Letter Sequence RAI |
---|
|
Initiation
- Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request
- Acceptance...
- Supplement, Supplement
Results
Other: ML060890398, ML060950574, ML073511698, ML081200606, ML081790538, ML090980515, ML092080216, ML092440479, ML100190011, NRC 2009-0113, Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact for Debris Blockage in Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors (TAC Nos. MC4705/4706), NRC 2011-0010, Plan for Completion of Actions for Generic Letter 2004-02 Potential Impact for Debris Blockage in Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors
|
MONTHYEARML0515202022005-06-0202 June 2005 6/2/05, Turkey Point, RAI, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Sump Recirculation at Pressurized-Water Reactors Project stage: RAI ML0515201832005-06-0202 June 2005 Request for Additional Information, Generic Letter 2004-02 Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Sump Recirculation at Pressurized-Water Reactors. Project stage: RAI ML0515202272005-06-0303 June 2005 6/3/05, Seabrook, RAI, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Sump Recirculation at Pressurized-Water Reactors Project stage: RAI ML0603703962006-02-0808 February 2006 RAI, Response to Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design-Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors Project stage: RAI ML0603704382006-02-0808 February 2006 Request for Additional Information Response to Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design-basis Accidents at Pressurized-water Reactors Project stage: RAI ML0603801332006-02-0909 February 2006 Request for Additional Information Response to Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design-Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors Project stage: RAI ML0603704912006-02-0909 February 2006 RAI - Response to Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design-Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors Project stage: RAI ML0608903982006-04-11011 April 2006 Requested Extension of Completion Schedule for NRC Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized Water Reactors Project stage: Other ML0609505742006-04-13013 April 2006 Approval of GSI-191/GL 2004-02 Extension Request Project stage: Other NRC 2007-0085, Response to Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors2007-11-16016 November 2007 Response to Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors Project stage: Request L-2007-155, Request for Extension of Completion Date of the Generic Letter 2004-02 Actions2007-12-0707 December 2007 Request for Extension of Completion Date of the Generic Letter 2004-02 Actions Project stage: Request ML0735116982007-12-20020 December 2007 GSI-191/GL 2004-02 Extension Request Approval (Tac No. MC4705/4706) Project stage: Other L-2008-030, Supplemental Response to NRC Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors2008-02-27027 February 2008 Supplemental Response to NRC Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors Project stage: Request L-2008-033, Supplemental Response to NRC Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors.2008-02-28028 February 2008 Supplemental Response to NRC Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors. Project stage: Request L-2008-073, NRC Generic Letter 2004-02 Request for an Extension to the Completion Date for Ex-Vessel Downstream Effects Evaluations2008-04-14014 April 2008 NRC Generic Letter 2004-02 Request for an Extension to the Completion Date for Ex-Vessel Downstream Effects Evaluations Project stage: Request ML0812006062008-04-29029 April 2008 Approval of Extension Request for GL 2004-02 Project stage: Other NRC 2008-0038, Supplemental Response to Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Lmpact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors2008-06-0909 June 2008 Supplemental Response to Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Lmpact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors Project stage: Request L-2008-137, Supplemental Response to NRC Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors.2008-06-30030 June 2008 Supplemental Response to NRC Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors. Project stage: Request L-2008-138, Supplemental Response to NRC Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors.2008-06-30030 June 2008 Supplemental Response to NRC Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors. Project stage: Request ML0817905382008-07-0101 July 2008 Generic Safety Issue 191/Generic Letter 2004-02, Additional Extension Request Approval Project stage: Other ML0826106902008-09-17017 September 2008 Request for Additional Information Related to GL 2004-02 Project stage: RAI ML0826107052008-09-17017 September 2008 Request for Additional Information (RAI) Related to Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Sump Recirculation at Pressurized-water Reactors Project stage: RAI ML0834400782008-12-19019 December 2008 Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized Water Reactors, Request for Additional Information Project stage: RAI ML0833806712008-12-22022 December 2008 Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized Water Reactors, Request for Additional Information (TAC Mc 4725) Project stage: RAI ML0833001732009-01-0707 January 2009 GSI-191/GL 2004-02 Request for Additional Information Project stage: RAI ML0836589782009-01-16016 January 2009 Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized Water Reactors, Request for Additional Information Project stage: RAI ML0835800232009-01-22022 January 2009 Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized Water Reactors, Request for Additional Information Project stage: RAI L-2009-063, Response to NRC Request for Additional Information Regarding the Responses to GL 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors2009-03-19019 March 2009 Response to NRC Request