IR 05000413/1980037
| ML20008E814 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 02/04/1981 |
| From: | Cunningham A, Jenkins G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20008E809 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-413-80-37, 50-414-80-37, NUDOCS 8103090767 | |
| Download: ML20008E814 (5) | |
Text
_
~
.
,$^ M%q'e J / ~~'f UNITED STATES
.
M's NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
't~ fe4-e q
-$
REGION 11
{ c xCj;, f g;gg
,
tal MARIETT A sT. *d W. sulT ?. 3100 o,
- (y ATLANTA, GEORGIA 303G3
j
+....
Report Nos. 50-413/E0-37 an: 50-4 4/30-37 Licensee: Duke Poaer Cor:any 422 South Church Street Charlotte, NC 28242 Fa-ility Name: Catawba Nuclear Station Dc:ket Nos. 50-413 and 50-414 License Nos. CPPR-116 and CPPR-117 Insce: tion at Charlotte,_Nortn Carolina anc Plant Site near for(, Scutn Carolin1
',
j
kb//
/
n / st lI
.
~
Inspector NX. /1 i,te r t /-
"'~/C
'
A. L. Cunp(i Na 1 Cate Signe:
-
.,, y
-
-
i
-
AppFovod by c-
, A. i.f m _ 1 7 2 6 dI G:4. Je.kirfr Section Cnief a te Signed a
FF&M5franch SUPJfARY Inspection en December 9-11, 1930 Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved 22 ins;ector-hours en site in the areas of environmental protectico includirg canagement controls; review of previous enforcement catters; status review of preoperational nonradioicgical environmental monitoring; review of waste canagement and centrols; status review of environmental protection program requirements and ccT.mitments.
Results Of the five areas inspected, no violattens or deviations were identified.
-
8103090767
.__
_
.-
_
_
_
_
.
.
,
t
.-..,;
.uttn..
>
t l
1.
Persons Contacted
,
t Licensee.::picyees
.
O. G. =..=., ? -s,f. a... v.=. a - a..
..
.
,
- D. :.. C l a.t. a a., r. a. s t -. :_ -, *.. =. =..-
.
..
.
"S. E. Pager, Chief Engineer, Civil Ergineer Givisien
"J. H. Miller, Tecnnical Assistant Engi eer r.
4,. r. 11...,, 43c.4 3...,. r a. s i 3..
- . - f.r a. a..
a J
o.
...
...w
.,
y. y.. s *.,
.C a. " ' *. *. E.2 - #, l #. *. * a s.~ ~. ~, ', *~ *. *..
l
...
.
..
-
.
.i. p.. -., p. 4...
4.,. 2 1 r. a. c. 4. y-. :-,3...,
.
.....
.
.
..
.
....
G. A. Alexancer, Assistant Cesign Engineer
"Atterded exit interview l
2.
Exit Intervies I
!
.
4. r. 3,... j e..
3,-r, 2.,, ~s e, j ne 4..
3 w e,a.
s. a-t.' e..
Fe.a.
..-
10..^ ^s
--
n..
.....
-
a
.
.
.
w.
,
-
....,
..
....
..
.
.~t,-..s.
j.
..., 3 ~w i.
.s
.v.
e..
3... ". s ",, #,
..
a.-
..j. 5
.we,s.
..rs
.3 fe s w
,.
..
...
..
...
vicus inspect'en findings -as discussed (paragraph 3).
3.
Licensee A:tien en Presicus Inspection Fincings (Closed)
Ncnce:clience (50-413/79-11-01 ard 50-tit /73-11-01)
Er: sten and Runoff COntrci.
Ir.s;e:tien cis *csed that tne be-, north-est of the LP5W intake structure, was ri;ra;;ed anc grassed, -nere re uired, to precluce urface erosien and runoff.
There were no further questiens regarding tnis items.
4.
Unresolved Ite:s Unresolved ite:s were not identified during this inspecticn.
5.
