IR 05000400/1985018

Insp Rept 50-400/85-18 on 850507-10.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Preoperational Test Program Review,Procedure Verification & Plant Tour

ML18003B139
Person / Time
Site:	Harris
Issue date:	05/23/1985
From:	Jape F, Taylor P NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML18003B138	List: IR 05000400/1985018 ML18003B137
References
50-400-85-18, NUDOCS 8507010630
Download: ML18003B139 (10)

Text

UNITEDSTATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION II

101 MARIETTASTREET, N.W.

ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30303 Report No.:

50-400/85-18

, Licensee:

Carolina Power and Light Company 411 Fayetteville Street Raleigh, NC 27602 Docket No.:

50-400 Facility Name:

Harris

Inspection Conducted:

May 7-10, 1985 Inspector:

P.

. Tay Approved by:

ape, ection 1e Engineering Branch Division of Reactor Safety License No.:

CPPR-158 s- ~s Date signed s-~~ ~

ate igne e

SUMMARY Scope:

This routine, unannounced inspection entailed 31 inspector-hours on site in the areas of preoperational test program review, preoperational test procedure verification and plant tour.

Results:

No violations or deviations were identified.

&30 00+

850/0>

Ocg 06 pog

0

9P.¹.¹;'¹0

'f9Y¹?", '¹ f:¹"¹,

?

JL¹) c¹ j<<(f j,'CfCi ¹

~;)>>

<<, y li

) ).

!

.>>>>.v3 <<¹ L>'¹ ">>

i'

l4 <<J li l r

~

'<<

1 I ~ F'l<>l ¹ 'I P.'VL?l ',

~ Ta <<¹*~¹'>>¹'.;;

>>J>t

>> >9

" '"P'] ~" J

<<,,.~>>¹>>,

k>>.-."':l'¹¹¹,)V,~'¹")9'~-'.?.14'<<i;<<< '

'~"I'~ g!,

'0 )

<<¹'¹>> l

~ i'll

REPORT DETAILS Persons Contacted Licensee Employees

• R. A. Watson, Harris Project, Vice President

• J. L. Harness, Assistant Plant Manager

• C. S. Hinnant, Manager, Startup

• N. J. Chiangi, Manager, guality Assurance/guality Control

• C. S. Bohanan, Director, Regulatory Compliance

• G. T. Lew, Startup Supervisor E. Lashley, Senior Project Specialist, Electrical G. Trott, Project Specialist, Maintenance H. Lipa, Chemistry Supervisor NRC Resident Inspector

• R. L. Prevatte z.

3.

• Attended exit interview Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on May 10, 1985, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.

The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection findings listed below.

No dissenting comments were received from the licensee.

The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the materials provided to or reviewed by the inspector during this inspection.

Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters 4 ~

This subject was not addressed in the inspection.

Unresol ved Items 5.

Unresolved items were not identified during the inspection.

Overall Preoperational Test Program Review (703018)

The inspector reviewed the following areas of the licensee's Preoperational and Startup Test Program to verify that administrative controls have been developed in accordance with commitments and requirements specified in the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR),

Chapter 1.8, Conformance to NRC Regulatory Guides, Chapter 14.2, Preoperational Test Program, Regulatory

k

4'"(<<l "vlf,

'=

ref.fvf l r<<)<<gga

<<<<

I j~l

)

1 "',',,

v

>

~ fl'7 4'I""'rr,;"

vvvvr<<414 vv '"

l

"

ff 1 vv

4

)P fQ

<< fl

"*

))eZ y.<<;<< i <<1':)"'F I

4.'53.'gi~

l l'

I

~ "'4," '

~ <<<

1,"<< ',I'l.v 4 i

, I," vv<<4>>

I I

( <<l<<4

<<

lf t,.<<

I f

vt') rli

<<

1 ") 1<<

~ )'4

'I 1 4 1' ill v'4 v f "v<<'J vl '.

=<<

<<VJ

)."I li lJt I

" ) 7

)V3

<<i l ) Vv

'

)0 l" 4 1 *lyvylo

,1 I<<'

,Ig f ~ V

~ i

<<V,"1 <<)J>>

1 "l ~

v-fly.~<<) I 4~ft) IV,<<,

" f'V

'

<<'9

<<f.).P>>

lf 4'

V 414 41

~

V

><<

lf,l

v

'l I

VI'I IIV)

kr'V"

ll II vf

)V, Vl>>

')<)

.V4<<

"

.)

Iv

~

Vr V y Iflf'

l'l l

<<,J")

I

~ '

ff

Il

f'f r fi.I" l

'f<<'.

+l.ll, 'lr'f""f.

)"f II f'4'

I "fl:'>> I'Vl

$

"'

frr(

<<a fl illK),.<<""<<1<'f<<))l k'<<'

) V:,,<<v,'Ii.i<<v)3 fr)li

<<)

l

+" ~4 (

~

l',

'4<<J

)

fVN>A'))

'fV 4,l

<<)

ff V

y'

),.'

',

"

V " <<.

