IR 05000400/1985046
| ML18003B192 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 12/13/1985 |
| From: | Decker T, Gooden A, Kreh J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18003B191 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-400-85-46, NUDOCS 8512240194 | |
| Download: ML18003B192 (22) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
101 MARIETTASTREET, N.W.
ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30323 DEC 17 jg85 Report No.:
50-400/85-46 Licensee:
Carolina Power and Light Company P. 0.
Box 1551 Raleigh, NC 27602 Docket No.:
50-400 Facility Name:
Harris
License No.:
CPPR-158 Inspection Conducted:
November 18-22, 1985 Inspectors: ~
~J.
L. Kreh k. Goodeo Accompanying Personne F
L. McManus (Comex Corporation)
Approved by:XZ T.
R. Decker, Section Chief Emergency Preparedness Section Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards D te igned
/3 Da e
igned z>/z ~
Date Signed SUMMARY Scope:
This special, announced inspection entailed 131 inspector-hours onsite in the area of emergency preparedness.
The purpose of this inspection was to evaluate the applicant's responses and corrective actions with respect to, the deficiency, improvement items, and incomplete areas identified during the emergency preparedness appraisal conducted March 4-15, 1985 (NRC Inspection Report No. 50-400/85-09).
The applicant's responses to the appraisal findings were documented in attachments to letters to the Regional Administrator dated July 26, 1985 and October 2, 1985.
Results:
No violations or deviations were identified.
BSiapqp)
OCR O~000<0 pgp
+ 19/
8g~@~
FOR
REPORT DETAILS Persons Contacted Applicant Employees AJ
~A.
"R.
- C RA
'kS G.
J.
- J E.
"A.
C.
J.
- C W.
J
~
B.
E.
M.
J.
R.
R.
A.
C.
R.
D.
W.
G.
L.
W.
G.
R.
L.
Willis, Plant General Manager Powell, Training Director Black, Jr.,
Manager, Emergency Preparedness Gibson, Assistant to the Plant General Manager Stanley, Project Specialist, Training Zimmerman, Manager, Nuclear Licensing W.
M.
M.
E.
L.
S.
E.
L.
F
~
W.
0.
M.
Bullock, Principal Engineer, Process Computers C.
Lowry, Emergency Preparedness Consultant (NUS Contractor)
A. Holder, Librarian, Technical Support Center D.
M.
L.
M.
A.
Poland, Project Specialist, Radiation Control Evans, Project Specialist - Health Physics, HEEC Shearin, Project Specialist Environmental, HEEC Ridenour, Technical Aide, Document Control Sylvester, Senior Reactor Operator Taylor, Instrument and Electrical Supervisor Sikich, Training Consultant Stamm, Training Consultant Collins, Director, Plant Operations Johnson, Document Control Supervisor Garrou, Senior Specialist, Emergency Planning Briney, Shift Foreman Brooks, Shift Foreman McKenzie, Acting Director - Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC)
Trolenberg, Project Specialist, Emergency Preparedness McDuffee, Supervisor, Radiation Control Sears, Environmental and Chemistry Foreman Bean, News Coordinator, Corporate Communications Walsh, Senio>
Specialist - Environmental, HEEC Other applicant employees contacted included engineers, technicians, operators, security personnel, and office personne NRC Resident Inspectors
"G.
F. Maxwell, Senior Resident Inspector Attended exit interview Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on November 22, 1985, with those persons indicated in Paragraph 1 above.
The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection findings.
No dissenting comments were received from the applicant.
The applicant did not identify as proprietary any of the materials provided to or reviewed by the inspectors during this inspection.
Applicant Action on Emergency Preparedness Deficiencies (25555B)
Applicant action on the deficiency identified during the March 1985 appraisal was evaluated.
(Closed)
Deficiency 400/85-09-45:
Insuring the Unusual Event matrix in PEP-101 is consistent with NUREG-0654, Appendix 1.
