IR 05000261/1989014

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Rept 50-261/89-14 on 890731-0804.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radiological Effluents,Plant Chemistry & Environ Monitoring
ML14176A758
Person / Time
Site: Robinson Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/24/1989
From: Decker T, Hughey C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML14176A757 List:
References
50-261-89-14, NUDOCS 8909110280
Download: ML14176A758 (8)


Text

V

,

REG(J4 UNITED STATES o

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION II

101 MARIETTA STREET, ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323 AUi 2 5 1I9 Report No.:

50-261/89-14, Licensee:

Carolina Power and Light Company P. 0. Box 1551 Raleigh, NC 27602 Docket No.:

50-261 License No.:

DPR-23 Facility Name: H. B. Robinson Inspection Conducted: July 31 - August 4, 1989 Inspector:

f,2 d-C. A. Hughey T

8'

Accompanying Personnel: D. Seymour Approved by:

'

&

- /

.

T. R. Decker, Chief

'A Radiological Effluents and Chemistry Section Emergency Preparedness and Radiological Protection Branch Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards SUMMARY Scope:

This routine, unannounced inspection was conducted in the areas of radiological effluents, plant chemistry, and environmental monitorin Results:

In the areas inspected, violations or deviations were not identifie The chemistry counting room quality control program was adequate in ensuring the accuracy of plant radiochemical measurement Plant, chemistry had been generally maintained well within the guidelines recommended by the steam generator owner's grou The environmental monitoring program appeared effective in assessing the impact of radiological releases to the environmen Liquid and gaseous effluents were well within Technical Specifications, 10 CFR 20, and 10 CFR 50 effluent limitations for 198 REPORT DETAILS 1. Persons Contacted Licensee Employees

  • C. Dietz, Nuclear Project Manager
  • J. Eaddy, Jr., Supervisor, Environmental and Chemistry (E.&C)
  • J. Harrison, Project Specialist, E&C J. Hill, Technician I,.E&C C. Lowder, Technician I, E&C
  • R. Morgan, Plant General Manager W. Neeley, Senior Specialist, Corporate
  • R. Smith, Manaer, Environmental and Radiation Control
  • H Watkins, Foreman, E&C Other licensee employees contacted during this inspection included craftsmen, engineers, operators, mechanics, security force members, technicians, and administrative personne Nuclear Regulatory Commission L. Garner, SRI K. Jury, RI
  • Attended exit interview 2. Radioactive Effluents (84750)

a. The licensee's counting room quality assurance (QA) program was reviewed by the inspector to ensure compliance with selected portions of Regulatory Guide 4.15, "QA for Radiochemical Monitoring Programs

  • (Normal Operations)

-

Effluent Streams and the -Environment,"

Revision (Rev.) 1, 197 The following laboratory records were reviewed:

(1) Current efficiency calibration packages for all three intrinsic germanium detector (2) Lower limit of detection verifications for gamma spectroscopy equipmen (3) Source certificates for calibration source (4) Current efficiency and resolution control charts for the gamma spectroscopy equipmen (5) Daily performance checks for the Packard 460C Liquid Scintillation Spectrophotomete (6) Daily efficiency checks. for the two LB/1000 Tennelec proportional cou.nter b. The inspector randomly reviewed six waste release permits, all completed durina 198 All permits were properly completed and reviewed with no discrepancies note. Steam Cycle Chemistry (84750)

A review of chemistry data plots for the period January 1988 up to the time of the inspection, indicated that secondary chemistry had generally been maintained well within the guidelines recommended by the steam generator owners group (SGOG).

During power operation, steam generator blowdown cation conductivity in all three steam generators averaged between 0.1 and 0.2 micromho/centimeter (umho/cm),

well below the recommended Action 1 level of 0.8 umho/cm. Chloride, sulfate, and sodium concentrations in blowdown were consistently maintained well below the recommended Action 1 levels of 20 parts per billion (ppb)

each, with sulfate concentrations averaging between 5 and

ppb, chloride concentrations between 2 and 8 ppb,.and sodium concentration less than 2 pp Feedwater cation conductivity had been consistently maintained at about 0.o6 umho/cm,,well below the recommended diagnostic limit of 0.2 umho/c Feedwater dissolved oxygen had been maintained less than 1 pp During power ascension at the beginning of the current fuel cycle, March 1989, limited hideout return had been noted to a maxium of about 50-60 ppb sulfate Periodic radiological analyses of the.steam generator blowdown samples indicated very slight primary to secondary leakage during the current fuel cycl. Reactor Coolant System Chemistry (84750)

