 5.8 39 Turbine Bldg Roof 48.1 40 Turbine Bldg Roof .4 41 Turbine Bldg Roof .3 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf 105.1 919.4 Maxi muns: CPPJIP
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-7 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant
========================================================================
Run No. 107A Gas Parameters: Gas 1
\.lind dir 205.0 Cs (ppm) 502.0 Urf (m/s) 1.85 Column 1 Is (V) -3.94 Urm Cm/s) 3.00 Column 1 Cbg (ppm) 8.42 Zref (m) 300 Column 1 Atn (-) 11 Uaf(m/s) .90 Column 2 Is (V) -3. 76 Zanem (m) 3.05 Column 2 Cbg (ppm) 6.54 Zrefa (m) 183 Column 2 Atn (-) 11 n @ anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 30.00 Tracer cone (%) 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000 Buildings In Source name CONT BLDG Project 907 - # sources operating 1 Date 05-10-93 Stack height (ft) 3.3 Location x y Z I Descrip Cf (1)
(m) (m) Cm) (µg/m3) 1 Service Bldg Int. 416.0 2 Se.rvi ce Bldg Int. 496.7 3 Service Bldg Int. 121.8 4 Service Bldg Int. 125.0 5 Emergency CR Int. 328.7 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 364.5 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 353.2 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 395.0 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 384.6 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 495.9 11 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 499.5 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 524.7 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 506.4 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 531.9 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 520.2 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 553.6 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 556.2 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 551.2 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 628.2 20 Service Building 511.9 21 Service Bldg Int. 493.4 22 Service Bldg Int. 437.4 23 Aux Building Roof 460.4 24 Aux Building Roof 856.4 25 Aux Building Roof 842.7 26 Alt Normal CR Int. 209.9 27 Normal CR intake 320.2 28 Smoke purge duct 394.2 29 Normal CR intake 450.5 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 446.2 31 Turbine Bldg Roof 57.5 32 Turbine Bldg Roof 28.8 33 Turbine Bldg Roof 147.9 34 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 35 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 36 Turbine Bldg Roof 95.3 37 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 38 Turbine Bldg Roof 6.4 39 Turbine Bldg Roof 48.3 40 Turbine Bldg Roof 1.6 41 Turbine Bldg Roof 219.9 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf 112.2 Maximums: 856.4 CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-8 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant
========================================================================
Run No. 108A Gas Parameters: Gas 1
\.lind dir 205.0 Cs (ppm) 502.0 Urf (m/s) 1.85 Column 1 Is (V) -3.92 Urm (m/s) 3.00 Column 1 Cbg (ppm) 8.83 Zref Cm> 300 Column 1 Atn (-) 11 Uaf(m/s) .90 Column 2 Is (V) -3. 77 Zanem Cm) 3.05 Column 2 Cbg (ppm) 4.66 Zrefa Cm) 183 Column 2 Atn (-) 11 n @ anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 40.00 Tracer cone (%) 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000 Buildings In Source name CONT BLDG Project 907 # sources operating 1 Date 05-10-93 Stack height (ft) 3.3 Location X Y Z I Descrip Cf (1)
(m) Cm) Cm) (µg/m3> 1 Service Bldg Int. 450.3 2 Service Bldg Int. 529.4 3 Service Bldg Int. 143.0 4 Service Bldg Int. 151. 1 5 Emergency CR Int. 365.0 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 410.7 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 392.6 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 422.7 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 416.3 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 543.2 11 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 553.5 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 552.8 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 542.0 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 580.'4 15 Alt Emerg. CR Ir:it. 582.3 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 578.0 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 569.6 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 577.4 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 529.9 20 Service Building 538.4 21 Service Bldg Int. 537.4 22 Service Bldg Int. 479.1 23 Aux Building Roof 469.3 24 Aux Building Roof 851.4 25 Aux Building Roof 866.0 26 Alt Normal CR Int. 242.2 27 Normal CR intake 318.8 28 Smoke purge duct 420.3 29 Normal CR intake 459.5 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 471.9 31 Turbine Bldg Roof* .0 32 Turbine Bldg Roof 22.8 33 Turbine Bldg Roof 137.8 34 Turbine Bldg Roof 8.4 35 Turbine Bldg Roof 27.1 36 Turbine Bldg Roof 84.5 37 Turbine Bldg Roof 5.8 38 Turbine Bldg Roof 15.0 39 Turbine Bldg Roof 42.7 40 Turbine Bldg Roof 3.0 41 Turbine Bldg Roof 6.3 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf 167.3 Maximums: 866.0 CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-9 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant
========================================================================
Run No. 2D1A Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Wind dir 205.0 Cs (ppm) 502.0 Urf (m/s) 1.85 Column 1 Is (v) -3.93 Urm Cm/s) 3.00 Column -1 Cbg (ppm) 10. 10 Zref Cm> 300 Column 1 Atn (*) 11 Uaf(m/s) .90 Column 2 Is (V) -3.77 Zanem (in) 3.05 Column 2 Cbg (ppm) 7.45 Zrefa Cm> 183 Column 2 Atn (*) 11
- n @ anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 30.00 Tracer cone (%) 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000 Buildings In Source name CONT BLDG Project 907 # sources operating
- 1 Date 05-10-93* Stack height (ft) 3.3 L_ocation X Y Z I Descrip Cf (1)
Cm) Cm) Cm> (µg/m3> 1 Service Bldg Int. 497.5 2 Service Bldg Int. 558.4 3 Service Bldg Int. 134.4 4 Service Bldg Int. 151.8 5 Emergency CR Int. 377.7 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 412.2 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 436.9 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 430.6
*9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 440.7 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 563.2 11 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 561.2 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 596.8 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 578.9 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 598.4 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 608.8 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 607.2 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 589.6 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 590.4 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 598.9 20 Service Building 560.0 21 Service Bldg Int. 553.6 22 Service Bldg Int. 486.5 23 Aux Building Roof 486.8 24 Aux Building Roof 905.9 25 Aux Building Roof 916.7 26 Alt Normal CR Int. 222.9 27 Normal CR intake 326.3 28 Smoke purge duct 425.0
- 29. Normal CR intake 479.9 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 484.9 31 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 32 Turbine Bldg Roof 21.6
- 33. Turbine Bldg Roof 145.9 34 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 35 Turbine Bldg Roof 16.9 36 Turbine Bldg Roof 91.9 37 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 38 Turbine Bldg Roof 3.2 39 Turbine Bldg Roof 40.7 40 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 41 Turbine Bldg Roof 6. 1 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf 131.8 Maximums: 916.7
- CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-10 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant
========================================================================
Run No. 202A Gas Parameters: Gas 1
\.lind dir 200.0 Cs (ppm) 502.0 Urf Cm/s) 1.85 CollJlll'l 1 Is (V) *4.02 Urm Cm/s) 3.00 CollJlll'l 1 Cbg (ppm) 6.12 Zref Cm) 3DO Column 1 Atn (-) 11 Uaf(m/s) .90 Col1.111n 2 Is (V) -3.85 Zanem Cm> 3.05 Col1.111n 2 Cbg (ppm) 6.13 Zrefa Cm> 183 Colunn 2 Atn (-) 11 n @ anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 30.00 Tracer cone (%) 10.0 Scale 300 Qf Cg/s) 1.000 Buildings In Source name CONT BLDG Project 907 # sources operating 1 Date 05-10-93 Stack height (ft) 3.3 Location X Y Z I Descrip Cf (1)
Cm) Cm) Cm> cµg/m3) 1 Service Bldg Int. 444.6 2 Service Bldg Int. 527.5
. 3. Service Bldg Int. 142.4 4 Service Bldg Int. 152.8 5 Emergency.CR Int. 353.9 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 369.9 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 374.9 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 385.6 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 394.4 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 491.4 11 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 512.8 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 518.0 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 513.6 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 526.7 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 544.3 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 558.8 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 542.8.
18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 543.9 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 515.1 20 Service Building 482.0 21 Service Bldg Int. 488.8 22 Service Bldg Int. 442.0 23 Aux Building Roof 487.3 24 Aux Building Roof 811.2 25 Aux Building Roof 891.4 26 Alt Normal CR Int. 311.9 27 Normal CR intake 427.3 28 Smoke purge duct 478.9 29 Normal CR intake 462.6 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 380.9 31 Turbine Bldg Roof 8.2 32 Turbine Bldg Roof 55.6 33 Turbine Bldg Roof 261.7 34 Turbine Bldg Roof* .0 35
- Turbine Bldg Roof 38.2 36 Turbine Bldg Roof 166.9 37 Turbine Bldg Roof 5.2 38 Turbine Bldg Roof .8 39 Turbine Bldg Roof . 107.2.
40 Turbine Bldg Roof .0
- 41. Turbjne Bldg Roof .0 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf 153.6 Maximuns: 891.4 CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-11 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant
========================================================================
Run No. 203A Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Wind dir 190.0 Cs (ppm) 502.0 Urf Cm/s) 1.85 Column 1 Is (V) -4.02 Urm Cm/s) 3.00 Column 1 Cbg Cppm) 5.12 Zref Cm> 300 Column 1 Atn (*) 11 Uaf(m/s) .90 Column 2 Is (V) -3.87 Zanem Cm> 3.05 Column 2 Cbg (ppm) 4.28 Zrefa (m) 183 Column 2 Atn (*) 11 n @ anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 30.00 Tracer cone (%) 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000 Buildings In Source name CONT BLDG Project 907 # sources operating 1 Date 05-10-93 Stack height Cft) 3.3 Location X Y Z / Descrip Cf (1) (m) (m) Cm> (µg/m3> 1 Service Bldg Int. 356.5 2 Service Bldg Int. 336.9 3 Service Bldg Int. 184.6 4 Service Bldg Int. 207.0 5 Emergency CR Int. 240.2 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 249.0 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 209.4 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 235.0 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 232.6 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 217.9 11 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 224.4 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 234.2 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 243.2 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 256.8 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 255.9 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 273.9 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 286.7 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 295.7 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 260.4 20 Service Building 201.5 21 Service Bldg Int. 218.4 22 *Service Bldg Int. 196.9 23 Aux Building Roof 791. 7 24 Aux Building Roof 1115.1 25 Aux Building Roof 1163.2 26 Alt Normal CR Int. 435.8 27 Normal CR intake 571.1 28 Smoke purge duct 641.2 29 Normal CR intake 624.4 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 562.6 31 Turbine Bldg Roof 68.3 32 Turbine Bldg Roof 286.4 33 Turbine Bldg Roof 643.9 34 Turbine Bldg Roof 48.2 35 Turbine Bldg Roof 204.9 36 Turbine Bldg Roof 517.5 37 Turbine Bldg Roof 24.8 38 Turbine Bldg Roof 133.8 39 Turbine Bldg Roof 397.0 40 Turbine Bldg Roof 10. 1 41 Turbine Bldg Roof 25.5 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf 291.8 Maximums: 1163.2
- CPPl!!P
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-12 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant
========================================================================
Run No. 204A Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Wind dir 210.0 Cs (ppm) 502.0 Urf Cm/s) 2.01 Colunn 1 Is Cv) *4.00 Urm Cm/s) 3.00 ColUl!Y'I 1 Cbg (ppm) 4.77 Zref Cm) 300 Column 1 Atn (-) 11 Uaf(m/s) .89 Column 2 Is Cv> -3.89 Zanem Cm) 10.00 Column 2 Cbg (ppm) 4.13 Zrefa Cm> 600 Column 2 Atn (-) 11 n @ anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 30.00 Tracer cone (%) 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000 Buildings In Source name CONT. BLDG Project 907 # sources operating 1 Date 05-11-93 Stack height (ft) 3.3 Location X Y Z I Descrip Cf ( 1) (m) Cm) Cm) (µg/m3> 1 Service Bldg Int. 275.3 2 Service Bldg Int. 294.3 3 Service Bldg Int. 117.2 4 Service Bldg Int. 119.0 5 Emergency CR Int. 294.7 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 314.3 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 308.6 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 307.9 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 318.3 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 363.4 11 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 368.9 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 374.1 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 382.1 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 392.0 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 385.6 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 384.8 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 393.9 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 386.3 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 368.9 20 Service Building 362.0 21 Service Bldg Int. 378.6 22 Service Bldg Int. 354.2 23 Aux Building Roof 349.5 24 Aux Building Roof 780.3 25 Aux Building Roof 685.9 26 Alt Normal CR Int. 252.3 27 Normal CR intake 337.7 28 Smoke purge duct 404.1 29 Normal CR intake 470.2 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 454.7 31 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 32 Turbine Bldg Roof 2.9 33 Turbine Bldg Roof 30.5 34 Turbine Bldg Roof 7.8 35 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 36 Turbine Bldg Roof 9.3 37 Turbine Bldg Roof 7.6 38 Turbine Bldg Roof 7.8 39 Turbine Bldg Roof 3.5 40 Turbine Bldg Roof 2.9 41 Turbine Bldg Roof 7.6 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf 44.9 Maximums: 780.3 CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen,. Inc. C-13 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant
========================================================================
Run No. 205A Gas Parameters:* Gas 1 Wind dir 220.0 Cs (ppm) 502.0 Urf (m/s) 2.01 Col1.111n 1 Is (V) -4.14 Urm (m/s) 3.00 Coll.llV'I 1 Cbg (ppm) 5.70 Zref (m) 300 Column 1 Atn (-) 11 Uaf(m/s) .89 Column 2 Is Cv> *4.01 Zanem Cm> 10.00 Column 2 Cbg (ppm) 5.26 Zrefa Cm> 600 Coll.llV'I 2 Atn (-) 11 n @ anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 30.00 Tracer cone.(%) 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000 Buildings In Source name CONT. BLDG Project 907 # sources operating 1 Date 05-11-93 Stack height (ft) 3.3 Location X *y
- Z I Descrip Cf
1 Service Bldg Int. 137.5 2 Service Bldg Int. 274.8 3 Service Bldg Int. 31.5 4 Service Bldg Int. 34.6 5 Emergency.CR Int. 282.4 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 290.8 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 362.9 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 299.8 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 289.1 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 484.6 11 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 498.4 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. - 517.8 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int
- 528.0 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 537.9 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 557.5 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 568.4 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 572.2 18 Alt Emerg. CR Irit. 591.2 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 593.7 20 Service Building 517.8 21 Service Bldg Int. 540.0 22 Service Bldg Int. 497.8 23 Aux Building Roof 540.7 24 Aux Building Roof 983.7 25 Aux Building Roof 891.6 26 Alt Normal CR Int. 42.9 27 Normal CR intake 85.2 28 Smoke*purge duct 163.4 29 Normal' CR intake 213.3 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 280.4 31 Turbine Bldg Roof .o 32 Turbine Bldg Roof 4.8 33 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 34 Turbine Bldg Roof .0.
35 Turbine Bldg Roof .o 36 *Turbine Bldg Roof .. ,,:.,::.'/j,*;O-* 37 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 38 Turbine Bldg Roof .o 39 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 40 Turbine Bldg Roof .o 41 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf 13.8 983.7 Maximums:
- CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-:14
- CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS*
Palisades Nuclear Power Plant
========================================================================
Run No. 206A Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Wind dir 230.0 Cs (ppm) 502.0 Urf. Cm/s) 2.01 Column 1 Is (V) -4.02 Urm Cm/s) 3.00 Column 1 Cbg (ppm) 8.75 Zref Cm> 300 Column 1 Atn (-) 11 Uaf (m/s) .89 Coli.mn 2 Is (V) -3.87 Zanem Cm) 10.00 Column 2 Cbg (ppm) 4.15 Zrefa Cm) 600 Column 2 Atn (-) 11 n iii anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 30.00 Tracer cone. (%) 10.0 Scale 300. Qf (g/s) 1.000 Buildings In Source name CONT BLDG Project 907. # sources operating 1 Date 05-11-93 Stack height Cft) 3.3 Location x y Z I Descrip Cf (1) Cm> Cm) Cm) cµg/m3>
---------~--------------------------------------------------------------
1 Service Bldg Int. 119.5 2 Service Bldg Int. 258.8 3 Service Bldg Int. .0 4 Service Bldg Int. 15. 1 5 Emergency CR Int. 258.3. 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 293.9 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 338.4 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 327.6 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 326.0 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 501.1 11 Alt Emerg *. CR Int. 518.7 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 548.4 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 536.6 14* Alt Emerg. CR Int. 589.3 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 580.1 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 635.1 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 619.5 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 656.7 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 640.9 20 Service Building 529.8 21 Service Bldg Int. 586.4 22 Service Bldg Int. 536.9 23 Aux Building Roof 315.6 24 Aux Building Roof 1106.1 25 Aux Building Roof 1046.3 26 Alt Normal CR Int. 94.6 27 Normal CR *intake 173.4 28 Smoke purge duct 268.8 29 Normal CR intake 299.7 30 Alt Normal CR In*t. 382.1 31 Turbine Bldg Roof 2.1 32 Turbine Bldg Roof 4.3 33 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 34 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 35 Turbine Bldg Roof 2.1 36 Turbine Bldg Roof 7.9 37 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 38 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 39 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 40 Turbine Bldg Roof 5.7 41 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf 73.1 Maximums: 1106. 1 CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-15 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant.
========================================================================
Run No. 207A Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Wind dir 180.0 Cs (ppm) 502.0 Urf Cm/s) 1.85 Column 1 Is (v) -4.04 Urm Cm/s) 3.00 Column 1 Cbg (ppm) 10.06 Zref Cm) 300 Column 1 Atn (-) 11 Uaf(m/s) .90 Column 2 Is (v) -3.89 Zanem Cm) 3.05 Column 2 Cbg (ppm> 10.72 Zrefa Cm) 183 Colunn 2 Atn (-) 11 n iii anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 30.00 Tracer cone (%) 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000 Buildings In _ Source name CONT BLDG Project 907 # sources operating 1 Date 05-10-93 . Stack height Cft) 3.3 Location X Y
- Z / Descrip. Cf cp Cm) Cm) Cm) (µg/m >
1 Service Bldg Int. 317.6 2 Service Bldg Int. 126.4 3 Service Bldg Int. 360.9 4 Service Bldg Int. 386.1 5 Emergency CR Int. . 262.5. 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 242.7 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 193.1 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 217.9 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 207.3 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 31.8 11 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 29.8 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int
- 29.5
. 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 51.4 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 55.1 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 58.2 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 59.7 17 Alt Emerg._ CR Int. 90.2
. 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 93.0 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 94.0 20 Service Building 24.8 21 Service Bldg Int. 49.2 22 Service Bldg Int. 79.1 23 Aux Building Roof 1404.0 24 Aux Building Roof 3373.6 25 Aux Building Roof 2418.9 26 Alt Normal CR Int. 620.3 27 Normal CR intake 84(>.3 28 Smoke purge duct 1805.8 29 Normal CR intake 2659.7 30 ~Lt Normal CR Int. 2754.9 31 Turbine Bldg Roof 46.2 32 Turbine Bldg Roof 131.0 33 Turbine Bldg Roof 640.5
- 34. Turbine Bldg Roof 31.0.
35 Turbine Bldg Roof 96.2 36 Turbine Bldg Roof 203.9 37 Turbine Bldg Roof 18.6 38 Turbine Bldg Roof 38.8 39 Turbine Bldg Roof 109.6 40 Turbine Bldg Roof 1.6 41 Turbine Bldg Roof 16;4 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf 106.2 Maximums: 3373.6
- CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-16 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant
========================================================================
Run No. 207B Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Wind dir 180.0 Cs (ppm) 502.0 Urf (m/s) 1.85 ColUlll"I 1 Is (V) -4.03 Urm Cm/s) 3.00 Coll.llll'l 1 Cbg (ppm) 2.86 Zref Cm) 300 Column 1 Atn (-) . 11 Uaf(m/s) .90 Column 2. Is (v) -3.89 Zanem Cm) 3.05 ColUllU'l 2 Cbg (ppm) 2.97 Zrefa Cm) 183 ColUllV'l 2 Atn (-) 11 n @ anem .213 Total vol flow Ccc/s) 30.00 Tracer cone (%) 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000 Buildings In Source name CONT BLDG Project 907 # sources operating 1 Date 05-10-93 Stack height (ft) 3.3 Location X Y Z I Descrip Cf (1) (m) Cm> Cm> (µg/m3) 1 Service Bldg Int. 237.7 2 Service Bldg Int. 154.4 3 Service Bldg Int. 175. 7 4 Service Bldg Int. 208.7
.5 Emergency CR Int. 167.5 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 156.0 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 121.1 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 142.8 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 142.8 10 Alt. Emerg. CR Int. 74.5 11 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 62.0 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 76.0 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 89.7 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 92.3 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 103.2 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 104.0 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 117.4
- 18. Alt Emerg. CR Int. 121.1 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 109.,
20 Service Building 65.2" 21 Service Bldg Int. 83.0 22 Service Bldg Int. 12.2 23 Aux Building Roof 793.2 24 Aux Building Roof 1268.7 25 Aux Building Roof 1244.0 26 Alt Normal CR Int. 370.9 27 Normal CR intake 525.6 28 Smoke purge duct 647.2 29 Normal CR intake 642.9 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 616.9 31 Turbine Bldg Roof 252.7
. 32 Turbine Bldg Roof 631.6 33 Turbine Bldg Roof 1051.1 34 Turbine Bldg Roof 173.0 35 Turbine Bldg Roof 492.7 36 Turbine Bldg Roof 931.2 37 Turbine Bldg Roof 105.4 38 Turbine Bldg Roof 318.9 39 Turbine Bldg Roof 730.4 40 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 41 Turbine Bldg Roof 16.4 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf 253.7 Maxi muns: 1268.7 CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-17 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power .Plant
========================================================================
Run No. 208A Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Wind dir 205.0 Cs (ppm) 502.0 Urf (m/s) 1.85 column 1 Is Cv> -3.94 Urm (m/s) 3.00 Collilll 1 Cbg (ppm) 12.60 Zref Cm> 300 Colunn 1 Atn (-) 11 Uaf(m/s) . 90 Column 2 Is (v) -3.79 . Zanem (m) 3.05 Colunn 2 Cbg (ppm) 7.28 Zref a (m) 183 Column 2 Atn (-) 11 n @ anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 30.00 Tracer cone (%) 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000 Buildings In Source name CONT BLDG Project 907 # sources operating 1 Date 05-10-93 Stack height (ft) 3.3 Location i< y Z I Descrip Cf cp (µg/m ) . Cm> Cm) Cm> 1 Service Bldg Int. 421.2 2 Service Bldg Int. 489.7 3 Service Bldg Int*. . 87.1 4 Service Bldg Int. 116.9 5 Emergency CR I n.t. 364.6. 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 356.2 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 348.5 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 381.6 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 358.5 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 499.3 11 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 496.8 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 527.1 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 513.6 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 539.8 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 532.8
- 5 k,gu( ,l 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 557.3 fh..'S' (IJV\ ~
17 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. Alt Emerg. CR Int. 526.6 566.8 ~ )..A fC.O/" J..,J. 19 20 Alt Emerg. CR Int. Service. Building 519.8 516.7 ,~ ""',* rt-- 21 22 Service Bldg Int. Service Bldg Int. 483.1 446.0 v-'1 . 0 ~ J3 ,. fb-f ,.,:t. Aux Building Roof 443.3 /Lrfl"- ~ . '~
- 23 24 Aux Building Roof 882.4 £, y: c.P--f ,... . j..A" ~ ']) '.
25 26 Aux Building Roof Alt Normal CR Int.* 811.0
.224.2 ~ . cxA Af~ r 27 Normal CR intake 323.3 -fPl I VI . II'-"
vJ6.s r1 28 Smoke purge duct 435.7 * ).. µtJ- . ~.>' I 29 30 Normal CR intake Alt Normal CR Int. 484.6. 470.6 (!MJ ' rfM. ~ 31 32 Turbine Bldg Roof Turbine Bldg Roof
.0 18.3 ~ ;. '"' # f3' 33 34 Turbine Bldg Roof Turbine Bldg Roof 177.3 23.1 ii fl'1~
35 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 36 Turbine Bldg Roof
- 80.3 37 Turbine Bldg Roof 57.3 38 . Turbine Bldg Roof 34.2 39 Turbine Bldg Roof 45.9 40 Turbine Bldg Roof 2.4 41 Turbine Bldg Roof .0-
- 42. Lower Aux Bldg Rf 117. 7 .
Maximuns: 882.4
- CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-18 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant
========================================================================
Run No. 208B Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Wind dir 205.0 Cs (ppm) 502.0 Urf (m/s) 5.54 Column 1 Is (v) -3.98 Urm (m/s) 3.00 ColUllTI 1 Cbg (ppm) 4.79 Zref (m) 300 Column 1 Atn (-) 11 Uaf(m/s) 2.68 Column 2 Is Cv) -3.82 Zanem Cm) 3.05 Column 2 Cbg (ppm) 4.59 Zrefa (m) 183 Column 2 Atn (-) 11 n @ anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 30.00 Tracer cone (%) 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000 Buildings In Source name CONT BLDG Project 907 # sources operating 1 Date 05-10-93 Stack height (ft) 3.3 Location X Y Z I Descrip Cf (1) Cm) Cm) Cm> (µg/m3) 1 Service Bldg Int. 102.7 2 Service Bldg Int. 149.2 3 Service Bldg Int. 23.8 4 Service Bldg Int. 21.8 5 Emergency CR Int. 91.4 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 102.4 7 Alt Emerg.- CR Int. 111.1 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 113. 7 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 117.4 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 172.4 11 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 157.2 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 180.0 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 178.7 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 183.2 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 191.1 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 192.7 - 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 197.6 18 Alt Emerg *. CR Int. 200.6 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 198.7 20 Service Building 175.3 21 Service Bldg Int. 182.5 22 Service Bldg Int. 160.8 23 Aux Building Roof 179.7 24 Aux Building Roof 312.2 25 Aux Building Roof 297.4 26 Alt Normal CR Int. 95.3 27 Normal CR intake 140.2 28 Smoke purge duct 180.3 29 Normal CR intake 197.4 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 189.3 31 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 32 Turbine Bldg Roof 8.2 33 Turbine Bldg Roof 42.8 34 Turbine Bldg Roof .o 35 Turbine Bldg Roof 3.3 36 Turbine Bldg Roof 25.5 37 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 38 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 39 Turbine Bldg Roof 16.7 40 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 41 Turbine Bldg Roof .o 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf 46.9 Maximums: 312.2 CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-19 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant
========================================================================
Run No. 209A .Gas Parameters: Gas 1
\Jind dir 205.0 Cs (ppm) 502.0 Urf Cm/s) 1.85 .Column 1 Is (v) -4._11 Urm Cm/s)
- 3.00 Column 1 Cbg (ppm) 9.76 Zref Cm) 300 Column 1 Atn (-) 11 UafCm/s) .90 Column 2 Is (v) -3.96 Zanem Cm) 3.05 Column 2 Cbg Cppm). 9.64 Zrefa Cm) 183 Column 2 Atn (-) 11 n @ anem .213 Total vol flow Ccc/s) 30.00 Tracer cone (%) 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000 Buildings In Source name CONT BLDG Project 907 # sources operating 1 Date 05-10-93 Stack height Cft) 3.3
*---------------~-----*---------------------------------------------------
Location X Y Z I Descrip . Cf C1) Cm) Cm) Cm) (µg/m3) 1 Service Bldg Int. 401.6 2 Service Bldg Int. 496.5 3 Service Bldg Int. 123.9 4
- Service Bldg Int,* 122.6 5 Emergency CR Int .. 356.9 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 381.5 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 387.7 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 399:8 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 416.3 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 537.6 11 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 491.0 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 549.8 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 556.2 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 562.0 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 558.4 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 567.3 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. . 578.2 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 572.6 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 548.9 20 Service Building 532.3 21 Service Bldg Int. 540.1 22 Service Bldg Int. 501.8*
23 Aux Building Roof 523.3 24 Aux Building Roof 925.2 25 Aux Building Roof 905.1" 26 Alt Normal CR. Int. "388.3 27 Normal CR intake 483.7 28 Smoke purge duct 573.4 29 Normal CR-intake 629.5 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 589.4 31 Turbine Bldg Roof 36.6 32 Turbine Bldg Roof 51.0 33 Turbine Bldg Roof 196.4 34 Turbine Bldg Roof 30.5 35 Turbine Bldg Roof 44.7 36 Turbine Bldg Roof 125.6 37 Turbine Bldg Roof. 24.9 38 Turbine Bldg Roof 44.2 39 Turbine Bldg Roof 90.9
. 40 Turbine Bldg Roof 15.2 41 Turbine Bldg Roof 26.4 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf 204.1 Maximums: 925.2 CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-20 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant
========================================================================
Run No. 210A Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Wind dir 205.0 Cs (ppm) 502.0 Urf Cm/s) 1.85 *Column 1 Is (v) -4.07 Urm (m/s) 3.00 Column 1 Cbg Cppm) 2. 71 Zref Cm> 300 Colunvi 1 Atn (-) 11 Uaf(m/s) .90 Coluim 2 Is (V) -3.96 Zanem Cm> 3.05 Column 2 Cbg (ppm) 2.91 Zrefa Cm> 183 Coluim 2 Atn (-) 11 n @ anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 30.00 Tracer cone (%) 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000 Buildings In Source name CONT BLDG Project 907 # sources operating 1 Date 05-10-93 Stack height (ft) 3.3 Location X Y Z I Descrip Cf (1) Cm) Cm> Cm> (µg/m3) 1 Service Bldg Int. 335.5 2 Service Bldg Int. 445.1 3 Service Bldg Int. 5.2 4 Service Bldg Int. 44. 1 5 Emergency CR Int. 256.3 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 303.6 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 308.8 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 319.6 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 362.9 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 524.3 11 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 471.0 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 531.9 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 536.2 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 544.8 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 545.1 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 546.3 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 556.9 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 556.2 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 539.2 20 Service Building 518.9 21 Service Bldg Int. 530.3 22 Service Bldg Int. 490.8 23 Aux Building Roof 539.9 24 Aux Building Roof 912.3 25 Aux Building Roof 902.8 26 Alt Normal CR Int. 351.5 27 Normal CR intake 465.8 28 Smoke purge duct 542.5 29 Normal CR intake 584.3 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 555.4 31 Turbine Bldg Roof 27.4 32 Turbine Bldg Roof 39.6 33 Turbine Bldg Roof 158.5 34 Turbine Bldg Roof 25.1 35 Turbine Bldg Roof 29.6 36 Turbine Bldg Roof 86.7 37 Turbine Bldg Roof 21.5 38 Turbine Bldg Roof 20.5 39 Turbine Bldg Roof 50.4 40 Turbine Bldg Roof 8.4 41 Turbine Bldg Roof 16.3 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf 167.4 43 Service Bldg Expan 203.7 44 Service Bldg Expan 137.0 45 Service Bldg Expan 96.3 Maximums: 912.3 CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-21 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant
========================================================================
Run No. 211A Gas Parameters: Gas 1
\Jind dir 200.0 Cs (ppm) 502.0 Urf (m/s) 1.85 Column 1 Is Cv) -4.05 Urm Cm/s) 3.00 Column 1 Cbg (ppm> 7.56 Zref Cm> 300 Column 1 Atn (-) 11 UafCm/s) .90 Column 2 Is (v) -3.93 Zanem (m) 3.05 Column 2 Cbg (ppm) 7.42 Zrefa Cm> 183 Column 2 Atn (-) 11 n @ anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 30.00 Tracer cone (%) 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000 Buildings In Source name CONT BLDG Project 907 # sources operating 1 Date 05-10-93 Stack height Cft) 3.3 Location X Y Z / Descrip Cf C1)
(m) Cm) Cm) Cµg/m3) 1 Service Bldg Int. 358.0 2 Service Bldg Int. 490.9 3 Service Bldg Int. 15.6 4 Service Bldg Int. 23.8 5 Emergency CR Int. 212.9
') 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 249.7 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 267.2 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 277.3 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 305.9 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int*. 477.0 11 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 412.4 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 499.3 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 515.8 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int . 519.3 15 . Alt Emerg. CR Int. 531.5 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 534.6 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 555.3 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 556.1 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 530.7 20 Service Building 462.4 21 Service Bldg Int. 492.8 22 Service Bldg Int. 451. 7 23 Aux Building Roof 526.3 24 Aux Building Roof 901.0 25 Aux Building Roof 952.0 26 Alt Normal CR Int. 275.0 27 Normal CR intake 387.8 28 Smoke purge duct 512.4 29 Normal CR intake 600.7 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 567.7 31 Turbine Bldg Roof 21.6 32 Turbine Bldg Roof 66.1 33 Turbine Bldg Roof 253.8 34 Turbine Bldg Roof 25.3 35 Turbine Bldg Roof 43.9 36 Turbine Bldg Roof 160.5 37 Turbine Bldg Roof 28.3 38 Turbine Bldg Roof *33.0 39 Turbine Bldg Roof 109.4 40 Turbine Bldg Roof 6.9 41 Turbine Bldg Roof 16.4 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf 179.0 43 *Service Bldg Expan 167.5 44 Service Bldg Expan 145.9 45 Service Bldg Expan 142.2 Maximums: 952.0 CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen~ Inc. C-22 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant
========================================================================
Run No. 212A Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Wind dir 190.0 Cs Cppm) 502.0 Urf (m/s) 1.85 Coll.Jin 1 Is (V) -4.05 Urm Cm/s) 3.00 Coll.Jin 1 Cbg (ppm) 3.85 Zref Cm) 300 Column 1 Atn (-) 11 Uaf(m/s) .90 Colum 2 Is cv> -3.90 Zanem Cm> 3.05 Colunn 2 Cbg (ppm> 4.25 Zref a Cm> 183 Colum 2 Atn (-) 11 n iii anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 30.00 Tracer cone (%) 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000 Buildings In Source name CONT BLDG Project. 907 # sources operating 1 Date 05-10-93 Stack height (ft) 3.3 Location x y Z I Descrip Cf cp Cm> Cm> Cm> (µg/m > 1 Service Bldg Int. 337.5 2 Service Bldg Int. 317.9 3 Service Bldg Int. 23.1 4 Service Bldg Int. 71.2 5 Emergency CR Int. 180.3 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 187.2 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int.
