IR 05000302/1980031
| ML19339A697 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 09/26/1980 |
| From: | Brownlee V, Colon T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19339A692 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-302-80-31, NUDOCS 8011040537 | |
| Download: ML19339A697 (3) | |
Text
.... -
.
-.
,
O
U pa Caroq'o UNITED STATES
~
NUCLEAR REGULA~ORY COMMISSION
$
E REGION 11
'
- ~#
g 101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100 o
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
.....
Report No. 50-302/80-31 Licensee: Florida Power Corporation 3201 34th Street, South St. Petersburg, FL 33733 Facility Name: Crystal River 3 License No. DPR-72
~
Inspection at Crystal River 3 site near Crystal River, Florida a'nd Corporate offices in St. Petersburg, Florida Inspector: f /4m
- m (
9-2b '$
V. L.()Brownlee ~
Date Signed
/f(??fhg 9 - 2. /,. - 8 o Approved f
T. E. Conlon,'Section Chief, RCES Branch Date Signed SUMMARY Inspection on August 25 - 26, 1980 Areas Inspected This special, unannounced management inspection involved 13 inspector-hours on site and at the corporate offices in review of procedures controls and adopted by Florida Power Corporation to implement the evaluation and reporting require-n.ents of 10 CFR Part 21.
Results No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
i
>
I i
8011040537
!
_ r t
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees T. C. Lutkehaus, Nuclear Technical Services Superintendent (Acting Plant Manager)
J. Colby, Assistant Manager Nuclear Engineering J. Cooper, Nuclear QA/QC Compliance Manager J. Smith, Quality Programs G. Anderson, Buyer T. D. Hagen, Technical Specification Coordinator
- H. M. Perry, Nuclear Support Services Department G. Brilli, Senior Nuclear Buyer R. M. Bright, Acting Manager, Nucleat Support Services
- E. E. Froats, Manager Quality Audits & Engineering S. Ulm, Project Engineering, Nuclear Engineering J. C. Clapp, Manager, Vendor QA G. A. Becher, Supervisor Mechanical / Structural Engineer D. C. Nusbicker, Jr., Site Supervisor, Quality Programs Department R. 'Widell, Nuclear Engineering, Project Engineer B. E. Crane, Planning Engineer, Plant Staff
- Attended Exit Interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on August 26, 1980 with those persons indicated in paragraph I above.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items
.
Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Compliance with 10 CFR 21 a.
General i
The purpose of this inspection was to ascertain whether FPC and appro-
!
priate responsible officers had established and implemented procedures and other instructions as required to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 21 requirements relative to the reporting of defects and noncompliances.
,
l Inspector determinations are based on the requirements of 10 CFR 21 as
' -
clarified by' staff positions in NUREG-0302, Revision 1.
The inspector examined and evaluated the Crystal River site procedures on August 25, l
.r
.
-. ~
-
.-.
.
~
.
-2-
'1980, at the site, and reviewed and evaluated Corporate Office proce-dures on August 26, 1980, in the Corporate Offices in St. Petersburg, Florida.
b.
Documents Examined (1) Nuclear Support Services Department Procedure NSSD-15, Revision 2, December 31, 1979, " Compliance with 10 CFR Part 21, Reporting of Defects and Noncompliance".
(2) Quality Program Procedure QP No. 15.55, Rev. 0), August 21, 1980
" Reporting of Defects and Noncompliances."
(3) Engineering Procedure No.10, March 13,1978, "10 CFR Part 21".
(4) Engineering Procedure No. 12, August 1, 1979, " Applicability of 10 CFR Part 21 to Procurement Documents".
(5) Production Engineering 10 CFR 21 Review Form.
c.
Program Review The inspector reviewed the above controlling procedures and verified that procedures have been established to assure that the following requirements of 10 CFR 21 will be met; the posting (21.6), evaluating deviations (21.21. (1)), informing the director (21.21(a) assure that the director will notify the Commission (21.21(b)), and to assure that procurement documents specify that provisions of 10 CFR Part 21 will apply when applicable (21.31), maintenance of records (21.5'M), and disposition of records (21.51(b)).
d.
Program Implementation The inspector held discussions with the above noted responsible managers, engineers, QA and QC personnel and examined the above noted areas for posting, audits and audit findings, acnconformances and evaluations, vendor and other sources of input, notification documentation, and reports to verify procedure implementation.
Based on the above program review and implementation evaluation the inspector concludes:
(1) Responsible personnel at the site and General Offices are quite knowledgeable of. Part 21 requirements.
(2) Responsible personnel understand the company Part 21 procedures.
(3) The procedures are adequate.
The inspector has no further questions regarding this matter.
_