CNS-16-069, Submittal of Emergency Plan, Revision 16-2

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Submittal of Emergency Plan, Revision 16-2
ML16286A641
Person / Time
Site: Catawba  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/10/2016
From: Simril T
Duke Energy Carolinas
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
CNS-16-069
Download: ML16286A641 (89)
v • d • e


Text

'ifom:Simtil

\VicefRresiderit (Catawbafl\Jucilear'.Station iD.Like!Ener,gy tCNOIE\'/P i I ~.800 cconcord iRoad

\'l(ork, 'SC '.29'745 i0: i803.,10~ ;3340

!f: i803.i7lM:3221 CNS-16-069 10CFR50.54(q)

October 10, 2016 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

SUBJECT:

Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Catawba Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos.: 50-413 and 50-414 Emergency Plan, Revision 16-2 Enclosed for NRC staff use is Revision 16-2 to the Catawba Nuclear Station Emergency Plan.

All changes have been specifically highlighted (side-barred). These revisions are effective on September 12, 2016.

These revisions are being submitted in accordance with 10CFR50.54 (q) and are not a reduction in the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan. The 10CFR50.54 (q) Evaluations are provided as .

By copy of this letter, two copies of this document are being provided to the NRC, Region II.

If there are any questions, please call Tom Arlow at (803) 701-4027.

Very truly yours, Tom Simril Vice President, Catawba Nuclear Station Attachments: 1. 10CFR50.54 (q) Evaluation

2. Plan Update Instructions
3. Emergency Plan Revision 16-2

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission October 10, 2016 Page Two xc: (with attachments)

Catherine Haney, Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region II Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1257 xc: (w/o attachments)

Michael Orenak NRC Project Manager (CNS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North, Mail Stop 0-8G9A 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Joseph D. Austin Senior Resident Inspector (CNS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Catawba Nuclear Site

!DukeJEnergy (QNOWP ii 4800t:GoncordfRoa:d

.,itorkJSC .29.'745 0(!;t©.1Derr 1l©i,, 2EM!63:

MEMO~INJIDil!.JiM.

Subj;ect: Catawba Nuclearr Station Emelig:emcy !Plain IR:evi1sion 16-2 Encl0sed is Catawba Nudear Station Emergency IPtan !Revision 116-2. Plan Update h1strnctibns arre provided for incorporat~ng this revision into the Catawba Nudear Station Emergency Pl'an.

1,f you have any questions. please call me at 803-701-4027.

Sincerely, Tom Arlow Emergency Preparedness Manager Catawba Nuclear Station

Catawba Nuclear Station Emergency Plan Revision 16-2 Attachment 1 10CFR50.54(q) Evaluation

,\

~ EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)

Rev.1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 1of4

<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form>>

. **.J .. *:

,, . ._; : . Sqre~niog.an~Eva1uation,N,1,Jmo~r / *;:  ;

)~ppliha~I~. Si~~!5 .: *. :o . ,. *-;..  ;*

BNP 0 EREG#: 2057469 CNS

.. *.*  ; 'l  :. .*. ' . ,.

., .; ' *. ' *' / ~ . ' *. ',

' \

Part I. Description of Activity Being Reviewed (event or action, or series of actions that may result in a change to the emergency plan or affect the implementation of the emergency plan):

Section B.3 changed from:

"B.3 Emergency Coordinator (Line of Succession)

The Emergency Coordinator function as described above in paragraph B.2 will later be assumed by the EOF Director at the Emergency Operations Facility as this organization is staffed and ready to take over its functions."

to "B.3 Emergency Coordinator (Line of Succession)

The Emergency Coordinator functions as described above in paragraph B.2 will later be assumed by the TSC Emergency Coordinator and/or the EOF Director at the Emergency Operations Facility as these organizations are staffed and ready to take over its functions."

Part II. Activity Previously Reviewed? Yes 10 No I*

Is this activity Fully bounded by an NRG approved 10 CFR 50.90 submittal or 10 CFR 50.54(q) Continue to Alert and Notification System Design Report? Effectiveness Attachment 4 Evaluation is not , 10 CFR If yes, identify bounding source document number or approval reference and required. Enter 50.54(q) ensure the basis for concluding the source document fully bounds the proposed justification Screening change is documented below: below and Evaluation complete Form, Part Ill Attachment 4, Justification:

Part V.

Bounding document attached (optional) 10

  • 'I t

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)

Rev.1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 2 of 4

<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form>>

I* '"',

'"* ..: '.'> ~ **, " .

Part Ill. Editorial Change Is this activity an editorial or typographical change only, such as formatting, Yes lo No I

  • 10 CFRSO.S4(q) Continue to paragraph numbering, spelling, or punctuation that does not change intent? Effectiveness Attachment 4, Evaluation is not Part IV and required. Enter address non Justification:

justification and editorial complete changes Attachment 4, PartV & VI.

' '*. ~ '

"'~

    • .* " ~ ' ,.'# ,,>' " *" ***

Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (Reference Attachment 1, Considerations for Addressing Screening Criteria)

Does this activity involve any of the following, including program elements from NUREG-06S4/FEMA REP-1 Section II? If answer is yes, then check box.

1 1.0 CFR. s6.47.(b)(1)Assigilitl13nfofRespqrisiJ?ilhy (prganization coritrcily, * ":

1a Responsibility for emergency response is assigned.

  • 1b The response organization has the staff to respond and to augment staff on a continuing basis D (24-7 staffing) in accordance with the emergency plan.

2.*' 1o CF.R ~Q:47(b)(2) Qnsiie Emerge'ncY, Organization 2a Process ensures that onshift emergency response responsibilities are staffed and assigned D 2b The process for timely augmentation of onshift staff is established and maintained.

3 *, *;tO Cf~.S0.4 "Z(b)(3) Emergency.Response Support apd ges9urc.es

' ",  : '". , \' . ,*(; ", ," ,' * , '. / ~. '",, - ,* * ."".: -'. ',,':*,. - ** ,' '"* / ',,' ', * * '""-.w 3a Arrangements for requesting and using off site assistance have been made. D 3b State and local staff can be accommodated at the EOF in accordance with the emergency plan. D (NA for CR3) 1cj .~i=R .$0 Ai{b)( 4.) Emf3r9ency. .c1asslfitat!on ~yst~m 4 '

4a A standard scheme of emergency classification and action levels is in use. D

{Requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM.)

1oGF~ S0.4;7(b)(5) Nqtjficatioh ty113thod§'and;Proced.ure~

§ .,

" ~*

Sa Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of initiating notification D of the declared emergency within 1S minutes (60 minutes for CR3) after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notification.

Sb Administrative and physical means have been established for alerting and providing prompt instructions D to the public within the plume exposure pathway. (NA for CR3)

Sc The public ANS meets the design requirements of FEMA-REP-10, Guide for Evaluation of Alert and D Notification Systems for Nuclear Power Plants, or complies with the licensee's FEMA-approved ANS design report and supporting FEMA approval letter. (NA for CR3)

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)

Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 3 of 4

<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form>>

Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.)

6 10CFR50.47(b)(6) Emergency Communications 6a Systems are established for prompt communication among principal emergency response D organizations.

6b Systems are established for prompt communication to emergency response personnel. D 7 10 CFR 50.47(b)(7) Public Education and Information

?a Emergency preparedness information is made available to the public on a periodic basis within the D plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone (EPZ). (NA for CR3) 7b Coordinated dissemination of public information during emergencies is established. D 8 10 CFR 50.47(b)(8) Emergency Facilities and Equipment 8a Adequate facilities are maintained to support emergency response. D 8b Adequate equipment is maintained to support emergency response. D 9 10 CFR 50.4 7(b )(9) Accident Assessment 9a Methods, systems, and equipment for assessment of radioactive releases are in use. D 10 10 CFR 50.47(b)(10) Protective Response 10a A range of public PARs is available for implementation during emergencies. (NA for CR3) D 10b Evacuation time estimates for the population located in the plume exposure pathway EPZ are available D to support the formulation of PARs and have been provided to State and local governmental authorities.

(NA for CR3) 10c A range of protective actions is available for plant emergency workers during emergencies, including D those for hostile action events.

10d Kl is available for implementation as a protective action recommendation in those jurisdictions that D chose to provide Kl to the public.

11 10 CFR 50.47(b)(11) Radiological Exposure Control 11a The resources for controlling radiological exposures for emergency workers are established. D 12 10 CFR 50.47(b)(12) Medical and Public Health Support 12a Arrangements are made for medical services for contaminated, injured individuals. D 13 10 CFR 50.47(b)(13) Recovery Planning and Post-accident Operations 13a Plans for recovery and reentry are developed. D 14 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14) Drills and Exercises 14a A drill and exercise program (including radiological, medical, health physics and other program areas) D is established.

14b Drills, exercises, and training evolutions that provide performance opportunities to develop, maintain, D and demonstrate key skills are assessed via a formal critique process in order to identify weaknesses.

14c Identified weaknesses are corrected. D 15 10 CFR 50.47(b)(15) Emergency Response Training 15a Training is provided to emergency responders. D

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)

Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 4 of 4

<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form>>

Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.)

10 CF~,soA7(1:>)(:1 !)) Erjl~rgency ~l~hMai0tenan¢e jf,) ',-

  • * ~. ,, ' <'

',,/n '" ~d ' ;

16a Responsibility for emergency plan development and review is established. D 16b Planners responsible for emergency plan development and maintenance are properly trained. D

~' "

PART IV. Conclusion If no Part IV criteria are checked, a 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation is not required, then complete D

Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part V. Go to Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q)

Screening Evaluation Form, Part VI for instructions describing the NRC required 30 day submittal.

If any Attachment 4, 10CFR50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part IV criteria are checked, then complete Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part V and perform a 10 CFR 50.54(q)

  • Effectiveness Evaluation. Shaded block requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM .
  • F>a.rt ,v. ~ig6atures: .. "*,, '* ... ; ',.

~"

".*.". ' / ,',' ' '> ," ,*

Preparer Name (Print): P~igna~ure: . . Date:

Staci Fischer - -*~~ 08/30/2016 Reviewer Name (Print): Reviewer Signature: Date:

White, Jeffery M. (electronic signature attached) 8/30/2016 Approver (EP Manager) Name (Print): Approver Signature: Date:

Ar/ow, Tom A. (electronic signature attached) 8/30/2016 Approver (CFAM, as required) Name (Print) Approver Signature: Date:

Part VI. NRC Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedure Submittal Actions Create two EREG General Assignments.

to Licensing.

  • One for Licensing to submit the 10 CFR 50.54(q) information to the NRC within 30 days after the change is put in effect.

(~ DUKE Duke Energy

~ ENERGY.

ACTION REQUEST - 02057 469 Action Request Assignment Attributes Action Request Assignment Routing/Return Comments Routing Comments from the X601 Panel Updated On Updated By

      • No Routing Comments Found ***

Routing Comments from the X602 Panel Updated On Updated By

      • No Return Comments Found ***

Action Request Assignment Completion Approval I

Route list  : 001 Route List Initiator  : 144004 Send Send Action Action Passport Fae Group Type Date Time Taken Date Time Last Name 180034 A 08/30/2016 08:58 APPROVED 08/30/2016 09:05 WHITE TAA7322 A 08/30/2016 09:05 APPROVED 08/30/2016 15:23 ARLOW JBT7317 08/30/2016 08:58 09/13/2016 10:47 TEASDELL 144004 08/30/2016 08:58 08/30/2016 08:58 FISCHER Action Request Assignment Cause/Action Action Request Assignment Reference Documents Doc Sub Minor Facility Type Type Document Sheet Rev Rev Title Action Request Assignment Reference Equipment Equip Equip Equip Equip Rev Facility Unit System Type Number Tag Status Rev Status

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)

Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 1 of 10

<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form>>

Screening and Evaluation Number Applicable Sites BNP D EREG#: _ _2057469 CNS

Part I. Description of Proposed Change:

Section B.3 changed from:

"B.3 Emergency Coordinator (Line of Succession)

The Emergency Coordinator function as described above in paragraph B.2 will later be assumed by the EOF Director at the Emergency Operations Facility as this organization is staffed and ready to take over its functions."

to "B.3 Emergency Coordinator (Line of Succession)

The Emergency Coordinator functions as described above in paragraph B.2 will later be assumed by the TSC Emergency Coordinator and/or the EOF Director at the Emergency Operations Facility as these organizations are staffed and ready to take over its functions." , 10 CFR 50.54(q) Initiating Condition (IC) and Emergency Action Level (EAL) and EAL Yes D Bases Validation and Verification (V&V) Form , is attached (required for IC or EAL change) No

Rev.1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 2of10

<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form>>

Part II. Description and Review of Licensing Basis Affected by the Proposed Change:

Three licensing basis documents were reviewed for applicability, 1) the Catawba Emergency plan, Revision 2, as the original plan approved by the NRC, 2) the current Catawba Emergency plan, revision 148, and 3) "Duke Power Company Response to Supplement 1 to NUREG-0737, Emergency Response Capability for Catawba Nuclear Station, Volume 1."

Applicable sections of the Emergency Plan titled, "Catawba Nuclear Station Emergency Plan, revision 2 - January 1983:

Section A, Assignment of Responsibility, and section B, Onsite Emergency Organization.

Section A.1.b, Concept of Operations, states, "All emergencies or accident situations at the station are handled initially by the Shift Supervisor. When an abnormal situation occurs, the Shift Supervisor is able, utilizing station operating and emergency procedures and from background training and experience, to determine if the abnormal situation is an emergency condition. During the course of the emergency condition and as response personnel are notified, and emergency centers are activated (O.S.C., T.S.C., C.M.C), the Shift Supervisor is the person in charge, and assumes the position of the Emergency Coordinator until the arrival of the Station Manager.

When the Station Manager arrives and relieves the Shift Supervisor of the Emergency Coordinator function, he becomes the person in charge or the decision maker. When the Crisis Management center (CMC) is activated and operational, the Recovery Manager at the CMC is responsible for company emergency response. The Control Room at the station is the initial center for coordination of the emergency response for all emergency conditions. For emergencies classified as Alert, Site Emergency and General Emergency, the Emergency Coordinator shall activate the Technical Support Center (TSC) and the Crisis Management Center (CMC).

The TSC acts in support of the command and control function of the Control Room and provides an area for other station personnel who have expertise in all areas of plant operation to support the emergency condition ...

As the C.M.C. becomes operational, it will assume many of the functions of the T.S.C. and will rely on the T.S.C. as a vital link to the station. The T.S.C. will provide the C.M.C. with up-to-date plant parameters, which will allow this facility to perform its assigned tasks in accordance with the Crisis Management Plan."

Section A.1.d, Key Decision Making, states, "During the course of any emergency condition at Catawba, several persons have the potential to be "in charge" or to be the "Key Decision Maker". Prior to the T.S.C. activation and arrival of the Station Manager, the Shift Supervisor becomes the Emergency Coordinator at the Station and is in charge. When the Station Manager arrives on-site and assumes the Emergency Coordinator positions, he becomes the person in charge of emergency response and becomes the key decision maker. After C.M.C. is activated and becomes operational, the Recovery Manager is responsible for company emergency response."

Section 8.2, Station Emergency Coordinator, states, "Initial activities at Catawba during any emergency condition are directed by the Shift Supervisor from the Control Room. The Shift Supervisor shall assume the functions of the Emergency Coordinator until the arrival of the Station Manager or his designee at which time the Station Manager will assume the responsibility of the Emergency Coordinator. The Emergency Coordinator will have the authority and responsibility to immediately and unilaterally initiate any emergency actions including:

a. Provide protective action recommendations to authorities responsible for implementing off-site emergency measures. This authority shall not be delegated to other elements of the emergency organization.

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)

Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 3of10

<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form>>

Part II. Description and Review of Licensing Basis Affected by the Proposed Change (continued)

b. Notification and activation of the Station, Corporate, County/City, South Carolina, North Carolina and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission emergency organizations having a response role.
c. Continued assessment of actual or potential consequences both on-site and off-site throughout the evolution of the emergency condition.
d. Effective implementation of emergency measures in the environs including protective actions for affected areas, implementation of emergency monitoring teams and facilities to evaluate the environmental consequences of the emergency condition, prom pt notification and communications to off-site authorities.
e. Continued maintenance of an adequate state of emergency preparedness until the emergency situation has been effectively managed and the station is returned to a normal or safe operating condition."

Section B.3, Station Emergency Coordinator (Line of Succession), states, "The Emergency Coordinator function as described above in paragraph B.2 will later be assumed by the Recovery manager as the Crisis Management Center as this corporate organization is staffed and ready to take over its functions. This assumption of the Emergency Coordinator functions will take place for the Alert, Site Area Emergency and General Emergency categories."

Section B.4, Protective Action Recommendation, states, "The functional responsibilities of the Emergency Coordinator as described in paragraph B.2. Protective Action recommendations to state and local authorities is initially vested with the Shift Supervisor/Emergency Coordinator. As the Crisis Management Center becomes operational, the Recovery Manager is the person who is responsible for making protective action recommendations."

