IR 05000346/1984019
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:- _ _. - _ _ . _. , 1 ;I ' ' ' .
. s ,_ * - - g - -
- .
. . . ..-T .c. s .. - . . ' v.,A , . .) - . . - - .- ; , /< *,? . .. f . J i, . - =m o s
. - ., s. -0,e .; ,y i.
s i ... -r , - .-,.: ..... l _ l... < 4 i f'- , . -. >. ,,.. I i.. , tw l . .. - I_ IL j ' ~. ,e . F. ' SA'CD' FOR : Cc:r'es E. *;crelius, : ;. -c tor Tivisicn Of E bctor Ir j'-cts Regicn } }I ! i 'ACM: J. Nelson Grece, Cir ectGr r M v i s i 0r. of C M I i t.)
- C r 3 r:c e,
u safegateds, ard :-!;ecticr. Frogr5cs , ,... . . .w..or:e ent u t a ce or,r:spectur ur:: , I i 5_tEJECT: UV!S-SESSE FERF0~t2CE APP;.*! SAL If,5PECT10h ) p07:.ri. i.ai. re,ew :v.e.r.i W..- 4 w.
. ..,. .
, . ... - ... _... , - . . . . - - :.-m a, :.n o rcer.ier.: r i r,ci ngs ( r, t.r s ;, re f e rrec :: a s,p re s c r. e: _r.a e : siec a )
- t : i-
.nt 'r 3 :nio re:.crt. v.ere observec curin; the p:rfoc ar; t a:.: rai s t - - .
- -
- .; r
- :es E
+ sic cr.c are provided for your ic l i '...::. Y:t s':Jc : : ,
-
- s tw :t 1-Eusa ker. :.ers List (Re;icr, II: T r d i r ; 5, n.2r ' a r,:
.: ,....:.3.-...,. ..m,.. _ _, e :. c< .. .
-
- ....
..c
..- c3 , .. . . . ' n e a v. r i n E '.' i. ; ,6, 3 or:vc.-c er .r-r ice revier c i : n e 2 <,., r.,-.r.rs it . .. . . !
- .c.: minatice. c. e-3ppre.p-13te er. forcer.ent class 1Ticati:.r ic-eten.
.na
res.,lis cf tnis re.4ew are provicec be,.ow: > ,
f l 1.
PEF 50-34E/bl-13-0S has been incorporated into Davis-Besse enforceTent ! p3ckage 50-345/64-;5.
2.
Three PEFs appear :c be desiations from licensee comcitrr.ents to the NRC.
a.
Item 50-345/84-19-13: Failure to develop and utilize shift turrever , checklists as specifiec by hUREG-0578.
b.
Item 50-34E/84-19-14: Failure to establish an effective interccm systerr. bet.sen tne contrcl room and tne Shift Supervisor's office.
I c.
Item 50-346/84-19-15: Fuilure to use tecnr.ically trained indivicuals as the plant operations snif t Administrative Assistant.
3.
Six PEFs a;cear to be Seserity Level IV vicictions (Supplement I tc . 10 CrR 2, Ap;ericu C).
...
' r t ra ry ic ;G ~ 1.3'-1971, the itcer.ses : :
c.
- er 5;-3/i l'.-n-E:
- .
rc; esta:1 s".a:e:; ate c rinistra::ve pro:e:vres for tre Ealit . _.
. rs su rar.;e L ;v i s ier.. i l t.
Ite-50-345 /E '-19-Of - c tentia'. cris sior c# 5:fety evaluatiors ! recui re: t, 10 C E 'O.E'. (t,ote: This i. err recuires accititrai
- cl l Oic.JP 10 ice 6tify exar.: es of c.-itte safety evaluati:-r.5,.
! t A 8%LL2..L J5 2B y _ .. . _ - _ _ _ . . - -. _ _ __ . _
$
s . Charles E. *.crelius-2-c.
I:ec 50-326/E?-19-C9: Ccntrary to A'dl 15.7-1972, the licersee has baen calibreting 0-rtair, t'sTE ait! cat e :<ecural gsidance, d.
Item 50-346/24-19-10: Recoras of the review of out of calitration M&TE were not teir.g retaired.
e.
Item 50-346/84-19-;E: Failure to e.al;5te a ser.dcr prelitirary safety concern (P5C) regarding high pretsure infection pa ps.
(Ncte: This item requires additier.al foll:au; to d+ terr ir.e the sef e ty significar.ce of the suLject.i ;cr F50).
f.
Item 50-345/84-19 '8: Safety-relatec.Taterials ere pro.rea using the wror.g specifications.
. t ~- ni i r;i r-; ic rtrs 5;;3ar to e s,eseri;y Level,,i s,. t.ations , . . - - - s . . . , - -.. . . . e.r;.. er e r.!. !O lu. err 6, . r; pe nC l ). L).
i++c ;; crrec cf tne results cf ycur fcilcwat c r.
..e . :: >i s ;.'.i:. E' '.9.f, v.hicr were assignec a crelirir.3 ry clas s sia c ticr ~ir: li ~.i-;f E c - 55 i: e 'is e.e' :. s i;; t.ichs.
Because these FEFs ave f ::.erai ~. It be . itii~1ec Li E *eri,, tessi Ill viciations, Ci;trding c' ;r.E resvi 5 c' y og-it li t cv.u p, v.e a c u i c i n. 'e to participate in any enforcer +nt e;tiens y:a ray a'e . . , fc.. . ccrcerning thet.. I# yc Fase an.s q;esticns, please contact ne or tne Tear Leacer,ct. J. Callan.
C . / ~ / . w - ~J n ~.- t.
nr J. Nelson Grace,'Directcr / Divisior of Quality Assurance, Safeguards, and Inspectior. Programs Office of Inspection and Enforcemer.t Encicsure: Fotential Erforcement findings cc: E.
F.. Grimes. IE J. A. Axelrac, IE J. M. Taylor, IE
. . . . . PO T ENT I A'. i.'.io;CiMEfC.:i G:?.S FACILITY Cavis-Eesse DOCKET NO.
50-346 DATE 10/1/84 AREA Ctccitt-e A:tisities I EP '.0.
306,14-19-01 I!,5PECTOP L. W;eeler 7EAM LEADER L.J. Callan . _... _ _ _ _ _.., _.. _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _, _. _ --_ - ..:_un_.
. .. .. i f.E.3.: er ;res ne SEE I ressei.. era;rar.
.;ifici
- r te scfe:j-
'
. ~ riitle; p'.;e:Jr ei v. i t r. i r la days 0 tr.e C2;- * e rg;,*4:f;1;r egg . i ;':cante:. . - - - - - - -. - - _.... .v 2.u Centrery to the ab:ve, curin; tne period A ril-sur.e l'E *
ter.:cra ry
nacifications te safety-reicted procedures were a;;crently resieaec more than 14 days after the date the modification was ingler ented.
E>an@les: T-rroc 7956 to SP1104.14 (Ccntrol Roor.. P.'AC) ir; e er.ted May 18, . 1934 anc reviewed by the SRB on June 13, 1954 T-mod 7992 to ST 5031.06 (SFAS Overall Respcnse Time Calculation) . implemented April 10, 1984 anc reviewed by the SRB May 30, 1984.
( , ! l l l l . _ _.
. s . .. . , ..:...,.,.-,...,e . .. -,:..... .-.,T... .. . a .- u.... % FACILITY Cavis-Eesse 00 ^.N E.7 ! 0.
50-3aC DATE 10/1/84 MEA Com.ittee Actisit:es ! ! E. L C. 1 :E /84 - 19 -02
- N5FECTOR L. 1-l tee l e r TE4: LPDER L.J. Callan
... .. __ _._... . . _ -. .. . _ - __ __ ? Pq.'9EMENT- . . , :!-r.ical Sp eci,.1 c a ti cr E. :. c.,<.h r e c.s i rs s tm.e Ccr a ny,,bc,.e a r es iew : ca rd . . . . - .:. i....oi to review: all recoc.ra. zed incications or ur. antic.>.atec cesic.n ... . ... . . .. . ceficier.cies of sa'ety-related systems.
