IR 05000289/1981010
| ML20004D300 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 05/05/1981 |
| From: | Ebneter S, Sassani A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20004D297 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-289-81-10, NUDOCS 8106090129 | |
| Download: ML20004D300 (4) | |
Text
%
.
I
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (d 0FFICE OF INSPECTION Atl0 ENFORCEMENT Region I Report No.
81-10 Docket No.
50-289 License No. DPR-50 Priority Category C
--
Licensee:
Metropolitan Edison Company P.O. Box 480 Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057 i
Facility Name:
Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Inspection at: Middletown, Pennsylvania Inspection conducted:
April 20-22, 1981 Inspectors: l S Snk.
.S * / - V/
V date signed
.
A.D. Sassani, Jr., Reactor Inspector
.
date signed date signed f[
/
Approved by:
v d te signed S.D. Ebneter, Chief, Plant Systems Section, Engineering Inspection Branch Inspection Summary:
Inspection on April 20-22,1981, (Report No. 50-289/81-10)
Areas Inspected:
Routine, unannounced inspection by a region based in-spector of documentation and records, associated with the Unit 1 Restart Program, including: electrical and instrumentation documents and records associated with incore thermocouples (Task RM-4) and valve position in-dication/ acoustic monitoring (Task RM-6) modifications.
The inspection involved 17 inspection hours on site by one NRC region based inspector.
Resul ts : No item of noncompliance was identified.
,
Region I Form 12 (Rev. April 77)
8106090//7
'
__
- __
.
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted General Public Utilities Nuclear (GPUN)
-
C.
Davis, Modifications Control Coordinator T.
Faulkner, Supervisor, Modification Control N.
Hollerbush, QC Start-up Coordinator T.
Jacobsen, Lead QC, Instrumentation and Control i
W.
Shumaker, Lead QC, Electrical Metropolitan Edison Company
,
,
- L.
Harding, Supervisor of Licensing I.
Porter, Unit 1, Start-up and Testing L.
Zubey, Construction Manager Catalytic Engineering and Constructors T.
Reddington, Field Superintendent, Unit 1
<
R.
Thomas, Construction Work Package Coordinator
- denotes personnel present at exit interview.
'
2.
Documentation Review The inspector reviewed quality related documentation pertaining to modifications and engineering changes to ascertain whether applicable requirements have been met.
Dccumentation inspected for this determination include:
Operational QA Plan, Revision 8
--
,
Engineering Change Memorandum Procedure, EMP-008
--
--
Station Administrative Procedure, AP-1043, Unit 1, Engineering Change Modifications
Modification Control Group Instructions, No. MCG-1.
i
--
No item of noncompliance was identified.
.
.
3.
Incore Thermocouples, (Task RM-4)
The requirements for this task are detailed in NUREG-0578, Paga A-11, NUREG-0680, Page C8-14 and GPUN TMI-1 Restart Report, Section 2.1.1.6.
3.1.
The inspector reviewed documents and records relative to the mod-ification to ascertain whether applicable requirements have been met.
Documentation reviewed for this determination include:
Engineering CF.ange Memorandum, ECM-5002, Revisions 0, 1, and 2
--
Engineering Change Memorandum, ECM-5009, Revision 0
--
--
Engineering Change Memorandum, iCM-5012, Revisions 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4
--
Engineering Change Memorandur., ECM-S157, Revision 0
--
Purchase Order 86000, Cable.
During the review of documentation the inspector observed that ECM-S002, Revision 2 and ECM-5012, Revision 4 were designated to upgrade the modification to "Important to Safety" and add the following Quality Control (QC) requirements:
,
a.
QC installation inspection b.
Verification that material installed is in accordance with pur-chase requisition.
While tracing the flow path of the ECM package, the inspector found the package in route to the QC coordinator and the additional QC requirements not implemented.
Because the addtttonal QC requirements for installation inspection and material verification had not been performed, the inspector identified this as an inspector follow-up item.
This item will be the subject of a further review by an NRC inspector during a subsequent IE inspection (81-10-01).
4.
Valve Position Indication / Acoustic Monitoring (Task RM-6)
The inspector reviewed documents and records relative to the mod-
,
ification to ascertain whether applicable requirements have been met.
_
,
-
-
,
-
.
Documentation reviewed for this determination include:
Engineering Change Memorandum, ECM-S036, Revisions 0, 1, and 2
--
QC Electrical Plant Inspection Report Log
--
QC Status t,og
--
Modification Control Group Status Log.
--
'
During the review of documentation the inspector observed that ECM-
S036, Revision 2 was designated to upgrade the modifications to "Important to Safety". The construction organization had not been notified at
,
this time.
The inspector identified this item as an inspector follow-up item and
'
will be the subject of a further review by an NRC inspector during a
subsequent IE inspection (81-10-02).
'
5.
Exit Interview The inspector met with the licensee representatives (denoted in paragraph 1) at the conclusion of the inspection on April 22, 1981. The inspector
summarized the purpose, scope, and findings of the inspection.
F
'
i
+
r I
.
i
.
&
P
$