ML20133B999
Text
.
e UNITED STATES O
t NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION h
j vvASHINGTON. D. C. 20655
- g June 12, 1985
%...+ /
l MEMORANDUM FOR:
Chairman Palladino Comissioner Roberts Commissioner Asselstine Commissioner Bernthal Comissioner Zech FROM:
William J. Dircks Executive Director for Operations 5
SUBJECT:
DAILY STAFF NOTES - JUNE 11, 1985 EDO 1.
Rule Signed by the EDO On June 11, 1985, the Executive Director for Operations approved a final rule which amends 10 CFR Part 9.
This rule reflects the change in copying charges resulting from the Comission's award of a new contract for the copying of records, t'
This notice constitutes notice to the Commission that, in accordance with
,l(
the rulemaking authority delegated to the EDO, the EDO has signed this i
final rule and proposes to forward it on June 19, 1985 to the Office of i
the Secretary for Federal Register publication, unless otherwise directed by the Commission.
i
!_E i
1.
PNO-III-85-47A, Toledo Edison Corrtany (Davis-Besse), Loss of Feedwater 1'
toSteamGenerators(Update).
2.
PNO-V-85-35 U.S. Ecology, Inc., Richland, Washington Burial Site 1
(Richland, WA), State of Washington Suspension of Philadelphia Electric i
Company's (NRC Licensee) Permit for Radioactive Waste Burial.
NRR e510070192 e50717 PDR COMMB NRCC 1.
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station CMMESPMDEW N I
On June 6,{HPCI) turbine tripped on overspeed during a surveillanc 1985, at approximately 3:00 a.m., the high pressure coolant J
injection l
i test. NRC s Resident inspector learned on June 8th that video tapes of subsequent startups of the turbine showed that a transducer was interfering with the linkage in the turbine governor.
The transducer had been mounted temporarily on the governor relay piston to obtain data following the trips on hi Daily Highlight dated May 24, gh steam flow which were reported in a 1985.
i The licensee informed the Project Manager on June 10th that the HPCI turbine now operates correctly after removal of the transducer and adjustments of both the steam control valve and the turbine stop valve to provide a smoother startup.
NRR (Continued) 2.
Davis-Besse Unit No. 1 The following is the preliminary sequence of events which occurred at the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, operated by Toledo Edison The information is preliminary and may Company, on June 9, 1985.
require clarification or correction upon detailed analysis of the event.
No The plant was originally at approximately 90% of full power.The plant was in f surveillance testing was in progress.
control except for the #2 Main Feedpump which was in manual.
Event Time The #1 Main Feedwater Pump (MFP) tripped on 01:35:00 overspeed due to a control failure. Automatic plant runback initiated.
Due to the reduced feedwater flow available, Reactor Coolant System Plant (RCS) temperature and pressure increasing.
ran back to approximately 80% of full power.
Reactor tripped on high RCS pressure (2300 psig).
01:35:29
(
Turbine trip from reactor trip.
The Steam & Feedwater Rupture Control System 01:35:31 (SFRCS), Channel 2, spuriously half tripped.
Main Steam Isolation Valve (MSIV) #1 closed.
01:35:36 01:35:37 MSIV #2 closed.
Nonnal post trip equipment operation, such as 01:35 to the auto transfer of housepower to the startup 01:40 transfonners, etc. The #2 MFP continued to supply normal feedwater until approximately 0140 hours0.00162 days <br />0.0389 hours <br />2.314815e-4 weeks <br />5.327e-5 months <br />, when there was not adequate steam to operate the MFP turbine due to the closure of the MS!V's.
Approx. 01:41 Steam Generator water levels decreased to the SFRCS low level trip setpoint. The SFRCS actuated. The Control Room Operator at this time also actuated the SFRCS manually, however, he incorrectly actuated the SFRCS on low steam pressure instead of the desired low steam generator level.
01:41:31 The #1 Auxiliary Feedpump (AFP) tripped on overspead.
3-i It l
NRR (Continued) 01:41:44 The #2 AFP tripped on overspeed.
I 01:42 The Operator corrected his error by clearing the manual SFRCS actuation on low steam pressure..
However, since the AFP's were tripped, no feedwater j
was supplied by the AFP's i
01:45 Both. Steam Generators had steamed down to approximately 12-13 inches of indicated level.
0 RCS Tave approximately 562 F.
01:45 - 01:51 RCS Tave increasing due to lack of primary to secondary heat transfer. RCS pressure increasing due to decreasing density in RCS water and in-i 1
creasing pressurizer level.
RCS pressure increased to the Power Operated Relief Valve (PORV) setpoint (2425 psig).
PORV cycled a total of three (3) times, relieving pressurizer pressure to the Quench I
Tank.
'(
01:51 Operators placed the Startup Feedpump (SUFP) in operation to supply the #1 Steam Generator. The
- 1 Steam Generator pressure had reached a minimum 1
of approximately 750 psig. The #1 Steam Generator repressurized to approximately 900 psig from the startup feedpump.
01:52
- 2 AFP returned to operation by operators to supply the #2 Steam Generator. MaximumRgS temperature had reached approximately 592 F.
~
Steam Generator #2 level restored.
The #2 Steam Generator had reached a minimum of 920 j
psig.
01:55
- 1 AFP returned to operation by operators to supply the #1 Steam Generator. Steam Generator i
- 1 level restored.
01:58 Tave restored to normal post trip temperature.
Additional Notes:
Adequate subcooled margin was available throughout the transient.
The Reactor Coolant Pumps remained in operation.
The Quench Tank contained the discharges from the PORV. Makeup /High Pressure Injection cooling of the RCS was available as a method of core cooling at all times.
An Incident Investigation Team was sent to the site on 6/10/85.
1 NRR (Continued)
Stuck Control Rod l
3.
Point Beach Unit No. 1 The licensee has determined the cause of the two earlier reported stuck control rods, F-12 and J-4, to be loose parts generated from control rod guide tube (CRGT) flow insert replacement conducted during i
the current outage. One loose part was part of a new " flexure pinless" flow insert which had broken, and the other loose part was a flexure pin which had been removed from the control rod guide tube during the outage. Flexure pins (4) had been used to hold down the previous flow j
inserts, and were being removed this outage in conjunction with flow insert replacement due to their susceptibility to stress induced i
cracking. The licensee plans to remove and inspect all CRGT flow 1
inserts and all CRGT internals. The licensee / Westinghouse also plans to modify the procedures for installation of the ficw inserts in order l
to correct inadequacies in the procedure.
The loose part flexure pin appears to be a parts accountability /
closecut problem specific to this repair effort which will be corrected i
with the inspection of the CRGT internals. The loose part associated 1
with the new flow insert appears to be caused by installation procedural inadequacies which the licensee expects to correct by
.[
modifying the procedures. Neither of these problems appeared to exist
! \\.
during a similar repair effort on Unit 2 in the Fall 1984 refueling j
outage.
i The licensee is currently planning to startup on June 18, 1985. The Region III personnel and the senior resident inspector are closely following this event.
REGION III
]
1.
Davis-Besse Unit No. 1 A special NRC Investigative Team from Headquarters arrived at the Davis Besse site at 8 a.m. (EST), June 11, 1985, to review the circumstances surrounding the complete loss of feedwater to the steam generators on i
June 9, 1985.
(See PNO-III-85-47). A Region III team has been and will continue to remain on site evaluating the event. On June 10, Region III issued a Confirmatory Action Letter (CAL) placing a freeze on work involving equipment that malfunctioned during the incident until such time as the NRC Investigative Team has an opportunity to evaluate the event. The CAL also requires the licensee to review, evaluate, and implement corrective actions concerning the unexplained closure of the Main Steam Isolation Valves, the inadvertent trip of the Main Feedwater Pumps and the failure of the Auxiliary Feedwater System to initiate.
Regional Administrator authorization is required before the licensee can restart the unit and before the unit can exceed 5 percent power.
i i
j I
f
- - - ~
~..-.._,,y-n,---_. - -,. - - -, _ _ _. - - -.,,. _., _ _... -...,
,.._.-,.__,,__,,,,r__._-,
.m.,,.-,m_
m,_____%
- t
.s
. ~.. -
,-},
d..
g, r
. t 3
9
' e%
- +
4
~
e s.
i
'{**,<-
- dI>y
- y i
.. u.s.,.:.,.
e.
u...
c f,
. 4f
. t.
i
. gar,.,
..,3
,m
.g c..
/
,m>
g 9
a
+-
g-
'.y,._ f t
s
. z.
.,9. ;
,a s
s -.:
,i :
.,'s.
?.;. ".
j.
y.
.,, w,2, s
.a.
s s
g ~ ga
- m
- ..g, ;,..
L
.J g.;
...c a J;
c.
e, %
.i..
r
..,... m.-
_ u...
. _u.
w.
.s,
.. <c
.e...,..
...s
.... ~.
7..--.
- t
...f...
. ~. _ _ -
m..
w,,e p*#
N,f. onal Inquiries Concerning Davis-Besse - b.
c A M.,.- s b -.
s
.3
... i,
~.. q i' 4,* (
j>
.f, ENCLOSURE
?,,
a
(%). l )'
q
..'..".'4.
'C.A
- o -
.s.
g%.,
q q
~;
- ..:.. :..a ' c :4,ggg
,7
+. w. m i..._
a r
'..'.p",,,.-
N,
.ik..
W._q. ment Supporting Q-22
- t..
t 1
,g,
.g e
,.,+g 3-r..
- , a g.-
..t -
t y s
q
. '<. '4
.ph.
d-e 4*
(
. p';r.