Guide 1.68, Revision 2, August 1978, Initial Test Program for Water Cooled Nuclear Power Plants, ANSI 45.2.1, 1973, Cleaning of Fluid Systems, Components during Construction Phase and ANSI 18.7-1976, Administrative Controls and QA for Operational Phase of Nuclear Power Plants.

Startup and Test Personnel Training The licensee has comnitted to ANS 3.1, September 1979, Draft, Qualification and Training of Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants, regarding the selection and training of test personnel who have responsibilities in the conduct, review and approval of test procedures, and test results during the preoperational test program.

The Harris Plant Startup Manual, Section 3,

Startup Personnel Certification describes the certification process for the startup manager, supervisors and test engineers.

The training program requires that startup group personnel receive general plant orientation, classroom and American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) N-Stamp program training.

In addition

"Required Reading" of specific plant manuals such as Quality Assurance (QA) program manual, startup manual, ASME QA manual, sections of the FSAR and the startup manual is conducted at prescribed frequencies.

Revisions/Changes to these manuals are also required to be read and sign-off as completed.

The inspector selected training records of 20 of the startup group test engineers to verify that the training program is being implemented and their education and nuclear plant experience meet ANS 3.1 specified requirements.

As a result of'eviewing personnel training records and interviews with startup group test engineers, the inspector concluded that the training program as described in section three of the startup manual is being implemented except for a minor discrepancy concerning completing the program's

"Required Reading".

The inspector identified six startup group test engineers as being a

few days overdue in completing their review of the latest revision to the ASME QA Manual.

The licensee initiated action and corrected this item.

b.

Measurement and Test Equipment The licensee program which described the handling, use and storage of test equipment and instrumentation used to provide data to show that acceptance criteria is being met is identified in MMM-006, Revision

Measurement and Test Equipment Calibration Program.

The program also identifies areas of responsibilities within the maintenance group to ensure that both electrical and mechanical test equipment is calibrated using reference standards and personnel conducting these activities are trained and qualified.

The calibration program also provides and maintains calibration records, prescribed calibration frequency, instrument history cards and the care and storage of test equipment and instrumentation.

The inspector toured the calibration shop and observed equipment calibration, record keeping activities in progres Ml ~

A

~

t Hw tv)

~

h hl 'f

~ '1 h M

~ H)'

~

h IH W

'rl,ff

WH

'

444 II M

R II

' )f Mr

'f Hv

'I II

,",P, l, pf)>>" t-f

~ '

~ hg

~

~ 4 Ch ~

') f i I,f'f H,h

~ 4 Itfh r

II tl ft ih IH It I I h

t '

"~'wf h

It

'l"~ 44

~

- ~ lh

'H>>, fhft f

4 I;'II

~, H

W t I

"I"f Hl II I, f vh V

M

'4 I"

~, H tt tl I, H)V H

~

'F

'

'I It),

h]

I')

h W

~ )i I

t

'I C

I

)4'I Ir hH'I f 1 ~

1 l

I 4 th r,'"

l" 'id

~

I g

I MWM PI

+

tl

"'I l HJ

)h V I

,,4. yl

))j yC).

- li'

i L

LH lt w

f l'I h Hhl lt I ')Iltl Hhh)h 4 ~

H ~

lv

~

)

I V

Wh

~ 1

,J

~

H

'

k

4 gv Wwl h

4 )

h) f hI) H("

~

I'f II VI

,I'h I 'lt )

~,I

llH C>> tl f'i'

ith

.) i f),"4

'I'hg I" )HE f

'

f Hh

</<fh,h fHH h

I

, Mw&

M t)ill

'l HHtH

'

WH II

~

H M

l I f,t lhlMH

",

fi I

I, P

'- )(f

") i

(HH " f<<W fh'4

hl'>>

7" H

H h)ft W

Hlh

')'

f'ftf

'I fQ.

'

HI Itl JH 1 h 4)',

~

I,"l I

f

Preventive Maintenance Program MMM-003, Revision 2,

Preventive Maintenance Program sets forth instructions and responsibilities for the establishment and implementation of the program to ensure that plant equipment and structures are capable of performing their design safety functions.

The program also includes the gathering, analysis, trending and evaluation of maintenance data so that corrective actions can be planned to prevent unscheduled downtime on essential equipment.

The inspector held discussion with maintenance specialist who have responsibilities in the implementation of the program to verify that these activities are ongoing on a routine bases.

System Cleanliness and Housekeeping Program The inspector reviewed the following administrative controls to verify that a formal program for housekeeping activities during preoperational testing have been established and contains requirements to implement cleanliness zones, control of materials from a fire prevention/pro-tection standpoint and that periodic insp'ection to ensure that the housekeeping program is being implemented.

O-MMM-11, Cleanliness and Housekeeping 1-FP-07, Control of Flammable Liquids 1-FP-13, Fire Protection Housekeeping In addition to the above, the inspector reviewed the procedures listed below to verify that a program for maintaining the appropriate degree of cleanliness of nuclear plant components and piping during the preoperational test phase has been established.

The inspector also verified that water chemistry controls for primary and secondary systems are established and include requirements concerning water quality, sampling frequency, handling of out of specification chemistry and the layup of plant systems.

