IR 05000280/1979030
| ML18130A553 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 06/25/1979 |
| From: | Messitt B, Ruhlman W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18130A551 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-280-79-30, 50-281-79-47, NUDOCS 7909180171 | |
| Download: ML18130A553 (7) | |
Text
e
- e UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 Repor~ Nos. 50-280/79-30 and 50-281/79-47 Licensee:
Virginia Electric and Power Company Richmond, Virginia 23261 Facility Name:
Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-280 and 50-281 License Nos. DPR-32 and DPR-37 Inspection SUMMARY Inspection on June 4-8, 1979 Areas Inspected r Williamsburg, Virginia Section Chief, RONS Branch Date Signed Date Signed This routine, unannounced inspection involved 39 inspector-hours onsite in the areas of record keeping, routine maintenance, refueling and outage related main-tenance, and plant tou Results Of the four areas inspected, no apparent items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in three areas; one apparent item of noncompliance was found in one are J.8~ J 71
e DETAILS Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- W. L. Stewart, Manager, VEPCO
- J. L. Wilson, Superintendent Operations, VEPCO
- R. F. Saunders, Superintendent Maintenance, VEPCO
- T. A. Peebles, Superintendent Technical Services, VEPCO
- R. L. Baldwin, Supervisor Administrative Services, VEPCO
- E. P. Dewandel, Staff Assistant, VEPCO D. A. Christian, Engineer, VEPCO R. M. Smith, Supervisor Health Physics, VEPCO H. W. Kibler, Electrical Supervisor, VEPCO 0. Voltsberger, Training, VEPCO H. L. Miller, Training, VEPCO Other licensee employees contacted included technicians, operators, mechanics and office personne Other Organizations D. Yaffee, Westinghouse NRC Resident Inspector
- D. J. Burke
- Attended exit intervie.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on June 8, 1979, with those persons indicated in Paragraph 1 abov With respect to the items of noncompliance (280/79-30-01 and 281/79-47-01)
discussed in Paragraph 5.b, the Plant Manager acknowledged the item and
- immediately took administrative steps to correct it. With respect to the unresolved items (280/79-30-02 and 281/79-47-02) discussed in Paragraph S.c, and the unresolved items (280/79-30-03 and 281/79-47-03) discussed in Paragraph 5.d, the Plant Manager acknowledged the inspector's finding.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspecte j
e-2-Unresolved Items Unresolved items are matters about which more information fs required to determine whether they are. acceptable or may involve noncompliance or deviations. - New unresolved items identified during this inspection are c}iscussed in Paragraphs 5.c and.
Records Review Conducted The inspector verfied the program for control and retrieval of records and documents pertaining to safety related systems and personnel qualification and training, including the following documents:
Assistant Control Room Operator - Control Room Log - Units 1 and 2, dated March 2, 1977 Emergency Procedure #1 Reactor Trip, dated July 26, 1977 Design Change (DC) 76-27 Containment Access Hatch Modification Design Change 77-41 Recirc Spray NPSH Licensee Event Report 1-78-3 Licensee Event Report 2-78-17 MR 2901311046, dated 3-20-79 MR 1901301746, dated 1-30-79 and Tagging Record Sl-6333 Tagging Record 52-5678 Tagging Record Sl-6622 Training Records of Mechanics and Electricians (3)
Additionally records of reactor operations and equipment performance were reviewed to assure availability of sufficient information to detect adverse performance trend The inspector also reviewed vault procedures and VEPCO Internal Quality Assurance Audit Reports #S78-1 and #S79-S pertaining to station record The inspector used one or more of the following acceptance criteria for inspecting the above areas:
e e-3-
- ANSI N45.2.9 (1974)
- 10 CFR SO, Appendix B
- Technical Specifications (T/S)
- VEPCO Quality Assurance Manual (QAM)
- Inspector Judgement The inspector also toured vault facilities to verify environmental conditions and fire prevention/suppresssion systems were as require In the areas inspected one item of noncompliance was identified and two unresolved items were identifie Failure to Establish Security As required by 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, ANSI N45.2.9 and the implementing document VEPCO Quality Assurance Manual, " A full time security system shall be established to preclude entry of unauthor-ized personnel into the storage area. This system shall guard against larceny and vandalism".
During the inspection of the main vault facility it was noted that a second door in the vault area was unlocked allowing unmonitored entrance to and exit from the area and in fact was being used to allow transiting of the vaul This is designated an item of noncompliance (280/79-30-01 and 281/79-47-01).
The licensee acknowledged the above item and immediately took adminis-trative steps to correct i Inadequate Control of Records Vault Access As required by the VEPCO Quality Assurance Manual Section S.4.2a
"Access to station records.
is controlled by the Key Card System."