The current revision of the Catawba Emergency Plan is revision 148. The following sections are affected by the change described in this evaluation:

Section A.1.b, Concept of Operations, states "All emergencies or accident situations at the station are handled initially by the Shift Manager. When an abnormal situation occurs, the Shift Manager is able, utilizing station operating and emergency procedures and from background, training and experience, to determine ifthe abnormal situation is an emergency condition. During the course of the emergency condition and as response personnel are notified, and emergency centers are staffed (OSC, TSC, EOF), the Shift Manager is the person in charge, and assumes the functions of the Emergency Coordinator until the arrival of the Station Manager/designee. When the Station Manager/designee arrives and relieves the Shift Manager of the Emergency Coordinator function, he/she becomes the person in charge or the decision-maker. When the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) is activated and operational, the EOF Director at the EOF is responsible for company emergency response. The Control Room at the station is the initial center for coordination of emergency response for all emergency conditions. For emergencies classified as Alert, Site Area Emergency and General Emergency, the Emergency Coordinator shall activate the Emergency Response Organization. The TSC acts in support of the command and control function of the Control Room and provides an area for other station personnel who have expertise in all areas of plant operation to support the emergency response.

After the EOF is operational and activated, it will assume many of the functions of the TSC and will rely on the TSC as a vital link to the station. The TSC will provide the EOF with up-to-date plant parameters, which will allow this facility to perform its assigned tasks."

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)

Rev.1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 4of10

<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form>>

Part II. Description and Review of Licensing Basis Affected by the Proposed Change (continued)

Section A.1.d Key Decision-Making, states, "During the course of any emergency condition at Catawba, several persons have the potential to be "in charge" or to be the "Key Decision Maker". Prior to TSC activation and arrival of the Station Manager/designee, the Shift Manager assumes the functions of the Emergency Coordinator at the Station and is in charge. When the Station Manager/designee arrives on-site and assumes the Emergency Coordinator function, he/she becomes the person in charge of emergency response and becomes the key decision-maker. After EOF is operational and activated, the EOF Director is responsible for company emergency response."

Section B.2 Emergency Coordinator, states, "Initial activities at Catawba during any emergency condition are directed by the Operations Shift Manager from the Control Room. The Operations Shift Manager shall assume the functions of the Emergency Coordinator until the arrival of the Station Manager/designee at which time the Station Manager/designee will assume the functions of the Emergency Coordinator. The Emergency Coordinator will have the authority and the responsibility to immediately and unilaterally initiate any emergency actions including:

a. Provide protective action recommendations to authorities responsible for implementing off-site emergency measures, implement event classification, notification, and event escalation/de-escalation/termination. THIS AUTHORITY SHALL NOT BE DELEGATED TO OTHER ELEMENTS OF THE EMERGENCY ORGANIZATION.
b. Notification and activation of the Station, Corporate, County/City, South Carolina, North Carolina and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission emergency organizations having a response role.
c. Continued assessment of actual or potential consequences both on- site and off-site throughout the evolution of the emergency condition.
d. Effective implementation of emergency measures in the environs including protective actions for affected areas, implementation of emergency monitoring teams and facilities to evaluate the environmental consequences of the emergency condition, prompt notification and communications with off-site authorities.
e. Continued maintenance of an adequate state of emergency preparedness until the emergency situation has been effectively managed and the station is returned to a normal or safe operating condition."

Section B.3 Emergency Coordinator (Line of Succession), states, "The Emergency Coordinator function as described above in paragraph B.2 will later be assumed by the EOF Director at the Emergency Operations Facility as this organization is staffed and ready to take over its functions."

Section B.4 Functional Responsibilities of the Emergency Coordinator "The functional responsibilities of the Emergency Coordinator are described in paragraph B.2. Protective Action recommendations to state and local authorities is initially vested with the Operations Shift Manager/

Emergency Coordinator. As the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF} becomes operational, the EOF Director is the person who is responsible for making protective action recommendations."

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)

Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 5of10

<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form>>

Part 11. Description and Review of Licensing Basis Affected by the Proposed Change (continued)

Duke Power Company Response to Supplement 1 to NUREG-0737, Emergency Response Capability for Catawba Nuclear Station, Volume 1 does not contain applicable sections related to assignment of responsibility or augmentation of the onsite ERO.

RIS 2005-02, Revision 1, states that for the purposes of determining whether a change to a licensee's emergency plan constitutes a decrease in effectiveness, the licensee should use the last emergency plan reviewed and approved by the NRC. If the emergency plan change process has been properly implemented over the years, comparing a proposed emergency plan change to either the latest emergency plan reviewed and approved by the NRC or the emergency plan as changed by the licensee should result in the same decrease in effectiveness determination. The original Emergency Plan citations are listed to illustrate the differences between the last emergency plan reviewed and approved by NRC, revision 2, and the emergency plan as changed by the licensee, revision 148. Changes include variations in the titles of the ERO facilities and ERO positions. No significant changes that alter the intent of these sections have been made over the course of the revisions.

Part Ill. Description of How the Proposed Change Complies with Regulation and Commitments.

If the emergency plan, modified as proposed, no longer complies with planning standards on 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements in Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50, then ensures the change is rejected, modified, or processed as an exemption request under 10 CFR 50.12, Specific Exceptions, rather than under 10 CFR 50.54(q):

The change related to the responsibility for classification affect 10 CFR 50.47(b)(1) and 10 CFR 50.47(b)(2) 10 CFR 50.47(b)(1 ), "Primary responsibilities for emergency response by the nuclear facility licensee and by State and local organizations within the Emergency Planning Zones have been assigned, the emergency responsibilities of the various supporting organizations have been specifically established, and each principal response organization has staff to respond and to augment its initial response on a continuous basis."

10 CFR 50.47(b)(2), "Onshift facility licensee responsibilities for emergency response are unambiguously defined, adequate staffing to provide initial facility accident response in key functional areas is maintained at all times, timely augmentation of response capabilities is available and the interfaces among various onsite response activities and offsite support and response activities are specified."

Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50 Section IV.A (applicable excerpts only):

A. Organization The organization for coping with radiological emergencies shall be described, including definition of authorities, responsibilities, and duties of individuals assigned to the licensee's emergency organization and the means for notification of such individuals in the event of an emergency. Specifically, the following shall be included:

1. A description of the normal plant operating organization.
2. A description of the onsite emergency response organization (ERO) with a detailed discussion of:
a. Authorities, responsibilities, and duties of the individual(s) who will take charge during an emergency;
b. Plant staff emergency assignments;
c. Authorities, responsibilities, and duties of an onsite emergency coordinator who shall be in charge of the exchange of information with offsite authorities responsible for coordinating and implementing offsite emergency measures.

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)

Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 6of10

<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form>>

Part Ill. Description of How the Proposed Change Complies with Regulation and Commitments (continued)

3. A description, by position and function to be performed, of the licensee's headquarters personnel who will be sent to the plant site to augment the onsite emergency organization.

Conclusion The changes related to the responsibility of classification continue to comply with Regulations and Commitments because the authorities, responsibilities and duties (Classification, Notification and Protective Action Recommendations) remain unambiguously defined as assigned to the Shift Manager, the TSC Emergency Coordinator, or the EOF Director, dependent upon which emergency facilities are activated/operational.

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)

Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 7of10

<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form>>

Part IV. Description of Emergency Plan PLANNING STANDARDS, FUNCTIONS AND PROGRAM ELEMENTS Affected by the Proposed Change (Address each function identified in Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part IV of associated Screen):

The change related to the responsibility for classification affect 10 CFR 50.47(b)(1) and 1 OCFR 50.47(b)(2)

PLANNING STANDARDS The regulation at 10 CFR 50.47(b){1) states the following:

"Primary responsibilities for emergency response by the nuclear facility licensee and by State and local organizations within the Emergency Planning Zones have been assigned, the emergency responsibilities of the various supporting organizations have been specifically established, and each principal response organization has staff to respond and to augment its initial response on a continuous basis."

The regulation at 10 CFR 50.47(b)(2) states the following:

"[Onshift] " .. .facility licensee responsibilities for emergency response are unambiguously defined, adequate staffing to provide initial facility accident response in key functional areas is maintained at all times, timely augmentation of response capabilities is available and the interfaces among various onsite response activities and offsite support and response activities are specified."

FUNCTIONS Two emergency planning functions have been defined for 10 CFR 50.47(b)(1 ):

(1) Responsibility for emergency response is assigned.

(2) The response organization has the staff to respond and to augment staff on a continuing basis (i.e.,

2417 support) in accordance with the emergency plan.

Two emergency planning functions have been defined for 10 CFR 50.47(b){2):

(1) The process ensures that onshift emergency response responsibilities are staffed and assigned.

(2) The process for timely augmentation of onshift staff is established and maintained.

Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50 Section IV.A provides supporting requirements (applicable excerpts only):

A. Organization The organization for coping with radiological emergencies shall be described, including definition of authorities, responsibilities, and duties of individuals assigned to the licensee's emergency organization and the means for notification of such individuals in the event of an emergency. Specifically, the following shall be included:

1.A description of the normal plant operating organization.

2. A description of the onsite emergency response organization (ERO) with a detailed discussion of:
c. Authorities, responsibilities, and duties of the individual{s) who will take charge during an emergency;
d. Plant staff emergency assignments;
c. Authorities, responsibilities, and duties of an onsite emergency coordinator who shall be in charge of the exchange of information with offsite authorities responsible for coordinating and implementing offsite emergency measures ..

3.A description, by position and function to be performed, of the licensee's headquarters personnel who will be sent to the plant site to augment the onsite emergency organization.

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q)

Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 8of10

<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form>>

Part IV. Description of Emergency Plan PLANNING STANDARDS, FUNCTIONS AND PROGRAM ELEMENTS Affected by the Proposed Change (Address each function identified in Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part IVofassociatedScreen)(continued): .. __ _ _ _ _ ___________ _

PROGRAM ELEMENTS Section II.A of NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, Rev 1, contains the following informing criteria:

II, A. Assignment of Responsibility (Organization Control) (applicable excerpts only) 1a. Each plan shall identify the State, local, Federal and private sector organizations (including utilities), that are intended to be part of the overall response organization for Emergency Planning Zones.

1b. Each organization and sub-organization having an operational role shall specify its concept of operations, and its relationship to the total effort.

Section 11.8 of NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, Rev 1, contains the following informing criteria:

II, 8. Onsite Emergency Organization

1. Each licensee shall specify the onsite emergency organization of plant staff personnel for all shifts and its relation to the responsibilities and duties of the normal staff complement.
2. Each licensee shall designate an individual as emergency coordinator who shall be on shift at all times and who shall have the authority and responsibility to immediately and unilaterally initiate any emergency actions, including providing protective action recommendations to authorities responsible for implementing offsite emergency measures.
3. Each licensee shall identify a line of succession for the emergency coordinator position and identify the specific conditions for higher level utility officials assuming this function.
4. Each licensee shall establish the functional responsibilities assigned to the emergency coordinator and shall clearly specify which responsibilities may not be delegated to other elements of the emergency organization. Among the responsibilities which may not be delegated shall be the decision to notify and to recommend protective actions to authorities responsible for offsite emergency measures.

Part V. Description of Impact of the Proposed Change on the Effectiveness of Emergency Plan Functions:

Two emergency planning functions have been defined for 10 CFR 50.47(b)(1 ):

(1) Responsibility for emergency response is assigned.

(2) The response organization has the staff to respond and to augment staff on a continuing basis (i.e.,

24/7 support) in accordance with the emergency plan.

Two emergency planning functions have been defined for 10 CFR 50.47(b)(2):

(1) The process ensures that onshift emergency response responsibilities are staffed and assigned.

(2) The process for timely augmentation of onshift staff is established and maintained The change related to the responsibility of classification continues to comply with Emergency Plan Functions because the responsibilities (Classification, Notification and Protective Action Recommendations) remain unambiguously defined as assigned to the Shift Manager, the TSC Emergency Coordinator, or the EOF Director, dependent upon which emergency facilities are activated/operational.

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)

Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 9of10

<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form>>

Part VI. Evaluation Conclusion.

Answer the following questions about the proposed change.

1 Does the proposed change comply with 10 CFR 50.47(b) and 10 CFR 50 Appendix E? Yes* NoD 2 Does the proposed change maintain the effectiveness of the emergency plan (i.e., no Yes* NoD reduction in effectiveness)?

3 Does the proposed change maintain the current Emergency Action Level (EAL) scheme? Yes* NoD 4 Choose one of the following conclusions:

a The activity does continue to comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, and the activity does not constitute a reduction in effectiveness or change in the current Emergency Action Level (EAL) scheme. Therefore, the activity can be implemented without prior NRC

  • approval.

b The activity does not continue to comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b) or 10 CFR 50 Appendix E or the activity does constitute a reduction in effectiveness or EAL scheme change. D Therefore, the activity cannot be implemented without prior NRC approval.

Part VII. Disposition of Proposed Change Requiring Prior NRC Approval Will the proposed change determined to require prior NRC approval be either revised or rejected?

IYesD I NoD If No, then initiate a License Amendment Request in accordance 10 CFR 50.90 and AD-LS-ALL-0002, Regulatory Correspondence, and include the tracking number:

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)

Rev.1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 10of10

<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form>>

Part VIII. Signatures: EP CFAM Final Approval is required for changes affecting risk significant planning standard 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4).

Preparer Name (Print): Pre~a~: . ..svfv___,

Date:

Staci Fischer 8/31/2016 Reviewer Name (Print): Reviewer Signature: Date:

White, Jeffery M. (electronic signature attached) 8/31/2016 Approver (EP Manager) Name (Print): Approver Signature: Date:

Ar/ow, Tom A. (electronic signature attached) 8/31/2016 Approver (CFAM, as required) Name (Print): Approver Signature: Date:

If the proposed activity is a change to the E-Plan or implementing procedures, then create two EREG General Assignments.

  • to Licensing. -
  • One for Licensing to submit the 10 CFR 50.54(q) information to the NRC within 30 days after the change is put in effect.

l_~ DUKE Duke Energy

~ ENERGY.

ACTION REQUEST - 02057469 Action Request Assignment Routing/Return Comments Routing Comments from the X601 Panel Updated On Updated By Section 5 changes 20160830 180034 Routing Comments from the X602 Panel Updated On Updated By

      • No Return Comments Found ***

Action Request Assignment Completion Approval Route list  : 001 Route List Initiator : 144004 Send Send Action Action Passport Fae Group Type Date Time Taken Date Time Last Name 180034 A 08/30/2016 14: 17 APPROVED 08/30/2016 14:18 WHITE 180034 A 08/30/2016 12:42 RETURNED 08/30/2016 13:54 WHITE TAA7322 A 08/30/2016 14:18 APPROVED 08/30/2016 15:23 AR LOW JBT7317 08/30/2016 14:17 09/13/2016 10:47 TEASDELL 144004 08/30/2016 14:17 08/30/2016 14:17 FISCHER Action Request Assignment Cause/Action Action Request Assignment Reference Documents Doc Sub Minor Facility Type Type Document Sheet Rev Rev Title Action Request Assignment Reference Equipment Equip Equip Equip Equip Rev Facility Unit System Type Number Tag Status Rev Status Action Request Assignment Cross References Ref Ref Ref RefNbr Limit Type Nbr Sub Type Status AS Cls Description

.\

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)

Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 1 of 5

<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form>>

Screening and Evaluation Number Applicable Sites BNP D EREG #: _ _ _ _ _.2057467_ _ __ CNS

  • CR3 D HNP D MNS D SAD #: _ _ _ _2053611 _ __ ONS D RNP D GO D Document and Revision Catawba Emergency Plan, Section E, Revision 147 (PRR 2047642)

Part I. Description of Activity Being Reviewed (event or action, or series of actions that may result in a change to the emergency plan or affect the implementation of the emergency plan):

Part I. Description of Proposed Change:

Section E.2.a changed "Operations Shift Manager" to "Shift Manager" changed "Public Affairs" to "Corporate Communications" Section E.2.c, second NOTE changed "Operations Shift Manager" to "Shift Manager" Figure E-1 Replaced the entirety of the figure with a new Emergency Notification Form (ENF).

Line by Line review of the ENF changes:

  • Added a note above Line 1 that reads "Lines 1 - 6 are required for INITIAL Notifications"
  • Line 1 - Added "Event" to the beginning of the Line. Changed "Actual Event" to "Actual Declaration"
  • Added the option to select termination in Line 1
  • Deleted the option to select "Initial" or "Follow-up"
  • Old Line 3, new Line 2, "Site" revised to "Affected Site"
  • New Line 4, removed "Based On." "EAL#" EAL Description remains in Line 4.
  • Added "Termination Date and Time (mark "N/A" for EAL# &Description)" to Line 4.
  • Old Line 6, new Line 5, changed "Emergency Release" to "Release to the Environment (caused by the emergency)"
  • Added a note below Line 6, "Lines 7-11 are NOT required for INITIAL notifications. Lines 7-11 may be provided separately for follow-up notifications"
  • Deleted Line 7, "Release Significance"
  • Old Line 8, new Line 7, "Event Prognosis" revised to "Prognosis: Upgrade in classification or PAR changes is likely before the next follow- up notification DYes DNo"
  • Old Line 11 "Affected Unit(s)" and old Line 12 "Unit Status", new Line 8, deleted the note "(Unaffected unit(s) Status not required for initial notifications)"

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)

Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 2 of 5

<< 10 CFR 50.54{q) Screening Evaluation Form>>

  • Old Line 14, new Line 10, "Release Characterization" revised to "Airborne Release Characterization"
  • Deleted the following from old Line 14, "Other:" "Form: Airborne Start Time, Date, and Time, Stop Time and Date", as well as, "Liquid Start Time Date, and Stop Time, Date"
  • Old Line 15 new Line 11, "Projection Parameters" revised to "Dose Projection"
  • New Line 15, added the words "(ORO use Only)" to this Line Part II. Activity Previously Reviewed? Yes ID No I*

Is this activity Fully bounded by an NRC approved 10 CFR 50.90 submittal or 10CFR Continue to Alert and Notification System Design Report? 50.54(q) Attachment 4, Effectiveness 10 CFR If yes, identify bounding source document number or approval reference and Evaluation is 50.54(q) ensure the basis for concluding the source document fully bounds the proposed not required. Screening change is documented below: Enter Evaluation justification Form, Part Ill below and Justification:

complete Attachment 4, Part V.

