ML20155G716
| ML20155G716 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde |
| Issue date: | 04/22/1986 |
| From: | Van Brunt E ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR |
| To: | Kirsch D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20155G721 | List: |
| References | |
| ANPP-36349-EEVB, NUDOCS 8605070094 | |
| Download: ML20155G716 (1) | |
Text
m gg
((p% *%
en Arizona Nuclear Power Project 6
P O. box 52034 e PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85072-2034
'h April 22,1986 ANPP-36349-EEVB/JYM/98.05 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region V 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, CA 94596-5368 Attention:
Mr. D. F. Kirsch, Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Safety and Projects
Subject:
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS)
Units 1, 2 and 3 Docket Nos. STN 50-528 (License NPF-41)
STN 50-529 (License NPF-46)
STN 50-530 Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance Report File: 86-056-026
References:
(A) letter from J. B. Martin, NRC, Region V, to E. E. Van Brunt, Jr.,
ANPP, dated December 19, 1985.
Subject:
Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance Report.
(B) Letter from D. F. Kirsch, NRC, Region V, to E. E. Van Brunt, Jr.,
ANPP, dated April ll, 1986.
Subject:
Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance Report Numbers 50-528/85-36: 50-529/85-38; 50-530/85-28.
Dear Mr. Kirsch:
Attached is a copy of the ANPP response to the Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance Report (SALP) provided in Reference (A). The two editorial errors iden-tified in Reference (B) were noted in the attached response.
Very truly yours,
. Va
[d Executive Vice President Project Director EEVB/JYM/rw Attachment cci A. C. Gehr (all w/a)
R. P. Zimmerman G. W. Knighton J. B. Martin 8605070094 860422 PDR ADOCK 05000528 G
PDR I
(
H- {!$0
i f
+
Arizona Nuc! ear Power Project P.o. box $2034 e PHOENIX. ARIZONA 85072-2034 s# - -
3 February 21, 1986 ANPP-35270-EEVB/WFQ/98.05 Mr. John B. Martin, Regional Administrator Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region V 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, CA 94596-5358 Attention:
J. B. Martin Regional Administrator
.b
Subject:
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS)
Units 1, 2, and 3 Docket Nos. STN 50-528 (License NPF--41).
STN 50-529 (License NPF-46)
STN 50-530 Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance Report
~
File: 86-056-026
Reference:
Letter from J. B. Martin, NRC Region V, to E. E. Van Brunt, Jr., ANPP, dated December 19, 1985;
Subject:
Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance Report
- j
Dear Mr. Martin:
1 l
We have reviewed the Systematic Assessment Palo Verde Units 1, 2, and 3 which was of Licensee Performance Report for transmitted by the referenced letter.
We were pleased to see that this report, which evaluated the Palo Verde Facili-ties for the eighteen month period April 1, 1984 - September 30, 1985, found our overall performance to be satisfactory. The attachment lists an area of inaccuracy found during our review.
This report is very important to the Palo Verde Project and, as such, it has been given considerable attention by our senior and functional management personnel. Senior management has met with the functional managers and has directed that actions responding to the recommendations and concerns of the report be taken. These actions involve development, tracking and implementation of appropriate actions to enhance ANPP programs. In many cases actions were recognized by management and were taken prior to issuance of the report, as example: A revised development and approval process, restructured responsibili-ties and the addition a manager position to enhance the Licensee Event Report (LERs) program were developed in October 1985. As a result, quality and timely-ness of LER's are improving, also the deficiencies in sub-contractor work, l
most of which resulted from work performed prior to this SALP evaluation, resulted in additional monitoring and improved work quality.
s Through our resultant actions to the constuctive comments contained in the report, we intend to achieve continued management involvement.
i
.' g*-
Mr. John B. Martin
~ 5ystemat'le AssessMant' Hf LicenTeF7e'rformance' Report ANPP-35270 Page 2.
'M a
~
We appreciate the significance of this report and believe we can make even futher improvements in the future.
.., - r Very truly yours,
.e.
)
G((
O LL(.,m E. E. Van Brunt, Jr.
Exec.utive Vice President Project Director EEVB/WFQ/rw Attachment cc:
A.'C. Gehr R. P. Zimmerman G. W. Knighton
[ '.
ll
. =
-I
.. =
'..ae_... - ass s e u n i.
Att_a_chmen t,.. __
3. 3, n Page 3, Summary Results Table, Item 18,.?reoperational Testing,
,[
lists a SALP rating of "2'.' and trend as "not apparent";
s.
whereas
- ~-
-. ' +
.uu..c.
Page 28, Performance ~ Analyses Item 18, states a SALP rating of "1" and a trend as " improved".
ena-up M
h 8
d 1
I w
a i s il g
f a
b 1
(
I f
i r
,..~ -
..n..,
.-<n.
r,.
- ~ -. - - -.. -. - - -, - -
---.a-
,-,.- - - - _ - - - ----