for Additional Information Regarding the Responses to GL 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors Project stage: Response to RAI L-2009-062, Response to NRC Request for Additional Information Regarding the Responses to GL 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors.2009-03-19019 March 2009 Response to NRC Request for Additional Information Regarding the Responses to GL 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors. Project stage: Response to RAI NRC 2009-0033, Response to Request for Additional Information GSI-191/GL 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized Water Reactors2009-04-0707 April 2009 Response to Request for Additional Information GSI-191/GL 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized Water Reactors Project stage: Response to RAI ML0909805152009-04-0808 April 2009 SONGS - GSI-191 Chemical Effects Project stage: Other L-2009-084, Response to Nrc'S Request for Additional Information2009-04-22022 April 2009 Response to Nrc'S Request for Additional Information Project stage: Request NRC 2009-0053, Request for Extension of Unit 1 and 2 Completion Dates for Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact for Debris Blockage in Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors (TAC MC4705/4706)2009-06-12012 June 2009 Request for Extension of Unit 1 and 2 Completion Dates for Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact for Debris Blockage in Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors (TAC MC4705/4706) Project stage: Request NRC 2009-0059, Response to Request for Additional Information GSI-I91/GL 2004-02 Potential Lmpact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized Water Reactors2009-06-29029 June 2009 Response to Request for Additional Information GSI-I91/GL 2004-02 Potential Lmpact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized Water Reactors Project stage: Response to RAI ML0920802162009-07-27027 July 2009 Notice of Forthcoming Conference Call with Florida Power and Light Concerning Turkey Point Generic Letter 2004-02 Response Project stage: Other L-2009-180, Responses to Nrc'S Request for Additional Information on Generic Letter 2004-02 Supplemental Responses, Dated 02/27/2008 and 06/30/20082009-07-30030 July 2009 Responses to Nrc'S Request for Additional Information on Generic Letter 2004-02 Supplemental Responses, Dated 02/27/2008 and 06/30/2008 Project stage: Supplement NRC 2009-0077, Response to Request for Additional Information GSI-191/GL 2004-02 (TACs MC4705/4706) Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized Water Reactors2009-07-31031 July 2009 Response to Request for Additional Information GSI-191/GL 2004-02 (TACs MC4705/4706) Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized Water Reactors Project stage: Response to RAI ML0924404792009-09-11011 September 2009 Summary of Conference Call with Florida Power & Light, to Discuss Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blackage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactor, Responses Project stage: Other NRC 2009-0113, Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact for Debris Blockage in Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors (TAC Nos. MC4705/4706)2009-10-27027 October 2009 Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact for Debris Blockage in Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors (TAC Nos. MC4705/4706) Project stage: Other ML1001900112010-01-19019 January 2010 Notice of Conference Call with Florida Power & Light Concerning Turkey Point Generic Letter 2004-02 Response Project stage: Other ML1003512132010-02-18018 February 2010 Request for Additional Information Regarding GL 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors Project stage: RAI ML1009700022010-04-0909 April 2010 Request for Additional Information, Regarding GL 2004-02 Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors Project stage: RAI NRC 2010-0046, Supplemental Response for Extension Request for Completion of Actions for Generic Letter 2004-02 Potential Impact for Debris Blockage in Emergency Recirculation Durian Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors2010-06-11011 June 2010 Supplemental Response for Extension Request for Completion of Actions for Generic Letter 2004-02 Potential Impact for Debris Blockage in Emergency Recirculation Durian Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors Project stage: Supplement ML1019405202010-07-14014 July 2010 Notice of Conference Call with Florida Power and Light Company to Discuss Draft Responses to NRC Requests for Additional Information for Generic Letter 2004-02 Project stage: Draft RAI ML1007407182010-07-28028 July 2010 February 3, 2010, Turkey Point, Unit 3 & 4, Summary of Meeting with Florida Power & Light, on Generic Letter 2004-02 Project stage: Meeting L-2010-205, Responses to Nrc'S Request for Additional Information Dated Feb. 18, 2010 Re Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors2010-09-17017 September 2010 Responses to Nrc'S Request for Additional Information Dated Feb. 18, 2010 Re Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors Project stage: Request ML1009903062010-09-22022 September 2010 Request for Additional Information Regarding GL 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors Project stage: RAI ML1025902742010-12-17017 December 2010 Summary of Teleconference Meeting with Florida Power & Light Company, on Generic Letter 2004-02 Project stage: Meeting NRC 2011-0010, Plan for Completion of Actions for Generic Letter 2004-02 Potential Impact for Debris Blockage in Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors2011-02-0404 February 2011 Plan for Completion of Actions for Generic Letter 2004-02 Potential Impact for Debris Blockage in Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors Project stage: Other ML1103502052011-02-0404 February 2011 Forthcoming Public Teleconference with NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, to Discuss Planned Testing for Seabrook Specific Erosion Project stage: Request 2009-01-07
