IR 05000302/1980019
| ML19320B932 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 05/14/1980 |
| From: | Price D, Upright C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19320B915 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-302-80-19, NUDOCS 8007150511 | |
| Download: ML19320B932 (9) | |
Text
e
y o,,
UNITED STATES
,
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION c.
E REGION ll
-
'
.
e
o 101 MARIETTA ST N.W SUITE 3100
,
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
-
Report No. 50-302/80-19 Licensee: Florida Power Corporatica 3201 34th Street, South St. Petersburg, FL 33733 Facility Name:
Crystal River s
Docket No.
50-302 L'icense No.
DPR-72 Inspection at Crystal River site near stal River, Florida Inspected by:___
!
[/[
O D.
5~. Price '
~
/ DateJSigned Approved by: //8
~ 4I
-
C H. Upright, ting ection Chief, RONS Branch fatefgned SUMMARY Inspection on April 21-25, 1980.
Areas Inspected
.
This routine, unannounced inspection involved 33 inspector-hours on site in the areas of records program, document control program and plant tour.
Results Of the three areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in one area; two apparent item of noncompliance were found in two areas (infraction - failure to properly implement record control program -
paragraph 6); (infraction - failure to provide adequate document control program for vendor manuals paragraph 7.d).
>
a-
' s:a.
.
8 0 0 715 0 gll
-
-_
.
~
..
-
s
/
,
DETAILS s
1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees D. Poole, Plant Manager s
- T. Lutkehaus, Nuclear Technical Services Superintendent
- P. McKee, Operations Superintendent
- G.'Westafer, Maintenance Superintendent
,
- P. Breedlove, Office Manager
- G. Williams, Nuclear Quality Assurance / Quality Control Supervisor
- K. Baker, Nuclear Engineer
- K. Lancaster, Nuclear Compliance Supervisor
- J. Bufe, Nuclear Compliance Auditor Other. licensee employees contacted included operators, mechanics, and office personnel.
NRC
.
'
- A. Ruff, Reactor Insepctor
- B. Smith, Resident Inspector
- Attended exit! interview
.
2.
Exit Interview The insepetion scope and findings were summarized on April 25, 1980 with those persons indicated in paragraph I above. The licensee acknowledged
-
l noncompliance in the areas of document and records control.
Commitments were made by the licensee to have superceded changes to the Plant Opera-tional Quality Assurance Manaual (P0QAM) microfilmed by December 31, 1980 (paragraph 7.b) and to have the uncontrolled drawings located in the maintenance library issued in accordance with Dccument Control-(DC)
Procedure - 102, Contro' of Drawings, Specifications, Requirement Outlines, and Manufacturer's Mano :s, by June 1,1980 (paragraph 7.c).
3.
Licensee _ Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Closed) Deficiency (302/79-04-04): Lack of evaluation statement in QA audit reports. Based upon review of four Quality Assurance Audits performed between November,1979 and February 1980, it appears that the licensee's program has been implemented as stated in his zesponse to the item contained in his letter (3-0-3-a-2, CS-79-181) dated-qque 15, 1979.
This item is closed.
.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required to determine whether they are acceptable or may involve noncompliance
.
.
-.
.
-
.
-. _ -
__
- - - - -.-
.
g_
.
..
.
-2-
,
,
,
or deviations. New unresolved items identified during this inspection are discussed in paragraph 6.
5.
Plant Tour The inspector toured various areas of the plant including the auxiliary building, intermediate building, and the refueling floor of the reactor building. Fuel handling operations were observed No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
6.
Re' cords Program The inspector conducted a review of the licensee's record control system as described by the following:
Quality Program Policy 6.1, Control of Documents Affecting Quality,
.
-
Revision 4, dated 8/9/79 Quality Program Policy 17.1, Quality Program Records Control, Revision
.
4, dated 8/9/1979 Quality Program Procedure 17.51, Quality Records for Operation,
.
Revision 4, dated 9/10/79 Quality Program Procedure 6.50, Nuclear Power Plant Instruction
.
Document Control, Revision 3, dated 9/10/79 Quality Administrative Procedure (QAP) 5, Documenting Quality Programs
.
Record, Revision C, dated 1/31/75 QAP 6, Control of Quality Program Documentation, Revision 2, dated
.
7/21/77 QAP 9, Transmittal of Quality Records - Quality Programs Department to
.
Nuclear Plant Quality Document File, Revision 1, dated 8/13/79 QAP 23, Reporting of Defects and Noncompliance, Revision 1, dated
.
1/22/80 Administrative Instruction (AI)-400, Plant Operating Quality Assurance
.
Manual Control Document, Revision 31, dated 3/21/80 AI-800, Conduct of Administrative Services, Revision 9, dated 1/11/80
.
DC-101, Introduction to Document Control Procedure,. Revision 5, dated
.
10/12/78
~.a, DC-102, Control of Drawings, Specification Requirement Outlines, and
.
Manufacturer's Manuals, Revision 2, dated 10/12/78
.
7__
-_
..
.
3-
.
