ML17179B046

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 930712-29.Violation Noted: on 930719,radioactive Matl Labels on Numerous Bags in Bay 7 of Radwaste Bldg Barrelling Area Did Not Contain Max Measured Contact Dose Rate
ML17179B046
Person / Time
Site: Dresden  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 08/18/1993
From: Norelius C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML17179B045 List:
References
50-237-93-22, 50-249-93-22, NUDOCS 9308260135
Download: ML17179B046 (1)


Text

NOTICE OF VIOLATION Commonwealth Edison Company Dresden Station, Units 2 and 3 Dockets No. 50-237; 50-249 License Nos. DPR-19; DPR-25 During an NRC inspection conducted from July 12 - 29, 1993, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, the violation is listed below:

Technical Specification 6.11.1 requires that procedures for personnel radiation protection be approved, maintained, and adhered to for all operations involving personnel radiation exposure.

Procedure DRP 1160-03, Revision 5, "RADIOLOGICAL SIGNS, LABELS, SIGNALS, AND CONTROLS," states that radioactive material tags and labels shall contain the maximum measured contact dose rate on the item or container.

Contrary to the above, on July 19, 1993, radioactive material labels on numerous bags in Bay 7 of the radwaste building barrelling area did not contain the maximum measured contact dose rate.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement IV).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Commonwealth Edison Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:

Document Control Desk, Washington D.C. 20555 with a copy to the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region III, 799 Roosevelt Road, Glen Ellyn, Illinois, 60137, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the Dresden Nuclear Generating Station within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation* and should include for each violation: (1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or a Demand For Information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

Dated at Glen Ellyn, Illinois this 19 day of August 1993 9308260135 930818 1~:

PDR ADOCK 05000237

~'..

G PDR F'~.i Charles E. Norelius, Director Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards