IR 05000395/1980031

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Mgt Meeting Rept 50-395/80-31 on 801031.Major Areas Discussed:Results of Evaluation of Util Regulatory Performance as Concluded in Licensee Performance Program. Program Encl
ML19345F778
Person / Time
Site: Summer 
Issue date: 02/03/1981
From: Robert Lewis
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML19345F774 List:
References
50-395-80-31, NUDOCS 8102190271
Download: ML19345F778 (7)


Text

_ - -

-.. - -

- _ _

_

. - - -

-

-

-.

. - - _-

.-

-

.

,

'o UNITED STATES

.

!,,, [./.:. g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

'

c REGION 11

.

l[

101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100 l

o, ATLANTA, GEORGI A 30303 o'

S

q

  • ....

-

Report No. 50-395/80-31 Licensee:

South Carolina Electric and Gas Company

.

Columbia, SC 29218 i

Facilit-y Name:

V. C. Summer Docket No. 50-395 l

l License No. CPPR-94 i

Meeting at SCE&G Corporate Office, Columbia, South Carolina Attending Personnel:

See Details Approved by:

.d

[8/

R. C. Lewif, Acting Chief, RONS Branch Date Signed

?

SLMIARY

'

l Meeting conducted October 31, 1980 This special, announced management meeting was conducted to discuss the results of NRC's evaluation of SCE&G's regulatory performance as concluded in-the Syste-

matic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP) program.

'

'

l l

Results A summary of the licensee performance evaluation was presented. Areas of concern were discussed with corporate management. SCE&G's performance is considered to-be acceptable; although four areas were identified for increased inspection emphasis.

j

'

l l

l s:

l l

f 81021908N

'

t

,

L~-...-,__..,,_..-.,..-.-__,_-.__...,_-

..

.

.-

.

.

-,. _ _. -.. - _. _ _.. _ -. -. - -.,... -, -. _,

I

.

.

DETAILS 1.

Personnel Attending Meeting South Carolina Electric and Gas Company G. C. Meezle, Executive Vice President - Operations T. C. Nichols, Vice President and Group Executive - Nuclear Operations W. A. Williams, General Manager - Nuclear Operations E. H. Crews, Jr., Vice President and Group Executive - Engineering and Construction D. Nauman, Group Manager - Quality Assurance P. Moore, Manager - Quality Assurance 0. S. Bradham, Manager - V. C. Summer C. Price, Manager - Nuclear Engineering l

0. Dixon, Group Manager Production Engineering l

M. Whitaker, Group Manager - Nuclear Engineering and Licensing Nuclear Regulatory Commission J. P. O'Reilly, Director, Region II l

l C. E. Murphy, Chief, RC&ES Branch R. C. Lewis, Acting Chief, RONS Branch NRC Resident Inspector

,

i l

J. L. Skolds l

l t

2.

Areas Discussed a.

A brief summary of the Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP) was presented to include the basis for the evaluation and its l

purpose.

!

l b.

The results of the SALP evaluation of the licensee's performance were discussed.

SCE&G's performance to date is considered acceptable; although four areas were identified for increased inspection emphasis by the NRC.

The SALP evaluations are contained in Enclosure 1 to this report.

c.

Items of concern were discussed with corporate management to include those areas where the NRC considers additional licensee management (

attention may be warranted.

!

I l

,

!

'

-

b e

Enclosure 1

-

-

SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE FOR SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPAhT V. C. SUMMER STATION

l l

'

a l

l l

l

.

.

REGION II

LICENSEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (CONSTRUCTION)

Facility:

V. C. Summer Licensee:

South Carolina Electric and Gac Company l

Unit Identification:

Docket No-CP No./Date of Issuance Unit No.

-

50-395 CPPR-94/3/21,73

Reactor Information:

Unit 1 NSSS Westinghouse MWt 2785 Appraisal Period:

September 1,1979 through August 31, 1980 Appraisal Completion Date: October 16, 1980

Review Board Members:

A. R. Herdt, Acting Chief, RC&ES Branch F. Cantrell, Chief, Projects Section #2 J. K. Rausch, Acting Chief, Projects Section #1 r

P. J. Kellogg, Chief, Reactor Projects Section #3 W. Kane, LPM, NRR (By Telephone)

A.

