IR 05000400/1985003
| ML18003B068 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 02/07/1985 |
| From: | Blake J, Kleinsorge W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18003B067 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-400-85-03, 50-400-85-3, IEB-80-08, IEB-80-8, IEB-83-06, IEB-83-07, IEB-83-6, IEB-83-7, NUDOCS 8503060847 | |
| Download: ML18003B068 (13) | |
Text
~I 8 RKCu, Ip.0 ty
- nO
+>>*++
UNITEDSTATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
101 MARIETTASTREET, N.IN.
ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30323 Report No.:
50-400/85-03 Licensee:
Carolina Power and Light Company 411 Fayetteville Street Raleigh, NC 27602 Docket No.:
50-400 Facility Name:
Harris
Inspection Co d
ary-18 1985 License No.:
CPPR-158 Inspector:
W rge at igne Approved by:
e, ection ie Engineering Branch Division of Reactor Safety te igne SUMMARY Scope:
This routine, unannounced inspection entailed 32 inspector-hours on site in the areas of licensee action on previous enforcement matters (92702),
construction progress (92706B), preservice inspection (730528 and 73053B),
weld heat treatment (55156B),
nondestructive examination (57050B)
and IE Bulletins (927038).
Results:
No violations or deviations were identified.
8503060847 8502if PDR ADOCK 05000400
P H
~
N I
H l
r
I If PI H
l H
Il Ol ll
N
'1 I h
HI ll l f')
REPORT DETAILS 1.
Licensee Employees Contacted
- R. M. Parsons, Project General Manager Completion Assurance
- N. J. Chiangi, Manager QA/QC Harris
- E. M. Steudel, Manager Technical Support
- R. Hanford, Manager Welding
- H. W. Bowles, Director ONS
- G. L. Forehand, Director QA/QC
- C. S.
Bohanan, Director Regulatory Compliance
- D. A. McGaw, Superintendent
-
- M. D. Vernon, Superintendent
-
- C. R.
Osman, Principal QA/QC Specialist NDE
- D. C. Whitehead, QA Supervisor Other licensee employees contacted included construction craftsmen, engineers, technicians, and office personnel.
NRC Resident Inspectors
- R. Prevatte (Construction)
- G. F. Maxwell (Operations)
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on January 18, 1985, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.
The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection findings listed below.
No dissenting comments were received from the licensee.
(Open)
Inspector Followup Item 400/85-03-01:
"Unavailable Post Weld Heat Treatment (PWHT) Records" - paragraph 7a(1)(b).
The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the materials provided to or reviewed by the inspectors during this inspection.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters (92702)
a ~
(Closed)
Violation 400/82-03-01:
"Incorrect Signoff Of Welding Inspection Record" CPLL's letter of response dated June 1,
1982, has been reviewed and determined to be acceptable by Region II.
The inspector held discussions with the responsible engineer and examined the corrective actions as stated in the letter of response.
The inspector concluded that CPSL had determined the full extent of the subject noncompliance, performed the necessary survey and follow-up actions to correct the
e rfrs 5,
5 J,W J
)r Ip) ~
5 fs
) )f"rt'1
')
1I!I
Wlllly It 5 "I
"".ll IIP
"
~ )is '-
)dsll~
r5'5
~ sf
'I
,,tl,,
S=
l)
I" sf f4
'
'
l~
ltf f ) S<<f rt 5'")sll i
5 Sf
~ If
~)r
~ I',
hr rr)
It I
WW J, W
f
"5 if
~
I 5"
"'
h
'l"'hsL )
l'55t 's'
I
')"tl 5'IIII s'WW r
s $ 55
,rr 'W l
I
'I, tf W
)
I,I, I
I" W
t
I I<<T I
',ll't
<<fp $
I II Wa
present conditions and developed the necessary corrective actions to preclude recurrence of similar circumstances.
The corrective actions identified in the letter of response have been implemented.
b.
(Closed) Violation 400/82-03-02:
"Non-Certified Welding Inspectors" CP&L's letters of response dated June 1 and July 30, 1982, have been reviewed and determined to be acceptable by Region II.
The inspector held discussions with the responsible engineer and examined the corrective actions as stated in the letters of response.
The inspectors concluded that CP8L had determined the full extent of the subject noncompliance, performed the necessary survey and follow-up actions to correct the present conditions and developed the necessary corrective actions.