Attachment 1,
"Unusual Event Matrix", to PEP-101 (Revision 1) was developed in.an effort to achieve consistency with NUREG-0654, Appendix 1,
"Example Initiating Conditions:
Notification of Unusual Event".
The alarm setpoint used for the failed-fuel monitor (equivalent to 0. 1% fuel failure)
was
x 104 cpm.
This setpoint may be readjusted during power operation and testing.
In place of the NUREG-0654 example initiating condition,
"Rapid Depressurization of.PWR Secondary Side,"
the applicant chose to define specific events that would cause a rapid depressurization of the secondary side (viz.,
main steam or feedwater break; failure of a
steam generator safety or relief value to reseat after operation; or steam generator blowdown line break [applicable in Modes 1,
2,
& 3j).
While these events could cause a rapid depressuri-zation, the scope was somewhat limited in that other events not listed could also cause rapid depressurization.
The applicant agreed to add to the Unusual Event Matrix, by February 28, 1986, a general
"catch-all" statement that would capture, for the purpose of event classification, any rapid depressurization of the secondary side.
Based on the applicant's agreement confirmed by plant management representatives during the exit interview, this deficiency is closed, but a n'w item is opened:
Inspector Followup Item (400/85-46-01):
Insuring that the Unusual Event=
matrix of PEP-101 is sufficiently wide in scope to include ~an event causing rapid depressurization of the secondary side.
Applicant Action on Emergency Preparedness Improvement Items (25555B)
Applicant action on improvement items identified during the March 1985 appraisal was evaluated.
The bracketed numbers at the beginning of the subparagraphs correspond to the item numbers used in Appendix B to the letter of April 22, 1985, which transmitted NRC Report No. 50/400-85-0 (Cl osed)
Improvement Item (400/85-09-01):
Including procedural requirement for training on new emergency preparedness equipment.
Revision
to PEP-403, Section 5.5.7, stated that periodic training, in addition to annual retraining, will be provided whenever significant changes are made to the Emergency Plan (EP)
or Plant Emergency Procedures (PEPs),
as described in TI-302,
"Emergency Plan Training."
Section 3.4 of TI 302 directed the Plant General Manager to specify, in writing, to the plant training unit, specific training requirements should significant changes to the emergency preparedness program be implemented.
(Cl osed)
Improvement Item (400/85-09-02):
Providing procedu'ral method for briefing outside augmentation personnel needed in an emergency.
Section 3.3.8 of TI-302 defined the training requirements for CP&L personnel not assigned to SHNPP, vendors, consultants, etc.,
who may respond to an emergency.
Included were General Emergency Training (GET)
and selected topics as required by the Emergency Response Manager (ERM), Plant Manager (PM), or Site Emergency Coordinator (SEC).
PEP-403 provided that an exemption to training may be granted by the ERM, PM or SEC such that individuals deemed necessary for termination or mitigation of the emergency may be utilized immediately.
(Closed)
Improvement Item (400/85-09-03):
Adding to training program specific cautions to emergency personnel regarding safety during unusual plant conditions.
Section 3. 1 of TI-302 specified that portions of the EP training program shall include specific precautions relating to each individual'
responsibility to exercise caution during unusual plant conditions, such as abnormally high radiation areas or areas with changing radiation levels.
A statement was included in each lesson plan and handout advising personnel to exercise caution during plant emergencies.
(Closed)
Improvement Item (400/85-09-15):
Placing adequate numbers of plant procedures in the Control Room so that all operators having access requirements may easily accomplish their tasks.
Three copies of the Plant Emergency Procedures were noted in different locations (e.g.,
Shift Foremans office, Clearance Center, etc.) of the Control Room.
(Closed)
Improvement Item (400/85-09-21):
Providing portable radio unit for Operations Support Center (OSC) leaders in the OSC storage cabinets.
Several radios for the OCS leader's use were observed in the Operations instrument calibration laboratory, which is in a room adjacent to the OSC.
