ML17202U807
| ML17202U807 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 08/24/1990 |
| From: | Shafer W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17202U806 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-237-90-17, 50-249-90-17, NUDOCS 9009040008 | |
| Download: ML17202U807 (1) | |
Text
'
- commonwealth Edison Company
- Dresden Nuclear Station
- App.end ix NOTICE OF V10LATION Docket No. 50-237 Docket Nb. 50-249 As a result of the inspection conducted on June *13, through July 31, 1990,
- and in accordance with the General Policy and Procedures for NRC Enforcement Actions, (IO CFR Part 2, Appendix C), (1990) the following violation was identified:
IO CFR'50, Appendix.B, Criterion V, as implemented by (ommonwealth.Edison Company's Quality Assurance Program, requires that activities.affecting quality be. prescribed by documented instructions, procedures or drawings of a type appropriate to the circumstances.
Contrary to the above, documented instructions for activities affecting quality prescribed in equipment outage checklists were inappropriate to
- the circumstances in the following cases:
- a.
Outage number 111-460 i~plemented on February 4, 1990 failed to recognize all consequences of a fuse removal, resulting in an unexpected group II primary containment isolation, standby gas treatment system automatic initiation and reactor building ventilation system isolation.
.b.
Outage number II-412 implemented on June 11, 1990 prescribed the closure.
of incorrect valves, resulting in an unexpected recirculation pump trip.
- c.
Outage number 11-421 implemented on June 13, 1990 failed to recognize all consequences of opening a breaker, resulting in an unexpected half group II primary containment *isolation signal.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).
(237/90017-02(DRP))
Pursuant to the provisions of IO CFR 2.201, you are required to.submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice a written statement or explanation in reply, inclu.ding for each violation:
(1) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved; (2) the corrective steps that will oe taken to avoid further violations; and (3) the d~te when full compliance will be achieved.
Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good caus~ shown.
I
- '