The corrective actions identified in the letters of response have been implemented.
4.
Unresolved Items (92701)
Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Independent Inspection Effort (92706B)
Construction Progress The inspector conducted a general inspection of the power-block construction area to observe construction progress and construction activities such as welding, material handling and control, housekeeping and storage.
Within the areas examined, no violations or deviations were identified.
6.
. Preservice Inspection (PSI)
The inspector reviewed the PSI procedures and observed work activities indicated in the following paragraphs to determine whether the procedures and activities were consistent with regulatory requirements and licensee commitments.
The applicable code for PSI is ASME B 8 PV Code,Section XI, 1980 edition with addenda through winter 1981.
a e Review of Procedures (73052B)
Approval The inspector reviewed the below listed procedures to ascertain whether they had been approved by authorized licensee personnel and Level III examiners.
Procedure No.
CP&L-IST-501-Rev.
Tit1e
"Procedure for Ultrasonic Examination of Piping Systems (NES)"
b.
Observation of Work and Work Activities (73053B)
The inspector observed the PSI activities described below to determine whether these activities had been performed in accordance with regulatory requirements and licensee procedures.
Ultrasoni'c Examination Weld No.
Iso.
No.
In-progress ultrasonic (UT) inspection work activity was observed and compared with the requirements of the applicable procedure and code in the following areas:
availability of and compliance with approved NDE procedures; use of knowledgeable NDE personnel; use of NDE personnel qualified in the proper level; recording of inspection results; type of apparatus used; extent of coverage of weldment; calibration require-ments; search units; beam angles; DAC curves; reference level for monitoring discontinuities; method of demonstration of penetration; limits for evaluating and recording indications; recording significant indications; and acceptance limits.
Inspection The inspector observed a portion of the 45'xamination conducted on the below listed weld joints:
1-RH-SW-E5 1-RH-SW-E6 1-ISI-RH-9 1-ISI-RH-9 Within the areas examined, no violations or deviations were identified.
7.
Weld Heat Treatment (55156B)
a
~
The inspector reviewed records for safety-related structures as indicated below to determine whether applicable code and procedural requirements had been met.
The applicable code for Post Weld Heat Treatment (PWHT) is ASME Section III, Subsection NE, Class MC (74 W 76)
and AWS Dl.1-75 as applicable.
(1)
PWHT (a)
The inspector reviewed the licensee's program to determine whether approved and adequate procedures were available for the conduct of PWHT and whether the licensee had a system capable of meeting the heating and cooling rates, metal temperature, temperature unformity and control limits specified in the ASME BSPV Code and AWS Dl.l as applicable.
(b)
By review of records, the inspector reviewed post-weld activities to determine whether weld area was instrumented to provide time-temperature records for the duration of the
k, p
F
'
\\
H
)
"
i I...I ff 4>>
fi Flffh I
4 I
~
II
~
ft It Il
~,
I'
<<VI f
Ill<< ~
~ I SFI P
F F
k P'P,fh H
I 4"
p Ii
hp pl I
I
~
gf Vl~
v'K K
K
,,li fi f
'I lf',hh i
'F I fp l p
p j
pp Itif>>PN N
Ft
',
it,'4<<
li'N f'I.Nkvd '")
Kk )"
~
"pki,h'"'I
/
~
..i ~
If 4'
'(
'g p>>)
kf
I I,'I K"
~ H tf KF'
r
) <<NF$ + Vt P>> F
I, H
if
FF) f
I lfip lgplj h
Ill,f
F>>
h
I H<<ll N
H p
N Avf II I Ki,
'lp 4 4)
I k
'li p
') I'
tp F
,
~
IVI k F
It j
'I'N P
F Nk'
L I If I
p F)<<J I,
Nfl K
'
H'
i
Nrp 0 KP 4,'
I lit
,
~ ;p P
'KPN g
" 'A<)'I II k
I,'
p<<i SV EV I l
entire heat treatment cycle; temperature monitoring instru-ments were properly calibrated; sufficient temperature measuring devices were used; PWHT temperature and holding time
'was specified, was adhered to; maximum initial temperature, heat-up and cool-down rates were specified, and were adhered to; temperature records being generated reflect adherence to regulatory requirements:
Weld Joint Structure Code 10E8-36B1RB 10E8-36B1RA 519 M5/512G1WB/F DDR 621 326 M3/326 M4 C1-278.5-M-3 MSPP C1-278.5-M-2 MSPP Cl-271-M-4 FPP C1-271-M-6 FPP Frame 2 Air Accumulator Frame 2 Air Accumulator Restraint Structure Main Steam Restraint Crossover Leg Restraint Main Steam Penetration-Main Steam Penetration Feedwater Penetration Feedwater Penetration D1. 1 D1.1 Dl.l Dl. 1 D1.1 II I NE III NE III NE III NE With regard to the examination above, the PWHT records for C-1-182-FW-33 and C-1-182-FW-34 on 1364-39491 R6 with FCR-H-1291 on weld map M-10-110 Rl were requested but not available at the time of this inspection.