(Closed)
Improvement Item (400/85-09-22):
Providing status board for tracking repairs, damage, and monitoring teams.
An OSC storage cabinet was available and contained a personnel status board and collapsible easel board for use in tracking repai rs, damage, and monitoring team g [7]
h.[8]
(Closed)
Improvement Item (400/85-09-23):
Providing a minimum of one sound-powered phone and cord in the OSC storage cabinet.
The inspector noted that two sound-powered phone headsets and cords have been placed in OSC storage cabinet ¹2.
(Closed)
Improvement Item (400/85-09-24):
Providing dosimeters with a
range sufficient to monitor the limits set forth in the Emergency Plan for emergency workers.
Dosimeters with a range of 100R were examined and available in the dosimetry laboratory for distribution during emergencies.
These dosimeters were maintained by the Radiation Control Group.
i. [9]
j. [10]
(Closed)
Improvement Item (400/85-09-26):
Use of consistent terminology ("Site Evacuation" and "Plant Site Evacuation" were used interchangeably)
in the EP, PEP-215, and PEP-381.
The inspector reviewed the current versions of the subject documents and found that the= term "Site Evacuation" had been consistently applied.
(Closed)
Improvement Item (400/85-09-34):
Providing a written agreement between the applicant and the National Weather Service (NWS) to document the role of NWS in emergency response.
The inspector reviewed a
memorandum of agreement (signed in November 1985) detailing arrangements between the applicant and NWS on the above 'ubject.
The arrangements appeared to be adequate.
(Closed)
Improvement Item (400/85-09-35):
Eliminating reference to mixed-mode calculation if not applicable, or substantiation of the use of mixed-mode release assumptions.
The reference to mixed-mode calculations has been removed from procedure PEP-343, Rev.
3.
m [13]
(Closed)
Improvement Item (400/85-09-43):
Standardizing the wording in PEP-102 and PEP-103 relating,to the specific non-delegable authorities of the Site Emergency Coordinator (SEC).
The applicant revised the cited procedures to achieve standardiza-tion as suggested.
The delineation of nondelegable authorities of the SEC was clear and explicit, and was consistent with NRC guidance.
(Closed)
Improvement Item (400/85-09-46):
Including requests for"--
Federal assistance among the SEC'
nondelegable responsibilities.
Revision 1 of PEP-220,
"Emergency Response Manager,"
included
"requesting assistance from Federal agencies" among the responsibilities of the ERM.
Prior to activation of the EOF, this responsibility is invested in the SEC in accordance with PEP-102 and PEP-103.
The applicant'
assignment of the responsibility for requesting Federal assistance was consistent with NUREG-0654 planning criteri n.L15]
(Closed)
Improvement Item (400/85-09-48):
Dating issues of PSO-85-002 so that personnel can be assured they are using current copies.
A review indicated that Revision 3 to PSO-85-002 was dated 9/25/85, and each page of the attachments was properly numbered.
o.[16]
p (171 (Closed)
Improvement Item (400/85-09-50):
Providing a checklist in PEP-102 to assi st the SEC in using the procedure.
PEP-102, Revision 3, incorporated a checklist format in Section 9.0 to assist the SEC during an emergency.
(Closed)
Improvement Item (400/85-09-51):
Modifying Attachment
to PEP-104 to include reference to Step 9.6 regarding sheltering versus evacuation.
A review of Revision 1 to PEP-104,
"Protective Action Recommendations,"
indicated the Attachment 2 diagram now contains a decision box for evacuation or shelter based on wind speed.
In addition, the preferred recommendations based on plant conditions and affected subzones were included.
q.[18]
(Closed)
Improvement Item (400/85-09-52):
Revising PEP-104, paragraph 5.3, to reference Attachment 4 to determine affected subzones.
