|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML18066A6871999-10-19019 October 1999 Forwards Response to NRC 990908 RAI Re Inservice Insp Program Relief Request 14.Ltr Contains No New Commitments & No Revs to Existing Commitments ML18066A6881999-10-19019 October 1999 Forwards Rev 5 to Palisades Nuclear Plant COLR, Per Requirements of TS 6.6.5.Ltr Contains No New Commitments & No Revs to Existing Commitments ML18066A6741999-10-0202 October 1999 Forwards MOR for Sept 1999 for Palisades Nuclear Plant & Operating Data Rept Sheet for Month of Aug 1999.MOR for Aug 1999 Inadvertently Had Copy of Ref Data Sheet for Apr 1999 Data ML18066A6791999-10-0101 October 1999 Provides Response to RAI Re Draft Rept, Study of Air- Operated Valves in Us Nuclear Power Plants. ML18066A6621999-09-30030 September 1999 Notifies NRC That Util Will Implement ITS at Plant on or Before Oct 31,2000 & Attachments 1 & 2 Contains Request for License Condition Which Relates First Performance of New or Revised Surveillance Requirements to Implementation of ITS ML18066A6601999-09-29029 September 1999 Forwards NRC Form 536,in Response to NRC Administrative Ltr 99-03, Preparation & Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations. ML18066A6471999-09-17017 September 1999 Forwards Final Clean Copies of ITS & Bases Pages Which Incorporate All Changes Proposed in Listed Ltrs.Clean Copies Also Incorporate Some Editorial Changes & Bases Clarifications as Result of Ongoing Reviews to LCOs ML18066A6331999-09-0202 September 1999 Forwards Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 & Revised Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1999 for Palisades Nuclear Plant ML18066A6261999-08-26026 August 1999 Forwards Addl New Valve Relief Request as Alternative to Code Requirements That Will Provide Acceptable Level of Quality & Safety.Request Would Allow Use of App II, Check Valve Condition Monitoring Program, of ASME OM Code-1995 ML20211D5661999-08-17017 August 1999 Forwards semi-annual Fitness for Duty Program Performance Rept for 990101-990630,IAW 10CFR26.71(d).Attachments 1 & 2 Summarize Test Results at Palisades Plant,Big Rock Point Plant & Corporate Ofc ML18066A6111999-08-13013 August 1999 Requests Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR50,App R, Fire Protection Program for Nuclear Power Facilities Operating Prior to 790101. Request Concerns Oil Collection Sys Requirements for PCP Motors ML18066A5881999-07-30030 July 1999 Provides Rev to Instrument Channel Drift Measurement Submitted on 990611,in Response to NRC Comments on Util RAI Response for Sections 3.3,3.5 & 3.6 & Editorial Changes Revs Necessary for Consistency within ITS ML18066A5921999-07-30030 July 1999 Forwards Results of Review by Consumers Energy of Two NRC Draft Repts Entitled, Evaluation of Air-Operated Valves at Light-Water Reactors & Study of Air-Operated Valves in Us Nuclear Power Plants. ML18066A5971999-07-30030 July 1999 Forwards Markup of Draft NRC SE Re Util Proposal to Convert to Its.Ltr Contains No New Commitments & No Revs to Existing Commitments ML20210G8351999-07-29029 July 1999 Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Records in App a Encl & Will Be Available in PDR ML18066A5651999-07-19019 July 1999 Forwards Corrections to Previously Submitted TS Section 3.7, Plant Systems, Converting to Its,Per NUREG-1432.Licensee Realized That Certain Provisions of CTS Had Been Inappropriately Replaced with Provisions from STS ML18066A5111999-06-29029 June 1999 Provides Voluntary Confirmation of Facility Readiness as Outlined in GL 98-01,Suppl 1, Y2K Readiness of Computer Sys at Npps. Disclosure & Response Encl ML20209B2081999-06-29029 June 1999 Discusses Closure of Response to RAI Re GL 92-01,Rev 1,Suppl 1, Reactor Vessel Structural Integrity. Rvid,Version 2 Issued as Result of Review of Responses.Info Should Be Reviewed & Comments Submitted by 990901 ML20210G8791999-06-23023 June 1999 FOIA Request for All Document Communications Between NRC & Region III Involving R Landsman,B Jorgensen & R Caniano & NRC Staff Under Their Supervision & All Communications in Their Possession to & from Consumers Power Re Plant ML18066A5061999-06-17017 June 1999 Forwards Responses to NRC Questions for ITS LCOs 3.6.3 & 3.6.6 of 990126 Submittal.One Editorial Change in Addition to Those Made in Response to NRC Comments & Conforming Changes Made to Associated Bases,Encl ML18066A4991999-06-11011 June 1999 Forwards Responses to NRC Comments Re ITS Section 3.3 & Associated Revs to ITS Sections 1.0,3.3,3.4 & 3.9 of 990126 ITS Conversion Submittal.One Technical Change & Several Editorial Changes Unrelated to NRC Comments,Also Provided IR 05000255/19970181999-06-0909 June 1999 Discusses Response of 980226 Violation Re Insp Rept 50-255/97-18 Re Failure to Take Adequate Corrective Action. Ltr Contains New Commitments & No Rev ML18066A4921999-06-0909 June 1999 Discusses Response of 980226 Violation Re Insp Rept 50-255/97-18 Re Failure to Take Adequate Corrective Action. Ltr Contains New Commitments & No Rev ML18068A6011999-06-0808 June 1999 Forwards Description of Recent Changes Made to Palisades Site Emergency Plan,Excluding Minor & Editorial Changes Not Requiring Further Explanation ML18066A4881999-06-0404 June 1999 Provides Responses to NRC Questions & Associated Editorial Revs for ITS LCOs 3.6.1,3.6.2,3.6.4,3.6.5 & 3.6.7 of 980126 Submittal.Responses to Comments on Remaining Section 3.6 LCOs Will Be Submitted Separately ML18066A4801999-05-24024 May 1999 Forwards Copy of Rev to NPDES Permit Number MI0001457 Renewal Application as Submitted to Mi Dept of Environ Quality on 990513 ML18066A4721999-05-18018 May 1999 Informs That During Period from 981101-990430,there Were No NPDES Permit Violations & No Repts of Oil,Salt or Polluting Matl Losses Were Made to Govt Agencies ML18066A4651999-05-17017 May 1999 Forwards ISI Program Relief Request 14 for NRC Approval in Accordance with 10CFR50.55(a)(3) as Requirement for Which Proposed Alternative Provide Acceptable Level of Quality & Safety.Rev 0 to SIR-99-032 Rept Also Encl ML18066A4611999-05-14014 May 1999 Requests Approval to Use Alternative Requirements IAW 10CFR50.55a(a)(3)(i),proposing to Follow Requirements of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code Case N-566-1.IST Program Relief Request 6 for NRC Approval Encl ML18068A5831999-05-0303 May 1999 Forwards Proposed TS Section 3.5,in