IR 05000400/1986011
| ML18019A681 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 03/12/1986 |
| From: | Blake J, Kleinsorge W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18019A679 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-400-86-11, NUDOCS 8603240202 | |
| Download: ML18019A681 (20) | |
Text
~'p,R REOII, c~
wp0 Op OO n +w*w+
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
101 MARIETTASTREET, N.W.
ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30323 I
Report No.:
50-400/86-11 Licensee:
Carolina Power and Light Company P. 0.
Box 1551 Raleigh, NC 27602 Docket No.:
50-400 License No.:
CPPR-158 Facility Name:
Harris Unit 1 Inspection Co d
Inspector:
nso F
ruary 18-21, 1986 Approved by:
a
,
ec ion se Engi eer ng Branch Div sio of Reactor Safety I
Date Si ned z-sC ate sgne SUMMARY Scope:
This routine, unannounced inspection involved 30 inspector-hours on site in the areas of housekeeping (54834B),
material identification and control (429028),
material control (429408),
reactor coolant pressure boundary piping, safety-related piping, steel structures and supports, and licensee identified items 50.55(e).
Results:
No violations or deviations were identified.
8603240202 8603l7 PDR ADQCK 05000400 Q
I II'
REPORT DETAILS Persons Contacted Licensee Empl oyees
- C. I. Loflan, Manager, Harris Plant
- G. L. Forehand, Director, QA/QC
- D. A. McGaw, Superintendent, QA/QC
- C. L. McKenzie, Acting Director, QA/QC Operations
- R. Hanford, Welding Manager
- D. L. Tibbitts, Acting Director, Regulatory Compliance
- M. G. Wallace, Regulatory Compliance
- K. Hate, QA Engineer
.
- K. A. Douglas, QA/QC Other licensee employees contacted included construction craftsmen, engineers, technicians, and office personnel.
Other Organization
- J. P. Kirk, Project Administrator, Daniels Construction Company (DCC)
NRC Resident Inspectors
- G. F. Maxwell
- S. P. Burris
- P. G. Humphrey
- Attended exit interview Exit Interview (30703B)
The inspection scope and findings were summarized on February 21, 1986, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.
The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection findings listed below.
No dissenting comments were received from the licensee.
(Open)
Inspector Followup Item 400/86-11-01:
"Positive Identification of Welders" - Paragraph 6.e.(3).
The licensee did not identify, as proprietary, any of the materials provided to or reviewed by the inspector during this inspection.
Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters (92701B)
(92702B)
This subject was not addressed in the inspectio l'
IP
',C
w'
t rI N
4.
Unresolved Items
'
a
~
Welding Procedure Specifications (55171B)
The following Welding Procedure Specifications (WPS) were selected for review.and comparison with the ASME Code:
Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Independent Inspector Effort Housekeeping (54834B),
Material Identification and Control (42902B),
and Material Control (42940B)
The inspector conducted a
general inspection of auxiliary and reactor containment buildings to observe activities such as housekeeping, material identification and control, material control, and storage.
Within the areas examined, no violations or deviations were identified.
6.
Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary Piping The inspector reviewed procedures, observed work and reviewed records for welding work activities as described below to determine whether applicable code, procedure, and regulatory requirements were being met.
The applicable code for the installation of reactor coolant pressure boundary (RCPB) piping is ASME BSPV Code,Section III, Subsection NB, 1974 Edition with Addenda through Winter 1976.
WPS No.
8BU9 8BA7 882 1F1 8BU10 8S1 3A1 3-1A1 Process*
GTAW GTAW/SMAW GTAW FCAW GTAW GMAW SMAW SMAW PllR
54 6, 6A, 6B 5 6C 63, 63A, 131, 149
& 151 101
99 100
- GTAW-Gas Tungsten Arc Welding SMAW-Shielded Metal Arc Welding GMAW-Gas Metal Arc Welding FCAW-Flux Core Arc Welding The above WPSs and their supporting Procedure gualification Records (PgRs)
were reviewed to ascertain whether essential, supplementary and/or nonessential variables including thermal treatment were consistent with code requirements; whether the WPSs were properly
I
~
I h
JI I'
IJ I,'I Il
~
M n
qualified and their support P(Rs were accurate and retrievable; whether all required mechanical tests had been performed and the results met the minimum requirements; whether the P(Rs had been reviewed and certified by appropriate personnel and; whether any revisions and/or changes to nonessential variables were noted.
