IR 05000395/1980008
| ML19305E566 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Summer  |
| Issue date: | 04/01/1980 |
| From: | Mcfarland C, Rausch J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19305E559 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-395-80-08, 50-395-80-8, NUDOCS 8005200062 | |
| Download: ML19305E566 (4) | |
Text
~$ /# ""%,
'
UNITED STATES
,
f
$
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 80052 Go eQ J'
f REGION 11
101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100
$,
.
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
- ~~ ~
m s%
Report No. 50-395/80-08 Licensee: South Carolina Electric & Gas Company Columbia, South Carolina 29218 Facility Name:
V. C. Summer Docket No. 50-395 License No. CPPR-94 Inspection at Summer site near Columbia, SC Inspector:
kJ
- - /- 8#
/
C. R.
Farland Date Signed Approved by: (
f( /
~~ / ~ M
,
e W7 J.jk. Rads
, Acting Section Chief, RC&ES Branch
~Date Signed
-
SUMMARY Inspection on March 3-6, 1980 Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved 23 inspector-hours on site in the areas of reactor vessel internals installation activities, on site design activi-ties and safety related pipe supports and restraints.
Results Of the 'three areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
.
V
.
..
.
.
_ _ _ _ _ _.. - _.. -... _.
...
..
'
.
.
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
'
- A. S. Bashore, Assistant Site Manager
- D. R. Moore, QA Manager
- A. A. Smith, Site QA Coordinator
- J. M. Woods, QC Manager S. E. Cash, QA Surveillance Specialist M. W. Clounts, QC Mechanical Supervisor
- H. Radin, Senior Engineer
,
Other licensee employees contacted included construction craftsmen and office personnel.
Other Organizations W. L. West, Daniel Construction Company (DCC) Project Quality, Manager H. A. Bamberger, Gilbert Associates, Inc., (GAI) Resident Engineer, Piping & Hangers R. Flemming, GAI Resident Engineer, Piping & Mechanical S. L. Fox, GAI Piping Engineer D. Wieland, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Site Manager C. Montemayor, Westinghouse Staff Engineer H. W. Gutzman, Westinghouse Startup Test Supervisor NRC Resident Inspector
- J. L. Skolds
,
- Attended exit Interview 2.
E2. 't Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on March 6, 1980 with
,
-
those persons indicated in Paragraph 1 above.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous inspection Findings
" " ~
'
Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items
Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
+
5.
Independent Inspection The inspector reviewed the onsite design activities by GAI and SCE&G as
,
l related to piping and supports. SCE&G has authorized onsite design yovk by GAI for four inch and smaller piping (GAI design report number 1923) ana
,
i
_ __
_ _.
__n_w.~
-~~m----~~ee---~
- ~ ~ ~ - ~
!
-
-
_ - - _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _
.
.
-2-
.
for tubing (GAI design report number 1933) and has retained responsibilities for QC (DCC QCP-VII-07) and QA. The GAI Pipe Support Design Group's primary function is to design pipe supports for piping systems including tubing for instrumentation systems. Design input is provided by DCC (WP-VII-07) in
!
the form of isometic drawings and the outputs of the Group are support drawings transmitted to SCE&G Document Control for distribution.
The Group's design work is as designated in reports 1923 and 1933, volumes 1 and 2 of GAI's Reading, Department 0430 " Piping Engineering Standard". No computer programs are used by the Groups; all work is as designated in the above documents.
Check calculations are performed locally.
The final design verification is performed in the Reading office of GAI using the same design manuals. The design calculations provide the spacing, configu-ration, loading, and weld size.
The design and loadings for the Hilti bolts for the piping supports and restrains are as specified in the manu-facturer's recommendations. The Groups performs an engineering evaluation of the hanger installation for the safety related piping including the larger sized piping designed in the Reading GAI office. The inspector reviewed the documents noted above and discussed the design work with the
]
GAI piping engineering task group leader.
The inspector also reviewed a report of the SCE&G QA audit of September 5-7, 1979, of the adequacy and implementation of the site resident engineers' work and support design work by the GAI Piping Support Engineering Group.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in this area of inspection.
6.
Reactor Vessel Internals, Review of Procedures, Observation of Work and Review of Records The inspector reviewed the Westinghouse and SCE&G procedures, Westinghouse operations checklists and status of items completed since this inspector's previous inspection, Region II report 50-395/79-20.
The internals have been fit up, cleaned, and installed in the reactor. The reactor system has been hydrostatically pressure tested. The reactor internals are not scheduled to be removed from the reactor vessel again until after the hot functional test. The inspector observed the closed reactor.
The inspector reviewed the checklists for major lifts of the lower internals assembly and the upper internals assembly, the surveillance reports of the closure of the reactor head Aind related operaticas, the Westinghouse operation checklist and the status ofiitems completed documentation, and the trip reports of the Westinghouse Pensacola Division (WPD) staff to the site on June 18-29,
~
1979 and October 15-18, 1979 relative to the fit up and assembly of the inter-nals, conducting certain tests, cleanliness work, and preparing for cold hydro.
The inspector also reviewed documentation of earlier WPD trip reports to assure that all outstanding items related to the reactor internals were completed or currently recognized as open items.
The review of the above documentation and the inspector's discussions with the Westinghouse and SCE&G staff indicates that the installation of the reactor internals was performed as required. The applicable specifications,
.
,
w se +we
-
_g%
_
.-
--MM W
- W***
" " * * * * *
..
.,,
......-
.-
--
.
'
3-work procedures and QA/QC procedures relative to the requirements for lifting and handling, placement, cleanliness, physical protection, access control, the entry of foreign objects, QC inspections and QA audits were met.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in this area of inspection.
7.
Sa fe ty-Re.1ated Pipe Support and Restraint Systems The inspector reviewed the DCC work procedure WP-VII-07, Fabrication and installation of Hanger and Supports, and the DCC QC procedure QCP-VII-07, Inspection of Fabrication and Installation of Pipe Hangers and Supports.
Both procedures were revised and reissued January 19, 1980 as a part of a correr.tive action program.
The outstanding noncompliances (395/79-01-01 and 395/79-34-01) and a 10 CFR 50.55(e) item are related to the hanger problem. During the inspection SCE&G initiated an extensive hanger rein-spection program and nonc the current hanger QC data is to be considered
'
final until the reinspect. ion program is completed.
The inspector did observe pipe supports CSH-019 and CCH-386 and snubbers RHH-099 and RHH-100 as a part of an orientation of the hanger problem.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in this area of inspectian.
..
OF
%
yg r
-
.
_.