Managenen. Controls Sections 3.E(4) of Constructicn Permits CFFR-116 anc CPFR-117 re;uire
",
implementatien of effective control Over all constructi:n activities
!
whicn can cause significant adverse environ. ental 10:act.
These l
d0cuments further require a periodic review by the licensee of all
,
constru: tion activities to assure :: plian:e with tne above :Orditions.
l The inspector concucted a cetailed review of cuarterly re;crts sur-itted to the Cesign Engineering De;artment for the ;erice deginning May 1, 1979, threu;h the third quarter of 1950.
- tivites reviewed in each report included these related to the
.ajor consit ents su cart:sc in Section 4.6 of the FES (e.g.,
erosien centrol a.c waste anage ent require:ents).
The ins ector also revie ed tre licensee's annual audit l
of environ. ental ccnditi0ns and cc sitrents i ;; sed by the Ccnstructicn
,
t i
t
_
-
. - - - - - -
.
.
.
P a. r. t *. s.
Tha.
4. -. s a. ~... r r. a. v '. a.a.
"...a.
. = ~.. ".. ', * - i.~., s a - ". *
,a.
- a 2 =. -. '. e' a.
.
.
-
~
,~
.
.
f o $ *r, n. $ p $
g o.,d P.., f, p r. e. i. v p $ *. *. 4 * r $
'*e t*.*.
4 4. e 4 4. m, $.
1.' p 4. E. 4. *.1 * 4. - e.
- I.
.*
e
.
..
.
..,
.
s.~
.......
~. e
..
..
.
s r. a..- *. #. V E a '.- *. '..*. s
'.~.'.'t'a..'.'
s '. *. a.
4.
s - a... *. *..".' #.
a...'>'..,o-3'.
ea.'...'.*.,"
-
.
.
-.
..
.
.
c. a. r. e. a.e.._, g g., A.. s. a 4.
.a.
$.4,..,a.n...2 44....
.e$.. 4
-..'...es..
.-2..
.. a.
a
-
..
..a.
,
.....
.
..
...
l i - a.. s a. a. ' s
...=.=,a..=...
.....,1
- ..-. a.v a.*
..,.. = -
.=.,=.2-=..
.
. 2 8. *. * - a.
i
..
..
.
,
.
..
.
c o., g j,. c.. g.. $. e.
n. a.
L.
e.. $ *...
4. 3,.
c a. r-j. $
-
4..,....j-r -.3 -. 4.
3. $
2,.
a ~.. a.,.
3. -
.,
.,
.a..
...
.
....
...
.
-.
~
,..
T".e r s. wa. e.~... ".a. s *. i ~.. s r. a..=., i r -.*. i s "i. a_
.
.
.
w
,
g
.
-
.
6.
'a'aste anage ent Centrol s
.o.. ( : -),, i.
c..- s....
4.
.
rc.-- 4.. s S.,.. j..
- -
~ c c.. e. e. c
.r,
- = : :.. ? -..
.4.,,.s s
r
-
~
-
.4
.....
....
.
........
.
o d... e l '. c a.., s a. a.
- . * =. k a.
" a.
.. a.. a. s a.= j" -.. #. p". '. r. -
=~..'.,s,
',~~.'t~..'.~.,
.. "..
.
..
...
.
-#
,
.
..
,
.
st. a.,i c.,
4.,.
,c, e.-. 4. ~....;..:
-3,
4.
3. s. 3.,.,2
.3
..
..
.
.
,
.
...
.
.... :..., s.3,j,
.~..ea
.
..
.
..
..
- .., 4. e f - a 2. 6 4.
a.,. s c. c..
.-...~4.n.
s,.
4.
4.
4.,. s,.
.:
.=. n.
,., 2. :.
... >.....
...
.
.
.
-
..
....
....
..
.-
.
.
anage en*
as used herein a*ciles
- e
- c..atesi 3:
(.3 seaige
.;
.,c.3.._...
e..s., 4. ] n..u.
[ -))
~_~...~.4.~.-
..2 n...$,
(7)
..3
.*4.,
.i n.
..
