IR 05000443/1986029
| ML20206M926 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 08/13/1986 |
| From: | Bailey R, Keimig R, Tavares C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20206M902 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-443-86-29, NUDOCS 8608260025 | |
| Download: ML20206M926 (6) | |
Text
-_
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
Report No.
50-443/86-29 Docket No.
50-443 License No.
CPPR-135 Licensee:
Public Service of New Hampshire
_
P. O. Box 330 Manchester, New Hampshire Facility Name:
New Hampshire Yankee-Seabrook Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Inspection At:
Seabrook, New Hampshire Inspection Conducted:
May 12-16, 1986 Date of Last Physical Security Program Review:
January 13-16, 1986 Type of Inspection:
Routine, Preoperational Security Program Review Inspectors:
,
cf jty, f f
'
R. J. Baile ThysicalpcurityInspector
'date
.
h// db CTavares'Scpingkamp,pysicalSecurity date Inspector l
.
l I
Approved by:
/
-
- -/5-Bd j
JV R. Keimi,Chpf,SafeguardsSection date l
gDivisiono Radt341on Safety and Safeguards l
l Inspection Summary: Preoperational Security Program Review on May 12-16, 1986 l
(Inspection Report No. 50-443/86-29 Areas Inspected:
Security Plan and Implementing Procedures; Management Effectiveness; Organization; Audits; Records and Reports; Testing and Mainte-nance; Locks, Keys, and Combinations; Physical Barriers (Protected and Vital);
Lighting; Compensatory Security Measures; Assessment Aids; Access Control (Personnel, Packages and Vehicles); Detection Aids (Protected and Vital Areas);
Alarm Stations; Communications; Personnel Training and Qualification; Security i
l Contingency Plan; and status of inspector followup items.
Results:
Implementation of the physical security program is progressing in accordance with the licensee's schedule.
!
B609260025 860814 PDR ADOCK 05000443
'
l a
enn i
_-
-
-
..
.
. _..
..
__ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.
.
OETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Pullic Service of New Hampshire C. W. Roberts, Manager, Security and Computer Systems S. J. Ellis, Security Department Supervisor P. B. Upson, Audit Supervisor
_
-
R. W. Gregory, Licensing Engineer V. W. Sanchez, Licensing Engineer R. E. Guillette, Assistant Project Construction QA Manager P. R. Cole, Startup Test Engineer W. T. Middleton, Quality Assurance Staff Engineer T. L. Wiebold, Quality Assurance Engineer W. C. Howe, Chief, Green Mountain Security D. Conway, Supervisor, Green Mountain Security Nuclear Regulatory Commission A. C. Cerne, Senior Resident Inspector N. J. Blumberg, Lead Reactor Engineer Inspector, Region I J. A. Schumacher, Reactor Enginee.r, Region I R. S. Barkley, Resident Inspector
.
The inspectors also interviewed other licensee employees and members of i
the Green Mountain contract security organization.
2.
MC 30703 - Exit Interview
,,
,
The inspectors met with the licensee representatives listed in paragraph 1 at the conclusion of the review on May 16, 1986. At that time, the pur-
.
!
pose and scope of the review were discussed and the findings were presented.
No written material was provided to the licensee during this review.
3.
MC 92701 - Status of Inspector Follow-up Itcms (IFIs) - Physical Security Program a.
(Closed) IFI 50-443/85-18-03: Review'of the protected area barrier (PAB) inside the main guard house. The inspectors observed that the PAB in the main guard house' conforms to the description in the NRC-approved physical security plan.
b.
(Closed) IFI 50-443/85-18-04: Review of a vital area barrier (VAB).
. ~.. r m.. v p ;g < s y ru y n
-
g,n
<.
u v q:[q ptgu;r
-
" 5... "
'.:...::aa;.U.V
,.
e P f L1.....
_
.-..
_
_
_ -
-. _ - -
-
.-
--
. -
_
'
'
l
.
c.
(Closed) IFI 50-443/85-27-04:
Review of a vital area barrier (VAB).
,....
-,
- - y<.nyty3$
[5gp
- ^. Wi3UU rg.
.,.. u u.Ji!CIGl.LY LER Cl.U U.
d.
(Closed)
IFI 50-443/85-27-06:
Review of the badge issue process.
The inspectors observed that the procedures for issuing badges were modified to provide a more efficient entry into the protected area.
.
,
4.
MC 81018 - Security Plan and Implementing Procedures The inspectors observed that the licensee will use instructions published in the security force inanual, security procedures and post instructions to implement the NRC-approved physical security plan.
5.
MC 81022 - Security Organization The inspectors determined that the licensee had completed hiring the full complement for the security force. A few personnel yet required qualifi-cation and certification.
6.
MC 81034 - Security Program Audit
-
The licensee informed the inspectors that the Audit and Evaluation Group in the New Hampshire-Yankee Company conducted an audit to determine if the objectives outlined in the Physical Security, Security Contingency and Training and Qualification Plans would be met.
The report had not been finalized as of this inspection. The inspectors stated that the results of this audit will be reviewed during a future preoperational security program review.
Inspector Follow-up Item (IFI) 86-29-01.
7.
MC 81038 - Records and Reports The inspectors determined that the licensee had developed records and forms to administratively control the flow of security information. The inspectors observed several forms being refined to meet the requirements cutlined in written security procedures.
8.
MC 81042 - Testing and Maintenance The inspectors observed that a testing and maintenance program was developed to provide support to the security organization.
Procedures for conducting routine testing on security related equipment were available for use.
l
.. _ _
..
..
- _ -
._
_
. -.
- -.
.
.
.
9.
MC 81046 - Locks, Keys and Combinations
,
'
The inspectors observed that the licensee had installed locks throughout the protected and vital areas as described in the NRC-approved physical security plan.