Response to NRC 990317 RAI Re Util 980126 TS Change Request Re Conversion to Improved Ts,Per NUREG-1432 ML20206J2411999-04-30030 April 1999 Submits Corrected Copy of Ltr Forwarding 1998 Consumers Energy Co Annual Rept. Ltr Contains Corrected Docket & License Number for Big Rock Point.With One Oversize Encl ML20217A8191999-04-29029 April 1999 Forwards Listed Matls Related to Palisades Plant June 1999 Initial License Exam ML20206E8271999-04-28028 April 1999 Forwards Palisades Plant Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept for 1998. There Were No Reportable Events During This Period ML20207B4661999-04-23023 April 1999 Forwards Copy of Final Exercise Rept for Biennial Radiological Emergency Preparedness Exercise Conducted on 981201 for Palisades Npp.No Deficiencies Noted.Seven New Arcas Identified ML18066A4531999-04-0707 April 1999 Forwards ITS Pages 3.1.4-2 & 3.1.4-8,revising Completion Time for Action D.1,as Requested by NRC 990406 Telcon,Per TS Change Request Submitted 980126.Change Submitted Does Not Alter Conclusions of No Signficant Hazards Considerations ML18066A4481999-04-0202 April 1999 Responds to Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-255/98-06. Corrective Actions:Nuclear Performance Assessment Dept Has Reviewed Observations & Agrees That Field Observations by Qualified Personnel Are Important Aspect of Program ML18066A4471999-03-30030 March 1999 Confirms Completion of Util Review of Design Engineering Contractor Cable Ampacity Evaluation.Evaluation Available at Plant for NRC Review ML18066A4411999-03-30030 March 1999 Forwards Response to NRC 990126 RAI Re TS Section 3.7 of Util 980126 LAR Request for Conversion to Its.Licensee Received Permission to Delay TS Section 3.6 Response to Allow for Addl Time for Preparation & Internal Review ML18066A4441999-03-26026 March 1999 Submits Certification of Financial Assurance for Decommissioning of Palisades Nuclear Plant.Certified Rept of Status of Consumers Energy Co Decommissioning Funding & Trust Agreement Encl as Attachments 1 & 2 ML18066A4401999-03-25025 March 1999 Forwards Revised Best Estimate Fluence Evaluation Using Industry Data, Providing Justification for Using Industry Data to Determine Best Estimate Fluence.Review of Info & SE Requested ML18066A4191999-03-23023 March 1999 Forwards 1998 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release & Disposal Rept, for Palisades Plant,Providing Summary of Quantities of Radioactive Liquid & Gaseous Effluent Releases & Solid Radioactive Waste Processed During 1998 ML18066A4231999-03-22022 March 1999 Forwards Answers to 990311 Telcon Request for Addl Clarification & Revs Re ITS Section 3.4.Markups of Previously Submitted TS Pages & Revised Pages for Section 3.4 Also Encl ML20204F2091999-03-18018 March 1999 Requests That Listed TS Change Requests (Tscrs) Be Issued with Allowance That Tscrs Be Fully Implemented within Sixty Days of Issuance.Request Will Allow Time for Completion of Final Training & Procedure Changes Associated with Amend ML18066A4121999-03-18018 March 1999 Concludes That Mod to Provide Automatic Switchover of Control Room Heating,Ventilation & Air Conditioning (CRHVAC) Sys to Emergency Mode Is Not Needed to Meet Regulatory Requirements.Mod Commitment Cancelled ML18066A4141999-03-18018 March 1999 Forwards Rev 4 to COLR, Containing Limits for Fuel Cycle 14 & Future Cycles ML20204E5861999-03-16016 March 1999 Submits Current Limits of Property Insurance Maintained at Consumers Energy Co Operating Nuclear Power Plants ML18066A4131999-03-11011 March 1999 Responds to NRC 990210 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-255/98-22.Corrective Actions:Analytical Evaluation, EA-C-PAL-98-1067-01, P-50A Case to Cover Stud Evaluation, Was Submitted to NRC on 981220 ML18068A5241999-02-12012 February 1999 Resubmits Relief Request 12,with Addl Info That Includes Specific Locations Where Relief Request Would Be Applied,Per 10CFR50.55a(g)(5)(iii) ML18068A5211999-02-11011 February 1999 Informs NRC That Implementation of Formal Industry Position on Severe Accident Mgt at Palisades Plant Was Completed on 981217 ML20203F2541999-02-10010 February 1999 Informs That Beginning 990216,DE Hills Will Be Chief of Operations Branch Which Includes Operator Licensing Function 1999-09-30
[Table view] Category:INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML18066A6871999-10-19019 October 1999 Forwards Response to NRC 990908 RAI Re Inservice Insp Program Relief Request 14.Ltr Contains No New Commitments & No Revs to Existing Commitments ML18066A6881999-10-19019 October 1999 Forwards Rev 5 to Palisades Nuclear Plant COLR, Per Requirements of TS 6.6.5.Ltr Contains No New Commitments & No Revs to Existing Commitments ML18066A6741999-10-0202 October 1999 Forwards MOR for Sept 1999 for Palisades Nuclear Plant & Operating Data Rept Sheet for Month of Aug 1999.MOR for Aug 1999 Inadvertently Had Copy of Ref Data Sheet for Apr 1999 Data ML18066A6791999-10-0101 October 1999 Provides Response to RAI Re Draft Rept, Study of Air- Operated Valves in Us Nuclear Power Plants. ML18066A6621999-09-30030 September 1999 Notifies NRC That Util Will Implement ITS at Plant on or Before Oct 31,2000 & Attachments 1 & 2 Contains Request for License Condition Which Relates First Performance of New or Revised Surveillance Requirements to Implementation of ITS ML18066A6601999-09-29029 September 1999 Forwards NRC Form 536,in Response to NRC Administrative Ltr 99-03, Preparation & Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations. ML18066A6471999-09-17017 September 1999 Forwards Final Clean Copies of ITS & Bases Pages Which Incorporate All Changes Proposed in Listed Ltrs.Clean Copies Also Incorporate Some Editorial Changes & Bases Clarifications as Result of Ongoing Reviews to LCOs ML18066A6331999-09-0202 September 1999 Forwards Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 & Revised Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1999 for Palisades Nuclear Plant ML18066A6261999-08-26026 August 1999 Forwards Addl New Valve Relief Request as Alternative to Code Requirements That Will Provide Acceptable Level of Quality & Safety.Request Would Allow Use of App II, Check Valve Condition Monitoring Program, of ASME OM Code-1995 ML20211D5661999-08-17017 August 1999 Forwards semi-annual Fitness for Duty Program Performance Rept for 990101-990630,IAW 10CFR26.71(d).Attachments 