- 168.4
-8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 187.9 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 187.0 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 204.9 11 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 215.3 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 215.0 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 228.7 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 243.6 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int; 263.0 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 259.1 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 269.7 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 2n.2 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 254.8 20 Service Building *194.1 21 Service Bldg Int. 210.9 22 Service Bldg Int. 196.4 23 Aux Building Roof 849.4 24 Aux Building Roof 1215.8 25 Aux Building Roof 1239.8 26 Alt Normal CR Int *. 394.4 27 Normal CR intake 599.8 28 Smoke purge duct. 607.9 29 Normal CR intake . 563.3 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 499.6 31 Turbine Bldg Roof 83.5 32 Turbine Bldg Roof 297.8 33
- Turbine Bldg Roof 698.2 34 Turbine Bldg Roof 39.4 35 Turbine Bldg Roof 220.5
*-~.:;'f-,._
36 Turbine Bldg Roof 554.5 37 Turbine Bldg Roof* 14.9 38 Turbine Bldg Roof 126.1 39 Turbine Bldg Roof 434.4 40 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 41 Turbine Bldg Roof 10.4 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf 359.6 43 Service Bldg Expan 224.3 44 .Service Bldg Expan 273.8 45 Service Bldg Expan 290.6 Maxi muns: 1239.8 CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-23 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS - Palisades Nuclear Power.Plant
======================================================================== .
Run No. 213A Gas Parameters: Gas 1
\.lind dir 220.0 Cs. (ppm) 502.0 Urf (m/s) 2.01 Col1.1111'1 1 Is (V) *4.03 Urm (m/s) 3.00 Column 1 Cbg Cppm) 8.34 Zref Cm) 300 Column 1 Atn (-*) 11 Uaf(m/s) .89 Column 2 Is (v) -3.88 Zanem (m) 10.00 Column 2 Cbg (ppm) 3.23 Zrefa (m) 600 Colunn 2* Atn (-) 11 n @ anem -_ .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 30.00 Tracer cone (%) 10.0-Scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000
- Buildings In Source name CONT BLDG Project 907 # sources operating 1 Date 05-11-93 Stack height (ft) 3.3
-~-------------------------~---~---------~------------------~-----------
Location X Y *z I Descrip Cf
1 Service Bldg Int. 97.-1 2 Service Bldg Int. . 241 .0 3 Service Bldg Int. .0 4 Service Bldg Int. 7.2 5 Emergency CR Int. - 214. 1 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 283.9 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 349.0-8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 286.8 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 271.9. 10 *Alt Emerg. CR Int. 476.3. 11 - Alt Emerg. CR-Int. 422.7 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int *. 502.1 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 500.5 14 Alt Emerg. 'CR Int. 544.3 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 551.4. 16 Alt Emerg *. CR lrit. 565.7 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 554.2 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 586.5 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 581.0 20 *service Building 499.9 21 Service Bldg Int. 527.3 22 Service Bldg Int. 525.7 23 . Aux Building Roof 559.7 24 Aux Building Roof - 1067.8 25 Aux Building Roof 940.4 26 Alt Normal CR Int. 95.8 27 Normal CR intake 165.2 28 Smoke purge duct 261.1 29
- Normal CR intake 256~8 30
- Alt Normal CR Int. 341.9 31 Turbine.Bldg Roof .0 32 Turbine Bldg Roof 6.4 33 Turbine Bldg Roof 17.9 34 Turbine Bldg Roof. .7.2 35 Turbine Bldg Roof 8.3 .
36 turbine Bldg Roof 9.3* 37 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 38 Turbine Bldg Roof 10.7 39 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 40 Turbine Bldg Roof 7.2 41 Turbine Bldg Roof .o 42 - Lower Aux Bldg Rf 29.3 43 Service Bldg Expan 145.3 44 Service Bldg Expan 125.9 45 Service Bldg Ex_pan 5.5 Maximums: 1067.8
- CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-24 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant ======================================================================== Run No. 301A Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Gas 2 Wind dir 205.0 Cs (ppm) 986.0 502.0 Urf Cm/s) 1.85 Colutn 1 Is (V) *4.26 -3.98 Urm Cm/s) 3.00 Coll.1111'1 *1 Cbg (ppm) 7.41 4.04 Zref Cm) 300 Colutn 1 Atn (-) 11 11 Uaf(m/s) .90 Colutn 2 Is (V) -4.06 -3.87 Zanem Cm) 3.05 Colutn 2 Cbg (ppm) 7.53 4.67 Zrefa Cm> 183 Colutn 2 Atn (*) 11 11 n iil*anem .213 Total vol flow Ccc/s) 12.00 12.00 Tracer cone (%)
- 40.0 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000 1.000 Buildings In Source name VENT STK SIRW VENT Project 907 # sources operating 1 1 Date 05-10-93 Stack height Cft) 3.3 3.3 Locatfon x y Z I Descrip Cf
.
Cm> Cm> Cm> cµg/m > . (µg/m > 1 Service Bldg Int. 393.6 516.8 2 Service Bldg Int. 333.7 470.4 3 Service Bldg Int. 82.3 147.2 4 Service Bldg Int. 100.8 163.9 5 Emergency CR Int. 249.2 332.0 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 281.2 334.2 7 Alt Emerg: CR Int. 222.6 318.2 .8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 287.2 356.6 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 248.7 346.6 10 Alt.Emerg. CR Int. 171.4' 280.6 11 Alt Emerg., CR Int. 162.6 308.7 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 155.9 284.5 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 147.8 293.5 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 168.7 311.8 15 Alt Emerg~* CR Int. 159.1
- 327.6 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 142.2 294.2 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 141.7 344.7 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 154.1 329.3 19 'Alt Emerg. CR Int. 144.3 .. 361.7 20 Service Building 133.1. 255.2 21 Service Bldg Int. 115.6 261.4 22 Service Bldg Int. 99.4 212.4 23 Aux Building Roof 435.6 . 2982.8 24 Aux Building Roof 515.1 4212.5 25 Aux Building Roof 548.7 3062.4 26 Alt Normal CR Int.* 12.8 2720.0 27 Normal CR intake 18.3 5346.3 28 Smoke purge duct 16.4 7454:7 29 Normal CR intake 12.2 8395.5 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 22.8 7610.6 31 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 11.4 32 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 33 Turbine Bldg Roof* .0 20.8 34 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 35 Turbine Bldg Roof 5.2 .0 36 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 9.7 37 . Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 38 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 39 Turbine Bldg Roof '1. 7. 13.3 40 Turbine Bldg Roof .0' .o 41 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .o 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf .0 .0 8395.5 Maxi muns: 548.7 CPPl!P
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-25 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant* ======================================================================== Run No. 302A Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Gas 2 Wind dir 200.0 Cs (ppm) 986.0 502.0 Urf Cm/s) 1.85 Co lU11V1 1 Is (V) -4.27 -4.00 Urm Cm/s) 3.00 Colunn 1 Cbg (ppm) 21.96 4.52 Zref Cm) 300 Coli.inn 1 Atn (*) 11 11 Uaf(m/s) .90 Coli.mn 2 Is (V) -4.02 -3.83 Zanem Cm> 3.05 *Coli.mn 2 Cbg (ppm) 24.05 5. 11 Zrefa Cm) 183 Coli.mn 2 Atn (*) 11 11 n @ anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 12.00 12.00 Tracer cone (%) 40.0 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000 1.000 Buildings In Source name VENT STK SIRW VENT Project . 907 # sources operating 1 1 Date 05-10-93 Stack height (ft) 646.3 3.3 Location x y Z I Descrip Cf ( 1) Cf Cf.> Cm> Cm) Cm> cµg/m3> (µg/m ) . ---------------~---------------------------------------~---------------- 1 Service Bldg Int. 348.8 473.0 2 Service Bldg Int. .223;9 371.8 3 *service Bldg Int. 128.4 205.4 . 4 Service Blog Int *. 147.4 210.5 5 Emergency CR Int. 233.4 322.2 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 230.3 310.8 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 173.5 277.0 *8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 232.2 285.2 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 206.5 329.8 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 98.6 200.6 11 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 85.0 203.5 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 94.9 194.7 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 98.9 243.1 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 105.0 214.4 15 Alt Emerg. CR* Int. 123.2 229,9 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 98.6 240.0
- 17. Alt Emerg. CR Int. 122.3 320.3 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 117.0 289.1 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 110.2 277.0 20 Service Building . 75.5 171.1 21 Service Bldg Int. 79.0 201.6 22 Service Bldg Int. 64.5 167.2.
. 23 Aux Building Roof 546.7 2310.3 24 Aux Building Roof 596.1 3914.3 25 Aux Building Roof 548.4 2719.2 26 Alt Normal.CR Int. 39.6 2323;0 27 Normal CR intake 25.2 3753.7 28 Smoke purge duct 39.6 6048.5 29 Normal CR intake 57.3 5719.1 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 69.1 4874.2 31 Turbine Bldg Roof .o 17.0 32 Turbine Bldg Roof .o .. 17.7 33 Turbine Bldg Roof 23.4 126.3 34 Turbine Bldg Roof 3.7 17.7 -35 Turbine Bldg Roof 4.3 47.1 36 Turbine Bldg Roof .o 47.2 37 Turbine Bldg Roof 4.3 28.3 38 Turbine Bldg Roof 9.2 19.7 39 *Turbine Bldg Roof .o 26.4 40 Turbine Bldg Roof .o .o 41 Turbine Bldg Roof 7.8 28.3 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf 14.7 13.8 Maximums: 596.1 6048.5 CPP~ Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-26 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant ======================================================================== Run No. 303A Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Gas 2 Wind dir 195.0 Cs (ppm) 986.0 502.0 Urf Cm/s) 1.85 Column 1 Is (V) -4.28 -4.01 Urm* Cm/s) 3.00 Collllln 1 Cbg (ppm) 24.45 5.39 Zref Cm> 300 Column 1 Atn (-) 11 11 Uaf(m/s) .90 Column 2 Is (v) -4.02 -3.83 Zanem Cm) 3.05 Colunn 2 Cbg (ppm) 28.72 5. 11 Zrefa Cm) 183 Collllln 2 Atn (-) 11 11 n @ anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 12.00 12.00 Tracer cone (%) 40.0 10.0 Scale 300* Qf Cg/s) 1.000 1.000 Buildings In Source name VENT STK SIRW VENT Project 907 # sources operating 1 1 Date 05-10-93 Stack height (ft) 646.3 3.3 Location X Y Z I Descrip Cf (1) Cf (2) Cm) Cm) (m) (µg/m3) (µg/m3) 1 Service Bldg Int. 270.1 449.8 2 Service Bldg Int. 145.6 338.4 3 Service Bldg Int. 181.8 218.3 4 Service Bldg Int. 221.1 249.8 5 Emergency CR Int. 222.5 306.8 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 198.1 299.0 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 162.7 214.6 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 186.1 253.8 9 Alt Emerg: CR Int. 180.1 252.2 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 59.9 194.8 11 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 71.0 173.1 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 64.5 194.8 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 74.4 216.4 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 67.3 210.5 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 65.8 207.0 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 57.1 198.7 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 90.0 240.9 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 87.5 245.9 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 91.8 252.2 20 Service Building 35.0 131.8 21 Service Bldg Int. 58.9 182.6 22 Service Bldg Int. 34.1 139.7 23 Aux Building Roof 561.8 2672.5 24 Aux Building Roof 522.4 4601.4 25 Aux Bu.ilding Roof 404.3 3009.4 26 Alt Normal CR Int. 79.2 1916.1 27 Normal CR intake 61.5 3063.9 28 Smoke purge duct 76.5 5781.8 29 Normal CR intake 116.9 5969.8 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 134.5 4963.4 31 Turbine Bldg Roof 5.2 18.8 32 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 45.2 33 Turbine Bldg Roof 23.4 169.4 34 Turbine Bldg Roof 1.8 23.6 35 Turbine Bldg Roof 7.8 35.8 36 Turbine Bldg Roof 4.6 96.4 37 Turbine Bldg Roof 9.5 ' 20.7 38 Turbine Bldg Roof 4.6 39.3 39 Turbine Bldg Roof 8.7 54.6 40 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 41 Turbine Bldg Roof 9.5 37.6 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf .o 21.6 Maximums: 5969.8 561.8 CPP~ Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-27 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant ======================================================================== Run No. 304A Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Gas 2 Wind dir 190.0 Cs (ppm) 986.0 502.0 Urf Cm/sj 1.85 Column 1 Is (V) -4.30 -4.03 Urm Cm/s) 3.00 Column 1 Cbg (ppm) 20.20 4.86 Zref Cm) 300 Column 1 Atn (*) 11 11 Uaf(m/s) .90 Column 2 Is (V) -4.06 -3.88 Zanem Cm) 3.05 Column 2 Cbg (ppm) 17.00 5.18 Zrefa Cm) 183 Column 2 Atn (*) 11 11 n.@ anem .213 Total vol flow Ccc/s) 12.00 12.00 Tracer cone (%) 40.0 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/S) 1.000 1.000 Buildings In Source name VENT STK SIRW VENT Project 907 # sources operating 1 1 Date 05-10-93 Stack height (ft) 646.3 3.3 Location X Y Z I Descrip Cf (1) Cf Cf.> Cm> Cm> Cm> (µg/mJ> (µg/m ) 1 Service Bldg. Int. . 159.4 346.1 2 Service Bldg Int. 74.8 227.5 3 Service Bldg Int. 219.7 258.2 4 Service Bldg Int. 297.2 274.2 5 Emergency .CR Int. 180.9 237.6 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 186.9 227.5 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 131.8 187.1 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 170.5 213.9 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 132.7 187.1 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 20.1 73.9 11 . Alt Emerg. CR Int. 17.2 119. 7 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 38.3 110.8 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 36.2 106.6 14 Alt Emerg., CR Int. 39.2 105.0 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. .31.9 151.5 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 52.0 149.7 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 35.3 149.7 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 65.6 161.4 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 52.6 224.5 20 Service Building 22.8 68.1 21 Service Bldg Int. 11.2 89.8 22 Service Bldg Int. 30.1 75.8 .... , 23 Aux Building Roof 367.1 2349.8 24 Aux Building Roof 398.4 4458.6 25 Aux Building Roof 232.6 3017.6 26 Alt Normal CR Int. 139.5 1551.6 27 Normal CR intake . 80.1 2246.9 28 Smoke purge duct 104.8 4365.2 29 Normal CR intake 116.3 4729.4 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 148.6 4155.2 31 Turbine Bldg Roof 4.3 54.3 32 Turbine Bldg Roof 31.9 134.2 33 Turbine Bldg Roof 35.3 351. 7 34 Turbine Bldg Roof 1.8 13.6 35 Turbine Bldg Roof 21.5 93.5 36 Turbine Bldg Roof 29.2 196.4 37 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 24.3 38 TurQine Bldg Roof 19.1 31.1 39 Turbine Bldg Roof 25.8 157.1 40 Turbine Bldg Roof 6.4 5.8 41 Turbine.Bldg Roof .0 .0 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf 4.6 1.9 398.4 4729.4 Maximums: CPP~ Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-28 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant ==============================~~======================================== Run No. 305A Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Gas 2 IJind dir 185.0 Cs (ppm) 986.0 502.0 Urf (m/s) 1.85 Column 1 Is (V) -4.30 -4.06 Urm (m/s) 3.00 Column 1 Cbg (PPm) 13.98. 5.07 Zref (m) 300 Column 1 Atn (-) 11 11 Uaf(m/s) .90 Column 2 Is (v) -4.08 -3.90 Zanem (m) 3.05 Collllll 2 Cbg (ppm) 14.25 4.51 Zrefa (m) 183 CollMlll"I 2 Atn (-) 11 11 n @ anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 12.00 12.00 Tracer cone (%) 40.0 10.0 Scale 300 .Qf (g/s) 1.000 1.000 Buildings In Source name VENT STK SIRIJ VENT Project 907 # sources operating 1 1 Date 05-10-93 Stack height Cft) 646.3 3.3 Location X Y Z I Descrip
- Cf (1) Cf Cf.>
Cm> Cm> (m) (µg/m3) cµg/m ) 1 Service Bldg Int. 197.0 361.8 2 Service Bldg Int. 79.8 189.5 3 Service Bldg Int. 296.0 250.5 4 Service Bldg Int. 382.5 344.2 5 Emergency CR Int. 228.9 248.7 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 226.6 228.2 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. . 161.8 168.9 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 201.2 201.1 9 . Alt Emerg. CR Int. 166.1 187.4 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 39.0 44.5 11 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 22.4 48.2 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 32.6 87.0 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 27.5 87.2 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 53.5 114.1 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 38.7 92.8 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 48.9 112.2 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 64.5 129.9 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 71.6 189.5 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 78.3 152.2 20 Service Building 21.8 36.7 21 Service Bldg Int. 31.0 66.8
- 22. Service Bldg Int. 26.3 73.5 23 Aux Building Roof 256.4 2338.1 24 Aux Building Roof 243.8 4666.0 25 Aux Building Roof 151.4 3399.5 26 Alt Normal CR Int. 263.8 1233.7 27 Normal CR intake 160.0 1614.4 28 Smoke purge duct 159.5 3503.9 29 Normal CR intake 213.4 3776.2 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 245.6 3554.1 31 Turbine Bldg Roof 12.9 55.7 32 Turbine Bldg Roof 71.6 199.2 33 Turbine Bldg Roof 166.1 458.3 34 Turbine Bldg Roof 20.8 54.1 35 Turbine Bldg Roof 48.2 122.5 36 Turbine Bldg Roof 80.7 303.6 37 Turbine Bldg Roof 13.8 29.7 38 Turbine Bldg Roof 16.3 90.9 39 Turbine Bldg Roof 30.1 193.0 40 Turbine.Bldg Roof 6.3 3.9 41 Turbine Bldg Roof 9.5 1.9 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf 11.8 15.5
----------------------------------~------------------------------------- Maxi nuns: 382.5 . 4666.0 CPP.l!P Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-29 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant ======================================================================== Run No. 306A Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Gas 2 Wind dir 180.0 Cs (ppm) 986.0 502.0 Urf Cm/s) 1.85 Column 1 Is (V) *4.31 -4.05 Urm Cm/s) 3.00 ColU1111 1 Cbg (ppm) 15.56 6.70 Zref Cm) 300 Column 1 Atn (-) 11 11 Uaf(m/s) .90 Column 2 ls (V) -4.08 -3.90 Zanem (m) 3.05 Column 2 Cbg (ppm) 17.64 6.18 Zrefa Cm) 183 Column 2 Atn (-) 11 11 n @ anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 12.00 12.00 Tracer cone (%) 40.0 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000 1.000 Buildings In Source name VENT STK SIRW VENT Project 907 # sources operating 1 1 Date 05-10-93 Stack height (ft) 646.3 . 3.3 Location X* *y Z I Descrip Cf (1) Cf Cf.> Cm) Cm> Cm) (µg/m3) (µg/m > 1 Service Bldg Int. . 164.0 262.6 2 Service Bldg* Int. 41.7 118.0 3 Service Bldg Int. 293.7 236.6 4 Service Bldg Int .. 359.1 296.0 5 Emergency CR Int. 198.4 173.2 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 183.2 156.7 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 132.2 113.6 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 167.8 160.6 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 151.1 117.4 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. .o 17.4 11 Alf Emerg. CR Int. 13.7 39. i 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 4.5 31.0 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 16.3 24.2 . 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 12.7 38.7 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 31.8 48.4 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 21.8 75.5 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 26.6 55.9 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 35.4 94.8 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 53.2 i 96.9 20 Service Building
- 14.5 23.2 21 Service Bldg Int. 7.7 5.6 22 Service Bldg Int. 10.9 5.8 23 Aux Building Roof 158.0 2078.8 24 Aux Building Roof 180.5 4476.9 25 Aux Building Roof 123.7 3470.3 26 Alt Normal CR Int. 256.6 1106.6*
27 Normal CR intake 167.5 1309.5 28 Smoke purge duct 151.4 3008.4 29 Normal CR intake 199.2 3269.1 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 226.7 3254.1 31 Turbine Bldg Roof 40.4 59.6 32 Turbine Bldg Roof 129.7 239.9 33 Turbine Bldg. Roof 212.1 450.8 34 Turbine Bldg Roof 3.6 9.7 35 Turbine Bldg Roof 64.4 147.2 36 Turbine Bldg Roof 98.8 325.0 37 Turbine Bldg .Roof .0 .0 38 Turbine Bldg Roof 15.4 52.2 39 Turbine Bldg Roof 42.9 210.5 40 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 7.7 41 Turbine Bldg Roof 7.7 .0 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf .o .0 Maximums: 359.1 4476.9. CPP~ Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-30 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant ======================================================================== Run No. 307A Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Gas 2 *Wind dir 210.0 Cs (ppm) 986.0 502.0 Urf Cm/s) 2.01 Column 1 ls (V) *4.27 -4.02 Urm Cm/s) 3.00 Column 1 Cbg (ppm) 9.93 4.75 Zref Cm> 300 ColUlll'l 1 Atn (*) 11 11 UafCm/s) .89 Column 2 ls (V) *4.06 -3.87 Zanem (m) , 10.00 Column 2 Cbg (ppm) 11.18* 4. 15 Zrefa Cm> 600 Column 2 Atn (*) 11 11 n @ anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 12~00 12.00 Tracer cone (%) 40.0 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000 1.000 Buildings In Source name VENT STK SIRW VENT Project 907 # sources operating 1 1 Date 05-11-93 Stack height Cft) 646.3 3.3 Location x Y z / Descrip Cf (1) Cf Cf.> Cm) Cm) Cm) (µg/mJ) (µg/m ) .1 Service Bldg Int. 355.8 374.8 2 Service Bldg Int. 353;6 377.8 3 Service Bldg Int. 120.5 143.4 4 Service Bldg Int. 129.4 143.2 5 Emergency CR Int. 273.6 305.7 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 283.1 331.3 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 219.4 264.3 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 283.9 315.1 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 261.6 305.7 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 167.2 250.7 11 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 147.6 226.3 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 136.1 236.4 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 138.0 231.5 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 135.2 234.6 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 121.3 221.1 16 Alt Emerg *. CR Int. 128.5 229.2 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 137.2 247.0 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 144.5 254.3 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 136.4 243.5 20 Service Building 122.6 207.7 21 Service.Bldg Int. 112.5 219.4 22 Service Bldg Int. 97.4 189.8 23 Aux Building Roof 305.5 1936.3 24 Aux Building Roof 394.8 3787.0 25 Aux Building Roof 478.6 3110.8 26 Alt Normal CR Int. 16.8 2211.3 27 Normal CR intake 8.0 3147 .1 28 Smoke purge duct 21.0 4485.4 29 Normal CR intake 28.7 4584.1 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 36.1 3905.2 31 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 32 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 33 Turbine Bldg Roof 6.4 22.5 34 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 35 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 36 Turbine Bldg Roof .o .0 37 Turbine Bldg Roof 8.0 .0 38 Turbine Bldg* Roof 4.2 16.1 .39 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 40 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 41 Turbine Bldg Roof 7.2 .0 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf 2.5 21.5 --------------------------~--------------~------------------------------ Maximums: 478.6 4584.1 CPP~ Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-31 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS -Palisades Nuclear Power Plant ======================================================================== Run No. 308A Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Gas 2 Wind dir 215.0 Cs (ppm) 986.0 502.0 Urf (m/s) - 2.01 'column 1 Is (v) -4.30 -4.04 Urm (m/s) 3.00 Column 1 Cbg (ppm) 12.84 6.46 Zref (m) 300 Column 1 Atn (-) 11 11 Uaf(m/s) .89 Column 2 Is (V) -4.08 ~3.90 Zanem (m) 10.00 Column 2 Cbg (ppm) 14. 75 5.92 Zrefa Cm) 600 Column 2 Atn (-) 11 11 n @ anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 12.00 12.00 Tracer cone (%) 40.0 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000 1.000 Buildings In Source name VENT STK SIRW VENT Project 907 # sources operating ,1 1 Date ~ 05-11-93 Stack height (ft} 646.3 3.3 Location X Y Z I Descrip Cf (1) - Cf Cf> (m) (m) (m) (µg/m3) (µg/m ) 1 Service Bldg Int. 240.1 611.6 2 Service Bldg Int. 315.8 663.7 3 Service Bldg Int. 80.0 189.0 4 Service Bldg Int. 84.4 213.5 5 Emergen-cy CR Int. , 319.3, 481.1
- 6. Alt Emerg. CR Int. 326.7 487.5 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 320.9 458.7 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 342.6 503.5 9 Alt Emerg'. CR Int. 331.2 498.2 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 293.3 469.7 I 11 Alt-Emerg. CR Int. 274.9 477.6 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 268.2 450.2 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 245.6 438.1 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 228.9 444.8 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 227.4 450.1 16 Alt Emerg; CR Int. 218.1 , 482.2 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 202.0 436.4 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 217.2 435.9 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 207.6 457.0 20 Service Building 244.8 443;0 21 Service Bldg Int. 209.2 410.6 22 Service Bldg Int. 183.0 347.0 23 Aux Building Roof 177.5 3948.1 24 Aux Building Roof 386.0 1891.4*
25 Aux Building Roof 529.3 1608.1 26 Alt Normal CR Int. 11. 7 3459.0 27 Normal CR intake 17.4 5547.6 28 Smoke purge duct 20.1 8079.9 29 Normal CR intake 13.5 7753.6 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 7.5 8487.3 31 Turbine Bldg Roof 4.8 8.6 32 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 8.9 33 Turbine Bldg Roof 1.6 .0 34 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 35 Turbine Bldg Roof - 3.2 .o 36 Turbine Bldg Roof_ 6.7 .0 37 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 38 Turbine Bldg Roof .8 1.8 39 Turbine Bldg Roof 14.3 13.7 40 Turbine Bldg Roof 7.5 8.9 41 Turbine Bldg Roof 4.8 .0 42 ~ewer Aux Bldg Rf .0 1.8 ------*------------------~-----------------------------------~-----~----- Maximums: 529.3 8487.3 CPP~ Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-32. CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant ======================================================================== Run No. 309A Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Gas 2 IJind dir 220.0 Cs (ppm) 986.0 502.0 Urf Cm/s) 2.01 Column 1 Is (V) *4.30 *4.04 Urm Cm/s) 3.00 Column 1 Cbg (ppm) 13.29 5.34 Zref Cm> 300 Colurm 1 Atn (-) 11 11 Uaf(m/s) .89 Column 2 Is (v) ' -4.07 -3.89 Zanem Cm> 10.00 ColL1111 2 Cbg Cppm) 14.05 6.32 Zrefa Cm> 600 ColLlll1 2 Atn C-) 11 11 n @ anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 12.00 12.00 Tracer cone (%) 40.0 10.0 Scale 300 Cf Cg/s) 1.000 1.000 Buildings In Source name . VENT STK SIRIJ IJENT Project 907 # sources operating 1 1 Date 05-11-93 Stack height Cft) 646.3 3.3 Location X Y Z I Descrip .Cf (1)
- Cf C:f.>
Cm) Cm) . Cm> (µg/mJ) (µg/m ) service Bldg 1 Int. 75.2 1086.9 2 Service Bldg Int. 160.6 976.6 3 Service Bldg Int.* 27.7 286.7 4 Service Bldg Int *. *19.2 283.3 5 Emergency CR Int. 208.3 576.9 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int~ 215.0 614.8 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 271.6 515.1 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 222.6 673.6 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 205.1 731.4 10 Alt.Emerg. CR. Int. 326.3' 406.3 11 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 308.8 410.4 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 308.7 386.7 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 281.9 367.4 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 280.3 335.0 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 266.9 334.8 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 259.4 306.5 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 249.4 298.8 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 240.1 276.2 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 245.5 297.0 20 Service Builging 306.2' 363.5, 21 Service Bldg Int. 255.0 310.8 22 Service Bldg Int. 226.7 237.0 23 Aux Building Roof 33.3 1330.7 24 Aux Building Roof 176.5 286.9 25 Aux Building Roof 258.9 336.5 26 Alt Normal CR Int. .0 782.3 27 Normal CR intake . .0 2905.2 28 Smoke purge duct .o 6852.0 29 Normal CR intake .0 10590.5 30 Alt Normal CR Int. .o 12481.5 31 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 13.7 32 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 10.7 33 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 34 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 35 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 5.2 36 Turbine Bldg 'Roof .0 .o 37 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 38 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 39 Turbine Bldg Roof 1.6 5.2 40 Turbi n*e Bldg Roof .0 .0 41 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .o 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf .0 .o Maximums: 326.3 12481.5 CPPl!!P
- Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C:-33 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant
======================================================================== Run No. 310A Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Gas 2 Wind dir 225.0 Cs (ppm) 986.0 502.0 Urf (m/s) 2.01 Column 1 Is (V) -4.30 -4.04 Urm (m/s) 3.00 Column 1 Cbg (ppm) 11.92 5.34 Zref (m) 300 Column 1 Atn (-) 11 11 Uaf(m/s) .89 Column 2 Is (v) -4.07 -3.89 Zanem Cm> 10.00 Coluinn 2 Cbg (ppm) 16.24 5.41 Zrefa Cm> 600 Column 2 Atn (-) 11 11 n @ anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 12.00 12.00 Tracer cone (%) 40.0 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000 1.000 Buildings In Source name VENT STK SIRW VENT Project 907 # sources operating 1 1 Date 05-11-93 Stack height Cft) 646.3 3.3 Location x y Z I Descrip Cf CJ) Cf Cf.> Cm> Cm). (m) (µg/m ) (µg/m > 35.6. 1 Service Bldg Int. 1291.7 2 Service Bldg Int. 77.9 1115.3 3 Service Bldg Int. 1.6 295.4 4 Service Bldg Int .. .0 326.0 5 Emergency CR Int. 177.3 458.6 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. . 192.6 488.2 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int.* 228.8 395.1 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 212.7 497.1 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 214.5 496.4 10 Alt Emerg. CR.Int. 263.8 267.2 11 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 260.5 286.8 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 268.8 260.1 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 251.0 233.6 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 233.7 194.2 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 228.0 182.1 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 206.9 163.9 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 201.1 132.3 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 183.4 139.0 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 193.2 158.0 20 Service Building 275.5 229.8 21 Service Bldg Int. 224.0 175.2 22 Service Bldg Int. 175.9 114.0 23 Aux Building Roof 9.5 321.2 24 Aux Building Roof 42.7 41.0 . 25 Aux Building Roof 50.7 65.3 26 Alt Normal CR Int. .0 728.7 27 Normal CR intake .0 3328.8 28 Smoke purge duct .0 7796.3 29 Normal CR intake .o 11504.7 30 Alt Normal CR Int. .0 . 13133.9 31 Turbine Bldg Roof .* 6.3 20.6 32 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 1.8 33 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 34 Turbine Bldg Roof .o .0 35 Turbine Bldg Roof 4.8 25.8 36 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 3.6 37 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 38 *Turbine Bldg Roof .o .0 39 Turbine Bldg Roof 2.4 .0 40 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .o* 41 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf .0 .0 Maximums: 275.5 13133.9 CPP~ Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-34 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant ======================================================================== Run No. 311A Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Gas 2 Wind dir 230.0 Cs (ppm) 986.0 502.0 Urf Cm/s) 2.01 Column 1 Is (V) -4.30 -4.05 Urm Cm/s) 3.00 ColUlm 1. Cbg (ppm) 12.17 5.33 Zref Cm> 300 Column 1 Atn (-) 11 11 Uaf(m/s) .89 Column 2 Is (v) -4.07 -3.89 Zanem Cm> 10.00 Colunn 2 Cbg (ppm) 11.15 3.48 Zrefa Cm> 600 Column 2 Atn (-) 11 11 n @ anem .213 Total vol flow (CC/S) 12.00 12.00 Tracer cone (%) 40.0 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000 1.000 Buildings In Source name VENT STK SIRW VENT Project 907 # sources operating 1 1 Date 05-11-93 Stack height (ft) 646.3 3.3 Location X. Y Z I Descrip Cf (1) Cf Cf.> Cm) Cm> Cm) (µg/m3> (µg/m ) 1 Service Bldg Int. 54.7 1247.4 2 Service Bldg Int. 135.7 1114. 1 3 Service Bldg Int. 2.4 341.0 4 Service Bldg Int. 6.7 395.7 5 Emergency CR Int. 225.2 519.2 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 255.4 568.6 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 281.5 407.8 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 288.1 543.7 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 278.4 484.9 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 361.8 342.2 11 Alt.Emerg. CR Int. 346.6 305.0 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 373.5 290.5 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 340.2 241.6 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 355.9 244.2 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 337.0 219.3 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 335.0 224.6 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 304.5 173.1 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 310.7 172.9 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 297.4 174.8 20 Service Building 391.9 285.2. 21 Service Bldg Int. 327.5 197.0 22 Service Bldg Int. 285.6 162.2 23
- Aux Building Roof 10.3 282.7 24 Aux Building Roof 87.9 73.1 .