The revised PEP-104, paragraph 5.3, made reference to Attachment
as being used to determine affected downwind subzones.
r. [19]
s.[20]
t.[21]
u.L22]
(Closed)
Improvement Item (400/85-09-53):
Reviewing Attachment
to PEP-104 from a human-factors standpoint.
PEP-104, Revision 1,
included a revised, Attachment 2, "Protective Action Recommenda-tions Based on Plant Conditions Decision Chart,"
that was compatible with guidance in IE Information Notice No. 83-28.
This decision chart was simplified to remove the human-factor problem associated with the previo'us chart.
(Closed)
Improvement Item (400/85-09-54):
Providing a
copy of CRC-828 and Westinghouse core damage document in the TSC and EOF as reference sources.
The inspector confirmed the availability of CRC-828 (referenced in PEP-362 as a supplemental proc.) in the TSC and EOF.
The Westinghouse document,
"Core Damage Assessment Methodology,"
was a developmental reference for PEP-362 and was not intended to be incorporated by reference as was CRC-828.
The applicant agreed to separately classify these two references to clarify the di stinction described above.
(Closed)
Improvement Item (400/85-09-55):
Define the frequency of dose projection updates in PEP-216.
Revision
to PEP-216, Section 9.05, included the frequency and/or conditions for updating dose projections.
(Closed)
Improvement Item (400/85-09-60):
Reviewing PEP-207 and PEP-208 to reduce redundancy and confusion. 'he inspector's review of Revision 2 to PEP-207 and Revision 3 to PEP-208 noted
that all radiation control responsibilities during emergencies were assigned to,the Radiological Control Coordinator (PEP-208),
and al 1 chemi stry responsibi 1 ities assi gned to the Chemi stry Coordinator (PEP-207).
(Closed)
Improvement Item (400/85-09-61):
Developing a checkli st of priorities for support functions.
The applicant provided in Rev.
2 of PEP-204,
"Radiological Control Director",
a '"likely order" activities priority list.
The list was intended to provide general priority guidance for the Director.
The priority list failed to include any reference to fire and fire-fighting priority.
The applicant stated that fire fighting will be included in the list by February 28, 1986.
(Cl osed)
Improvement Item (400/85-09-62):
Developing a checklist of priorities for performing radi ol ogi cal functions.
The applicant has provided in PEP-204 a "likely order" activities priority list.
The list is intended to provide general guidance for the Director., With respect to the prioritization of Health Physics activities, the list was found to be adequate.
(Closed)
Improvement Item (400/85-09-63):
Reviewing routine procedures referenced in PEP-371 for applicability and deleting from the list those which are not applicable.
The applicant approved Revision
to PEP-371,
"Emergency Response in Radiological Areas."
The four PEPs and the
other Plant Procedures referenced in PEP-371 were applicable to the procedure.
(Closed)
Improvement Item (400/85-09-70):
Incorporating into PEP-406 a definition of a director responsible for corrective actions.
PEP-406,
"Performance of Exercises and Drills," assigned responsibility for corrective measures, action due dates, designation of cognizant Unit or Section Manager, and tracking of deficiencies noted during exercises and drills to the Senior Specialist Emergency Preparedness.
Section 3.3 of PEP-001 made the same assignment.
(Closed)
Improvement Item (400/85-09-71):
Placing administrative checklists in operation for unresolved emergency preparedness items and recurring requirements to ensure timely accomplishment.
Rev.
1 of PEP-001,
"Administration of Plant Emergency Procedures" assigned responsibility for tracking unresolved items and
-=-
recurring requirements to the Senior Specialist Emergency Preparedness.
Recurring requirements will be tracked in accordance with PEP-103,
"Surveillance and Periodic Test Program,"
which was still in the developmental process.
The applicant developed a computer (IBM-PC) tracking system for unresolved/deficient emergency preparedness
- related items.
This program was referred to as the "Emergency Preparedness Action Item List."