-
,
DC-103, Control of P0QAM Procedures, Revision 3, dated 8/20/79
.
DC-104, Control of Quality Construction Testing, att Plant Oper.:t,* g
.
Records, Revision 3, dated 4/19/79
.
The review was made no verify the following:
Requirements, provisions and responsibilities for records maintenance
.
had been established Controls and responsibilities to assure transfer and retention of
.-
'
construction phase records existed Record storage controls and responsibilities had been established
.
Provisions had been made to establish record retention periods.
.
The inspector used portions of one or more of the following acceptance criteria for the above items:
.
Regulatory Guide 1.88 - Revision 2-October,1976
.
.
Technical Specifications (TS)
,
.
Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) Chapter 1.7, Quality Program.
.
The following records were reviewed to verify implementation of the licensee's record control program.
Senior Operator's License for V. Roppel dated 1/27/76
.
Purchase Order SPO-00000112, Lawrence Pump Company, dated 8/7/78
.
Modification Approval Record (MAR) SB77-07-49 dated 11/9/79
.
MAR 77-6-26
.
Nuclear General Review Committee (NGRC) meeting minutes from 1977 and
.
1978.
The inspector was unable to locate microfilms of NGRC mee, ting minutes for all of 1978. These documents are required by TS 6.10.2 to be retained.
The inspector was shown hard copies of the minutes from seVen of the eleven NGRC meeting that occurred in 1978. The licensee stated that the remainder of the meeting minutes from 1978 (meeting numbers 42 through 45) would be
'
obtained from files in the corporate office.
.
N
r-.
_
_
_
-
..
-4-
.
e
,
Thi= matter of possible failure to retain NGRC meeting minutes is considered an unresolved item (302/80-19-1) until the licensee forwards copies of the-missing meeting minutes to the inspector for review.
10 CFR 50, Appendix b, Criterion XVII, requires that record retention requirements be established. The licensee's accepted Quality Assurance Program, Section 1.7.6.7.1.q, states that all records transmitted to the
,
quality files will be done in accordance with established written procedures.
DC-104 requires that plant operating records, including NGRC meeting minutes, be' aicrofilmed. This was apparently not done for the minutes from 1978
,
meetings and represents apparent noncompliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVII, (302/80-19-2).
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVII, requires that QA records be identi-fiable and retrievable. This requirement is implemented by the licensee's approved Quality Assurance Program, Chapter 1.7. ANSI N45.2.9-1974, referenced by this program,. requires the licensee's storage system to provide for accurate retrieval of information without undue delay. Failure to locate NGRC meeting minutes for all of 1978 and for the 8/4/77 meeting, without undue delay, using the licensee's filing system represents apparent non-compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVII (302/80-19-2).
7.
Document Controt /rogram The inspector conducted a review of the licensee's document control system as described by the policies and procedures listed in paragraph 6 above.
The review was made to vi ify that administrative controls had been established for drawings, manuals, TSs, FSARs and procedures. One or more of the acceptance criteria listed in paragraph 6 above were used in evalu-ating the licensee's document control program.
a.
Document Review The following documents were reviewed to verify implementation of the licensee's program:
Procedures AI 100, Facility Administrative folicies, Revision 2, dated
.
5/14/79 AI-200, Organization and Responsibility, Revision 16, dated
.
3/5/80 Operating Procedure 301, Filling and Venting of the Reactor
.
Coolant System, Revision 15, dWted 9/21/79
".;;,,
'
Emergency Plans and Irplementing Procedure - 215, Post Accident
.
Reactor Building Purging, Revision 2, dated 2/28/80
,
-, - - - -
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - -
- - - - - - - _
,
..
-5-
.
<
,
1:\\bnormal Procedure - 115, Loss of Reactor Coolant Makeup, Revision
.
S, dated 8/9/76 Drawings 135438E, revision 5, pressurizer surge nazzle
.
203-047 RC-05, revision 5, logic diagram-reac(or coolant pump
.
PD424094, revision B, main steam stop velves
.
..
CV5512, revision A, level transmitter
.
10-399156-2WD, revision A1, wiring diagram (control rod drive
.
cable egnnectors)
211-021DH-00, revision 2, block diagram
"D. H." System
.
304-614, revision 6, control rod drive filter addition
.
304-081, revision 15, feed water pumps suction and discharge -
.
plans 308-814, revision 3, reactor coolant bleed and cation tanks -
.
transmitter 308-833, revision 9, makeup and purification system valve
,
.
302-651, revision 18, reactor coolant system
.
302-082, revision 16, emergency feedwater system
.
302-081, revision 21, feedwater system
.
302-702, revision 12, core flood system
.
302-711, revision 22, reactor building spray
.
302-281, revision 11, diesel generator (oil and exhaust)
.
302-282, revision 8, diesel generator (air and cooling water)
.
302-284, revision 1, diesel air coolant
.
302-601, revision 28, nuclear services closed cy,cle cooling
.
302-611, revision 20, nuclear services and decAh*8 eat sea water
.
