IR 05000302/1980004
| ML19322E386 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 02/08/1980 |
| From: | Ashenden M, Upright C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19322E385 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-302-80-04, 50-302-80-4, NUDOCS 8003270354 | |
| Download: ML19322E386 (3) | |
Text
1 O /
UNITED STATES
/8'
(f
'o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION E
,
$.;
y.c REGION 11 o,, y a
[
101 MARIETTA ST N.W.. SUITE 3100
%
U g
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
Report No. 50-302/80-04 Licensee: Florida Power Corporation 3201 34th Street, South St. Petersburg, Florida 33733 Facility Name: Crystal River 3 Docket No.30-302
,
License No. DPR-72 Inspection at Crystal River 3 near Crystal River, Florida Inspector: f}f cfjfovj%
c9l0 'yn
M. Ashenden D'te" Signed a
Approved by:
[ /z
8 9O C.
M.~ Upright. A ing Section Chief, RONS Branch
/ D te Signed
Inspected on January 21 5, 1980.
SUMMARY Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved 30 inspector-hours on site in the area of plant operations.
Results Of the one area inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
.
.
8003270 3 5 0-
'
,'t
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- P. McKee, Operations Superintendent
- J. Cooper, QA/QC Manager
- J. Bufe, QA Auditor
- R. Kennedy, QA Supervisor T. Wayble, Shift Supervisor J. Kraiker, Shift Supervisor H. Embach, Shift Supervisor P. Breaux, Shift Supervisor
Other licensee employees contacted included 4 technicians, 7 operators, 2 mechanics, and office personnel.
NRC Resident Inspector
- B. Smith (In Training)
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on January 25, 1980, with
.
those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Review of Plant Oparations The inspector reviewed the shift logs and operating records and verified that; shift surveillance sheets were completed; equipment out of service log reflected the plant condition; log reviews were conducted by plant management; operating orders did not conflict with the intent of Technical Specification requirements; jumper log met the requirements of 10 CFR 50.59 and jumper and lifted wires were properly approved; nonconformance reports were reviewed to insure that Technical Specification reporting of Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) was not violated.
The inspector conducted a tour of accessible areas which included the following observations:
_
-
2-
.
Plant recorders and other instruments were being monitored as required.
-
Radiation controls were properly established.
-
Plant housekeeping was adequate.
-
Fluid leaks were identified and reported to maintenance.
-
_
"[
Piping vibrations were not excessive.
-
Several pipe hangers appeared to have proper setting and appeared
-
secure.
-
Selected valve positions and control switches were in the proper position.
- Clearance and Caution Orders were properly hung.
-
Shift turn overs were of sufficient detail.
-
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified during the inspection.
6.
Reactor Building Temperature In discussion with several operators it was found that the Reactor Building temperature alarm located on the annunciator panel was inoperative due to a set of open links that was properly logged in the plant Jumper log, however the alarm point was not labeled or tagged to further insure that the operators would not depend on an inoperative alarm. The licensee took immediate action and placed an information tag on the alarm window. This is designated an
.
inspector followup item, 302/80-04-01.
.
._
J