The program appears to be functioning adequatel aa.[28]
(Closed)
Improvement Item (400/85-09-72):
Modifying the EP to reflect that distribution of Plant Operating Manuals (POMs) is in accordance with PGO-014.
EP Section 5. 1.2 (Rev.
5) stated that approved changes to the EP will be distributed in accordance with the distribution list for the Plan and Procedures in a
Plant General Order (PGO).
Although no specific PGO is given, this statement was satisfactory.
PGO-014 (Rev.
3, dated 8/26/25)
detailed the distribution of controlled and selected uncontrolled copies and includes an acknowledgement sheet as proof of receipt for controlled copies.
bb.[29]
(Closed)
Improvement Item (400/85-09-78):
Considering engineering design change to include control board annunciator for alarms for Gross Failed-Fuel Detector System (GFFDS).
Problems or alarms on the GFFDS cause a
main control board annunciator trouble alarm.
Procedure ALB-026-2-1 (draft form)
has been prepared to direct operator action in the event of the alarm.
cc.[30]
dd.[31]
ee.[32]
.
(Closed)
Improvement Item (400/85-09-79):
Preparing off-normal response procedure for alarm on the GFFDS.
"Abnormal Operating Procedure High RCS Activity," was approved and in use.
(Closed)
Improvement Item (400/85-09-80):
Ensuring that procedural changes are promptly entered into in-use procedure'.
The applicant's Document Control Group had the responsibility for entering procedural changes to the in-use Control Room plant manuals.
RMP-002,
"Document Distribution and.Control Procedures,"
described the methods for entering and maintaining the Plan Manuals.
Monthly checks are performed by the Document Control Group to insure accuracy of the manuals.
A recent 100% audit of the Control Room manuals and procedures was conducted by Document Control and indicated a 99.8% accuracy of 3777 items checked.
(Cl osed)
Improvement Item (400/85-09-81):
Ensuring that any procedural changes are promptly brought, to the attention of cognizant personnel and that appropriate training is ultimately conducted.
TI-901A,
"Dissemination of training related information," was in use to insure that appropriate training was conducted on procedure changes, plant modifications, operational experiences, etc.
This procedure was being revised for program improvement.
The Operations Department utilized Procedure OMM-009, to provide information to Operations personnel.
Required reading and reviews of procedure changes were addressed in OMM-009.
5.
Applicant Action on Incomplete Emergency Preparedness Areas (25555B)
The inspector evaluated selected areas of the licensee's emergency preparedness program that were found to be'incomplete during the March 1985 appraisal.
The bracketed numbers at the beginning of the subparagraphs
correspond to the item numbers used in Appendix C to the letter of April 22, 1985, which transmitted NRC Report No. 50-400/85-09.
a.[1]
b [2]
(Closed)
Incomplete Ar ea (400/85-09-04):
Completing respiratory protection training for designated personnel.
The initial respiratory protection training program was completely A
spot check was made comparing Rev.
of the Onsite Emergency Organization chart (which indicated those personnel requiring respirator training)
against the computer records showing personnel who have successfully completed respirator traini'ng.
No discrepancies were noted.
This portion of the applicant's program appeared adequate.
(Closed)
Incomplete Area (400/85-09-05):
Completing necessary and scheduled training of State and local agencies as specified in EP training, drill, and exerci se schedule.
The following records of training were reviewed:
Apex Volunteer Fire Department Holly Springs Rural Fire Department State and local officials Emergency Plan overview class.
Several classes were conducted from Nov.
1984 to March 1985.
Emergency Plan Training for the Wake County Sheriff's Department was rescheduled for Dec.
1985.
c.[5]
(Closed)
Incomplete Area (400/85-09-08):
Completing emergency personnel make-up classes.
All make-up classes and training were complete.
The Emergency Plan training conducted was compared to the Onsite Emergency Organization Personnel Chart.
