IR 05000425/1987032
| ML20236H368 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 07/27/1987 |
| From: | Belisle G, Wright R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20236H356 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-425-87-32, NUDOCS 8708050161 | |
| Download: ML20236H368 (7) | |
Text
--.
. _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. -. _ -. _ _ _ _ _ -. _. _ _ _. -.
_. - _. _ _ -. _ -., _ _ - - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.
>n REO
-
UNITED STATES o
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g'
"'
q
,.g *
-
. REGION il p-g j
101 MARIETTA STREET.N.W.
,j
t ATLANTA, GEORGI A 30323
%*.**.*
!
s Report No.:
50-425/87-32 Licensee: Georgia Power Company P. O. Box 4545 Atlanta, G.'
30302 Docket No.:
50-425'
License No.: -CPPR-109 Facility-Name: Vogtle 2 Inspection Conducted:. July 13-17, 1987 Inspector:
Ild, b h
7/27/87 R. W. Wrightf f
Date Signed
.
Approved by:
3 $7t
'7 7 /[7 G. A. Belisle' Section Chief Dnte Sfgned Quality Assurance Programs Section-Division of Reactor Safety SUMMARY Scope:
This routine, unannounced inspection was ccnducted in the areas of licensee action on previous enforcement matters; procurement, receiving and storage.
Results:
No violations or deviations were identified.
A
!
870B050161 870728ADOCK 05000425 PDR PDR G
,
... -.-__ _
__
.
.
REPORT DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees L. Arnold,. Construction Warehouse Issue Supervisor R. Beaver, Jr., Material Engineer and Planning Supervisor D. Dalenberg, Civil Quality Control (QC) Inspector D. Gardner, Technical / Quality Representative, Procurement and Materials
- E. Groover, Quality Assurance (QA) Site Supervisor
- G. McCarley, Project Compliance Coordinator G. Reeves, Senior QC Inspector - Materials
- P.
Rice, Vice President and Project Director C. Whitney, General Manager - Project Support Other licensee employees contacted included engineers, technicians, and office personnel.
Other Organizations K. Hamko, Materials - QA Engineer, Pullman Power Products (PPP)
R. Warrell. QC Receiving Inspector, PPP NRC Resident Inspectors
- H. Livermore, Senior Resident Inspector - Construction
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on July 17, 1987, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above. The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection findings.
No dissenting comments were received from the licensee. The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the materials provided to or reviewed by the inspector during this inspection.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters (92702)
(Closed) Severity Level IV Violation 425/86-60-01:
Auxiliary Building Structural Steel Platform Connection (Beam to Column) Not Erected in Accordance with Current Approved As-Built Drawings i
The licensee's dated response February 11, 1987, was considered acceptable by Region II. The potential for this discrepancy was effectively elimin-ated on September 20, 1985, when procedure DC-A-03 was revised to require QC to sign-off field change requests (FCRs) in Category 1 areas as " work
-
- _ - _
- - _ - -
-. -.
.--
_ _ - _ _ _
_ _ _.
_ _
.-
. _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _
,
1l'
.2 (
complete" following their final work inspection. To determine the extent
of. this discrepancy, the licensee examined all Unit 2 auxiliary and i
cont'rol building Category 1 structural steel installation FCRs which were j
signed-off. prior to September 20,1985. ' All work was found to have been
!
i correctly performed as indicated by the applicable FCRs, and consequently this violation. was identified as an' isolated incider.t.
The: inspector conducted. discussions with the GPC Civil-Field Engineering personnel who j
conducted these reviews and reexamined the specific beam to column connec-j tion. number 46. verifying that it ~ was now erected.in accordance with current approved as-built drawings.
The inspector concluded that the licensee had determined the full extent
,
'
of the. violation, taken action to ' correct current conditions, and
- developed. corrective actions needed to. preclude recurrence of similar problems.. Corrective actions stated in the " licensee' response have-been
. implemented.
!
4.
Unresolved Items (92701)
Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Procurement, Receiving, and Storage (35065)
a.
Inspection Objectives This inspection was conducted to determine whether material and equipment procurement specifications include applicable.QA and technical requirements identified in the Safety Analysis Report (SAR)
and whether receipt. inspection and storage activities are in compli-ance with the QA program.
b.
References (1) GPC-SAR, Chapter 17, Quality Assurance Program (2) Plant Vogtle Procurement and Materials Policy and Procedure Manual, R5 (3) NSSS Component Receiving and Storage Guidelines (Westinghouse Nuclear Service Division)
(4) GPC Qualified Suppliers List (QSL)
(5) Bechtel Evaluated Supplier List (ESL)
!
(6) Vogtle Field Procedures CM-T-01, R1 Storage Areas DC-A-04, R12 Contracts and Specifications DC-A-06, R11 Review and Control of QA Documentation GD-A-24, R8 On-Site Procurement Process GD-A-30, R13 Receipt, Receipt Inspection, Storage, and Handling
'
GD-T-01, R15 Nonconformance Control
!
-
.
l
.-
l
GD-T-09, R7 Inspection and Maintenance of Items in Storage GD-T-17, R6 Housekeeping GD-T-14, R9 Distribution, Field Storage, and Handling of Welding Material WH-A-01, R5 Material Issue (7) GPC ASME-Field Procedures Manual FP-N-103, R0 Material Receipt and Handling FP-N-114, R0 Storage of Material and Components FP-N-116, R0 Nonconformance Control
FP-N-1093, R0 Review and Control of ASME III QA Documentation (8) Pullman Power Products Procedure X-5, Revision dated 4/28/86, Receiving Inspection (
t c.
Program Review The inspector-reviewed the licensee's QA program for procurement,
)
receiving, and storage of material and equipment as described in l
references (2) through (8) to verify that it met requirements of reference (1), the. accepted QA program, NRC Regulatory Guides, and ANSI standards endorsed by the program.
GPC performs all current procurement for Unit 2.
All critical items
!
have been procured and current generated requisitions are primarily for consumables, standard stock items, and replacement items.
These items are purchased from specifications which have been previously approved and issued by Bechtel Power Corporation, the Architect i
Engineer.
PPP performs receipt inspection for all ASME Code materials / equipment and GPC performs similar inspections for the remaining materials / equipment.
j l
Within this area, no violations or deviations were identified.
d.
Site Procurement Activities and Records Purchase Change
Order Notice Specification Vendor PAV 13042
X4AQ32, R7 Dubose Steel Inc.
PAV 13283
X4AQ34, R11 Consolidated Pipe &
Supply PAV 16044 N/A X4AQ37, R13 Techailoy PAV 3718
X3AJ02, R14 Okonite Co.
PAV 2-51
X4AR01, R13 Anchor Darling Value Co.
PAV 2-51 78, 80, 84 X4AR01, R13 Anchor Darling Valve Co.
'
PAV 426 183 X3AE01, R6 United Controls Inc.
PAV 2-2 N/A X6AA01 Crosby Valve & Gage Co.
(56638)
(1)
(G-678837, R2) Crosby Valve & Gage Co.
i
_
p
,
,.
'
..'
'
L
.These 1986-87 procurement contracts, applicable procurement specifi-L.
.. cations, related. receiving inspection records, and. supplier -;
forwarded documentation (inspection, test, material, -etc.) required
"
via procurement' documents were selected for examination to verify they contained the following requirements:
Applicable regulatory, technical, and quality assurance' require-
-
.ments.
Documentation to confirm acceptability' of the item' required to
-
.be furnished.
f Purchase notification points, hold points, and access rights-
-
incorporated in or provided for in the documentation where necessary.
- QA requirements applicable to subcontractors
-
.
10 CFR 21 reporting-requirements
-
Suppliers were on approved vendor lists
-
Procurement documentation received adequate review.
-
Procurement document PAV-13042, change. notice 5 was issued with a l
typographical. error-stating "GPC QC receipt inspection not required."
However, subsequent NRC review disclosed that GPC receipt inspection-(Report 86-7247) was performed on the subject structural. steel shipment and the vendor provided the proper documentation to confirm
.i the acceptability of the material.
j Within this area,. no violations or deviations were identified.
e.
' Receiving Inspection
'The inspector examined the system established for conducting
_
receiving inspection to verify the following
.,
i
'
Facilities are adequate
-
Certified Mill Test Reports were reviewed and approved by
-
trained personnel a
Inspection staff is adequate
)
-
Inspectors are properly trained and certified
{
-
-
Inspections are properly documented j
-
Records are reviewed and approved Identified discrepancies are appropriately resolved.
-
4
-.
._.
-
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _
.____._______A
,
_
-. _ _ _ _ _
.
Receiving inspection reports documenting the item's acceptance discussed in paragraph d. were reviewed to confirm implementation of requirements.
Receipt inspection verification adequacy was also provided by ' witnessing the receipt inspection process for an alternate shutdown indicator system cabinet and for various colored
,
indicator lenses.
Certification records and training of receiving
'
inspectors and document reviewers were found to be in compliance with commitments, l
Within this area, no violations or deviations were identified.
'
f.
Storage 7': inspector reviewed the controlling QA/QC storage procedures reference in section 5.b. to ascertain that these procedures were in compliance with applicable ANSI standard commitments.
)
The inspector examined site warehouses, laydown areas, Unit 2 reactor and auxiliary buildings to determine the following:
-
Storage facilities for Class A equipment had a properly controlled environmental atmosphere
-
Facilities for Class B, C, and D material / equipment storage were adequate
-
Protection from damage during storage was adequate Periodic inspection of storage facilities was made
-
Stored items were identified and stored a proper level j
-
Nonconforming items were segregated and/or controlled
-
Items in storage received the required preventive maintenance
-
Equipment in the power blocks was adequately protected.
-
Equipment received periodic rotation and electric heaters in motors were energized.
The inspector was impressed with the licensee's overall construction storage program.
All storage areas examined (warehouses, laydown I
areas, inplace storage) were found controlled, well organized, and exceptionally clean. Materials and equipment were provided necessary protection from construction debris, damage, and indications were evident that a good construction maintenance program was in place.
i The licensee has liberally posted notices throughout the project that j
i
. - - - _
- - -
,-
- - _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - _ - -
.
stress equipment protection, good housekeeping, and construction maintenance principals that remind the employees of the importance of these activities. Based on the results of current storage observa-
-
tions, it appears this communication form is working extremely well, Within this area, no violations or deviations were identified.
g.
Audits The inspector reviewed the following audits:
CP02/0P07-86/40'
Procurement CP03/CP08-86/59 ASME Section III Program for Procurement /
Warehouse CP03-87/26 Warehouse Activities i
These audits were reviewed to verify that the licensee was implement-
'
ing a program to evaluate the adequacy of Plant Vogtle's Procurement, Receiving, and Storage Program against site procedures and ANSI N45.2.2, and N45.2.13 requirements.
Audit identified deficiencies were generally administrative in nature, not affecting hardware.
Scheduled reaudits either have or will confirm corrective action implementation of deficiencies identified.
]
Within this area, no violations or deviations were identified.
l
i i
I l
1