IR 05000369/1980007
| ML19318A565 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | McGuire, Mcguire  |
| Issue date: | 05/15/1980 |
| From: | Conlon T, Hardwick R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19318A559 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-369-80-07, 50-369-80-7, 50-370-80-14, NUDOCS 8006230371 | |
| Download: ML19318A565 (4) | |
Text
.
..
'o UNITED STATES
/
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
E REGION 11 s
,
o 101 MARIETTA ST N.W.. SUITE 3100 k
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 g*****o
,
MAY 16 $80 Report Nos. 50-369/80-07 and 50-370/80-04 Licensee: Duke Power Company 422 South Church Street Charlotte, NC 28242 s
l Facility Name: McGuire Nuclear Station Docket Nos. 50-369 and 50-370 License Nos. CPPR-83 and CPPR-84 Inspection at McGuire site near Lake Norman, North Carolina Inspecto s-uh6 b
/
R. J. Hardwick, Jr.
Date Signed
'
,
Approved by F/
d f /!fC
T. E. Conlon, Section Chief, RCES Branch Date Signed i
SUMMARY Inspection on April 30 - May 2, 1930 Areas Inspected This special, announced inspection involved 16 inspector-hours on site in the area of installed electrical equipment. This inspection is in conjunction with the office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) review of near-term-operating-licensing (NTOL) facilities with respect to NUREG 0588.
Results l
Of the areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations wera identified.
l
.
l se Ae
- g,
800623031%
'
,
- ~
l
,
,
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- K. S. Canady, Project & Licensing Manager s
- N. A. Rutherford, Licensing, Systems Engineer
- G. A. Copp, Nuclear Engineer
'
- B."G. Burton, Engineering Specialist
- T. P. Harrall, Assistant Design Engineer i
- D. L. Sweat, Technical Specialist L. Charles, Technical Specialist
- T. H. Heitman, Junior Engineer
)
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on May 2, 1980 with those persons indicated in Paragraph I above.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings
Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
,
5.
Electrical Equipment Environmental Review A physical examination, in the area of environmental qualification, was made of installed electrical instrumentation and control equipment. The environmental qualification documentation review for this equipment will be made by NRR. The equipment that was examined is located inside the reactor building and is listed below.
Instrument or Component No. and Description Cable No.
Electrical Penetration INCPT 5150, Pressurizer 1*NC788 E209 Pressure Transmitter 4=
INCPT 5160, Pressurizer 1*NC789 E439
+a,.
.
Pressure Transmitter
,
INCPT 5170, Pressurizer 1*NC790 E428 Pressure Transmitter
.
.._
.
..
-
.
.
.
-2-
,
'
J (Cont'd)
Instrument or Component No. and Description Cable No.
Electrical Penetration INCPT 5171, Pressurizer 1*NC791 E241 Pressure Transmitter INC31B, Pressurizer Block 1*NC527, -531 E237, E108 '
'
Valve-634 INC33A, Pressurizer Block 1*NC519, -523, E115, E108, E237 Valve-633 INC35B, Pressurizer Block 1*NC513, -517 E237, E108 Valve-632 INC32B, Pressurizer Power 1*NC578, -580 E231 Operated Relief Valve
,
INC34A, Pressurizer Power 1*NC581, -583 E114 Operated Relief Valve INC36B, Pressurizer Power 1*NC584, 586 E231 Operated Relief Valve INM813, Reactor Coolant
,
Sampling Containment
'
Isolation Valve INSPT5070, Containment Pressure Transmitter 1NSPT5390, Containment
Pressure Transmitter INSPT5520, Containment Pressure Transmitter TB337, Splicing Junction Box
,
The inspector was informed that the pressurizer pressure transmitters installed in Unit I are Barton model 763, Lot I transmitters. These Lot 1 transmitter are not presently environmentally qualified. To support the pre-operational test schedule, the licensee has begun to -replace the Unit I transmitters with environmentally qualified Barton Model763, Lot 2 trans-mitters from Unit 2.
The Unit 2 transmitters will be replaced at a later date.
After a review of the instrumentation and control equipment installed in Unit 2, and the present sta,tus of construction, it was decided to delay the
l
,-
..
.
. -
-
.. -
.
..
..
..
.
-3-
,
,
site equipment environmental qualification inspection. The licensee will be informed of the Unit 2 inspection dates and the systems to be examined
,
at a later date.
Within the areas examined, there were no items of noncompliance or deviations identified.
T
I
.
i
.
I 4.-
~ ~; gg s i
!
!
..
,, - _.,, -, - -, -,
y__,--
-.
n.,_w_,,__.
-
,--,,- -,,,,
_ _ -..
y
%,..
.--, --- -