IR 05000261/1981009
| ML14176A606 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Robinson  |
| Issue date: | 04/01/1981 |
| From: | Blake J, Herdt A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML14176A605 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-261-81-09, 50-261-81-9, NUDOCS 8105150048 | |
| Download: ML14176A606 (5) | |
Text
gR o
UNITED STATE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 Report. No. 50-261/81-09 Licensee: Carolina-Power and. Light. Company 411 Fayetteville. Street Rafeigh, NC 27602 FaciTity Name:
H. B'. Robinson Docket No. 50-261 License No. DPR-23 Inspection at H.,.. Ro inson site near Hartsville, SC Inspector,
_
_
_
_
- r ke Date Signed Approved by
_____
A. R. Herdt, Section Chief Date Signed Engineering Inspection Branch Engineering and Technical Inspection Division SUMMARY Inspected on March, 17-20 198 Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved 28 inspector-hours onsite in the areas of inservice inspection program; inservice inspection records; licensee event reports; IE Bulletin responses; and previously identified. inspection finding Results Of the. 5 areas inspected, no vio-lationscor deviations-were-identifie REPORT DETAILS 1. Persons Contacted Licensee. Employees
- R. B. Starkey, Jr.,. SiteManager J*.
M. Curley, Engineering Supervisor M-. F. Pages, Engineering Supervisor D. H. Bauer,, QA Supervisor W. Farmer, Inservice Inspection Coordinator Other licensee employees contacted included several technicians, operators, security force members, and office personne NRC Resident Inspector S. Weiss
- Attended exit interview 2. Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on March 20, 1981 with thosew persons indicated in paragraph-1 abov The inspector and site manager discussed-the effects that the-recent CP&L reorganization might have on the, si t..
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Open)
Unresolved Item (K50-261/79-25-01)
OBE/DBE Design Comparison. The licensee is providing a discussion of OBE/DBE design-comparison in the IE Bulletin 79-14 report which is due to be sent to RIT by March 31, 198 This item remains open pending receipt and review of that repor (Closed) Noncompliance (50-261/79-25-02) Inadequate QA-Records to IEB 79-1 CP&L's letter of response dated: January 8, 1980 has-been reviewed and determined to be acceptable by Region IL. The inspector held discussions with Engineering. Supervision at: thez site, and examinedthe corrective actions as stated in the letter of respons The inspector concluded that CP&L had determined the full extent of the-subject. noncompliance, performed the necessary survey-and. followup: actions to correct the, present conditions and" developed the necessary corrective, actions to preclude recurrence of similar circumstances.,The corrective actions identified in the letter of' response have, been implemente (Open) Noncompliance. (50-261/79-25-03) Failure, to Identify All Pipe Supports and Restraints as. Specified in IEB 79-1 CP&L letter of response dated January 8,- 1980 has been-reviewed and determined to be acceptable by Region II. The inspector held discussions with-Engineering: Supervision at the site and found that a report on IEB-79-14-, being-finalized for submittal to: R11, wilT verify complete corrective action on this item-., This-item remains open pending receipt. and. review of the. repor (Closed)
Noncompliance (50-261/80-24-01) Failure to Establish Adequate Procedures. CP&L.'s letter-of response dated November 12, 1980 has been reviewed and determined to be acceptable by Region I. The inspector held discussions, with Engineering Supervision at the site and. examined the corrective actions-as stated in the letter of respons The inspector concluded that CP&L had determined the full extent of the subject. noncom pliance, performed the necessary survey and followup actions to correct the present conditions and. developed the necessary corrective actions to pre clude recurrence of similar circumstances.. The corrective actions identi fied in the letter of response have been implemente (Closed)
Noncompliance (50-261/80-24-02)
Failure to Follow Procedure CP&L's letter of response dated. November 12, 1980 has been reviewed and determined to be acceptable by Region I The inspector held discussion with Engineering Supervision at the site and examined the corrective actions as stated in the letter of respons The inspector concluded that CP&L. had determined the full extent of the subject noncompliance, performed the necessary survey and followupactions.,to correct the present conditions and developed the necessary corrective actions to preclude recurrence of similar circumstance The correctivet actions-identified in the letter of response have been implemente (Open) Unreso:lved Item. (50-261/80-24-03)
Cross ReferenceChecks of New Loads of Reanalyzed Safety Related Piping System This item-was discussed with Ehgineering Supervision at the site. The inspector was informed that this topic is discussed in the report being prepared for submittal concerning IEB 79-14. This item remains open pending receipt and review of this repor (Closed)
Unresolved Item (50-261/80-24-04)
Proper Use and Installation of U-Bolt The licenseeprocedures were-modified to provide specific controls on the installation of U-Bolt This item is close.
