IR 05000395/1980028
| ML19345B212 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Summer  |
| Issue date: | 10/09/1980 |
| From: | Bryant J, Rausch J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19345B209 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-395-80-28, NUDOCS 8011260352 | |
| Download: ML19345B212 (4) | |
Text
'
/
jo UNITED STATES g
!
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
E REGION 11
.
101 MARIETTA ST N.W., SUITE 3100
ATLANTA, GEO8tGIA Jo3o3 g *... *,e Report No. 50-395/80-28 Licensee: South Carolina Electric and Gas Company Columbia, SC 29218 Facility Name:
V. C. Summer Docket No.
50-395 License No.
CPPR-94 Inspection at V. C. Summer Site near Columbia, South Carolina and at the Corporate Office in Columbi, Sou h Carniina.
-[
- ' 7 '[42 Inspector:
.
-
,
. Ra s~ch
/
Date Signed
/p /C/f-f!
Approved by:
. h 44 b
/
,
J.
Br"yant, Se n'Chiet', RCES Eranch
' Da'ts ' Signed SUltfARY Inspection on September 23-25,1980 Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved 20 inspector-hours on site in the areas of licensee action on previous inspection findings, review quality records, safety-related structures-observation of work and work activities, licensee identified items (50.55(e)), unresolved items and inspector followup items.
Results No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
,
/
'
8011260352
.
.
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted
,
Licensee Employees J. L. Algar, Site Manager
- D. R. Moore, Manager, QA T. A. McAlister, QA Surveillance Specialist R. Bouknight, QA Surveillance Specialist Ron B. Clary, Senior Licensing Engineer W. B. Whitaker, Jr., Group Manager, Nuclear Engineering and Licensing Other Organizations
- C. C. Wagoner, Project Manager, Daniel Construction Company (DDC)
- W. L. West, Project Quality Manager, DCC NRC Resident Inspector J. L. Skolds
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on September 25, 1980, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings a.
(Closed) Infraction 395/79-01-01, Failure to follow procedures for pipe support installation. SCE&G replied to the subject infraction on February 27, 1979 advising that a field change request (FCR) was to be written to document changes made to the pipe support. Final inspections will verify that the FCR-B is included in the pipe support. Future QC inspections related to lock wire will be assumed by the licensee for direct implementation. The NRC reviewed Procedure AP-III-02 which was revised just prior to the infraction. The licensee's commitment to close adherence to the procedure should prevent recurrence of the problems. This item is closed.
b.
(Closed) Unresolved Item 395/80-10-06, Requirements for qualification /
certification as auditor.
The licensee has prepared and approved procedures that identify requirements for auditor qualification. The inspector noted that these procedures identify the minimum education, training and experience necessary for qualfying individuals as auditors.
The inspector also reviewed licensee records which showed the actual dates of auditor qualification / certification for QA personnel. This i
item is closed.
i
.
~2-
,
s
.
c.
(closed) Unresolved Item 395/80-10-07, substitution of " Surveillance" as an " audit.
The licensee has taken action to eleminate the concerns identified in IE report 395/80-10 concerning identification of those
"surveillances" substituted for " audits" and satisfaction of procedural requirements for " audits", i.e auditor qualification and reporting requirements. The NRC inspector reviewed procedure QAP 23 which was revised to require the same documentation, procedural requirements and
_
management review for both "surveillances" and " audit s".
The inspector has no further questions concerning this item.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Independent Inspection Effort The inspector conducted a general inspection of the reactor, auxiliary and intermediate buildings to observe construction progress and construction activities such as welding, electrical installatica, material handling and control, housekeeping and storage.
There were no items of noncompliance or deviations in this area of the inspection.
6.
Licensee Identified Items (50.55(e))
(Open) Item 395/80-28-01, Class I pipe supplied without 4 way UT. On a.
July 2,1980, and on September 17, 1980 the licensee reported that Class I pipe supplied by Southwest Fabricating and Welding Company was without 4 way UT required by specification. The licensee is evalu-ating.
b.
(Closed) Item 395/80-10-02, Deficient service water booster. The NRC inspector reviewed the complete data sheets for winding resistance and insulation resistance which are a part of the work request No. 50884 package. In addition, measurements for current, bearing temperature and vibration taken during operation of the installed pumps were reviewed.
The inspector has no further questions regarding this item.
(Closed) Item 395/79-30-09 10 CFR Part 21 procedures. The subject c.
infraction, replied to by SCE&C on November 15, 1979 committed to procedural modification and indoctrination of employees by December 31, 1979. The NRC inspector examined Quality Assurance Procedure QAP-25, Rev 2 and Nuclear Engineering Procedure NE-123. The latter must be updated to reflect an organizational en-ge. That is report-ability within the company for the " responsible officer" needs to be changed from VP Group Executive of Engineering Construction to VP Group Executive of Nuclear Operations.
The licensee has arranged for this change.
This ites is closed.
.
m,pwhy-
- wope
-+emi WO
_ hMW@N'
WMM m e' w meimWp W @de nW @ @ @
we S@
Gim'se
@h-Ne eg g 6O-M mi r*6
.-
.... -...
.. -
....
-... - - - - -...
.
-
..
.....
...
.
.
-3-
-
7.
Guidance - 10 CFR 50.55(e), Construction Deficiency Reporting The subject guidance document was reviewed by the NRC inspector with the licensee's corporate QA and licensing management in Columbia. Specific attention was called to Section 6(e) of the 4/1/80 issue which discusses
-
the notification of potentially reportable ' deficiencies.
In additon, Section 7, Enforcement, and Section 8, Relation to Appendix B Requirements, were discussed. The licensee was advised the subject document, although not representing an interpretation of the regulations, will be used by I&E to inspect his reporting of construction deficiencies and Part 21 matters.
Within the areas discussed, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
.
.
e
_.,..y--
-
'g