IR 05000280/1979027
| ML18130A509 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 06/19/1979 |
| From: | Hufham J, Perrotti D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18130A508 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-280-79-27, 50-281-79-44, NUDOCS 7908280171 | |
| Download: ML18130A509 (4) | |
Text
--*
. *-. :*
- I I
___.,/
e e
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 Report Nos. 50-280/79-27 and 50-281/79-44 Licensee: Virginia Electric and Power Company Richmond, Virginia 23261 Facility Name:
Surry Units 1 and 2 License Nos. DPR-32 and DPR-37
_Inspection~
at Surry
- ts 1 and 2, Surry, Virginia Inspector: =-""---=-=-------------------------
-t,. n. J. Perrotti Approved by: /~/.J!~_,,__,,,_ _.,,,,.---
fa, J ~
Chief, FF&MS Branch SUMMARY Inspection on May 31 through June 1, 1978 Areas Inspected
~/19/z~
Date Signed
,A;h2 D'ate Signed This routine, announced inspection involved eight inspector-hours on-site in the areas of emergency tests and drills, and a previously identified unresolved ite Results Of the two areas inspected, no apparent items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
..
- '
r""*-'**-*~---u*.,*M~~~-------",' ___ ; ____ * "--**-~---*-'*-**---*-***'**-~--'-./',,. s-****'
e
-
DETAILS Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- W. L. Stewart, Station Manager
- J. L. Wilson, Superintendent, Operations
- T. A. Peebles, Superintendent, Technical Services
- W. W. Cameron, Corporate Superintendent, Technical Services
- R. M. Smith, Supervisor, Health Physics
- H. L. Miller, Supervisor, Nuclear Training
- R. L. Baldwin, Supervisor, Administrative Services
- F. L. Rentz, Resident Q. C. Engineer
- E. P. Dewandel, Staff Assistant
- D. H. Rickeard, Sr. Engineering Technician - Operations Other licensee employees contacted included one operator and one office personne NRC Resident Inspector D. J. Burke I
- Attended exit interview Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on June 1, 1979 with those persons indicated in Paragraph 1 abov.
Unresolved Items There were no unresolved items identified during this inspectio Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Closed) Unresolved Item 78-28-01:
Main Control Room Environmental System Operability Tes The MCRE System operability test has been included in Admin Procedure 2 This matter is closed (paragraph 6). Emergency Tests and Drills Technical Specification 6.4.H requires an annual emergency dril Including a communications chec The site Emergency Plan, paragraph 7.1.2, specifies that appropriate offsite agencies will be asked to participate in or to observe the emergency dril The inspector verified, by review of drill critique memo, that an emergency drill was successfully completed on August 10, 1978, and
.
.
.
_____ --.,:-.,,_._-~_,*,.-,.-:,,._,..,.*--~--*---<.C..;,~--""'-.*-.,.... =*-*-*,:'..--:...:..-1."<.:--
.,._...... -_.....,.,,--~**-----,c.*;r-**.!.*--<*-----~-=-*-..-::*.'*-:;.-; -~--' **,:L-~.,- *>--- - ~-* ~..
. :*.
..*. -..
~
- ..,,:
- c *
e e-2-that recommendations by drill monitors had been incorporated into the emergency procedure A simulated radiation emergency drill was held on June 1, 197 Two inspectors were available at the site to witness the emergency drill activities in the control room and control room anne The simulated emergency developed as a result of a loss of coolant accident and subsequent release of radioactive materials to the environmen The main areas observed were:
(1) Shift supervisors responses (2) Emergency classification (3) Notification and communications (4) Plant personnel assembly and accountability Licensee representatives acted as observers at the control room, south annex, security building, HP lab, Unit 2 turbine basement, construction gate, turbine building and clean change roo The main areas observed at these locations were:
(1) Communications (2) Accountability (3) HP emergency team response (4) General Conduct of the drill at each locatio The inspector was informed by a licensee representative that a critique would be held at a' later time since there were so many observers
involve At the 1 exit interview the inspector discussed the overall effectiveness of the drill with licensee representative The inspec-tor stated that any deficiencies identified by the drill monitors and corrective actions taken would be reviewed during subsequent inspec-tion The inspector asked about the accountability of all personnel onsite, especially the large numbers of construction personne The inspector was informed that the accountability was accomplished satis-factoril The inspector asked about the site evacuatio The in-spector was informed that an evacuation had been completed on May 9, 1979, as a result of a bomb threat. Just prior to departure from the site on June 1, 1979, the inspector reviewed documentation which verified than an evacuation had been accomplished on that dat However, there appeared to be some problem in the accountability of construction workers and the evacuation of security personne Subsequent to the inspection, on June 4, 1979, the inspector contacted a licensee representative, by telephone, to discuss the bomb threat evacuatio The inspector informed the licensee representative that the matter of the evacuation would be considered an open item to be followed during a subsequent inspectio There were no items of noncompliance or deviation Main Control Room Environmental (MCRE) System Operability Test During a previous inspection, the inspector identified the monthly oper-ability test of the MCRE as an unresolved item (50-280, 281/78-28-01).
. ____..
\\
i*.
--~ )
e e-3-During this inspection, the inspector discussed this matter with the Operations Superintendent and verified, by review of Admin Procedure 29, that the operability test of the MCRE system (excluding the pressurization by air bottles) had been incorporated into the procedure and was due the first week of each mont The inspector had no further comments on this matter at this tim I-i