1 & 2 Summarize Test Results at Palisades Plant,Big Rock Point Plant & Corporate Ofc ML18066A6111999-08-13013 August 1999 Requests Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR50,App R, Fire Protection Program for Nuclear Power Facilities Operating Prior to 790101. Request Concerns Oil Collection Sys Requirements for PCP Motors ML18066A5971999-07-30030 July 1999 Forwards Markup of Draft NRC SE Re Util Proposal to Convert to Its.Ltr Contains No New Commitments & No Revs to Existing Commitments ML18066A5881999-07-30030 July 1999 Provides Rev to Instrument Channel Drift Measurement Submitted on 990611,in Response to NRC Comments on Util RAI Response for Sections 3.3,3.5 & 3.6 & Editorial Changes Revs Necessary for Consistency within ITS ML18066A5921999-07-30030 July 1999 Forwards Results of Review by Consumers Energy of Two NRC Draft Repts Entitled, Evaluation of Air-Operated Valves at Light-Water Reactors & Study of Air-Operated Valves in Us Nuclear Power Plants. ML18066A5651999-07-19019 July 1999 Forwards Corrections to Previously Submitted TS Section 3.7, Plant Systems, Converting to Its,Per NUREG-1432.Licensee Realized That Certain Provisions of CTS Had Been Inappropriately Replaced with Provisions from STS ML18066A5111999-06-29029 June 1999 Provides Voluntary Confirmation of Facility Readiness as Outlined in GL 98-01,Suppl 1, Y2K Readiness of Computer Sys at Npps. Disclosure & Response Encl ML20210G8791999-06-23023 June 1999 FOIA Request for All Document Communications Between NRC & Region III Involving R Landsman,B Jorgensen & R Caniano & NRC Staff Under Their Supervision & All Communications in Their Possession to & from Consumers Power Re Plant ML18066A5061999-06-17017 June 1999 Forwards Responses to NRC Questions for ITS LCOs 3.6.3 & 3.6.6 of 990126 Submittal.One Editorial Change in Addition to Those Made in Response to NRC Comments & Conforming Changes Made to Associated Bases,Encl ML18066A4991999-06-11011 June 1999 Forwards Responses to NRC Comments Re ITS Section 3.3 & Associated Revs to ITS Sections 1.0,3.3,3.4 & 3.9 of 990126 ITS Conversion Submittal.One Technical Change & Several Editorial Changes Unrelated to NRC Comments,Also Provided IR 05000255/19970181999-06-0909 June 1999 Discusses Response of 980226 Violation Re Insp Rept 50-255/97-18 Re Failure to Take Adequate Corrective Action. Ltr Contains New Commitments & No Rev ML18066A4921999-06-0909 June 1999 Discusses Response of 980226 Violation Re Insp Rept 50-255/97-18 Re Failure to Take Adequate Corrective Action. Ltr Contains New Commitments & No Rev ML18068A6011999-06-0808 June 1999 Forwards Description of Recent Changes Made to Palisades Site Emergency Plan,Excluding Minor & Editorial Changes Not Requiring Further Explanation ML18066A4881999-06-0404 June 1999 Provides Responses to NRC Questions & Associated Editorial Revs for ITS LCOs 3.6.1,3.6.2,3.6.4,3.6.5 & 3.6.7 of 980126 Submittal.Responses to Comments on Remaining Section 3.6 LCOs Will Be Submitted Separately ML18066A4801999-05-24024 May 1999 Forwards Copy of Rev to NPDES Permit Number MI0001457 Renewal Application as Submitted to Mi Dept of Environ Quality on 990513 ML18066A4721999-05-18018 May 1999 Informs That During Period from 981101-990430,there Were No NPDES Permit Violations & No Repts of Oil,Salt or Polluting Matl Losses Were Made to Govt Agencies ML18066A4651999-05-17017 May 1999 Forwards ISI Program Relief Request 14 for NRC Approval in Accordance with 10CFR50.55(a)(3) as Requirement for Which Proposed Alternative Provide Acceptable Level of Quality & Safety.Rev 0 to SIR-99-032 Rept Also Encl ML18066A4611999-05-14014 May 1999 Requests Approval to Use Alternative Requirements IAW 10CFR50.55a(a)(3)(i),proposing to Follow Requirements of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code Case N-566-1.IST Program Relief Request 6 for NRC Approval Encl ML18068A5831999-05-0303 May 1999 Forwards Proposed TS Section 3.5,in Response to NRC 990317 RAI Re Util 980126 TS Change Request Re Conversion to Improved Ts,Per NUREG-1432 ML20206J2411999-04-30030 April 1999 Submits Corrected Copy of Ltr Forwarding 1998 Consumers Energy Co Annual Rept. Ltr Contains Corrected Docket & License Number for Big Rock Point.With One Oversize Encl ML20217A8191999-04-29029 April 1999 Forwards Listed Matls Related to Palisades Plant June 1999 Initial License Exam ML20206E8271999-04-28028 April 1999 Forwards Palisades Plant Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept for 1998. There Were No Reportable Events During This Period ML20207B4661999-04-23023 April 1999 Forwards Copy of Final Exercise Rept for Biennial Radiological Emergency Preparedness Exercise Conducted on 981201 for Palisades Npp.No Deficiencies Noted.Seven New Arcas Identified ML18066A4531999-04-0707 April 1999 Forwards ITS Pages 3.1.4-2 & 3.1.4-8,revising Completion Time for Action D.1,as Requested by NRC 990406 Telcon,Per TS Change Request Submitted 980126.Change Submitted Does Not Alter Conclusions of No Signficant Hazards Considerations ML18066A4481999-04-0202 April 1999 Responds to Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-255/98-06. Corrective Actions:Nuclear Performance Assessment Dept Has Reviewed Observations & Agrees That Field Observations by Qualified Personnel Are Important Aspect of Program ML18066A4471999-03-30030 March 1999 Confirms Completion of Util Review of Design Engineering Contractor Cable Ampacity Evaluation.Evaluation Available at Plant for NRC Review ML18066A4411999-03-30030 March 1999 Forwards Response to NRC 990126 RAI Re TS Section 3.7 of Util 980126 LAR Request for Conversion to Its.Licensee Received Permission to Delay TS Section 3.6 Response to Allow for Addl Time for Preparation & Internal Review ML18066A4441999-03-26026 March 1999 Submits Certification of Financial Assurance for Decommissioning of Palisades Nuclear Plant.Certified Rept of Status of Consumers Energy Co Decommissioning Funding & Trust Agreement Encl as Attachments 1 & 2 ML18066A4401999-03-25025 March 1999 Forwards Revised Best Estimate Fluence Evaluation Using Industry Data, Providing Justification for Using Industry Data to Determine Best Estimate Fluence.Review of Info & SE Requested ML18066A4191999-03-23023 March 1999 Forwards 1998 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release & Disposal Rept, for Palisades Plant,Providing Summary of Quantities of Radioactive Liquid & Gaseous Effluent Releases & Solid Radioactive Waste Processed During 1998 ML18066A4231999-03-22022 March 1999 Forwards Answers to 990311 Telcon Request for Addl Clarification & Revs Re ITS Section 3.4.Markups of Previously Submitted TS Pages & Revised Pages for Section 3.4 Also Encl ML20204F2091999-03-18018 March 1999 Requests That Listed TS Change Requests (Tscrs) Be Issued with Allowance That Tscrs Be Fully Implemented within Sixty Days of Issuance.Request Will Allow Time for Completion of Final Training & Procedure Changes Associated with Amend ML18066A4141999-03-18018 March 1999 Forwards Rev 4 to COLR, Containing Limits for Fuel Cycle 14 & Future Cycles ML18066A4121999-03-18018 March 1999 Concludes That Mod to Provide Automatic Switchover of Control Room Heating,Ventilation & Air Conditioning (CRHVAC) Sys to Emergency Mode Is Not Needed to Meet Regulatory Requirements.Mod Commitment Cancelled ML20204E5861999-03-16016 March 1999 Submits Current Limits of Property Insurance Maintained at Consumers Energy Co Operating Nuclear Power Plants ML18066A4131999-03-11011 March 1999 Responds to NRC 990210 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-255/98-22.Corrective Actions:Analytical Evaluation, EA-C-PAL-98-1067-01, P-50A Case to Cover Stud Evaluation, Was Submitted to NRC on 981220 ML18068A5241999-02-12012 February 1999 Resubmits Relief Request 12,with Addl Info That Includes Specific Locations Where Relief Request Would Be Applied,Per 10CFR50.55a(g)(5)(iii) ML18068A5211999-02-11011 February 1999 Informs NRC That Implementation of Formal Industry Position on Severe Accident Mgt at Palisades Plant Was Completed on 981217 ML18066A4051999-02-10010 February 1999 Requests Copy of Consumers Energy (Palisades) Formal Response to RAI Dtd 990512 (USI A-46) ML18066A3921999-01-29029 January 1999 Forwards Licensee Interpretation of TS Requirements for Performance of SRs as Applied to Instrumentation Channel Calibr.Ltr Established No New Commitments ML18066A3891999-01-28028 January 1999 Submits Response to Concern Expressed in Insp Rept 50-255/98-06 Re Whether Palisades ISI Program Was Being Conducted IAW Applicable Requirements 1999-09-30
[Table view] Category:UTILITY TO NRC
MONTHYEARML18057A4811990-09-17017 September 1990 Confirms 900718 Telcon Notification Re Westinghouse Agreement to Join Utils as Equity Investor in Plant ML18057A4551990-09-0606 September 1990 Forwards Proprietary Info Re Dept of Labor Decision on Discharge of Former Employee of Util,Per NRC 900809 Request. No 10CFR50.7 Violation Occurred Since Job Performance Was Reason for Discharge.Encl Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790(a)(6)) ML18057A4521990-09-0404 September 1990 Submits Addl Info Re Circuit & Raceway Schedule Enhancement Project,Per Insp Rept 50-255/90-10.Electrical Cable Separation & Channelization Anomalies Identified During Review of Physical Raceway Installations Will Be Evaluated IR 05000255/19900101990-09-0404 September 1990 Submits Addl Info Re Circuit & Raceway Schedule Enhancement Project,Per Insp Rept 50-255/90-10.Electrical Cable Separation & Channelization Anomalies Identified During Review of Physical Raceway Installations Will Be Evaluated ML18057A4371990-08-31031 August 1990 Forwards Analysis Concluding That Plant Reactor Beltline Matl Upper Shelf Energy Will Remain Greater than 50ft-lbs Until Yr 2032,per 900716 Commitment ML18057A4381990-08-31031 August 1990 Forwards Info Re Contamination of South Radwaste Area,Per 10CFR20.302,in Response to NRC 900112 Request.Approval Requested to Dispose of Low Level Radwaste in Place ML20059E0001990-08-29029 August 1990 Forwards Semiannual fitness-for-duty Program Performance Rept for Jan-June 1990 ML18057A4201990-08-24024 August 1990 Forwards Revised Application for Amend to License DPR-20, Changing Tech Specs Re Incore Analysis Program.Request Revised Per NRC Comments During 900709 Meeting ML18057A4021990-08-22022 August 1990 Forwards Missing Pages from Decommissioning Funding Rept, Consisting of Pages 25 & 26 of Attachment a to Exhibit E ML18057A4241990-08-21021 August 1990 Forwards Application for Amend to License DPR-20,changing Tech Spec 4.5.1 Re Statement on Integrated Leak Rate Test ML18057A4071990-08-21021 August 1990 Forwards Tech Specs Change Request to License DPR-20,to Remove Redundant Requirements & Change Basis Statements No Longer Applicable ML18057A4121990-08-21021 August 1990 Forwards Application for Amend to License DPR-20,changing Tech Specs to Revise Wording for Reactor Protective Sys Trip Setting Limits for Steam Generator Low Water Level ML18057A4181990-08-21021 August 1990 Forwards Description of Changes Being Made to Plant Site Emergency Plan & Emergency Plan Changes.Change Allows Reduction in Shift Staffing During Cold Shutdown for Stated Staff ML18057A3911990-08-17017 August 1990 Forwards Replacement Pages,To Palisades Second 10-Yr Interval Inservice Insp Program. ML18057A3851990-08-17017 August 1990 Forwards Addl Info in Support of NRC Development of SER for full-term OL for Plant,Including Date of SER Providing Provisional OL to Plant & Summary of Valid Exemptions from 10CFR Regulations,Per Telcon ML18057A3841990-08-17017 August 1990 Provides Addl Info Re Transfer of Plant Ownership to Palisades Generating Co,Per NRC 900725 Ltr ML18057A3821990-08-14014 August 1990 Requests That Bechtel-KWU Rept 128901/MJS, Full Flow Testing of Motor-Operated Valve MO-1042A, Be Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790(b)(1)) ML18057A3721990-08-0808 August 1990 Forwards Addl Info Re Util Request for Exemption from Separation Criteria of 10CFR50,App R,Section III.G.2 Re Containment Air Room ML20055J1421990-07-26026 July 1990 Responds to Commitment Oversight Issue Resulting from Insp Rept 50-255/90-08.Commitment Mgt Seminar Training Will Be Complete Prior to 901001 ML18057A3561990-07-26026 July 1990 Forwards Certification of Financial Assurance for Decommissioning ML18057A3411990-07-18018 July 1990 Forwards Revised Proposed Tech Spec Page 6-3,now Designated as Page 6-1b,adding Section 6.3.4,now Designated as Section 6.3.5 to Remove Organization Charts,Per Generic Ltr 88-06 ML18057A3381990-07-16016 July 1990 Advises That Util Does Not Foresee Need to Rely on Section V.C of App G to Remain in Compliance W/Upper Shelf Energy (Use) Requirements Re Use of Matl in Reactor Beltline ML18057A3281990-07-13013 July 1990 Responds to