25 Aux Building Roof 77.7 34.3 26 Alt Normal CR Int. .o 1721.9 27 Normal CR intake 3.2 6122.0 28 Smoke purge duct
- 5.0 9974.9 29 Normal CR intake .0 13212.0 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 2.5 13235.1 31 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 10.3 32 Turbine Bldg Roof 5.9 46.3 33 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 34 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 8.9 35 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 36 Turbine Bldg Roof 5.0 19.6 37 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 38 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 17.8 39 Turbine Bldg Roof 2.4 .0 40 Turbine Bldg Roof 4.2 33.9 41 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0
.42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf .0 10.7 13235 .1 Maximums: 391.9 CPP~ Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-35 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant ======================================================================== Run No. 312A Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Gas 2 \Jind dir 240.0 Cs (ppm) 986.0 502.0 Urf (m/s) 2.01 Column 1 Is (V) -4.29 -4.03 Urm (m/s) 3.00 Column 1 Cbg (ppm> 19.75 9.59 Zref (m) 300 Column 1 Atn (-) 11 11 Uaf(m/s) .89 Column 2 Is (v) -4.05 -3.87 Zanem (m) 10.00 Column 2 Cbg (ppm) 7.31 4.54 Zrefa Cm> 600 Column 2 Atn (-) 11 11 n @ anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 12.00 12.00 Tracer cone (%) 40.0 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000 1.000 Buildings In Source name VENT STACK SIRIJ VENT Project 907 # sources operating 1 1 Date 05-11-93 Stack height (ft) 646.3 3.3 Location X Y Z I Descrip Cf (1) Cf (2) (m) Cm) (m) (µg/m3) (µg/m3) 1 Service Bldg Int. 176.2 992.9 2 Service Bldg Int. 297.2 729.1 3 Service Bldg Int. .o 352.8 4 Service Bldg Int. 1.7 458.6 5 Emergency CR Int. 81.7 545.5 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 141.4 652.1 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 113.5 573.0 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 152.4 666.4 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 147.6 621.2
- 10. Alt Emerg. CR Int. 303.1 530.3 11 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 277.7 356.2 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 393.2 345.8 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 366.6 222.0 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 463.1 215.0 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 404.7 94.6 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 474.9 100.3 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 428.5 63.7 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 470.7 109.3 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 390.4 89.5 20 Service Building 372.1 345.8 21 Service Bldg Int. 403.1 91.2 22 Service Bldg Int. 403.3 139.7 23 Aux Building Roof .0 504.2 24 Aux Building Roof 80.8 .0 25 Aux Building Roof 35.7 .0 26 Alt Normal CR Int. 10.1 1220.0 27 Normal CR intake .0 2190.6 28 Smoke purge duct .0 5447.9 29 Normal CR intake .0 12701.5 30 Alt Normal CR Int. .8 17854.0 31 Turbine Bldg Roof .o .0 32 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 21.5 33 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 34 Turbine Bldg Roof 3.4 .0
.35 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 36 Turbine Bldg Roof 1. 7 .0 37 Turbine Bldg Roof 21.4 .0 38 Turbine Bldg Roof 5.9 12.5 39 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 40 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 41 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf 10.9 .0 Maxill1\.ills: 474.9 17854.0 CPP~ Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-36 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant ======================================================================== Run No. 312B Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Gas 2 Wind dir . 240.0 Cs (ppm) 986.0 502.0 Ur.f Cm/s) 2.01 Column 1 ls (V) -4.29 -4.04 Urm Cm/s) 3.00 . Collllln 1 Cbg (ppm) 45.95 19.87 Zref Cm> 300 Column 1 Atn (-) 11 11 Uaf(m/s) .89 Coll.llln 2 ls Cv> -4.05 -3.89 Zanem Cm> 10.00 Collill"I 2 Cbg Cppm) 38.91 27. 13 Zrefa Cm> 600 Collllln 2 Atn (-) 11 11 n @ anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 12.00 12.00 Tracer cone (%)
- 40.0 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000 1.000 Buildings In Source name VENT STACK* SIRW VENT Project 907 # sources operating 1 1 Date 05-11-93 Stack height Cft) 646.3 3.3 Location x y Z I Descrip Cf cp Cf Cf.>
Cm> Cm> Cm) Cµg/m >.. (µg/m ) 1 Service Bldg Int. 134.9 *532.0 2 Service Bldg Int. 75.6 232.1 25 Aux Building Roof 309.6 240.3 26 Alt Normal CR Int. 50.4 1160.6 27 Normal CR intake .0 2625.7 28 Smoke purge duct 50.4 5249.4 29 Normal CR intake 293.7 12270.5 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 84.0 17337.1
- Maximuns: 309.6 17337.1 CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-37 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant ======================================================================== Run No. 313A Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Gas 2 Wind dir 250.0 Cs (ppm) 986,0 502.0 Urf (m/s) 2.01 Column 1 Is (V) *4.28 -4.03 Urm (m/s) 3.00 ColUITV'l 1 Cbg (ppm) 13.12 8.34 Zref (m) 300 Column .1 Atn (-) 11 11 Uaf(m/s) .89 Column 2 Is (v) -4.04 -3.88 Zanem (m) 10.00 Column 2 Cbg (ppm) 8.29 5.04 Zrefa Cm) 600 Column 2 Atn (-) 11 11 n @ anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 12.00 12.00 Tracer cone (%) 40.0 . 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000 1.000 Buildings In Source name VENT STflCK SIRW VENT Project 907 # sources operating 1 1 Date 05-11-93 Stack height (ft) 646.3 3.3 -----------------------------------~------------------------------------ Location x y Z I Descrip . Cf
Cm) (m) Cm) (µg/m ) (µg/m ) 1 Service Bldg Int. 119.3 593.8 2 Service Bldg Int. 189.6 454.0 3 Service Bldg Int. .0 583.4 4 Service Bldg Int. .8 656.0 5
- Emergency CR Int. 66.8 555.9 6 _ Alt Emerg. CR Int. 62.4 647.1 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 39.0 521.5 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 70.8 647.1 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 79.5 592.0 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 103.7 586.3 11 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 101.8 471.6 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 131$.2 441.5 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 149.5 340.8 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 197.2 312.8 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 197.3 225.5 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 246.1 155.5 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 241.8 136.0 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 273.1 109.0 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 267.3 39.6 20 Service Building 131.5 434.4 21 Serv.ice Bldg Int. 198.1 184.2 22 Service Bldg Int. 247.8 105.5 23 Aux Building Roof 58.1 435.4 24 Aux Building Roof 156.8 323.5 25 Aux Building Roof 352.4 . 831.3 26 Alt Normal CR Int. 283.2 1360.3 27 Normal CR intake 312.6 2431.8 28 Smoke purge duct 148.3 5543.2 29 Normal CR intake 129.7 10589.6 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 198.9 14284.4 31 Turbine Bldg Roof .o 15.5 32 Turbine Bldg Roof 2.5 14.3 33 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 48.2 34 Turbine Bldg Roof 10.1 12.5 35 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 36 Turbine Bldg Roof 6.7 .o 37 Turbine Bldg Roof 27.0 15.5 38 . Turbine Bldg Roof 9.3 10.7 39 Turbine Bldg Roof 4.0 .0 40 Turbine Bldg Roof* 1.7 .0 41 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .36.1 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf 11.8 7.2 Maxi muns: 352.4 14284.4
- CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-38 CPP Project 93~0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant ======================================================================== Run No. 314A Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Gas 2 Wind dir 170.0 Cs (ppm) 986.0 502.0 Urf (m/s) 1.85 Column 1 Is (v) -4.32 -4.04 Urm Cm/s) 3.00 Column 1 Cbg (ppm) 26.72 13.28 Zref Cm) 300 Column 1 Atn (*) 11 11 Uaf(m/s) .90 Column 2 Is (v) -4.06 -3.89 Zanem Cm) 3.05 Column 2 Cbg Cppm) 27.69 11.48 Zrefa Cm> 183 Column 2 Atn (-) 11 11 n @ anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 12.00 12.00 Tracer cone (%) 40.0 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000 1.000 Buildings In Source name VENT STK SIRW VENT Project 907 # sources operating 1 1 Date 05-10-93 Stack height (ft) 646.3 3.3 Location x y Z I Descrip Cf (1) Cf Cf.> Cm> Cm) Cm) (µg/m3) (µg/m > Service Bldg 1 Int. 125.2 190.1 2 Service Bldg Int. 20.1 42.6 3 Service Bldg Int. 159.5 165.9 4 Service Bldg Int. 211.5 242.1 5 Emergency CR Int. 61.7 61.5 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 58.4 77.5 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 38.6 20.5 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 57.4 85.2 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 43.7 22.4 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. .0 .0 11 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 8.6 .0 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 9.1 9.7 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. .0 .0 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. .0 .o 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 6.9 7.5 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 12.8 29.1 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 8.6 .0 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 5.5 13.6 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 24.0 14.9 20 Service Building 3.6 7.7 21 Service Bldg Int. .0 .o 22 Service Bldg Int. 4.6 .0 23 Aux Building Roof 119.2 1670.2 24 Aux Building Roof 208.8 4133.9 25 Aux Building Roof 165.5 4255.8 26 Alt Normal CR Int. 399.3 794.2 27 Normal CR intake 197.2 1295.6 28 Smoke purge duct 197.8 3742.6 29 Normal CR intake 270.1 4856.0 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 283.6 4207.5 31 Turbine Bldg Roof 290.6 123.0 32 Turbine Bldg Roof 802.3 333.2 33 Turbine Bldg Roof 986.8 508.9 34 Turbine Bldg Roof 137.7 75.5 35 Turbine Bldg Roof 464.7 227.4 36 Turbine Bldg Roof 756.7 408.7 37
- Turbine Bldg Roof 26.6 .0 38 Turbine Bldg Roof 165.9 108.5 39 Turbine Bldg Roof 311.2 268.4 40 Turbine Bldg Roof 1.8 15.5 41 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 5.6 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf 3.6 17.4 4856.0 Maximums: 986.8 CPP~
.Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-39 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant ======================================================================== Run No. 315A Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Gas 2 \Jind dir 260.D Cs (ppm) 986.0 502.0 Urf (m/s) 2.01 Column 1 Is (V) -4.28 -4.06 Urm Cm/s) 3.00 Column 1 Cbg (ppm) 8.98- 2.97 Zref Cm> 300 Column 1 Atn (-) 11 11 Uaf(m/s) .89 Column 2 Is (v) -4.03 -3.89 Zanem Cm) 10.00 Column 2 Cbg (ppm) 9.80 3.35 Zrefa (m) 600 Column 2 Atn (-) 11 11 n @ anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 12.00 12.00 Tracer cone (%) 40.0 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000 1.000 Buildings In Source name VENT STK SIR\J VENT Project 907 # sources operating 1 1 Date 05-11-93 Stack height (ft) 646.3 3.3 Location x y Z I Descrip Cf (1) Cf Cf> Cm) (m) (m) (µg/m3) (µg/m ) 1 Service Bldg Int. 62.0 717.4 2 Service Bldg Int. 94.8 493.5 3 Service Bldg Int. .0 726.0 4 Service Bldg Int. .0 766. 1 5 Emergency CR Int. .0 565.4 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. * .0 575.5 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. .0 532.9 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 5.1 602.2 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 3.2 623.5 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 19.5 666.3 11 Alf Emerg. CR Int. 33.4 572.2 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 41.5 520.2 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int . 48.5 480.0 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 71.9 402.6 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 105.8 336.5 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 131.2 265.5 17 *AL t Emerg. CR Int. 134.4 206.7 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 144.7 155.0 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 154.3 165.7 20 Service Building 27.9 482.8 21 Service Bldg Int. 116.9 268.2 - 22 Service Bldg Int. 145.5 158.6 23 Aux Building Roof -1.6 71.7 _24 Aux Building Roof .0 12.5 25 Aux Building Roof .0 .o 26 Alt Normal CR Int. .0 803.5 27 Normal CR intake .0 - 951.4 - 28 Smoke purge duct 5.9 2004.3 29 Normal CR intake- .0 5741.0 30 Alt Normal CR. Int. .0 13955.2 31 Turbine Bldg Roof .o 18.8 32 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 35.6 33 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 5. 1 34 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 35 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 20.5 36 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 14.3
- 37. Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 38 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 1.8 39 Turbine Bldg Roof 1.6 20.5 40 Turbine Bldg Roof .8 .0 41 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf .0 .0
---------------------------~--------------------------------~----------- Maximums: 154.3 13955.2 CPP~ Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-40 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant ======================================================================== Run No. 316A Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Gas 2 Wind dir 270.0 Cs Cppm) 986.0 502.0 Urf Cm/s) 2.01 Column 1 Is Cv) -4.29 -4.04 Urm Cm/s) 3.00 ColUlll'I 1 Cbg (ppm) 11.04 5.96 Zref Cm) 300 Column 1 Atn (-) 11 11 Uaf(m/s) .89 Coll..llV'I 2 Is (V) -4.04 -3.87 Zanem Cm) 10.00 Coll..llV'I 2 Cbg (ppm) 10.26 5.45 Zrefa Cm) 600 Coll..llV'I 2 Atn C-) 11 11 n @ anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 12.00 12.00 Tracer cone (%) 40.0 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000 1.000 Buildings In Source name VENT STK SIRW VENT Project. 907 # sources operating 1 1 Date 05-11-93 Stack height (ft) 646.3 3.3 -----------------------------------~------------------------------------ Location X Y *Z I Descrip . Cf (1) Cf Cf.> Cm) Cm) (m) * (µg/m3) (µg/m ) 1 Service Bldg Int. 15.9 628.3 2 Service Bldg Int. 38.0 492.7 3 Service Bldg Int. .0 521.9 4 . Service Bldg Int. .o 559.0 5 Emergency CR Int. .0 216.3 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. .0 238.3 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. .0 224.9 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. .0 259.8 9 Alt Emerg. *cR Int. .0 231.8 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. .0 419.3 11 . Alt Emerg. CR Int. 25.4 432.6 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 5.9 431.8 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 5.6 346.8 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 11.0 268.8 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 21.5 230.0 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 34.6 186.3 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 37.3 156.2 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 49.0 155.9 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 49.3 164.8 20 Service* Building 11.8 270.5 21 *Service Bldg Int. . 21.5 171.7 22 Service Bldg Int. 38.8 116.5 23 Aux Building* Roof .0. 319.3 24 Aux Building Roof .0 .0 25 *Aux Building Roof .0 .0 26 Alt Normal CR Int. .0 1005.2 27 Normal CR intake .0 1890.2 28 Smoke purge duct 27.9 3898.8 29 Normal CR intake .0 8632.0 30 Alt Normal CR Int. .0 12964.9 31 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 242.1 32 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 247.3 33 Turbine Bldg Roof .o 97.9 34 Turbine Bldg Roof .o 43.0 35 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 99.6 36 Turbine Bldg Roof 3.4 68.1 37 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .o 38 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 39 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 29.2 40 Turbine Bldg Roof. .0 .0 41 Turbine Bldg Roof .o .0 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf .o .0 Maxi muns: 49.3 12964.9 CPP~ Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-41 _ CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant ======================================================================== Run No. 329B Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Gas 2 \.lind dir 205.0 Cs (ppm) 986.0 502.0 Urf Cm/s) 5.54 Colunn 1 ls (V) -4.30 -4.03 Urm Cm/s) 3.00 Column 1 Cbg (ppm) 8.94 3.61 Zref (m) 300 Column 1 Atn (-) 11 11 Uaf(m/s) 2.68 Column 2 ls (V) -4.06 -3.89 Zanem Cm) 3.05 Column 2 Cbg (ppm) 9.70 3.87 Zrefa Cm> 183 Column 2 Atn (-) 11 11 n @ anem .213 - Total vol flow (cc/s) 12.00 12.00 Tracer cone (%) 40.0 10.0 Scale 300 Qf Cg/s) 1.000* 1.000 Buildings In Source name VENT STK S!R\.I VENT Project 907 # sources operating
- 1 1 Date 05-10-93 Stack height (ft) 646.3 3.3 Location X
- Y Z I Descrip Cf (1) Cf (2)
Cm) Cm)
- Cm> (µg/m3) (µg/mr) 1 Service Bldg Int. 88.5 159.1 2 Service Bldg Int. 93.4 151.5 3 Service Bldg Int. 13.5 59.9 4 Service Bldg Int. 15.2 77.1 5 .Emergency CR Int. 63.2 94.8 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int.
- 75.4 103.6 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 64.1 106.1 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 76.6 115.9 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 73.9 114.8 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 52.9 87.4 11 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 43.4 84.9 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 54.1 99.1 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 48.6 96.7 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int.* 50.8 98.4 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 53.7 110:4 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 57.8 117.2 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 52.9 121.0 18 Alt Emerg; CR Int. 56.6 126.9 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 58.9 128.5 20 Service Building 42.9 84.8 21 Service Bldg Int.* 35.4 83.0 22 Service Bldg Int. 32.8 73.2 23 Aux Building Roof 220.7 1073.8 24 Aux Building Roof 248.4 1515.5 25 Aux Building Roof 257.5 997.7 26 Alt Normal CR Int. 1.2 1017.4 27 Normal CR intake 6.6 . 1754.6 28 Smoke purge duct 12.2 2887.8 29 Normal CR intake 10.3 2844.0 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 12.8 2952.6 31 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 10.6 32 Turbine Bldg Roof ~o 9.7 33 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 11.9 34 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 35 Turbine Bldg Roof .o 4.4 36 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 6.5 37 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 38 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 39 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 5.6 40 Turbine Bldg Roof .. 0 .0 41 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf .0 .0
---~-------------------------------------------------------------------- Maximums: 257.5 2952.6
- CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-42 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant ======================================================================== Run ~o. 330A Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Gas 2 Wind dir 215.0 Cs (ppm) 986.0 502.0 Urf Cm/s) 1.85 Column 1 Is Cv> -4.29 -4.10 Urm Cm/s) 3.00 Column 1 Cbg (ppm) 6.43 2.20 Zref Cm) 300 Column 1 Atn (-) 11 11 Uaf(m/s) .90 Column 2 Is (V) -4.04 -3.93 Zanem Cm) 3.05 Column 2 Cbg (ppm) 7.08 2.43 Zrefa Cm) 183 Column 2 Atn (-) 11 11 . n@ anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 12.00 12.00 Tracer cone (%) 40.0 10.0 Scale 300 Qf Cg/s) 1.000 1.000 Buildings In Source name VENT STK SIRW VENT Project 907 # sources operating 1 1 Date . 05-10-93 Stack height (ft) 646.3 3.3 ---------------------------------------------------------------~-------- Location X Y Z I Descrip Cf (1) Cf Cf.> Cm) Cm) Cm) (µg/m3> (µg/m ) ----------------------------~----------------------~-------------------- 1 Service Bldg Int. 210.5 665.8 2 Service Bldg Int. 298.0 688.6 3 Service Bldg Int. 55.2 172.9 4 Service Bldg Int. 45.8 180.3 5 Emergency CR Int. 294.1 483.7 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 315.4 500.6 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 289.8 437.8 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 311. 7 502.6 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 302.8 538.9 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 266.8 454.6 11 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 218.2 402.8 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 239.3 425.8 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 213.0 419.4 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 220.0 433.5 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 184.6 421.2 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 187.0 420.1 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 188.0 456.2 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 193.4 433.5 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 181.1 432.2 20 Service Building 215.5 404.7 21 Service Bldg Int. 186.3 397.3 22 Service Bldg Int. 170.5 . 356.8 23 Aux Building Roof 144.0 41n.1 24 Aux Building Roof 373.1 1782.0 25 Aux Building Roof 505.5 1510~1 26 Alt Normal CR Int. 10. 1 2633.7 27 Normal CR intake 6.0 4888.9 28 Smoke purge duct 7.3 7883.8 29 Normal CR intake 11.2 9031.1 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 11.9 9251.4 31 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 23.9 32 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 28.8 33 Turbine Bldg Roof 4.3 36.8 34 Turbine Bldg Roof 11.0 24.9 35 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 5.5 36 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 17.3 37 Turbine Bldg Roof 3.5 25.8 38 Turbine Bldg Roof 14.7 13.4 39 Turbine Bldg.Roof .0 9.2 40 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 5.8 41 Turbine. Bldg Roof 12.9 18.4 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf 6.4 23.0 Maxi muns: 505.5 9251.4 CPP~ Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-43. CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant ======================================================================== Run No. 331A Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Gas 2 Wind dir 205.0 Cs (ppm) 986.0 502.0 Urf (m/s) 1.85 Column 1 Is (v) -4.34 -4.07 Urm (m/s) 3.00 Column 1 Cbg Cppm> 24.54 3.09 Zref (m) 300 Golumn 1 Atn (-) 11 11 Uaf(m/s) .90 Column 2 Is (V) -4.13 -3.94 Zanem Cm> 3.05 Column 2 Cbg Cppm) 11.93 2.67 Zrefa Cm> 183 Column 2 Atn (-) 11 11 n @ anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 12.00 12.00 Tracer cone C%) 40.0 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000 1.000 Bui Ldings In Source name VENT STK SIRW VENT Project 907 # sources operating 1 1 Date 05-10-93 Stack height Cft) 646.3 3.3 Location X Y Z I Descrip Cf ( 1) Cf Cf.> Cm) Cm) (m) Cµg/m3) (µg/m) 1 *. Service Bldg Int. 324.1 559.6 2 Service Bldg Int *. 329.6 470.4 3 Service Bldg Int. .0 13.0 4 Service Bldg Int. 67.2 143.4 5 Emergency CR Int. 129.7 263.1 6 Alt Emerg. CR. Int. 222.1 286.9 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 124.5. 252.0 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 226.6 315.5 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 162.9 307.6 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 137.9 256.3 11 *Alt Emerg. CR Int. 77-.6 222.3 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 135.3 250.5 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 80.2 255.7 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 126.3 241.0 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 75.1 281.6 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 140.6 271.6 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 72.5 266.8 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 138.8 306.0 . 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int *. 81.0 303.9 20 Service Building 104.8 204.6 21 Service Bldg Int. 43.5 222.3 22 Service Bldg. Int. 80.6 189.3 23 Aux Building Roof 472.6 2881.2 24 Aux Building Roof 615.4 4040.8 25 Aux Building Roof 586.0 2784.9 26 Alt Normal CR Int. .0 2755. 7 27 Normal CR intake .0 4534.0 28 Smoke purge duct 5.4 7574.8 29 Normal CR intake .* 0 . 7765.4 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 9.9 7481. 1 31 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 37.1 32 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 59.3 33 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 79.7 34 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 22.9 35 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 27.8 36 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 47.8 37 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .o 38 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 15.3 39 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 22.2 40 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 22.9 41 Turbine Bldg Roof .o 7.4 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf .0 22.9 43 Service Bldg Expan 131.4 313.1 44 Service Bldg Expan 147.8 323.2 45 Service Bldg Expan 31.6 303.9 ---------------------------------------------------------------------~--. Maximums: 615.4 7765.4
- CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-44 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant ======================================================================== Run No. 332A Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Gas 2 Wind dir 195.0 Cs (pJX!l) 986.0 502.0 Urf (m/s) 1.85 Colunn 1 Is (V) -4.32 -4.06 Urm (m/s) 3.00 Colunn 1 Cbg (pJX!l) 20.09 9.14 Zref Cm> 300 Column 1 Atn (-) 11 11 Uaf(m/s) .90 Colunn 2 Is (V) -4 .11 -3.93 Zanem Cm) 3.05 Colunn 2 Cbg (ppm) 22.33 8.17 Zrefa (m) 183 Coluin 2 Atn (-) 11 11 n @ anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 12.00 12.00 Tracer cone (%) 40.0 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000 1.000 Buildings In Source name VENT STK SIRW VENT Project 907 # sources operating 1 1 Date 05-10-93 Stack height (ft) 646.3 3.3 Location X Y Z I Descrip Cf
(m) Cm> Cm> (µg/m ) (µg/m ) 1 Service Bldg Int. 150.9 424.7 2 Service Bldg Int. 88.3 318.1 3 Service Bldg Int. 12.0 24.1 4 Service Bldg Int. 37.9 97.7 5 Emergency CR Int. 117 .4 189.2 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 116.3 201.2 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 88.3 144.6 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 110.8 . 216.5 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 95.1 187.3 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 29.7 128.4 11 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 36.0 139.1 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 31.5 151.4 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 32.6 161.3 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 25.2 174.4 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 48.9 194.7 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 39.7 233.8 17
- Alt Emerg. CR Int. 43.7 211.4 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 41.5 228.0 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 54.0 242.9 20 Service Building 25.2 99.6 21 Service Bldg Int. 18.9 122.4 22 Service Bldg Int. 12.6 120.7 23 Aux Building Roof 444.9 2709.4 24 Aux Building Roof 385.7 4842.3 25 Aux Building Roof 314.6 3115.5 26 Alt Normal CR Int. 62.2 1816.6 27 Normal CR intake 46.3 2878.2 28 Smoke purge duct 59.5 5206.4 29 Normal CR intake 72.0 8141.2 30 Alt Normal CR Int. 74.8 6942.5 31 Turbine Bldg Roof 24.0 150.2 32 Turbine Bldg Roof 18.9 170.5 33 Turbine Bldg Roof 82.3 320.8 34 Turbine Bldg Roof 6.3 105.4 35 Turbine Bldg Roof 18.9 139. 1 36 Turbine Bldg Roof 31.5 252.9 37 Turbine Bldg Roof 10.3 57.5 38 Turbine Bldg Roof 4.5 92.0 39 Turbine Bldg Roof 23. 1 192.9 40 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 57.5 41 Turbine Bldg Roof 3.4 105. 7 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf 7.2 155.2 43 Service Bldg Expan 215.1 248.5 44 Service Bldg Expan 257.7 323.8 45 Service Bldg Expan 290.6 346.8 Maximums: 444.9 8141.2 CPP~
Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-45 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant ===============================================================~======== Run No. 333A Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Gas 2 Wind dir 215.0 Cs (ppm) 986.0 502.0 Urf Cm/s) 2.01 Colunn 1 Is Cv) -4.29 -4.03 Urm. Cm/s) 3.00 Column 1 Cbg Cppm) 19.07 7.23 Zref Cm> 300 Column 1 Atn (-) 11 11 Uaf(m/s) .89 Column 2 Is Cv> -4.05 -3.88 Zanem Cm> 10.00 Column 2 Cbg Cppm) 9.49 4.40 Zrefa Cm> 600 Column 2 Atn (-) 11 11 n @ anem .213 Total* vol flow (cc/s) 12.00 12.00 Tracer cone (%) 40.0 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/s)
- 1.000 1.000 Buildings In Source name VENT STK SIRW VENT Project 907 # sources operating 1 1 Date 05~11-93 Stack height (ft) 646.3 3.3 Location X Y Z I Descrip . Cf ( 1) Cf C:f.>
Cm> Cm) (m) (µg/m3> (µg/m > 1 Service Bldg Int. 97.7 507.9 2 Service Bldg Int. 283.4 596.2 3 Service Bldg Int. 2.4 .o 4 Service Bldg Int. 3.4 60.9 5 Emergency CR Int. 239.0 266.9 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 274.2 356.3 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 250.1 342.6 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 303.6 383.1 9 Alt Emerg~ CR Int. 261.2 . 365.0 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 336.4 410.0 11 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 248.5. 313.3 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 322.1 397.5 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 258.0 342.6 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 285.9. 374.2 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 237.4 373.6 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 286.8 383.1 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 225.5 315.1 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 273.3 372.4 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 231.8 327.1 20 Service Building 306.1 372.4 21 Service Bldg Int. 217.6 296.1 22 Service Bldg Int. 244.7 293.6 23 Aux Building Roof 145.3 3854.9 24 Aux Building Roof 377.6 1792.1 25 Aux Building Roof 497.8 1475.5 26 Alt Normal CR Int. .0 4160.7 27 Normal CR intake .0 5791.8 28 Smoke purge duct .8 7967.0 29 Normal CR intake .0 6914.3 30_ Alt.Normal CR Int. 2.5 8677.7 31 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 5.2 32 . Turbine Bldg Roof* .0 5.4 33 . Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .o 34 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 35 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 36 Turbine Bldg Roof *.o .0 37 Turbine Bldg Roof* .o .0 38 Turbine B.ldg Roof .o .0 39 Turbine Bldg Roof .o 31.0 40 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 41 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 17;2 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf .o .0 43 Service Bldg Expan '191.3 315.1 44 Service Bldg Expan 148.9 342.0 45 Service Bldg Expan .0 215.2 8677.7 Maximuns: 497.8 CPP~ Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. C-46 CPP Project 93-0907 FULL SCALE CONCENTRATION RESULTS Palisades Nuclear Power Plant ======================================================================== Run No. 334A Gas Parameters: Gas 1 Gas 2 Wind dir 225.0 Cs (ppm) 986.0 502.0 Urf Cm/s) 2.01 Column 1 Is (v) -4.29 -4.03 Urm (m/s) 3.00 Column 1 Cbg (ppm) 14. 71 5.60 Zref Cm) 300 Column 1 Atn (-) 11 11 Uaf(m/s) .89 Column 2 Is (v) -4.07 -3.89 Zanem (m) 10.00 Column 2 Cbg (ppm) 9.21 3.61 Zrefa. (m) 600 Column 2 Atn (-) 11 11 n @ anem .213 Total vol flow (cc/s) 12.00 12.00 Tracer cone (%) 40.0 10.0 Scale 300 Qf (g/s) 1.000 1.000 Buildings In Source name VENT STK SIRW VENT Project 907 # sources operating 1 1 Date 05-11-93 Stack height Cft) 646.3 3.3 Location x y Z I Descrip Cf cp (µg/m ) Cf Cj,> (µg/m ) Cm> Cm) Cm) 1 Service Bldg Int. 41.3 1156. 1 2 Service Bldg Int. 100.5 877.2 3 Service Bldg Int. .0 41.3 4 Service Bldg Int. 4.2 131.9 5 Emergency CR Int. 167.5 345.8 6 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 222.8 397.6 7 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 245.3 294.2 8 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 232.0 468.9 9 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 192.9 526.4 10 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 287.3 237.1 11 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 230.2 261.5 12 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 283.1 185.4 13 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 227.1 137.6 14 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 245.5 131.9 15 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 211.2 129.0 16 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 228.7 130.2 17 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 188.2 122 ..1 18 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 206.1 98.1 19 Alt Emerg. CR Int. 171.5 92.9 20 Service Building 293.2 189.0 21 Service Bldg Int. 211.2 113.5 22 Service Bldg Int. 201.1 105.2 23 Aux Building Roof .o 357.8 24 Aux Building Roof 49.4 44.6 25 Aux Building Roof 42.9 41.3 26 Alt Normal CR Int. .0 4083.0 27 Normal CR intake .0 5816.7 28 Smoke purge duct .8 7472.4 29 Normal CR intake .0 7986.1 30 Alt Normal CR Int. .0 8602.8 31 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .. 0 32 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 12.5 33 Turbine Bldg Roof .o .0 34 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .o 35 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 36 Turbine Bldg Roof 5.0 10.7 37 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 38 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 39 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .. 0 40 Turbine Bldg Roof 2.5 14.3 41 Turbine Bldg Roof .0 .0 42 Lower Aux Bldg Rf .o .0 43 Service Bldg Expan 130.2 381.9 44 Service Bldg Expan 95.5 351.2 45 Service Bldg Expan 38.1 240.9 Maximums: 293.2 8602.8 CPP~ APPENDIX D
- QUALITY ASSURANCE DOCUMENTATION
- CPP~
CPP QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN for Wind Tunnel Modeling of the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant (CPP Proposal 93-0907) Submitted Date: ~...!..J::::j* "i "5: By: Project Manager Accepted for CPP, Inc. Date: _;}__/..J.Ljil_ ~~-~~ By: C~sner Chief Executive Officer Approved for Sargent & Lundy Engineers Date: _I___) _ _ By:
Title:
CPP~
CPP QA Plan 0907 March 12. 1993 CPP QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN for Wind Tunnel Modeling of the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant (CPP Proposal 93-0907) This document describes the Cermak Peterka Petersen. Inc. (CPP) quality assurance (QA) plan for wind tunnel diffusion modeling to be performed for the Palisades nuclear power plant. under contract with Sargent & Lundy Engineers. This plan will need approval by Sargent & Lundy prior to initiation of the study. Section l describes the instrumentation used. calibration procedures, and traceability to NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) standards. Sections 2 through 6 describe the QA management. training procedures. the report review, inspection of engineering calculations. and exception reports. respectively. The QA checklists and forms are described in the last section. 1.0 INSTRUMENTATION AND STANDARDS Instrumentation and equipment used at the Environmental Wind Tunnel of Cermak Peterka Petersen. Inc. consists of five main types: gas concentration measurements (gas chromatography), sampling equipment. velocity measurements (pitot tube and hot film anemometer), flow rate measurements. and wind pressure measurements. The instrumentation and applicable standards are discussed below. 1.1 Concentration Measurements The primary concentration measurement device used at CPP is a Varian 3700 Gas Chromatograph (GC) equipped with two separation columns. two flame Ionization Detectors (FIDs), and two automatic injection loops. The GC system is calibrated with premixed; certified commercially-obtained gas mixtures. The certification is traceable to NIST standards. Certificates of traceability of the gas mixtures are to be included in the QA forms described in Section 6. Certifications of gases will be no older than one year. The GC receives a multipoint calibration to assure linearity of the response. Nonlinear calibrations can indicate problems with flow settings or with column operation. Also, at the beginning of each run. a single-point calibration check is performed. *The individual singe-point run calibration is used to adjust the linear curve for minor fluctuations in calibration and to check
- overall operation. Section 7 contains QA forms that will describe the results of the multipoint calibrations. The GC multipoint calibrations will be performed bot.h prior to and following the wind tunnel testing. The single-point run calibration resultS are incorporated into the run reports to be included in the final report.
