IR 05000010/1999007
| ML20205K572 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 04/02/1999 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20205K554 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-010-99-07, 50-10-99-7, 50-237-99-07, 50-237-99-7, 50-249-99-07, 50-249-99-7, NUDOCS 9904130276 | |
| Download: ML20205K572 (2) | |
Text
.
.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
.
REGION lli Docket Nos:
50-010; 50-237; 50-249 License Nos.
>
Report Nos:
50-010/99007(DRS); 50-237/99007(DRS);
50-249/99007(DRS)
Licensee:
Commonwealth Edison Company (Comed)
Facility:
Dresden Nuclear Station, Units 1,2, and 3 Location:
R.R. No.1 Morris,IL 60450 Dates:
March 8-12,1999 Inspector:
T. Madeda, Physical Security inspector Approved by:
James R. Creed, Safeguards Team Leader Division of Reactor Safety 9904130276 990402 PDR ADOCK 05000010 G
.
.-
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Dresden Nuclear Power Station NRC Inspection Reports 50-010/99007; 50-237/99007; 50-249/99007 This inspection reviewed plant support activities relating to the physical protection of the Dresden facility. The report evaluated security activities related to alarm stations, communications, testing and maintenance, protected area detection and assessment aids, personnel search equipment, security program plans, response capabilities, security training and qualification activities, and follow up of previous inspection findings.
- Personnel errors by two alarm station operators resulted in the inadvertent inactivation of a perimeter intrusion alarm zone with no compensatory measure being established in a timely manner. Adequate corrective action was implemented. This was considered a licensee identified non-cited violation. (Section S2.2)
ineffective planning by licensee security supervisors and inadequate monitoring activities e
by security personnel resulted in the degradation of a vehicle denial barrier for three days. When discovered, correction action was implemented. Th.. was considered a licensee identi'ied non-cited violation. (Section S2.3)
Security force response to routine and reactive security activities was conducted in an e
effective and timely manner and were consistent with security plan requirements.
(Section S4.1)
.