- g i j%..
a;
',,f 8 -
g 8, sev g~.,.
. ' ~
p;
,e r, 0,f-
, 'r 4
3 e
'g 4
8*
,z,
+.
9
- l fe? '
. Y,
,a t
,z r
yg_
k bl$ y.
'=e.*
g Tj,
,p, M
4
~
..hj* p g.
', d.' ' >.
s V,4 [.*y
-.3
- n
-- s s.
,. e'..
.e s.4 n
c.
...L
- s
.. p,,, ',,p s we,.h ;.
t
~,, j.
, is "
- 9 ;,'
e.i,%
4's e
i
.r g
s g.
,L
...<'.p..
y-
,.g s
.. l j.,., 4,e. s,
s4
+4 I
a ra,6 p.
.s
.* :.C.. ;.p e.,.,.
w :,.
A. ':.
4, p. n,..
n.4
~.
.4 e,*
r
-y
.f.
,.e.,
.'.,s-
,.g'.
4 ',s
, e
'C '-.
.,. g
..g..
4e.
4
.,.c.
,,s..e 4.g g),,'
v f
.F,'..-
s.
..e e
.'..',,l*
e
,.....g. % ef.,' *,
r S
oo
'Q m.
,' y
,4.
L
,t
.a 4,
- 9 5.
p,
', r
[
't' l '
4,
-a
.. =.
BCLOSURE 4: ATTAOPENTS SUPFDRTING 0]ESTI% 22 1
4 INDEX OF DOCUMENTS RESPONSE TO QUESTION 22
\\
1979 04/30/79 LETTER:
J. Keppler - TEco: Transmits Report 79-08 (attached),
report of enforcement conference on 04/18/79 discussing administrative and operating regulatory performance.
(5 pgs.)
06/15/79 LETTER:
J. Keppler - TECo: Transmits Report 79-12 (attached),
report of meeting 05/31/79 (2nd of series) regarding immediate and long-term improvements in regulatory performance.
(9 pgs.)
07/10/79 NOTICE:
Significant licensee meeting 07/17/79, to discuss implementation of additional management controls.
(1 pg.)
08/06/79 LETTER:
J. Keppler - TECo: Transmits Report 79-20 (attached),
report of meeting 07/17/79 (3rd of series) regarding immediate and long-term improvements in regulatory performance.
(7pgs.)
08/19/79 NOTES: Notes for TEco meeting 08/19/79.
(5 pgs.)
09/10/79 NOTICE:
Significant licensee meeting 09/19/79, to discuss TECo program to improve management control and operations.
(1 pg.)
09/12/79 LETTER:
J. Keppler - TECo:
Confirms meeting schedule for 09/19/79 meeting.
(1 pg.)
10/15/79 LETTER:
J. Keppler - TECo: Transmits Report 79-26 (Attached) report of meeting 09/19/85 (4th of Series) regarding immediate and long-term improvements in regulatory performance.
(8pgs.)
t
/
2
1980 02/13/80 LETTER:
T. N. Tambling - R. F. Heishman:
Status Update of Davis-Besse Corrective Actions to improve Management Controls and Plant Operations.
(5 pgs.)
02/16/80 LETTER:
J. Keppler - TECo:
Confirmation Letter of meeting between TECo and NRC. (1 pg.)
02/17/80 LETTER: Davis-Besse Reactor Operators - R. Crouse loss of Qualified Operators and request to meet with Crouse to Discuss this.
(2 pgs.)-
03/31/80 LETTER / INSPECTION REPORT:
J. Keppler - TECo:
Cover letter to Inspection Report which is a series of management meetings.
(6 pgs.)
04/23/80 LETTER:
J. Keppler - N. C. Moseley (IE):
Description of Davis-Besse Event of April 19, 1980.
(4 pgs.)
Sumary)of Physical Security Inspections at Davis-Besse.
05/80 (6 pgs.
05/13/80 LETTER:
R. W. Reid - TECo:
Notice of Enclosed NUREG Documents.
(1 pg.)
05/27/80 LETTER:
J. Keppler - TECo:
Confirmation Letter between TEco and NRC.
(1 pg.)
05/27/80 NOTICE:
Significant Licensee Meeting 06/04/80 to discuss Management, Security, and Radiation Protection Enforcement Conference.
(1 pg.)
06/04/80 OUTLINE: Management Meeting on 06/04/84.
(1 pg.)
06/20/80 LETTER:
V. Stello - TECo: (2 pgs.) g Civil Penalties due to Proposin overexposure on 04/30/80.
07/10/80 LETTER / INSPECTION REPORT:
,J. Keppler - TEco meeting and enforcement conference summary for 06/04/80.
(14 pgs.)
07/18/80 LETTER:
J. S. Creswell - J. F. Ahearne:
Sumary of Inspector's concerns.
(2 pgs.)
J. Keppler - Attached address listing (:
11/18/80 LETTER:
Enclosed Performance Appraisal Branch (not attached).
1 pg.)
11/26/80 LETTER:
J. Keppler - TEco:
Confinnation of 12/05/80 meeting to discuss regulatory performance.
(1 pg.)
11/26/80 LETTER:
M. Johnson (TEco) - V. Stello: Response to Performance Appraisal Team.
(1 pg.)
3
11/03/80 LETTER:
J. Keppler - TEco:
Confirmation of meeting to discuss the evaluation of Regulatory Performance.
(1 pg.)
12/08/80 LETTER:
J. Keppler - R. F. Heishman:
Performance Appraisal Branch Inspection of Davis-Besse.
(1 pg.)
12/31/80 LETTER / INSPECTION REPORT:
J. Keppler - TECo:
Refers to management meeting 12/05/80 and NRC Sumary.
(9 pgs.)
4
1981 01/21/81 LETTER:
V. Stello - TECo: Transmits Report 80-3 (PAS)
Performance Appraisal Section Report.
Executive sumary and report cover sheet attached.
(5 pgs.)
03/03/81 MEMO:
N. Mosely - V. Stello:
Davis-Besse PAS Inspection Transmits Assessment Report. Evaluation of IE Program and Regional Implementation attached.
(14 pgs.)
05/01/81 MEMO:
J. Keppler. - N. Moseley: Disposition of inspection findings resulting from the Davis-Besse PAS Inspection.
Report 81-03, Notice of Violation, Notices of Deviation, Memo from J. Keppler to J. Sniezek (04/22/81) attached.
(15 pgs.)
05/08/81 LETTER: TECo - J. Keppler:
Response to concerns resulting from PAS Inspection.
Cover sheet only attached.
(2 pgs.)
03/11/81 LETTER:
J. Keppler - TECo:
Confirms meeting scheduled for 03/17/81 at Regional Office.
(1 pg.)
03/25/81 MEMO:
E. Brach - W. Rogers: Management visit to Davis-Besse.
d Thank you for coopsration and support.
(1 pg.)
06/10/81 LETTER:
J. Keppler - TECo:
Express appreciation for cooperation j
in meeting 05/26/81. Coments helpful in recognizing impact of NRC initiatives.
(1 pg.)
07/08/81 LETTER: TEco - J. Keppler:
Confirms discussions. Have initiated corrective action plans as a result of evaluation of inadvertent reactor trip 06/24/81.
(3 pgs.)
i i
1
^
5
1982 01/15/82 LETTER:
R. Spessard - TEco:
Confirms meeting plans for 01/21/82 at Regional Office.
(1 pg.)
01/20/82 MEMO:
J. Keppler - R. Spessard:
Recent inspection findings at Davis-Besse.
Importance of borated water storage overtemperature.
(1 pg.)
02/25/82 LETTER:
R. Spessard - TECo: Transmits Report 82-05 (DRP1), report of management meeting on 01/21/82 at Region III to discuss drawing control, nonconformance reports, personnel errors.
Report cover sheet only attached.
(3 pgs.)
04/30/82 LETTER:
C Paperiello - TECo:
Thank you for response to items in your letter of 04/20/82.
(1 pg.)
07/30/82 LETTER: TECo - J. Hind: TECo comments on SALP Report, acknowledges SALP, takes issue with conclusions in one area.
(2 pgs.)
09/08/82 LETTER:
J. Keppler - TEco:
Confinns conversation discussing security matters.
Region III personnel available to discuss matters.
(1 pg.)
09/23/82 LETTER:
J. Keppler - TEco: Transmits final SALP Report and provides overall observations on Regulatory performance (Report not attached).
(3 pgs.)
6
1983 03/24/83 LETTER:
C. Norelius - TEco:
Transmits report 83-06 (attached),
report of enforcement conference on 03/09/83 discussing maintenance drawirg control and equipment operability.
(5 pgs.)
07/07/83 LETTER:
J. Hind - TECo: Confirms meeting date of 07/12/83 for presentation of SALP report.
(2 pgs.)
07/08/83 MEMO:
C. Norelius - R. Spessard:
Requests inspection of OA program at Davis-Besse Station.
(1 pg.)
l l
07/18/83 LETTER:
R. Crouse - NRC (J. Stolz):
Provides status report on TEco activities towards developing and implementing a Davis-Resse Station Integrated Living Schedule Program (ILSP).
(4 pgs.)
10/17/83 LETTER:
V. Gilinsky - J. Williamson:
Discusses results of plant tour at Davis-Besse Station.
(1 pg.)
09/20/83 LETTER:
R. Crouse - NRC (J. Stolz):
Informs NRC of delay in submitting ILSP until October 1983.
(2 pgs.)
i 10/28/83 MEMO:
W. Schultz - J. Axelrad:
Forwards documents to NRC HQ regarding proposed civil penalty on fire protection issues.
(24 pgs.)
