ML14322A203
| ML14322A203 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 11/26/2014 |
| From: | Melendez-Colon D License Renewal Projects Branch 1 |
| To: | Kaminskas V DTE Electric Company |
| Melendez-Colon D, 301-415-3301 | |
| References | |
| TAC MF4222 | |
| Download: ML14322A203 (10) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 November 26, 2014 Mr. Vito Kaminskas Site Vice President - Nuclear Generation DTE Electric Company Fermi 2 - 280 OBA 6400 North Dixie Highway Newport, MI 48166
SUBJECT:
REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR THE REVIEW OF THE FERMI 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION - SET 6 (TAC NO. MF4222)
Dear Mr. Kaminskas:
By letter dated April 24, 2014, DTE Electric Company submitted an application pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 54, to renew the operating license NPF-43 for Fermi 2, for review by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff). The staff is reviewing the information contained in the license renewal application and has identified, in the enclosure, areas where additional information is needed to complete the review.
These requests for additional information were discussed with Ms. Lynne Goodman, and a mutually agreeable date for the response is within 35 days from the date of this letter. If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-3301 or e-mail Daneira.Melendez-Colon@nrc.gov.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Daneira Meléndez-Colón, Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-341
Enclosure:
Requests for Additional Information cc w/encl: ListServ
- Concurred via e-mail OFFICE LA:RPB1:DLR* PM:RPB1:DLR PM:RPB1:DLR BC:RPB1:DLR PM:RPB1:DLR NAME YEdmonds DMeléndez-Colón ESayoc YDíaz-Sanabria (GCasto for) DMeléndez-Colón DATE 11/24/14 11/25/14 11/24/14 11/26/14 11/26/14
SUBJECT:
REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR THE REVIEW OF THE FERMI 2, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION - SET 6 (TAC NO. MF4222)
DISTRIBUTION:
E-MAIL:
PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRsrg Resource RidsNrrPMFermi2 Resource D. Melendez-Colon Y. Diaz-Sanabria M. Wentzel B. Wittick D. McIntyre, OPA C. Kanatas, OGC D. Roth, OGC M. Kunowski, RIII B. Kemker, RIII V. Mitlyng, RIII P. Chandrathil, RIII A. Stone, RIII S. Sheldon, RIII
ENCLOSURE FERMI 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SET 6 (TAC NO. MF4222)
RAI 2.3.3.17-10
Background:
License Renewal Application (LRA) Section 2.1 describes the applicants scoping methodology, which specifies how systems or components were determined to be included within the scope of license renewal.
Issue:
One review method used by the staff is to confirm the inclusion of all components subject to an aging management review (AMR) by reviewing the results of the screening of components within the license renewal boundary. The staff noted, during its review of drawings, as supplied by the applicant, that continuations of piping within the scope of license renewal could not be located; therefore acceptable scoping of systems, structures and components (SSCs) could not be verified. Drawing LRA-M-2042 has eight within scope continuations to/from drawing I-2314-02. Drawing I-2314-02 was not provided.
Request:
The staff requests the applicant to provide sufficient information to locate the license renewal boundary. If the continuation cannot be shown on license renewal boundary drawings, then provide additional information describing the extent of the scoping boundary and verify whether or not there are additional component types subject to an AMR between the continuation and the termination of the scoping boundary. If the scoping classification of a section of the piping changes over the continuation, provide additional information to clarify the change in scoping classification.
RAI 2.3.4.1-1
Background:
In LRA Section 2.1.1.2.2 (1), Nonsafety-Related SSCs Directly Connected to Safety-Related SSCs, the applicant stated, in part, For nonsafety-related SSCs directly connected to safety-related SSCs, components within the scope of license renewal include the connected piping and supports up to and including the first seismic or equivalent anchor beyond the safety-nonsafety interface, or up to a point determined by alternative bounding criteria.