No discre-
. ancies were noted.
d.L6]
e. [9]
.f. [12]
(Closed)
Incomplete Area (400/85-09-09):
Completing planned walk-through and talk-through training and drills for onsite and offsite support organizations.
The inspector reviewed documentation of the major preparatory training sessions for the May 1985 exercise.
These sessions were conducted on April 18, 1985; April 25, 1985; May 2, 1985; and May 9-10, 1985.
The conduct of these preparatory drills was considered adequate as demonstrated by the successful pre-license exercise.
(Closed)
Incomplete Area (400/85-09-12):
Complete the instal-lation and testing of State and local emergency communication systems.
Installation has been completed for the Automatic Ring-Down (ARD) to State and local warning points.
A records review (Form OPT-0101-2-0)
indicated monthly testing was conducted according to procedure OPT-0101, titled
"Monthly Emergency Communication Drills," Revision 0.
(Closed)
Incomplete Area (400/85-09-16):
Completion of construction items in the Technical Support Center (TSC)
such as
I l
g [13]
power systems, ventilation, radiation monitoring, and facility integrity.
The TSC has been turned over from Construction, and the inspector verified that power, ventilation and radiation monitoring systems were installed.
However, the ventilation system had failed during qualification tests to produce the required positive pressure (0. 125 inch water column),
apparently due to the absence of door seals.
Preliminary tests indicated that facility integrity will be verified once the door seals are in place, expected by February 28, 1986.
Based on the above findings, this item is closed, but a
new inspector follow-up item is opened.
Inspector Follow-up Item 9400/85-46-02):
Verifying TSC positive-pressure specification.
(Closed)
Incomplete Area (400/85-09-17:
Completing installation and testing of TSC communications systems.
The required equipment was installed.
The inspector reviewed records of monthly testing of the Emergency Notification System (ENS),
the Health Physics Network (HPN) equivalent, and the Automatic Ring-Down (ARD) to the State and counties.'.
[14]
i. [15]
j.[17]
(Closed)
Incomplete Area (400/85-09-18):
Completing stocking of the emergency kits.
The TSC emergency kits appeared to be fully stocked in accordance with their respective inventories.
(Open)
Incomplete Area (400/85-09-19):
Completing the instal-lation and testing of the Emergency Response Facility Information System (ERFIS) in the TSC.
The inspector observed a demonstration of the ERFIS at one of the consoles in the TSC.
Capabilities and limitations of the system were discussed.
Although the ERFIS hardware was installed, the applicant acknowledged that the software was still in the testing/debugging stage.
This area will be reviewed again during a future inspection.
(Open)
Incomplete Area (400/85-09-25):
Installation and testing of Emergency Response Facility Information System (ERFIS) in the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF).
All terminal installations for ERFIS have been completed; however, the system testing was incomplete at this time.
The inspector was informed that software problems (with a
minimal number of hardware problems) still existed.
Remaining EOF items that were identified by the applicant during the appraisal as being incomplete have been resolved.
k.[20]
(Closed)
Incomplete Area (400/85-09-29):
Completing the Supplemental Procedure, PEP-402, to reflect all the emergency equipment and supplies.
Supplemental specific information, such as the proposed PS0-85-014, is needed and should include maintenance responsibilities.
Revision 1 to PEP-402,
"Haintaining Readiness of Emergency Facilities,"
Section 3.0, identified by
I
~r
1.[21]
m.[22]
n.[26]
o.[27]
p L29]
q [30]
title the responsible individual for maintenance of emergency equipment and supplies.
As a
supplement to PEP-402, PSO-85-014 contained an inventory of supplies and equipment for each emergency.
In addition, the individuals responsible for maintaining and periodically inventorying kits were listed'Open)
Incomplete Area (400/85-09-30):
Verifying operability and accuracy of in-plant capabilities for detecting airborne iodine in the presence of noble gases.