10/28/83 LETTER:
J. Williamson - V. Gilinsky:
Responds to Gilinsky letter of 10/17/83 on plant tour.
(3 pgs.)
LETTER:
C. Norelius - TECo:
Confirms a meetin 11/04/83 to discuss the Regulatory Improvement Program (g date of 10/31/83 RIP) at Davis-Besse Station.
(1 pg.)
11/07/83 MEMO:
A. Davis - W. Shafer:
Notes from 11/4/83 meeting on RIP
'at Davis-Besse.
(2 pgs.)
11/21/83 LETTER:
LRS consultants (C. Rice) - R. DeYoung:
Comments on safety performance of Davis-Besse Station in regard to l
V. Gilinsky site tour.
(1 pg.)
11/23/83 MTG NOTICE: Announces enforcement conference on 12/01/83 to discuss Appendix R inspection at Davis-Besse Station (confirmation letter to licensee attached).
(2 pgs.)
11/23/83 LETTER:
A. Davis - TECo: Transmits report No. 83-23(DPRP) discussing management meeting on 11/04/83 with TECo.
(6pgs.)
12/07/83 MEMO:
A. Davis - T. Rehm: Transmits copy of inspection report No 83-23 and copy of a draft memo forwarding the report thru ED0 office to Comissioner Gilinsky.
(8 pgs.)
i i
7
t 12/09/83 MEMO:
W. Schultz - J. Axelrad:
Requests review and concurrence on proposed enforcement action regarding one train of ECCS equipment.
(10 pgs.)
12/12/83 MEM0:
W. Dircks - Commissioner Gilinsky: Transmits copy of inspection report No. 83-23 to SMSN office (was in draft form in 12/07/83 memo above).
(1 pg.)
4 12/16/83 LETTER:
R. Crouse - J. Keppler: Transmits requested information from MTG on Appendix R (12/01/83) enforcement conference.
(23 pgs.)
l 12/23/83 LETTER:
C. Norelius - TEco:
Provides clarification of NRC views presented at 12/14/83 MTG with TEco on status of regulatory j
enhancement program.
(2 pgs.)
)
12/29/83 LETTER:
J. Haverly - W. Little: Transmits information to supple-ment 12/16/83 submittal from TECo on Appendix R.
(49 pgs.)
09/05/83 MEMO:
R. Spessard - E. Pawlik:
Recommends an O! investigation of Davis-Besse Appendix R inspection findings.
(2 pgs.)
l I
i i
1 j
i 1
1 i
i i
8
1984 Confirmation of meeting)to review 01/06/84 LETTER:
C. Norelius - TEco:
01/10/84 (1 pg comprehensive enhancement program on 01/20/84 LETTER:
R. Crouse - J. Stolz:
Letter explaining " Draft Integrated Livina Schedule Program Plan for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant Station" (not attached).
(2 pgs.)
Enclosed documents proposing )
02/02/84 MEMO:
W. Schultz - J. Axelrad:
Supersedes 10/?8/83 document.
(23 pgs.
civil penalty action.
05/16/84 LETTER:
P. McLaughlin - H. Bocher: Trip report to Davis-Besse.
06/20/84 LETTER:
A. DeAgazio - G. C. Lainas:
Third AFW pump / diesel generator at Davis-Besse plus attachment on safety evaluation report.
(3 pgs.)
07/05/84 LETTER:
W. Shafer - C. Norelius:
Trip report discussing Davis-Besse training organi::ation and programs.
(3pgs) 07/07/84 LETTER:
C. Norelius - TECo:
Confirmation of enforcement conference on 07/13/84. Will deal with personnel errors.
(1 pg.)
07/11/84 NOTICE OF VIOLATION:
R. Spessard - TECo (3 pgs.)
07/11/84 LETTER / INSPECTION REPORT:
R. Spessard - TECo:
Special inspection of quality assurance program.
(40 pgs.)
07/16/84 LETTER:
R. Crouse - J. Stolz: Transmittal letter for integrated living schedule program for NRC approval (not attached).
(2 pgs.)
07/18/84 LETTER:
R. Crouse - C. Norelius:
Current status of TECo's comprehensive corrective action program in maintenance area.
07/20/84 LETTER:
R. Peters - W. Shafer:
status of performance enhancement program (attached).
(40 pgs.)
07/24/84 MEMO:
I. Jackiw - Region III Files:
Perf. Enhancement Program -
Trip Rpt. McLaughlin to Booker (sic) dated 05/16/84 08/17/84 LETTER:
R. Crouse - C. Norelius:
Response to violations from inspection report 07/11/84 (10 pgs.)
08/25/84 NOTES:
R. Walker - W. Shafer: Davis-Besse PAT team exit.
08/84 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL REPORT.
(45 pgs.)
09/06/84 MEMO:
C. Norelius - J. Hind:
Possible equipment intentionally mispositioned.
(1 pg.)
9
09/07/84 LETTER:
R. Spessard - TECo: TECo steps taken to correct noncompliance.
(1 pg.)
09/11/84 LETTER:
INSPECTION REPORT:
C. Norelius - TEco:
Special Inspection.
(12 pgs.)
09/14/84 LETTER:
R. Crouse - J. Keppler:
Status of perfonnance enhancement program (attached).
(31 pgs.)
i 09/14/84 MEMO:
W. Schultz - J. Axelrad:
Proposed civil penalties on poor management. Actions and inspection report (attached).
(25 pgs.)
09/21/84 MEMO:
K. Seyfrit - C. Norelius:
Evaluation of LERS 04/01/83 to 08/31/84.
E00 input to SALP review.
(1 pg.)
10/02/84 MEETING NOTES:
SALP sumary rating (attached).
(13 pgs.)
10/03/84 LETTER:
R. Crouse - C. Norelius:
Response to violations from i
inspection report dated 09/07/74 (not attached).
(3pgs.)
1 i
10/09/84 MEMO:
A. DeAgazio - G. Lainas:
Backfit issue at Davis-Besse on l
Auxiliary Feedwater System.
(3 pgs.)
l 10/18/84 MEMO:
A. Davis - R. Spessard:
Performance appraisal inspection at Davis-Besse. Meeting set up.
(1 pg.)
10/24/84 MEMO:
L. Callan - J. Grace: Assessment of implementation of the NRC inspection report.
Enclosures not attached.
(1 pg.)
- i
~
10/30/84 LETTER:
J. Keppler - TECo:
Regulatory performance not improving enough at Davis-Besse.
(2 pgs.)
11/15/84 MEMO:
J. Grace - C. Norelius:
D. B. performance appraisal i
inspection potential enforcement findings.
Includes D. B. Enforcement Conference draft.
(52 pgs.)
1 11/28/84 MEMO:
S. Chilk - W. Dircks: Comission inputs for the training policy statement.
(1pg.)
11/29/84 LETTER:
R. Crouse - C. Norelius:
Response to violations to NRC July 11, 1984 letter.
(2pgs.)
12/06/84 LETTER:
J. Keppler - TECo:
SALP 4 board report for TEco review l
(SALP attached).
(39pgs.)
12/14/84 LETTER:
R. Crouse - R. DeYoung:
Response to performance Appraisal Inspection 84-19. All attachments included.
(32 pgs.)
12/26/84 LETTER:
J. Taylor - TEco:
Extension for response to alleged violations. Letter attached.
(21 pgs.)
12/84 REGULATORY PERFORMANCE:
History April 1979 - October 1984.
(9 pgs.)
l 10 1
1 i
1985 01/02/85 MEMO:
J. Asselstine - W. Dircks: Training Program at Davis-Besse Nuclear Plant Training as Category 3, Suggest Staff Monitor Closely (2 pgs.)
02/04/85 LETTER: TECo - J. Keppler: Response to 3 ALP Report. Low ratings came as a shock, not argue with assessments, devote energy to a program of improvement.
(3 pgs.)
01/04/85 Speech Outline from SALP Meeting.
(3 pgs.)
01/09/85 MEMO:
J. Keppler - W. Dircks:
Inform of Regulatory Performance.
Chronology of perfomance, starting in 1979.
(2 pgs.)
01/17/85 LETTER:
J. Keppler - TECo: Refers to meeting 12/28/84 Discussing regulatory concerns.
Previous letter 10/30/84 attached.
(3 pgs.)
01/31/85 MEMO:
H. Thompson - H. Denton:
Training Program at Davis-Besse, Proposes training review. Memos of 01/30/85 (Draft?) and 12/12/85 i
attached.
(3 pgs.)
3 I
01/31/85 LETTER: TECo - J. Keppler:
Response to PAT Report 84-19 item on general employee training. Will revise.
(1 pg.)
02/08/85 MEMO:
J. Keppler - W. Dircks, H. Denton, J. Taylor:
Davis-Besse i
SALP Response: Transmits TECo response to SALP. Believe have attention and comitment of top licensee management. TECo response attached.
(19 pgs.)
l 02/19/85 MEMO:
J. Keppler - C. Norelius:
Training Program at Davis-Pesse Nucleer Plant. Memo from W. Dircks to Commissioner Asselstine (02/12/85) attached.
Please factor commitments into master inspection plan.
(4pgs.)
0?/26/85 MEMO:
W. Shafer - C. Norelius:
Trip Report - Davis-Besse:
i Meeting 02/07-08/85 to discuss licensee's performance enhancement program.
55 action plans to meet with licensee first Thursday of i
each month. Action plans attached.
(59pgs.)
j 03/04/85 0UTLINE: Management Assessment Team: Objectives, proposed plan, l
team members, schedules, (Draft) TEco organization charts attached.
1 (6 pgs.)