Bounding document attached (optional) 10 Part Ill. Editorial Change Yes lo No I*

Is this activity an editorial or typographical change only, such as formatting, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Continue to paragraph numbering, spelling, or punctuation that does not change intent? Effectiveness Attachment 4, Evaluation is not Part IV and required. Enter address non Justification:

justification and editorial complete changes Attachment 4, Part V & VI.

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)

Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 3 of 5

<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form>>

Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (Reference Attachment 1, Considerations for Addressing Screening Criteria)

Does this activity involve any of the following, including program elements from NUREG-06S4/FEMA REP-1 Section II? If answer is yes, then check box.

The following changes in position titles neither meet the definition of editorial, as described in AD-EP-ALL-0602, nor do these changes affect any of the planning standards listed below. The change in title from "Operations Shift Manager" to "Shift Manager" does not affect the responsibilities, qualifications or training, et al, for this position. This position remains as the on-shift Emergency Coordinator as described in the regulations and licensing basis. The change in title from "Public Affairs" to "Corporate Communications" is a similar change in title only, and does not affect responsibilities, qualifications or training, et al.

Section E.2.a changed "Operations Shift Manager" to "Shift Manager" changed "Public Affairs" to "Corporate Communications" Section E.2.c, second NOTE changed "Operations Shift Manager" to "Shift Manager" 1 10 CFR S0.4 7(b )( 1) Assignment of Responsibiiity (Organization Control) 1a Responsibility for emergency response is assigned. D 1b The response organization has the staff to respond and to augment staff on a continuing basis D (24-7 staffing) in accordance with the emergency plan.

2 10 CFR S0.47(b)(2) Onsite Emergency Organization 2a Process ensures that onshift emergency response responsibilities are staffed and assigned D 2b The process for timely augmentation of onshift staff is established and maintained. D 3 10CFR S0.47(b)(3) Emergency Re!:!ponse Support and Resources -

3a Arrangements for requesting and using off site assistance have been made. D 3b State and local staff can be accommodated at the EOF in accordance with the emergency plan. D (NA for CR3) 4 10CFR S0.47(b)(4) Emergency Classification System 4a A standard scheme of emergency classification and action levels is in use. D (Requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM.)

s 10 CFR_ S0.47(b)(S) Notificatign _Methods and Procedures Sa Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of initiating notification of the declared emergency within 1S minutes (60 minutes for CR3) after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notification.

Sb Administrative and physical means have been established for alerting and providing prompt instructions D to the public within the plume exposure pathway. (NA for CR3)

Sc The public ANS meets the design requirements of FEMA-REP-10, Guide for Evaluation of Alert and D Notification Systems for Nuclear Power Plants, or complies with the licensee's FEMA-approved ANS design report and supporting FEMA approval letter. (NA for CR3)

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) .' Rev.1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 4 of 5

<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form>>

Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.)

.o 6.:.t*. ~ CFR 5o)i7(b}(6) Em'ergency.cprnf!lµnic~tions .. " .. . . *... .. "'"'

6a Systems are established for prompt communication among principal emergency response D organizations.

6b Systems are established for prompt communication to emergency response personnel. D li.7:.

', , ~

' *1

' q: Cf .4 f R $0 7(b)(f) *Pµblic:: Educat(oll: ci.~d nfo~rnaJion *..

.' / :- ' ' .,.

7a Emergency preparedness information is made available to the public on a periodic basis within the D plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone (EPZ). (NA for CR3) 7b Coordinated dissemination of public information during emergencies is established. D 1o:cFR 50.47(b)(8) E:rnerg~ncyFacilities'.an<t:Equipf11.enf ... ',.,.

8..-

' ' ,~

8a Adequate facilities are maintained to support emergency response. D 8b Adequate equipment is maintained to support emergency response. D Q j o .CFR.50.4:7(6}($) :Acci~entA~s~ssmen( .* ..  :  ;.

9a Methods, systems, and equipment for assessment of radioactive releases are in use. D

  • .10 : *.1d GF.R 50.47(b)(fo) ProtectiveResi:>ons~. * " '* .

10a A range of public PARs is available for implementation during emergencies. (NA for CR3) D 10b Evacuation time estimates for the population located in the plume exposure pathway EPZ are available D to support the formulation of PARs and have been provided to State and local governmental authorities.

(NA forCR3) 10c A range of protective actions is available for plant emergency workers during emergencies, including D those for hostile action events.

10d Kl is available for implementation as a protective action recommendation in those jurisdictions that D chose to provide Kl to the public.

~1 1o *cF*R 5b:47(b)(,1 j ). Radjologicaf Exposure Control. : ...

11a The resources for controlling radiological exposures for emergency workers are established. D 1~ . JO CFR 5.0*.41(q )(t,.2) *IYl~.dical and. Public i-f.ealth' Stl!Jp:or(  ;*

12a Arrangements are made for medical services for contaminated, injured individuals. D 1.3 *, 1o CFR.50.4l(b)(1.3) RE:lcov~ry,Plan~ing aridPost,-,acddentOperations . .'

13a Plans for recovery and reentry are developed. D 14 . JO CFR50.47(b.)04)Drills and E~ercises .. . ' . *.* ~"  :, .. .. ..

14a A drill and exercise program (including radiological, medical, health physics and other program areas) D is established.

14b Drills, exercises, and training evolutions that provide performance opportunities to develop, maintain, D and demonstrate key skills are assessed via a formal critique process in order to identify weaknesses.

14c Identified weaknesses are corrected. D 15 10CFR 50.4 7(b )( 15) Emergency Res po rise Training 15a Training is provided to emergency responders. D

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)

Rev.1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 5 of 5

<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form>>

Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.)

16 10'CFR.50.47{b)0{,)) Emerger:icy Plan Ma,intenanc;e , , *, "<< *\

16a Responsibility for emergency plan development and review is established. D 16b Planners responsible for emergency plan development and maintenance are properly trained. D PART IV. Conclusion If no Part IV criteria are checked, a 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation is not required, then complete D , 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part V. Go to Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q)

Screening Evaluation Form, Part VI for instructions describing the NRC required 30 day submittal.

If any Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part IV criteria are checked, then complete , 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part V and perform a 10 CFR 50.54(q)

  • Effectiveness Evaluation. Shaded block requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM.

Part V. Signatures: ,, ~ ,, , > , "

Preparer Name (Print): Preparer Sign~re: Date:

Staci Fischer

'79.rzt.u H~ 08/31/2016 Reviewer Name (Print): Reviewer Signature: Date:

White, Jeffery M. (electronic signature attached) 08/31/2016 Approver (EP Manager) Name (Print): Approver Signature: Date:

Ar/ow, Tom A. (electronic signature attached) 08/31/2016 Approver (CFAM, as required) Name (Print) Approver Signature: Date:

Part VI. NRC Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedure Submittal Actions Create two EREG General Assignments.

to Licensing.

  • One for Licensing to submit the 10 CFR 50.54(q) information to the NRC within 30 days after the change is put in effect.

/.~ DUKE Duke Energy

~ ENERGY.

ACTION REQUEST - 02057467 08/31/2016 TAA7322 COMPLETE Action Request Assignment Attributes Action Request Assignment Routing/Return Comments Routing Comments from the X601 Panel Updated On Updated By

      • No Routing Comments Found ***

Routing Comments from the X602 Panel Updated On Updated By

      • No Return Comments Found ***

Action RequestAssignment Completion Approval Route list  : 001 Route Listlnitiator : 144004 Send Send Action Action Passport Fae Group Type Date Time Taken Date Time Last Name 180034 A 08/31/2016 11 :53 APPROVED 08/31/2016 13:18 WHITE TAA7322 A 08/31/2016 13:18 APPROVED 08/31/2016 19:19 ARLOW JBT7317 08/31 /2016 11 :53 09/1 3/2016 10:46 TEASDELL 144004 08/31 /2016 11 :53 08/31/2016 11 :53 FISCHER Action Request Assignment Cause/Action Action Request Assignment Reference Documents Doc Sub Minor Facility Type Type Document Sheet Rev Rev Title Action Request Assignment Reference Equipment Equip Equip Equip Equip Rev Facility Unit System Type Number Tag Status Rev Status

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)

Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 1 of 12

<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form>>

Screening and Evaluation Number Applicable Sites BNP D EREG#: _ _2057467 CNS

Part I. Description of Proposed Change:

Figure E-1 Replaced the entirety of the figure with a new Emergency Notification Form (ENF).

Line by Line review of the ENF changes:

  • Added a note above Line 1 that reads "Lines 1 - 6 are required for INITIAL Notifications"
  • Line 1 - Added "Event" to the beginning of the Line. Changed "Actual Event" to "Actual Declaration"
  • Added the option to select termination in Line 1
  • Deleted the option to select "Initial" or "Follow-up"
  • Old Line 3, new Line 2. "Site" revised to "Affected Site"
  • New Line 4. Removed "Based On." "EAL#" EAL Description remains in Line 4.
  • Added "Termination Date and Time (mark "N/A" for EAL# &Description)" to Line 4 .
  • Old Line 6 new Line 5. Changed "Emergency Release" to "Release to the Environment (caused by the emergency)"
  • Added a note below Line 6: "Lines 7-11 are NOT required for INITIAL notifications. Lines 7-11 may be provided separately for follow-up notifications"
  • Deleted Line 7 "Release Significance"
  • Old Line 8, new Line 7 "Event Prognosis" revised to "Prognosis: Upgrade in classification or PAR changes is likely before the next follow- up notification DYes DNo".
  • Old Line 11 "Affected Unit(s)" and old Line 12 "Unit Status", new Line 8, deleted the note "(Unaffected unit(s) Status not required for initial notifications)".
  • Old Line 14, new Line 10, "Release Characterization" revised to "Airborne Release Characterization"
  • Deleted the following from old Line 14 - "Other:" "Form: Airborne Start Time, Date, and Time, Stop Time and Date", as well as, "Liquid Start Time Date, and Stop Time, Date".
  • Old Line 15 new Line 11, "Projection Parameters" revised to "Dose Projection"
  • New Line 15 added the words "(ORO use Only)" to this Line , 10 CFR 50.54( q) Initiating Condition (IC) and Emergency Action Level (EAL) and EAL Yes D Bases Validation and Verification (V&V) Form , is attached (required for IC or EAL change) No

Rev.1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 2of12

<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form>>

Part II. Description and Review of Licensing Basis Affected by the Proposed Change:

Three licensing basis documents were reviewed for applicability, 1) the Catawba Emergency plan, Revision 2, as the original plan approved by the NRG, 2) the current Catawba Emergency plan, revision 148, and 3) "Duke Power Company Response to Supplement 1 to NUREG-0737, Emergency Response Capability for Catawba Nuclear Station, Volume 1."

Applicable sections of the Emergency Plan titled, "Catawba Nuclear Station Emergency Plan", revision 2 - January 1983:

Section E, Notification Methodology Section E.2.a., Notification of Unusual Event, states, "The Emergency Coordinator will assure prompt notification of State and Local offsite authorities (State and all County Warning Points, or Emergency Operations Centers if established), the NRG Operations Center via the Emergency Notification System, the Senior Station NRG representative and the Construction Project Manager of the Unusual Event and the reason for the emergency for any initiating condition or implementation of any emergency procedure listed in Figure D-1.

NOTE: Notification format and message authentication technique to offsite authorities shall be in accordance with the appropriate emergency procedure (See Figure E-1 )"

Section E.2.b., Alert, states, "The Emergency Coordinator will assure prompt notification of State and Local offsite authorities (State and all County Warning Points, or Emergency Operations Centers if established), the NRG Operations Center via the Emergency Notification System, the Senior Station NRG representative and the Construction Project Manager of the Alert and the reason for the emergency for any initiating condition or implementation of any emergency procedure listed in Figure D-2.

NOTE: Notification format and message authentication technique to offsite authorities shall be in accordance with the appropriate emergency procedure (See Figure E-1 )"

Section E.2.c., Site Area Emergency, states, "The Emergency Coordinator will assure prompt notification of State and Local offsite authorities (State and all County Warning Points, or Emergency Operations Centers if established), the NRG Operations Center via the Emergency Notification System, the Senior Station NRG representative and the Construction Project Manager of the Site Area Emergency and the reason for the emergency for any initiating condition or implementation of any emergency procedure listed in Figure D-3.

NOTE: Notification format and message authentication technique to offsite authorities shall be in accordance with the appropriate emergency procedure (See Figure E-1 )"

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)

Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 3of12

<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form>>

Part II. Description and Review of Licensing Basis Affected by the Proposed Change (continued):

Section E.2.c., General Emergency, states, "The Emergency Coordinator will assure prompt notification of State and Local offsite authorities (State and all County Warning Points, or Emergency Operations Centers if established), the NRC Operations Center via the Emergency Notification System, the Senior Station NRC representative and the Construction Project Manager of the General Emergency and the reason for the emergency for any initiating condition or implementation of any emergency procedure listed in Figure D-4.

NOTE: Notification format and message authentication technique to offsite authorities shall be in accordance with the appropriate emergency procedure (See Figure E-1 )"

Section E.3, Emergency Message Format (Initial), states, "Figure E-1, Warning Message: Nuclear Facility to State/Local Government contains information about the class of emergency, whether a release is taking place, the potentially affected areas and whether protective actions may be necessary."

Section E.4, Emergency message Format (Follow- Up), states, "Figure E-1, Warning Message: Nuclear Facility to State/Local Government contains provisions for follow-up information if it is known and appropriate."

Figure E-1 is the initial and followup warning message form.

The current revision of the Catawba Emergency Plan is revision 148. The following sections are affected by the change described in this evaluation:

Section _E, Notification Methodology Section E.2.a, Notification of Unusual Event, Section E.2.b, Alert, Section E.2.c, Site Area Emergency, and Section E.2.d, General Emergency, all sections contain:

"The Operations Shift Manager shall assure prompt notification of Federal, State and Local off-site authorities:

1. North Carolina Warning Point (Raleigh, NC)
2. South Carolina Warning Point (Columbia, SC)
3. York County Warning Point (Rock Hill, SC)
4. Gaston County Warning Point (Gastonia, NC)
5. Mecklenburg County Warning Point (Charlotte, NC)
6. NRC Operations Center (Rockville, MD)

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)

Rev.1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 4of12

<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form>>

Part II. Description and Review of Licensing Basis Affected by the Proposed Change (continued):

Notification format and message authentication technique to off-site authorities shall be in accordance with applicable Catawba Nuclear Station Emergency Response Procedures."

Section E.3 Emergency Message Format (Initial)

Figure E-1, Emergency Notification contains information about the class of emergency, whether a release is taking place, the potentially affected areas and whether protective actions may be necessary.

Section E.4 Emergency Message Format (Follow-Up)

Figure E-1, Emergency Notification contains provisions for follow-up information if it is known and appropriate.

Figure E-1 is the Nuclear Power Plant Emergency Notification Form.

"Duke Power Company Response to Supplement 1 to NUREG-0737, Emergency Response Capability for Catawba Nuclear Station, Volume 1," does not contain applicable sections related to the format of the emergency notification.

RIS 2005-02, Revision 1, states that for the purposes of determining whether a change to a licensee's emergency plan constitutes a decrease in effectiveness, the licensee should use the last emergency plan reviewed and approved by the NRC. If the emergency plan change process has been properly implemented over the years, comparing a proposed emergency plan change to either the latest emergency plan reviewed and approved by the NRC or the emergency plan as changed by the licensee should result in the same decrease in effectiveness determination. The original Emergency Plan citations are listed to illustrate the differences between the last emergency plan reviewed and approved by NRC, revision 2, and the emergency plan as changed by the licensee, revision 148. No significant changes that alter the intent of these sections have been made over the course of the revisions.

Part Ill. Description of How the Proposed Change Complies with Regulation and Commitments.

If the emergency plan, modified as proposed, no longer complies with planning standards on 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements in Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50, then ensures the change is rejected, modified, or processed as an exemption request under 10 CFR 50.12, Specific Exceptions, rather than under 10 CFR 50.54(q):

The change to the notification methodology affects 10 CFR 50.47(b)(5) 10 CFR 50.47(b) (5), "Procedures have been established for notification, by the licensee, of State and local response organizations and for notification of emergency personnel by all organizations; the content of initial and follow-up messages to response organizations and the public has been established; and means to provide early notification and clear instruction to the populace within the plume exposure pathway Emergency Planning Zone have been established."

