IR 05000395/1980001
| ML19344D683 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Zion, Summer File:ZionSolutions icon.png |
| Issue date: | 03/10/1980 |
| From: | Kellogg P, Skolds J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19344D678 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-395-80-01, 50-395-80-1, NUDOCS 8004280014 | |
| Download: ML19344D683 (6) | |
Text
I
'
mg D
4't, UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
$
E REGION 11
.
3 #
o 101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100 o
ATLANTA, GEoRG*A 30303
Report No. 50-395/80-01 Licensee: South Carolina Electric and Gas Company Columbia, SC 29218 Facility:
V. C. Summer Docket No. 50-395 License No. CPPR-94
.
Inspection at Summer ar.Powe Statipn near Parr, South Carolina Inspector:
I Lt V 5!/e 60
, _,,
J. L. S-AL"
//
Dat'e Signed
/
!/
l
.
/
Approved by:
/ c 7/
s5
-
P. J Y1Mo, Arm-Nhn_ Chief, LJNS Branch Dat'e' Signed r
SUMMARY Inspection on January 1-31, 1980 Areas Inspected This routine inspection by the Resident Inspector involved 180 inspector-hours onsite in the areas of preoperational test procedure review, preoperational test program implementation, independent inspection effort and proposed technical specification review.
Results Of the 4 areas inspected, no apparent items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in 3 areas; I apparent item of noncompliance was found in 1 area (Infraction - failure to perform audit of lif ted lead and jumper log - paragraph
,
6.b).
,
8004280 h
,
_ _ _
.
f
.
J DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- 0. S. Bradham, Plant Manager
- J. G. Connelly, Assistant Plant Manager S. Smith, Maintenance Supervisor
- A. B. Harrison, Operations Supervisor K. Beale, Health Physics Supervisor D. Hembree, Assistant Startup Supervisor
- A. A. Smith, QA Site Coordinator
-
C. L. Ligon, Administrative Supervisor
- A. Koon, Technical Staff Engineer
- K. Woodward, Shift Supervisor B. Croley, Technical Support Supervisor Other licensee employees contacted included operators, mechanics and security force members.
Other Organizations C. W. Bowman, Westinghouse Startup Group
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on January 11, 1980 and January 31, 1980, with those persons indicated in Paragraph I above. The item of noncompliance was discussed with the licensee management. The inspector attended the exit interviews of T. Gibbons and R. Hardwick on Janua ry 11, 1980 and E. Girard on January 25, 1980.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection 5.
NRR Meeting
-
The inspector participated in a meeting held on site with J. Ennis and D. Tibbetts to discuss the V. C. Summer Security Plan. The meeting took place January 7-9, 1980.
-
'
l
l
,
l
'
,
t w
r
-2-
,<
6.
Preoperational Test Program Implementation The inspector reviewed the preoperational test program to determine whether the administrative controls set up by the licensee were being implemented.
Areas examined were: Test Organization, Test Program Administration, Document Control, Design Changes and Modifications, Plant Maintenance, Equipment Protection and Cleanliness, Test and Measurement Equipment, Training, and System Turnover. References used were: FSAR Chapter 14, Regulatory Guide 1.68 Revision 0; V. C. Summer Startup Manual; and ANSI 18.7-1976.
Findings were acceptable with the following exceptions:
In reviewing the red tag log, the inspector noted that approximately a.
25% of the index sheets looked at were missing the name of the person placing the tag.
Administrative Procedure 204.1, " Safety Tagging" had recently been revised and a new index sheet had been generated.
The revised procedure requires the name of the person placing tLe tags be on the index sheet since it is not on any of the tags. Without the person's name on the index sheet, there is no record of who hung the red tags. The inspector also noted that a different type of red tag was being used in the control room, which was not addressed in AP-204.1
" Safety Tagging". These tags were being used on switches on the main control board in order to inform the operator that.a piece of equipment was tagged out.
The tags were small enough so as not to obstruct other switches on the control board. However, at the time these tags were being used, the revision to AP-204.1, implementing these tags, had not been approved. The above items concerning red tags are further examples of the lack of administrative control of the red tag system as discussed in Inspection Report 50-395/79-41 and will be followed up in conjunction with Itsm of Noncompliance "A" in Inspection Report 50-395/79-41.
b.
In reviewing the lifted lead and jumper log the inspector noted that an audit of the log had never been done. Startup Manual Procedure SUM B-12, " Lifted Lead and Jumper Control" Section 7.1 requires the Shift Supervisor to perform a monthly audit. The failure to perform an audit is considered to be an apparent item of noncompliance (80-01-01).
The inspector reviewed the corrective action taken to this item of noncompliance. Procedure changes and informing the Shift Supervisors of this audit responsibility appears to be adequate correccive action.
This item is closed.
Start Up Manual Procedure SUM B-10, " Document Control", requires the c.
Startup Clerk to periodically perform a random check to insure documents issued by Startup are current and to document his findings. The inspector noted that the documented last check was on September 19, 1978. The inspector informed'the licensee that " periodically" should be less than every 16 months and suggested that a check be performed.
d.
Section 14.1.12 of the FSAR states that a limited number of test deficiencies may exist at the scheduled core loading date and that
'
e
- -
.
