Letter Sequence Approval |
|---|
|
Initiation
- Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request
- Acceptance...
|
MONTHYEARULNRC-05830, Environmental Report; Operating License Renewal Stage Final, Chapter 3 Through Attachment D2011-12-15015 December 2011
Environmental Report; Operating License Renewal Stage Final, Chapter 3 Through Attachment D
Project stage: Other
ML1135403492011-12-15015 December 2011
Environmental Report; Operating License Renewal Stage Final, Cover Through Chapter 2
Project stage: Other
ML1135303722011-12-15015 December 2011
Callaway, Unit 1, License Renewal Application
Project stage: Request
ML1135403542011-12-15015 December 2011
Environmental Report; Operating License Renewal Stage Final, Attachment E Through End
Project stage: Other
L-12-065, Submittal of Shield Building Root Cause Evaluation2012-02-27027 February 2012
Submittal of Shield Building Root Cause Evaluation
Project stage: Request
ML12056A0452012-03-12012 March 2012
Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events
Project stage: Request
ULNRC-05842, Response to Commission Order to Modify Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order Number EA-12-049)2012-03-30030 March 2012
Response to Commission Order to Modify Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order Number EA-12-049)
Project stage: Other
ML12097A2162012-04-0505 April 2012
Firstenergy Notification of Filing Related to Proposed Shield Building Cracking Contention
Project stage: Request
ML12115A3722012-04-23023 April 2012
Attachment 1 - Declarations of Ruth Schaefer, Mary A. Mosley, Mark Haim, Carla T. Klein, and Patrick J. Wilson
Project stage: Request
ML12115A3712012-04-24024 April 2012
Missouri Coalition for the Environments Hearing Request and Petition to Intervene License Renewal Proceeding for Callaway Nuclear Power Plant
Project stage: Other
ML12115A3762012-04-24024 April 2012
Declaration of Arjun Makhijani in Support of Missouri Coalition for the Environments Hearing Request Regarding Callaway License Renewal Application
Project stage: Other
ML12125A1682012-05-0404 May 2012
Memorandum and Order (Initial Prehearing Order)
Project stage: Request
ML12138A0372012-05-14014 May 2012
FENOC-Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1, Submittal of Contractor Root Cause Assessment Report-Section 1
Project stage: Request
ML12142A3682012-05-21021 May 2012
NRC Staff'S Answer to Missouri Coalition for the Environment'S Hearing Request and Petition to Intervene
Project stage: Request
ML12142A1582012-05-21021 May 2012
Amerens Answer Opposing the Missouri Coalition for the Environments Hearing Request and Petition to Intervene
Project stage: Request
ML12165A1962012-06-13013 June 2012
Transcript of Union Electric Company Callaway Plant Unit 1 Oral Arguments, June 7, 2012. Pages 1-171
Project stage: Request
ML12191A3592012-07-0909 July 2012
Intervenors Motion for Leave to File a New Contention Concerning Temporary Storage and Ultimate Disposal of Nuclear Waste at Callaway Nuclear Power Plant
Project stage: Request
RA-12-082, Security Plan, Training and Qualification Plan, and Safeguards Contingency Plan, (Revision 12)2012-07-13013 July 2012
Security Plan, Training and Qualification Plan, and Safeguards Contingency Plan, (Revision 12)
Project stage: Request
ML12195A1172012-07-13013 July 2012
Notice (Notice of Need for More Time)
Project stage: Request
ML12199A3762012-07-17017 July 2012
Memorandum and Order (Ruling on Standing and Hearing Petition Contention Admissibility)- LBP-12-15
Project stage: Request
ML12216A0872012-07-17017 July 2012
Physical Security Plan, Training and Qualification Plan, and Safeguards Contingency Plan Revision 14
Project stage: Request
ML12205A5072012-07-23023 July 2012
Intervenors Fourth Motion to Amend And/Or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking)
Project stage: Request
ML12206A6082012-07-24024 July 2012
Amerens Response to Request to Show Cause and Amerens Unopposed Motion for Extension
Project stage: Request
ML12206A4012012-07-24024 July 2012