Number and Nature of Noncompliance Items Noncompliance category:

Unit i Violations

Infractions

Deficiencies

"

Areas of Noncompliance:

Unit 1 (List Arecs as Required)

(Points)

Procedures, not followed Welding, U.T.

Mechanical

-

Startup

Weld filters undersized

Weld end prep

Quality Assurance

i Total Points 112

.

.

.

1-2 The board considered the number of ite=s of nonce =pliance in the construction areas to be less than average. However, the number of items (7 Infractions,1 Deficiency) identified in the preoperational area appear to be excessively high for a plant in this sta;;e.

B.

Nu=ber and Nature of Construction Deficienev Reports (CDRs)

Site damage to equipment

Site design deficiencies

Vendor design deficiencies

Vendor preparation deficiencies

Deficient pipe & hanger welds

Other

-

-

C.

Escalated Enforcement Actions None.

D.

Management Conferences Held During Past Twelve Months On Nove=ber 19, 1979, undersized socket weld proble=s were discussed along with corrective actions to assure that similar problems are identified and corrected. A followup meeting was held January 16, 1980 to assure correc-tive action was underway.

.

On March 26, 1980, a meeting was held to clarify IE positions regarding Part 21 i=ple=eatation and notification require =ents.

E.

Justification of Evaluations of Functional Areas Categorized as Recuiring an Increase in Inspection Frecuencv/ Scope (See evaluation sheet)

A review of the types of nonconfor=ances indicates that QA/QC Progrannatic procedure preparation needs closer surveillance. The licensee's construction and inspection progra=s have been =aintained on schedule. No action other than continuation of the routine program with e=phasis on the QA aspects is considered necessary.

F.

Overall Evaluation The licensee's performance of licensed activities in the construction areas

-

,

i; above average.

Their perfor=ance in the areas of preoperational' test program, procedural adherence, equipment control, is well below average.

Areas identified as requiring corrective actions are the discipline of operations, procedural adherence and procedural adequacy.

Preoperational~

inspection results also indicate the perspective for safety of operations is lacking.

.

Appendix A - Functional Areas Appendix B - Action Plan (Internal Use Only)

.

.

,-

,

APPENDIX A 1-A-1 FUNCTIONAL AREAS (Construction)

Inspection Frequency and/or Scope FUNCTION /.L AREA Increas'e No Change Decrease 1.

Quality Assurance, Management & Training X

2.

Substructure and Foundations X

3.

Concrete X

4.

Liner (Containment and Others)

X 5.

Safety-Related Structures X

6.

Piping & Hangers (Reactor Coolant & Others)

X 7.

Safety-Related Components (i'e s s el, Internals and EVAC)

X

_

8.

Electrical Equipment X

9.

Electrical (Tray and Wire)

X

l 10.

Instrumentat on X

i 11.

Fire Protection X

l 12.

Preservice Inspection X

l l

13.

Reporting X

l l

.

M (BRANCH ClfLEFf

/s/'4 JS/

/(DAJE)

f

.

.

"

.

.

APPENDIX A 1-A-2 FUNCTIONAL AREAS (Operations)

INSPECTION FREQUENCY AND/OR SCOPE FUNCTIONAL AREA INCREASE NO. CHANGE DECREASE 1.

Management Control X

-

2.

Plant Operations X

3.

Refueling Operations and Activities X

4.

Maintecance X

5.

Surveillance and Preoperational Testing

- X

6.

Training X

7.

Radiation Protection X

8.

Environmental Protection X

9.

Emergency Planning X

10.

Fire Protection X

11.

Security and Safeguards X

12.

Design Changes and Modifications X

l 13.

Reporting X

l 14.

QA Audits X

l 15.

Committee Activities X

,

16.

Quality Control X

17.

Procurement X

  • These areas will be given increased inspection emphasis during implementation of the routine program.

Should problems continue to develop, increased resources will be applied to these areas.

/. d[

(BRANdh CHIEF)

// 6 / 8 96 (DATE)

l