IR 05000400/1985013
| ML18018B933 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 03/29/1985 |
| From: | Jape F, Taylor P NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18018B932 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-400-85-13, NUDOCS 8505210107 | |
| Download: ML18018B933 (8) | |
Text
~R ASCII,Np0 Cy 0O IA c
~
o
/p
'<+*AD+
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
101 MARIETTASTREET, N.IN.
ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30323 Report No.:
50-400/85-13 Licensee:
Carolina Power and Light Company 411 Fayetteville Street Raleigh, NC 27602 Docket No.:
50-400 Facility Name:
Harris
Inspection Conducted:
March 18-22, 1985 Inspector:
c~W
~ P..
Tay or Approved by:
F. Jape, ection C ief Engineering Branch Division of Reactor Safety License No.:
CPPR-158 Date Soigne 9/~p/Ps Date Soigne SUMMARY Scope:
This routine, unannounced inspection entailed 32 inspector-hours at the site in the areas of overall preoperation test program review, preoperational test procedure verification and plant tour.
Results:
No violations or deviations were identified.
07 8 OOPOO g02 F90 Og210O<5 050op9
>4 AJf t
"
"'+foal A~(RA "t>>tt,')I>>
$ If'
AI',)
l '
I~ g N'g PPj f jlggffgf) f'oal
'
ll g'hatt t j tllft
")IIII g lW(
y l,',Al)6;tt'tA"f q~fjl'
<<']
t,,i'.sf'ftt 1'f
'.tt',.'A,<<a>~,'P
"." IP f
>t'I 'I'ft ~ "/<eltt"fP I ""f )Etl;I fg~
IA~~)')Rtt 'f)
>I'A" I>,f f A
~ fP f.'<,I)
I, I<>>
'ttff "'y'Pl'gf'f tV ')'I'L",'.t,'.">ff'
REPORT DETAILS Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- G. L. Forehand, Director, Quality Assurance/Quality Control
- N. J. Chiangi, Manager, Quality Assurance/Quality Control
- C. S. Hinnant, Manager, Startup
- C. S.
Bohanan, Director, Regulatory Compliance
- G. T. Lew, Startup Supervisor
- C. R.
Osman, Principal Quality Assurance/Quality Control Specialist-Nondestructive Examination
- M. G. >Iallace, Construction Specialist C. Rose, Operations QA Supervisor Other licensee employees contacted included engineers and office personnel.
NRC Resident Inspector
- G. F. Maxwell
- Attended exit interview Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on March 22, 1985, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.
The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection findings.
No dissenting comments were received, from the licensee.
The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the materials provided to or reviewed by the inspector during this inspection.
Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters This subject was not addressed in the inspection.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during the inspection.
Overall Preoperational Test Program Review (70301)
The inspector conducted a review of the Harris Facility Startup Manual Volume I, Revision 20.
This document identifies those administrative controls that will be used to conduct the preoperational and startup test programs.
The inspector reviewed the following sections of the Harris Startup Manual:
ryli 'l I M
lla' f
'r p I j'
P 'r lal 'ga)lI.>>
l f,')
>>> o')<<
) Il4>,,
Ii I '<
)~a'rji f'
II I
)
I l I r
g l Il"l(fir""
'.i
,il,jlf jj ylgg
<<ii)!'I p
~).r 7" "'l,'
Kl
~
)
a
'
a I'lf,l)',f ", 'i I -yy
" '0)')
r
~ f J I
af 4 SS)rII j>
>1 Il l
II
~
Ifl)
~)I r>i~
i I <>f)>>
jil
~aiI)J
. f iara+
g) ~ " '
Il P;li, l)f
- ~
V f
lI 'rf4
l, fa;II II I ll I
i C.I'
p-
"l I
f)r)tl gl
,
III l l)
I ~ Ia,al
~
I ) II"4 r() A
'Jf'll
)
a a0 r)A 4 f'P I)ag f )
II I]ji
~ ) I
"I ')lI(<<,)f
%ra f'a)lq l"I'I,rr ~I ) >).
,, f IIIl
~
I C,'I'f t()
f)a)$
,
'a
)
')
~
q II Wll )
Za ga jj I I)'fj Ig V )
II
Section 11, Preoperational Test Program Section 12, Handling Test Failures, Nonconformances and Reportable Items Section 13, Design Change Process Section 14, Temporary Field Modifications:
Control and Identification Section 20, Declaration of System Operability Section 21, Star tup Group and Operations Interface The above portions of the Startup Manual (SUM) were reviewed to ascertain that the preoperational test program administrative controls have been developed in accordance with commitments and requirements specified in Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR),
Chapter 14.2, Preoperational Test Program; Regulatory Guide 1.68, Revision 2, August 1978, Initial Test Program for Water Cooled Nuclear Power Plant; and ANSI 18.7-1976, Administrative Controls and gA for Operational Phase of Nuclear Power Plants.
ANSI 18.7, Section 5.2.6, Equipment Control, requires that temporary modifications shall be controlled by approved procedures which shall include a requirement for independent verification.
The inspector noted that the preoperational startup program and, specifically, Section 14 of the Startup Manual do not require independent verification.
This program, however, will be in effect prior to issuance of an operating license as the licensee has committed to TMI Action Item I.C.6 implementation.
Section 14 does not require periodic audits or checks to be conducted on temporary modification.
The status of plant systems is provided by the temporary modification log.
These areas were discussed with startup management who indicated that startup engineers routinely conduct audits on system temporary modification to ensure control is being maintained.
Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
6.