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)

Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 5of12

<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form >>

Part Ill. Description of How the Proposed Change Complies with Regulation and Commitments (continued)

IV.D.1. of Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50 provides supporting requirements (applicable excerpts only):

D. Notification Procedures

1. Administrative and physical means for notifying local, State, and Federal officials and agencies and agreements reached with these officials and agencies for the prompt notification of the public and for public evacuation or other protective measures, should they become necessary, shall be described. This description shall include identification of the appropriate officials, by title and agency, of the State and local government agencies within the EPZs.

Line-by-line explanations of the ENF changes are described below:

  • Added a note above line 1 that reads "Lines 1 - 6 are required for INITIAL Notifications" Clarifies that those lines are used and required for initial notifications. Subsequently, lines 7-12, are completed (as applicable) in follow-up messages.
  • Line 1 - Added "Event" to the beginning of the Line. Changed Actual Event" to Actual Declaration" "Declaration" is consistent with emergency classification and does not convey the meaning of other events that do not require classification.
  • Added the option to select termination in line 1 Easily distinguishes the type of notification is being sent.
  • Deleted the options to select "Initial" or "Follow-up" It is now understood, and agreed upon, by the states and counties that Initial forms will have lines 1-6 completed and Follow-up messages will supply additional information in lines 7-11, as applicable.
  • Old Line 3, new Line 2. "Site" revised to Affected Site" Added the word "Affected" for additional clarification.
  • New line 4. Removed the words "Based On" "EAL#" EAL Description remains in Line 4 Revised for clarification.
  • Added "Termination Date and Time (mark "NIA "for EAL# &Description)" to Line 4.

Clarifies that the EAL information is not needed for termination messages.

  • Old line 6, new line 5. "Emergency Release" revised to "Release to the Environment (caused by the emergency)"

This additional wording was made at the request of the offsite response organizations to provide additional clarification of a release.

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)

Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 6of12

<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form>>

Part Ill. Description of How the Proposed Change Complies with Regulation and Commitments (continued)

  • Added a note below line 6 that reads "Lines 7-11 are NOT required for INITIAL notifications. Lines 7-11 may be provided separately for fa/low-up notifications" This note clarifies that Initial notification form lines 7-11 will be left blank. However, lines 7-11 will be provided on follow-up notifications as applicable to the emergency declared, or could be provided by other means (e.g. WebEOC) if agreed upon by all agencies.
  • Deleted line 7 "Release Significance" Actual dose projections will be provided for any release to the environment attributable to the event on follow-up notifications. If Release to the Environment is marked for an initial, it is understood that the release is under evaluation. Removing "Under and above normal operating limits" and providing the actual dose projection information will eliminate confusion and other questions as to the sites operating limits.
  • Old Line 8 ", new line 7 "Event Prognosis revised to Prognosis: Upgrade in classification or PAR changes is likely before the next fa/low- up notification OYes ONo" Provides clarification on the prognosis of the declaration.
  • Old Line 11 Affected Unit(s)" and old Line 12 "Unit Status", new line 8, deleted the note "(Unaffected unit(s) Status not required for initial notifications)"

Unit status for all units will be provided on follow-up notifications. Affected Unit(s) by the declared emergency will be marked with a "Yes" in the check box provided in follow-up messages.

  • Old Line 14 new line 10, "Release Characterization", revised to Airborne Release Characterization" Clarifies that the release information provided will be those releases that are airborne releases and not liquid. The purpose of the Emergency Release information on the Emergency Notification Form is to provide source term information used by Duke Energy for dose assessment, provide information on the release magnitude and support the development of Protective Action Recommendations (PARs) by Duke Energy and Protective Action Decisions (PADs) by the offsite response organizations. Per Federal Guidance in EPA-400-R-92-001, Manual of Protective Action Guides and Protective Actions for Nuclear Incidents, Protective Actions Guides for the early phase are focused on protecting the public from an airborne release of radioactive materials. During the early phase of an incident, doses may accrue from both airborne and from deposited radioactive materials. The focus is external dose from direct exposure to airborne and deposited materials, and committed dose to internal organs from the inhalation of radioactive material. Protective Actions for food and water are considered Intermediate Phase, not Early Phase, actions. EPA-400-R-92-001 did not include Intermediate Phase Protective Action Guides for water as these were still being developed by EPA. Liquid releases will be reported in the remarks section of the form (new line 12) only if the liquid release extends beyond the site boundary.

I

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)

Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 7of12

<< 10 CFR 50.54(q} Effectiveness Evaluation Form>>

Part Ill. Description of How the Proposed Change Complies with Regulation and Commitments( continued)

  • Deleted the following from old line 14 - "Other:" "Form: Airborne Start Time, Date, and Time, Stop Time and Date': as well as, "Liquid Start Time Date, and Stop Time, Date" The "other" selection was not used, and there were no instructions for its use, therefore removed from the form. Start and stop times of releases are no longer used in the new methodology of dose projection. The new methodology is a snap shot of protected dose from current conditions and is independent of what has happened previously in a release.
  • Old line 15 "Projection Parameters': new line 11, revised to read "Dose Projection" Update the title.
  • New line 15 added the words "(ORO use Only)" to this line.

This line is only for use by the OROs when the form is received.

Conclusion The changes described above provide clarification of the information provided to the offsite response organizations.

These changes were discussed, negotiated and agreed to by the State and Local OROs.

The ENF, as revised, continues to comply with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(5), as the content of the initial and followup notification forms remain established, and continues to comply with 10 CFR 50 Appendix E, as administrative means for notifying local, State, and Federal officials and agencies remain described.

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)

Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 8of12

<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form>>

Part IV. Description of Emergency Plan PLANNING STANDARDS, FUNCTIONS AND PROGRAM ELEMENTS Affected by the Proposed Change (Address each function identified in Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part IV of associated Screen):

The changes related to the responsibility for classification affect 10 CFR 50.47(b)(5)

PLANNING STANDARDS The regulation at 10 CFR 50.47(b)(5) states the following:

"Procedures have been established for notification, by the licensee, of State and local response organizations and for notification of emergency personnel by all organizations; the content of initial and follow-up messages to response organizations and the public has been established; and means to provide early notification and clear instruction to the populace within the plume exposure pathway Emergency Planning Zone have been established."

Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50 Section IV.D provides supporting requirements (applicable excerpts only):

D. Notification Procedures

1. Administrative and physical means for notifying local, State, and Federal officials and agencies and agreements reached with these officials and agencies for the prompt notification of the public and for public evacuation or other protective measures, should they become necessary, shall be described. This description shall include identification of the appropriate officials, by title and agency, of the State and local government agencies within the EPZs.

FUNCTIONS Three emergency planning functions have been defined for 10 CFR 50.47(b)(5):

(1) Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of alerting them of the declared emergency within 15 minutes after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notifications.

(2) Administrative and physical means have been established for alerting and providing prompt instructions to the public within the plume exposure pathway.

(3) The public ANS meets the design requirements of FEMA-REP-10, "Guide for Evaluation of Alert and Notification Systems for Nuclear Power Plants" (Ref. 12), or is compliant with the licensee's FEMA-approved ANS design report and supporting FEMA approval letter.

PROGRAM ELEMENTS Section 11.E of NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, Rev 1, contains the following informing criteria:

II. E. Notification Methods and Procedures

3. The licensee in conjunction with State and local organizations shall establish the contents of the initial emergency messages to be sent from the plant. These measures shall contain information about the class of emergency, whether a release is taking place, potentially affected population and areas, and whether protective measures may be necessary.
4. Each licensee shall make provisions for follow-up messages from the facility to offsite authorities which shall contain the following information if it is known and appropriate:

4.a. location of incident and name and telephone number (or communications channel identification) of caller;

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)

Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 9of12

<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form>>

Part IV. Description of Emergency Plan PLANNING STANDARDS, FUNCTIONS AND PROGRAM ELEMENTS Affected by the Proposed Change (Address each function identified in Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part IV of associated Screen):

4.b. date/time of incident; 4.c. class of emergency; 4.d. type of actual or projected release (airborne, waterborne, surface spill),and estimated duration/impact times; 4.e. estimate of quantity of radioactive material released or being released and the points and height of releases; 4.f. chemical and physical form of released material, including estimates of the relative quantities and concentration of noble gases, iodines and particulates;

4. g. meteorological conditions at appropriate levels (wind speed, direction (to and from), indicator of stability, precipitation, if any);
4. h. actual or projected dose rates at site boundary; projected integrated dose at site boundary; 4.i. projected dose rates and integrated dose at the projected peak and at 2, 5 and 10 miles, including sector(s) affected;
4. j. estimate of any surface radioactive contamination in-plant, onsite or offsite;
4. k. licensee emergency response actions underway;
4. I. recommended emergency actions, including protective measures; 4.m. request for any needed onsite support by offsite organizations; and
4. n. prognosis for worsening or termination of event based on plant information.

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)

Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 10of12

<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form>>

Part V. Description of Impact of the Proposed Change on the Effectiveness of Emergency Plan Functions:

The changes to the ENF were established in conjunction with the States and Local Offsite Response Organizations (OROs). Duke Energy requested concurrence from the OROs in a letter dated April 4, 2016. Concurrences from the OROs supporting Catawba Nuclear Station were received on the following dates: Gaston County, 4/11/16; Charlotte Fire DepartmenUMecklenburg County, 4/15/16; York County, 4/18/15; State of North Carolina, 4/28/16; State of South Carolina, 4/11 /16.

Three emergency planning functions have been defined for 10 CFR 50.47(b)(5):

( 1) Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of alerting them of the declared emergency within 15 minutes after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notifications.

(2) Administrative and physical means have been established for alerting and providing prompt instructions to the public within the plume exposure pathway.

(3) The public ANS meets the design requirements of FEMA-REP-10, "Guide for Evaluation of Alert and Notification Systems for Nuclear Power Plants" (Ref. 12), or is compliant with the licensee's FEMA-approved ANS design report and supporting FEMA approval letter.

Only the first emergency plan function listed is affected by changing the ENF. The ENF continues to comply with the first 10 CFR 50.47(b)(5) Emergency Planning Function listed above, as the procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies remain capable of alerting them of the declared emergency within 15 minutes after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notifications.

In addition, all of the Emergency Planning Elements listed in NUREG-0654, Section E.3 and E.4 are included in the revised ENF.

Initial messages continue to contain information about the class of emergency, whether a release is taking place, potentially affected population and areas, and whether protective measures may be necessary.

Follow-up messag~s contain: affected site, unit, and unit status, and name and telephone number (or communications channel identification) of caller; date/time of incident; class of emergency, emergency action level and description; whether a release is occurring or has occurred; airborne release estimated duration; estimate of quantity of radioactive material released or being released and the height of releases; estimates of the relative quantities and concentration of noble gases, iodines and particulates; meteorological conditions (wind speed, direction (from), stability class, and precipitation); projected dose rates at site boundary, 2, 5 and 10 miles; licensee emergency response actions underway; recommended protective measures; and prognosis for worsening of event.

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)

Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 11 of 12

<< 10 CFR 50.54{q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form>>

Part VI. Evaluation Conclusion.

Answer the following questions about the proposed change.

1 Does the proposed change comply with 10 CFR 50.47(b) and 10 CFR 50 Appendix E? Yes* NoD 2 Does the proposed change maintain the effectiveness of the emergency plan (i.e., no Yes* NoD reduction in effectiveness)?

3 Does the proposed change maintain the current Emergency Action Level (EAL) scheme? Yes* NoD 4 Choose one of the following conclusions:

a The activity does continue to comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, and the activity does not constitute a reduction in effectiveness or change in the current Emergency Action Level (EAL) scheme. Therefore, the activity can be implemented without prior NRG

  • approval.

b The activity does not continue to comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b) or 10 CFR 50 Appendix E or the activity does constitute a reduction in effectiveness or EAL scheme change. D Therefore, the activity cannot be implemented without prior NRG approval.

Part VII. Disposition of Proposed Change Requiring Prior NRG Approval Will the proposed change determined to require prior NRG approval be either revised or rejected?

IYes D INo D If No, then initiate a License Amendment Request in accordance 10 CFR 50.90 and AD-LS-ALL-0002, Regulatory Correspondence, and include the tracking number:

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)

Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 12of12

<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form>>

. d Part VIII. Signatures: EP CFAM Final Approval is required for changes affecting risk significant planning standard 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4).

p~~!g~~~

Preparer Name (Print): Date:

Staci Fischer 08/31/2016 Reviewer Name (Print): RW!E wer Signature: Date:

White, Jeffery M. (electronic signature attached) 08/31/2016 Approver (EP Manager) Name (Print): Approver Signature: Date:

Ar/ow, Tom A. (electronic signature attached) 08/31/2016 Approver (CFAM, as required) Name (Print): Approver Signature: Date:

If the proposed activity is a change to the E-Plan or implementing procedures, then create two EREG General Assignments.

  • to Licensing. -
  • One for Licensing to submit the 10 CFR 50.54(q) information to the NRC within 30 days after the change is put in effect.

(~ DUKE Duke Energy

~ ENERGY.

ACTION REQUEST - 02057 467 Routing Comments from the X602 Panel Updated On Updated By

      • No Return Comments Found ***

Action Request Assignment Completion Approval Route list  : 001 Route List Initiator  : 144004 Send Send Action Action Passport Fae Group Type Date Time Taken Date Time Last Name 180034 A 08/31 /2016 11 :58 APPROVED 08/31 /2016 13:20 WHITE TAA7322 A 08/31 /2016 13:20 APPROVED 08/31 /2016 19:21 AR LOW JBT7317 08/31/2016 11 :58 09/13/2016 10:46 TEASDELL 144004 08/31 /2016 11 :58 08/31 /2016 11 :58 FISCHER Action Request Assignment Cause/Action Action Request Assignment Reference Documents Doc Sub Minor Facility Type Type Document Sheet Rev Rev Title Action Request Assignment Reference Equipment Equip Equip Equip Equip Rev Facility Unit System ~ Number Tag Status Rev Status Action Request Assignment Cross References Ref Ref Ref RefNbr Limit Type Nbr Sub Type Status AS Cls Description Action Request Assignment Appendices APPENDIX 1

J Catawba Nuclear Station I Emergency Plan Revision 16-2 Attachment 2 Plan Update Instructions Replace Revision 146 Cover Sheet with Revision 16-2 Cover Sheet List of Effective Pages (LOEP)

Replace entire LOEP Table of Contents Replace all pages of this section.

List of Figures Replace all pages of this section.

Introduction Replace all pages of this section.