.Unresolved Items Unresolved items-were not identified during-this inspectio. Inservice Inspection Program The. licensee submitted. a revised, inservice inspection and test program, applicable to the second 120-month interval beginning March 7, 1981. This program was submitted by CP&L letter-Serial No. No-81-444 dated March 10, irA
198 The program, as submitted, did not contain the weld and component section-, only a commitment-to develop-and submit this section prior-to January 1,. 198 The-inspector-reviewed: the submittal for-potential impact on the licensee's site maintenance and periodic test progra Discussions were held with the site QA supervisor,. site--manager,, and. engineering-supervisors,, pointing out the need to careful.y. review the impact of their-commitment-that the program be implemente& effective April 1, 198 One impact of updating to, the 77 Revision with 78 Summer Addenda-of ASME B&PV Code-Section XF is that station personnel doing operability inspections of pumps, valves, snubbers, supports., etc.-., now have to be-certified as visual inspectors in accordance with the requirements of Section-X There were no violations or deviations discovered during this part of the inspectio.
Inservice Inspection Records The inspector reviewed a part of the inservice inspection records which have been generated: during the ten years that the plant has been in commercial operation OThis-review is an ongoing inspection until after the completion of the next refueling outage which has been designated as. the outage-to complete the first 120-month interval inspection There-were no violations or-deviations noted. during this phase of the inspectior.
Review of Licensee Event Reports (LERs)
The inspector reviewedLER No. 79-12 for-consistency with the requirements of Technical Specification Section.The. inspector examined the Ticensee's analysis of the event; reviewed the corrective action taken, and discussed the LER with licensee representatives and the NRC resident inspecto This LER,_ dated. May 21, 1979, reported pipe support. failures on the safety injection line between the pump header and the-boron injection tan The
.LER stated that the apparent cause of the failure-was-due-to water hammer, and further stated-that the-investigation to, identify. the. source of the water hammer would continue-.
A review of Plant Nuclear Safety Committee (PNSC)
files by the! resident inspector turned up memo from the Engineering Supervisor to the PNSC on the subject of Safety Injection-Line Pipe Support, dated November8, 197 This memo traced the same problem identified in LER 79-12, but included IIU
details on how air was most probably trapped in the line to produce a water hammer and,. further-. stated what precautions would be made in the future to ensure that no. air is left in the lin This memo-to, the PNSC in conjunction with-the. LER, report provided sufficien information to'justify closing this LE Therewere no violations. or deviations in this: area of inspection.
IE Bulletin Responses The inspector reviewed the licensees responses to the following IE Bulle tin (Open)
IE Bulletin 79-13, Re. The Revision 2 to the Bulletin added additional inspection-requirements which were to be conducted at the nex outage and the results reported to the Commissio The inspections were conducted during the 1980 outage and the radiographs were reviewed at the site by an RIL inspector (see RII Report No. 50-261/80-23). Because of the review of the radiographs by RII, the licensee apparently felt that ful filled the-Bulletin requirement for submittal of inspection result The licensee agreed to correct this inadvertent omission by submitting a formal response as soon as possible.. This Bulletin will remain open pending receipt and review of the formal repor (Closed) IE Bulletin 80-0 The inspector reviewed the licensee's response to the, Bulletin and the response referenced. FSAR section The inspector agrees that thedesign, of the H., B. Robinson penetrations is not of the type addressed by the Bulleti There-were no. violations or deviations in this.area of the inspection.