IR 05000413/1981018
| ML20010H371 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 08/28/1981 |
| From: | Conlon T, Gibbons T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20010H363 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-413-81-18, 50-414-81-18, NUDOCS 8109240395 | |
| Download: ML20010H371 (5) | |
Text
, _ _
_.__
_
_
. _.
_
_ _ _
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - -
.
..
. _ _ _
p'
UNIYED STATES p"
%g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
$
j
REGION II
- '
101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
Report Nos. 50-413/81-18, 50-414/31-18 g
i Licensee:
Duke Power Company 422 South Church Street
,
Charlotte, North Carolina 28242 Facility Name: Catawaba 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-413, 50-414 License Nos. CPPR 11'
CPPR 117 Inspection at N ar Rock Hill, South Carolina
Inspector: t/ N_<
28 f/
T~. D. Gibbon.
Ddte Signed Approved by:
Mf[gZ7f/
7-28-@(
T. E. Conlon, Section Chief
.
Date Signed Engineering Inspection Branch Engineering and Technical Inspection Division SUMMARY Inspection on August 11-:4, 1981 Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved 25 inspector-hours onsite in the areas of Electrical cable and terminations work, work activities and quality reccrds, licensee's action on previous enforcement items, licensee identified
+
items, bulletins and circulars.
Results Of the areas inspected, no violctions or deviations were identified.
,
,
G
.
_.
_ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _.
-
r
..
.
REPORT DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- J. C. Rogers, Site Manager
- J. C. Shropshire, QA Engineer
- S. W. Dressler, Project Construction Engineer
- J. W. Glenn, QA Engineer R. O. Sharpe, Nuclear Licensing Engineer R. A. Morgan, Project Senior QA Enginecr NRC Resident Inspector
- P. K. Vandoorn
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope anJ findings were summarized on August 14, 1981 with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings a.
(Closed) Violation V,~ 413,414/81-02-05, Training. Duke Power Company letter of response dated May 13,'1981 has been reviewed and determined to be acceptable by Region II.
The inspector held discussions with licensee QA personnel and examined the corrective actions as st ed in the letter of response. The ~ inspector concluded that Duke Power had determined the full xtent of the subject noncompliance, performed the necessary survey and follow-up actions to correct the present conditions and developed the necessary corrective actions to preclude recurrence of similar circ;umstances. The cor ective actions identified in the letter of response have been implemented.
b.
(Closed) Infraction 413,414/80-09-07 Gonconformance Procedures Duke Power Company letter of response dated August 15, 1980 has -been reviewed and determined to be acceptable by Region-II. The inspector held discussions with licensee design coordinator and ' examined the corrective actions as stated in the letter of response. The inspector-concluded that Duke Power had determined the full extent of the subject.
noncompliance, performed the necessary survey and follow-up actions to correct the present conditions and Jeveloped the necessary corrective actions to-preclude _ recurrence of similar circumstances.
The corrective actions identified in the letter of response have been-implemented.
m_
e
.'
.
4.
Unresol.ed Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
-Licensee Identified Items a.
(Closed) Item 413/81-07-04 and 414/81-07-04, " Lack of Radiation Cure" 10 CFR 50.55(e)).
On July 3,1980, Duke Power Company notified IE:II of a 50.55(e) item concerning lack of radiation cure on cross-linked polyethylene cable conductor.
The Construction Deficiency Report t 2s submitted on August 1, 1981. The report has been reviewed and <ctermined to be acceptable by IE:II. The inspector held discussions with responsible licensee representatives, reviewed supporting documentation, and observed representative samples of work to verify that the corrective action identified in the report has been completed.
b.
(Closed) Item 413/El-12-01. and 414/81-12-01, " Electrical Isolation Between Class i Valve and Non Class 1 Pressure Switch 10 CFR 50.55(e)
On April 28, 1981, Duke Power Company notified IE:II of a 50.55 (e)
item concerning elect-ical isolation between Class I Containment isolation valve and N..- IE pressure swith. The Construction Deficiency Report was submitted on May 28, 1981. The report has been reviewed and determined to be acceptable by IE:II. The inspec*
held discussions with responsible licensee representatives, r viewing supporting documentation, to verify that the corrective action identified in the report has been completed.
6.