Tab B- Site Emergency Organization Replace all pages of this section Tab E - Notification Methodology Replace all pages of this section

Catawba Nuclear Station Emergency Plan Revision 16-2 Attachment 3 Emergency Plan Revision 16-2

LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES (LOEP)

  • This page intentionally left blank .
  • Page 1 of6 Rev. 16-2 October 2016

LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES (LOEP)

EMERGENCY PLAN SECTION PAGE NUMBER REVISION NUMBER DATE Emergency Plan Approval Cover Sheet 16-1 March 2016 Table of Contents I 16-1 March 2016 2 16-1 March 2016 3 16-1 March 2016 4 16-1 March 2016 5 16-1 March 2016 6 16-1 March 2016 List of Figures, Tables and Attachments 7 16-1 March 2016 8 16-1 March 2016 9 16-1 March 2016 Introduction i-1 16-1 March 2016 i-2 16-1 March 2016 i-3 16-1 March 2016 i-4 16-1 March 2016 i-5 16-1 March 2016 i-6 16-1 March 2016 Section A A-1 16-1 March 2016 A-2 16-1 March 2016 A-3 16-1 March 2016

  • Section B A-4 A-5 B-1 B-2 B-3 16-1 16-1 16-2 16-2 16-2 March 2016 March 2016 October 2016 October 2016 October 2016 B-4 16-2 October 2016 B-5 16-2 October 2016 B-6 16-2 October 2016 B-7 16-2 October 2016 B-8 16-2 October 2016 B-9 16-2 October 2016 B-10 16-2 October 2016 B-11 16-2 October 2016 B-12 16-2 October 2016 B-13 16-2 October 2016 Section C C-1 16-1 March 2016 C-2 16-1 March 2016 Section D D-1 146 May2015 D-2 146 May2015 D-3 146 May 2015 D-4 146 May 2015 D-5 146 May 2015 D-6 146 May 2015 D-7 146 May 2015 Rev. 16-2 Page 2 of6 October 2016

LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES (LOEP)

EMERGENCY PLAN SECTION PAGE NUMBER REVISION NUMBER DATE D-8 146 May2015 D-9 146 May 2015 D-10 146 May2015 D-11 146 May 2015 D-12 146 May2015 D-13 146 May2015 D-14 146 May2015 D-15 146 May2015 D-16 146 May2015 D-17 146 May2015 D-18 146 May2015 D-19 146 May2015 D-20 146 May2015 D-21 146 May 2015 D-22 146 May 2015 D-23 146 May2015 D-24 146 May2015 D-25 146 May 2015 D-26 146 May 2015 D-27 146 May 2015 D-28 146 May 2015 D-29 146 May2015 D-30 146 May2015 D-31 146 May2015 D-32 146 May 2015 D-33 146 May2015 D-34 146 May 2015 D-35 146 May 2015 D-36 146 May2015 D-37 146 May 2015 D-38 146 May 2015 D-39 146 May 2015 D-40 146 May 2015 D-41 146 May2015 D-42 146 May 2015 D-43 146 May 2015 D-44 146 May 2015 D-45 146 May 2015 D-46 146 May 2015 D-47 146 May 2015 D-48 146 May 2015 D-49 146 May2015 D-50 146 May 2015 D-51 146 May 2015 D-52 146 May 2015 D-53 146 May 2015 D-54 146 May 2015 D-55 146 May 2015 D-56 146 May2015 D-57 146 May 2015 D-58 146 May 2015 D-59 146 May 2015 Rev. 16-2 Page3of6 October 2016

LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES (LOEP)

EMERGENCY PLAN SECTION PAGE NUMBER REVISION NUMBER DATE D-60 146 May 2015 D-61 146 May2015 D-62 146 May2015 D-63 146 May2015 D-64 146 May2015 D-65 146 May 2015 D-66 146 May2015 D-67 146 May2015 D-68 146 May2015 D-69 146 May2015 Section E E-1 147 October 2016 E-2 147 October2016 E-3 147 October 2016 E-4 147 October 2016 E-5 147 October 2016 E-6 147 October 2016 E-7 147 October 2016 E-8 147 October 2016 E-9 147 October2016 E-10 147 October 2016 E-11 147 October 2016 Section F F-1 16-1 March 2016 F-2 16-1 March 2016 16-1 March 2016 F-3 F-4 16-1 March 2016 F-5 16-1 March 2016 F-6 16-1 March 2016 F-7 16-1 March 2016 Section G G-1 14-3 June,2014 G-2 14-3 June,2014 G-3 14-3 June,2014 Section H H-1 16-1 March 2016 H-2 16-1 March 2016 H-3 16-1 March 2016 H-4 16-1 March 2016 H-5 16-1 March 2016 H-6 16-1 March 2016 H-7 16-1 March 2016 H-8 16-1 March 2016 H-9 16-1 March 2016 H-10 16-1 March 2016 H-11 16-1 March 2016 H-12 16-1 March 2016 H-13 16-1 March 2016 H-14 16-1 March 2016

  • Page 4 of6 Rev. 16-2 October 2016

LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES (LOEP)

EMERGENCY PLAN SECTION PAGE NUMBER REVISION NUMBER DATE Section I 1-1 146 May2015 1-2 146 May2015 1-3 146 May2015 1-4 146 May2015 Section J J-1 146 May2015 J-2 146 May2015 J-3 146 May2015 J-4 146 May2015 J-5 146 May2015 J-6 146 May2015 J-7 146 May 2015 J-8 146 May2015 J-9 146 May2015 SectionK K-1 14-3 June,2014 K-2 14-3 June, 2014 K-3 14-3 June,2014 K-4 14-3 June, 2014 Section L L-1 11-1 May 2011 L-2 11-1 May 2011 Section M M-1 13-1 August, 2013

  • Section N M-2 M-3 M-4 M-5 N-1 13-1 13-1 13-1 13-1 16-1 August, 2013 August, 2013 August, 2013 August, 2013 March 2016 N-2 16-1 March 2016 N-3 16-1 March 2016 Section 0 0-1 14-3 June,2014 0-2 14-3 June,2014 Section P P-1 146 May 2015 P-2 146 May2015 P-3 146 May 2015 P-4 146 May2015 P-5 146 May 2015 P-6 146 May2015 P-7 146 May 2015 Section Q Q-1 16-1 March 2016 Appendix I Q-1.1 16-1 March 2016 Q-1.2 16-1 March 2016 Q-1.3 16-1 March 2016 Q-1.4 16-1 March 2016 Rev. 16-2 Page5of6 October 2016

LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES (LOEP)

EMERGENCY PLAN SECTION PAGE NUMBER REVISION NUMBER DATE Q-1.5 16-1 March 2016 Q-1.6 16-1 March 2016 Q-1.7 16-1 March 2016 Q-1.8 16-1 March2016 Section Q, Appendix 2 Q-2.l 16-1 March 2016 Q-2.2 16-1 March 2016 Q-2.3 16-1 March 2016 Q-2.4 16-1 March2016 Appendix 3 Q-3.1 16-1 March2016 Q-3.2 16-1 March 2016 Q-3.3 16-1 March2016 Q-3.4 16-1 March 2016 Q-3.5 16-1 March2016 Appendix 4 Q-4.l 16-1 March 2016 Appendix 5 Q-5.I 16-1 March 2016 Q-5.2 16-1 March 2016

  • Page 6 of6 Rev. 16-2 October 2016
  • INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION EMERGENCY PLAN REVISION 16-2 October 2016

  • APPROVED:

Tom Simril Date Approved Site Vice President Catawba Nuclear Station Original Issue: August, 1980

DUKE ENERGY CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION EMERGENCY PLAN Table of Contents Page#

1. Introduction A. Purpose i-1 B. Scope i-1 C. Planning Basis i-2 A. Assignment of Responsibility A. I .a Organization A-1 A. I. b Concept of Operations A-3 A. I .c Block Diagram of Organization Interrelationships A-3 A. I .d Key Decision-making A-3 A. I .e 24 Hour Emergency Response A-4 A.2.a Responsibility for and Functions of Emergency Response A-4 Organization A.2.b Legal Basis for Authority A-4 A.3 Agreement Letters for Emergency Response Support from Off- A-4 Site Agencies A.4 Individual Responsible for Continuity of Resources A-4 B. Site Emergency Organization
  • B.1 B.2 B.3 B.4 B.5 B.6 Plant Staff Under Emergency Conditions Emergency Coordinator Emergency Coordinator (Line of Succession)

Functional Responsibilities of the Emergency Coordinator Minimum Staffing Requirements Site Functional Area Interfaces B-1 B-1 B-1 B-2 B-2 B-2 B.7 Augmented Suppo1t of Site Emergency Organization B-2 B.8 Contractor, Private, and Government Organizations B-3 B.9 Local Agency Suppmt Services B-4 B.9.a Law Enforcement, Emergency Traffic Control, Related Police B-5 Matters B.9.b Early Warning or Evacuation of the Populace B-5 B.9.c Radiological Emergency Monitoring Assistance B-5 B.9.d Hospitals, Medical Supp01t B-5 B.9.e Ambulance Service B-5 B.9.f Fire-fighting B-5 B.9.g Public Health and Safety, Evaluation of the Radiological B-5 Situation B.9.h Local, State and Federal Support Responsibilities B-6 C. Emergency Response Supp01t and Resources C. l .a Individuals Authorized to Request Federal Assistance C-1 C.1.b Federal Resources Arrival Time C-1 C. I .c Emergency Operations Facility Resources Available to Federal C-1 Response Organization Rev. 16-2 October 2016

C.2.a State and County Representation at the Emergency Operations C-1 Facility (EOF)

C.2.b Licensee Representation at the Off-Site EOCs C.3 C-1 Radiological Laboratories-Availability and Capability C-1 C.4 Emergency Support From Other Organizations C-2 D. Emergency Classification System D. l Emergency Classification System D-1 D. l.a Unusual Event D.l.b Alert D-1 D.l.c D-1 Site Area Emergency D.l.d D-2 General Emergency D.2 D-2 Initiating Conditions D-3 E. Notification Methodology E.l Notification of Response Organization E-1 E.2 Activation of Emergency Organization E-1 E.2.a Notification of Unusual Event E.2.b Ale11 E-1 E-2 E.2.c Site Area Emergency E-4 E.2.d General Emergency E-6 E.3 Emergency Message Format (Initial)

E-7 E.4 Emergency Message Format (Follow-up)

E-8 E.5 State and Local Organizations-Disseminating Public Inf01mation E-8 E.6 Ale11 and Notification System E-8 E. 7 Supporting Information for Public Infonnation Messages E-8 F. Emergency Communications F.1.a 24 Hom Notification Capability F-1 F. l .b Communications With State/Local Governments F-1 F. l .c Communications With Federal Organizations F-2 F. l .d Communications Between Station, EOF, Local EOCs and F-2 Monitoring Teams F.1.e Activation of Emergency Personnel F-2 F.1.f Communications Between NRC, EOF and Monitoring Teams F-2 F. l .g ERDS Data Transfer F-2 F.2 Medical Suppo11 Communications F-2 F.3 Communications System Testing F-2 G. Public Education and Information G.1 & G.2 Education and Info1mation Program Public G-1 G.3.a Nuclear Communications Location and Contacts G-1 G.3.b Nuclear Communications Media Center G-2 G.4.a Public Spokesperson G-2 G.4.b Spokesperson Information Exchange G-2 G.4.c Rumor Control G-2 G.5 News Media Training Sessions G-2 Rev. 16-2 October 2016

H. Emergency Facilities and Equipment

Control Room Technical Support Center Operations Support Center Emergency Operations Facility (EOF)

H-1 H-1 H-1 H-2 H.3 H-2 State and Local Government Emergency Operations Centers H-3 H.4 Activation and Staffing H.5 H-3 Assessment Actions H.5.a H-3 Meteorological, Hydrologic and Seismic H.5.b H-3 Radiological Monitors H.5.c H-4 Plant Parameters H.5.d H-4 Fire Detection H.6 H-4 Data, Monitoring Equipment and Analysis Facilities H-4 H.7 Off-site Radiological Monitoring H.8 H-5 Meteorology Instrumentation and Procedures H-5 H.9 Operations Support Center H-5 H.10 Emergency Equipment/Instrumentation Inspection, Inventory, H-5 Operational Check, Calibration H.11 Emergency Kits H.12 H-5 Receipt and Analysis of Field Monitoring Data H-5 I.

Accident Assessment I.I Emergency Action Level Procedures I.2 I-1 On-site Capability and Resources to Provide Initial Values and I-1 Continuing Assessment I.2.a Post Accident Sampling I-1 I.2.b Radiation and Effluent Monitors I.2.c I-2 In-plant Iodine Instrumentation 1.3.a/ I-2 Method for Dete1mining Release Source Tenn I-2 1.3.b I.4 Effluent Monitor Readings Vs On-site/Off-site Exposure I.5 I-2 Meteorological Info1mation Availability I-2 I.6 Release Rates/Projected Doses for Off-scale Instrumentation I. 7/ I-3 Field Monitoring Within EPZ I.8 I-3 I.9 Detect and Measure Radioiodine Concentration in the EPZ I.IO I-3 Relationship Between Contamination Levels and Integrated I-3 Dose/Dose Rates I.11 Plume Tracking I-4 I. Protective Response J.1.a On-site Alerting and Notification thru J.1.d J-1 J.2 Evacuation Routes and Transportation J-1 J.3 Personnel Monitoring J.4 J-1 Site Evacuation Procedures - Decontamination/Non-Essential J-2 Personnel Criteria Rev. 16-2 October 2016

J.5 Personnel Accountability J-2 J.6 Protective Measures-Breathing Apparatus, Protective Clothing, J-2 KI J.7 Protective Action Recommendations J-3 J.8 Evacuation Time Estimates J-4 J.9 Implementing Protective Measures J-5 J.9.a Carowinds: Special Consideration J-5 J.10 Implementation of Protective Measures for Plume Exposure J-5 Pathway J.10.a EPZMaps J-5 J.10.b EPZ-Population Distribution Map J-5 J.10.c EPZ-Population Alerting and Notification J-5 J.10.d EPZ-Protecting Immobile Persons J-6 J.10.e Use ofRadioprotective Drugs for Persons in EPZ J-6 J.10.f Conditions for Use of Radioprotective Drugs J-6 J.10.g State and County Relocation Plans J-6 J.1 O.h Relocation Center Locations J-6 J.1 O.i Evacuation Route - Traffic Capacities J-6 J.1 O.j Evacuated Area Access Control J-6 J.1 O.k Planning for Contingencies in Evacuation J-6 J.10.1 State/County Evacuation Time Estimates J-6 J.10.m Bases for Protective Action Recommendations J-6 J.11 Ingestion Pathway Planning J-6 J.12 Relocation Center - Registering and Monitoring J-7

  • K. Radiological K. I K.2 K.3 K.3.a Exposure Control On-site Exposure Guidelines Doses in Excess of 10CFR Pa1i 20 Emergency Persom1el Exposure and Records Distribution of Dosimetry K-1 K-1 K-1 K-1 K.3.b Dose Records K-2 K.4 State/Local Plan for Authorizing Doses Exceeding PAGs K-2 K.5 Decontamination K-2 K.5.a Action Levels for Determining the Need for Decontamination K-2 K.5.b Radiological Decontamination K-2 K.6 Contamination Control Measures K-2 K.6.a Area Access Control K-2 K.6.b Drinking Water and Food Supplies K-2 K.6.c Recove1y Effo1is K-2 K.7 Decontamination of Personnel at Relocation Assembly Area K-3 L. Medical and Public Health Supp01i L.1 Hospital and Medical Suppo1i L-1 L.2 On-site First Aid Capability L-1 L.3 Public, Private, Militaiy Hospitals, Emergency Medical L-1 Facilities L.4 Transport of Accident Victims L-2
  • Rev. 16-2 October 2016

M Recovery and Re-entry Planning and Post-Accident Operations M.1 Re-entry/Recovery Plans and Procedures M-1 M.1.a Outline of Station Recovery Plans M-1 M.1.b Outline ofRecove1y Plans M-2 M.2 Recovery Organization M-3 M.3 Information to Members of Recovery Organization M-4 M.4 Total Population Exposure Estimates M-4 N. Exercises and Drills N.1.a Exercises N-1 N.1.b Exercise Scenario/Response N-1 N.2 Drills N-1 N.2.a Communications N-1 N.2.b Fire Drills N-2 N.2.c Medical Emergency Drills N-2 N.2.d Radiological Monitoring Drills N-2 N.2.e Radiation Protection Drills N-2 N.3 Exercises and Drill Execution N-3 N.4 Exercise Critique N-3 N.5 Critique Action Items N-3

0. Radiological Emergency Response Training 0.1 Off-site Support Agency Training 0-1 0.1.a Emergency Response Training (Off-Site Supp01i Agencies) 0-1 0.1.b Emergency Response Training (State and Local Emergency 0-1
  • 0.2 0.2.a 0.2.b 0.2.c 0.2.d Planning Officials)

Emergency Organization Training Training for ERO Members Training for Security Members Training for Fire Brigade Personnel Practice Drills 0-1 0-1 0-1 0-1 0-1 0.3 First Aid Training 0-2 0.4 Training for Radiological Emergency Response Personnel 0-2 0.5 Retraining of Radiological Emergency Response Personnel 0-2 P. Responsibility for the Planning Effort P.1 Emergency Preparedness Staff Training P-1 P.2 Emergency Response Planning P-1 P.3 Station Emergency Preparedness Manager P-1 P.4 Review of Emergency Plan P-1 P.5 Distribution of Revised Plans P-1 P.6 Supporting Plans P-2 P.7 Implementing Procedures P-2 P.8 Table of Contents P-2 P.9 Audit of Emergency Plan P-2 P.10 Telephone Number Updates P-3 Rev. 16-2 October 2016

Q. Appendices Appendix Index Appendix 1 Q-1 Definitions Appendix 2 Q-1.1 Meteorological Program Appendix 3 Q-2.1 Alert and Notification System Description Q-3.1 Appendix 4 Evacuation Time Estimates Appendix 5 Q-4.1 Agreement Letters Q-5.l Rev. 16-2 October 2016

LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE NO TITLE PAGE i-1 10 Mile EPZ i-5 i-2 50 Mile EPZ i-6 A-1 Responsibility for Emergency Response Functions A-5 B-la Minimum On-Shift ERO Staffing Requirements for Emergencies B-7 B-lb Minimum Augmented ERO Staffing Requirements for Emergencies, B-8 Page 1 of2 B-lb Minimum Augmented ERO Staffing Requirements for Emergencies, B-9 Page 2 of2 B-2 Site Emergency Organization B-10 B-3 EOF Organization - Minimum Staffing Requirements B-11 B-4 Inter-Relationships of Response Organizations - Unusual Event B-12

  • B-5 E-1 F-1 Inter-Relationships of Response Organizations - Aleit, Site Area Emergency, General Emergency Emergency Notification Fonn (Page 1)

B-13 E-9 Control Room Emergency Communications Prior to TSC Activation F-3 F-2 Emergency Communications after TSC Activation and during EOF F-4 Activation F-3 Emergency Communications during EOF Activation and after EOF F-5 Activation F-4 EOF Communications Duke Emergency Management Network F-6 (DEMNET) Phone System G-1 Public Emergency Notification Brochure G-3 G-2 Deleted H-1 Catawba Nuclear Site Technical Support Center H-7 H-2 Catawba Nuclear Site Operations Supp01t Center H-8 Rev. 16-2 October 2016

FIGURE

  • NO TITLE PAGE H-3 McGuire/Catawba/Oconee EOF General Location H-9 H-4 McGuire/Catawba/Oconee EOF Specific Location H-10 H-S Catawba/EOF General Atrnngement H-11 H-6 Duke Energy Media Center H-12 H-7 Joint Infonnation Center (JIC)

H-13 H-8 Generalized Met System H-14 H-9 Deleted I-1 Deleted I-2 Guidance for Offsite Protective Actions I-8 I-3 Catawba Nuclear Station Evacuation Road Network and Nodes I-9 I-4 Deleted

  • I-Sa Deleted I-Sb Deleted I-Sc Deleted I-Sd Deleted I-Se Deleted I-SF Deleted K-1 Emergency Worker Exposure Limits K-4 M-1 Recovery Organization M-S 0-1 Deleted 0-2 Deleted P-1 Supporting Plans P-4 P-2 Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures P-S Rev. 16-2 October 2016

FIGURE NO TITLE PAGE 2-1 Catawba Nuclear Station Meteorological Parameters of the Upgraded Q-2.4 System 3-1 Siren Range in Feet Q-3.4 3-2 Siren Locations Q-3.5

  • Rev. 16-2 October 2016
  • INTRODUCTION A. PURPOSE This Emergency Plan for the Catawba Nuclear Site is established for the protection of life and prope1iy in all emergency and accident situations. It particularly applies to those radiological situations (radiation, contamination and reactor accidents) where the health and safety of station personnel and the general public may be involved; but it also includes other general industrial emergency and accident conditions involving radioactive materials such as fire, vehicular accidents, natural disasters, medical injmy or illness and industrial security.