Request for Addl Info Re Second 10-yr Interval Insp Program,Per 900418 Telcon.Util 900329 Response Revised to Reflect That Certain Components in Class 2 Sys Should Not Be Exempted,Per IWC-1220 of 1974 ASME Code Section XI ML18057A3191990-07-0909 July 1990 Forwards Performance Indicator Trend Graphs for Jan 1989 - May 1990 ML18057A3201990-07-0606 July 1990 Discusses Reassessment of Control Room Temp Following Station Blackout Event.Results of Analysis Indicate That Control Room Temp Will Remain Below 112 F for 4 H After Onset of Blackout ML18057A3171990-07-0303 July 1990 Provides Summary of Upgrades Made to Plant Electrical Distribution Sys,Per 870714 Loss of Offsite Power Event When Inadvertent Actuation of Water Deluge Spray Sys for 1-2 Startup Transformer Resulted in Bus to Ground Fault ML20058K3771990-07-0202 July 1990 Forwards Rev 26 to Security Plan.Rev Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21(c)) ML18057A3111990-06-25025 June 1990 Forwards Endorsements 116 & 117 to Nelia Policy NF-179 & Endorsements 102 & 103 to Maelu Policy MF-50 ML18057A3101990-06-25025 June 1990 Responds to Generic Ltr 90-04, Request for Info on Status of Licensee Implementation of Generic Safety Issues Resolved W/Imposition of Requirements on Corrective Actions. ML18057A3031990-06-22022 June 1990 Provides Addl Info Re Environ Qualification of Instrument Circuit Associated W/Steam Generator Pressure Channel PT-0752D,per Insp Rept 50-255/90-05.Circuits Spliced Directly to Pigtail from Electrical Penetration Connector ML18057A3001990-06-21021 June 1990 Concurs W/Nrc Change in Terminology & Submits Revised Proposed Section 4.14 of Tech Specs ML18057A2771990-06-15015 June 1990 Forwards Corrected NRC Form 474 Re Simulation Facility Certification,Indicating Exceptions to Ansi/Ans 3.5 ML18057A2901990-06-13013 June 1990 Forwards Application for Amend to License DPR-20,revising Tech Spec 3.3.1.b Re Safety Injection Tank Min Level ML18057A2941990-06-12012 June 1990 Advises That Submittal of Second Interval Inservice Insp Program Delayed from 900615 to 900715,per 900418 Telcon ML18057A2711990-06-11011 June 1990 Requests Temporary Waiver of Compliance from Tech Spec 3.1.1i in Order to Maintain Plant in Hot Shutdown While Repair Made to Pressurizer Heater Power Supply.Request Based on 900608 Failure of Heater Transformer 15 ML18057A2641990-06-11011 June 1990 Provides Response to NRC Requalification Exam Rept Dtd 900410 on NRC Concerns Re Facility & Training Ctr Staffing. Adequate Staffing Will Be Maintained to Ensure Operator Requalification Program Successful ML18057A2591990-06-11011 June 1990 Forwards Palisades Simulator Certification Submittal. ML18057A2631990-06-10010 June 1990 Requests Temporary Waiver of Compliance from Tech Spec 3.1.1i to Enable Plant to Be Maintained in Hot Shutdown While Repair Made to Pressurizer Heater Power Supply.Waiver Requested for 900611-18 ML18057A2571990-06-0808 June 1990 Responds to NRC 900509 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-255/90-12.Corrective Actions:Continuing Training Program Will Be Developed for Supervisors That Will Discuss Fire Protection Program Implementation Topics ML20043D0601990-06-0404 June 1990 Forwards Rev 25 to Security Plan,Including Changes to Security Plan Drawings to Clarify Protected Area Boundary within Plant Security Bldg & Vital Area Boundaries in Other Specific Vital Areas of Plant.Rev Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21) ML18057A2581990-06-0101 June 1990 Forwards Revised Response to Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-255/89-26.Concurs That Tests Performed Using Instrumented Insp Technique During 1988 Refueling Outage Considered Invalid ML18057A2561990-05-31031 May 1990 Advises That No NPDES Notifications Required Nor Any Repts of Oil or Salt Occurred During Nov 1989 - Apr 1990 ML18057A2541990-05-30030 May 1990 Forwards Response to Technical Evaluation Rept EGG-NTA-8333 Which Evaluated Plant Compliance w/NUREG-0737,Item II.D.1 & Requested Addl Info Re New PORVs & Block Valves No Later than Jan 1990 ML18057A2511990-05-30030 May 1990 Forwards Final Response to Concerns Re Porv/Block Valve Mod, Per 900308 Meeting.Bechtel Technical Rept Withheld ML18057A2501990-05-29029 May 1990 Forwards Investigation Rept Re Unsatisfactory Performance Testing of Fitness for Duty Program Blind Performance Test Samples ML18057A2411990-05-24024 May 1990 Forwards Revised Application to Amend License DPR-20, Consisting of Revised Attachments 1 & 5 to 890227 Amend Request,Reflecting Transfer of Plant Ownership ML18057A2311990-05-17017 May 1990 Forwards Analysis of Reactor Pressure Vessel Fast Neutron Fluence & PTS Ref Temps for Palisades Nuclear Plant. Rept Concludes That PTS Screening Criteria Will Be Exceeded at Axial Welds in Sept 2001 as Opposed to Mar 2002 ML18054B5861990-05-0707 May 1990 Forwards Monthly Trend Graph Rept for Jan 1989 - Mar 1990 Covering Safety Status Performance Indicators for HPSI, Auxiliary Feedwater,Emergency Ac Power,Lpsi,Containment Spray & Svc Water Sys ML18054B5801990-04-30030 April 1990 Responds to Request for Addl Info on Proposed Administrative Changes to Tech Spec Section 3.0.4,per Generic Ltr 87-09. Licensee Will Implement Program to Assure Appropriate Level of Mgt Approval Required When Operating Conditions Changed ML18054B5741990-04-25025 April 1990 Requests That Correspondence Re 890227 Application for Amend to License DPR-20 to Permit Transfer of Ownership of Plant Be Sent to Listed Address 1990-09-06
[Table view] |
Text
Powier Kenneth W Berry Director POWERiNii Nuclear Licensing lttlCHlliAN'S PROliRESS General Offices: 1945 West Parnall Road, Jackson, Ml 49201 * (517) 788-1636 September 2, 1988 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 DOCKET 50-255 - LICENSE DPR-20-PALISADES PLANT - REVISED RESPONSE TO INSPECTION REPORT 88008 NRC Inspection Report 88008 dated April 22, 1988, transmitted two Notices of Violation and requested a written response. Consumers Power Company trans-mitted responses to the Notices of Violation by letter dated May 23, 1988
- The violation identified as Item 1 pertains to containment penetration 33 and failure to identify its current classification and usage as an unreviewed safety question. Item 2 is in regard to the failure to comply with Technical Specification 6.8.1.c during performance of Technical Specification Surveil-lance Procedure MI-39.