Preoperational Test Procedure Verification (703118)
The inspector reviewed FSAR Chapter 14, portions of the plant's Safety Evaluation Report (NUREG-1038)
and Regulatory Guide 1.68, Revision 2, Test Program for Nuclear Power Plants to verify that:
Preoperational testing commitments in these documents have been identified for accomplishment.
Preoper ational test procedures are being prepared for the required commitments Identified tests are being scheduled for performanc ~ >>
M A )
i qf
<<
il
-
li /P Il )
F}I I I,
I
~
Ij )
,) <<>><4)>>)I<<>>
1,
I") fy,
)IM>>
jj 1'<<My+ 1 ";~
"~
MI<<>>j F
) fj)M,
"'.3, j f))
I,M,ar-
~
'
If>>M'I'f
1 +
1>>
.'Jl'y i
~
"
~
" ",C,l vf,
"'t<<<<M
'>>f}F 'v }I ),
I<<", "l
) f>>I, ) 'i'I
+ ",!"
'I 1)
i~,
1'fy<>MP %,<<Fl
"
I
'F '
i M
> ~ if) ">>f
~ "J;')
If")'6 ~
<<
i, ( <<7~ )',
M
~
l "M)f")
MI i
yf>>l""
)I>> )t}vM'}I j
jg }JFM ~I'l>>ff "if+1} ""1
-
I
'<<1 J")
<< t>>
) '1~
I
')
E (llew
'
)I>>
M<<f~F', <<M'Mi" ji>>g 'F
')f f )
'vffjj ll Il
'I
~
F>>M>>I')
l "'>>M i,p I
'}<<,.>>If<<","*'vjII I "l <<)(i )
'
I) <'C'
)fd" f V ""'" I'j
'),".) )V l 1>>)>>
l I M,M ij,)
M)
~'+f V
}
gI<<f II MI f
Ffi" j<<'V + ),
M F'
)r,'..'
<<M~ff ~
ff )
.),
1)"',
.I}rt),
~ >>l>>IIl; l~f I,I Iij VC, '>>) I',
iv
-
<<I M) iii y
)
I,
'"}"<<<)
M 1)
j)gy<<
M-
<<I <<'I;
','
" >>f
>> I I I" !I, g "}f"lfi ',l ".i 1 I"'}>>',
'
fi<<."Vi}j <<)
- I 1 1<<'-
>>"
~i)I1 1,'Q
)
Il
<<
l l 'f i!
gyj)
"
1'
I')
.I-'"
<<
"'
i "'I
<<Q
<< ~ <<M'
) )";"
y~r=
<<
I II 1 Il M yr I f >>.
', f,~IMI,)f
"" jj.
'- '.'I,i
')"I ) i ) 1
'1 fl, f l.,'
") MII)f'i<<;
<<
"F.'f '"<<I k<<if f f<<.'I ~')I
<< "M/<<I,I)i f 'I,')<<,),l >>'
<<<<J>>)F-1'vl}if i)f )IIf y}
'
<<
l'
'7'<<} "1
<<
>>
9 I'/
f I}tll'l>>
) f
<<, f i
I y
'
<<) "ij Ml.)
I <<y
)"
<<w
~ Mr
"M'II,,
I, 1)
I 1 l ll~ 1<<li FV II
'F '<<f)
MI <<>>
M'"f I
il 1il 1>>
The scheduling of test activities is primarily accomplished utilizing the critical path method which identifies all test program activities to support major milestones, such as the reactor coolant system cold hydrostatic test which is scheduled for April 1985.
The licensee issues test activity schedules on a weekly basis and planning meetings are held daily to support the preoper ational test program.
The licensee also issues a startup procedure status report on a
monthly basis.
This document provides preoperational test procedure status with respect to their being approved and issued.
Presently 183 preoperational tests have been identified with 55 being approved and issued for use.
The inspector examined the issued preoperational test procedures and noted that the test methods provided in the procedure agree favorably with the test abstracts provided in Chapter
of the FSAR.
The above areas will continue to be reviewed to ensure testing requirements and commitments are being implemented.
Within the areas inspected, no violation or deviations were identified.
7.
Plant Tour The inspector toured the control room, reactor auxiliary building, containment, containment annulus and outside plant areas to observe work activities in progress, housekeeping, and tag controls on equipment.
Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identifie )l)4r'
>>
> 4'r
)
)
4>"
g>f).
"f)ill
"i
~
$
4 '4)
f )
II >>
>
1% )
~
I i
~ '>
>> ">.
Fg f
gt I,
Cl>) I't
>I f $ )t CC
'>t >,'I',t~ J
'('
4,1 II l,t>I
'
<
'
L',t fi I
r
/) f ),
)4'C
)
fCIIT
~
,'1 '
tg" ', >>
I'
4 yg '4 gy>'1'
)
)
, Cf'4, Ci C ) I 4)
f '")>>)>'I'
)
'
CA
'4" "')'9
"
"
'Il)y)
4>
II
<r
)) f rl))
r'fc
".'<<,).),.
') '* 'f )
I r],
)t
')
".
>q 'g).
)
It )C4>CC',"fW
'>'J
.
'",
'
)"
>>"f>)fC)
I'" "AP
) <
.,
4),')
>C 4,)
'I'))( '
~ g ) "
> ',I')
)>f) ))'
'i~
r I
t r
"fill>)4
"4'I II)
t )fk)4
)'>g Il(
>
,44> 'f
~
f4(
>4) fQ f))> )I r
I ti>>
ti
~ )I
~ r)r
~
)
>4
f>1>'i)
',
~'1
>~C
>'=)>,
~
444 >.l >>
i