IR 05000528/1985036

Errata to SALP Repts 50-528/85-36,50-529/85-38 & 50-530/85-28,correcting Editorial Errors Re Summary of Results for Preoperational Testing

ML20155G740
Person / Time
Site:	Palo Verde
Issue date:	04/22/1986
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:
Shared Package
ML20155G721	List: IR 05000528/1985036 ML20155G716 ML20155G731
References
50-528-85-36, 50-529-85-38, 50-530-85-28, NUDOCS 8605070108
Download: ML20155G740 (3)

Text

r. ,

,

,

,. . .,. . 12 - . .

..,- '

.' "

s., . , ... ..... . .. _ _

-.c . '.

. . . .

u .o Errata Sheet-

. SALP Board Report No. 50-528/85-36, 50-529/85-38 and 50-530/85-28 a

,-

.

'Sh - e 8 d Part III .. SUMMARY.OF RESULTS Functional Area 18 Preoperational Testing Page 3

_ _ .

-

.. ,

Now Reads:

~

"

Last SALP This SALP Functional Areas Period Rating Period Rating Trend *

18. . Preoperational Testing 3 2 Not Apparent"

, Should Read:

"

Last SALP This SALP

' Functional Areas Period Rating Period Rating Trend

,

18. Preoperational Testing 3 1 Improved" l .

Basis:

This is an editorial error in the summary table. The evaluation detail in

, pages 27 and 28 show Category I rating and steadily improved performance during the assessment period. Therefore, the summary table is revised to reflect the evaluation detail.

!

e l'

t I

r i

i R DOCK O DR I G

!

. ., a l

F

.

,,

. ;~ <

'

.,

,,

,

"'

III. SLHMARY OF RESULTS

'

• Overall, the SALP Board found the licensee's perfomance to be accehtable *

• and directed toward safe facility operation. The Board identified p

rength or improvements in the areas of operator's response to unusual

-.

nt conditions, fire protection systems, and preoperational testin Howgver, performance should be improved in the areas of surveillance, emergency due t observedpreparedness, security, and subcontractor quality assurance,

- -

weaknesses or a declining tren _ r_ _ _ _ _

Last SALP This SALP

.~

Functional eas Period Rating Period Rating Trend * Plant Op~epations 2 2 Improved Radiologicf1 Controls 2

"'

2 Maintenance Not Apparent 2 2 Improved

- Surveillance x None

,

- Fire Protectibn

-- 2 Not Apparent None 1 Not Apparent Emergency Prep ~ar g ess 1 2 Security Declined ** Refueling 3 g

None

1 Improved None Quality Program an h None 2*** Not Apparent Administration Congols 10. Licensing Activities * 2 11. Training 2 Not Apparent None 2 Not Apparent

-. .-_.1 Containment Safety- y2 Not Apparent Related Structures, and Major Steel Supports W 2

.

.

1 Piping Systems s and Supports 21 2 Not Apparent

, 1 Safety-Related M t

Components 2

'

I Not Apparent 15. Auxiliary Systems 2 %W 2 Not Apparent 16. Electrical Equipment

,

and Cables 2 ., 2 Not Apparent 1 Instrumentation I g i Not Apparent 18. Preoperational Testing 3 ', 2 Not Apparent 1 Startup Testing 3 2 Not Apparent i

The trend indicates the SALP Board's perception of the trend of the licensee's performance during the current assessment period. It is not necessarily a comparison of performance during the current period with the previous period. For example, performance in the fire protection area was considered to be improving, even though performance in this functional area was not assessed during the previous SALP perio **

While an overall decline between rating periods was observed, an improvement in performance was noted toward the end of this appraisal perio *** This area was considered by the Board to be a marginal Category 2 rating, with significant deficiencie i ORIGINAL PAGE

,

I

.

M

- , _ _,

F

.. -2

. -' 4.; .,

.,

III, SUMMARY OF RESULTS Overall, the SALP Board found the licensee's performance to be acceptable 2 and directed toward safe facility operation. The Board identified a

strength or improvements in the areas of operator's response to unusual plant conditions, fire protection systems, and preoperational testin E0"*V8r., performance,should be_ improved in,.the, areas,of. surveillance,-

. . . ,

emergency preparedness, security, and subcontractor quality assurance, due to observed weaknesses or a declining tren ~ ~

Last SALP This SALP Functional Areas Period Rating Period Rating Trend *

_ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _

. Plant Operations 2 2 Improved Radiological Controls 2 .. 2 Not Apparent Maintenance 2 2 Improved Surveillance None '.,_ 2 Not Apparent

. Fire Protection None 1 Not Apparent

' Emergency Preparedness 1 2 Declined ** Security 2 2 Improved Refueling None 1 None Quality Program and None 2*** Not Apparent Administration Controls 1 Licensing Activities 2 2 Not Apparent 1 Training None 2 Not Apparent

. 1 Containment Safety- 2 2 Not Apparent Related Structures, and Major Steel Supports

. 1 Piping Systems and Supports 2 2 Not Apparent

,

'

1 Safety-Related Components 2 2 Not Apparent l 1 Auxiliary Systems 2 2 Not Apparent 1 Electrical Equipment and Cables 2 2 Not Apparent 1 Instrumentation 1 1 Not Apparent 1 Preoperational Testing 3 1 Improved .

1 Startup Testing 3 2 Not Apparent

• The trend indicates the SALP Board's perception of the trend of the licensee's performance during the current assessment period. It is not necessarily a comparison of performance during the current period with the previous period. For example, performance in the fire protection area was considered to be improving, even though performance in this functional area was not assessed during the previous SALP perio **

While an overall decline between rating periods was observed, an improvement in performance was noted toward the end of this appraisal perio ***

This area was considered by the Board to be a marginal Category 2 rating, with significant deficiencie CORRECTED PAGE Ja 1