1 03/04/85 LETTER: TECo - J. Keppler:
Supplemental information to response l
to SALP report requested by phone call 02/19/85.
Supplemental j
information attached.
(31 pgs.)
03/06/85 LETTER:
J. Axelrad - TECo: Acknowledge letter of 01/14/85 and check of $90,000.
Letter of 01/14/85 and attachments.
(15pgs.)
I 11
03/06/85 0UTLINE:
Toledo Edison SALP Presentation, Region III 03/06/85.
(43 pgs.)
03/08/85 LETTER:
W. Little - TECo: Transmits Report 85-01, Followup on Findings in PAT Report 84-09.
Report 85-01 attached.
(13 pgs.)
03/13/85 LETTER:
J. Partlow - TEco:
Response to PAT Inspection:
Pleased to receive response, disappointed response only addressed identified specific details. Region III closely monitoring.
No further response requested.
(1 pg.)
03/15/85 MEMO:
A. Davis
-'J. Keppler:
Visit to Davis-8 esse on March 15, 1985:
Discussions with operators, their suggestions.
(1 pg.)
03/18/85 LETTER:
R. Spessard - TECo:
Transmits Report 85-05(DRS).
First in a planned series to provide in-depth review and evaluation of corrective program and its implementation.
Program acceptable, increased management attention needed.
Report attached.
(11 pgs.)
03/25/85 MEMO:
E. Brach - W. Rogers: Mgmnt. Visit to Davis-Besse.
03/28/85 PRINTOUT:
PEP Implementation Tracking System.
(5pgs.)
04/02/85 LETTER: TECo - J. Keppler: Mentions 03/06/85 meeting.
Provides charter and membership of SALP improvement task force. Attachments.
(11 pgs.)
04/23/85 LETTER: Transmits SALP Report.
Discusses overall view of corrective actions proposed. Continued management needed.
SALP Report 84-11 attached.
(58 pgs.)
05/14/85 LETTER:
R. Spessard - TECo: Transmits Inspection Report No. 85007(DRS) (2 pgs.)
05/15/85 Draft Notes on Plant Status 05/16/85 LETTER:
R. Spessard - TEco:
Transmits Inspection Report (attached) No. 85012(DRS) (10 pgs.)
05/24/85 Meeting Notes for Enforcement Conference on 05/24/85 (Draft Notice of Violation included) (10 pgs.)
06/05/85 MEMO:
J. Keppler - W. Dircks:
Status of Regulatory Performance at Davis-Besse Nuclear Plant.
06/11/85 MEMO:
J. Keppler - W. Dircks:
Status of Regulatory Performance at Davis-Besse Nuclear Plant.
06/18/85 MEMO:
W. Schultz - J. Axelrad:
TEco - Davis-Besse Proposed Civil Penalties.
i 12 t
UNKNOWN DOCUMENT INDEX Date Unknown: Agenda for SALP Meeting (3 pgs.)
Date Unknown: Toledo Edison SALP Presentation (15 pgs.)
13
- I 22
-Q gn i
t
)
r o
i p o p vu
( S t
4 n e E m R h U c S a O t L t C A tfE
1979 04/30/79 LETTER:
J. Keppler - TECo: Transmits Report 79-08 (attached),
report of enforcement conference on'04/18/79 discussing administrative and operating regulatory performance.
(5 pgs.)
06/15/79 LETTER:
J. Keppler - TECo: Transmits _ Report 79-12 (attached),
report of meeting 05/31/79 (2nd of series) regarding immediate and long-term improvements in regulatory performance.
(9 pgs.)
07/10/79 NOTICE: Significant licensee meeting 07/17/79, te discuss implementation of additional management controls.
(1 pg.)
08/06/79 LETTER:
J. Keppler - TECo: Transmits Report 79-20 (actached),
report of meeting 07/17/79 (3rd of series) regarding immediate and long-term improvements in regulatory performance.
(7 pgs.)
08/19/79 NOTES: Notes for TECo meeting 08/19/79.
(5 pgs.)
09/10/79 NOTICE: Significant licensee meeting 09/19/79, to discuss TECo program to improve management control and operations.
(1 pg.)
09/12/79 LETTER:
J. Keppler - TECo: Confirms meeting schedule for 09/19/79 meeting.
(1 pg.)
10/15/79 LETTER:
J. Keppler - TECo: Transmits Report 79-26 (Attached) report of meeting 09/19/85 (4th of Series) regarding immediate and long-term improvements in regulatory performance.
(8 pgs.)
2
I T-s.1 l'1 a rec o
u4, UNITEo STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMIS$10N f ff R]
REGloN llt 799 moosevett aoAo
,e -
ctes ettvs.ittisois soist j
s, APR 3 01979 Docket No. 50-346 Toledo Edison Company ATTN:
Mr. J. Williamson President and Chief Executive Officer Edison Plaza 300 Madison Avenue Toledo, OH 43652 Centlemen:
This refers to the enforcement conference conducted by me, and others of this office on April 18, 1979, at the Toledo, Ohio Corporate offices with you, Mr. W. Johnson and others of your staff.
The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas discussed during this conference. As indicated in the enclosed report, this meeting represents the first of a series of meet!ags that we have requested to be held in order to achieve both i= mediate and long-term improvements in the regulatory performance of the Davis-Besse 1 facility.
No items of nonco=pliance with NRC requirements were identified during the course of this conference.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice", Part
- 2. Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room, except as follows.
If this report contains information that you or your contractors believe to be proprietary, you must apply in writing to this office, within twenty days of your receipt of this letter, to withhold such information from public disclosure.
The application must include a full statement of the reasons for which the information is considered proprietary, and should be prepared so that proprietary information identified in the application is contained in an enclosure to the application.
jh&MYNb b
Toledo maison Company APR 3 01979 ve will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this conference.
Sincerely.
James G. Kappler Director Enclosure IE Inspection Report No. 50-346/79-08 cc w/ enc 1:
T. D. marray, Station Superintendent Central Files Reproduction Unit NRC 20b FDR Iocal FDR NSIC TIC Barold W. Kohn, Fower Siting Commission i
ome>..a111.
...RII
... 21
.... A I,11.p..
- ?I........,
Ta=hkin ik Spe = rd H
man elius ppler
,y,,,,,,
- 3Z8Z8::::::::::::::::::::::::T~ fir #:::::::::::::::::4 :307.~.:::~
- ~::
~.................,~.......
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COPellSSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT REGION III Report No. 50-346/79-08 Docket No. 50-346 License No. NPF-3 Licensee: Toledo Edison Company Edison Plaza 300 Madison Avenue Toledo, OH 43652 Facility Name:
Davis-Besse 1 Inspection At: Davis-Besse Corporate Office Toledo, OH Inspection Conducted: April 18, 1979 Qj
&= :
.(
Inspectors:
T. N. T bling "L, -
3'
~77 9 4. d'essard L
r
,a i
R. L. Sp 7/.D/77 Other Accompanying Personnel:
J. G. Keppler R. F. Heishman Approved By: R.F.Heibhmn, Chief 80 f
Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch Inspection Su==arv Inspection on April 18, 1979 (Report No. 50-346/79-08)
Areas Inspected: An enforcement conference was held with corporate and site management to discuss administrative and operating regulatory performance of the facility.
The plants enforcement history, number of personnel errors, breakdowns in management controls, equipment problems, and general effective-ness of management in dealing with identified problems were highlighted to demonstrate the need for improved management controls and plant operations.
The conference involved approximately 15 man-hours by four NRC personnel.
Results:
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified within the scope of this conference.
i sd >-
^
U # '
A fY
u DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted J. Williamson, President and Chief Executive W. Johnson, Executive Vice President L. Roe, Vice President, Facilities Development R. Croase, Fossil Operations, General Superintendent T. Murray, Station Superintendent G. Novak, Superintendent Power Engineering and Construction 2.
Enforcement Conference This conference was held as the first of a series of management meetings being requested by RIII to address major concerns regarding the opera-tion of the plant and the administrative and engineering support to the plant. The licensee was requested to address these concerns and formu-late a program to improve their management controls and plant operations.
A review of this program and its implementation will be the subject of discussion in the subsequent management meetings; the first to be held approximately a month later.
The specific areas of concern addressed in this first meeting were:
a.
The unfavorable trend in the number of noncompliances found in the operation and management of the plant.
b.
The increase in personnel errors during the first part of 1979, and the significance of the personnel errors that occurred in 1978 and the first part of 1979.
c.
The increasing number of repetitive equipment problems that are not being resolved in a timely manner.
d.
Apparent breakdowns in the management system to grasp and address technical and ad=inistrative problems in a timely fashion, as evi-denced by previously identified and new problem areas still per-sisting.
Other areas addressed during the meeting were:
a.
The licensee's regulatory performance as compared to other RIII licensee's with an operating license.
b.
The results of a recent RIII investigation (Inspection Report No.
50-346/79-06) which reinforced previous RIII concerns regarding certain aspects of the licensee's management control system involving facility changes.
-2
c.
The types of enforcement action available to the NRC, and where Davis-Besse with its current regulatory performance record and
- l existing trends fit into these action levels.
j The licensee was advised that based on his current regulatory performance record and existing trends, as exemplified by the specific areas of con-cern, prompt management action was necessary to af fect both immediate and long term improvements in the areas of management controls and i
plant operations in order to avoid further escalated enforcement action in the future, e.g., imposition of civil monetary penalties or issuance of orders.
t j
The licensee acknowledged the information presented during this enforce-ment conference and stated that corrective action had been and would be initiated to improve and correct the identified areas of concern.