In-plant procedures for collection, preparation, and analysis of air samples has been revised to include sample purging of noble gases from iodine cartridges prior to performing gamma isotopic analysis'ocumentation was reviewed that indicated an in-plant analytical system was available and calibrated for various geometries; however, actual iodine analysis, or iodine verification checks, have not been made.
(Closed)
Incomplete Area (400/85-09-31):
Perform operability and calibration procedures after final inventories have been established.
Several survey insturments stored inside emergency cabinets in the TSC, OSC, EOF, and security building were checked for operability and current calibration stickers.
All equipment was operable and within calibration requirements.
(Closed)
Incomplete Area (400/85-09-37):
Completing installation of the Security radio system.
The Security radio system, as well as the Operations and Maintenance (0&M) radio repeater system ( see paragraph 5.o below),
was demonstrated for the inspector.
Both systems had been completed and in use since before the May 1985 exercise, according to the applicant.
During the inspection, the applicant was in the process of connecting both systems to an uninterruptible power supply, a task scheduled to be completed by Dec.
31, 1985.
(Closed)
Incomplete Area (400/85-09-38):
Completing the 08M radio repeater system.
Discussed in paragraph S.n above.
(Closed)
Incomplete Area (400/85-09-40):
Completing tie-ins to ARD warning points.
The subject task was completed on June 26, 1985.
The ARD connects to the State Warning Point and to the counties of Wake, Chatham, Lee, and Harnett.
(Cl osed)
Incompl ete Area (400/85-09-41):
Compl eting final operational testing of all emergency communication systems.
The applicant's emergency communications systems as delineated in EP Section 3.8 and as demonstrated during the May 1985 exercise, were reviewed by the inspector and determined to be operational.
Although only partial documentation of final operational testing was available for review, the applicant stated that such testing had been conducted, and the inspector's random testing of the various systems disclosed no inoperable equipmen I
(Closed)
Incomplete Area (400/85-09-42):
Review reserve emergency supplies and equipment.
Much of the reserve equipment and supplies were available in the Waste Processing Building, although final implacement of many items was awaiting construction turnover.
Locations and types of reserves were described in PEP-402,
"Maintaining Readiness of Emergency Facilities."
(Closed)
Incomplete Area (400/85-09-44):
Inclusion of steps in Emergency Alarm and Abnormal Procedures to direct user to the proper PEPs.
The applicant has completed entry of a
step or precautionary note that directs the user into the Emergency Plan from the various Operating Procedures, Abnormal Operating Procedures, Emergency Operating Procedures, etc.
The inspector conducted a
spot check of the Control Room (CR)
and Technical Support Center (TSC) procedures to verify entry of the steps in question.
No discrepancies were noted in the CR procedures.
Several entries were missing from the TSC copies of the Operating Procedures.
The applicant's document control group was in process of distributing ten changes to the controlled distribution list.
(Closed)
Incomplete Area (400/85-09-49):
Describing in PEP-342 the ERFIS dose projection methodology.
The applicant has chosen to rely on the (previously inspected)
IBM PC method of dose projection on an interim basis, since the ERFIS software for dose projection was neither operable nor inspectable.
The applicant stated an intention to eventually include dose projection capability in the ERFIS.
(Closed)
Incomplete Area (400/85-09-56):
Reviewing offsite radiological survey program.
A procedures review indicated that PEP-351 and PEP-206 were revised to remove disparities that previously exi'sted between PEP-351, PEP-206, and RC-EM-19.
Examples of items that were clarified as a result of procedural revisions were:
1) individual by title with lead responsibility for direction/control of monitoring teams, 2) team deployment, 3)
individual by title that receives records and logs of emergency response activity, and other matters regarding environmental monitoring during emergencies.
(Closed)
Incomplete Area (400/85-09-57):
Reviewing onsite out-of-plant radiological survey program.
The inspector's review and a
discussion with 'company representatives indicated that the procedure for conducting radiological surveys inside the exclusion area boundary has been completed.