The plan described herein will be implemented at Catawba by incorporating it into detailed station Emergency Procedures; as such, it will be coordinated with station operating, radiological control, and industrial security procedures.

B. SCOPE The Emergency Plan is a coordinated effort involving station personnel; station facilities and equipment; the emergency resources of Duke Energy corporate organizations; emergency services of various local, state and federal agencies having appropriate jurisdiction or concern for public health and safety, particularly the radiological emergency and emergency plans of local county Preparedness Agencies; South Carolina Emergency Management Division of the S.C. Adjutant General's Office, the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Bureau of Radiological Health; the North Carolina Department of Crime Control and Public Safety, and the No1ih Carolina Depaiiment of Environment, Health and Natural Resources, Division of Radiation Protection.

The Emergency Plan organization and the emergency organizations that have responsibilities in the management of an emergency condition at the station are identified throughout the Plan. The Emergency Planning Zone concept is shown in NUREG-0654, Rev. 1, and is utilized in this plan.

The key elements of the Emergency Plan include:

a. An essentially unifonn means ofrepo11ing and handling any emergency or accident situation.
b. A graded emergency classification system of increasing severity, based on specific crite1ia, Emergency Action Levels (EAL's) and a method for relating EALs to U.S. EPA Protective Action Guides (PAG's).
c. Interaction with the emergency plans of appropriate local, state and federal agencies concerned with public health and safety in the event of a reactor accident.

The Emergency Plan is compatible with facility design features, site, layout and site location, with respect to such considerations as access routes, smTOunding population distributions and lake and land use.

i-1 Rev. 16-2 October 2016

  • Agreements have been made with local, state and federal authorities for coordination of activities in the event of an emergency. Local agencies provide fire protection, medical support, and ambulance rescue service upon request. In addition, the emergency plans of the Emergency Preparedness Agencies of the counties involved provides assistance and logistical support in the event that evacuation of po1iions of the Plume Exposure Emergency Planning Zone becomes necessa1y. The disaster plans of the Emergency Preparedness Agencies in York County where the station is located, and of the Emergency Management Agencies in the adjacent counties (Mecklenburg and Gaston) as they relate to the protection of the public who may be affected by an accident situation at Catawba, all include the following aspects:
a. Notification of their own Emergency Preparedness Agency personnel and other emergency services involved in their Emergency Plans.
b. Law enforcement and traffic control.
c. Notification or warning of persons in affected areas.
d. Evacuation as necessary to designated schools or other public buildings out of the affected area, where shelter, food, overnight accommodations, medical care, etc., would be made available.
e. Assistance and cooperation with related agencies in other counties, Duke Energy and other state and federal agencies .
  • Means have been developed for notification and coordination of emergency activities with persons and groups on site as well as within the Exclusion Area, including po1iions on Lake Wylie which might be affected by an accident, as well as water authorities of nearby cities and industries downstream.

Duke Energy intends to meet all of the requirements for early warning of the public and will periodically evaluate the resources necessary to provide this capability.

Radiological emergency situations, if they occur at all, are expected for the most pmi, to be highly localized, and only station prope1iy and station personnel are subject to any potential major hazard.

Members of the public are also within the Exclusion Area at various times (highway traffic, station visitors, boating and recreation on Lake Wylie, etc.). In case of a major accidental release of radioactivity, the general public and property in the Emergency Planning Zone may also be affected. The plan includes provisions for the protection of all persons in the plume exposure pathway, as well as in the ingestion pathway, of the Emergency Planning Zone.

C. PLANNING BASIS The bases for this plan are the upgraded Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP 1, Rev. 1, and 10CFR50. The overall objective of the Emergency Plan is to provide for early detection, warning and protective action response and i-2 Rev. 16-2 October 2016

recommendations for emergency conditions at Catawba that may affect the station proper and/or off-site areas. The range of emergency conditions is very large, starting with a zero point requiring no planning at all, up to planning for the worst possible accident scenario, regardless of its extremely low likelihood. Although the planning basis is independent of specific accident scenarios, a number of emergency conditions were considered in the development of this plan, including core melt release sequences.

The planning basis also considers time frames between initial accident recognition, response actions, and recommendation of appropriate protective actions in the event a potential for, or an actual release of radioactive materials is taking place. Knowledge of the potential for and the kinds of radioactive mate1ials released, duration of the release and the time available to activate protective response on-site and off-site is important in determining what instmctions/

recommendations are to be given. Location of the population affected and communication mechanisms to those authorities responsible for activating protective action is also an important part of the planning basis.

Emergency Planning Zones With regard to the area over which planning effmis should be carried out, "Emergency Planning Zones" (EPZs) about each nuclear facility are defined both for the sho1i tenn "plume exposure pathway" and for the longer tenn "ingestion exposure pathways." EPZs are defined as the areas for which planning is needed to assure that prompt and effective actions can be taken to protect the public in the event of an accident. The state response organizations are principally responsible for the planning associated with the ingestion exposure pathway .

  • The emergency plans are related to two predominant exposure pathways. They are:
a. Plume exposure pathway -- The principal exposure sources from this pathway are: (a) external exposure to gamma radiation from the plume and from deposited material; and (b) inhalation exposure from the passing radioactive plume. The duration of the release leading to potential exposure could range from one-half hour to days. For the plume exposure pathway, shelter and/or evacuation would likely be the principal immediate protective actions to be recommended for the general public. A recommendation to administer prophylactic iodine to the public would also be considered based on radioiodine dose projections. '

The size (about 10 miles radius) of the plume exposure EPZ (refer to Figure i-1) was based primarily on the following considerations:

a. projected doses from the traditional design basis accidents would not exceed Protective Action Guide levels outside the zone;
b. projected doses from most core melt sequences would not exceed Protective Action Guide levels outside the zone;
c. for the worst core melt sequences, immediate life threatening doses would generally not occur outside the zone;
  • i-3 Rev. 16-2 October 2016
d. detailed planning within 10 miles would provide a substantial base for expansion of response effo1is in the event that this proved necessary.
b. Ingestion exposure pathway -- The principal exposure from this pathway would be from ingestion of contaminated water or foods such as milk, fresh vegetables or aquatic foodstuffs.

The duration of potential exposure could range in length from hours to months. For the ingestion exposure pathway, the planning effo1i involves the identification of major exposure pathways from contaminated food and water and the associated control and interdiction points and methods. The ingestion pathway exposures in general would represent a longer te1m problem, although some early protective actions to minimize subsequent contamination of milk or other supplies should be initiated (e.g., remove cows from pasture and put them on stored feed).

The size of the ingestion exposure EPZ (about 50 miles in radius, which also includes the I 0-mile radius plume exposure EPZ [Refer to Figure i-2]) was selected because:

a. the downwind range within which contamination will generally not exceed the Protective Action Guides is limited to about 50 miles from a power plant because of wind shifts during the release and travel periods;
b. there may be conversion of atmospheric iodine (i.e., iodine suspended in the atmosphere for long time periods) to chemical forms which do not readily enter the ingestion pathway;
c. much of any pmiiculate materials in a radioactive plume would have been deposited on the ground within about 50 miles from the facility; and
d. the likelihood of exceeding ingestion pathway protective action guide levels at 50 miles is comparable to the likelihood of exceeding plume exposure pathway protective action guide levels at I 0 miles.

The NRC has concluded that it would be unlikely that any protective actions for the plume exposure pathway would be required beyond the plume exposure EPZ. Also, the plume exposure EPZ is of sufficient size for actions within this zone to provide for substantial reduction in early severe health effects (injuries or deaths) in the event of a worst case core melt accident.

  • i-4 Rev. 16-2 October 2016
  • rncrg1mr;,.
.:;\.J.;.'.ft.\};:il<'\ :'H l1CLl::~?(J{ ST::*\.TlflN*

Ht.iiUR.11.i" I ~

9:'

'I

' j,

\

\ '

~ I

,' 4_;./

...... - ~: -'*

~ *-

~(

,,,.J/

I I

- Lo'D Of [. &'.:i.Jl'll'.ftlr/ 0 2 4 IN cind Loo~ tlu '001.:

t

  • i-5 Rev . 16-2 October 2016
  • !DUl'!li' EH f3t CA ll 1.\C WI{.!< ., l JCLEA Tl' S*l1:>i.'FHtiK lflG 1.t1 ° i ..:y 5@1M'IEID

\*...... *

E FJZ>>

, *. :~~"""~-

.... o! '

k

  • f *'

~- ")  ;.

. ~l

/.

,,- -~

'\,

__*.r

./

v

' ()_ ....* -

  • ,, ~
  • , - .r\ . . .......

0 B f

  • i-6 Rev. 16-2 October 2016
  • B.

Catawba Nuclear Station Emergency Plan Section B - Site Emergency Organization Site Emergency Organization B.1 Plant Staff Under Emergency Conditions Figure B-2 shows the emergency organization of plant staff personnel for all shifts. The relationship of these personnel to their normal responsibilities and duties is unchanged during an emergency condition.

B.2 Emergency Coordinator Initial activities at Catawba during any emergency condition are directed by the Operations Shift Manager from the Control Room. The Operations Shift Manager shall assume the functions of the Emergency Coordinator until the aiTival of the Station Manager/designee at which time the Station Manager/designee will assume the functions of the Emergency Coordinator. The Emergency Coordinator will have the authority and the responsibility to immediately and unilaterally initiate any emergency actions including:

a. Provide protective action recommendations to authorities responsible for implementing off-site emergency measures, implement event classification, notification, and event escalation/de-escalation/termination. THIS AUTHORITY SHALL NOT BE DELEGATED TO OTHER ELEMENTS OF THE EMERGENCY ORGANIZATION .
b. Notification and activation of the Station, Corporate, County/City, South Carolina, North Carolina and the Nuclear Regulatmy Commission emergency organizations having a response role.
c. Continued assessment of actual or potential consequences both on- site and off-site throughout the evolution of the emergency condition.
d. Effective implementation of emergency measures in the environs including protective actions for affected areas, implementation of emergency monitoring teams and facilities to evaluate the environmental consequences of the emergency condition, prompt notification and communications with off-site authorities.
e. Continued maintenance of an adequate state of emergency preparedness until the emergency situation has been effectively managed and the station is returned to a normal or safe operating condition.

B.3 Emergency Coordinator (Line of Succession)

The Emergency Coordinator functions as described above in paragraph B.2 will later be assumed by the TSC Emergency Coordinator and/or the EOF Director at the Emergency Operations Facility as these organizations are staffed and ready to take over its functions .

  • B-1 Rev. 16-2 September 2016
  • B.4 This assumption of the Emergency Coordinator functions will take place for the Ale11, Site Area Emergency and General Emergency categories.

Functional Responsibilities of the Emergency Coordinator The functional responsibilities of the Emergency Coordinator are described in paragraph B.2.

Protective Action recommendations to state and local authorities is initially vested with the Operations Shift Manager/ Emergency Coordinator. As the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) becomes operational, the EOF Director is the person who is responsible for making protective action recommendations.

B.5 Minimum Staffing Requirements The positions, title and major tasks to be performed by the persons assigned to the functional areas of emergency activity at the station are described in Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures. These assignments shall cover the emergency functions in Figure B-1 (a and b ).

The minimum on-shift staffing reflective of two units in operation is as indicated in Figure B-l a. The capability to augment on-shift resources after declaration of an emergency is as indicated in Figure B-1 b. The functional tasks to be performed by persons assigned to the areas of emergency activity are as designated in Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures.

A detailed analysis demonstrating that on-shift personnel assigned emergency plan implementation functions are not assigned responsibilities that would prevent the timely perfonnance of their assigned functions as specified in Figure B-1 a. See CNS-OSSA-12212012 Rev: 0 .

B.6 Site Functional Area Interfaces Figures 8-4 and 8-5 describe and specify the interfaces between and among the functional areas of emergency activity, licensee headquaiiers suppo11, local services suppo11, and state/local government response organizations. Figure B-4 is for use prior to activation of the EOF. Figure B-5 is for use after the EOF is established.

8.7 Augmented Suppo11 of Site Emergency Organization Upon declaration of an Ale11, Site Area Emergency or General Emergency, the EOF organization will be ale11ed and personnel will repo11 to the EOF as soon as possible. The EOF organization is described in Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures. The Public Affairs organization is described in the implementing procedure for nc activation. Refer to Section G for the Public Affairs function. Figure B-3 shows the minimum staff required to declare the EOF operational. The EOF will be staffed using 75 minutes as a goal for the minimum staff to be in place and operational.

In addition to the minimum staff shown in Figure B-3, other personnel are expected to report to the EOF to augment the minimum staff. This augmentation would occur gradually and would range from a few minutes to a few hours depending on the proximity of the personnel to the EOF .

Rev. 16-2 B-2 September 2016

  • B.8 The organization identified in this section is capable of continuous (24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />) operations for a protracted period. The individual responsible for assuring continuity ofresources is the EOF Director. Each group's operational plan is specified in the Emergency Plan or Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures.

Contractor, Private, and Government Organizations The Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) serves as a clearinghouse for indushy wide support during an emergency. When notified of an emergency situation at a nuclear plant, INPO will provide emergency response as requested.

INPO will be able to provide the following emergency suppot1 functions:

a. Assistance to the affected utility in locating sources of emergency manpower and equipment.
b. Analysis of the operational aspects of the incident.
c. Dissemination to member utilities of information concerning the incident.
d. Organization of industry experts who could advise on technical matters.

Ifrequested, one or more suitably qualified members of the INPO staff will report to the EOF Director and will assist in coordinating INPO's response to the emergency .

The State of South Carolina The response provided by the State of South Carolina to an emergency developing at Oconee or Catawba is described in the South Carolina Operational Radiological Emergency Response Plan. The principal state agency for mobilization of state resources to cope with an emergency is the Emergency Preparedness Division under the office of the Adjutant General.

This agency is suppo11ed by the Bureau of Radiological Health, which provides radiological assessment and protection functions, and by other state agencies.

For a Catawba emergency, the State of South Carolina would operate out of the State Emergency Operations Center (SEOC) in West Columbia, South Carolina.

The State of North Carolina The response by the State of North Carolina to an emergency development is described in the No11h Carolina Emergency Response Plan in Support of Catawba Nuclear Site.

The principal state agency for mobilization of State resources to cope with an emergency is the Division of Emergency Management. This agency is supported by the Division of Radiation Protection for radiological assessment and protection functions, and by other State agencies .

  • B-3 Rev. 16-2 September 2016
  • The state organization, when it is mobilized as the State Emergency Response Team (SERT),

becomes the primary response authority. For an emergency at Catawba, the SERT organization is established in the Emergency Operations Center in Raleigh, N.C.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission The response provided by the NRC to an emergency developing at a Duke nuclear station is described in the NRC Region II Emergency Plan. The representative of the NRC who would provide input to the EOF Director is the Region II Regional Administrator/ designee. A workspace and a telephone have been provided in the EOF for this NRC representative.

The role of the NRC in an emergency situation is to provide oversight and recommendations on licensee actions.

County Governments In an emergency situation at a nuclear station, county governments are immediately notified of the accident. They have the prima1y responsibility for the protection of the citizens within the county boundaries. The principal Duke Energy contact with county government is through the Emergency Preparedness Director or designee. This contact will be maintained by the TSC until relieved by EOF Off-Site Agency Communicators.

It is recognized that the county council, the chief executive of the county, and mayors of local communities have responsibilities in an emergency situation as well. The Government Agency Liaison on the staff of the Public Information Manager serves as the primary Duke Energy contact with these people.

Risk Management Companies Risk management companies will be notified of emergency conditions by the EOF staff.

Risk Management companies would set up claims payments and other such capabilities at facilities appropriate to the emergency.

Contractors The contractor who may be requested to respond is Westinghouse. Westinghouse will operate from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, with a small contingent at the plant.