......
,,
...
.
.
~...,, ]
.<
s. o.. ] $,
,
e.. 4., ] $
s.s
.
...
.
. -.,
1, A,. r. 4.. 2... $.,
...
(" I)'
-.4 2.,
.2. ~...
ar -
.
....
.
e.s,.
.s. n... o..s o...
4.. e.
$
.s....
4,.....n.,
31.
y.
$.
3.,,
.
....
.x s.
2.
.
.
.....
2.
.c, a n 4, * a ry,a,a s * e t re a t e e.t -a c i. 4. *y
-
l 4'.a. s r. ~. i ~,... i s, 1,, s a. d.
" s. *.
"...a.
l i. a... n.. a.
~,--l'a.d
. "... ". "...a_
' '.I N.'..,
a.
,
.~
m ~
.
c..... i *.- s..~.. s
.-... a. r n 'o.,
- a.
c. a ~. i a ry e.a s. a.
..8..~..*.~..
'..=.*.'."../-
_
..
.
~
...
m
.
cefined in Section 4.6.1(1) of the F:5:
(1)
sewage treatment
< s., j t 9.../
-.,
a11 a. t. c.., w ).
s. a. ~., r. s
. '.
".. a.
5 *. =. a.
. '.
(. W...
,.
m.
y
..
...
.
r. a, r.,, '6 ; n a.,
(' 2 )'
e... j.. e c.
, 't.2 +4
. c.
e a
ts s.,, ra. 4. n..
s,-f,
. n. a.
.c..
a.
.,.r..,
,.,
4.
......
.
.
..
..
r.a e. n14. r a : n n. e. a,,
n., e ua.,3.+
a.,a
- ..i;r e.
,.. 1
-... ',
.s.a
.,.
v. -. -(
.
,.
m
...
...
.....
n....
.~..
.
C *.~..y
.W.e a 19.. r. a.
.* r *. a....,
a..~.
(. ' )
,,, e r a *.i m.
., '.
~...a.
'. a. i l "..," ~,.=
. r
,
,
.
- r.= i a.a. d w.= s *.e
- r e."... a. u.
wy.r".-
. a. r *. i #. '. a. d ", " "... e ( * a *. a.
. #.
.C. ~ *...
~a
.
..
.
.
.
,.
Carclina.
Operatice of the systen a:ceared censistent with 1s d a. s i ", n..*. i *.e r t.s a.. '.
- . " m~.. f,, n s.
T" e 1.. s =. ".c r ra. v i a.
M.
a l l. ~.. i *.. r *. ~.,
.
o ad - = f r~* a a a..a. d ".. a, *. a ~.."*d s s a d l ac. s 'c e.
"... e s a. ~. ~~.d a r/- a '
- .a. r. '. 2 ry
, ~
.
.
~
.
-
-
.
s/ s *.*. s. #.
'. h a. #. a r. t i f *.y.
~ * a..- a.. a.. a.. ~ q ". a s *. *.,. s.. e... *.,- *..*o' s i *. a...
...
.
...
.
A.,.
.c cil 5.c.,.
.
,.
....
i. n
.t. o.. j w..
. o.1( 1.2 ) c :.
+w.
-
...t.,
... a.
1 4.. 2.. s.. js -. -- 4... : s
.w
..
.
.
.,..
....
. -...
..
=aintain centrol cf spoile eartn aterials to at ti.: ate hic.h 3,f.g.g
... c #. #. ' a '*~d
.~. #. n i _. l.'. a.
- * 8. *.. s g r *.
s
^#
S E '.' 'u. s. *. *.
'.="<,a.
'n'y '6 i a..
.
..o
.
.
..
o
..
.
.
,,,
.i n t e.*.i c e.
4.,.1(1) c '. *ha 2 "., v a.
- s*...=.~..,
" a.
li.a...sa.a.
'. s.= l s,.
.,. -
.
.....
.
...
,
~.,. ~... s 1 s i *.a.
e ra,., s i ~..