Memorandum and Order (Request to Show Cause as to Why New Contention Motion Should Not Be Deemed Conceded/Unopposed)
Project stage: Request
ML12214A2642012-07-25025 July 2012
PVNGS Security Plan, Training and Qualification Plan, Safeguards Contingency Plan, and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Security Program, Revision 14
Project stage: Request
CP-201200875, Report of Changes to the Physical Security Plan (Revision 7)2012-07-26026 July 2012
Report of Changes to the Physical Security Plan (Revision 7)
Project stage: Request
ML12209A1592012-07-27027 July 2012
NRC Staff'S Response to Request to Show Cause as to Why New Contention Motion Should Not Be Deemed Conceded/Unopposed
Project stage: Request
ML12216A1482012-08-0101 August 2012
7 to Physical Security Plan, Training and Qualification Plan, Safeguards Contingency Plan, and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Plan
Project stage: Request
RBG-47269, Submittal of Revision 10 to the Security Plan, T&Q Plan and Safeguards Contingency Plan2012-08-0202 August 2012
Submittal of Revision 10 to the Security Plan, T&Q Plan and Safeguards Contingency Plan
Project stage: Request
ML12219A2272012-08-0202 August 2012
Duke Energy Physical Security Plan, Revision 18
Project stage: Request
ML12219A2282012-08-0303 August 2012
Revision to the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Physical Security Plan, Training and Qualification Plan, Safeguards Contingency Plan and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Security Program, Revision 9
Project stage: Request
ULNRC-05889, Union Electric Co. Facility Operating License NPF-030 Physical Security Plan, Revision 102012-08-0303 August 2012
Union Electric Co. Facility Operating License NPF-030 Physical Security Plan, Revision 10
Project stage: Request
ML12216A1192012-08-0303 August 2012
Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time to File an Answer
Project stage: Request
L-2012-305, 5 to the Physical Security Plan, Cover Letter2012-08-0303 August 2012
5 to the Physical Security Plan, Cover Letter
Project stage: Request
ML12219A2252012-08-0303 August 2012
Security Plan Change Revision 13
Project stage: Request
ASLBP 12-919-06-LR-BD01, NRC Staff Answer to Missouri Coalition for the Environments Motion for Leave to File New Contention Concerning Temporary Storage and Ultimate Disposal of Nuclear Waste2012-08-0303 August 2012
NRC Staff Answer to Missouri Coalition for the Environments Motion for Leave to File New Contention Concerning Temporary Storage and Ultimate Disposal of Nuclear Waste
Project stage: Request
ML12221A3362012-08-0808 August 2012
Draft RAI on Revision to Security Plan
Project stage: Draft RAI
ML12229A2872012-08-13013 August 2012
Security Plan, Revision 9 to the Training and Qualification Plan, and Safeguards Contingency Plan
Project stage: Request
ML12237A0772012-08-23023 August 2012
Draft Request for Information Email - Related to Physical Security Plant (Psp), Training and Qualification Plan (T&Qp), and Safeguards Contingency Plan (Scp), Revision 14 (TAC D91660)
Project stage: Draft RAI
ML12229A4332012-09-0606 September 2012
Request for Additional Information Regarding Security Plan, Training and Qualification Plan, and Safeguards Contingency Plan, Revision 12 (TAC No. D91660)
Project stage: RAI
ML12251A0472012-09-11011 September 2012
Request for Additional Information, Review of Physical Security Plan (Psp), Training and Qualification Plan (T&Qp), and Safeguards Contingency Plan (Scp), Revision 14 (TAC D91660)
Project stage: RAI
ML12255A0742012-09-18018 September 2012
Request for Additional Information, Changes to Callaway Physical Security Plan (TAC No. D91660)
Project stage: RAI
2CAN101202, Cycle 23, Core Operating Limits Report2012-10-0404 October 2012
Cycle 23, Core Operating Limits Report
Project stage: Request
ML12286A3362012-10-0404 October 2012
(ANO) Units 1 and 2, Revision 14 of the ANO Security Plan
Project stage: Request
ML12284A0182012-10-0505 October 2012
NRR E-mail Capture - (D91660) Request for Additional Information (RAI) Draft Questions Corporate Security Plans Submitted 7/30/2012