During the inspection it was noted that access to the records vault is not so controlle In discussion the licensee stated that this is a recent change to the system and that there is a pending revision to the VEPCO Quality Assurance Manual to acknowledge this system chang Pending the receipt and implementation of the above mentioned revision this item will be held unresolved (280/79-30-02 and 281/79-47-02). Inadequate Vault Facility As required by 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, ANSI 45.2.9 (1974), and VEPCO Quality Assurance Manual, the implementing document, "Records discussed in this standard are appropriately classed for fire protection purposes as National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Class I and as such should be afforded the equivalent protection of a NFPA Class A, four hour minimum rated facility."
e-4-The licensee's internal auditing group has identified (audits S78-1, S79-5) that the vault facility does not meet the standards in ANSI N45. 2. 9 and thus the NFPA requirement In the -answer to audit I/S79-5 the licensee states the corrective action to be a proposed revision to his "Topical Report" excepting certain provisions of ANSI N45. 2. Pending NRR approval of such a revision this item is unresolved (280/79-
30-03 and 281/79-47-03). * Maintenance (Routine)
The inspector conducted a review of maintenance documentation as follows:
Maintenance Report (MR) 1901301764, Instrument Air Compresser 1-IA-C-2A>Will Not Pump,
MR 1901300500 1-CH-P-2A, Boric Acid Transfer Pump Coupling
.
MR 1901261549 1-SW-P-lC, Service Water Pump Preventative Maintenance MR 1901230252 TV-HSlOlB, Packing Leak MR 1901171244, Check Limit Switches on FCV 1113A MR 1901160635 1-RS-P-2A,,Seal Head Tank Low Level Alarm HR 1901151205 RV 1893, Lifts Below Setpoint MR 1901150915, Seal Penetration 14D MR 1901131900, Tavg Channel TI-l-412D Drifted MR 1903212200 1-CH-75 MR 1903190827, Check Calibration on All Fire Pump House Gages MR 1903151013 HCV-RH-1758 1Will Not Operate MR 2901311046, Replace Existing Conduit (RH System)
HR 2901261800 2-FW-P-3A MR 2901261554 2-DG-P-1A 1Preventative Maintenance Inspection HR 2901261547 SV-2-551B1Pressurizer Safety Valve MR 2901251542 MOV-RS-256A,Preventative Maintenance MR 2901251307 Breaker 24J3 Preventative Maintenance The inspector also monitored work in progress under HR 1905221518 "Repair RHR Supports per DC 79-27", and reviewed the training and qualification records of eight maintenance mechanics, electricians and foreme The inspector used one or more of the following acceptance criteria for inspecting the above items:
- ANSI N18.7 (1972)
- ANSI N45.2.9 (1974)
- Technical Specifications
- Regulatory Guide 1.33 (Nov. 1972)
- VEPCO Quality Assurance Manual (QAH)
- Inspector Judgement
- Various Maintenance Procedures
..
./
-s-The above documentation was reviewed to verify:
- Administrative approval was obtained prior to initiating work
- Where required, maintenance was performed using an approved procedure
- Where required, functional testing was performed prior to return to service
~ Quality Assurance review was performed
- Maintenance was performed by qualified personnel
- Where required, a reportable occurence report was submitted in connection with the maintenance Within the areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identifie.
Maintenance (Refueling and Outage Related)
The inspector conducted a review of refueling and other outage related major maintenance on Unit 2 (50-281). Included in this review were:
Disconnection for repair of RCP stators per maintenance procedures EMP-C-EPH-04A and EMP-C-EPH-52. This work was being done with assistance from a Westinghouse technical representativ Corrective Maintenance on RCP seals per maintenance procedure KMP-C-RC-00 Snubber removal, testing, and repair per maintenance procedures MPP-C-HSS-20, 21 and 24 and periodic test 3 The inspe 0cto"r also visited the s*pecia:i RCP maintenance enclosure and snubber* -
maintenance area and witnessed ongoing work related to the stator repai The inspector used one or more of the following acceptance criteria for inspecting the above items:
- ANSI Nl8.7 (1972)
- ANSI N45.2.9 (1974)
- Technical Specifications
- Regulatory Guide 1.33 (Nov. 1972)
- VEPCO Quality Assurance Manual (QAM)
- Inspector Judgement The above areas were reviewed to verify:
Administrative approval was obtained prior to initiating work Where required, maintenance was performed using an approved procedure Where required, functional testing was performed prior to return to service Quality Assurance review was performed
e-6-Maintenance was performed by qualified personnel Hold points for inspection/audit and signoff by QA personnel were included Requirements were met to obtain special welding/flame permits if necessary Provisions requiring review of materials certification data were met if necessary Removal of jumpers required for maintenance/testing activities Within the areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified. However, an item of concern was note The tagging records held by the electrical shop for the work on the RCP stators showed cleared tags that were not indicated on the control room copies of the same record No other tagging records reviewed were found to have any. discrepanc The licensee was notified and the discrepancy was cleared. The operator involved is no longer employed by the license This item is designated for inspection followup during a future inspection (280/79-30-04 and 281/79-47-04). Plant Tour The inspector toured the Unit #1 Containment, external site areas, Auxiliary building and turbine buildin No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.