On July 29, 1988, the NRC requested additional information regarding Consumers Power Company's May 23, 1988, response. This request enumerated concerns within the response, its corrective actions, and the 10CFR50.59 analysis performed in support of Item 1. It was further requested that pursuant to 10CFR2.201 that Consumers Power Company response in writing within 30 days.
This response period was subsequently extended to 37 days on August 25, 1988, via a telecon between Mr W E Axelson, NRC Region III, and Mr D P Hoffman, Consumers Power Company
- After reviewing the specific concerns expressed by the NRC regarding the 10CFR50.59 review performed in support of Item 1, Consumers Power Company has revised the 10CFR50.59 review to indicate that an unreviewed safety question (URSQ) exists. While acknowledging the existence of an URSQ, Consumers Power Company believes that no significant hazard to the general public is being presented. Information supporting this conclusion is within the attached response.
Further supporting information to this conclusion will be presented to the NRC within a no significant hazards consideration analysis being completed for a change to Palisades Technical Specification 3.6, "Containment System" .
.~eeo9oao13a-886962 ---- --
PDR ADOCK 05000255 G PNU OC0988-0002A-PM01-NL04
Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2 Palisades Plant Revised Response to IR 88008 September 2, 1988 Consumers Power Company's responses to the concerns enumerated by the NRC within the July 29, 1988 letter, are provided in the attached revised response to NRC Inspection Report 88008. This attached response is essentially a complete rewrite of the original response and therefore changes are not specifically highlighted.
Kenneth W Berry Director of Nuclear Licensing CC Administrator, NRC Region III NRC Resident Inspector, Palisades Attachment
REVISED RESPONSE TO INSPECTION REPORT 88-008 ITEM 1 Viol~tion (50-255/88008-01 (DPR) 10CFR50.59 requires that a safety evaluation be performed for changes made in the facility as described in the FSAR and that the bases be documented for the determination that the change does not involve an unreviewed safety question (URSQ). Otherwise, prior Commission approval is required.
Contrary to the above_, in 1982 the licensee identified a discrepancy between the FSAR description of containment penetration 33 and the existing method of satisfying a Technical Specification (TS) Surveillance requirement and did not identify the issue as an URSQ. Subsequent intentions to modify the penetration or submit a TS change request were dropped without proper review.
Discussion The final evaluation of SEP Topic VI-4, NRC letter dated February 8, 1982, specifie4 that the valves associated with penetration 33 were classified as C3 and noted that the valve arrangement differed from the requirements of GDC 56 in that one valve should be located inside containment. A Request for Modification to install a two inch automatic isolation valve for containment penetration 33 was initially prepared on January 6, 1982. The request iden-tified that an automatic valve was required by the FSAR_since the valves needed to be opened during power operation for flushing and sampling. The original FSAR specified that "Class C3 penetrations *** include those systems that are not connected to either the containment atmosphere or to the reactor coolant system and are never opened during power operation". Installation of an automatic valve would have changed the FSAR classification of penetration 33 from a Class C3 to Class C2. The original FSAR states. that "penetrations in this class include systems that are not connected to either the containment atmosphere or to the primary coolant system and are normally open or may be opened during power operation". Completion of the modification would have eliminated the unreviewed safety question associated with the opening of a C3 penetration during power operation and, therefore, would have been consistent with the FSAR requirements.
Concurrent with the proposed modification, an interpretation of the Palisades TS was written that identified the opening of a containment isolation valve during power operations to be consistent with the C-E Standard Technical Specifications (STS). The STS permit the opening of containment isolation valves on "an intermittent basis under administrative control". The adminis-trative controls were specified in a letter to the NRC dated June 2, 1982. The letter also committed Consumers Power to submit a change to the Palisades TS that would specifically resolve the issue. This change request was never
- submitted to the NRC. Completion of the Technical Specification Change Request (TSCR) would have required a safety evaluation to be performed. The safety
- _.-
- _.eV'aluation would have been required to address the necessity to open a manual IC88088-LI01-NL04
2 Class C3 penetration during power operation in order to justify the TSCR.
Submittal of such a TSCR, therefore, would have eliminated the failure to determine whether or not an unreviewed safety question existed.
The modification to install an automatic isolation valve for containment penetration 33 was not completed, and the project was closed out on September 3, 1986. The decision not to proceed with installation was made after reviewing the existing Palisades TS requirements for containment integrity and sampling of the safety injection tanks, and the TS interpretation letter dated June 2, 1982. Based on the above, including the TSCR which was to have been submitted, it was determined that the existing manual valve would be acceptable. The safety evaluation for the modification package was not revised due to an oversight by the individual recommending closeout. This individuai failed to recognize that the original safety evaluation would be invalidated by modification closure without installation of the automatic isolation valve.
Procedures governing the modification process have been strengthened over the last two years to assure modifications are completed as approved. If changes in the scope of a modification are made, the individual processing the change is required to process an Engineering Design Change, review the change against the approved safety evaluation and attain the same level of review as the original design.
An FSAR change request was submitted on August 15, 1986, to clarify the confi-guration and operation of containment penetration 33. Palisades FSAR update, Section 5.1, Page 21, now has an exception to GDC 57 allowing these manual valves to be opened during power operation for the sampl~ng of the safety injection tanks.
On March 17, 1988, a revised safety evaluation was written to address the fact that the automatic isolation valves were elimin~ted from the original modifica-tion design. This safety evaluation concluded that no URSQ exists with the Plant in its as-modified configuration. The bases for the conclusion were that both the original and as-modified Plant configuration utilize manual valves, the number of valves relied upon was decreased from six to two and the exis-tence of the FSAR exception to GDC 57 described above.
Corrective Actions Taken And Results Achieved Although the inspection report identified this issue to be an URSQ, another internal 10CFR50.59 review, ie, Safety Evaluation (SE), which was written on May 23, 1988, to address the opening of certain manual isolation valves during power operation, improperly concluded this issue not to be an URSQ. This conclusion was reached because first, the system in question is not coupled to the primary coolant pressure boundary; second, the SE would,require that administrative controls be in place to assure that the operator remains in appropriate protective clothing and in close proximity to the valves during the flushing and sampling process until the isolation valve is returned to its closed position; and third, the valve only affects safety injection tank level and low level of this tank has been previously reviewed by the NRC during establishment of a one hour LCO in the Palisades TS. This third point was included solely to address accident consequences stemming from tank level and was not intended to imply NRC review of the containment isolation issue. The operator is not required to remain at the valves due to ALARA constraints and poor communication capabilities.
