IR 05000289/1981005
| ML20004A150 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 03/19/1981 |
| From: | Ebneter S, Sassani A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20004A149 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-289-81-05, 50-289-81-5, NUDOCS 8105120190 | |
| Download: ML20004A150 (5) | |
Text
.-
j l
!
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
.
W OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT l
Region I
-
,
Report No. 50-289/81-05
,
Docket No. 50-289 License No. DPR-50 Priority Category C
--
Licensee:
Metropolitan Edison Company P. O. Box 480
,
Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057 Facility Name:
Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit I l
Inspection at:
Middletown, Pennsylvania
]
Inspection conducted:
February 23-27, 1981 Inspect'rs:
4 # Se'
b 3 - / */ - 8 /
o
_
A. D. Sassani, Jr.f' Reactor Inspector date signed date signed date s1gned Approved by: MA[-O /.M FBL M 3 - / f - S'/
S. D. Eb' net'er, Chief, Plant Systems date signed
'
Section, Engineering Inspection Branch P
Inspection Summary:
'
Inspection on February 23-27, 1981 (Report No. 50-289/81-05)
Areas Inspected:
Routine, unannounced inspection by a regional-based inspector of work activities and records associated with the Unit 1 Restart Program, i
including: electrical and instrumentation documents, records and equipment installation associated with borated water storage tank (BWST) le"el indication (Task LM-4) and containment isolation on reactor trip (Task RM-50) modifications.
The insp2ction involved 35 inspection hours on site by one NRC regional-based inspector.
,
-
Results:
No item of noncompliance was identified.
I Region I Form 12 (Rev. April 77)
8105120/70
r:
-
,.
<
.
i
,
. i
-
'I
.
t
-
DETAILS
1.
Persons Contacted
-
General Public Utilities Nuclear Corporation (GPUNC)
l
.
.
,
l
- B. Ballard, QA Modifications / Operations Manager
- J. Fornicola, Operations QA Manager I
- J. Fritzen,- Engineering Manager
T.' Graham,= Lead QC, Receiving
!
- H. Hukill, Vice President and' Director of TMI-1
!
'R. Prabhaker, TMI QA Engineering Manager
'
W. Shumaker, Lead QC, Electrical
Metropolitan Edison Company
"
- L. Harding, Supervisor of Licensing
- D. Mitchell, Licensing Engineer L. Zubey, Construction Manager Catalytic Engineering and Constructors D. Grahat, Electrical Superintendent, Unit 1
)
J. Kimmel, Electrical Supervisor, Unit 1 T. Reddington, Field Superintendent, Unit 1
)
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
]
W. Rekito, Reactor Inspector F. Young, TMI-1 Resident Inspector
- Denotes personnel present at exit interview.
l 2.
Borated Water Storage Tank (BWST) Level Indication, (Task LM-4)
a.
Tne inspector reviewed quality related documents and records relative
'
to electrical and instrumentation components to a;certain whether applicable requirements have been met in areas relating to receipt
inspection, installation inspection, component certification, and i
purchase order requirements.
Areas inspected for this determination include:
j
!
Engineering Change Memorandum, ECM-5017, Revisions 0, 1, and 2
--
Purchase Order 72856, Instrument Valves
'
--
,
,,e
.. -,.
-
e e
.
.
,
u
-
t
.
L
'
-
.
'
Purchase Order 86529, Indicating Pressure Switch l
---
i i
Purchase Order 65582, Instrument Tubing _
--
I Me?-Ed, Quality Control, Accept Tag for Purchase Order 72866, Item
--
No. 8
'
,
t QC Receipt Deficiency Report, RDR 80-15 l
--
Electrical Inspection Report No. 159, Conduit, Run No. RK837
!
--
!
Electrical Inspection Report No. 160, Cable, Run No. bK837
--
.
Electrical Ins y tion Report No. 179, Cable Terminating, Run No.
l
--
RK837
I During the rc view of the instrument valve purchase order package, no.
l 72866, the inspector observed that the receiviag checklist inspection
!
report indicated that the in:trument valves were "Not For N1, N2, or i
N3 Use".
The inspectur then reviewed the Met-Ed, Quality Control,
'
Accept Tag for this purchase order and ascertained that the Accept Tag
,
contained the same statement "Not For N1, N2, or N3 Use".