Startup Manual, Section 3, Flushing/Cleaning Program Preoperational Chemistry Control Manual:

(PCC)

PCC-01, Revision 0, Secondary Systems Source Water Surveillance PCC-02, Revision 0, Chemistry Surveillance Secondary System Flushing and Hydrostatic test PCC-03, Revision 0, Chemistry for Flushing, Hydrostatic Test and Wet Layup of Steam Generator PCC-04, Revision 0, Layup of Secondary Systems PCC-05, Revision 0, Primary System Source Water Surveillance

~

~ <<

ah jl

.) f,>>"

l),

i>>

t

"; f>>t

I I'

h

"I a

f

~

)

~>>,t atl.

ta

"aa

<<

Via aal

'l ii>>f a)r (.

I'1 I J l )VI 'v

'f<<

l,'

Vra ',ttr

)J 1 1>>

~

i'pa+ r ii, ) 1<<

ll f>> 1 I

Fa I iia'g>>(>>

<<V Ii

~

I'I ti I ftli<<h>> ~

'll la t

Vila<<

a

)

I It I;t

)) 1,,

~

tl,>>Mf)a,h f 1 Ii 1,',

f)'<<

I I

>>>>rat

<

I

'

~

i I

IA I)

lt)

Va l

tl r

i ~ <<ha r

),II )

I l I I>>

FF-'

N.

)ha

>>

~

f ii<<)

II rl j

<<

~ )

I a ll'I av I

I

~

'I

'

>>Ff

) f V

<<'"). +'a I

1),'t aal

)

II

I,

~

III f l,),. Vaf

=<<

1 ~

I

~ IF>>

It I II'"r>>rf ll, j

~

V Ia

~)t tl

't >>g

)

i)al

)I

'

a yit N

PCC-06, Revision 0, Chemistry Surveillance Primary System Flushes and Hydrostatic Test PCC-07, Revision 0, Chemistry Programs for Reactor Coolant System Cold Hydrostatic Test PCC-08, Revision 0, Chemistry Control During Hot Functional Testing Program (Closed)

Inspector Followup Item, 400/85-02-01, Simplify method of expressing tolerances or ranges in acceptance criterion.

The licensee issued Revis'ion 20 to the Startup Manual, Section 11 Preoperational Test Program, which incorporated an additional form for expressing quantitative acceptance crtieria tolerances by writing out the range or band of the acceptance criteria.

Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.

6.

Preoperational Test Procedure Verification (70311B)

The inspector reviewed FSAR Chapter 14, portions of the Safety Evaluation Report and Regulatory Guide 1.68 to determine if preoperational tests commitments in these documents have been identified, test procedures are being prepared, approved and issued for these tests.

The licensee's Startup Procedure Status Report reflects those test identified in FSAR Chapter 14.

Approximately 30Ã of the Chapter 14 tests have test procedures approved and issued.

This area will continued to be reviewed to verify that the pre-operational test program adequately addressess NRC requirements and licensee commitments.

Within the areas inspected no violations or deviations were identified.

7.

Plant Tour The inspector toured the control room, reactor auxiliary building, containment, containment annulus and outside plant areas to observe work activities in progress, housekeeping, and tag controls on equipment.

Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identifie if

~ Kffff.P>> ff *

f >>

Kl<<f f jK')

'

r

) 'f>>j

ii

'

I" l

" llfifKK'I

>> Q f J'ff'>>

Ki'f K)<<f ff f

> ',.","

Kffff,

>>. )i f

-" "'jl'f

' .. ','<<.f l

~,'

f W

~ ) jf

'[

K ',f'

""'.f'f -

)

'

>>g:,

)

<<

')-,"K il

>>>>

~ f'ff fl,'fK',f'fUU<<

f

"K>> ~

i<<J I,",f P>>

),'<< If.i <<f'K,>

f>>KU Uf"

)<<f '<<t'll

>

.f"

).K>>

f f

)='

'<<K)>>

', Ii~

>> ',i f)f i"

Ui)>>KU<<fh f'i I'<<'

)>>,',",Ii'KK'j fi i '

'

f'"';!

.

'I

) ) ')"UK -'

<<f)

g'<<"

l l>>~=

<<)gfKU KKji

>>P-f

~

UKg P.

P<<

>u6"

",'",

""ff)+:

'~

f Kf fj t'

'l,tff'f~

f

<<'S" ya

"

K>>,

IU'>> '

'f '

'fK"

>> 'I )

K"

<<<<g

"*ff

<<'f f J'

'

f" '"

>>

I f K<<)jan')"

U ~

l 'I ~ "f).'

~ <<,

~

I>>U f

<< '<<f<<jp'

<<

. >>)>>j r t>>')f 6f ""

"

fl'

"..

)

'll

>>'"

I'I fi, fl K',

K 1 I<<

f

<

8K )f

~

)

)

ffff ff, ~ )

~ i f '~gg>>>>'>>f'I

>>K K

K

>> I

,") <<f

'>> fK.', Qf>>f if'f, iv'/

'f)>>

I ~ f U>>

I

<< I(

f U

>>, ~