[Table View] |
|
---|
Category:Letter
MONTHYEARIR 05000335/20230102024-01-26026 January 2024 NRC Quadrennial Focused Engineering Inspection (FEI) Commercial Grade Dedication Report 05000335/2023010 and 05000389/2023010 L-2024-010, Point Units 3 and 4, Seabrook, Duane Arnold, and Point Beach Units 1 and 2, Nuclear Property Insurance - 10 CFR 50.54(w)(3)2024-01-25025 January 2024 Point Units 3 and 4, Seabrook, Duane Arnold, and Point Beach Units 1 and 2, Nuclear Property Insurance - 10 CFR 50.54(w)(3) IR 05000335/20230042024-01-24024 January 2024 Integrated Inspection Report 05000335/2023004 and 05000389/2023004 L-2024-004, Relief Request (RR) 7, Proposed Alternative in Accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1) Extension of Inspection Interval for Reactor Pressure Vessel Welds from 10 to 20 Years2024-01-18018 January 2024 Relief Request (RR) 7, Proposed Alternative in Accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1) Extension of Inspection Interval for Reactor Pressure Vessel Welds from 10 to 20 Years L-2024-002, Withdrawal of Proposed Alternative to American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Operation and Maintenance (OM) Code for the Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) 2C Pump2024-01-0808 January 2024 Withdrawal of Proposed Alternative to American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Operation and Maintenance (OM) Code for the Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) 2C Pump L-2023-173, Quality Assurance Topical Report (FPL-1) Revision 30 Update2023-12-15015 December 2023 Quality Assurance Topical Report (FPL-1) Revision 30 Update L-2023-179, Unusual or Important Environmental Event - Turtle Mortality2023-12-14014 December 2023 Unusual or Important Environmental Event - Turtle Mortality L-2023-168, License Amendment Request Supplement to Revision 2 for the Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1432 Revision 52023-12-12012 December 2023 License Amendment Request Supplement to Revision 2 for the Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1432 Revision 5 L-2023-155, Supplement to Response to Request for Additional Information, Revised NextEra Common Emergency Plan, and Revised Site-Specific Emergency Plan Annexes Regarding License Amendment Request for Common Emergency Plan Consistent with NUREG-06542023-11-28028 November 2023 Supplement to Response to Request for Additional Information, Revised NextEra Common Emergency Plan, and Revised Site-Specific Emergency Plan Annexes Regarding License Amendment Request for Common Emergency Plan Consistent with NUREG-0654, ML23332A1772023-11-28028 November 2023 Correction to the 2022 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report L-2023-162, Response to 50.69 2nd Round of Rals2023-11-21021 November 2023 Response to 50.69 2nd Round of Rals IR 05000335/20230032023-11-0606 November 2023 Integrated Inspection Report 05000335/2023003 and 05000389/2023003 ML23270B8882023-10-23023 October 2023 Regulatory Audit Summary Regarding License Amendment Request to Adopt 10 CFR 50.69, Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structure, Systems, and Components for Nuclear Power Reactors EPID L-2022-LLA-0182 ML23346A1322023-10-0606 October 2023 Communication from C-10 Research & Education Foundation Regarding NextEra Common Emergency Fleet Plan License Amendment Request and Related Documents Subsequently Published ML23275A1102023-10-0202 October 2023 License Amendment Request Revision 2 for the Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1432, Revision 5 L-2023-131, Subsequent License Renewal Application - Second Annual Update2023-09-28028 September 2023 Subsequent License Renewal Application - Second Annual Update L-2023-136, Supplement to License Amendment Request to Adopt 10 CFR 50.69, Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems and Components for Nuclear Power Reactors2023-09-26026 September 2023 Supplement to License Amendment Request to Adopt 10 CFR 50.69, Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems and Components for Nuclear Power Reactors L-2023-122, Corrections to the 2022 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report2023-09-20020 September 2023 Corrections to the 2022 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report IR 05000335/20233012023-09-20020 September 2023 NRC Operator License Examination Report 05000335/2023301 and 05000389/2023301 L-2023-127, Correction to the 2022 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report2023-09-18018 September 2023 Correction to the 2022 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report L-2023-113, Correction to the 2020 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report2023-09-14014 September 2023 Correction to the 2020 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report L-2023-108, Report of 10 CFR 50.59 Plant Changes2023-09-11011 September 2023 Report of 10 CFR 50.59 Plant Changes L-2023-118, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Adopt 10 CFR 50.69, Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems and Components for Nuclear Power Reactors2023-09-11011 September 2023 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Adopt 10 CFR 50.69, Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems and Components for Nuclear Power Reactors L-2023-112, Corrections to the 2021 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report2023-09-0606 September 2023 Corrections to the 2021 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report L-2023-107, Technical Specification Bases Control Program Periodic Report of Bases Changes TS 6.8.4.j.42023-09-0606 September 2023 Technical Specification Bases Control Program Periodic Report of Bases Changes TS 6.8.4.j.4 ML23219A0042023-09-0101 September 