!
l The inspector examined the installation of this modification as described
!
in paragraph 2.b of this report and ascertained that three instrument valves from this purchase order were installed. Additionally, the.-
l latest approved-for-coustruction drawing, B-308-856, Revision IA-1
!
indicates that the classification of this installation is Nuclear
.
Class-N3.
l
The inspector examined other items of this purchase order and ascer-i tained that numerous other instrument valve Quality Control, Accept i
Tags contained "Not For N1, N2 or N3 Use".
j i
The inspector requested tha', the 11censee ascertain whether other
'
' instrument valves from tH s purchase order were installed in Nuclear
!
Class N1, N2, or N3 classified installathns, j
The inspector identified this as an unresolved item, which will be the
!
subject of a further review by an NRC inspector during a subaaquent IE q
inspectio: (81-05-01).
b.
The inspector examined completed work on differential pressure switch I
(DPS 914), cable, conduit, instrument tubing and instrument valves to asce?tain whether applicable requirements have been met on the installa-
!
tior of the components r-d materials.
l
,
..
..
.
.
,
r
'
Documentat' ion reviewed for this determination include:
.-
Piping Instrument Diagram, B-308-856, Revision JA-l'
[
---
Field Fabrication and _ Erection of Piping Specification,' SP-5661
[
--
,
Receiving, Storing and Installation of Cable Trays and Conduits
--
. Procedura, ECP-S-:', Revision 12
--
Receiving Storage and Installing Wire and Cable Procedure, ECP3-2, Revision 34
,
--
Field Questionnaire Transmittal, FQ-R49 l
l During the inspection of the installation of DPS-914, located in the borated water storage tank tunnel area, the inspector observed that i
the installation does not agree with the latest approved-l for-construction drawing B-308-856, Revision IA-1.
Although the electrical installation inspection had been completed, the inspector
- ascertained that the mechanical installation inspection had not been performed.
]
,
The inspector identified this as an unresolved item which will be tne subject of a further review by an NRC inspector during a subsequent IE inspection (81-05-02).
3.
Containment Isolation on Reactor Trip (Task RM-5C)
.;
The requirements for this task are detailed in NUREG-0578, Section 2.1.4,
-NUREG-0680, Section 2.1.4, Page C8-21 and GPU TMI-1 Restart Report, Sectirm l
2.1.1.5.
a.
The inspector examined completed work on conduit and conduit supports
to ascertain whether applicable requirements have been met on the
'
installation of the materials ar.d components.
Areas inspected for this determination include:
Receiving, Storage and Installation of Cable Trays and Conduits
--
' Procedure, ECP-8-2, Revision 12
--
Conduit Support Location Drawing, Auxiliary Building EL 305 feet, C-204-140, Revision IA-2 j
Electrical Conduit and Cable Layout Drawing, Control Tower EL 338
--
feet, E-215-045, Revision 10-2
'
Engineering Change Memorandum ECM-5164, Conduit Supports
--
i
',
n
.
,
- ,
u--
'
I
5.
!
I
.
.i
-
Engineering' Change Memorandum, ECM-S070, Cenduit j
--
.
Electrical Conduit Support Drawings, S-204-166 thru S-204-178 for i
--
Conduit Supports IAXD-C19 tinru 1AXD-C31
,
' Conduit Run Nos. RP-755, RP-735, RP-745, RP-733, RR-731, RP-743,
--
RR-733,.RR-741, RR-743, and RR-753
?
No item: cf.nonccmpliance was identified.
l
!
4.
Unresolved Items l
Unresolved items are matters about which more_information is_ required in.
l order to ascertain whether they are acceptable items, items of noncompliance, l
or deviations. The unresolved items reviewed during this inspection are i
discussed'in paragra.ph 2.a and 2.b.
j
]
S.
Exit Interview The inspector met with the licensee representatives (denoted in paragraph i
1) at the conclusion of the inspection on. February 27, 1981.
In addition, j
- the NRC TMI-1 Resident Inspector, Mr. F. Young, attended the meeting. The
!
inspector summarized the purpose, scope and findings of the inspection and the unresolved items were discussed.
!
[
,
i l
. ;
!
.
-
- -
, _ -
%
qq-Nw
-
-r-
,v
-