ML20058E610
| ML20058E610 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 11/26/1993 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20058E594 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-010-93-03, 50-10-93-3, 50-237-93-25, 50-249-93-25, EA-93-223, NUDOCS 9312070076 | |
| Download: ML20058E610 (2) | |
Text
.
l
.{
Commonwealth Edison Company Docket Nos. 50-10; 50-237; 50-249 l
Dresden Station License Nos. DRP-02; DPR-19; DPR-25 Units 1, 2 and 3 EA 93-223 During an NRC inspection conducted on August 25, 1993, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.
In accordance.with
}
the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, the violation is j
listed below Amendments 42 and 38 of facility operating license numbers DPR-i 02, DPR-19, and DPR-25 require that the licensee have and maintain a Station Security Plan.
Technical Specification 6.2.A requires written procedures to be l
implemented covering the Station Security Plan.
?
Section D.1 of Security Post Order No.
1,. Revision 13, dated January 1993 which implements the Station Security Plan requires,_
in part, the security officer to visually examine the contents of all packages that are conveyed through the x-ray machine, and to control and assure the physical search of any packages containing.
items which, viewed on the x-ray monitor, are unidentifiable or seem suspicious.
This type of item is termed an " indiscernible mass."
Contrary to the above, on August 16, 1993, at approximately 6:55 a.m.,
a se' rity officer did not adequately examine, control and assure the physical search of a package containing an indiscernible mass when viewed on the x-ray monitor prior to its entry into the protected area.
This indiscernible mass was a facsimile of a firearm.
(01013)
This is a Severity Level III violation (Supplement III).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Commonwealth Edison Company (Licensee) is hereby required to submit a written statercent or explanation to the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory i
Commission, ATTN:
Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C.
20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region III, 799
)
Roosevelt Road, Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the Dresden Station, within 30 days of the
{
date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation 1
(Notice).
This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a i
Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:
(1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for j
disputing the violation, (2) the correccive steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
If an adequate reply is not.
received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or a 9312070076 931126
]
j ADOCKObOO{g{0 PDR g
m
m__.,.,.-.m..
n.
~
t
'flotice of Violation 2
{
Demand for Information may.be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked or why such-other action as may be proper should not be taken.
Where good cause is shown, consideration may be given to extending the i
response time.
Under the authority of Section 182 of the Act, 42 U.S.C.
- 2232, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.
I Dcted at Glen Ellyn, Illinois this'2_h_ day of IJovember 1993 e
)
6 i
s l
l 1
i i
i.-
1 l
i,
.-e.,'.r-n=M-+~*--+r--
e m-r
--w --r e
- w+re--w--*
-em+
r-,r
-*-s--
-n+--e
= ' ' ~ ~ + - + - - -
- + + -
-