B.9 Local Agency Support Services State, local and county agencies responsible for public health and safety work through the Emergency Preparedness Agency's Emergency Operations Center in the affected county until the State Emergency Response Team establishes its headquarters; Mecklenburg and Gaston counties, North Carolina; York Municipal-County Emergency Preparedness Agency, York County, South Carolina. The EOF coordinates with the agencies necessaiy to support the emergency condition. Agencies that have agreed to provide support, as necessary to Catawba Nuclear Station and surrounding areas, are listed below: (Agreement Letters in Appendix 5)

  • B-4 Rev. 16-2 September 2016
  • B.9.a Law Enforcement, Emergency Traffic Control, Related Police Matters I. York County Sheriffs Depa1tment (York, SC)
2. South Carolina Highway Patrol (SC Highway Patrol, Dist. 4, Chester, SC)

B.9.b Early Warning or Evacuation of the Populace

l. York County Emergency Management (Rock Hill, SC)
2. Gaston County Emergency Management (Gastonia, NC)
3. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Emergency Management Office (Charlotte, NC)
4. South Carolina Emergency Management Division (Columbia, SC)
5. No1th Carolina Depaitment ofDepa1tment of Public Safety B.9.c Radiological Emergency Monitoring Assistance
1. US/DOE Radiological Assistance Team, Savannah River Operations Office (Aiken, SC)
2. South Carolina Depa1tment of Health and Environmental Control, Bureau of Radiological Health, (Columbia, SC)
3. N 01th Carolina Depa1tment of Environment, Health and Natural Resources, Division of Radiation Protection (Raleigh, NC)
4. Civil Air Patrol, No1th Carolina Wing (Charlotte, NC)
  • B.9.d Hospitals, Medical Supp01t I.

2.

3.

4.

Piedmont Medical Center (Rock Hill, SC)

Carolinas Medical Center (Charlotte, NC)

Carolinas Emergency Medicine Specialists, P.A. (Rock Hill, SC)

REACTS Facility, DOE (Oak Ridge, TN)

B.9.e Ambulance Service I. Piedmont Medical Center (Rock Hill, SC)

B.9.f Fire-Fighting

l. Bethel Volunteer Fire Depaitment (Clover, SC)

B.9.g Public Health and Safety, Evaluation of the Radiological Situation.

I. York County Health Depaitment (Rock Hill, SC)

2. South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Bureau of Radiological Health (Columbia, SC)
3. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources, Division of Radiation Protection (Raleigh, NC)
  • B-5 Rev. 16-2 September 2016
  • 8.9.h Local, State and Federal Support Responsibilities Agreements have been made with local, state and federal agencies to provide fire protection, medical supp01t, ambulance and rescue service, and Hostile Action response. Implementation of the emergency plans of the Emergency Preparedness Agencies of three adjacent counties will provide assistance and logistics suppo1t if evacuation of portions of the ten mile EPZ becomes necessary. The emergency plans of the Emergency Preparedness Agencies in York County where the station is located, and in Mecklenburg and Gaston Counties, Nmth Carolina, as they relate to .

the protection of the public who may be affected by an emergency at Catawba, all address the following aspects:

1. Notification of their own personnel and other agencies involved, including the Sheriffs Department, the Highway Patrol, police, rescue squads, fire depmtments and the Red Cross.
2. Law enforcement and traffic control.
3. Notification or warning of persons in affected areas
4. Evacuation, as necessary, to designated schools or other public buildings out of the affected area, where shelter, food, overnight accommodations, communications, medical care, etc. would be made available .
5. Assistance and cooperation with related agencies in other counties, Duke Energy, and other state and federal agencies .
  • 8-6 Rev. 16-2 September 2016

FIGURE B-la CA TA WBA NUCLEAR STA TION MINIMUM ON-SHIFT ERO STAFFING REQUIREMENTS FOR EMERGENCIES FundionaI Area *Major Tasks Emergency Positions Unit Supervisor (SRO) I I. Plant Operations and CR Supervisor (SRO) I Assessment of Control Room Operator (RO) 3 Operational Aspects (a)

Auxiliary Operator (AO) 3

2. Emergency Direction and Command and Control Operations Shift Manager Control Licensee Operator (SRO/RO/NLO) JlbJ
3. Notification & *r::~~~iTstite***-********* - . . . . . .,. ,. *-**...................................

'6pe~-~t~~-(SROfROfNLO)'""-*****-** . --*'}"tliT'-

.....____ _, __...._,_,__......._ ..........._..........._ ,_,__ _,_._._,_,..,_, __ .._._,__, ____ _, __ _,_,,_,_.__..,..__ "'--1(6)--

Communication F ederal Operator (SRO/RO/NLO) I Tech Support - OPs Shift Technical Advisor I

5. Plant System Engineering, Repair, and *-* .......----***-~-S:?.:.~-J?..~1~~-~- §:fil!.!I~c.111~i£c:L~d-~~i.. ~:==-~=*==:==~:= ==i~:~=

Repair and Corrective Mechanical Maintenance I Corrective Actions Actions IAE Maintenance 2 Radiation Protection (such as access control, job

6. In-Plant PAs RP Qualified Individual 2(b) coverage and personnel monitoring)

Fire Brigade Lead (RO/SRO/NLO) I

7. Fire Fighting (c) Fire Brigade Member (NLO) 2 Fire Brigade Member (SPOC) 2<bl
8. I" Aid and Rescue MERT(d) 2
9. Site Access Control and Security & Accountability SAS Operator I Accountability Security Personnel (e)

Minim:Um # ot Personnel: 2~

(a) The Control Room staff complement is reflective of2 Units in operation in accordance with §50.54(m).

(b) May be performed by an individual filling another position provided they are qualified to do the collateral function.

(c) The Fire Brigade requirement of five members is met by using three personnel from Operations (including the Fire Brigade Leader) and two personnel from SPOC (SLC 16.13-1).

(d) The Medical Emergency Response Team (MERT) can be filled by any qualified technician.

(e) Per Duke Energy CNS Security Plan .

  • B-7 Rev. 16-2 September 2016

FIGURE B-lb CA TA WBA NUCLEAR STATION MINIMUM AUGMENTED ERO STAFFING REQUIREMENTS FOR EMERGENCIES PAGE 1 of2 Capability for Additions Major Functional Area Major Task Position, Title or Expertise 45 Min. 75 Min.

Emergency Direction and TSC Emergency Coordinator Control (Emergency 1 Coordinator)

Notification/Communication Notify Company Off-Site Agency Communicator 2 Personnel, State, County, Federal Agencies and Maintain Communication Emergency Operations EOF Director Senior Manager 1 Facility (EOF) Radiological Dose Assessment Radiological Assessment Manager 1 Accident Assessment and Plant Status Accident Assessment Manager l***

Support Access Control Electronic Card Reader #

Communications Off-Site Agency Communicators 2 Off-Site Surveys FMT Members (2 Teams) 4*****

Radiological Support and RP Coverage for Repair/ RP Qualified Individuals 6 Protective Actions Corrective Actions, Access Control, Search &

Rescue, Radiochemistry, Contaminated Injmy Medical Response, Personnel Monitoring, Dosimetry, Firefighting

  • Out of Plant Surveys In-Plant Surveys Dose Assessment Radwaste Operations Off-Site Dose Assessor Radwaste Operator 1

I I

1 1

(TSC)

I Plant System Engineering, Technical Support Core/Thermal Hydraulics Repair and Corrective Electrical l***

Actions Mechanical I I

Repair and Corrective Mechanical Maint. Tech. I Actions IAE Technician 2 Firefighting Fire Brigade ****

Rescue Operations and First Aid MERT ****

  • B-8 Rev. 16-2 September 2016

FIGURE B-lb CATA WBA NUCLEAR STA TION MINIMUM AUGMENTED ERO STAFFING REQUIREMENTS FOR EMERGENCIES PAGE 2 of2 The 75 minute clock begins at the time of the initial Emergency Classification. The TSC/OSC are required to be activated within the same time. The EOF must be operational within 75 minutes of the Emergency Declaration. All facilities are required to be activated at an Alert or Higher Classification.

      • The TSC Reactor Engineer and the Accident Assessment Manager in the EOF will provide additional suppo11 in the area of core thermal hydraulics within 75 minutes.
        • Augmentation in these areas is provided by local support. The local support agencies respond in accordance with existing letters of agreement. Response is expected to occur similar to any other industrial facility.
          • The Field Monitoring Teams will initially report to the Operations Support Center (OSC). If needed, the Field Monitoring Teams will be dispatched from the Operations Supp011 Center (OSC). Once the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) Field Monitoring Coordinator is ready he/she will assume control of the Field Monitoring Teams. An FMT consists of one RP qualified individual and one vehicle driver
  1. An electronic card reader in conjunction with a posted building security officer fulfills the function for controlling access to the EOF during emergencies .
  • B-9 Rev. 16-2 September 20 I 6

FIGURE B-2 CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION SITE EMERGENCY ORGANIZATION CONTROL ROOM NRC EMERGENCY I----------<

EMERGENCY OPERATIONS COORDINATOR FACILITY TSC LOGKEEPER JOINT ON-SITE INFORMATION MEDIA CENTER CENTER osc TSC EVACUATION COORDINATOR OSC COORDINATOR TSC OFF-SITE AGENCY TSC DOSE ASSESSOR OSC LOG/STATUS KEEPER COMMUNICATORS OPERATIONS 1---1--~EQUIPMENT ENGINEERING RADIATION PROTECTION OPERATIONS SUPT.

MECHANICAL MAINT. 1---1--~RADIATION PROTECTION OPERATIONS ENGINEER ENGINEERING MANAGER IAE MAINTENANCE NUCLEAR SUPPLY CHAIN ASST. OPERATIONS ENG.

SYSTEMS SUPPORT ENGINEER CHEMISTRY NRC COMMUNICATOR REACTOR ENGINEER TSC EMERGENCY PLANNER TSC DATA COORDINATOR REGULATORY COMPLIANCE SECURITY MANAGER ON CALL Rev. 16-1 B-10 March 2016

FIGURE B-3 CAT A WBA NUCLEAR STATION EOF ORGANIZATION -MINIMUM STAFFING REQUIREMENTS EOF DIRECTOR I I I I I I ACCIDENT RADIOLOGICAL EOF OFF-SITE AGENCY FIELD MONITORING ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT TEAMS MANAGER MANAGER COMMUNICATORS (2)

Rev. 16-1 B-11 March 2016

FIGURE B-4

  • CA TA WBA NUCLEAR STATION INTER-RELATIONSHIPS OF RESPONSE ORGANIZATIONS UNUSUAL EVENT*

SHIFT WORK MANAGER '

CONTROL ROOM (OSM)

_. OPERATIONS SHIFT MANAGER DETERMINES EMERGENCY ACTION LEVEL STATION ~ ~

CHIEF NUCLEAR MANAGER ~ ~

OFFICER OFF-SITE AGENCIES

" *~ *~

S.C. STATE NUCLEAR LOCAL COUNTY N.C. STATE GOVERNMENTS GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT REGULATORY (York, Gaston, (Columbia) (Raleigh) COMMISSION Mecklenburg)

  • DOES NOT REQUIRE ACTIVATION OF ANY EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION
  • B-12 Rev. 16-1 March 2016

FIGURE B-5

  • CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION INTER-RELATIONSHIPS OF RESPONSE ORGANZA TIONS ALERT SITE AREA EMERGENCY GENERAL EMERGENCY TECHNICAL

.i OPERATIONS SUPPORT

~C-EN-TER----,

CONTROL ROOM J

SUPPORT CENTER ON-SITE OFF-SITE EMERGENCY JOINT INPO OPERATIONS INFORMATION FACILITY CENTER

  • STATE GOVERNMENT (NC & SC)

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES 1ir LOCAL COUNTY NUCLEAR FEMA GOVERNMENTS REGULATORY (York, Gaston, DOE COMMISSION Mecklenburg)

NSSS SUPPLIER LOCAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE AGENCIES

  • B-13 Rev. 16-1 March 2016

Catawba Nuclear Station Emergency Plan Section E - Notification Methodology E. Notification Methodology E.1 Notification of Response Organization This section identifies specific emergency responses and related criteria that specify when these measures are to be implemented. Emergency measures discussed in this section include notification of and activation of the emergency organization; assessment actions; corrective and protective actions.

E.2 Activation of Emergency Organization This section describes the necessary communication steps to be taken to alert or activate emergency personnel for each class of emergency listed in Section D. The notification format and message authentication technique to off-site authorities shall be in accordance with Catawba Emergency Response Procedures RP/O/A/5000/006A, Notifications to States and Counties from the Control Room, RP/O/A/5000/006B, Notifications to States and Counties from the Technical Suppo11 Center, and SR/O/A/2000/004, Notifications to States and Counties from the Emergency Operations Center.

E.2.a. Notification of Unusual Event The Shift Manager on duty is to be notified immediately of all initiating conditions indicative of an "Unusual Event" in process or that has occurred which indicates a potential degradation in the level of safety of the plant. (See Section D for examples of initiating conditions in this classification.)

NOTE: This emergency classification is fu11her defined in Catawba Nuclear Station Emergency Response Procedure RP/O/ A/5000100 I, Classification of Emergency.

The Shift Manager assumes the functions of the Emergency Coordinator and shall ensure that all actions required by any initiating Emergency Procedure have been performed and that all actions necessary for the protection of persons and property are being taken.

The Shift Manager shall assure notification of:

1. Station Manager
2. Site Vice President
3. Chief Nuclear Officer for any initiating condition in this classification listed in Section D .
  • E-1 Rev. 147 September 2016

The Shift Manager shall assure prompt notification of Federal, State and Local off-site authorities:

I. North Carolina Warning Point (Raleigh, NC)

2. South Carolina Warning Point (Columbia, SC)
3. York County Warning Point (Rock Hill, SC)
4. Gaston County Warning Point (Gastonia, NC)
5. Mecklenburg County Warning Point (Charlotte, NC)
6. NRC Operations Center (Rockville, MD)

Notification fonnat and message authentication technique to off-site authorities shall be in accordance with applicable Catawba Nuclear Station Emergency Response Procedures.

The Shift Manager shall augment on-shift resources to assess and respond to the emergency situation as needed to ensure the protection of persons and property.

The Shift Manager will assess the emergency condition and determine the need to remain in a Notification of Unusual Event, escalate to a more severe class or close out the emergency.

The Emergency Preparedness Manager or designee will close out the Emergency with verbal summary to off-site authorities, notified above, followed by an LER or written summa1y within 30 days.

The actions required for this emergency class are performed by station personnel.

Outside organizations (NRC, state and local officials) are notified of the event for information. Unless deemed necessa1y by the Emergency Coordinator, the Emergency Response Organization is not activated for this emergency class.

If an Unusual Event occurs, a station representative calls the NRC, the State, appropriate local officials, Corporate Communications, and others as applicable. The Corporate Communications representative notifies media representatives and public officials per established public information procedures.

E.2.b Alert The Shift Manager on duty is to be notified immediately of all initiating conditions indicative of an "Alert" classification in process or that have occurred which involve an actual or potential substantial degradation of the level of safety of the plant or a security event that involves probable life threatening risk to site personnel or damage to site equipment because of hostile action. (See Section D for examples of initiating conditions in this classification.)

NOTE: This Emergency Classification is further defined in Catawba Nuclear Station Emergency Response Procedure, RP/O/A/5000/00 I, Classification of Emergency .

  • E-2 Rev. 147 September 2016

The Shift Manager shall ensure that all actions required by any initiating Emergency Procedure have been performed and that all actions necessary for the protection of persons and prope1iy are being taken.

NOTE: The Shift Manager assumes the function of the Emergency Coordinator until the arrival of the Station Manager or designee at which time the Station Manager or designee assumes the responsibility of the Emergency Coordinator.

The Shift Manager shall assure notification and activation of the Emergency Response Organization for any initiating condition in this classification listed in Section D.

The Emergency Response Organization personnel will be notified by text and/or voice message upon the initial emergency declaration via a mass communication system using AD-EP-ALL-0301 (Activation of the Emergency Response Organization Notification System [ERONS]). Redundant notification is provided by the on-site public address system, Nuclear Callout System and/or an automated telephone system which will allow timely alerting of Emergency Response Organization personnel.

The Emergency Coordinator shall assure prompt notification of Federal, State and Local off-site authorities:

I. No11h Carolina Warning Point (Raleigh, NC)

2. South Carolina Warning Point (Columbia, SC)
3. York County Warning Point (Rock Hill, SC)
4. Gaston County Warning Point (Gastonia, NC)
5. Mecklenburg County Warning Point (Charlotte, NC)
6. NRC Operations Center (Rockville, MD)

Notification fonnat and message authentication technique to off-site authorities shall be in accordance with applicable Catawba Nuclear Station Emergency Response Procedures.

The Emergency Coordinator shall augment on-site resources by notification and activation of the Emergency Response Organization in accordance with RP/O/A/5000/003, Alert.

The Emergency Coordinator in the Technical Suppo1i Center will assess and respond to the emergency by:

I. Dispatching on-site monitoring teams with associated communication equipment in accordance with Catawba Nuclear Station Radiation Protection procedures.

