ML20217D615
| ML20217D615 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 03/25/1998 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20217D598 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-010-98-08, 50-10-98-8, 50-237-98-08, 50-237-98-8, 50-249-98-08, 50-249-98-8, NUDOCS 9803300104 | |
| Download: ML20217D615 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000010/1998008
Text
.
lON
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGIONlli
Docket Nos:
50-010;50-237;50-249
License Nos:
Report Nos:
50-010/98008(DRS); 50-237/98008(DRS);
50-249/98008(DRS)
Licensee:
Commonwealth Edison Company (Comed)
Facility:
Dresden Nuclear Station, Units 1,2 and 3 ,
Location:
R. R. No.1
Morris,IL 60450
1
Dates:
Between March 2 and 11,1998
Inspector:
T. Madeda, Physical Security inspector
Approved by:
James R. Creed, Chief, Plant Support Branch 1
'
Division of Reactor Safety
)
1
4
, Enclosure Cont
SLFECUAB
U#
TION
tro
9803300104 980325
ADOCK 05000010
G
l
-
-
.
-
J
!
.
l
1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Dresden Nuclear Power Station
NRC Inspection Reports 50-010/98008; 50-237/98008; 50-249/98008
This inspection included a review of plant support activities relating to the physical protection of
)
the facility. The inspector assessed the capability of the licensee to protect their facility against
j
radiological sabotage and determined whether regulatory requirements were met. The
'
elements of the security program inspected were control of personnel, packages and vehicles;
vehicle barriers; compensatory measures; security procedures; event logs; security force
knowledge; management support and staffing; and follow-up previous inspection findings. The
inspection was conducted between March 2 and 11,1998.
The licensee failed to suspend unescorted access for a plant employee in a timely
j
manner. The event appeared to be an isolated individual error related to weak
attention-to-detail by a clerk in the licensee's badging department and not a
programmatic problem. Licensee corrective action was implemented in a timely and
effective manner. (Section S1.1)
The inspector observed a violation when a vehicle was inadequately searched. Weak
attention to detail by the search officer caused the violation. Prior licensee corrective
action for similar findings in two previous inspections that focused on weak individual
performance did not prevent recurrence. (Section S1.2)
The inspector identified that the licensee failed to conduct a for-cause drug test after
receiving credible information that an individual was abusing drugs. The credible
information was the results of a recent drug test. Licensee's actions regarding sanctions
taken against the individual appeared appropriate to address the safety aspects of the
event to deter drug use and maintain plant safety. The event was an isolated error and
not indicative of a programmatic problem. (Section S8.1)
- Enclosure
5
M
2
3gyn;
This
,
'
a Decontrolled
ION