WPSs are qualified in accordance with ASME Section IX, the latest edition and addenda at the time of qualification.
b.
Review of gA Manual (35100B)
The inspector reviewed the guality Assurance Manuals listed below and appropriate referenced documents to determine whether adequate gA plans and procedures, including inspection (gC)
procedures, have been established (written, reviewed, approved, and issued)
to assure that the following activities are controlled and accomplished in accordance with gA program requirements:
organizational structures and gA personnel; audits; quality requirements; work and quality inspection procedures; control of material; control of process; corrective action; document control; test control and control of test equipment; and quality records.
c, A Manuals Reviewed Carolina Power and Light (CPSL)
Chicago Bridge and Iron (CBSI)
Richmond Engineering Co.
(RECO)
Welding Filler Material Control (55172B)
The'nspector reviewed the licensee's program for control of welding materials to determine whether materials were being purchased, accepted, stored, and handled in accordance with gA procedures and applicable code requirements.
The following specific areas were examined:
Purchasing, receiving, storing, distribution, and handling proce-dures, material identification Welding material purchasing and receiving records for the following materials were reviewed for conformance with applicable procedures and code requirements:
~Te ER-308 E-308 E-308 ER-308 ER-308L E-9018M E-9018M Size I/8II 3/32" 3/32" 3/32"
"Y" Insert Ring 3/32"
]/8 II Heat No.
18302 0752A 0752C 465272 43379 421P4461 411P9121
I v
II ti I.
'1
<<1
'jl P
III II M
F H
~ti
d.
Weld Heat Treatment (55176B)
(1)
Meld Joint Preheating (a)
The inspector reviewed the licensee's program to determine whether procedures properly specify acceptable preheating methods, provide requirements for monitoring and recording preheat temperature before, during, and if specified, after welding, and whether specified temperature control is utilized on in-process welds which are required to be maintained at preheat for extended time periods.
(b)
By direct observation and. review of records, the inspector observed/reviewed the preheating activities for the welds indicated in Paragraph 6.f. to determine whether preheat control procedures are being followed during field welding activities.
e.
Welder Performance gualification (55177B)
The inspector reviewed the CPSL program for qualification of welders and welding operators for compliance with gA procedures and applicable code requirements.
(1)
The following welder qualification status records and "Records of Performance gualification Test" were reviewed:
Re air Welder S mbol E-99 C-79 B-7 D-96 E-91 A-72 Welder S mbol I-2 SL-54 SJ-19 C-22 B-46 (2)
The following qualification activities were reviewed and compared with the applicable procedures.
(a)
Evaluation of bend test specimens 32-1790 70-859
(a
'a
(b)
In-process Welder Performance Testing 70-551 (c)
Review of test specimen radiographs 99-1126-6G (d)
Preparation and evaluation of fillet break test and macro specimen 70-551 (3)
The inspector verified that the welder in-process of performance testing was positively identified.
With regard to the inspection above, the inspector noted that the licensee had an effective program to assure positive identifica-tion of welders during pre-employment and employment qualification testing as well as updating and renewal testing.
This program is undocumented and thus, its continuation is dependent on personnel continuity.
The inspector discussed the above with the licensee who indicated that they would review the matter to determine the most appropriate method of formally documenting their welder identification program.
The above will be identified as inspector followup item 400/86-11-01:
"Positive Welder Identification."
f.
Special Melding Applications (55178B)
The inspector examined special welding activities including weld repair as described below to determine whether applicable code and procedure requirements were being met.