2023 Transmittal Letter - Safety Evaluation Related to the SLRA of St. Lucie Plant, Units 1and 2, Revision 1 L-2023-114, Proposed Turkey Point Units 6 and 7; Seabrook Station; Point Beach Units 1 and 2 - Official Service List Update2023-08-17017 August 2023 Proposed Turkey Point Units 6 and 7; Seabrook Station; Point Beach Units 1 and 2 - Official Service List Update L-2023-098, and Point Beach Units 1 and 2 - Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Common Emergency Plan Consistent with NUREG-0654, Revision 22023-08-0707 August 2023 and Point Beach Units 1 and 2 - Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Common Emergency Plan Consistent with NUREG-0654, Revision 2 IR 05000335/20230022023-08-0707 August 2023 Integrated Inspection Report 05000335/2023002 and 05000389/2023002 L-2023-105, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations2023-08-0303 August 2023 Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML23201A0872023-08-0303 August 2023 Audit Plan in Support of Review of License Amendment ML23212B2652023-07-27027 July 2023 Operator Licensing Written Examination Approval 05000335/2023301 and 05000389/2023301 L-2023-099, Pump Relief Request 10 (PR-10), One-Time Request for an Alternative to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Operation and Maintenance (OM) Code for the Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) 2C Pump2023-07-26026 July 2023 Pump Relief Request 10 (PR-10), One-Time Request for an Alternative to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Operation and Maintenance (OM) Code for the Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) 2C Pump L-2023-102, Relief Request PSL2-15-RR-01, Proposed Alternative to ASME Section XI Code Examination Requirements for Reactor Vessel Bottom Area and Piping in Covered Trenches2023-07-26026 July 2023 Relief Request PSL2-15-RR-01, Proposed Alternative to ASME Section XI Code Examination Requirements for Reactor Vessel Bottom Area and Piping in Covered Trenches ML23200A1232023-07-21021 July 2023 Transmittal Letter for the St. Lucie SLRA Review L-2023-097, Subsequent License Renewal Application Revision 1 - Supplement 62023-07-13013 July 2023 Subsequent License Renewal Application Revision 1 - Supplement 6 L-2023-076, In-Service Inspection Program Owner'S Activity Report (OAR-1)2023-07-11011 July 2023 In-Service Inspection Program Owner'S Activity Report (OAR-1) ML23184A0352023-06-30030 June 2023 Notification of St. Lucie Units 1 & 2 Focused Engineering Inspection (FEI) 05000335/2023010 and 05000389/2023010 and Initial Information Request L-2023-087, Florida Power & Light/Nextera Energy, Results of the Safety Culture Program Effectiveness Review, March 20, 2023 (ADAMS Accession No. ML22340A452)2023-06-29029 June 2023 Florida Power & Light/Nextera Energy, Results of the Safety Culture Program Effectiveness Review, March 20, 2023 (ADAMS Accession No. ML22340A452) IR 05000335/20234032023-06-29029 June 2023 Security Inspection Report 05000335/2023403 and 05000389/2023403 IR 05000335/20234022023-06-20020 June 2023 Security Baseline Inspection Report 05000335/2023402 and 05000389/2023402 L-2023-082, Subsequent License Renewal Application Revision 1, Supplement 52023-06-14014 June 2023 Subsequent License Renewal Application Revision 1, Supplement 5 L-2023-074, Addendum to 2021 Decommissioning Funding Status Reports / Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Ctsfsi) Financial Assurance Update2023-06-0202 June 2023 Addendum to 2021 Decommissioning Funding Status Reports / Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Ctsfsi) Financial Assurance Update L-2023-071, NextEra Energy Quality Assurance Topical Report (FPL-1) Revision 29 and Florida Power and Light Company Quality Assurance Program Description for 10 CFR Part 52 Licenses (FPL-2) Revision 11, Annual Submittal2023-05-22022 May 2023 NextEra Energy Quality Assurance Topical Report (FPL-1) Revision 29 and Florida Power and Light Company Quality Assurance Program Description for 10 CFR Part 52 Licenses (FPL-2) Revision 11, Annual Submittal IR 05000335/20234012023-05-16016 May 2023 Cyber Security Inspection Report 05000335/2023401 and 05000389/2023401 (Cover Letter) IR 05000335/20230012023-05-0909 May 2023 Integrated Inspection Report 05000335/2023001 and 05000389/2023001 ML23109A1132023-04-30030 April 2023 SLRA Change Schedule Letter L-2023-059, Subsequent License Renewal Application - Aging Management Requests for Additional Information (RAI) Set 4 Supplemental Response2023-04-21021 April 2023 Subsequent License Renewal Application - Aging Management Requests for Additional Information (RAI) Set 4 Supplemental Response ML23097A1642023-04-17017 April 2023 Summary of March 23, 2023, Meeting with Florida Power and Light on St. Lucie and Turkey Point Improved Technical Specifications Conversion License Amendment Requests L-2023-055, 2022 Annual Environmental Operating Report2023-04-12012 April 2023 2022 Annual Environmental Operating Report 2024-01-08
[Table view] Category:Request for Additional Information (RAI)