The inspector indicated that, pending NRC review of the above PWHT records, this matter would be identified as inspector followup item 400/85-03-01:
"Unavailable PWHT Records."
(2)
Stress Relief The inspector examined the cumulative stress-relief records for above welds to determine whether the total time at temperature did not exceed that permitted by applicable Code requirements based on the welding procedure qualification record.
Within the areas examined, no violations or deviations were identified.
8.
Nondestructive Examination The inspector reviewed procedures, observed in-process examinations and reviewed quality records as described below to determine whether applicable code, procedure and regulatory requirements were being met.
The applicable code for nondestructive examination is ASME B&PV Code,Section V,
1974 Edition with Addenda through Winter 1976.
a.
Review of guality Program The inspector reviewed the below listed documents to ascertain whether the nondestructive examination program had been approved by the licensee and whether adequate plans and procedures had been established
~ Sj "
I
~ )W
<<f
- ~, 'IW h
)
M tl H
M t
M M '
hI, l Wf, M
f,
>
M
H f)
M I 'II lIMQPMII'ht W -
MH
~ WI
~
j
~ I M 7
')>I, h
'
"I
,,}I" II )(I t),~tg '"
II H
II c 'l W.'W) ll>>
HH H
II
)I 1
'" I'W MH th M
II
"f]
I,'If
~ h.
'
hh '
'
Q
'))"'"j 7)j.',
II'j, H"a)
.W
~'>><4j"4))ii,:,
It t M
1 ~
t
~, ~
MM H
(1 ) I)
S MSP W
l(M
'
lt H
'M, M
II
,)q),) '
q>>
[
~
H r
II It I j) MIf)S 'WI M, 'h M
Q )
)lIg P
M I
M f j HIW)
h ', I
.,1 W
HI ~
H
~ I'H 'Ph, P
S j ~
)
M WH
'M IIH ~ ))'ll ')
I ),1 1'~)'>
"HI g
")h )ht
'j)t)
.
.<<h 'II
'IC)QH'Whh
'll j I,)
'l -W
~ M)
~I,
)HWW) ~
f y
I ~ )h t
SW I.
IIt,)
II M
~ )
M It M
)
II)J
~ '" 1)
~ )
tj)
1 )M)
e A
to assure that the modification project would be controlled and accomplished consistent with commitments and regulatory requirements.
Number CP8L-NDEP-606, Rev.
b.
Visual Examination (57050B)
(1)
Procedure Review Title
"Remote Visual Weld Examination" The inspector reviewed Procedure NDEP-606 RO to ascertain whether it had been reviewed and approved in accordance with the licensee's established gA procedures.
The above procedure was reviewed for technical adequacy and conformance with ASME,Section V, Article 9 and other licensee commitments/requirements in the below listed areas:
Method Application Kow visual examination is to be performed Surface condition Method for surface preparation Direct/remote viewing Special illumination Sequence of performing examination Data to be tabulated Acceptance criteria Report form (2)
Work Obser vation The inspector, by direct observation, reinspected/reviewed the visual examinations indicated below to determine whether the inspection procedure clearly specified required tests; the procedure was available; required tools were available; test attributes were consistent with the procedure; defects were evaluated in accordance with the procedure; correct acceptance criteria were used; and results were reported in the prescribed manner.
Weld 4 to embed on CAR-2168G-220, R6 - Package 261-C3822N-422.
A Within the areas examined, no violations or deviations were identifie g R,R fh I
~
I
~ r
>vq I
<<4 "a"
I 2 f>>I)I:)9"f
)
,')II':)<<I Of
[,IV
)"<<<<
I
'
'4 4)E C<<>><<
'('
<<I
"~
l h'.