(1)
Records of the following repair welds were examined relative to the following:
welding procedure used; repair welding procedure includes all pertinent requirements; repair welding procedure qualification; repair welder performance qualification; ANI witnessed performance qualification; repair area does not exceed limits; base and filler material as specified; base material repairs documented; NDE performed, and records completed.
Re air Welds 1-RC-36-3-SW-1 1-RC-149-1-SW-3 5-RC-1-VW-3 (Loop 1)
1-SI-151-4-VW-6 1-SI-206-FW-723
H H
H H
H
~"
H at a
lf a
a t
F
&H tl a
C'H'a H
lt H
F
)
I'I a" (
J HV Il II
rta
~
H a ( (
I l H
(2)
The inspector reviewed records of special welding applications listed below to determine whether applicable requirements had been met.
S ecial Weldin Processes Autogenous Gas Tungsten Arc Welding FW6-IS/IMS-212 FW32-IS/1-CC-350 Flux Core Arc Welding Restraint Steel BW-71A Gas Metal Arc Welding FWE1-4 - M10360-1 FWQ1-4 - M10360-1 Gas Tungsten Arc Seal Welding CRDM FW-64 CRDM FW-41 Within the areas examined, no violations or deviations were identified.
7.
Safety-Related Piping The inspector reviewed procedures, observed work, and reviewed records for safety-related piping as described below to determine whether applicable code and procedure requirements were being met.
The applicable code for safety-related piping is the ASME BSPV Code,Section III, Subsections NC and ND, 1974 edition with addenda through winter 1976.
Non-nuclear safety-related high energy piping identified seismic category 1 is fabricated to ANSI B31.1 (73S73)
and post weld heat treated when required to ANSI B31.1 (77W77).
Special Welding Applications (55188B)
Special welding activities are discussed in Paragraph 6.f.
Within the areas examined, no violations or deviations were identified.
8.
Steel Structures and Supports The inspector observed welding work activities for steel structures and supports as described below to determine whether applicable code and procedure requirements were being met.
The applicable code for fuel pool liner welding is the ASME BSPV Code,Section III, Subsection ND, 1974
l J
J
]t V
II
Edition through the winter 1976 addenda.
The applicable code for the refueling water storage tank is the ASME BSPV Code,Section III, Subsection NC, 1977 edition with no addenda.
'a ~
b.
c ~
Welder Performance gualification (55157B)
Welder performance qualification is discussed in Paragraph 6.e.
Review of gA Manual (35100B)
Review of gA Manual is discussed in Paragraph 6.b.
Special Welding Applications Special welding applications are discussed in Paragraph 6.f.
Within the area examined, no violations or deviations were identified.
9.
Licensee Identified Items
a
~
b.
(Closed)
Item 400/CDR 83-127:
"Deficiencies in Chilled Water Valves" (10 CFR 50.55(e)).
On May 5, 1983, the licensee notified IE:II of a
50.55(e)
item concerning deficiencies in chilled water valves.
After the final reported, dated August 31, 1983 was submitted, the licensee identified additional deficiencies in chilled water valves.
This CDR (83-127)
was reopened and made part of CDR 84-199.
The final report for both CDR 83-127 and 84-199 was submitted on July 30, 1985.
The report has been reviewed and determined to be acceptable by IE:II.
The inspector held discussions with responsible licensee and/or contractor representa-tives, reviewed supporting documentation, and observed representative samples of work to verify that the corrective actions identified in the report have been completed.
(Closed)
Item 400/CDR 83-131:
"Unverified Anchor Bolt Type" (10 CFR 50.55(e)).
On May 3, 1983, the licensee notified IE:II of a 50.55(e)
item concerning unverified anchor bolt types.
The final report submitted on July 23, 1985.
The report has been reviewed and determined to be acceptable by IE:II.
The inspector held discussions with responsible licensee and/or contractor representatives, reviewed supporting documentation, and observed representative samples of work to verify that the corrective actions identified in the report have been complete I V
I V
V I
VV ~
v (
V'(
('I I
VI
I W
V l'
W
~
't
~
V r
\\
F D
'I ~I f
V
(Closed)
Item 400/CDR 83-157:
"Deficient Operations on HVAC Dampers" (10 CFR 50.55(e)).
