IR 05000413/1980001
| ML19312D141 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 02/04/1980 |
| From: | Conlon T, Harris J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19312D139 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-413-80-01, 50-413-80-1, 50-414-80-01, 50-414-80-1, NUDOCS 8003210261 | |
| Download: ML19312D141 (4) | |
Text
._.2
_. :.
.
,_
-
....
._.
.
_
,..
.58
'o,E
-
. UNITED STATES
-,
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION f
-
-y'
REGION 11 v.'
0, 101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100
- 9 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 FEB -~41980
'
-Report-Nos. 50-413/80-01 and 50-414/80-01 Licensee: Duke Power Company'
422 South Church Street Charlotte, North Carolina 28242 Facility Name: Catawba Nuclear Station Docket. Nos. 50-413_and 50-414 '
License Nos. CPPR-116:and CPPR-117-Inspection at Catawba Site near Lake Wylie, South Carolina Inspector:
h
{u S/h'/TC J. y-Harris Date Signed Approved by: [/twA r/S4' Mh 2 /d!/D T. E.fConlon, Section C(tief, RC&ES_ Branch Ditd Gigned
~
.
SUMMARY Inspection on January 23-25, 1980 Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced. inspection involved 20 inspector-hours on site'in the areas of structural concrete and nuclear service water dam.
Results
.0f the two areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviation were identified.
.
.
+
b
.a#'
F
't ;i *
l\\ -
,
800 210 %
n
b
. ;,.
.t o :
- ;.
-
-
DETAILS-
~
Person'_ Contacted 1.:
s-Licensee Employees s
~
- D. G. Beam, Project Manager
.
1*D. L. Freeze, Project Engineer
- R'., A. Morgan, Senior QA Manager
. *S.
W. Dressler,' Senior Construction Engineer J..C. Shropshire,-QA Engineer, Mechanical L
T. H.'Robertson, Construction Engineer,' Civil S. Morrison, Assistant General Superintendent
.s McCrary, Construction Engineer, Civil-C.-V.-Sheriff, Civil Technician Supervisor, Civil D.'Jennings, Civil Inspector,.QC F. Krau'., Civi1 Inspector, QC
_
- H.
D. t, son, QA Engineer
- Attended exit interview
~
2.
~ Exit Interview The inspection scope and. findings were summarized on January 25, 1980 with those persons indicated in paragraph I above.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.
4.-
Unresolved Items
,
Unresolved items were not identified during this-inspection.
5.
Independent Inspection t
- ,_
The inspector also examined work activities in the following areas:
,
w a.
Concrete batch plant-b.~
Soils and-concrete testing' laboratory c.
Construction status-d..
Repair. work on voids in. Units 1 and 2 containment building.
-
. Examination of currentness of laboratory and testing equipment showed that numerous. test sieves used for particle size analysis of concrete aggregates
'and earthfill materials are failing to meet ASTM E-11 requirements. ASTM
.
-
C 136, " Sieve or Screen Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggrega'tes".and ASTM ~
'
'
D' 422, " Particle Size Analysis of Soils" state test ' sieves shall conform to
'
{
ASTM specification E-11.
Calibration' data on' test sieves'showed that 55 L
k
-?
.,.
.
-
- _
x a-. a - - - i t.
_. '_ .. . . . _._ .- .
" _i
- - ,. ,
-, .;= .. '
- ,
-2-t,. . , , Lpercent' of t all. wirecioth test sieves received from vendors failed to conform , to'E-11 specifications even though the sieves wer'e certified by the manu - facturer-as meeting E-11 specifications... Sieves not meeting E-11 are being returned'to the vendor.
No deviations.or -items off noncompliance were ' identified.
~ 6.
Containment _(Structural Concrete II) - Observation of Work and Work
- Activities
- The : inspector observed partial placement of pour number 4327, main steam support number 4.
Acceptance criteria examined by the inspector appear in: a.
'PSAR, Section 3.8' 'b.- Procedure _M-2, Inspection of Design Concrete c.
Drawing number CN-1388-2 - -Discussions _with responsible engineers and observations of work and records P' showed.that concrete was'being batched, transported and placed in accordance J with' acceptance criteria. Followup examination of inspector followup item 413/414/79-21-01,~" Concrete Cleanliness and Vib' ration Practices", indicated responsible engineers had initiated a program for retraining craftsmen and inspectors in vibration practices and prepour cleanup. This item remains .open and.will be followed up in future inspections.
No deviations or items of noncompliance were identified.
. 7.
Lakes, Dams and Canals -. Review of Quality Records ~ The inspector examined the instrument _ monitoring program, records on the filter blanket and inservice inspection program for the nuclear service z-water dam. Acceptance criteria examined by the. inspector a} pear in: < a.: .PSAR,_Section 2.4_and;2.5-1._ -Procedure M-1, Inspection of Compacted Earthfills c.
Procedure M-26, Laboratory Soil Testing ~ d.
' Specification.CNS-1114.00-01, Specification on General Grading and Work for ~ Construction of Earth Dams and Fills -- Le.c : Drawing number CN1028-1, Dam Instrumentation .f.' Drawing number'CN 1027-1, Nuclear Service Water Pump Structure and Intake , s,>
- g.
JRegulatory Guide'1.127, Inspection of Water-Control Structures Associated with Nuclear Power Plants , . u , a, a m, - en - -
- ... - ;,
- , gjp .i ,
_ - s _ f.
~A - - 3 - --
....- , l=~- , ' ,
- Records examihA'd by the' inspector' included piezometer and settlement monu -
~ ' ' ' ment data, inservice inspection ~results and density,-compaction and-gradation ? test results on the filter blanket.' Discussions'with responsible engineers .-and examination-of' records showed that materials.were placed as specified .and that the, dam was.being monitored ~and' inspected in'accordance~with . . acceptance' criteria.
No'deviationsLor items'of noncompliance were identified.
c.
?. +: a ' ~~ I.
. - E i .h ' k ~ j t > ... t > L.
e
-.p , ,
4
_ , -- - p , , . . %'; e - 'r ~ ' ,, }}