The inspectors discussed the proposed procedures for expediting vital area entry by plant personnel during emergencies.
The licensee acknowledged the procedure requires refinement and stated that alternate methods would be studied to address the issue.
This issue will be reviewed during a future preoperational security program review.
-
Inspector Follow-up. Item (IFI) 86-29-02.
10. MC 81052 - Physical Barriers - Protected Area The inspectors made the following observations and discussed them with licensee representatives. The site security supervisor acknowledged these items and stated that correctiva action, where required, would be taken.
These items will be reviewed during future preoperational security program reviews.
a.
A tour of Unit 2 (inactive construction site) by the inspec-tors revealed that tunnels and pipe penetrations leading to Unit I had been sealed as described in the NRC-approved physical security plan.
b.
T:1^ ~ ',
~."'q!;F ,?E9H3T.DS
^ ~ -
g., ~
.-.,- m
,.., -
"
. a u s, n._
,...,
W'
,a.
.. a.. uu:U.LL1 S
d'
c.
i
!
Inspector Followup Item (IFI) 50-443/86-29-03.
11. MC 81054 - Fhysical Barriers - Vital Areas The inspectors made the following observations and discussed them with licensee representatives. The site security supervisor acknowledged these items and-stated that corrective actions, where required, would be taken.
These items will be reviewed during future preoperational security program reviews.
a.
Several vital areas are still under construction and could not be evaluated.
6.
e 7"r --
r--
- n,"7e,pg c e r?pt,DS
,
1.23 7 ~ P PU".'.i]
PSiC-
..H Z.03 ILLY
.n.
LEfi.lik..
L
-
_
____
_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ ______ _ ______ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
'.
.
r 1- -
n
-
n.y y 3 c.
LT ~
c' ' 'T'.i;;
.
.
LT X
,........n..;i;0BLLY
'
LEFT CLR.
Inspector Follow-up Item (IFI) 86-29-04.
12. MC 81062 - Lighting l
_ The inspectors conducted a tour of the protected area during the hours of darkness en May 13, 1986 and observed one area, at ground level, where lighting did not conform to the NRC-approved physical security plan. A i
check of lighting on roof tops, where required, will be conducted during a future preoperational security program review.
Inspector Follow-up Item (IFI) 86-29-05.
,
13. MC 81064 - Compensatory Security Measures The inspectors observed that the licensee had established procedures for implementing compensatory security measures when required.
14. MC 81066 - Assessment Aids The inspectors observed that the licensee was in the process of adjusting the assessment aids to ensure adequate coverage of the protected area perimeter. This item will be reviewed during a future preoperational security program review.
Inspector Follow-up Item (IFI) 86-29-06.
I 15. MC 81070 - Access Control - Personnel
The inspectors noted that the licensee has developed an access authori-
'
zation program for the protected and vital areas. The inspectors monitored program implementation during their processing.
No deficiencies were identified.
16. MC 81072 - Access Control - Packages The inspectors observed implementation of the proposed procedures to
control materials and supplies being transported from the warehouse into i
the protected area.
Some potential deficiencies were noted. This item i
will be reviewed during a future preoperational security program review.
Inspector Follow-up Item (IFI) 86-29-07.
17. MC 81074 - Access Control - Vehicles The inspectors observed vehicles being searched at the main vehicle gate
to the protected area.
Security force members conducted the searches in accordance with the NRC-approved physical security plan and implementing
'
procedures.
!
i i
i
_ -., _.
,.
.._.,-..-- _.-.- - _.,---._.,--_ _,-----_- -- ~. _. _,,., _ _,,.. -. - - _ _ _. _ - _ -. -., - ~.,,... - - -, - -, _, _ - - - - - - - -..
..
-
-_
_ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.
18.
MC 81078 - Detection Aids - Protected Area The inspectors observed that the detection aids for the protected area perimeter were installed; however, the licensee stated that the system was not yet ready for NRC evaluation.
This item will be reviewed during a future preoperational security program review.
Inspector Follow-up Item (IFI) 86-29-08.
19. MC 81080 - Detection Aids - Vital Areas
-
The inspectors observed that the detection aids for the vital areas were installed; however, the licensee stated that the system was not yet ready for NRC evaluation.
This item will be reviewed during a future preoper-ational security program review.
Inspector Follow-up Item (IFI) 86-29-09.
20. MC 81084 - Alarm Stations The inspectors observed that the alarm stations were completed; however, the licensee stated that the systems in these alarm stations were not yet ready for NRC evaluation. This item will be reviewed during a future preoperational security program review.
Inspector Follow-up Item (IFI)
86-29-10.
~
21. MC 81088 - Communications
.
-
The inspectors observed that the fixed and portable communications j
systems were installed and partially operational. The licensee stated that these systems were not yet ready for NRC evaluation.
These items
,
i will be reviewed during a future preoperational security program review.
i Inspector Follow-up Item (IFI) 86-29-11.
22.
MC 81501 - Personnel Training and Qualification I
The inspectors observed that the licensee had only a few security force members remaining to be trained and qualified. The licensee was advised that the qualification program will be reviewed during a future preopera-tional security program review.
Inspector Follow-up Item (IFI) 86-29-12.
23. MC 81601 - Security Contingency Plan I
!
The inspectors observed that the procedures for handling security contin-gencies and security organization emergency actions (in accordance with the site emergency plan) were completed and successful exercises had been l
conducted. However, the licensee stated that this item was not yet ready I
for NRC evaluation. The licensee was advised that this item will be reviewed during a future preoperational security program review.
'
l Inspector Follow-up Item (IFI) 86-29-13.
i
!
.-
_
--.
-.. _
- - _ _. - _---_-_ - -
-_-_