- - -. - - _ _ -.. - _ _... _ -. -. - -...... .- ..
r. i. *.#.. - w.
.. _. % . * E**'ew' 6"'
- * E.
.'ee..=.
-
- $.
.d * "* F %. I.
fi ' ,6 . g ..
. f., i. f a f m, w* eCe
-h. ** h.
v w,7 * Y 1 P.\\ ' , w.s - t . . .<w.
w ... .-.-.f. l.',.- *. ;. i;. v s .;. - - r*e
- g
. i * a. e. ;..- E.ge*
- . e, 5, f ( * j.*s.
. - P l r**
Ef t c. *. r. C.
- . . ea a.
......., . .. .
- P P ** 9
- "E-p;rt : : -a:.
_ _ .._.,. _ _ ___._ _ _. _ _ - - - _ _ -. _ - -
I - .- . . r.,,.,.ou . .... . K,,,, n. A,m ....... ...i ....ie . ..o FACILITY Cavis-Besse DOCKET f.0, 50 246 DATE 10/1/84 AREA r3clity Assurance I!Ci 'C 346/d4-19-03 I *,S PE CTOR L.J. Callan TEl# LEADER l.J. Callan .. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _..... _. ._.
.. _. _. _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _.. _ _ _ PE00lRE'G4T: f.",;". r e vision E, s t ates : tat Toledo Ediscn cc.* plies v.itn ANSI 18.7-1972 Ecragraph 4.4 of ANS! M8.7-1972 states that formal audits shall include c t s s-va t i :4r ! cf tr.e ;e.-'c r7nce of operating ar.d r..ainter.ance activities, arc thest ucits sr,El' re re.'s e: ty the saf6ty rc$iew conr.ittees.
_ _ - ..._... _. _ _. _ _ .... _ _ _ _., -... r.,...... "crtrary l' t's c '..d.
- ' a i " i.;i; prt
- grar
- "
19: 4 Cic DC*. it:1 rt e:3Eria ic', c# I F.i M P' v ~~ i :s Of C;erating br c r:ir ter.brct a.it:1 (c.
q13*.icr., perations, ar G r.a in;er.a nCS aud i t5 ... ., . s.
c;e"I tict i e), au.1* ;.Y;, . O . .m,iucs absersations of. crgoirig activities.
..:, a '.c.. Ee-cic rect . .. .. . . .... .
. . r . . F ;.,,.. -c... a n. c.:. ...e..,., . ....... .
- ....
FACILITY Davis-E. esse 1:O E i '40.
50-346 DATE 10/1/84 Qualit".feiurance 1. dM '40. 3 'C/ E4-19-04 AREA
T E *J'.1.EADER L.J. Callan INSPECTOR l.J. Callan- - - - - -. . ... .. -.. . ...... -.. -. - . REQUIREMEfT: The T:iene Ecist.r. '.uclear Qeality *ss cance l'anual, resisicr 5, states that s .. r..
- .c.12-197/.
- icieco telscr. cccplies with nN5. fu.. . . rc, age.ent c,. the auditec crcar.izatur ,,. . c.m t... .,.co recuires tna: r
- .c...-
. pes:-aucit confererce v.ith tne accitir; v;3r,irati;r,. carti:i a:e it. E .... -.... -... -. - -. - - . ... - - - -.. - -..:... ...'..u'
r a ry I: **e c :se, tne liCersee di; nC: grGV1Ci " * ' 3 3 4 : ~ ' *, r:;. : i.t r : c * ' a: :ne ps:-Eucit m 'eren:e fcr audit 120E, t.uchar mi:Er m;, a ~. re-Carir.; July...,.b . . . . I I l r
, . . . . . .,,., c.
- i '. "., 0... 1 f (.,,.. 1,a.. -...
..t# P & e.' s eJ i".**.r.
FM I! liY Cc'.is-5 esse N.K ET NO. 50-316 DATE 10/1/84 ARE.
C.s a.l.i t..y /sse _m..e.
!!Et: '.C. Ili/24-19-05 . ._ . IN5?ELTOR L.J. C311an !EAM LE20ER L.J. Callan . -. -.. ... - - -.. - - - ... - -.............. .. - -... - - - - - - - - - REQUIOEMENT: RG 1.33, f.:verter 1972, r+;., ires, in part, tbbt proteceres ce establishec that cc.er procedure 6dhersnce, the netnod for imple. er. ting terparary changes to peccedures, ar.c procedure review arc approval pclicy.
-- - - - - -. ..... -..
...
.. -. - -...... -
- 9P9'p #
I.'%..
- '.
~. E.
- E
- ' " ".
s" ~"A'
.. ' ~. ~ -.'.'"E.*.
- Lm
- eg
- .*
k, '. # E.
' I * S. . S. C.^E I's.L. w# I** .. ..s*.
a? ,, C p, -
..e.
.s L, + - % ../.,b.
. w.
,
- * %'.C f v* r 37- ' c..*.:. e *.ie*-
- t.*.~.r
.* : e.
= =,...... . > . . ... .,, ** y e. f. *. ?.. v. :. A ?. e, f c* (, ". C., * r, c.
.
.. . . s . >. v . g _. t.u.
a.*,* * E. c* : * * 5
- * ? *i.,.
v t '.* o *, r* L.
- .cg.Qg ;. f, e A " *.' e. L '* 1 '.
E
?
- r,*
7, * s*. s* 6..* f :. L, A r. ; r- ... .. p $ - s c.
. u tr.e Cucii:y Asse ar.:t :i,,sicr prc. cec re sy ne. . - - -
, - \\ ' )
.. . .....,, c...-..,. t.. r 2,,. 4.o .,.. _.,, .x : .u e s,...,- FACILITY Enis-Ees:e 20^.kET NO.
50-366 CATE 10/1/M AREA Ce s i.:. n_ _ C_t a r c e s _a__r d_ l i EM ',0.
3 t E./.E ? - 19 -0. 6_ F.cci fi c_o.t i cn s _ _ -- I';5PECTOR L. '.shitnev TEAM LEtCER L.J. Callan . _ __. _.-..._ _._ _ . _... _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _.. _ ..._ ____._.__.
__ ?E00lREMENT: 10 CFR 50.59 states that the litersee shall r. air tain recor cs of chages in the f acility ic. the exterit that such char ges constitute changes to the facility as cescritec in the safety analysis report.
These records shall inchce a written si.fety eva%ation wnich provides the basis for the ceterr%etior tna; tr e char gec test or e>Leriment coes r,ct in.olve an ., ee. i t.. e c s a ' e t,s c ut ;r.
-.... _ _ -. _ _ -... _.._.:.. - .. _ C;r t ra r 10 t.i i::ve, 7 le:: Ecisor. prccesures dire:t that writter, t s a f et;. e al atiens be cercactec for only those mocification's which are ceterrinec tc ci ' ns lea sefety relatec" as cefir.ec in AD 13:5.00, Cnar.;es, -ests anc E); riments, F.evision 6.
Therefore, riedificaticns which ccnstitute changes to tr.e facility as cescribed in the safety analysis report, but which are ceter.inec rot to be " nuclear safety related" are not procecurally m required to receive written safety evaluations.
- Note: This has been ir:corporatec into Davis-Esese enforcement pack age 50-346/E4-15.
< l -- ,. - _ -
, - . . .-..,.., c. n,. - r,., -,,,o r,.<.t....... i. w.
,.. -.,. . i s oi . FACILITY Cr.is-Eesse u C:t.i NO.
50-346 DATE 10/1/84 1:'iA C-s i en,..C_L : us. >o IIEM '.0. 346/E4-19-07 - .. -. _.. __ mod 111 Ca t_1 Cn s-Jd NCTOR .L. Wn i t. : &.v.
it O' :.OER L.J. Cal.la.n --- -. - . _.. _.. _ __.