The i
licensee indicated that a plan for achieving immediate and long term l
corrective action in these areas of concern, including an implementa-tion ttse table, would be presented during the next meeting to be held I
in about one month from the date of this meeting.
I f
4
[
i i
l f.
l I
i l
t i
v
+
c 1
?d
[gpa nse UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION f,j g
REGION lli I
.f OLEN ELLYN ILLIPeOll 60,37 t
JUN 151979 Docket No. 50-346 Toledo Edison Company ATTN: Mr. W. Johnson President and Chief Operating Officer Edison Plaza 300 Madison Avenue Toledo, OH 43652 Gentlemen:
This refers to the meeting conducted by me, and others of this office on May 31, 1979, at the Region III offices with you and others of your staff.
The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas discussed during the meeting. As indicated in the enclosed report, this meeting represents the second of a series of meetings that we have requested to be held in order to achieve both immediate and long-term improvements in the regulatory performance of the Davis-Besse 1 facility.
No items of noncompliance with NRC requirements were identified during the course of this inspection.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice,"
Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room, except as follows.
It'this report contains information that you or your contractors believe to be proprietary, you must apply in writing to this office, within twenty days of your receipt of this letter, to withhold such information.from public disclosure.
The application must include a full statement of the reasons for which the information is considered proprietary, and should be prepared so that proprietary information identified in the application is contained in an enclosure to the application.
3 6
4 h(.;D
(, g Toledo Edison Company
- i. (*j i
Thank you for your cooperation with us..lf you have any questions j
regarding the enclosed report please feel free to call me.
j Sincerely, j
i l
r James G. Keppler Director
Enclosure:
IE Inspection Report No. 50-346/79-12 cc w/ encl:
T. D. Murray, Station Superintendent Central Files l
Reproduction Unit h7C 20b PDR Local PDR I
NSIC TIC Harold W. Kohn, Power Siting Consission i
1 i
l l
I
}
I a
l 4
l 1
i
[
i e
I i
j
[
l i
RIII RIII RIII RI RIII RIII l
T b g/b1k W n S
eter H han us K pler 77 h ff Sp sard 6/13/79 i
i
s U.S.' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT REGION III,-
Report No. 50-346/79-12 Docket No. 50-346 License No. NPF-3 Licensee: Toledo Edison Company Edison Plaza 300 Madison Avenue Toledo, OH 43652 Facility Name: Davis Besse 1 Meeting At: Region III Office, Glen Ellyn, Illinois Meeting Conducted: May 31, 1979 4nspectors:
T. N. Tambling ~i". d. -l MI'- -
4./I1/71 U
AF M -
6, i 7$
R. L. Spessard R. F. Warnick 8N 3
g /n,7f R. F. Heishman 6-13-77 J. G. Keppler MAh*
4. f 9.%
Other Accompanying Personnel: y $ r N er LA3/"9 J. F Approved By: W.. C H'eiIhm n, C'hief
/M)[
Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch MM7M h19
a g
Inspection Summary Meeting on May 31, 1979 (Report No. 50-346/79-12)
Areas Inspected: A special, announced egeting was held with corporate l
and site management to discuss what action had been or would be taken to address specific RIII concerns expressed in a previous meeting on April 18, 1979. The meeting lasted approximately four hours, and seven RIII personnel attended.
~
Results: The licensee outlined a program based upon their assessment of problem areas to improve the level of management control, staffing, training, the correction of equipment problems and general plant operations.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified within the scope of this meeting.
l f
i i
l i
1 l
i t
[
I i
'l i
,8 l
t I
1 2-I i
- s DETAILS 1.
Attendees a
Toledo Edison Company i
W. A. Johnson, President and Chief Operating Officer L. E. Roe, Vice President, Facilities Development R. P. Crouse, Assistant Vice President, Energy Supply T. D. Murray, Station Superintendent i
1 NRC J. G. Keppler, Director, Region III G. W. Roy, Deputy Director, Region III j
R. F. Heishman, Chief, RO&NS Branch R. L. Spessard, Chief, Reactor Projects Section 1 1
R. F. Warnick, Chief, Reactor Projects Section 2 J. F. Streeter, Chief, Nuclear Support Sectica 1 T. N. Tambling, Project Inspector State of Ohio j
l R. S. Ryan, Director, Ohio Department of Energy
)
J. F. McAvoy, Director of Environmental Protection l
J. R. Williams, Nuclear Preparedness Officer, Ohio Disaster Services Agency.
2.
Corporate Meeting This meeting was the second of a series of management meetings requested by RIII. The purpose of this second meeting was to discuss what actions had been or would be taken by TEco to address specific RIII concerns expressed in the first meeting j
held on April 18, 1979 (Inspection Report No. 50-346/79-08).
a.
Previous Meeting Recap j
I The RIII Director summarized the purpose of the previous meeting and this meeting and expressed thq need for TECo to increase their level of performance or excellence.
b.
Corrective Actions I
i The licensee outlined a program, based upon their assess-
]
ment of problem areas, to improve the level of management i
h
! l l
l control, staffing, training, the correction of equipment problems and plant operations.
(1) Staffing Immediate efforts will be made to fill staff openings in Power Engineering and the plant.
Currently, 12 staff openings are in Power Engineering and 22 staff openings are at the plant. Approximately 22 of these 2
openings are designated as technical positions.
An inhouse review will be conducted on future manning requirements and organizational structures.
(2) Procedures At the plant, a group will be developed to centralize the preparation and maintenance of procedures. This group will also coordinate the control of drawings.
Steps will also be taken.to eliminate the excessive use of temporary modifications to procedures.
An outside consultant will be utilized to review plant procedures. The scope of this review will be designed to establish uniformity and general upgrading of pro-cedures.
It is anticipated that it will take one-to-two months to get this review underway.
(3) Management Controls Several areas have or will be addressed to improve or promote better management control. These include:
Promotion of Mr. Crouse to Assistant Vice President, Energy Supply, with a direct responsibility to concentrate his efforts on the nuclear generating station.
Mr. Johnson has started ~and will continue direct meetings with all plant personnel to discuss current prbblem areas.
Management has and will continue to visit other nuclear generating stations to review their organization and controls.
]
O There will be a reevaluation of their personnel policies, including selection and evaluation of new personnel, a development program for managers, and promotion gractices.
(4) Training A broad training program was recently implemented for all plant staff, directed primarily toward improving
~
job-related skills. This program should be completed in 1980.
The need for a plant simulator for training and re-qualifying operators will be reevaluated.
(5) LER's l
Starting the first part of June, a special investiga-tion group will be set up to investigate and evaluate all LER's.
Special emphasis will be placed on personnel errors and repetitive equipment problems. The concept of this group is to be similar to that used by the safety group to investigate other industrial accidents.
The significance of each LER will be evaluated and reported to top management.
Monthly meetings will be held with the plant staff to discuss significant LER's.
(6) Maintenance Currently, there is a long range computer program under development.to track maintenance and to improve the preventative maintenance program.
(7) Surveillance Testing There are plans to implement, over the next six months, a specialized computer program to assist the operators in identifying and tracking surveillance requirements imposed by action statements in the technical specifications.'
(8) FCR's A review system is being initiated to improve the processing of FCR's.
This will include computerizing the tracking of FCR's and preplanning procurement and schedule of work. __
b
-a (9) Communisation A consultant has been retained to evaluate the lines ofcommunicationan{methodsofpersonnelmotivations.
(10) Nuclear Services Group A nuclear services group will be established and will report to the Assistant Vice President, Energy Supply.
This will be a separate group to handle support acti-vities at the plant.
The activities will include IE Bulletins, audits, FCR's, outage planning, training, nuclear fuels, etc.
The activities of this group are designed to permit the station superintendent to con-centrate on day-to-day activities of the plant.
c.
Summation At the conclusion of the licensee's presentation, RIII personnel discussed the following items:
Expressed a concern that the licensee might be addres-sing only the items identified by the NRC. The licensee stated that they were trying to factor in all pertinent concerns.
Questioned whether the Quality Assurance Group was being appropriately consulted in the corrective actions.
The licensee stated that the QA Group will be an integral part of the corrective actions.
Questioned whether the company's " Negation Task Force" would complete their review. The licensee stated that the group would complete their assigned task.
Questioned whether the corrective action program would address the number of nuisance alarms in the control room. The licensee stated that their evaluation of nuisance alarms would continue.
7 Asked the licensee to establish a tim,etable for imple-l mentation of the various corrective actions outlined, and to develop the methods to insure that the various milestones of the program are properly met.
i Asked the licensee to schedule the third meeting in approximately three-to-four weeks to discuss schedules, milestones, accomplishments, etc.
1.
1
, -. ~-,, -
s d.
Additional Matters Discussed The following additional matters relative to Davis-Besse 1 were discussed:
(1) Bulletins No.79-05A and 79-05B Shutdown Order The licensee was informed of Region III's plans for closing out its review of Bulletins No.79-05A and No.79-05B and the Shutdown Order. The review and verifi-cation of items on the Shutdown Order will be coordi-nated with the special task force at NRC headquarters.
(2) Resident Inspector Program The licensee was informed that Region III is planning to select a resident inspector for the Davis-Besse 1 site early this summer.
Until this resident inspector moves to the site the current temporary onsite inspec-tor's office will be staffed by inspectors from the Region III office.
The licensee was informed that the permanent office I
will have to be within the protected area. A minimum of 250 square feet of floor area will be required. At the time of the move to permanent quarters the telephones will have to be moved.
The licensee designated Mr. G. Wells as their co-ordinator for establishment of the site office.