-.- +E
f
-3-
these test deficencies will be evaluated and categorized. This is not being done at this time due to the early stage of the test program.
This item will remain open (80-01-02) to be looked at in the future by the inspector.
7.
Preoperational Test Procedure Review The inspector reviewed the following preoperational test procedures:
.
SW-1 - Service Water CC-1 - Component Cooling Water DG-5 - Diesel Generator A DG-7 - Diesel Generator B AH-P8 - Control Building Controlled Access Ventilation AH-P17 - Auxiliary Building Ventilation
The procedures were reviewed to ensure they were technically adequate and to ensure they were consistent with the commitments made in Chapter 14 of the FSAR and with Regulatory Guide 1.68.
The inspector had the following comments concerning the tests:
a.
SW-1 Step 6.6.5 closes valve 3108B when the valve was closed in step 6.6.3 and not reopened.
Step 6.10.6 says to " realign" PS-4521.
" Realign" wac meant to mean open the isolation valve and close the rent.
Step 6.16.3 indicates that valve 3138B controls flow to HVAC Chiller l
Condensor "C".
Valve 3138D or C controls flow to this component.
Steps 6.3.7.3, 6.13.7.3 and 6.17.7.3 should verify that valves 3113A,
3113C and 3113B close when the Screen Waste Pump and Screen are stopped.
l
!
Step 6.22.1 stop "B" Service Water Pump. At this point in the procedure
"B" Service Water Pump was not running.
'
'
.
t Step 6.25.2.10 starts"C" Service Water Pump from the Evacuation Panel.
l The step does not include shutting off the pump and returning the Transfer Switch to " Remote" prior to proceding to the next step.
These items will remain open (80-01-03).
b.
CC-1
-
.
Step 6.50 left out valves 9670C and 963.1.
This item was corrected by issuance of a TCR and is considered cl'osed.
.
M i
. - - -
e e,
-
-
-
-
-4-c.
AH-P17 The procedure does not verify the following interlocks:
(1) Tripping XFN-24B causes XVN-17B to trip.
(2) Tripping XFN-24A causes XFN-17A to trip.
(3) Tripping XFN-17B causes XFN-15 to trip.
Step 6.4.1 attempts to start the main supply fan (XFN15) without any-exhaust fans running.
d.
DG-5 Section 8.3.1.1.2.4 of the FSAR states that following a loss of the single largest load, diesel generator speed change will not exceed 75%
of the differen.
>etween nominal speed and the overspeed trip setpoint or 115% of nominal speed, which ever is lower. DG-5 does not verify this but rather just verifies that the overspeed trip is not reached.
Section 8.3.1.1.2.8 of the FSAR states that Instrumentation (on the diesel) is designed and installed to permit inplace calibration. This is not current in that some instrumentation must be removed for cali-bration.
8.
Independent Inspection Effort The inspector reviewed Questions and Answers in the FSAR and had the fol-lowing comments:
-
Question 211.25 states that electrical power will be locked out to valves 8701A, B and 8702A, B (RHR Loop Suction Valves) when RHR is needed, the vessel head is on and the steam generators are not available for cooldown.
This provision for locking out power was not incorporated into any procedure.
Question 211.123 states that the Reactor Coolant Pumps are to be secured if Component Cooling Water is lost for 10 minutes. System Operating Procedure (SOP) 101 " Reactor Coolant System" says to trip the RCP's in 10 minutes but
.
SOP 118 " Component Cooling Water" says to trip the RCP's in 1 minute.
-
Question 211.27 states that the fill and vent procedures will be verified during the preoperational test program to ensure they work. This is not being done.
Question 211.32 states that power will be locked out to valves 8808A, B and
C (Accumulator MOV's) during operat' ion. The proposed Technical Specifications
'
i do not require power being locked out to-the.se valves.
,
,
Question 211.48 states that an audible and visual alarm exists for valve 6700-SF (RWST Suction Valve). No alarms exist for this valve.
'.
b (
r o
-5-The above items will remain open (80-01-04) pending licensee review.
Section 6.3.5.3.1 of the FSAR states that a low flow alarm is provided for the boric acid recirculation flow through the BIT. No low flow alarm exists.
The above item will remain open (80-01-05) pending licensee review.
FSAR Section 14.1.1.4 has a portion of the discussion omitted in that there is a discontinuity in the paragraph concerning Personnel Responsibilities and Qualifications. This item will remain open (80-01-06) pending licensee review.
The Operational QA Plan Section 1.2 states that "the structures, syst, ems and components to which the OQA Plan applies shall be listed and made part of the VC Summer QA Records". At the present time, this list does not exist. This item will remain open (80-01-07) pending licensee review.
9.
50.55e Reports The inspector received a 50.55e report from the licensee concerning improper usage of electrical tape on safety-related electrical equipment. This item is open and will be reviewed at a later date.
The inspector received a report that an employee had died from injuries sustained while working at the site.
10.
Plant Tour The inspector toured the plant at various times to observe construction activities, housekeeping, maintenance, equipment preservation and logbooks.
Findings were acceptable.
11.
Technical Specification Review The inspector reviewed the proposed Technical Specification for clarity and enforceability. Comments concerning the proposed Technical Specifications will be incorporated into a letter to NRR at a later date and will be included in a later report.
- 1s
.
.
,
,