___._ . _. _ e.., I.s. p p -:..&e: .9 . 10 CFR EC.71 states ti.at ar.r.ual F5AR revisicr.s shall be ccr. ducted to re' lect the effects of changes in the facility as describea in the FSAR, 5..c tr.at revisic.ns shall t.e current as of E nonths prior to issue.
.... - -.. -. ._ - _.. -... g...7 . ,....m C: .ra. tr ne :-::.e...e T!.AF was founc nct tc re#'.e :: t-e s.e s i '. e series c# mcci'i:t:i'.'is asce tc tr.e pressurizer coce 5:Ce:s relie'.c'.es elve relo:t.i.r., -e.nal of relatec cischarce ricing ::,t r,( q e'.:r tar:. . . ccding snor-leng:ns cf cist.harce piping to each sah e, cap 'ng ine ne,. ciscr.arge piping i.t rupture cisks, enc accing an crair. lu e f ro 7.hs rer .he.6ast 0;. tr.e se r.ccl,i u s;.i cns, ciscr.acge pipirg Ic the cuer.ch tar.k.). . e .e.v o c -v:., was cc p,.eted vuly xr, *96. ..n..
c . . -
- .
, % . ,. u.,. 7...,..,,.... :.. n r.. n,. ee -..., - ., v.
.m . . FACILITY Cavis-Sesse DOCKti t.0.
50-356 CATE 10/1/84 AREA Eesicn Chances and l ' EM NO. :- a ! 3 < '.9-08 Mocificaticns INSPECTOR L. 'n'h i t nev TEAM LE' DER L.J. Callan . _ _ _. ___ .. _ _.. _ _. _ _ _.... _ .. _ _ F iOUI RE*'ENT : 10 CFR 50.59 states that the licer.sae sr.all rair tain records of charges in tne facility to the extent t'at such chances ccrstitute charges in the
- acility as cescribed in the safety analysis report.
10 CFR 50.59 further states that these re:cres shall include a writter safety e.aluation.
_. _... _ - _ _ _ _ _ ,- -..,... ..... C ; r t : : c,
- tre at:.e, the lice see had not beer, concoctirg sa'i.
- .: !. at v. :
- t ic
.; r.ar;gir g tempcrary leac shielcing on safety-relate; syite s #ro-0:tz.e., 1953 thrcugh May 25,1964 Lead sFielcirg was nung cr ::'tt3-relatec pioing cr. at least the two occasions discussec Delen.
On Marcr 8, 1954 leac shielding was hung cn ceca) heat syster piping.
N:F. El-007C. ititiatec May 30, 1984, recuestec er.gineering analysis of this ir:stallation.
. On May 4, 1984 lead shielding was hung on decay heat systet piping.
At the tire of the inspection, an engineering analysis of this installation had not been ccnducted or requested.
Note: This has been incorporated into Cavis-Besse enforcement package 5C-346/84-1. . . . . t.. -., e; -..m. ..n,.y....... . c-,;.-... ru .i.e.
...... FACILITY Davis-Besse "i:KET NO.
50-346 DATE 10/1/84 A cEA '4ir,te.c r ee i;EM NO. 346c'S4-19-09
- N5PECTOR T. O..e r ti n lEAM LEADER L.J. Callan
. - _ _ _. . -... . - -.. - . - - REQUIREJ'ENT: h;AM, resision 5, section 2.0, states that Toledc Edisor, co.r. plies with AN5I NIE.7-1972.
Ar.51 18.7-1972, section 5.3.6, s ates ti at procedcres shall be provic&d for calibra.tior, of M&TE.
. -. -. -. .-
- .,....
. .... Ctr.trary ic the abc4 e, the r+;narical r.aintenance grcut was four.c tc be caiitrating ecuipment suct. as tcrcue wrenches aric cial it dicatori csir.g as guidance U.S. Gcternment h YAIR} prccedures whicF. were not ccr. trolled, I revie ec, or issuec ur.cer tr.e Davis-Eesse procedure program.
The !&C r.aintenance group was found to be calibrating pressure gauges, digital - nultineters, cigital poteritiometers, cigital calibrators, and digital tenperature indicators without procedural guidanc. . , .. r.. -, e.
<:.-ry... u... . .. .i ..... .a . . FACILITY Cavis-{p_sse 03CKET '.0.
50_-366 DATE 10/1/84 '0EA M5intar.ance ITU' .0.
IIE/84-19-1C IN5PECTOR T.O. Martin TEAM LE JER l.J. Callan ... - - -- - - -...... -.. .... -. - . -.. -. - - -.. -- - r t y,,i n - h.., T : ..,,. . TS 6.8.1.a requires tF:,t writter proceduces be establishec, ir;ier triec anc maintair.ed co.eririg the applic5tle ;rc.ic res recc.rer.:ed in A;;2r. dix - ' A of RG 1.33, Ncverber 1972.
PG 1.33. Ncvenber 1972, rectmiends that truce:;res be ;rosiced tc 55 s.re that reasurin; arc te:.in; c5 vices are cr.:erly controllec.
. ... . . . . . .,.... . a 5:rarent ta,;bratic arc.estin;
- +:.rt.
.,...;. e.-:ecure.. c.c..... r c .. , . c ;. r.s i. z. c i t s..... i... ;, r,,. . .,.e...re...
- . v. r.c r. c.;..,
r..,, b. r.. . . .. . ...:. .. se: m c,, c e...- . ' a ' ecuitme.nt calibratec witt, tr.is ce#e:tive tes: sr51' te cc'..;; e: c e;oi t en:, i t.:. acir; a - survell,iances anc tests ir. wr.i r i-wts us:c.
.. . t ~r.i s ; c;e cu a + wr: e .uires that a review o' tr.is lis. t tr.e 15'. Er.gir.eer ar.c Mair, terr.r.ce ir.cineer be documer.ted anc retained.
_ _.
_._.. -. '. h u, : r i. 0 Contrary to the above, no records of the review of instances of out of calibration measuring anc test equipment were retained.
_-- -.. - . . _ -
. . = - . _ . % . -u:c.i:AL it, G 2 Fit.T F I'.3It,G FACILITY Cavis-5 esse DOCKET NO.
50-346 DATE 10/1/S4 AEA l'aintenance ITEP. NO.
3 6/34-19-11 INSRECTOR-T.0. Martin _ TEAM LEADER L.J., Callan ... -.- -. -. -.. -.. -..... -.. - -. REQUIREMEriT: TS 6.8.1.a requires that peccedv es be establishec, irpleTented, er.c , r.aintained as reccrc.endec in RG 1.33, tic e.ber 1972.
, l RG 1.33, November 1972, reccre. ends that procedures be preparec 'cr ! mainterance that can affect the perforr.ance of sa'ety-re' ate: e xi:' int.
i ! l T5 t.E.2 reaires that ci'. pr;cebres iFile~. entec EJrskarc to IE 5.5.:.E
- e resiera: Dy the 5F.E and 5;prcied by the Statier Su:erir c ;itt.
j . - -. -...... - -. - < -FIW:!.G: , t (crcrary to tne at;ve: (1) Tre vendor ranual usec for the calibration of LT CF322, Core Flooding Tank 1 Level Transmitter, on September 7,1983, was not reviewed by -
i the SRE or apprcved by the Station Superintencent.
(E) The vendor ranual used to perform a calibration check of FT 4522, j Auxiliary Feed Water Flow Transmitter, on June 25, 1984, was not reviewed by the SRB or approved by the Station Superintendent.
I (3) Maintenance Work Order 2-78-0126-18, for the installation of pipe > ' nangers, specified the installation and torquing of anchor bolts ' in a safety-relatec application using maintenance instruction MI-71, i !
- nstallation cf Anchor Bolts, revision 3.
This maintenance instructicn ! was r.ot reviewec by the SR5 or. approved by' the Station Superintendent.
i . P l . i t r---- --
e
.-e-v- - - - - - - -r-+ r-- --r ---r, s --, -wym v -%n --ee-w -~ -c--m-mt--eme*-----o--t-r-e-y+w-r ww ww w - ee-e
~w -
, - . _ _., . _. _ _ _. _ . . _. _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ f ' . . . .
pc:c, IAL E:,F:kCEMENT Fi*,CIhG
I i FACILITY Davis-Fesse DOCKET NO.