MONTHYEARML23243A9862023-08-31031 August 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - Draft RAIs for EP Staff Augmentation Times LAR (L-2022-LLA-0166) ML23226A0762023-08-14014 August 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information - St. Lucie Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Adopt 10 CFR 50.69 (L-2022-LLA-0182) ML23173A1522023-06-22022 June 2023 Request for Additional Information NextEra Fleet Emergency Plan Amendment Request ML23254A4022023-01-24024 January 2023 RP Inspection_2023-001_Document Request ML22311A5582022-11-22022 November 2022 Supplemental Information Needed for Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment Request for Cep ML22325A0692022-11-18018 November 2022 RAI Set 4 ML22270A1482022-09-26026 September 2022 SLRA Second Round RAI Letter 2 - Class 1 Fatigue (Final) ML22217A0022022-08-0404 August 2022 Email from Brian Harris (NRC) to Robert Coffey (FPL) - St. Lucie SLRA Second Round RAI Letter 1) ML22217A0032022-08-0404 August 2022 SLRA Second Round RAI Letter 1) ML22193A0872022-07-11011 July 2022 Letter RAI Set 3 (Final) ML22133A0032022-05-12012 May 2022 SLRA Rai'S Set 1 ML22101A2322022-05-0202 May 2022 Summary of the Environmental Remote Audit Related to the Review of the Subsequent License Renewal Application Enclosure RCIs and RAIs ML22094A1672022-04-0101 April 2022 2022 St. Lucie POV Inspection Information Request ML22075A1212022-03-16016 March 2022 Stl Problem Identification and Resolution (Pi&R) Information Request Final Report ML21350A4262021-12-21021 December 2021 Supplemental Information Needed for Acceptance of Licensing Amendment Request Concerning Technical Specification Conversion to NUREG-1432, Revision 5 ML21119A3142021-04-28028 April 2021 Requests for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Requests to Apply Risk Informed Completion Times (RICT) for the 120-Volt AC (EPID L-2020-LLA-0283) (Email) ML21063A3192021-03-0404 March 2021 Request for Additional Information Regarding Relief Request RR 15 - Extension of RPV Welds from 10 to 20 Years ML20092G3442020-04-0101 April 2020 RAIs for LAR to Revise Technical Specifications 6.8.4.o, Reactor Coolant Pump Flywheel Inspection Program ML20094G2022020-03-30030 March 2020 Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Adopt EAL Schemes Pursuant to NEI 99-01 (L-2019-LLA-0210) ML19225D3152019-08-13013 August 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - St. Lucie Plant, Unit No. 2, Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Relocate the MOV Thermal Overload Bypass Devices (L-2019-LLA-0106) ML19218A2742019-08-0606 August 2019 Notification of Inspection and Request for Information ML19193A1982019-07-12012 July 2019 Emailed St. Lucie Heat Sink RFI ML19192A1372019-07-11011 July 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information - St. Lucie Plant, Unit No. 2, Fall 2018 Refueling Outage Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report ML19192A1352019-06-25025 June 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Draft Request for Additional Information - St. Lucie Plant, Unit No. 2, Fall 2018 Refueling Outage Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report ML19151A8312019-05-31031 May 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - St. Lucie Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, Request for Additional Information Regarding Emergency Diesel Generator Surveillance Requirement Amendment Request ML19151A5092019-05-21021 May 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Draft Request for Additional Information - St. Lucie Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Emergency Diesel Generator Surveillance Requirement Amendment Request ML19109A1392019-04-18018 April 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - St. Lucie Plant, Unit No. 2, Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request Pertaining to the Iodine Removal System ML19053A2242019-02-0101 February 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - St. Lucie Plant Unit No. 1 - Draft Request for Additional Information Related to Relief Request 6 Regarding the Refueling Water Tank Bottom Liner L-2018-018, St. Lucie Plant, Unit No. 2, Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Reduce the Number of Control Element Assemblies (EPID L-2018-0181)2018-10-22022 October 2018 St. Lucie Plant, Unit No. 2, Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Reduce the Number of Control Element Assemblies (EPID L-2018-0181) ML18296A2052018-10-22022 October 2018 NRR E-mail Capture - St. Lucie Plant, Unit No. 2, Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Reduce the Number of Control Element Assemblies (EPID L-2018-0181) ML18197A4112018-08-0101 August 2018 Supplemental Information Needed for Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action License Amendment Request to Reduce the Number of Control Element Assemblies ML18019A0712018-01-18018 January 2018 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information - St. Lucie Inop AFW Steam Supply LAR (L-2017-LLA-0296) ML17331B1532017-11-27027 November 2017 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information - St. Lucie IST Relief Request #5 - PR-01 (L-2017-LLR-0113) ML17277A3692017-10-0404 October 2017 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information - St. Lucie Rict LAR - MF5372/MF5373 ML17152A1842017-06-0101 June 2017 Request for Additional Information - RPS Rate of Change and LCO Change LAR (CACs MF9119 9120) ML16356A1432016-12-20020 December 2016 Notification of Inspection and Request for Information ML16326A0092016-11-18018 November 2016 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information Re. Nextera/Fpl LAR to Adopt TSTF-545 - CACs MF8203, MF8204, MF8208, and MF8209 ML16308A3232016-11-0303 November 2016 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information - St. Lucie EDG Day Tank LAR - MF8006 ML16292A8212016-10-14014 October 2016 Emergency Preparedness Inspection and Request for Information ML17003A0452016-10-11011 October 2016 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) FW: St. Lucie Response to RAI on SL2-22 SG Tube Inspection Report (MF7604) ML16244A2602016-08-26026 August 2016 Notification of Inspection and Request for Information ML16155A3502016-06-0303 June 2016 Notification of Inspection and Request for Information ML16089A0052016-03-28028 March 2016 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information - St. Lucie Srxb Mtc Surv - MF7269 & MF7270 ML16077A1062016-03-17017 March 2016 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information - St Lucie Vacuum Gothic LAR - MF6980/MF6981 ML16068A2612016-03-0808 March 2016 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information - St Lucie TSTF-422 - MF6683/MF6684 ML16068A0412016-03-0808 March 2016 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information - St Lucie Unit 1 Relief Request No. 10 - MF6685 ML16013A2152016-01-13013 January 2016 NRR E-mail Capture - St. Lucie RAIs (Rvi Aging Management Plan) MF6777 and MF6778 ML15336A8882015-12-16016 December 2015 Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Changes to the Snubber Surveillance Requirements ML15308A6152015-11-23023 November 2015 Request for Additional Information on License Amendment Request for Changes to the Required Actions for Inoperability of Auxiliary Feedwater Pumps ML15233A0362015-09-0404 September 2015 Redacted Request for Additional Information Regarding Proposed License Amendment Request and Exemption Request to Allow the Transition to Areva Fuel 2023-08-31