Voltage readings from the GC are recorded with a .PC computer-based data acquisition card. The computer voltage measurements will be calibrated against a certified digital voltmeter prior to testing. Voltage readings will also be recorded on strip chart recorders as a precaution against loss of data on the computer .
- CPP~
CPP QA Plan 0907 2 March 12. 1993 1.2 Tracer Gas Sampling Equipment Gas samples are withdrawn from selected locations in the wind tunnel with a 50-syringe sampling system. Plastic tubing carries the gas from the tunnel *physical model to the sampling system located adjacent to the tunnel. For each run, the withdrawal takes place for a 200 second time period while the tunnel is running and while the tracer gases are being emitted from model sources. After the sampling, the gas contents of the syringes (two at a time) are injected into the GC for analysis. Two aspects of the sampling system need periodic checks. One is to ensure that the sample flow rate in the tunnel is sufficient to obtain a sample but not too large to influence the air flow around the physical model. A flow rate of 10 to 12 cc/sis typically used. This flow rate is measured for randomly selected sampling tubes. The other aspect requiring confirmation is a leakage check. This is accomplished by sampling with all 50 syringes and tubes from an air volume containing a constant gas concentration. The collected samples are analyzed with the GC, and the concentration results for the syringes are compared. Improperly operating syringes arid leaking tubes will be indicated by lower concentrations than the other sampling ports. The results of these checks are to be included in the documentation described in Section 6. The sampling system leakage tests will be performed both before and after the wind tunnel testing program .. 1.3 Velocity Measurements Velocity measurements are used in diffusion. studies for two primary purposes: 1) to measure the approach wind profile and the variation of mean velocity and turbulent fluctuations as a function of height and position; and 2) to determine the mean model velocity at a reference height which is used as a scaling parameter for simulation of plume rise and diffusion. In this study,.mean velocities will be measured with a pitot-static tube. The approach profile of
- mean velocities and turbulent fluctuating velocities will be measured with a hot film anemometer.
The pitot-static tube is the primary velocity standard at CPP. The pitot-static tube is a standard device which converts the total pressure head of an air flow into a static pressure mea5urable with a pressure transducer and which also makes a measurement of the static pressure. The difference in total and static pressure is the dynamic pressure proportional to air density and the square* of air velocity. Mean velocities in the wind tunnel will be computed from calibrations of pressure transducers and measurements of atmospheric pressure and temperature. Pressure transducer calibrations ar~ described below. Measurements of atmospheric pressure and temperature are made daily with a Fisher Scientific Nova model mercury barometer and a simple mercury thermometer. The lowerHmit of velocity is limited by the sensitivity of the pressure transducer and the design of the pitot tube. The pitot tube will not be used to measure air speeds below 1.5
- m/s. All testing for this project will be performed at reference air speeds higher than this limit. The pitot-static tube will be inspected for physical damage before and after the testing program.
The hot film anemometer is to be used to measure the profiles of mean velocity and turbulent velocity fluctuations for characterization of the approach wind flow. The hot film anemometer is calibrated against the pitot-static tube. The hot film anemometer is sensitive to dust deposits, and calibration is performed at least once for each day of use. _The hot film anemometer is to be mounted on a vertical traverse system. A calibration of the traverse system is required to ensure accurate measurement heights needed in fits of the approach wind flow.
- CPPA1P
CPP QA Plan 0907 3 March 12. 1993
- All pressure transducer and hot film anemometer outputs will be recorded by a PC computer-based data acquisition system that will be calibrated against a certified digital voltmeter.
1.4 Flow Rate Measurements The flow rate of gas (usually a mixture of a tracer ga5 and a carrier gas) emitted from a source is an important scaling parameter. The primary calibration method is a certified. commercially available soap-bubble meter located at CPP. The gas mixture passes through a bubble generator and bubble surfaces travel upward through a tube of known diameter. A bubble is timed as it travels through a known volume. Thus. volume flow rate is measured directly by volume and time readings. Flow meter calibrations depend on the gas mixture used, so *a separate calibration is made for each mixture used. Routine flow rate. measurements in the testing are made with either electronic flow meters or rotameters. Each of these instruments used is calibrated with the particular gas mixture using the soap-bubble meter. Results of the flow meter calibrations will be included in the documentation described in Section 7. 1.5 Pressure Measurements Pressure measurements are used for the pitot-static velocity probe (as described in Section 1.3 above). A sensitive electronic Setra Model 239, with a full scale range of 0.5 inches of water. is to be used. Calibration will be performed with a Dwyer inclined manometer Model 424. The inclined manometer converts a pressure reading into a length reading. The calibration will be documented in the forms described in Section 7. Pressure transducer calibrations will be performed both before and after the wind tunnel testing program. 1.6 NIST Traceability Several primary calibration standards used at CPP will be traceable to NIST standards. This . section summarizes the traceability to NIST. First, voltage measurements are common to many procedures. A digital voltmeter (DVM) (Fluke Model 9020A) is to be sent to a metrology laboratory for calibration against certified voltage standards. The certified DVM will be used by CPP to check the voltage acquisition of the PC computer-based A/D data acquisition card.
- Gas concentrations will be compared to calibration gases with certifications provided by the gas supplier.
Velocity measurements will be taken with a pitot-static tube of standard design. Differential pressure measurements will be taken with a pressure transducer calibrated against aninclined manometer (Dwyer Model 424) which is certified to be of standard design~ Volume flow rate measurements will be traced to a certified, commercially available certified soap bubble meter. 2.0 QA MANAGEMENT Mr. Chester E. Wisner, CEO of Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc., ha5 overall responsibility for quality assurance at the company. Dr. Michael A. Ratcliff, the project manager for this study, is responsible for ensuring that this Quality Assurance Plan is followed. Mr. Steven L. cpp.;;g
CPP QA Plan 0907 4 .'vfarch 12. 1993
- Mike, assistant laboratory manager, is primarily responsible for performing instrument calibrations. Mr. Mike will report to Dr. Ratcliff on all QA matters. Likewise, Dr. Ratcliff will report to Mr. Wisner.
3.0 TRAINING CPP uses on the job training for employees who collect data and perform calibrations. The current employees who will be working on this study have at least one year of experience and several have over 7 years of experience. The documentation of training will consist of two parts: l) documentation of employee qualifications, and 2) documentation of training for and understanding of the particular test plans of this study. Employee qualification documents for each data collector will include a resume of the empioyee and a statement from a company principal that the employee qualifications satisfies the requirements of the position. Prior to the testing, the particular test plans will be discussed with the data collection personnel and any* questions the data collectors have will be answered. At that time the data collector will sign a document stating that the test plan has been explained and that they understand the test plan. The signed documents will be included in the QA documentation described in Section. 7..
- 4.0 REPORT REVIEW The report will be prepared primarily by the project manager. Prior to submission, the draft report will be reviewed by a principal of the corporation who deals primarily in atmospheric diffusion. A signed statement from the reviewer will be included in the QA documentation.
5.0 ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS Representative samples of engineering calculations performed during the study will be checked by hand calculations and documented in the QA report. Two calculations which are common to dispersion studies are for full-scale (real world) x/Q and dilution factors obtained from the tunnel measurements. 6.0 EXCEPTION REPORTS During the course of the study, any out of the ordinary conditions which may degrade the quality of the data will be recorded in exception reports. A decision on whether to accept the data as is, correct the data, or discard and retake the data will be made by the project manager and recorded with the report. Exception reports will be included in the QA documentation, and each report title will be entered in the master QA checklist. 7 .0 QUALITY CONTROL CHECKLISTS This section describes the checklists used to ensure the QA steps of Sections l to S above are taken. The master checklist is Form QA-1 and lists all of the other forms, documentation, and calibrations used iff quality assurance. Beside each entry is a space for an initial for the person performing the task. and the date of signature. CPPJIP
CPP QA Plan 0907 5 ,\1arch 12. 1993
- Three other standard checklist forms are included in the QA documentation: a project information list (Form QA-2), a model information list (Form QA-3), and a form for each approach wind profile used (Form QA-4). Each of the forms requires an initial and date of initial for each entry. Much of the actual information requested in the forms is to be attached. Several sample calibration attachments are included in this document .
CPP~
7 Form QA-1 (Page 1 of~ Project: f}_f1 j1LciL:1-Master QA Checklist / Proj Number: -J) -(I '1C7 tern Project Information Sheet Completed (attach Form QA-2) Model information Sheet Completed (attach Form QA-3) Approach Setup Description Sheet(s) (attach Form QA-4) List 1. l<;~ 2.W~ 3. Digital Voltmeter Certification (attach) Inclined Manometer Certification (attach) Soap Bubble Fiowmeter Certification (attach) Gas Concentration Certifications (attach) List 1. N<.v,_,M_ 'o..;'-'t""""I i;,\1.,uvvu.., u.<~
- 2. N <. ~ iYJ-J< l" - o ,, ., *~"~] "':'"-r l ~""'- 1 4 c ~
- 3. L1,~\J'(.-., i'iA>vV- ,..,,r 1 1.~cv-..._.._
- 4. l- k-U-' n,,"-..,. V- ..~ ' ,.-.._t "'*-* ,_,__.
_,~.._
~"f- ? \-6i v7*~\
Multipoint GC calibration (attach) *
- 1. Pre-test
- 2. Post-test Syringe system check (attach)
- 1. Pre-test
- 2. Post-test 5'!,,*"'.')" Sysk*vn h.,:c,,.,~; CtwLc..k..
Syringe system intake flow rate (attach) Volume Flow Rate calibrations (attach) List meters and gas mixtures:
,""1,.,](.;, ... ~j ~rwu,,,r n"/~,/11;, .tf.7~"/";:4, *'1..<:
- 1. \el"""
~:::::~====~::;=~;;;==~B~Sl,.,..¥1-4
- //,7 "1 3 (;u)) r-> ,.r7 HA /v~ ':,. v ..; -/ N 2. //. /i J) l.J.4 I 4r J'
~\?i ""
- 5. i-KM3 (5'£>\ M. ~T~ 54.l 't 13ai!_ <-'.e
. ) I
- 6. *"'"";s(_DL-t>) e:..T~A.J~- Z..57"l ,~a.JL (-{ e Velocity traverse height calibration (attach)
Pressure transducer calibration (attach)
- 1. Pre-test
- 2. Post-test A/D Voltage calibration (attach)
~
- Form QA-1 (Page 2 off) Project: /,_£>A_~~
Master QA Checklist Proj Number: ..;~ -C'1tJ 7 Item Initial Date 1ot tu e 1nspeet1on ror pnys1ca1 aamage
- 1. Pre-test*
- 2. Post-test Model Scale inspection (attach)
Calculations checks (attach) List: 1. C/Q
- 2. Dilution 3.
4. Project Review (attach) Data Collector Employee Training (attach statements) Employee name: Gt,.1sl-er e. W1srwi Pro~!.d Dm..<.J-n.
- 1. Qualifications {tu~)
- 2. Understanding of test plan Employee name: f'1111"c{.,11.e.f A . R.@1 ff; Pn;ie.ct- il--1r)I.. N1.-r 1 . Qualifications ( R..Ls"' ....-)
- 2. Understanding of test plan Employee name: s~ l. M'/c{..... lksf-* ~ ~d:,lt-.-~
i
- 1. Qualifications
- 2. Understanding of test plan Employee name: S tJ1vn. I' 6-rt~(} 1
'!JJ.t.. 4:c¥ Tu..f._lN'l'"u,~......,
1 . Qualifications .
- 2. Understanding of test plan AJ.,r,*~ JVl . fl,? c1. "' 3(.VVl ~7 MriJ. ~h... 4-ori .
J. tYv1..1:Nu-h~ .
- 1 z,, V,J..y,r~>r rJ <nrr ft~ (#/A) lr' 1J11'! I,~ 1', ~rv<-y / 'Dif1.. ~ 1'~J .:.._
- t. G1.1 ~ r::c~~1 .
-z., v~~l\-y *.f 'Te.it f(r...-
)-kVVlr- I}). Vv\ 1'(LtA./ V'°*1- Ac.5f-" l'f.r~= c..J6.-.
- 1. a"'~ R~ .,,...,,_,
'Z.* U~s~;~ c.{ -r . c-r p(6-
I
.D.e.s~rh"lr- ~
S. :;~ ,*,._JQ.J..~ f ~J. l';--o~ Z...'i/lpr 15
~. f2_cv;,'....,._ .ov.........~ .l'G"""'i ~(f b 2-er ~<ts ......... 7. Sc..vv-~ .ry1/.vv.A. /l)ri--1<.rr J.
- L t'B ~'i.3'
- i::::c::c QCICI 8.
"'Cl Cl Nr.r:.
iB ;vt_ "-] 7J - rS ,vt "115 1 '8 rvt "-} 7 ~
;VJkYL. Cj 5 I
0 fl/lt--; '
. J
( ~ !V1J-. .i(':5-I 6 (IA. ,,.;../i J
;i--1,.4-y.J-
f Form QA-2 Project:_Pc._U _ _J"_* _i:z...,,..c&...,._s.,,,...,..~------------ Project Information Sheet Project Number: _ _ f..;;.3_-_0....__9-_'(J_.7_ _ _ __ I Item 1uescricuon Initial 1uate I Project Number Official Project ntle J Sponsor Name/Address I t~S.W:Wt.~m~wimt\~~tf~f:f:tW:t$tf:t~tJ/SJltltti\t~~~r:~lfl~lKllt !~*%w~~~$:- Other Companies (eg. owner) r'o ,,.,,.r .1~ Pouvc- 6......_ ...~.., ~ .S-~r9< I { 0 ~r- M:r::) I Staffing: Project Director Project Manager Data Collection Coordinator Mn~i~M~~-rui~~t.~wJ,w.#.1?:t w$.W:;;'.~. mf' Model Construction Coordinator I Goal of Study: I. ~04.J..~ ..-...,/....,.. en.. ~,,..,_...., ,,;.,.J MA"12_ S' ~15 I"\~ ~J...,./ ~ /~ I I 2.. D,'"c.M..( ~ ..,.._ (,,,,,..._. a.J- u--h-vf ,,.,,..,..,_ M~ ~
~1ii1;~i~t1m~ilii~ii1MWJt~J%i~t:(1~1i:1~W:if.~m*~1l~lt~~1~;~~~~~l~t~~W:1ws11~lilim1 *~m;m~*-
Site Location: ' A> vr,,...:1-, M:r: IV1 ~ ~ /.1..Y" 'if I Meteorological Data: Model Scale: /:?oo I Sources to Test: il~tm.~f:~~;~~;~;f;~1~~ll~~~i~~~lm/~i~;~r:fil§r:.~~m~m~~~~mmmi~~~mmi~mt1~~!;~1~~~1l;~~~m~~~;~~*~l~~itmmili~1~~r~ f~i~itr:~~~~~11r::r.?:~~~ ;~,~~~~
\1tt!:ll\l~~l\f?1#~f:t,f\~fftt.f~~~Jffi~lfJ~1JMfl1l~f:ili\f:llt~l~l~f:f:l~~tl~~f:t~ lf:UJ~ft~~J~ imt¥~~
1. I 2. 3. 4. I 5. 6. m~~it~~~t~~~rJ&f~~&1~~~i~t.i~~~~~~~~~~~r:?:i~M~t~mw.r:~mw.t~~~~~~m1t~t~~~i1~&wJr:i~t ~~i&.~§~~~~WMt ~~~~.. :.:-..... . . . .. : Configurations to Test: tt&.~J*~i~tlt~il@tm?.1*1:tttf.~~*1ti%~m~f:r:tttt@t:t.~tmti~lflJ%ft:l~? r;~m~~itta~~w t~t.~~ 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
j.
"i Form QA-3 Model Information Sheet Project: __A_~ __;-_~----------
Project Number:_""'"'1""'"'3_--=o_z......._o_.7_ i tern escnpuon nitJ ate j Model Scale Buildings to Construct (attach list) J Terrain to construct r Source Descriptions (attach tor each source:
- 1. stack diameter I '
- 2. stack height(s)
- 3. stack orientation
- 4. stack flow rate
.... 5. stack exit temperature
...,-j
- 6. stack trip installed?)
Concentration Sampling Grid(s) l (attach diagrams of locations) l l l l l
~,,_,,.,,., 0.1.-;e"~ r1-.&.% I.
Praj.,,.A ..-.PvX<=--:j-L~~;.;* ~*- - - - - - - P..j
- 101 ln,.h*I ~
I- . . . .
- c::::c::::c:
000 11100 Gcl'M.C. N*lu: I) Po<AfiA- f (,,...,,.,t_ p..e,/ ""~ b(~s
-N
_ C"I., Nf'4~ C"IC"IC"I.
- 2) )~f' 5fvvc..J-vre.r 4r rr-</h'J '7 S"~ g Lv~b *
~ Z"3~r.S s.,b '*
3 ) Cft,rGv-v--) T ~ ( l j ) (I -,J_ .. ) :J L{) ~v ,- '-'-- 8 {,j_i_) ""!' "'-""-/> ~""'---7 ~ 3-<-H-
/)~';~
r-,-d.d_,- :L ';>1;µ_ v(i,*f- e~"y
- fr*r,i,tc 11
;::. Po~ bl o c_,{L_:
A. 6:rvv/-ol.A*., ~ J f; ,..'-. Cl,,,~*~
- 8. tv"'"'*~ . ~. ,.., J c.. tf-v 't(J Lt'/
JL 0 ~;. ~,c_e_ 13fj
. e,. di-. De.. """'1.~i.~ ).P"t
~ . c.. !if'. '5:'"'l'f di- .f ~
J> I ( ~1-r,...J~- S"J.yi/ JiF~ r;. , ~-~f ~ r..,,,..,...t ~ f"W"J ;v- W'l ~~ -c:, --J . c - 3 c.J. -c.v-k- .,l,,vJ
~~s (1Jkof.(
r=, D"'t c,,.; f- St. '""'7'-- 16 aL / 52.. n ¢ 2o o " ;..11
~- T ~o ~ of urfJ (,,,.'"") H>~.r L
' 17 (,. P~ _,.,,, P} {I ~ .fV' ofj .(V°>1) ~ ~ /-J LA C9J
~ ~-rl~ 0-VV 9-_5 f'VV'CJ ' r-1 a...; ..f/'J') 0'2: -->/ ~
rr -.nJ,ra ~ ~ J.-J ;rr ~w .r-rrr-t svt/ ~ -1 ifVI ynv _,-(v. 'Y }.' ~"'! fv_ '7' ~,-. a...V" S t? -y' ,,..,_.,_,, u"' J7) "fJ *ri '-'""7
---d 4 c>'f (,) a/ Jr1 ~-Irv! :p; frr-; rt~\M IJ °) ~' 5
), 'J 1,. 7- ' , I r' 'f"f}. "'7 ->"') "! ""'] 0"1! * -ry "/ j J j )v,5 1
....., ~ ~ c ~ ~ -12. -;/ ~7 j ""'"/ 1~' J\11 ~-">?j) r'J-" ,-v...; 5 "'-8/) (..,_ "l' J., /'> g '4 0 )'P" " 5 :;1-0 n rv?ef "' J>J Y'V'7'" nJ.
- r::-_ vy!. , ?p ~ ~, ~ "'-'fr) "'1"' .,,.,_, -..U :f o "I'.'.5
~ --yf,~ ~ O<...A.r' 0 5 "~ "'1./\0 ) ) .J~ tl/N l tl..*-'..J-
~s~-;. ojt??
~~.....,._ ___
_rvio;
.'-*.1.
~~N*J::/
+.'~.3
+o Q.../ .:I e o:,".; ~o;
(*-1...... __.., .... ....,) WWi.l WWi.l
.!..~.!...
.a.~-
~
cc CCC I.II
"""I.II
- ::: :r r.t.f.N/
-r~d 1-"'*lNtJ
S'ourc,e. Du~r""'*,__ Sl...ac,,t
- Pl't#j*~"
!P"1J #I f ~";-C\_clu-i
/ IN"h-.f
- .n U1"'
~en Vi 000 11'100
- 6. 'f f+ (,..... ..............,..$)
fvr,*n... fol' c:;-f ~~-,,._~t- f3tp{_J-(Ji'tii. 1-,..4*,,.,. _u._______
. c:v/a "'~'
/:l*w4'1c. /oW- (f/lo ~J 0~~ J ~j~j)
~h,~~
61';f ,.* .., - - - - - - - r,-.-p? on.,., N*h11
/__,:;~ - tui..J*t(._~ h ~,~,-V\~ Bu,{~
~ ~-~ vl~ c -S-Z.. t4,v f s.
S-ourc,1- Du~;,c,** .._ Ska~
- P"*i*""
P"1j;11 P~5~ _1_~_--10-..7________ I- I- ... J: ::: ::: v~ 000 11100 Stt<w NNN N"" l=l*w4H.
- E*1:f r.,,,,_, --~--1._,,_~ . . .--
r,.-p? Io~ N*"- I °"'r f-v !,,..._. cJ_.., -~ ~ v.:, "'....e. j ....., :;. ,____
~A~~ ~ ~ C-se /:in (occ-Jib--._
~
~ "1 .:.
- J r
*' ~~
r.I\
~- " ~~
~ I -~
~ .::.
2""
..t
- i
~}
~ <,
~
J2 ~ ~
..,., l'f) cy--
{
\.
~
~ l l ~
s 0
~
'-.J
\n
,*.c' ~ i cf
~ ~
\)
\N\ :FJ 1)s
\:()
- LL J)
V\-- 0 I ~ tt N ~
\) \J I
~
~
C)
~
~ t ~
N ~
- 11.J
". ~
~
- 1 ~ -tj ~-(
~
~
~
~
-~
~
['
~ ~
~
j 13~ l -t .t /. ~
~ ~-
.~
.. ~{\
"' j
~
~ ~
--~ *' I~
~~ ..~ I :\.
~
tt ~
,.\) ~
- c:S :t ~ ll
~
-~
,* 1'
~
t q: r
~
~
J
~
\i\
J
~
SU:IHS OOt H* 1-tt Q snms 001 n1-tt
- 5H:IH5 05 1111-u;
Cermak Peterka Petersen. inc. CPP Project 93-0907
. . ~ {1.M°J . (JJ(A 1" ~ ("'- 11.. ftLll
/ /&' /lA~ 15 . ;fA1b. *--::ff
-z,1 M f17
'"----" LJ 7
5
,, 6 i 8 9
\.I\ \,
I 10 ID 3 4 ~ I
'/
2 11
- -20 12 13 L I 14 17 D
n
\
'*\
I I _____, I
, .40 O' !>O' 100" I
-Points 1 and 2 located at el. 58'
-Point .3 located at el. 15' \~'
~
2Qm. !Om Om I Om -Points 4 and 22 located at el. 20'
-Points 7, 20 and 21 located at el. 28'
-Points 5, 6, 8- 19 located at el 51'
-All others at roof heights Note: Location 5 is emergency control room intake:
Locations 27 ona 29 ore normal control room intakes. Figure 7. Measurement locations used in the wind tunnel modeling (excluding Service Building expansion). CPP~
CPP Project 93-0907 LJ I I ., I 44
,, 49 43
,, ' 5 6 I a g
. -I 45 10 Sentice Building 11 0 Expansion * -20 12 46 * *48 13 14 0
' \,
\
I
\
J II o* !>Cl' 100"
-Points 1 and 2 located at el.* 58'
-Point .3 located at el. 15' 10111 '°"' -Points 4 and 22 located at el. 20'
-Points 7, 20 and 21 located at el. 28'
-Points 5, 6, 8- l 9 located at el 51 *
~Points 43-45, 49 located at el 49'
-Alf others at root heights Note: Location 5 is emergency control room intake; Locations 27 ana 29 are normal control room intakes.
Figure 8. Measurement locations at the Service Building expansion. CPP~
~I Form QA-4 Bounaary Layer Checklist (Use tor eacn aoproacn ororile des1rea1 Project P~ J--~
Project Numoer:f? - 90 7 VELOC11Y PROFILE Item 1 1arget : /-\CtUal ; 1n1t1at 1uate Power Law Exponent (n)
~.,' - -
) -...J ~~
Rougnness length (zo) I [~.s] TUNNEL SE11JP tern Reference Height (ft) Reference Locanon No. of Spires Spire Type Sp.acing of Spires (ft) Height of spires(ft) Height of trip (in.) Length of roughness upwind of T.T. Distance spire upwind edge to trip (ft) ~LS2~---------....,..-+.....::::1~!ar....~::l:l:~ Roughness Setup Root Settings Polaroid of setuo (attachl ct~~~~C;, U.e:"1c~~
Point Location Emean Umean Ur ms Turb RefVel RefVolt
<cm) <volts) ( m/s) ( m/s) ( /.) ( m/s) (volts) 1 2.00 5.588 1. 553 .484 29.121 3.215 .204 ..::. 3.69 5.575 1.630 .432 26. 4*37 3.149 .195 3 5.94 5.653 1.756 .454 25.689 3.118 .191 4 7.71 5.794 2. 028 . .506 24.954 3.159 . 1'37 5 10.29 5.865 2.167 .486 22.418 3.167 .197 6 12.25 6.853 2.138 .478 22.344 3.112 .191 7 15.03 6.937 2.312 .475 20.559 3.167 .198 8 20. 13 6.946 2.329 .475 20.400 3.160 .197 '3 24.86 7.067 2.5'93 .427 16.482 3.167 .198 10 29. 8'3 7. 124 2.734 .459 16.790 3.146 .195 11 35.10 7.127 2.735 .419 15.306 3.167 .198 12 39.70 7.216 2. '355 .390 13.210 3.184
- 200 13 45.28 7.213 2.952 .430 14.561 3.145 . 195 14 50.06 7.187 2.886 .439 15.208 3.092 .188 15 60.16 7.287 3.145 .410 13.047 3.197 .201 16 69.89 7.255 3.058 .411 13.424 3.136 .194 17 79.81 7.296 3.171 .428 13.506 3. 112 .191 18 90. 17 7.345 3.306 .413 12.487 3.156 .196 19 100.07 7.376 3.390 .378 11. 162 3.165 .197
!-~~7:;i ,._:.::.._ppf?...C...-:~~'-
Positioning traverse to 3.712 volts. WIND TUNNEL PROFILE RESULTS Project 907 -- Profile letter: B Collection Bar op res Temp X-Loc F"ix-Loc Date Time UnHg) deg C Orient <cm> <cm) 4- 5-93 21:12 24.81 23.00 Vert .oo .oo Serial Resistance Calibration Constants Sample Number Cold Hot A B C Rate<Hz) 66065 4.85 7.27 .744830 1.411180 .418620 150.0 Profile Roughness Spires Trip Sample Type Ht <in) Ln (ft) # Ht (in> Ht (in) Time(sec) Approach 2.00 44.00 2 60.00 14.75"" 30.0 TT Azimuth: *0 Taken approximately 10" into roughness, leading edge of TT. Lifter 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Setting .oo .oo .oo .oo .oo .oo
- 00
~_LAND CASE. 44' of 2" Youghness* with 4" cubes in 4 rows per 4'X8'
~ sheet.