S pn arg 8
p UNITED STATES g
[
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g
...t REGION lit e
799 ROOSEVELT ROAD
$[\\Y o GLEN ELLYN, ILLINOIS 60137
+....
July 10, 1979 NOTICE OF SIGNIFICANT LICENSEE MEETING Name of Licensee:
Toledo Edison Company Name of Facility:
Davis-Besse Unit 1 Docket No.:
50-346 Date and Time of Meeting: July 17, 1979 at 10:30 a.m.
Location of Meeting:
Region III Offices, Glen Ellyn, Illinois Purpose of Meeting:
To discuss progress in the implementation of additional management controls at Davis-Besse Power Station.
(Follow-up to May 31, 1979 meeting)
,IE Attendees:
J. G. Keppler. Director. RIII R. F. Heishman, Chief, Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch, RIII R. F. Warnick, Chief, Reactor Projects Section No. 2, RIII L. A. Reyes, Reactor Inspector, RIII Licensee Attendees:
W. A. Johnson, President and Chief Operating Officer L. E. Roe, Vice President, Facilities Development R. P. Crouse, Assistant Vice President, Energy Supply and others NOTE: Attendance by NRC personnel at this IE/ Licensee meeting should l
be made known by July 16, 1979, C.O.B., via telephone call to R. F. Warnick, FTS 387-9200.
l Distribution:
N. C. Moseley, Director, Reactor Operations Inspection, IE S. E. 3ryan, Assistant Director for Field Coordination, IE D. Thompson, Executive Officer for Operations Support, IE W. Gammill, Acting Assistant Director for Operating Reactor Projects, NRR R. W. Reid, Chief, ORB 4, DOR, NRR R. F. Heishman, Chief, RO&NS Branch, RIII e
0 m.,
,,y.
m--,.
.y.
y._.3,
g A6"79
[ par
'o,,
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION e
o nE REGION lli i
e 799 ROOSEVELT ROAD
\\#
e GLEN ELLYN, ILLINOIS 60137 AUG 6 1979 Docket No. 50-346 Toledo Edison Company ATTN: Mr. W. Johnson President and Chief Operating Officer Edison Plaza 300 Madison Avenue Toledo, OH 43652 Gentlemen:
This refers to the meeting conducted by me, and others of this office on July 17, 1979, at the Region III offices with you and others of your staff.
The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas discussed during the meeting. As indicated in the enclosed report, this meeting represents the third of a series of meetings that we have requested to be held in order to achieve both immediate and long-term improvements in the regulatory performance of the Davis-Besse 1 facility.
No items of noncompliance with NRC requirements were identified during the course of this meeting.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room except as follows.
If this report contains information that you or your contractors believe to be proprietary, you must apply in writing to this office, within twenty days of your receipt of this letter, to with-hold such information from public disclosure. The applica, tion must include a full statement of the reasons for which the information is con-sidered proprietary, and should be prepared so that proprietary informa-tion identified in the application is contained in an enclosure to the application.
NhYS bJ S
AUG 6 1979 Toledo Edison Company -
~
Thank you for your cooperation with us.
If you have any questions regarding the enclosed report please feel free to call me.
Sincerely, James G. Keppler Director
Enclosure:
IE Inspection Report No. 50-346/79-20 cc w/ enc 1:
i T. D. Murray, Station Superintendent Central Files Reproduction Unit NRC 20b PDR Local PDR NSIC TIC Harold W. Kohn, Power l
Siting Conunission i
l i
RII y 7,v RII RI I, RIII R
eyes /bik Warnick Hefshman tu espier l
t 1 2, 8/I/79 I-A l
1
U.S. NUCLEAR REGUIATORY COMM2SSION l'
0FFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
]
REGION III
]
Report No.
50-346/79-20 Docket No.
50-346 License No.
NPF-3 i
Licensee:
Toledo Edison Company Edison Plaza, 300 Madison Avenue Toledo, Ohio 43652 Facility Name: Davis-Besse 1 i
Meeting At:
Region III Office, Glen Ellyn, Illinois Meeting Conducted-Jul 17 979 Y
s.
y Inspector-
. A. Reyes (Date)
Approved By:
R. F. Warnick, Chief I-2-79 Reactor Projects Section 2 (Date)
Meeting Summarv Meeting on July 17, 1979 (Report No. 50-346/79-20)
Scope of Meeting: A special, announced meeting was held with corporate and site management to discuss what action had been or would be taken to address specific RIII concerns expressed in previous meetings on April 18, and May 31, 1979. The meeting lasted approximately two hours, and four RIII personnel attended.
Results The licensee outlined a program based upon their assessment of problem areas to improve the level of management control, staffing, training, the correction of equipment problems and general plant operations. The licensee also reported the status of the implementation of the program. No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified within the scope of this meeting.
s
- I 4
n p,/
1
/ # v AO2 A nL b
(*'
]
/ /W /
v-N,-
DETAILS 1.
Attendees Toledo Edison Company W. A. Johnson, President and Chief Operating Officer L. E. Roe, Vice President, Facilities Development R. P. Crouse, Assistant Vice President, Energy Supply T. D. Murray, Station Superintendent 2.
NRC J. G. Keppler, Director, Region III R. F. Heishman, Chief, Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch R. F. Warnick, Chief, Reactor Projects Section 2 L. A. Reyes, Reactor Inspector 3.
Corporate Meeting This meeting was the third of a series of management meetings requested by Region III. The purpose of this third meeting was to discuss what actions had been or would be taken by TECo to address specific RIII concerns ex-pressed in the two previous meetings held on April 18, and May 31, 1979, (Inspection Report Nos. 50-346/79-08, and 79-12) and to discuss the time-table to implement the various corrective actions.
a.
Previous Meeting Recap The RIII Director summarized the purpose of the previous meetings and his impressions of the meeting held in Washington to address the Davis Besse shutdown order.
b.
Corrective Actions The licensee outlined a program, based upon their assessment of problem areas, to improve the level of management control, staffing, training, the correction of equipment problems, and plant operations.
(1) Staffing of the 22 staff openings the licensee had filled 3 as of July 17, 1979, and expected to have all positions filled by July, 1980.
The following table su=marizes the expected dates for progressively filling all positions:
Openings Classification Opening filled by 10 Bargaining Unit January, 1980 9
Professional January, 1980 4 filled July, 1980 5 filled Of tha 9 op:nings in th2 professional staff tha licenose expects to hire 5 with previous experience.
These 5 positions will be distributed among the different departments as follows:
1 - Operations 2 - Maintenance 2 - Technical Staff The licensee is evaluating the hiring policies and practices of the company. A recommendation has been made to increase the starting salary for new engineers. This measure will help to attract new engineers. The salary of the existing engineers will be adjusted appropriately to reflect the increase to new hires.
i The overtime compensation policy will be revised to compensate all employees, but emphasis will be on lower pay employees.
A program for training interviewers is being implemented and is expected to be operational by February, 1980.
(2) Procedures 1
l At the plant, a group will be developed to centralize the pre-paration and maintenance of procedures.
The personnel assign-ments for this group are expected to be completed by July, 1979.
Commencement of work is expected to start immediately after assignments of personnel have been completed.
An outside consultant will be utilized to review plant procedures.
The scope of this review will be designed to establish uniformity and general upgrading of procedures. Work is expected to commence on September, 1979.
(3) Management Control Several areas have or will be addressed to improve or promote better management control.
These include:
- Mr. Johnson has started and will continue direct meetings with all plant personnel to discuss current problem areas.
- Management has and will continue to visit other nuclear generating stations to review their organization and Controls.
- There will be a reevaluation of their personnel policies, including screening and selection process for new employees, career path interviews every 3 years in addition to the yearly merit review, and the Station Promotional Policy.
The evaluation of the Station Promotional Policy procedure is expected to be finished by September, 1979 and appro-1riate action taken immediately af ter. i
I (4) Trmining A broad training program was recently implemented for all plant staff, directed primarily toward improving job-related skills.
The program includes:
- The addition of a licensed operator and an experienc,ed Health physicist to the training personnel.
- Addition of one weeks simulator training to the requali-fication program for licensed operators.
- Addition of a " Basic Nuclear Technology Course" to train plant personnel other than operators.
- Addition of a training program on Technical Specifications to be offered to the Technical plant personnel. The pro-gram is expected to be completed by December,1979.
(5) LER's A special investigation group will be setup to investigate and evaluate all LER's.
The group will include:
(a) Section Head (b) Performance Engineer (c) Designated individual knowledgeable in the subject area of the LER If the suspected cause of the LER is a personnel error the responsible individual, his supervisor and a representative from the training group will be included.
If the suspected j
cause of the LER is equipment failure, an engineer familiar l
with the equipment will be included.
(6) Maint enance Arrangements are being made with a maintenance contractor to help in the implementation of the Facility Change Requests.
Currently, there is a long range computer program under development to track maintenance and to imporv,e the preven-tive maintenance program.
.The cocputer program is expected to be operational by Hay, 1980.
(7) Surveillance Testing l
There are plans to implement, by April, 1980, a specialized computer program to assist the operators in identifying and tracking surveillance requirements imposed by action state-ments in the technical specifications.
(8)
Communiention A consultant has been retained to evaluate the lines of communication and methods of personnel motivations.
(9) Nuclear Services Group A nuclear services group will be established and will report
- o the Assistant Vice President, Energy Supply. This will be a separate group to handle support activities at the plant.
The activities will include lE Bulletins, audits, FCR's, outage planning, training, nuclear fuels, etc.
The activities of this group are designed to permit the station superintendent to concentrate on day-to-day activities of the plant.
The position of the Nuclear Services Group Director is expected to be filled by October, 1979.
c.