On December 21, 1983, the licensee notified IE:II of a 50.55(e)
item concerning deficient G.
H. Bettis operators on Ruskin Supplied HVAC dampers.
The final report submitted on April 5, 1985, dated March 29, 1985.
The report has been reviewed and determined to be acceptable by IE:II.
The inspector held discussions with responsible licensee and/or contractor representatives, reviewed supporting documentation, and observed representative samples of work to verify that the corrective actions identified in the report have been completed.
(Closed)
Item 400/CDR 84-160:
"Deficient Shop Welds on Seismic Restraint Structures" (10 CFR 50.55(e)).
On February 9, 1984, the licensee notified IE:II of a 50.55(e)
item concerning deficient shop welds on seismic restraint structures received from Pittsburgh Bridge and Iron (PBI).
The final report was submitted on March 22, 1985.
The report has been reviewed and deter-mined to be acceptable by IE:II.
The inspector held discussions with responsible licensee and/or contractor representatives, reviewed supporting documentation, and observed representative samples of work to verify that the corrective actions identified in the report have been completed.
(Closed)
Item 400/CDR 84-175:
"Bolts Maximum Hardness Valves Exceeded" (10 CFR 50.55(e)).
On May 17, 1984, the licensee notified IE:II of a
50.55(e)
item concerning bolts received from Hub, Inc. of Tucker, Georgia, that exceeded maximum allowable hardness valve.
The final report was submitted on November 30, 1984.
The report has been reviewed and determined to be acceptable by IE:II.
The inspector held discussions with responsible licensee and/or contractor representatives, reviewed supporting documentation, and observed representative samples of work to verify that the corrective actions identified in the report have been completed.
(Open)
Item 400/CDR 84-184:
"6000 Lb.
Reducers - Incorrect Material Markings and Thickness" ( 10 CFR 50.55(e)).
On August 13, 1984, the licensee notified IE: II of a 50.55(e)
item concerning ANSI rating stamping and thickness deficiencies in four ASME Class I flow restrictors.
The final report submitted on December 13, 1984, dated December 14, 1984.
The report has been reviewed and determined to be acceptable by IE:II.
The inspector held discussions with responsible licensee and/or contractor representatives, reviewed supporting documentation, and observed representative samples of work to verify that the corrective actions identified in the report have been complete C N
A l'
,II E
t
l V
P l
D t
The final report indicated that all the identified reducers were returned to the vendor.
The licensee was unable, during this inspec-tion, to provide objective quality evidence that there were no other identical reducers in the system with the same deficiencies.
Pending the resolution of the above, this matter remains open.
g.
(Closed)
Item 400/CDR 84-199:
"Additional Deficiencies in Chilled Water Valves" (10 CFR 50.55(e)).
On December 21, 1984, the licensee notified IE:II of a 50.55(e)
item concerning additional deficiencies in chilled water valves identified after the final report was submitted for CDR-127.
CDR-127 was reopened and made part of CDR-199.
The final report for both CDR 83-127 and CDR 84-199 was submitted on July 30, 1985.
The report has been reviewed and determined to be acceptable by If:II.
The inspector held discussions with responsible licensee and/or contractor representa-tives, reviewed supporting documentation, and observed representative samples of work to verify that the corrective actions identified in the report have been completed.
h.
(Closed)
Item 400/CDR 85-22:
"Anchor Darling Check Valves - Loose Parts" (10 CFR 50.55(e)).
On October 25, 1985, the licensee notified IE: II of a 50.55(e)
item concerning check valves supplied by Anchor Darling with internal parts that could come loose and cause loss of operability.
The final report was submitted on November 22, 1985, dated November 20, 1985.
The report has been reviewed and determined to be acceptable by If:II.
The inspector held discussions with responsible licensee and/or contractor representatives, reviewed supporting documentation, and observed representative samples of work to verify that the corrective actions identified in the report have been complete t t
'I 1