50-3d6 DATE 10/1/84 . AREA Mainter.5nce ITEM NG.
3c6/84-19-12 l INSFECTOR T.O. Martin TEAM LEADER L.J. Callan
. f a .... _ _ _.,.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _
. REQUIREMENT: > I !.;AM, revision 5, section 2.0 states that Toleco Edison cceplies with AN5! N18.7-197E.
ANSI N18.7-1972, section 5.1.6.1, states that r.ainter.ance that car affect the performar.ce of safety-related ec,uipr.er.t shall be properly preplarr.ed anc perfccmed.in acccccance with v ritten procecures.
,-
-- -._ ._ .-..~..e.
. .. . ,
{ Contrary to tre above:
! (l' f: air.ter.ance Werk Orcer 2-Ea-0826-01 did not provice guidance for ! the repair cf cor.ponents identified as defective.
This MWO specified the replacement and repair of components "as needed" on the spent fuel ' cask crane.
-
(2) ttWO 2-83-005-2, for the safety-related installation of conduit anchored in a concrete wall, provided no instructions for torquing ' or setting the anchor bolts used.
j (3) MWO 1-84-1900-00 specified the performance of a calibration check on auxiliary feedwater flow transmitter FT 4522.
Hcwever, the flow ! transmitter poser supply was replaced which was beyond the sccpe of i the M'a0 instructions.
} $
i
1
r _ . - _.
, _.,, -,, .. _ _.... _,,. - - -..........., _, _, _.., _.. _,, - -, -,,, -,.., _. -.,. -,.,,, _. -, _
. a - . . rC.' :AL E'F.1.m 'di F I'.'. ING ~ FACILITY Cavis-Eesse MC Kt i
- .O.
50-346 CATE 10/1/84 AREA _P l a_n t_._C.m: a.r a.t.i_o r_s.
I T EM NO. i.;.6/_5_4_-19-13 _ D.5PECTOR D.J. Suli h an, Jr.
TEAM LF D ER L.J. Callan - _. - _. - - _ _ - - - _. -.. - _ -. _ -. _. - _- _PEOUIREMENT: Ir. a letter tc tr.s NRC datec Ja%ary 15, 1950 the Licenset ccTitted to resising Station Fracecure AD 1839, Station Cperaticns, tc be ccnsistent with r ecorrendation 2.2.1.c of f L' PEG-0576, er, titled it'.1-2 Lessons Learnea Task Fcree Status Report anc St.crt-Terr F.ecy indations.
Ee:ctrr.e nc at i on 2.2.1. c. c' ..:EG 0575 ine c i f'.+c tr.a t s r. f
- .r~.e e c".e9 :ist incluce critical :iar. :ar5 e.ars, ai':43: 1_ ',rns, u c :ne a:ce::a:lc 3. tics of es:,:;.1-: 5.st.e 5.
_ _ _ _ _.-- _ _. _.. _ _. _ _ _. __ _ _ _ _ __ f......u..... 1, Ir. cesiation tc tr e docts, or August 2t., 19E4, procecure AD 1839, Station Operations, was nct consisteri. with NUREG 0578 in that shift turnover - checklists in use cic not include critical plant pararneters, alicwable limits and the acceptatie status of essential systems.
. __.
_ _. _, ,-....r . _ - _ -, - - -. - y . _,,. -.,.
.
. P0;;*: ;L. Et,-uR.EME',T FINDING FACILITY Cavis-Eesse COCKET NO.
50-346 DATE 10/1/E4 AREA Plent C;e_ rations ITEM NO. 3:5/54-19-14 INSPECTOR D.J. Sullisan, Jr.
TEAM LEADER L.J. Callan _ _.. _ _ _ _ _ _ __- _ _ _. _ _ _. _ _ _ _. _.. _ _. REQUIREMENT: 10 C.h 50.5a r+cuires, for a single unit r.uclear station, that two senicr
reacter cperations (SR0s) be cn shift and that or.e be present in the control room at all times.
A safety e' alvatior by the Gffice of Nuclear Reactor Fegulaticr, dite: '_ I Jort 1;14, 3'inted a-t e:..;;ior. to this recuirer..ar; ty ; err ittin; : i fRC-Licerse: assistcr: Srif-Supervisor to '.ecte tr.e con:rci rocc ::
- r ;;. 5
- s.:".: c;rE:: ;. r.: c:tisities.
A c c r.ci ti on of tr.i s ( + :-./ ~ .3s tra i cire ; ir:tsr ;- 5e provided betW&er. tht Cortrol rcor a r.; ;"S SE.[-L i e"5ec $ '.- ~ ~ E J:t r. # s t r's Gf fi ce.
. . . -... ~.. - - - ..,_..: r..v.. Contrary to tne abcve, the installed intercom dic not prosiae relittle anc ir elligible scice communications between these two staticos wr.en testec by the NRC inspector during the PAS Inspection.
_ _ _ _ - - _ -.-- - __ -. __
. . . Fe.'ENT! AL i.'. :; CEMENT FI'.::NG FACILITY Casis-Scs;e 30CAET NO.
50-346 OATE 10/1/84 .G EA Plant Cypreti;ns lidM NO. ^i6/54-19-15 INSPECTOR D. J. Sul '. i s in, J r.
TEA" L EADER L.J. Callan ___ ___ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ . _. .._ . _ _ _ _.... _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _. _ if 0VIREMENT_:
- n a letter to the '.;C dated Ar.e 19, 1981, the Licensee ceraitted to assign
"te:tnically trair.ed incisiduals to "eoch shift team for adc.inistrative auties." The shift Administrative Assistar.t perforr'.s this function, +ccesciisning a variety of coministr6tive duties under the ger.eral supervision c# tr,e Sr.if t Super.'scr.
. _.. - -._-. _
- ,.. + r. e..
... . ".Or.triry 10 trE d*Ve, tMre t.3E bee" nt t rcining Orc 4rb-51*h:'is 6: It . e (I a r;t - es.re th&t 19e strir.istrctive Assistarit i s i r c y. i e c g g 3 ;, i t.
.- s;ecific cetajis requirec tc perforr his cuties.
.
. . . Fv. ' t. ! ! Al. E',:C 2::Eyr.t.! + :.3:NG . FACILITY Cavis-Eesse 00:KET NO.
0-306 DATE 10/1/84 .iPEA Cccrective Act'c.n S.itam I T EM '.0.
2 ? './10 -19-16
- '.5FECTOR J.D. Smith T E * M L F. A'J E R l.J. Callan
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. ....... _ - _. .__._ _ _. - . _ _ _ _ _.
- E0'eIREt:ENT:
Criterion XVI cf tppendix E '.c 10 CFR 50 st5tes, ir part, "*43se.s stail . be established to assure that conditices adscese it cualit\\, such es failures, ralfunctions, deficiencies, desiations, cefective c.aterial ar.d + rt i ;s:-n t, arc norconformances are prce ptly icentified and correctec.'
- acis-Eesse pro:ecu re SEFV-NZ, Babcock and 'rLilm 'C tur ' enc;. ' e'..rini.
. Eb~~ety CCrcerrs P$Cs',. rei reer establisnec ir ACCOrcir:Ce witt .r i t ! - ;,i r e.'E r. t.
- ic-;rarr. C.3 of Fre
- ec e SERV-0C2 recuires that PSCs be reviewet for
- tr tial ir.ccc; cr Divis-D-tse f.; clear Power Staticn within 30 days and a repce
- Le ;re;ared ce 6ilin; this review.
FP.;It.G: Contrary to the above, PSC 01-01 was issued by Eabcock and Wilcox on - March 25,1981, but the licensee review of this PSC was not completed until May 23, 1983.
This PSC provided inforr.ation en the potential for High Pressure Injection pump fail.;res resulting from a loss of adequate recirculation ficw during operation against a shutoff hea __ . . . C T E t.T 1. d'.FCSCEMif.T FP,DI'.G FACILITY Cavis-Ecise 00CKti N0.
50-306 DATE 10/1/54 AREA Procure er nt lief; NO. 346/54-19-17 INSPECTOR J.E. Qyer TEAM LEADER L.J. Callan __ ... _ _ ._ _ _ _. .. _.. _ _ REQUIREltENT: The !.velear Qo3;ity Assurance Manual, Section 2, ter 32, Revisior. 5, states that Tcledo Edison ccc, plies witn ANSI N45.2.13-197c.
A t,5 f.4 5. 2.13 - : ': 76, paragraph 3.3, recuires a res dew of procuret.ent docurents c::v.ents-arir; tec tc the surpiiers r. set the specified te eas re tr.5 r ntr.u a.c in3; trese res teai shall be cc.cutte: prior to the re: re cc J.irti r e ". e k s e. . _- .
- n. -....
..... , Ccr.t ra ry to tne abcse, Procurer.ent Quality Assurance Instru: tier, Section 2.
Rssisitr. 1, ccea n0t require a resien o-the purchase crder (PD', befcre it is reless:c to tne supplie-s. The ir.spector feard or.e PC, 054-0-E1473A-Rh, issued en May 1, 1954, that differec from its purchase recuisition.
C ua l i t,s Er.gineering had further exar@les wrich they four.c as a result cf reviers conoucted after PO issuance. These deficiencies were not identified to the Purchasing Depar r.+nt for P0 correction.
< l . - - - _ - - . . _. _.
.., -. -..
s
. . .- .
- F e.n i e.
r U r e.***.,si.m L. r-1.... e...a.
c vi FACILITY Eavis-Essse 00CstT ';0.
50-346 DATE 10/1/84 'aiA F roc u rar.en t ITEM NO. 346/54-19-18
- !;SPECTOR J.. E. C e r TEAM L: :9ER L.J. Callan
. - . - . -... ..-. ..-..-.... . -. _. - - - _ . - - - -. - - - - - .. - . E(CUIRE"ENT: re Nuclear Caality As sur3rce l'anual, Sectior, 2, Item 15, Revision 5 states tr.at Tolecc. Ecison corplies with Regulatory Guice (RG) 1.123, Resision 1 (July 1977).
RG 1.123, paragraph C.5, states that the artvisicos of sectior. 5.2.-13 cf ANSI 18.7-1976 apply, in conjunction with I':5: !.25.2.13, fcr.he con rol cf spare or reolacer.ent parts carir.; the
- e 6
- 'c,s rt
- se cf ru.. ear praer riar:s.
.3 : ' ' E. I ' E 's. F r - *. '. *. r 5.2.'.3; 5:Etes
- .ri-t " ;;e:; r e *:
"'b .i ' ,. .
- cais e e
- .'sra: a r.: u :.c 5-:ec tc e sore tr.3: i t f e t,,
re1 + t : ' ~
- s cease
- tc spe:ificrticns anc ccces e:uisaient to :".s: 3re: -'ec 'c r.i cri;u al eccip;ert cr *.ncse specifie oy a ;rc peri., re. : -e: t.: a. rec.e:
' t r s i ors. . _ _ _ _ _ -. .. r.,..u.. . c.
Contrary to the above, licensee procedures NFES 071, Purchase Requisitions - for Spare and Replacerent Parts, Revision 0.and NFES 072, Purchase of Engineered Items, Revision 0, do not require that materials be procurec te specifications and codes equivalent to the construction specifications or that the proper evaluations be r.onducted. As a result of this materials have been procured to the wrong specifications as identified in Audit Finding Report 1110-1 and Supplier Deviation Report 84-0092.
i !
, l . , - -.._. . . F C ; c.'; AL E*..E ..".*, T c :'C I % - FACILITY Cavis-Sesse DO' tit N0.
50-3 6 DATE 10/1/E4 APEA F rc.c u re.,e n t liEM ';0. 145.<5?-19-19 INSPECTOR J.E. D.ar TEAM LEADER L.J. Callar.
-- _ . --..-.-- . - - -. - - - -... EEOL'IREMENT: The riuclear Quality As surar.ce "ansai, Section 2, IteT 19, sr.ates that Tcleco Edison ccmplies witn the requirer.ents of ANSI N18.7-1972.
ANSI N18.7-1972 paragraph 5.3.9 requires that procedures Le pec.-iced for the control of mater iais and cce p:r.er ts recessary for p'. ant r ab er.ance ar.c r.cdification.
- J.0', Sta:ict t'.a te ri a l Tci sc Ecison nuclear sa'et,, relatec proce:
s 1: 2: s e Cct,trei Fesisior. 7, 1ssac 14 May 1954, racairt: c St e> cess r.iteriai de recseret tc its ste er.r ri.nir. 2C cays c',:: :. - ci e tict.. .. - -.... - ...-.-.. - -- . . r t r.- v e.r. .... . Cor.tr6ry to the atcve, three cerconents wers fcunc in tte casitz. :/ tr.e Staticr Mainter.ance Cepartt.ent wnicn were assignec tc fot s that rec :.een cor.pletec for greater than 3C cays. A static c-rin; pressure s<.4tch (ser 7E-E-2554), found in the instrument & control (I&C) snep office on August 23, 1954, was issued to Maintenance Work Order (f!WO) 1-84-1449, which was ccmpleted l'ay - 29, 19E4 A solenoid valve (ser 32-8490), found in the ISC stcrage s; ace or.
August 23, 1984, was issued for no specific job cr. January 5,1951.
A iimit switch (purchased under PO Q 66983A), found in the I&C stcrage spaces or August 23, 1984, was issued for MWO IC 104-81 which was completed on January 11, 1982.
i __
' , . .
, H. U. ! AL .% 0 mCEME.',i F I',0I.NG FACILITY Cavis-??sse DOCKET NO.
50-346 DATE 10/1/84 AMA Radick;ical_Centrols It m N0. 346/24-19-20 Ih5PECTOR R.C. F3ulus IEAM LEADER L.J. Callan - .. --. -. -. . . - -. -. REQUIREMINT: T.S. 6.8.1 re;oir es that procedures re;c.ner. cec in *;peridix A to Regulatory Guide 1.33, he.enber 1972, be established, inpler. entec, and maintained.
Licensee proc-cure RC 4528.00, Revision 3, " Efficiencies for hadiation ' Detectors," s;ecifiec actions tc be talen wher. results cf c6ily checks c' cca. ting instra is were outsict c f establishec tounca-ies.
r .
-
- . - - -. - _. -.. - _..-,,..
- .
.. * - -
- .trar.. It t* t ?
- ;.e
1.
Durir.; tre tricd April 17, 19E4 throuch Jur.e 17, 1954, licensee persc"r.EI CCntinvec IC use & ceta Counter when chily checks v.ere outsice tne estat'.tred boundaries on 1; occasions.
2.
Durirc tne period January 1,1954 through Aucust 14, 1954, licensee perscnnel usec a liquid scintillation counter wnen daily checks, after - correction for a calculational error, were outside the established bouncaries for all but six days curing the period.
._ _ . -. - -. - -- - - - - -
. . . . FO I t.r. : At : *.s c.. Mi F i.0:!;G FACILITY Davis-Ee Me DOCr.E T *;0.
50-346 DATE 10/1/84 AREA Radiole:ical Cu teols l iEr '.C.106/54-19-21 U.SPECTOR R.C. Paulus TEAM : DOER L.J. Callan _ _ _. __... _ __ _ __.. ___._.
__.
_ _ l ?EO.L IREMENT: .. T.S. 6.8.1 regires !!.et procedures recc..:: red in Appendix A to Regulatory Gside 1.33, f,0, Seer S72, be established, ir.plenented, and raintained.
T.S. 6.8.2 requires th&t these procedures and changes thereto be reviewec by the Sta ti;r. F t. ' er F; arc.