Issue:
On drawing LRA-M-2678 (E-2) the staff could not locate seismic or equivalent anchors on the 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2) nonsafety-related line continued from safety-related valve 3120. The nonsafety-related line at E-2 continues to drawing I-2400-7, location D-4. Drawing I-2400-7 was not provided. The same 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2) nonsafety-related line from safety-related valve 3120 branches and continues to valves F314 and F315, at LRA-M-2678 (G-6 and F-6) and continue to M-5498 (H-3) and I-2400-06 (C-4), respectively. Drawings M-5498 (H-3) and I-2400-06 (C-4) were not provided.
Request:
The staff requests the applicant to provide additional information to locate the seismic or equivalent anchors between the safety-nonsafety interface and the end of the 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2) scoping boundary.
RAI 2.3.4.2-1
Background:
In LRA Section 2.1.1.2.2 (1), Nonsafety-Related SSCs Directly Connected to Safety-Related SSCs, the applicant stated, in part, For nonsafety-related SSCs directly connected to safety-related SSCs, components within the scope of license renewal include the connected piping and supports up to and including the first seismic or equivalent anchor beyond the safety-nonsafety interface, or up to a point determined by alternative bounding criteria.
Issue:
On drawing LRA-M-2023 (F-8) a 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2) nonsafety-related line continues from drawing LRA-M-2004-01 (H-2). The staff could not locate seismic or equivalent anchors on the 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2) nonsafety-related lines continued from LRA-M-2004-01 (H-2). This line continues to 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1) safety-related valves F076A and F076B at locations F-1 and F-2.
Request:
The staff requests the applicant to provide additional information to locate the seismic or equivalent anchors between the safety-nonsafety interface and the end of the 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2) scoping boundary.
RAI 2.3.4.2-2
Background:
LRA Section 2.1 describes the applicants scoping methodology, which specifies how systems or components were determined to be included within the scope of license renewal.
Issue:
One review method used by the staff is to confirm the inclusion of all components subject to an AMR by reviewing the results of the screening of components within the license renewal boundary. The staff noted, during its review of the drawings and locations (indicated in the table below) as supplied by the applicant, that continuations of piping within the scope of license renewal could not be located; therefore, acceptable scoping of SSCs could not be verified.
License Renewal Boundary Drawing Number & Location Continuation Issue LRA-M-2035, location E-8 Could not find continuation from drawing LRA-M-2035, location E-8, to drawing LRA-M-2089, location H-4.
License Renewal Boundary Drawing Number & Location Continuation Issue LRA-M-5715-4, locations D-4 and D-7 Continuations to/from LRA-M-5715-4 to/from drawing M-5715-3, locations D-6 and D-4, respectively, could not be found because M-5715-3 was not provided.
Request:
The staff requests the applicant to provide sufficient information to locate the license renewal boundary. If the continuation cannot be shown on license renewal boundary drawings, then provide additional information describing the extent of the scoping boundary and verify whether or not there are additional component types subject to an AMR between the continuation and the termination of the scoping boundary. If the scoping classification of a section of the piping changes over the continuation, provide additional information to clarify the change in scoping classification.
RAI 2.3.4.3-1
=
Background===
LRA Section 2.1 describes the applicants scoping methodology, which specifies how systems or components were determined to be included within the scope of license renewal.
Issue:
One review method used by the staff is to confirm the inclusion of all components subject to an AMR by reviewing the results of the screening of components within the license renewal boundary. The staff noted, during its review of the drawings, as supplied by the applicant, that continuations of piping within the scope of license renewal could not be located; therefore, acceptable scoping of SSCs could not be verified. Drawing LRA-M-2007 (D-5 through E-5, and D-6) has within scope 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2) lines continuing to drawing I-2400-03, four locations.
Drawing I-2400-03 was not provided.
Request:
The staff requests the applicant to provide sufficient information to locate the license renewal boundary. If the continuation cannot be shown on license renewal boundary drawings, then provide additional information describing the extent of the scoping boundary and verify whether or not there are additional component types subject to an AMR between the continuation and the termination of the scoping boundary. If the scoping classification of a section of the piping changes over the continuation, provide additional information to clarify the change in scoping classification.