IC88088-LI01-NL04
3 Subsequent to Consumers Power's May 23, 1988 submittal in response to this inspection report item, an independent review of the May 23, 1988 internal 10CFR50.59 review was conducted. This independent review conducted by the consulting firm who aided in the development of Palisades recent 10CFR50.59 training program, determined that the issue could have been deemed to be or not to be an URSQ, depending on the guidance utilized in the decision making process. In the case of no URSQ existing, the consultant primarily cited that increases in accident and malfunction consequences were small and of minimal significance, and that application of guidelines for 10CFR50.59 reviews presented by the Nuclear Safety Analysis Center (NSAC) in conjunction with the Nuclear Management and Resources Council (NUMARC) in January 1988 would support no URSQ existing. However, in the case of an URSQ existing, the consultant cited recent correspondence between the NRC and NUMARC which call for an URSQ determination for "any" positive change that affects consequences of an accident or malfunction of equipment.
After indepth evaluation of the consultant's review, the NRC correspondence to NUMARC, the original and updated FSAR, Palisades Plant TS and positions presented in the NRC's letter to Consumers Power Company of July 29, 1988, the internal 10CFR50.59 review was revised again. This revision concluded that an URSQ does exist due to a reduction in the margin of safety inherent to Palisades TS 3.6.1.a. This TS calls for maintenance of containment integrity unless the reactor is in the cold shutdown condition. Containment integrity is defined in Palisades TS 1.4 to exist when all of the following are true:
- a. All non-automatic containment isolation valves and blind flanges are closed.
- b. The equipment door is properly closed and sealed.
- c. At least one door in each personnel airlock is properly closed and sealed.
- d. All automatic containment isolation valves are operable or are locked closed.
- e. The uncontrolled containment leakage satisfies TS 4.5.1.
While Consumers Power is now submitting an URSQ, we feel that no hazard is being presented to the public. For an additional hazard to be presented, radioactive materials from the containment atmosphere would have to be dis-persed into the environment. In order for this to occur, the following events would have to occur concurrently:
- a. A core damaging accident which causes fission products to be released to the *containment atmosphere.
- b. A safety injection tank drain line failure such that a pathway would exist from the containment atmosphere *
- c. The required TS boron concentration sampling in progress.
IC88088-LI01-NL04
4
- The probability of these events taken concurrently yields an acceptably small probability to allow manual operation of the penetration 33 isolation valves.
It is recognized that there are other sets of concurrent events which could result in a leak path for fission products, but they are considered even less probable than the above scenario.
In addition to the above, Plant operators will be required to remain in appro-priate protective clothing in the vicinity of the valves. These actions will be controlled via guidance contained in SOP-3. While Palisades does not yet follow the STS, the above probabilities and administrative cont~ols appear to comply with the staff's position as presented in STS of allowing the opening of certain manual containment isolation valves while at power operation.
Corrective Actions To Be Taken To Avoid 'Further Non-Compliance I
A TSCR has subsequently been determined as the preferred corrective action. In order for the TSCR to receive prompt reviews and NRC acceptance, the TSCR will address and resolve applicable STS requirements. This includes the incor-poration of a Containment Isolation Valve Specification in the Palisades TS.
An isolation valve table will be included in either the Palisades TS or by reference to the FSAR. This table will be similar to that presented in the original FSAR and will list at a minimum for each penetration, the associated system name, equipment identification numbers for associated valves, and applicable valve actuations.
A complete independent review to verify the technical accuracy of all FSAR changes processed since the June 28, 1984 FSAR update is not felt to be war-ranted, in light of other efforts recently completed and currently in progress.
A System Functional Evaluation (SFE) was performed as documented in our January 28, 1988 submittal. The SFE provided a line-by-line review of system characteristics presented in the FSAR and served as the basis for testing, modifications and FSAR changes in light of existing system configurations.
Additional review of the FSAR is being provided by the design basis reconstitution effort of the Palisades Configuration Control Project (CCP).
The CCP is tasked with establishing an accurate, up-to-date, physically verified set of design bases documents for selected systems. Discrepancies identified within the FSAR during the project will be corrected through existing Plant procedures.
FSAR Section 5.1.6.9 currently contains an exception to Criterion 57 of 10CFR50 Appendix A, "General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants" regarding operation of the manual valves associated with penetration 33. This exception was entered into the FSAR with Revision 2 dated October 31, 1986. The FSAR change request was initiated by Plant personnel at the time FC-576 was being closed out. The basis for this change was that penetration 33 was currently classified as a type C2 penetration, while the change request initiator felt it more accurately reflected a type C3 penetration with exception. The exception was* for opening the valves during power operation to perform required sampling in accordance with TS Table 4.2.1 Item 5 and_ the TS interpretation letter dated June 2, 1982. The initiator felt the NRC had previously reviewed the present
_Palisades containment isolation arrangement due to Consumers Power's June 2, 1982 submittal, and the initiator felt that no further NRC reviews were required.
IC88088-LI01-NL04
5
- While reviewing the NRC's final evaluation of Systematic Evaluation Program (SEP) Topic VI-4, "Containment Isolation System"* dated February 8, 1982 in regard to 10CFR50 Appendix A classifications, Consumers Power noted that penetration 33 was classified under Criterion 56. The SEP topic further identified that the valve arrangement for penetration 33 differs from the explicit requirements of Criterion 56 from the standpoint of valve location, namely, that one of the isolation valves should be located inside containment.
Upon detailed review of the applicable General Design Criterion (ie, 55, 56 and 57), definitions presented in 10CFR50.2 and discussions with the Plant's Nuclear Steam Supply System vendor and architect/engineer, Consumers Power believes penetration 33 is most accurately reflected by Criterion 57. This is consistent with definitions presented in both the original and updated FSARs, and the separation of the safety injection tank sample/drain line from the containment atmosphere and the reactor coolant pressure boundary.
Each of the items detailed in the NRC letter of July 29, 1988, which specifi-cally address the May 23, 1988, safety evaluation will be evaluated against the existing guidance provided in Administrative Procedure 3.07, "Safety Evaluations". Recognizing the lack of a unified methodology for performing safety evaluations, these specific issues will be further reviewed against guidance currently available through the NUMARC/NSAC efforts and that provided to NUMARC by the NRC. The understanding gained from these reviews will be incorporated into the next revision of Administrative Procedure 3.07. Prior to issuance of this procedure, a memorandum detailing the reasoning for changes will be issued to reconcile any differences from the current philosophy employed in the Palisades safety evaluation program. Results of the above evaluation will be discussed with the NRC Senior Resident Inspector.
Necessary changes to SOP-3 will be made by November 15, 1988.