- -. -. - -. _ - -. ._.
_ '., y. 9,'.", o [ & .. . i p -;r
- c :ne c : s, ite f t.ilor.in; licer see cro:ecre3 c: i-in.: :i e:iysis c# sinies tc cetermine cercer.t atic: s c' racic st' ice: rei-ne:
- e u.-es;ricte:' a eas. sere not res ie,.e: by :re Sta:iar. isvis. 5:er::
RC c502.00 G:m.a 50ectral Analys n ' .. 2.
RC 4504.0; Gross A ;ha and Ee:a-Garc.a Activity 3.
RC 4509.00 Tritiur Determination 4.
RC 45E4.00 Detern.ination of Strontiur-59 anc Strcnti n-90 5.
LI 4811.00 Gar.rna Spectroscopy System . I
_.
_ - m., _., _.. _.. _. _ _ _ _. -. _.,. _ _ _. . _ _ _.- ..-.__,.._._,..,,-_.y-m _
_.
.
t . . -.,... ,,,. T F.n. t,.,.,o .. A.... . F u. k:...,,, ... - .ACILITY Casis-E.'sse N';KET NO.
50-346_ DATE 10/1/84 ' AC.EA C;arator T,$ininS liEM NO. 346/E4-19-22
- t.5PECTOR C.J. Sullivan, Jr.
IEU4 LEADER L.J. Callan . _ - -.. _.... .... - - -.. -. ... - - -. ~.. - c. n.. t ;..: y :. 3 s.
sa .. 10 CFR 55, 4,is cix A, requires th6t the requall'ic6ti0n lecture sseles be directec 6; ir 6Itdge w6 akne 55e5 identified in the annU6l R0 and SRO , reCLalification E+ir.ination.
_.. .. - _.... _..- _
- ...
.,. .v.. ... .. r t r i r;. *c .: c::is, 6 !Eview Of trair:109 records reve5 led tr,ct r.; cti'y: " . li'33 M cnc SC esfri 6tions r.6d been ConducteC 10 Cete,rir,s tni f'
- ":
t .. r ? *. t ".1 C i 7 ti.Hi reGualifictticr. lecture Series.
Fortrir, the r:C ; *, r i *
- C d'.s i. Zi ite '-
- blificaticr spanir.ation results b6C rZ beer r,*-itter it.
. . proc 6 Lres 2".C t'itre w&S nC rethodology for perfon inc the analyu.5 &n:
- , r t. 41 t i '. C * Ee
- T 6 Ci ir.tO the lecture Series.
'
. -- -w-- - - - - - -,, - wr 3 ,+,,., - - - - -,w--- - - - - ~ -.. -, - - -. ~ + ' +- rr*--~---*-e
. . _ > . Ot
. . ?nis ?.-se " .. .t - >fa nge ' In the iept: '.:ar 23, 1132, 5,0 + stic A:se. c,t of 1.icactee Perfcr ance (iALP) Report, NRC r egicnal m3 agiment c'.ed 3 Ore >s in the licensee's c+;Sbility to recognize design basis requir *:nts for +c,uip,ent ;;.erability.
.. Specifically, the manigament csntrois est:-tlished (procedures, training, gaalificatic's of personnel, 61-Lal cr ritten directi es, etc.) -are weak in that all suppsrt equipment / systems / structures *equired to mitigate an accident, provide sa'e s'.,t::wn cf the r e+ctor and pres ent e ceeding 10 CFR 100 f . racioicgi:a '{riis were rot identified as such ir, the r.anagement controls allc in; t -Is 'O.icie-t/ systems / structures to be removed from service. ;t.v.; t*e ir:.'+:; es i: e sa'ety significance of the equi;nent/syster's;*c:/.re being -E?O.ec ' :t se vice.
Examples cited at the time of the Se;tercer -::-; denoting tne.eair,ess were: 1) Removal of all the emergency core cooling ru;r coolers for one train of emergency core cooling from service without the train being declared inoperable 2) Removal of both diesel generator train's torr. ado shielding without personnel aware that this rendered the diesel generators inoperable.
3) Heating of the borated water storage tank over the design assumptions for loss of coolant ac'ident mitigation.
The report further c recommenced that the licer.see place greater emphasis on the understanding of design basis requirements not explicitly covered in the Technical Specifications.
In ar Enfcr:e.e. Can'erence on Marcn 9, 1983, NRC regional canage ent continue: to es;ress concerns o er the licensee's inatility to uncerstinc ine uncerlying operacility recuirements of safety relatec ecuipment/s> stems ! l . _ _. __ _ _ _. _ _ _. _ _.., _ _. _, ,, _ _ _ _, _ _ _,.. _ _. -. _ _ _..,., _ _ _
., At T . . . v rtructures 5' 'g alth '.ta r ca r.a s ; r. t' e a ' r t e ce i ; 1.4ng control areas.
The c.en'.s teat p_p;orted 'AC regior.al.ta a;+3vnt's :0ncarns were: 1) the licensee tak ing credit for. cnfo. ctional cor.sputer a' e es in Technical ?,sacification sur.rtl'inces dae to not testing the ala v.s far operability before' taking credit for them, 2) Failure to establish an ed>quate check valve testing program under Section XI of the ASME code and 3) Failure to adequately assure operability of a Main Steam Isclation Valve after maintenance.
As a result of the Enforce. ent Conference the licensee ccr.mitted to initiate a cc.prehe sise c: e:t ve action progra: to add ess t s N : c:n; errs.
A ;c-ticr
I c' the pr:;-ar was ic : sal witn c; erability.
These
- -
. s-.5-t e: "Ir res;; se tc c.siticms af c;eracility anc safety est e.
ri Vie: i tr5
- 5
- e::icr + pert and certain other re:ent events, Tele:; :: :c* his t.egr a
- ag-a
- tc up; ade our capabilities in that area.
Tc he7: a;%iese ar.
e; pro;riate determination of the safety function of piece c' eauierent anc its requireeents to caintain operability Toledo Edison is instituting:... . . We are currently investigating methods to record safety and . operability requirements into a retrievable format as they are indentified.
This program is being developed by the Station ' , Te hnical Section, and the program development will be completed by August 1, 1983."
I-edditior ir a letter. R.P.C-ouse to C.E.Norelius, dated A ril 7, 1993 the 'i:eries statec tnat craft action plans had been preca ec fo-the following:
-. -..
c.Ar T . - . r i' ' i; r, 3bility regaire ents is being 3.
A p 0;rsm to 3.
2.
t's , inccrporated intc inx.il 4 us ef ore rev's s.
Presently procedure reviews c are including a revisw uf FEAR cc +'t: 30ts to include them in procedures.
b.
Ev mid April, infstr.etion in the US'sR, which includes the original FSAR, t,RC correspcrdence, ?!)' +od Sechtel ccrres ;-dance, LER's FCR's, and other r information pertinent to station c;.erations will be available in a cc'ps.ter ized te) -crded f;rmat hich will 6 ?cplify the identification of and location of documentation pertinent to a given subject.
This should et.'st station pe-sone.sl in the re,'s. of tbs USAF. and identification of c;e ELility recuir e, tents.
It tne 3ctcber 25, '.5E3 5A ' Feport NRC regi:nal tinagement reiterated that tne L li:-n ee snould e.'su e that c3;nirant indivic 5 1 5.cre a sre of ali cesign ba:,es/F5AR assunptions.
Fart of the impetus of this recom endation was the reorganization by the station staff after discussion with the offsite engineering staff that the practice of removing an emergency core cooling room cooler from serv'ce constituted inoperability of that train's emergency core cooling system.
Subsequent (after the fact) analysis of the original FSAR by the licensee determined that one room cooler was adequate in most conditions.
On November 1, 1983, the licensee removed on of the two ventilation supply fans for the No. 1 emergency diesel generator froe service for maintenance.
Base on the F54R recvire-arts, disab'ing cf t*is f ar rs:e tre diesel generator inoper-able.
