IR 05000280/1979017
| ML18116A178 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 05/04/1979 |
| From: | Cantrell F, Elrod S NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18116A177 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-280-79-17, 50-281-79-25, NUDOCS 7907200411 | |
| Download: ML18116A178 (3) | |
Text
t I
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION 11 101 MARIETTA STREET, ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 Report Nos. 50-280/79-17 and 50-281/79-25 Licensee:
Virginia Electric and Power Company Richmond, Virginia 23261 Facility Name:
Surry Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-280 and 50-281 License Nos. DPR-32 and DPR-37 Inspection SUMMARY Inspection on April 3-6, 197 Areas Inspected Virginia This routine, unannounced inspection involved 34 inspector-hours onsite in the areas of activities connected with seismic reanalysis of safety related piping, including applicable IE bulletins, protection of reactor plant com-ponents, observation of safety related work activities, previously identified open items and unresolved item Results Of the four areas inspected, no apparent items of noncompliance or deviations were identifie *
DETAILS Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- W. L. Stewart, Station Manager.
- J. L. Wilson, Superintendent Operations
- R. F. Saunders, Superintendent Maintenance
- T. A. Peebles, Superintendent Technical Services
- R. M. Smith, Health Physics Supervisor
- F. L. Rentz, Quality Control Engineer
- R. L. Baldwin, Supervisor Administrative Services
- E. P. Dewandel, Staff Assistant
- A. L. Parrish, III, SGRP Manager
- C. F. Rhodes, SGRP
- Y. P. Mangum, SGRP
- W.R. Skelley, Jr., SGRP
- J. S. Fisher, Fire Marshall L. Snyder, SGRP L. Leffler, SGRP J. Peterson, Maintenance Coordinator W. A. Thornton, Supervisor, Chemistry Other Organizations G. Crowder, Daniels Construction Company NRC Resident Inspector
- D. J. Burke
- Attended exit intervie.
Exit Interview 3.
The inspection scope and findings were summarized on April 6, 1979 with those persons indicated in Paragraph l above. *The licensee was informed that no items of noncompliance were disclosed by the inspectio The items listed in paragraphs 3 through 7 were discusse Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Closed) Unresolved Item (281/79-12-01): Placing Systems in Long-term Layu The inspector reviewed with plant management their plan for layup of systems in Unit No. Conditions indicated in this plan
' L
'.
-2-were also sampled by the inspecto The inspector has no further questions at this tim.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspectio.
Protection of Reactor Plant Components.
During a walkthrough of containment No. 2, the inspector observed.
components that had been protecte No damaged components were noted during this walk throug The inspector also discussed with licensee management, engineering controls that had been recently institute Of particular note was the establishment of a team to perform weekly team walkthrough inspections to check protection of component The inspector has no further questions at this time and is closing inspector followup item 281/79-12-0 No deviations or 1tems of noncompliance were identifie Tours of No. 2 Containment Two tours of No. 2 containment were made by the inspector to observe conditions and safety related work activities. Protection of reactor plant components is addressed in paragraph Severa*1 personnel were sweeping and moppin On each walkthrough, a number (about 20)
of persons not actively employed at th~ moment were using the low radiation "rest areas" as planned by the licensee. The tours revealed a quantity of radwaste material, mostly large boxes of lagging, that had been in containment significantly longer than an orderly schedule for radwaste removal would dictate. It is understood that unavaliability of the polar crane was the major cause for this dela No deviations or items of noncompliance were observe Seismic Reanalysis of Safety Related Systems The inspector reviewed the program with licensee management and ascer-tained that initial steps to obtaining a new seismic analysis were in progress, including detailed measurements of systems and sight verifica-tion of valves included in IE Bulletin 79-0 The inspector sampled by observation the activities of two of the measuring teams and had no further questions at this poin No deviations or noncompliances were observe \\Yt
'
.
I
\\;'
,!
- }
l