Summation At the conclusion of the licensee's presentation, RIII personnel discussed the following items:
- Questioned whether the Quality Assurance Group was being appropriately consulted in the corrective actions.
The licensee stated that the QA Group will be an integral part of the corrective actions.
- Questioned whether the corrective action program would address the number of nuisance alarms in the control room. The licensee stated that their evaluation of nuisance alarms would continue.
- Asked the licensee to schedule the next meeting in approx-imately three-to-four weeks to discuss schedules, milestones, accomplishments, etc. The meeting will be held at the Davis-Besse Nuclear Plant.
9.
NOTES FOR TECO MANAGEMENT MEETING August 19, 1979 i
NOTE:
Reyes has asked Terry Murray to be ready to discuss TECO position on the following items 1.
Replacement of the ISC Engineer.
2.
The large backlog of maintenance work and the new need for additional, I
manpower to meet the new Environmental Technical Specification.
3.
Resolution on the continued problems in NI-I (startup channel).
The licensee is meeting Technical Specifications but the reliability of the equipment is very poor and unpredictable.
l If the licensee addresses these 3 items delete them from the following examples.
Compt' -:nt them on l
1.
Their decision to address I. Yin concerns on seismic restraints by redoing the calculations using present day standards.
We feel this exemplifies a positive attitude towards meeting a pro-blem head on and not relying on dubious information.
2.
There is an apparent reduction in personnel errors in the past 6 months.
There have been 11 LER's reported to date when the primary 4
cause has been attributed to personnel error.
Nine of these were in the 1st quarter of 1979, and 2 reported in the 2nd quarter. Our records indicate none so far in the 3rd qu,arter.
However, there are still apparent problem areas that need close management attention. We are addressing these individually as they arise, but feel that you should address them for latent causative factors.
Examples:
I.
Relocation of the ion chamber for the SFAS radiation monitor from inside to outside containment.
A review of the safety evaluation by one of our inspectors indicates an incomplete assessment of the location change on the detectors sensitivity - ie its ability to detect radiation.inside containment with the same level of sensitivity as originally designed.
The questions to be asked is why was it necessary for an NRC inspector l
to comment on the safety evaluation?
l II.
Equipment reliability and the time it takes to bring things up to their original design operating level.
l It appears that FCR's are continuing to be a major bottle-neck.
Also there are serious questions as to why it takes so long to correct equipment problems:
To cite a few examples:
1.
Security equipment - continuous break down of the detectors in the gate house.
2.
Air ejector radiation monitors it is operational now after at
. _ _ _ _ _. -. _. _ - _ - _. _ = _
e
)-
- f lj Least 3 years of being inoperatable. True it was not required to i
be operable per your tech spec's, but it is primary tool to q
protect against steam generator tube Leaks.
i i
f i
3.
Post accident radiation monitors, Emergency ventilation dampers, 4
l fire suppression equipment are responsible for 20 to 30 LER's r
i over the past several years alone plus rising questions of equip-1 j
ment reliability and the ability of TECO to resolve these pro-blems.
i
)
4.
Calibration of the containment Hz onalyzer's permanent resol-l ution of the apparent moisture effect on the calibration.
It i
i came to our attention in July.
As we understand it, there is a I
j temporary fix but you are stilL waiting a final resolution from j
i 1
the vendor.
2 l
1 5.
Continued problems with startup channel NI-1 l
i j
6.
The large backlog maintenance items i
i i
III. In your review of procedures you should make sure that you are evalu-j ating them from the standpoint of:
i 1.
Why arent personnel able to properly implement them and meet your regulatory requirements.
A review of your 1979 non-compliance i
i history indicates that this is a major problem.... Examples failure l
l to document the required reading List.
l l
i
!l-
%~
failure to implement the requirements of your test programs.
failure to properly document maintenance in safety-related equipment.
failure to implement your security requirements.
failure to follow an operating procedure (DH7A 878).
failure to meet flamable material requirements, failure to update documents in a timely fashion.
The requirements are there, why do people have problems following them?
s 2.
For cases where the requirements are not completely spelled out, you should review your procedures to make sure that you are meeting your commitments in the FSAR, in the QA manual, to reg. guides, to the ANSI standards and regulatory requirements.
Examples.
Log books - Are they meeting the standards for documenting equipment status.
Equipment status tagging - Is is meeting the ANSI standard.
Record storage - Are storage facilities and locations within the scope of the ANSI standards.
5-i l
There is a feeling that some of your managers are not fully knowledgable of all the commitments and the meaning of these commitments in your QA manual.
Ask the question: When was the Last time you read the QA manual and assured yourself you understood the requirements.
We will be conducting an independent reaudit of your QA commitments at some future date.
I i
i s
t i
d
j jo, UNITED STATES j
E NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l
g a
REGION lit f
'g *... * *e'[
798 COOsEVELT ROAD e,
oLEN sLLYN. ILLINOls Sots 7 i
{i l
j September 10, 1979 i
i NOTICE OF SIGNIFICANT LICENSEE MEETING
[
l Name of Licensee: Toledo Edison Company 1
l Name of Facility: Davis-Besse Unit 1 l
Docket No.:
50-346 i
i j
Date and Time of Meeting:
September 19, 1979 at 10:30 a.m.
I j*
Location of Meeting:
Davis-Besse Site j
Purpose of Meeting: Discuss the details, schedule, and accomplishments i
of TECO's program to improve and promote better management control and operations for Davis-Besse 1.
i IE Attendees:
j tJ. C Keppler, Director, RIII j
R. F. Heishman, Chief, Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support i
Branch, RIII R. F. Warnick, Chief, Reactor Projects Section No. 2, RIII
)
j T. N. Tambling, Reactor Inspector, RIII l
j L. A. Reyes, Resident Inspector, RIII i
1 l
Licensee Attendees:
W. A. Johnson, President and Chief Operating Officer L. E. Roe, Vice President, Facilities Development I
i R. P. Crouse, Assistant Vice President - Energy Supply I
and others t
i i
NOTE: Attendance by NRC personnel at this IE/ Licensee meeting should
]
be made known by September 17, 1979, C.O.B., via telephone call to R. F. Warnick, FTS 387-9331.
t Distribution:
N. C. Moseley, Director, Reactor Operations Inspection, IE l
S. E. Bryan, Assistant Director for Field Coordination, IE l
}
D. Thompson, Executive Officer for Operations Support, IE W. Gammill, Acting Assistant Director for Operating Reactor Projects, DOR, NRR R. W. Reid, Chief, ORB 4, DOR, NRR Dan Gardner, Licensing Project Manager, ORD 4, DOR, NRR j
J. G. Keppler, Director, RIII l
j R. F. Heishman, Chief, Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support l
l Branch, RIII 1
l I
i i
l o
SEP 12195 Docket No. 50-346 Toledo Edison Company ATTN: Mr. Wendell A. Johnson President and Chief Operating Officer Edison Plaza 300 Madison Avenue Toledo, OH 43652 Gentlemen:
This confirms the arrangements made by I.. A. Reyes and T. D. Murray for a meeting of NRC and Toledo Edison Company representatives at the Davis-Besse plant site on September 19, 1979, at 10:30 a.m.
The purpose of this meeting is to discuss the details, schedule, and accomplishments of your program to improve and promote better management control and operations for the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station.
Personnel from this office presently planning to attend the meeting include myself, R. F. Heishman, R. F. Warnick, T. N. Tambling, and L. A. Reyes.
We appreciate the opportunity to discuss these matters with you.
Sincerely, James G. Xeppler Director cet Mr. T. D. Murray, Station Superintendent Central Files Reproduction Unit NRC 20b PDR I,ocal PDR NSIC TIC Marold W. Kohn, Power Siting Commission Nelen W. Evans, State of Ohio R
RIIL.
RIII.
R I R!!!
RI!!
f g
qf Nithbus W6ppler f
Reyes k Tambling Warnick He an 9jggj79
\\
'iI'l "I
l.
-nican wir w
k,'O W
~
an me.
/
UNITED STATES
^g
[
NUCLEAR REGULATCRY COMMIS$10N l
RE0lON 111 l
l.
3 8,
79s R004sVsLT ROAD OLsN s LLYN. ILLIN0ls sol 37
'g QCT 151979 1
Docket No. 50-346 Toledo Edison Company ATTN: Mr. W. Johnson President and Chief Operating Officer l
Edison Plaza 300 Madison Avenue i
Toledo, OH 43652 Gentlement This refers to the meeting conducted by me, and others of this office on September 19, 1979, at Toledo Edison Company offices with you and others of your staff.
The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas discussed during the meeting. As indicated in the enclosed report, this meeting represents the fourth of a series of meetings that we have requested to discuss the status of actions taken to achieve both immediate and long-i ters improvements in the regulatory performance of the Davis-Besse 1 l
facility.
No items of noncompliance with NRC requirements were identified during the course of this meeting.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room, except as follows.
If this report contains information that you or your contractors believe to be proprietary, you must apply in writing to this office, within twenty days of your receipt of this letter, to withhold such information from public disclosure. The application must include a full statement of l
the reasons for which the information is considered proprietary, and should be prepared so that proprietary information identified in the application is contained in an enclosure to the application, wu 2% $ Mou c/
7pn
'T
=--r
---g-n.m.m,_...-.---,._p_,_.,,,7,4,__e
_.g,,,
OCT 1em, Toledo Edison Company i Thank you for your cooperation with us.
If you have any questions regarding the enclosed report please feel free to call me.