However, the maintenance staf' inci. c.a ' m.: rote tne maintenance work order indicated that this mainter.ance cic not mske ths ciese' generator inoperable.
The mair,tenance sort orde.as *esie-e: an: ap: ove: c) tne shift .~ -, -. - -.....,... -. - y _.. - y ,
, 'ik i . $ - . . d o'th 'ha
- '
r ce sthff i:it tS work did net rs'se the s-perv4scr an; f diesel ger.arator, ope-able.
n.e la edure associated with the diesel zent that two sentilation fans must be generator did r.vt reflect the requi e vparable for e 3ch ciesel gene stor.
Sutseq.ent (after the fact) analysis of the original Fi;R by the licensee d3termined that only one ventilation fan was required depending on the te perature canditions.
i As a result sf c r.tireing ccncerns cver the total parformance of the licensee, on November 4, 1983, NRC regional management requested the licensee to develop a Reculatory 2;r;.erer.t Frocram that would enterpass all aspects of the licersee's orgs-4:et'.on recuiring imprsvement.
One area specifically rer.e:'.+ tc Le in t%e trs;ra was evaluation cf Technical 5;e:i E *. { o n s i r.: final /upda:ed safe:) a.s'ys 4 s repart to ceterr.ine Operatili y licits on t safety-relatec.. stems.
The Nece.-ter 1, 199? evert.as indicative that t".e . operability concerns were valid.
After the November 1, 1983, event the licensee instituted two new managsment controls.
They were: 1) Upper management approval was required before a safety-related system could be altered from its normal configuration and 2) Bechtel informed the licensee what systems had to be in service for equipment operability.
This letter was provided to the shift supervisors.
However, even with all these controls in place the licensee was disabling the air conditioning portion of the emergency control room ventilation during cuarterly pre.entative maintenance a:tivities.
The maintenance staff was cesignating the system to be operable on the maintenan:e ork order and the shift supervisor's review ag eet.
._.
- . -_ - .-. _,. .
'
- Ar T
. . .. ditic,4rs is not a significant LCO It is oated that the d4 390lir'g o' 5;- ' vi0'ation.
Ne,erthe'ess, it is one.mcre is,'ple of equipment being renc.ed from service by pers;.1 el ho do not..ders*.snd the operability requirements of In this instance sn a ter the fact safety e.aluation shcwed f safety aquipment.
that the impact on safe plant operation.3s minimal for the time the incident occ rred.
i M;re irportar.t is tFat this type of ar.alysis must be completed before the ecuipment is removed frcm service and the analysis must be performed by a pera:n who has ede; sate esperience and knowledge in order to make this C&c"5 ion.
., , h t
-. - - _ _ . _- . - .
.. . ., .
!' zificart bsi:ert *- .tcr fire. 2r - Tr 's-Eesse . Inspector: W. E.gers .. , , - - 1.
.c enser ,2 red During cc' trol room tour (resiew of log bo:Ls) W. Rogers identified to the licensee that one train of the Emergency Diesel Generator Ventilation Syster was rema ed cut of se vice and the tiart wts ir a LCO conditior.. vec :ne Est ie-Fesicer. rio: ;.;5 :ec this eat, its ;:: veuic a e teer eersede:. . 2.
Teo uses. '??L ine Senior Resident identified that a Tech Spec required Surveillarice Test (ST503;.01 SFAS) was not totally completed.
W. Rogers informed the licensee about this before the Tech Spec time limit (+25%) was exceeded.
3.
January 1924 By resiening the licensee's log W. Rogers determined that the licensee ertered s LCC w*.er they transferred cre of the safety buses to a r: - , Class IE so;rce.
Because of 'n.
ogers' observetice the Tech Soe: LCC ~ was r0~. et~eeCet.
i I L
_ .~ ~ O . - afrir.c.
- ' - - '3s:s.E3;se-
. Four (4) .t. p=:ple hir ed
, 1 for litersed c;erator training - - I for QA trair.i g - 1 for electrical r.aintenance . - . . . . . ter eva:uattar section
- ~ c.:edu es ir Traininc Dept.
< - iC ;-:.ce:,.-es r.2ve bser. issued 1 ;ro:ecu e is s:1 cc s andir.c le.De:t it iisce 0,- e: c' - . i August ~ t.eec Analysis (Tas6 Evaluation) has been completec ' , . , Estimated cost to have Davis-Sesse ItiP0 accreditec will be 4 million
dollars
,
F I I r e $ - -,, ___ _ _ _.
,__ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _. _ _ _. _ _ _ ,, _ _ _ ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ -.
..;- . - . . PAT F -f'-cs. 'as't : -<se : ',.. tion
Stier 9th in senior licers-d n,arator ar ca - H: wever, loss of I or 2 cgsrators ray cause problems Trairirg Area - rating will be Category 3
Witiresses in re;aal. trair.ir; prcgram - Same exam giser. 6 days per week to groups in requal, class - Techr.ical corter.: c' E>ar wea6 - Cneristry an: H: Ees t_L : orograr ir. " :.5. y
- .. . Flan Modificatica.s ratir.g will be Ca:E ;;ry 3
50.55 resiews are r.ot being adecuatei> Lerforred - No iustification why safety evaluation is not needed - FCR for HPI pump recirc. line did not receive safety review - Appears to be unreviewed safety question - common mode failure
Mainter.ance Safety-related raintenance troce:ures no: being resiewed - by Station Review Ecard (SEE) SDE not reviewirg F-0:ec.*e 'e rorary F-4!. witbir 14 day linit - (approximately 5 '.T '
Strength ir Cavis-fesst ! E r*tre rt es: s-; centre syster d - . - -
- -- . . .- . . -. -ri - . . i . c ..: - -w.. r- .a .. . .. . .... aca,*, ness ir %3 iticSticn t.,. 3..u, i t o rs - .
'els ak cc a r.kation link be t,..-+ n OA (C. Daf t) arid P. Crouse - s , t i !
k
l )
T
i i ~ i J
4 O
4 k =
?
i ! I
, i ., ~. - - - _,, - -, - _ ,-c-, ,m., , _ -....- - - ._-.y, ,. -. _y .... __... ,, _, - _,,. _..,,, s.,,. . -, ~.._,.,--_, - - _. _ _.- _ -. _,_-.__%.-- .
' . - .
- e:f c:;re rer 'rance
"4 s;;rv .
- 3.is-? esse
. n/c-Enf rce ent Conference to discuss ad.r.inistraties and opera-Epril 1979 ? r; cegulator;. rerforcance of Cavis-Eesse First of a series of r.3r.3ge-ent reetings to address rajor concerns (1) unfavorable &ed trend in nu-ber of noncorpli-ances; (2) increase end significance of personnel errors; (3) increase in repetitive equip ~ent problems not resolved in titeily ranner; (4) breakdown ir. ranapecent system tc pras: anc address techr.ical an: ad-4 ni s *.r a : '. E :-::'r : ir :i ely fasnion.
tlay 1R7E Second in series o' r;eeting to discuss a::ic"E :t.er. t,. TECC to address Region III concerns.
TECO outlined ^ program of improvement in ranagement control, staffing, training and correction of equipment problems.
! July 1979 TECO outlined corrective action details in following areas: Thirc "anage ent 1 - Training - 22 openings and 3 filled to date Meeting 2-Procedures-groupdevelopedtocentralize(thepre-preparation and maintenance of procedures.
3 - Management Control - management meetings with plant perser.nel :: continue 4 - Maintenance - contractor to assist in ir;iementing ! Fa cil i t,s C'.arpe :pavest progra. Aisc. inpreve
l ! - , _
, .. . . .
- rasenti,e -air.tet5nce pro; ram.
Se.tember 1979-- Ciscussions on fell:,ing matters: a - Favrth Mar. age.ent 1 - Difficulty in tilling sacancies (cFar.ges made in salary Meeting structure ar.d hiring policies);
'LERs in area of personnel errors declir.ed in past 6
L,;e.cet caol ranths;
'.uclear Services Group to handle su; port activities (audits, FCRs, outage planning, training, etc.) esta-tiished, i - Training progra~ s being im:'s er.:ec.
a Fe: sa y 19E:
- iscussion on ici'.cveing ratters; Fi f tr. Ma r,a ge~e r.