,
I, ',ER '
)I'3:)9r:-.I't Or h
WH pl
).I
'
<<(
4 f
.
I I I If'h ; I I I("fl'
4 h Ihg
'") t,
,
II I <<III 7'(<<t(
)
~ '[) 4), t" ~,
~ >> t.."()
) I ~.')4 R,,j I, )ft I )4
'I'l I- "
'R i
l1 jj ',
P I'I f",IV'"yt
'I,>C )
f) R,
'
'
f gt I I
f tl a<<I 4o
<<
f>>'I 'ft<<a, g
4, fa'l tl I'<</I,
'1 a'I II>>ah I h>>
I)"
If f E
~.f I,
'
- )
<>I'I " 'I( <<Rf, I"
'<<t" 4 Iqf 4',,y'i
"
<<'I
"'" <<)I"
<<f<>>>E a
h t1'") '",1 "'
I')
)~
f >I)'t 'I>>I I
afI )4't!>>)II fl f
"
RI
>>
f)~l,t~ >>f ~ tt
'0 9.
IE Bulletin (IEB) (92703B)
a 0 b.
(Closed)
IEB No. 80-08,
"Examination of Containment Liner Penetration Welds", Unit
The inspector has reviewed CP&L's letter of July 2, 1980, and deter-mined that the requested action of the Bulletin has been acceptably addressed.
The inspector held discussions with responsible CP&L representatives, reviewed supporting documentation and observed repre-sentative samples of work to verify that the actions identified in the letter of response have been completed.
(Open)
IEB No. 83-06,
"Nonconformi.ng Materials Supplied by Tube-Line, Inc.", Unit
The inspector has reviewed CP&L's letters of October
and November 15, 1983, and June 1,
1984, and determined that the requested actions of the Bulletin have been acceptably addressed.
The inspector held discussions with responsible CP&L representatives, reviewed supporting documentation and observed representative samples of work to verify that the actions identified in the letters of response have been completed.
This matter remains open pending NRC's review of objective quality evidence of the disposition of the 39 fittings identified in CP&L letter LAP-83-525 of November 1983.
c ~
(Open)
IEB No.
83-07,
"Apparently Fraudulent Products Sold by Ray Miller, Inc.", Unit 1 The inspector reviewed CP&L's letters of March 23, June 1,
and November 9, 1984, and determined that the requested actions of the Bulletin have not been acceptably addressed.
The inspector held discussions with responsible CP&L representatives, reviewed supporting documentation and observed representative samples of work to verify that the actions identified in the letters of response have been completed.
The June 1,
1984, letter indicated that CP&L was unable to contact 13K of their suppliers; the November 9, 1984, letter made no change in this area.
The licensee committed to reevaluate their position relative to the previously uncontactable suppliers, and to develop a program to address the issue of the possibility of Ray Miller material supplied by uncontactable suppliers.
The licensee agreed to respond by January 31, 1985.
This matter remains ope 'ghh
)
l
~h)
l)fWMW W
"'il,,
II IWI M
I
'4 ill~r w
p
)
~
~
W M =Mr/ra f
]f W,M.
S.
~ '
f')
g
)l IM,
II
~
"1
'I M
"l1()
f'
<
M 4'll "
l)W W
l
" i" P W;WM'
~ f
~ <<f frw w
h
'*w Mf f "
'
~
Ii
)
ff
= )",f),.fh W
>)
hrhq h
WM
')w
'W'I M
W
4
"
'
M W
~
~
,) f f
,.I ) Wl'll
)hrI MM l
'h ~ 4
M i
lr')
h
'f
~'
W f 4hf 4g l
)"'u W
MW M ~
~ )
L '"
ll f
ff r>>,
Wl h, IMW M)WWM QW h'f IWII,M
lh W ~
mr WM
=
WII
"Mg ~i t
" 'l) I
'W I
M W
$ 4 ~
"<<I W
'I
'f 'gh W
W, FMI.IM)
'*)M I l
W W W
'M D
f f'
w
ll h
i." ) f i, Mf
~
WW ff
,.
'3p 8 W
.- W"'f M
"
" M)'I,.W
)4
"
W
" f r
~
. Ill,i
...r W