Spacing of 4" cubes is 9-8-9-8/4X8. Trip is beveledc and in usual spot. Mean Estimate Rms Turbulence Point Location Velocity Velocity EYYor Velocity Intensity Use
# <cm) ( m/s) ( m/s) ( i.) ( m/s) ( '") flag 1 2.00 1. 663 1. 523 '3. 183 .48 29.121 1 2 3.69 1.630 1.726 -5.561 .43 26.497 1 3 5.94 1.766* 1.902 -7.192
- 45 25.689 1 4 .7. 71 2.028 2.006 1.098 .51 24.954 1 5 10.29 2.167 2.128 1. 801 .49 22.418 1 6 12.25 2.138 2.206 -3.070 .48 22.344 1 7 15.03 2.312 2.300 .542 .48 20.559 1 8 20.13 2.329 2.441 -4.600 .48 20.400 1
'3 24.86 2.593 2.549 1. 725 .43 16.482 1 10 29.89 2.734 2.647 3.314 .46 16.790 1
l l ..:iO. lV L * /~;:) L. 1;,;s;:i
- ULL ."+L 1 ::>. ;.jUb l 12 39.70 2. '355 2.805 5.356 .39 13.210 1
- 13 45.28 2. '352 2.881 2.469 .43 14.561 1 14 50.06 2.886 2.941 -1. 850 .44 15.208 1 15 60.16 3. 145 3.053 3.021 .41 13.047 1 16 69.89 3.058 3.148 -2.852 .41 13.424 1 17 79.81 3.171 3.235 -1. 964 .43 13.506 1 18 90. 17 3.306 3.316 -.303 .41 12.487 1 19 100.07 3.390 3.388 .058 .38 11.162 1 20 108.42 3.450 3.444 . 173 .39 11. 420 1 Uref Zref Corre 1 at i *::>n Exponent Avg Ref ( m/s) (cm) I ref coefficient N Vel ( m/s) 3.39 100.07 19 * '3872274 .204320 3.16
N = .205 UREFFIT:-= 3.452 model m/s ZREFFIT = 325.260 full m - CORRELATION = .98543 L/-i-C!J@
.-- l /f l'V 0 c ~ _s~
ZO = .82344 full m USTAR = .230 model mis CORRELATION = .97668 Please hit any key to proceed
- Form QA-4 Bounaary Layer ChecKlist (Use tor eacn aoproacn oronle des1rea1 f? () -;...~
Project._ _..:...f"..;,?-U Project Numoer: 1? ~ fo 7 VELOClTY PROFILE tern 1 1 arget 1Actuai 11n1t1ai 1 uate Power Law Exoonent (n} o,O(,,- o, l'f
/t-1/l-((.. 1 >. r1~
I .*: 6GJ Roughness length (zo) TUNNEL SETI.JP Item , uescriot1on 1 1nmai 1Oate
!:tiifffftJffitttlttt:t:=tnt:t:?::t=lWl!:Mfi:f Mtlf#MHli#W@i:
Reference Height (ft) I ,....-, I r~ ,._, I _, - , -* \ Reference Locanon tr--, n, ,,_,_ , * ,..,, ,.<' - ~ -r I ,- ,, - ,. - . -* ! I No. of Spires ~ I ; *-* Spire Type _, " - -" ~ ,., I , i..,. - ) _.., ', Spacing of Spires (ft} ,_, ... .: ,* * - ,, '/ - '-' .)- . _,, I *'11
- _, __, -** r Height of spires(ft) .: . - .L . I ~ *" (,, - ) - .... 1.
Height of trip (in.) _, ..;.. ,-,. I r~ ;.:.. Length of roughness uowind of T.T. ,1..,, o ,,._~ I * . '* ... , - _.., J
~
Distance spire upwind edge to trip (ft) 1----;-....,,_ ,, .R _11 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _...._...'-'--__ I t? i-+- u -F-'r _
-~---"ll Roughness Setup ' '- -- I ._ 1 _ ,-_ '-f ~
11 0 Root Settings ! I I Polaroid of setuo (attachl
Point Location Emean Umean Ur ms Turb RefVel RefVolt (cm) (volts) ( m/s) ( m/s) (%) ( mis) (volts) 1 2.00 6.916 2.239 .243 10.844' 3.024 .180 2 3.76 7.042 2.515 .226 8.975 3.013 .179 3 5.68 7.058 2.553 .216 8.453 '3.013 .179 4 7.95 7.110 2.678 .242 9.052 3.041 . 182 5 10.00 7.124 2.710 .225 8.288 3.063 .185 5 12.44 7.141 2.751 .207 7.526 3.039 .182 7 15.23 7.153 2.780 .191 6.877 3.036 .181 8 19.87 7.169 2.821 .178 6.302 3.033 .181
'3 24.99 7.188 2.867 .162 .5. 666 3.032 .181 10 29.92 7.202 2.904 .170 5.854 3.026 . 180 11 34.90 7.200 2.897 .. 143 4.'947 3.050 .183 12 39.82 7.209 2.920 . 157 5.383 3.025 .180 13 44.98 7.201 2.899 .134 4.622 3.007 . 178 .
14 49.78 7.220 2.950 .139 4.703 3.024
- lSO 15 59.68 7.230 2.974 .138 4.650 3.017 .179 16 69.86 7.247 3.019 . 144 4.770 -3. 124 . 192 17 80.14 7.248 3.022 .135 4.482 3.067 .185 18 90.31 7.268 3.075 .138 4.475 3.022 . 180 19 100.30 7.280 3.108 .124 4.000 3.030 .181 Positioning traverse to 3.714 volts.
WIND TUNNEL PROFILE RESULTS Project 907 -- Profile letter: A Collection* Bar op res Temp X-Loc Fix-Loe Date Time <inHg) deg C Orient (cm) * <cm) 4- 5-93 19:43 24.81 23.30 Vert .oo .oo Seri al Resistance Calibration Constants Sample Numbe'I". Cold Hot A B C Rate(Hz) 66065 4.85 7.27 .744830 1.411180 .418620 150.0
'-.]'""
Profile Roughness Spires Trip Sample
*~~ Type Ht Cin) Ln Cft) # Ht (in) Ht <in) Time(sec)
~.~, Approach 1.00 .00 2 60.00 4.50 30.0 FL.r-..--r-' *0....) ~r....) e_.:-.:._
~ ~) TT Azimuth: .o .
~ Profile taken approx. 10" into where roughness will be.
i *~ *\1J Li ft er Setting 1
- 00 2
- 00 3
- 00 4
- 00 5
- 00 6
- 00 7 .
- 00
~ ~Two
-i
-sJ _ WATER CASE -flat tunnel. Profile approx. 13" UW 5' flat top spires spaced 45.25"-54"-45.25" lead edge of TT.
i Trip is beveled and in usual spot.
~ - Mean Estimate Rms .Turbulence ~ Point Location Velocity Velocity Error Velocity Intensity Use \J _ ~ # <cm) ( m/s) ( m/s) <i.> ( mis) (i.) flag I'~ 1 2.00 2.239 2.377 -5.777 .24 10.844 1 2 3.76 2.515 2.483 1.296 .23 8.975 1 3 5.68 2.553* 2.555 -.090 .22 8.453 1 4 7.95 2.678 2.615 2.380 .24 9.052 1 5 10.00 2.710 2.657 1.979 .22 8.288 1 6 12.44 2.751 2.698 1.955 .21 7.526 1 7 15.23 2.780 2.736 1.586 .19 6.877 1 8 19.87 2.821 2.787 1.201 .18 6.302 1 9 24.99 2.067 2.032 1.242 .16 *5.666 1 10 29.92 2.904 2.867 1.293 .17 5.854 1
11 34. '30 2. 8'37 2.8'38 -.026 . 14 4.947 1 12 39.82 2.920 2.925 -. 166 .16 5.383 1 13 44.'38 2.899 2.950 -1.722 . 13 4.622 1 14 49.78 2.950 2.970 -.697
- 14 4.703 1 15 59.68 2.974 3.008 -1.142 .14 4.650 1 16 69.86 3.019 3.041 -.718 .14 4.770 1 17 80.14 3.022 3.070 -1.557 .14 4.482 1 18 90.31 3.075 3.096 -.662 .14 4.475 1 1 '3 100.30 3. 108 3.118 -.324 . 12 4.000 1 20 107.39 3.142 3.133 .275 .12 3.711 1 LJyef Zref CoY"rel at ion Exponent Avg Ref
( m/s) (cm) I ref *: oe f f i c i en t N Vel ( m/s)
- 3. 12 100.30 1'3 * '3738986 .069370 3.04
~--c 3 at)
-------*~ ' -.. *-* .*.
~1 N = .069 UREFFIT = 3.133 model m/s ZREFFIT = i22.170 full m CORRELATION = * '37378 zo = .00003 full m USTAR = .077 model m/s q3-o9o7 CORRELATION = .97282 '~-- _,,,. //
Pleas~ hit ~ny key to proceed
~rnTROLOGY LABORATORY RErORT OF CERTIFICATION PERFORMED-FOR Cermak Peterka Petersen, inc.
INSTRUMENT: Multimeter, Digital MANUFACTURER: Fluke MODEL NO: B050A SERIAL NO: 3436263 OTHER ID ~10: None PURCHASE ORDER NO: 20149 This is to certify that the instrument was calibrated in our laboratory on March 28, 1993, and was found to be within manufacturer's specifications, or t6 the ~pecif ications given below: RECALIBRATION DUE DATE: September 28, 1993 As received, unit performed within manufacturer's specifications. '.'lo adjustment was required or performed. Test Environment: Temperature: 23°r. Relative Humidity: 18% Standards Used: M18199, Cal Due 07/07/93 M17102, Cal Due 07/07/93 This will further certify that the test described above was performed using standards traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology. By: Date:- March 28, 1993 c/A-a&~£
.J. Belohlavek BASG TEST NUMBER: 3430 45444 Metrology Laboratory
CERTIFICATION OF INCLINED MANOMETER DWYER INSTRUMENTS. INC.*
- t 375 NORTH McCAN STREET
""~r-ff:'!fM; e'A'LIFORNIA 9Z806 (7!4) 630-64Z4 * (ZIJ) 860-6547
Subject:
Your Purchase Order No. 2221*
)).a..t.Qd Date shipped: 7 8 6 - - - - - - - - - - -
CERTIFICATION OF CONFORMANCE We certify that the mat~rial. in the quantity called for I on subject purchase order, conforms' to the requirements I and warranty of our published catalog data pertaining to *\ the subject material. We have on file evidence in support of this certification, DWYER INSTRUMENTS, INC .
CERTIFICATION OF INCLINED MANOMETER INVOICE DAViS & DAViS S
- LOTO F_o_ sax 9027 ... DENYER, COLORADO 2GZC9 ~ 303-::;;35-4c.g4 1 * -------***-------*-** *.** ******-*-****-**--------------*-** ------*--*--
Cermak/Peterka SHIPPED TO
-------------1415 -Blue-Spruce-----------------**--
Ft Collins Co 80524 .L r-s6 I QATE SHIPPED" 1-2-a6 SHIPPEO VIA- YCUR ORDER NO** 2221
.
- F.a.a;;::,:.
Denver
.* TERM&c.*
Net 30 INVOICE NO- . . *-:-.; 424-5 stationary inclined vertica1 manometer 240.00
----------Sta--t-e_t_ax--~----"----1----*-:-20
-------------------------------------------*--4-------i-__:;:.....:...::.....:...=.:; 247. 20 UPS 1.34
*---!-------------- - - - ----------*------------------------- ---------------- _______,-2..48-54
*- ---------**-*-**------------------------- *****-- **--**-*-** ---***-**-----** -***--*-***-*- *- -*-- -*** . ----- **- ---------4---
1o~c..ou.,i..c.1VT6 TRIPLICATE
~;
- J.>
i*i
- n
- 1 *** :6L * :>r:: I d.i .q,:
n
*j. i*-1 i.!
- ..: . ,. i r-I iJ! :ii [! ; ** J
**I ....
1** I ,:: _, n ~ :.: . r-- ilJ i-"'i
*'* I i** :J m 3 []" *-J l.i. *-.1 :.u t :i I .... u !ll fl) -*i -* U.i I' ;-i 1> *-* I id i:r :::i :.L fTl *-1 n- I i*-
- *** 1*1 ,, '
r*1 111 ~;::r i
!~1 ff] 1~ I tfJ f~'l ') u ~ !.
l)_t
...... ) I.:
,1,
.l~
I I I r:l (-J Tj j**L
!'ii I .. .:J 1*~-
r:* jlj f!j :.. , ' ,.
- / ' I ni :*; i o u n ......,
.J
, I ***; ..i * ... :::::
1* I i:"t ... i l ;1 ' i*:._ I 1* .. J ,;-* j liJ 1--1 !*. I ... **1 :~ 1 ~f/ I
- I i*-~ ;::) :: i) 1-.J I n .r:-" ;'"! :f :i ._I*
1* i .:;-,
.. I
() I . . *::::- -:;r !. l ::r ***h -1 qi o- I ::i *..u !*-'
,. u }-I .,- .:: !.. I 1.1
... t*.) I i-'* rn :~'J n t:.1 Cl ,:t I ::J i ..S IJI c:* .::.: .. ii jJ I
I en ;- : ::r ,-, I ,. :..T i ! fl! :. ; I f** !l.i r.1 ,;* rr1
- .. 11"'11 w t-- :n ;
'._' I.II **-1 i\) 1*1 *_: [f :s ::;
m **1 III ';']'
*c * :*-'*
",.-t* l1i ;:, :--*i "'
li! I :::o :~: !.~ :J rt !l! ,*-.1 ~i (.-J .i> l**l ,.. rn ITI Cl' J> ..) n ;:::*J 1** r-1* m !"!: l l 0 i _.j_ fl H :r::. '.T !~I (, Pl ii
**,. 11 -I Ci ..., - *'D
- .'.:i "'T1 1--t **L : :. i.1:
I-'* .;,;- ~::r i:r :-* ...i I *i
- i Pl !Tl fO , ::; :u ]) i. j r*1 flJ i.:J . *J. *--1
*:*i. 1-- 1
- rt lfj ;'i I fi_,
o rn ra ..-;*: :::~
*--* '.l Cl. ;.*. f[I ! i I-**' n *. ~ :J I u r:i .;i n i-.) iI
...1J *:c ni .~*:,
*-**' *.. } CJ ITJ r* !.11 1.'i. ;
I** ....... i' ~. H JJ -~J t-- 11 i i *l
-q rn ! ...
'7'
-I
G .:i. l. . i ..:::" 11 T n s. t 1*~Ltme=-n t CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE CELL :3/N .13646-H DATE 12-1-92 This is to certify that the above referenced Gilibrator Flow Cell was calibrated using film flowmeter MCH-101~ whi~h has been calibrated traceable to th~ National Institute ot Science and Technology~ per circular # 602~ ~ith the following
-esults:
F\:EFERENCE S/N RELATIVE F'ERCENT MCH-101 13646-H DIFF. DIFF. LPM LPM LPM 3.001 ::;; . 005 .004 .1 3.026 3.026 0 0 3.081 3.081 (l 0 3.081 3.081 0 0 3.072 ::;;
- 072 0 0 3.068 3.068 0 0 3.059 3.055 -.004 -.11 3.051 3.051 0 0 3.047 3.042 -.005 -.11 3.038 3.042 .003 .1
-.01 .1 MEAN 3.05 3.05
IJ Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. Shipped 500 .WEAVER PARK RD From: LONGMONT co 80501 Phone: 303-442-4700 Fax: 303-772-7673 C E R T I F I C A T E 0 F A-NA LYS IS
-------------------------------------------------------------------~-----
CERMAK-PETERKA ASSOCIATES PROJECT~: 08-10178-001 PO#: 201 20 1415 BLUE SPRUCE #3 ITEM#: 0802E3010105A DATE: 3/29/93
*FT COLLINS co 80524
~-------------~----------------------------------------------------
CYLINDER #: 1A012776
/
ANALYTICAL ACCURACY:.+/- 2~ FILL PRESSURE: 2000 PSIG BLEND TYPE : CERTIFIED WORKING STD REQUESTED GAS ANALYSIS gQMEQ~.S~I -~~Q~~-MQ1=.5§_ ETHANE 10.. PCT
..:.1MQ1=5§l_
NITROGEN 10.0 PCT 83.7 PCT 83. 7 PCT ARGON BAL BAL
- ~"!.:.I"- -.A CGA 350 2000 PSIG QC# 13299318 ANALYST: -~:~AA~~~--
DIANA~~ . APPROVED BY: ---~---------------- RIC SCHMELTEKOPF PLUMSTEADVILLE. PENNSYLVANIA I TROY. MICHIGAN I HOUSTON. TEXAS I DURHAM. NORTH CAROLINA SOUTH PLAINFIELD. NEW JERSEY I FREMONT. CALIFORNIA I WAKEFIELD. MASSACHUSETTS I LONGMONT, COLORADO BATON ROUGE. LOUISIANA
IJ Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. Shipped 500 WEAVER PARK RD From: LONGMONT CO 80501 Phone: 303-442-4700 Fax: 303-772-7673 C E R T I F I C A T E 0 F A N A L Y S I S
~-----------~-----------------------------------------
CERMAK-PETERKA ASSOCIATES PROJECT#: 08-10178-003 PO#: 20120 1415 BLUE SPRUCE #3 ITEM#: 0802M3002415A DATE: 3/29/93 FT COLLINS co 80524 CYLINDER #: 1A021640 ANALYTICAL ACCURACY: +/- 2~ FILL PRESSURE: 2000 PSIG BLEND TYPE CERTIFIED WORKING STD REQUESTED GAS ANALYSIS ~QMfQ~g~I --~Q~£-~Q!:g§_ -.i~Q!:§§l._ METHANE 40. PCT 40.0 PCT NITROGEN 11. 94 PCT . 1 1'. 8 PCT ARGON BAL BAL I ; 'IC..*- ... .._~ ""'1 CGA 350 2000 PSIG QC# 13299319 ANALYST: ~a~
-DiJ\iW<sEEHLER -----
APPROVED BY: __ /;(.__ ~--~----------- RIC SCHMELTEKOPF PLUMSTEADVILLE. PENNSYLVANIA I TROY. MICHIGAN I HOUSTON. TEXAS I DURHAM. NORTH CAROLINA SOUTH PLAINFIELD. NEW JERSEY I FREMONT. CALIFORNIA I WAKEFIELD. MASSACHUSETTS I LONGMONT. COLORADO BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA
ii Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. Shipped 500 WEAVER PARK RD From: LONGMONT co 80501 Phone: 303-442-4700 Fax: 303-772-7673 C E R T I F I C A T E 0 F A N A L Y S I S
--------------------.----~------------------------------------------------
CERMAK-PETERKA ASSOCIATES PROJECT#: 08-10178-002 Pois:: 20120 1415 BLUE SPRUCE #3 ITEM ii: 0802183201 5A DATE: 3/29193 FT COLLINS co 80524
-----------~-------------~-----------------------------------------------
CYLINDER#: A7112 ANALYTICAL ACCURACY: +/- 2% FILL PRESSURE: 1494 PSIG BLEND TYPE : CERTIFIED WORKING STD REQUESTED GAS ANALYSIS gQMfQ~5~! --~Qf':l~_MQJ:§§_ _lMQ!:.S§l_ ETHANE- 24.97 PCT 25.0 PCT H EL I UM BAL BAL
. ( .i,__ ** *... : -
~ -
j(" /
\ .
CGA 350 1.494 PS I G QC# 13299321 ANALYST: APPROVED BY: --~-----------------
. RLC SCHMELTEKOPF PLUMSTEADVILLE. PENNSYLVANIA I TROY, MICHIGAN I HOUSTON. TEXAS I DURHAM. NORTH CAROLINA SOUTH PLAINFIELD, NEW JERSEY I FREMONT. CALIFORNIA I WAKEFIELD. MASSACHUSETIS I LONGMONT, COLORADO BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA
11 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. Shipped 500 WEAVER PARK RD From: LONGMONT co 80501 Phone: 303-442-4700 Fax: 303-772-7673 C E R T I F I C A T E 0 F A N A L Y S I S
~---------------------------------------------------------------
CERMAK-PETERKA ASSOCIATES PROJECT #: 08-10178-004 PO#: 20120 1415 BLUE SPRUCE #3 ITEM #; 0802M2016815A DATE: 3/29/93 FT COLLINS co 80524 CYLINDER #: 1A014501 ANALYTICAL.ACCURACY: +/- 2~ FILL PRESSURE: 2000 PSIG BLEND TYPE : CERTIFIED WORKING STD REQUESTED GAS ANALYSIS ~QMfQ~5~! --~Q~g-~Q.b5§_ _.i~Q.bs§l._ METHANE 54.06 PCT 54. 1 PCT HELi UM BAL BAL
. ~- *L ~.._ *~ ~--- .
{fY' CGA 350 2000 PSIG QC# 13299320
---~---------------
ANALYST: APPROVED BY:
.RIC SCHMELTEKOPF PLUMSTEADVILLE.. PENNSYLVANIA I TROY. MICHIGAN I HOUSTON, TEXAS I DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA SOUTH PLAINFIELD. NEW JERSEY I FREMONT, CALIFORNIA*, WAKEFIELD. MASSACHUSETTS I LONGMONT, COLORADO BATON ROUGE. LOUISIANA
IJ Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. Shipped 500 WEAVER PARK RD From: LONGMONT co 80501 Phone: 303-442-4700 Fax: 303-772-7673 C E R T I F I C A T E 0 F A N A L Y S I S CERMAK-PETERKA ASSOCIATES PROJECT #: 08-09333-001 STEVE MIKE PO#: 2000 1415 BLUE SPRUCE #3 ITEM#: 0802E4005704A DATE: 12/15/92 FT COLLINS co 80524 CYLINDER #: 1A023214 ANALYTICAL ACCURACY: +/- 2~ FILL PRESSURE: 2000 PSIG BLEND TYPE CERTIFIED MASTER GAS REQUESTED GAS ANALYSIS
~~~5~I __ g~g-~.bs§_ _J.~Q.bs§J.._
ETHANE 500. PPM 502. PPM METHANE 1, 000. PPM 986.. PPM PROPANE 500. PPM 496. PPM NITROGEN BAL BAL
,.,---.... ~
1£) , '-* * {
*..:Hv~ .....,.:_
'-. /'
.._.._*i ~
- t ~ ,_._ . .: I
' ** 1)
., i. 1 CGA 350 2000 PSIG QC# 26159210
- ANALYST:~-IZ~
. SUSAN~B~ANDON APPROVED BY: ---*~----------------
RIC SCHMELTEKOPF PLUMSTEADVILLE. PENNSYLVANIA I TROY. MICHIGAN I HOUSTON. TEXAS I DURHAM. NORTH CAROLINA SOUTH PLAINFIELD. NEW JERSEY I FREMONT. CALIFORNIA I WAKEFIELD. MASSACHUSETTS I LONGMONT, COLORADO BATON ROUGE. LOUISIANA
./_;.;.-n*,
r~*() fi 1 *. v~ j I
~ *. . 't IV' 1, 1": I *"
CAB MIX 21
,._PPH (BY VOLUME) IN
,;, 971.5 t.Vl""-~
- (71 .s tff\'1 >
'1.1~*, *,,,,)!.
{""
366 .. -:VOL) IN NITRCGEN
.994 OF ANALYSIS +/-*.
Scott GAS MIXTURES SECTION 2 Product Grades
~*.T. standards. Each mixture table. Gas mixtures having alternative by this method is verified blend or accuracy specifications are Non<ertified gas mixtures are utilized analysis.
- available on request.
in applications where concentration
* .fully documents its gravimetric accuracies are not critical. These As the leader in calibration gas ures to provide gravimetric mixtures are prepared by partial technology, Scott offers an unparalleled ion standards that are
- pressure and volumetric techniques. selection of gaseous minor components, ed in the specialty gas Such mixtures are verified as being
- balance gases, and available
.* Scott gravimetric practices within the specified blend tolerance; concentrations. For some of the more lder. al I statistical parameters however, an analysis of the mixture's unique mixtures listed in the catalog used ding scale weight uncertaintv minor component is not reported. in leading edge standardization and the raw material impurities of all measurements, Scott performs analytical
.Components in multi<omponent STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS uncertainty calculations to validly
** *
- As a result. Scott can make FOR SCOTT GAS MIXTURES represent analytical accuracy. On able on request gravimetric Scott gas mixtures are prepared request, gravimetric uncertainty
* *nty calculations that are truly utilizing high purity, chemically pure calculations can be provided as well.
tative of cylinder contents. or pre-purified grade gases. Mixtures Gravimetric and analytical uncertainty Gravimetric Master gases also prepared using specific higher purity calculations are performed using analytical certification. As a gases are available on request. precision propagation of error formulae.
- l rule, Scott cites analytical These formulae represent the square root Standard Scott gas mixture products
- inties to be consistent with of the sum of the squared individual error standards organizations: are produced to have the specifi* .
*cations summarized in the following sources at the 95% confidence.level.
mixtures within this product
.... prepared utilizing the most
**
- partial pressure and
~--
- ic.techniques or by other
*)~p11..blending methods.
+/- 1% N.l.S.T. Traceable*
*ing standards are analyzed gas l.:2%. NJ.S.T.Tra<:eahl~ ~"
*res utilized for applications +/-5% .. ........ +/- 2% N.l.S.T. Traceable**
,,. * . * . . ..,""' .* ___... 4 .....- . * ~T--
- the extreme precision and
. racy of a Master Gas is not
_ired. Two product grades -
. --*~~~- ... --
"Zero" +/-2%
LENDGP and CERTIFIED
- prise this product category; each
...::zero"-. *~-~-"'-19'..:___~=
- grade has separate blend *"::;i:.siy.,*::- .. =--~-~"".:::~~7.+/-J%~=7:.
. :~*alysis specifications. +/- 1%
¥,is of the mixture's minor - 2'..'~:+/-:;(jicy.,-A~-"'":~-
*~L~f;;;;;;~~~~~~*...,.,.". . ~*" '~" '*-;r=~:=* =*t!=91" '~: :0;*~ ~ . , ~. ,. \~- : o/ :r.o , ., ~ ,j.""""""'"'====.;,~~=_-=~= oJ;:;i.- 'f,
- nent is certified by Scott and a
- cation of Analysis is provided II products within this category.
~: . * -* -~2o/O'.'..
.,,*::*1.... 16%'to 49'YO' =-i=_-*J,,.J=
lend111 Working Standards are
*.* ared utilizing Scott's patented .;~ ..... **-.::* . ..... ..
-~ ~
~blending and analytical 1 ppm to 15% +/- 10% +/-5%
SS. *:;~16%'to 49 o/o ~ '.. .iZ+/- so/o:*:: =2- ==:;~~+/-~~:..:z::~ IFIED +/- 15% Not Reported ORKING STANDARDS £ 10o/o . ~~-~~-NotReportecL
- EPA Protocol Gas analytical uncenainty will match N.l.S. T. SRM uncenainty for the following:
- certified Working Standards NO (S 20 ppm) : +/- 2% NO, : +/- 4% SO, (S 100 ppmJ : +/- 2% H,S (S 25.2 ppmJ : +/- 3%
' prepared utilizing partial **Analytical accuracy.is relative to traceabilitv with N.l.S. T. SRMs.
ure and volumetric techniques Gas mixtures requiring different specifications are available on request. Blend Tolerance is the maximum deviation(s) from _other precision blending the desired concentration(s) al the minor componentts). Analvsis is the maximum deviation(s) from the reported valuelsJ fOf" the minor componenttsl. *zero* Blend Tolerance 1s equal to the analytical accuracv oi the spec1iic mixture. ods. Mic~rav analvtical uncertaintv mav varv with mixture composition. 51
POWER FUNCTION FIT on <:OLD) VARIAN GC LINEARITY: ETHANE 4-07-93 Log L1::ig Log Calculated values Ltsing original PPM Original Volts Volts data from above /. I. PPM CH 1 CH2 CH 1 CH2 Error Error C:Y) <:XU <X2) PPM PPM CH 1 CH 2
============================================================
2.3125 10.1 -0.1873 -0.2508 '3.90 9.68 -L 94'Y. -4.13/. 4.6052 100 2.1011 2.095'3 9'3. 56 102.38 -0.44'Y. 2.38/. 4.6052 100 2. 1292 2.0832 102.43 101. 08 2.43/. 1. 08/. 6.2046 495 3.6743 3.6475 486.59 486.88 -1.701. -1. 64'Y. 6.2046 495 3.7218 3.7242 510.47 525.93 3.137. 6.257. 6.2186 502 3.6623 3.6384 480.72 482.45 -4.24Y. -3.90Y. 6.2186 502 3.6684 3.6460 483.70 486.14 -3.647. -3.16'Y. 6.8788 '371. 5 4.3983 4.3709 1009.90 1007.29 3.95Y. 3. 68'Y. 6.8788 971.5 4.4313 4.3981 1044.03 1035.27 7.477. 6.56/.
'3. 2043 '3'340 6.6343 6.5'374 '3629. 56 '3438. 86 -3.12/. -5. 04'Y. . '3. 2043 9940 6.6536 6.6365 '3819. 27 . '3816. '34 -1.21/. -1. 24/.
Channel 1 Y= 11 * '36305 x ""* 1.008512 I Channel 2 Y=12.4585G x A 1.004970 Channel 1 Channel 2 Regression Output: Regression Output: Constant 2.481823 Constant 2.522408 Std Err of y Est 0.038465 Std Err of y Est 0.043697 R Squared 0.999659 R Squared 0.999561 No. of Observations 11 No. of Observations 11 Degrees of Freedom 9 Degrees 1::if Freedom '3 X Coefficient (s) 1. *008512 X Coefficient(s) 1.004970. Std Err of Coef. 0.006199 Std Err of Coef. 0.007018
- 4-07-93 Original OLD CVarian) GC LINEARITY CHECK Converted to RANGE 12:
Volts* Volts Calculated CH 1 CH 2 E T H A N E Y. PPM RANGE CH 1 CH 2 PPM PPM Error Error (Y) . (XU CXo2) CY) CY) CH 1 CH 2
========= ------- ====== ------ ====================================
- 10. 1 12 0.8292 0.7782 '3.95 '3. 58 -1. 50Y. -5.10/.
100 12 8.175 8.1328 98.08 100.17 -1. 92'Y. 0.17'Y. 100 11 8.408 8.03 100.88 98.90 0.88Y. -1. lO'Y. 495 11 39.422 38.378 472.99 472.68 -4.45Y. .:...4.51'Y. 495 10 41. 34 41.44 496.00 510.40 0.20Y. 3.11/. 502 C992A)11 38.95 38.03 467.33 468.40 -6~91'Y. -6.69/. 502 ('3'33A) 11 39. l '3 38.32 470.21 471. *37 ..... 6.33Y. -5. '38Y. 971. 5 11 81. 316 79.114 975.64 974.41 o. 43'Y. o. 30'Y.