2. Providing periodic plant status updates to off-site authorities (at least eve1y hour or as agreed otherwise).

.). Providing periodic meteorological assessments to off-site authorities and, if any releases are occurring, dose estimates for actual releases .

Rev. 147 E-3 September 2016

NOTE: These functions will be provided through the EOF when operational.

The Emergency Coordinator will assess the emergency condition and determine the need to remain in an Ale11 status, escalate to a more severe class, reduce the emergency class or close out the emergency.

The EOF Director or designee, will close out the emergency with a verbal summaiy to off-site authorities followed by an LER or written summary within 30 days.

E.2.c. Site Area Emergency The Shift Manager on duty is to be notified immediately of all initiating conditions indicative of a "Site Area Emergency" in process or which have occurred which involve actual or likely major failures of plant functions needed for protection of the public or hostile action that results in intentional damage or 1irnlicious acts; (I) toward site personnel or equipment that could lead to the likely failure of or; (2) that prevent effective access to equipment needed for the protection of the public. (See Section D for examples of initiating conditions in this classification.)

NOTE: This Emergency Classification is futiher defined in Catawba Nuclear Station Emergency Response Procedure RP/O/A/5000/001, Classification of Emergency.

The Shift Manager shall ensure that all actions required by the initiating Emergency Procedure have been perfonned and that all actions necessa1y for the protection of persons and property are being taken .

NOTE: The Shift Manager assumes the function of the Emergency Coordinator until the arrival of the Station Manager or designee at which time the Station Manager or designee assumes the responsibility of the Emergency Coordinator.

The Shift Manager shall assure notification and activation of the Emergency Response Organization for any initiating condition in this classification listed in Section D.

The Emergency Coordinator shall assure prompt notification of Federal, State and Local off-site authorities:

1. North Carolina Warning Point (Raleigh, NC)
2. South Carolina Warning Point (Columbia, SC)
3. York County Warning Point (Rock Hill, SC)
4. Gaston County Warning Point (Gastonia, NC)
5. Mecklenburg County Warning Point (Charlotte, NC)
6. NRC Operations Center (Rockville, MD)

Notification format and message authentication technique to off-site authorities shall be in accordance with applicable Catawba Nuclear Station Emergency Response Procedures .

  • E-4 Rev. 147 September 2016

The Emergency Coordinator shall augment on-site resources by notification and activation of the Emergency Response Organization in accordance with RP/OIA/50001004, Site Area Emergency .

The Emergency Response Organization personnel will be notified by text and/or voice message upon the initial emergency declaration via a mass communication system using AD-EP-ALL-0301 (Activation of the Emergency Response Organization Notification System [ERONS]). Redundant notification is provided by the on-sitepublic address system, Nuclear Callout System and/or an automated telephone system which will allow timely ale11ing of Emergency Response Organization personnel.

The Emergency Coordinator may order the evacuation of non-essential station personnel to an Evacuation-Relocation Site if the emergency situation warrants.

The Emergency Coordinator in the Technical Suppo11 Center will assess and respond to the emergency by:

1. Dispatching the On-site and Off-site Monitoring Teams with associated communications.
2. Providing meteorological and dose estimate information to off-site authorities for actual releases via a dedicated individual or automated data transmission.
3. Providing release and dose projections based on available plant condition information and foreseeable contingencies to off-site authorities.
  • 4. Providing a dedicated individual for plant status updates to off-site authorities .
5. Providing technical staff on-site available for consultation with the NRC and State on a periodic basis.

NOTE: These functions will be provided through the EOF when it is operational.

The Emergency Coordinator will assure notification of all Catawba Nuclear Station management not notified thus far for those initiating conditions or implementation of any Emergency Procedure affecting these personnel in accordance with Catawba Nuclear Station Emergency Response Procedure RP/O/A/5000/004, Site Area Emergency.

The Emergency Coordinator, in coordination with the EOF Director, will assess the emergency condition and determine the need to remain in Site Area Emergency, escalate to a more severe class, reduce the emergency class or close out the emergency.

The EOF Director will close out or recommend reduction of the emergency class by briefing the off-site authorities at the EOF or by phone if necessa1y, followed by an LER or written summaiy within thirty days.

E.2.d General Emergency Rev. 147 E-5 September 2016

The Shift Manager on duty is to be notified immediately of all initiating conditions indicative of a "General Emergency" in process or which have occurred which involve actual or imminent substantial core degradation or melting with potential for loss of containment integrity or hostile action that results in an actual loss of physical control of the facility. (See Section D for examples of initiating conditions in this classification.)

NOTE: This emergency classification is fmiher defined in Catawba Nuclear Station Emergency Response Procedure, RP/O/A/5000/001, Classification of Emergency.

The Shift Manager shall ensure that all actions required by the initiating Emergency Procedure have been performed and that all actions necessary for the protection of persons and prope1iy are being taken.

NOTE: The Shift Manager assumes the function of the Emergency Coordinator until the arrival of the Station Manager or designee at which time the Station Manager or designee assumes the responsibility of the Emergency Coordinator.

The Shift Manager shall assure notification and activation of the Emergency Response Organization for any initiating condition in this classification listed in Section D.

The Emergency Coordinator shall assure prompt notification of Federal, State and Local off-site authorities:

I. North Carolina Warning Point (Raleigh, NC)

2. South Carolina Warning Point (Columbia, SC)
3. York County Warning Point (Rock Hill, SC)
4. Gaston County Warning Point (Gastonia, NC)
5. Mecklenburg County Warning Point (Charlotte, NC)
6. NRC Operations Center (Rockville, MD)

Notification fo1mat and message authentication technique to off-site authorities shall be in accordance with applicable Catawba Nuclear Station Emergency Response Procedures.

The Emergency Coordinator shall augment on-site resources by notification and activation of the Emergency Response Organization in accordance with RP/O/A/5000/005, General Emergency .

  • E-6 Rev. 147 September 2016

The Emergency Response Organization personnel will be notified by text and/or voice message upon the initial emergency declaration via a mass communication system using AD-EP-ALL-0301 (Activation of the Emergency Response Organization Notification System [ERONS]). Redundant notification is provided by the on-site public address system, Nuclear Callout System and/or an automated telephone system which will allow timely alerting of Emergency Response Organization personnel.

The Emergency Coordinator shall order the evacuation of all non-essential station personnel to an Evacuation-Relocation Site.

The Emergency Coordinator, in the Technical Suppo1i Center, will assess and respond to the emergency by:

1. Dispatching the On-Site and Off-Site Monitoring Teams with associated communications.
2. Providing meteorological and dose estimate information to off-site authorities for actual releases via a dedicated individual or automated data transmission.
3. Providing release and dose projections based on available plant condition information and foreseeable contingencies to off-site authorities.
4. Providing a dedicated individual for plant status updates to off-site authorities and periodic press briefings.
  • 5. Providing technical staff on-site available for consultation with the NRC and State on a periodic basis.

NOTE: These functions will be provided through the EOF when it is operational.

The Emergency Coordinator will assure notification of all Catawba Nuclear Station Management not notified thus far for those initiating conditions or implementation of any Emergency Procedure affecting these personnel in accordance with Catawba Nuclear Station Emergency Response Procedure RPIO/A/50001005, General Emergency.

The Emergency Coordinator shall make a recommendation to the off-site authorities to evacuate and/or shelter affected zones in accordance with RPIO/A/50001005, General Emergency.

The Emergency Coordinator, in coordination with the EOF Director and Off-Site Agencies, will assess the emergency condition and determine the need to remain in a General Emergency or terminate the emergency and enter into Recovery.

The EOF Director will terminate the emergency class and recommend entry into recovery by briefing the off-site authorities at the Emergency Operations Facility, or by phone if necessary, followed by an LER or written summary within thirty days .

Rev. 147 E-7 September 2016

E.3 Emergency Message Format (Initial)

  • E.4 Figure E-1, Emergency Notification contains infonnation about the class of emergency, whether a release is taking place, the potentially affected areas and whether protective actions may be necessary.

Emergency Message Format (Follow-Up)

Figure E-1, Emergency Notification contains provisions for follow-up information if it is known and appropriate.

E.5 State and Local Organizations-Disseminating Public Information State and Local plans provide for disseminating information in Initial and Follow-up Messages to the public. (See state and local plans).

E.6 Ale11 and Notification System The Ale11 and Notification System for Catawba Nuclear Station will include an acoustic alerting signal, tone alert radios for special facilities and notification of the public by the Emergency Alert System (EAS). The system is designed to meet the acceptance criteria of Section B of Appendix 3, NUREG-0654, FEMA-REP-1, Rev. I. As a back-up, State and Local plans maintain the ale11 mechanism via emergency vehicles, automated dialing systems, PA Systems, etc. to also ale11 the public to monitor commercial broadcasts for emergency information. See Appendix 3, Ale11 and Notification System Plan .

  • Each county will control the activation of the sirens within its boundaries.

Duke Energy will cooperate with FEMA and the state/local governments in their sampling of the residents to assess the ability to hear the ale11ing signal, the public's awareness of the meaning of the prompt notification message, and the availability of emergency information.

The siren system will be tested and maintained in accordance with the schedule as specified in Appendix 3.

The EAS System is the primary notification system. Backups include the use of county vehicles with audio equipment, county automated dialing systems, and other media communications.

E.7 Suppo11ing Information for Public Information Messages The portion of Figure E-1 in which protective action recommendations are made assists the state and local authorities in preparing messages for the public's infmmation via the EAS (Emergency Ale11 System).

EAS message formats are described in the North Carolina and South Carolina Emergency Plans .

  • E-8 Rev. 147 September 2016

Figure E-1 Page 1of1 NUCLEAR POWER PLANT EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION FORM MESSAGE# Confirmation Phone#: -------AUTHENTICATION CODE #: - - - - -

Lines 1 - 6 are required tor INITIAL Notifications

1. EVENT: D DRILL 0 ACTUAL DECLARATION D TERMINATION (ONLY Lines 1, 2, & 4 required)
2. AFFECTED SITE:

CATAWBA

3. EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATION 0 UNUSUAL EVENT D ALERT 0 SITE AREA EMERGENCY D GENERALEMERGENCY
4. EAL#_ _ _ _ __ Declaration Date: __/__/__ Time:

Tennination Date: __/__/__ Time: _ _ _ (mark "NIA" for EAL# & Description)

EAL DESCRIPTION: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

5. RELEASE TO THE ENVIRONMENT (caused by the emergency): D NONE D IS OCCURRING D HAS OCCURRED
6. PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATIONS:

D NONE D EVACUATE: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

0 SHELTER:----------------------------------

0 CONSIDER THE USE OF Kl (POTASSIUM IODIDE) IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORO PLANS AND POLICIES D OTHER:

Lines 7-11 are NOT required for INITIAL notifications. Lines 7-11 may be provided separately tor follow-up notifications.

7. PROGNOSIS: Upgrade In classification or PAR change is likely before the next follow-up notification D Yes D No
8. SITE UNIT(S) STATUS:

AFFECTED UNIT DYES Unit 1 - _ _ _ _ %Power Shutdown: Date __}_ _/__ Time _ _ __

O YES Unit 2 -  % Power Shutdown: Date __}_ _/__ Time _ _ __

9. METEOROLOGICAL DATA:

Wind direction from: _ _ _ degrees Wind Speed: _ _ _ mph Precipitation: _ _ _ inches Stability Class: 0 A D B DC DD DE OF D G Lines 10 - 11 are completed for follow-up notifications, IF Line 5 IS OCCURRING or HAS OCCURRED is selected

10. AIRBORNE RELEASE CHARACTERIZATION: D GROUND D MIXED D ELEVATED MAGNITUDE UNITS: D Ci D Ci/sec D ,uCi/sec Noble Gases: Iodines: Particulates: _ _ _ __
11. DOSE PROJECTION: Projection period: _ _ _ _ Hours Estimated Release Duration Hours Performed. DISTANCE TEDE (mrem) Thyroid CDE (mrem)

Date __} _ _! _ _ ---------;

Site Boundary Time: _ _ __

2 Miles 5 Miles 10 Miles

12. REMARKS (As Applicable): _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
13. APPROVED BY: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _TITLE: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.Date __}_ _/__Time _ _ __
14. NOTIFIED BY: Date __}_ _/__ Time _ _ __
15. RECEIVED BY (ORO use only): _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.Date _ ,_ _,__Time _ _ __
  • E-9 Rev. 147 September 2016

'.O{:)'ff!B!JGil. (lJF fP lf.i{f~.JJ.C)fl ffiW~IrflmJGS .~Ifill) FD~m:,.JJGffil .9flfil-*t!l11} 4l\1. [L7*Ill1'lff~

cc:tt~m11e1111JB:'J .,.__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __,

~~\'l_l{O

§;H-~~ Pur~ ~ Birf~:f

~IR: efeuemee. A\JDl-Ilff((Jl-AIIl.JL,.©H©Bi,, Seetiiiomi 53 ancll Altitiadh1111emt 2')J.

JP'l.rewairedl JBy,c S'..N1*. 1F11s.efueJr~ (Caitrni;~ba11E*!11J.e11~1il.ey1 Ii>'l!afilt'l1inig,0111; ©@vi2'~f,2'©ll!6!

J!nlb: S:C© we.::.

Subrnititaill ©if tfo;iis: IBllllleFge111.y JPilairo, neviisix*n11, lR'.e.vi;si10tW 116~2'),i. Success: is the: c,l1e.v-eli0*wnnent 0,f cornw.-tete: a!ild! a:ccu:u:aite: in-Jfo}l.11ll1.a:tfom, t0! the. WilR:C.

W01rk lrask .IEx]lectedl lR'.eslilJI'.ts::

]ndliJviJdlu:aDs: wiillV lP'mv:id!e. iinfo1ri!l'l'a~io111 tfo.ai~ liias* beelJll irev;i:e:wedl a:nd! appr<rwcdl i111Itemai~Ry. A fi:na:]

l!'eview o;fitfae: cmr,eir l:etrtie1r wi:iilil! ensma.re: u1'lat no. mistakes: fumve. be.en JiThade .

.Experiret'l!ce: Levdi:

No quallil:cati~Ha.s: a:Fe: t'eqrm-i!redi :fm p1ro1vi:dfum:g Regiwfatr~nry A:ffaitrs wl'i:th irnliforn1aitim11 that gpes1 iinto reguiat.ory cones.poindlencc:. Hnwe;ve1',, it i1s*. ~n.cumbent om1 the indiiviid'uall ~o* em;sme tlhat lile#sll.e ~s*

cognizan~ oJ tl;i,c topic and can: pmvide: crnnpkte and accurate i!nfonnaho*n.

  • Relevant OE:

There have. been se:vernE :iindlustry vio]atirons: aga~nst ] 0CFR50.9 (completeness and/ accurncy of infonnaticm} in recent years*. ]t is important to provide quaTity i.nfonuati:on such that the site avoids the need for additional violations.

The fol'lm\~ng would produce probahle worst case consequences if an error in the correspondence should occur:

I OCFR50 ..9 violation Incorrect milestone dates provided Incorrect infonnation provided that forms the basis for a regulatory decision Incomplete or inaccurate submittal Untimely submittal Procedural violation Personnel to review PJB:

T.E. Owusu S.E. Andrews C. Wilson J.M. White

CONDUCT OF PRE-JOB BRIEFINGS AND POST-JOB AD-HU-ALL-0003 CRITIQUES Rev. 2 ATTACHMENT 2 Page 1 of 2

<< Standard Pre-Job Brief Form >>

Risk Level (check one)

Brief#: REVERSE BRIEF (If Pre Planned) 0 Low Risk D Medium Risk D High Risk YIN PJB Lead: S.N. Fischer Date Prepared: 09/29/2016 Attendees: T.E. Owusu; S.E. Andrews; C. Wilson; J.M. White Scope I What are we trying to accomplish?

Submittal of this Emergency Plan revision (Revision 16-2). Success is the development of complete and accurate information to the NRC.

Affected Unit{s} Affected Train{s}

0 Unit 1 0 Unit 2 0 Unit 3 IBJ Shared 0 N/A 0 Train A D Train B D Train C IBJN/A Affected Channel{s} Affected Loop(s}

  • DI (A) D II (B) D Ill (C) DIV (D) IBJN/A Affected Component: N/A Procedure(s) I Attachments: AD-HU-ALL-0003 Level of Use:

DA WR/WO#:

DB DC D Information Use 0 Reference Use 0 Continuous Use 0 Mixed Use DD IBJN/A Critical Steps:

Error Likely Situations:

Special Plant Conditions or System Alignments:

Personal Safety and Environmental {e.g., PPE, Hazards, Asbestos, Chemical)

CONDUCT OF PRE-JOB BRIEFINGS AND POST-JOB AD-H U-ALL-0003 CRITIQUES Rev.2 ATTACHMENT 2 Page 2 of 2

<<Standard Pre-Job Brief Form>>

Radiological Safety:

Site, Fleet and Industry OE:

Worst Case Consequences:

General Information and Additional Questions:

  • Actions:

Supervisor Approval: Date:

Post Job Critique Conducted: DYes D No D N/A

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=CNS-16-069,_Submittal_of_Emergency_Plan,_Revision_16-2&oldid=2510319"