The inspector reviewed trend plots of various reactor coolant system chemistry parameter For the period March 1988 to present, which corresponded to the current fuel cycle, chloride concentrations had been consistently maintained below 20 ppb, which was well below Technical Specification (TS)

limit During 100 percent power steady state operations, dose equivalent Iodine-131 averaged about 7.0 E-04 microcuries per gram and the Iodine-131/Iodine-133 ratios averaged about This indicated good fuel cladding integrity with very low fission product leakage into the reactor coolant, other than that expected from tramp uranium. Average reactor coolant gross activity for the period was about 2.0 E-01 microcuries per gra As discussed in Inspection Report N /89-04 (January 30 through February 3, 1989),

the licensee had previously initiated an elevated lithium control program in the reactor coolant system to reduce transport, deposition, and activation of corrosion products in the core. The purpose of this program was to reduce general dose rates around the plan During the current fuel cycle (13),

the licensee had initiated further improvements in the program including a further increase of initial lithium levels in the reactor coolant system (RCS) to 3.35+/-0.5 parts per million (ppm).

This increase would hopefully further reduce the general plant dose rate source ter Dose rate reduction had been noted during the last outage as the result of a limited RCS level increase during the previous fuel cycle (12).

5. Environmental Monitoring (84750)

The inspector examined selected offsite environmental monitoring sites and discussed the offsite environmental monitoring program with cognizant licensee representative This examination included five thermoluminescent (TLD)

monitoring stations, three air sampling stations and one water sampling station. The stations appeared well maintained and the air samplers' integrated flow meters were within current calibratio The annual Environmental Surveillance Report for January 1 through December 31, 1988, was reviewe The program was conducted and reports submitted in accordance with TS requirements. This report concluded that the Robinson Nuclear Plant had minimal offiste radiological impact during 198 There were also no changes in the land use census, performed during May 1988, that would yield a higher potential offsite dos. Service Water System (84750)

The inspector reviewed the water treatment program in place at Robinson for controlling and monitoring microbiological influenced corrosion (MIC).

At the time of the inspection, the licensee had been chlorinating the service water system one hour per day with sodium hypochlorit Measurements of free available chlorine residuals averaged 5pp The licensee sampled and measured free floating bacteria levels as an indicator of effectiveness of the chlorination program. The licensee had developed criteria for the use and monitoring of a biodispersan However, based on the positive results obtained with the service water chlorination program, these had not been implemente MIC and other corrosive processes were being monitored by the licensee in three way A plexiglass "biobox" simulated a worst-case service water environment and allowed the licensee to visually qualify system biofoulin A Deposit Accumulation Testing System (DATS)

side stream monitor had been installed to monitor and measure fouling deposits by relating the amount of deposit to changes in heat transfer rates across a selected metal surface. The license had also installed a corrosion coupon rac This coupon rack, installed on April 26, 1989, contained eight metal coupons representing a cross section of the materials contained in the Service Water System. These metals were copper, 90/10 copper, nickel, admirality brass, AL-6XN, AL-6X, AL-6X with a 625 weld, 316 stainless, and carbon stee Periodically, the licensee removed these coupons and made

visual, estimates of corrosion damage..The inspectors witnessed a visual inspection on August 3, 198 Only the carbon steel coupon showed severe corrosive attac The licensee planned on removing the coupons at some future date for quantitative analyse The licensee had also utilized equipment inspections to monitor the effectiveness of the service water chlorination programs.. The inspector reviewed correspondence and photographs of plant equipment that documented

"before" and "after" results of this program with the "before" pictures showing a greater accumulation of biofouling and corrosio Previous to th.is inspection, the licensee had replaced all service water piping in containment with AL-6X and'AL-6XN high grade stainless stee The inspector determined that the licensee had formulated plans for replacing service water piping outside of containment during an upcoming outag Lastly, the licensee was in the process of developing layup procedures for key components of the service water system to prevent MIC in potential stagnant areas of the system. These procedures were to cover the layup of systems during outages and the layup of system components isolated during normal plant operatio. Semiannual Effluent Reports (84750)