'371. 5 10 84.04 81.3 1008.32 1001.33 3. 7'3% 3.07%
Fit 10 to 1000 PPM Intercept = ZERO
- CH 1 1::H 2 Constant Channel 1 Y=l 1. '39812 X Y=l:.2.31648 X Regression*. Output:
+
+
O *constant* 0 0 Channel 2 Regression Output: 0 Std Err *:if Y Est 22.57204 St~ Err of Y E?t 21. 40696 F~ Squared
- 0.995886 *R Squared 0.996300 No. of Observations 9.00 No. of Observations '3 Degrees of Freedom 8.00 Degrees of Freedom 8 X Coefficient(s) 11. 998 X CoefficientCs) 12.31648 Std Err of C*::ief
- 0.159 Std Err of *coef. 0.154875
4'-07-93 OLD CVarianl GC LINEARITY CHECK E T H A N E Co::inverted* t*::i RANGE 12: Calculated Original Volts Volts CH 1 CH 2 I. I. F'PM RANGE CH 1 CH 2 PPM PPM El"l"Ol" . El"l"Ol"
<:Y) (X 1l CX2) CY) (Y) CH 1 CH 2
- 10. 1
=======
12
======
0.8292
====== ====================================
0.7782 10.72 10.33 6.107. 2. 25'Y. 100 12 8.175 8.1328 105.64 107.93 5.64'Y. 7.93'Y. 100 11 8.408 8.03 108.66 106.57 8.667. 6.57/. 495 11 39.422 38.378 509.45 509.32 2.92'Y. .2.89'Y., 4*35 10 41.34 41.44 534.23 549.96 7. 93'Y. 11. 1 O'Y. 502 (992A)11 38~95 38.03 503.35 504.70 0. 27'Y. 0. 54'Y. 502 ('393A) 11 39. 1 '3 38.32 506.45 508.55 0. 8'3'Y. . 1. 30'Y. 971. 5 11 81.316 79.114 1050.84 1049.93 8. 17'Y. 8.07/.
'371. 5 10 84.04 81.3 1086.04 1078.94 11
- 79'Y. 11.06/.
9940 10 760.74 733.18 9830.94 9730.13 "'-1
- 1 O'Y. -2.11'1.
'3'340 '3 775.6 762.4 10022.97 10117.91 0.837. 1. 7_'3/.
/~-- .;__ - f' .:;. I ;~ -:-~
~-~ Intercept = ZERO CH 1 Y=12.92286 X + 0 CH 2 Y=13.27112 X + 0 Channel 1 Channel 2 Regression Output: Regression Output:
C*::instant 0 Constant 0 Std Err* *:if Y Est 63.29946 Std El"r of Y Est 98.37451 R Squared O. '3'3'9729 R Squared o. '399346 No. of Observations 11.00 No. of Obsel"vations 11 Degl"ees*of f"reedom 10.00 begrees of f"yeedom 10 X Coefficient(s) 12.923 X Coefficient(s) 13.27112 Std Err of Coef. 0.058 Std Err of Coef. 0.092220
- OLD (Varian) GC LINEARITY CHECK E T H A N E 4 - 07 -- 93 6
5 4 lf) 1-- _J 0 > 3 - ('.) 0 _J 2 -
----..4'-----------------------------*--*------*---*--
- + - - - - - , - - - - i - - - - - , - - - - - - - . - - - - - T - - - - . - - - - - - T 2 4 6 8 10 LOG PARTS PER MILLION (ppm)
D Channel-1 + Channel-2
- OLD (Varian) GC LINEARITY CHECK E T H A N E 4 - 07 -- ':33 800 - - - - , - - - - - - - - - -
700 - 600 - ()) CJ1 c 0 500 - [!'.'. 0 +-' D ()) 400 +-'
\._
()) c 8 300 (n ./ f- _J
/;/
0 200
/
_/~ 100 -- 0 - - - - * ---.----,-------,----,c-----~--- r - --~-----* 0 2 4 6 8 10 (Thousands) PARTS PER MILLION (ppm) 0 C h a n 11 e I -- 1 + Channel-2
POWER FUNCTION Fir on (OLD) VARIAN GC.LINEARITY: ETHANE 5.....:10-93 L*::ig Log Log Calculated values using c*riginal PPM Original Volts Volts data from above 'l. /. PPM CH 1 CH2 CH 1 CH2 Error ( Y) (Xl) Error
<X2) PPM PPM CH 1 CH 2
============================================================
2.3125 10.1 -0.2024 -0.3205 '3.83 9.58 -2.68/. 4.6052 -5.16/. 100 2. 1011 2.0401 100.57 102.98 0.57/. 4.6052 2.98/. 100 2.1092 2.0287 101.39 101.80 1. 39/. 1. 80/. 6.2186 502 3.6705 3~5975 490.35 4'33. 48 -2.32/. -1.70/. 6.2186 502 3.6773 3.6211 493.73 505.34 -1.65/. 0.67/. 6.8788 971.5 4.392'3 4.3101 1016.76 1010.67 4.667. 4. 03/. - 6.8788 '371. 5 4.3984 4.3124 1022.42 1013.05 5. 24'Y. 4. 28'Y. 9.2043 '3'340 6.6265 6.5383 '3693 .. 74 '3510. 46 -2.481. -4.32/.
'3. 2043 '3940 6.6278 6.5613 '3706. 18 '3733. 66 -2.35/. -2.08/.
Channel 1 Y=12.05764 x ,... A 1..009511 Channel 2 Y=13.22354 x 1. 006.101 Channel 1 Channel 2 Regression Output: Regression Output: Constant 2.489698 C*::instant 2. 581 '3'3'3 Std Err of Y Est 0.033091 Std Err of Y Est 0.037854 R Squared 0.999804 R Squared 0.'399743 No. of Observations 9 No. of Observations 9 Degrees of Freedom 7 Degrees of Freedom 7 X Coefficient(s) 1.009511 X Coefficient(s) 1.006101 Std Err of Coef. 0.005338 Std Err of Coef. 0.006086
5-10-93 OLD (Varian) J3C LINEARITY CHECK E T H A N E C*::inver t ed to RANGE 12: Calculated Ol"iginal Volts Volts CH 1 CH 2 i. r. PPM RANGE CH 1 CH 2 PPM PPM Error Error
<Y) (X1) . <X2) <Y> (Y) CH 1 CH 2 ========= ======= ====== =====~ ====================================
10.1 12 o. 8168. *o.7258 *3~90 9.54 -1. '347. -5.55'Y. 100 12 8.1754 7.691 99.13 101.08 -0.87'Y. 1. OB'Y. 100 11 8.242 7.604 '39. 93 '39. 94 -0.071. -:-0. 06'X 502 ('393A> 11 39.272 36.SOS 476.17 479.82 -5.1S'Y. -4.42'Y. 502 (993A)10 39.54 37.38 479.42 4'31. 28 -4.SO'Y. -2.14'Y. 971.5 11 80.874 74.446 '380.60 '378. 43 0.94'X 0.71'7. 971.5 10 81.32 74.62 '386. 00 980.71 1. 4'3'X o. '35'Y. Fit 10 to 1000 PPM
- Intercept = ZERO CH 1 Y=12.12497 X + 0 CH 2 Y=13.14277 x* + 0 Channel
- 1
- Channel 2 Regression Output: Regression Output:
.Constant 0 Constant 0 Std Err of Y Est 15.65640 Std E~r of. Y Est 11.11651 R Squayed 0.998511 R Squ~red o. 99924'3 No. of Obsel"vation~ 7.00 No. of Observations 7 Degrees of Fl"eedom 6.00 Degrees of Fl"eedom 6 X Coefficient(s) 12.125 X Coefficient<s) 13.14277 Std Err of Coef. - 0.122 Std Err of Coef. 0.094093
OLD (V ~f iap) GC LINEARITY CHECK . 5 - 10 .. SJ3 ETHANE 7~------- - - - - - - - - - - - - * - - * ---------- 6 - 5 - /
/~
,/
4 (f) I- _J 0 > 3 - l'.J 0 _J 2 -
~
/,/,-
~
1 -
-1 2 4 6 8 10 LOG PARTS PER MILLIOl'J (pprn)
D Channel-1 + Channel-2
0 --J.+llLl.--~--~------y------.-----,------.------.----.---i------ 0 2 4 6 8 10 (Thousands) PARTS PER MILLION (ppm) D Channel -1 + Channel-2
- ==== GAS CHROMATOGRAPH Operator:BH Date <MDV 4 Sampling System File name 5
907990 A 93 SYRINGE PERFORMANCE CHECK
====
MEDIAN, column 1 -6.071 Press MEDIAN, 1:olumn 2 -5.87 CALTJM to obtain MEDIAN Acceptable percent Deviatn: 2.0 Number of syringes passed: 50 MEDIAN, column 1 -6.071 Number of syringes failed: 0 MEDIAN,- column 2 -5.87 Syringe MEAN, column 1 -6.072 Column
- 1 MIN: -6.036 Syringe standard deviation, 1:1::.l umn 1 0.024 MAX: -6. 165 Syringe MEAN, column ,,_ -5.869 Syringe standard deviation, column 2 0.030 Column 2 MIN: -5.836 MAX: -5.976 Syringe GC-FID Voltage Percent Test Results Number Column Recorded Deviation(Pass /Fail) 1 1 -6.165 1.55 Pass 2 2 -5.'376 1. 81 Pass ...... s+cw<.. . . . t't\.I'-!.. a.wrD~
-i-
\ j 3 1 -6.080 o. 15 Pass r--5 e.. ~.e.i; ~(" ~(.::._
4 2 -5.910 0.68 Pass -\-\A:i _$1...i ,*. 5 1 -6.087 0.26 Pass ~(,\ (o. l'1CJ := c,\.....<.c:...\c., tl-- 6 2 -5.879 o. 15 Pass s~ 7 1 -6.071 o.oo Pass 8 2 -5.875 0.09 Pass 9 1 -6.066 -OoOS Pass r\A C..-, 2 L' 14q.3 10 2 -5.870 o.oo Pass 11 1 -6.101 0.49 Pass 12 2 -5.877 0.-12 Pass
13 1 -6. 082. 0.18 Pass 14 2 -5.884 0.24 Pass 15 1 -6.068 -0.05 Pass 16 2 -5.856 -0.24 Pass 17 1 -6.052 -,<).31 Pass 18 2 -5.858 -0.20 *Pass 19 1 -6.061 -o. 16 Pass* 20 2 -5.857 -0.22 Pass 21 1 -6.046 -o. 41. Pass 22 2 -5.871 0.02 Pass 23 1 -6.060 -0.18 Pass 24 25 2 1
-5.890
-6.047 0.34 Pass
-0.40 Pass
;?ose-? D n
~
s'1 (** ".5 (... 26 27 2
-1
-5.836
-6.061
-0.58 Pass
-0.16 Pass
'( <: < Qc-r V'- 0-~ C~c..\c_
28 2 -5.872 0.03 Pass -Q.\~ 9D\99D A 29 1 . -6. 066 -o.oa Pass 30 31 2 1
-5.851
-6.081
-0.32 Pass 0.16 .Pass 5 \}A.. S"-2..(-°!3 32 2 -5.840 -0.51 Pass 33 1 -6.075 0.07 Pass 34 2 -5.913 0.73 Pass 35 1 -6.087 0.26* Pass 36 2 -5.875 0.09 Pass
- 37 38 39 40 1
2 1 2
-6.062
-5.844
-6.083
-5.842
-0.15
-0.44 0.20
-0.48 Pass Pass Pass*
Pass 41 1 -6.075 0.07 Pass 42 2 . -5.850 -0.34 Pass 43 1 -6.040 -0.51 Pass 44 2. -5.854 -0.27 Pass 45 1 -6.036 -0.58 Pass 46 2 -5.843 -0.46 Pass 4T 1 -6.073 0.03 Pass
. 48 2 -S.840 -0.51 Pass 49 1 -6.080 0.15 Pass 50 2 -S.870 'o.oo Pass
==== GAS CHROMATOGRAPH Sampling System SYRINGE PERFORMANCE CHECK Operator:SH File name '3019'30/6 Date C:MDY 5 4 *33 MEDIAN, column 1 -5.415 Press MEDIAN, column ..::. ..... -5.508 CALTJM to obtain MEDIAN Ac*: eptabl e percent Deviatn: 3.0 Number of syringes passed: 46 MED I AN, c r::i 1 umn 1 -5.415 Number of syringes failed: 4 MEDIAN~ column 2 -5.508 Syringe MEAN, ecol umn 1 -5.433 Ccrlumn 1 MIN: -4. '312 Syringe standard deviation, c *:il umn 1 0.126 MAX: -5.468 Syringe .-.
MEAN, column ..::. -5.447 Syringe standard devi at i *:in, c*:*l umn 2 o. 126 C1:1lL1mn 2 MIN: -5.47 MAX: -5.664 Syringe (3C-FID Voltage Percent Test F~esul ts Number Column Recorded Deviation<Pass /Fail) 1 1 -5.664 4.60 Fail
...::.. 1 -5.588 3. 1 '3 Fail 3 1 -5.265 -2.77 *Pass 4 1 -5.535 2 ..22 Pass 5 1 -5.529 2.11 Pass 6 1 -5.542 ..... ..,
~- ***h..J
... Pass 7 1 -5.523 1. 99 Pass 8 1 -5.532 2.16 Pass
'3 1 -5.353 -1.14 Pass 10 1 -5.523 1.99 Pass
~ 1 -4.'362 -8.37 Fail 12 1 -5.531 2.14 Pass 13 14 1
1
-5.513
-5.510
- 1. 81 Pass
- 1. 75 Pass
........ \
S.\e vl"" \'-J\', k 1
~
.::.vper .
v 1.Sc [). 15 1 -5.508 1. 72 Pass 16 1 -5.479 1.18 Pass c...~& ".J--~~h& ~,~~\~ \~ vd '! e."'J 17 1 -5.459 0.81 Pass 18 1 -5.497 1. 51 Pass
+"'(D v S \..-. T'-'~ s '1 ,*, "'~ (.....
1'3 1 -5. 4*39 1.53 Pass ?<J ~-{~"'-<-(.... c.. \---~c,l c:c .... ~\.J 20 1 -5.509 1. 74 Pass 1 -5.484 D ,,._ ,\\~'\ 11. 19q3 21 1.27 Pass 22 1 -5.508 1. 72 Pass 23 24 1 1
-5.488
-5.467 1.35 Pass 0.96 Pass SJ==_'ld 25 1 -5.435 0.37 Pass 1Nv*, *-z, ~ 1'13 1 \
26 1 -5.416 0.02 Pass 27 1 -5.468 0.98 Pass 28 1 -5.497 1. 51 Pass 29 1 -5. 4'::13 1.44 Pass 30 1 -5.484 1.27 Pass 31 1 -5.450 0.65 Pass 32 1 -5.411 -0.07 Pass 33 1 -5.445 0.55 Pass 34 1 -5.452 0.68 Pass 35 1 -5.489 1.37 Pass 36 1. -5.446 0.57 Pass
37 1 -5.420 o. 0'3 Pass 38 1 -5.410 -0.09 Pass 39 1 -5.434 0.35 Pass 40 1 -5.318 -1. 7'3 Pass 41 1 -5.273 -2.62 Pass
~ 1 -4.912 -9.29 Fail rl-43 1 -5.484 1.27 Pass 44 1 -5. 39'3 -0.30 Pass 45 1 _C"
..J.
w~.;... -1. 72 Pass 46 1 -5.470 1.02 Pass 47 1 -5.415 0.00 Pass 48 1 -5. 33'3 -1.40 Pass 49 1 - -5. 440 0.46 Pass 50 1 -5.404 -0.20 Pass
- ==== GAS CHROMATOGRAPH Sampling System SYRINGE PERFOF~MANCE CHEC~<
Operato~:SH Date ~MDV 5 File name 4
'301'3'31
'33
/&*
MEDIAN, *:*::il umn 1 -5. 2'38 Press MEDIAN, cQlumn 2 -5.36 CALTJM to obtain MEDIAN A*:ceptabl e percent Deviatn: 3.0 Number 1:1f syringes passed: 46 MEDIAN, c*::ilumn 1 -5.2'38 Number 1:1f syringes failed: 4 MEDIAN, column 2 -5.36 Syringe MEAN, column 1 -5.320 .Column 1 MIN: -4.898 Syringe standard deviation, column 1 0.081 MAX: -5.322 Syringe MEAN, 1:olumn 2 -5.314 Syringe standard deviation, c*::il umn 2 o. 0'37 Column .-, ..::. MIN: -5.333 MAX: -5.551 Syringe* GC-FID Voltage Percent Test Results Number C*::il umn Recorded DeviationCPass /Fail) 1 1 -5.551 4.78 Fail 2 1 -5.471 3.27 Fail 3 1 -5.224 -1.40 Pass 4 1 -5.387 1. 68 Pass 5 1 -5.381 1.57 Pass 6 1 -5.371 1.38 Pass 7 1 -5.371 1.38 Pass 8 1 -5.371 1.38 Pass
'3 1 -5.258 -0.76 Pass 1 -5.366 1.28 Pass cfb 12 1
1
-5.079
-5.378
-4.13 1.51 Fail Pass
~
....;5. 370 13 14 1
1 -5.347 1.36
. o. '32 Pass Pass L S\-e -.--<---* \V\~ le c:_~e r IJ .~
15 1 -5.362 . 1. 21 Pass c..... >>_' 5\; ~ t.\c hJ s~~I bi \\tJJce"'-.\* _J 16 1 -5.337 0.74 Pass 17 . 18 1 1
-5.339
-5.346 0.77
- o. '31 Pass Pass
+\...rnvs ~ ~--~ S'f <*...-.SL 19 1 -..:5.367 1.30 Pass *~ e , 0-o,, v"--o.-.. . . <c._ ck c...Jc. .
20 1 -5.347 0.92 Pass Co~i..)\c_,~~ o---. r\-\CL1 ~, 19q~ 21
.-£.G.-.
1 -5.349 0.96 Pass 23 1 1
-5.333
-5.352 0.66 Pass*
1.02 Pass S,t<l\:t 24 1 -5.317 0.36 Pass l\Aevi '2.l, hciJ 25 1 -5.310 0.23 Pass 26 1 -5.278 -0.38 Pass 27 1 -5.340 0.79 Pass
- 28. 1 -5.336 0.72 Pass 29 1 -:-5.316 0.34 Pass 30 1 -5.317 0.36 Pass 31 1 -5.315 0.32 Pass 32 1 -5.294 -0;,08 Pass
- 33 34 35 36 1
1 1 1
-5.339
-5. 322.
-5.360
-5.307 0.77 Pass 0.45 Pass 1.17 F'ass 0.17 Pass
37 1 -5.306 o. 15 Pass 38 1 -5. 2'38 o.oo Pass 3'3 1 -5.310 c). 23. Pass 40 1 -5. 22(> -1.47 Pass 41 1 -5.208 -1.70 Pass cw...., 44 1 1 1
-4.898
-5.345
-5. 2'34
-7.55 Fail 0.89 Pass
-0.08 Pass 45 1 -5.238 -1.13 Pass 46 1 -5.312 0.26 Pass 47 1 -5.314 0.30 Pass 48 1 -5.288 -0. 19 Pass 49 1 -5.285 -0.25 Pass 50 1 -5.303 o. 0'3 Pass
SAMPLE GRID GRID SHEET NO. POINT l.
.3 SA.M. PL~ Po 1 t.:Jl" - SA.r"{P'L~ 33 3=3
~Ll 6 E... 0 F .. -f'AP c..H.e..c... K Pt!.e.fu<<<rtE.t> t - - _3_4_-+-_.;:;:;3;....i;l.f-.____. 35 35 41 41 43
. 44 45 46 47 48 50 6G.
SAMPLE GRID ! GRID SHEET NO. I POINT i I ( 2 2-PROJECT NAME: f'AL.\ ~1'\-b>~ r--::ioe:.. Pe.~ ft?~* 3 3 PROJECT NO. C:J 3-Q90*1 SCALE ~: 3CCi 4 4 DATE '+/--2.0.ff3 INITIAL ::::::r'Gr...
-"?"
GRID ID. NO. / 5 5 LAYOUT NAME WIND DIRECTION 6 (~ SOURCE 7 *1
- RUN NOS. ZtCA.. <-3\~, u~1A- ;..j".;.;.A, \.d'.,"'.2..,h , ;;.:lis 1 8 '6
~\)\\ ,z.i2A,Z.l.3A,.3.33As; ~.3t+A/ti4A; 9 10 4
~o I I ( (
12 l7-13 \3 14 l4 15 15 16 l~ 17 l-, 18 t 1-. 19 iq 20 20 21 Zl 22 Z~Z-23 Z3 24 -z 25 Z.'5 26 7~
- 27. Z.'7 28 Z'1<
29 7,q 30 .30 31 ~( 32 3Z.. 33 .33 f" '2-.~*('E-5~ ,.::;~ 34 3 c.f-35 .35 SA.riP'L~ po,,. .::.rr,) 5A..-(PL~ 36 3~
-r'us.e....of" "'-tAr c..~e...c.K ~
37 37 38 3g A"t>e>l--r-'lo~A.l- *-tA..:p~ 4~ l{-~ 6. 39 ,3Cf 40 40 p~e_~o~E....1::>~ . 41 Lt- l 42 4-Z-B'i /l) D~E- 4-z.o-~3 43 4-?;, ( ~ tf,u)-cr] 44 4 -
'"'"~
45
~
46 47 - 48 49 Rei. 50 C3G..
.. SAMPLE GRID GRID SHEET NO. I POINT I I. PROJECT NAME: P,~\.c_7A ,P"E...S 2 3
-~
PROJECT NO. S 3-0<1 O"J SCALE \CJo_360 4 4-GRID ID. NO. .3 DATE '-X-30§..~INITIAL .:J'~ 5 5 LAYOUT NAME WIND OIRECTJON ~ esc. 6 (c., SOURCE 7 ( 8 RUN NOS. '-f~'5A R 9 '9. 10 lO I I I \ 12 l'i-13 I "2i . 14 t4-15 t5 16 (b 17 l/ 18 (~ 19 (q 20 zo 21 Z.( 22 7.-:z_ 23 Z-3 24 ~ 25 Z6 26 7j_ 27 Z.7 28 -z_g 29 z~ 30 3a
. 31 32 33 ,
34 P(LE:--(E"~ ~G\. 35 36 SAt-irt...,E- rou. .:J~- SAf-(.~L._..G..R . 37 l<- c.,c. 38
.- (L.) l3 E_<.) 'P !~P c_(-b=*C..K pe:_ *o-~ ~ ~
. 39 40 41
~
'6'i DAYe:-lf-30-~3 -* 42 ~
43 .:8.43
~ 9<;
..,/ l /
1:-~0 //'
. 44 4 45 ~5 46 4'=7 47 4-(
48 . '-1-S? 49 6~ 50 Br-...
FLOW AATOR CALIBRATION LOG Flow Ra tor No: 7z::J:/.1 -'iii--*~. _ ilf
- Fluid:
Temp: 7 Pres: / t./.
/4 1 1'-
l
"~
ct~! Date: Time: L/ '1 j p, /'-1
- Calibration taken by: is/-f Proj
- No: 11- -:;; 9 o 7 Setting tf//, ~,..,,~
~
fthl4'~ Glass (se~~~)Vol/sec t' No. Volume Vol/min I 20 G 7G.o II .,2 7 2 l ?6 G ~1.o I/, j'JJ
.5 q7 ~' 7. / I/. 0'1 6 I I 7 .
I '()~.~ //, 01
- I . .
I~- 6 93,3 //.f"G 10 II Jo 'r//.S- 111.{"J I 12 ll /'7 71~0 //. ~ 2 14 1.5 Cf ~ 1~. 6 JI,~ I 16 17
?.r r;, ( o. "I I/. o I ta 19 .s 0 Gz~,a I o.4 s-20 21 2.J ~ 9 7.l 11. 6 2 22 23 L '1 701,0 11 *b t u
2.5 26 27 21 2? JO
- LC/;
VofuvV'L F(ov-- f~ol'I AATOR CALIBRATION LOG Flow Rator No: /YIM) (""?L 0)
- Fluid:
Temp: Pres: 72~~
~r;.*4Ne Z "/. 1 /
!(.). (,) ~"1) /Vi ?1; 7~)
Date: ~- 7-~J Time: . . r"1 .
.~
,g"' Ar Calibration taken by: 11 If Proj. No: ~7 l -o q o 7 Sett:. C,/iU..:-..Ta~
No. Steel mg Glass Voltnne ~}Vol/ sec Vol/min I I. r;- . 21 ~. l '?. i-, 2 12.r l/9'7. I ~.2,
/
3 5 s. ~ 7"/?.7 I '2. L// 6 I 7 . L/, r qq'l.o ;r,.s-7 9 ~.~ 12.//r/ 20.21 10 n ~.J- I "I 30 ? ? . irr I 12
! ll 7. s- /htfO 2 7.}]
u 15 8.~ 1?27 1o.'-1 J.- 16 17 o;.r- II 9ct 6 ? 3.27 I II 3 19 20 10.~ 216 z. ](:..OJ
- 21 22 I 11.~ 2]o.S- ?i.'12.
23 ~s- t..1.~2. 1 "* z. u 25 6.0 z. ~.r~ '11,,~ 26
"~
27 27i'I (,fr, ,1.-/ 21 29 7,o -z_ ~ 7 f.? "11.~ 30 i.~ y JI!;- 0 r2 ..r ~ ~- HOTU ~~M~-~
\ "-(-:. OL-Z.503 x ,_ o.L-{
2 '1 ':. 0. 29 2Lf K. - o.Ys Y~*'t3 s.~.
<, Y.-= 0 .. 31 Y4 x - z. 95
Volv~ ~(o~ r~ fEjl FLOW RATOR CALIBRATION LOG Flow Ra.tor No:~ l'1? ( ::.;L./,))
- Fluid:/"r~ 7 Temp: 7, ** ,,,::
Pres: ::
,/ ~
..!-'..JN /£ l/ ?f I
/,,/'.). o -?.. J f'/2 //. I ~r:J
- e: :..-/-
rime: fl.,,,_, J 7-
/]l'?t r1NC&
q.J A,,_ Calibration taken by:13 tJ Proj. No: o/ ]-090 7 Setting C;'//~A7~11
. +iiile;c~ l _
No. Steel Glass Volume (s~~~Vol/sec Vol/min I I. r- 2,;;~. ~ J. ?. " 2 I
~
l ?. 0 ( 15. I /0.22.
.5 I I t-1. c? 86J.7 I "I. 'I" I
\ 6 I I 7 I s.~ lo'?~ /(, O?
I
~ 9-10
(.... 0 7.o
. I ']OZ /! .. 7 IJ I~ ) S'. '2?
l2 ll g.o /7~ 7 2 J'. 'I~- IA 1.5 q*,. r;* I~ 7#f 7/.1'2. 16 I 17 /c1.0 I 2 0 S-1 ?'I.I?
..s , IS 19 JI. o 7Zo~ ]G.77
\ 20 21 22 r.r 111." 2l4J J 'JOS-2l I 6, o *-z ..rr3 'I?. s- r
- u 25 6.~- 2 7'1' '-/ ~. 7/
26 27 1.0 z 931 (...1 i. 8.5 21 29 7, .:; 512 (; .s- z.' . JO L) v NOTES
\
r::-Lw~@ Vo\u~ FLOW RATOR CALIBRATION LOG Flow Rater No: Vvt.li1A..5(oL.b\ . G°tlLtt7~~ Fluid: KE.-r1-t~~ S4.l '1o; 13J_ ~ S~ IL.t-095-S Temp: 7cf-<>F Date: 4:-~-'13 /.-lc~"'cb Pres~ Z.5,.D4 Tme: AK Calibration taken by:~ Proj. No: &1, 3-l)e::;o7
~lUS~ie...
Setting
~0.7 Na.
2 I Steel Glass 7.,_fj I
-- ~ t-U;> Vol/ sec 9 O"t-o ( "-
Vol/min l I '1bl*t/i.rt5.o-zfi 5 z..Lf'5 It+.~ ~ 1is1q z.s. 51"'7 I r 6 I
~ :z;.t5 '-' - Z.056 3<.f-.. i'.~O I
~.cgs -1.,:; Z.'5:!>4 4-Z.2~-~
10 11 LJ..t+~ c:::t.0 z.q'9't ~R
'( ' 12 13 5 ... 05 10... 5 3~'7'f' st. . z_u IA 1.S 5.~~ \Z.-.C ~"lo~ l- t.,..,
16
\. 11 b .(")
40~ re,i .'f.3:3 r 18 I? 't .. 6 I ~~'.?, ~2.og '1 20 21 ct .. o 5~1..f~ 11~:1~ 22
\... 23 t () .. c; ~!51~
~
-~
. -~
--' \Oi.c;~~
j 2A t7_n ...., l '4-0* 'let-~
'-('
,, I 2.5 26 27 13_.::; ~"703 t'Z.~.31>3 l 25 29 t'+A~ 1'13Z-- 13Z.ZD -..
30
\.
N01'U
- 10.0 ~o,3 t!i.f.11 1
\, , = 0
- l .. 4-l'=C
v'ol..rwu.. rle-vJ ~~ FLO\\' AATOR CALIBAATION LOG A-(tlZ--
- ..--/
Flow.Rater No:
*Fluid:
Temp:
~W'l.3 ( O L-"D)
ET'HA~E... Z..'5% 7 7Lf°F
'\
Date: tSJ.. '-le
~-8-Gt 3
~ 6'.~ t-l S tZAT'tJIL
~~-tJ.. 1 ~ 045-5
. ~ ~
~
Pres.: Z5.0~ Time: PK Calibration taken by: ::r~ Proj. No: q3-D40t Setting No. Steel Glass Vol/min 2 l A I. z., t 1'1"1~ 7 I
- I 3 ..
9 10
'(. ~ R- ll
- l z..
-IA 15
-16 17
.. '=' Z..'5 I I .:J,,
19-I~. t 20 21 1 22 2l
'('. u 25 26 I 6-. lt..IMA.~~
I 27 I '0 I Y- . I !:)~~~ 19~*'1'2531 I+- {~4e:,-~ 2s 1
- > I ..a ~5l:,
JO I NOTU ..:..s c;
'-/'"
- Y'=o.
y~lt X -Z.l7Z.
= o. z {34 x - ((.~g.z.rg o~
~---------------------------- 0 j_/ t
~
0
'/
0 ' 0* cO }_ ---- J uJ
--- s _* **-.~
V) '.\ cl. tfJ tJ. 0-
, J
<{
~
\(\ l -j* sums oor: .... 1*r:r: a ........ SlUHS 00 l r:tr 1*r:r: . *
- sums O!; 1tr1 *r:r: '-"'!
1 Computer type IBM AT
- 2: First channel 2
- 3. No. of channels 1
- 4. Sa~ple time Csec) 15.00 Ci 3-oqa 5. Sample rate (Hz)
- 6. List raw data
- 7. List data to LPT1 150.00 F
T BOTTOM of the VERTICAL Traverse Travel
\
Channel- 2 Zero .ooo Mean .558 Rms .02'3 Rm ax .688 Rmin .415 BOTTOM *:if the VERTICAL Traverse Travel Channel- 2 Zero .000 Mean .558 Rms
- 029
.Rmax .649 Rmin .400 TOP of the VERTICAL Traverse Travel Channel- 2 Zero .ooo Mean 3.707*
Rms .030 Rmax 3.887 Rmin* 3.481 TOP of the VERTICAL Traverse* Travel Channel- 2 Zero .000 3.703
.030 Rmax 3.813 Rmin 3.599
- C~ter Operator Source Indicator 2 11 s&m11 "Mechanical charrber" "Dwyer manometer II
- 1stCH #CH Sa~time Sa~rate Te~(C) Baro<inHg) 0 1 8.00 250.00 23.89 24. 71
- Pressure levels to be used:
.00 .10 .20 .30 .40 .so 5.00 5.00 5.00 - 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 ' **-~----------------------------------------~
pagebreak. CPP_INC. CALIBRATION RECORD Date: 4 - ,_'1.3
-ee ee ee i-FORM Ms-1 EQUIPMENT ID I MAKE: SETRA MODEL: 239 SERIAL #: 167360 SETUP INFO T~rature (Deg C): 23.89 C~ter type: LE Atm. Pres. ( inHg): 24. 71 Metrabyte A/D channel: a Pressure source: Mechanical charrber S~les I Second: 250 Pressure indicator: Dwyer manometer Averaging period (seconds): 8 DATA W/O Load . j Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 - Max Diff Average Cale Load Error I ( in.H20) -------------.----- Voltage ------------------ --. Cin.H20) ---
.00 .015 .018 .011 .007 .014 .001 .001
.10 1.028 1.021 1.028 .007 - 1.026
- 102 .002
.20 2.017 2.020 - 2.016 .004 2.018 .200 .000
.30 3.034 3.045 3.035 .011 3.038 .302 .002
.40 4.042 4.038 4.040 .004 4.040 - .401 .001
.50 5.016 5.013 5.011 .DOS 5.013 .498 -.002 Max: .011 RESULTS by Trial 1 Trial 2 Tri al 3 Average Least Absolute Performance:
- Max Error ( inH20) .002 .002 .00~ .002 Deviation Nonlinearity (%FS) .42 .46 .43 .38 Nonrepeatibility C%FS> ---- .. ----- ----- .22 Slope: in.H20/V .09927 .09928 .09935 .09935 GI local gravity,in.H20/V
- 0.9989 .09916 .09917 .09924 .09924 psf/V .