2 ro s"w, s e ~4 a. ~.. s o... 4 - a.". a *. i,...
.y c -.1 "..a. d.
d
- a
.
..
.
.
m previding piped drainage syste=s, intercepts and bar ditches, a.
grcund cover to centrol the flew of surface waters.
As a result cf nese requirements, a significant pertien cf the site inspe:tien was directed toward ver'#ying their 1:clementation.
Inspecticn of -
" a.
s f *.a., i u~. l " s i v a.
^ #.
"... e i ~.. a k e r e, v a.,
,
- . i r_ a. d ".... " c " ~.. a.... s *.."." s
...
.
o
., f "... e s t *.e d r a #. r. 2. 3 sy s *.a. s, ad.a a - a.... a. r.. c '.
c,. - f i s *..,
.r, a.
2..".
a
,
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
berrew areas, were censistent with Constructicn Fer=it require:ent,
.
-
..
-
.
- _ _
- -
_
....
_ - _ - -
- _. -.. -. -.
..
.
.
Inspection also disclosed that severe erosion along the sector of the northwest berm of the intake cove, immediately opposite the LPSW
,
intake structures, was corrected as discussed in paragraph 3 above.
There were no questions regarding this item.
c.
Control-Olsposal o' Chemical and Construction Waste
,
Section 4.6.1(14) requires that waste (including chemicals, fuels,
lubricants, and bitumens) will neither be deposited nor discharged into a natural water shed where the possibility of surface runoff
,
or transfer to Lake Wylie exists.
This commitment also requires the burial of construction wastes (e.g.,
fol N e, scrap metal, packing materials, etc.) or transportation of such waste to an assigned landfill area.
Inspection of the construction site disclosed that the licensee had implemented effective handling procedures and controls, and provided special areas for chemical storage, fuel and lubricant storage, and construction vehicle main-tenance.
Fuel supply, construction vehicle maintenance and washing areas were provided with sumps and special drainage-as required to prevent discharge of petrochemicals to the natural watershed.
Inspection also revealed that an approved on-site landfill was provided to accomodate disposal of nonmerchantable
'
construction waste.
A licensee representative stated that the landfill area provided was adequate to accommodate construction and selected solid and putrescible wastes generated during the remaining period of plant construction.
There were no questions concerning this item.
7.
Preoperational Monitoring Program
,
'The current status of the preoperational nonradiological monitoring
.
' program was confined to monthly. and quarterly synoptic water quality
,
monitoring of physicochemical parameters (e.g.,
temperature, pH,
~
conductivity, nutrients, trace heavy metals) at designated stations in Lake Wylie.
The final year of aquatic biological monitoring of plankton, periphyton, benthos, and bacteria, as required by Section 3.E(2) of the
'
Permits, is defined in Section 6.1.1 of the FES.
This program is scheduled to be implemented one year prior to fuel loading.
Interim synoptic water quality monitoring was implemented as required during
.
'
the period May 1, 1979 through November 30, 1980.
There were no questions regarding this item.
8.
Plant Site Inspection The inspector conducted a detailed inspection of the plant site to verify that environmenal protection commitments and conditions imposed by-the Construction Permits were being implemented as required.
,
l Inspection-included the following items:
(1)
erosion and runoff control; (2)
status and efficiency' of site drainage system;- (3)
air-quality control; -(4)
construction waste, management; (5) groundwater hydrology and piezometric monitoring of the nuclear safety water dam; _
,
. - ~ _,
,. _.-_
,
,,
_ _.
_ __-
_ -. - - - _
_~
_-
__.
..
.
.
(6)
landfill operation; (7)
paint and petrochemical stcrage; (3)
status of completion of the statien waste water treat e-t syste ;
(9)
1::tegrity of the sector of security fence cited in the annual audit (paragraph 5);
(10)
erosion and runoff control in cooling to er construction, spoil storage and borrow areas.
Inspection disclosed that environ, ental conditions and cccmitments imposed by the Dermits were implemented as required.
There were nc questions regardic; this item.
.J