Revision 2 to PEP-351 provided procedures for performing offsite radiological monitoring surveys within the exclusion area boundary.
PEP-206 and PEP-223 identified by title the individuals responsible for direction and control of monitoring teams during emergencies.
(Closed)
Incomplete Area (400/85-09-58):
Changing Section 2.3 of PEP-331 to reflect deletion of HPP-605 and the addition of
HPP-060.
A review of Revision 3 to PEP-331,
"Emergency Plant Monitoring," indicated the changes involving deletion of HPP-605 and the addition of HPP-060 to Section 2.3 were completed.
(Closed)
Incomplete Area (400/85-09-59):
Completing the printing and distribution of survey forms in the appropriate procedures.
The inspector reviewed HPP-060,
"Performance of Radiation and Contamination Surveys,"
and noted survey forms were included as an attachment.
(Closed)
Incomplete Area (400/85-09-67):
Completing SHNNP site-specific training for corporate public information personnel.
Records were provided to the inspector showing that 67 applicant employees received the subject training prior to the May 1985 exercise.
(Closed)
Incomplete Area (400/85-09-68):
Completing public education with respect to SHNNP.
The applicant stated that a copy of the SHNNP public information brochure (in the form of a
calendar)
was sent to each household and business in the 10-mile EPZ during September 1985.
In addition, EPZ residents have been receiving a four-page newsletter called "Harris News" on approxi-mately a quarterly basis since December 1984.
A "media training day" was held prior to the May 1985 exercise.
An extensive file of articles on SHNNP from area newspapers was reviewed by the inspector.
(Closed)
Incomplete Area (400/85-09-69):
Reviewing inventory,
'peration check, and calibration of emergency equipment, facilities and supplies.
PEP-402,
"Maintaining Readiness of Emergency Facilities,"
provided instructions for maintaining emergency facilities and kits in a condition of readiness.
It detailed the responsibility for the various facilities and kits to be inventoried and frequency of inventory.
A Plant Special Order,
"Emergency Equipment Inventory Checklists" (PS0-85-014, Rev. 2),
provided a detailed account of the equipment requirement for each facility and kit utilized in the emergency preparedness program.
(Closed)
Incomplete Area (400/85-09-73):
Completing training for the State and county agencies.
This item essentially duplicated Incomplete Area (400/85-09-05).
See discussion in paragraph 5.b.
above.
(Closed)
Incomplete Area (400/85-09-74):
Completing the emergency kits for Rex Hospital and Wake County Medical Centers The inspector reviewed the listing of contents for kits and records of the first regular quarterly inventory conducted in Sept.
1985 at both hospitals.
(Closed)
Incomplete Area (400/85-09-75):
Submitting the final version of the public information brochure for review by FEMA and
~
a fl
NRC.
Concurrence by FEMA and NRC in the subject publication was documented in a letter dated September 6,
1985 from the Region II office to the applicant.
(Open)
Incomplete Area (400/85-09-76):
Completing the placing of public notices for transients.
The applicant indicated that this aspect of the public information program had not yet been implemented.
The following projects are being planned by the applicant in the effort to fulfill applicable regulatory requirements:
complete placement of signs around Harris Lake; place information stickers on public-telephone books; distribute supplies of brochure and stickers to motels (only one such facility presently within the 10-mile EPZ),
restaurants, stores, etc.,
in the EPZ
.
This area will be reviewed again during a
future inspection.
(Open)
Incomplete Area (400/85-09-77):
Reviewing Program Implementation.
The applicant has implemented the annual exercise program,,and successfully completed the first exercise in Nay 1985.
The next exercise is scheduled for July 1986.
However, conduct and scheduling of required drills was not implemented.
The applicant planned to include Emergency Preparedness drill scheduling in PEP-103.
Currently, the applicant's Regulatory Compliance Unit was assisting in establishing the main data base for scheduling.
Once this is developed
, responsibility wi 11 shift to Planning and Scheduling.