Failure to track Consumers Power'~ commitment to the NRC (ie, failure to submit a TSCR following the June 2, 1982 submittal) was the root cause of this event.
Commitments at that time were normally tracked by the Gener.al Office Nuclear Licensing Department (NLD) via an Action Item Record (AIR), as no formal commitment tracking system existed. However, an AIR was not initiated and therefore, the commitment was not tracked.
Presently, commitments are tracked by NLD via the. Correspondence Logging &
Commitment Tracking System (CLCTS). Commitments made in letters to the NRC are identified by NLD and summarized on a Record Summary Sheet. An independent review of the submittal is then performed to assure all commitments are iden-tified and logged into the CLCTS. The existing commitment tracking system provides assurance that NRC commitments are no longer lost or forgotten.
Date When Full Compliance Will Be Achieved A TSCR that addresses the Limiting Condition for Operations, applicability, Action Statement and surveillance requirements of Section 3/4.6.4 of the CE-STS will be prepared and submitted by September 16, 1988.
Changes to the Palisades' FSAR will be incorporated in a subsequent Palisades
. FSAR update following the TSCR submittal.
IC88088-LI01-NL04
6 Evaluation of the items presented in the NRC letter of July 29, 1988, which specifically address safety evaluation performance will be completed by September 23, 1988. Administrative Procedure 3.07 will be revised as necessary from the above evaluation by October 31, 1988.
- ITEM 2 Violation (50-255/88008-02 (DPR))
TS 6.8.1.c requires that surveillance and test activities of safety-related equipment be implemented and maintained. Surveillance Procedure MI-39 tests the auxiliary feedwater actuation system (AFAS) logic in accordance with TS 4.1.3.16.
Contrary to the above, I & C technicians performing TS Surveillance MI-39 on April 4, 1988 did not implement the procedure when they did not obtain the required logic channel trip indications due to incorrect test performance and yet they signed the data sheet believing they had properly completed the surveillance test.
Corrective Actions Taken and Results Achieved The failure by the I & C technicians to verify the required AFAS logic channel trip indications were attributed to several contributing factors as identified below:
- 1. The guidance provided in TS Surveillance Procedure MI-39 and existing component labeling on auxiliary feedwater actuation panel, EC-187 *are not wholly congruent to assure consistent satisfactory test performance.
- 2. The I & C on-the~job training program does not specifically address MI-39.
- 3. A lack of attention to detail by the technicians performing the test was a factor. Adequate attention to indication light response would have revealed that an improper test button was depressed.
During the performance of the surveillance test, the. I&C technicians signed off portions of MI-39 in good faith, believing indications received were those required. Only after the NRC Senior Resident Inspector inquired as to the validity of the received indications, did the I&C technicians question the response. The technicians then called an I&C engineer to the AFAS panel who clarified existing confusion by identifying the correct test circuitry.
The auxiliary feedwater actuation panel has been relabeled to provide enhanced continuity with MI-39. Until further corrective measures can be taken to eliminate confusion associated with performance of MI-39, appropriate I&C supervision or direct second party overview will be required.
In order to assure training provided to I&C technicians will result in profi-cient TS surveillance performance, a QA Surveillance and Human Performance Evaluation of the I&C TS surveillance training program was initiated. The QA surveillance completed on May 6, 1988, did not indicate that major changes are ICS8088-LI01-NL04
7 warranted at this time. However, the surveillance did recommend the use of post-training (ie, approximately two months) evaluations to further verify training effectiveness. Post-training evaluations are currently utilized in Palisades Plant and Midland Training Center classroom programs. A post-training evaluation process for the On-the-Job-Training (OJT) program has been developed and is currently being reviewed.
The Human Performance Evaluation has been completed. This evaluation noted the following:
- 1. A total review and update of the I&C training was already in progress.
Personnel involved in this effort include I&C management, supervision, technicians, and representatives from both the Palisades Training Depart"-
ment and the Midland Training Center. Included in this effort are enhance-ments to the classroom and OJT portions of TS surveillance test training.
- 2. OJT for I&C technicians is an established program, however, plant instru-
- mentation system availability during power operations limits its scope.
- 3. All plant I&C technicians have received the 12-week indoctrination training at the Midland Training Center.
- 4. Established long-range plans to improve ~he I&C technician and supervisory traini programs will enhance I&C TS surveillance test training
- The evaluation recommended the following:
- 1. Appointment of a full-time I&C training coordinator.
- 2. Walkdowns and "tabletop" discussions should be performed for surveillance tests performed during power operation which have the potential to signi-ficantly affect plant performance.
- 3. The simulator orientation training course should be offered to I&C per-sonnel in order to enhance understanding of normal and abnormal plant responses of instrumentation systems.
Corrective Actions To Be Taken To Avoid Further Non-Compliance As stated above, the AFAS panel has been relabeled. TS Surveillance Procedure MI-39 was revised on June 1, 1988. The combination of both these efforts should eliminate a large portion of existing technician confusion during MI-39 performance.
Surveillance Procedure MI-39 is being included within existing I&C Department surveillance test training. By inputting MI-39 into the training program, specific emphasis will be placed on procedural steps and necessary procedure limitations and responses. As stated above, the post-training evaluation process for the I&C OJT program has been developed and is in the review process. Plant management has evaluated the recommendations made in the Human Performance Evaluation and will adopt the following:
IC88088-LI01-NL04
8
- 1. A full-time I&C training coordinator will be assigned tci the I&C training program enhancement project following completion of the in-progress refueling activities. Following successful completion of the project, the continued need .for a full-time coordinator will be evaluated.
- 2. The existing OJT program for surveillance test performance qualification presently includes actual test performance under the direct supervision of a qualified I&C technician or supervisor/engineer. This is done on an individual technician basis prior to receiving test performance qualifica-tion. During the I&C training program enhancement review, a need for advanced training in systems affected by test performance was identified.
Efforts are currently in progress to develop these advanced systems classes. Through these efforts, the benefits to be gained from additional procedure walkdowns and "tabletop" discussions will be achieved.
- 3. As recommended in the Human Performance Evaluation, the three-day simulator orientation course will be added to the I&C department training matrix.
Date When Full Compliance Will Be Achieved The post-training evaluation process will be included in the I&C OJT program in conjunction with completion of the I&C training enhancements program scheduled for completion by September 1, 1989.
The I&C training coordinator is expected to be appointed by January 15, 1989.
This date will coincide with the currently planned completion of in-progress refueling outage activities. The advanced system classes for systems affected by surveillance tests are expected to be completed by September 1, 1989. The three-day simulator orientation class will be added to the I&C training matrix by December 31, 1988.
Training specifically for Surveillance Test MI-39 will be conducted through the OJT program. This procedure will be added to the OJT program by March 31, 1989.
IC88088-LI01-NL04 L