Project stage: Draft RAI
ULNRC-05921, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Changes to Security Plan (TAC No. D91660)2012-10-18018 October 2012
Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Changes to Security Plan (TAC No. D91660)
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML12296A0102012-10-19019 October 2012
NRR E-mail Capture - D91660 - Dominion Physical Security Plan - Request for Additional Information - This Message Is Publically Available and non-sensitive
Project stage: RAI
ML12296A9302012-10-23023 October 2012
Enclosudraft Request for Additional Information
Project stage: RAI
ML12305A0432012-10-29029 October 2012
Email Security-Related Request for Additional Information, Review of Revision 10 of the Physical Security Plan, Training and Qualification Plan, and Safeguards Contingency Plan (TAC D91660)
Project stage: RAI
ML12305A0192012-10-30030 October 2012
NRR E-mail Capture - FW: D91660 - NextEra Energy Duane Arnold Physical Security Plan - RAI - This Message Is Publically Available and non-sensitive
Project stage: RAI
2012-06-13
[Table View] |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 February 21, 2014 Mr. Edward D. Halpin Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Pacific Gas and Electric Company Diablo Canyon Power Plant P.O. Box 56, Mail Code 104/6 Avila Beach, CA 93424
SUBJECT:
DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 - REVIEW OF PHYSICAL SECURITY PLAN, TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION PLAN, SAFEGUARDS CONTINGENCY PLAN, AND INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION SECURITY PROGRAM, REVISION 7 AND 8 (TAC NO. D91660)
Dear Mr. Halpin:
By letter dated August 3, 2012, and as supplemented by a non-public letter dated March 6, 2013, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (the licensee}, submitted Revision 7 of the Physical Security Plan, Training and Qualification Plan, Safeguards Contingency Plan, and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Security Program for Diablo Canyon Power Plant (DCPP}, Units 1 and 2. In addition, by letter dated May 9, 2013, the licensee submitted Revision 8 of the Physical Security Plan, Training and Qualification Plan, Safeguards Contingency Plan, and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Security Program for DCPP, Units 1 and 2. Both Revision 7 and 8 were submitted under the provisions of paragraph 50.54(p)(2} of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR).
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(p)(2}, the licensee may make changes to the plans without prior Commission approval if the changes do not decrease the safeguards effectiveness of the security plans. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs review consisted of determining whether the licensee properly concluded that changes in the revision did not decrease the safeguards effectiveness of the Commission-approved security plans.
The NRC staff concluded that the proposed changes in both Revision 7 and 8 did not involve a decrease in the safeguards effectiveness of the security plan as described in 10 CFR 50.54(p) and continues to meet the requirements in 10 CFR 73. The licensee provided supplemental information to support the review of Revision 7 in response to a request for additional information. This information was later incorporated into Revision 8 by the licensee. The staff's review of Revision 7 and 8 is summarized in staff conclusion of Enclosure. The effectiveness of the implementation of the identified changes in the revised security plans is subject to future NRC review and inspection.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-4125 or via e-mail at James.Kim@nrc.gov.
Docket Nos. 50-275 and 50-323
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv Sincerely, James Kim, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 OFFICE OF NUCLEAR SECURITY AND INCIDENT RESPONSE REVIEW OF 10 CFR 50.54(p)(2) CHANGES TO PHYSICAL SECURITY PLAN.
TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION PLAN. AND SAFEGUARDS CONTINGENCY PLAN. AND INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION SECURITY PROGRAM. REVISION 7 AND 8 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT. UNITS 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-275 AND 50-323
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By letters dated August 13, 2012 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML12219A358), as supplemented by letter dated March 6, 2013 (non-public), and May 9, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No. ML13134A016), Pacific Gas and Electric Company (the licensee) submitted Diablo Canyon Power Plant's Physical Security Plan, Training and Qualification Plan, and Safeguards Contingency Plan, Revision 7 and 8 respectively under the provisions of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.54(p)(2). Portions of the letters dated August 13, 2012, and May 9, 2013, contain sensitive unclassified non-safeguards information (security-related) and safeguards information and, accordingly, are withheld from public disclosure.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's review of the licensee's security plans was conducted in accordance with the applicable requirements of 10 CFR Part 73 as well as the guidance contained within the Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response (NSIR)
Procedure LIC-800, "Security Review Procedure for 10 CFR 50.54(p)(2)," and the NRC-endorsed Nuclear Entergy Institute (NEI) 03-12, Revision 7, Template for Security Plans, as appropriate.
2.0 REGULATORY EVALUATION
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(p)(2), the licensee may make changes to the plans without prior Commission approval if the changes do not decrease the safeguards effectiveness of the security plans. The licensee must submit a report to the NRC containing the description of each change, within 2 months after changes are made.
Enclosure The NRC staff's review consisted of determining whether the licensee properly concluded that changes did not decrease the safeguards effectiveness of the Commission-approved security plans.
3.0 TECHNICAL EVALUATION
3.1 REVISION 7 The NRC staff compared these changes with the previous revision of the licensee's security plans and referred to the guidance documents listed above. The NRC staff noted that the licensee's Revision 7 security plans utilized the NEI 03-12, Revision 7, template endorsed by NRC to make security plan changes and addressed recently issued Security Frequently Asked Questions.
The following items were noted:
- 1.
The NRC staff questioned the descriptions within the Physical Security Plan regarding illumination of the protected area and how the system meets the requirements of 10 CFR 73.55(e)(7)(i)(C), 10 CFR 73.55(i)(2), and 10 CFR 73.55(i)(3)(vii).
- 2.
The NRC staff also had questions regarding the description of the training and qualification requirements for security personnel.
The NRC staff requested additional information from the licensee in order to complete its review. The NRC staff sent a request for additional information (RAI) to the licensee on January 23, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No. ML13023A407). By letter dated March 6, 2013, the licensee provided its response to the RAI. The March 6 letter is withheld from public disclosure in its entirety because it contains security-related information.
The licensee's RAI response provided adequate clarification of the items for which information was requested. The NRC staff concludes that the licensee's proposed Revision 7 does not decrease the safeguards effectiveness of the security plan and continues to meet the requirements in 10 CFR 73, and is, therefore, acceptable.
3.2 REVISION 8 The NRC staff compared these changes with the previous revision of the licensee's security plans and referred to the guidance documents listed above. The NRC staff noted that the licensee's Revision 8 security plan included a change to the configuration of the security response organization and incorporated the information submitted to the NRC in response to a January 23, 2013, request for additional information. The NRC staff concludes that the licensee's proposed Revision 8 does not decrease the safeguards effectiveness of the security plan and continues to meet the requirements in 10 CFR 73, and is, therefore, acceptable.
4.0 CONCLUSION
The NRC staff determined that the proposed changes in both Revision 7 and 8 did not result in a decrease in the safeguards effectiveness of the security plan and continues to meet the requirements in 10 CFR 73, and is, therefore, acceptable.
Principal Contributor: Rick Costa, NSIR O~e: February 21, 2014
ML14043A003 OFFICE NRR/DORL/LPL4-2/PM NAME JKim DATE 2/18/14 OFFICE NSIR/DSP/BC**
NAME RFelts DATE 5/22/13 Sincerely, IRA/
James Kim, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation RidsNrrPMDiabloCanyon Resource RidsRgn4MaiiCenter Resource RidsNsirDsp Resource RCosta, NSIR
- memo dated 3/19/13; **memo dated 5/22/13 NRR/DORL/LPL4-1/LA NSIR/DSP/BC*
JBurkhardt RFelts 2/13/14 3/19/13 NRR/DORLILPL4-1/BC NRR/DORLILPL4-2/PM MMarkley JKim 2/21/14 2/21/14