Sincerely, James G. Keppler Director i
Enclosure:
IE Inspection Report No. 50-346/79-26 cc w/ enc 1:
Mr. T. D. Murray, Station Superintendent Central Files Reproduction Unit NRC 20b
{
PDR Local PDR NSIC TIC Harold W. Kohn, Power Siting Coseission Helen W. Evans, State of Ohio i
I t
I l
e,e 44 aie A
us e'
,eia..
ra.mios (4$\\%
s4 %
/d, "r idrM 3 j,j,,
L U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT REGION III Report No. 50-346/79-26 Docket No. 50-346 Licensee No. NPF-3 Licensee: Toledo Edison Company j
Edison Plaza 300 Madison Avenue i
Toledo, OH 43652 i
j Facility Name: Davis-Besse 1 I
t Meeting At:
Toledo Edison Company Offices Meeting Conducted:,,,Se p t 19, 1979 Inspectory.
A. Re
/d 9/
l T. C. T er m M o
}
T. N. Tambling D
/,o!J[~f 5 g
Other Accompanying Personnel J. G. Keppler
]
R. F. Heishman 1
l R. F. Warnick
)
Rfu)='5 j
Approved By:
R. F. Warnick, Chief
,/h. f. M Reactor Projects Section 2 I.
Meetina Summary 1
Meetinn on September 19, 1979 (Report No. 50-346/79-26)
Areas..nspected: A special, announced meeting was held with Corporate and
}
site management to discuss the status of licensee actions taken to address specific Region III concerns expressed in previous meetings on April 18, i
May 31 and July 17, 1979. The meeting lasted approximately two hours and 4
five Region III personnel attended.
Results: The licensee reported the status of implementation of the program j
that was outlined in the previous three meetings. The program was based upon
, m, n n,8, 3~
r gp o.
Y 'Tr
\\
4 their assessment of problem areas to improve the level of management control, staffing, training, the correction of equipment problems and general plant operations.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified within the scope of this aceting.
1 2-
DETAILS 1.
Attendees (Toledo Edison Company)
W. A. Johnson, President and Chief Operating Officer L. E. Roe, Vice President, Facilities Development R. P. Crouse, Vice President, Energy Supply T. D. Murray, Station Superintendent 2.
NRC J. G. Keppler, Director, Region III R. T. Heishman, Chief, Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch R. F. Warnick, Chief, Reactor Projects Section 2 L. A. Reyes, Reactor Inspector T. N. Tambling, Reactor Inspector 3.
Corporate Meeting This meeting was the fourth of a series of management meetings requested by Region III. The purpose of this fourth meeting was to discuss actions taken by TEco to address specific Region III concerns expressed in the three previous meetings held on April 18, May 31 and July 17, 1979, (Inspection Report Nos. 50-346/79-08, 79-12, and 79-20) and to discuss the timetable to implement the various corrective
- actions, s.
Previous Meetina Recap The Region III Director summarized the purpose of the previous
- meetings, b.
Licensee's Progress Report The licensee detailed the progress they have made to improve their level of management control, staffing, training, plant operations; and to reduce the number of equipment problems.
l (1) Staffing Of 22 designated staff openings, the licensee has brought 8 new personnel on board as of July 31, 1978.
- However, l
two professional and three bargaining unit personnel have left the company reducing the net gain to date. The company's goal is still to have all positions filled by July 1980. An extensive recruiting ef fort is being pursued and the company has 16 invitations extended to new people for further interviews.
]
i
The licensee has evaluated its salary structure and new hiring policies and has implemented changes effecting present employees and new personnel.
The licensee expressed concern in being able to fill all the new openings in a timely manner because of a finite supply of qualified individuals and increasing needs throughout the industry.
Region III staff expressed concern regarding the priority assigned to filling the openings in the Instrument and Control group. The I&C group has a backlog of work esti-mated to be several thousands man-hours and the imple-mentation of the Environmental Technical Specifications will add new surveillance and calibration requirements to the existing ones.
The licensee stated that they have put a top priority on filling I&C staff positions and started to routinely work on Saturdays to help decrease the backlog of work and to assure that work on safety related equipment is completed ih a timely fashion.
(2) Procedures At the plant a group is being developed to centralize the preparation and maintenance of procedures. One position in this group has been filled and temporary assignments are being planned for the remaining two positions.
An outside consultant will be utilized to independently review plant procedures. The scope of this review will be designed to establish uniformity and general upgrading of procedures.
(3) Manatement Control The evaluation of the Station Promotional Policy is in progress and is expected to be revised by October, 1979.
Some of the proposed changes are still to be reviewed by the bargaining units.
(4) Trainina A broad training program is being implemented for all plant staf f, directed primarily toward improving job-related skills. The program includes 4
-The addition of a licensed operator and an experienced health physicist to the training staff has been completed.
These two persons are already performing their daties in the training department.
-Addition of one week simulator training to the requali-fication program for licensed operators. This require-ment is now included in the program.
-Addition of a " Basic Nuclear Technology Course" to train plant personnel other than operators.
Approximately do maintenance technicians have attended this course and another class is scheduled for November, 1979.
-Addition of a training program on Technical Specifica-tions to be offered to the plant technical personnel.
The program is expected to be completed by December, 1979.
(5) LER's The total number of LER's in the areas of personnel error and inadequate procedure has been reduced during the past 6 months. The total number of LER's in the area of com-ponent failure has increased, apparently due to the sur-veillances completed during the maintenance outage.
(6) Haintenance Arrangements are being made with a maintenance contractor to help in the implementation of the Facility Change Requests. Final selection of the contractor is being negotiated.
(7) Surveillance Testing There are plans to implement, by April,1980, a spec-inlized computer program to assist the operator in iden-tifying and tracking surveillance requirements imposed by action statements in the technical specifications. A purchase order for the computer software package has been issued.
(8) Nuclear Services Group The position of the Nuclear Services Group director has been filled as of September 1, 1979.
Additional personnel are being transferred to fill remaining positions within the group.
5-
(9) Emergency Planning The licensee has put a high priority on conducting Emer-gency Planning at both the local and State levels. Three people are currently assigned to this task with the required management over view.
c.
Summation At the conclusion of the licensee's presentation, Region III personnel discussed the following items:
-Questioned whether in the process of reviewing the procedures the licensee is verifying that commitments in the FSAR, QA Manual, Regulatory Guides, ANSI Standards and other regula-tory requirements are being set.
-Expressed concern in the time schedule to replace the 1&C supervisor in order to decrease the existing backlog of work and to comply with the additional requirements of the New Environmental Technical Specifications.
-Expressed concern in that repetitive LER's in the aress of Fire Protection Program, Post Accident Radiation Monitors, and Emergency Ventilation System account for approximately 20% of all LER's.
-Expressed concern in the frequent breakdown of the security equipment in the gate house.
-Asked the licensee to schedule the next meeting during the first quarter of 1980.
6-
1980 02/13/80 LETTER:
T. N. Tambling - R. F. Heishmant. Status Update of Davis-Besse Corrective Actions to improve Management Controls and Plant Operations.
(5 pgs.)
02/16/80 Lt.1TER:
J. Keppler - TECo:
Confirmation Letter of meeting between TEco and NRC. (1 pg.)
02/17/80 LETTER:
Davis Besse Reactor Operators - R. Crouse Loss of Qualified Operators and request to meet with Crouse to Discuss this.
(2 pgs.)
03/31/80 LETTER /INSrECTION REPORT:
J. Keppler - TEco:
Cover letter to inspection Report which is a series of management meetings.
(6 pgs.)
04/23/80 LE m R:
J. Keppler - N. C. Moseley (IE): Description of Davis Besse Event of April 19, 1980.
(4 pas.)
05/80 Summary of Physical Security Inspections it Davis Besse.
(6 pgs.)
05/13/80 LETTER:
R. V. Reid TEco:
Notice of Encloced NURED Documents.
(1 pg.)
05/27/80 LETTER:
J. Keppler TEco Confirmation Letter between TECo and NRC.
(1 pg.)
05/27/80 NOTICE:
Significant Licensee Meeting 06/04/80 to discuss Management, Sacurity, and Radiation Protection Enforc'ement Conference.
(1 pg.)
06/04/80 OLTLINE t Management Meeting on 06/04/84 (1 pg.)
06/20/80 LETTER:
V. Stallo TEco:
Proposing Civil Penalties dua to overexposure on 04/30/80.
(2 pgs.)
07/10/80 LETTER / INSPECTION REPORT: J. Keppler TEco meeting and enforcement conference summary for 06/04/80.
(14 pgs.)
07/18/80 LETTER:
J. S. Cranwell J. F. Ahearnet Summary of Inspector's concerns.
(2 pas.)
11/18/80 LETTER:
J. Xeppler Attached address listing:
Enclosed Performance Appraisal Branch (not attached).
(1 pg.)
11/26/80 LETTER:
J. Keppler TEco Confirmation of 12/05/80 meeting to discuss regulatory perfOmance.
(1 pg.)
11/26/80 LE1TER:
M. Johnson (TEco) = \\'. Stallo:
Response to Parformance Appraisal Teas.
(1 pg.)
3
r
~~
~
)
l l
11/03/80 IIITER:
J. Keppler - TECo:
Confirmation of meeting to discuss i
the evaluation of Regulatory Performance.
(1 pg.)
i 12/08/80 LETTER:
J. Keppler - R. F. Heishman: Pdrformance Appraisal Branch Inspection of Davis-Besse.
(1 pg.)
12/31/80 IIITER/ INSPECTION REPORT:
J. Keppler-TECo:
Refers to i
asnagemen. meeting 12/05/80 and NRC Summary.
(9 pgs.)
i i
n l
4 l
- - - - -