'. - Trair.inc and experience leve'. cf r.0".licdrsec c;eratinc Meeting personnel.
Letter to TECO V.F. excressin; cer.cerns relating to safe operation of plant.
Committrer. s
made to strengthen training area.
' 2 - Security inspection identified nine items.
June 4, 1980 Licensee reported on the status of their prcgram to Sixth Manage en improve mar.agement controls and operations at Davis-Besse.
Meeting Rill acknowledged significant progress made in ten areas to [- positive trerd: im; rove marTge ent controls and t"e c:eratiens c' Da.'s-Eerst rcbie s ir. ir:le entaticr. cf tre se: <' y :- g-t-a.:.s cvereXposure has cetracted fror im;r0.e en s in cir.e-area.- ' . .:. O < SALP 2 General Obser.ation that tFire a; pears to be a lack of (*;cte-ber 1933-initiative in taking aggressive action before ite.t.s " arch 1932) beco e regulatory iss as.
L ocve ent, mair tir a nce, fire pectection and drawing control failed to show significant evidence of soif identification of p cble s Sakness in ca; ability and aggressive corrective acticns.
< to recegnize design basis r+c ire ents for eca p.ent cperability (re, oval of ECCS room ccolers w/o declaring train inoperable; heating EnST cver cesign assuntions for LOCA analysis; <emosa c' coth diesel generators tornado missie shielcing 5.3 ceclaring dieseis ino.e'acle yfary_1]E2 Discuss concerns in the area c' crawing controls, non-(a na ger e nt conformance reports and increase in personnel errcrs.
eeti ng ) . March 1983 Continued RIII concern over licensee's inability to under-(Enforcement stand operability requirements. Other concerns: 1) Main-Conference) tenance - failure to identify causes of ecu'ipment ralfunc-s.... u ne wu.s.o tions inadequate; 2) Drawing contrcl - failure to update g and control drawings, 3) i.onconformance program - noncon-forming conditions not tracked or identified to proper cepanizations.
kri: 19E3 Comorehensive Corrective Action Frogra-initiated b,y TECC tc adcress concerns including tro:e cetermination of equiorent operability recuire ent _ _ % '.. e . . July. ;_;{3 I ,.r :. +:.enti re%d in confirntory measure,ents +dt :- (S ALP 3 yril 1352- +s+ceh and p ecare,ent are'as.
Maintenance contir.ad at Yarcn 19?3) a CAT 3 le.?l.
While c.erall performance was 9:>od in ?' ant , Operations,,+csannel errers and c.perator cognizance of . ftices,v>is still a concern.
de sign /F S.i: "5; '.e-ber '.353 Discuss the need to de.elo: a F+gulatory Insec<ement . (Ma r.a ger ent pecgrar as a result of concerns originally addressed in Meeti ng ', the Co f rehensive Corrective 'ction Program and concerns - icerti~ied curing a site visit ty Cercissicner V. Gilinsky.
.ar. gary.~3' tic:- sa:- is s;atas c# treir ir.:n-rsasures to res0'.e ' ~ crating ccntrcl crcblers.
' icersee defines sccpe of _ their Ferforrance Enhancemer,: Fragram (FEP).
. January - Meetines with licensee to discuss development of PEP.
April 1954 April-May 1984 Eight items of noncompliance were identified.
Inspection (RIII OA Inspec-concluded that even though noncompliances were identified, tion) Davis-Besse nas an acceptable cuality program.
A:ril 1984 A ciagn: sic cf :ne Lav s-Eesse training organization anc trc;<a s..as
- sse: :. ".-:.c:nsu'. ant in tnis area,.
. The rajCr :"Ob'.er icer.:#fisc Was the lack Cf staff to -. - . . , ... - im::e ent v. a. a: ea-s :: ce a we i > ceveio:ec prog-a. Tne roc: cause of tnis :-::'.eT is tr.e Com:any's wage anc salary structure.
A tctal of 21 ;csitions are bucgeted ._ -. -_.
. _ , __ _ _, _ _ .
. .:. . . It7;.,i . t:~ot
- nly 13 Fa.e t::en filled (in last conth this is up to 18).
' - L' J .'uly 105,4 Discuss re..ent 4..nts that ir,dicate a bra;down in mansgc-( Er.fo rcerent nent control systeis.
InSbility of TECO to recognize Conference) dcsign basis reiwire ents for equipaent cperability and failure to take effective corrective acti;ns when a problem has been identified.
E>am:les: 1) Control :.com Emergency Ventilation system ~;-:e increretle cue :o personnel error.
Eme gen:3 Diesel 7.sr.erator (EDGl ventile:ict. sup:13 #ar
- D en cut of service,itnsu: ceciaring i:1 ir.c;s acie anc
. not perforring the re: ired surveillances; 3) Startur Feed < A Eumo suction valve left "o;en" and rencere: ag auxiliary feedwater pump inoperable. After corrective actions were. taken by TEC0, the valve was again left "open" approxi-mately a month later.
July-Aucust 1934 Ten areas inspected by eight inspectors.
Twenty one (PAS inspection potential enforcement findings were identified as follows: 7 CAT 2 and 1 - Failure of SRV to review procedure modification 3 CAT 3) 2 - Failure of CNRS to review a deficiency in the design g of the high cressure injection system.
, H;: V:t.s e:cra~ 2 - Failure to intiude otservations of maintenan;e an: 7 set, ? sac.Ina ocerations activities in the OA audit Drograr/ 4 - Failure te crovice acecuate managerent re;resentatic-at 0; cost aucit. . -5- , ,, Sejie-ter 1534 RIII Ov;?osec Esca1 3t'c Ir#srcement Action based on ite s discuss:-d furing.luly Erfucrent Conference.
- r.3bility of TECO to recognize design besis require ~ents of ecui;:ent c:.-in Sbility and faihre tc ersure adequate ccrre. ti'.e
. actions to preclude repetition of identified pedlems, i t . i , - _.
. ...
. . , , ... . Descripticn of farferriyce_jny t..
- nt Trc ; ram j PEP _},
_ - Divided ir,to three phasas.*4rch 1934 - June 1925) - f_hase I_ (March 1984 - A;<il 1994) Conduct situation appraisals (SAs) to identify ;r:blams; dese. lop deviation statements; and _ _..- . -. -. ... -. cor? ete Problem Analysis (PA).
i - _ Phase 11(May 1984 - July 1934) Action Planning Groups (APGs) devela ec alternate apt-c. aches to addressing prcbable causes c ( Cs' and/or rOS: 0r:bable causes iMOCs,. ~'9 re:r3*-~rt;;f L'
? C siO" Er,alysis Or00ess used to selec! C'e#Sr3:is ;e.;#;e ::
reso've Causes.
Qevelg; i;;iOr Cla*I.
- Phase III (July'1984 - June 1985) Action plans t: be r_eviewec and prioritized.
Prioritization will be on the basis of benefits . obtained, resources recuired, immediacy of irract etc.
__* * * ', . s.J-3 ' Interim Action Program was implemented to identify areas of performance - , where problems could be promptly mitigated.
Tne Interim Action Program objectives were to: 1.
Identify problem areas - from audit _ finding reports; corrective action recuests; NRC. instectior re: Orts. :'.30 #indings. etc.
2.
Assign Safety anc Regula ;rj sigr.ifi:5 1:e Ir,;rities.
3.
Validate reasonableness of a::icr :: rescise :",e noncom:liances.
4.
Icentify modified or net iterir ac-icn :: re :acer.
__
, O , _g.
... - .v- . ... - . - .. . . Total of 135 i nte.ri..actic ns..ere id er,ti fied.
... - - - ecticn P,.6ns - -6.ctal.. u. cns . . - . i t _ .
Wm
- E\\
. . . -. }}