[Table view] |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 September 22, 2010 Mr. Mano Nazar Executive Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Florida Power and Light Company P.O. Box 14000 Juno Beach, Florida 33408-0420
SUBJECT:
ST. LUCIE PLANT UNIT NO.2 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING GL 2004-02, "POTENTIAL IMPACT OF DEBRIS BLOCKAGE ON EMERGENCY RECIRCULATION DURING DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENTS AT PRESSURIZED-WATER REACTORS" (TAC NO. MC4711)
Dear Mr. Nazar:
By letter to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), dated April 16, 2009, Florida Power and Light Company submitted responses to the NRC staffs January 16,2009, request for additional information (RAI) regarding Generic Letter (GL) 2004-02, "Potential Impact of debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors" for St. Lucie Unit 2.
The NRC staff has reviewed the licensee's submittals and determined that additional information is needed to conclude that there is reasonable assurance that GL 2004-02 has been satisfactorily addressed. These RAJ questions were e-mailed to you on March 4, 2010, and clarifications were discussed in a telephone call on March 25, 2010. We encourage you to move forward with preparation of the formal responses that will be the subject of a public meeting in the near future.
Should you have any questions on the issues discussed in this letter, contact me at 301-415-2020.
Sincerely, Brenda L. Mozafari, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-389
Enclosure:
Request for Additional Information cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ST. LUCIE PLANT UNIT 2 REGARDING LICENSEE RESPONSES TO GENERIC LETrER 2004-02 DOCKET NO. 50-389 Debris Generation/Zone of Influence (ZOI)
- 1. In its request for additional information (RAI) dated January 16, 2009, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff requested (RAI 2) that the licensee describe how the small fines debris size category was divided into small pieces and fines for Nukon, calcium silicate, and Foamglas debris. The NRC staff reviewed your response dated April 16, 2009, and additional information is needed for Nukon and calcium silicate.
Specifically, as noted in the NRC staffs safety evaluation (SE) on the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Guidance Report 04-07, a two-category debris size distribution is not considered appropriate for application with analytical refinements such as computational fluid dynamics. In addition, with respect to fibrous debris, no information was provided for the NRC staff to conclude that the percentages of fines and small pieces used for the strainer head loss testing were representative of the relative quantities of these types of debris that would be predicted to reach the plant strainers. Therefore, identify the quantity of fiberglass and calcium silicate fines that would be generated during a loss-of coolant accident (LOCA). Further evaluate the consequent effects of explicitly modeling fine fibrous and calcium silicate debris with respect to transport, head loss, and other parts of the evaluation that would be affected if fine debris transport were explicitly considered. Alternately, the licensee may choose to demonstrate that the existing evaluation would be bounding had a more refined debris size distribution consistent with the NRC staff's SE on NEI 04-07 been considered. Include a specific basis to demonstrate that the breakdown of fibrous small pieces and fines used for head loss testing is prototypical or conservative with respect to the analyzed plant condition.
Debris Transport
- 2. In RAI 6 in its January 16, 2009, letter, the NRC staff requested that the licensee provide contour plots of the velocity and turbulence in the containment pool, as well as for the corresponding conditions simulated in the strainer head loss test flume. The licensee provided information in response to the NRC staff's request; but the following additional information is needed:
Enclosure
-2
- a. Describe the extent to which the high-flow and low-flow case results were used in the design basis transport analysis and in simulating the transport of debris in the strainer test flume. In your response, clearly indicate for what purposes (e.g.,
simulating the failure of a low-pressure safety injection (LPSI) pump to trip) and at which times in the accident scenario the high- and low-flow cases were applied. This information is necessary because it is not clear whether proceduralized actions from the control room will lead to the prompt termination of flow from an LPSI pump that has failed to stop automatically.
- b. The flow velocities in the vicinity of the strainer were unexpected, in that very low velocities appeared to be present along the approach to the strainer from which most of the debris and flow arrives, whereas very high velocities appeared to be present on the sheltered side of the strainers without an obvious physical reason. Justify that observed behavior was realistic and not an artificial result of the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) boundary condition assumed at the strainer surface.