302-621, revision 16, spent fuel cooling
.
.
.n
.,w.,-
n.s
. - va r -a-o-namm=-
.ryone a
,
--o~v v
v,W--
-
_
,
m
-
m-v-
- _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ __
..
.
_
-6-
,
,
302-631, revision 17, decay heat closed cycle cooling
.
302-693, revision 12, containment monitoring system
.
302-753, revision 7, control complex ventilation
.
Technical Specifications
.
s FSARs
.
'
Vendor Manuals
.
Struthers Nuclear and Processing Company Heat Exchangers for
.
Nuclear Service Systam, Decay Heat Closed Cycle, and Secondary Service (manual #30)
Crane - Chempump; Reactor Building Surp Pumps 3A and 3B (manual
.
- 86)
B&W Reactor Vessel with Head (manual #172)
.
ITT Barton, models 289A, 291A; Differential Pressure Indicating
.
Switch (manual #427)
Rochester Instrument System; Reactor Coolant Pump Power Monitor
.
(manual #437)
.
Diamond Power Company; Control Rod Drive Mechanism (CRDM) Control
.
System (manual 135)
Reactor Coolant Pumps (manual #210)
.
b.
Microfilming of Records Changes to P0QAM procedures, required by TS 6.10.1 to be retained, were being filed in the site administrative building. DC-104 requires that these operating records be microfilmed and stored in the records vault. The licensee's approved Quality Assurance Plan, Section 1.7.6.7.ls, commits to the requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.88, Revision 2, which endorses ANSI N45.2.9-1974. This standard requires that these records be afforded the equivalent protection of a NFPA Class A, four-hour minimum rated facility or the establishment of duplicate records stored in a separate remote location. Some of the procedure changes (less than 10 percent) had been microfilmed. The licensee committed to microfilming the remainder by December 31, 1980, and storing them in their qualified vault. This mattqq. vill be inspected at a later date (302/80-19-3).
.
___
,
..
..
-7-
..
e
,
c.
Drawing Control 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVII requires the licensee to estab-lish requirements concerning record retention. Section 1.7.6.7.1q of the Quality Assurance Program requires that all records transmitted to the quality files be done so in accordance with written procedures.
The Quality Assurance Program, Section 1.7.6.7.ls, commits to the requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.88 Revision 2, which in turn, endorses ANSI N45.2.9-1974. This standard requires'that quality assurance records be distributed and handled in accordance with
'
written procedures. DC-102 requires that revised drawing aperture
'
cards be entered in " satellite" files and that the susperceded cards be destroyed. The inspector observed that the maintenance library aperture card for drawing 302-081, feedwater system, had not been updated with revision 21 and the old card, revision 20, had not been destroyed. DC-101 states that a red information only stamp is used for copies that are not to be used for work or any other official function. The inspector found that two file cabinets in the mainte-nance library contained unstamped drawings which were not being used for any official function. The licensee commited to stamping these
drawings in accordance with DC-102 by June 1, 1980.
These examples of failure to distribute and handle records in accor-dance with written procedures constitutes an apparent item of noncompliance with respect to 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVII (302/80-19-2).
i d.
Control of Vendor Manuals
[
-
Several problems were observed in the licensee's ability to control vendor manuals. The control room copy of the Reactor Building Sump Pumps manual contained an outdated revision of this manual in addition to the correct revision. The master index for the Reactor Coolant Pump manual listed the maintenance library as having one copy. The inspector found that this library had two copies, one having the incorrect revision.
The CRDM' Control System manual was shown by the master index to have the following distribution:
Maintenance Library Two sets of Volume I, II and III
-
Instruction Library One set of Volume I, II, and III
-
Control Room One set of Volume I, II, and III
-
Electrical Library No sets
-
an Upon inspection, it was found that no volumes'of this 3anual were in the maintenance library (the librarian ststed that they had been lost and were being reproduced). However, one Volume I, three Volume IIs and one Volume III.were found in the electrical library. Th.e Volume I in the control room and electrical library did not have the most current revision entered. One of the Volume IIs in the electrical
,
__
,
.
~
.
-..
-.
__
. - ___ -_______ _ _______________. _ _ - _
s *
-
.
-8-
,
e
,
library did not have the most current revision entered.
The manual check-out system indicated that instruction library Volume II had been checked out since July 31, 1978 and Volume III since September 18, 1979. Two service tips (dated November and December 1979) had not been entered into these manuals due to their being checked out. Upon inspection, the checked out Volume II was found in the library files.
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion VI, requires that measures be estab-lished to control the issuance of documents. The accepted Quality Assurance Program states that Florida Power Corporat' ion has a document control system which includes provisions which require that changes be promptly included in appropriate documents and that obsolete or super-
,
seded documents be controlled.
-
Failure to control the documents discussed above is considered an apparent item of noncompliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50 Appendix B, Criterion VI (302/80-19-4).
.
k9 '
' '.
,
.
.
.g % #-wowywww -me e w,e
..e+
-,-+-=we=~emeo
- - -* *
e-
=
e **