RAI 2.3.4.3-2
Background:
LRA Section 2.1 describes the applicants scoping methodology, which specifies how systems or components were determined to be included within the scope of license renewal.
Issue:
One review method used by the staff to confirm the inclusion of all components subject to an AMR review by reviewing the results of the screening of components within the license renewal boundary. The staff noted, during its review of the drawings and locations (indicated in the table below) as supplied by the applicant, that continuations of piping within the scope of license renewal could not be located; therefore, acceptable scoping of SSCs could not be verified.
License Renewal Boundary Drawing Number & Location Continuation Issue LRA-M-2011, location H-4 Within scope 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2) line continuing to drawing 6M721-2004 (drawing LRA-M-2004), location C-3. Could not locate the continuation from LRA-M-2011 on drawing LRA-M-2004.
LRA-M-2011, locations G-2, G-4, G-6, G-8, and D-3 Within scope 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2) lines to sample sink drain drawings on drawings I-2400-03 and I-2400-06. Drawings I-2400-03 and I-2400-06 were not provided.
LRA-M-2011-1, location H-2 Within scope 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2) line continuing to drawing M-3007. Drawing M-3007 was not provided.
Request:
The staff requests the applicant to provide sufficient information to locate the license renewal boundary. If the continuation cannot be shown on license renewal boundary drawings, then provide additional information describing the extent of the scoping boundary and verify whether or not there are additional component types subject to an AMR between the continuation and the termination of the scoping boundary. If the scoping classification of a section of the piping changes over the continuation, provide additional information to clarify the change in scoping classification.
RAI 2.3.4.3-3
Background:
LRA Section 2.1 describes the applicants scoping methodology, which specifies how systems or components were determined to be included within the scope of license renewal.
Issue:
One review method used by the staff is to confirm the inclusion of all components subject to an AMR by reviewing the results of the screening of components within the license renewal boundary. The staff noted, during its review of the drawings and locations as supplied by the applicant, that continuations of piping within the scope of license renewal could not be located; therefore, acceptable scoping of SSCs could not be verified. Drawing LRA-M-2017-1 (D-5) has a 2-inch-diameter 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2) line continuing to an unspecified drawing (and location) with a note At Condenser.
Request:
The staff requests the applicant to provide sufficient information to locate the license renewal boundary. If the continuation cannot be shown on license renewal boundary drawings, then provide additional information describing the extent of the scoping boundary and verify whether or not there are additional component types subject to an AMR between the continuation and the termination of the scoping boundary. If the scoping classification of a section of the piping changes over the continuation, provide additional information to clarify the change in scoping classification.
RAI 2.3.4.3-4
Background:
LRA Section 2.1 describes the applicants scoping methodology, which specifies how systems or components were determined to be included within the scope of license renewal.
Issue:
One review method used by the staff is to confirm the inclusion of all components subject to an AMR by reviewing the results of the screening of components within the license renewal boundary. The staff noted, during its review of the drawings and locations (indicated in the table below) as supplied by the applicant, that continuations of piping within the scope of license renewal could not be located; therefore, acceptable scoping of SSCs could not be verified.
License Renewal Boundary Drawing Number & Location Continuation Issue LRA-M-2985-1, locations F-3, D-4, and E-6 Drawing LRA-M-2985-1 has three within scope 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2) lines continuing to drawings M-4352, I-2314-3, and I-2314-3, respectively. Drawings M-4352 and I-2314-3 were not provided.
LRA-M-2985-1, location G-6 Drawing LRA-M-2985-1 (G-6) has a 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2) line continuing to drawing LRA-M-2017-1, location A-7. Review of drawing LRA-M-2017-1 could not locate the continuation from drawing LRA-M-2985-1.
LRA-M-2985-1, locations E-2 and E-3 Drawing LRA-M-2985-1 (E-2 and E-3) has two 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2) lines continuing to drawing LRA-M-2017-1 (F-6 and D-5).
Review of drawing LRA-M-2017-1 could not locate the continuations from drawing LRA-M-2985-1.
Request:
The staff requests the applicant to provide sufficient information to locate the license renewal boundary. If the continuation cannot be shown on license renewal boundary drawings, then provide additional information describing the extent of the scoping boundary and verify whether or not there are additional component types subject to an AMR between the continuation and the termination of the scoping boundary. If the scoping classification of a section of the piping changes over the continuation, provide additional information to clarify the change in scoping classification.
RAI 2.3.4.3-5
Background:
LRA Section 2.1 describes the applicants scoping methodology, which specifies how systems or components were determined to be included within the scope of license renewal.
Issue:
One review method used by the staff is to confirm the inclusion of all components subject to an AMR by reviewing the results of the screening of components within the license renewal boundary. The staff noted, during its review of the drawings and locations (indicated in the table below) as supplied by the applicant, that continuations of piping within the scope of license renewal could not be located; therefore, acceptable scoping of SSCs could not be verified.
License Renewal Boundary Drawing Number & Location Continuation Issue LRA-M-2003, location F-4 Drawing LRA-M-2003 (F-4) has a within scope 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2) line continuing to drawing M-4504-1. Drawing M-4504-1 was not provided.
LRA-M-2003, locations E-5 and F-5 Drawing LRA-M-2003 (E-5 and F-5) has a within scope 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2) line continuing to drawing I-2314-03 (H-3).
Drawing I-2314-03 was not provided.
Request:
The staff requests the applicant to provide sufficient information to locate the license renewal boundary. If the continuation cannot be shown on license renewal boundary drawings, then provide additional information describing the extent of the scoping boundary and verify whether or not there are additional component types subject to an AMR between the continuation and the termination of the scoping boundary. If the scoping classification of a section of the piping changes over the continuation, provide additional information to clarify the change in scoping classification.
RAI 2.3.4.3-6
Background:
LRA Section 2.1 describes the applicants scoping methodology, which specifies how systems or components were determined to be included within the scope of license renewal.
Issue:
One review method used by the staff is to confirm the inclusion of all components subject to an AMR by reviewing the results of the screening of components within the license renewal boundary. The staff noted, during its review of the drawings and locations (indicated in the table below) as supplied by the applicant, that continuations of piping within the scope of license renewal could not be located; therefore, acceptable scoping of SSCs could not be verified.
License Renewal Boundary Drawing Number & Location Continuation Issue LRA-I-2336-05, locations C-2, E-4, E-5, and E-6 Drawing LRA-I-2336-05 has four within scope 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2) lines to drawings M-2165 and I-2334-20. Drawings M-2165 and I-2334-20 were not provided.
LRA-I-2336-06, locations B-7 and B-8 Drawing LRA-I-2336-06 (B-7 and B-8) has two within scope 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2) lines continuing to drawing I-2333-07. Drawing I-2333-07 was not provided.
LRA-I-2336-26, location E-4 Drawing LRA-I-2336-26 (E-4) has a within scope 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2) line continuing to drawing I-2334-05. Drawing I-2334-05 was not provided.
LRA-I-2336-26, location D-4 Drawing LRA-I-2336-26 (D-4) has an 8-inch-diameter 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2) line continuing from an unspecified drawing (and location) with a note From Guard Piping.
LRA-I-2346-05, location E-7 Drawing LRA-I-2346-05 (E-7) has a within scope 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2) line continuing to drawing I-2346-06. Drawing I-2346-06 was not provided.
LRA-I-2346-05, locations F-4, E-4, and D-4 Drawing LRA-I-2346-05 has three10 CFR 54.4(a)(2) lines continuing to unspecified drawings with notes To Portable Drum, To Main Oil Tank, and To Waste Oil Tank, respectively.
Request:
The staff requests the applicant to provide sufficient information to locate the license renewal boundary. If the continuation cannot be shown on license renewal boundary drawings, then provide additional information describing the extent of the scoping boundary and verify whether or not there are additional component types subject to an AMR between the continuation and the termination of the scoping boundary. If the scoping classification of a section of the piping changes over the continuation, provide additional information to clarify the change in scoping classification.