- c. Clarify the basis for considering the turbulence in the test flume to be representative of the plant containment pool.
- d. Provide the length of the pathway along the trench on the more stagnant side of the strainer that was used to determine a weighted average velocity along the approach to the strainers. The fluid velocities tend to be reduced along this pathway, and, as shown in Figure 8-1, very little debris appears to transport to the strainers from this direction. Justify how a representative length of the trench on the stagnant side was used for determining an averaged flume flow.
- e. Identify the elevation or depth that is represented by the contour plots provided.
- 3. In previous RAI 7, the NRC staff requested a description of the emergency core cooling system (ECCS) trench and how it was modeled in the CFD calculation, including the modeling of obstacles and equipment. The licensee provided a broad overview of the principles and methodology for modeling obstacles, but did not provide plant-specific details. From viewing the CFD contour plots provided by the licensee in response to RAI 6, it is not clear that any obstacles in the trench appear as either nonfluid regions or have an influence on the fluid flow in the trench. Based on discussion provided by the licensee concerning the equipment and objects located in the tank, as well as a photograph of one section of the trench, the NRC staff expects that obstacles would be present in the trench that could have a significant influence on the flow in the trench.
Provide additional specific information concerning the major obstacles modeled in the trench, as well as the minimum clearances in the plant and in the CFD calculation, and how the modeled obstacles are representative of the actual obstacles in the plant.
Although alternate flow paths would still be available to convey water to the strainers, it appears to the NRC staff that blockage caused by debris in the trench could increase the velocity along the containment pool floor and potentially result in increased transport to the strainers. Justify the assumption that this debris would be incapable of transporting into and causing blockage or flow reductions in the ECCS trench.
-3
- 4. In previous RAI 9, the NRC staff requested that the licensee provide a basis for the assumptions made concerning debris erosion in the post-LOCA containment pool. Your response indicated that testing performed by Alion in the 2006-2007 timeframe formed the basis for the assumed erosion value for small pieces of fiberglass of 10-percent over a 30-day period. The NRC staff did not consider the response adequate, because of concerns whether the Alion test set up was prototypical, and because of anomalies in the test results. Provide acceptable test results that demonstrate that 10-percent erosion over a 30-day period is justified for small pieces of fiberglass in the post-LOCA containment pool and show that these test results are applicable to the St. Lucie Unit 2 Plant condition.
In addition, the strainer head loss testing performed at Alden Laboratory used a test protocol that appears to have permitted debris settlement. Identify the flow velocities applicable during the period for which the debris settlement was credited, and provide justification for neglect of erosion of any debris that settled during the performance of the head loss test. Specific justification should be provided for the assumed eroded percentage if the velocities in the test flume during the transport portion of the test were in excess of the incipient tumbling velocity at which erosion testing was performed.
- 5. In previous RAI 10, the NRC staff requested a description of the modeling of drainClge from the containment sprays and a basis for assuming a uniform spray drainage model.
The licensee's response did not provide a basis to conclude that the effect of non uniform spray drainage (e.g., drainage from the refueling canal, floor drains, spillage from solid floors, etc.) can be neglected, either in the vicinity of the strainers (for the purpose of strainer testing that credits debris settlement), or throughout the containment building (in the analytical debris transport analysis). In particular, it was not clear that streams of drainage water would realistically be broken up into dispersed droplets by obstacles prior to reaching the containment pool surface, or that the location of specific concentrated drainage sources is not significant. Provide additional basis to justify the assumed spray drainage model adequately represents the plant condition and identify any significant sources of non-uniform drainage that could affect either the analytical transport calculation or the flow modeling in the strainer test flume.
- 6. In previous RAI 12, the NRC staff requested a technical basis to support the assumption that 23 percent of the calcium silicate debris settles in the containment pool and a description of the sizes assumed for the settled debris. Provide additional justification to address the two remaining items identified below regarding this RAI: (1) the licensee's response appeared to credit inactive volumes with capturing washed-down debris, even though these inactive regions would typically fill prior to the majority of debris washing down from upper containment (which may be addressed by the licensee in general when responding to new RAI 7, below), and (2) Was provided no information concerning the size distribution of the calcium silicate assumed to settle in the containment pool. This information is needed to confirm that the debris transport metrics used by the licensee to determine transport were applicable to the assumed debris size category and whether the potential for erosion has been considered.