- 5. 1930 .51492 .51497 .51536 .51535 Slope (k): psi/V I 144 .00358 .00358 .00358 .00358 CHECK-OFF ls k between 0.0034 and 0.0038 psi/V Is nonlinearity< 1.0%?
Is nonrepeatability < 1.0%? END
- C~ter Operator Source Indicator 2 "SLM 11 "Mechanical chani>er" "Dwyer manometer "
- 1stCH #CH Sa""time Sa""rate T~(C) Baro(inHg) 1 1 8.00 250.00 22.22 25. 10
- Pressure levels to be used:
.00 .10 .20 .30 .40 .50 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
- pagebrealc CPP INC. CALIBRATION RECORD Date: 05-18-93 FORM MS-1 EQUIPMENT ID MAKE: Setra MODEL: 239 SERIAL #: 167360 SETUP INFO T~rature (Deg C): 22.22 C~ter type: LE Atm. Pres. CinHg): 25.10 Metrabyte A/D chal'Ylel: 1 Pressure source: Mechanical chan'ber S8""Les I Second: 250 Pressure indicator: Dwyer manometer Averaging period (seconds): 8 I
DATA W/O Load Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Max Diff Average Cale Load Error I Cin.H20) ------------------ Voltage ------------------ --
- (in.H20) - --
.00 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
- 10 1.003 1.013 1.006 .010 1.007 . 101 .001
.20 2.020 2.001 2.012 .019 2.011 .201 .001
.30 3.013 2.989 3.009 .025 3.004 .300 .000
.40 4.002 3.997 4.024 .027 4.008 .400 .000
.so 4.988 4.976 5.017 .041 4.994 .499 -.001 Max: .041 RESULTS by Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Average Least Absolute Performance: Max Error CinH20) .. 002 .001 .001 .001 Deviation Nonlinearity (%FS) .36 .30
- 12
- 19 Nonrepeatibility CXFS) ----- ----- ----- .82 Slope: in.H20/V .09989 . 10019 .09955 .09993 iil Local gravity,in.H20/V
- 0.9989 .09978 . 10008 .09944 .09982 psf/V
- 5. 1930 .51813 .51969 .51638 .51839 Slope Cle): psi/V I 144 .00360 .00361 .00359 .00360 CHECK-OFF Is le between 0.0034 and 0.0038 ,./
Is nonlinearity< 1.0%? /" ls nonrepeatability < 1.0%? .../"" Calibration " 8 ny Cal ibrati /- ac'Cepted-~) <;:rejected Date 5 -I ~-.,--,"'_""'.>----- END
A/D Voltage ChecK 4*12-93
- 1. ColJllUter type IBM AT
- 2. First channel 0
- 3. No. of channels 3
- 4. Sa~le time (sec) 5.00 S. Sa~le rate (HZ) 250.00
- 6. List raw data F
- 7. List data to LPT1 T Channel* 0 1 2 8050A Zero 0 0 0 Mean 1.494 1 .49 1.496 Zero Corrected 1 .471 1.471 1.472 Channel* 0 1 2 Zero 0 0 0 Mean 4. 737 4.727 4.736 Zero ,,._(_; 0 Corrected 4.714 4.708 4.712 Cv> o.(:.f-id-1 .
Channel* 0 1 2 re. W\-0 vt.J J. \}"1 -_, Zero 0 0 0 Mean 8.041 8.033 8.041 ~ C...fl l (a,<..h""lh. . Zero Corrected 8.018 8.014 8.017 /Vt.Adl-Channel* 0 1 2 18 /Vl~ '1~ Zero 0.023 0.017 0.024 Zero 0.023 0.019 0.024 Zero 0.023 0.019 0.024 Channel* 0 1 2 Zero 0.023 0.019 0.024 Mean 8.018 8.014 8.018 8.021 Rms 0.014 0.014 0.015 Rmax 8.058 8.058 8.062 Rm;n 7.955 7.95 7.95
- r fu/:lt.
hl\vt. ,._$F'-.l MoJf,/ ,..,,.. AU-
~ plkt* s1-c1e*c Ur11k,/, Se-.,,J"';-- l"AE""-12.-tvl
' J
......... """ ~.,.. .;.,,~,/ ,.. c. ~ldc,.ct *' plt'filcAf J: :::c :::c Cl Cl Cl Ill CIO
-C"I rJa """',
m:J- Pre.
- te r+
- 0 Poa+* +-es+
- r
+uot..
Jtl\vC. MoJc,/ t~IF't.l
"""'A..,
~ fH.HI* sk1t*c u~ ~UL P/t-E:-fz. -/Vl
' ~
- r :r :i::
""" N"' ~.,,,.#/ ,.. c ~ldc1tct *' pley1tcA/
0& ,.,._,,. 000
-C"I 11100
_C"I., Cl p,., .. tt , .. m Paa+- +.ts+
.i PNJ'~ _._i)~~-t-ftL_~_,6------ I Ptaj .,,
- c::c::c 000 11'100
-<'I
/,.,1ye,.1tn. r I 0,,..... ,,.,..,,J*'~ .i,.*~;,.,,. o~* 1.lcl,.
~ c/,*..,.,f AA ,,lw .H,,..,,, .,.( -"*ere:, ~.,C W\&Alfl~ SA,~ .,., nee-4' u-wAN.-J
- W-tc "1.:4 s** C..
I If
/b -=I
> c,r,.L._ .
. I 94./ :Y /7-t'~/F'f
.58 '/ (5 _01:II'~)5 0Q DO'~ CJh~ '2f7) =
(~~1
-"17 -:::.
"""/)
...,,,;,;, 01 = ~ o?
( oOtO/] 06 *a cz,rz*o . s I.,.., ..sa */ = ( ~,;- -z = """"'"""~(? ) j----' :ffl r-J-ob'O ~ *
- s/~ 00. ~ :: jLt ""1/1
;:: -=
II I
! ~,
~
c"/\ I D
/1. bl o *a - I t.)t.)t.)
I ---
~~t;J 11 IL5'0 - /\ I ..,_
0 0 VI I 000
"""VI
! ::: ::: :r
~!\
mm m *
/1 ~b*z- i .........
I Ill Ill Ill vv clcl -Z. OS r?;; II I i II
-5# '"\.ilj Jr.>°? -;;,-v/)a.s [-YJ8 ~ '-1.~vi.e-J 0 SdZ (!,NI
/t. 2?, /; :c;; w hi i
Project number 0907 Run number 0201 A Data collector "BH II Grid ID 0001 Ni.irber of GC colurns 2 Range selector exponents 11 11 IJind direction 205.0 Pitot, GC A/D channels o 1 2 Ambient temperature (deg C) 24.00 Sample injection time (sec) 40.00 Sample collection time (sec): 200.00 Target Wind Speed (m/s) 3.00 NU!ber of gases 1 Terrain/buildings in 1 C~ter type IBM-AT 1 Barometric pressure (inHg) 24.90 Velocity cal. factor (psi/V): .00358 Velocity standard 0 Ref vel tolerance (%) 3.00
**Gas number Gas name Source strength (%)
Delta Time of Peak (sec)
" Ethane "
10.00
- 31. 31.
~o Stack Height Cm> 1. O Operating Stack Label "Cont Bldg 11 Source Bottle ID "1A-016616 11 Cal Gas Concentration (ppm) 502. .::( C~
Flow device label "OLD rrm3-G 11 Flow device setting 8.32 Total volume flow (cc/s) 30.00 c::!:; \/'"""
**=======~=====================================================================*
Syringe GC GC Peak Volts 11 Ni.irber 11 11 Colurn 11 "Range" C6 1 11 -4. 142 cs 1 11 -4.037 1 C4 C3 C2 1 1 11 11 11
-3.969
-3.944
-3.921 tc-- VCA.Z C1 1 11 -3.933 C6 2 11 -4.007 cs 2 11 -3.859 C4 2 11 -3.807 C3 2 11 -3.780 C2 2 11 -3.774 C1 2 11 -3. 774 1 1 11 - . 727 2 2 11 - . 755 3 1 11 - .254 4 2 11 - .246 5 1 11 - . 571
~ vtn"""
c/<9 C~ce1t~ Ct.a_..t._ ?. /?. 6 2 11 - .572 AAA£ f'f M~ '1$ 7 1 11 - .648 8 2 11 -.595 9 1 11 - .653 10 2 11 - . 761 11 1 11 - .810 12 2 11 - .803 13 1 11 - .833 14 2 11 -.805 15 1 11 - .872 16 2 11 - .816 17 1 11 - .847 18 2 11 - .795 19 1 11 - .859 20 2 11 - .757 21 1 11 -.800 22 2 11 - .665 23 1 11 - . 713 24 2 11 -1. 190 25 1 11 -1 .273 26 2 11 - .335 27 1 11 -.504 28 2 11 -.588 29 1 11 - . 704 30 2 11 - .663 31 1 11 -.074 32 2 11 -.083 33 1 11 - .269 34 2 11 - .049 35 1 11 - . 101 36 2 11 - . 171 37 1 11 -.069 38 2 11 - .060 39 1 11 - . 132 40 2 11 -.047 41 1 11 -.087 42 2 11 - .221 43 1 999 999.000 44 2 999 999.000 45 1 999 999.000 46 2 999 999.000 47 1 999 999.000 48 2 999. 999.000 49 1 11 -.079 E: 50 2 11 - .056 vb'}
?c;.£rab ti A <t~n I /'f.,A,f~ ~5 I M~ y I
I I !I o,*e-~ -p, '(J!-;r.- I~ C~cvf~ ~ I I
I l I I c .v : : 2 r:;, 600 c...f=.tv< C.o V
-:::: 'f ;o c.f. .s
- z::z:
000 11100
":""C'4 s
-3 c .::.. c.
- v 61
=-
=
c~
- = /O'L- /V /: /00 C
~ ~ ;: 107- hn ~ =aoo I
_µg 1"'4 3 ;tV-...1'
. gr~ .
OOVI ooc.
- c:::c:::c
'" "" "'"'-t i'
I i i I i . i
CPP~ \Vind Engineering Consultants STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING OF TEST PLAN I have read the preliminary project test plan (CPP Project 93-0907) dated 3-30-93. I understand the test plan and acknowledge that the preliminary iest plan may change due to client direction the necessity for additional measurements to confinn measured phenomena modeVsampllng configurations.
- I also understand that I am free to ask funher questions regarding the test plan at any time.
Signed: ~~??~r-William P. Harvey Position: Data Acquisition Technician . Date: '7 9.5
- Cermah Peterka Petersen. Inc* 1415 Blue Spruce Or. ~Ft. Cullins. CO 80524*<303) 221-33 71 *FAX (303) 221-3124
I I I OIA f-c.,.f- ,r-- I w~ 7~-r<Ja.c..J..... v-e).o c.A Or J
't; rlt"u //-,~
r-' ,-Q c.. ~le.. .
~
w (4...r
¢ h> b. 2.S- ~ ~"-"""- 0. .r "'
I ( .... J.<-.I f- P Ia...-vr
......... S"~C/k.. t;{ .r~/\.
11'111'1111 I
\.MWW i (~ c..c-vv-d h:I f' {A/)-..,_ (.
- g::z *
- r::::
11'111'1111 Q Cl Cl 11100
-N I -N~ ~~~
NNN I NN~ I tel I i i c..~.-
- --~J I '5" VV"r t..
/Z. ;_fl...
f/1JV-C.....
/~.s,,.....,.1...
- 10. G:7 -rt.
7 , .__, /,. 8. 0 VV"f' /.,
~ rh.. s-.. ~ ,,,,,.., t...
~/,/..r~
;. e.
~ .f.{,.... c;&. ..f* i-c....(,A (.,4/1 ....... .A
~ yz,._,_ .>~ V-:,,..~ FloV>J. ~ . f.A/ovld L.::vv- ~ ~ O..J 1
(Jvaf a.c..fv~ v(A_g(... ( ~3 c.c. ~). '77..v... 1'v1. ~oL..R.. f{o W- ~ .rt...iJv( )._ ~
I I ~ -z_z_-9 _3 I
- z:::z:::z:
000
... oo
-C"f o..-:9 +le_ tw+ L..JC4~ r~ rv.-.
s.~- 4l~i0 UJvv..f~ 'ijm*r ~---*" cv-J... £..ew-.r""~ f""*.,...k..,v'r In\ r~IJi.JJ ~ Y'" ..Ms" g.,y..J.. r.o~ ~ 1> ~ l.. Ct.--s *. MA.ya_ 2."3 Ar 13
~i.-v .
I r '1/lf "'} -rvvi,'-f r-l'J ),..,, -} IYVI f'* /()
~" l~'""+~z
~
'.r~/-' -/1 °:f * ~I ~f VV\? r?j -)vlVY.Jcl ~17) ~ ""1;1.*
-rm!~ ~/' -: ; 1.M .* .l""7' "'J ~~ ..r-_; ")-\r/I ovz; , J. '-f"'fl
~ v-.! 11.',,....,, -......v~ !.; ..,,, /'l.../ +" '1 I -IJ o) f..._/VJ ~r' e /II
'fr'°1-~ ~ ~U' /5 :f 0 Cv_tJJ'I? ()Jc/ ~ ~ f(V)0/5
'Mr:'/! ~~.f"VJ,I "frh~~~ n;t T"'1,1 v-j*<' ~1.t-/.::f ~
d" ~ OO*UI
. 000
- c::c::c:
"" m 4 -4 c.nc.n~
I I Ii I
~<£~-S 1 * ~~~~'~i~ i t_c'\C;d-~
I i -P4....Ll~Dc=~ '-f--2.3-Cf 3 I- I- .... UIWIM
- t::::::
QQO <1100
-C'1 r.,,v I f1...., . J'"f(.,vr..- fVT,.,'t"4 .
M~ -:z.?~$ .
- c::c::c 11'111'111'1 000
"'00
-C'4
.,_('4., N~c-4 C'4C'4C'4
~V\ f1.v.. ~)~ rltJ. ~ /l.lr.. 57 o B VJ'* 1r ~I a. u.. ~
u;rye.rf~...
. 7 . old:;. /~ rv~ *. 510A. /tu1" .~df'
. 23Ay.,,/ 9'l
J/,
/h.L 5/ n/,...~ S~ r r ~
1 por.f. - 4.rf ~c.L re v~J fttJ *fivo ~7n*~ (#11 ~.L #'fz..) ~ avr o,C I~hu.-h'>---
~7- b~ 5" ~ ___.,(_ (o ~
- f1....L- ~-d;. of ~ Mo
- ::: l: S"J n*"'-? ~ /1,.._,v1 I' o./.U
- I.!7 '? 1-o (o °lo, 000 11'100
-C"I
~ hvo sf'n*~ ~s/' ~.I.. .;.,, toe~ k...J" /1 a.--t. 'f c..
~* C/\.t 'h *~ ~ MA.- Jl-v~. No ac.n *""""' ~,-11 k
)U,. ~~I ?;ov; Ld" /W~
/8M7 'fs
CHESTER E. WISNER
SUMMARY
OF EXPERIENCE: Mr. Wisner has over 20 years of experience in environmental consulting and research. over teri of which have been at senior management levels. He currently seives as the Chief Executive Officer of CPP. *He has directed research and industrial projects of all sizes. including a recent study of ozone formation in Louisiana with a budget exceeding $1 million. He has conducted wind mnnel studies of transpon and dispersion around buildings for serveral clients including the Hawaii Depamnent of Health. the University of California at San Diego, the University of Cincinnati Cardiov3scular Center. the Texas Medical Center, the University of Texas Medical Branch, and the County of San Bernardino, California. EDUCATION: M.B.A .* Marketing and Management Policy and Strategy, University of California. Los Angeles. 1982 M.S., Meteorology, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, 1970 B.S .* Engineering Physics, University of California. Berkeley, 1968 (currently enrolled in doctoral program of study in Atmospheric Science. Colorado State University, Fort Collins) AFFILIATIONS:
*Air and Waste Management Association (formerly APCA)
American Meteorological Society, former member of the Committee on Weather Modification Weather Modification Association. former Secretary SELECI'ED PUBLICATIONS:
*Wisner. C. E .* R. L. Petersen. and D. K. Paree. 1991: Air aualitv analysis of the Hawaii Deoanment of Health laboratorv facilitv. Repon prepared for James K. Tsugawa AIA & Associates. Honolulu, HI.
December 6, 1991. Wisner, C. E., and R. L. Petersen. 1991: Air quality analysis of the UCSD Molecular Biology Research facility. Repoit prepared for UCSD Facilities Design & Construction. La Jolla. CA, August 5, 1991. Wisner, C. E., R. L. Petersen. and M. A. Ratcliff, 1991: Air quality evaluation for the Biomedical Research Institute at LSUMC. Shreveoon. *Louisiana. Repon prepared for Slack Bradley Miremont & Assoc., Shrevepon. LA, May 31, 1991. Wisner, C. E .* R. L. Petersen, and L. Cottone, 1991: Erosion ootential tests in the vicinity fo East Helena using a oonable wind runnel. Repon prepared for ASARCO, Inc., East Helena. Mr, May I, 1991. Wisner, C. E., B. Contractor and B. Blanchard, 1990: A field study to support modeling of the ozone formation process in the vicinitv of Baton Rouge. Louisiana. Proceedings of the A WMA International Specialty Conference on Tropospheric Ozone, Los Angeles, California. March, 1990. CPP~
Wisner, C. E. and T. W. Davis, 1989: Characterization of fugitive emission rates using a mobile integrating sampler. Presented at the EPNAWMA International Symposium on Measurement of Toxic and Related Air Pollutants. Raleigh. Nonh Carolina, May, 1989. Wisner, C. E. 1980 - 1989: (several proprietary repons to industrial clients related to environmental permitting and environmental hazards evaluation) Wisner. C. E., J. R. Thompson. and D. A. Griffith. 1978: Initial development of a tactical svstem for dispersing supercooled stratus. North American Weather Consultants Repon No. 78-20 submitted to Air Force Geophysics Laboratory under Contract No. F19628-76-C-0306. Thompson. J. R, R. W. Shaffer, C. E. Wisner and D. A. Griffith. 1978: A design study for a cloud seeding program for the State of Utah. North American Weather Consultants Repon No. 77-15 submitted to the Utah Division of Water Resources. Wisner, C. E. and L. N. Shaffer, 1977: A studv of strarus clouds in Central Europe. North American Weather Consultants Report No. 77-8 submitted to Air Force Geophysics Laboratory under Contract No. F19628-76-C-0097. Sutherland, J. L., C. E. Wisner and D. E. Hughes, 1977: Sierra Cooperative Pilot Project - a radar climatology of Sierra Nevada winter storms. Nonh American Weather Consultants Repon No. 77-12 submitted to Bureau of Reclamation under Contract No. 6-07-DR-20130. Wisner, C. E., J. R. Thompson. and D. A. Griffith. 1976: Test plan for stratus dispersal tests. North American Weather Consultants Repon No. 76-7 submitted to Air Force Geophysical Laboratory under Contract No. F19628-76-C-0306. Wisner, C. E. and R. Reed, 1976: Sierra Cooperative Pilot Project -radar site selection. North American Weather Consultants Repon No. 76-4 submitted to Bureau of Reclamation under Contract No. 6-07-DR-20130. Wisner, C. E., 1976: A studv of diurnal variation of convective activitv in South Dakota using serial rawinsonde data, 1973 - 1975 summer seasons. North American Weather Consuitants Repon No. 76-2 submitted to the South Dakota Division of Weather Modification under Contract No. 14-06-0-7240. Wisner, C. E., 1975: Feasibility of developing a model to predict appropriate seeding rates for cumulus clouds. North American Weather Consultants Repon No. 15-23 submitted to South Dakota Division of Weather Modification under Contract No. 14-06-D-7240. Elliott, R. D. and C. E. Wisner, 1972: . Regional weather modification svstems. Nonh American Weather Consultants Report No. 6-1117 submitted to U.S. Air Force under Contract No. F19628 C-0233. Wisner, C. E., H. D. Orville and C. Myers, 1972: A numerical model of a hail-bearing cloud. J. Atmos. Sci .* ~ 1160-1181. CPP~
MICHAEL A. RATCLIFF Project Engineer. CERMAK PETERKA PETERSEN, INC., Wind Engineering Consultants, Fort Collins, Colorado. EDUCATION Ph.D. Civil Engineering, Fluid Mechanics and Wind Engineering Program, Colorado State University, 1984 M.S. Engineering, Atmospheric Science major, University of Texas at Austin, 1978 B.S. Engineering Science, Atmospheric Science major, University of Texas at Austin, 1976 EXPERIENCE Senior Project Engineer at CERMAK PETERKA PETERSEN, INC. since 1984. Responsible for coor-dinating laboratory activities and project engineer for numerous building aerodynamic and pedes-trian environment studies, pollution diffusion studies, development of numerical diffusion models, computer program development and electronics. Graduate student responsibilities at Colorado State University included implementation of an NSF funded atmospheric field study of heavy particle turbulent diffusion. Tasks included aerosol generation and sampling, numerical modeling, instrumentation, microcomputer programming, and data collection and reduction. Other experi-ence includes a Master's Thesis Appointment at Argonne National Laboratory which involved modification and validation of cooling tower drift deposition models. PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES/AWARDS Member of American Meteorological Society, the Air Pollution Control Association, and the Wind Engineering Research Council. Member of the honor societies of Phi Kappa Phi and Chi Epsilon Pi. Graduation with Highest Honors and Engineering Scholar 1974-1976 at the University of Texas. Conference and symposium presentations include "Development and Verification of a Wet Cooling Tower Drift Deposition Model" (APCA, 1978), "Evaluation of Theory and Performance of Salt-Drift Deposition Models for Natural-Draft Cooling Towers" (AlAA/ ASME, 1978), "A Lagrangian-Eulerian Model to Predict the Diffusion of Heavy Particles" (7th Sympoisum on Turbulence and Diffusion, AMS, 1985), "Particle Diffusion in the Atmospheric Surface Layer (ASCE Specialty Conference on Advances in Aerodynamics, Fluid Mechanics, and Hydraulics, 1986), "Evaluation of Improvements to the Plume Rise Algorithms in the ISC Model" (APCA, 1987), and "Evaluation of an Integral Plume Rise Algorithm in a Building Wake Dispersion Model" (ASCE/ ASME, 1987). CPPAC'
This cenifies that CPP, Incorporated employee Steven L. Mike has appropriate training and experience totaling at least 6 months for the position of Assistant Laboratory Coordinator. He is qualified to perform the duties of the above position for the wind tunnel study of the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant, CPP Project 93-0907, for Sargent & Lundy Engineers under Purchase Order PS-0738 .
- By:
Chester E. Wisner Chief Executive Officer Date:_'l~./1_t/A . . . .1.-=-'. .J_ _ CPP, Incorporated Cermak Peterka Pctcrsrn. Inc.* 1-f 15 Blue .Srrucc Or.* Ft. L<lilins. cu 8052-f 0 ! 303 l 22l-3311 *FA..\ UOJ l 221-312-f
STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING OF TEST PLAN I have read the preliminary project test plan (CPP Project 93-0907) dated 3-30-93. I understand the test plan and acknowledge that the preliminary test plan may change due to client direction the necessity for additional measurements to confinn measured phenomena modeVsampling configurations .
- I also understand that I am free to ask funher questions regarding the test plan at any time.
Signed: Steven L. Mike Position: Assistant Laboratory Coordinator
.\ c n *<_
Date: *r\' ""** *\ 1. 1 1-1 .._; l.°LTtnah Peterka Pctcrs.:n. Int .* / .l ! 5 Biur: sr'rut:c Dr.* Ft. C ilins. Ll) 8052-f. ! i~1J I 2:.:. 1 *.3.l-: I
- FA.\ 1.303 i 221-312-f 1
CPP~ *.Vind Engmeenng Lt_,'nsuiwnrs ...;.;**======================~ This cenifies that CPP, Incorporated employee John T. Gregg has appropriate training and experience totaling at least 6 months for the position of Data Acquisition Technician. He is qualified to perfonn the duties of the above position for the wind tunnel study of the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant. CPP Project 93-0907, for Sargent & Lundy Engineers under Purchase Order PS-0738 .
- By: ~!
Chester E. Wisner Chief Executive Officer CPP, Incorporated L"c:rmak Pi:terka Petersen. Inc.* 1415 Blue Spruce Dr.* Fe. Collins. CO 8052-f *( .303 J 221-33 I I* FAX (30.3 l 221-312-+
(. --"JD . ~~"
. .. . - ..........i"'"....
.',ma C:l'.2:tnca::icr *_.:*;1suLLancs STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING OF TEST PLAN I have read the preliminary project test plan (CPP- Project 93-0907) dated 3-30-93. I understand the test plan and acknowledge that the preliminary test plan may change due to client direction the necessity for additional measurements to confinn measured phenomena model/sampling configurations.
I also understand that I am free to ask funher questions regarding the test plan at any time.
~ t7 <2 Signed: ~---) t1,~ --r::""><
i John T. Gregg *
\.
Position: __...-Data Acquisition Technician Date: Cermak Peterka Pi:tt:rscn. i11c
- H 15 Blue iprucc Dr.* Ft. C.,i/ins. Cc) 8L152-f *! 303 J 2~ l *3.3! I* FA.\" 1 303 i 2.:! 1-312-f
TIIis cenifies that CPP, Incorporated employee Adrian M. Manzanares has appropriate training and experience totaling at least 6 months for the position of Model Construction Technician. He is qualified to perfonn the duties of the above position for the wind tunnel study of the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant, CPP Project 93-0907, for Sargent & Lundy Engineers under Purchase Order PS-0738. By: Date:---//t__,6:-L.d........,_.;...~_ _ Chester E. Wisner Chief Executive Officer CPP, Incorporated Camak Pt*tr:rka Petersen. /11c. *I-+ 15 Bltit: ipnict* Or.* FL Collins. CU 8052-l *rJclJ J 22 I -331 I* FA..\ dJJ i 221-3 / 2-f
CP.J.D~
,:;;..~ -.Vind En.gmeenng Lc'nsuitams This certifies that CPP, Incorporated employee William P. Harvey has appropriate training and experience totaling at least 6 months for the position of Data Acquisition Techniciari. He is qualified to perfonn the duties of the above position for the wind tunnel study of the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant. CPP Project 93-0907, for Sargent & Lundy Engineers under Purchase Order PS-0738 .
- By:
Chester E. Wisner Chief Executive Officer CPP, Incorporated Cc:rmak Pc_terka Petersen. Inc.* I-+ 15 Blue Spruce Dr.* Ft. Cullins. CO 80524 *(303) 221-33 i I* FA,\ 1303 l 221-312-f.
This cenifies that CPP, Incorporated employee Steven W. Miller has appropriate training and experience totaling at least 6 months for the position of Data Acquisition Technician. He is qualified to perform the duties of ihe above position for the wind tunnel study of the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant. CPP Project 93-0907, for Sargent & Lundy Engineers under Purchase Order PS-0738 .
- By:
Chester E. Wisner Date:__.~...._~-+-~f_'f-"-J-Chief Executive Officer CPP, Incorporated l ..mnak Peterka Petersen. i11c.
- i-f 1.5 Blue irnicc Dr.* Fr. C1ili11s. L°Ll Sl.152-f *' .3L1.3 1 ~~ 1-.5.3 :-1 *FA. \ , 3L!.3 l ~.21-312-f
(~°PP~ \.....-1.L ...i.. :=a, '..\.ind Engmeenng t~:.msuitanrs STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING OF TEST PLAN I have read the preliminary project test plan (CPP Project 93..()<)()7) dated 3-30-93. I understand the test plan and acknowledge that the preliminary test plan may change due to cliem direction the necessity for additional measurements to confinn measured phenomena model/sampling configurations. I also understand that I am free to ask funher questions regarding the test plan at any time. Signed: Steven W. Miller Position: Supervisory Technician Date:
- Camak Peterka Petersen. Inc.* 1415 Blue Spruce Dr.* Ft. Cullins. CO 80524 *UOJ) 221-3371
- FA.X: (303) 221-3124
- ATTACHMENT 2 Consumers Power Company Palisades Plant Docket 50-255 DOCUMENTATION OF APPROPRIATE ATMOSPHERIC DISPERSION FACTORS FOR CONTROL ROOM HABITABILITY ASSESSMENTS BASED ON WIND TUNNEL TEST RESULTS EA-PAH-94-04
*-*-*- PALI sADES NUCLEAR PLANT ENGINEERING ANALYSIS COVER SHEET EA -PAH-94-04 Total Number of Sheets 15 Title Documentation of A1111ro11riate Atmos11heric Dis11ersion Factors for Control Room Habitabilit)'. Assessments Based on Wind Tunnel Tests INITIATION AND REVIEW Calculation Status Preliminary Pending Final Superseded D D x D Initiated I nit Review Method Technically Reviewed Revr Rev Appd Appd CPCo
# Description By Detail Qual By Appd By Date Alt Cale Review Test By Date
/..J.//// . ~,,,/Jc !JO ..,
-......- ~(,9 / 1'e-~
#~11 0 Original Issue l;JJ.J.i.., ,/,,,~ s~
- ..JI *.. ~S
'8-1'8-~'I
- PURPOSE:
The objective of this engineering analysis is to document the appropriate atmospheric dispersion factors (x/Q's) for control room habitability assessments based on wind tunnel tests performed on a scale model of the Palisades plant.
SUMMARY
& CONCLUSION:
This analysis evaluated the results of wind tunnel testing on a scale model of the Palisades plant to determine atmospheric dispersion factor values at the control room normal and emergency air intakes for releases from the containment building, the ventilation stick and the SIRW Tank. The effects of operating the emergency diesel generators, the planned support building expansion and the ongoing service building expansion were all evaluated. The maximum values for the atmospheric dispersion factors were documented, including associated uncertainties. The atmospheric dispersion factors for releases from the conWnment building were determined to be more conservative than those for release from the ventilation stack. Therefore, only applicable atmospheric dispersion factors for containment building and SIRW Tank releases were developed. Appropriate adjustment factors were then applied to the maximum values to obtain the atmospheric dispersion factors applicable over the range of required time intervals for radiological consequence analyses. The applicable atmospheric dispersion
- factors are listed in Table 2 on page 8 of this analysis. The applicability of the containment building atmospheric dispersion factors to the releases that occur in all FSAR radiological consequence events
*was also concluded. The analysis also documented the major conservatisms that exist in application of the developed atmospheric dispersion factors.
PALISADES NUCLEAR PLANT EA-PAH-94-04 ANALYSIS CONTINUATION SHEET Sheet *_2_ Rev # ----'o,,__ 1~0 INTRODUCTION Atmospheric dispersion factors, or x/Q's, are one of the significant factors employed in radiological assessment calculations following the release of radioactive contaminants .. The x/Q's provide a numerical estimate of the dilution that occurs between the point of release and the point of intake for a radioactive release. In other words, based on a given release rate of radioactive contaminants from a release location, the x/Q's determine the concentration of the contaminants at the point of intake. Atmospheric dispersion factors are generally determined using mathematical models. These models may be appropriate for large scale estimates such as offsite doses. However, these mathematical models are simplistic. in comparison to the highly complex air flow characteristics that occur in building complexes. Due to their simplicity, the mathematical models generally under-predict dispersion within building complexes. This tends to make the mathematical models undesirable for purposes such as control room habitability assessments where. the atmospheric dispersion in and around building arrangements is* required. Figure- 1 shows the complexity of typical air flow patterns past a simple building arrangement. Complex air flows, such as shown in Fig. 1, are difficult to accurately model using current mathematical methods. In a building complex, more complications in the air flow patterns arise since the turbulence zones from individual structures merge together in complicated ways. In contrast to current numerical dispersion models, wind tunnel modeling directly simulates the air flow patterns in the building complex through the use of scaling relations derived from the governing equations of motion. Wind tunnel modeling is well-suited for predicting the air flow patterns around nuclear power plant building complexes. A scale model of a nuclear plant site in a wind tunnel can provide more accurate estimates of atmospheric dispersion factors for control room habitability assessments. hlgbly 1mbulcnt wBlo.
~---
Figure 1
PALISADES NUCLEAR PLANT EA-PAH-94-04 ANALYSIS CONTINUATION SHEET Sheet _3_* Rev # __o~-
2.0 BACKGROUND
For Palisades, the atmospheric dispersion factors for control room habitability assessments have historically been determined using simplistic mathematical modeling .. Since the atmospheric dispersion factors are a significant input to control room habitability assessments, those employed at Palisades have been revised several times over the years in an effort to gain margin using the most current methodologies. The control room habitability analyses to date have been performed with the atmospheric dispersion factors calculated in References 3 .1, 3. 2 & 3. 3. The margin ~ the control room habitability calculations was eventually determined to be unacceptable and planning (or modifications to the control room HVAC system was initiated. During this*planning, however, wind tunnel testing was proposed as a possible solution for the control room habitability concerns. With more accurate atmospheric dispersion factors obtained through wind tunnel testing, significant margin in control room habitability could be gained. Therefore, CPP Wind Engineering Consultants were contracted through Sargent & Lundy to perform a wind tunnel study on a scale model of Palisades. The results of the wind tunnel study are provided in Reference 3.4. The wind tunnel study of the Palisades plant considered three sources of contaminant release: the containment building, the ventilation stack and the SIRW Tank. For conservatism, the containment building was modeled as* a porous structure with source gas releases directly to the environment through many small holes drilled into the building. This was felt to be conservative considering that many of the containment penetrations that could result in leakage following an accident are located inside of the auxiliary building. Source gas releases from the ventilation stack were for the most part modeled for comparison to containment building releases. The ventilation stack was modeled as an elevated release with negligible release momentum in the vertical direction. The SIRW Tank was modeled to account for this release path when the potential for sump water leakage to the tank exists following an accident. Two receptor locations from the wind tunnel study are of interest to control room habitability assessments: the normal ak intakes and the emergency air intake. The normal air intakes are the locations of the air intakes that the control room HVAC system obtains fresh air from during normal operations. If a radiological release is suspected, the control room HVAC system is switched from normal mode to emergency mode, which switches fresh air suction to the emergency air intake located 95 .5 meters from the containment building. Many *other receptor locations were evaluated in the wind tunnel study but are not of concern for this analysis. The wind tunnel study also included an evaluation of several items. that could alter the air flow patterns between the release locations and the control room air intakes~ Specifically, the study evaluated the effects of emergency diesel generators exhausts (which are high momentum horizontal discharges between the protected area buildings), the service building expansion that is underway and the potential support building expansion that is planned. Each of these items was evaluated to determine if there was any influence on the measured x!Q values. As can be seen from the discussions in Reference 3.5, x!Qs are used as a multiplication factor in the equations for determining radiation exposure doses. Since it is used as a multiplication factor, higher x!Q values represent higher radionuclide concentrations and are more conservative. Tue wind tunnel study therefore was intended to determine maximum x!Q values from each release location to each intake location. The method of the wind tunnel study to determine maximum x!Q values was to evaluate each
PALISADES NUCLEAR PLANT EA-PAH-94-04 ANALYSIS CONTINUATION SHEET. Sheet 4 Rev # ---=-0_ _ of the three release locations discussed above in combination with a spectrum of wind directions, sampling at each of the two control room air intake locations. The wind directions chosen were based on the direct line path from the release locations to the two control room air intake locations and several* encompassing wind directions revolving around the direct line path. For each combination of a given release location and control room air intake location, the wind directfon that resulted in the maximum x!Q was determined .. Thus, a different wind direction results in the maximum x!Q for each control room air intake for a given release source. Since the wind tunnel study was performed for many different cases, this analysis is being performed to document the appropriate values for use in control room habitability assessments at Palisades.
3.0 REFERENCES
3.1 Bechtel Cale 20592-027-001 Rev. 0, "X/Q Values at the Control Room Fresh Air Intakes (Normal
& Emergency) due to Releases at SIRW Tank," Jap.uary 28, 1992. (Filed with EA-PAH-92-01 Cart/Frame: F037/0367) 3.2 Bechtel Cale 001-N-002 Rev. 1, "Control Room Inleakage X/Qs Using New Wake Model," March 28, 1990.
3.3 Bechtel Cale 001-N-001 Rev. 1, "Control Room X/Q Values Using Composite Wake Model," December 22, 1990. 3.4 "Wind Tunnel Predictions of Control Room Intake Concentrations From Three Sources of Radioactive Materials at the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant," Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc. June 1993. CPP Project 93-0907. Cart/Frame: F521/0004. 3.5 K.G. Murphy and K.M. Campe, "Nuclear Power Plant Control Room Ventilation System Design for Meeting General Design Criterion 19," 13th AEC Air Cleaning Conference, August 1974.
- 3.6 NUREG-0800 US NRC Standard Review Plan, Seetion 6.4 Rev 2, "Control Room Habitability System," July 1981.
- 3. 7 Palisades Final Safety Analysis Report.
4.0 ANALYSIS INPUTS 4.1 All atmospheric dispersion data from the wind tunnel tests is obtained from Reference 3'.4. 1-.2 As described under section 4.5 on page 20 of Reference 3.4, the maxiffium repeatability of wind tunnel tests is approximately 10 %. This will represent the uncertainty for the atmospheric dispersion factors obtained through wind tunnel testing. As described on page A-7 of Reference 3 .4, the experimental error associated with measuring the concentrations is + 3 % for concentrations of 100 µg/m 3
- Since all of the maximum concentrations from which the atmospheric dispersion
PALISADES NUCLEAR PLANT EA-PAH-94-04 ANALYSIS CONTINUATION SHEET Sheet 5 Rev# -~o __ factors are to be based are greater than 100 µglm3, the uncertainty associated with test repeatability encompasses the experimental error. 4.3 The time intervals for which x/Q values are needed for control room habitability assessments are 0 - 8 Hrs, 8 - 24 Hrs, 1 - 4 Days, and 4 - 30 Days per References 3.5 and 3.6. 4.4 Wind speed adjustment factors and wind direction adjustment factors for accounting for effects of changes in wind speed and direction over progressively longer periods of time are obtained from . Table 1 of Reference 3.5. The adjustment factors are multiplication factors that were developed for-application to the 5 percentile x!Q value to obtain appropriate x/Q values for set time intervals following an accident. The adjustment factors are shown below, with the combined factors simply being the product of the wind speed and wind direction factors. Table 1 Adjustment Factor 0-8Hrs ,_ ______________ 8-24Hrs 1-4 Days 4 - 30 Days
~--------------------- ------------- ~-------------- -------------
Wind Speed 1.0 0.67 0.5 0.33 Wind Direction 1.0 0.88 0.75 0.50 Combined 1.0 0.5896 0.375 0.165 5.0 ASSUMPTIONS 5.1 The adjustment factors for wind speed and direction from Reference 3.5 are appropriate for use with each maximum x!Q for a given release and receptor location combination from the wind tunnel tests. 6.0 ANALYSIS 6.1 DEVELOPMENT OF APPROPRIATE x.IQ VALUES Pages 18 - 20 of Reference 3.4 present the maxiinum x!Qs for each release location to each intake location without consideration of the influence of the emergency diesel generator exhausts, the service building expansion or the planned expansion of the support building. The maximums are as follows: 6.43xl04 s/m3 for the normal air intake and 3.78xl04 s/m3 for the emergency air.intake with releases from containment; 3.13xl04 s/m3 for the normal air intake and 3.19xl04 s/m3 for the emergency air
- intake with releases from the ventilation stack; and 1.32x10-2 s/m3 for the normal air intake and 5. 77xl04 3/m3 for the emergency air intake with releases from the SIRW Tank. As can be seen from these results, the containment building releases resulted in higher, more conservative x/Qs than ventilation stack releases for both the normal and emergency control room air intakes. This is as expected since the ventilation stack is an elevated release. Since the containment building maximum* x!Qs were shown to be more conservative than that fo~ the ventilation stack, only those for the containment building and the
PALISADES NUCLEAR PLANT EA-PAH-94-04 ANALYSIS CONTINUATION SHEET Sheet _6_ Rev # __O=--- SIRW Tarik are to be addressed in this analysis for use in control room habitability assessments. The specific applicability of the using the containment building maximum x!Qs in place of ventilation stack or other release locations (except for the SIRW Tank) for all radiological consequence events is addressed later in this analysis.
- The effect of diesel generator exhausts on atmospheric dispersion was evaluated since they discharge at a high flow rate in the horizontal direction between the auxiliary building and service building. It was felt that this high momentum flow rate could change the air flow patterns and affect dispersion to the emergency air intake. Reference 3. 4 discusses the diesel generator effects on pages 20 - 21 and in Figures 20 - 22. The maximum x/Qs decreased for the emergency air intake and increased for the normal air intake with releases from the containment building. The decrease for the emergency air intake was greater than the increase for the normal air intake. The emergency air intake is also the predominant location for air entering the control room during the emergency mode of operation.
Therefore, the overall effect of diesel generators operating would be a slight decrease to no change in predicted radionuclide ingress to the control room; and hence the same effect would be expected on predicted control room doses following an accident. with releases from the containment building. The changes in x/Qs for the normal and emergency air intakes with releases from the ventilation stack were. somewhat different from the changes. for releases from containment when the diesels generator exhausts are modeled. However, the x!Qs with releases from the containment building were still more conservative (higher) than those with releases from the ventilation stack. For relea&es from the SIRW Tank, the changes seen with the diesel generator exhausts modeled were within the repeatability of the wind tunnel tests ( +/- 10 %) .
- Considering the effects for each of the release locations and air intake locations with the diesel generators operating, little change is seen in xi Qs or the* change that was seen was deemed to be in an overall conservative direction. Therefore, the effects of diesel generator exhausts will not be considered in the x!Qs speeified for use in control room habitability assessments at Palisades.
Note should be made that the values in Figures 20 - 22 of Reference 3. 4 cannot be compared to the maximum values determined without the diesel generator exhaust modeled. The reason for this being . that the win.d speed had to be increased for the cases with diesel generator exhausts operating to meet all
- of the similarity criteria for wind tunnel tests, due to the high momentum and temperature that the
- exhausts have in full scale operation. Therefore, the concentrations for the releases were measured with and without the diesel exhausts modeled at the higher wind speed and presented in the Figures. This was only the case for evaiuating diesel generator exhaust effects. The: effects of service building expansion and the planned support buildfu.g expansion were evaluated at the same wind speeds as the base cases.
The effect of the planned support building expansion was evaluated since it would be a large structure and could impact air flow patterns. This structure must be discussed in this analysis so that any effects may be acco~nted for as necessary if the addition is made. Reference 3.4 discusses the effects of the planned support building expansion on page 21 and in Figures 23 - 25. Concentrations at the emergency air intakes decreased for releases from the containment building and the ventilation stack. The decrease for the containment building releases was about the same as the maximum expected repeatability variation for wind tunnel tests, 10 %, whereas the decrease for ventilation stack releases was slightly greater than expected repeatability variation, 15 %. At the normal air intakes, concentrations increased by approximately 20 %, more than the expected repeatability variation for wind tunnel tests for releases from the containment building. The concentrations at the normal air intake did not change appreciably for releases from the ventilation stack. The effects of the planned support building expansion also did.
PALISADES NUCLEAR PLANT EA-PAH-94-04 ANALYSIS CONTINUATION SHEET Sheet _ 7 _ Rev # __o~- not change the conclusion that the x/Qs for containment building releases are more conservative than ventilation stack releases. For releases from the SIRW Tank, the support building had no appreciable effect on measured concentrations. In summary for support building expansion effects, the maximum
- x!Q for the normal air intake with releases from the containment buildmg may be conservatively increased by up to 10 % over the repeatability variation of 10 %. However, if the increase is accounted for at the normal air intake, it is also appropriate to account for the 10 % decrease at the emergency air intake, which simply cancels out the repeatability variation that will be applied to the maximum.
The effect of the service building expansion was evaluated due to the direct impact associated with the emergency air intake, since the emergency air intake is located at the north end of the existing service building. Sip.ce the service building expansion is currently being completed and the major structure which could act to effect air flow patterns is already in place, the results of that portion of the wind . tunnel study are directly applicable to the current plant configuration. Reference 3.4 discusses the effects of the service building expansion of pages 21 - 22 and in Figures 26 - 28. Due to the large effects on emergency air intake concentrations, more tests were performed with the service building expansion and the results were presented niore explicitly. For releases from the containment building, the maximum x!Q decreased to 2.56xl04 s/m3 at the emergency air intake, with no change in the maximum at the normal air intake. For releases from the ventilation stack, the maximum x!Q decreased to 2.39xl04
- s/m3 at the emergency air intake, with no decrease in the maximum at the normal air intake. The effects of the service building addition also did not change the conclusion that the x/Qs for containment building releases are more consen'ative than ventilation stack releases. For releases from the SIRW Tank, no appreciable change occurred at the emergency air intake. However, the maximum at the normal air intake decreased by approximately 25 % for releases from the SIRW Tank, which is a 15 % greater change than the expected repeatability variation of 10 %. In summary for the effects of the service building expansion, a maximum x!Q of 2.56xl04 s/m3 should be used for the emergency air intake with releases from the contait:iment building. Also, the maximum x!Q for the normal air intake with releases from the SIRW Tank may be decreased by up to 15 % to account for service building expansion effects, Now the effects discussed above must be summarized and applied to obtain the appropriate maximum x!Q values for use in control room habitability analyses. Two sets of x!Qs are recommended for use, which are those for containment building releases and those for SIRW Tank releases. Also, as explained above the diesel generators have no significant non-conservative effect on the maximum x!Q values, which leaves only the effects of the building expansions to be accounted for.
For the normal air intake with releases from the containment building, a maximum_ x!Q of 6.43xl04 s/m3 was measured without accounting for effects of the building expansions. A 10% increase should be
- applied for future support building expansion effects along with a 10 % increase to account for the repeatability variation, or uncertainty. Therefore, a maximum x!Q of (1.2* 6.43x104 ) = 7.72xl04 s/m3 should be used for the normal air intake with releases from the containment building.
For the emergency air intake with releases from the containment building, a maximum x!Q of 3.78xl04 5/m3 was measured without accounting for effects of the building expansions. The service building expansion reduced the maximum to 2.56xl04 s/m3 for the emergency air intake with releases from the containment building. A 10 % decrease should be applied for the future support building expansion effects along with a 10% increase to account for the repeatability variation, which cancel one another out. Therefore, a: maximum x!Q of 2.56x104 s/m3 should be* used for the emergency air intake with releases from the containment building.
PALISADES NUCLEAR PLANT EA-PAH 04 ANALYSIS CONTINUATION SHEET Sheet _a_ Rev # -~o~- For the normal air intake with releases from the SIRW Tank, a maximum xlQ of l.32x10-2 s/m3 was measured without accounting for effects of the building expansions. A 15 % decrease can be applied for
- service building expansion effects along with a 10% increase to account for repeatability variation, which will be conservatively assumed to cancel one another out. Therefore, a maximum xlQ of l.32x10-2 s/m3 should be used for the normal air intake with releases from the SIRW Tank.
For the emergency air intake with releases from the SIRW Tank, a maximum x!Q of 5. 77xl04 s/m3 was measured without accounting for effects of the building expansions. No change was predicted due to building expansions so only a 10% increase should be applied to account for repeatability variation. Therefore, a maximum xlQ of (l.l *5.77xl04 ) = 6.35xl04 s/m3should be used for the emergency air intake with releases from the SIRW Tank.
- As discussed in Assumption 4.4 of this analysis, adjustment factors can be applied to maximum x/Q
*values to obtain values for the time intervals generally used in radiological consequence analyses. The adjustment factors listed in Table l under Assumption 4.4 were developed to be applied to the 5 percentile x/Q, or x!Q that will not be exceeded rilore than 5 % of the time~ The xlQ values described in this analysis are actually more conservative than a 5 percentile value since they were developed as absolute maximums. The x/Qs that result after applying the adjustment factors are shown in Table 2 below.*
Table 2 Time ________________ Containment"T' _________________ Releases SIRW Tank Releases Interval ~----------------"T'---------------- I Norm. Intake : Erner. Intake Norm. Intake* I Erner. Intake 0- 8 Hrs 7. 72xl04 s/m3 2.56xl04 s/m3 l.32xlo-2 s/m3 6.35xl04 s/m3 8-24Hrs 4.55xl04 s/m3 l.51xl04 s/m3 7. 78x10-3 s/m3 3.74xl04 s/m3 1 - 4 Days 2.90xl04 s/m3 9.60xlo-s s/m3 4.95x10-3 s/m3 2.38xl04 s/m3 4 - 30 Days 1.27xl04 s/m3 4.22x10-5 s/m3
- 2.18x10-3 s/m3 l.05xl04 s/m3 6~2 APPLICABILITY TO FSAR EVENT OTHER THAN THE MHA To apply the x/Qs listed in Table 2 to all radiological consequence type *accidents, the release locations.
and characteristics must be evaluated. Specifically, the values in Table 2 were developed for the maximum hypothetical accident (MHA), which would potentially have radiological releases from the containment building,. the ventilation stack and the SIRW Tank. It was previously shown in this analysis that the x/Qs for the containment building are slightly more conservative than that for the ventilation 3tack, such that the values for the containment building can be used for both release locations. Other FSAR [Ref. 3. 7] Chapter 14 radiological events, however, have different release locations and release characteristics. The discussion that follows will evaluate each FSAR Chapter 14 radiological event that requires a control room habitability analysis with respect to the applicability of the x/Qs listed in Table 2.
PALISADES NUCLEAR PLANT EA-PAH-94-04 ANALYSIS CONTimJATION SHEET Sheet _ 9 _ Rev # __o~- The cask drop event is described in section 14.11 of the FSAR. A cask drop event causes a release of radioactive fissiori gases in the spent fuel pool area of the auxiliary building. Two cases are generally* considered for this event: a case in which fuel handling area exhaust fans are operating and a case in which the fuel handling area exhaust fans are not operating. If the fuel handling area exhaust fans are operating, any release into the spent fuel pool area exits through the fuel handling area charcoal filters and would then be released from the ventilation stack, With releases through the stack, the xl.Qs for containment building releases would be conservative. If the fuel handling area exhaust fans are not operating, the release would probably be through the ventilation stack also since the auxiliary building is maintained at a slightly negative pressure, but would not pass through the fuel handling area *exhaust charcoal filters. However, some of the release could potentially be released directly from the auxiliary building through openings that exist between wall spaces. Since the spent fuel pool area is located_ directly next to the containment building, any direct releases from this area would be close to the containment building. For releases of this nature, the x/Qs for containment building releases would be
~~- . . .
The. main steam line break (MSLB) event is described in: section 14.14 of the FSAR.. An MSLB causes a large release of steam from the secondary system, which could release radioactivity if primary to secondary leaks exist. The most likely location for an MSLB is inside of the containment building due to . the increased pipe thickness that is used outside of containment. For any radiological releases from an MSLB inside of containment, the x/Qs for containment building releases would be appropriate. The increased pipe thickness for the main steam line piping outside of containment starts several feet from the containment wall. Therefore, the probable location for an MSLB outside of containmept would be in that short distance of piping. A break in this area would cause the release to occur in the CCW room of the auxiliary building. Since the control room is maintained at a positive pressure and air blows from the control room when doors are opened, any radiological release must travel outside of the buildings to be drawn into the control room HVAC system. For most paths from the CCW room there would be a large amount of in building dilution occurring before any radioactivity escapes to the environment, which would r~sult in very low x/Qs. If the steam release exits the auxiliary building to the environment through the upper level of the CCW room, it would be close to the containment building. The high temperature of the steam would cause the release to be buoyant which causes it to rise. Since this release would be close to the containment building, the x/Qs for containment building releases would be . appropriate. The high buoyancy of the steam would actually result in lower x/Qs, making those for containment building releases conservative. The steam generator tube rupture (SGTR) event is described in section 14.15 of the FSAR~ An SGTR causes a transfer of primary coolant to the secondary side of the steam generators. The radioactivity
*transferred with the primary coolant is then released from the secondary side as the main steam safety valves or atmospheric dump valves lift to relieve secondary side pressure or as the atmospheric dump valves are lifted during cool down of the plant. The exhaust of the safety valves and dump valves are on the auxiliary building roof near the SIRW Tank. When these valves are lifted to relieve steam, any a
radioactivity released will be with the steam. This release will be at high velocity vertical exhaust. Due to the high temperature of the steam, the release will also have a high buoyancy which would tend to elevate the release even more. Vertical releases with high momentum and high temperature releases that are more buoyant are dispersed much more than releases modeled for the containment building, ventilation stack and SIRW Tank in the wind tunnel. The momentum and buoyant forces would cause most of the release from the safety valves or dump valves to be carried over the control room normal air intakes. A large portion would more than likely be carried over the emergency air intake also. Any
- PALISADES NUCLEAR PLANT EA-PAH-94-04 ANALYSIS CONTINUATION SHEET Sheet 10 Rev # --'o"---
plume that the emergency air intake is exposed to would be very much diluted. Since a release of this nature would have very low x!Qs for the emergency air intake and even lower for the normal air. intake, the x/Qs for releases from the containment building would be conservative. The control rod ejection (CRE) event is described in section 14.16 of the FSAR. There are two cases evaluated for the CRE event: an induced LOCA which releases to the containment building and a release through the secondary system due to primary to secondary leakage. If the CRE results in an induced LOCA, the release locations and characteristics would be very similar to that of the MHA and the x/Qs for containment building releases would be appropriate. If the CRE results in a radiological release through the secondary system, the release would occur through the main steam safety valves or atmospheric dump valves. The release characteristics would then be similar to that described above for the SGTR event and the x/Qs for containment building releases would be conservative. The fuel handling accident (FHA) is described in section 14~ 19 of the FSAR. An FHA can result in the release of radioactive fission gases in the spent fuel pool area of the _auxiliary building or in the r~actor cavity of the containment building during refueling operations. If the release is in the spent fuel pool
- area of the auxiliary building, it is similar in nature to the cask drop event discussed above and the x/Qs for containment building releases are appropriate if not conservative. If the FHA occurs iri the reactor cavity of the containment building the radioactive gases could travel through the containment opening to the spent fuel pool area or could be released through the containment vent path. If the release goes to the spent fuel pool area of the auxiliary building, it would be very similar to an FHA in that area. If the release is through the containment vent path, it would travel through the ventilation stack to the environment and the x/Qs for containment building releases would be conservative.
-The failure of the volume control tank is describec;l in section 14.21 of the FSAR. This type of release would be in the auxiliary building and would be released to the environment through the ventilation stack. In this case, the x/Qs for containment building releases would be conservative.
The failure of small lines carrying primary coolant outside of containment is described in section 14.23 of the FSAR. This event is characterized by the release of radioactive primary coolant into the auxiliary building. The ventilation stack would be the path to the environment for this type of release and the x!Qs for containment building releases would be conservative. 6.3 DISCUSSION OF MAJOR CONSERVATISMS Due to the many conservatisms employed in development of the x!Qs listed in Table 2 for all radiological consequence events, a section discussing the more significant conservatisms seemed appropriate. First off, References 3.5 & 3.6 state that the 5 % x!Qs should be used for the 0 to 8 hour time interval and the adjustment factors from Table I should be applied to obtain recommended values for other time intervals. The 5 percentile xlQ, as describect previously, is the value that will not be exceeded more than 5 % of the time based on- probabilities of wind directions, wind speeds and wind classes. The values obtained from the wind tunnel tests are absolute maximum values from measurements taken on a scale model. The wind tunnel test does not take into account the probability of the wind direction or other wind characteristics that resulted in the maximum measured value. Therefore, this is felt to be a conservative approach for determining x/Qs.
PALISADES NUCLEAR PLANT EA-PAH-94-04 ANALYSIS CONTINUATION SHEET Sheet 11 Rev # ----'o=---- Using x/Qs for containment building releases is also conservative since any leakage from containment after an accident would be through penetrations which are in the auxiliary building. The auxiliary building air is discharged through the ventilation stack that results in lower x/Qs than for the containment building releases. The modeling of the containment building in the wind tunnel, as a "porous" structure with many smill holes in the sides is also very conservative. For analyzed accidents that result in release locations other than the containment building, application of the containment building x/Qs is also conservative as discussed in section 6.2 of this analysis. A different wind direction resulted in the maximum xlQ that was measured in the wind tunnel for each air intake location from_each release location. However, those maximum values are all applied at once to an accident analysis. This is much more conservative than determining which single wind direction results in x/Qs that give maximum predicted doses. This analysis has taken the absolute maximums for _each intake and corresponding release location and applied them all at once without regard for the wind directions that resulted in the x/Qs. The wind tunnel tests assumed neutral buoyancy for all of the releases, meaning that temperature and _ density of the released gases are approximately the same temperature and density as that of the ambient air. However, for most accident releases, the release is characterized by a temperature that is higher .than ambient. Higher temperatures result in higher buoyancy, which causes more vertical dispersion. Lower x/Qs would be expected if buoyancy effects were accounted for. 7.0
SUMMARY
& CONCLUSION This analysis evaluated the results of wind tunnel testing on a scale model of the Palisades plant to determine atmospheric dispersion factor values at the control room normal and emergency air intakes for releases from the containment building, the ventilation stack and the SIRW Tank. The effects of operating the emergency diesel generators, the planned support building expansion and the ongoing service building expansion were all evaluated. The maximum values for the atmospheric dispersion factors were documented, including associated uncertainties. The atmospheric dispersion factors for releases froin the containment building were determined to be more conservative than those for release from the ventilation stack. Therefore, only applicable atmospheric* dispersion factors for containment building and SIRW Tank releases were developed. Appropriate adjustment factors were then applied to ,
the maximum values to obtain the atmospheric dispersion factors applicable over the range of required time intervals for radiological consequence analyses. The applicable atmospheric dispersion factors are listed in Table 2 on page 8 of this analysis. The applicability of the containment building atmospheric dispersion factors to the releases that occur in all FSAR radiological consequence events was also concluded. The analysis also documented the major conservatisms that exist in application of the developed atmospheric dispersion factors.
PALISADES NUCLEAR PLANT EA-PAH-94-04 ANALYSIS CONTINUATION SHEET Sheet 12 Rev # _ _,o"--- 8.0 LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
- 1. Form 3698 9-89, Engineering Analysis Checklist, 1 page.
- 2. Administrative Procedure 9.11 Attachment 5, Technical Review Checklist, 1 page.
- 3. Form 3110 10-91, NOD Document Review Sheet, 1 page.
onn 3698 10-93 PALISADES NUCLEAR PLANT ENGINEERING ANALYSIS CHECKLIST Affected Revision Items Affected By This EA Yes No Required Identify* Closeout
-5(,j'f?l"C e~* £4--/'..Pl"/-Y;<-o/
- l. Other EAs D r &of Ce/ca/cs t?t?/-/l/-t?I// .(u I tJO/--tl-C&:'Z.£ed
- 2. Design Documents Elec 4- ;<v59..z-o:<.7- a:J//.(ev E-38 through E-49 DJ("
- 3. Design Documents Mech M239-M246, M249, M259-M261, M660, M664-M666 D _;i(
4.0 LICENSING DOCUMENTS 4.1 Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) D 4.2 Technical Specifications D 4.3 Standing Order 54 D 5.0 PROCEDURES 5.1 Administrative Procedures D Working Procedures D Tech Spec Surveillance Procedures D 6.0 OTHER DOCUMENTS 6.1 0-L ist D $ 6.2 Plant Drawings D :.8' 6.3 Equipment Data Base D :K'. 6.4 Spare Parts (Stock/MMS) D :8:' 6.5 Fire Protection Program Report (FPPR) D 'i( 6.6 Design Basis Documents ~ D fPR-/,Ok 6.7 Operating Checklists D ~ 6.8 SPCC/P!PP Oil and Hazardous Material Spill Prevention Plan D :3. 6.9 EEO Documents D jl Do any of the following documents need to be generated as a result of this EA: Yes No
- l. Corrective Action Document? D Reference - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- 2. Safety Evaluation? D Reference - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- 3. EEO Evaluation Sheet?* D Reference - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Is PRC Review of this EA Required? D amp leted By -+-<t. . .r1~/_...,_A.__-_n. . td;
. . . .~~-.._*
. .µ._/I_ _ _ _ __ Date S- Z- 79'
- Identify Section, No, Drawing, Document, etc.
Proc No 9.11
~ECHNICAL REVIEW CHECKLIST Attachment 5 Revis1on 6 EA - /};-/I ... :?~- O 1f REV. _O_ _ Page 1 of 1 This checklist provides guidance for the review of engineering analyses.
Answer questions Yes or No, or N/A if they do not apply .. Document all co11111ents on a 3110 Form. Satisfactory resolution of comments and completion of this checklist is noted by the Technically Reviewed signature on the Initiation and Review record block of Form 3619. (Y, N, N/A)
- 1. Have the proper input codes, standards and design principles been specified?-
I
- 2. Have the input codes, standards and design principles been properly applied? v
- 3. Are all inputs and assumptions ~alid and the basis for their use documented? y
}
- 4. Is Vendor information used as input addressed correctly in the analysis? --4-Y---
S. If the ana-1 ys is argument departs from Vendor Information/Reco11111endations, is the departure justifi_cation documented? - -~Y---
- 6. Are assumptions accurately described and reasonable? I y
- 7. Has the use of engineering judgement been documented and justified? V I
- 8. Are all constants, variables and formulas correct and properly applied? y
- 9. Have any minor (insignificant) errors been identified? If yes; Identify on the 3110 Form and justify their C.emml.cflh n:uf.. c~
insignificance. *
- 10. Does analysis involve welding? If Yes; verify the following information is accurately represented on the analysis drawing (Output document). __/\/_,_____ _
- Type of Weld
- Size of Weld
- Matertal Being Joined
- Thickness of Material Being Joined
- Location of Weld(s)
*Appropriate Weld Symbology
- 11. _Has the objective of the analysis been met? y
- 12. Have administrative requirements such as numbering and format been satisfied? y
~~O. ~/POWER/Nii MICHl&All"S l'RlllillE55 NUCLEAR OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT Document Review Sheet Document Title 'CC</~e,, te;t/on Document Number Revision Number Cv.r1f/ E"4 - /;111 o er Page of Response or Resolution ff> 0 II Date Review Coordinator Date e -1!,;.- For*m 3110 10-91}}