Electrical (Cables and Terminations II) Obser,vation of Work and Work Activities (Unit 1)
The inspector-selected 10 cables for examination as follows:
1*ATC1113, 1 * ATC 449, 1 *ATC764, 1 *CAS E1, 1 * CA522, 1* EP E501, 1 * EP E502, 1* EPC576, 1* EPC 577 and 1*EQB539.
The cables were examined to assure the SAR and QAM requirements were complied with in tne areas of storage, handling, protection. identification use of specified material, size, type, QC and work procedures, drawing control, termination components locatio1, routing, t
separation, raceway supports, raceway identification, caole pulling, raceway loading, terminations, high potential testing as required and nonconformance control.
!
Within the areas examined there were no violations identified.
7.
Electrical (Cables and termination II) Observation of Work and Work activities Unit 1
,
,
t
,.
.
..
..
The inspector selected the cables id, ified in paragraph 6 for examination to assure t,iat the requirrrats of and QAM are complied with in the
.
areas of raceway inspectie9, acc ph nt., material certification, vendor certified test reports, size
"pe of cable, location,. routing, protection, ide nification of ract ays, cable pulling terminations, raceway supports, high potential testing as required and nonconformance control.
Within the areas examined there were no violations identified.
8.
IE Circulars (Units 1 and 2)
The inspector examined the licensee evaluations of thirteen circulars. The inspector accepted the licensee's evaluations.
a.
(Closed) IEC-78-08 - Environmental Qualification of Class IE Electrical Equipment b.
(0 pen) IEC78-16 Limitorque Operator. This item will remain open until the required action is completed c.
(Closed) IEC 79-05 Moisture In Stranded Wire d.
(Closed) IEC79-13 Replacement Of Diesel Fire Pump Contactors e.
(Closed) IEC79-17 General Electric SB-12 Switches f.
(Closed) IEC79-20 GTE Sylvania Relay g.
(Closed) IEC79-23 Motorstarters and Contactors h.
(Closed) IEC79-24 Core Spray Pipe (BWR)
1.
(Closed IEC80-01 G. E.
Induction Disc Relay j.
(Closed) IEC80-11 Emergency Diesel Generator Lubrication Oil Cooler k.
(Closed) IEC80-16 Rosamont 5100U Trip Units 1.
(Closed) IEC78-06 Common Mode Flooding (BWR)
m.
(Closed) IEC 79-18 Target Rock Valves
,
9.
IE Bulletins (IEB)
a.
(Closed) IEB No. 78-01, GE MOD CR120A Relay Flammable Contact-Arm Retainers, Units 1 anc' 2.
Duke Power Company letter of February 27, 1978, reports that the subject type relays are not used for safety related functions at the statio (~
'
..
..
b.
(Closed) IE8 No. 78-02, Terminal Block, Qualifications,. Units 1 and 2.
Duke Power Company letter o' February 28, 1978, reports that the subject type terminal blocks.:re not_ used for safey-related functions.
c.
(Closed) IEB No. 78-14 Deteriation of Buna W components :in Asco Solenords.
The inspeccor reviewed the bulletin and identified it -as-not applicable to :he station, a.
(Closed) IEB t!a. 79-26 Boron loss from BWR control blades.
The inspector reviewed the bulletin and identified.it as not' applicable to
the station.
'
e.
(Closed) IEB No. 79-27.
Loss of non Class 1E instrumentation and control power system. The inspector reviewed the licensee evaluation for the station.
The license's evaluation stated that there is no impact on the station.
f.
(Closed) IEB No. 19-5A, 79-6A.
Nuclear incident at TMI supplement.
The ir.spector examined the bulletins and identified them as not
,
,
applicable to the station.
g.
(Closed) IEB No 80-06 Engineering Safety Festures reset controls. The ins.pe: tor. examined the licensee's evaluation that the station design was adequate. The bulletin required no written response. The licensee evaluation was accepted by the inspector.
h.
(Closed) IEB No. 80-09.
Hydromotor actuators deficiencies.
The inspector has revi+wed Duke Power Company letter of December 1,1980 and determined that the requested action of the bulletin has been
acceptably addressed. The inspector held discussion with responsible
'
ticen ae personnel, reviewed supporting documentation and observed j
representative samples of work to verify that the actions identified la the letter of response have been completed.
b E
r
, -..,,
-. - -
=--