The inspector reviewed the semiannual radioactive effluent reports for 198 This review included an examination of the liquid and gaseous effluent data for 1988 as compared to the 1987 and 1986 data, and is summarized in Attachment 1 of this repor Environmental monitoring procedure EMP-010, Effluent and Waste Disposal Report, Rev. 4, dated October 26, 1988, discussed the method for preparing the semiannual effluent report This procedure was complete and well organize Liquid fission and activation product discharges were well below the Region II average for 198 Liquid tritium discharges for 1988, however, were slightly above the Region II average. This was attributable to the fact that Robinson does not recycle liquid radwaste for reuse in the plant. A comparison of liquid tritium and gross alpha discharaes for 1988 to 1987, and 1986 data showed no significant trend Liquid fission and activation products, however, did show slight increases during 1986, 1987, and 198 Gaseous fission and activation product releases were also well below the Region II average for 198 This was attributed to good fuel integrit Dose equivalent Iodine-131 values during the latest fuel cycle beginning in March 1989, indicated that this trend should continue. A comparison of gaseous iodine, particulate, and tritium discharges for 1988 to 1987, and 1986 data showed no significant trend Fission and activation gases, however, showed slight increases over the perio For 1988, Robinson liquid and gaseous effluents were well within TSs, 10 CFR 50, and 10 CFR 20 effluent limitation. Non-Radiological Confirmatory Measurements (84750)

The inspector submitted a series of non-radiological chemistry samples to the licensee for analysis to assess the capability of the chemistry staff to perform acceptable analyse These "unknowns" were prepared for the NRC by Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL).

The licensee diluted the samples, as directed 'by the inspector, to bring the concentrations' to within. the ranges. normally observed in the condensate, feedwater, or reactor coolant and were then analyzed by three different chemist The results were presented in Attachment.

Staffing There had been no major changes in the Chemistry Department staff since the last inspection in this are An upcoming company wide reorganization, however, could reuslt in significant changes and will be closely followed, in the future by the inspecto.

Plant Tour This inspection also included a informal tour of the plant site as an aide to inSpector familiarizatio As part of this tour, several plant systems were reviewed and the locations of several effluent monitors were identifie Overall, the inspector was impressed with the general housekeeping at the plan.

Exit Interview The inspection scope and results were summarized on August 4,.1989, with those persons indicated in Paragraph 1. The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection -results listed abov Proprietary information is not contained in this repor Dissenting comments were not received from the license ATTACHMENT 1 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE SUMMARY H. B. ROBINSON Abnormal Releases 1988 1987 1986

0 1 Liquid 1. Fission and Activation products 9.64E-01 9.36E-01 1.81E-01 2. Tritium 5.36E+02 2.47E+02 3.42E+02 3. Gross Alpha

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD b. Gaseous 1. Fission and Activation Gases 1.04E+03 7.70E+02 6.59E+02 2. Iodines 1.07E-03 2.08E-02 9.71E-03 3. Particulates 2.76E-05 1.56E-05 2.05E-04 4. Tritium 7.66E+00 1.39E-01 9.66E+00

  • ATTACHMENT 2 NON-RADIOLOGICAL COMPARISON RESULTS H. B. ROBINSON Analysis Dilution NRC Value Licensee 2 sigma 3 sigma Analyte Method 1:X

+/-2 sigma (3 sigma)

Value Agreement Agreement Fluoride 87A IC 1000 22.5 +/- 4.1 (6.2)

2 A A

87B IC 1000 42.3 +/- 3.6 (5.3)

3 D A

87C IC 1000 82.8 +/- 7.0 (10.4)

7 A A

Chloride 87A IC 1000 18.5 +/- 1.4 (2.1)

1 A A

87A IC 1000 37.3 +/- 2.4 (3.6)

3 A A

87A IC 1000 76.5 +/- 6.3 (9.4)

8 D A

Sulfate 87A IC 1000 19.5 +/- 2.0 (2.9)

2 D A

87A IC 1000 38.3 +/- 2.9 (4.4)

3 A A

87A IC 1000 78.0 +/- 8.2 (12.4)

7 A A

ori 7D Titration None 1040 +/- 21 (31)

995 D

D 7E Titration Non +/- 62 (93)

2958 D

D 87F Titration None 5000 +/- 120 (180)

4946 A

A Ammonia 87M Spe +/- 10 (15)

109 A

A 87N Spe +/- 29 (43)

297 A

A 870 Spe.

1000 492 +/- 46 (69)

498 A

A Hydrazine 87P Spe.9 +/- 0.6 (0.9)

2 D D

87Q Spe.9 +/- 6.1 (9.1)

5 A A

87R Spe +/- 8 (12)

9 A A

Silica 87S Spe.8 +/- 7.8 (11.7)

A A

87T Spe +/- 8 (11.2)

D D

87U Spe +/- 9 (14.1)

136 D

D Iron 87G AA 2000 18.6 +/- 1.2 (1.8)

1 D A

87H AA 2000 39.8 +/- 3.90 (5.9)

4 A A

871 AA 2000 58.5 +/- 7.3 (10.9)

5 A A