- 4
- 7. In previous RAI 13, the NRC staff requested further information regarding the assumed locations of debris at the onset of the switchover to recirculation. The licensee provided discussions applicable to small fines and large pieces of debris. The NRC staff had two remaining issues regarding the licensee's response. The first is that the licensee's discussion of small fines debris assumed that a significant fraction of the small fines debris blown to upper containment would be washed down prior to the filling of inactive volumes in the containment pool and would be captured in these inactive volumes. This assumption is not consistent with the position stated in the SE on NEI 04-07 or the NRC staff's understanding regarding the sequence of post-LOCA events, since inactive pools typically fill more quickly than the time necessary to wash most debris from upper containment into the post-LOCA pool. The second issue is that the licensee assumed that 92 percent of small fines debris remaining in lower containment in active pools would remain inside the bioshield wall during pool fill. The licensee's approach of assuming that the percentage of small fines remaining inside the bioshield after pool fill is equal to the percentage of the total sump fluid volume that is located inside the bioshield appears to lack a physical basis. High pool velocities and directed flow toward the annulus would likely result in more debris transport to the annulus than this volume ratio approach would predict, and would likely result in an increase in debris transport to the strainers. Provide additional justification to support this assumption or demonstrate that the transport results for small pieces remain conservative.
Head Loss and Vortexing
- 8. Justify that the debris added to the strainer performance testing was prepared to adequately or conservatively represent the debris predicted to arrive at the strainer by the plant transport evaluation. Address in your response the following points:
- a. Clearly define the fibrous debris size categories considered in the transport evaluation.
- b. Provide the amount of each fibrous debris size predicted to arrive at the strainer by the transport calculation.
- c. Provide the amounts of each debris type and size added to the test. Provide justification for how the surrogate categories realistically or conservatively represented the debris predicted to reach the strainer by the transport evaluation. Provide information that quantifies the sizes of the fibrous debris surrogates.
- d. Provide information that justifies that the fine fibrous debris added to the head loss testing was prepared in a manner such that the added debris was as suspendable as it would be in the plant.
- e. State whether 'fine fibrous debris was removed from the small fibrous debris prior to addition to the test flume. If the fines were removed, provide information that justifies that this action resulted in prototypical or conservative head loss testing parameters.
- 5
- f. Justify that significant agglomeration of debris did not occur during its addition to the test flume.
- g. Justify that the flow rates and turbulence present in the test flume were representative or conservative with respect to those expected in the plant for the purposes of debris transport to the strainer.
- 9. The licensee's response stated that, following the addition of the full debris load to the test, there was open strainer area remaining on the strainer and that, therefore, a thin bed had not formed. Based on a review of the head loss test graph provided in response to previous RAI 24, it appeared that head loss was still increasing when chemical debris was added to the test. Justify that the test methodology, particularly the timing of the chemical debris addition, did not affect the test results nonconservatively by nonprototypically preventing the transport of debris to the strainer.
- 10. The licensee's response to previous RAI 27 stated that the licensee performed a viscosity correction to the test results from a nonchemical debris bed. Based on the post-test photographs that show strainer area that is covered only by chemical debris and no fibrous debris, it is not clear that a viscosity correction should be made to the nonchemical result. Justify the use of the viscosity correction to the nonchemical result or recalculate the nonchemical head loss at higher temperatures using an appropriate methodology.
- 11. Provide an evaluation of potential deaeration as the sump fluid passes through the debris bed. The results of the deaeration evaluation should be compared against the guidance contained in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.82, Rev. 3 to ensure that the limits in the guidance are not exceeded. If deaeration is predicted to occur at limits within the guidance, adjust net positive suction head (NPSH) required as described in the Regulatory Guide and verify NPSH margin.
September 22, 2010 Mr. Mano Nazar Executive Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Florida Power and Light Company P.O. Box 14000 Juno Beach, Florida 33408-0420 SUB..IECT: ST. LUCIE PLANT UNIT NO.2 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING GL 2004-02, "POTENTIAL IMPACT OF DEBRIS BLOCKAGE ON EMERGENCY RECIRCULATION DURING DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENTS AT PRESSURIZED-WATER REACTORS" (TAC NO. MC4711)
Dear Mr. Nazar:
By letter to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), dated April 16,2009, Florida Power and Light Company submitted responses to the NRC staff's January 16, 2009, request for additional information (RAI) regarding Generic Letter (GL) 2004-02, "Potential Impact of debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors" for St. Lucie Unit 2.
The NRC staff has reviewed the licensee's submittals and determined that additional information is needed to conclude that there is reasonable assurance that GL 2004-02 has been satisfactorily addressed. These RAI questions were e-mailed to you on March 4, 2010, and clarifications were discussed in a telephone call on March 25, 2010. We encourage you to move forward with preparation of the formal responses that will be the subject of a pUblic meeting in the near future.
Should you have any questions on the issues discussed in this letter, contact me at 301-415-2020.
Sincerely, IRA!
Brenda L. Mozafari, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-389
Enclosure:
Request for Additional Information cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION:
PUBLIC RidsNrrPMStLucie RidsNrrDssSsib LPLlI-2 RlF RidsNrrLABClayton RidsRgn2MailCenter RidsNrrDorlLpl2-2 RidsAcrsAcnw_Maii CTR RidsOgcRp ADAMS Accession Number' ML100990306 OFFICE LPLlI-2/PM LPLlI-2/LA SSIB/BC LPLlI-2/BC NAME BMozafari BClayton MScott w/minor changes DBroaddus DATE 9/21/2010 9/21/2010 9/20/2010 9/22/10 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY